EX-99.1 2 hycroft_2023initialassessm.htm EX-99.1 Document
image_1a.jpg
 picture1a.jpg
picture2a.jpg
Hycroft Property
Initial Assessment Technical Report Summary
Humboldt and Pershing Counties, Nevada
Effective Date: March 27, 2023

Prepared for:
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
4300 Water Canyon Road, Unit 1
Winnemucca, NV, 89445
USA

Prepared by:
Ausenco Engineering USA South, Inc
595 South Meyer Avenue
Tucson, AZ, 85701


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Date and Signature Page
This technical report summary (the TRS), entitled “Hycroft Property Initial Assessment Technical Report Summary, Humboldt and Pershing Counties, Nevada” is current as of December 31, 2022, and has been prepared by:
Qualified Person or Consulting FirmResponsible for the following sectionsSignatureDate
Ausenco Engineering USA South, Inc
1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.8, 1.10, 1.11, 2, 3.1-3.5, 3.7, 3.8, 4, 5, 10, 21, 22.1, 22.3, 22.5, 22.7.2, 23.3, and portions of sections 23.1, 24, and 25.
“signed”March 27, 2023
Independent Mining Consultants, Inc
1.4, 1.6, 1.7, 1.9, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 20, 22.2, 22.4, 22.6, 22.7.1, 23.1, 23.2 and for portions of sections 23.1, 24, and 25.
“signed”March 27, 2023
WestLand Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc3.6“signed”March 27, 2023




image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Table of Contents
1    Executive Summary
1
1.1    Introduction
1
1.2    Project Setting
1
1.3    Mineral Tenure, Surface Rights, Water Rights, Royalties and Agreements
1
1.4    Geology and Mineralization
2
1.5    History
2
1.6    Exploration, Drilling and Sampling
3
1.7    Data Verification
3
1.8    Metallurgical Testwork
3
1.9    Mineral Resource Estimation
4
1.10    Conclusions
5
1.11    Recommendations
6
2    Introduction
7
2.1    Overview
7
2.2    Qualified Persons
7
2.3    Site Visits
8
2.4    Effective Dates
8
2.5    Sources of Information and References
8
2.6    Previous Technical Report
8
2.7    Units and Abbreviations
8
3    Property description and location
12
3.1    Introduction
12
Hycroft Property
Page i
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

3.2    Property Ownership and Title In Nevada
12
3.3    Land Status
14
3.4    Property Agreements and Royalties
15
3.5    Water Rights
18
3.6    Liabilities & Encumbrances
18
3.6.1    Environmental Liabilities
18
3.6.2    Mine Safety Disclosures
18
3.6.3    Operating Permits
18
3.6.4    Hycroft Expansion Permitting and Timelines
21
3.6.5    Crofoot Heap Leach Facility Closure
22
3.7    Environmental Considerations
22
3.8    Social License Considerations
22
3.9    Significant Risks
23
4    Accessibility, climate, local resources, infrastructure and physiography
24
4.1    Access
24
4.2    Climate
24
4.2.1    Local Resources and Infrastructure
24
4.3    Physiography
25
4.4    Seismicity
25
5    History
26
5.1    Regional Mining History
26
5.2    Exploration History on the Property
26
5.3    Mine Production on the Property
28
6    Geological setting, mineralization, and deposit
30
Hycroft Property
Page ii
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

6.1    Geological Setting
30
6.1.1    Regional Geology
30
6.1.2    Local Geology
30
6.2    Mineralization
32
6.2.1    Brimstone
32
6.2.2    Vortex
33
6.2.3    Bay and Boneyard
34
6.2.4    Central
35
6.2.5    Camel Hill and Cut 5 Zones
35
6.3    Alteration
36
6.4    Deposit Types
36
7    Exploration
38
7.1    Drilling
38
7.2    Additional Exploration
40
8    Sample preparation, analyses, and security
41
8.1    Introduction
41
8.2    Sample Preparation
41
8.3    Assay Methods
41
8.4    Sample Security
42
8.5    Analytical Results
42
8.6    QP Comment
42
9    Data verification
43
9.1    Certificate of Assay Checks
43
9.2    QA/QC Post-2005 – 2022
43
Hycroft Property
Page iii
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

9.2.1    Standards 2021 - 2013
43
9.2.2    Blanks 2008 - 2014
47
9.2.3    Check Assays 2011 - 2012
47
9.2.4    Standards 2021 – 2022
49
9.2.5    Blank Analysis Results 2021 - 2022
49
9.2.6    Duplicate Assays, 2021 - 2022
50
9.2.7    DDH vs RC for Post-2000 Samples
51
9.2.8    Old vs. New Drilling
51
9.2.9    Downhole Surveys
52
9.3    QP Comment
52
10    Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
54
10.1    Mineralized Materials and Sampling
54
10.1.1    Hycroft Mineralization Domains
54
10.1.2    Samples for Metallurgical Testing
55
10.2    Comminution Tests
55
10.3    Flotation
56
10.3.1    Review of Flotation Testwork
56
10.3.2    Flotation Time
60
10.4    Direct Cyanidation
60
10.5    Concentrate Oxidation Tests
60
10.5.1    Atmospheric Oxidation – Batch Tests
63
10.5.2    Hycroft Mill Demonstration Plant
64
10.5.3    Pressure Oxidation
65
10.5.4    Roasting
67
Hycroft Property
Page iv
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

10.6    Deleterious Elements
70
10.7    QP Comment
11    Mineral Resource Estimates
71
11.1    Model Location
71
11.2    Database
71
11.3    Basic Statistics
72
11.3.1    Geology
73
11.3.2    Lithology
73
11.3.3    Alteration
73
11.3.4    Structure
74
11.4    Domains
77
11.5    Assay Caps
77
11.6    Bench Height Confirmation
78
11.7    Composites
79
11.8    Variography
82
11.9    Block Grade Estimation
85
11.9.1    Gold, Silver and Mercury
85
11.9.2    Cyanide Ratio
89
11.9.3    Sulfide Sulfur
89
11.9.4    Density
91
11.9.5    Stockpile Grade Estimation
91
11.9.6    Treatment of 1982 – 1987 Data
92
11.10    Classification
93
11.11    Model Verification
93
Hycroft Property
Page v
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

11.11.1    Swath Plots
93
11.11.2    Smear Check
96
11.11.3    Reconciliation
97
11.12    Mineral Resources
97
12    Mineral Reserve Estimate
104
13    Mining Methods
105
14    Processing and Recovery Methods
106
15    Infrastructure
107
16    Market Studies
108
17    Environmental Studies, permitting, and plans, negotiations, or agreements with local individuals or groups
109
18    Capital and Operating Costs
110
19    Economic Analysis
111
20    Adjacent PRoperties
112
21    Other Relevant Data And Information
113
22    Interpretations and Conclusions
114
22.1    Introduction
114
22.2    Geology and Mineralization
114
22.3    History
114
22.4    Exploration and Drilling
114
22.5    Metallurgical Testing
115
22.6    Mineral Resources
116
22.7    Risks
116
22.7.1    Mineral Resource Estimate
116
Hycroft Property
Page vi
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

22.7.2    Mineral Processing
116
23    Recommendations
117
23.1    Introduction
117
23.2    Proposed Exploration Program
117
23.3    Proposed Metallurgical Studies
117
24    References
118
25    Reliance on Information Provided By The Registrant
121
List of Appendices
Appendix A – Hycroft Patented Claims
Appendix B – Hycroft Unpatented Claims
List of Tables
Table 1-1:    Hycroft Mineral Resources as of March 27, 2023, Imperial Units
5
Table 2-1:    Unit Abbreviations
9
Table 2-2:    Name Abbreviations
10
Table 3-1:    Hycroft Annual Land Holding Costs
15
Table 3-2:    Hycroft Operating Permits
19
Table 3-3:    Hycroft Miscellaneous Permits
20
Table 3-4:    Hycroft Permits and Annual Fees
20
Table 3-5:    Right-of-Way Payment and Renewal Schedule
21
Table 4-1:    Hycroft Water Wells and Permitted Yearly Consumption
25
Table 5-1:    Au and Ag Sales from 2019 to 2022
29
Hycroft Property
Page vii
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Table 9-1:    Nearest Neighbor Sample Comparison of RC Gold Composites versus DDH Gold Composites
51
Table 9-2:    Nearest Neighbor Sample Comparison of 1982-1987 Gold Assays versus Post-2005 Gold Assays
52
Table 10-1:    Average Sulfur Contents of Oxide, Transition and Sulfide Mineralized Materials
55
Table 10-2:    Summary of Test Samples
55
Table 10-3:    Grindability Test Summary
56
Table 10-4:    G&T Composites 1 through 24 Flotation Test Results
58
Table 10-5:    G&T Composites M-1 through M-17 Flotation Test Results
59
Table 10-6:    Flotation Reagent Schemes Studied
60
Table 10-7:    Estimated Metallurgical Recoveries from 2016 Feasibility Study – Au and Ag
 63
Table 10-8:    Hycroft Alkaline POX Testwork Summary
 66
Table 10-9:    Hycroft Acid POX Testwork Summary
 68
Table 10-10:    Deleterious Element Assay
 70
Table 11-1:    Block Size and Model Size
Table 11-2:    Data Available for the Assembly of the Resource Model for Au, and Ag
 72
Table 11-3:    Assay Database (No Stockpile Assays, and No Drilling from 1982 through 1987)
 72
Table 11-4:    Population Domains for Grade Estimation
77
Table 11-5:    Assay Cap Values
78
Table 11-6:    Basic Statistics of 40-ft Length Composites, In-Situ Rock, Eliminating Years 1982 to 1987
80
Table 11-7:    Grade Estimation Parameters for Au, Ag, and Mercury
87
Table 11-8:    Estimation Parameters for Cyanide Ratio
89
Table 11-9:    Sulfide Sulfur Estimation Parameters
90
Hycroft Property
Page viii
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Table 11-10:    Sulfide Sulfur Default Values if Not Estimated
90
Table 11-11:    Density Assigned to the Block Model
91
Table 11-12:    Stockpile Grade Estimation of Assignments
92
Table 11-13:    IMC Smear Check, Below End 2021 Topography, Without stockpile blocks or drilling, and without data from 1982 through 1987 Drilling.
96
Table 11-14:    Economic Parameters for Mineral Resources
100
Table 11-15:    Hycroft Mineral Resources as of March 2023, Imperial Units
102
Table 11-16:    Hycroft Mineral Resources as of March 2023, Metric Units
103
Table 25-1:    Information Provided by Hycroft
122
15

List of Figures
Figure 3-1:    Hycroft Mine Property Location Map
13
Figure 3-2:    Hycroft Mine Claims Map
16
Figure 3-3:    Current Property and Facilities Layout (2023)
17
Figure 5-1:    Predominant Mineralization Zones Identified for the Mine.
27
Figure 6-1:    Stratigraphic Column for Hycroft Deposit Area
31
Figure 6-2:    Simplified East–West Cross-Sections through the Sulphur District
32
Figure 6-3:    Brimstone Generalized Geology Cross-Section
33
Figure 6-4:    Vortex to Camel Hill Generalized Section
34
Figure 6-5:    Bay Geologic Cross-Section
35
Figure 6-6:    Generalized Hycroft Epithermal Diagram
37
Figure 7-1:    Drillhole Collar Locations
39
Hycroft Property
Page ix
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 9-1:    Results of Submitted Gold Standards 2005 - 2013
45
Figure 9-2:    Results of Submitted Silver Standards 2005-2013
46
Figure 9-3:    Results of Blank Submissions
47
Figure 9-4:    Check Assay Results, Fire Assay Gold 2011 - 2012
48
Figure 9-5:    Check Assay Results, Fire Assay Silver 2011 – 2011
48
Figure 9-6:    Standards Results, 2021 – 2022
49
Figure 9-7:    Blank Results, 2021 – 2022
50
Figure 10-1:    Recovery vs. Time Plot, G&T Kamloops Tests, M Composites
62
Figure 10-2:    Au Extraction vs. Sulfide Oxidation
64
Figure 10-3:    Oxidation of Central Flotation Concentrate: Sulfate Spike Test
65
Figure 10-4:    Demonstration Plant Cyanide Leach Recovery of Au and Ag
65
Figure 11-1:    East–West Cross-Section 43,000N Looking North, showing Hycroft Rock Types
75
Figure 11-2:    East–West Cross-Section 43,000N Looking North, showing Hycroft Alterations
75
Figure 11-3:    Hycroft Structure Interpretation
76
Figure 11-4:    Bench Height Analysis
79
Figure 11-5:    Variograms for Silicic Material Between the West Splay and Central Faults
83
Figure 11-6:    Variograms in Silicic Material Between the Central Fault and the East Fault Footwall
84
Figure 11-7:    Horizontal Swath Plots for Gold and Silver
94
Figure 11-8:    Vertical Swath Plots for Gold and Silver
95
Figure 20-1:    Location of Rosebud Property
Hycroft Property
Page x
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

