UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2020

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________to _______________

Commission File Number: 001-38419

Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware	47-3898435
( State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3928 Point Eden Way Hayward, CA 94545
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (510) 694-6200

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Titles of Each Class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of Each Exchange on which Registered
Common Stock, Par Value $0.0001 Per Share	RCUS	The New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☒
Emerging growth company	☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

As of July 31, 2020, the registrant had 64,906,328 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, outstanding.

Table of Contents

		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholder's Equity	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	23
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	23
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	24
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	24
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	53
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	54
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	54
Item 5.	Other Information	54
Item 6.	Exhibits	55
SIGNATURES		56

i

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

ARCUS BIOSCIENCES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2020			2019*
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	285,185		$	57,937
Short-term investments		177,288			130,333
Receivable from collaboration partners		222			132
Accrued interest receivable		239			251
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		8,665			4,052
Total current assets		471,599			192,705
Property and equipment, net		8,264			9,330
Restricted cash		203			203
Other long-term assets		1,323			872
Total assets	$	481,389		$	203,110
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	12,052		$	4,704
Accrued research and development expenses		13,899			4,572
Other accrued liabilities		5,611			4,950
Deferred revenue, current		7,000			7,000
Other current liabilities		1,463			1,480
Total current liabilities		40,025			22,706
Deferred revenue, noncurrent		8,522			12,022
Deferred rent		3,439			3,734
Other long-term liabilities		693			806
Total liabilities		52,679			39,268
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019; no shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019		-			-
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019; 58,940,933 and 45,925,004 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively		6			4
Additional paid-in capital		706,713			369,100
Accumulated deficit		(278,153	)		(205,326	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		144			64
Total stockholders’ equity		428,710			163,842
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	481,389		$	203,110

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

* The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2019 has been derived from the audited financial statements as of that date.

1

ARCUS BIOSCIENCES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2020			2019			2020			2019
Collaboration and license revenue	$	1,750		$	1,750		$	3,500		$	3,500
Operating expenses:
Research and development		35,693			24,999			58,835			40,553
General and administrative		11,432			5,911			18,440			10,879
Total operating expenses		47,125			30,910			77,275			51,432
Loss from operations		(45,375	)		(29,160	)		(73,775	)		(47,932	)
Non-operating income (expense):
Interest and other income, net		301			1,482			948			3,016
Gain on deemed sale from equity method investee		131			-			613			-
Share of loss from equity method investee		(131	)		(412	)		(613	)		(844	)
Total non-operating income, net		301			1,070			948			2,172
Net loss		(45,074	)		(28,090	)		(72,827	)		(45,760	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(144	)		84			80			220
Comprehensive loss	$	(45,218	)	$	(28,006	)	$	(72,747	)	$	(45,540	)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.93	)	$	(0.64	)	$	(1.57	)	$	(1.05	)
Weighted-average number of shares used to    compute basic and diluted net loss per share		48,556,843			43,797,718			46,419,724			43,653,325

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

ARCUS BIOSCIENCES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

	Common stock				Additional Paid-In		Accumulated			Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Total Stockholders’
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Income (Loss)			Equity
Balance at December 31, 2018 *		43,610,823	$	4	$	357,873	$	(122,828	)	$	(107	)	$	234,942
Cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of ASC 606		-		-		-		2,212			-			2,212
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		69		-		-		-			-			-
Vesting of early exercised stock options and restricted stock		114,934		-		273		-			-			273
Stock-based compensation		-		-		1,674		-			-			1,674
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-		-			136			136
Net loss		-		-		-		(17,670	)					(17,670	)
Balance at March 31, 2019		43,725,826	$	4	$	359,820	$	(138,286	)	$	29		$	221,567
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		17,649		-		99		-			-			99
Vesting of early exercised stock options and restricted stock		107,952		-		260		-			-			260
Issuance of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan		82,681		-		596		-			-			596
Stock-based compensation		-		-		2,130		-			-			2,130
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-		-			84			84
Net loss		-		-		-		(28,090	)		-			(28,090	)
Balance at June 30, 2019		43,934,108	$	4	$	362,905	$	(166,376	)	$	113		$	196,646
Balance at December 31, 2019 *		44,212,195	$	4	$	369,100	$	(205,326	)	$	64		$	163,842
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		59,939		-		643		-			-			643
Vesting of early exercised stock options and restricted stock		77,388		-		220		-			-			220
Stock-based compensation		-		-		3,462		-			-			3,462
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-		-			224			224
Net loss		-		-		-		(27,753	)		-			(27,753	)
Balance at March 31, 2020		44,349,522	$	4	$	373,425	$	(233,079	)	$	288		$	140,638
Issuance of common stock in public offering, net of $21,629 offering costs		12,650,000		2		326,244		-			-			326,246
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		216,286		-		1,751		-			-			1,751
Vesting of early exercised stock options and restricted stock		64,501		-		216		-			-			216
Issuance of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan		91,859		-		607		-			-			607
Stock-based compensation		-		-		4,470		-			-			4,470
Other comprehensive loss		-		-		-		-			(144	)		(144	)
Net loss		-		-		-		(45,074	)		-			(45,074	)
Balance at June 30, 2020		57,372,168	$	6	$	706,713	$	(278,153	)	$	144		$	428,710

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

* The balances as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 have been derived from the audited financial statements as of that date.

3

ARCUS BIOSCIENCES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2020			2019
Cash flow from operating activities
Net loss	$	(72,827	)	$	(45,760	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Stock-based compensation expense		7,932			3,804
Depreciation and amortization		1,629			1,836
Share of loss from equity method investee		613			844
Gain on deemed sale from equity method investee		(613	)		-
Amortization of premiums on investments		(323	)		(1,580	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivable from collaboration partners		(90	)		-
Amounts owed by a related party		-			21
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(4,601	)		(952	)
Other long-term assets		(135	)		(35	)
Accounts payable		6,668			(566	)
Accrued research and development expenses		9,327			10,094
Accrued liabilities		661			(565	)
Other current liabilities		-			29
Deferred revenue		(3,500	)		(3,500	)
Deferred rent		(266	)		(262	)
Other long-term liabilities		310			-
Net cash used in operating activities		(55,215	)		(36,592	)
Cash flow from investing activities
Purchases of short-term and long-term investments		(139,689	)		(123,837	)
Proceeds from maturities of short-term and long-term investments		92,134			165,968
Sales of short-term investments		1,003			-
Purchases of property and equipment		(465	)		(1,179	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(47,017	)		40,952
Cash flow from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs		326,512			-
Proceeds from issuance of common stock pursuant to equity award plans		3,001			695
Repurchase of unvested shares of stock		(33	)		(51	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		329,480			644
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		227,248			5,004
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period		58,140			71,267
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$	285,388		$	76,271
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Unpaid portion of financing costs included in accounts payable	$	266		$	-
Unpaid portion of deferred financing costs included in accounts payable	$	316		$	-
Unpaid portion of property and equipment purchases included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	110		$	48
Vesting of early exercised stock options and restricted stock	$	436		$	533

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

ARCUS BIOSCIENCES, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. Organization

Description of Business

Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (the Company) is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on creating best-in-class cancer therapies. The Company’s initial focus has been on well-characterized biological pathways with significant scientific data supporting their importance. Since its inception in 2015, the Company has built a robust and highly efficient drug discovery capability to create highly differentiated small molecules, which the Company is developing in combination with its in-licensed monoclonal antibodies through rationally designed, indication-specific, adaptive clinical trial designs.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2020, the Company had cash and investments of $462.5 million, which are cash, cash equivalents, and investments in marketable securities, which the Company believes will be sufficient to fund its planned operations for a period of at least twelve months following the filing date of this report.

Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and pursuant to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the Company’s opinion, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented have been included.

Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2020 or for any future period. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2019 has been derived from audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current year presentation. “Accrued interest receivable,” which was previously reported as “Prepaid expenses and other current assets”, and “Accrued research and development expense”, which was previously reported as “Other accrued liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheets, are now reported as separate line items.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related financial information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2019 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2020.

The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, and will remain an emerging growth company until December 31, 2020. Under the JOBS Act, the Company elected the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. At June 30, 2020 the Company determined that it will become a large accelerated filer at December 31, 2020 and in the process will no longer qualify as an emerging growth company. The Company will adopt any accounting pronouncements deferred under the extended transition period election on or before December 31, 2020.

Principles of Consolidation

The Company established a wholly-owned subsidiary in Australia in 2017 and a wholly-owned subsidiary in Ireland in 2019. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the Company’s accounts and those of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts, transactions and balances have been eliminated.

5

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates were used to determine the value of stock-based awards and other issuances, accruals for research and development costs, useful lives of long-lived assets, and uncertain tax positions. Actual results could differ materially from the Company’s estimates.

Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments

Cash equivalents include marketable securities having an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase. Short-term investments have maturities of greater than three months and up to twelve months at the time of purchase. Collectively, cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments are considered available-for-sale and are recorded at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Realized gains and losses are included in interest and other income, net in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income or loss. The basis on which the cost of a security that is sold or an amount that is reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss into earnings is determined using the specific identification method.

Reconciliation of Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash as Reported in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Restricted cash at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 represents cash balances held as security in connection with the Company’s facility lease agreements. The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash within the condensed consolidated balance sheets to the total shown in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Cash and cash equivalents	$	285,185	$	57,937
Restricted cash		203		203
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	285,388	$	58,140

Concentration of Credit Risk

Cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments are financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk. The Company invests in money market funds, treasury bills and notes, government bonds, commercial paper and corporate notes. The Company limits its credit risk associated with cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments by placing them with banks and institutions it believes are credit worthy and in highly rated investments.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel costs for the Company’s research and development employees, costs incurred to third-party service providers for the conduct of research, preclinical and clinical studies, laboratory supplies and equipment maintenance costs, product license fees, consulting and other related expenses.

The Company estimates research, preclinical and clinical study expenses based on services performed, pursuant to contracts with third-party research and development organizations that conduct and manage research, preclinical and clinical activities on its behalf. The Company estimates these expenses based on discussions with internal management personnel and external service providers as to the progress or stage of completion of services and the contracted fees to be paid for such services. If the actual timing of the performance of services or the level of effort varies from the original estimates, the Company will adjust the accrual accordingly. Payments associated with licensing agreements to acquire licenses to develop, use, manufacture and commercialize products that have not reached technological feasibility and do not have alternative future use are expensed as incurred. Payments made to third parties under these arrangements in advance of the performance of the related services by the third parties are recorded as prepaid expenses until the services are rendered.

6

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based awards granted include stock options and restricted stock awards with time-based vesting. ASC 718 requires the recognition of compensation expense, using a fair value-based method, for costs related to all stock-based payments. The Company’s determination of the fair value of stock options with time-based vesting on the date of grant utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, and is impacted by the Company’s common stock price as well as other variables including, but not limited to, expected term that options will remain outstanding, expected common stock price volatility over the term of the option awards, risk-free interest rates and expected dividends. Compensation expense associated with restricted stock awards is based on the fair value of common stock on the date of grant.

Income Taxes

On March 18, 2020, the Families First Coronavirus Response act (FFCR Act), and on March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) were each enacted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The FFCR Act and the CARES Act contain numerous tax-related provisions relating to refundable payroll tax credits, deferment of employer side social security payments, net operating loss carryback periods, alternative minimum tax credit refunds, modifications to the net interest deduction limitations and technical corrections to tax depreciation methods for qualified improvement property. On June 29, 2020 California State Assembly Bill 85 (the Trailer Bill) was enacted which suspends the use of California net operating loss (NOL) deductions and certain tax credits, including research and development tax credits, for the 2020, 2021, and 2022 tax years.

The FFCR Act, CARES Act and Trailer Bill did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2020; however, the Company continues to examine the impacts the FFCR Act, CARES Act and Trailer Bill may have on its business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. ASU 2019-12 reduces costs and complexity of applying accounting standards while maintaining the usefulness of the information provided to users of financial statements. While not required to be adopted until 2021 for most calendar year public business entities, early adoption is permitted for any financial statements not yet issued. The Company early adopted this ASU as of January 1, 2020, with an immaterial impact on its financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards or Updates Not Yet Effective

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 (Topic 842), Leases (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases. The ASU will also require new qualitative and quantitative disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases and ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which offers a practical expedient for transitioning at the adoption date. The Company is required to adopt these ASUs for its year ended December 31, 2020, with an effective date of January 1, 2020. The Company expects to adopt the standard using the modified retrospective approach which requires a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings for adjustments prior to January 1, 2020. The Company also expects to adopt certain practical expedients provided by ASU 2018-11. The Company is in the process of implementing its plan, which includes the identification of its lease population and implementing changes to existing process that will be required to meet the requirements of the new standard. The adoption of Topic 842 is expected to impact the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as the Company has certain operating lease arrangements for which it is the lessee. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of Topic 842 will have on its financial position and results of operations but anticipates the recognition of additional material assets and corresponding material liabilities on its condensed consolidated balance sheet related to leases. The adoption of this accounting standard update is also expected to impact the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statement disclosures.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which modifies the measurement and recognition of credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments. The ASU updates the guidance for measuring and recording of current expected credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost by replacing the “incurred loss” model with an “expected loss” model. Accordingly, these financial assets will be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The ASU also requires that credit losses related to available-for-sale debt securities be recorded as an allowance through net income rather than reducing the carrying amount under the current, other-than-temporary-impairment model. The Company is required to adopt ASU 2016-13 for its year ended December 31, 2020, with an effective date of January 1, 2020. The Company expects to adopt the standard using the modified retrospective approach which requires a cumulative-effect adjustment to accumulated deficit for adjustments prior to January 1, 2020. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No.2018-13 (Topic 820), Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurement in Topic 820. The Company is required to adopt ASU 2018-13 by December 31, 2020, with an effective date of January 1, 2020. The Company expects to adopt the standard on December 31, 2020. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No.2018-15 (Subtopic 350-40), Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software. ASU 2018-15 requires an entity in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract to follow the guidance in Subtopic 350-40 to determine which implementation costs to capitalize as an asset related to internal-use software. The Company is required to adopt ASU 2018-15 by December 31, 2020, with an effective date of January 1, 2020. The Company expects to adopt the standard on December 31, 2020. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-18 (Topic 808), Collaborative Arrangements. ASU 2018-18 clarifies that certain transactions between collaborative arrangement participants should be accounted for as revenue under ASC 606 when the collaborative arrangement participant is a customer in the context of a unit of account and precludes recognizing as revenue consideration received from a collaborative arrangement participant if the participant is not a customer. The Company is required to adopt ASU 2018-18 by December 31, 2020, with an effective date of January 1, 2020. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Note 3. Fair Value Measurements

Financial assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value. The accounting guidance for fair value provides a framework for measuring fair value, clarifies the definition of fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the reporting date. The accounting guidance establishes a three-tiered hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

Level 2—Inputs (other than quoted market prices included in Level 1) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with market data at the measurement date and for the duration of the instrument’s anticipated life.

Level 3—Inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires management to make judgments and consider factors specific to the asset or liability.

During the periods presented, the Company has not changed the manner in which it values assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value. The Company recognizes transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy as of the end of the reporting period. There were no transfers within the hierarchy as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. The following tables set forth the Company’s financial instruments that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Money market funds	$	273,190	$	273,190	$	-	$	-
U.S. treasury securities		121,015		-		121,015		-
U.S. government agency securities		14,990		-		14,990		-
Corporate securities and commercial paper		53,278		-		53,278		-
Total assets measured at fair value	$	462,473	$	273,190	$	189,283	$	-

	December 31, 2019
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Money market funds	$	45,498	$	45,498	$	-	$	-
U.S. treasury securities		74,854		-		74,854		-
Corporate securities and commercial paper		67,918		-		67,918		-
Total assets measured at fair value	$	188,270	$	45,498	$	142,772	$	-

8

Classified as (with contractual maturities):

	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Cash and cash equivalents	$	285,185	$	57,937
Short-term investments (due within one year)		177,288		130,333
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities	$	462,473	$	188,270

Investments in marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale. At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the balance in the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss comprised activity related to the Company’s available-for-sale marketable securities. There were immaterial and no realized gains or losses recognized on the sale or maturity of available-for-sale marketable securities as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, and as a result, the Company did not reclassify any amounts out of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the periods then ended. The Company has a limited number of available-for-sale marketable securities in loss positions as of June 30, 2020, which the Company does not intend to sell and has concluded it will not be required to sell before recovery of the amortized cost for the investment at maturity. The fair value and amortized cost of investments in marketable securities by major security type as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are presented in the tables that follow (in thousands):

	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value
As of June 30, 2020:
Money market funds	$	273,190	$	-	$	-		$	273,190
U.S. treasury securities		120,894		121		-			121,015
U.S. government agency securities		14,991		-		(1	)		14,990
Corporate securities and commercial paper		53,254		30		(6	)		53,278
Total	$	462,329	$	151	$	(7	)	$	462,473

	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value
As of December 31, 2019:
Money market funds	$	45,498	$	-	$	-		$	45,498
U.S. treasury securities		74,801		12		(1	)		74,812
Corporate securities and commercial paper		67,907		55		(2	)		67,960
Total	$	188,206	$	67	$	(3	)	$	188,270

Note 4. Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of June 30, 2020		As of December 31, 2019
Personnel expenses	$	3,980	$	4,571
Professional fees		437		183
Other		1,194		196
Total	$	5,611	$	4,950

Note 5. Equity Investment

In 2016, the Company purchased approximately 3.6 million shares of common stock of PACT Pharma, Inc. (PACT Pharma), a privately funded, early-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on adoptive cell therapy, and 1.0 million shares of Series A preferred stock. The Company determined the fair value of such investment to be insignificant to the Company’s 2016 financial statements given the start-up nature of operations of PACT Pharma, and it was recorded at a nominal amount. The Company also received certain warrants to purchase PACT Pharma common stock exercisable upon PACT Pharma’s achievement of certain valuation thresholds pursuant to a Master Services Agreement between the Company and PACT Pharma (the PACT Agreement), which agreement has since expired. The Company determined PACT Pharma to be a variable interest entity, and that the Company has a variable interest in PACT. However, because the Company is not the primary beneficiary of PACT Pharma, it is not required to consolidate the results of operations of PACT Pharma within its condensed consolidated financial statements.

9

The Company’s investment in PACT Pharma is accounted for as an equity method investment, and as a result the Company records its share of PACT Pharma’s operating results in interest and other income, net, in its condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The investment balance was zero at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

In January and June 2020, PACT Pharma issued shares in its Series C and Series C-1 preferred stock financings. The Company did not participate in these financings, and therefore its equity ownership percentage in PACT Pharma decreased. As a result of the dilution in its equity ownership percentage and an increase in PACT Pharma’s estimated fair value per share, the Company realized a $0.2 million and $1.5 million gain on deemed sale from equity method investee during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively. After applying a total of $0.1 and $0.9 million in losses accumulated in prior periods when the equity investment balance was zero, the Company recorded a gain of $0.1 million and $0.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively.

The Company’s share of PACT Pharma’s losses for the for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 exceeded the gains on deemed sale recognized as a result of the Series C and Series C-1 financings. Since the Company has no obligation to provide cash financing to PACT Pharma, no additional losses are being recorded beyond the investment’s carrying amount. The Company recorded $0.1 million and $0.6 million for its share of PACT Pharma’s operating losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively. The Company recorded $0.4 million and $0.8 million for its share of PACT Pharma’s operating losses for the three or six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively . The unrecognized equity method losses in excess of the Company’s investment was $0.6 million as of June 30, 2020.

At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company determined the fair value of the warrants to be insignificant to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Note 6. License and Collaboration Agreements

Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd

In September 2017, the Company and Taiho entered into an option and license agreement (the Taiho Agreement) to collaborate on the potential development and commercialization of certain investigational products from the Company’s portfolio in Japan and certain other territories in Asia (excluding China) (the Taiho Territory). The Taiho Agreement provides Taiho with exclusive options in the Taiho Territory, over a five-year period (the Option Period), to obtain an exclusive development and commercialization license to clinical stage investigational products from the Company’s programs (each, an Arcus Program).

