XML 25 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.1
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2020
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Note 8—Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present information about the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques that the Company utilized to determine such fair value.
December 31, 2020
 
Description
  
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets

(Level 1)
   
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   
Significant
Other
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 
Assets
               
Investments held in Trust Account Money Market Funds
  $316,991,065   $—     $—   
Liabilities
               
Public Warrants
   161,456,462    —      —   
Private Placement Warrants
   —      —      158,469,002 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
    161,456,462    —      158,469,002 
December 31, 2019
 
Description
  
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets

(Level 1)
   
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   
Significant
Other
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 
Assets
               
Investments held in Trust Account Money Market Funds
  $316,398,889   $—     $—   
Liabilities
               
Public Warrants
   6,282,349    —      —   
Private Placement Warrants
   —      —      3,312,941 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
    6,282,349    —      3,312,941 
Level 1 instruments include investments in money market funds and U.S. Treasury securities, and the Public Warrants when representative market prices were available based on the public trading of the Public Warrants.
The estimated fair value of the Private Placement Warrants, and the Public Warrants, prior to being separately listed and traded, is determined using Level 3 inputs. In the case of the Public Warrants, the Company used a Binomial-Lattice Model (“BLM”) that assumes optimal exercise of the Company’s redemption option at the earliest possible date. In the case of the Private Placement Warrants, since they were also subject to the make-whole table, the Company used a BLM as well. Inherent in options pricing models are assumptions related to expected share-price volatility, expected life, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. The Company estimates the volatility input based on the observed price of its Public Warrants, when available. Otherwise, the volatility input is based on implied volatilities of guideline companies. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury curve on the grant date for a maturity similar to the expected remaining life of the Warrants. The expected life of the Warrants is assumed to be equivalent to a probability-weighted average between a two-year life (in the event that there is no business combination) and the contractual life (if a business combination is consummated) of the Warrants. The dividend rate is based on the historical rate, which the Company anticipates to remain at zero. For all of the periods presented, the probability assigned to the consummation of a business combination was in the range of 75% - 90%. For the below valuation dates, when a public market price for the stock was not available, the closest available date where a public market price was available for such stock was used instead.
The following table provides quantitative information regarding fair value assumptions for the Public Warrants (fair values, and related inputs and assumptions, of Private Placement Warrants and Public Warrants were materially consistent between July 30, 2019 (IPO Closing Date) and September 6, 2019 (Overallotment Option exercise date by investors):
The following table provides quantitative information regarding fair value assumptions for the Public Warrants:
 
   
Initial measurement
(July 30 and
September 6, 2019)
 
Stock price
   9.82 
Exercise price
   11.50 
Expected term
   5.38 
Volatility
   8.60
Risk-free rate
   1.85
Dividend yield
   0
Probability of completing a Business Combination
   75
 
The following table provides quantitative information regarding fair value assumptions for the Private Placement Warrants:
 
   
Initial measurement
(July 30 and
September 6, 2019)
  
September 30,
2019
  
December 31,
2019
 
Market price of public stock
   9.82   9.71   9.80 
Exercise price
   11.50   11.50   11.50 
Expected term
   5.38   5.21   4.96 
Volatility
   8.60  14.10  10.50
Risk-free rate
   1.85  1.55  1.68
Dividend yield
   0  0  0
Probability of completing a Business Combination
   75  75  75
 
   
March 30,

2020
  
June 30,
2020
  
September 30,
2020
  
December 31,
2020
 
Market price of public stock
   9.65   10.05   15.60   40.08 
Exercise price
   11.50   11.50   11.50   11.50 
Expected term
   4.71   4.46   4.59   4.47 
Volatility
   14.20  15.10  46.30  74.30
Risk-free rate
   0.36  0.26  0.26  0.31
Dividend yield
   0  0  0  0
Probability of completing a Business Combination
   75  75  90  90
The change in the fair value of the warrant liabilities is summarized as follows:
 
   
Warrant
liabilities
(Level 3)
 
Fair value as of May 10, 2019 (inception)
   —   
Issuance of Public Warrants and Private Placement Warrants
   8,635,764 
Change in fair value of Public Warrants and Private Placement Warrants
   959,526 
Transfer of Public Warrants from Level 3 to Level 1 measurement
   (6,282,349
   
 
 
 
Fair value of Private Placement Warrants as of December 31, 2019
   3,312,941 
Change in fair value of Private Placement Warrant
s
   155,156,061 
Fair value of Private Placement Warrants as of December 31, 2020
   158,469,002 
   
 
 
 
Transfers to/from Levels 1 and 3 are recognized at the end of the reporting period. There were no transfers between levels for the year ended December 31, 2020. The estimated fair value of the Public Warrants transferred from a Level 3 measurement to a Level 1 fair value
measurement at December 31, 2019.