UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-23613
Pioneer Core Trust I
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
60 State Street, Boston, MA 02109
(Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP code)
Terrence J. Cullen, Amundi Asset Management, Inc.,
60 State Street, Boston, MA 02109
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 742-7825
Date of fiscal year end: August 31, 2022
Date of reporting period: September 1, 2021 through August 31, 2022
Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.
A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. ss. 3507.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio
Annual Report | August 31, 2022
visit us: www.amundi.com/us
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22 1
President’s
Letter
Dear Investors,
The last few years have seen investors face some unprecedented challenges. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 was the most significant development, as the pandemic affected the everyday lives of millions and led to major changes in government and central-bank policies. Later that year, the widespread distribution of COVID-19 vaccines led to a general decline in virus-related hospitalizations in the US and had a positive effect on overall market sentiment during most of the 2021 calendar year, and led to strong performance overall.
Eventually, however, the easier monetary and fiscal policies enacted during the height of the pandemic as well as ongoing supply chain issues, which were, at least in part, an outgrowth of certain virus-containment measures, were among the numerous factors that combined to drive inflation levels higher in the latter part of 2021.
With rising inflation already a concern, investor sentiment sharply deteriorated in the first quarter of 2022, with the negativity driven largely by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February as well as signs that inflation was more entrenched than transitory in many regions of the world. The war and the resulting economic sanctions placed on Russia by the US and European governments also contributed to a spike in energy prices, given that Russia is a major exporter of natural gas as well as other resources, particularly to Europe.
The persistently high inflation readouts led key central banks, including the US Federal Reserve (Fed), to signal a tightening of monetary policy. The Fed had already announced that it would taper its bond purchases and eventually end its pandemic-era quantitative easing program by the spring of 2022; and, with US inflation hitting 40-year highs, the Fed began aggressively raising its benchmark federal funds rate target range, while indicating that more rate hikes were likely. The magnitude of the rate increases heightened investors’ concerns about the ability of the Fed and other central banks to cool inflation without triggering a recession.
Due to what has been, so far, a tumultuous year for investors, the performance of most asset classes, especially riskier assets such as equities and corporate bonds, has turned negative, as market participants have tried to ascertain the direction and progression of Fed policy, economic growth, the war in Ukraine, and other factors. In the US, the upcoming mid-term elections in November of this year are another important benchmark that investors are closely monitoring, as political uncertainty has often contributed to increased market volatility.
2 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Since 1928, Amundi US’s investment process has been built on a foundation of fundamental research and active management, principles which have guided our investment decisions for more than 90 years. We believe active management – that is, making active investment decisions – can help mitigate the risks during periods of market volatility.
At Amundi US, active management begins with our own fundamental, bottom-up research process. Our team of dedicated research analysts and portfolio managers analyzes each security under consideration, communicating frequently with the management teams of the companies and other entities issuing the securities, and working together to identify those securities that best meet our investment criteria for our family of funds. Our risk management approach begins with each security under consideration, as we strive to develop a deep understanding of the potential opportunity, while considering any potential risk factors.
Today, as investors, we have many options. It is our view that active management can serve investors well, not only when markets are thriving, but also during periods of market stress. As you consider your long-term investment goals, we encourage you to work with your financial professional to develop an investment plan that paves the way for you to pursue both your short-term and long-term goals.
We greatly appreciate the trust you have placed in us and look forward to continuing to serve you in the future.
Lisa M. Jones
Head of the Americas, President and CEO of US
Amundi Asset Management US, Inc.
October 2022
Any information in this shareowner report regarding market or economic trends or the factors influencing the Fund’s historical or future performance are statements of opinion as of the date of this report. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 3
Portfolio Management Discussion | 8/31/22
In the following interview, Jonathan Chirunga and David Eurkus discuss the factors that influenced the performance of Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio during the 12-month period ended August 31, 2022. Mr. Chirunga, Managing Director, Director of High-Yield Municipals, and a portfolio manager at Amundi Asset Management US, Inc. (Amundi US), is responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund, along with Mr. Eurkus, Managing Director, Director of Municipals, and a portfolio manager at Amundi US.
Q | How did the Fund perform during the 12-month period ended August 31, 2022? |
A | Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio returned -9.34% during the 12-month period ended August 31, 2022, while the Fund’s benchmark, the Bloomberg US Municipal High Yield Bond Index (the Bloomberg Index), returned -10.06%. During the same period, the average return of the 201 mutual funds in Morningstar’s High-Yield Municipal Funds category was -11.25%. |
Q | How would you describe the investment environment in the municipal bond market during the 12-month period ended August 31, 2022? |
A | Consistent with the poor returns for the broader fixed-income market, municipal issues suffered unusually weak performance over the past 12 months. Two key developments played a role in the market’s sizable downturn. |
First, the US Federal Reserve (Fed) sought to combat inflation by ending its quantitative easing (bond purchase) policy and beginning to raise interest rates. The Fed hiked the target range for the federal funds rate by 25 basis points (bps) at its March meeting, and then followed up with increases of 50 bps, 75 bps, and 75 bps, respectively, in May, June, and July. (A basis point is equal to 1/100th of a percentage point.) As of August 31, investors had come to anticipate several more increases to the federal funds rate target range before year-end. Those factors contributed to an across-the-board rise in government bond yields over the period. For example, the 10-year US Treasury note, which came into the period with a yield of 1.30% in September 2021, had risen to 3.15% by the final day of August 2022. (Bond prices and yields have tended to move in opposite directions.)
4 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
The second development contributing to the market downturn during the period was that with the rise in prevailing yields came an increase in yield spreads for municipal issues relative to US Treasuries. The combination of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, ongoing supply chain disruptions, and questions about the direction of the economy led to underperformance for the bond market’s “spread sectors” in relation to Treasuries over the 12-month period. (Spread sectors are nongovernmental fixed-income market sectors that offer higher yields, at greater risk, than governmental investments.) In that environment, the municipal market experienced substantial outflows, which further weighed on municipal bond prices.
High-yield municipal issues, while losing ground in absolute terms, finished the 12-month period with performance that was slightly ahead of their investment-grade municipal counterparts, due in part to their generally lower sensitivity to interest-rate risk.
Although market performance was poor, the fundamentals within the municipal bond market remained firm. The gradual reopening of the economy as COVID-19 becomes less of a factor, substantial federal aid packages passed and distributed during 2020-2021, and rising tax receipts have contributed to a steady improvement in the financial health of municipal issuers. The default rate within the municipal market has also remained very low, which we believe helps to illustrate the gap between price performance and the underlying strength of municipal issuers.
Q | What factors affected the Fund’s performance relative to the Bloomberg Index during the 12-month period ended August 31, 2022? |
A | The Fund’s relative performance benefited during the 12-month period from an underweight allocation versus the benchmark in special-tax revenue bonds. A large portion of the special-tax sector has consisted of bonds issued from real estate development deals. As mortgage rates increased during the period, special-tax revenue bonds underperformed as the rising rates weighed on the outlook for the property sector in general, and so the Fund’s underweight to the sector aided relative returns. In addition, security selection results within the hospital(s) sector contributed positively to the Fund’s relative performance during the period. |
From a ratings perspective, the Fund’s allocation to non-rated municipal bonds was a key positive contributor to benchmark-relative performance for the period. Each non-rated municipal bond is subject to our in-depth credit analysis process before we consider adding it to the portfolio, and
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22 5
our team of analysts assigns every non-rated bond an internal rating. In addition, we review all obligors of the non-rated bonds held in the portfolio, and seek to make once-per-year site visits (optimally) to help ensure the ability of the non-rated issuers to maintain their coupon payments is not at risk.
A key detractor from the Fund’s relative returns during the period was the portfolio’s allocation to investment-grade municipal bonds, as investment-grade municipals are typically more sensitive to changes in interest rates than high-yield municipals. During a period that saw a rapid rise in US Treasury rates have a negative effect on the more interest-rate-sensitive portions of the municipal market, the Fund’s exposure to investment-grade municipals was a drag on relative returns. We reduced the portfolio’s allocation to investment-grade municipals as we saw opportunities in the high-yield municipal segment present themselves. Another detractor from relative performance during the period was the Fund’s positioning with respect to pollution control revenue (PCR) bonds and industrial development revenue (IDR) bonds (that is, tax-exempt debt issued by municipal entities to finance projects used by private corporations).
At the individual security level, the Fund’s underweight allocation to bonds issued by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico aided relative returns, as the performance of the Commonwealth’s debt lagged that of the broader municipal bond market. Exposure to revenue bonds issued by Southwestern Illinois Development Authority (Special Facilities) was another positive contributor to the Fund’s relative results. On the downside, the portfolio’s positions in revenue bonds issued by Capital Trust Agency Senior Living (Florida) and Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority (Illinois) were key detractors from the Fund’s relative performance during the period.
Q | Did the Fund have any exposure to derivative securities during the period? |
A | The Fund had no exposure to derivatives during the 12-month period. |
Q | What is your investment outlook heading into the Fund’s new fiscal year? |
A | We see the potential for further market volatility given the broad uncertainty surrounding inflation, Fed monetary policies, and developments on the geopolitical front. However, credit conditions have |
6 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
remained stable across the municipal bond space, and we foresee very low odds of a wholesale rise in default risk. The ratio of ratings upgrades to downgrades within the municipal market has remained favorable as well. We also have seen record tax payments in issuing states, as well as budget surpluses. While corporate and government debt levels have risen significantly since the financial crisis of 2008, the municipal market has continued to hover at around $4 trillion in outstanding debt. We believe this provides a positive underpinning for the market and indicates greater financial discipline among municipal issuers. In our view, those factors indicate that the weakness in prices has not been accompanied by a meaningful decline in underlying fundamentals in the municipal market. We would also note that the recent market downturn has caused the ratio of tax-exempt yields to US Treasury yields to rise (the Municipal-to-Treasury ratio), which has often been an indication of improving value in the market, given that the higher the Municipal-to-Treasury ratio, the more attractive municipals are relative to Treasuries. We believe the attractive yields currently available on municipal bonds could help drive rising demand, which would be a positive for the market, especially since expectations are for limited supply through year-end.
As is always the case, headline news events have had a minimal effect on our day-to-day approach to managing the portfolio. Our goal is to invest the Fund in what we believe are fundamentally sound credits with attractive yields, while maintaining an appropriate level of portfolio diversification*. We also seek to avoid experiencing defaults in the portfolio through our emphasis on fundamental research. That approach was successful over the past 12 months, as the Fund did not have any exposure to bonds that defaulted. We believe this steady, long-term approach remains the most effective way to identify opportunities and to help minimize the risk associated with investing in the high-yield municipal market.
* | Diversification does not assure a profit nor protect against loss. |
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 7
Please refer to the Schedule of Investments on pages 15–31 for a full listing of Fund securities.
All investments are subject to risk, including the possible loss of principal. In the past several years, financial markets have experienced increased volatility and heightened uncertainty. The market prices of securities may go up or down, sometimes rapidly or unpredictably, due to general market conditions, such as real or perceived adverse economic, political, or regulatory conditions, recessions, inflation, changes in interest or currency rates, lack of liquidity in the bond markets, the spread of infectious illness or other public health issues, armed conflict including Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine, sanctions against Russia, other nations or individuals or companies and possible countermeasures, or adverse investor sentiment. These conditions may continue, recur, worsen or spread.
Investments in high-yield or lower rated securities are subject to greater-than-average price volatility, illiquidity and possibility of default.
The market price of securities may fluctuate when interest rates change. When interest rates rise, the prices of fixed income securities in the Fund will generally fall. Conversely, when interest rates fall, the prices of fixed income securities in the Fund will generally rise.
Investments in the Fund are subject to possible loss due to the financial failure of issuers of underlying securities and their inability to meet their debt obligations.
The Fund’s investments, payment obligations and financing terms may be based on floating rates, such as LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate), or SOFR (Secured Overnight Financing Rate). Plans are underway to phase out the use of LIBOR. There remains uncertainty regarding the nature of any replacement rate and the impact of the transition from LIBOR on the Fund, issuers of instruments in which the Fund invests, and financial markets generally.
Prepayment risk is the chance that an issuer may exercise its right to prepay its security, if falling interest rates prompt the issuer to do so. Forced to reinvest the unanticipated proceeds at lower interest rates, the Fund would experience a decline in income and lose the opportunity for additional price appreciation.
The value of municipal securities can be adversely affected by changes in financial condition of municipal issuers, lower revenues, and regulatory and political developments.
A portion of income may be subject to local, state, federal, and/or alternative minimum tax. Capital gains, if any, are subject to a capital gains tax.
8 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
The Fund may use derivatives, which may have a potentially large impact on Fund performance.
Before investing, consider the product’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Contact Amundi Asset Management US, Inc., for the Fund’s registration statement. Read it carefully.
Any information in this report regarding market or economic trends or the factors influencing the Fund’s historical or future performance are statements of opinion as of the date of this report. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22 9
Portfolio Diversification
(As a percentage of total investments)*
State Diversification
(As a percentage of total investments)*
10 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
10 Largest Holdings | ||
(As a percentage of total investments)* | ||
1. | Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, Senior Class 2, | |
Series B2, 5.00%, 6/1/55 | 5.04% | |
2. | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Series B1, 5.00%, 6/1/47 | 3.19 |
3. | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., Series A1, 4.214%, 6/1/50 | 3.15 |
4. | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. Sales Tax Revenue, | |
Restructured Series A1, 5.00%, 7/1/58 | 2.34 | |
5. | City of Oroville, Oroville Hospital, 5.25%, 4/1/49 | 2.18 |
6. | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Big River Steel Project, | |
4.50%, 9/1/49 (144A) | 1.99 | |
7. | New York Counties Tobacco Trust IV, Series A, 5.00%, 6/1/45 | 1.95 |
8. | Tuscaloosa County Industrial Development Authority, Hunt Refining | |
Project, Series A, 5.25%, 5/1/44 (144A) | 1.69 | |
9. | Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, McCormick Place Expansion, | |
5.00%, 6/15/50 | 1.57 | |
10. | Dominion Water & Sanitation District, 5.875%, 12/1/52 | 1.56 |
* | Excludes short-term investments and all derivative contracts except for options purchased. The Portfolio is actively managed, and current holdings may be different. The holdings listed should not be considered recommendations to buy or sell any securities. |
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 11
Investment Returns
The mountain chart on the right shows the change in value of a $10,000 investment made in Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio during the period shown, compared to that of the Bloomberg U.S. Municipal High Yield Bond Index.
Average Annual Total Returns | ||
(As of August 31, 2022) | ||
Bloomberg | ||
U.S. | ||
Municipal | ||
High Yield | ||
Period | Fund | Bond Index |
Life-of-Fund | ||
(12/21/20) 0.00% | -1.98% | |
1 Year | -9.34 | -10.06 |
The performance data quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and interests, when withdrawn, may be worth more or less than their original cost.
All results are historical.
Please see the registration statement and financial statements for more information.
12 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Comparing Ongoing Fund Expenses
As an investor in the Fund, you incur two types of costs:
(1) ongoing costs, including management fees and other Fund expenses; and
(2) transaction costs.
This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 at the beginning of the Fund’s latest six-month period and held throughout the six months.
Using the Tables
Actual Expenses
The first table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this table, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period as follows:
(1) | Divide your account value by $1,000 |
Example: an $8,600 account value ÷ $1,000 = 8.6
(2) | Multiply the result in (1) above by the corresponding share class’s number in the third row under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period. |
Expenses Paid on a $1,000 Investment in Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio
Based on actual returns from March 1, 2022 through August 31, 2022.
Beginning Account | $1,000.00 |
Value on 3/1/22 | |
Ending Account Value | $925.40 |
(after expenses) | |
on 8/31/22 | |
Expenses Paid | $0.10 |
During Period* |
* | Expenses are equal to the Portfolio’s annualized net expense ratio of 0.02% multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the partial year period). |
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 13
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the tables are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as sales charges (loads) that are charged at the time of the transaction. Therefore, the table below is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Expenses Paid on a $1,000 Investment in Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio
Based on a hypothetical 5% return per year before expenses, reflecting the period from March 1, 2022 through August 31, 2022.