1    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1    Introduction
This Technical Report Summary (TRS) has been prepared by Ausenco Engineering USA South Inc. (Ausenco), Independent Mining Consultants, Inc. (IMC), and WestLand Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc. (Westland) for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (Hycroft), following the reporting requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Modernization of Property Disclosures of Mining Registrants under subpart 1300 and item 601 (96)(B)(iii) of Regulation S-K for an Initial Assessment (IA).
This TRS provides an update to the mineral resource estimate in the Company’s Initial Assessment, filed on EDGAR on Form 8-K on February 22, 2022. The mineral resource estimate utilizes a milling and pressure oxidation process for sulfide mineralization and heap leaching process for oxide and transition mineralization. This TRS includes drill results received through December 9, 2022 which formed the basis of this mineral resource estimation model and this updated report.
1.2    Project Setting
The Hycroft property (the Mine) is situated on the western flank of the Kamma Mountains on the eastern edge of the Black Rock Desert approximately 54 miles west of Winnemucca in Humboldt and Pershing Counties, Nevada. The Mine property straddles Townships 34, 35, 35½ and 36 North and Ranges 28, 29 and 30 East (MDB&M) with its central co-ordinates at approximately latitude 40°52’ north and longitude 118°41’ west.
The Mine is accessible via Nevada State Route 49 (Jungo Road), an unpaved road maintained by Humboldt County and Pershing County and Hycroft. The Union Pacific railway, a major east–west railway, runs immediately adjacent to the property.
Existing facilities on site include two administration buildings, a mobile maintenance shop, a light vehicle maintenance shop, a warehouse, leach pads, primary, secondary and tertiary crushing systems, two Merrill-Crowe process plants, and a refinery.
1.3    Mineral Tenure, Surface Rights, Water Rights, Royalties and Agreements
The Mine property consists of 30 private parcels with patented claims that comprise approximately 1,787 acres, and 3,247 unpatented lode and placer mining claims that encompass approximately 62,298 acres. The combined patented and unpatented claims comprise approximately 64,085 acres. Much of the project area is located on un-surveyed public and private land. The following is a list of land acquisitions/transactions made over the years which constitute the entire Hycroft land claim package:
    The Crofoot property and approximately 3,500 acres of claims were acquired by Vista Gold Corporation (Vista) in 1985.
    The Crofoot property, originally held under lease, is owned by Hycroft subject to a 4% Net Profits Royalty (NPR) retained by the former owners, with a cap of US$7.6 M, of which US$3.1M has been paid.
    The Lewis property and approximately 8,700 acres of claims were acquired by Vista in early 1987.
    In 2006, approximately 13,100 acres of additional claims were staked by Vista.
    From 2007 through 2015, the company staked additional lode mining claims contiguous to existing Hycroft claims that cover approximately 37,373 acres of land. Some of these lode claims overlap existing placer claims.
These claims are contiguous or proximate to the original Crofoot and Lewis claims. In 1996, the lease/purchase agreement was amended to provide for minimum advance royalty payments of US$120,000 on January 1 of each year in which mining occurs on patented and unpatented claims. The sum of payments for the Crofoot property is capped at US$7.6 M, of which US$3.1 M has been paid through December 2022. An additional US$120,000 annually is due if mineralized material production exceeds 5 Mtons from the Crofoot property on either patented or unpatented claims in any calendar year. All advanced royalty payments are taken as a credit against the NPI.
Effective May 29, 2020 Sprott Private Resource Lending II (CO) acquired a 1.5% Net Smelter Returns Royalty on the property.
Payment of annual claim holding fees to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and Humboldt and Pershing Counties are made every third calendar quarter (Q3). Payments are current through the 2021-2022 claim years, with
Hycroft Property
Page 1
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

US$593,727 paid in Q3 2022. Payment of annual land holding fees and property taxes is required to continue to hold the Hycroft property in good standing. Hycroft controls all surface and mineral rights within the Hycroft mineral resource area. No further land acquisition is required for operation of the mine and processing facilities as presently designed.
Water resources are sufficient at the Mine and controlled under 11 separate water right permits administered by the Nevada Division of Water Resources (NDWR). These permits are either held in ownership by Hycroft or leased to Hycroft. Hycroft controls a total of 20,414.9-acre feet per year (6.65 billion gallons per year) in the Black Rock Desert Hydrographic Basin.
1.4    Geology and Mineralization
The Hycroft deposit is a low-sulfidation, epithermal, hot springs system that contains Au and Ag mineralization. Radiometric dates indicate that the main phase of Au and Ag mineralization formed four million years ago, when hydrothermal fluids were fed upward along high angle, normal faults. Low-grade Au and Ag mineralization was co-deposited with silica and potassium feldspar throughout porous rock types.
A subsequent drop in permeability, due to sealing of the system, led to over pressuring and subsequent repeated hydrothermal brecciation. Additional precious metal mineralization was deposited during this event as breccia zones, veins, and sulfide flooding.
Au and Ag mineralization was followed 0.4 to 2 million years ago by an intense event of high sulfidation acid leaching of the mineralized volcanic rocks coincident with a regional water table drop. This allowed steam heated sulfur gases to condense into sulfuric acid and leach the upper portion of the mineralized rocks.
Oxidation of sulfide mineralization occurs to variable depths over the deposit, depending upon proximity to faults, extent of acid leaching, and depth to water table. Sulfide content through the deposit can be variable but typically averages between 1.5 and 2.0% sulfide sulfur.
The Hycroft deposit is typically broken into six major zones based on geology, mineralization, and alteration. These include Brimstone, Vortex, Central, Bay, Boneyard, and Camel Hill zones. The boundaries are typically the major faults, namely Break, East and Ramp.
1.5    History
The Mine is located in the Sulfur District, where mining for native sulfur began in the late 1800’s. Then, in the early part of the 20th century high-grade Ag was mined as were veins of nearly pure alunite (hydroxylated aluminum potassium sulfate mineral) in the southern part of the district. From 1941 to 1943, cinnabar (a mercury sulfide mineral) was also mined. Exploration for native sulfur commenced again in 1966 with the Duval Corporation (Duval) reporting elevated Au and Ag values but finding no significant evidence of a sulfur deposit at depth (Wallace, 1980).
In 1977, the Cordex Syndicate mapped, and rock chip sampled the Hycroft property, recognizing the potential for a bulk tonnage, low-grade precious metal deposit. Homestake then took interest in the property and completed surface sampling and exploration drilling during 1981-1982. Mining officially began as a small heap leach operation in 1983 at what was then known as the Lewis Mine. In 1985, Vista gained control of the original Hycroft property. They also acquired the Lewis Mine in early 1987 from F. W. Lewis, Inc., and the Crofoot Mine in April 1988. From 1985 to 1999, they had drilled 3,212 exploration holes, totaling 965,552 feet (ft) with the bulk of this drilling focused on oxide gold mineralization at Central, Bay and Brimstone.
The remaining leasehold interest in the Lewis property was purchased by Vista in December 2005. Production followed at the former Crofoot property in the Bay, South Central, Boneyard, Gap, and Cut-4 pits along the Central Zone. Production from the Brimstone Pit commenced in 1985 and continued until December 1998. The Mine was placed on a care and maintenance program through 2007. During 1983 to 1998, the Mine produced approximately 1.2 Moz of Au and 2.5 Moz of Ag. An additional 58,700 oz of Au was produced from the leaching operations from 1999 through 2004. In May 2007, the Nevada-based holdings of Vista were spun out into Allied Nevada Gold Corp (Allied Nevada). The Mine was included as part of the transfer of ownership allowing Allied Nevada to explore, expand, and develop the resources. The Mine was reactivated in September 2007 and achieved planned ore production by the end of 2009. With the construction of the North leach pad in 2013, the total leach pad space was increased to more than 20 million square ft. In 2010, the Mine began an expansion program that included construction of a 21,000 gallon per minute Merrill-Crowe processing plant and a three-stage crushing facility as well as solution pumping capacity upgrades. Active mining was stopped again at the Mine in June 2015 due to low metal prices, but active leaching of previously mined ore continued through 2018. During this time, Allied Nevada emerged from its financial restructuring to become Hycroft Mining Corporation. In late 2018, Hycroft began construction of new leach pads. In April 2019, active mining began with
Hycroft Property
Page 2
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

a focus on transition and sulfide minerals but were set aside for future processing. Only oxide ore was placed on the new leach pads during this time with production of Au and Ag continuing through until 2021. From September 2007 through July 2019 metal sales have totaled approximately 900,000 oz of Au and 5.0M oz of Ag. Active mining ceased and production at the Mine was terminated on November 11, 2021. Annual sales in ounces of Au and Ag produced from the Mine’s heap leach operations over years 2019 through 2022 total approximately 105,500 ounces of Au and 615,000 ounces of Ag.
1.6    Exploration, Drilling and Sampling
The Hycroft district includes data from 1981 to 2022 and includes 5,601 holes, representing 2,588,826 ft of drilling. At this time, there are 5,532 drillholes in the resource model area which includes holes drilled for stockpile definition. During 2021 and 2022, there were 171 new holes added to the database.
In addition to drilling activity, Hycroft has also conducted geophysical surveys, soil and rock chip sampling programs, field mapping, historical data compilation, and regional reconnaissance around the Mine area. In 2022, a hyperspectral flight of the property was conducted. These efforts are designed to improve the understanding of the known mineralization, as well as provide data for further exploration of the greater property position.
1.7    Data Verification
The Hycroft and IMC team have put significant effort toward the verification of the database during 2022. That work has included:
1)    Detailed comparison of certificates of assay versus the assay database which resulted in substantial update and correction to the database.
2)    Analysis of the QAQC data used by Hycroft and previous owners from 2005 to 2022. This work was done in two stages representing different time periods.
3)    Analysis of Diamond drilling (DDH) versus Reverse Circulation Drilling (RC) with the post-2005 drilling to confirm that the two methods can be comingled and utilized for the estimation of mineral resources.
4)    Comparison of Pre-2005 drilling versus Post-2005 drilling to verify the application of the older data, because the Pre-2005 data QA/QC information was not available.
The updated statement of mineral resource reflects information developed in 2022. The four primary areas include:
1)    Additional drilling assay results from 2021 and the assay results received through December 9, 2022 have been added to the database. This data came from 171 holes containing 23,804 gold fire assays and 23,780 silver fire assays.
2)    Approximately 165,000 silver fire assay samples previously included in the database as “no assay” results were found to have trace level assay values1. As a result, the “no assay” sample values were replaced with the lower “trace sample” values. “Trace assay” sample values are less than the grade of economic mineralization which is 0.399 oz/ton.
3)    The February 2022 resource statement reflected downward adjustments for reported bias in grade estimation from pre-2000 gold fire assay values. Detailed review of historical assay certificates confirmed that the database used to develop the mineral resource corresponds to the original assay certificates, therefore the downward adjustment was removed.
4)    Detailed analysis of the earliest drilling at Hycroft from 1982 to 1987 indicated that the assays were high biased. As a result, the historical assays from this period have been adjusted downward and taking a conservative approach, the resource from this time period has been classified as inferred material only.
1.8    Metallurgical Testwork
From 2009 to 2016, Hycroft metallurgical test programs conducted on the Hycroft deposit consisted of a series of comminution, flotation, concentrate oxidation, and cyanide leaching tests on mineralized materials, flotation tails, and oxidized concentrate of sulfide mineralized materials. Samples for metallurgical testwork were mostly derived from drilled core samples selected to represent the materials from the five main mineralization domains. Testwork was conducted by G&T Kamloops Laboratories (G&T) and SGS Mineral Services, Lakefield (SGS), both in Canada, and by
1 “No Assay” sample values allow the model to estimate the mineralization in the area between two drill holes with known mineralization values. “Trace Assay” values are approximately one-half the detection limit of the calibrated laboratory instrument used in assessing assay samples.
Hycroft Property
Page 3
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Hazen Research Inc. (Hazen) in Colorado. POX testwork was performed by Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (KCA), SGS and Hazen.
Comminution testwork demonstrate the Hycroft rock mineralization exhibits very high rock competency both in the SAG and ball mills.
Flotation testwork can be summarized as follows:
    Au recoveries from flotation at grinds ranging from 100 to 150 microns were 80% but tended to decrease with grinds finer than 100 microns or coarser than 150 microns;
    Flotation tests performed at neutral pH generally outperformed tests conducted at basic pH;
    Testwork using various frother and promoter reagents were conducted to optimize flotation results; and
    An average mass pull of 13.8% was observed for some tests. The same set of tests indicated a flotation time of 19 minutes for gold and 17 minutes for silver to achieve ~ 80% target recoveries for both.
Oxidation testwork on Hycroft concentrates from the aforementioned flotation testwork included pressure oxidation (POX), roasting, ambient pressure alkaline oxidation and other oxidation methods including chlorination, fine grinding with intense cyanidation, and the Albion process. The following is a summary of the results of the predominant testwork studies conducted.
Results from early batch testwork conducted in 2009 results were positive and indicated that Hycroft concentrates were amenable to oxidation under atmospheric conditions, using trona to create the appropriate alkaline environment to promote oxidation. Pilot plant testing on Hycroft’s three main domains confirmed the findings of the batch tests. Different material types oxidized at varying rates, with Vortex materials oxidizing the fastest followed by Central and then Brimstone. The Master Composite oxidation rate was comparable to Brimstone. At 60% sulfide oxidation, 85% Au and 80-84% Ag recoveries were achievable by atmospheric oxidation for all material types tested.
The viability of the alkaline atmospheric oxidation (AAO) process using trona was demonstrated with a 10-ton per day demonstration plant operated at site from 2016 to 2017. This plant included primary grinding, followed by flotation, atmospheric oxidation, cyanide leaching, countercurrent decantation (CCD) and precipitation. The results indicated Au recoveries peaked at 80% and Ag recoveries were at 90% for the Brimstone mineralized materials.
POX was evaluated in the development of the mineral resource, in part, due to the consistency of sulfide oxidation at elevated pressure and the observation of improved overall gold and silver recoveries.
1.9    Mineral Resource Estimation
The mineral resource at the Hycroft property is currently envisioned to be produced from a conventional hard rock open pit mine feeding two alternative process facilities.
    Run of Mine (ROM) oxide material will be directed to cyanide heap leaching, producing a gold and silver doré or
    Sulfide and transitional material will be directed to a crushing, flotation milling followed by pressure oxidation (Pox) of the concentrate to make a gold and silver doré.
The terms of reference for this estimate of mineral resources are mineralization in-place. The procedures described in the following paragraphs establish that the stated mineral resources have reasonable prospects of economic extraction.
Mineral resources were developed using a computer based on the block model of the mineralization and pit optimization software to determine the mineralization with reasonable expectation of economic extraction as defined by S-K 1300.
The cutoff grade that is reported for this statement of mineral resources is based on mining and processing costs estimated by IMC and Ausenco combined with reasonable metal prices. The internal or marginal cutoff is applied and reported where the benefits of selling the recovered metal will pay for the processing and fixed general and administrative costs. The cutoff is $0.01 / ton in terms of income after subtraction of mining, processing, and G&A costs.
Metal prices for Mineral Resource were US$1,900/oz Au and US$24.50/oz Ag. Spot prices for gold and silver in 2022 have ranged from US$1,628 to US$2,039/oz Au and US$17.77 to $US26.18/oz Ag respectively. The prices selected for determination of mineral resources are an approximation of current metal prices and do not include extensive price extrapolation. Table 1-1 summarizes the mineral resource in imperial units. An additional table in metric units is included in Section 11.
Hycroft Property
Page 4
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