In consideration for the exclusive options and other rights contained in the Taiho Agreement, Taiho agreed to make non-refundable, non-creditable cash payments to the Company totaling $35.0 million, of which the Company received $25.0 million during 2017. An additional $5.0 million was received in 2018 and the remaining $5.0 million was received in 2019.  

In the event that the Company has not initiated IND enabling studies for at least five Arcus Programs prior to the expiration of the Option Period, Taiho may elect to extend the Option Period, up to a maximum of seven years, subject to an extension fee. For each option that Taiho elects to exercise, Taiho will be obligated to make an option exercise payment of between $3.0 million to $15.0 million, depending on the development stage of the applicable Arcus Program for which the option is exercised. In addition, the Taiho Agreement provides that the Company is eligible to receive additional clinical and regulatory milestones totaling up to $130.0 million per Arcus Program, and it will be eligible to receive contingent payments of up to $145.0 million per Arcus Program associated with the achievement of specified levels of Taiho net sales in the Taiho Territory.

In addition, the Company will receive royalties ranging from high single-digits to mid-teens on net sales of licensed products in the Taiho Territory. Royalties will be payable on a licensed product-by-licensed product and country-by-country basis during the period of time commencing on the first commercial sale of a licensed product in a country and ending upon the later of: (a) ten (10) years from the date of first commercial sale of such licensed product in such country; and (b) expiration of the last-to-expire valid claim of the Company’s patents covering the manufacture, use or sale or exploitation of such licensed product in such country (the Royalty Term).

The Company evaluated the Taiho Agreement under ASC 606 and determined that the current performance obligations consist of (1) the research and development services, in which the Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to initiate IND enabling studies for at least five Arcus Programs, as well as further develop such Arcus Programs during the term of the Agreement, and (2) the obligation to participate on the joint steering committee. These deliverables are non-contingent in nature. The Company determined that the obligation to participate in the joint steering committee does not have stand-alone value to Taiho because the committee’s primary purpose is to monitor and govern the research and development activities and, hence, it is inseparable from the research and development services.

The Company’s assessment of the transaction price included an analysis of amounts it expected to receive, which at contract inception consisted of the upfront cash payment of $20.0 million due upon contract execution in September 2017, a $5.0 million payment due within 30 days of contract execution, an anniversary payment of $5.0 million due in 2018, and a final anniversary payment of $5.0 million due in 2019. All payments were made by Taiho as they became due and payable so given this successful collection history, the Company considers the entire $35.0 million in non-refundable fees to be the initial transaction price.

10

The Company determined that the combined performance obligation of the research and development services and the obligation to participate on the joint steering committee are satisfied over time. The Company uses a time-elapsed input method to measure progress toward satisfying its performance obligation, which is the method the Company believes most faithfully depicts the Company’s performance in transferring the promised services during the time period in which Taiho has access to the Company’s research and development activities. Accordingly, the transaction price of $35.0 million is being recognized using this input method over the estimated performance period of five years.

The Company also concluded that, at the inception of the agreement, Taiho’s exclusive options are not considered material rights as the options do not contain a significant and incremental discount. The Company therefore excludes the exclusive options from the initial transaction price and accounts for them as separate contracts. In 2018, Taiho exercised its option to the Company’s adenosine receptor antagonist program, including etrumadenant (formerly referred to as AB928), for a fee of $3.0 million, which was recognized by the Company as revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018 under Topic 605. The adoption of Topic 606 in 2019 had no effect on the revenue recognized for this fee. In 2019, Taiho exercised its option to the Company’s anti-PD-1 antibody program, including zimberelimab (formerly referred to as AB122) for a fee of $8.0 million. The Company identified one performance obligation, the delivery of the license, which was completed in 2019. The transaction price was determined to be the payment of $8.0 million, which was recognized by the Company as licensing revenue during the year ended December 31, 2019 under Topic 606. Upon the option exercises, Taiho gained sole responsibility for the development and commercialization of the licensed products from within the programs in the Taiho Territory.

The Company also determined that the clinical and regulatory milestone payments under the Taiho Agreement are variable consideration under Topic 606 which need to be added to the transaction price when it is probable that a significant revenue reversal will not occur. Based on the nature of the clinical and regulatory milestones, such as the regulatory approvals which are not within the Company’s control, the Company will not consider achievement of such milestones to be probable until the uncertainty associated with the milestones has been resolved. When it is probable that a significant reversal of revenue will not occur, the milestone payment will be added to the transaction price, which will then be allocated to each performance obligation, on a relative standalone selling price basis, for which the Company recognizes revenue. As of June 30, 2020, no clinical or regulatory milestones had been achieved under the Taiho Agreement.

The Company also considers the contingent payments due from Taiho upon the achievement of specified sales volumes to be similar to royalty payments. The Company considers the license to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate. The Company will recognize revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied). As of June 30, 2020, no sales milestone or royalty revenue has been recognized.

The Taiho Agreement shall remain in effect until expiry of all Royalty Terms for the licensed products, in each case subject to certain exceptions.

The Company recognized a total of $1.8 million of revenue under the Taiho Agreement during each of the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, and $3.5 million of revenue during each of the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. Revenue recognized under the Taiho Agreement related to the non-refundable upfront research and development fees received in prior periods. As of June 30, 2020, the Company recorded deferred revenue, current and deferred revenue, noncurrent of $7.0 million and $8.5 million, respectively, in its condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Changes in Deferred Revenue Balances

The Company recognized the following revenue as a result of changes in the deferred revenue balance during the period below (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
Revenue recognized in the period from:	2020		2019		2020		2019
Amounts included in deferred revenue at the beginning of the period	$	1,750	$	1,750	$	3,500	$	3,500
Performance obligations satisfied in previous period		-		-		-		-

11

WuXi Biologics License Agreement

The Company entered into a license agreement (the WuXi Agreement) with WuXi Biologics (Cayman) Inc. (WuXi Biologics) in August 2017, as subsequently amended in June 2019 and March 2020, in which the Company obtained an exclusive license to develop, use, manufacture, and commercialize products including an anti-PD-1 antibody worldwide except for Greater China and Thailand. From the inception of the WuXi Agreement through June 30, 2020, the Company has made upfront and milestone payments of $26.0 million and incurred sub-license fees of $1.2 million. The Company also incurred a $5.0 million payment obligation in the second quarter of 2020 upon its achievement of a development milestone. These payments were recorded as research and development expense, as the products had not reached technological feasibility and do not have an alternative future use. The WuXi Agreement also provides for additional clinical and regulatory milestone payments, commercialization milestone payments of up to $375.0 million, and tiered royalty payments to be made to WuXi Biologics that range from the high single-digits to low teens of net sales by the Company of licensed products.

The Company incurred $5.0 million in development milestone expense under the WuXi Agreement during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020.

Abmuno License Agreement

In December 2016, the Company entered into a license agreement (the Abmuno Agreement) with Abmuno Therapeutics LLC (Abmuno) for a worldwide exclusive license to develop, use, manufacture, and commercialize products that include an anti-TIGIT antibody, including domvanalimab (formerly referred to as AB154). Under the Abmuno Agreement, the Company has made upfront and milestone payments totaling $6.6 million as of December 31, 2019. The Abmuno Agreement also provides for additional clinical, regulatory and commercialization milestone remaining payments of up to $101.0 million as of June 30, 2020.

No upfront or milestone payments were made under the Abmuno Agreement during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Genentech Collaboration Agreement

In December 2019, the Company and Genentech, through F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (collectively, Genentech) entered into a Master Clinical Collaboration Agreement (the Genentech Agreement) pursuant to which the parties may conduct combination clinical studies involving Genentech’s monoclonal antibody, atezolizumab (TECENTRIQ®) and the Company’s investigational products. Pursuant to the Genentech Agreement, the parties entered into Trial Supplements for the evaluation of etrumadenant (formerly referred to as AB928) and atezolizumab utilizing the MORPHEUS platform in two separate study indications: second and third line metastatic colorectal cancer; and first line metastatic pancreatic cancer. The Company and Genentech will each supply their respective investigational products for use in the collaboration studies and will share a portion of the development costs under specific terms as set forth in the agreement.

No expense was incurred on this collaboration for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020.

Strata Collaboration Agreement

On April 30, 2019, the Company and Strata Oncology, Inc. (Strata) entered into a Co-Development and Collaboration Agreement (the Strata Agreement) to pursue a clinical development collaboration utilizing Strata’s precision drug development platform and proprietary biomarkers to evaluate zimberelimab, the Company’s clinical-stage anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients in a tumor-agnostic fashion.

Under the terms of the Strata Agreement, the parties will share a portion of development costs for the clinical collaboration under specified terms. Strata is eligible to receive $2.5 million upon the achievement of a development milestone, as well as regulatory and commercial milestones of up to $125.0 million and up to double-digit royalties on U.S. net sales of zimberelimab in the biomarker-identified indication. From the inception of the Agreement through June 30, 2020, the Company has made a milestone payment of $2.5 million and has incurred expenses of $2.0 million, of which $0.4 million had been reimbursed by Strata as development cost sharing. These amounts were recorded within research and development expense.

As further consideration in connection with the Strata Agreement, the Company issued to Strata 1,257,651 restricted shares of its common stock with an initial measured fair value of $15.0 million, which are subject to vesting based upon the achievement of specified regulatory milestones within certain timelines. Expense relating to the restricted shares subject to these milestones is recognized if it is considered probable that the associated shares will vest. The probability of achievement is assessed at the end of each quarterly period. As of June 30, 2020, the Company determined that none of the restricted shares were probable of vesting and, as a result, no compensation expense related to the restricted shares has been recognized to date.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company incurred expenses pursuant to the Strata Agreement of $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively. Of these expenses, $0.1 million and $0.2 million have been reimbursed by Strata as development cost sharing for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively. Net expenses related to this co-development agreement are recorded within research and development expenses.

12

Note 7. Stockholders’ Equity

In June 2020, pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 that was filed in May 2020, the Company issued 12,650,000 shares of its common stock at $27.50 per share in an underwritten public offering (the May 2020 Public Offering). The total number of shares sold consisted of 11,000,000 base shares and an additional 1,650,000 shares sold pursuant to the underwriters’ option exercise. Net proceeds from the May 2020 Public Offering were approximately $326.2 million after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and other offering expenses.

Note 8. Stock-Based Compensation

In March 2018, the Company adopted the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (2018 Plan). The 2018 Plan replaced the Company’s 2015 Stock Plan (2015 Plan) and 3,570,000 shares were reserved under the 2018 Plan, along with any shares remaining available for issuance under the Company’s 2015 Plan or outstanding awards under its 2015 Plan that subsequently expire, lapse unexercised or are forfeited to or repurchased by the Company.

In January 2020, the Company adopted the 2020 Inducement Plan (2020 Plan). Under the 2020 Plan, 3,000,000 shares were reserved for issuance.

Restricted Stock Units

In June 2020, the Company issued a total of 658,950 shares of common stock under restricted stock agreements to its employees and directors under the 2018 Plan. At the date of grant, the shares had an estimated weighted average fair value of $29.41 per share. Under the terms of the restricted stock agreements, shares vest annually over four years for employees and over 12 months for directors.

Total stock-based compensation expense was recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Research and development	$	2,368	$	868	$	4,104	$	1,715
General and administrative		2,102		1,262		3,828		2,089
Total stock-based compensation	$	4,470	$	2,130	$	7,932	$	3,804

Note 9. Net Loss per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except share and per share data):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020			2019			2020			2019
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(45,074	)	$	(28,090	)	$	(72,827	)	$	(45,760	)
Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding		50,153,160			45,409,588			48,053,186			44,970,831
Less: weighted-average common shares subject to vesting		(1,596,317	)		(1,611,870	)		(1,633,462	)		(1,317,506	)
Weighted-average common shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share		48,556,843			43,797,718			46,419,724			43,653,325
Net loss per share: basic and diluted	$	(0.93	)	$	(0.64	)	$	(1.57	)	$	(1.05	)

13

The following outstanding potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the periods presented because including them would have been antidilutive:

	As of June 30,
	2020		2019
Common stock options issued and outstanding		7,201,567		4,449,690
Unvested restricted common stock issued as part of   collaboration agreement		1,257,651		1,257,651
Unvested early exercised common stock options		311,114		665,301
Restricted stock units issued		658,950		-
Total		9,429,282		6,372,642

Note 10. Commitments

Leases

The Company leases laboratory and office space in Hayward, California under non-cancelable operating leases that expire in 2025, subject to an option by the Company to extend the lease term. In June 2020, the Company entered into a lease amendment for 36,303 square feet of additional space in Hayward, California, that is expected to commence January 2021 for an eight-year term with minimum lease payments of $10.1 million. The lease amendment provides for one eight-year extension period.

Note 11. Subsequent Events

On May 27, 2020, the Company entered into an Option, License and Collaboration Agreement (Gilead Collaboration Agreement), Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement), and Investor Rights Agreement, each with Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Gilead). The transaction closed on July 13, 2020 following expiration of the antitrust waiting period. Upon closing, Gilead made an upfront payment of $175 million pursuant to the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, Gilead made an equity investment of approximately $200 million in the Company by purchasing 5,963,029 shares of Arcus common stock at a per share price of $33.54 pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, and the Company appointed Gilead’s designee, Merdad Parsey, M.D., Ph.D., to the Company’s Board of Directors pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement.

Pursuant to the terms of the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, Gilead has an exclusive license to develop and commercialize zimberelimab (formerly referred to as AB122) in certain markets and obtained exclusive options to acquire an exclusive license to develop and commercialize all of the Company’s current and future clinical programs during the 10-year collaboration term and, for those programs that enter clinical development prior to the end of the collaboration term, for up to an additional three years thereafter. Gilead may exercise its option, on a program-by-program basis, upon payment of an option fee that ranges from $200 million to $275 million per program for the Company’s current clinical programs, and $150 million per program for all other programs that enter clinical development. If Gilead exercises its option with respect to the Company’s TIGIT program, the Company is also eligible to receive up to $500 million in potential U.S. regulatory approval milestones with respect to domvanalimab (formerly referred to as AB154).

Upon Gilead’s exercise of its option to a program, the two companies will co-develop and equally share global development costs, subject to certain opt-out rights of the Company, expense caps on the Company’s spending and true-up adjustments. For each optioned program, provided the Company has not exercised its opt-out rights, the Company has an option to co-promote in the United States with equal sharing of related profits and losses. Gilead has the right to exclusively commercialize any optioned programs outside of the U.S., subject to the rights of the Company’s existing partners to any territories, and Gilead will pay to the Company tiered royalties as a percentage of revenues ranging from the high teens to the low twenties. Gilead will further provide ongoing research and development support of up to $400 million over the collaboration term.

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement and the Investor Rights Agreement, Gilead has the right, at its option, to purchase additional shares from the Company, up to a maximum of 35% of the Company’s then-outstanding voting common stock, from time to time over the next five years, at a purchase price equal to the greater of a 20% premium to market (based on a trailing five-day average closing price) at the time Gilead exercises such option, and the $33.54 initial purchase price. The Investor Rights Agreement also includes a three-year standstill and a two-year lockup and provides Gilead with registration rights commencing at the end of the lockup period, pro rata participation rights in certain future financings and the right to designate two individuals to be appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors.

14

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2019, and management’s discussion and analysis, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 5, 2020. This discussion and other parts of this report contain forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations, and intentions. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section of this report entitled “Risk Factors.”

Overview

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on creating best-in-class cancer therapies. Our initial focus has been on well-characterized biological pathways with significant scientific data supporting their importance. We have built a robust and highly efficient drug discovery capability to create highly differentiated small molecules, which we have the ability to develop in combinations with our monoclonal antibodies through rationally designed, indication-specific, adaptive clinical trial designs. Our vision is to create, develop and commercialize highly differentiated combination cancer therapies that have the potential to cure.

We currently have four investigational products in clinical development. We hold worldwide development and commercialization rights to each of these investigational products with the exception of zimberelimab, for which we hold rights outside of China and Thailand. Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Taiho) has a time-limited option to exclusively license the development and commercialization rights to each of our programs for Japan and certain other territories in Asia (excluding China), which they have exercised with respect to our adenosine receptor antagonist program, including etrumadenant (formerly referred to as AB928), and our anti-PD-1 program, including zimberelimab. Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Gilead) has a time-limited option to obtain an exclusive license to all of our current and future clinical programs, subject to the rights of our existing partners to any territories. Upon closing of our Option, License and Collaboration Agreement with Gilead (the Gilead Collaboration Agreement), Gilead obtained an exclusive license to our zimberelimab program.

Etrumadenant (formerly referred to as AB928), our small molecule dual A_2a/A_2b adenosine receptor antagonist, is in clinical development, and is being evaluated in four Phase 1b expansion studies in specific cancer indications: advanced colorectal cancer, triple negative breast cancer, EGFR-mutated lung cancer, and prostate cancer; two collaboration studies with Genentech utilizing their MORPHEUS Phase 1b/2 platform in third-line metastatic colorectal cancer and first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer; a Phase 1b/2 multi-cohort platform trial in participants with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer; and a Phase 1b trial in participants with colorectal cancer.

AB680, our small-molecule CD73 inhibitor, is in a Phase 1/1b study for the treatment of first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer. This study consists of a safety dose-escalation portion, followed by an enrollment expansion to evaluate the combination of AB680, zimberelimab (our anti-PD-1 antibody) and the standard-of-care chemotherapies gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel.

Domvanalimab (formerly referred to as AB154), our in-licensed anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody, is in Phase 2 development for the treatment of first-line metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in combination with zimberelimab and etrumadenant (formerly referred to as AB928).

Zimberelimab (formerly referred to as AB122), our in-licensed anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, is the cornerstone of our combination strategy. In addition to the combination studies with zimberelimab described above, we are also evaluating zimberelimab as monotherapy in a tumor-agnostic, biomarker-selected Phase 1b trial.

Gilead Collaboration

On May 27, 2020, we entered into an Option, License and Collaboration Agreement (Gilead Collaboration Agreement), Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement), and Investor Rights Agreement, each with Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Gilead). The transaction closed on July 13, 2020 following expiration of the antitrust waiting period. Upon closing, Gilead made an upfront payment of $175 million pursuant to the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, Gilead made an equity investment of approximately $200 million in us by purchasing 5,963,029 shares of our common stock at a per share price of $33.54 pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, and we appointed Gilead’s designee, Merdad Parsey, M.D., Ph.D., to our Board of Directors pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement.

Pursuant to the terms of the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, Gilead has an exclusive license to develop and commercialize zimberelimab (formerly referred to as AB122) in certain markets and obtained exclusive options to acquire an exclusive license to develop and commercialize all of our current and future clinical programs during the 10-year collaboration term and, for those programs that enter clinical development prior to the end of the collaboration term, for up to an additional three years thereafter. Gilead may exercise its option, on a program-by-program basis, upon payment of an option fee that ranges from $200 million to $275

15

million per program for our current clinical programs, and $150 million per program for all other programs that enter clinical development. If Gilead exercises its option with respect to our TIGIT program, we are also eligible to receive up to $500 million in potential U.S. regulatory approval milestones with respect to domvanalimab (formerly referred to as AB154).

Upon Gilead’s exercise of its option to a program, the two companies will co-develop and equally share global development costs, subject to certain of our opt-out rights, expense caps on our spending and true-up adjustments. For each optioned program, provided we have not exercised our opt-out rights, we have an option to co-promote in the United States with equal sharing of related profits and losses. Gilead has the right to exclusively commercialize any optioned programs outside of the U.S., subject to the rights of our existing partners to any territories, and Gilead will pay to us tiered royalties as a percentage of revenues ranging from the high teens to the low twenties. Gilead will further provide ongoing research and development support of up to $400 million over the collaboration term.

