0000921895-23-001697.txt : 20230719 0000921895-23-001697.hdr.sgml : 20230719 20230719163205 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000921895-23-001697 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: SC 13D/A PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 FILED AS OF DATE: 20230719 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20230719 SUBJECT COMPANY: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: Cano Health, Inc. CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001800682 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-OFFICES & CLINICS OF DOCTORS OF MEDICINE [8011] IRS NUMBER: 000000000 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: SC 13D/A SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 005-91632 FILM NUMBER: 231097047 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 9725 NW 117TH AVENUE, SUITE 200 CITY: MIAMI STATE: FL ZIP: 33178 BUSINESS PHONE: 2034227700 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 9725 NW 117TH AVENUE, SUITE 200 CITY: MIAMI STATE: FL ZIP: 33178 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: Jaws Acquisition Corp. DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 20200121 FILED BY: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: Cooperstone Elliot CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001865521 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: SC 13D/A MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: C/O CANO HEALTH, INC. STREET 2: 9725 NW 117TH AVENUE, SUITE 200 CITY: MIAMI STATE: FL ZIP: 33178 SC 13D/A 1 sc13da713756002_07182023.htm AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO THE SCHEDULE 13D

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 13D

(Rule 13d-101)

INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN STATEMENTS FILED PURSUANT

TO § 240.13d-1(a) AND AMENDMENTS THERETO FILED PURSUANT TO

§ 240.13d-2(a)

(Amendment No. 7)1

Cano Health, Inc.

(Name of Issuer)

Class A Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share

(Title of Class of Securities)

13781Y103

(CUSIP Number)

ELLIOT COOPERSTONE

ITC RUMBA, LLC

One Vanderbilt Ave, Suite 2400

New York, NY 10017

(646) 930-1531

 

STEVE WOLOSKY, ESQ.

ANDREW FREEDMAN, ESQ.

OLSHAN FROME WOLOSKY LLP

1325 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10019

(212) 451-2300

(Name, Address and Telephone Number of Person

Authorized to Receive Notices and Communications)

 

July 17, 2023

(Date of Event Which Requires Filing of This Statement)

 

If the filing person has previously filed a statement on Schedule 13G to report the acquisition that is the subject of this Schedule 13D, and is filing this schedule because of §§ 240.13d-1(e), 240.13d-1(f) or 240.13d-1(g), check the following box ¨.

Note:  Schedules filed in paper format shall include a signed original and five copies of the schedule, including all exhibits.  See § 240.13d-7 for other parties to whom copies are to be sent.

 

 

 

1              The remainder of this cover page shall be filled out for a reporting person’s initial filing on this form with respect to the subject class of securities, and for any subsequent amendment containing information which would alter disclosures provided in a prior cover page.

The information required on the remainder of this cover page shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section of the Act but shall be subject to all other provisions of the Act (however, see the Notes).

 

CUSIP No. 13781Y103

  1   NAME OF REPORTING PERSON  
         
        ITC Rumba, LLC  
  2   CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX IF A MEMBER OF A GROUP (a) ☒
        (b) ☐
           
  3   SEC USE ONLY    
           
           
  4   SOURCE OF FUNDS  
         
         
  5   CHECK BOX IF DISCLOSURE OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO ITEM 2(d) OR 2(e)     ☐
       
           
  6   CITIZENSHIP OR PLACE OF ORGANIZATION  
         
        DELAWARE  
NUMBER OF   7   SOLE VOTING POWER  
SHARES          
BENEFICIALLY         - 0 -  
OWNED BY   8   SHARED VOTING POWER  
EACH          
REPORTING         - 0 -  
PERSON WITH   9   SOLE DISPOSITIVE POWER  
         
          - 0 -  
    10   SHARED DISPOSITIVE POWER  
           
          - 0 -  
  11   AGGREGATE AMOUNT BENEFICIALLY OWNED BY EACH REPORTING PERSON  
         
        - 0 -  
  12   CHECK BOX IF THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT IN ROW (11) EXCLUDES CERTAIN SHARES     ☐
       