The risks to the Mineral Resource are project costs and project recoveries as well as metal prices that can have a substantial impact on the Mineral Resource both positively and negatively. Hycroft mineral resources are sensitive to engineered and estimated parameters of operating costs, recovery, and metal price. That sensitivity may result in future variation in the mineral resource as costs and recoveries are refined.
Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and detailed economic considerations have not been applied. Modifying factors for mine and process design have not been applied.
Table 1-1:    Hycroft Mineral Resources as of March 27, 2023, Imperial Units
ClassificationApproximate
Cutoff, AuEq
Au oz/ton
KtonsAu
oz/ton
Ag
oz/ton
Sulfide
Sulfur%
Au Contained Ounces (000)Ag Contained Ounces (000)
Heap Leach Resource
Measured
0.00294,1620.0080.172.1475315,725
Indicated
0.00259,7510.0070.131.784367,529
Meas + Ind
0.002153,9130.0080.152.001,18923,254
Inferred
0.00246,1180.0070.141.623376,549
Mill, Flotation + Concentrate by POX and Cyanide Leach Process
Measured0.010402,7350.0130.501.785,236200,965
Indicated0.010346,3080.0120.391.584,156136,445
Meas + Ind0.010749,0430.0130.451.699,391337,410
Inferred0.010249,4940.0120.361.523,01989,568
Combined Mineral Resources Leach Plus Process Plant
Measured0.002 - 0.010496,8970.0120.441.855,989216,690
Indicated0.002 - 0.010406,0590.0110.351.614,592143,974
Meas + Ind0.002 - 0.010902,9560.0120.401.7410,581360,664
Inferred0.002 - 0.010295,6120.0110.331.543,35696,117
Total material in the Pit (Ktons) =3,631,287
Notes:
Mineral resources based on metal prices of $1,900/troy oz Au and $24.50/troy oz Ag
Cutoffs are income – process cost = NPR = NSR – Process Opex
Numbers may not match exactly due to rounding.
Mineral resources are contained within a computer-generated optimized pit. Total material in that pit is approximately 3.63 billion tons.
All units are imperial. Ktons means 1,000 short tons of 2,000 lbs. Au and Ag grades are in troy ounces/short ton.
1.10    Conclusions
IMC developed the Hycroft deposit block model based on 2,537,335 ft of drilling from 5,532 drillholes.
Previous Hycroft metallurgical test programs conducted on the Hycroft sulfide deposit consisted of a series of comminution, flotation, concentrate oxidation, and cyanide leaching tests on mineralized materials, flotation tailings, and oxidized sulfide concentrates.
Comminution testwork demonstrates the Hycroft rock mineralization exhibits very high rock competency. Flotation at grinds ranging from 100 to 150 microns at neutral pH with strong non-selective sulfide collectors showed Au and Ag recoveries. Oxidation testwork on Hycroft concentrates from the aforementioned flotation testwork improved recoveries with POX results in the mid-90s and 80s for Au and Ag, respectively.
The mineral resources statement was developed using a conventional computer-based block model. Each block was evaluated to determine the net return from the following two processes:
Hycroft Property
Page 5
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

    ROM cyanide heap leaching of oxide ore; and
    Milling, Flotation, POX followed by Cyanide Leach and Merrill-Crowe.
1.11    Recommendations
The Ausenco QPs recommend Hycroft proceed with a further study to develop a process plant to treat sulfide ore in addition to its oxide heap leaching capability provided it updates and improves the interpretation of the fault boundaries, major rock types, and alteration, and specifically drill cores to target areas within the mine plan that are not well-defined and update the slope stability.
Ausenco also recommend additional testwork focusing on optimizing grind size and mass pull percentage, flotation reagent suite, POX, equipment sizing, residence times, lime/limestone, and oxygen consumption. Also recommended is that Hycroft obtain solid separation data and flocculant requirements, optimize cyanide consumption and reagent use in cyanide destruction.
IMC recommends on-going data diligence and clean up along with targeted drilling as budgets and time allow.

Hycroft Property
Page 6
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

2    INTRODUCTION
2.1    Overview
This Technical Report Summary (TRS) summarizes the results of an Initial Assessment and updates the mineral resource estimate for the Mine located in northwestern Nevada. The work has been prepared at the request of Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (Hycroft). The report follows the requirements and outline as described in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ruling S-K Subpart 1300 (S-K1300). This TRS has been completed by Ausenco, IMC and Westland.
The updated statement of mineral resource reflects information developed in 2022. The four primary areas include:
1)    Additional drilling assay results from 2021 and the assay results received through December 9, 2022 have been added to the database. This data came from 171 holes containing 23,804 gold fire assays and 23,780 silver fire assays.
2)    Approximately 165,000 silver fire assay samples previously included in the database as “no assay” results were found to have trace level assay values2. As a result, the “no assay” sample values were replaced with the lower “trace sample” values. “Trace assay” sample values are ½ the detection limit of the laboratory instrument and less than the grade of economic mineralization.
3)    The February 2022 resource statement reflected downward adjustments for reported bias in grade estimation from pre-2000 gold fire assay values. Detailed review of historical assay certificates confirmed that the database used to develop the mineral resource corresponds to the original assay certificates, therefore the downward adjustment was removed.
4)    Detailed analysis of the earliest drilling at Hycroft from 1982 to 1987 indicated that the assays were high biased. As a result, the historical assays from this period have been adjusted downward and taking a conservative approach, the resource from this time period has been classified as inferred material only.
This TRS supersedes all previous technical studies, including the TRS filed on EDGAR as on Form 8-K on February 22, 2022.
The mineral resource is based on information provided by Hycroft which has been checked and validated wherever possible by IMC. The calculations and interpretations presented here are the work of IMC, who takes responsibility for the published mineral resource.
Some sections of this report were published previously as part of the previous Technical Reports and are listed below in Section 2.6. The sections of these reports which were utilized have been reviewed by both IMC and Ausenco in sufficient detail so that Qualified Persons at IMC and Ausenco have assumed responsibility for this work.
Hycroft staff have provided all requested information and have worked with IMC and Ausenco in an open and transparent manner throughout the Project period.
This report uses imperial units including troy ounces for gold and silver, throughout. Occasional use of non-imperial units will be clearly noted and explained in text when they occur. Tons means short tons of 2000 lbs. Ktons means 1000 short tons. Precious metal grades are presented in units of troy ounces per short ton (oz/ton).
2.2    Qualified Persons
Below is a list of the firms that acted as Qualified Persons (QPs) in the preparation of this Technical Report Summary:
    Ausenco Engineering South USA, Inc. is responsible for sections 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.8, 1.10, 1.11, 2, 3.1-3.5, 3.7, 3.8, 4, 5, 10, 21, 22.1, 22.3, 22.5, 22.7.2, 23.3, and portions of sections 23.1, 24, and 25.
    Independent Mining Consultants, Inc. is responsible for sections 1.4, 1.6, 1.7, 1.9, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 20, 22.2, 22.4, 22.6 22.7.1, 23.1, 23.2 and for portions of sections 24, and 25.
    WestLand Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc. is responsible for subsection 3.6.
2 “No Assay” sample values allow the model to estimate the mineralization in the area between two drill holes with known mineralization values. “Trace Assay” values are approximately one-half the detection limit of the calibrated laboratory instrument used in assessing assay samples.
Hycroft Property
Page 7
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

2.3    Site Visits
Ausenco field experts completed a site visit of the Hycroft property on April 8, 2021 to inspect the existing infrastructure.
IMC Qualified Persons, John Marek P.E. and Anh D. Nguyen, P.E. visited the Hycroft property on August 5, 2021. Their purpose was to review the existing core and logs.
2.4    Effective Dates
The overall Report effective date is March 27, 2023.
2.5    Sources of Information and References
The authors sourced information from documents listed in the References section of this report (Section 24).
2.6    Previous Technical Report
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation previously filed the following Technical Report Summary:
    Technical Report Summary of Initial Assessment on the Hycroft Mine, Nevada, United States of America, Prepared by Ausenco Engineering USA South Inc for Hycroft Mining Corporation, Effective date: February 18, 2022.
    Newman, S., DeLong, R.F., Clarkson, B. M., Carew, T., Hartmann, M., Technical Report Summary: Heap Leaching Feasibility Study. Prepared by M3 for Hycroft Mining Corporation, Effective date: July 31, 2019.
Hycroft Mining Corporation completed the following Technical Report in accordance Canada’s National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and which are available on the SEDAR website:
    Ibrado, A.S., Roth, D.K., Snider, J.W., Brown, R.A., Harris, D.A., Pennstrom, W.J., Peterson, A.T. NI 43-101Technical Report Mill Expansion Feasibility Study, Winnemucca, Nevada, USA. Prepared by M3 for Allied Nevada Gold Corp., Effective date: November 03, 2014.
2.7    Units and Abbreviations
























Table 2-1:    Unit Abbreviations
Hycroft Property
Page 8
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

UnitDescription
acacre
aslabove sea level
AxbHardness of ore in term of impact breakage, unitless
Bbillion
Btonsbillion short tons
bgsbelow ground surface
°CCelsius
Dday
°FFahrenheit
faslfeet above sea level
ftfeet
Ggravity
ggallon
gpmgallons per minute
g/ygallons per year
Hphorsepower
in.inch
Kg.kilogram
ktonskilo short tons
kVkilovolt
lbpound
Mmillion
mimile
mi2
square mile
Mmmillimeters
Mtonsmillion short tons
Min.minute
MozMillion ounces
ozounce
oz/tonounces per short ton
oz/gounces per gallon
pcfpounds per cubic foot
ppmparts per million
psiggauge pressure
tonshort ton
ton/dshort tons per day
US$United States dollars
wt/wtweight percent
%percent
Hycroft Property
Page 9
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Table 2-2:    Name Abbreviations
NameDescription
AAOAtmospheric alkaline oxidation
Agsilver
Augold
AusencoAusenco Engineering USA South, Inc.
BLMBureau of Land Management
BMRRBureau of Mining Regulation and Reclamation
CCDCountercurrent decantation
CFRCode of Federal Regulations
CSCarbon Steel
DuvalDuval Corporation
EAEnvironmental Assessment
EISEnvironmental Impact Statement
EMSEM Strategies
G&TG&T Kamloops Laboratories
GolderGolder Associates USA Inc., a member of WSP
HazenHazen Research Inc.
HycroftHycroft Mining Holding Corporation
ICPInductively coupled Plasma
IMCIndependent Mining Consultants, Inc.
KCAKappes, Cassiday & Associates
LECOLaboratory Equipment Corporation
LOMLife of Mine
Mill+ConcPOXpressure oxidation treatment of the concentrates
MSHAMine Safety and Health Administration
MWWAIMichael W. West and Associates Inc
NaHSSodium hydrosulfide
NACNevada Administrative Code
NaCNSodium cyanide
NDEPNevada Department of Environmental Protection
NDOWNevada Department of Wildlife
NDWRNevada Division of Water Resources
NEPANational Environmental Policy Act
NHLFNorth Heap Leach Facility
NPINet Profits Interest
NPRNet of Process
NRPNevada Reclamation Permit
PAXPotassium amyl xanthate
POXPressure oxidation
QA/QCQuality Assurance and Quality Control
Hycroft Property
Page 10
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RCReverse circulation
RODRecord of Decision
ROMrun-of-mine
ROWright-of-way
SECUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission’s
SEISSupplemental Environmental Impact Statement
SGSSGS Minerals Service Lakefield
SK1300U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ruling S-K Subpart 1300
SRKSRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc.
TcmThe camel conglomerate
TMFTailings Management Facility
TRIFRTotal Reportable Incident Frequency Rate
TRSTechnical Report Summary
TSGTertiary Sulfur Group
USFWSUnited States Fish and Wildlife Service
QPsQualified Persons
WestLandWestLand Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc.
VistaVista Gold Corporation


Hycroft Property
Page 11
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

3    PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
3.1    Introduction
The Mine is an existing gold and silver operation located 54 miles west of Winnemucca in Humboldt County and Pershing County, Nevada, as shown in Figure 3-1. The Mine is accessible via Nevada State Route 49 (Jungo Road), an all-weather, unpaved road that is maintained by Humboldt County and Hycroft. A major east–west railway runs immediately adjacent to the property.
The Mine property straddles Townships 34, 35, 35½ and 36 North and Ranges 28, 29 and 30 East (MDB&M) with an approximate latitude 40°52’ north and longitude 118°41’ west. The mine is situated on the western flank of the Kamma Mountains on the eastern edge of the Black Rock Desert.
The Mine property, which was consolidated through multiple transactions over several years as discussed below, consists of 30 private parcels with patented claims that comprise approximately 1,787 acres, and 3,247 unpatented lode and placer mining claims. Some unpatented mining claims overlap other Hycroft patented and unpatented mining claims to ensure there are no fractional claim gaps. The unpatented and patented claims cover a surface are of approximately 62,298 acres. The combined area of patented and unpatented claims is approximately 64,085 acres of land. Existing facilities on site include two administration buildings, a mobile maintenance shop, a light vehicle maintenance shop, a warehouse, three (3) Heap Leach Pads – Crofoot, North, and Brimstone, primary, secondary and tertiary crushing systems, two Merrill-Crowe process plants and a refinery. It is considered that existing components of the mine property would be utilized for future development. The Mine operates under permit authorizations from the BLM, NDEP, NDOW, NDWR and County agencies. At the date of this report, the Company had approximately 65 employees at the mine.
3.2    Property Ownership and Title In Nevada
The mine is owned and managed by Hycroft Resources and Development, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation.