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement and the Investor Rights Agreement, Gilead has the right, at its option, to purchase additional shares from us, up to a maximum of 35% of our then-outstanding voting common stock, from time to time over the next five years, at a purchase price equal to the greater of a 20% premium to market (based on a trailing five-day average closing price) at the time Gilead exercises such option, and the $33.54 initial purchase price. The Investor Rights Agreement also includes a three-year standstill and a two-year lockup and provides Gilead with registration rights commencing at the end of the lockup period, pro rata participation rights in certain future financings and the right to designate two individuals to be appointed to our Board of Directors.

COVID-19 Pandemic

The degree to which COVID-19 impacts our business operations, research and development programs and financial condition will depend on future developments, including new information which may emerge concerning the duration and/or severity of the outbreak and any resurgences, actions by government authorities to contain the spread of the virus, and when and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume. Our management is actively monitoring this health crisis and its effects on our operations, key vendors and workforce.

In mid-March, we voluntarily transitioned our employees, including our laboratory-based personnel, to work-from-home prior to the institution of state and local shelter-in-place orders. Most of our non-laboratory operations, including the conduct and management of our clinical trials and the contract manufacturing organizations engaged in CMC activities on our behalf, were easily and quickly transitioned to remote work arrangements. However, we were not able to transition our laboratory operations to work-from-home and only arranged for limited outsourcing of our discovery activities to third-party research organizations. In late June, we began to transition our laboratory-based personnel back into our facilities; however, our laboratories are operating at reduced capacity due to employee safety measures, such as social distancing requirements and shift work. Our non-laboratory-based personnel continue to work remotely.

Entering 2020, we anticipated that our discovery-stage programs would lead to the advancement of two new molecules into clinical studies in the first quarter of 2021. Based upon current timelines, the first program that we expect to advance into clinical studies remains on-track to meet this objective. The suspension of our laboratory operations has delayed the advancement of the second of these two discovery-stage programs into clinical studies; however, the magnitude of this delay is not yet known.

Despite the public health and mandatory self-quarantine measures in force during the second quarter, we continued to see relatively robust enrollment across our ongoing Arcus-sponsored studies. However, we continue to expect that this pandemic will result in delays to some of our clinical programs, particularly in initiating new studies and/or new investigational sites due to diversion of their resources away from necessary start-up activities, and by limiting the ability of investigational sites to conduct all activities associated with our ongoing studies. For example, the circumstances may hinder their ability to screen patients for enrollment. We are collaborating with our investigational sites to implement measures to minimize disruptions to patients and ensure continued access to treatment, in accordance with health authority guidance.

With respect to manufacturing and supply, we believe we currently have sufficient drug supply for our ongoing clinical studies. Our third-party contract manufacturers continue to operate at or near normal levels and, at this time and subject to further COVID-19 implications, we do not anticipate any disruptions to our drug supply chain.

The full impact of the COVID-19 outbreak continues to evolve and is highly uncertain and subject to change. In connection with our resumption of laboratory operations, we instituted regular COVID-19 testing services in order to minimize the risk to our employees. These additional operating costs, along with the absence of any furlough or measures to reduce personnel costs despite reduced laboratory capacity, will have a negative impact on our operations and financial condition. We do not expect the forward impact will be material due to adjustments in operations that we have made. However, there are many uncertainties around the COVID pandemic and future developments, which are unpredictable, may result in a material, negative impact to our operations and financial condition.

16

Components of Operating Results

Collaboration and License Revenue

Under the Taiho Agreement, we recognize revenue from the upfront and annual payments for research and development services performed by us to develop our investigational products and from option exercise payments upon Taiho’s exercise of options during the Option Period.

Operating Expenses

Research and Development Expenses

Our research and development expenses consist of expenses incurred in connection with the research and development of our pipeline programs. These expenses include payroll and personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation for our employees, laboratory supplies, product licenses, consulting costs, contract research, pre-clinical and clinical expenses, and depreciation. We expense both internal and external research and development costs as they are incurred. We record advance payments for services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities as prepaid expenses and recognize them as an expense as the related services are performed.

We do not allocate our costs by investigational product, as a significant amount of research and development expenses include internal costs, such as payroll and other personnel expenses, and certain external costs that are not recorded at the investigational product level. In particular, with respect to internal costs, several of our departments support multiple research and development programs, and we do not allocate those costs by investigational product.

We expect our research and development expenses to increase substantially during the next few years due to our Gilead collaboration and as we seek to complete existing clinical trials and advance our programs into later-stage clinical trials, pursue regulatory approval for our investigational products, and advance other programs into the clinic. Later-stage clinical trials typically include a larger number of subjects, are of a longer duration and include more geographic regions. As we advance our clinical-stage programs and prepare to seek regulatory approval, we will also need to conduct certain validation activities with respect to our manufacturing processes for the investigational products in each program. Moreover, in order to maximize the potential of our collaboration with Gilead, we believe it will be important to grow our discovery capabilities and pipeline. As a result, we expect our preclinical, clinical, and contract manufacturing expenses to increase significantly relative to what we have incurred to date. The level of our future research and development investment will depend on a number of factors and uncertainties, including clinical outcomes from our ongoing clinical trials, whether our collaborators opt into any of our programs, the amount of opt-in and milestone payments we receive from our collaborators, and the breadth of any joint development program agreed to with Gilead for programs they opt into. In addition, under our license agreements with WuXi Biologics (Cayman) Inc. (WuXi Biologics) and Abmuno Therapeutics LLC (Abmuno), and our co-development and collaboration agreement with Strata Oncology, Inc. (Strata), we may be required to pay additional clinical and regulatory milestone payments based on the development progress of zimberelimab and domvanalimab (formerly known as AB154). Therefore, we are unable to predict the timing or the final cost to complete our clinical programs or validation of our manufacturing and supply processes and delays may occur due to numerous factors. Factors that could cause or contribute to delays or additional costs include, but are not limited to, those discussed in “Risk Factors.”

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist principally of personnel-related costs including payroll and stock-based compensation for personnel in executive, finance, human resources, information technology, business and corporate development, and other administrative functions. Our general and administrative expenses also include professional fees for legal, consulting, and accounting services, rent and other facilities costs, fixed asset depreciation, and other general operating expenses not otherwise classified as research and development expenses.

We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will increase substantially during the next few years as we support our growing research and development activities, including due to staff expansion, additional occupancy costs, and other costs associated with increased infrastructure needs.

Interest and Other Income, Net

Interest and other income, net consists primarily of interest earned on our investments in fixed-income marketable securities.

Gain on Deemed Sale from Equity Method Investee

Gain on deemed sale from equity method investee consists of a gain related to the dilution of our investment in PACT Pharma, Inc. (PACT Pharma) occurring upon PACT Pharma’s new issuances of equity securities in which we do not participate on a pro rata basis or at all.

17

Share of Loss from Equity Method Investee

Share of loss from equity method investee consists of our share of loss recorded in connection with our equity method investment in PACT Pharma, Inc. (PACT Pharma).

Critical Accounting Policies, Significant Judgments and Use of Estimates

Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements, as well as the reported revenue and expenses incurred during the reporting periods. Our estimates are based on our historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe that the accounting policies relating to revenue recognition, clinical trial accruals and stock-based compensation reflect the more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements.

There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates during the six months ended June 30, 2020, as compared to the critical accounting policies and estimates disclosed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 and more fully described in Note 2 of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Change
	2020			2019			$			%
Collaboration and license revenue	$	1,750		$	1,750		$	-			0	%
Operating expenses:
Research and development		35,693			24,999			10,694			43	%
General and administrative		11,432			5,911			5,521			93	%
Loss from operations		(45,375	)		(29,160	)		(16,215	)		56	%
Non-operating income (expense):
Interest and other income, net		301			1,482			(1,181	)		-80	%
Gain on deemed sale from equity method investee		131			-			131		*
Share of loss from equity method investee		(131	)		(412	)		281			-68	%
Total non-operating income, net		301			1,070			(769	)		-72	%
Net loss	$	(45,074	)	$	(28,090	)	$	(16,984	)		60	%

*Not meaningful

Collaboration and License Revenue

Collaboration and license revenue was $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 and relates to our license and collaboration agreement with Taiho.

18

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses increased $10.7 million, or 43%, from $25.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 to $35.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020. The increase in research and development expenses was due to a $6.3 million increase in manufacturing costs required to supply our clinical studies, an increase of $3.8 million in clinical costs for our ongoing clinical studies, and an increase of $3.9 million in employee compensation costs primarily due to additional headcount, approximately $1.5 million of which consists of non-cash stock-based compensation. Those increases were partially offset by a decrease of $2.5 million due to the achievement of certain development milestones which resulted in expenses of $5.0 million pursuant to the terms of our WuXi Agreement, compared to a $7.5 million milestone payment to WuXi that was recorded in the same period in the prior year. We also saw a decrease of $1.2 million in lab supplies and equipment due to decreased lab activities caused by shelter-in-place orders amid the COVID pandemic.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $5.5 million, or 93%, from $5.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 to $11.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020. The increase in general and administrative expenses was due to $2.0 million in legal and accounting expenses largely incurred as a result of our collaboration agreement with Gilead, as well as $1.9 million in consulting expenses driven largely by corporate development activities. We also incurred increased expense of $1.3 million in employee compensation costs primarily due to additional headcount, approximately $0.8 million of which consists of non-cash stock-based compensation.

Interest and Other Income, Net

Interest and other income, net decreased $1.2 million or 80%, from $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 to $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020. The decrease was primarily due to lower interest income resulting from lower investment yields on our portfolio of marketable fixed-income securities and lower average cash and investment balances in the three months ended June 30, 2020 as compared to the same period in the prior year.

Gain on Deemed Sale from Equity Method Investee

Gain on deemed sale from equity method investee was $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 due to a gain recorded in connection with PACT Pharma’s Series C-1 preferred financing in June 2020 in which we did not participate.

Share of Loss from Equity Method Investee

Share of loss from equity method investee was $0.1 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 due to equity method losses resulting from PACT’s expanding operations.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Change
	2020			2019			$			%
Collaboration and license revenue	$	3,500		$	3,500		$	-			0	%
Operating expenses:
Research and development		58,835			40,553			18,282			45	%
General and administrative		18,440			10,879			7,561			70	%
Loss from operations		(73,775	)		(47,932	)		(25,843	)		54	%
Non-operating income (expense):
Interest and other income, net		948			3,016			(2,068	)		-69	%
Gain on deemed sale from equity method investee		613			-			613		*
Share of loss from equity method investee		(613	)		(844	)		231			-27	%
Total non-operating income, net		948			2,172			(1,224	)		-56	%
Net loss	$	(72,827	)	$	(45,760	)	$	(27,067	)		59	%

*Not meaningful

Collaboration and License Revenue

Collaboration and license revenue was $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 and relates to our license and collaboration agreement with Taiho.

19

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses increased $18.2 million, or 45%, from $40.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 to $58.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020. The increase in research and development expenses was due to an increase of $8.5 million in clinical costs for our ongoing clinical studies, an increase of $6.9 million in employee compensation costs primarily due to additional headcount, approximately $2.4 million of which consists of non-cash stock-based compensation, and a $5.9 million increase in manufacturing costs required to supply our clinical studies. Those increases were partially offset by a decrease of $2.5 million due to the achievement of certain development milestones which resulted in expenses of $5.0 million pursuant to the terms of our WuXi Agreement, compared to a $7.5 million milestone payment to WuXi that was recorded in the same period in the prior year. We also saw a decrease of $1.4 million in lab supplies and equipment due to decreased lab activities caused by shelter-in-place orders amid the COVID pandemic.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $7.5 million, or 70%, from $10.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 to $18.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020. The increase in general and administrative expenses was due to $2.3 million in legal and accounting expenses largely incurred as a result of our collaboration agreement with Gilead, as well as $2.4 million in consulting expenses driven largely by corporate development activities. We also incurred increased expense of $2.4 million in employee compensation costs primarily due to additional headcount, approximately $1.7 million of which consists of non-cash stock-based compensation, and a $0.5 million increase in expenses driven by investments in information technology and network security.

Interest and Other Income, Net

Interest and other income, net decreased $2.1 million or 69%, from $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 to $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020. The decrease was primarily due to lower interest income resulting from lower investment yields on our portfolio of marketable fixed-income securities and lower average cash and investment balances during the six months ended June 30, 2020 as compared to the same period in the prior year.

Gain on Deemed Sale from Equity Method Investee

Gain on deemed sale from equity method investee was $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 due to gains recorded in connection with PACT Pharma’s Series C and Series C-1 preferred financings in January 2020 and June 2020, respectively, in which we did not participate.

Share of Loss from Equity Method Investee

Share of loss from equity method investee was $0.6 million and $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, due to equity method losses resulting from PACT’s expanding operations.

20

Liquidity and Capital Resources

To date, we have financed our operations primarily through net proceeds of $226.2 million from private placements of convertible preferred stock, $46.0 million in proceeds from the Taiho Agreement, net proceeds of $124.7 million from our initial public offering of our common stock in March 2018, and $326.2 million of net proceeds in our May 2020 Public Offering. As of June 30, 2020, we had $462.5 million of cash, cash equivalents, and investments in marketable securities. Our cash and investments are held in a variety of interest-bearing instruments, including money market funds, U.S. government treasury obligations, U.S. government agency securities, and investments in corporate securities. In addition, in July 2020 we received $375.0 million from Gilead upon the closing of the transactions under the Collaboration Agreement and Purchase Agreement with Gilead.

Based on our existing business plan, we believe that our existing cash, cash investments, and short-term investments will be sufficient to fund our planned level of operations through at least the next 12 months following the filing date of this report.

We may require additional capital to complete the development and any commercialization of our investigational products. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

• the scope, rate of progress and costs of our drug discovery, preclinical development activities, laboratory testing and clinical trials for our investigational products;

• the number and scope of clinical programs we decide to pursue;

• the scope and costs of manufacturing development and commercial manufacturing activities;

• the timing and amount of programs Gilead exercises its option to, and the costs associated with our share of the global development plan for such optioned programs;

• the timing and amount of milestone payments we receive under the Taiho Agreement and Gilead Collaboration Agreement, and option fees under the Gilead Collaboration Agreement;

• the extent to which we acquire or in-license other investigational products and technologies;

• the cost, timing and outcome of regulatory review of our investigational products;

• the cost and timing of establishing sales and marketing capabilities, if any of our investigational products receive marketing approval;

• the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property rights and defending intellectual property-related claims;

• our ability to establish and maintain collaborations on favorable terms, if at all;

• our efforts to enhance operational systems and our ability to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel, including personnel to support the development of our investigational products;

• the costs associated with being a public company; and

• the cost associated with commercializing our investigational products, if they receive marketing approval.

If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience dilution. Any future debt financing into which we enter may impose upon us additional covenants that restrict our operations, including limitations on our ability to incur liens or additional debt, pay dividends, repurchase our common stock, make certain investments and engage in certain merger, consolidation or asset sale transactions. Any debt financing or additional equity that we raise may contain terms that are not favorable to us or our stockholders. If we are unable to raise additional funds when needed, we may be required to delay, reduce, or terminate some or all of our development programs and clinical trials. We may also be required to sell or license to others rights to our investigational products in certain territories or indications that we would prefer to develop and commercialize ourselves.

See “Risk Factors” for additional risks associated with our substantial capital requirements.

21

Summary Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

The following table sets forth the primary sources and uses of cash and cash equivalents for each of the periods presented below (in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
Net cash (used in) provided by:	2020			2019
Operating activities	$	(55,215	)	$	(36,592	)
Investing activities		(47,017	)		40,952
Financing activities		329,480			644
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	227,248		$	5,004

Cash Used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2020 increased by $18.6 million to $55.2 million as compared to $36.6 million for the same period in the prior year. The increase in cash used is primarily due to the $27.1 million increase in our net loss to $72.8 million. The change in our net loss is primarily a result of our expanded clinical development activities and general and administrative costs incurred to support our operations. The overall increase in cash used is partially offset by year-over-year changes in non-cash items, including $4.1 million of increased expense from stock-based compensation. Additional increase in cash used resulted from changes in our asset and liability balances due to the timing of payments to or from our vendors and collaborators.

Cash Provided by (Used In) Investing Activities

Cash provided by (used in) investing activities was a $47.0 million use of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $41.0 million provided by investing activities for the same period in the prior year. The change in cash flow from investing activities was primarily due to purchases and maturities of our investments in fixed-income marketable securities, as we invested proceeds from our May 2020 Public Offering.

Cash Provided by Financing Activities

Cash provided by financing activities was $329.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to an immaterial amount of cash provided in the same period in the prior year. The increase in cash provided is primarily due to cash received from our May 2020 Public Offering, net of direct offering costs, as well as funds received during the six months ended June 30, 2020 for issuance of common stock pursuant to equity award plans.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

In June 2020, we entered into a lease amendment for an additional 36,303 square feet of research and development offices in Hayward, California, that is expected to commence in January 2021 for an eight-year term with minimum lease payments of $10.1 million. The lease amendment provides for one eight-year extension period. Other than this lease, there have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of business during the six months ended June 30, 2020, as compared to those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

JOBS Act Accounting Election

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, and will remain an emerging growth company until December 31, 2020. Under the JOBS Act, we elected the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. At June 30, 2020 we determined that we will become a large accelerated filer at December 31, 2020 and in the process will no longer qualify as an emerging growth company. We will adopt any accounting pronouncements deferred under this election on or before December 31, 2020.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Since our inception, we have not engaged in any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in the rules and regulations of the SEC.

22

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

The market risk inherent in our financial instruments and in our financial position represents the potential loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates, exchange rates, or general market and economic conditions. Our market risks have not changed materially from those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2020. We do not believe that inflation, interest rate changes, exchange rate fluctuations, or general market and economic conditions had a significant impact on our results of operations for any periods presented herein.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial & Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within an organization have been detected. Accordingly, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of our disclosure control system are met.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial & Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon, and as of the date of this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial & Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

23

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings. From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. Regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us due to defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources, negative publicity, reputational harm and other factors.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

You should consider carefully the following risk factors, together with all the other information in this report, including our condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, and in our other public filings with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2020. The occurrence of any of the following risks could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or growth prospects or cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements we have made in this report and those we may make from time to time. You should consider all of the risk factors described when evaluating our business.

Risks Related to the Impact of COVID-19

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related risks could have a material adverse impact on our research and development programs and financial condition.  

The degree to which COVID-19 impacts our business operations, research and development programs and financial condition will depend on future developments, including new information which may emerge concerning the duration and/or severity of the outbreak and any resurgences, actions by government authorities to contain the spread of the virus, and when and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume. We expect that this pandemic will result in delays to some of our clinical programs, as well as to our discovery programs, but we are unable to predict the extent of any such delays or impact. Our laboratory-based operations were suspended due to shelter-in-place orders in force during the second quarter of 2020, which will affect our ability to meet some of our discovery and preclinical milestones and timelines. In late June, we began to transition our laboratory-based personnel back into our facilities, however, our laboratories are operating at reduced capacity due to employee safety measures, such as social distancing requirements and shift work.

The full impact of the COVID-19 outbreak continues to evolve and is highly uncertain and subject to change. In connection with our resumption of laboratory operations, we instituted regular COVID-19 testing services in order to minimize the risk to our employees. These additional operating costs, along with the absence of any furlough or measures to reduce personnel costs despite reduced laboratory capacity, will have an adverse impact on our financial condition.

In addition, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including governmental and other actions to combat it such as the imposition of the shelter-in-place and other public health orders, may exacerbate the effects of the risks described below.

Risks Related to our Limited Operating History, Financial Position and Capital Requirements

We are an early-stage immuno-oncology company with a limited operating history. We have incurred net losses since our inception and anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future. We have never generated any revenue from product sales and may never be profitable.

We are an early-stage immuno-oncology company with a limited operating history that may make it difficult to evaluate the success of our business to date and to assess our future viability. All of our investigational products are in early development, and none have been approved for commercial sale. We have never generated any revenue from product sales and have incurred net losses each year since we commenced operations. For the six months ended June 30, 2020 and the year ended December 31, 2019, our net losses were $72.8 million and $84.7 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2020, we had an accumulated deficit of $278.2 million. We expect that it will be several years, if ever, before we have an investigational product ready for commercialization. We expect to incur increasing levels of operating losses over the next several years and for the foreseeable future as we advance our investigational products. Our prior losses, combined with expected future losses, have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our stockholders’ equity (deficit) and working capital.

