EX-99.1 2 acrv-ex99_1.htm EX-99.1

Slide 1

CORPORATE R&D EVENT APRIL 24, 2024 ACRIVON PREDICTIVE PRECISION PROTEOMICS (AP3) OVERCOMING LIMITATIONS OF GENETICS-BASED PRECISION MEDICINE


Slide 2

Forward-looking statements -looking statements Certain information contained in this presentation includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding our future results of operations or financial condition, business strategy and plans and objectives of management for future operations. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements because they contain words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “will,” or “would” or the negative of these words or other similar terms or expressions. Our forward-looking statements are based primarily on our current expectations and projections about future events and trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The outcome of the events described in the forward-looking statements is subject to risks and uncertainties, including the factors described in our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. New risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all risks and uncertainties that could have an impact on the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation. The results, events, and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur, and actual results, events, or circumstances could differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are made only as of the date of this presentation. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements or to reflect new information or the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law.


Slide 3

outline Acrivon Therapeutics and AP3 overview 5 minutes Initial ACR-368 Phase 2 trial data 25 minutes AP3-based drug design: Dual WEE1/PKMYT1 inhibitor ACR-2316 and pipeline 20 minutes AP3 Interactome 5 minutes Live Q&A 20 minutes For a comprehensive corporate deck, please visit: https://Acrivon.com


Slide 4

Acrivon Therapeutics – a next-generation precision medicine company Neurological Cancer Inflammatory Fibrosis Drug P Metabolic Acrivon Predictive Precision Proteomics (AP3) Enables an exact match between the disease-driving, dysregulated pathways with a drug’s mechanism of action (Acrivon meaning ≈ exact, accurate) Broadly applicable in R&D (biological SAR, resistance, patient responders); leveraged for internal pipeline DNA RNA Protein Dysregulated Protein Dysregulated Pathways + OncoSignature®


Slide 5

Acrivon Pipeline Anticipated Next Milestone Phase 3 Phase 2 Phase 1 Preclinical ACR-368 (CHK1/CHK2) Single-Arm Trials Based on OncoSignature Prediction Option to Initiate Additional Trials in HPV+ SCC (H&N, Anal, Cervical) and sarcomas IND Filing in Q3 2024​ Trial Initiation Q4 2024​ Clinical Data 1H 2024 Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer Endometrial Cancer Bladder Cancer OncoSignature-Predicted Monotherapy Sensitive Tumors Future Development Candidates Additional AP3-driven co-crystallography programs ACR-368 Monotherapy Breakthrough Device & Fast Track Designations LDG Combination ACR-368 Monotherapy LDG Combination Notes Registrational intent Phase 2 single arm trials based on predicted sensitivity to ACR-368 monotherapy in OncoSignature-positive patients Exploratory Phase 1b/2 single arm trials of ACR-368 in combination with low dose gemcitabine, or LDG, in OncoSignature-negative patients LDG Combination ACR-368 Monotherapy Fast Track Designation ACR-368 Monotherapy LDG Combination ACR-2316 (WEE1/ PKMYT1) IND-Enabling Studies OncoSignature-Predicted Monotherapy Sensitive Tumors Cell cycle program (undisclosed target) Development Candidate 2025 Discovery


Slide 6

Acrivon Therapeutics – overview Next-generation precision medicine; Foundational team pioneers in phosphoproteomics-based R&D AP3-based prospective patient responder identification Acrivon in-licensed ACR-368 (Prexasertib) a Lilly flagship program (durable single agent activity across solid cancers, genomics insufficient for patient selection) with 3 key objectives Increase ORR in ovarian cancer using ACR-368 OncoSignature Identify and verify robust clinical activity in new indications (AP3 profiling) Validate our AP3 approach on a challenging drug to provide read through to other drugs (internal pipeline or external) Initial data demonstrate POC for these objectives AP3 applied for drug discovery - ACR-2316 and early pipeline AP3 has generated a potent, single agent active WEE1/PKMYT1 development candidate (Biological SAR) Specifically designed for clinical monotherapy development aiming for accelerated pathway ACR-2316 OncoSignature being generated for indication finding prior to clinical development AP3 has enabled streamlined preclinical development and accelerated timelines (IND filing now expected in Q3, 2024) New potential first-in-class cell cycle program for an undisclosed target initiated following the same AP3 approach AP3 interactome Proprietary, integrated, ML-enabled compound profiling data (~50 million datapoints/2 wk) Version 1.1.1 of AP3 interactome completed to be applied for AI-based drug discovery and development