Hycroft Property
Page 12
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 3-1:    Hycroft Mine Property Location Map
image_4a.jpgimage_5a.jpg
Source: Figure adapted from Hycroft, 2022
Hycroft Property
Page 13
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

3.3    Land Status
Hycroft holds 3,277 mining claims (30 unpatented placer claims and 3,247 unpatented lode claims) covering approximately 62,298 acres of land. Some mining claims overlap other Hycroft mining claims to ensure there are no fractional gaps in mining claims coverage. These claims are located in Humboldt County and Pershing County, Nevada as follows:
    T36N, R29E, Sections: 28, 32, 33
    T36N, R30E, Sections: 19, 28-34
    T35 1/2N, R29E, Sections: 25, 26, 35, 36
    T35N, R29E, Sections: 1-3, 10-15, 21-28, 31-36
    T35N, R30E, Sections: 2-10, 15-23, 25-36
    T34N, R28E, Sections: 1, 2, 11, 12, 13
    T34N, R29E, Sections: 1-28, 33
    T34N, R30E, Sections: 2-11, 17-20, 29, 30
In addition to the unpatented land, the Company owns 30 private parcels (patented mining claims) comprising 1,787 acres. These claims are located in Humboldt County and Pershing County, Nevada as follows:
    T35N, R29E, Sections: 24, 25, 35, 36
    T35N, R30E, Sections: 19, 30, 31
    T34N, R29E, Sections: 1, 2
The combined total of unpatented and patented mining claims cover a surface area of approximately 60,085 acres and are depicted in Figure 3-2. Individual mining claims for each township range and section are presented in Appendix A and B. Ausenco has defined the project centroid in the following mine grid coordinates:
    51 500 N
    20 500 E
This point is located central to all mine facilities. The project centroid shall be used to reference all other locations within 1 mile.
Much of the project area is located on un-surveyed public and private land for which the sections, ranges, and townships listed above have been interpolated. Patented claims have been surveyed (Wilson, 2008; Prenn, 2006). The following is a list of land acquisitions/transactions made over the years which constitute the entire Hycroft land claim package: has been assembled through a series of transactions:
    The Crofoot property and approximately 3,500 acres of claims were acquired by Vista in 1985.
    The Crofoot property, originally held under lease, is owned by Hycroft subject to a 4% Net Profits Royalty (NPR) retained by the former owners, capped at total future payments of US$7.6 M, of which US$3.1M has been paid.
    The Lewis property and approximately 8,700 acres of claims were acquired by Vista in early 1987.
    In 2006, approximately 13,100 acres of additional claims were staked by Vista. These claims are contiguous or proximate to the original Crofoot and Lewis claims.

From 2007 through 2015, the company staked additional lode mining claims contiguous to existing Hycroft claims that cover approximately 37,373 acres. Some of these lode claims overlap existing placer claims.
Payment of annual claim maintenance and holding fees to the BLM and Humboldt and Pershing Counties and payment of annual real property taxes for patented claims in Humboldt and Pershing Counties are made every third quarter (Q3). Payments are current through the 2022-2023 claim years, with US$593,727 paid for 2022-2023. Payment of annual claim maintenance and holding fees and real property taxes are required to continue to hold the Hycroft property in good standing from. BLM annual maintenance fees for claims are due not later than September 1 of each year. Humboldt and Pershing County State annual holding fees beginning September 1 of each year are due not later than November 1 of each year. Annual real property taxes for patented claims in Humboldt and Pershing Counties are due August 3115 of the following year.
Hycroft Property
Page 14
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Hycroft controls all surface and mineral rights within the Hycroft mineral resource area. No further land acquisition is required for operation of the mine and contemplated processing facilities.
Figure 3-3 shows the property layout including site facilities, mine workings, leach pads and waste dumps.
3.4    Property Agreements and Royalties
The original owners of the Crofoot property have a retainer of 4% NP royalty. In 1996, the lease/purchase agreement was amended to provide for minimum advance royalty payments of US$120,000 on January 1 of each year in which mining occurs on patented and unpatented claims. The sum of payments for the Crofoot property is capped at US$7.6M, of which US$3.1M has been paid through December 2022. An additional US$120,000 annually is due if ore production exceeds 5 Mtons from the Crofoot property on either patented or unpatented claims in any calendar year. All advanced royalty payments are taken as a credit against the 4% NP royalty. Table 3-1 shows the royalty amount and other annual land holding costs.
Table 3-1:    Hycroft Annual Land Holding Costs
Month DueLessorTypeAmount
Jan., Apr., Jul., & Oct.
Crofoot1
Advance Royalty4%
MonthlySprott RoyaltyNet Smelter Return Royalty1.5% NSR
August-OctoberU.S. BLM, Humboldt & Pershing CountiesClaim FeesUS$593,727
1 The Crofoot royalty is a minimum of $120,000 due in January but is only payable if mining occurs. An additional $120,000 minimum is due if ore production exceeds 5Mtons from the Crofoot property in any calendar year. The Net Profits royalty is capped at $7.6M cumulative of which $3.1M has been paid.
2 The Sprott royalty is equal to 1.5% of Net Smelter Returns free and clear of withholding taxes or similar taxes.
Hycroft Property
Page 15
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_40a.jpg
Figure 3-2:    Hycroft Mine Claims Map
image_6a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by Hycroft, February 2023
Hycroft Mine
Page 16
Technical Report Summary of Initial Assessment on the Hycroft MineMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 3-3:    Current Property and Facilities Layout (2023)
image_9a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by Hycroft, 2023.
Hycroft Property
Page 17
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

3.5    Water Rights
Hycroft controls a total of 16 separate water right permits administered by the NDWR. These permits are held in ownership either by Hycroft, or by other private parties and leased to Hycroft. Water resources to support the Mine are controlled under 14 permits in the Black Rock Desert Basin totaling 20,414.9 acre-feet per year (6.65 billion gallons per year). Two of these water permits are outside the Black Rock Desert Hydrographic Basin and used to support construction maintenance of Jungo Road with Humboldt County.
3.6    Liabilities & Encumbrances
The consolidated financial statements of Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation set forth its material liabilities as of the date of such financial statements.  The assets of Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) are subject to encumbrances and obligations, including encumbrances and obligations under and associated with the (i) the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 30, 2022 by and between the Company and Sprott Private Resource Lending Corp. and certain of its affiliates; (ii) the Sprott Royalty Agreement dated May 29, 2020 by and between the Company and Sprott Private Resource Lending II (Co) Inc.; (iii) the subordinated debt issued under the Omnibus Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement and Exchange Agreement dated as of May 28, 2020 and amended on March 14, 2022 by and among the Company and the subordinated debt holders; and (iv) royalty payment obligations associated with the Crofoot claims.
3.6.1    Environmental Liabilities
Gold production began on the property in 1983 and continued through 1985 when Standard Slag opened the Lewis Mine. There was a brief gap in mining until Hycroft acquired the Lewis Mine and the Crofoot claims and recommenced mining in 1988. Mining operations continued until 1998 when mining was placed on standby due to low metal prices. Process operations continued until 2004 when the property was placed on care and maintenance.
Efforts began in 2003 to update the Reclamation Plan, associated cost estimate, and related amount of surety bond posted with the BLM. During the years December 31, 2011 and 2012, Hycroft increased collateral account balances to support additional surety bonds for the benefit of the BLM. These additional surety bonds allowed Hycroft to continue operations at the Mine and to expand exploration activities outside of the Mine. In 2011, Hycroft received a reimbursement of US$0.5M related to reclamation costs that had been paid out.
In January 2014, the BLM approved an updated reclamation cost estimate allowing for the phased bonding of the expansion activities. The required bond amount was lowered from US$63 M to US$58.3M. Hycroft has Surface Management Surety Bonds with insurance companies that meet the financial requirements of the BLM to comply with the total requirement of US$58.3 M as detailed in the September 2013 reclamation cost estimate that requested the phasing of the mill expansion activities. Additionally, Hycroft has posted an exploration bond with the BLM in the amount of US$0.4 M. The Company has $33.7M of restricted cash for collateral for the Surface Management Surety Bonds and the exploration bond.
3.6.2    Mine Safety Disclosures
The operation of the Mine is subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Mine Act). MSHA inspects the Mine on a regular basis and issues various citations and orders when it believes a violation has occurred under the Mine Act. In 2022, MSHA issued five (5) citations and zero (0) of those were “Significant and Substantial" Violations under section §104(a) of the Mine Act. Fines totaled less than US$1,000 including citations and orders issued to contractors for the year ending December 31, 2022.
Hycroft mandated mine safety and health programs include employee and contractor training, risk management, workplace inspection, emergency response, accident investigation, and program auditing with a goal to have zero workplace injuries and occupational illness. In the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company implemented multifunctional workplace inspections and monthly employee engagement sessions. As a result, Hycroft operated twelve (12) months with zero (0) reportable workplace injuries and occupational illnesses. The Mine’s Total Reportable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) per 200,000 man-hours worked including contractors was 0.0 on December 31, 2022.
3.6.3    Operating Permits
The Mine operates under permit authorizations from the BLM, NDEP, NDOW, and NDWR. All operating and environmental permits, approved by the BLM, NDEP, NDOW and NDWR, are in good standing for mining operations at the Mine. Table 3-2 summarizes the operating permits while Table 3-3 shows the miscellaneous permits for the property.
Hycroft Property
Page 18
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Table 3-2:    Hycroft Operating Permits
Operating PermitsIssuing AgencyNumberStatus
Plan of OperationsBLMNVN-064641Current
Eagle Take PermitUSFWSMB90099B-0Current
Mercury Operating Permit to ConstructNDEP - BAPCAP1041-2255Current
Class I Air Quality Operating Permit to ConstructNDEP - BAPCAP1041-2974Incorporated into the Class II AQOP
Class I Air Quality Operating Permit to ConstructNDEP - BAPCAP1041-3344Incorporated into the Class II AQOP
Class I Air Quality Operating PermitNDEP - BAPCAP1041-2964Current
Permit to Operate a Public Water SystemNDEP - BSDWHU-0864-12NTNCCurrent
Class II Air Quality PermitNDEP - BAPCAP1041-0334.05Current
Water Pollution Control Permit-Crofoot ProjectNDEP - BMRRNEV60013Current
Water Pollution Control Permit-Brimstone ProjectNDEP - BMRRNEV94114Current (Application Shield)
Bioremediation Facility PermitNDEP - BMRRGNV041995-HGP15Superseded by Water Pollution Control Permit
Reclamation PermitNDEP - BMRR134In Renewal
Mining General Stormwater Pollution Prevention PermitNDEP - BWPCR300000: MSW-177Current
Class III Landfill WaiverNDEP - BSMMSWW-346Current
Artificial Pond Permit (Brimstone Process Ponds)NDOWHU019 – S503626Current
Artificial Pond Permit (Crofoot Process Ponds)NDOWHU009 – 39469Current
Artificial Pond Permit (North Process Ponds)NDOWHU022-39468Current
Artificial Pond Permit (Stage 1 Ponds)NDOWHU022-40377Current
General Onsite Sewage Disposal SystemNDEP - BWPCGNEVOSDS09Current
Dam Safety Permit (Crofoot Process Ponds)NDWRJ-273Current
Dam Safety Permit (Brimstone Leach Event Pond)NDWRJ-683Current
Dam Safety Permit (North Leach Event Ponds)NDWRJ-687Current
Dam Safety Permit (Stage 1 Event Ponds)NDWRPending
Hazardous Materials Storage PermitNV State Fire Marshall8250Current
Special Use PermitPershing CountySUP 12-04Current
Special Use PermitHumboldt CountyUH-12-04Current
Hycroft Property
Page 19
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Table 3-3:    Hycroft Miscellaneous Permits
Operating PermitsIssuing AgencyNumberStatus
Microwave Repeater; Sec. 29, 30BLMNVN46292Current
ROW Wells/Pipeline/Power Line; Sec. 3BLMNVN46564Current
ROW 2 Wells/Pipeline/Power LineBLMNVN46959Current
ROW Road & Waterline (Old Man camp to Lewis)BLMNVN39119Current
ROW Crofoot pipelineBLMNVN44999Current
ROW 24 kV Aerial Powerline, Lewis/FlokaBLMNVN54893Current
Kamma Peak StationFCCWNER344Current
Sulfur Mine StationFCCWNER345Current
Winnemucca Mountain StationFCCWNER346Current
Base Station & 45 Mobile UnitsFCCWNKK336Current
Operating and miscellaneous permits that require annual maintenance fees are shown in Table 3-4. Fixed annual fees are required for storm water and public drinking water system permits based upon the current Nevada regulatory structure. The other annual fees are based on annual mining production, quantities and types of chemicals stored on site, existing and permitted surface disturbance, and the level of actual and permitted air emissions. The variable fees shown are based upon the 2021 operational conditions.
Table 3-4:    Hycroft Permits and Annual Fees
Permit and Fee DescriptionAnnual Amount (US$)
Air Quality Operating Permit AP1041-0334.05Fees are incorporated into title V permit.
Air Quality Operating Permit AP1041-2255$14,000
Air Quality Operating Permit AP1041-2964$ 40,000
Reclamation Permit$30,000
Nevada Radioactive Material License$1,100
Stormwater Permit$200
Artificial Pond Permit$32,000
Water Pollution Control Permit NEV94114$20,000
Water Pollution Control Permit NEV60013$20,000
State Fire Marshall$228
Public Drinking Water System$225
Septic System Permits$600
Toxic Release Inventory Annual Fee$5,500
Nevada LP-Gas License$900
TOTAL$138,053
Hycroft currently holds six ROW leases and two exploration notices with the BLM, as described in Table 3-5 along with fees and renewals.
Hycroft Property
Page 20
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Table 3-5:    Right-of-Way Payment and Renewal Schedule
ROW NumberAnnual Payment Amount (estimated)Payment DateExpiration Date
NVN46292$12501/01/202312/31/2048
NVN46564$10001/01/202312/31/2046
NVN46959$61001/01/2023In Renewal
NVN39119$42701/01/2023In Renewal
NVN44999$27901/01/2023In Renewal
NVN54893$20001/01/2310/10/2025
3.6.4    Hycroft Expansion Permitting and Timelines
Hycroft submitted a Plan of Operations for an expansion of its heap leach facilities, open pits, and waste rock facilities to the BLM in April 2010. A major modification to the State Water Pollution Control Permit was submitted in 2011 for the process components that included engineering design reports from Golder Associates. The permit modification was issued in August 2012. An amended Plan of Operations that included a rail spur, open pit expansion and processing complex was submitted to the BLM in August 2012. The BLM determined that an Environmental Assessment (EA) was required, deemed the Plan of Operations complete, and initiated public scoping in December 2012. In March 2013, NV Energy submitted a ROW application for the power line associated with the Hycroft Mill. The BLM determined that this action should be analyzed with the Hycroft EA. Approval was received in December 2014. The permits required to construct and operate the crushing system and to begin mill construction were received in 2012. The air quality permit for operation of a mill was submitted in December 2012 and issuance was received in late 2013.
The Plan of Operations for a rail spur, open pit expansion and processing complex, that included a TMF and expanded Heap Leach Facility, was completed in December 2014, with the BLM issuance of the Record of Decision authorizing the proposed action received in January 2015. A major modification to the State Water Pollution Control Permit was submitted in 2011 for the process components that included engineering design reports from Golder Associates. The permit modification was issued in August 2012. All other permits required for the heap leach expansion have been received.
A Plan of Operations for the proposed southeast location of TMF, mining below the water table and expanded facilities was submitted to the BLM in April 2014. The BLM determined that a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) was required. In October 2019, the BLM issued a record of decision on the SEIS permitting the new TMF location, expanded facilities and deeper pit depths.
In December 2010, Hycroft submitted a minor modification to the NDEP which proposed increasing the permitted processing rate from 10 Mtons per year to 12 Mtons per year. This modification was approved in February 2011. In May 2011, Hycroft proposed a major modification to build a new heap leach pad on the site of the closed Lewis pad and to increase the processing rate to 30 Mtons/y. This modification was approved by the NDEP in December 2011. In January of 2012, Hycroft submitted another major modification to construct a heap leach facility on the south extent of the property. The facility was referred to as the South Heap Leach Facility (SHLF). Around the same time, Hycroft submitted a modification proposing to add both a north and south processing area, increasing the Brimstone and Lewis Heap Leach Pads permitted height to 400 ft, and increasing the permitted processing rate to 36 Mtons of ore per year. Both modifications were approved by the NDEP in September 2012. Later, in December 2012, Hycroft submitted a minor modification proposing to add a Merrill-Crowe facility at the North Process Area. NDEP approved this modification in May 2013. In March of 2013, Hycroft submitted another modification to construct a combined heap leach and tailings storage facility, referred to as the South Processing Complex (SPC), in the same location as the previously permitted SHLF. The SPC uses the new SHLF, constructed in a horseshoe shape, to provide the embankment for the Southeast TMF located in the central portion of the new SHLF. Also, as part of this modification, Hycroft proposed the construction of a mill and related facilities for processing high-grade ore at an approximate throughput of 65,000 tons per day (ton/d) during Phase 1 to a final phase capacity of 132,000 ton/d. Tailings were proposed to be pumped to the TMF at the South Processing Complex. These 2013 major modifications were approved by the NDEP until August 2017.
In September 2014, Hycroft submitted a minor modification to expand the Brimstone-North Heap Leach Facility to the southeast by approximately 80 acres including an additional Event Pond at the existing North Area Merrill-Crowe facility. NDEP approved these minor modifications in March 2015.
Hycroft Property
Page 21
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