           
  13   PERCENT OF CLASS REPRESENTED BY AMOUNT IN ROW (11)  
         
        0%  
  14   TYPE OF REPORTING PERSON  
         
        OO  

  

2

CUSIP No. 13781Y103

  1   NAME OF REPORTING PERSON  
         
        Elliot Cooperstone  
  2   CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX IF A MEMBER OF A GROUP (a) ☒
        (b) ☐
           
  3   SEC USE ONLY    
           
           
  4   SOURCE OF FUNDS  
         
        OO  
  5   CHECK BOX IF DISCLOSURE OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO ITEM 2(d) OR 2(e)     ☐
       
           
  6   CITIZENSHIP OR PLACE OF ORGANIZATION  
         
        USA  
NUMBER OF   7   SOLE VOTING POWER  
SHARES          
BENEFICIALLY         14,825  
OWNED BY   8   SHARED VOTING POWER  
EACH          
REPORTING         - 0 -  
PERSON WITH   9   SOLE DISPOSITIVE POWER  
         
          14,825  
    10   SHARED DISPOSITIVE POWER  
           
          - 0 -  
  11   AGGREGATE AMOUNT BENEFICIALLY OWNED BY EACH REPORTING PERSON  
         
        14,825  
  12   CHECK BOX IF THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT IN ROW (11) EXCLUDES CERTAIN SHARES     ☐
       
           
  13   PERCENT OF CLASS REPRESENTED BY AMOUNT IN ROW (11)  
         
        Less than 1%  
  14   TYPE OF REPORTING PERSON  
         
        IN  

  

3

CUSIP No. 13781Y103

The following constitutes Amendment No. 7 to the Schedule 13D filed by the undersigned (“Amendment No. 7”). This Amendment No. 7 amends the Schedule 13D as specifically set forth herein.

Item 4.Purpose of Transaction.

Item 4 is hereby amended to add the following:

On July 17, 2023, the Former Directors Group issued a press release and open letter to the Issuer’s stockholders (the “July 17 Letter”) condemning the Board’s failure to respond to the resounding rebuke by its stockholders at the Annual Meeting, where more than 82% of the votes cast WITHHELD support for the re-election of Dr. Alan Muney and Kim Rivera, and reiterating their view that change is urgently needed at the Issuer. The foregoing description of the July 17 Letter does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the July 17 Letter, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 7.Material to be Filed as Exhibits.

Item 7 is hereby amended to add the following exhibits:

99.1July 17 Letter

 

4

CUSIP No. 13781Y103

SIGNATURES

After reasonable inquiry and to the best of his or its knowledge and belief, the undersigned certifies that the information set forth in this statement is true, complete and correct.

Dated: July 19, 2023

  ITC Rumba, LLC
   
   
  By: /s/ Elliot Cooperstone
    Name: Elliot Cooperstone
    Title: Managing Partner

 

 

  /s/ Elliot Cooperstone
  Elliot Cooperstone

 

5

 

EX-99.1 2 ex991to13da713756002_071823.htm JULY 17 LETTER

Exhibit 99.1

 

Concerned Shareholders of Cano Health Condemn the Board’s Egregious Conduct and Unwillingness to Accept a Resounding Rebuke at the 2023 Annual Meeting

 

Group Holding ~35% Stake Issues Letter to Cano’s Stockholders Regarding the Current Board’s Latest Failures and the Importance of Continuing to Provide Feedback to the Failed Directors

 

Questions the Current Board’s Ability to Maintain Credibility as it Continues Ignoring a Critical Mass of Stockholders

 

Reaffirms Support for Interim Chief Executive Officer Mark Kent and Urges the Company to Pursue the Immediate Sale of Non-Core Assets to Pay Down Debt and Refocus Cano’s Strategy

 

Reiterates Commitment to Sustaining a Campaign for Change, With the Goal of Ensuring Mr. Kent and Management are Supported by a Properly Reconstituted Board

 

NEW YORK & MIAMI--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Elliot Cooperstone, Lewis Gold and Barry Sternlicht (collectively with our affiliates, the “Group” or “we”) today issued the below letter to Cano Health, Inc. (“Cano” or the “Company”) (NYSE: CANO) stockholders. As a reminder, the Group’s advocacy this past spring resulted in overwhelming WITHHOLD votes against Dr. Alan Muney and Kim Rivera, who were the two members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) held on June 15, 2023.