Slide 7

ACR-368 clinical data Initial data from the ACR-368 prospective patient selection Phase 2 clinical trial in gynecological cancers Data cut as of April 1, 2024


Slide 8

AP3 platform: Drug response prediction in individual patients “Disease Pathway-Based Method to Generate Biomarker Panels Tailored to Specific Therapeutics for Individualized Treatments”: EP 2 229 589, issued June 10, 2015; US2017/0067877A9, pending. OncoSignature® is a Registered Trademark: US Reg. No. 5,718,472; Int. Cl. 5, 42. Intl. Reg. 1382289 \ PROPRIETARY WORKFLOW INTEGRATING PROVEN TECHNOLOGIES STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 BIOMARKER IDENTIFICATION THERAPEUTIC PACKAGE Acrivon drug with predictive BM assay PATIENT RESPONDERS Optimal indications and combinations AP3 DRUG PROFILING Resistant Sensitive BIOMARKER VALIDATION HIGH RES PROTEOMICS BY MS CELL LINES, PDX, HUMAN TISSUE CLINICAL SIGNATURE ASSAY 3-6 BIOMARKERS PROSPECTIVE RESPONSE PREDICTION ON PRETREATMENT BIOPSY No benefit Benefit Predicted Non-responder Predicted Responder Patients without biomarkers critical for drug sensitivity efficiently excluded + OncoSignature® CLASS 1 BM CLASS 2 BM CLASS 3 BM AI-DRIVEN


Slide 9

ACR-368 OncoSignature prediction of drug sensitivity: Biomarker quantitation across human Cancer patient samples Predicted Responder Patient with drug target dependency Class 1 BM Class 2 BM Class 3 BM Patient High Predicted Non-Responder Patient with no drug target dependency efficiently excluded Class 1 BM Class 2 BM Class 3 BM Patient Low


Slide 10

Therapeutic bar for High grade platinum-resistant ovarian and endometrial cancer new approvals Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: ≥2nd line SOC* ~12% ORR, mDoR 3.7 – 5.7 months Mirvetuximab: Post 1-3 prior lines, FRa-high PROC (~35% of patients; ORR ~35%, PFS = 5.6 months) ~85% of patients with PROC do not benefit from mirvetuximab High grade endometrial cancer: ≥3rd line SOC** ~9% ORR, mDoR 3.1 months ACR-368 clinical activity (without patient selection) in past platinum-resistant ovarian trials: ~12% ORR, mDoR >5.6 months (BRCA-mutant and BRCA wild type patients regardless # lines of prior therapy; Lilly-sponsored 46-center, 8-country, N=169 patient study)^ TPP - high grade PROC: ≥25% ORR with CI lower bound >15% TPP - high grade endometrial cancer: ≥20-25% ORR with CI lower bound >15% * Aurelia trial: Pujade-Lauraine E et al, JCO (2014); Corail trial: Gaillard S et al, JCO (2016) ** Ray-Coquard I et al, BJC (2013) ^ Konstantinopoulos P et al, Gyn Oncol. (2022)


Slide 11

ACR-368-201 status – ovarian and endometrial (locked oncosignature thresholds, prospective trial) 12 weeks confirmatory scan on 11/27. PR confirmed (-30.16%). Clario reported SD (-23% and SD (-28%) 28 weeks scan expected on 3/18 21 patients awaiting 8-week scan 13 patients awaiting 8-week scan OncoSignature-positive ACR-368 RP2D (105 mg/m2) Registrational intent Phase 2 OncoSignature-negative ACR-368 RP2D (105 mg/m2) + ULDG RP2D (10 mg/m2) Exploratory Phase 1B/2 Patients who received at least one dose (N = 26) Patients who received at least one dose (N = 41) Patients with at least the 8-wk scan (N = 10) Patients with at least the 8-wk scan (N = 16) Patients currently on study (N = 21) Patients currently on study (N = 28) Data cut as of April 1, 2024 Patients enrolled (N = 31) Patients enrolled (N = 61; incl. 7 to be dosed) OncoSignature-positive rate =34%, consistent with predicted ~35% based on patient tumor sample OncoSignature screening prior to clinical trial