In April 2019, Hycroft submitted a major modification to construct a new heap leach facility named Hycroft Heap Leach Facility Stage 1 (Stage 1 HLF) north of the North Processing Facility. The Stage 1 HLF will have a storage volume of 29 Mtons and is the first stage of the larger facility (Hycroft HLF) with a storage capacity of 550 Mtons. The ultimate footprint of the Hycroft HLF will cover approximately 925 acres, the Stage 1 footprint is approximately 390 acres including the ponds, channels, and roads. Of this area, 234 acres will be geomembrane lined, with the HLF pad comprising 204 of these acres. Pregnant solution collected from the pad will be pumped to the existing North Merrill-Crowe process facility for precious metals recovery. The Barren solution from the North Merrill-Crowe facility will then be returned to the top of each lift and applied over a designated cell area using a drip and sprinkler system. The major modification was approved by NDEP in July 2020.
Currently, Hycroft has all permits required to restart the Mine and recently received the Federal Record of Decision for the Phase II Environmental Impact Statement supporting the LOM pit development.
    Received Record of Decision from BLM for EIS (10-22-19):
o    Current operating plan is fully permitted.
o    Existing operating permits will be amended as new facilities/infrastructure are required.
o    EIS allow for flexibility:
    Expanded pits.
    Construction of a tailings management facility to the south of the property, if needed.
    Phase 1 of the new leach pad is permitted.
    Phase 1A of the new leach pad has completed earthwork and HDPE liner installation. A media cover has been added to protect the porous multimedia protective layer. Collection ponds are in place. Electrical switch gear, instrumentation, and pumps are in storage and will be added during construction restart. No mineralized ore has been added to the pad. Phase 1B of the new leach pad and future phases will be planned for construction from cash flows when needed.
Any future expansion activities recommended in this Technical Report Summary will require multiple federal, state, and local permits. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)will require modification to the Golden Eagle Take Permit for the NE TMF and extensions of the South (Vortex) Dump.
3.6.5    Crofoot Heap Leach Facility Closure
NDEP has asked Hycroft to update the 2017 Final Permanent Closure Plan (FPPC), the updated plan will include schedule of compliance (SOC) items and incorporate current regulations.  There are six items in this plan. SOC Items 1 (Stormwater Controls), 4 (Water Quality Evaluation Report) and 6 (Investigation of trend for Wells SP-23, SP-24, and SP-25) have been submitted and are currently under review by NDEP. NDEP has accepted and approved SOC Items 2 (Heap Leach Drain Down Channel) and 3 (Update Monitoring Plan). SRK is preparing SOC Item 5 (updating FPPC) which will be delivered by June 1st, 2023.
Construction of a drain-down collection system was completed in 2012. Hycroft will continue to re-grade the pad, apply medium, and reseed the pad to complete the process. The Company is working in conjunction with NDEP, who will issue the final closure approval letter once these activities are reviewed and accepted.
3.7    Environmental Considerations
The Hycroft area has been surveyed for surface water resources, including Waters of the United States, biological resources, cultural resources, and groundwater resources. The Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) is known to occur adjacent to the Hycroft Project. Hycroft is working with the BLM and the USFWS on the management of this species.
3.8    Social License Considerations
Social and community impacts have been considered and evaluated in the NEPA process. Potentially affected Native American tribes, tribal organizations, and/or individuals are consulted during the preparation of all plan amendments to advise on proposed projects that may have an effect on cultural sites, resources, and traditional activities. Potential community impacts to existing population and demographics, income, employment, economy, public finance, housing, community facilities, and community services are also evaluated during NEPA review processes. There are currently no social or community issues that materially impact Hycroft’s ability to extract mineral resources.
Hycroft Property
Page 22
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

3.9    Significant Risks
Timely filings and payments are required to maintain title and rights to claims, water rights and permits. The Company maintains processes and controls to ensure timely filings and payments. Changing regulations or failure to make timely filings and payments are the significant risks to maintain environmental access or ability to perform the permitted and authorized work on the property.

Hycroft Property
Page 23
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

4    ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY
4.1    Access
The Mine and its related facilities are located 54 miles west of Winnemucca, Nevada along State Road No. 49 (Jungo Road), a good quality, unpaved road. Access is also possible from Gerlach via Jungo Road, Imlay or Lovelock by dirt roads intersecting Interstate 80. Winnemucca is a commercial community on Interstate 80 where a majority of the Mine’s employees are likely to reside. Winnemucca is 164 miles northeast of Reno, Nevada. The town is served by a transcontinental railroad and has a small public airport and there are adequate room, boarding and dining facilities.
4.2    Climate
The climate at the Mine is classified as arid, with an average precipitation of 7.7 inches per year; most of which occurs during the winter and spring months. Winds are generally light with an occasional dust or sandstorm, particularly in the spring.
Temperatures are moderate during the summer ranging from 50ºF at night and to above 90ºF during the day. Winter temperatures average 20ºF at night and 40ºF during the day. The average range between the highest and lowest daily temperatures is 30 to 35ºF as a result of strong surface heating during the day and rapid nighttime cooling due to the dry air. The Mine has not reported experiencing major delays in production due to inclement weather and operates year-round.
4.2.1    Local Resources and Infrastructure
Existing infrastructure at the Mine consists of the following: a truck shop, a maintenance building, a laboratory, ore crushing facilities, an administration building, and other service-related structures. Power is supplied to the site from nearby power lines that are fed directly from the main power grid and there is a modern communications system including cellular connections. Potable water is sourced from a well located approximately one mile south of the Crofoot Heap. A major east–west railway passes adjacent to the Hycroft property.
The Mine is in a well-known mining jurisdiction near several towns including Winnemucca, Gerlach and Lovelock. The Mine’s workforce primarily lives in Winnemucca (Humboldt County) and Lovelock (Pershing County).
Initial surveys indicated that the town of Winnemucca has the required infrastructure (short- and long-term rooming and boarding facilities, dining establishments, shopping, emergency services, schools, etc.) to support the maximum workforce and dependents. The Mine has always been successful in filling positions with qualified mining personnel from all over the country.
Currently, the Mine operates three production wells that are located four to five miles west of the mine, and a single potable well. These four production wells are the main sources of water for the mine site. All of the water rights are within the Black Rock Desert Hydrographic Basin, a recently designated basin. Water rights are shown in Table 4-1.
Hycroft controls sufficient land position and water rights to support all of its planned facilities and process water demands.
Hycroft Property
Page 24
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Table 4-1:    Hycroft Water Wells and Permitted Yearly Consumption
Application No.Permit Diversion Limit (cfs)Annual Appropriation Limit (acre-ft)Point of Division
812280.414.83T34N R29E S3
812263.2724.79T35N R29E S31
812253.2303.43T35N R29E S31
812272.01,448T35N R29E S31
812242.01,448T34N R28E S1
814085.43,890T35N R29E S31
814095.43,890T35N R29E S31
844770.3177.9T35N R29E S31
82274104,096T35N R29E S31
823553.32,050T35N R29E S31
823565.63,415T34N R28E S1
Total40.821,457.95
A fully developed project will include plans to develop access and haul roads to new processing facilities, a tailings management facility, and additional waste rock storage dumps. Furthermore, the development of a rail spur is recommended off the existing rail line for the receipt of grinding media, fuel, reagents, and other supplies.
A power study is needed to be conducted to upgrade the existing power at the site in the event that a fully developed processing plant is proposed.
4.3    Physiography
The mine is situated on the eastern edge of the Black Rock Desert and on the western flank of the Kamma Mountains between Winnemucca and Gerlach, Nevada. The site is characterized by flat, prehistoric lakebed and well-dissected topography with moderately steep slopes. Topographic relief within the project area is 950 feet. The elevation ranges from 4,100 feet on the western side to 6,000 feet on the eastern side. The climate at Hycroft Mine area is semi-arid. The area receives about seven to eight inches of precipitation per year, most of it as rain in the spring and snow in the winter months. Summer daytime temperatures are 85o to 95o F. Daily temperature ranges are extreme, usually 30o to 35o F, resulting in cool nights. Winter nights can drop to well below freezing, but daytime highs are usually above freezing. Winter snowpack is light, and snow does not normally present logistical problems. Vegetation consists mostly of sagebrush, rabbit brush, and grasses. Scattered pinon and juniper trees occur along slopes in the higher parts of the property.
4.4    Seismicity
In 2012, Michael W. West and Associates Inc. (MWWAI) completed a review of the Hycroft deterministic seismic hazard assessment (DSHA). MWWAI concluded that historical seismicity in the vicinity of the site is low to moderate with no relation to mapped faults. No faults in the project area are classified as “active/capable” based on an unequivocal association of instrumentally recorded earthquakes in the last approximately 50 years. MWWAI stated that a comparison of the USGS national probabilistic seismic hazard model to deterministic and probabilistic floating earthquake PGAs show reasonable agreement. MWWAI recommends the use of the deterministic and probabilistic PGAs presented in the DSHA.
Hycroft Property
Page 25
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