Beginning Account | $1,000.00 |
Value on 3/1/22 | |
Ending Account Value | $1,025.10 |
(after expenses) | |
on 8/31/22 | |
Expenses Paid | $0.10 |
During Period* |
* | Expenses are equal to the Portfolio’s annualized net expense ratio of 0.02% multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the partial year period). |
14 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Schedule of Investments | 8/31/22
Principal | ||
Amount | ||
USD ($) | Value | |
UNAFFILIATED ISSUERS — 99.4% | ||
MUNICIPAL BONDS — 99.0% of | ||
Net Assets(a) | ||
Alabama — 2.0% | ||
2,500,000 | Hoover Industrial Development Board, 5.75%, 10/1/49 | $ 2,593,950 |
2,990,750 | Tuscaloosa County Industrial Development Authority, | |
Hunt Refining Project, Series A, 4.50%, 5/1/32 (144A) | 2,701,844 | |
32,000,000 | Tuscaloosa County Industrial Development Authority, | |
Hunt Refining Project, Series A, 5.25%, 5/1/44 (144A) | 27,152,640 | |
Total Alabama | $ 32,448,434 | |
Alaska — 0.2% | ||
2,750,000 | Northern Tobacco Securitization Corp., Series A, | |
4.00%, 6/1/50 | $ 2,485,808 | |
1,500,000 | Northern Tobacco Securitization Corp., Series B1, | |
4.00%, 6/1/50 | 1,521,300 | |
Total Alaska | $ 4,007,108 | |
Arizona — 2.7% | ||
1,675,000 | Arizona Industrial Development Authority, Doral | |
Academy Nevada Fire Mesa, Series A, 5.00%, | ||
7/15/49 (144A) | $ 1,648,837 | |
12,795,000 | Industrial Development Authority of the City of | |
Phoenix, 3rd & Indian School Assisted Living Project, | ||
5.40%, 10/1/36 | 11,486,199 | |
9,535,000 | Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, | |
Deer Valley Veterans Assisted Living Project, | ||
Series A, 5.125%, 7/1/36 | 8,640,617 | |
1,000,000 | Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima, | |
Facility Desert Heights Charter, 7.00%, 5/1/34 | 1,052,380 | |
3,000,000 | Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima, | |
Facility Desert Heights Charter, 7.25%, 5/1/44 | 3,152,130 | |
15,770,000 | Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, | |
4.00%, 10/15/47 (144A) | 13,607,933 | |
1,700,000 | Tempe Industrial Development Authority, Series A, | |
6.125%, 10/1/47 (144A) | 1,607,197 | |
2,400,000 | Tempe Industrial Development Authority, Series A, | |
6.125%, 10/1/52 (144A) | 2,271,744 | |
Total Arizona | $ 43,467,037 | |
Arkansas — 2.3% | ||
34,765,000 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Big River | |
Steel Project, 4.50%, 9/1/49 (144A) | $ 31,909,403 | |
5,500,000 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Green | |
Bond, 5.45%, 9/1/52 (144A) | 5,427,895 | |
Total Arkansas | $ 37,337,298 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 15
Schedule of Investments | 8/31/22 (continued)
Principal | ||
Amount | ||
USD ($) | Value | |
California — 11.4% | ||
80,000 | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, | |
Asset-Backed, Series A, 5.875%, 6/1/43 | $ 80,300 | |
1,370,000 | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, | |
Golden Gate Tobacco Settlement, Series A, | ||
5.00%, 6/1/47 | 1,316,721 | |
185,000 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Series A, 5.00%, | |
12/1/36 (144A) | 188,491 | |
2,000,000 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Series A, 5.00%, | |
12/1/46 (144A) | 2,045,300 | |
2,000,000 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Series A, 5.00%, | |
11/1/49 (144A) | 1,959,660 | |
2,000,000 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Series A, 5.00%, | |
12/1/54 (144A) | 1,999,280 | |
2,910,000 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Series B, 4.75%, | |
12/1/31 (144A) | 2,661,224 | |
6,115,000 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Series B, 5.25%, | |
12/1/36 (144A) | 5,609,901 | |
4,530,000 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Series B, 5.50%, | |
12/1/39 (144A) | 4,139,152 | |
1,600,000 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Baptist | |
University, Series A, 5.50%, 11/1/45 (144A) | 1,638,064 | |
250,000 | California Municipal Finance Authority, John Adams | |
Academics Project, Series A, 5.00%, 10/1/35 | 255,293 | |
1,550,000 | California Municipal Finance Authority, John Adams | |
Academics Project, Series A, 5.25%, 10/1/45 | 1,582,984 | |
500,000 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Santa Rosa | |
Academy Project, 5.125%, 7/1/35 (144A) | 512,205 | |
1,575,000 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Santa Rosa | |
Academy Project, 5.375%, 7/1/45 (144A) | 1,656,490 | |
125,000 | California School Finance Authority, View Park | |
Elementary & Middle School, Series A, 4.75%, 10/1/24 | 127,494 | |
830,000 | California School Finance Authority, View Park | |
Elementary & Middle School, Series A, 5.625%, 10/1/34 | 870,595 | |
2,175,000 | California School Finance Authority, View Park | |
Elementary & Middle School, Series A, 5.875%, 10/1/44 | 2,266,807 | |
1,000,000 | California School Finance Authority, View Park | |
Elementary & Middle School, Series A, 6.00%, 10/1/49 | 1,040,820 | |
3,230,000 | California School Finance Authority, View Park High | |
School, Series A, 7.125%, 10/1/48 (144A) | 3,380,356 | |
1,875,000 | California Statewide Communities Development | |
Authority, Baptist University, Series A, 5.00%, | ||
11/1/41 (144A) | 1,945,444 | |
1,560,000 | California Statewide Communities Development | |
Authority, Baptist University, Series A, 6.125%, | ||
11/1/33 (144A) | 1,599,016 | |
4,030,000 | California Statewide Communities Development | |
Authority, Baptist University, Series A, 6.375%, | ||
11/1/43 (144A) | 4,114,912 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
16 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Principal | ||
Amount | ||
USD ($) | Value | |
California — (continued) | ||
1,000,000 | California Statewide Communities Development | |
Authority, Loma Linda University Medical Center, | ||
5.25%, 12/1/43 (144A) | $ 1,032,430 | |
10,000,000 | California Statewide Communities Development | |
Authority, Loma Linda University Medical Center, | ||
5.50%, 12/1/58 (144A) | 10,449,200 | |
13,095,000 | California Statewide Communities Development | |
Authority, Loma Linda University Medical Center, | ||
Series A, 5.25%, 12/1/56 (144A) | 13,113,333 | |
700,000 | City of Oroville, Oroville Hospital, 5.25%, 4/1/34 | 721,945 |
6,980,000 | City of Oroville, Oroville Hospital, 5.25%, 4/1/39 | 7,178,930 |
34,720,000 | City of Oroville, Oroville Hospital, 5.25%, 4/1/49 | 34,883,878 |
23,800,000 | City of Oroville, Oroville Hospital, 5.25%, 4/1/54 | 23,423,960 |
64,000,000 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., Series A1, | |
4.214%, 6/1/50 | 50,566,400 | |
2,500,000(b) | Pittsburg Unified School District Financing Authority, | |
Capital Appreciation General Obligation | ||
Pittsburg, 9/1/41 (AGM Insured) | 1,075,450 | |
1,925,000(b) | Pittsburg Unified School District Financing Authority, | |
Capital Appreciation General Obligation | ||
Pittsburg, 9/1/42 (AGM Insured) | 782,897 | |
805,000 | Tobacco Securitization Authority of Northern California, | |
Series B1, 4.00%, 6/1/49 | 807,817 | |
Total California | $ 185,026,749 | |
Colorado — 4.6% | ||
4,535,000(c) | 2000 Holly Metropolitan District, Series A, | |
5.00%, 12/1/50 | $ 4,627,333 | |
577,000(c) | 2000 Holly Metropolitan District, Series B, | |
7.50%, 12/15/50 | 562,258 | |
1,735,000(c) | Belleview Village Metropolitan District, 4.95%, 12/1/50 | 1,514,881 |
1,250,000(c) | Cottonwood Highlands Metropolitan District No. 1, | |
Series A, 5.00%, 12/1/49 | 1,141,712 | |
2,090,000(c) | Cottonwood Highlands Metropolitan District No. 1, | |
Series B, 8.75%, 12/15/49 | 2,144,925 | |
4,090,000(c) | Crystal Crossing Metropolitan District, 5.25%, 12/1/40 | 4,069,550 |
25,000,000 | Dominion Water & Sanitation District, 5.875%, 12/1/52 | 24,997,500 |
3,379,000 | Dominion Water & Sanitation District, 6.00%, 12/1/46 | 3,453,608 |
3,550,000(c) | Green Valley Ranch East Metropolitan District No. 6, | |
Series A, 5.875%, 12/1/50 | 3,421,312 | |
7,635,000(c) | Larkridge Metropolitan District No. 2, 5.25%, 12/1/48 | 7,937,880 |
3,280,000(c) | Littleton Village Metropolitan District No. 2, 5.375%, | |
12/1/45 | 3,293,022 | |
1,125,000 | Nine Mile Metropolitan District, 4.625%, 12/1/30 | 1,119,217 |
4,880,000 | Nine Mile Metropolitan District, 5.125%, 12/1/40 | 4,877,121 |
1,000,000(c) | Ridgeline Vista Metropolitan District, Series A, | |
5.25%, 12/1/60 | 1,030,410 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 17
Schedule of Investments | 8/31/22 (continued)
Principal | ||
Amount | ||
USD ($) | Value | |
Colorado — (continued) | ||
1,000,000(c) | Settler’s Crossing Metropolitan District No. 1, | |
Series A, 5.00%, 12/1/40 (144A) | $ 1,033,440 | |
2,130,000(c) | Settler’s Crossing Metropolitan District No. 1, | |
Series A, 5.125%, 12/1/50 (144A) | 2,186,871 | |
597,000(c) | Settler’s Crossing Metropolitan District No. 1, | |
Series B, 7.625%, 12/15/50 | 590,851 | |
1,875,000(c) | Village at Dry Creek Metropolitan District No. 2, | |
4.375%, 12/1/44 | 1,858,612 | |
1,250,000(c) | Villas Metropolitan District, Series A, 5.125%, 12/1/48 | 1,260,662 |
1,240,000(c) | Willow Bend Metropolitan District, Series A, | |
5.00%, 12/1/39 | 1,211,468 | |
1,460,000(c) | Willow Bend Metropolitan District, Series A, | |
5.00%, 12/1/49 | 1,360,078 | |
755,000(c) | Willow Bend Metropolitan District, Series B, | |
7.625%, 12/15/49 | 755,023 | |
Total Colorado | $ 74,447,734 | |
District of Columbia — 0.4% | ||
915,000 | District of Columbia, Inspired Teaching Demonstration | |
Public Charter School, 5.00%, 7/1/32 | $ 969,049 | |
1,500,000 | District of Columbia, Inspired Teaching Demonstration | |
Public Charter School, 5.00%, 7/1/42 | 1,549,230 | |
1,165,000 | District of Columbia, Inspired Teaching Demonstration | |
Public Charter School, 5.00%, 7/1/47 | 1,173,050 | |
1,835,000 | District of Columbia, Inspired Teaching Demonstration | |
Public Charter School, 5.00%, 7/1/52 | 1,832,101 | |
735,000 | District of Columbia Tobacco Settlement Financing | |
Corp., Asset-Backed, 6.75%, 5/15/40 | 746,804 | |
Total District of Columbia | $ 6,270,234 | |
Florida — 0.9% | ||
500,000(d) | Capital Trust Agency, Inc., Series B, 5.00%, 7/1/43 | $ 90,000 |
750,000(d) | Capital Trust Agency, Inc., Series B, 5.00%, 7/1/53 | 135,000 |
500,000(d) | Capital Trust Agency, Inc., Series B, 5.25%, 7/1/48 | 90,000 |
850,000 | County of Lake, 5.00%, 1/15/54 (144A) | 808,851 |
700,000 | County of Lake, Imagine South Lake, 5.00%, | |
1/15/39 (144A) | 723,457 | |
1,525,000 | County of Lake, Imagine South Lake, 5.00%, | |
1/15/49 (144A) | 1,479,113 | |
300,000 | Florida Development Finance Corp., Glenridge On | |
Palmer Ranch Project, 5.00%, 6/1/31 | 296,259 | |
10,475,000 | Florida Development Finance Corp., Glenridge On | |
Palmer Ranch Project, 5.00%, 6/1/51 | 9,161,435 | |
2,500,000 | Palm Beach County Health Facilities Authority, | |
Toby & Leon Cooperman Sinai, 4.25%, 6/1/56 | 1,967,750 | |
Total Florida | $ 14,751,865 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
18 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Principal | ||
Amount | ||
USD ($) | Value | |
Guam — 0.1% | ||
1,100,000 | Guam Economic Development & Commerce | |
Authority, Asset-Backed, 5.625%, 6/1/47 | $ 1,034,396 | |
Total Guam | $ 1,034,396 | |
Illinois — 15.3% | ||
1,650,000 | Chicago Board of Education, 5.75%, 4/1/35 | $ 1,833,992 |
8,010,000 | Chicago Board of Education, 6.00%, 4/1/46 | 8,917,132 |
6,500,000(c) | Chicago Board of Education, 6.138%, 12/1/39 | 6,322,810 |
5,440,000(c) | Chicago Board of Education, 6.519%, 12/1/40 | 5,429,283 |
18,765,000(c) | Chicago Board of Education, Series A, 4.00%, 12/1/47 | 16,415,059 |
2,035,000(c) | Chicago Board of Education, Series A, 5.00%, 12/1/33 | 2,095,541 |
14,170,000(c) | Chicago Board of Education, Series A, 5.00%, 12/1/42 | 14,081,579 |
5,000,000(c) | Chicago Board of Education, Series A, 5.50%, 12/1/31 | |
(AMBAC Insured) | 5,562,400 | |
1,000,000(c) | Chicago Board of Education, Series A, 7.00%, | |
12/1/46 (144A) | 1,105,760 | |
8,000,000(c) | Chicago Board of Education, Series B, 6.50%, 12/1/46 | 8,793,520 |
2,415,000(c) | Chicago Board of Education, Series C, 5.25%, 12/1/39 | 2,455,186 |
3,250,000(c) | Chicago Board of Education, Series D, 5.00%, 12/1/31 | 3,408,535 |
15,000,000(c) | Chicago Board of Education, Series D, 5.00%, 12/1/46 | 15,111,000 |
1,305,000(c) | Chicago Board of Education, Series G, 5.00%, 12/1/44 | 1,311,616 |
4,275,000(c) | Chicago Board of Education, Series H, 5.00%, 12/1/46 | 4,292,314 |
3,435,000(c) | City of Chicago, Series 2002B, 5.50%, 1/1/30 | 3,659,752 |
10,000,000(c) | City of Chicago, Series A, 5.00%, 1/1/28 | 10,643,000 |
10,000,000(c) | City of Chicago, Series A, 5.00%, 1/1/34 | 10,536,500 |
2,000,000(c) | City of Chicago, Series A, 5.00%, 1/1/44 | 2,031,520 |
9,200,000(c) | City of Chicago, Series A, 5.50%, 1/1/35 | 9,689,164 |
17,000,000(c) | City of Chicago, Series A, 5.50%, 1/1/49 | 17,601,460 |
7,975,000(c) | City of Chicago, Series A, 6.00%, 1/1/38 | 8,634,213 |
4,000,000(c) | City of Chicago, Series B, 6.314%, 1/1/44 | 3,883,600 |
4,270,000 | City of Plano Special Service Area No. 3 & No. 4, | |
4.00%, 3/1/35 | 4,309,412 | |
4,050,000 | Illinois Finance Authority, Series A2, 6.00%, 11/15/36 | 3,557,196 |
1,591,212(b) | Illinois Finance Authority, Cabs Clare Oaks Project, | |
Series B1, 11/15/52 | 31,204 | |
2,520,597(e) | Illinois Finance Authority, Clare Oaks Project, | |
Series A3, 5.25%, 11/15/52 | 1,659,208 | |
8,500,000 | Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, McCormick | |
Place Expansion, 4.00%, 12/15/47 | 7,389,730 | |
25,000,000 | Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, McCormick | |
Place Expansion, 5.00%, 6/15/50 | 25,114,500 | |
23,000,000 | Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, McCormick | |
Place Expansion, 5.00%, 6/15/57 | 23,329,360 | |
12,160,000 | Southwestern Illinois Development Authority, | |
5.00%, 6/1/53 | 11,831,802 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 19
Schedule of Investments | 8/31/22 (continued)
Principal | |||
Amount | |||
USD ($) | Value | ||
Illinois — (continued) | |||
1,415,000(d) | Southwestern Illinois Development Authority, Village | ||
of Sauget Project, 5.625%, 11/1/26 | $ 1,344,250 | ||
3,040,000 | Village of Lincolnwood, Series A, 4.82%, 1/1/41 (144A) | 2,612,850 | |
2,445,000 | Village of Matteson, 6.50%, 12/1/35 | 2,505,563 | |
1,139,000 | Village of Volo IL Special Service Area No. 17, | ||
5.50%, 3/1/47 | 1,153,545 | ||
Total Illinois | $ 248,653,556 | ||
Indiana — 6.4% | |||
8,230,000 | City of Anderson, 5.375%, 1/1/40 (144A) | $ 7,168,577 | |
630,000 | City of Evansville, Silver Birch Evansville Project, | ||
4.80%, 1/1/28 | 612,121 | ||
6,475,000 | City of Evansville, Silver Birch Evansville Project, | ||
5.45%, 1/1/38 | 5,638,689 | ||
600,000 | City of Fort Wayne, 5.125%, 1/1/32 | 544,074 | |
4,665,000 | City of Fort Wayne, 5.35%, 1/1/38 | 4,006,302 | |
24,990,000 | City of Hammond, Custodial Receipts Cabelas Project, | ||
7.50%, 2/1/29 (144A) | 24,802,325 | ||
1,275,000 | City of Kokomo, Silver Birch of Kokomo, 5.75%, 1/1/34 | 1,252,675 | |
7,705,000 | City of Kokomo, Silver Birch of Kokomo, 5.875%, 1/1/37 | 7,497,967 | |
1,155,000 | City of Lafayette, Glasswater Creek Lafayette Project, | ||
5.60%, 1/1/33 | 1,167,058 | ||
6,000,000 | City of Lafayette, Glasswater Creek Lafayette Project, | ||
5.80%, 1/1/37 | 6,105,420 | ||
900,000 | City of Mishawaka, Silver Birch Mishawaka Project, 5.10%, | ||
1/1/32 (144A) | 861,264 | ||
5,890,000 | City of Mishawaka, Silver Birch Mishawaka Project, 5.375%, | ||
1/1/38 (144A) | 5,072,291 | ||
4,560,000 | City of Terre Haute, 5.35%, 1/1/38 | 3,852,105 | |
5,190,000 | Indiana Finance Authority, Multipurpose Educational | ||
Facilities, Avondale Meadows Academy Project, | |||
5.125%, 7/1/37 | 5,329,144 | ||
330,000 | Indiana Finance Authority, Multipurpose Educational | ||
Facilities, Avondale Meadows Academy Project, | |||
5.375%, 7/1/47 | 335,795 | ||
1,940,000 | Indiana Finance Authority, Sanders Glen Project, | ||
Series A, 4.25%, 7/1/43 | 1,794,616 | ||
2,020,000 | Indiana Finance Authority, Sanders Glen Project, | ||
Series A, 4.50%, 7/1/53 | 1,876,964 | ||
11,985,000 | Indiana Housing & Community Development Authority, | ||
Series A, 5.00%, 1/1/39 (144A) | 9,912,913 | ||
8,425,000 | Indiana Housing & Community Development Authority, | ||
Evergreen Village Bloomington Project, 5.50%, 1/1/37 | 7,566,240 | ||
