XML 19 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.2
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2022
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents information about the Company’s liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs the Company utilized to determine such fair value (in thousands):

LevelJune 30, 2022December 31, 2021
Liabilities:
Warrant liability – Public Warrants1$8,125 $16,750 
Warrant liability – Private Placement Warrants35,320 10,710 
Total warrant liability$13,445 $27,460 

The following tables summarize the changes in the fair value of the warrant liabilities (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2022Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
Public WarrantsPrivate Placement WarrantsWarrant LiabilitiesPublic WarrantsPrivate Placement WarrantsWarrant Liabilities
Fair value, beginning of period$27,500 $18,179 $45,679 $16,750 $10,710 $27,460 
Change in valuation inputs or other assumptions(19,375)(12,859)(32,234)(8,625)(5,390)(14,015)
Fair value, end of period$8,125 $5,320 $13,445 $8,125 $5,320 $13,445 
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
Public WarrantsPrivate WarrantsWarrant Liabilities
Fair value, beginning of period$— $— $— 
Warrant liability acquired100,750 93,228 193,978 
Change in valuation inputs or other assumptions(21,375)(16,416)(37,791)
Fair value, end of period$79,375 $76,812 $156,187 

Public Warrants
The Company determined the fair value of the Public Warrants, based on the publicly listed trading price of such warrants as of the valuation date. Accordingly, the Public Warrants are classified as Level 1 financial instruments. The fair value of the Public Warrants was $8.1 million and $16.8 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

Private Placement Warrants
The estimated fair value of the Private Placement Warrants is determined with Level 3 inputs using the Black-Scholes model. The significant inputs and assumptions in this method are the stock price, exercise price, volatility, risk-free rate, and term or maturity. The underlying stock price input is the closing stock price as of each valuation date and the exercise price is the price as stated in the warrant agreement. The volatility input was determined using the historical volatility of comparable publicly traded companies which operate in a similar industry or compete directly against the Company. Volatility for each comparable publicly traded company is calculated as the annualized standard deviation of daily continuously compounded returns. The Black-Scholes analysis is performed in a risk-neutral framework, which requires a risk-free rate assumption based upon constant-maturity treasury yields, which are interpolated based on the remaining term of the Private Placement Warrants as of each valuation date. The term/maturity is the duration between each valuation date and the maturity date, which is five years following the date the Business Combination closed, or June 16, 2026.
The following table provides quantitative information regarding Level 3 fair value measurements inputs at their measurement dates:
June 30, 2022December 31, 2021
Exercise price$11.50 $11.50 
Stock price$3.29 $5.98 
Volatility67.5 %52.4 %
Term (years)3.964.46
Risk-free interest rate3.00 %1.18 %

Significant changes in the volatility would result in a significant lower or higher fair value measurement, respectively.
The fair value of the Private Placement Warrants was $5.3 million and $10.7 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.
The Warrants were accounted for as liabilities in accordance with ASC 815- Derivatives and Hedging and are presented within warrant liability on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The warrant liabilities are measured at fair value at inception and on a recurring basis, with changes in fair value presented within change in fair value of warrant liability in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
There were no transfers in or out of Level 3 from other levels in the fair value hierarchy.