5    HISTORY
5.1    Regional Mining History
The earliest recorded mining in the Sulfur District, where the Mine is located, began in the late 1800s following the discovery of significant native sulfur deposits (Couch and Carpenter, 1943; Wilden, 1964). Mining of native sulfur was sporadic from 1900 to 1950 with over 181,488 tons of sulfur ore, grading approximately 20-35% sulfur, mined and milled (McLean, 1991).
In addition to sulfur, high-grade Ag mineralization, consisting of nearly pure seams of cerargyrite (AgCl), was discovered in 1908 at Camel Hill (Vandenburg, 1938). Assays up to 3,439 oz/ton Ag and 0.362 oz/ton Au were reported (Jones, 1921). Ag mining ceased in 1912 with an estimated 165,375 Ag ounces produced. Minor Ag mining also occurred along the East Fault at the Snyder Adit, and Ag samples as high as 66 oz/ton (Friberg, 1980) and 29 oz/ton (Bates, 2001) were reported.
During the First World War, three 6- to 8-foot-wide veins of nearly pure alunite were mined in the southern part of the Sulfur District (Clark, 1918). In 1931, several hundred tons of alunite were mined as a soil additive (Fulton and Smith, 1932). Vandenburg estimated that 454 tons of alunite was shipped to the west coast to be used as fertilizer (Vandenburg, 1938). From 1941 to 1943, cinnabar was mined from small pits in the exposed acid leach zone (Bailey, 1944). Total mercury production during this period is estimated at 1,900 lbs (McLean, 1991).
5.2    Exploration History on the Property
In 1966, the Great American Minerals Company began extensive exploration for native sulfur in the area of the Mine. Approximately 200 shallow holes were drilled, and numerous trenches were dug (Friberg, 1980). In 1974, Duval drilled 20 holes on the Hycroft property in search of a Frasch-type sulfur deposit (Wallace, 1980). Duval found no evidence of a sulfur deposit at depth but did report elevated Au and Ag values. Duval drilled two core holes (DC-1 and DC-2) and 18 rotary holes (DR-3 through 20) (Ware, 1989).
In 1977, the Cordex Syndicate mapped and rock chip sampled the Hycroft property, recognizing the potential for a bulk tonnage, low-grade precious metal deposit. In 1978, Homestake became interested in the property, recognizing similarities with the McLaughlin hot springs deposit in California. Homestake completed surface sampling and exploration drilling during 1981-1982, and although successful in defining an oxide Au/Ag mineral deposit, they forfeited the property in 1982. The following mineralization zones shown in Figure 5-1 have been characterized at the Mine.

Hycroft Property
Page 26
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 5-1:    Predominant Mineralization Zones Identified for the Mine.
image_10a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by Hycroft Mining, 2022.
Hycroft Property
Page 27
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

5.3    Mine Production on the Property
Mining at the Mine began in 1983 with a small heap leach operation known as the Lewis Mine. In 1987, Vista acquired the Lewis Mine and in 1988, they acquired the Crofoot Mine. The Mine was comprised of various open pits on the property (e.g., the Bay, South Central, Boneyard, Gap and Cut-4 pits along the Central Zone and Brimstone) and produced approximately 1.2 Moz of Au and 2.5 Moz of Ag from 1983 to December 1998 when the operations were suspended due to low Au prices at the time (< $300/oz). An additional 58,700 ounces of Au was produced from the leaching and rinsing of the heap leach pads from 1999 through 2004, after the mine had been placed on a care and maintenance program. The remaining leasehold interest in the Lewis property was purchased by Vista in December 2005, in consideration of the US$5.1 M payment, resulting in the elimination of the 5% NSR royalty on Au and 7.5% NSR royalty on Ag.
In May 2007, Vista’s Nevada-based holdings were spun out into Allied Nevada Gold Corp. The Hycroft Mine was included as part of the transfer of ownership allowing Allied Nevada to explore, expand, and further develop the resources at the Mine. In September 2007, Allied Nevada’s Board of Directors approved the reactivation of the Mine, and a year later in December 2008, the Mine had produced its first doré which was shipped to an offsite refinery for final processing, yielding Au and Ag bullion. Permitting to construct a new refinery was received and completed at the Brimstone plant site by June of 2009. By the end of 2009, the Mine was achieving the forecasted ore production capacity. In 2010, the mine began an expansion program which included the construction of a 21,000 gallon per minute Merrill-Crowe processing plant, a three-stage crushing facility and upgrades to their solution pumping capacity. With the construction of the North leach pad complete in 2013, the total leach pad surface area at the Mine had increased to over 20 million square ft including the Brimstone and Lewis leach pads. Active mining ceased again in June 2015 due to low metal prices yet leaching of the mined ore continued through 2018.
On October 22, 2015, Allied Nevada emerged from its financial restructuring and changed its name to Hycroft Mining Corporation.
In late 2018, Hycroft began construction of Phase 1 of the North Leach Pad to expand process capacity for anticipated oxide material. Additionally, Hycroft began preparing the mine for a restart. Active mining began again in April 2019 and from this date to November 10, 2021, transition ore was placed on the existing leach pads. Sulfide materials, when encountered during active mining, were set aside for future processing. In November 2021, Hycroft suspended mining operations to refocus resources on metallurgical testwork and exploration. Final construction of Phase 1 of the North Leach Pad was suspended, and protective media cover material was placed on the multimedia liner. Electrical, instrumentation, and pumping equipment was placed in covered storage for a future restart.
Further information on the production history of the Mine comes from Hycroft’s internal documents. Ore from the Lewis Mine was crushed and stacked on the Lewis leach pads in the north-central part of the Sulfur District. Approximately 259.2 Mtons of ore of a gold grade (AuFA) averaging 0.014 oz/ton was mined from 1983 to 2019 beginning with ore mined from the Lewis Mine followed by ore mined from the Bay, South Central, Boneyard, Gap and Cut-4 pits, and finally the north end of the Brimstone Pit producing over 2.082 Moz of Au.
The Crofoot leach pad (Pads 1 and 2) were constructed in 1987, and Pad 3 in 1992. Ore was placed on Pad 1 from 1988 to 1997, on Pad 2 from 1989 to 1997, and on Pad 3 from 1993 to 1997. Solutions from these pads were treated in the Crofoot Merrill-Crowe plant located on the northeast side of Pad 1.
Production from the Brimstone Pit was placed on the Brimstone pad (Pads 4 and 5) as ROM. Pad 4, constructed just south of the old Lewis pad, was completed in 1996. Loading of Pads 4 and 5 commenced in October 1996 and July 1997, respectively. A 2,800 gallon per minute Merrill-Crowe leach solution plant (the Brimstone Plant) was completed and put into operation in February 1997. The plant treated solutions from Pad 4. Pad 5 solutions were treated in the older Crofoot plant.
In May 2007, the Nevada-based holdings of Vista were spun out into Allied Nevada Gold Corp. The Hycroft Mine was included as part of the transfer of ownership allowing Allied Nevada to explore, expand, and develop the resources at Hycroft.
The Hycroft Mine was reactivated in September 2007 and produced its first doré in December 2008 reaching planned ore production by the end of 2009.
In 2010, the mine began an expansion program that included construction of the North Merrill-Crowe facility, a 21,000 gallon per minute Merrill-Crowe processing plant, and a three-stage crushing facility as well as upgrading their solution pumping capacity. In 2013, Hycroft initiated the construction/expansion of the North leach pad bringing the total leach pad footprint for the Brimstone, Lewis, and North leach pads to more than 20 million square ft.
Hycroft Property
Page 28
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

After commissioning the crushing facility in 2014, ROM ore was crushed prior to placement on the heap. Active mining was stopped again at the Mine in June 2015 due to low metal prices, but active leaching of previously mined ore continued through 2018. During this time, Allied Nevada emerged from its financial restructuring to become Hycroft Mining Corporation. In late 2018, Hycroft began construction of new leach pads. In April 2019, active mining began with a focus on transition and sulfide minerals but were set aside for future processing. The crushing facility was also utilized for production in 2019-2020. Only oxide ore was placed on the new leach pads during this time with production of Au and Ag continuing through until 2021.
From September 2007 through July 2019 metal sales have totaled approximately 900,000 oz of Au and 5.0M oz of Ag. Active mining ceased in 2015 and production at the Mine was terminated on November 11, 2021. Table 5-1 lists the annual sales in ounces of Au and Ag produced from the Mine’s heap leach operations over years 2019 through 2022. Annual sales in ounces of Au and Ag produced from the Mine’s heap leach operations over years 2019 through 2022 total approximately 105,000 ounces of Au and 615,000 ounces of Ag.
Table 5-1:    Au and Ag Sales from 2019 to 2022
YearAnnual Au Sales
(oz)
Annual Ag Sales
(oz)
20198,37350,186
202024,720135,293
202154,968385,754
202217,51043,839
TOTALS105,571615,072

Hycroft Property
Page 29
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

6    GEOLOGICAL SETTING, MINERALIZATION, AND DEPOSIT
6.1    Geological Setting
The Hycroft deposit is a low-sulfidation, epithermal, hot springs system that contains Au and Ag mineralization. Radiometric dates of adularia (potassium feldspar) indicate that the main phase of Au and Ag mineralization formed four million years ago (Ebert, 1996) when hydrothermal fluids were fed upward along high angle, normal faults. Low-grade Au and Ag mineralization was co-deposited with silica and potassium feldspar throughout porous rock types.
A subsequent drop in permeability, due to sealing of the system, led to over pressuring and subsequent repeated hydrothermal brecciation. Additional precious metal mineralization was deposited during this event as breccia zones, veins, and sulfide flooding.
Au and Ag mineralization was followed 0.4 to 2.0 million years ago by an intense event of high sulfidation acid leaching of the mineralized volcanic rocks coincident with a regional water table drop. This allowed steam heated sulfur gases to condense into sulfuric acid and leach the upper portion of the mineralized rocks.
Oxidation of sulfide mineralization occurs to variable depths over the deposit, depending upon proximity to faults, extent of acid leaching, and depth to water table. Sulfide content through the deposit is variable from 0% to 20%.
6.1.1    Regional Geology
The Hycroft Mine is located on the western flank of the Kamma Mountains in the Basin and Range physiographic province of northwestern Nevada. The Kamma Mountains were formed during Miocene to Quaternary Epoch from the uplift of Jurassic basement rock and emplacement of Tertiary volcanic and sedimentary rocks. The stratigraphy along the western flank of the range is down-dropped to the west, along a series of north to northeast striking normal faults. These faults served as conduits of hydrothermal fluids that deposited the Hycroft mineralization.
6.1.2    Local Geology
The Hycroft property consists of Tertiary to Recent age, fault-controlled, low-sulfidation Au zones that occur over an area measuring approximately three miles in a north–south direction by two miles in an east–west direction. The zones are hosted in volcanic rock eruptive breccias, flows and conglomerates associated with the Tertiary Kamma Volcanics and sand to conglomeratic debris flows associated with the Tertiary Sulphur Group.
Younger rocks at the mine are Tertiary conglomerate, siltstone and fanglomerate of the Sulphur Group (locally termed “Camel Conglomerate”). These rocks are comprised of sediment eroded from the underlying Kamma Volcanics and Jurassic ALS Formation. The Sulphur Group is divided into three main units: a clast-supported coarse conglomerate, a matrix-supported conglomerate, and an underlying tuffaceous lake sediment. This unit outcrops throughout the mine site with increasing thickness to the west.
The older Kamma Group is exposed throughout the Kamma Mountains east of the Central Fault. It underlies the Camel Conglomerate. The volcanic package is comprised of siliceous to intermediate tuffs, coarse grained volcanic clastics, fanglomerates, eruption breccias and massive to flow banded rhyolites.
The Jurassic ALS Formation underlies the Kamma volcanic package. This formation consists of a thin bedded to laminated siltstone, with calcite cementing. ALS is exposed approximately three miles east of the deposit and is encountered only at depth in drilling at Hycroft. A generalized stratigraphic column for the Hycroft deposit area is presented in Figure 6-1. This stratigraphic column illustrates the formations of volcanic origin that host the deposit with notations for lithologies in each formation. The camel conglomerate (Tcm) of the Tertiary Sulfur Group (Tsg) has been broken out as a separate rock, in addition to those shown in Figure 6-1. The sub-group of the Tsg references lakebed sediments that are distinct from the Tcm.
Hycroft Property
Page 30
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 6-1:    Stratigraphic Column for Hycroft Deposit Area
image_11a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by SRK, 2019.
Seven major north-northeast trending, west dipping, normal fault zones appear to broadly control the distribution of Au and Ag mineralization as shown in Figure 6-2. From west to east, these fault zones are referred to as the Range, West Splay, Central, Break, Albert, Fire, and East faults. These major structures down-drop stratigraphy and also affect the distribution of alteration and mineralization. A post-mineral basin bounding fault appears to border the Camel Conglomerate and the adjacent Pleistocene Lahontan Lake sediments in the Black Rock Desert. Based on geophysics, this structure is approximately 1 to 2 miles west of the mine site. There are several east–west trending structures that appear to provide post-mineral offset to the deposit. These form a series of horst and grabens within the deposit footprint. Going from north to south, these faults include Cliff, Ramp, Prill, Camel and Hades Faults. Figure 6-2 is a north looking section through the Hycroft Mine showing structures, volcanic rock stratigraphy, and Au/Ag mineralization. There are also several other parallel fault zones that may have a significant impact on the localization of mineralization. The depth of oxide and mixed sulfide/oxide Au and Ag mineralization varies considerably throughout the area. Alteration at the deposit is dominated by acid leaching, silicification, argilization, and propylitization.
Hycroft Property
Page 31
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 6-2:    Simplified East–West Cross-Sections through the Sulphur District
image_12a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by Allied Nevada, 2011.
6.2    Mineralization
The Hycroft deposit is broken into six major zones based on geology, mineralization, and alteration. These include Brimstone, Vortex, Central, Bay, Boneyard, and Camel Hill. The boundaries are typically major faults, namely Break, East, and Ramp.
6.2.1    Brimstone
The stratigraphy at Brimstone includes up to 100 ft of alluvium, underlain by Camel Conglomerate rocks (0 ft to 400 ft), and Kamma volcanic rocks, as shown in Figure 6-3. ALS has been drilled at depth and is in fault contact (East Fault) with the overlying Kamma Volcanics. The Brimstone ore deposit is hosted primarily by Kamma volcanic rocks in the hanging wall of the East Fault. The volcanic rocks are principally eruption breccias, tuffs, rhyolites, and volcanic rocks proximal to vents, and overlie deformed and metamorphosed shale, sandstone, and siltstone of the ALS group. Kamma Volcanics are strongly altered in the hanging wall of the East Fault, whereas the same units are weakly altered to the east in the footwall of the fault.
At Brimstone, the East Fault is a north-northeast striking, west dipping, normal fault with repeated episodes of movement, including approximately 150 ft to 200 ft of alluvial offset. Where exposed in the Brimstone Pit, the fault clearly shows steep normal movement, with slickensides that plunge 80° to 85°. At depth the fault shallows to 45° to 60° and may merge with the Central and Break Faults. The fault may have originally served as a conduit to hydrothermal fluids. Only minor mineralization is noted footwall to the fault zone.
North of the Brimstone deposit, the east–west trending Ramp and Prill Faults appear to down drop favorable stratigraphy. Condemnation drilling of the leach pad to the north has shown only local zones of weak Au and Ag mineralization. To the south, the Brimstone Zone transitions to the Vortex Zone, with no apparent change in stratigraphy, but changes to alteration zonation.
Host rocks were highly altered by at least four phases of alteration. The relatively porous conglomerate and breccias were preferentially acid leached by late stage steaming hydrothermal acid vapors. Acid leach alteration extends to depths of 700 ft in some areas of the Brimstone deposit as seen in Figure 6-3, indicating that the water table was present below the base of the acid leached zone. A siliceous layer (basal acid leach), up to tens of feet thick, occurs at
Hycroft Property
Page 32
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