7,950,000 | Town of Plainfield Multifamily Housing Revenue, | ||
5.375%, 9/1/38 | 7,616,100 | ||
Total Indiana | $ 103,012,640 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
20 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Principal | ||
Amount | ||
USD ($) | Value | |
Iowa — 0.5% | ||
8,000,000 | Iowa Finance Authority, 4.75%, 8/1/42 | $ 8,007,680 |
Total Iowa | $ 8,007,680 | |
Kansas — 0.7% | ||
400,000 | Kansas Development Finance Authority, Series A, | |
5.25%, 11/15/33 | $ 365,636 | |
11,215,000 | Kansas Development Finance Authority, Series A, | |
5.25%, 11/15/53 | 8,762,616 | |
2,000,000 | Kansas Development Finance Authority, Series A, | |
5.50%, 11/15/38 | 1,785,500 | |
Total Kansas | $ 10,913,752 | |
Maryland — 0.1% | ||
900,000 | Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities | |
Authority, City Neighbors, Series A, 6.75%, 7/1/44 | $ 924,354 | |
Total Maryland | $ 924,354 | |
Massachusetts — 0.4% | ||
765,000(d) | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, | |
Adventcare Project, 7.625%, 10/15/37 | $ 267,750 | |
2,000,000(d) | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, | |
Adventcare Project, Series A, 6.75%, 10/15/37 (144A) | 700,000 | |
1,250,000 | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, | |
International Charter School, 5.00%, 4/15/40 | 1,273,763 | |
4,500,000 | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Linden | |
Ponds, 5.125%, 11/15/46 (144A) | 4,628,385 | |
Total Massachusetts | $ 6,869,898 | |
Michigan — 2.1% | ||
8,565,000 | David Ellis Academy-West, 5.25%, 6/1/45 | $ 7,845,540 |
1,250,000 | Flint Hospital Building Authority, Hurley Medical | |
Center, Series A, 5.25%, 7/1/39 | 1,252,475 | |
5,485,000 | Flint International Academy, 5.75%, 10/1/37 | 5,485,000 |
5,720,000 | Michigan Finance Authority, 5.75%, 4/1/40 | 5,910,991 |
1,105,000 | Michigan Finance Authority, Series 2, 5.00%, 6/1/40 | 1,162,747 |
1,615,000 | Michigan Finance Authority, Series B1, 5.00%, 6/1/49 | 1,666,632 |
4,000,000(e) | Michigan Strategic Fund, Series B, 7.50%, 11/1/41 | 4,269,720 |
7,115,000(e) | Michigan Strategic Fund, Michigan Department | |
Offices Lease, Series B, 7.75%, 3/1/40 | 6,421,145 | |
Total Michigan | $ 34,014,250 | |
Minnesota — 1.9% | ||
1,310,000 | City of Bethel, 6.00%, 7/1/57 | $ 1,238,081 |
4,210,000 | City of Bethel, Series A, 5.00%, 7/1/48 | 4,111,612 |
1,000,000 | City of Bethel, Series A, 5.00%, 7/1/53 | 960,080 |
2,600,000 | City of Brooklyn Park, Prairie Seeds Academy Project, | |
Series A, 5.00%, 3/1/34 | 2,662,270 | |
2,000,000 | City of Brooklyn Park, Prairie Seeds Academy Project, | |
Series A, 5.00%, 3/1/39 | 2,033,900 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 21
Schedule of Investments | 8/31/22 (continued)
Principal | ||
Amount | ||
USD ($) | Value | |
Minnesota — (continued) | ||
3,515,000 | City of Deephaven, Eagle Ridge Academy Project, | |
Series A, 5.00%, 7/1/55 | $ 3,694,089 | |
400,000 | City of Deephaven, Eagle Ridge Academy Project, | |
Series A, 5.25%, 7/1/37 | 422,004 | |
1,500,000 | City of Deephaven, Eagle Ridge Academy Project, | |
Series A, 5.50%, 7/1/50 | 1,571,025 | |
3,145,000 | City of Rochester, Series A, 5.25%, 9/1/43 | 2,797,195 |
6,080,000 | City of Rochester, Series A, 5.375%, 9/1/50 | 5,318,967 |
1,500,000 | City of Rochester, Rochester Math & Science | |
Academy, Series A, 5.125%, 9/1/38 | 1,428,615 | |
2,000,000 | Housing & Redevelopment Authority of The City of | |
St. Paul Minnesota, Great River School Project, | ||
Series A, 5.50%, 7/1/52 (144A) | 2,116,160 | |
1,415,000 | Housing & Redevelopment Authority of The City of | |
St. Paul Minnesota, Higher Ground Academy Project, | ||
5.125%, 12/1/38 | 1,418,608 | |
1,300,000 | Housing & Redevelopment Authority of The City of | |
St. Paul Minnesota, St. Paul City School Project, | ||
Series A, 5.00%, 7/1/36 | 1,313,442 | |
Total Minnesota | $ 31,086,048 | |
Missouri — 0.2% | ||
200,000 | Kansas City Industrial Development Authority, | |
Series A, 4.25%, 4/1/26 (144A) | $ 201,280 | |
1,000,000 | Kansas City Industrial Development Authority, | |
Series A, 5.00%, 4/1/36 (144A) | 978,260 | |
2,300,000 | Kansas City Industrial Development Authority, | |
Series A, 5.00%, 4/1/46 (144A) | 2,136,999 | |
Total Missouri | $ 3,316,539 | |
New Jersey — 2.7% | ||
905,000(d) | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, | |
Series A, 4.70%, 9/1/28 (144A) | $ 869,768 | |
1,255,000 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, | |
Series A, 5.25%, 10/1/38 (144A) | 1,231,619 | |
565,000 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, | |
Series A, 5.375%, 9/1/33 (144A) | 532,857 | |
1,140,000 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, | |
Series A, 5.625%, 9/1/38 (144A) | 1,043,898 | |
6,125,000 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, | |
Series A, 5.75%, 9/1/50 (144A) | 6,349,604 | |
1,215,000 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, | |
Charter Hatikvah International Academy, Series A, | ||
5.25%, 7/1/37 (144A) | 1,266,139 | |
2,500,000 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, | |
Charter Hatikvah International Academy, Series A, | ||
5.375%, 7/1/47 (144A) | 2,606,975 | |
7,205,000 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Marion | |
P. Thomas Charter School, Inc., Project, Series A, | ||
5.375%, 10/1/50 (144A) | 7,050,597 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
22 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Principal | ||
Amount | ||
USD ($) | Value | |
New Jersey — (continued) | ||
4,500,000 | New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, | |
St. Peters University Hospital, 6.25%, 7/1/35 | $ 4,507,875 | |
18,605,000 | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Series B, | |
5.00%, 6/1/46 | 18,771,143 | |
Total New Jersey | $ 44,230,475 | |
New Mexico — 1.2% | ||
1,690,000(e) | County of Otero, Otero County Jail Project, | |
9.00%, 4/1/23 | $ 1,690,000 | |
16,040,000(e) | County of Otero, Otero County Jail Project, | |
9.00%, 4/1/28 | 16,040,000 | |
1,750,000 | Lower Petroglyphs Public Improvement District, | |
5.00%, 10/1/48 | 1,605,712 | |
Total New Mexico | $ 19,335,712 | |
New York — 14.8% | ||
7,800,000 | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Green Bond, | |
Series C1, 4.75%, 11/15/45 | $ 7,749,768 | |
17,000,000 | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Green Bond, | |
Series C1, 5.25%, 11/15/55 | 17,597,210 | |
425,000 | Buffalo & Erie County Industrial Land Development | |
Corp., 5.00%, 10/1/28 (144A) | 444,949 | |
4,150,000 | Buffalo & Erie County Industrial Land Development | |
Corp., 5.00%, 10/1/38 (144A) | 4,187,765 | |
3,200,000 | Chautauqua Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., | |
5.00%, 6/1/48 | 3,199,904 | |
10,000,000(d) | Erie County Industrial Development Agency, Galvstar | |
LLC Project, Series A, 9.25%, 10/1/30 | 1,250,000 | |
8,000,000(d) | Erie County Industrial Development Agency, Galvstar | |
LLC Project, Series B, 9.25%, 10/1/30 | 1,890,000 | |
1,795,000(d) | Erie County Industrial Development Agency, Galvstar | |
LLC Project, Series C, 9.25%, 10/1/30 | 424,069 | |
8,755,000 | Erie Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., Asset-Backed, | |
Series A, 5.00%, 6/1/45 | 8,690,651 | |
4,395,000 | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Series A1, | |
5.00%, 11/15/46 | 4,479,384 | |
9,500,000 | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Series A1, | |
5.00%, 11/15/48 | 9,718,690 | |
4,845,000 | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Series A1, | |
5.25%, 11/15/56 | 4,962,346 | |
1,870,000 | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Series C1, | |
5.00%, 11/15/25 | 1,959,984 | |
2,000,000 | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Series C1, | |
5.00%, 11/15/33 | 2,116,640 | |
5,850,000 | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Series C1, | |
5.00%, 11/15/56 | 5,931,432 | |
17,100,000(b) | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, | |
Series C2, 11/15/32 | 11,669,895 | |
9,000,000(b) | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, | |
Series C2, 11/15/33 | 5,806,800 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 23
Schedule of Investments | 8/31/22 (continued)
Principal | |||
Amount | |||
USD ($) | Value | ||
New York — (continued) | |||
3,000,000 | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Series D1, | ||
5.00%, 11/15/43 | $ 3,089,280 | ||
2,969,643(e) | Nassau County Tobacco Settlement Corp., | ||
Asset-Backed, Series A2, 5.25%, 6/1/26 | 2,946,391 | ||
22,015,000 | Nassau County Tobacco Settlement Corp., | ||
Asset-Backed, Series A3, 5.00%, 6/1/35 | 21,466,386 | ||
14,020,000 | Nassau County Tobacco Settlement Corp., | ||
Asset-Backed, Series A3, 5.125%, 6/1/46 | 13,463,826 | ||
1,635,000 | New York Counties Tobacco Trust IV, Series A, | ||
5.00%, 6/1/42 | 1,576,516 | ||
32,420,000 | New York Counties Tobacco Trust IV, Series A, | ||
5.00%, 6/1/45 | 31,341,711 | ||
18,100,000 | New York Counties Tobacco Trust IV, Series A, 6.25%, | ||
6/1/41 (144A) | 17,696,008 | ||
51,600,000(b) | New York Counties Tobacco Trust V, Capital Appreciation | ||
Pass Through, Series S-4A, 6/1/60 (144A) | 2,557,296 | ||
6,450,000 | New York Counties Tobacco Trust VI, Series A-2B, | ||
5.00%, 6/1/45 | 6,300,424 | ||
10,000,000 | New York Counties Tobacco Trust VI, Series A-2B, | ||
5.00%, 6/1/51 | 9,835,300 | ||
2,820,000 | Riverhead Industrial Development Agency, | ||
7.65%, 8/1/34 | 2,818,816 | ||
4,000,000 | TSASC, Inc., Series B, 5.00%, 6/1/45 | 3,927,200 | |
24,000,000 | TSASC, Inc., Series B, 5.00%, 6/1/48 | 23,443,200 | |
5,000,000 | Westchester County Local Development Corp., 5.00%, | ||
7/1/56 (144A) | 4,091,750 | ||
3,530,000 | Westchester County Local Development Corp., | ||
Purchase Senior Learning Community, 5.00%, | |||
7/1/41 (144A) | 3,137,076 | ||
Total New York | $ 239,770,667 | ||
Ohio — 5.5% | |||
84,635,000 | Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, | ||
Senior Class 2, Series B2, 5.00%, 6/1/55 | $ 80,805,266 | ||
530,000 | Ohio Housing Finance Agency, Sanctuary Springboro | ||
Project, 5.125%, 1/1/32 (144A) | 459,876 | ||
5,275,000 | Ohio Housing Finance Agency, Sanctuary Springboro | ||
Project, 5.45%, 1/1/38 (144A) | 4,375,929 | ||
2,900,000 | Southeastern Ohio Port Authority, Refunding And | ||
Improvement Memorial Health System, 6.00%, 12/1/42 | 2,908,033 | ||
Total Ohio | $ 88,549,104 | ||
Pennsylvania — 4.0% | |||
1,000,000 | Chester County Industrial Development Authority, | ||
Collegium Charter School, Series A, 5.125%, 10/15/37 | $ 1,017,410 | ||
200,000 | Chester County Industrial Development Authority, | ||
Collegium Charter School, Series A, 5.25%, 10/15/32 | 200,378 | ||
2,535,000 | Chester County Industrial Development Authority, | ||
Collegium Charter School, Series A, 5.25%, 10/15/47 | 2,542,047 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
24 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Principal | ||
Amount | ||
USD ($) | Value | |
Pennsylvania — (continued) | ||
8,425,000 | Delaware County Industrial Development Authority, | |
Chester Charter School Arts Project, Series A, 5.125%, | ||
6/1/46 (144A) | $ 8,924,855 | |
1,310,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
5.00%, 4/15/32 (144A) | 1,356,060 | |
2,290,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
5.00%, 4/15/42 (144A) | 2,253,017 | |
3,335,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
5.00%, 4/15/52 (144A) | 3,173,386 | |
1,660,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
5.125%, 6/1/38 (144A) | 1,699,724 | |
3,500,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
5.25%, 6/1/48 (144A) | 3,571,260 | |
4,370,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
5.375%, 6/1/53 (144A) | 4,457,881 | |
9,435,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
5.50%, 6/1/49 (144A) | 9,774,094 | |
975,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
Series A, 5.00%, 11/15/31 | 993,135 | |
4,055,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
2800 American Street Co. Project, Series A, 5.625%, | ||
7/1/48 (144A) | 4,126,084 | |
8,295,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
Global Leadership Academy Charter School Project, | ||
Series A, 5.00%, 11/15/50 | 8,281,894 | |
2,200,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
Greater Philadelphia Health Action, Inc. Project, | ||
Series A, 6.50%, 6/1/45 | 2,212,320 | |
2,940,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
Greater Philadelphia Health Action, Inc., Project, | ||
Series A, 6.625%, 6/1/50 | 2,956,405 | |
340,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
Green Woods Charter School, Series A, 5.00%, 6/15/32 | 341,465 | |
1,045,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
Green Woods Charter School, Series A, 5.125%, 6/15/42 | 1,011,832 | |
970,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
Green Woods Charter School, Series A, 5.25%, 6/15/52 | 928,115 | |
1,020,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
Green Woods Charter School, Series A, 5.375%, 6/15/57 | 966,776 | |
3,570,000 | Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | |
Universal Arts, 5.00%, 3/15/45 (144A) | 3,386,645 | |
Total Pennsylvania | $ 64,174,783 | |
Puerto Rico — 6.2% | ||
2,020,659(b)(c) | Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Restructured | |
Series A, 7/1/33 | $ 1,146,966 | |
1,570,171(c) | Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Restructured | |
Series A1, 4.00%, 7/1/33 | 1,490,422 | |
1,411,375(c) | Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Restructured | |
Series A1, 4.00%, 7/1/35 | 1,296,912 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 25
Schedule of Investments | 8/31/22 (continued)
Principal | ||
Amount | ||
USD ($) | Value | |
Puerto Rico — (continued) | ||
1,211,332(c) | Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Restructured Series A1, | |
4.00%, 7/1/37 | $ 1,084,627 | |
1,646,948(c) | Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Restructured Series A1, | |
4.00%, 7/1/41 | 1,440,651 | |
2,712,803(c) | Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Restructured Series A1, | |
4.00%, 7/1/46 | 2,303,712 | |
876,798(c) | Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Restructured Series A1, | |
5.25%, 7/1/23 | 883,374 | |
1,748,733(c) | Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Restructured Series A1, | |
5.375%, 7/1/25 | 1,803,381 | |
1,732,895(c) | Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Restructured Series A1, | |
5.625%, 7/1/27 | 1,851,824 | |
1,704,781(c) | Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Restructured Series A1, | |
5.625%, 7/1/29 | 1,832,640 | |
1,655,840(c) | Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Restructured Series A1, | |
5.75%, 7/1/31 | 1,804,866 | |
4,745,000 | Puerto Rico Commonwealth Aqueduct & Sewer | |
Authority, Series A, 5.00%, 7/1/47 (144A) | 4,690,527 | |
6,685,000 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA, | |
5.25%, 7/1/21 | 5,398,137 | |
3,535,000 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC, | |
4.80%, 7/1/28 | 2,850,094 | |
1,285,000 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC, | |
5.00%, 7/1/24 | 1,040,850 | |
3,735,000 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series DDD, | |
5.00%, 7/1/23 | 3,025,350 | |
3,315,000 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT, | |
5.00%, 7/1/21 | 2,676,862 | |
1,000,000 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series WW, | |
5.00%, 7/1/28 | 810,000 | |
1,130,000 | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ, | |
4.75%, 7/1/27 | 911,063 | |
4,000,000 | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, | |
Series A, 5.85%, 3/1/27 | 3,996,400 | |
100,000 | Puerto Rico Industrial Tourist Educational Medical & | |
Environmental Control Facilities Financing | ||
Authority, 4.00%, 7/1/36 | 93,516 | |
100,000 | Puerto Rico Industrial Tourist Educational Medical & | |
Environmental Control Facilities Financing | ||
Authority, 4.00%, 7/1/37 | 92,781 | |
100,000 | Puerto Rico Industrial Tourist Educational Medical & | |
Environmental Control Facilities Financing | ||
Authority, 4.00%, 7/1/38 | 92,345 | |
100,000 | Puerto Rico Industrial Tourist Educational Medical & | |
Environmental Control Facilities Financing | ||
Authority, 4.00%, 7/1/39 | 91,588 | |
100,000 | Puerto Rico Industrial Tourist Educational Medical & | |
Environmental Control Facilities Financing | ||