To become and remain profitable, we must develop and eventually commercialize a product with significant market potential. This will require us to be successful in a range of challenging activities, including completing preclinical studies and clinical trials of our investigational products, obtaining marketing approval for these investigational products, manufacturing, marketing and selling those products for which we may obtain marketing approval and satisfying any post-marketing requirements. We may never succeed in these activities and, even if we succeed in commercializing one or more of our investigational products, we may never generate

24

revenues that are significant or large enough to achieve profitability. In addition, as a young business, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other known and unknown challenges. If we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis and we will continue to incur substantial research and development and other expenditures to develop and market additional investigational products. Our failure to become and remain profitable would decrease the value of the company and could impair our ability to raise capital, maintain our research and development efforts, expand our business or continue our operations. A decline in the value of our company could also cause our stockholders to lose all or part of their investment.

We may need to obtain additional funding to finance our operations and complete the development and any commercialization of our investigational products. If we do not receive substantial opt-in, milestone or royalty payments from our existing collaboration agreements, or are unable to raise additional capital when needed, we may be forced to restrict our operations or delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs.

The development of biopharmaceutical investigational products is capital intensive. Since our inception, we have used substantial amounts of cash to fund our operations and expect our expenses to increase substantially during the next few years as our investigational products enter and advance through preclinical studies and clinical trials and we expand our clinical, regulatory, quality and manufacturing capabilities. In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our investigational products, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to marketing, sales, manufacturing and distribution.

As of June 30, 2020, we had $462.5 million of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. In addition, upon closing of the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, common stock purchase agreement and investor rights agreement with Gilead, we received an upfront payment of $175 million and equity investment of approximately $200 million. While we believe that our cash position will be sufficient to fund our planned level of operations through at least the next 12 months, our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

• the scope, rate of progress and costs of our drug discovery, preclinical development activities, laboratory testing and clinical trials for our investigational products;

• the number and scope of clinical programs we decide to pursue;

• the scope and costs of manufacturing development and commercial manufacturing activities;

• the timing and number of programs Gilead exercises its option to, and the costs associated with our share of the global development plan for such optioned programs;

• the timing and amount of milestone payments we receive from Taiho Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. (Taiho) under our option and license agreement (the Taiho Agreement) and Gilead Collaboration Agreement, and option fees under the Gilead Collaboration Agreement;

• the extent to which we acquire or in-license other investigational products and technologies;

• the cost, timing and outcome of regulatory review of our investigational products;

• the cost and timing of establishing sales and marketing capabilities, if any of our investigational products receive marketing approval;

• the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property rights and defending intellectual property-related claims;

• our ability to establish and maintain collaborations on favorable terms, if at all;

• our efforts to enhance operational systems and our ability to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel, including personnel to support the development of our investigational products;

• the costs associated with being a public company; and

• the cost associated with commercializing our investigational products, if they receive marketing approval.

We cannot guarantee that future financing will be available in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Any additional fundraising efforts may divert our management from their day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our investigational products. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we would be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or future commercialization efforts.

Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our

25

technologies or investigational products.

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, our stockholders’ ownership interests will be diluted and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect their rights as common stockholders. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise funds through additional collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or investigational products or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market investigational products that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

Risks Related to the Discovery and Development of our Investigational Products

We are early in our development efforts. If we are unable to develop, obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize our investigational products, or experience significant delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.

We have no products approved for sale and our clinical-stage investigational products are in the early stages of clinical trials. We may subsequently learn of certain information or data that the FDA may request, which may necessitate conducting additional preclinical studies or generating additional information at significant cost in terms of both time and expense, including under a clinical hold imposed on an investigational new drug application (IND). Even if we conducted the additional studies or generated the additional information requested, the FDA could disagree that we have satisfied their requirements, all of which will cause significant delays and expense to our programs.

As we advance our clinical programs, we will need to expand our clinical operations, quality and regulatory capabilities to support these activities. In part because of our limited infrastructure, experience conducting clinical trials as a company and regulatory interactions, we cannot be certain that our clinical trials will be completed on time, that our planned clinical trials will be initiated on time, if at all, that our planned development programs would be acceptable to the FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities, or that, if approval is obtained, such investigational products can be successfully commercialized.

Our ability to generate product revenue, which we do not expect will occur for many years, if ever, will depend heavily on our ability to successfully complete the above activities and any other activities required for the successful development and eventual commercialization of one or more of our investigational products. The success of our investigational products will further depend on factors such as:

• the success of our collaboration with Gilead;

• successful completion of preclinical studies;

• permission to proceed under regulatory applications for our planned clinical trials or future clinical trials;

• successful enrollment in, and completion of, clinical trials;

• receipt of marketing approvals from applicable regulatory authorities;

• establishing manufacturing capabilities or arrangements with third party manufacturers for clinical supply and, if and when approved, for commercial supply;

• establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities and launching commercial sales of our products, if and when approved, whether alone or in combination with others;

• acceptance of our products, if and when approved, by patients, the medical community and third-party payors;

• effectively competing with other therapies;

• developing and implementing marketing and reimbursement strategies;

• obtaining and maintaining third party coverage and adequate reimbursement;

• obtaining and maintaining patent, trade secret and other intellectual property protection and regulatory exclusivity for our investigational products;

• the ability to obtain clearance or approval of companion diagnostic tests, if required, on a timely basis, or at all; and

26

• maintaining a continued acceptable safety profile of any product following approval.

If we do not achieve one or more of these factors in a timely manner, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully commercialize our investigational products, which would materially harm our business.

Clinical drug development is a lengthy, expensive and uncertain process. The results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials are not always predictive of future results. Any investigational product that we advance into clinical trials may not achieve favorable results in later clinical trials, if any, or receive marketing approval.

The research and development of drugs and biological products is an extremely risky industry. Only a small percentage of investigational products that enter the development process ever receive marketing approval. Before obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of any investigational product, we must complete preclinical development and then conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our investigational products in humans. Clinical testing is expensive, can take many years to complete and its outcome is uncertain.

The results of preclinical and early clinical trials of our investigational products and other products with the same mechanism of action may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. Clinical trial failure may result from a multitude of factors including flaws in study design, dose selection, placebo effect, patient enrollment criteria and failure to demonstrate favorable safety or efficacy traits. As such, failure in clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered setbacks in the advancement of clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or adverse safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in earlier trials. Based upon negative or inconclusive results, we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical trials or preclinical studies. In addition, data obtained from clinical trials are susceptible to varying interpretations, and regulators may not interpret our data as favorably as we do, which may further delay, limit or prevent marketing approval. In particular, results from uncontrolled trials, meaning trials in which there is no control group such as a placebo group, are inherently difficult to interpret. Clinical trials evaluating two or more investigational products in combination that have not yet been approved can compound these difficulties. As a key element of our strategy is the development of intra-portfolio combinations, many of our clinical trials will test more than one investigational products in uncontrolled studies, such as the clinical trials in our Phase 1/1b program for etrumadenant (formerly referred to as AB928) in which we are evaluating etrumadenant in combination with zimberelimab. Furthermore, as more investigational products within a particular class of drugs proceed through clinical development to regulatory review and approval, the amount and type of clinical data that may be required by regulatory authorities may increase or change.

We currently have four investigational products in clinical development and their risk of failure is high. We are unable to predict if these investigational products or any of our future investigational products that advance into clinical trials will prove safe or effective in humans or will obtain marketing approval. If we are unable to complete preclinical or clinical trials of current or future investigational products, due to safety concerns, or if the results of these trials are not satisfactory to convince regulatory authorities of their safety or efficacy, we will not be able to obtain marketing approval for commercialization. Even if we are able to obtain marketing approvals for any of our investigational products, those approvals may be for indications that are not as broad as desired or may contain other limitations that would adversely affect our ability to generate revenue from sales of those products. Moreover, if we are not able to differentiate our product against other approved products within the same class of drugs, or if any of the other circumstances described above occur, our business would be materially harmed and our ability to generate revenue from that class of drugs would be severely impaired.

Enrollment and retention of subjects in clinical trials is expensive and time consuming, can be made more difficult or rendered impossible by competing treatments, clinical trials of competing investigational products, and public health epidemics, each of which could result in significant delays and additional costs in our product development activities, or in the failure of such activities.

We may encounter delays in enrolling, or be unable to enroll and maintain, a sufficient number of subjects to complete any of our clinical trials. Patient enrollment and retention in clinical trials is a significant factor in the timing of clinical trials and depends on many factors, including the size of the patient population required for analysis of the trial’s primary endpoints, the nature of the trial protocol, our ability to recruit clinical trial investigators with the appropriate competencies and experience, the existing body of safety and efficacy data with respect to the investigational product, the number and nature of competing products or investigational products and ongoing clinical trials of competing investigational products for the same indication, the proximity of subjects to clinical trial sites, the eligibility criteria for the clinical trial and our ability to obtain and maintain subject consents.

For example, enrollment of oncology subjects in our zimberelimab clinical trial may be hampered by nivolumab from Bristol-Myers Squibb and pembrolizumab from Merck, both of which are approved and on the market. Subjects may opt to be treated with an

27

approved product rather than our anti-PD-1 antibody investigational product. In addition, Roche/Genentech have initiated Phase 3 trials with their anti-TIGIT antibody, which could reduce the number of clinical sites and subjects available for our Phase 2 trial evaluating our own anti-TIGIT antibody, AB154. Similarly, we are aware that AstraZeneca is conducting a broad clinical program with its A_2aR antagonist in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and we may compete for clinical sites and enrollment in this patient population, which may adversely impact the rate of enrollment and the timely completion of our Phase 1/1b trials evaluating etrumadenant (formerly AB928) in mCRPC.

Public health outbreaks, such as the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic, are also expected to adversely impact our clinical trial operations. We anticipate that the limited resources available at investigational sites will limit their ability to conduct and report all patient assessments and hinder their ability to collect all patients samples, which may impact our ability to assess the activity of our investigational products in a timely manner.

Furthermore, any negative results that we may report in clinical trials of our investigational products may make it difficult or impossible to recruit and retain subjects in other clinical trials of that same investigational product. Delays in patient enrollment may result in increased costs or may affect the timing or outcome of the planned clinical trials, which could prevent completion of these trials and adversely affect our ability to advance the development of our investigational products. Failures in planned subject enrollment or retention may result in increased costs or program delays and could render further development impossible.

If we do not achieve our product development goals in the time frames we announce and expect, the commercialization of our investigational products may be delayed, our share price may decline and our commercial prospects may be adversely affected.

Drug development is inherently risky and uncertain. The actual timing of our development milestones can vary significantly compared to our estimates, in some cases for reasons beyond our control, for any number of reasons, including:

• delays in completing IND-enabling preclinical studies or developing manufacturing processes and associated analytical methods that meet cGMP requirements;

• the FDA placing a clinical trial on hold;

• subjects failing to enroll or remain in our trial at the rate we expect;

• subjects choosing an alternative treatment or other investigational products, or participating in competing clinical trials;

• lack of adequate funding to continue our clinical trials;

• subjects experiencing severe or unexpected drug-related adverse effects;

• any interruptions or delays in the supply of our investigational products for our clinical trials;

• a facility manufacturing any of our investigational products or any of their components being ordered by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities to temporarily or permanently shut down due to violations of good manufacturing practice (cGMP) regulations or other applicable requirements, or infections or cross-contaminations of investigational products in the manufacturing process;

• any changes to our manufacturing process or product specifications that may be necessary or desired;

• any failure or delay in reaching an agreement with contract research organizations (CROs) and clinical trial sites;

• third-party clinical investigators losing the licenses or permits necessary to perform our clinical trials, not performing our clinical trials on our anticipated schedule or consistent with the clinical trial protocol, good clinical practices (GCP) or regulatory requirements or other third parties not performing data collection or analysis in a timely or accurate manner;

• third-party contractors becoming debarred or suspended or otherwise penalized by the FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities for violations of applicable regulatory requirements, in which case we may need to find a substitute contractor, and we may not be able to use some or all of the data produced by such contractors in support of our marketing applications;

• one or more Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) refusing to approve, suspending or terminating the trial at an investigational site, precluding enrollment of additional subjects, or withdrawing its approval of the trial;

• changes in regulatory requirements and policies, which may require us to amend clinical trial protocols to comply with these changes and resubmit our clinical trial protocols to IRBs for reexamination; or

• health crises and other epidemics, such as the recent COVID-19 outbreak, which has led to mandatory quarantines that has restricted the ability of trial sites to initiate new trials, screen patients for enrollment or treat enrolled patients, and has

28

diverted clinical trial site resources away from the conduct of our clinical trials.

These and other factors may also lead to the suspension or termination of clinical trials, and ultimately the denial of regulatory approval of an investigational product. Any delays in achieving our development goals may allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do and adversely affect our commercial prospects and cause our stock price to decline.

Preliminary and interim data from our clinical studies that we announce or publish from time to time are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data and may change as more patient data become available.

From time to time, we publish preliminary or interim data from our clinical studies. Preliminary data remain subject to audit confirmation and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. Interim data are also subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. As a result, preliminary and interim data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Material adverse changes in the final data could significantly harm our business prospects.

Serious adverse events, undesirable side effects or other unexpected properties of our investigational products may be identified during development or after approval, which could lead to the discontinuation of our clinical development programs, refusal by regulatory authorities to approve our investigational products or limitations on the use of our investigational products or, if discovered following marketing approval, revocation of marketing authorizations or subsequent limitations on the use of our investigational products.

To date, we have only tested our clinical-stage investigational products in a relatively small number of oncology subjects. As we continue our development of these investigational products and initiate clinical trials of our additional investigational products, serious adverse events, undesirable side effects or unexpected characteristics may emerge causing us to abandon these investigational products or limit their development to more narrow uses or subpopulations in which the serious adverse events, undesirable side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective. Even if our investigational products initially show promise in these early clinical trials, the side effects of drugs are frequently only detectable after they are tested in large, Phase 3 clinical trials or, in some cases, after they are made available to patients on a commercial scale after approval. Sometimes, it can be difficult to determine if the serious adverse or unexpected side effects were caused by the investigational product or another factor, especially in oncology subjects who may suffer from other medical conditions and be taking other medications. If serious adverse or unexpected side effects are identified during development and are determined to be attributed to our investigational product, we may be required to develop a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) to mitigate those serious safety risks, which could impose significant distribution and use restrictions on our products.

Drug-related side effects could also affect subject recruitment or the ability of enrolled subjects to complete the trial or result in potential product liability claims. Any of these occurrences may harm our business prospects significantly.

In addition, if one or more of our investigational products receives marketing approval, and we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by such products, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including:

• regulatory authorities may withdraw approvals of such product;

• regulatory authorities may require additional warnings on the label;

• we may be required to create a medication guide outlining the risks of such side effects for distribution to patients;

• regulatory authorities may impose subsequent limitations on the use of the product;

• we could be sued and held liable for harm caused to patients; and

• our reputation may suffer.

Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the particular investigational product, if approved, and could significantly harm our business, results of operations and prospects.

Adverse findings from clinical trials conducted by third parties investigating the same investigational products as us in different territories could adversely affect our development program.

Lack of efficacy, adverse events, undesirable side effects or other adverse findings may emerge in clinical trials conducted by third parties investigating the same investigational products as us in different territories. For example, we and Guangzhou Gloria Biosciences, Co. (Gloria Biosciences, formerly known as Harbin Gloria Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd.) each licensed our rights to the same

29

anti-PD-1 antibody (which we refer to as zimberelimab) from WuXi Biologics (Cayman) Inc. (WuXi Biologics). Gloria Biosciences refers to this antibody as GLS-010 and is conducting clinical trials with GLS-010 in China. We have no control over their clinical trials or development program, and adverse findings from the results or their conduct of clinical trials could adversely affect our development of zimberelimab or even the viability of zimberelimab as an investigational product. We may be required to report Gloria Biosciences’ adverse events or unexpected side effects to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, which could, among other things, order us to cease further development of zimberelimab. We may face similar risks to our programs that Taiho has exercised its option to license development rights under the Taiho Agreement.

A key element of our strategy is the development of intra-portfolio combinations. If we are not successful in discovering, developing and commercializing investigational products that take advantage of different mechanisms of action to achieve superior outcomes relative to the use of single agents or other combination therapies, our ability to achieve our strategic objectives would be impaired.

A key element of our strategy is to build a broad portfolio of investigational products that will allow for the development of intra-portfolio combinations. We believe that by developing or licensing these investigational products, we can control the combinations we pursue and, if and when approved, maximize the commercial potential of these combinations. However, these combinations have not been tested before and may fail to demonstrate synergistic activity against immunological targets, may fail to achieve superior outcomes relative to the use of single agents or other combination therapies, may exacerbate adverse events associated with one of the investigational products when used as monotherapy, or may fail to demonstrate sufficient safety or efficacy traits in clinical trials to enable us to complete those clinical trials or obtain marketing approval for the combination therapy. In addition, it may be difficult to interpret the results of any uncontrolled trials we conduct with our intra-portfolio combinations, such as the clinical trials in our Phase 1/1b program for etrumadenant (formerly referred to as AB928) in which we are evaluating etrumadenant in combination with zimberelimab.

We expect that our anti-PD-1 antibody, zimberelimab, will form the backbone of many of our intra-portfolio combinations. In the event that zimberelimab were to fail to demonstrate sufficient safety and efficacy, we would need to identify alternatives for accessing an anti-PD-1 antibody. In the event we are unable to do so or are unable to do so on commercially reasonable terms, our business and prospects would be materially harmed.

All of our investigational products are targeting mechanisms that other companies are pursuing as either monotherapy or combination products. As such, even if we are successful in developing combination therapies, competition from other investigational products in the same class which are either already approved or further along in development than ours may prevent us from realizing the commercial potential of our combination therapies and prevent us from achieving our strategic objectives.

Our intra-portfolio combination strategy relies on discovering, developing and commercializing highly differentiated small molecules. If we are not able to differentiate our small molecules from other products which are approved or in development, our business prospects would be materially adversely affected.

Our combination therapy strategy relies on discovering and developing differentiated small molecules with ideal pharmacologic properties for the targeted pathway to complement our antibody investigational products, which we believe will form the backbone of our combination therapies. We conduct in our laboratories those activities that we consider to be critical for creating a development candidate with optimal properties. These activities include medicinal chemistry, assay development, assessment of compound potency and selectivity, in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic profile evaluation, in vivo pharmacology and exploratory safety evaluation, among others. As such, we have invested heavily in these internal capabilities and over 75% of our current workforce is dedicated to research and development.

In addition, any small molecules we discover and design may, on further study, be shown to have harmful side effects or other characteristics that indicate that they are unlikely to be medicines that will receive marketing approval and achieve market acceptance. If we are unable to identify suitable compounds with ideal pharmacological properties and which are differentiated from other investigational products in development for preclinical and clinical development, our business and prospects would be materially harmed.

Certain of our investigational products may require companion diagnostics in certain indications. Failure to successfully develop, validate and obtain regulatory clearance or approval for such tests could harm our product development strategy or prevent us from realizing the full commercial potential of our investigational products.

Companion diagnostics are subject to regulation by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities as a medical device and may require separate regulatory authorization prior to commercialization. Certain clinical trials that we are conducting, or may in the future conduct, include the use of a diagnostic test to help identify eligible patients. For example, we are conducting a clinical trial

30

in collaboration with Strata Oncology (Strata) to evaluate zimberelimab in patients in a tumor-agnostic fashion utilizing Strata’s precision drug development platform and proprietary biomarkers. We also have significant efforts directed to identifying changes in various cells and proteins to understand their relationship, if any, to the clinical activity observed in our clinical trials and to assess if such cells and/or proteins could be used as predictive biomarkers to select for patients more likely to respond to our investigational products. However, we cannot be certain that we will be able to identify any such biomarkers, that such biomarkers will result in us identifying the appropriate patients for our investigational products or that we or any third party collaborators will be able to validate any diagnostic tests incorporating any predictive biomarkers we may identify.

