XML 27 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.24.3
Purchase Commitments and Contingencies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2024
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Purchase Commitments and Contingencies Purchase Commitments and Contingencies
Purchase Commitments
The following sets forth purchase commitments with software and equipment providers as of September 30, 2024 with a remaining term of at least one year:
2024 (remainder of year)$1,363 
20258,844 
20268,719 
20274,556 
20284,021 
Total purchase commitments$27,503 
The Company enters into contracts with suppliers to purchase materials needed for diagnostic testing. These contracts generally do not require multi-year purchase commitments.
There have been no material changes to the lease obligations from those disclosed in Note 10, “Leases” to the consolidated financial statements included in the 2023 Form 10-K.
Contingencies
The Company is or may become subject to various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that the outcome of any existing matters will have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. However, no assurance can be given that the ultimate resolution of such proceedings will not materially impact the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
Except as described below, the Company was not a party to any material legal proceedings at September 30, 2024, nor is it a party to any material legal proceedings at the date of issuance of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
On September 7, 2022, a shareholder class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, styled Helo v. Sema4 Holdings Corp., et al, 22-cv-1131 (D. Conn.) against the Company and certain of the Company’s current and former officers. Following the appointment of a lead plaintiff, an amended complaint was filed on January 30, 2023. The defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint on August 21, 2023, and that motion was granted on July 31,
2024. A second amended complaint was filed on September 13, 2024. As amended, the complaint purports to bring suit on behalf of the stockholders who purchased the Company’s publicly traded securities between January 18, 2022 and August 15, 2022. The second amended complaint purports to allege that the defendants made false and misleading statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and seeks unspecified compensatory damages, fees, and costs. The Company believes the allegations and claims are without merit.
On November 28, 2023, a stockholder filed a derivative suit, allegedly on behalf of the Company, based largely on the same allegations in the securities class action referenced above. The suit was filed in federal court in the District of Delaware, styled Ghazaleh v. Schadt, et al, 23-cv-01357 (D. Del.), and purports to assert claims against certain of the Company’s former and current officers and directors under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and corporate waste. The Company is named only as a nominal defendant. The complaint seeks damages on the Company’s behalf, and seeks corporate governance and other relief. On March 11, 2024, the Court issued an order staying this suit pending resolution of the Helo class action referenced above.
On June 25, 2024, a substantially similar stockholder derivative suit was filed in federal court in the District of Connecticut, styled Scinto v. Schadt, et al, 2:24-cv-01100 (D. Conn.). The suit, also purportedly brought on the Company’s behalf against certain of its former or current officers and directors, asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, corporate waste, and violations of Sections 10(b) and 14(a) of the Exchange Act. The Company is named only as a nominal defendant. The Complaint seeks damages on the Company’s behalf, as well as corporate governance reforms and other relief. On August 8, 2024, the Court issued an order staying this suit until the earlier of a commencement of discovery, announcement of settlement, or dismissal with prejudice in the Helo class action referenced above.
On February 7, 2023, a stockholder commenced a lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The suit is brought as a class action on behalf of stockholders of CMLS who did not redeem their shares in connection with the Business Combination between CMLS and Legacy Sema4. The defendants named in the amended complaint include and directors of CMLS at the time of the transaction, including certain directors who continue to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors, as well as CMLS Holdings LLC, Corvex Management LP, and Casdin Capital, LLC. The Company is not named as a defendant. The complaint alleges that the July 2, 2021 proxy statement mailed to CMLS stockholders in connection with the transaction contained false and misleading statements, and purports to assert a claim of breach of fiduciary duty against all individual defendants, and a similar claim against CMLS Holdings LLC and certain individuals for breach of fiduciary duty as control persons. The suit seeks to recover unspecified damages on behalf of the alleged class, among other relief. After defendants moved to dismiss the case, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint on July 6, 2023, revising certain allegations and adding third parties as defendants. The defendants answered the amended complaint on September 15, 2023. The Company is subject to certain claims for advancement and indemnification by the individual defendants in this proceeding.
During the second quarter of 2024, the parties reached an agreement in principle through mediation to resolve all claims for approximately $21 million, and during the third quarter of 2024, the parties executed a formal stipulation of settlement reflecting such agreement in principle. The settlement is expected to be funded by the Company (based on its indemnification obligations) and available insurance of approximately $10 million, and proceeds from the insurance of a third party defendant of approximately $1.4 million. The settlement must be approved by the Court in order to be finalized. There can be no assurance that such stipulation of settlement will be approved by the Court. As of September 30, 2024, the Company reserved the aforementioned settlement and associated litigation costs of approximately $2.6 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses, and recorded insurance recoveries in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.