Authority, 4.00%, 7/1/40 | 90,930 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
26 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Principal | ||
Amount | ||
USD ($) | Value | |
Puerto Rico — (continued) | ||
110,000 | Puerto Rico Industrial Tourist Educational Medical & | |
Environmental Control Facilities Financing | ||
Authority, 4.00%, 7/1/41 | $ 99,039 | |
1,295,000 | Puerto Rico Industrial Tourist Educational Medical & | |
Environmental Control Facilities Financing | ||
Authority, Series A, 5.20%, 7/1/24 | 1,312,198 | |
38,758,000 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. Sales Tax | |
Revenue, Restructured Series A1, 5.00%, 7/1/58 | 37,498,365 | |
19,458,000 | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. Sales Tax | |
Revenue, Restructured Series A2, 4.784%, 7/1/58 | 19,054,052 | |
Total Puerto Rico | $ 100,763,472 | |
Rhode Island — 0.4% | ||
2,065,000(d) | Central Falls Detention Facility Corp., 7.25%, 7/15/35 | $ 371,700 |
2,000,000(e) | Tender Option Bond Trust Receipts/Certificates, RIB, | |
Series 2019, 7.345%, 9/1/47 (144A) | 2,007,200 | |
4,250,000 | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Series B, | |
5.00%, 6/1/50 | 4,359,310 | |
Total Rhode Island | $ 6,738,210 | |
Tennessee — 0.1% | ||
1,095,000 | Metropolitan Government Nashville & Davidson County | |
Industrial Development Board, 4.00%, 6/1/51 (144A) | $ 905,401 | |
Total Tennessee | $ 905,401 | |
Texas — 4.0% | ||
640,000 | Arlington Higher Education Finance Corp., 3.50%, | |
3/1/24 (144A) | $ 637,888 | |
16,875,000 | Arlington Higher Education Finance Corp., 5.45%, | |
3/1/49 (144A) | 18,037,181 | |
95,000 | Arlington Higher Education Finance Corp., Series A, | |
5.875%, 3/1/24 | 96,201 | |
525,000 | Arlington Higher Education Finance Corp., Series A, | |
6.625%, 3/1/29 | 548,651 | |
375,000 | Arlington Higher Education Finance Corp., Universal | |
Academy, Series A, 7.00%, 3/1/34 | 385,860 | |
7,030,000 | Arlington Higher Education Finance Corp., Universal | |
Academy, Series A, 7.125%, 3/1/44 | 7,247,086 | |
280,000 | City of Celina, 5.50%, 9/1/24 | 283,696 |
1,025,000 | City of Celina, 6.00%, 9/1/30 | 1,050,082 |
2,590,000 | City of Celina, 6.25%, 9/1/40 | 2,652,315 |
16,755,000(e) | Greater Texas Cultural Education Facilities Finance | |
Corp., 9.00%, 2/1/50 (144A) | 15,790,080 | |
3,335,000(e) | Greater Texas Cultural Education Facilities Finance | |
Corp., Series B, 9.00%, 2/1/33 (144A) | 3,033,783 | |
100,000(f) | La Vernia Higher Education Finance Corp., Meridian | |
World School, Series A, 5.25%, 8/15/35 (144A) | 105,091 | |
2,000,000(f) | La Vernia Higher Education Finance Corp., Meridian | |
World School, Series A, 5.50%, 8/15/45 (144A) | 2,111,280 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 27
Schedule of Investments | 8/31/22 (continued)
Principal | ||
Amount | ||
USD ($) | Value | |
Texas — (continued) | ||
1,250,000 | New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., | |
Village On The Park, Series C, 5.50%, 7/1/46 | $ 750,000 | |
1,000,000 | New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., | |
Village On The Park, Series C, 5.75%, 7/1/51 | 600,000 | |
75,000 | New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., | |
Village On The Park, Series D, 6.00%, 7/1/26 | 41,250 | |
1,350,000 | New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., | |
Village On The Park, Series D, 7.00%, 7/1/51 | 810,000 | |
17,350,000(d) | Sanger Industrial Development Corp., Texas Pellets | |
Project, Series B, 8.00%, 7/1/38 | 4,272,437 | |
8,142,447 | Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance | |
Corp., Series A, 5.75%, 12/1/54 | 6,184,026 | |
1,000,000(e) | Texas Midwest Public Facility Corp., Secure Treatment | |
Facility Project, Restructured, 0.001%, 12/1/30 | 550,220 | |
Total Texas | $ 65,187,127 | |
Virginia — 5.6% | ||
3,000,000 | Ballston Quarter Community Development Authority, | |
Series A, 5.50%, 3/1/46 | $ 2,940,000 | |
2,050,000 | Cherry Hill Community Development Authority, | |
Potomac Shores Project, 5.40%, 3/1/45 (144A) | 2,061,870 | |
800,000 | Embrey Mill Community Development Authority, | |
5.30%, 3/1/35 (144A) | 859,128 | |
4,615,000 | Embrey Mill Community Development Authority, | |
5.60%, 3/1/45 (144A) | 4,989,553 | |
21,385,000 | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Series A1, | |
6.706%, 6/1/46 | 20,101,900 | |
51,495,000 | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Series B1, | |
5.00%, 6/1/47 | 51,206,628 | |
5,905,000(e) | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Series B2, | |
5.20%, 6/1/46 | 5,905,413 | |
14,000,000(b) | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Series D, 6/1/47 | 3,270,820 |
Total Virginia | $ 91,335,312 | |
Wisconsin — 2.3% | ||
775,000 | Public Finance Authority, Community School of | |
Davidson Project, 5.00%, 10/1/33 | $ 836,977 | |
5,905,000 | Public Finance Authority, Community School of | |
Davidson Project, 5.00%, 10/1/48 | 6,332,699 | |
1,590,000 | Public Finance Authority, Coral Academy Science | |
Las Vegas, Series A, 5.625%, 7/1/44 | 1,648,289 | |
2,660,000 | Public Finance Authority, Coral Academy Science | |
Reno, 5.00%, 6/1/50 (144A) | 2,792,814 | |
400,000 | Public Finance Authority, Coral Academy Science | |
Reno, Series A, 4.00%, 6/1/36 (144A) | 390,328 | |
700,000 | Public Finance Authority, Coral Academy Science | |
Reno, Series A, 4.00%, 6/1/51 (144A) | 618,023 | |
1,130,000 | Public Finance Authority, Coral Academy Science | |
Reno, Series A, 4.00%, 6/1/61 (144A) | 949,449 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
28 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Principal | ||
Amount | ||
USD ($) | Value | |
Wisconsin — (continued) | ||
9,310,000 | Public Finance Authority, Gardner Webb University, | |
5.00%, 7/1/31 (144A) | $ 9,925,484 | |
275,000 | Public Finance Authority, Lead Academy Project, | |
Series A, 4.25%, 8/1/26 (144A) | 275,316 | |
2,000,000 | Public Finance Authority, Lead Academy Project, | |
Series A, 5.00%, 8/1/36 (144A) | 2,089,760 | |
2,500,000 | Public Finance Authority, Lead Academy Project, | |
Series A, 5.125%, 8/1/46 (144A) | 2,572,975 | |
2,000,000 | Public Finance Authority, SearStone CCRC Project, | |
Series A, 4.00%, 6/1/56 (144A) | 1,447,600 | |
500,000 | Public Finance Authority, SearStone CCRC Project, | |
Series A, 5.00%, 6/1/37 (144A) | 525,820 | |
2,500,000 | Public Finance Authority, SearStone CCRC Project, | |
Series A, 5.00%, 6/1/52 (144A) | 2,549,600 | |
500,000(e) | Public Finance Authority, SearStone CCRC Project, | |
Series A, 5.613%, 6/1/47 | 534,295 | |
2,500,000(e) | Public Finance Authority, SearStone CCRC Project, | |
Series A, 5.688%, 6/1/52 | 2,671,475 | |
10,605,000(b)(d) | Public Finance Authority, Springshire Pre Development | |
Project, 12/1/20 (144A) | 1,060,500 | |
Total Wisconsin | $ 37,221,404 | |
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS | ||
(Cost $1,719,605,965) | $ 1,603,801,239 | |
DEBTORS IN POSSESSION FINANCING — 0.4% | ||
OF NET ASSETS# | ||
Retirement Housing — 0.4% | ||
6,000,000+^ | Springshire Retirement LLC - Promissory Note, | |
9.00%, 12/1/22 | $ 6,000,000 | |
Total Retirement Housing | $ 6,000,000 | |
TOTAL DEBTORS IN POSSESSION FINANCING | ||
(Cost $6,000,000) | $ 6,000,000 | |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN UNAFFILIATED ISSUERS — 99.4% | ||
(Cost $1,725,605,965) | $ 1,609,801,239 | |
OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES — 0.6% | $ 9,485,809 | |
NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $ 1,619,287,048 |
AGM | Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. |
AMBAC | Ambac Assurance Corporation. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 29
Schedule of Investments | 8/31/22 (continued)
RIB | Residual Interest Bond is purchased in a secondary market. The interest rate is subject to change periodically and inversely based upon prevailing market rates. The interest rate shown is the rate at August 31, 2022. |
(144A) | Security is exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. Such securities may be resold normally to qualified institutional buyers in a transaction exempt from registration. At August 31, 2022, the value of these securities amounted to $393,952,510, or 24.3% of net assets. |
(a) | Consists of Revenue Bonds unless otherwise indicated. |
(b) | Security issued with a zero coupon. Income is recognized through accretion of discount. |
(c) | Represents a General Obligation Bond. |
(d) | Security is in default. |
(e) | The interest rate is subject to change periodically. The interest rate and/or reference index and spread shown at August 31, 2022. |
(f) | Pre-refunded bonds have been collateralized by U.S. Treasury or U.S. Government Agency securities which are held in escrow to pay interest and principal on the tax exempt issue and to retire the bonds in full at the earliest refunding date. |
+ | Security is valued using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). |
^ | Security is valued using fair value methods (other than prices supplied by independent pricing services or broker dealers). |
# | Securities are restricted as to resale. |
Acquisition | |||
Restricted Securities | date | Cost | Value |
Springshire Retirement LLC - Promissory Note | 12/1/2021 | $6,000,000 | $6,000,000 |
% of Net Assets | 0.4% |
The concentration of investments as a percentage of total investments by type of obligation/market sector is as follows:
Revenue Bonds: | |
Tobacco Revenue | 24.5% |
Education Revenue | 22.3 |
Development Revenue | 17.1 |
Health Revenue | 16.7 |
Transportation Revenue | 5.3 |
Other Revenue | 3.8 |
Water Revenue | 2.1 |
Facilities Revenue | 1.6 |
Power Revenue | 1.0 |
Industrial Revenue | 0.2 |
Pollution Control Revenue | 0.1 |
Utilities Revenue | 0.1 |
94.8% | |
General Obligation Bonds: | 5.2% |
100.0% |
Purchases and sales of securities (excluding short-term investments) for the year ended August 31, 2022, aggregated $682,626,380 and $771,065,755, respectively.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
30 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
The Portfolio is permitted to engage in purchase and sale transactions (“cross trades”) with certain funds and accounts for which Amundi Asset Management US, Inc. (the “Adviser”) serves as the Portfolio’s investment adviser, as set forth in Rule 17a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, pursuant to procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees. Under these procedures, cross trades are effected at current market prices. During the year ended August 31, 2022, the Portfolio did not engage in any cross trade activity.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Portfolio’s investments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels below.
Level 1 | – unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. |
Level 2 | – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.). |
Level 3 | – significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio’s own assumptions in determining fair value of investments). |
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of August 31, 2022, in valuing the Portfolio’s investments:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||
Debtors in Possession Financing | $ — | $ — | $6,000,000 | $ 6,000,000 | ||
Municipal Bonds | — | 1,603,801,239 | — | 1,603,801,239 | ||
Total Investments in Securities | $ — | $1,603,801,239 | $6,000,000 | $1,609,801,239 | ||
The following is a reconciliation of assets valued using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3): | ||||||
Debtors in | ||||||
Possession | ||||||
Financing | ||||||
Balance as of 8/31/21 | $ — | |||||
Realized gain (loss) | — | |||||
Changed in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | — | |||||
Accrued discounts/premiums | — | |||||
Purchases | 6,000,000 | |||||
Sales | — | |||||
Transfers in to Level 3 | — | |||||
Transfers out of Level 3 | — | |||||
Balance as of 8/31/22 | $ 6,000,000 |
During the year ended August 31, 2022, there were no transfers in or out of Level 3.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 31
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 8/31/22
ASSETS: | |
Investments in unaffiliated issuers, at value (cost $1,725,605,965) | $1,609,801,239 |
Cash | 10,434,437 |
Receivables — | |
Investment securities sold | 270,200 |
Proceeds from contributions | 9,812,705 |
Interest | 27,202,022 |
Other assets | 311,500 |
Total assets | $1,657,832,103 |
LIABILITIES: | |
Payables — | |
Investment securities purchased | $ 36,937,714 |
Value of withdrawals | 1,410,002 |
Trustees’ fees | 12,989 |
Due to affiliates | 90,711 |
Accrued expenses | 93,639 |
Total liabilities | $ 38,545,055 |
NET ASSETS: | |
Paid-in capital | $1,638,577,490 |
Distributable earnings (loss) | (19,290,442) |
Net assets | $1,619,287,048 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
32 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Statement of Operations
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 8/31/22
INVESTMENT INCOME: | ||
Interest from unaffiliated issuers | $84,627,761 | |
Total Investment Income | $ 84,627,761 | |
EXPENSES: | ||
Administrative expenses | $ 135,928 | |
Transfer agent fees | 2,459 | |
Custodian fees | 12,169 | |
Professional fees | 77,275 | |
Printing expense | 925 | |
Pricing fees | 14,230 | |
Trustees’ fees | 85,150 | |
ICI Fees | 22,438 | |
Miscellaneous | 720 | |
Total expenses | $ 351,294 | |
Net investment income | $ 84,276,467 | |
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) | ||
ON INVESTMENTS: | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on: | ||
Investments in unaffiliated issuers | $ (49,557,811) | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | ||
Investments in unaffiliated issuers | $(223,692,236) | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $(273,250,047) | |
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations | $(188,973,580) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 33
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
Year | ||
Ended | 12/21/20 to | |
8/31/22 | 8/31/21* | |
FROM OPERATIONS: | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ 84,276,467 | $ 58,334,376 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (49,557,811) | 3,461,252 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||
on investments | (223,692,236) | 54,564,035 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | ||
from operations | $ (188,973,580) | $ 116,359,663 |
FROM CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS: | ||
Proceeds from contributions | $ 821,599,552 | $ 221,001,901 |
Value of withdrawals | (1,068,188,723) | (43,510,000) |
In-kind subscriptions | — | 1,760,998,235 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | ||
from capital transactions | $ (246,589,171) | $1,938,490,136 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | $ (435,562,751) | $2,054,849,799 |
NET ASSETS: | ||
Beginning of year | $2,054,849,799 | $ — |
End of year | $1,619,287,048 | $2,054,849,799 |
* The Portfolio commenced operations on December 21, 2020. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
34 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Financial Highlights
Year | ||
Ended | 12/21/20 to | |
8/31/22 | 8/31/21* | |
Total return | (9.34)% | 6.30%(a) |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 0.02% | 0.02%(b) |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average | ||
net assets | 4.47% | 3.07%(b) |
Portfolio turnover rate | 38% | 11%(a)(c) |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $1,619,287 | $2,054,850 |
* | The Portfolio commenced operations on December 21, 2020. |
(a) | Not annualized. |
(b) | Annualized. |
(c) | The portfolio turnover rate excludes purchases and sales from the transfer of assets from Pioneer High Income Municipal Fund (see note 1). |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 35
Notes to Financial Statements | 8/31/22
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio (the “Portfolio”) is a diversified series of Pioneer Core Trust I (the “Trust”), an open-end management investment company established as a Delaware statutory trust on October 14, 2020. The Portfolio is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The investment objective of the Portfolio is to maximize total return through a combination of income that is exempt from regular federal income tax and capital appreciation.