We currently do not have any plans to develop diagnostic tests internally. We are therefore dependent on the sustained cooperation and effort of third-party collaborators in developing and, if our investigational products are approved for use only with an approved companion diagnostic test, obtaining approval and commercializing these tests. If these parties are unable to successfully develop companion diagnostics for these investigational products, or experience delays in doing so, the development of our investigational products may be adversely affected and we may not be able to obtain marketing authorization for these investigational products. Furthermore, our ability to market and sell, as well as the commercial success, of any of our investigational products that require a companion diagnostic will be tied to, and dependent upon, the receipt of required regulatory authorization and the continued ability of such third parties to make the companion diagnostic commercially available on reasonable terms in the relevant geographies. Any failure to develop, validate, obtain and maintain marketing authorization and supply for a companion diagnostic we need will harm our business prospects.

The design or our execution of our ongoing and future clinical trials may not support marketing approval.

The design or execution of a clinical trial can determine whether its results will support marketing approval, and flaws in the design or execution of a clinical trial may not become apparent until the clinical trial is well advanced. In some instances, there can be significant variability in safety or efficacy results between different trials with the same investigational product due to numerous factors, including differences in trial protocols, size and type of the patient populations, variable adherence to the dosing regimen or other protocol requirements and the rate of dropout among clinical trial participants. The FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and in determining when or whether marketing approval will be obtained for any of our investigational products. Our investigational products may not be approved even if they achieve their primary endpoints in future Phase 3 clinical trials or registrational trials. The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our trial designs and our interpretation of data from preclinical studies or clinical trials. In addition, any of these regulatory authorities may change requirements for the approval of an investigational product even after reviewing and providing comments or advice on a protocol for a pivotal Phase 3 or registrational clinical trial that has the potential to result in FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities’ approval. Any of these regulatory authorities may also approve an investigational product for fewer or more limited indications than we request or may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials. Even if the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities approve an investigational product, they may not approve the labeling claims that we believe would be necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of our investigational products.

We have conducted, and continue to conduct, portions of our clinical trials outside the United States, and the FDA may not accept data from trials conducted in foreign locations.

We have conducted, and we expect to continue to conduct, portions of our clinical trials outside the United States. Although the FDA may accept data from clinical trials conducted outside the United States, acceptance of these data is subject to certain conditions imposed by the FDA. For example, the clinical trial must be well designed and conducted and performed by qualified investigators in accordance with ethical principles. The trial population must also adequately represent the U.S. population, and the data must be applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice in ways that the FDA deems clinically meaningful. In general, the patient population for any clinical trials conducted outside the United States must be representative of the population for whom we intend to label the product in the United States. In addition, while these clinical trials are subject to the applicable local laws, FDA acceptance of the data will be dependent upon its determination that the trials also complied with all applicable U.S. laws and regulations. We cannot assure you that the FDA will accept data from trials conducted outside the United States. If the FDA does not accept the data from such clinical trials, we would likely need to conduct additional trials, which would be costly and time-consuming and delay or permanently halt our development of our investigational products.

Risks Related to Reliance on Third Parties, Manufacturing and Commercialization

We expect to depend on our collaboration with Gilead for the research, development, manufacture and commercialization of our investigational products. If this collaboration is not successful, our business could be adversely affected.

In May 2020, we entered into an option, license and collaboration Agreement (the Gilead Collaboration Agreement) with Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Gilead) pursuant to which Gilead obtained an exclusive option to all of our current and future programs during the 10-

31

year collaboration term. Upon Gilead’s exercise of its option to a program, the companies will co-develop and equally share global development costs, subject to certain opt-out rights for us, expense caps on our spending and true-up adjustments. For each optioned program, provided we have not exercised our opt-out rights, we have an option to co-promote in the United States and share equally all associated profits and losses. Gilead has the right to exclusively commercialize any optioned programs outside of the U.S., subject to the rights of our existing partners to any territories, and will pay us tiered royalties as a percentage of revenues ranging from the high teens to the low twenties. In connection with the entering into of the Gilead Agreement, we and Gilead also entered into a common stock purchase agreement and an investor rights agreement. Our agreements with Gilead pose a number of risks including, but not limited to, the following:

• we may not be successful in this collaboration due to various factors, including our ability to demonstrate proof of concept in one or more clinical studies so that Gilead will exercise its option to these programs;

• if our collaborations on research and development candidates do not result in the successful development and commercialization of products or if Gilead terminates the collaboration agreement with us, we may not receive any future research funding or milestone or royalty payments under the collaboration. If we do not receive the funding we expect under these agreements, our development of our investigational products could be delayed and we may need additional resources to develop our investigational products;

• conflicts may arise between us and Gilead, such as conflicts regarding the combinations or indications to pursue or concerning the interpretation of clinical data, the commercial potential of any optioned investigational products, the interpretation of financial provisions or the ownership of intellectual property developed during the collaboration. Any such conflicts could slow or prevent the development or commercialization of our investigational products;

• we will be heavily dependent on Gilead for its further development and commercialization of the investigational products from the programs that it opts into;

• we have appointed one individual designated by Gilead to our board of directors pursuant to Gilead’s right to designate two individuals to be appointed to our board of directors, and will appoint another individual designated by Gilead to our board of directors in 2020 pursuant to this right, and Gilead owns approximately 13% of our outstanding common stock and will have the right (but not the obligation) to acquire additional shares from us up to an amount resulting in Gilead owning a total of 35% of our outstanding common stock and, as a result, may be able to exert significant influence over our company;

• Gilead could independently develop, or develop with third parties, products that compete directly or indirectly with our investigational products if Gilead believes that competitive products are more likely to be successfully developed or can be commercialized under terms that are more economically attractive than ours; and

• because Gilead has an option to all of our programs, it will be difficult for us to enter into new collaborations.

We rely on third parties to conduct our clinical trials and perform some of our research and preclinical studies. If these third parties do not satisfactorily carry out their contractual duties or fail to meet expected deadlines, our development programs may be delayed or subject to increased costs, each of which may have an adverse effect on our business and prospects.

We do not have the ability to conduct all aspects of our preclinical testing or clinical trials ourselves. As a result, we are and expect to remain dependent on third parties to conduct our ongoing clinical trials and any future clinical trials of our investigational products. The timing of the initiation and completion of these trials will therefore be partially controlled by such third parties and may result in delays to our development programs. Specifically, we expect CROs, clinical investigators, and consultants to play a significant role in the conduct of these trials and the subsequent collection and analysis of data. However, we will not be able to control all aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol and legal, regulatory and scientific standards, and our reliance on the CROs and other third parties does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. We and our CROs are required to comply with GCP requirements, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA, the Competent Authorities of the Member States of the European Economic Area, Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for all of our investigational products in clinical development. Regulatory authorities enforce these GCP requirements through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, clinical trial investigators and clinical trial sites. If we or any of our CROs or clinical trial sites fail to comply with applicable GCP requirements, the data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable, and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with product produced under cGMP regulations. Our failure to comply with these regulations may require us to stop and/or repeat clinical trials, which would delay the marketing approval process.

There is no guarantee that any such CROs, clinical trial investigators or other third parties on which we rely will devote adequate time and resources to our development activities or perform as contractually required. If any of these third parties fail to meet expected deadlines, adhere to our clinical protocols or meet regulatory requirements, otherwise performs in a substandard manner, or

32

terminates its engagement with us, the timelines for our development programs may be extended or delayed or our development activities may be suspended or terminated. If any of our clinical trial sites terminates for any reason, we may experience the loss of follow-up information on subjects enrolled in such clinical trials unless we are able to transfer those subjects to another qualified clinical trial site, which may be difficult or impossible. In addition, clinical trial investigators for our clinical trials may serve as scientific advisors or consultants to us from time to time and may receive cash or equity compensation in connection with such services. If these relationships and any related compensation result in perceived or actual conflicts of interest, or the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities concludes that the financial relationship may have affected the interpretation of the trial, the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site may be questioned and the utility of the clinical trial itself may be jeopardized, which could result in the delay or rejection of any marketing application we submit by the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority. Any such delay or rejection could prevent us from commercializing our investigational products.

Furthermore, these third parties may also have relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or conduct our clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or our stated protocols, we will not be able to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining, marketing approvals for our investigational products and will not be able to, or may be delayed in our efforts to, successfully commercialize our products.

We contract with third parties for the manufacturing and supply of investigational products for use in preclinical testing and clinical trials, which supply may become limited or interrupted or may not be of satisfactory quality and quantity.

We do not have any manufacturing facilities. We produce in our laboratory relatively small quantities of compounds for evaluation in our research programs. We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties for the manufacture of our investigational products for preclinical and clinical testing, as well as for commercial manufacture if any of our investigational products are approved. We currently have limited manufacturing arrangements and expect that each of our investigational products will only be covered by single source suppliers for the foreseeable future. In particular, we have an exclusive relationship with WuXi Biologics, located in China, for the manufacture of our investigational biologics, zimberelimab and AB154. While we have not yet experienced any disruptions in the supply of our investigational products as a result of the COVID-19 health crisis, our reliance on limited manufacturing and supply relationships increases the risk that we will not have sufficient quantities of our investigational products or products, if approved, or such quantities at an acceptable cost or quality, which could delay, prevent or impair our development or commercialization efforts.

Furthermore, all entities involved in the preparation of therapeutics for clinical trials or commercial sale, including our existing contract manufacturers for our investigational products, are subject to extensive regulation. Components of a finished therapeutic product approved for commercial sale or used in clinical trials must be manufactured in accordance with cGMP requirements. These regulations govern manufacturing processes and procedures, including record keeping, and the implementation and operation of quality systems to control and assure the quality of investigational products and products approved for sale. Poor control of production processes can lead to the introduction of contaminants, or to inadvertent changes in the properties or stability of our investigational products that may not be detectable in final product testing. We or our contract manufacturers must supply all necessary documentation in support of a New Drug Application (NDA) or Biologics License Application (BLA) on a timely basis and must adhere to the FDA’s Good Laboratory Practice regulations and cGMP regulations enforced by the FDA through its facilities inspection program. Comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require compliance with similar requirements. The facilities and quality systems of our third-party contractor manufacturers must pass a pre-approval inspection for compliance with the applicable regulations as a condition of marketing approval of our investigational products. We do not control the manufacturing process of, and are completely dependent on, our contract manufacturing partners for compliance with cGMP regulations.

In the event that any of our manufacturers fails to comply with such requirements or to perform its obligations to us in relation to quality, timing or otherwise, or if our supply of components or other materials becomes limited or interrupted for other reasons, we may be forced to manufacture the materials ourselves, for which we currently do not have the capabilities or resources, or enter into an agreement with another third party, which we may not be able to do on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. In particular, any replacement of our manufacturers could require significant effort and expertise because there may be a limited number of qualified replacements. In some cases, the technical skills or technology required to manufacture our investigational products may be unique or proprietary to the original manufacturer and we may have difficulty transferring such skills or technology to another third party and a feasible alternative may not exist. These factors would increase our reliance on such manufacturer or require us to obtain a license from such manufacturer in order to have another third party manufacture our investigational products. If we are required to change manufacturers for any reason, we will be required to verify that the new manufacturer maintains facilities and procedures that comply with quality standards and with all applicable regulations and guidelines. The delays associated with the verification of a new manufacturer could negatively affect our ability to develop investigational products in a timely manner or within budget. Our or a third party’s failure to execute on our manufacturing requirements, to do so on commercially reasonable terms and comply with cGMP could adversely affect our business in a number of ways, including:

33

• an inability to initiate or continue clinical trials of our investigational products under development;

• delay in submitting regulatory applications, or receiving marketing approvals, for our investigational products;

• loss of the cooperation of an existing or future collaborator, including option exercises by Taiho or Gilead under the Taiho Agreement or Gilead Collaboration Agreement, respectively;

• subjecting third-party manufacturing facilities or our manufacturing facilities to additional inspections by regulatory authorities;

• requirements to cease development or to recall batches of our investigational products; and

• in the event of approval to market and commercialize our investigational products, an inability to meet commercial demands for our product or any other future investigational products.

We, or our third-party manufacturers, may be unable to successfully scale-up manufacturing of our investigational products in sufficient quality and quantity, which would delay or prevent us from conducting clinical trials and developing our investigational products.

In order to conduct clinical trials of our investigational products, we will need to manufacture them in large quantities. We, or our manufacturing partners, may be unable to successfully increase the manufacturing capacity for any of our investigational products in a timely or cost-effective manner, or at all. In addition, quality issues may arise during scale-up activities. If we or our manufacturing partners are unable to successfully scale up the manufacture of our investigational products in sufficient quality and quantity, the development, testing and clinical trials of that investigational product may be delayed or become infeasible, and marketing approval or commercial launch of any resulting product may be delayed or not obtained, which could significantly harm our business.

Changes in methods of investigational product manufacturing or formulation may result in additional costs or delay.

As investigational products progress through preclinical to late stage clinical trials to marketing approval and commercialization, it is common that various aspects of the development program, such as the investigational product’s specifications, manufacturing methods and formulation, are altered along the way in an effort to optimize yield and manufacturing batch size, minimize costs and achieve consistent quality and results. Such changes carry the risk that they will not achieve these intended objectives. Any of these changes could cause our investigational products to perform differently and affect the results of planned clinical trials or other future clinical trials conducted with the altered materials. This could delay completion of clinical trials, require the conduct of bridging clinical trials or the repetition of one or more clinical trials, increase clinical trial costs, delay approval of our investigational products and jeopardize our ability to commercialize our investigational products and generate revenue.

The manufacture of biologics is complex and our third-party manufacturers may encounter difficulties in production. If any of our third-party manufacturers encounter such difficulties, our ability to provide supply of our investigational products for clinical trials or our products for patients, if approved, could be delayed or prevented.

Manufacturing biologics, especially in large quantities, is often complex and may require the use of innovative technologies to handle living cells. Each lot of an approved biologic must undergo thorough testing for identity, strength, quality, purity and potency. Manufacturing biologics requires facilities specifically designed for and validated for this purpose, and sophisticated quality assurance and quality control procedures are necessary. Slight deviations anywhere in the manufacturing process, including filling, labeling, packaging, storage and shipping and quality control and testing, may result in lot failures, product recalls or spoilage. When changes are made to the manufacturing process, we may be required to provide preclinical and clinical data showing the comparable identity, strength, quality, purity or potency of the products before and after such changes. If microbial, viral or other contaminations are discovered at the facilities of our manufacturer, such facilities may need to be closed for an extended period of time to investigate and remedy the contamination, which could delay clinical trials and adversely harm our business. The use of biologically derived ingredients can also lead to allegations of harm, including infections or allergic reactions, or closure of product facilities due to possible contamination.

In addition, there are risks associated with large scale manufacturing for clinical trials or commercial scale including, among others, cost overruns, potential problems with process scale-up, process reproducibility, stability issues, compliance with good manufacturing practices, lot consistency and timely availability of raw materials. Even if we obtain marketing approval for any of our investigational products, there is no assurance that our manufacturers will be able to manufacture the approved product to specifications acceptable to the FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities, to produce it in sufficient quantities to meet the requirements for the potential commercial launch of the product or to meet potential future demand. If our manufacturers are unable to produce sufficient quantities for clinical trials or for commercialization, our development and commercialization efforts would be impaired, which would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

34

Our reliance on third parties requires us to share our trade secrets, which increases the possibility that a competitor will discover them or that our trade secrets will be misappropriated or disclosed.

Because we rely on third parties to research and develop and to manufacture our investigational products, we must share trade secrets with them. We seek to protect our proprietary technology in part by entering into confidentiality agreements and, if applicable, material transfer agreements, consulting agreements or other similar agreements with our advisors, employees, third-party contractors and consultants prior to beginning research or disclosing proprietary information. These agreements typically limit the rights of the third parties to use or disclose our confidential information, including our trade secrets. Despite the contractual provisions employed when working with third parties, the need to share trade secrets and other confidential information increases the risk that such trade secrets become known by our competitors, are inadvertently incorporated into the technology of others, or are disclosed or used in violation of these agreements. Given that our proprietary position is based, in part, on our know-how and trade secrets, a competitor’s independent discovery of our trade secrets or other unauthorized use or disclosure would impair our competitive position and may have a material adverse effect on our business.

In addition, these agreements typically restrict the ability of our advisors, employees, third-party contractors and consultants to publish data potentially relating to our trade secrets, although our agreements may contain certain limited publication rights. For example, any academic institution that we may collaborate with will likely expect to be granted rights to publish data arising out of such collaboration and any joint research and development programs may require us to share trade secrets under the terms of our research and development or similar agreements. Despite our efforts to protect our trade secrets, our competitors may discover our trade secrets, either through breach of our agreements with third parties, independent development or publication of information by any of our third-party collaborators. A competitor’s discovery of our trade secrets would impair our competitive position and have an adverse impact on our business.

Our employees, clinical trial investigators, CROs, consultants, vendors, collaboration partners and any potential commercial partners may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including non-compliance with regulatory standards and requirements and insider trading.

We are exposed to the risk of fraud or other misconduct by our employees, clinical trial investigators, CROs, consultants, vendors, collaboration partners and any potential commercial partners. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional, reckless and/or negligent conduct or disclosure of unauthorized activities to us that violates: (i) FDA laws and regulations or those of comparable foreign regulatory authorities, including those laws that require the reporting of true, complete and accurate information, (ii) manufacturing standards, (iii) federal and state health and data privacy, security, fraud and abuse, government price reporting, transparency reporting requirements, and other healthcare laws and regulations in the United States and abroad, or (iv) laws that require the true, complete and accurate reporting of financial information or data. Such misconduct could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and cause serious harm to our reputation. We have adopted a code of conduct applicable to all of our employees, as well as a disclosure program and other applicable policies and procedures, but it is not always possible to identify and deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with these laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including the imposition of significant fines or other sanctions.

Even if we receive marketing approval, we may not be successful in commercializing our investigational products.

We have no sales, marketing or distribution capabilities or experience. If any of our investigational products ultimately obtains regulatory approval, we, whether alone or in collaboration with Gilead for programs that we commercialize together, may not be able to effectively or successful market the product due to a number of factors, including:

• the imposition by regulatory authorities of significant restrictions on a product’s indicated uses, marketing or distribution;

• the imposition by regulatory authorities of costly and time-consuming post-approval studies, post-market surveillance or additional clinical trials;

• our failure to establish sales and marketing capabilities;

• the failure of our products to achieve the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients, hospitals, cancer treatment centers, healthcare payors and others in the medical community necessary for commercial success;

• unfavorable pricing regulations or third-party coverage and reimbursement policies;

• inaccuracies in our estimates of the addressable patient population resulting in a smaller market opportunity than we believed.

If any of our investigational products for which we have or retain sales and marketing responsibilities are approved, we must either develop a sales and marketing organization, which would be expensive and time consuming, or outsource these functions to

35

other third parties. We may be unable to recruit and retain adequate numbers of effective sales and marketing personnel, and if we enter into arrangements with third parties to perform sales, marketing and distribution services our product revenue or the profitability of these product revenue to us are likely to be lower than if we were to market and sell any medicines that we develop ourselves.

Furthermore, our commercial success is dependent on obtaining coverage and reimbursement approval for a product from a government or other third-party payor, which is a time-consuming and costly process that could require us and any collaborators to provide supporting scientific, clinical and cost effectiveness data for the use of our products to the payor. There may be significant delays in obtaining such coverage and reimbursement for newly approved products, and coverage may be more limited than the purposes for which the product is approved by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Moreover, eligibility for coverage and reimbursement does not imply that a product will be paid for in all cases or at a rate that covers our costs, including research, development, intellectual property, manufacture, sale and distribution expenses. Interim reimbursement levels for new products, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and may not be made permanent. Obtaining reimbursement for our products may be particularly difficult because of the higher prices often associated with branded therapeutics and therapeutics administered under the supervision of a physician.