Slide 12

Oncosignature+ gyn patients – tumor shrinkage (Locked thresholds, prospective evaluation per protocol) BOR = Best overall response BOR PD PD SD SD SD PR PR uPR PR PR 105-004 102-010 124-001 166-003 141-002 102-012 120-011 143-002 120-007 143-004 * *Since data cut off, the one unconfirmed PR has been confirmed bringing the total confirmed PRs to 5 Data cut as of April 1, 2024


Slide 13

OncoSignature-positive phase 2 monotherapy GYN summary– prospective data with locked thresholds ^ Agresti-Coull -Ovarian: The 95% CI^ for ORR = (12%, 77%).  For reference, ovarian SOC ~12%. -Endometrial: The 95% CI^ for ORR = (23%, 88%).  For reference, endometrial SOC ~ 9% Data cut as of April 1, 2024 All 5 confirmed responders on treatment; median DoR not reached


Slide 14

ACR-368 OncoSignature prospectively predicts sensitivity to monotherapy in ongoing phase 2 trial ORR BM+ (ARM 1) ACR-368 monotherapy BM- (ARM 2) ACR-368 + ULDG Patients (N) Ovarian 40% (2/5) 0% (0/11) 16 Endometrial 60% (3/5) 0% (0/5) 10 Combined 50% (5/10) 0% (0/16) 26 Notes: (non-parametric bootstrap simulation and Fisher test BM+ vs BM-) ORR in ovarian all-comer = 12.5%, which is consistent with JTJN study (12%) P value (confirmed PRs) = 0.0038 Data cut as of April 1, 2024


Slide 15

Endometrial cancer is an AP3-predicted tumor type ACR-368 OncoSignature-based indication finding prior to trial entry ACR-368 OncoSignature imaging demonstrates addiction to CHK1/2 DDR axis Confirmation of predicted sensitivity in genetically non-modified PDX models Confirmation of ACR-368 OncoSignature prediction in PDX tumor tissues pretreatment in >1,000 cancer patients treated with ACR-368 in Lilly-sponsored trials, endometrial cancer was not tested


Slide 16

Oncosignature+ (ARM 1) Spider Plots – locked Thresholds Arm 1 – All GYN Subjects Arm 1 – Ovarian Arm 1 – Endometrial Note: mDoR established in past Phase 2 ACR-368 monotherapy RP2D trials (>200 patients) is between 5.6 months to >10 months (Konstantinopoulos et al, Gyn Oncol (2022); Lee et al, Lancet Oncology (2018)) Still on treatment Data cut as of April 1, 2024


Slide 17

Oncosignature-negative summary (GYN indications) – prospective data with locked thresholds Clear ULDG sensitization and activity (see waterfall plot), but no PRs to date with locked thresholds Data cut as of April 1, 2024


Slide 18

oncosignature-negative (arm 2)- best overall response (Locked thresholds, prospective evaluation) RP2D of ULDG = 10 mg/m2 104-026 166-002 152-002 120-008 124-002 104-023 171-001 109-015 119-002 152-001 113-002 104-028 104-027 148-001 153-004 BOR = Best overall response; One PD subject censored for lack of target lesion data points available in EDC BOR PD PD SD PD SD SD PD PD PD PD SD SD SD SD SD Data cut as of April 1, 2024


Slide 19

Treatment-Related Adverse Events by Indication – OncoSignature-positive (Arm 1) Treatment-related AEs in >15% of subjects, locked thresholds; RP2D (ACR-368 105 mg/m2) ARM 1 Endometrial   Ovarian   Urothelial   ALL (Arm 1)   N = 7 N = 14 N = 2 N = 23   All Gr 3/4   All Gr 3/4   All Gr 3/4   All Gr 3/4 Anemia 2 (29) 2 (29) 8 (57) 2 (14) 1 (50) 0 (0) 11 (48) 4 (17) Fatigue 2 (29) 1 (14) 3 (21) 0 (0) 1 (50) 0 (0) 6 (26) 1 (4) Nausea 3 (43) 0 (0) 2 (14) 0 (0) 2 (100) 0 (0) 7 (30) 0 (0) Thrombocytopenia 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (14) 2 (14) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (9) 2 (9) Neutropenia 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (7) 1 (7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (4) 1 (4) Febrile Neutropenia 0 (0) 0 (0)   2 (14) 2 (14)   0 (0) 0 (0)   2 (9) 2 (9) Data represented as number of subjects (% of subjects); Non-QC'd data, as of 8 March 2024 AE profile predominantly heme, consistent with previous monotherapy trials at RP2D