the base of the acid leached material. Underlying the acid leaching is a layer of hydrothermal clay alteration, followed by silica potassium feldspar alteration. Pervasive silicification, veining and hydrothermal brecciation are generally found in the rhyolites and breccias.
Zones of silicification of limited thickness, oriented parallel to the East Fault, are present in the footwall zone. Alteration extends for 50 ft to 70 ft footwall to the fault, with pervasive silicification and quartz veining dominant.
Figure 6-3:    Brimstone Generalized Geology Cross-Section
image_13a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by Allied Nevada, 2011.
Au and Ag are spatially associated with fracture and breccia-controlled chalcedony sulfide mineralization. A subsequent acid alteration event produced the current distribution of oxidized and transition sulfide/oxide ore. The lower acid leach material hosts Au and Ag mineralization, as does the underlying silicified and veined volcanics.
Drilling has shown that mineralization extends to a depth of over 1,200 ft in the Brimstone Zone. Mineralization thickness (true width) is 200–1,100 ft thick and remains open to the west toward the Break Fault and transitions into Vortex to the south.
6.2.2    Vortex
The stratigraphy in the Vortex Zone is correlative with those at the Brimstone Zone immediately to the north. Camel Conglomerate is underlain by tuffs, volcanic clastics, fanglomerates, and rhyolites of the Kamma Volcanics. The ALS is present, footwall to the East Fault, and appears to be in stratigraphic contact with the Kamma Volcanics, as seen in Figure 6-4.
The upper elevation at Vortex is hydrothermally clay (kaolinite) altered. Acid leaching is less prominent in Brimstone and is focused primarily along the East Fault. Strong silicification to depths greater than 1,500 ft is due to veining and phreatic hydrothermal brecciation. At least four mineralizing events are present as evidenced by crosscutting vein and breccia relationships. The hydrothermal venting may have contributed to the eruption breccias overlying the Brimstone Zone. Propylitic and/or clay alteration extends outboard of the silicification.
Hycroft Property
Page 33
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

The mineralization at Vortex is of both vein and disseminated type, with brecciated and altered rhyolite rocks and volcanic clastics acting as favorable hosts. In addition to Au mineralization, high-grade Ag has been encountered at Vortex; with values ranging from 10 to 647 oz/ton. The predominant Ag minerals are pyrargyrite, naumannite and miargyrite, occurring both in veins, disseminated and coarse grains along fractures.
Oxide mineralization is present at a depth of approximately 500 ft below surface, with sulfide mineralization extending to 2,500 ft below surface. Mineralization thickness (true width) is 1,000 to 1,800 ft thick. Banded quartz veins with both high-grade Ag and Au have been noted in core. Drilling to date indicates that the high-grade zones are both high angle banded quartz veins and a more extensive flat lying, massive quartz zone containing visible pyrargyrite and miargyrite.
6.2.3    Bay and Boneyard
Mineralization in the Bay and Boneyard zones is hosted by gentle, west dipping Camel Conglomerate. Both clast-supported and matrix-supported conglomerate rocks host mineralization. The basal rock type is tuffaceous lake sediments, composed of fine-grained clay with minor layers of gravel and conglomerate extending to a depth greater than 1,100 ft as shown in Figure 6-5. Mineralization is primarily bedding controlled, with the Range and Central Faults as the main feeders. The Break Fault may also have zoning controls but is poorly drilled in this zone. Mineralized siliceous hot spring sinters have been historically mined indicating that this deposit represents the upper-most levels of a hot spring hydrothermal system.
The predominant alteration type at Bay is silicification. Acid leach alteration in the area is relatively minor and occurs along high angle structures. Clay alteration of the underlying lacustrine sediments is also noted in limited drillholes and is illite smectite dominated. Strong oxidation is present in the upper portion of the silicified zone.
Au and Ag mineralization is associated with flat lying Camel Conglomerate, above the lacustrine lake sediments. Mineralization thickness (true width) is 20–250 ft thick at Bay and 50–300 ft thick at Boneyard. This zone transitions into the upper zone of mineralization at Central. Bay and Boneyard remain open to the north and east.
Figure 6-4:    Vortex to Camel Hill Generalized Section
image_14a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by Allied Nevada, 2011.
Hycroft Property
Page 34
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

6.2.4    Central
The Central Zone geology is similar in nature to that of Bay, with mineralization and alteration fed by high angle faults and fractures, with dominant lateral fluid flow through the porous conglomerate rocks of the Sulphur Group as seen in Figure 6-5. Camel Conglomerate units are underlain by lacustrine sediments. However, the lacustrine units thin dramatically to the south, with less than 50 ft of the material noted south of Cut-4.
The Central Zone is bounded to the east by the Central and Break Faults. Fault movement is unknown, but extends at least 2,000 ft, with recent reactivation in the quaternary (50–150 ft), as demonstrated by offset in the alluvium. The Range Fault to the west may provide an additional boundary, although drill data is limited at this time. Alteration along the Central Zone is similar to that of Bay. Acid leach alteration is stronger and more widespread than at Bay and is extensive in the southern portion of the pit. The acid leaching overlies silicified conglomerate rocks, except along the immediate trace of the Central Fault where silicification dominates as the alteration type. Oxidation extends downward approximately 400 ft. Underlying the silicification and acid leaching are illite-smectite clay altered and clay dominant lacustrine sediments. Hot spring sinter deposits have not been observed.
Au and Ag mineralization is associated with favorable stratigraphic horizons in the Camel conglomerate, with an upper and lower zone noted in drilling, separated by a north–south striking, east dipping clay layer. Mineralization remains open to the west, past the Range Fault, and at depth (>1,400 ft). Mineralization thickness (true width) in the upper zone is 50 300 ft thick, while the lower zone ranges from 300–1,200 ft thick and remains open at depth. The zone mineralization is contiguous to the Vortex and Brimstone Zones to the east, and the Camel Hill/Cut-5 zones to the south.
Figure 6-5:    Bay Geologic Cross-Section
image_15a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by Allied Nevada, 2011.

6.2.5    Camel Hill and Cut 5 Zones
Camel Conglomerate is the dominant lithology at Camel. The conglomerates appear to extend to depth in this zone, with only thin lake sediments drilled to date. The lack of lake sediments can be attributed to either the Camel Fault or facies changes along a shoreline. The Camel Fault is an east–west trending fault, with down-drop to the south, which is presently poorly defined by drilling.
Hycroft Property
Page 35
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Alteration south of the Central Pit and in the Camel Zone is predominantly comprised of silicification and clay alteration. Hydrothermal clays, overlying silicified conglomerate rocks, and basal illite-smectite clay altered rocks are present. Acid leaching in the area is relatively minor, especially with respect to the intensity and amount in the Central and Cut-4 Zones area immediately to the northeast.
Mineralization in the Camel/Cut-5 Zones is hosted by conglomerate rocks and occurs as both disseminated Au and Ag associated with pyrite and marcasite, and higher-grade veins, including Ag bearing pyrargyrite veins. Mineralization thickness (true width) is 200–1,100 ft thick, extends to depths greater than 1,400 ft, and remains open at depth. Oxidation extends to depths greater than 200 ft and an area of intense oxidized mordenite alteration is present between the Cut-5 and Camel Zones. Mineralization remains open to the south, west and at depth. To the north, Camel mineralization is contiguous with the lower zone of the Central Zone, while Cut-5 is contiguous with the upper zone. Mineralization is also open to the west of Camel and to the south towards Hades Fault.
6.3    Alteration
Detailed geologic work by previous owners at Hycroft identified a number of hydrothermal alteration events. However, for resource estimation purposes, there are four alteration types that have been interpreted and assigned to the block model.
    Acid Leach – Associated with the upper portion of the epithermal vent. Native Sulfur is common in this area and the original protolith has been obliterated with a white clay alteration.
    Propylitic – Propylitic altered material is generally found in the volcanic rocks of the Kamma Mountains. Although it is occasional interpreted within the mineralized zone of the deposit.
    Argillic – A pervasive alteration of both the Camel Conglomerates and the Kamma Volcanics. Where clay minerals have replaced the original potassium feldspars and other minerals.
    Silicic – Silica flooding which is associated with the mineralization processes at Hycroft.
Acid leach will not be sent to the process facility or to the leach pad due to the high levels of sulfides and native sulfur. It has been estimated but the minor remaining tonnage is not included in the mineral resource.
Propylitic is generally barren or nearly so. It has been lumped with the argillic alteration units for grade estimation and assignment.
Silicic alteration is generally better grade than the surrounding argillic and is mechanically more robust.
Oxidation has occurred across the deposit to variable depth depending on the structural preparation and available acidic ground water. The oxidized material has been the historical ore for heap leaching at Hycroft. This study includes ROM leaching of low-grade mineralization and flotation of mineralization with sufficient pyrite and other sulfides to generate Au and Ag rich concentrate.
Figure 6-6 is a generalized east–west section illustrating the alteration at Hycroft.
6.4    Deposit Types
The Hycroft deposit is a large, epithermal, low-sulfidation hot springs deposit (Figure 6-6). Au and Ag mineralization are noted as both disseminated and vein controlled.
Hycroft Property
Page 36
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 6-6:    Generalized Hycroft Epithermal Diagram
image_16a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by Allied Nevada, 2011.
Hycroft Property
Page 37
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

7    EXPLORATION
7.1    Drilling
The Hycroft drill history covers the period of from 1981 to 2022 and includes 5,601 holes, representing 2,588,826 ft of drilling. Some of those holes are water wells or are outside the resource model area and were not applied to mineral resource estimation. The drillhole collar locations are shown in Figure 7-1. At this time, there are 5,323 drillholes in the resource model area of which 188 have been drilled to define stockpiles or the Crofoot leach pad. Section 11 provides a more detailed breakdown of the amount of drilling and assaying used in resource modeling.
Exploration drilling was started in 1974 by Duval Corporation, which was evaluating the property for a Frasch-type sulfur deposit and the copper potential. Although native sulfur appeared to be limited to the acid leach zone, Au and Ag mineralization was discovered at depth, with the deepest hole completed to 2,000 ft. Duval concluded that the property did not have large scale sulfur potential. Twenty drillholes (9,726 ft) were completed on the project.
From 1981 to 1982, Homestake, using their McLaughlin deposit as a model, completed 96 RC drillholes totaling 16,537 ft, primarily in the Bay and Boneyard areas. Shallow oxide Au mineralization was discovered, but Homestake declined the opportunity. Crofoot and American Slag then proceeded to acquire the property rights and initiated small-scale oxide heap leach mining at Central and Bay in 1983. Homestake also completed 8 core holes during this timeframe, but collar location data has not been located.
Hycroft gained control of the district in 1985 and drilled 3,212 exploration holes, totaling 965,552 ft, between 1985 and 1999. The bulk of this drilling was shallow and focused on oxide Au mineralization at Central, Bay and Brimstone.
In 2005, Canyon Resources completed 33 drillholes totaling 13,275 ft of RC drilling. These were completed primarily in the Brimstone Pit area.
Hycroft commenced systematic exploration and resource development drilling starting in 2006. Drilling has been focused on oxide resource delineation, sulfide resource definition, sulfide exploration, condemnation drilling for facilities, Ag data and both geotechnical and metallurgical core samples. Between late-2006 and August 31, 2016, Hycroft has completed 1,970 exploration holes, totaling approximately 1.45 M ft.
A combination of rotary, RC and core drilling techniques has been utilized to verify the nature and extent of mineralization. The majority of samples have been collected using RC drilling methods on 5-foot sample intervals. RC drilling utilizes 4.5- to 5.5-inch tooling. Deeper drilling is conducted with diamond drilling, using PQ, HQ and NQ tooling. This practice continued through 2013. Since 2013, a RC drilling program was completed in 2014, and a metallurgical core program with the six drillholes was completed in 2017. The metallurgical drillholes were not included in the database for mineral resource estimation and are not shown on the drill hole location map. Various protocols applied to drilling by Hycroft are consistent with industry standards and the resulting data is of good quality for use in the Hycroft model. Shallow drillholes to sample heap material were completed with sonic coring. The 2018 sonic drilling program was limited to 56 vertical holes in sulfide stockpiles and did not include in-situ alluvium or bedrock material. While these were not used for interpolation of in-situ rock, they were applied to estimate grades in fill material.
During 2021 through 2022, Hycroft has drilled 171 holes, 100 in 2021 and 71 in 2022. Most of the 2021 drilling was diamond core that was used for metallurgical testing and assay. The 2022 drilling was predominantly RC to evaluate extensions of mineralization. Figure 7-1 illustrates the 2021 and 2022 drilling with “box” symbols to distinguish it from the rest of the drilling.
Hycroft Property
Page 38
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 7-1:    Drillhole Collar Locations
image_17a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by IMC, 2023.
Hycroft Property
Page 39
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

