XML 28 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.24.1.u1
Commitments and Contingencies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 30, 2024
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Insurance Reserves

As is typical in the healthcare industry, the Company is subject to claims that its services have resulted in patient injury or other adverse effects.

The accrued professional malpractice insurance reserves included in the interim unaudited consolidated balance sheets include estimates of the ultimate costs, including third-party legal defense costs, in the event the Company was unable to receive funds from claims made under commercial insurance policies, for claims that have been reported but not paid and claims that have been incurred but not reported at the balance sheet dates. Although substantially all reported claims are paid directly by the Company’s commercial insurance carriers (after the Company satisfies the applicable policy deductible and/or retention), the Company is ultimately responsible for payment of these claims in the event its insurance carriers become insolvent or otherwise do not honor the contractual obligations under the malpractice policies. The Company is required under U.S. GAAP to recognize these estimated liabilities in its consolidated financial statements on a gross basis; with a corresponding receivable from the insurance carriers reflecting the contractual indemnity provided by the carriers under the related malpractice policies.

Since October 1, 2023, the Company has maintained primary commercial insurance coverage on a claims-made basis for professional malpractice claims with a $2.0 million per claim deductible and $4.5 million per claim and annual aggregate limits. Prior to October 1, 2023, the Company maintained primary commercial insurance coverage on a claims made basis for professional malpractice claims with varying deductibles by policy year from $0.5 million to $1.5 million on a per claim basis and $5.0 million to $6.0 million per claim and annual aggregate limits. Moreover, the Company maintains excess insurance coverage for professional malpractice claims to cover any claims over the aggregate limits. In addition, the Company maintains workers’ compensation insurance with a $0.5 million per claim deductible and statutory limits. The Company reimburses insurance carriers for deductible losses under these policies. The Company’s insurance carriers require collateral to secure the Company’s obligation to reimburse insurance carriers for these deductible payments. Collateral as of March 30, 2024 was comprised of $22.7 million of issued letters of credit and $0.7 million in cash collateral. Collateral as of December 30, 2023 was comprised of $22.7 million of issued letters of credit and $0.7 million in cash collateral.

As of March 30, 2024, insurance reserves totaling $102.9 million were included on the interim unaudited consolidated balance sheets, representing $42.0 million and $60.9 million of reserves for professional malpractice claims and workers’ compensation claims, respectively. At December 30, 2023, insurance reserves totaling $91.8 million were included on the consolidated balance sheets, representing $39.4 million and $52.4 million of reserves for professional malpractice claims and workers’ compensation claims, respectively.

Litigation and Other Current Liabilities

On August 6, 2020, the Company sued Epic/Freedom, LLC (“Seller”), Webster Capital Corporation, and Webster Equity Partners (collectively, the “Defendants”) in the Delaware Superior Court. The Company asserted that the Defendants made fraudulent representations and warranties in connection with the Company's acquisition of Epic Health Services Inc. The Company sought damages ranging from $24.0 million to $50.0 million. The Company also requested a declaratory judgment holding that the Defendants waived any claim to the Company’s continued possession of $7.1 million in escrow funds (the “Escrow Funds”) that were delivered to the Company in January 2018 by the acquisition escrow agent. In response, the Defendants asserted four counterclaims: (1) specific performance of an alleged right to control a tax audit; (2) advancement of litigation fees and expenses for certain individual Defendants; (3) a declaratory judgment; and (4) breach of contract claim concerning the Escrow Funds. The Company subsequently reached an agreement with the Defendants, which (1) allowed the Defendants to take a principal role in the applicable tax audit, though the Company will continue to communicate with the Internal Revenue Service and retain the ability to make strategic decisions with respect to the audit and (2) dismissed claims against certain individual Defendants mooting Defendants’ claims for advancement of litigation fees and expenses. On March 10, 2023, the parties entered into a confidential settlement agreement releasing all claims related to this matter and ending all related litigation. The settlement did not have a material impact on the consolidated results of operations. On April 4, 2023, as part of the settlement, the Company funded $6.8 million to an escrow account for the purpose of settling certain tax audits with the IRS, which have now been effectively settled with the IRS.