Slide 20

Treatment-Related Adverse Events by Indication – OncoSignature-negative (Arm 2) Treatment-related AEs in >15% of subjects, locked thresholds, RP2D (ACR-368 105 mg/m2; ULDG = 10 mg/m2) ARM 2 Endometrial   Ovarian   Urothelial   ALL (Arm 2, 10 mg/m2 Gem)   N = 11 N = 22 N = 5 N = 38   All Gr 3/4   All Gr 3/4   All Gr 3/4   All Gr 3/4 Anemia 2 (18) 2 (18) 10 (45) 3 (14) 3 (60) 1 (20) 15 (39) 6 (16) Fatigue 1 (9) 0 (0) 9 (41) 2 (9) 1 (20) 0 (0) 11 (29) 2 (5) Nausea 1 (9) 0 (0) 6 (27) 0 (0) 1 (20) 0 (0) 8 (21) 0 (0) Thrombocytopenia 2 (18) 1 (9) 3 (14) 2 (9) 4 (60) 2 (40) 9 (24) 5 (13) Neutropenia 0 (0) 0 (0) 5 (23) 5 (23) 3 (60) 3 (60) 8 (21) 8 (21) Febrile Neutropenia 1 (9) 1 (9)   4 (18) 4 (18)   1 (20) 1 (20)   6 (16) 6 (16) Data represented as number of subjects (% of subjects); Non-QC'd data, as of 8 March 2024 AE profile predominantly heme, consistent with previous monotherapy trials at RP2D


Slide 21

ACR-368 Manufacturing Status Registration and validation campaigns complete with release of all batches 21.9 kg of GMP API in stock (enough for >100k doses) Registration campaign complete with all three batches released and yield ~95% Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Drug Product


Slide 22

AP3-enabled drug discovery AP3-based drug design: ACR-2316, a potential first-in-class, dual WEE1/PKMYT1 inhibitor and pipeline


Slide 23

Streamlined AP3-based biological SAR OPTIMIZATION FOR SINGLE AGENT ACTIVITY OF PRECLINICAL PROGRAMS Peptide clean up Direct DIA analysis Drug treatment Proteolysis P-peptide enrichment Ultra high resolution P-proteomic profiling Week 0 Week 2 Turnaround <2 weeks Quantitative mapping (>35,000 phospho-sites covering >4,500 proteins) Drug-regulated phospho-sites and biological process enrichment Drug-regulated pathway activity mapping and reconstitution P P Proprietary pipe for automated AP3 analyses with actionable results High resolution and throughput MS-based P-proteomics


Slide 24

AP3: TIGHT, HIGH-RESOLUTION DATA WITH DEEP COVERAGE Acrivon proprietary compound data (~50 million data points per experiment); dozens of compounds profiled Miniaturized, high throughput, scalable: <2 weeks turn-around, automated AI computational analyses in 1 day Actionable results: Resistance mechanisms, rational combinations, drug-tailored OncoSignature patient selection QC MS Data Data Clean Up QC Processed Data Volcano Plots Hierarchical Clustering Consensus Sequence Motif Kinase Inference Pathway Enrichment Functional Annotation Network Mapping Biomarkers 35388 p-sites 15733 p-sites


Slide 25

ACR-2316 –uniquely enabled by AP3 to overcome limitations of current wee1 and pkmyt1 inhibitors Zhu et al, J. Med. Chem. (2017) Program goals: Superior single agent activity (AP3) AP3-guided design to overcome WEE1 and PKMYT1 single inhibitor resistance through balanced dual inhibition High selectivity and potency (co-crystallography) Structure-guided design to limit adverse events (AEs) to be on-target, transient, mechanism-based Streamlined clinical development (ACR-2316 OncoSignature) To identify/prioritize sensitive indications prior to clinical start and for drug target engagement-based dose optimization AP3 used for biologically optimal SAR Co-crystallography for drug design and selectivity ACR-2316: Rationally designed WEE1/PKMYT1 development candidate AP3-based SAR from >40 co-crystals (1.5-3.1 Å) of novel WEE1/PKMYT1-selective series 5-20-fold more potent in preclinical models than clinical benchmarks Superior anti-tumor efficacy with complete tumor regression across models High selectivity ensures transient, short-lived, mild AEs Potent WEE1 inhibition, balanced PKMYT1 inhibition, overcomes resistance