The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue beneficial interests in the Portfolio. At August 31, 2022, all investors in the Portfolio were funds advised by the investment adviser of the Portfolio. At August 31, 2022, Pioneer High Income Municipal Fund owned approximately 99.999% of the Portfolio and Pioneer MAP-High Income Municipal Fund owned approximately 0.001% of the Portfolio. On December 21, 2020, the Pioneer High Income Municipal Fund transferred all of its investable assets, with a cost basis of $1,707,664,760 and a value of $1,760,998,235, to the Portfolio in exchange for an interest in the Portfolio. The transaction was structured to qualify as a tax-free exchange of assets.
Amundi Asset Management US, Inc., an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Amundi and Amundi’s wholly owned subsidiary, Amundi USA, Inc., serves as the Portfolio’s investment adviser (the “Adviser”). Amundi Distributor US, Inc., an affiliate of the Adviser, serves as the Portfolio’s placement agent.
In March 2020, FASB issued an Accounting Standard Update, ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) — Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (“ASU 2020-04”), which provides optional, temporary relief with respect to the financial reporting of contracts subject to certain types of modifications due to the planned discontinuation of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and other LIBOR-based reference rates at the end of 2021. The temporary relief provided by ASU 2020-04 is effective for certain reference rate-related contract modifications that occur during the period from March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. Management is evaluating the impact of ASU 2020-04 on the Portfolio’s investments, derivatives, debt and other contracts, if applicable, that will undergo reference rate-related modifications as a result of the reference rate reform.
36 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Effective August 19, 2022, the Portfolio is required to comply with Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act, which governs the use of derivatives by registered investment companies. Rule 18f-4 permits portfolios to enter into derivatives transactions (as defined in Rule 18f-4) and certain other transactions notwithstanding the restrictions on the issuance of “senior securities” under Section 18 of the 1940 Act. Rule 18f-4 requires a portfolio, to establish and maintain a comprehensive derivatives risk management program, appoint a derivatives risk manager and comply with a relative or absolute limit on portfolio leverage risk calculated based on value-at-risk (“VaR”), unless the portfolio uses derivatives in only a limited manner.
The Portfolio is an investment company and follows investment company accounting and reporting guidance under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”). U.S. GAAP requires the management of the Portfolio to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income, expenses and gain or loss on investments during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Portfolio in the preparation of its financial statements:
A. Security Valuation
Investments are stated at value, computed once daily, on each day the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) is open, as of the close of regular trading on the NYSE.
Fixed-income securities are valued by using prices supplied by independent pricing services, which consider such factors as market prices, market events, quotations from one or more brokers, Treasury spreads, yields, maturities and ratings, or may use a pricing matrix or other fair value methods or techniques to provide an estimated value of the security or instrument. A pricing matrix is a means of valuing a debt security on the basis of current market prices for other debt securities, historical trading patterns in the market for fixed-income securities and/or other factors. Non-U.S. debt securities that are listed on an exchange will be valued at the bid price obtained from an independent third party pricing service. When independent third party pricing services are unable to supply prices, or when prices or market quotations are considered to be unreliable, the value of that security may be determined using quotations from one or more broker-dealers.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22 37
Securities for which independent pricing services or broker-dealers are unable to supply prices or for which market prices and/or quotations are not readily available or are considered to be unreliable are valued by a fair valuation team comprised of certain personnel of the Adviser. Effective September 8, 2022, the Adviser is designated as the valuation designee for the Fund pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. The Adviser’s fair valuation team is responsible for monitoring developments that may impact fair valued securities.
Inputs used when applying fair value methods to value a security may include credit ratings, the financial condition of the company, current market conditions and comparable securities. The Portfolio may use fair value methods if it is determined that a significant event has occurred after the close of the exchange or market on which the security trades and prior to the determination of the Portfolio’s net asset value. Examples of a significant event might include political or economic news, corporate restructurings, natural disasters, terrorist activity or trading halts. Thus, the valuation of the Portfolio’s securities may differ significantly from exchange prices, and such differences could be material.
At August 31, 2022, one security was valued using fair value methods representing 0.37% of net assets. The value of this fair valued security was $6,000,000.
B. Investment Income and Transactions
Interest income, including interest on income-bearing cash accounts, is recorded on the accrual basis. Dividend and interest income are reported net of unrecoverable foreign taxes withheld at the applicable country rates and net of income accrued on defaulted securities.
Interest and dividend income payable by delivery of additional shares is reclassified as PIK (payment-in-kind) income upon receipt and is included in interest and dividend income, respectively.
Security transactions are recorded as of trade date. Gains and losses on sales of investments are calculated on the identified cost method for both financial reporting and federal income tax purposes.
The Portfolio makes a daily allocation of its net investment income and realized and unrealized gains and losses from securities to its investors in proportion to their investment in the Portfolio.
C. Federal Income Taxes
The Portfolio is classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. As such, each investor in the Portfolio is treated as the owner of its proportionate share of the net assets, income, expenses and realized and unrealized gains and losses of the Portfolio. Therefore, no federal income
38 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
tax provision is required. It is intended that the Portfolio’s assets will be managed so an investor in the Portfolio can satisfy the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code.
Management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken on income tax returns for all open tax years and has concluded no provision for income tax is required in the Portfolio’s financial statements. The Portfolio’s federal and state income and federal excise tax returns for tax years for which the applicable statutes of limitations have not expired are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state departments of revenue.
D. Risks
The value of securities held by the Portfolio may go up or down, sometimes rapidly or unpredictably, due to general market conditions, such as real or perceived adverse economic, political or regulatory conditions, recessions, the spread of infectious illness or other public health issues, inflation, changes in interest rates, armed conflict including Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine, sanctions against Russia, other nations or individuals or companies and possible countermeasures, lack of liquidity in the bond markets or adverse investor sentiment. In the past several years, financial markets have experienced increased volatility, depressed valuations, decreased liquidity and heightened uncertainty. These conditions may continue, recur, worsen or spread. Interest rates are very low, which means there is more risk that they may go up. The U.S. Federal Reserve has recently started to raise certain interest rates. A general rise in interest rates could adversely affect the price and liquidity of fixed-income securities and could also result in increased redemptions from the Portfolio. Rates of inflation have recently risen. The value of assets or income from an investment may be worth less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the real value of the Portfolio’s assets can decline as can the value of the Portfolio’s distributions.
The global pandemic of the novel coronavirus respiratory disease designated COVID-19 has resulted in major disruption to economies and markets around the world, including the United States. Global financial markets have experienced extreme volatility and severe losses, and trading in many instruments has been disrupted. Liquidity for many instruments has been greatly reduced for periods of time. Some sectors of the economy and individual issuers have experienced particularly large losses. These circumstances may continue for an extended period of time, and may continue to affect adversely the value and liquidity of the Portfolio’s investments. Following Russia’s recent invasion of Ukraine, Russian
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22 39
securities have lost all, or nearly all, their market value. Other securities or markets could be similarly affected by past or future geopolitical or other events or conditions.
Governments and central banks, including the U.S. Federal Reserve, have taken extraordinary and unprecedented actions to support local and global economies and the financial markets. These actions have resulted in significant expansion of public debt, including in the U.S. The consequences of high public debt, including its future impact on the economy and securities markets, may not be known for some time.
At times, the Portfolio’s investments may represent industries or industry sectors that are interrelated or have common risks, making the Portfolio more susceptible to any economic, political, or regulatory developments or other risks affecting those industries and sectors.
The municipal bond market can be susceptible to unusual volatility, particularly for lower-rated and unrated securities. Liquidity can be reduced unpredictably in response to overall economic conditions or credit tightening. Municipal issuers may be adversely affected by rising health care costs, increasing unfunded pension liabilities, and by the phasing out of federal programs providing financial support. Unfavorable conditions and developments relating to projects financed with municipal securities can result in lower revenues to issuers of municipal securities, potentially resulting in defaults. Issuers often depend on revenues from these projects to make principal and interest payments. The value of municipal securities can also be adversely affected by changes in the financial condition of one or more individual municipal issuers or insurers of municipal issuers, regulatory and political developments, tax law changes or other legislative actions, and by uncertainties and public perceptions concerning these and other factors. Municipal securities may be more susceptible to downgrades or defaults during recessions or similar periods of economic stress. Financial difficulties of municipal issuers may continue or get worse, particularly in the event of economic or market turmoil or a recession. To the extent the Portfolio invests significantly in a single state (including California, Illinois, New York and Indiana), city, territory (including Puerto Rico), or region, or in securities the payments on which are dependent upon a single project or source of revenues, or that relate to a sector or industry, including health care facilities, education, transportation, special revenues and pollution control, the Portfolio will be more susceptible to associated risks and developments.
40 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
The Portfolio invests in below-investment-grade (high-yield) debt securities and preferred stocks. Some of these high-yield securities may be convertible into equity securities of the issuer. Debt securities rated below-investment-grade are commonly referred to as “junk bonds” and are considered speculative with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal. These securities involve greater risk of loss, are subject to greater price volatility, may be less liquid and more difficult to value, especially during periods of economic uncertainty or change, than higher rated debt securities.
The Portfolio’s investments, payment obligations and financing terms may be based on floating rates, such as LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate). or Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR). ICE Benchmark Administration, the administrator of LIBOR, ceased publication of most LIBOR settings on a representative basis at the end of 2021 and is expected to cease publication of a majority of U.S. dollar LIBOR settings on a representative basis after June 30, 2023. In addition, global regulators have announced that, with limited exceptions, no new LIBOR-based contracts should be entered into after 2021. Actions by regulators have resulted in the establishment of alternative reference rates to LIBOR in most major currencies. Markets are developing in response to these new rates, but questions around liquidity in these rates and how to appropriately adjust these rates to eliminate any economic value transfer at the time of transition remain a significant concern. The effect of any changes to - or discontinuation of - LIBOR on the Portfolio will vary depending on, among other things, existing fallback provisions in individual contracts and whether, how, and when industry participants develop and widely adopt new reference rates and fallbacks for both legacy and new products and instruments. In March, 2022, the U.S. federal government enacted legislation to establish a process for replacing LIBOR in existing contracts that do not already provide for the use of a clearly defined or practicable replacement benchmark rate as described in the legislation. Generally speaking, for contracts that do not contain a fallback provision as described in the legislation, a benchmark replacement recommended by the Federal Reserve Board will effectively automatically replace the USD LIBOR benchmark in the contract after June 30, 2023. The recommended benchmark replacement will be based on the SOFR published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, including any recommended spread adjustment and benchmark replacement conforming changes. The process of transitioning from LIBOR may involve, among other things, increased volatility or illiquidity in markets for instruments that rely on LIBOR. The transition may also result in a reduction in the value of certain LIBOR-based investments held by the Portfolio or reduce the effectiveness of related transactions such as hedges. Any such effects of the transition away
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 41
from LIBOR, as well as other unforeseen effects, could result in losses for the Portfolio. Because the usefulness of LIBOR as a benchmark may deteriorate during the transition period, these effects could occur at any time.
With the increased use of technologies such as the Internet to conduct business, the Portfolio is susceptible to operational, information security and related risks. While the Portfolio’s Adviser has established business continuity plans in the event of, and risk management systems to prevent, limit or mitigate, such cyber-attacks, there are inherent limitations in such plans and systems, including the possibility that certain risks have not been identified. Furthermore, the Portfolio cannot control the cybersecurity plans and systems put in place by service providers to the Portfolio such as the Portfolio’s custodian and accounting agent, and the Portfolio’s transfer agent. In addition, many beneficial owners of Portfolio shares hold them through accounts at broker-dealers, retirement platforms and other financial market participants over which neither the Portfolio nor the Adviser exercises control. Each of these may in turn rely on service providers to them, which are also subject to the risk of cyber-attacks. Cybersecurity failures or breaches at the Adviser or the Portfolio’s service providers or intermediaries have the ability to cause disruptions and impact business operations, potentially resulting in financial losses, interference with the Portfolio’s ability to calculate its net asset value, impediments to trading, the inability of Portfolio shareowners to effect share purchases, redemptions or exchanges or receive distributions, loss of or unauthorized access to private shareowner information and violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputational damage, or additional compliance costs. Such costs and losses may not be covered under any insurance. In addition, maintaining vigilance against cyber-attacks may involve substantial costs over time, and system enhancements may themselves be subject to cyber-attacks.
The Portfolio’s registration statement on Form N-1A contains unaudited information regarding the Portfolio’s principal risks. Please refer to that document when considering the Portfolio’s principal risks.
E. Restricted Securities
Restricted Securities are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Restricted securities generally are resold in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. Private placement securities are generally considered to be restricted except for those securities traded between qualified institutional investors under the provisions of Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.
42 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Disposal of restricted investments may involve negotiations and expenses, and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult to achieve. Restricted investments held by the Portfolio at August 31, 2022 are listed in the Schedule of Investments.
2. Management Agreement
The Adviser manages the Portfolio’s portfolio. The Portfolio does not pay a management fee under the Portfolio’s investment advisory agreement with the Adviser. Shareholders should be aware, however, that the Portfolio is an integral part of separately managed account programs, and the Adviser or an affiliate will be compensated directly or indirectly by separately managed account program sponsor.
3. Compensation of Trustees and Officers
The Portfolio pays an annual fee to its Trustees. The Adviser reimburses the Portfolio for fees paid to the Interested Trustees. The Portfolio does not pay any salary or other compensation to its officers. For the year ended August 31, 2022, the Portfolio paid $85,150 in Trustees’ compensation, which is reflected on the Statement of Operations as Trustees’ fees. At August 31, 2022, the Portfolio had a payable for Trustees’ fees on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities of $12,989.
4. Transfer Agent
For the period from September 1, 2021 to November 21, 2021, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. served as the transfer agent to the Portfolio at negotiated rates. Effective November 22, 2021, BNY Mellon Investment Servicing (US) Inc. serves as the transfer agent to the Portfolio at negotiated rates.
5. Changes in Custodian and Sub-Administrator, and Transfer Agent
Effective November 22, 2021, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”) serves as the Portfolio’s Custodian and Sub-Administrator.
Effective November 22, 2021, BNY Mellon Investment Servicing (US) Inc. serves as the Portfolio’s transfer agent.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22 43
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Trustees of Pioneer Core Trust I and the Shareowners of Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Pioneer Core Trust I (the “Trust”)), including the schedule of investments, as of August 31, 2022, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets and the financial highlights for the year ended August 31, 2022 and the period from December 21, 2020 (commencement of operations) through August 31, 2021 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio (one of the funds constituting Pioneer Core Trust I) at August 31, 2022, and the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets and its financial highlights for the year ended August 31, 2022 and the period from December 21, 2020 (commencement of operations) through August 31, 2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Trust’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Fund’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities law and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
44 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of August 31, 2022, by correspondence with the custodian, brokers and others; when replies were not received from brokers and others, we performed other auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have served as the auditor of one or more investment companies in the Pioneer family of funds since 2017.
Boston, Massachusetts
October 28, 2022
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 45
Statement Regarding Liquidity Risk Management Program
As required by law, the Portfolio has adopted and implemented a liquidity risk management program (the “Program”) that is designed to assess and manage liquidity risk. Liquidity risk is the risk that the Portfolio could not meet requests to effect withdrawals from the Portfolio without significant dilution of remaining investors’ interests in the Portfolio. The Portfolio’s Board of Trustees designated a liquidity risk management committee (the “Committee”) consisting of employees of Amundi Asset Management US, Inc. (the “Adviser”) to administer the Program.
The Committee provided the Board of Trustees with a report that addressed the operation of the Program and assessed its adequacy and effectiveness of implementation (the “Report”). The Report covered the period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 (the “Reporting Period”).
The Report confirmed that, throughout the Reporting Period, the Committee had monitored the Portfolio’s portfolio liquidity and liquidity risk on an ongoing basis, as described in the Program and in Board reporting throughout the Reporting Period.