On November 23, 2022, a judgment in the amount of $19.8 million was rendered against the Company related to a civil litigation matter in Texas. In March 2023, the plaintiffs attempted to enforce the judgment by seeking a writ of garnishment, and $18.4 million was garnished from the Company’s cash accounts. The Company promptly obtained and recorded an $18.4 million cash collateralized appellate bond with the state trial court, and such court dissolved the writ of garnishment and ordered the return of the previously garnished funds. All previously garnished funds have been returned to the Company. In July 2023, the Company and the plaintiffs reached a confidential settlement agreement wherein the plaintiffs have agreed to release all claims and extinguish the aforementioned judgment in exchange for a settlement payment. The corresponding appeal of the judgment has been discontinued upon finalization of the settlement and the Company has secured the return of the underlying collateral for the aforementioned appellate bond. The settlement did not have a material impact on the consolidated results of operations.

On January 18, 2023, an arbitration award in the amount of $7.9 million was rendered against the Company related to a claim under the Company's Texas non-subscriber benefit plan. After the trial court entered a judgment to enforce the arbitration award, the Company promptly obtained a $9.1 million collateralized appellate bond and intends to avail itself of all appellate options. The ultimate resolution of these litigated matters is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

The Company is currently a party to various routine litigation incidental to the business. While management currently believes that the ultimate outcome of such proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or overall trends in results of operations, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties. Management has established provisions within other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, which in the opinion of management represents the best estimate of exposure and adequately provides for such losses that may occur from asserted claims related to the provision of professional services and which may not be covered by the Company’s insurance policies. Management believes that any additional unfavorable provisions would not be material to the Company’s results of operations or financial position; however, if an unfavorable ruling on any asserted or unasserted claim were to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the Company’s net earnings or financial position. The estimate of the potential impact from legal proceedings on the Company’s financial position or overall results of operations could change in the future.

Healthcare Regulatory Matters

Starting on October 30, 2019 the Company has received grand jury subpoenas issued by the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (the “Antitrust Division”), requiring the production of documents and information pertaining to nurse wages, reimbursement rates, and hiring activities in a few of its local markets. The Company is fully cooperating with the Antitrust

Division with respect to this investigation, and management believes that a loss event is not probable and that this matter will not materially impact the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition. However, based on the information currently available to the Company, management cannot predict the timing or outcome of this investigation or predict the possible loss or range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of this matter.

 

On July 19, 2023, the Company received a Civil Investigation Demand issued by the U.S. Department of Justice, United States Attorney’s Office, Middle District of Alabama (the “AUSA”), requiring the production of documents and information pertaining to Comfort Care Hospice, LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, regarding issues of (1) improper submission of claims to Medicare and other federal healthcare programs for service to patients who were ineligible or not properly certified for said healthcare services and (2) improper remuneration to medical directors and skilled nursing facilities for patient referrals in violation of certain federal regulations. The Company is fully cooperating with the AUSA with respect to this investigation, and management believes that a loss event is not probable and that this matter will not materially impact the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition. However, based on the information currently available to the Company, management cannot predict the timing or outcome of this investigation or predict the possible loss or range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of this matter.

Laws and regulations governing the government payer programs are complex and subject to interpretation. Compliance with such laws and regulations can be subject to future governmental review and interpretation as well as significant regulatory action. From time to time, governmental regulatory agencies conduct inquiries and audits of the Company’s practices. It is the Company’s practice to cooperate fully with such inquiries. In addition to laws and regulations governing the Medicaid, Medicaid Managed Care, and Tricare programs, there are a number of federal and state laws and regulations governing matters such as the corporate practice of medicine, fee splitting arrangements, anti-kickback statues, physician self-referral laws, false or fraudulent claims filing and patient privacy requirements. Failure to comply with any such laws or regulations could have an adverse impact on the Company’s operations and financial results. The Company believes that it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and is not aware of any pending or threatened investigations involving allegations of wrongdoing.