Reimbursement may also impact the demand for, and the price of, any product for which we obtain marketing approval. Assuming we obtain coverage for a given product by a third-party payor, the resulting reimbursement payment rates may not be adequate or may require co-payments that patients find unacceptably high. Patients who are prescribed medications for the treatment of their conditions, and their prescribing physicians, generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the costs associated with those medications. Patients are unlikely to use our products unless coverage is provided and reimbursement is adequate to cover all or a significant portion of the cost of our products. Therefore, coverage and adequate reimbursement is critical to new product acceptance and we expect to experience pricing pressures in connection with the sale of any of our investigational products due to the trend toward managed healthcare, the increasing influence of health maintenance organizations, and additional legislative changes.

Our or our collaborators’ inability to successful market and sell any of our investigational products, if approved, could have a material adverse effect on our business and our overall financial condition.

Even if our investigational products are approved by the FDA, they may never be approved or commercialized outside the United States, which would limit our ability to realize their full market potential.

In order to market any products outside the United States, we or our collaborators must establish and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of other countries regarding safety and efficacy. Clinical trials conducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries, and regulatory approval in one country does not mean that regulatory approval will be obtained in any other country. Approval procedures vary among countries and can involve additional product testing and validation and additional administrative review periods. Seeking foreign regulatory approvals could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us or our collaborators and may require additional preclinical studies or clinical trials which would be costly and time consuming. Regulatory requirements can vary widely from country to country and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in those countries. Satisfying these and other regulatory requirements is costly, time consuming, uncertain and subject to unanticipated delays. In addition, our or our collaborators’ failure to obtain regulatory approval in any country may delay or have negative effects on the process for regulatory approval in other countries. We do not have any investigational products approved for sale in any jurisdiction, including international markets, and we do not have experience in obtaining regulatory approval in international markets. If we or our collaborators fail to comply with regulatory requirements in international markets or fail to obtain and maintain required approvals, our ability to realize the full market potential of our products will be harmed.

Any investigational products for which we intend to seek approval as biologic products may face competition sooner than anticipated.

The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCIA) created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products that are biosimilar to or interchangeable with an FDA-licensed reference biological product. Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years following the date that the reference product was first licensed by the FDA. In addition, the approval of a biosimilar product may not be made effective by the FDA until twelve years from the date on which the reference product was first licensed. During this twelve-year period of exclusivity, another company may still market a competing version of the reference product if the FDA approves a full BLA for the competing product containing the sponsor’s own preclinical data and data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the safety, purity and potency of its product. The law is complex and is still being interpreted and implemented by the FDA. As a result, any such processes could have a material adverse effect on the future commercial prospects for our biological products.

Zimberelimab and AB154 are biological products and we may develop additional biological products in the future. We believe that any of our current and future investigational products approved as a biological product under a BLA should qualify for the twelve-year period of exclusivity. However, there is a risk that this exclusivity could be shortened due to Congressional action or otherwise, or that the FDA will not consider our investigational products to be reference products for competing products, potentially creating the opportunity for biosimilar competition sooner than anticipated. Other aspects of the BPCIA, some of which may impact the BPCIA exclusivity provisions, have also been the subject of recent litigation. Moreover, the extent to which a biosimilar, once approved, could be substituted for any one of our reference products in a way that is similar to traditional generic substitution for non-

36

biological products will depend on a number of marketplace and regulatory factors that are still developing.

Risks Related to our In-Licenses and Other Strategic Agreements

We are currently party to several in-license agreements under which we acquired rights to use, develop, manufacture and/or commercialize certain of our investigational products. If we breach our obligations under these agreements, we may be required to pay damages, lose our rights to these investigational products or both, which would adversely affect our business and prospects.

We rely, in part, on license and other strategic agreements, which subject us to various obligations, including diligence obligations with respect to development and commercialization activities, reporting and notification obligations, payment obligations for achievement of certain milestones and royalties on product sales, negative covenants and other material obligations. We may need to devote substantial time and attention to ensuring that we successfully integrate these transactions into our existing operations and are compliant with our obligations under these agreements, which may divert management’s time and attention away from our research and development programs or other day-to-day activities. If we fail to comply with the obligations under our license agreements or use the intellectual property licensed to us in an unauthorized manner, we may be required to pay damages and our licensors may have the right to terminate the license. If our license agreements are terminated, we may not be able to develop, manufacture, market or sell the products covered by our agreements and those being tested or approved in combination with such products. Such an occurrence could materially adversely affect the value of the investigational product being developed under any such agreement and any other investigational products being developed or tested in combination. For example, we intend to test many of our small-molecule investigational products with zimberelimab, which we in-licensed from WuXi Biologics. In the event we breach our license agreement with WuXi Biologics, and WuXi Biologics terminates our license agreement, we would be unable to test those combinations, or we would have to negotiate a new or reinstated agreement, which may not be available to us on equally favorable terms, or at all.

In addition, the agreements under which we license intellectual property or technology to or from third parties are complex, and certain provisions in such agreements may be susceptible to multiple interpretations. The resolution of any contract interpretation disagreement that may arise could narrow what we believe to be the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual property or technology, or increase what we believe to be our financial or other obligations under the relevant agreement, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Moreover, if disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing arrangements on commercially acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected investigational products.

If we are unable to successfully obtain rights to required third-party intellectual property rights or maintain the existing intellectual property rights we have, we may have to abandon development of the relevant research program or investigational product and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could suffer.

We may not realize the benefits of any acquisitions, in-license or other collaborations or strategic alliances that we enter into.

We have entered into in-license agreements with multiple licensors and option agreements to enable the development and commercialization of our investigational products worldwide. In the future, we may seek to enter into acquisitions or additional licensing arrangements with third parties to expand our pipeline or that we believe will complement or augment our development and commercialization efforts with respect to our investigational products and any future investigational products that we may develop. These transactions can entail numerous operational and financial risks, including exposure to unknown liabilities, disruption of our business and diversion of our management’s time and attention in order to manage a collaboration or develop acquired products, investigational products or technologies, incurrence of substantial debt or dilutive issuances of equity securities to pay transaction consideration or costs, higher than expected collaboration, acquisition or integration costs, write-downs of assets or goodwill or impairment charges, increased amortization expenses, difficulty and cost in facilitating the collaboration or combining the operations and personnel of any acquired business, impairment of relationships with key suppliers, manufacturers or customers of any acquired business due to changes in management and ownership and the inability to retain key employees of any acquired business. As a result, if we enter into in-license, acquisition or collaboration agreements, or strategic partnerships, we may not be able to realize the benefit of such transactions if we are unable to successfully integrate them with our existing operations and company culture, which could delay our timelines or otherwise adversely affect our business.

We also cannot be certain that, following a strategic transaction or license, we will achieve the revenue or specific net income that justifies such transaction or such other benefits that led us to enter into the arrangement. For example, under the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, for each program Gilead exercises its option to, it will pay an option fee that ranges from $200 million to $275 million for our current clinical programs, and $150 million per program for all other programs that enter clinical development. Furthermore, we and Gilead will equally share global development costs, as well as profits and losses for the United States, subject to certain opt-out rights for us, expense caps on our spending and true-up adjustments. If Gilead does not exercise its option to develop a program, our capital requirements relating to that development program will significantly increase and we may need to seek a new partner in order to develop and commercialize our investigational products from that program. Failure to realize the benefits of any collaborations or strategic alliances may further cause us to curtail the development of an investigational product, reduce or delay its development program or one or more of our other development programs, delay its potential commercialization or reduce the scope of

37

any planned sales or marketing activities, or increase our expenditures and undertake development or commercialization activities at our own expense. If we elect to fund and undertake development or commercialization activities on our own, we will need to obtain additional expertise and additional capital, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we fail to enter into collaborations and do not have sufficient funds or expertise to undertake the necessary development and commercialization activities, we may not be able to further develop our investigational products or bring them to market and generate product sales revenue, which would harm our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

We may wish to acquire rights to future assets through in-licensing or may attempt to form collaborations in the future with respect to our investigational products, but may not be able to do so, which may cause us to alter or delay our development and commercialization plans.

The development and potential commercialization of our investigational products may require substantial additional capital to fund expenses. Pursuant to the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, Gilead has an exclusive option to acquire an exclusive license to all of our current and future clinical programs during the 10-year collaboration term. Given the breadth of the collaboration, our ability to form new collaborations in the future will be limited. If Gilead declines to exercise its option to a program, we may need to enter into new collaborations for such programs with companies that have more resources and experience than us. We may not be successful in these efforts because third parties may not view our investigational products as having the requisite potential to demonstrate safety and efficacy. If and when we collaborate with a third party for development and commercialization of an investigational product, we can expect to relinquish some or all of the control over the future success of that investigational product to the third party. Our ability to reach a definitive agreement for a collaboration will depend, among other things, upon our assessment of the collaborator’s resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator’s evaluation of a number of factors. Those factors may include the following:

• the design or results of clinical trials;

• the likelihood of approval by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities;

• the potential market for the investigational product;

• the costs and complexities of manufacturing and delivering such investigational product to patients;

• the potential of competing products;

• the existence of uncertainty with respect to our ownership of technology or other rights, which can exist if there is a challenge to such ownership without regard to the merits of the challenge; and

• industry and market conditions generally.

The collaborator may also consider alternative investigational products or technologies for similar indications that may be available to collaborate on and whether such a collaboration could be more attractive than the one with us for our investigational product. We may also be restricted under any license agreements from entering into agreements on certain terms or at all with potential collaborators. Collaborations are complex and time-consuming to negotiate and document. In addition, there have been a significant number of recent business combinations among large pharmaceutical companies that have resulted in a reduced number of potential future collaborators and changes to the strategies of the combined company. As a result, we may not be able to negotiate collaborations on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to do so, we may have to curtail the development of such investigational product, reduce or delay one or more of our other development programs, delay the potential commercialization or reduce the scope of any planned sales or marketing activities for such investigational product, or increase our expenditures and undertake development, manufacturing or commercialization activities at our own expense. If we elect to increase our expenditures to fund development, manufacturing or commercialization activities on our own, we may need to obtain additional capital, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we do not have sufficient funds, we may not be able to further develop our investigational products or bring them to market and generate product revenue.

Our operating activities may be restricted by certain covenants in our license and other strategic agreements, which could limit our development and commercial opportunities.

In connection with certain of our acquisitions, in-license or other collaborations or strategic alliances, we may agree to and be bound by negative covenants which may limit our development and commercial opportunities. For example, pursuant to our in-license of anti-PD-1 antibodies from WuXi Biologics, we made certain covenants to not commercialize any anti-PD-1 antibody licensed or obtained by us after the date of the license agreement with WuXi Biologics other than anti-PD-1 antibodies licensed from WuXi Biologics, subject to certain exceptions as set forth in our license agreement with WuXi Biologics. Furthermore, we agreed in our license agreement that WuXi Biologics would be our exclusive manufacturer of anti-PD-1 antibodies licensed thereunder until a certain number of years has elapsed following commercialization of such an anti-PD-1 antibody and that we would utilize WuXi Biologics as our exclusive provider of CMC development services for our biologic investigational products for five years from the

38

date of our license agreement, subject to certain exceptions in each case. These exclusivity provisions may inhibit our development efforts, prevent us from forming strategic collaborations to develop and potentially commercialize any other anti-PD-1 antibody investigational products and may materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

If we are unable to obtain and maintain sufficient intellectual property protection for our investigational products, or if the scope of the intellectual property protection is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize products similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully commercialize our products may be adversely affected.

Our success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection in the United States and other countries with respect to our investigational products and research programs. We seek to protect our proprietary position by filing patent applications in the United States and abroad related to our novel discoveries and technologies that are important to our business, however, we cannot predict:

• if and when patents may issue based on our patent applications;

• the scope of protection of any patent issuing based on our patent applications;

• whether the claims of any patent issuing based on our patent applications will protect our investigational products and their intended uses or prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies or products;

• whether or not third parties will find ways to invalidate or circumvent our patent rights;

• whether or not others will obtain patents claiming aspects similar to those covered by our patents and patent applications; and/or

• whether we will need to initiate litigation or administrative proceedings to enforce and/or defend our patent rights which will be costly whether we win or lose.

Obtaining and enforcing patents is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications, or maintain and/or enforce patents that may issue based on our patent applications, at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development results before it is too late to obtain patent protection. Although we enter into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to patentable aspects of our research and development output, such as our employees, corporate collaborators, outside scientific collaborators, contract research organizations, contract manufacturers, consultants, advisors and other third parties, any of these parties may breach these agreements and disclose such results before a patent application is filed, thereby jeopardizing our ability to seek patent protection.

We also cannot be certain that the claims in our pending patent applications directed to our investigational products and/or technologies will be considered patentable by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or by patent offices in foreign countries. One aspect of the determination of patentability of our inventions depends on the scope and content of the “prior art,” information that was or is deemed available to a person of skill in the relevant art prior to the priority date of the claimed invention. There may be prior art of which we are not aware that may affect the patentability of our patent claims or, if issued, affect the validity or enforceability of a patent claim. Even if the patents do issue based on our patent applications, third parties may challenge the validity, enforceability or scope thereof, which may result in such patents being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable. Furthermore, even if they are unchallenged, patents in our portfolio may not adequately exclude third parties from practicing relevant technology or prevent others from designing around our claims. If the breadth or strength of our intellectual property position with respect to our investigational products is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to develop and threaten our ability to commercialize our investigational products. In the event of litigation or administrative proceedings, we cannot be certain that the claims in any of our issued patents will be considered valid by courts in the United States or foreign countries.

We may not identify relevant third-party patents or may incorrectly interpret the relevance, scope or expiration of a third party patent which might adversely affect our ability to develop and market our products.

We cannot guarantee that any of our patent searches or analyses, including the identification of relevant patents, the scope of patent claims or the expiration of relevant patents, are complete or thorough, nor can we be certain that we have identified each and every third party patent and pending application in the United States and abroad that is relevant to or necessary for the commercialization of our investigational products in any jurisdiction.

The scope of a patent claim is determined by an interpretation of the law, the written disclosure in a patent and the patent’s prosecution history. Our interpretation of the relevance or the scope of a patent or a pending application may be incorrect, which may

39

negatively impact our ability to market our products. We may incorrectly determine that our products are not covered by a third party patent or may incorrectly predict whether a third party’s pending application will issue with claims of relevant scope. Our determination of the expiration date of any patent in the United States or abroad that we consider relevant may be incorrect, which may negatively impact our ability to develop and market our investigational products. Our failure to identify and correctly interpret relevant patents may negatively impact our ability to develop and market our products.

In the future, we may need to obtain additional licenses of third-party technology that may not be available to us or are available only on commercially unreasonable terms, and which may cause us to operate our business in a more costly or otherwise adverse manner that was not anticipated.

From time to time we may be required to license technology from additional third parties to further develop or commercialize our investigational products. Should we be required to obtain licenses to any third-party technology, including any such patents required to manufacture, use or sell our investigational products, such licenses may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. The inability to obtain any third-party license required to develop or commercialize any of our investigational products could cause us to abandon any related efforts, which could seriously harm our business and operations.

We may become involved in lawsuits alleging that we have infringed the intellectual property rights of third parties or to protect or enforce our patents or other intellectual property, which litigation could be expensive, time consuming and adversely affect our ability to develop or commercialize our investigational products.

The coverage of patents is subject to interpretation by the courts, and the interpretation is not always uniform. There is a substantial amount of intellectual property litigation in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, and we may become party to, or threatened with, litigation or other adversarial proceedings regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our products candidates. Third parties may assert infringement claims against us based on existing or future intellectual property rights. For example, we are aware of certain patents owned or exclusively licensed by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) having claims directed broadly to treating cancer with anti-PD-1 antibodies (the BMS Patents), which expire in 2023 and 2024. The BMS Patents have been and may in the future be the subject of litigation. If the validity of the BMS Patents is upheld following all such challenges, and if we receive regulatory approval for zimberelimab prior to expiration of the BMS Patents, then we may need to delay our commercialization of zimberelimab or we may need to obtain a license from BMS, which license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we were sued for patent infringement, we would need to demonstrate that our investigational products, products or methods either do not infringe the patent claims of the relevant patent or that the patent claims are invalid or unenforceable, and we may not be able to do this. Proving invalidity may be difficult. For example, in the United States, proving invalidity in court requires a showing of clear and convincing evidence to overcome the presumption of validity enjoyed by issued patents. If we are found to infringe a third party’s intellectual property rights, we could be forced, including by court order, to cease developing, manufacturing or commercializing the infringing investigational product or product. Alternatively, we may be required to obtain a license from such third party in order to use the infringing technology and continue developing, manufacturing or marketing the infringing investigational product. However, we may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we were able to obtain a license, it could be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us. In addition, we could be found liable for monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees if we are found to have willfully infringed a patent. A finding of infringement could prevent us from commercializing our investigational products or force us to cease some of our business operations, which could materially harm our business.

In addition, we may find that competitors are infringing our patents, trademarks, copyrights or other intellectual property. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time consuming and divert the time and attention of our management and scientific personnel. Any claims we assert against perceived infringers could provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against us alleging that we infringe their patents, in addition to counterclaims asserting that our patents are invalid or unenforceable, or both. In any patent infringement proceeding, there is a risk that a court will decide that a patent of ours is invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, and that we do not have the right to stop the other party from using the invention at issue. There is also a risk that, even if the validity of such patents is upheld, the court will construe the patent’s claims narrowly or decide that we do not have the right to stop the other party from using the invention at issue on the grounds that our patent claims do not cover the invention. An adverse outcome in a litigation or proceeding involving our patents could limit our ability to assert our patents against those parties or other competitors, and may curtail or preclude our ability to exclude third parties from making and selling similar or competitive products. Any of these occurrences could adversely affect our competitive business position, business prospects and financial condition. Similarly, if we assert trademark infringement claims, a court may determine that the marks we have asserted are invalid or unenforceable, or that the party against whom we have asserted trademark infringement has superior rights to the marks in question. In this case, we could ultimately be forced to cease use of such trademarks. Even if we establish infringement, the court may decide not to grant an injunction against further infringing activity and instead award only monetary damages, which may or may not be an adequate remedy.

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during litigation. There could also be public

40

announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the price of shares of our common stock. Moreover, we cannot assure you that we will have sufficient financial or other resources to defend or pursue such litigation, which typically last for years before they are concluded. Even if we are successful in these proceedings, we may incur substantial costs and the time and attention of our management and scientific personnel could be diverted in pursuing these proceedings, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations. In addition, we may not have sufficient resources to bring these actions to a successful conclusion.

Because of the expense and uncertainty of litigation, we may not be in a position to enforce our intellectual property rights against third parties.

Because of the expense and uncertainty of litigation, we may conclude that even if a third party is infringing our issued patent, any patents that may be issued as a result of our pending or future patent applications or other intellectual property rights, the risk-adjusted cost of bringing and enforcing such a claim or action may be too high or not in the best interest of our company or our stockholders. In such cases, we may decide that the more prudent course of action is to simply monitor the situation or initiate or seek some other non-litigious action or solution.

We may be subject to claims that our employees, consultants or independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information of third parties.

We could in the future be subject to claims that we or our employees have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed alleged trade secrets or other confidential information of former employers or competitors. Although we try to ensure that our employees and consultants do not use the intellectual property, proprietary information, know-how or trade secrets of others in their work for us, we may become subject to claims that we caused an employee to breach the terms of his or her non-competition or non-solicitation agreement, or that we or these individuals have, inadvertently or otherwise, used or disclosed the alleged trade secrets or other proprietary information of a former employer or competitor.

While we may litigate to defend ourselves against these claims, even if we are successful, litigation could result in substantial costs and could be a distraction to management. If our defenses to these claims fail, in addition to requiring us to pay monetary damages, a court could prohibit us from using technologies or features that are essential to our investigational products, if such technologies or features are found to incorporate or be derived from the trade secrets or other proprietary information of the former employers. Moreover, any such litigation or the threat thereof may adversely affect our reputation, our ability to form strategic alliances or sublicense our rights to collaborators, engage with scientific advisors or hire employees or consultants, each of which would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Patents are of national or regional effect, and filing, prosecuting and defending patents on all of our investigational products throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive. As such, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the United States, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in and into the United States or other jurisdictions. Further, the legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to pharmaceuticals or biologics, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing products in violation of our proprietary rights generally. In addition, certain developing countries, including China and India, have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties. In those countries, we and our licensors may have limited remedies if patents are infringed or if we or our licensors are compelled to grant a license to a third party, which could materially diminish the value of those patents. This could limit our potential revenue opportunities. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license.