Slide 26

ACR-2316 ++++ ++ ++++ ++++ ++++ Adavosertib ++ - ++ +++ ++ Azenosertib ++ - +++ ++ ++ Debio0123 + - ++++ + + Lunresertib - +++ + + + WEE1 cellular drug target engagement PKMYT1 cellular drug target engagement In vivo efficacy Kinome selectivity Relative performance Human tumor cell viability Acr-2316 shows attractive profile in ongoing preclinical studies


Slide 27

Dual wee1/pkmyt1 inhibitor ACR-2316 demonstrates strong potency and selectivity DNA content 100 nM, 24 hour ACR-2316 exerts potent cell cycle effects with pronounced S-G2/M accumulation KinomeScan (468 kinases @ 1mM) DMSO Azenosertib Lunresertib ACR-2316 94% 41% 58% 50% ACR-2316 is highly selective (KinomeScan) WEE1 PKMYT1 WEE1 WEE1 PKMYT1 ACR-2316 Adavosertib Azenosertib Lunresertib ACR-2316 potently inhibits cancer cell viability


Slide 28

Optimized dual inhibitors show desirable pathway effects Activity (NES) -5 0 5 Substrate motif-inferred kinase activities Kinase activity based on proprietary PTM-SEA-based hybrid workflow and analyses Optimized dual WEE1 and PKMYT1 inhibitors affect cell cycle and canonical MAPK pathways in desirable manner ACR-2743 ACR-2316 Benchmark* WEE1 + PKMYT1 Inhibitors in combination *Clinical-stage selective WEE1 and PKMYT1 inhibitors


Slide 29

ACR-2316 potently activates CDK1, regulating >300 CDK1 consensus substrates and driving mitotic catastrophe Unbiased quantitation of ACR-2316-regulated CDK1 substrate p-sites (308) in intact cells based on CDK1 consensus recognition motif (Acrivon proprietary hybrid database approach) across multiple experiments Actionable insight into drivers of mitotic catastrophe and on-target CDK1-driven pathways CDK1 consensus substrates CDK1 consensus substrates CDK1 consensus substrates CDK1 consensus substrates CDK1 consensus substrates DMSO Res. Sens.


Slide 30

ACR-2316 is highly potent across human tumor cell lines and patient-derived ex vivo tumor models Patient-derived ex vivo tumor models Human tumor cell lines Breast Lung Ovarian Prostate Renal Medulloblastoma Glioblastoma


Slide 31

ACR-2316 induces potent cell death compared to benchmark wee1 and pkmyt1 inhibitors CellTox-Green Assay Most Cytotoxic ACR-2316 Adavosertib Azenosertib Debio 0123 Lunresertib


Slide 32

Acr-2316 induces potent caspase 3/7 cleavage compared to benchmark wee1 or pkmyt1 inhibitors Caspase 3/7-Glo Assay ACR-2316 Adavosertib Azenosertib Debio 0123 Lunresertib Highest Caspase Activity


Slide 33

ACR-2316 induces complete tumor regression across models and dosing regimens 5d on/2 d off Model 1 5d on/2 d off Model 2


Slide 34

Expediting ACR-2316 towards clinical monotherapy development A novel, AP3-enabled, internally discovered dual WEE1 / PKMYT1 inhibitor Rational Design Potent anti-tumor activity across human tumor cell lines and in tumor-bearing mice vs benchmarks Superior Profile Optimized via AP3 AP3-enabled design for optimized single agent activity Streamlined Development Aiming for expedited monotherapy development Advancing towards IND in Q3, 2024, FIH in Q4, 2024 OncoSignature test in development for indication finding Dose optimization to be guided by drug target engagement (BM2)