The Report discussed the Committee’s annual review of the Program, which addressed, among other things, the following elements of the Program:
The Committee reviewed the Portfolio’s investment strategy and liquidity of portfolio investments during both normal and reasonably foreseeable stressed conditions. The Committee noted that the Portfolio’s investment strategy continues to be appropriate for an open-end fund, taking into account, among other things, whether and to what extent the Portfolio held less liquid and illiquid assets and the extent to which any such investments affected the Portfolio’s ability to meet withdrawal requests. In managing and reviewing the Portfolio’s liquidity risk, the Committee also considered the extent to which the Portfolio’s investment strategy involves a relatively concentrated portfolio or large positions in particular issuers, the extent to which the Portfolio uses borrowing for investment purposes, and the extent to which the Portfolio uses derivatives (including for hedging purposes). The Committee also reviewed the Portfolio’s short-term and long-term cash flow projections during both normal and reasonably foreseeable stressed conditions. In assessing the Portfolio’s cash flow projections, the Committee considered, among other factors, historical net withdrawal activity, withdrawal policies, ownership concentration, and the degree of certainty associated with the Portfolio’s short-term and long-term cash flow projections. The Committee also considered the Portfolio’s holdings of cash
46 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
and cash equivalents, as well as borrowing arrangements and other funding sources, including, if applicable, the Portfolio’s participation in a credit facility, as components of the Portfolio’s ability to meet withdrawal requests. The Portfolio has adopted an in-kind redemption policy which may be utilized to meet larger withdrawal requests.
The Committee reviewed the Program’s liquidity classification methodology for categorizing the Portfolio’s investments into one of four liquidity buckets. In reviewing the Portfolio’s investments, the Committee considered, among other factors, whether trading varying portions of a position in a particular portfolio investment or asset class in sizes the Portfolio would reasonably anticipate trading, would be reasonably expected to significantly affect liquidity.
The Committee performed an analysis to determine whether the Portfolio is required to maintain a Highly Liquid Investment Minimum, and determined that no such minimum is required because the Portfolio primarily holds highly liquid investments.
The Report stated that the Committee concluded the Program operates adequately and effectively, in all material respects, to assess and manage the Portfolio’s liquidity risk throughout the Reporting Period.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22 47
Trustees, Officers and Service Providers
Investment Adviser and Administrator
Amundi Asset Management US, Inc.
Custodian and Sub-Administrator
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
Placement Agent
Amundi Distributor US, Inc.
Legal Counsel
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Transfer Agent
BNY Mellon Investment Servicing (US) Inc.
Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures of the Portfolio are available without charge, upon request, by calling our toll free number (1-800-225-6292). Information regarding how the Portfolio voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is publicly available to investors at www.amundi.com/us. This information is also available on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s web site at www.sec.gov.
Trustees and Officers
The Portfolio’s Trustees and officers are listed below, together with their principal occupations and other directorships they have held during at least the past five years. Trustees who are interested persons of the Portfolio within the meaning of the 1940 Act are referred to as Interested Trustees. Trustees who are not interested persons of the Portfolio are referred to as Independent Trustees. Each of the Trustees serves as a Trustee of each of the 49 U.S. registered investment portfolios for which Amundi US serves as investment adviser (the “Pioneer Funds”). The address for all Trustees and all officers of the Portfolio is 60 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.
The Registration Statement of the Portfolio includes additional information about the Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-6292.
48 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Independent Trustees
Name, Age and Position | Term of Office and | Principal Occupation(s) During At Least | Other Directorships Held by Trustee |
Held With the Fund | Length of Service | The Past Five Years | During At Least The Past Five Years |
Thomas J. Perna (71) | Trustee since 2006. | Private investor (2004 – 2008 and 2013 – present); Chairman (2008 – 2013) | Director, Broadridge Financial |
Chairman of the Board | Serves until a successor | and Chief Executive Officer (2008 – 2012), Quadriserv, Inc. (technology | Solutions, Inc. (investor |
and Trustee | trustee is elected or | products for securities lending industry); and Senior Executive Vice President, | communications and securities |
earlier retirement | The Bank of New York (financial and securities services) (1986 – 2004) | processing provider for financial | |
or removal. | services industry) (2009 – present); | ||
Director, Quadriserv, Inc. (2005 – | |||
2013); and Commissioner, New | |||
Jersey State Civil Service | |||
Commission (2011 – 2015) | |||
John E. Baumgardner, | Trustee since 2019. | Of Counsel (2019 – present), Partner (1983-2018), Sullivan & | Chairman, The Lakeville Journal |
Jr. (71)* | Serves until a successor | Cromwell LLP (law firm). | Company, LLC, (privately-held |
Trustee | trustee is elected or | community newspaper group) | |
earlier retirement | (2015-present) | ||
or removal. | |||
Diane Durnin (65) | Trustee since 2019. | Managing Director - Head of Product Strategy and Development, BNY | None |
Trustee | Serves until a successor | Mellon Investment Management (investment management firm) (2012-2018); | |
trustee is elected or | Vice Chairman – The Dreyfus Corporation (2005 – 2018): Executive Vice | ||
earlier retirement | President Head of Product, BNY Mellon Investment Management | ||
or removal. | (2007-2012); Executive Director- Product Strategy, Mellon Asset Management | ||
(2005-2007); Executive Vice President Head of Products, Marketing and | |||
Client Service, Dreyfus Corporation (investment management firm) | |||
(2000-2005); Senior Vice President Strategic Product and Business | |||
Development, Dreyfus Corporation (1994-2000) |
* | Mr. Baumgardner is Of Counsel to Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, which acts as counsel to the Independent Trustees of each Pioneer Fund. |
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22 49
Independent Trustees (continued)
Name, Age and Position | Term of Office and | Principal Occupation(s) During At Least | Other Directorships Held by Trustee |
Held With the Fund | Length of Service | The Past Five Years | During At Least The Past Five Years |
Benjamin M. Friedman (78) | Trustee since 2008. | William Joseph Maier Professor of Political Economy, Harvard University | Trustee, Mellon Institutional Funds |
Trustee | Serves until a successor | (1972 – present) | Investment Trust and Mellon |
trustee is elected or | Institutional Funds Master Portfolio | ||
earlier retirement | (oversaw 17 portfolios in fund | ||
or removal. | complex) (1989 - 2008) | ||
Craig C. MacKay (59) | Trustee since 2021. | Partner, England & Company, LLC (advisory firm) (2012 – present); Group | Director, Equitable Holdings, Inc. |
Trustee | Serves until a successor | Head – Leveraged Finance Distribution, Oppenheimer & Company | (financial services holding company) |
trustee is elected or | (investment bank) (2006 – 2012); Group Head – Private Finance & High Yield | (2022 – present); Board Member of | |
earlier retirement | Capital Markets Origination, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey (investment | Carver Bancorp, Inc. (holding | |
or removal. | bank) (2003 – 2006); and Founder and Chief Executive Officer, HNY | company) and Carver Federal | |
Associates, LLC (investment bank) (1996 – 2003) | Savings Bank, NA (2017 – present); | ||
Advisory Council Member, | |||
MasterShares ETF (2016 – 2017); | |||
Advisory Council Member, The Deal | |||
(financial market information | |||
publisher) (2015 – 2016); Board Co- | |||
Chairman and Chief Executive | |||
Officer, Danis Transportation | |||
Company (privately-owned | |||
commercial carrier) (2000 – 2003); | |||
Board Member and Chief Financial | |||
Officer, Customer Access Resources | |||
(privately-owned teleservices | |||
company) (1998 – 2000); Board | |||
Member, Federation of Protestant | |||
Welfare Agencies (human services | |||
agency) (1993 – present); and Board | |||
Treasurer, Harlem Dowling Westside | |||
Center (foster care agency) | |||
(1999 – 2018) |
50 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Name, Age and Position | Term of Office and | Principal Occupation(s) During At Least | Other Directorships Held by Trustee |
Held With the Fund | Length of Service | The Past Five Years | During At Least The Past Five Years |
Lorraine H. Monchak (66) | Trustee since 2017. | Chief Investment Officer, 1199 SEIU Funds (healthcare workers union | None |
Trustee | (Advisory Trustee from | pension funds) (2001 – present); Vice President – International Investments | |
2014 - 2017). Serves until | Group, American International Group, Inc. (insurance company) | ||
a successor trustee is | (1993 – 2001); Vice President – Corporate Finance and Treasury Group, | ||
elected or earlier | Citibank, N.A. (1980 – 1986 and 1990 – 1993); Vice President – Asset/Liability | ||
retirement or removal. | Management Group, Federal Farm Funding Corporation (government- | ||
sponsored issuer of debt securities) (1988 – 1990); Mortgage Strategies | |||
Group, Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. (investment bank) (1987 – 1988); | |||
Mortgage Strategies Group, Drexel Burnham Lambert, Ltd. (investment bank) | |||
(1986 – 1987) | |||
Marguerite A. Piret (74) | Trustee since 2006. | Chief Financial Officer, American Ag Energy, Inc. (controlled environment | Director of New America High |
Trustee | Serves until a successor | and agriculture company) (2016 – present); President and Chief Executive | Income Fund, Inc. (closed-end |
trustee is elected or | Officer, Metric Financial Inc. (formerly known as Newbury Piret Company) | investment company) | |
earlier retirement | (investment banking firm) (1981 – 2019) | (2004 – present); and Member, | |
or removal. | Board of Governors, Investment | ||
Company Institute (2000 – 2006) | |||
Fred J. Ricciardi (75) | Trustee since 2014. | Private investor (2020 – present); Consultant (investment company services) | None |
Trustee | Serves until a successor | (2012 – 2020); Executive Vice President, BNY Mellon (financial and investment | |
trustee is elected or | company services) (1969 – 2012); Director, BNY International Financing Corp. | ||
earlier retirement | (financial services) (2002 – 2012); Director, Mellon Overseas Investment Corp. | ||
or removal. | (financial services) (2009 – 2012); Director, Financial Models (technology) | ||
(2005-2007); Director, BNY Hamilton Funds, Ireland (offshore investment | |||
companies) (2004-2007); Chairman/Director, AIB/BNY Securities Services, Ltd., | |||
Ireland (financial services) (1999-2006); Chairman, BNY Alternative Investment | |||
Services, Inc. (financial services) (2005-2007) |
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22 51
Interested Trustees
Name, Age and Position | Term of Office and | Principal Occupation(s) During At Least | Other Directorships Held by Trustee |
Held With the Fund | Length of Service | The Past Five Years | During At Least The Past Five Years |
Lisa M. Jones (60)** | Trustee since 2017. | Director, CEO and President of Amundi US, Inc. (investment management | Director of Clearwater Analytics |
Trustee, President and Chief | Serves until a successor | firm) (since September 2014); Director, CEO and President of Amundi Asset | (provider of web-based |
Executive Officer | trustee is elected or | Management US, Inc. (since September 2014); Director, CEO and President | investment accounting software |
earlier retirement | of Amundi Distributor US, Inc. (since September 2014); Director, CEO and | for reporting and reconciliation | |
or removal | President of Amundi Asset Management US, Inc. (since September 2014); | services) (September 2022 – | |
Chair, Amundi US, Inc., Amundi Distributor US, Inc. and Amundi Asset | present) | ||
Management US, Inc. (September 2014 – 2018); Managing Director, Morgan | |||
Stanley Investment Management (investment management firm) | |||
(2010 – 2013); Director of Institutional Business, CEO of International, Eaton | |||
Vance Management (investment management firm) (2005 – 2010); Director | |||
of Amundi Holdings US, Inc. (since 2017) | |||
Kenneth J. Taubes (64)** | Trustee since 2014. | Director and Executive Vice President (since 2008) and Chief Investment | None |
Trustee | Serves until a successor | Officer, U.S. (since 2010) of Amundi US, Inc. (investment management firm); | |
trustee is elected or | Director and Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer, U.S. of | ||
earlier retirement | Amundi US (since 2008); Executive Vice President and Chief Investment | ||
or removal | Officer, U.S. of Amundi Asset Management US, Inc. (since 2009); Portfolio | ||
Manager of Amundi US (since 1999); Director of Amundi Holdings US, Inc. | |||
(since 2017) |
** | Ms. Jones and Mr. Taubes are Interested Trustees because they are officers or directors of the Fund’s investment adviser and certain of its affiliates. |
52 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
Fund Officers
Name, Age and Position | Term of Office and | Principal Occupation(s) During At Least | Other Directorships Held by Officer |
Held With the Fund | Length of Service | The Past Five Years | During At Least The Past Five Years |
Christopher J. Kelley (57) | Since 2006. Serves at the | Vice President and Associate General Counsel of Amundi US since | None |
Secretary and Chief | discretion of the Board | January 2008; Secretary and Chief Legal Officer of all of the Pioneer Funds | |
Legal Officer | since June 2010; Assistant Secretary of all of the Pioneer Funds from | ||
September 2003 to May 2010; Vice President and Senior Counsel of | |||
Amundi US from July 2002 to December 2007 | |||
Thomas Reyes (59) | Since 2010. Serves at the | Assistant General Counsel of Amundi US since May 2013 and Assistant | None |
Assistant Secretary | discretion of the Board | Secretary of all the Pioneer Funds since June 2010; Counsel of Amundi US | |
from June 2007 to May 2013 | |||
Anthony J. Koenig, Jr. (58) | Since 2021. Serves at the | Managing Director, Chief Operations Officer and Fund Treasurer of | None |
Treasurer and | discretion of the Board | Amundi US since May 2021; Treasurer of all of the Pioneer Funds since | |
Chief Financial and | May 2021; Assistant Treasurer of all of the Pioneer Funds from January 2021 | ||
Accounting Officer | to May 2021; and Chief of Staff, US Investment Management of Amundi US | ||
from May 2008 to January 2021 | |||
Luis I. Presutti (57) | Since 2006. Serves at the | Director – Fund Treasury of Amundi US since 1999; and Assistant Treasurer | None |
Assistant Treasurer | discretion of the Board | of all of the Pioneer Funds since 1999 | |
Gary Sullivan (64) | Since 2006. Serves at the | Senior Manager – Fund Treasury of Amundi US since 2012; and Assistant | None |
Assistant Treasurer | discretion of the Board | Treasurer of all of the Pioneer Funds since 2002 | |
Antonio Furtado (40) | Since 2020. Serves at the | Fund Oversight Manager – Fund Treasury of Amundi US since 2020; | None |
Assistant Treasurer | discretion of the Board | Assistant Treasurer of all of the Pioneer Funds since 2020; and Senior Fund | |
Treasury Analyst from 2012 - 2020 |
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22 53
Fund Officers (continued)
Name, Age and Position | Term of Office and | Principal Occupation(s) During At Least | Other Directorships Held by Officer |
Held With the Fund | Length of Service | The Past Five Years | During At Least The Past Five Years |
Michael Melnick (51) | Since 2021. Serves at the | Vice President - Deputy Fund Treasurer of Amundi US since May 2021; | None |
Assistant Treasurer | discretion of the Board | Assistant Treasurer of all of the Pioneer Funds since July 2021; Director of | |
Regulatory Reporting of Amundi US from 2001 – 2021; and Director of Tax | |||
of Amundi US from 2000 - 2001 | |||
John Malone (51) | Since 2018. Serves at the | Managing Director, Chief Compliance Officer of Amundi US Asset | None |
Chief Compliance Officer | discretion of the Board | Management; Amundi Asset Management US, Inc.; and the Pioneer Funds | |
since September 2018; Chief Compliance Officer of Amundi Distributor US, Inc. | |||
since January 2014. | |||
Brandon Austin (50) | Since March 2022. Serves | Director, Financial Security – Amundi Asset Management; Anti-Money | None |
Anti-Money | at the discretion of | Laundering Officer of all the Pioneer Funds since March 2022 Director of | |
Laundering Officer | the Board | Financial Security of Amundi US since July 2021; Vice President, Head of | |
BSA, AML and OFAC, Deputy Compliance Manager, Crédit Agricole Indosuez | |||
Wealth Management (investment management firm) (2013 – 2021) |
54 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
This page was intentionally left blank.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 55
This page was intentionally left blank.
56 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
This page was intentionally left blank.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 57
This page was intentionally left blank.
58 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
This page was intentionally left blank.
Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfoli | Annual Report | 8/31/22 59
This page was intentionally left blank.
60 Pioneer High Income Municipal Portfolio | Annual Report | 8/31/22
This report must be preceded or accompanied by the Portfolio’s registration statement.
The Portfolio files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT. Investors may view the filed Form N-PORT by visiting the Commission’s web site at https://www.sec.gov.
Amundi
Asset Management US, Inc.
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
www.amundi.com/us
© 2022 Amundi Asset Management US, Inc. 32720-01-1022
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.
(a) Disclose whether, as of the end of the period covered by the report, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant or a third party. If the registrant has not adopted such a code of ethics, explain why it has not done so.
The registrant has adopted, as of the end of the period covered by this report, a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller.
(b) For purposes of this Item, the term “code of ethics” means written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:
(1) Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
(2) Full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that a registrant files with, or submits to, the Commission and in other public communications made by the registrant;
(3) Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules, and regulations;
(4) The prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the code; and
(5) Accountability for adherence to the code.