Changes in patent law in the United States and other jurisdictions could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our investigational products.

As is the case with other biopharmaceutical companies, our success is heavily dependent on intellectual property, particularly patents. However, the patent position of biopharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain, involves complex legal and factual questions and has in recent years been the subject of much litigation, resulting in court decisions, including Supreme Court decisions, that have increased uncertainties as to the ability to obtain and enforce patent rights in the future. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States and other countries could increase the uncertainties and costs. For example, in September 2011 the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (the America Invents Act) was signed into law and included a number of significant changes to U.S. patent law as then existed. These include provisions that affect the way patent applications are prosecuted, redefine prior art and provide more efficient and cost-effective avenues for competitors to challenge the validity of patents. These include allowing third-party submission of prior art to the USPTO during patent prosecution and additional procedures to attack the validity of a patent by USPTO administered post-grant proceedings, including post-grant review, inter partes review, and

41

derivation proceedings. After March 2013, under the America Invents Act, the United States transitioned to a first inventor to file system in which, assuming that the other statutory requirements are met, the first inventor to file a patent application will be entitled to the patent on an invention regardless of whether a third party was the first to invent the claimed invention. However, the America Invents Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on several patent cases in recent years, either narrowing the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations. Depending on future actions by the U.S. Congress, the U.S. courts, the USPTO and the relevant law-making bodies in other countries, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that would weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce our existing patents and patents that we might obtain in the future.

We may rely on trade secret and proprietary know-how which can be difficult to trace and enforce and, if we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.

In addition to seeking patents for some of our technology and investigational products, we may also rely on trade secrets, including unpatented know-how, technology and other proprietary information, to maintain our competitive position. Elements of our investigational product, including processes for their preparation and manufacture, may involve proprietary know-how, information, or technology that is not covered by patents, and thus for these aspects we may consider trade secrets and know-how to be our primary intellectual property. Any disclosure, either intentional or unintentional, by our employees, the employees of third parties with whom we share our facilities or third party consultants and vendors that we engage to perform research, clinical trials or manufacturing activities, or misappropriation by third parties (such as through a cybersecurity breach) of our trade secrets or proprietary information could enable competitors to duplicate or surpass our technological achievements, thus eroding our competitive position in our market.

Trade secrets and know-how can be difficult to protect. We require our employees to enter into written employment agreements containing provisions of confidentiality and obligations to assign to us any inventions generated in the course of their employment. We and any third parties with whom we share facilities enter into written agreements that include confidentiality and intellectual property obligations to protect each party’s property, potential trade secrets, proprietary know-how, and information. We further seek to protect our potential trade secrets, proprietary know-how, and information in part, by entering into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who are given access to them, such as our corporate collaborators, outside scientific collaborators, contract research organizations, contract manufacturers, consultants, advisors and other third parties. With our consultants, contractors, and outside scientific collaborators, these agreements typically include invention assignment obligations. Despite these efforts, any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose our proprietary information, including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts inside and outside the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor or other third party, we would have no right to prevent them from using that technology or information to compete with us. If any of our trade secrets were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor or other third party, our competitive position would be harmed.

We may become subject to claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of our patents and other intellectual property.

We may be subject to claims that former employees, collaborators or other third parties have an interest in our patents or other intellectual property as an inventor or co-inventor. The failure to name the proper inventors on a patent application can result in the patents issuing thereon being unenforceable. Inventorship disputes may arise from conflicting views regarding the contributions of different individuals named as inventors, the effects of foreign laws where foreign nationals are involved in the development of the subject matter of the patent, conflicting obligations of third parties involved in developing our investigational products or as a result of questions regarding co-ownership of potential joint inventions. Litigation may be necessary to resolve these and other claims challenging inventorship and/or ownership. Alternatively, or additionally, we may enter into agreements to clarify the scope of our rights in such intellectual property. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or right to use, valuable intellectual property. Such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

Patent terms may be inadequate to protect our competitive position on our investigational products for an adequate amount of time.

Patent rights are of limited duration. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new investigational products, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such investigational products are commercialized. Even if patents covering our investigational products are obtained, once the patent life has expired for a product, we may be open to competition from biosimilar or generic products. A patent term extension based on regulatory delay may be available

42

in the United States. However, only a single patent can be extended for each marketing approval, and any patent can be extended only once, for a single product. Moreover, the scope of protection during the period of the patent term extension does not extend to the full scope of the claim, but instead only to the scope of the product as approved. Laws governing analogous patent term extensions in foreign jurisdictions vary widely, as do laws governing the ability to obtain multiple patents from a single patent family. Additionally, we may not receive an extension if we fail to apply within applicable deadlines, fail to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents or otherwise fail to satisfy applicable requirements. If we are unable to obtain patent term extension or restoration, or the term of any such extension is less than we request, the period during which we will have the right to exclusively market our product will be shortened and our competitors may obtain approval of competing products following our patent expiration, and our revenue could be reduced, possibly materially.

Risks Related to our Business Operations

We expect to expand our research and development capabilities and, as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.

In order to maximize the potential of our Gilead Collaboration Agreement, we expect to experience significant growth in our discovery and clinical development capabilities. To support this growth, we will also need to increase the number of employees in clinical operations, biostatistics and data management, quality, regulatory affairs and, if any of our investigational products receives marketing approval, sales, marketing and distribution. To manage our anticipated future growth, we must:

• identify, recruit, integrate, maintain and motivate additional qualified personnel;

• manage our development efforts effectively, including the initiation and conduct of clinical trials for our investigational products, both as monotherapy and in combination with other intra-portfolio investigational products; and

• improve our operational, financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures.

Our future financial performance and our ability to develop, manufacture and commercialize our investigational products will depend, in part, on our ability to effectively manage any future growth, and our management may also have to divert financial and other resources, and a disproportionate amount of its attention away from day-to-day activities in order to devote a substantial amount of time, to managing these growth activities.

If we are not able to effectively expand our organization by hiring new employees and expanding our groups of consultants and contractors, we may not be able to successfully implement the tasks necessary to further develop and commercialize our investigational products and, accordingly, may not achieve our research, development and commercialization goals.

Our future success depends on our ability to retain key employees, consultants and advisors and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.

Our industry has experienced a high rate of turnover in recent years. Our ability to compete in the highly competitive biopharmaceuticals industry depends upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled and experienced personnel with scientific, medical, regulatory, manufacturing and management skills and experience. We conduct our operations in the San Francisco Bay Area, a region that is home to many other biopharmaceutical companies as well as many academic and research institutions, resulting in fierce competition for qualified personnel. We may not be able to attract or retain qualified personnel in the future due to the intense competition for a limited number of qualified personnel among biopharmaceutical companies. Many of the other biopharmaceutical companies against which we compete have greater financial and other resources, different risk profiles and a longer history in the industry than we do. Our competitors may provide higher compensation, more diverse opportunities and/or better opportunities for career advancement. Any or all of these competing factors may limit our ability to continue to attract and retain high quality personnel, which could negatively affect our ability to successfully develop and commercialize our investigational products and to grow our business and operations as currently contemplated.

We are highly dependent on the services of our founders, Terry Rosen, Ph.D., who serves as our Chief Executive Officer, and Juan Jaen, Ph.D., who serves as our President.

We are highly dependent on the services of our founders, Terry Rosen, Ph.D., who serves as our Chief Executive Officer, and Juan Jaen, Ph.D., who serves as our President. Although we have entered into employment agreements with them, they are not for a specific term and each of them may terminate their employment with us at any time, though we are not aware of any present intention of either of these individuals to leave us.

Drs. Rosen and Jaen have significant experience identifying and developing biopharmaceuticals. We believe that their drug discovery and development experience, and overall biopharmaceutical company management experience, would be difficult to

43

replace. However, the historical results, past performance and/or acquisitions of companies with which they were affiliated do not necessarily predict or guarantee similar results for our company.

Further, Drs. Rosen and Jaen have certain other business and personal commitments outside of serving as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Arcus, including serving on the boards of other companies and foundations, which may result in diversion of their focus and attention on our company.

We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing products more quickly or marketing them more successfully than us. If their investigational products are shown to be safer or more effective than ours, then our commercial opportunity will be reduced or eliminated.

We compete in the segments of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other related markets that develop immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer, which is highly competitive with rapidly changing standards of care. As such, our commercial opportunity could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, are more convenient, or are less expensive than any products that we may develop or that would render any products that we may develop obsolete or non-competitive. Our competitors also may obtain marketing approval for their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for ours, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market.

Some of the other products in the same class as our investigational products have already been approved or are further along in development. With respect to our dual adenosine receptor antagonist, etrumadenant (formerly AB928), we are aware of several other clinical-stage selective adenosine A_2aR antagonists being developed by AstraZeneca, Corvus, CStone, iTeos Therapeutics and Novartis and a clinical-stage selective adenosine A_2bR antagonist being developed by Palobiofarma. For our small-molecule CD73 inhibitor, AB680, we are aware of several pharmaceutical companies developing antibodies against this target, including AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corvus, Novartis and Tracon, all of whom have advanced their CD73 antibodies into clinical development. Other pharmaceutical companies, such as Boehringer Ingelheim, Calithera, Eli Lilly, Merck and ORIC, have small-molecule programs against this target, of which only Eli Lilly has advanced its CD73 inhibitor into clinical development. Regarding our anti-PD-1 antibody, zimberelimab, multiple large pharmaceutical companies have already received regulatory approvals for their anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, including AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Pfizer in partnership with Merck KGaA, Regeneron in partnership with Sanofi Genzyme and Roche/Genentech, and there are also many other anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies in clinical development. With respect to our anti-TIGIT antibody, AB154, we are aware of several pharmaceutical companies developing antibodies against this target, including Astellas, Beigene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Compugen, Genentech, Innovent, Merck KGaA, Mereo and Seattle Genetics. To our knowledge, there are no approved anti-TIGIT antibodies.

As more investigational products within a particular class of drugs proceed through clinical development to regulatory review and approval, the amount and type of clinical data that may be required by regulatory authorities may increase or change. Consequently, the results of our clinical trials for investigational products in those class will likely need to show a risk benefit profile that is competitive with or more favorable than those products and investigational products in order to obtain marketing approval or, if approved, a product label that is favorable for commercialization. If the risk benefit profile is not competitive with those products or investigational products, or if the approval of other agents for an indication or patient population significantly alters the standard of care with which we tested our investigational products, we may have developed a product that is not commercially viable, that we are not able to sell profitably or that is unable to achieve favorable pricing or reimbursement. In such circumstances, our future product revenue and financial condition would be materially and adversely affected.

Many of our competitors, such as large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies like AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis and Roche/Genentech, have longer operating histories and significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical studies, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than we do. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller and other early stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and subject enrollment for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.

The key competitive factors affecting the success of all of our programs are likely to be their efficacy, safety, convenience, and availability of reimbursement. If we are not successful in developing, commercializing and achieving higher levels of reimbursement than our competitors, we will not be able to compete against them and our business would be materially harmed.

The development and commercialization of zimberelimab may face strong competition from other anti-PD-1 antibodies that have already received marketing approval by larger companies with substantial resources and more experience developing, manufacturing and commercializing biologic compounds.

44

As discussed above, some companies, such as AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Pfizer in partnership with Merck KGaA, Regeneron in partnership with Sanofi Genzyme and Roche/Genentech, have anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies that are approved and on the market, and continue to develop and seek regulatory approval for their respective anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies for additional oncology indications. For example, in June 2020, the U.S. FDA granted accelerated approval to Keytruda^® (pembrolizumab) for the treatment of patients with solid tumors that have high tumor mutational burden. Many other companies are developing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies for various oncology indications that are further along in development than zimberelimab. This competitive environment could limit our development opportunities for zimberelimab or compromise our ability to successfully enroll our ongoing and future clinical trials with zimberelimab by limiting the availability of clinical trial investigators, sites and/or subjects which could slow, delay or limit the progress of zimberelimab’s development. As a result of these or other problems and risks, we may never receive marketing approval for zimberelimab, may not realize the full commercial potential of zimberelimab as monotherapy or in combination with our other investigational products, may never recoup our financial investment or may never generate significant value or revenue from this asset.

Our internal information technology systems, or those of our third-party CROs or other contractors or consultants, are subject to failure, security breaches, loss or leakage of data, and other disruptions, which could result in a material disruption of our investigational products’ development programs, compromise sensitive information related to our business or prevent us from accessing critical information, potentially exposing us to notification obligations, liability or reputational damage and otherwise adversely affecting our business.

We are increasingly dependent upon information technology systems, infrastructure and data to operate our business. In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store and transmit confidential information, including but not limited to intellectual property, proprietary business information and personal information. It is critical that we do so in a secure manner to maintain the confidentiality, integrity and availability of such confidential information. We also have outsourced elements of our operations to third parties, and as a result we manage a number of third party contractors who have access to our confidential information.

Despite the implementation of security measures, given their size and complexity and the increasing amounts of confidential information that they maintain, our internal information technology systems and those of our third-party CROs and other contractors and consultants are vulnerable to breakdown or other damage or interruption from service interruptions, system malfunction, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures, as well as security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees, contractors, consultants, business partners, and/or other third parties, or from cyber-attacks by malicious third parties (including the deployment of harmful malware, ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, social engineering and other means to affect service reliability and threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information), which may compromise our system infrastructure or lead to data leakage. We have experienced at least one intrusion into our computer systems, and, although our investigation indicates that it did not have a material adverse effect on our operations, there can be no assurance of a similar result in the future. We cannot assure you that our data protection efforts and our investment in information technology will prevent other breakdowns, data leakages, breaches in our systems or other cyber incidents that could have a material adverse effect upon our reputation, business, operations or financial condition. Furthermore, as the cyber-threat landscape evolves, these attacks are growing in frequency, sophistication and intensity, and becoming increasingly difficult to detect. There can be no assurance that we and our third-party CROs and other contractors and consultants will be successful in detecting, preventing or fully recovering systems or data from all breakdowns, service interruptions, attacks or breaches of systems that could adversely affect our business and operations and/or result in the loss or disclosure of critical or sensitive data, which could result in financial, legal, business or reputational harm to us.

To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and reputational damage and the further development and commercialization of our drug candidates could be delayed. In addition, the loss of clinical trial data for our investigational products could result in delays in our marketing approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. Furthermore, significant disruptions of our internal information technology systems or security breaches could result in the loss, misappropriation, and/or unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of, or the prevention of access to, confidential information (including trade secrets or other intellectual property, proprietary business information, and personal information), which could result in financial, legal, business, and reputational harm to us. In particular, any such event that leads to unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of personal information, including personal information regarding our clinical trial subjects or employees, could harm our reputation directly, compel us to comply with federal and/or state breach notification laws and foreign law equivalents, subject us to mandatory corrective action, and otherwise subject us to liability under laws and regulations that protect the privacy and security of personal information, which could result in significant legal and financial exposure and reputational damages that could potentially have an adverse effect on our business.

Unfavorable global economic and trade conditions could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our results of operations could be adversely affected by general conditions in the global economy and in the global financial markets and global trade. The current global economic conditions are highly volatile due to the COVID-19 pandemic and government restrictions on movement, which may lead to disruptions in the capital and credit markets and reduce our ability to raise additional

45

capital when needed on acceptable terms, if at all. Furthermore, we conduct, and we expect to continue to conduct, portions of our clinical trials outside the United States, and unfavorable economic conditions resulting in the weakening of the U.S. dollar would make those clinical trials more costly to operate. A weak or declining economy could also strain our suppliers, possibly resulting in supply disruption.

Adverse trade conditions may further impact our operating results or financial condition by increasing the cost of our operations. For example, proposed tariffs by the Trump administration have included a 25% tariff on raw ingredients for pharmaceuticals, such as the active pharmaceutical ingredients for our investigational products. Given our exclusive relationship with WuXi Biologics, located in China, for the manufacture of zimberelimab and AB154 and for biologics CMC development, these additional tariffs, if they were to be imposed, would have an adverse impact on our operating results and financial condition. Any of the foregoing could harm our business and we cannot anticipate all of the ways in which the current economic climate and financial market conditions could adversely impact our business.

Our future growth may depend, in part, on our ability to operate in foreign markets, where we would be subject to additional regulatory burdens and other risks and uncertainties.

Our future profitability may depend, in part, on our ability to commercialize our investigational products in foreign markets for which we may rely on collaboration with third parties. We are not permitted to market or promote any of our investigational products before we receive marketing approval from the applicable regulatory authority in that foreign market, and we may never receive such marketing approval for any of our investigational products. To obtain marketing approval in many foreign countries, we must comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of such countries regarding safety and efficacy and governing, among other things, clinical trials and commercial sales, pricing and distribution of our investigational products, and we cannot predict success in these jurisdictions. If we obtain approval of our investigational products and ultimately commercialize our investigational products in foreign markets, we would be subject to additional risks and uncertainties, including:

• our customers’ ability to obtain reimbursement for our investigational products in foreign markets;

• our inability to directly control commercial activities because we are relying on third parties;

• the burden of complying with complex and changing foreign regulatory, tax, accounting and legal requirements;

• different medical practices and customs in foreign countries affecting acceptance in the marketplace;

• import or export licensing requirements;

• longer accounts receivable collection times;

• longer lead times for shipping;

• language barriers for technical training;

• reduced protection of intellectual property rights in some foreign countries;

• the existence of additional potentially relevant third-party intellectual property rights;

• foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; and

• the interpretation of contractual provisions governed by foreign laws in the event of a contract dispute.

Foreign sales of our investigational products could also be adversely affected by the imposition of governmental controls, political and economic instability, trade restrictions and changes in tariffs.

We or the third parties upon whom we depend may be adversely affected by earthquakes, fires or other natural disasters and our business continuity and disaster recovery plans may not adequately protect us from a serious disaster.

Our headquarters and main research facility are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, which in the past has experienced severe earthquakes and fires. If these earthquakes, fires, other natural disasters, terrorism and similar unforeseen events beyond our control prevented us from using all or a significant portion of our headquarters or research facility, it may be difficult or, in certain cases, impossible for us to continue our business for a substantial period of time. We do not have a disaster recovery or business continuity plan in place and may incur substantial expenses as a result of the absence or limited nature of our internal or third party service provider disaster recovery and business continuity plans, which, particularly when taken together with our lack of earthquake insurance, could have a material adverse effect on our business. Furthermore, integral parties in our supply chain are operating from single sites, increasing their vulnerability to natural disasters or other sudden, unforeseen and severe adverse events. If such an event were to affect our supply chain, it could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our clinical trials, our development plans and business.

46

Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.

We have incurred substantial losses during our history and our ability to generate profits in the future is uncertain. Unused losses for the tax year ended December 31, 2017 and prior tax years will carry forward to offset future taxable income, if any, until such unused losses expire. Unused losses generated after December 31, 2017, under current tax law will not expire and may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such net operating losses in tax years beginning after December 31, 2020 will be limited to 80% of current year taxable income in any given year. In addition, both our current and our future unused losses may be subject to limitation under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (IRC), if we undergo an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50 percentage point change (by value) in its equity ownership by certain stockholders over a three-year period. We performed an analysis under IRC Section 382 through December 31, 2018 with respect to our net operating loss and credit carryforwards. We concluded that, while an ownership change occurred in previous years as defined under IRC Section 382, we do not expect such ownership changes to result in the expiration of our net operating loss carryforwards prior to utilization.