 

***

 

Fellow Stockholders,

 

The three of us hold an approximately 35% equity stake in Cano, making our Group the largest stockholder of the Company. We are gratified that the initial phase of our campaign for change at Cano resulted in the current Board being harshly rebuked by more than 82% of voting stockholders at the recent Annual Meeting. We are equally pleased that our efforts helped lead to Dr. Marlow Hernandez resigning as Chief Executive Officer following a troubled public market tenure that was defined by abysmal capital allocation, egregious disclosure lapses and related-party transactions, persistent strategic missteps and substantial value destruction. This has paved the way for a new Chief Executive Officer, which we suggested during our service as directors, to start bringing sorely needed operational acumen, proper ethics and integrity to Cano.

 

We encourage Mark Kent, Cano’s interim Chief Executive Officer, and his team to focus on achieving efficiencies, eliminating excesses and executing a more focused strategy. If supported by a reconstituted Board and no longer shackled to Dr. Hernandez’s self-serving agenda, we are confident they can unlock Cano’s significant earnings power and enhance value for all of us. This brings us to the purpose of today’s letter: making sure you are aware of key facts and in a position to continue to share your views with what remains an entrenched Board.

 

1

 

Since the Annual Meeting, the following has occurred:

 

1.The Board has disregarded the unambiguous results of the Annual Meeting, where more than 82% of the votes cast WITHHELD support for Dr. Alan Muney and Kim Rivera. We question how Dr. Muney, Chair of the Compensation Committee, and Ms. Rivera, Chair of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee, can possibly continue to retain their leadership positions as Committee Chairs, much less their board seats. Their unwillingness to step down from the Board reflects a clear disregard for good corporate governance and the will of the stockholders they are supposed to represent. This seems to align with the Board’s general unwillingness to adopt the widely utilized “Majority Voting Standard,” which the Council of Institutional Investors estimates has been adopted by the vast majority of S&P 500 companies and a majority of Russell 3000 companies.

 

2.The Board has elected to keep Dr. Marlow Hernandez as a director, despite him being a failed leader who should have been required to step off following his recent resignation as an executive. Dr. Hernandez’s employment agreement plainly stated that “the Executive shall be deemed to have resigned from all officer and board member positions that the Executive holds with the Company or any of its respective subsidiaries and affiliates upon the termination of the Executive’s employment for any reason.” Mr. Kent needs to be given the opportunity to refresh the leadership team and put Cano on the path to value creation, which we believe he cannot do with Dr. Hernandez’s continued involvement in any capacity at the Company. Beyond this, we question how Dr. Hernandez can continue to even serve as a fiduciary when he is in debt to executives of Cano (stemming from a series of loans and pledges of stock that were only disclosed at our prior behest) and still entangled with other related-party transactions.

 

3.The Board continues to keep in place Sol Trujillo as Chairman and Angel Morales as Chair of the Audit Committee. This is a slap in the face to stockholders considering that they both acted as blind allies of Dr. Hernandez, having stood by him as approximately 90% of Cano’s equity market value was destroyed. We hold Messrs. Trujillo and Morales directly accountable for Cano’s shoddy governance, back-to-back delayed 10-Ks and participation in the egregious $57.8 million transaction with MSP Recovery, Inc. (“MSP”). We firmly believe Messrs. Trujillo and Morales knew Cano would be issued practically worthless MSP shares in exchange for sold receivables, which was recently confirmed in MSP’s July 7th 8-K filing.1 In our view, this speaks to their motivations in not bringing such a significant transaction to their fellow directors for approval in the first place.