(c) The registrant must briefly describe the nature of any amendment, during the period covered by the report, to a provision of its code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant or a third party, and that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in paragraph (b) of this Item. The registrant must file a copy of any such amendment as an exhibit pursuant to Item 10(a), unless the registrant has elected to satisfy paragraph (f) of this Item by posting its code of ethics on its website pursuant to paragraph (f)(2) of this Item, or by undertaking to provide its code of ethics to any person without charge, upon request, pursuant to paragraph (f)(3) of this Item.
The registrant has made no amendments to the code of ethics during the period covered by this report.
(d) If the registrant has, during the period covered by the report, granted a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the code of ethics to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant or a third party, that relates to one or more of the items set forth in paragraph (b) of this Item, the registrant must briefly describe the nature of the waiver, the name of the person to whom the waiver was granted, and the date of the waiver.
Not applicable.
(e) If the registrant intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement under paragraph (c) or (d) of this Item regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of its code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions and that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in paragraph (b) of this Item by posting such information on its Internet website, disclose the registrant’s Internet address and such intention.
Not applicable.
(f) The registrant must:
(1) File with the Commission, pursuant to Item 12(a)(1), a copy of its code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, as an exhibit to its annual report on this Form N-CSR (see attachment);
(2) Post the text of such code of ethics on its Internet website and disclose, in its most recent report on this Form N-CSR, its Internet address and the fact that it has posted such code of ethics on its Internet website; or
(3) Undertake in its most recent report on this Form N-CSR to provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of such code of ethics and explain the manner in which such request may be made. See Item 10(2)
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
(a) (1) Disclose that the registrant’s Board of Trustees has determined that the registrant either:
(i) Has at least one audit committee financial expert serving on its audit committee; or
(ii) Does not have an audit committee financial expert serving on its audit committee.
The registrant’s Board of Trustees has determined that the registrant has at least one audit committee financial expert.
(2) If the registrant provides the disclosure required by paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this Item, it must disclose the name of the audit committee financial expert and whether that person is “independent.” In order to be considered “independent” for purposes of this Item, a member of an audit committee may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee, the Board of Trustees, or any other board committee:
(i) Accept directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the issuer; or
(ii) Be an “interested person” of the investment company as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(19)).
Mr. Fred J. Ricciardi, an independent Trustee, is such an audit committee financial expert.
(3) If the registrant provides the disclosure required by paragraph (a)(1) (ii) of this Item, it must explain why it does not have an audit committee financial expert.
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
(a) Disclose, under the caption AUDIT FEES, the aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years.
The audit fees for the Trust were $47,300 payable to Ernst & Young LLP for the year ended August 31, 2022 and $44,000 for the year ended August 31, 2021.
(b) Disclose, under the caption AUDIT-RELATED FEES, the aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item. Registrants shall describe the nature of the services comprising the fees disclosed under this category.
There were no audit-related services in 2022 or 2021.
(c) Disclose, under the caption TAX FEES, the aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. Registrants shall describe the nature of the services comprising the fees disclosed under this category.
The Trust paid aggregate non-audit fees to Ernst & Young LLP for tax services of $17,200 and $16,000 during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
(d) Disclose, under the caption ALL OTHER FEES, the aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item. Registrants shall describe the nature of the services comprising the fees disclosed under this category.
There were no other fees in 2022 or 2021.
(e) (1) Disclose the audit committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures described in paragraph (c)(7) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
PIONEER FUNDS
APPROVAL OF AUDIT, AUDIT-RELATED, TAX AND OTHER SERVICES
PROVIDED BY THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
SECTION I - POLICY PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY
The Pioneer Funds recognize the importance of maintaining the independence of their outside auditors. Maintaining independence is a shared responsibility involving Amundi Asset Management US, Inc., the audit committee and the independent auditors.
The Funds recognize that a Fund’s independent auditors: 1) possess knowledge of the Funds, 2) are able to incorporate certain services into the scope of the audit, thereby avoiding redundant work, cost and disruption of Fund personnel and processes, and 3) have expertise that has value to the Funds. As a result, there are situations where it is desirable to use the Fund’s independent auditors for services in addition to the annual audit and where the potential for conflicts of interests are minimal. Consequently, this policy, which is intended to comply with Rule 210.2-01(C)(7), sets forth guidelines and procedures to be followed by the Funds when retaining the independent audit firm to perform audit, audit-related tax and other services under those circumstances, while also maintaining independence.
Approval of a service in accordance with this policy for a Fund shall also constitute approval for any other Fund whose pre-approval is required pursuant to Rule 210.2-01(c)(7)(ii).
In addition to the procedures set forth in this policy, any non-audit services that may be provided consistently with Rule 210.2-01 may be approved by the Audit Committee itself and any pre-approval that may be waived in accordance with Rule 210.2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) is hereby waived.
Selection of a Fund’s independent auditors and their compensation shall be determined by the Audit Committee and shall not be subject to this policy.
SECTION II - POLICY | |||
SERVICE CATEGORY | SERVICE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION | SPECIFIC PRE-APPROVED SERVICE SUBCATEGORIES | |
I. AUDIT SERVICES | Services that are directly | o Accounting research assistance | |
related to performing the | o SEC consultation, registration | ||
independent audit of the Funds | statements, and reporting | ||
o Tax accrual related matters | |||
o Implementation of new accounting standards | |||
o Compliance letters (e.g. rating agency letters) | |||
o Regulatory reviews and assistance | |||
regarding financial matters | |||
o Semi-annual reviews (if requested) | |||
o Comfort letters for closed end offerings | |||
II. AUDIT-RELATED | Services which are not | o AICPA attest and agreed-upon procedures | |
SERVICES | prohibited under Rule | o Technology control assessments | |
210.2-01(C)(4) (the “Rule”) | o Financial reporting control assessments | ||
and are related extensions of | o Enterprise security architecture | ||
the audit services support the | assessment | ||
audit, or use the knowledge/expertise | |||
gained from the audit procedures as a | |||
foundation to complete the project. | |||
In most cases, if the Audit-Related | |||
Services are not performed by the | |||
Audit firm, the scope of the Audit | |||
Services would likely increase. | |||
The Services are typically well-defined | |||
and governed by accounting | |||
professional standards (AICPA, | |||
SEC, etc.) | |||
AUDIT COMMITTEE APPROVAL POLICY | AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORTING POLICY | ||
o “One-time” pre-approval | o A summary of all such | ||
for the audit period for all | services and related fees | ||
pre-approved specific service | reported at each regularly | ||
subcategories. Approval of the | scheduled Audit Committee | ||
independent auditors as | meeting. | ||
auditors for a Fund shall | |||
constitute pre approval for | |||
these services. | |||
o “One-time” pre-approval | o A summary of all such | ||
for the fund fiscal year within | services and related fees | ||
a specified dollar limit | (including comparison to | ||
for all pre-approved | specified dollar limits) | ||
specific service subcategories | reported quarterly. | ||
o Specific approval is | |||
needed to exceed the | |||
pre-approved dollar limit for | |||
these services (see general | |||
Audit Committee approval policy | |||
below for details on obtaining | |||
specific approvals) | |||
o Specific approval is | |||
needed to use the Fund’s | |||
auditors for Audit-Related | |||
Services not denoted as | |||
“pre-approved”, or | |||
to add a specific service | |||
subcategory as “pre-approved” | |||
SECTION III - POLICY DETAIL, CONTINUED
SERVICE CATEGORY | SERVICE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION | SPECIFIC PRE-APPROVED SERVICE |
SUBCATEGORIES | ||
III. TAX SERVICES | Services which are not | o Tax planning and support |
prohibited by the Rule, | o Tax controversy assistance | |
if an officer of the Fund | o Tax compliance, tax returns, excise | |
determines that using the | tax returns and support | |
Fund’s auditor to provide | o Tax opinions | |
these services creates | ||
significant synergy in | ||
the form of efficiency, | ||
minimized disruption, or | ||
the ability to maintain a | ||
desired level of | ||
confidentiality. |
AUDIT COMMITTEE APPROVAL POLICY | AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORTING POLICY |
o “One-time” pre-approval | o A summary of |
for the fund fiscal year | all such services and |
within a specified dollar limit | related fees |
(including comparison | |
to specified dollar | |
limits) reported | |
quarterly. | |
o Specific approval is | |
needed to exceed the | |
pre-approved dollar limits for | |
these services (see general | |
Audit Committee approval policy | |
below for details on obtaining | |
specific approvals) | |
o Specific approval is | |
needed to use the Fund’s | |
auditors for tax services not | |
denoted as pre-approved, or to | |
add a specific service subcategory as | |
“pre-approved” |
SECTION III - POLICY DETAIL, CONTINUED
SERVICE CATEGORY | SERVICE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION | SPECIFIC PRE-APPROVED SERVICE |
SUBCATEGORIES | ||
IV. OTHER SERVICES | Services which are not | o Business Risk Management support |
prohibited by the Rule, | o Other control and regulatory | |
A. SYNERGISTIC, | if an officer of the Fund | compliance projects |
UNIQUE QUALIFICATIONS | determines that using the | |
Fund’s auditor to provide | ||
these services creates | ||
significant synergy in | ||
the form of efficiency, | ||
minimized disruption, | ||
the ability to maintain a | ||
desired level of | ||
confidentiality, or where | ||
the Fund’s auditors | ||
posses unique or superior | ||
qualifications to provide | ||
these services, resulting | ||
in superior value and | ||
results for the Fund. |
AUDIT COMMITTEE APPROVAL POLICY | AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORTING POLICY |
o “One-time” pre-approval | o A summary of |
for the fund fiscal year within | all such services and |
a specified dollar limit | related fees |
(including comparison | |
to specified dollar | |
limits) reported | |
quarterly. | |
o Specific approval is | |
needed to exceed the | |
pre-approved dollar limits for | |
these services (see general | |
Audit Committee approval policy | |
below for details on obtaining | |
specific approvals) | |
o Specific approval is | |
needed to use the Fund’s | |
auditors for “Synergistic” or | |
“Unique Qualifications” Other | |
Services not denoted as | |
pre-approved to the left, or to | |
add a specific service | |
subcategory as “pre-approved” |
SECTION III - POLICY DETAIL, CONTINUED
SERVICE CATEGORY | SERVICE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION | SPECIFIC PROHIBITED SERVICE |
SUBCATEGORIES | ||
PROHIBITED SERVICES | Services which result | 1. Bookkeeping or other services |
in the auditors losing | related to the accounting records or | |
independence status | financial statements of the audit | |
under the Rule. | client* | |
2. Financial information systems design | ||
and implementation* | ||
3. Appraisal or valuation services, | ||
fairness* opinions, or | ||
contribution-in-kind reports | ||
4. Actuarial services (i.e., setting | ||
actuarial reserves versus actuarial | ||
audit work)* | ||
5. Internal audit outsourcing services* | ||
6. Management functions or human | ||
resources | ||
7. Broker or dealer, investment | ||
advisor, or investment banking services | ||
8. Legal services and expert services | ||
unrelated to the audit | ||
9. Any other service that the Public | ||
Company Accounting Oversight Board | ||
determines, by regulation, is | ||
impermissible |
AUDIT COMMITTEE APPROVAL POLICY | AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORTING POLICY |
o These services are not to be | o A summary of all |
performed with the exception of the(*) | services and related |
services that may be permitted | fees reported at each |
if they would not be subject to audit | regularly scheduled |
procedures at the audit client (as | Audit Committee meeting |
defined in rule 2-01(f)(4)) level | will serve as continual |
the firm providing the service. | confirmation that has |
not provided any | |
restricted services. |
GENERAL AUDIT COMMITTEE APPROVAL POLICY:
o For all projects, the officers of the Funds and the Fund’s auditors will each make an assessment to determine that any proposed projects will not impair independence.
o Potential services will be classified into the four non-restricted service categories and the “Approval of Audit, Audit-Related, Tax and Other Services” Policy above will be applied. Any services outside the specific pre-approved service subcategories set forth above must be specifically approved by the Audit Committee.
o At least quarterly, the Audit Committee shall review a report summarizing the services by service category, including fees, provided by the Audit firm as set forth in the above policy.
(2) Disclose the percentage of services described in each of paragraphs (b) through (d) of this Item that were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
Non-Audit Services
Beginning with non-audit service contracts entered into on or after May 6, 2003, the effective date of the
new SEC pre-approval rules, the Trust's audit committee is required to pre-approve services to
affiliates defined by SEC rules to the extent that the services are determined to have a direct impact on the operations or financial reporting of the Trust. For the years ended August 31, 2022 and 2021, there were no services provided to an affiliate that required the Trust's audit committee pre-approval.
(f) If greater than 50 percent, disclose the percentage of hours expended on the principal accountants engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.
N/A
(g) Disclose the aggregate non-audit fees billed by the registrants accountant for services rendered to the registrant, and rendered to the registrants investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant for each of the last two fiscal years of the registrant.
The Trust paid aggregate non-audit fees to Ernst & Young LLP for tax services of $17,200 and $16,000 during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
(h) Disclose whether the registrants audit committee of the Board of Trustees has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrants investment adviser (not including any subadviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
The Fund’s audit committee of the Board of Trustees has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the Affiliates (as defined) that were not pre- approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS
(a) If the registrant is a listed issuer as defined in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.10A-3), state whether or not the registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(58)(A)). If the registrant has such a committee, however designated, identify each committee member. If the entire board of directors is acting as the registrant’s audit committee as specified in Section 3(a)(58)(B) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(58)(B)), so state.
N/A
(b) If applicable, provide the disclosure required by Rule 10A-3(d) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.10A-3(d)) regarding an exemption from the listing standards for audit committees.
N/A
ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.
File Schedule of Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers as of the close of the reporting period as set forth in 210.1212 of Regulation S-X [17 CFR 210.12-12], unless the schedule is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.
Included in Item 1
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
A closed-end management investment company that is filing an annual report on this Form N-CSR must, unless it invests exclusively in non-voting securities, describe the policies and procedures that it uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities, including the procedures that the company uses when a vote presents a conflict between the interests of its shareholders, on the one hand, and those of the company’s investment adviser; principal underwriter; or any affiliated person (as defined in Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(3)) and the rules thereunder) of the company, its investment adviser, or its principal underwriter, on the other. Include any policies and procedures of the company’s investment adviser, or any other third party, that the company uses, or that are used on the company’s behalf, to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities.
Not applicable to open-end management investment companies.
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
(a) If the registrant is a closed-end management investment company that is filing an annual report on this Form N-CSR, provide the following information:
(1) State the name, title, and length of service of the person or persons employed by or associated with the registrant or an investment adviser of the registrant who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the registrant’s portfolio (“Portfolio Manager”). Also state each Portfolio Manager’s business experience during the past 5 years.
Not applicable to open-end management investment companies.
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
(a) If the registrant is a closed-end management investment company, in the following tabular format, provide the information specified in paragraph (b) of this Item with respect to any purchase made by or on behalf of the registrant or any affiliated purchaser, as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.10b-18(a)(3)), of shares or other units of any class of the registrant’s equity securities that is registered by the registrant pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 781).
Not applicable to open-end management investment companies.
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
Describe any material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s board of directors, where those changes were implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure in response to the requirements of Item 407(c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-R(17 CFR 229.407)(as required by Item 22(b)(15)) of Schedule 14A (17 CFR 240.14a-101), or this Item.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which the shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s board of directors since the registrant last provided disclosure in response to the requirements of Item 407(c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-R of Schedule 14(A) in its definitive proxy statement, or this item.
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) Disclose the conclusions of the registrant’s principal executive and principal financials officers, or persons performing similar functions, regarding the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c))) as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of the report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30(a)-3(b) and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-15(b) or 240.15d-15(b)).
The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
(b) Disclose any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act (17CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occured during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
There were no significant changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
(a) If the registrant is a closed-end management investment company, provide the following dollar amounts of income and compensation related to the securities lending activities of the registrant during its most recent fiscal year:
N/A
(1) Gross income from securities lending activities;
N/A
(2) All fees and/or compensation for each of the following securities lending activities and related services: any share of revenue generated by the securities lending program paid to the securities lending agent(s) (revenue split); fees paid for cash collateral management services (including fees deducted from a pooled cash collateral reinvestment vehicle) that are not included in the revenue split; administrative fees that are not included in the revenue split; fees for indemnification that are not included in the revenue split; rebates paid to borrowers; and any other fees relating to the securities lending program that are not included in the revenue split, including a description of those other fees;
N/A
(3) The aggregate fees/compensation disclosed pursuant to paragraph (2); and
N/A
(4) Net income from securities lending activities (i.e., the dollar amount in paragraph (1) minus the dollar amount in paragraph (3)).
If a fee for a service is included in the revenue split, state that the fee is included in the revenue split.
N/A
(b) If the registrant is a closed-end management investment company, describe the services provided to the registrant by the securities lending agent in the registrants most recent fiscal year.
N/A
ITEM 13. EXHIBITS.
(a) File the exhibits listed below as part of this Form. Letter or number the exhibits in the sequence indicated.