Slide 35

AP3-derived dual potency optimization to overcome wee1 inhibitor resistance: Reciprocal quenching Induced Suppressed Enrichment Score (NES) 500 5 Protein set size Mitotic regulation Cell cycle and cancer DNA homology repair DNA damage responses Sensitive Resistant WEE1i PKMYT1i PKMYT1i WEE1i PUJANA_BRCA1_PCC_NETWORK PUJANA_CHEK2_PCC_NETWORK REACTOME_CELL_CYCLE REACTOME_SEPARATION_OF_SISTER_CHROMATIDS Protein set name EC75 Comprehensive annotation, weighted for protein set size


Slide 36

AP3 reciprocal quenching reveals optimal target potency profile for dual WEE1/PKMYT1 inhibitor PKMYT1i WEE1i PKMYT1i WEE1i Sensitive Resistant HCL, Euclidean 1043 p-sites from 298 proteins 4 -4 Centered log2FC (treated vs. DMSO) Target substrate of ACR-368 Target substrate of PKMYT1i Optimal potency ratio results in significant synergy WEE1i and ACR-368 WEE1i and PKMYT1i dual inhibition synergy Sensitive Resistant Target substrates Target substrates PKMYT1i WEE1i PKMYT1i WEE1i


Slide 37

Data completeness Peptide IDs CV Pearson Correlation PCA Hierarchical Clustering DEPs Volcano Plots ANOVA Hierarchical clustering Consensus Sequence Motif Kinase Inference Pathway Enrichment Network Mapping Biomarkers Filtering Batch effects Normalization Imputation 50,000 phosphosites 20,000 phosphosites Ap3 interactome v.1: Proprietary Interactive Data analysis infrastructure Actionable data across all AP3 experiments accessible for all Acrivon scientists Fully scripted, algorithm-based machine-learning enabled pathway and biomarker analyses


Slide 38

cell cycle regulatory pipeline program (undisclosed target) Target X – an exciting cancer drug target, no/minimal competitor programs, perfectly suited for AP3 platform DepMap data suggest suggest target X is an essential gene for cancer cell viability Strong mechanistic target rationale for role in oncogenesis Highly selective tool compound shows strong anti-tumor efficacy in rodent models Tool compound AP3 profiling supports selectivity New preclinical program leveraging co-crystallography and AP3 infrastructure successfully built for ACR-2316 Tool compound is a selective target X inhibitor (originally believed to be inhibitor for another target) Development candidate 2025


Slide 39

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS – March 31, 2024 PRO-FORMA Cash and marketable securities ~$234M Projected runway into H2’26 Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding ~43.8M Current operating plan, including PIPE Not including additional financing Pro-forma as of Mar-31-2024 Including net proceeds from recent PIPE Pro-forma as of Mar-31-2024 Including shares and pre-funded warrants issued with recent PIPE Note: Unaudited


Slide 40

Key take-aways Initial clinical data (cut-off date April 1, 2024) have demonstrated prospective validation of our AP3 platform and our key objectives 50% confirmed overall response rate observed in patients with OncoSignature-positive gynecological (ovarian and endometrial) cancers Enrichment of ORR in ovarian cancer (40% confirmed ORR) AP3-based prediction of endometrial cancer to be sensitive to ACR-368 now proven with clinical data and confirmed ORR of 60% All 5 confirmed responders still on treatment, with mDoR not yet reached Initial, prospective validation of the AP3-based ACR-368 OncoSignature assay has demonstrated clear segregation of RECIST responders in the OncoSignature-positive versus OncoSignature-negative arms (p-value=0.0038) Streamlined AP3-based drug design - ACR-2316, our internally-discovered dual WEE1/PKMYT1 inhibitor Demonstrated superior single agent activity in preclinical studies compared to clinical benchmarks Accelerated timelines with anticipated IND filing in Q3 and first-in-human in Q4, 2024 Pro-forma cash and marketable securities ~$234M with runway projected to second half of 2026


Slide 41

Infectious, CNS, and other diseases Oncology Fibrotic and inflammatory Autoimmune Cancers with DDR stress Therapeutic areas Therapeutic modalities Small molecule Bifunctional molecule Antibody ADC Oligo/RNA The AP3 Approach is modality and disease agnostic Current focus


Slide 42

Q&A session