FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Q1)

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2021

Dec. 31, 2020

NOTE 9. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company follows the guidance in ASC Topic 820 for its financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period, and non-financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at least annually.

The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities reflects management’s estimate of amounts that the Company would have received in connection with the sale of the assets or paid in connection with the transfer of the liabilities in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In connection with measuring the fair value of its assets and liabilities, the Company seeks to maximize the use of observable inputs (market data obtained from independent sources) and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs (internal assumptions about how market participants would price assets and liabilities). The following fair value hierarchy is used to classify assets and liabilities based on the observable inputs and unobservable inputs used in order to value the assets and liabilities:

•

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for an asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

•

Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 inputs. Examples of Level 2 inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities and quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

•

Level 3: Unobservable inputs based on the Company assessment of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs the Company utilized to determine such fair value:

Description	Level		March 31, 2021		December 31, 2020
Assets:
Marketable securities held in Trust Account		1	$	254,202,898	$	254,187,706

Liabilities:
Warrant Liability – Public Warrants		1		88,000,000		41,000,000
Warrant Liability – Private Warrants		3		53,900,000		22,680,000

The following tables summarize the changes in the fair value of the warrant liabilities:

	Three months ended March 31, 2021
	Public Warrants		Private Warrants		Warrant Liabilities
Fair value, beginning of period	$	41,000,000	$	22,680,000	$	63,680,000
Change in valuation inputs or other assumptions		47,000,000		31,220,000		78,220,000
Fair value, end of period		88,000,000		53,900,000		141,900,000

	Three months ended March 31, 2020
	Public Warrants			Private Warrants			Warrant Liabilities
Fair value, beginning of period	$	5,000,000		$	8,260,000		$	13,260,000
Change in valuation inputs or other assumptions		(125,000	)		(70,000	)		(195,000	)
Fair value, end of period		4,875,000			8,190,000			13,065,000

The Warrants were accounted for as liabilities in accordance with ASC 815-40 and are presented within warrant liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. The warrant liabilities are measured at fair value at inception and on a recurring basis, with changes in fair value presented within change in fair value of warrant liabilities in the consolidated statement of operations.

The Private Warrants were initially valued using a Modified Black Scholes Option Pricing Model, which is considered to be a Level 3 fair value measurement. The Modified Black Scholes model’s primary unobservable input utilized in determining the fair value of the Private Warrants is the expected volatility of the common stock. The expected volatility as of the IPO date was derived from observable public warrant pricing on comparable ‘blank-check’ companies without an identified target. The expected volatility as of subsequent valuation dates was implied from the Company’s own public warrant pricing. A Monte Carlo simulation methodology was used in estimating the fair value of the public warrants for periods where no observable traded price was available, using the same expected volatility as was used in measuring the fair value of the Private Warrants. For periods subsequent to the detachment of the warrants from the Units, the close price of the public warrant price was used as the fair value as of each relevant date.

There were no transfers in or out of Level 3 from other levels in the fair value hierarchy.

NOTE 10.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (RESTATED)

•

Level 3: Unobservable inputs based on the Company assessment of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs the Company utilized to determine such fair value:

Description	Level		December 31, 2020		December 31, 2019
Assets:
Marketable securities held in Trust Account		1	$	254,187,706	$	251,924,993
Liabilities
Warrant Liability – Public Warrants		1		41,000,000		5,000,000
Warrant Liability – Private Placement Warrants		3		22,680,000		8,260,000

The following table presents the changes in the fair value of warrant liabilities:

	Private Placement		Public			Warrant Liabilities
Fair value as of June 7, 2019	$	—	$	—		$	—
Initial measurement on August 12, 2019		7,280,000		10,625,000			17,905,000
Change in valuation inputs or other assumptions		980,000		(5,625,000	)		(4,645,000	)
Fair value as of December 31, 2019		8,260,000		5,000,000			13,260,000
Change in valuation inputs or other assumptions		14,420,000		36,000,000			50,420,000
Fair value as of December 31, 2020	$	22,680,000	$	41,000,000		$	63,680,000

There were no transfers in or out of Level 3 from other levels in the fair value hierarchy.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References + Details