SIGNATURES
[See General Instruction F]
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) Pioneer Core Trust I
By (Signature and Title)* /s/ Lisa M. Jones
Lisa M. Jones, President and Chief Executive Officer
Date November 4, 2022
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title)* /s/ Lisa M. Jones
Lisa M. Jones, President and Chief Executive Officer
Date November 4, 2022
By (Signature and Title)* /s/ Anthony J. Koenig, Jr.
Anthony J. Koenig, Jr., Managing Director, Chief Operations Officer & Treasurer of the Funds
Date November 4, 2022
* Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.
CODE OF ETHICS
FOR
SENIOR OFFICERS
Policy
This Code of Ethics for Senior Officers (this “Code”) sets forth the policies, practices and values expected to be exhibited by Senior Officers of the Pioneer Funds (collectively, the “Funds” and each, a “Fund”). This Code does not apply generally to officers and employees of service providers to the Funds, including Amundi Asset Management US, Inc., and Amundi Distributor US, Inc. (collectively, “Amundi US”), unless such officers and employees are also Senior Officers.
The term “Senior Officers” shall mean the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller of the Funds, although one person may occupy more than one such office. Each Senior Officer is identified by title in Exhibit A to this Code.
The Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) of the Pioneer Funds is primarily responsible for implementing and monitoring compliance with this Code, subject to the overall supervision of the Board of Trustees of the Funds (the “Board”). The CCO has the authority to interpret this Code and its applicability to particular situations. Any questions about this Code should be directed to the CCO or his or her designee.
Purpose
The purposes of this Code are to:
· | Promote honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; |
· | Promote full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Fund files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in other public communications made by the Fund; |
1 | Last revised January 2021 |
· | Promote compliance with applicable laws and governmental rules and regulations; |
· | Promote the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code; and |
· | Establish accountability for adherence to the Code. |
Each Senior Officer should adhere to a high standard of business ethics and should be sensitive to situations that may give rise to actual as well as apparent conflicts of interest.
Responsibilities of Senior Officers
Conflicts of Interest
A “conflict of interest” occurs when a Senior Officer’s private interests interfere in any way – or even appear to interfere – with the interests of or his/her service to a Fund. A conflict can arise when a Senior Officer takes actions or has interests that may make it difficult to perform his or her Fund work objectively and effectively. Conflicts of interest also arise when a Senior Officer or a member of his/her family receives improper personal benefits as a result of the Senior Officer’s position with the Fund.
Certain conflicts of interest arise out of the relationships between Senior Officers and the Fund and already are subject to conflict of interest provisions in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “ICA”), and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “IAA”). For example, Senior Officers may not individually engage in certain transactions (such as the purchase or sale of securities or other property) with the Funds because of their status as “affiliated persons” of the Funds. The Fund's and Amundi US’ compliance programs and procedures are designed to prevent, or identify and correct, violations of these provisions. This Code does not, and is not intended to, repeat or replace such policies and procedures, and such conflicts fall outside of the parameters of this Code.
Although typically not presenting an opportunity for improper personal benefit, conflicts arise as a result of the contractual relationship between the Fund and Amundi US because the Senior Officers are officers or employees of both. As a result, this Code recognizes that Senior Officers will, in the normal course of their duties (whether formally for a Fund or for Amundi US, or for both), be involved in establishing policies and implementing decisions that will have different effects on Amundi US and the Fund. The participation of Senior Officers in such activities is inherent in the contractual relationship between a Fund and Amundi US and is consistent with the performance by the Senior Officers of their duties as officers of the Fund and, if addressed in conformity with the provisions of the ICA and the IAA, will be deemed to have been handled ethically. In addition, it is recognized by the Board that Senior Officers may also be officers of investment companies other than the Pioneer Funds.
Other conflicts of interest are covered by this Code, even if such conflicts of interest are not subject to provisions of the ICA or the IAA. In reading the following examples of conflicts of interest under this Code, Senior Officers should keep in mind that such a list cannot ever be exhaustive or cover every possible scenario. It follows that the overarching principle is that the personal interest of a Senior Officer should not be placed improperly before the interest of a Fund.
2 | Last revised January 2021 |
Each Senior Officer must:
· | Not use his or her personal influence or personal relationships improperly to influence investment decisions or financial reporting by a Fund whereby the Senior Officer would benefit personally to the detriment of the Fund; |
· | Not cause a Fund to take action, or fail to take action, for the individual personal benefit of the Senior Officer rather than the benefit of the Fund; and |
· | Report at least annually any affiliations or other relationships that give rise to conflicts of interest. |
Any material conflict of interest situation should be approved by the CCO, his or her designee or the Board. Examples of these include:
· | Service as a director on the board of any public or private company; |
· | The receipt of any gift with a value in excess of an amount established from time to time by Amundi US’ Business Gift and Entertainment Policy from any single non-relative person or entity. Customary business lunches, dinners and entertainment at which both the Senior Officer and the giver are present, and promotional items of insignificant value are exempt from this prohibition; |
· | The receipt of any entertainment from any company with which a Fund has current or prospective business dealings unless such entertainment is business-related, reasonable in cost, appropriate as to time and place, and not so frequent as to raise any question of impropriety; |
· | Any ownership interest in, or any consulting or employment relationship with, any of a Fund’s service providers other than its investment adviser, principal underwriter, administrator or any affiliated person thereof; and |
· | A direct or indirect financial interest in commissions, transaction charges or spreads paid by a Fund for effecting portfolio transactions or for selling or redeeming shares other than an interest arising from the Senior Officer’s employment, such as compensation or equity ownership. |
Corporate Opportunities
Senior Officers may not (a) take for themselves personally opportunities that are discovered through the use of a Fund’s property, information or position; (b) use a Fund’s property, information, or position for personal gain; or (c) compete with a Fund. Senior Officers owe a duty to the Funds to advance their legitimate interests when the opportunity to do so arises.
3 | Last revised January 2021 |
Confidentiality
Senior Officers should maintain the confidentiality of information entrusted to them by the Funds, except when disclosure is authorized or legally mandated. Confidential information includes all non-public information that might be of use to competitors, or harmful to the Funds, if disclosed.
Fair dealing with Fund shareholders, suppliers, and competitors
Senior Officers should endeavor to deal fairly with the Funds’ shareholders, suppliers, and competitors. Senior Officers should not take unfair advantage of anyone through manipulation, concealment, abuse of privileged information, misrepresentation of material facts, or any other unfair-dealing practice. Senior Officers should not knowingly misrepresent or cause others to misrepresent facts about a Fund to others, whether within or outside the Fund, including to the Board, the Funds’ auditors or to governmental regulators and self-regulatory organizations.
Compliance with Law
Each Senior Officer must not knowingly violate any law, rule and regulation applicable to his or her activities as an officer of the Funds. In addition, Senior Officers are responsible for understanding and promoting compliance with the laws, rules and regulations applicable to his or her particular position and by persons under the Senior Officer’s supervision. Senior Officers should endeavor to comply not only with the letter of the law, but also with the spirit of the law.
Disclosure
Each Senior Officer should familiarize himself or herself with the disclosure requirements generally applicable to the Funds. Each Senior Officer should, to the extent appropriate within his or her area of responsibility, consult with other officers of the Funds and Amundi US with the goal of promoting full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in the reports and documents a Fund files with, or submits to, the SEC and in other public communications made by the Funds.
Initial and Annual Certifications
Upon becoming a Senior Officer the Senior Officer is required to certify that he or she has received, read, and understands this Code. On an annual basis, each Senior Officer must certify that he or she has complied with all of the applicable requirements of this Code.
Administration and Enforcement of the Code
Report of Violations
Amundi US relies on each Senior Officer to report promptly if he or she knows of any conduct by a Senior Officer in violation of this Code. All violations or suspected violations of this Code must be reported to the CCO or a member of Amundi US’ Legal and Compliance Department. Failure to do so is itself a violation of this Code.
4 | Last revised January 2021 |
Investigation of Violations
Upon notification of a violation or suspected violation, the CCO or other members of Amundi US’ Compliance Department will take all appropriate action to investigate the potential violation reported. If, after such investigation, the CCO believes that no violation has occurred, the CCO and Compliance Department is not required to take no further action. Any matter the CCO believes is a violation will be reported to the Independent Trustees. If the Independent Trustees concur that a violation has occurred, they will inform and make a recommendation to the full Board. The Board shall be responsible for determining appropriate action. The Funds, their officers and employees, will not retaliate against any Senior Officer for reports of potential violations that are made in good faith and without malicious intent.
The CCO or his or her designee is responsible for applying this Code to specific situations in which questions are presented under it and has the authority to interpret this Code in any particular situation. The CCO or his or her designee shall make inquiries regarding any potential conflict of interest.
Violations and Sanctions
Compliance with this Code is expected and violations of its provisions will be taken seriously and could result in disciplinary action. In response to violations of the Code, the Board may impose such sanctions as it deems appropriate within the scope of its authority over Senior Officers, including termination as an officer of the Funds.
Waivers from the Code
The Independent Trustees will consider any approval or waiver sought by any Senior Officer.
The Independent Trustees will be responsible for granting waivers, as appropriate. Any change to or waiver of this Code will, to the extent required, be disclosed as provided by SEC rules.
Other Policies and Procedures
This Code shall be the sole Code of Ethics adopted by the Funds for purposes of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and forms applicable to registered investment companies thereunder. The Funds’ and Amundi US’ Codes of Ethics under Rule 17j-1 under the ICA and Rule 204A-1 of the IAA are separate requirements applying to the Senior Officers and others, and are not a part of this Code. To the extent any other policies and procedures of the Funds or Amundi US overlap or conflict with the provisions of the Code, they are superseded by this Code.
Scope of Responsibilities
A Senior Officer’s responsibilities under this Code are limited to Fund matters over which the Senior Officer has direct responsibility or control, matters in which the Senior Officer routinely participates, and matters with which the Senior Officer is otherwise involved. In addition, a Senior Officer is responsible for matters of which the Senior Officer has actual knowledge.
5 | Last revised January 2021 |
Amendments
This Code other than Exhibit A may not be amended except in a writing that is specifically approved or ratified by a majority vote of the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees.
Confidentiality
All reports and records prepared or maintained pursuant to this Code will be considered confidential and shall be maintained and protected accordingly. Except as otherwise required by law or this Code, such matters shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the Board and their counsel, or to Amundi US’ Legal and Compliance Department.
Internal Use
This Code is intended solely for the internal use by the Funds and does not constitute an admission, by or on behalf of any Fund, as to any fact, circumstance, or legal conclusion.
6 | Last revised January 2021 |
Exhibit A – Senior Officers of the Pioneer Funds (Effective as of August 14, 2008)
President (Principal Executive Officer)
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
Code of Ethics for Senior Officers
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 30a-2(a)
UNDER THE 1940 ACT AND SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Lisa M. Jones, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Pioneer Core Trust I;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 4, 2022
/s/ Lisa M. Jones
Lisa M. Jones
President and Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 30a-2(a)
UNDER THE 1940 ACT AND SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Anthony J. Koenig, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Pioneer Core Trust I;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 4, 2022
/s/ Anthony J. Koenig, Jr.
Anthony J. Koenig, Jr.
Managing Director, Chief Operations Officer & Treasurer of the Funds
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
I, Lisa M. Jones, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:
1. The Form N-CSR (the Report) of Pioneer Core Trust I fully complies for the period covered by the Report with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Trust.
Date: November 4, 2022
/s/ Lisa M. Jones
Lisa M. Jones
President and Chief Executive Officer
This certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
I, Anthony J. Koenig, Jr., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:
1. The Form N-CSR (the Report) of Pioneer Core Trust I fully complies for the period covered by the Report with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Trust.
Date: November 4, 2022
/s/ Anthony J. Koenig, Jr.
Anthony J. Koenig, Jr.
Managing Director, Chief Operations Officer & Treasurer of the Funds
This certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
/($.*'$FRI,F3*%.J7,FRI
/($.*'$FRI,F3*%.J7,FRI
/($.*'$FRI,F3*%.J7,FRI 'CT /VN)RE?H0QK4#28L^D$ S^I#%8-8SG<+*H0=%L$>$($B>L%0
ME_V4@;5]T-!^2P+:/#B6(=S0HSWM@ %O_S($HQ_*2V34054.&.=#T4E+=-2*
M#3U H0]-8&\\\\ !-!B1MP:B!#)(4<@\5% =?5"!/4#;1;.0E9QI*4,?59A0
MU6*SPU/T FP$R!'!X (&1Q$HP(GUX"8.J
M4)!\:RB_;/K(IF0: %$!J5(U&HM Z2^/>5.Z&C$DIW+JQ,2X%3$*+#]; : \3"A1
MW:7I5(/[WQ%K\@ %.N5_8LHFX^AVQ' I1":;2!E5+"H5%D+J 1G9""8@-DVL
M3N1G#4J&3W "N>@R J>,2$6
ME!>5PG5Y3'98!D%V2ZL0>#D/D^"?'09;!!R9-L QV#N\$%0;1F<$O'!=T#&E
M61'%B&>7J[)E!J&B##%ZEKR_JRH2P>*E L%%% J "+I%C
.:P1IU,;-D(I&]*1 TJ,NMB:B;R(1-32K\!
M9RB$T*A!;_:F%3>]
/($.*'$FRI,F3*%.J7,FRI )*G
M!>%B.X&HV9_&TH@97*-1C0@ ]A!*!E^*J%WT 3$NA*$.R"S-(OJ2LFR^R2,!
M>*G%#3IY$%[(;!A6&U>%3%E;AZE+?9HUP#1GD)X$G',Y"(@HEV8%A)2E!Q32
M X7OL.5;#-%EDZ$YV#QX*Y"8AH:QO%"#,,;P3#/&THWO!.T0:3A"H59QHTH-
MCA6(LX@;). 9Q L-&('SDP%D'SR, AA?E8(>1O["! G''Z""1,#OF\%5D.
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MG5\))4.=%V\'UE?>6BHX.Z.JL1UPITK:UX"1/#NBK_,)O",U<(Q'ML3FR1
M8GZQFFAZF>@7&1#R!+ E$&P&(ZMAOQ8JS%0#XK:+;LDL$W5QV#)'&32&=*LS
M2F4AA16*>R:EU;))^;G< S'V>TIDX46*90[0+',CS0,)\UFQB=+_HXP^?+,Y
M3[2,]-?CUQ*%[5VVN3W#!2BTR7"#&K8&>-=?8200HSXIBU=(@@562."XO+*V
M5U_(188#F8BOQ)3&S,Y0E%=[(H!B="X"*D/)2^_SJW_\XC#,%J<95,X#J9U^
M8P+)!&BC=0/C Y(+J @2]:!)A<5Y3E
M)JN5B=\3PNM O+I=PS 0@&@X*#;IS*#+NJ6]Q+D"#W9@EGS R"TZ@M,,BK\U
M)Z^-&TGE2=#<,D=*5DS0H-P$JJ4KNU?Y,R8"DUJ L$_0E9HED9B(H_Q9C;HP
MI>\,O(82(7FH%AE0%5N3V[V\,!R#4/&S-BI!@WHMG.2,1]_YU38(1,@T"C
M6QNIM9,[,(>>L,N\0-/O62&/H4^Y 8GD3 H:M2C&.1,<2 -0?"[(355(_92
M89Q:*#CCW (&*KU.D0?6BD*ST<6B Z9D8M-(#*7JM$1B6QZM^B)#')=RJ]"8
M?"E>4(,IA=MMDEO$[8BS0 RLS%&8!V.T:H?!!(BPQV RIU/[$*BJZ6UV2*S
M&Q>'$(M#0Q\G*I.G6<0'$(;@=+/",<&>L<^6I50/@]S9Y(G14>$=^J)%C _K
M](G.F3Q.-#,%TMZC6QLSXKO HU$4C:BUJATV42)?F0%A.,AJC,G$U"*X6X0/
MDJ%CK2>YM;N>R!+N^HU"*()? R2\6>RAX]H^7^$78LC=A_ B1G'
/($.*'$FRI,F3*%.J7,FRI )$KY8)FO%U9CS;O
M"#]CL/*XF/+F/O]YX2X9GWM?$*
M6JG7C%B1LW")RA"BRSB.51&BU'")P]E7#UD@TK!7E,@,@'49
/($.*'$FRI,F3*%.J7,FRI
/($.*'$FR9$)E)@EF$L.2) H4T5F(Q)&<9B0\F1EB,,P+PU4 7AG&0?44UMP]2
M%/JGPFL&.0B8C%>U]M1 =(&4&4Z;C:A:93B%9]!@=OWG%)(/UF0D83ZF5R-<
M'FJY'&'*+95)D/Y5UM512!V748T U+,/6HG=:)"+0F9IXHQNZ5@7A>@-]*5/
M/L)0E&AT(H5><9&Q=J1D*$ZJ8$<,^B0HI%4>- R0.*UP@Q@W , HE%P%,"H.
MJIE:U$N'WO]ET). ^:C:9A2N2EUH;A'4*@ AAHK##=!I=N*/J![;D7)NU927
M6WJJY%.P!T2;J7(C$K35AW4!^V*1:3&II1C;M4HAD;3^U&)I)L(9F9P692JK
M0%BZ"D"8 VFB)52_(FK0,N8RFM6A764H9E*X#M0O3H7N4V]A9