However, recent and future equity issuances, including our May 2020 public offering and our equity issuances to Gilead, may result in an additional ownership change. As a result, our ability to use all of our pre-change net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs) and other pre-change tax attributes (such as research tax credits) to offset our post-change income or taxes may be subject to limitations that could result in increased future tax liability to us. Similar provisions of state tax law may also apply to limit our use of accumulated state tax attributes. In addition, at the state level, there may be periods during which the use of NOLs is suspended or otherwise limited, including a recent California franchise tax law change limiting the usability of California state NOLs to offset taxable income in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2020 and before January 1, 2023, which could accelerate or permanently increase state taxes owed. Therefore, even if we attain profitability, we may be unable to use all or a material portion of our NOLs and other tax attributes, which could adversely affect our future cash flows.

Changes in tax laws or regulations that are applied adversely to us or our customers may have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow, financial condition or results of operations.

New income, sales, use or other tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances could be enacted at any time, which could adversely affect our business operations and financial performance. Further, existing tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances could be interpreted, changed, modified or applied adversely to us. For example, legislation enacted in 2017, informally titled the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Act”), enacted many significant changes to the U.S. tax laws. Future guidance from the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities with respect to the Tax Act may affect us, and certain aspects of the Tax Act could be repealed or modified in future legislation. For example, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) modified certain provisions of the Tax Act. In addition, it is uncertain if and to what extent various states will conform to the Tax Act, the CARES Act, or any newly enacted federal tax legislation. Changes in corporate tax rates, the realization of net deferred tax assets relating to our operations, the taxation of foreign earnings, and the deductibility of expenses under the Tax Act or future reform legislation could have a material impact on the value of any deferred tax assets, could result in significant one-time charges, and could increase our future U.S. tax expense.

Risks Related to Our Industry

Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur substantial liabilities and could limit our commercialization of any investigational products that we may develop.

We face an inherent risk of product liability exposure related to the testing of our investigational products in human clinical trials and will face an even greater risk if we commercially sell any products that we may develop. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against claims that our investigational products or products caused injuries, we could incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in:

• delay or termination of clinical trials;

• decreased demand for any investigational products or products that we may develop;

• injury to our reputation and significant negative media attention;

• withdrawal of clinical trial subjects;

• initiation of investigations by regulators;

• significant costs to defend the related litigation and diversion of management’s time and our resources;

• substantial monetary awards to study subjects or patients;

• product recalls, withdrawals or labeling, marketing or promotional restrictions;

• loss of revenue; and

47

• the inability to commercialize any products that we may develop.

Although we maintain product liability insurance coverage, it may not be adequate to cover all liabilities that we may incur. We anticipate that we will need to increase our insurance coverage as our investigational products advance through clinical trials and if we successfully commercialize any products. Insurance coverage is increasingly expensive. We may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in an amount adequate to satisfy any liability that may arise.

Failure to comply with health and data protection laws and regulations could lead to government enforcement actions (which could include civil or criminal penalties), private litigation, and/or adverse publicity and could negatively affect our operating results and business.

We and any potential collaborators may be subject to federal, state, and foreign data protection laws and regulations (i.e., laws and regulations that address privacy and data security). In the United States, numerous federal and state laws and regulations, including federal health information privacy laws, state data breach notification laws, state health information privacy laws, and federal and state consumer protection laws (e.g., Section 5 of the FTC Act), that govern the collection, use, disclosure, and protection of health-related and other personal information could apply to our operations or the operations of our collaborators. In addition, we may obtain health information from third parties (including research institutions from which we obtain clinical trial data) that are subject to privacy and security requirements under federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 (HITECH). Depending on the facts and circumstances, we could be subject to criminal penalties if we knowingly obtain, use, or disclose individually identifiable health information maintained by a HIPAA-covered entity in a manner that is not authorized or permitted by HIPAA.

The legislative and regulatory landscape for privacy and data security continues to evolve, and we expect that there will continue to be new proposed laws, regulations and industry standards relating to privacy and data security in the United States, the EU and other jurisdictions. This increased focus on privacy and data security issues may negatively affect our operating results and our business. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA), which took effect on January 1, 2020, gives California residents expanded rights to access and require deletion of their personal information, opt out of certain personal information sharing, and receive detailed information about how their personal information is used. In addition, the CCPA authorizes private lawsuits to recover statutory damages for certain data breaches. While it exempts some data regulated by HIPAA and certain clinical trials data, the CCPA may increase our compliance costs and potential liability with respect to other personal information we collect about California residents. Some observers note that the CCPA could mark the beginning of a trend toward more stringent privacy legislation in the U.S., which could increase our potential liability and adversely affect our business.

International data protection laws also apply to health-related and other personal data obtained outside the United States. In the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation) took effect in May 2018 and imposes, in some cases, stricter obligations than data protection laws in the United States on the use of health-related and other personal data. These requirements include the obligation to appoint data protection officers in certain circumstances, rights for individuals to be “forgotten” and to data portability, and the obligation to make public notification of significant data breaches. Under the General Data Protection Regulation, data protection authorities can also impose administrative fines of up to 4% of our total worldwide turnover or up to €20 million (whichever is higher). In addition, the General Data Protection Regulation only permits the transfer of personal data outside the European Economic Area (EEA) to countries that offer a level of data protection deemed adequate by the European Commission, unless an approved data transfer mechanism is in place. Some of the approved data transfer mechanisms face legal challenges in the EU, which adds to the complexity of transferring personal data outside the EEA. The General Data Protection Regulation increases our responsibility and liability in relation to personal data that we process, and we must put in place additional mechanisms to ensure compliance with the new EU data protection rules.

Failure to comply with U.S. and international data protection laws and regulations could result in government enforcement actions (which could include civil or criminal penalties), private litigation, and/or adverse publicity and could negatively affect our operating results and business. Moreover, clinical trial subjects about whom we or our potential collaborators obtain information, as well as the providers who share this information with us, may contractually limit our ability to use and disclose the information. Claims that we have violated individuals’ privacy rights, failed to comply with data protection laws, or breached our contractual obligations, even if we are not found liable, could be expensive and time-consuming to defend and could result in adverse publicity that could harm our business.

We will be subject to applicable fraud and abuse, transparency, government price reporting, and other healthcare laws and regulations. If we are unable to comply, or have not fully complied, with such laws, we could face substantial penalties.

Although we do not currently have any marketed products, if we obtain FDA approval for any of investigational products and begin commercializing those products in the United States, our operations will be subject, either directly or indirectly through our customers and third party payors, to various U.S. federal and state fraud and abuse, transparency and other healthcare laws and regulations, and similar laws in other jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. These laws may impact, among other things, our research and proposed sales, marketing and education programs and constrain the business of financial arrangements and relationships with healthcare providers, physicians and other parties through which we market, sell and distribute our products for which we obtain

48

marketing approval. The laws that may affect our ability to operate include, but are not limited to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute; federal civil and criminal false claims laws, such as the False Claims Act (FCA); HIPAA; federal and state consumer protection and unfair competition laws; the federal transparency requirements under the Physician Payments Sunshine Act; state and foreign law equivalents of each of these federal laws; and state and foreign laws that require pharmaceutical companies to implement compliance programs. Many of these laws are discussed in detail in “Item 1. Business” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The scope and enforcement of each of these laws is uncertain and subject to rapid change in the current environment of healthcare reform. Federal and state enforcement bodies have continued their scrutiny of interactions between healthcare companies and healthcare providers, which has led to a number of investigations, prosecutions, convictions and settlements in the healthcare industry. Responding to investigations can be time-and resource-consuming and can divert management’s attention from the business. Any such investigation or settlement could increase our costs or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business.

Ensuring that our business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will likely be costly. We have entered into consulting and advisory board arrangements with physicians and other healthcare providers, including some who could influence the use of our investigational products, if approved. Because of the complex and far-reaching nature of these laws, regulatory agencies may view these transactions as prohibited arrangements that must be restructured, or discontinued, or for which we could be subject to other significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties such as fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, additional reporting obligations and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or other agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could substantially disrupt our operations. If any of the physicians or other healthcare providers or entities with whom we expect to do business is found to be not in compliance with applicable laws, they may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government funded healthcare programs.

Changes in healthcare law and implementing regulations, as well as changes in healthcare policy, may impact our business in ways that we cannot currently predict, and may have a significant adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

In the United States and some foreign jurisdictions, there have been, and continue to be, several legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes regarding the healthcare system that could prevent or delay marketing approval of investigational products, restrict or regulate post-approval activities, and affect the ability to profitably sell investigational products for which marketing approval is obtained. Among policy makers and payors in the United States and elsewhere, there is significant interest in promoting changes in healthcare systems with the stated goals of containing healthcare costs, improving quality and/or expanding access. In the United States, the pharmaceutical industry has been a particular focus of these efforts and has been significantly affected by major legislative initiatives. For additional detail regarding health care reform activities that may impact our business, see “Business—Government Regulation—Healthcare Reform” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We are subject to certain U.S. and foreign anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, export control, sanctions, and other trade laws and regulations. We can face serious consequences for violations.

U.S. and foreign anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, export control, sanctions, and other trade laws and regulations (collectively, Trade Laws) prohibit, among other things, companies and their employees, agents, clinical research organizations, legal counsel, accountants, consultants, contractors, and other partners from authorizing, promising, offering, providing, soliciting, or receiving directly or indirectly, corrupt or improper payments or anything else of value to or from recipients in the public or private sector. Violations of Trade Laws can result in substantial criminal fines and civil penalties, imprisonment, the loss of trade privileges, debarment, tax reassessments, breach of contract and fraud litigation, reputational harm, and other consequences. We have direct or indirect interactions with officials and employees of government agencies or government-affiliated hospitals, universities, and other organizations. We also expect our non-U.S. activities to increase over time. We expect to rely on third parties for research, preclinical studies, and clinical trials and/or to obtain necessary permits, licenses, patent registrations, and other marketing approvals. We can be held liable for the corrupt or other illegal activities of our personnel, agents, or partners, even if we do not explicitly authorize or have prior knowledge of such activities.

If we fail to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.

We, and the third parties with whom we share our facilities, are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the handling, use, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. Each of our operations involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals and biological and radioactive materials. Each of our operations also produce hazardous waste products. We generally contract with third parties for the disposal of these materials and wastes. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials. We could be held liable for any resulting damages in the event of contamination or injury resulting from the use of hazardous

49

materials by us or the third parties with whom we share our facilities, and any liability could exceed our resources. We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties.

Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses we may incur due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of hazardous materials, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. We do not maintain insurance for environmental liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted against us in connection with our storage or disposal of biological, hazardous or radioactive materials.

In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These current or future laws and regulations may impair our research and development. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions.

Risks Related to Owning our Common Stock

The stock price of our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance.

The market price of our common stock has fluctuated and may fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

• overall performance of the equity markets;

• our operating performance and the performance of other similar companies;

• results from our ongoing clinical trials and future clinical trials with our current and future investigational products or of our competitors;

• changes in our projected operating results that we provide to the public, our failure to meet these projections or changes in recommendations by securities analysts that elect to follow our common stock;

• regulatory, trade or legal developments in the United States and other countries, including changes in tariffs or other trade restrictions and the changes in the structure of healthcare payment systems;

• the level of expenses related to future investigational products or clinical development programs;

• our failure to achieve product development goals in the timeframe we announce;

• announcements of acquisitions, strategic alliances or significant agreements by us or by our competitors;

• recruitment or departure of key personnel;

• the economy as a whole and market conditions in our industry;

• trading activity by a limited number of stockholders who together beneficially own a majority of our outstanding common stock;

• the size of our market float; and

• any other factors discussed in this report.

In addition, the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many immuno-oncology companies. Stock prices of many immuno-oncology companies have fluctuated in a manner unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. In the past, stockholders have filed securities class action litigation following periods of market volatility. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, it could subject us to substantial costs, divert resources and the attention of management from our business and adversely affect our business.

The amount of our future losses is uncertain and our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly or may fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, each of which may cause our stock price to fluctuate or decline.

Our quarterly and annual operating results may fluctuate significantly in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control and may be difficult to predict, including the following:

• the timing and success or failure of clinical trials for our investigational products or competing investigational products, or any other change in the competitive landscape of our industry, including consolidation among our competitors or partners;

50

• our progress towards the achievement of any product development goals or milestones we announce, including any delays or failures which lead to the suspension or termination of any clinical trial or development program;

• the timing and cost of, and level of investment in, research and development activities relating to our investigational products, which may change from time to time;

• option fees received by us in connection with option exercises by Taiho and/or Gilead pursuant to their respective option agreements;

• our ability to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel;

• expenditures that we will or may incur to develop additional investigational products;

• our ability to obtain marketing approval for our investigational products, and the timing and scope of any such approvals we may receive;

• the changing and volatile U.S. and global economic environments; and

• future accounting pronouncements or changes in our accounting policies.

The cumulative effects of these factors could result in large fluctuations and unpredictability in our quarterly and annual operating results. As a result, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful. This variability and unpredictability could also result in our failing to meet the expectations of industry or financial analysts or investors for any period. If our revenue or operating results fall below the expectations of analysts or investors or below any forecasts we may provide to the market, or if the forecasts we provide to the market are below the expectations of analysts or investors, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. Such a stock price decline could occur even when we have met any previously publicly stated guidance we may provide.

Sales of substantial amounts of our outstanding shares may cause the price of our common stock to decline.

The price of our common stock could decline if there are substantial sales of our common stock, particularly sales by our directors, executive officers and significant stockholders, or if there is a large number of shares of our common stock available for sale and the market perceives that sales will occur. Certain of our stockholders have rights, subject to some conditions, to require us to file registration statements covering their shares or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or our stockholders, subject to market standoff and lockup agreements. We have also registered shares of common stock that we have issued and may issue under our employee equity incentive plans. These shares can be sold freely in the public market upon issuance, subject to vesting conditions and, in the case of our affiliates, volume limitations under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired, which could result in sanctions or other penalties that would harm our business.

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting. Commencing with our fiscal year ending December 31, 2019, our management was required to perform an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting. However, as of December 31, 2019, our independent registered public accounting firm was not required to perform an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting.

Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting will not prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud will be detected. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will not in the future identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which may have a negative impact on our ability to timely and accurately produce financial statements, may result in a material misstatement of our consolidated financial statements or may negatively impact the confidence level of our stockholders and other market participants with respect to our reported financial information.

Ensuring that we have adequate internal controls over financial reporting is a costly and time-consuming effort that needs to be re-evaluated frequently. To the extent necessary, implementing any changes to our internal controls may distract our officers and employees, entail substantial costs to modify our existing processes and take significant time to complete. These changes may not,

51

however, be effective in maintaining the adequacy of our internal controls, and any failure to maintain that adequacy, or consequent inability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis, could increase our operating costs and harm our business.

Commencing with our fiscal year ending December 31, 2020, our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to perform an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting. Despite our efforts, there is a risk that our independent registered public accounting firm will not be able to conclude within the prescribed timeframe that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Investors’ perceptions that our internal controls are inadequate or that we are unable to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis may harm our stock price and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities.

Our disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.

We are subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. We designed our disclosure controls and procedures to reasonably assure that information we must disclose in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, and recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. We believe that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures, no matter how well-conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. For example, our directors or executive officers could inadvertently fail to disclose a new relationship or arrangement causing us to fail to make any related party transaction disclosures. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Our failure to meet the continued listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange could result in a delisting of our common stock.

If we fail to satisfy the continued listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), such as the corporate governance requirements or the minimum closing bid price requirement, NYSE may take steps to delist our common stock. Such a delisting would likely have a negative effect on the price of our common stock and would impair your ability to sell or purchase our common stock when you wish to do so. In the event of a delisting, we can provide no assurance that any action taken by us to restore compliance with listing requirements would allow our common stock to become listed again, stabilize the market price or improve the liquidity of our common stock, prevent our common stock from dropping below the NYSE minimum bid price requirement or prevent future non-compliance with NYSE’s listing requirements.

We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

We have never declared nor paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business, and we do not expect to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, stockholders must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investment.

The concentration of our stock ownership will likely limit our stockholders’ ability to influence corporate matters, including the ability to influence the outcome of director elections and other matters requiring stockholder approval.

Based upon shares outstanding as of July 15, 2020, after the closing of our collaboration agreement with Gilead, our executive officers, directors and the holders of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, in the aggregate, beneficially owned approximately 38.7% of our common stock. Gilead, which owns approximately 13% of our outstanding common stock, also has the right to designate two individuals to be appointed to our board of directors, of which we have already appointed one of its designees. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, will have significant influence over all matters that require approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. Corporate actions might be taken even if other stockholders oppose them. This concentration of ownership might also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our company that other stockholders may view as beneficial.

Delaware law and provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws could make a merger, tender offer or proxy contest difficult, thereby depressing the trading price of our common stock.

Our status as a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control by prohibiting us from engaging in a business combination with an interested

52

stockholder for a period of three years after the person becomes an interested stockholder, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more difficult, including the following:

• a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms, which could delay the ability of stockholders to change the membership of a majority of our board of directors;

• the ability of our board of directors to issue shares of preferred stock and to determine the price and other terms of those shares, including preferences and voting rights, without stockholder approval, which could be used to significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquirer;

• the exclusive right of our board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of our board of directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of directors;

• a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which forces stockholder action to be taken at an annual or special meeting of our stockholders;

• the requirement that a special meeting of stockholders may be called only by a majority vote of our entire board of directors, the chairman of our board of directors or our chief executive officer, which could delay the ability of our stockholders to force consideration of a proposal or to take action, including the removal of directors;

• the requirement for the affirmative vote of holders of at least 66 ²⁄₃% of the voting power of all of the then-outstanding shares of the voting stock, voting together as a single class, to amend the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation relating to the management of our business or our amended and restated bylaws, which may inhibit the ability of an acquirer to effect such amendments to facilitate an unsolicited takeover attempt; and

• advance notice procedures with which stockholders must comply to nominate candidates to our board of directors or to propose matters to be acted upon at a stockholders’ meeting, which may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.

In addition, as a Delaware corporation, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. These provisions may prohibit large stockholders, in particular those owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock, from merging or combining with us for a certain period of time. A Delaware corporation may opt out of this provision by express provision in its original certificate of incorporation or by amendment to its certificate of incorporation or bylaws approved by its stockholders. However, we have not opted out of this provision.

These and other provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated bylaws and Delaware law could make it more difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to obtain control of our board of directors or initiate actions that are opposed by our then-current board of directors, including delay or impede a merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving our company. The existence of these provisions could negatively affect the price of our common stock and limit opportunities for our stockholders to realize value in a corporate transaction.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty, any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation or our bylaws or any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees and may discourage these types of lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Not applicable.

53

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

54

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit Number	Exhibit Description	Incorporated by Reference
		Form	File No.	Exhibit	Filing Date
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation	10-Q	001-38419	3.1	May 9, 2018
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws	8-K	001-38419	3.1	May 26, 2020
10.1*A	Option, License and Collaboration Agreement dated May 27, 2020 between Arcus Biosciences, Inc. and Gilead Sciences, Inc.
10.2 A	Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated May 27, 2020 between Arcus Biosciences, Inc. and Gilead Sciences, Inc.	8-K	001-38419	99.1	July 13, 2020
10.3 A	Investor Rights Agreement dated May 27, 2020 between Arcus Biosciences, Inc. and Gilead Sciences, Inc.	8-K	001-38419	99.2	July 13, 2020
10.4*	Third Amendment dated June 26, 2020 to the Lease agreement dated September 30, 2015 between Arcus Biosciences, Inc. and Hayward Point Eden I Limited Partnership
10.5	Non-Employee Director Compensation Program	8-K	001-38419	10.1	June 5, 2020
31.1*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1†	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2†	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document – The instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
101.SCH	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104	Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in exhibit 101)

* Filed herewith.

A This exhibit omits information subject to confidential treatment.

† This certification is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

55

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		ARCUS BIOSCIENCES, INC.
Date:	August 6, 2020	By:	/s/ Terry Rosen
			Terry Rosen, Ph.D.
			Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date:	August 6, 2020	By:	/s/ Robert C. Goeltz II
			Robert C. Goeltz II
			Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

56