 

4.The Board remains comfortable with sweetheart severance deals for executives, as evidenced by what we deem to be a golden parachute for Dr. Hernandez. It is completely irresponsible for these directors, who claim to be prioritizing stockholders’ interests, to be authorizing sweetheart deals for failed leaders from scarce stockholder capital.

 

5.The Board continues to keep in place Frederick S. Green, who up until last year worked at Cano’s outside law firm, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP (“Weil”), as the Company’s Interim Chief Legal Officer. In our view, the Company should not continue providing exorbitant monthly equity awards to Mr. Green. How can the Board claim to be putting stockholders first when it is relying on an in-house attorney that appears incentivized to maintain the value-destructive status quo?

 


1 Form 8-K, MSP Recovery, Inc., July 7, 2023 (link here).

2

 

6.Directors Muney and Rivera as well as Jacqueline Guichelaar remain unwilling to buy any stock of the Company on the open market, thereby perpetuating their misalignment with stockholders. We do not believe a Board comprised of such misaligned and uncommitted independent members should continue to deny a critical mass of stockholders a say in the Company’s future.

 

7.The Board has refused to include Guy P. Sansone and Joseph Berardo, Jr., who we put forth as director candidates, in its purported refreshment process. This is the case despite Messrs. Sansone and Berardo having valuable experience with liquidity-constrained companies in the healthcare services industry. We seriously question how these directors can be so arrogant as to try to pick their own colleagues and replacements above the clear objections of major stockholders.

 

How can a group of misaligned directors who oversaw the destruction of significant value, who stood by anti-stockholder actions and inaction, who ignored the will of more than 82% of the voting stockholders at the recent Annual Meeting, who endorsed countless related-party transactions, who presided over dubious material transactions, and who continue to stand behind Dr. Hernandez and a business strategy that has clearly failed have any credibility with Cano stockholders?

 

We believe the facts demonstrate that this Board has acted irresponsibly and opted to remain oblivious to the deteriorating performance of the Company. It seems that we and our fellow stockholders need to once again communicate our collective disdain for the status quo and desire for an alternative strategy. As far as we are concerned, the following steps are essential:

 

·The Board needs to collaborate with us, Cano’s largest stockholder, on a refreshment process that results in the departures of Dr. Hernandez, Mr. Trujillo, Dr. Muney, Ms. Rivera and Mr. Morales. We remind stockholders that Dr. Hernandez and Mr. Morales are “lame ducks” given they are up for election in 2024. Should they not step down prior to the opening of the Company’s nominating window, we intend to instead nominate competent, integrity-rich and experienced directors to replace them then.

 

·The Board, once properly reconstituted, needs to elect a Chairman and Committee Chairs that have the confidence of stockholders.

 

·The Board, once properly reconstituted, needs to publicly commit to supporting Mr. Kent and his team in accelerating the divesting of Cano’s non-core assets in order to support debt reduction and a more focused strategy that targets the high-growth Florida market.

 

·The Board, once properly reconstituted, needs to revise and actively enforce Cano’s policies to limit related-party transactions, insider dealings and excessive stock pledging on the part of insiders.

 

·The Board’s members need to show alignment with stockholders by purchasing stock on the open market during future open windows.

 

You can contact Cano and request that your own feedback be shared with the full Board by emailing the purportedly independent Chairman at sol@tgrpllc.com or investors@canohealth.com. While the Board does not appear to be addressing stockholder feedback right now, we believe it is important for the directors to continue hearing from all of us.

 

3

 

In closing, rest assured that our Group’s campaign for change is continuing vigorously. We have the conviction, resources and resolve to hold this seemingly incompetent, misguided and corrupt Board accountable – whether it is via an election contest, through legal channels or in the court of public opinion.

 

Sincerely,

 

Elliot Cooperstone Lewis Gold Barry Sternlicht

 

Contacts

 

Longacre Square Partners

Charlotte Kiaie / Joe Germani, (646) 277-8813

ckiaie@longacresquare.com / jgermani@longacresquare.com

 

4