7.2    Additional Exploration
In addition to drilling activity, Hycroft has also conducted geophysical surveys, soil and rock chip sampling programs, field mapping, historical data compilation, and regional reconnaissance at the Mine site. These efforts are designed to improve the understanding of the known mineralization, as well as provide data for further exploration of the greater property position.
A soil sampling grid was conducted over the Vortex and Brimstone areas historically (1,797 samples) and was extended approximately 5,200 ft north and 29,600 ft south of the mine in 2011–2012 (1,834 samples). The soil sampling program was conducted primarily along the East Fault exposure, which is a primary ore-controlling feature at Vortex and Brimstone. Results, using Au, Ag, arsenic, and antimony, indicate potential exploration targets to the south of the Vortex area. At present this work has identified several target areas. Au values range from 0 to 0.027 oz/ton, while Ag values range from 0 to 3.7 oz/ton. Soil samples are taken on an evenly spaced grid, and screened for coarse material and wind-blown material, resulting in a fraction between 2 mm and 180 µm being prepped for analysis. These samples are considered representative of local soil geochemistry and are used to guide the regional exploration effort.
Rock chip sampling has been conducted both historically in the active mine area, and on a regional basis (2007–present). A database of 2,416 samples has been compiled, covering the greater land position. Using Au, Ag, arsenic, and other elements, exploration targets have been developed both north and south of the current mine. Rock chip samples have been taken on most outcrops, with a focus on alteration and potential mineralization. These samples are used as a guide to exploration and are point samples only.
The land position has been surveyed with both gravity and induced polarity (IP) geophysical techniques by Hycroft. The current ground-based gravity survey covers approximately 130 square miles, centered on the mine site. Gravity indicates several structural features and density changes that offer potential exploration targets.
Ground IP surveys were run over the mine site and Vortex in 2007 and extended outward in 2011 to cover approximately 24 square miles. The survey results focus on chargeability anomalies, that potentially identify sulfide material (> approximately 1.5%) at depth, and resistivity anomalies, that potentially identify silicification at depth. Results have identified and confirm additional exploration targets suggested by the other geophysical methods.
Field mapping was historically and is currently carried out in all active mine areas. Mapping focuses on structure, bedding, joints, lithology, and alteration. The near mine data is incorporated into the three-dimensional geology model, while the regional work is focused on defining exploration targets for future drilling. A regional geology map covering the land position was compiled in 2012. Regional exploration data from Homestake, LAC Minerals, USX, HRDI, and others has been compiled from both in-house and public data sources. Approximately 250 drillholes, various soil and rock chip locations and results, and various field maps have been identified at present.
In 2022 a hyperspectral imaging flyover of the Hycroft was conducted by SpecTIR Advanced Hyperspectral Solutions. Both Longwave Infrared (LWIR) and Shortwave Infrared (SWIR) imaging was collected with the intent of helping identify key minerals on the surface to focus reconnaissance mapping and soils programs.

Hycroft Property
Page 40
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

8    SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES, AND SECURITY
8.1    Introduction
This section describes the sample collection, preparation, analysis, and security that has been used by Hycroft or their predecessors. Drilling and sampling at the Mine have been ongoing from 1982 through 2022. Hycroft provided IMC with the database which contained assay information for drilling from 1982 through 2022. IMC is the qualified organization for the section.
Most of the current staff at Hycroft have been at site less than 3 years. As a result, much of the information that is reported here regarding historical sample preparation, analysis, and security was previously reported in a Technical Report Summary prepared by M3 and SRK in July of 2019 titled “Technical Report Summary, Heap Leaching Feasibility Study, Winnemucca, Nevada, USA”, July 31, 2019. IMC has confirmed that information as much as possible with the data provided.
Discussion of Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QAQC) regarding the database is presented in Section 9.
8.2    Sample Preparation
Sample preparation procedure prior to 1999 was not documented. Starting in 2005, preparation procedures were well documented standard methods. The comparison of the pre-2005 data with post-2005 drilling will be presented in Section 9 to provide some confidence in the application of some of the pre-2005 data.
Post-2005 sample collection consisted of both diamond core and RC drilling. Core samples are currently split at the mine site, tagged, and the split core is sent to commercial laboratories for further preparation. Reverse circulation samples are currently collected at the rig with a rotary splitter. Bags of RC cutting splits are tagged and sent to commercial laboratories for further preparation and assaying.
Once at the commercial labs, the samples are crushed to 10 mesh and a 2.2 lb (1 kg) split is taken and pulverized to 85% passing 200 mesh prior to assay analysis.
8.3    Assay Methods
Prior to 1992, most samples were sent to Barringer Laboratories, Inc., in Golden, Colorado. Fire assays were routinely performed on cyanide soluble assays for selected intervals.
From 1992 to 1999, samples were processed at the Hycroft laboratory at the mine site.
The Hycroft laboratory assays consisted of fire Au followed by cyanide soluble Au and cyanide soluble Ag on all intervals. Hycroft cyanide soluble assay methods are reported to have been non-standard and were developed to provide a prediction of recoverable Au and Ag from heap leaching.
There are no samples in the database for the time period from 2000 through 2004. Starting in 2005, all samples were sent out to commercial labs for analysis that are Independent of Hycroft. During 2012, there were 10 drillholes that were an exception to this rule that were assayed by the Hycroft lab. Those holes have reportedly been compared with assays from commercial labs and are still maintained in the database.
The external labs that have been used by Hycroft prior to 2021 are all in the Reno/Sparks, Nevada area and are listed below with their accreditations:
    ALS Minerals                    ISO9001:2000 and ISO17025
    American Assay Laboratories            ISO/IEC17025, PTP-MAL Canada
    Inspectorate                    ISO9001:2008
    McClelland                    ISO/IEC17025
During 2021 and 2022, Hycroft utilized the following laboratories in the Reno/Sparks area:
    Bureau Veritas Mineral Laboratories USA        ISO-9001 ISO-14001 ISO-45001 OHSAS-18001
    Paragon Geochemical                ISO/IEC 17025:2017
Hycroft Property
Page 41
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

All intervals were assayed using conventional fire assay with Atomic Absorption (AA) or gravimetric finish for Au. Fire Ag assays were not regularly completed by previous project operators. After 2013, aqua regia digestion was used for total Ag assays and replaced the previous gravimetric treatment of Ag. The lower detection limit on the aqua regia method was the reason for the change.
The fire assay method for Au with an AA finish was the primary assay method at all of the labs. Cyanide soluble methods were alternatively hot or cold cyanide depending on the lab.
As noted previously, cyanide Ag was much more consistently assayed than fire Ag. Starting in 2014, total Ag was consistently assayed along with fire Au.
Cyanide soluble assays for Au and Ag were highly prevalent in the pre-2000 drilling. As drilling began to target the deeper sulfide mineralization after 2005, the cyanide soluble assays were selectively run on the upper, oxidized portion of the deposit and not applied to the deeper sulfide mineralization.
During 2007 and 2008, Hycroft also applied 35 element Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) analysis to roughly 90% of the assay intervals. That data results in 53,624 sample intervals that can be used to track trace elements.
During 2011, 127 drillholes were selected for ICP and Laboratory Equipment Corporation (LECO) analysis at American Assay. These holes were generally on 500 x 200-foot centers across the estimated sulfide pit target at the time. Most were assayed on 25-foot intervals from top to bottom for total sulfur, sulfide sulfur and carbon. During 2014, additional sample intervals were selected from the 2012 to 2014 drilling for LECO and ICP.
The sulfide sulfur results from this work have been used to assign sulfide sulfur values to the block model for process metallurgical input. It should be noted that the sulfide sulfur procedures also report elemental sulfur along with the sulfide component.
Assay submittals have included blanks and standards since at least 2007. Check assays and duplicate assays were submitted in 2012 and 2014. The results of the analysis of those samples will be reported in Section 9.
8.4    Sample Security
Samples were delivered to the analytical laboratories in numbered bags along with transmittal sheets that list the sample numbers, the total sample count, and codes for sample type (RC or Core). The lab confirmed the receipt of shipment against the transmittal sheets to account for all samples issued.
It is reported that no officers, directors, or associates of Hycroft or their predecessors were operationally involved in the sample collection, preparation, or assay transmittal.
8.5    Analytical Results
Following analysis, results are posted to a digital laboratory database for which Hycroft has secure permission privileges. Managers download the data where the sample results are cross-referenced to sample numbers. Each drillhole carries a unique self-identifying sample number, simplifying the cross-referencing. The completed digital file for each drillhole is emailed to Hycroft by the lab and a follow-up, hard copy certificate is mailed to Company offices.
Data is checked by geologists visually and loaded into the secure acQuire database. The acQuire database is further checked using electronic methods and then calculated into ounce per ton values and loaded to the modeling database for display and further visual QA/QC checking.
8.6    QP Comment
The sample preparation, analysis and security are typical for the U.S mining industry and is acceptable for application to mineral resource determination.

Hycroft Property
Page 42
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

9    DATA VERIFICATION
This section will address the QA/QC and data verification procedures that were used to confirm that the Hycroft database was acceptable for estimation of mineral resources. A number of tasks have been completed to verify the data since the completion of the previous Technical Report Summary (Feb 2022).
The Hycroft and IMC teams have put significant effort towards the verification of the database during 2022, including:
1)    Detailed comparison of certificates of assay versus the assay database which resulted in substantial update and correction to the database.
2)    Analysis of the QAQC data used by Hycroft and previous owners from 2005 to 2022. This work was done in two stages representing different time periods.
3)    Analysis of Diamond drilling (DDH) versus Reverse Circulation Drilling (RC) with the post-2005 drilling to confirm that the two methods can be comingled and utilized for the estimation of mineral resources.
4)    Comparison of Pre-2005 drilling versus Post-2005 drilling to verify the application of the older data because the Pre-2005 data QAQC information was not available.
The IMC approach to data verification was to establish the reliability of the post-2005 drilling based on the available QA/QC data and the comparison between DDH and RC. Once the post-2005 data was established as reliable, it was used to check the pre-2000 drilling by a nearest neighbor sample comparison. The updated statement of mineral resources reflects information developed in 2022, as presented in Sections 1 and 2.
9.1    Certificate of Assay Checks
The team at the Hycroft mine site completed an extensive check and verification of the database with interval by interval checks against the available certificates of assay. After completion of that work, IMC completed a spot check of 95 of the drill hole certificates of assay to confirm the edits and corrections completed by Hycroft.
The Hycroft certificate of assay checks confirmed the following two major points.
1)    The historic Hycroft code of -8 in the database correlated to the existence of “trace” assays within the certificates. With this knowledge, the resource model database was edited so that ½ trace values were entered into the intervals previously coded as -8.
2)    The gold assay data used in the estimate of measured and indicated has not been factored. With respect to the inferred mineral resource, the 1982 to 1987 gold assay data was factored down to adjust for bias. No other adjustments have been made to the database.
9.2    QA/QC Post-2005 – 2022
The 2005 to 2022 drilling data has had the following QAQC information collected.
    Standards
    Blanks
    Duplicate Assays, and
    Check Assays from 2011 through 2013.
That information will be analyzed in two parts to understand the relative reliability of the post-2005 drilling. The data collected from 2005 to 2014 and the recent data collected from 2021 through 2022.
9.2.1    Standards 2021 - 2013
Blind standards are inserted into the assay sample submissions for analysis at the assay lab. The lab obviously knows the sample is a standard, but they do not know which standard.
The standards database provided to IMC did not include dates of insertion. It is presumed that the insertion of standards started in 2005 with the modern drilling program. However, the earliest example of standard acquisition that IMC could find was mid-2007. There are indications of sample insertion though the 2013-time frame.
In most exploration environments, standards results are reviewed as they arrive from the lab to confirm that the measured result is within the error tolerance reported for the standard. IMC takes a different approach and compares
Hycroft Property
Page 43
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

the accepted value of the standard against the multiple assays of the standard on an XY plot to identify any potential bias in the assay process.
Figure 9-1 illustrates the results of the standards submissions for gold for 2005-2013.
The comparison of the accepted value of the standard and the tested standards results does not indicate a consistent bias. The points that are scattered off access likely reflect swapped samples meaning that the wrong standard was recorded or submitted to the lab compared to the tabular results. There are roughly 22 apparent sample swaps out of a total of 7,154 tested standards or about 0.3% of the original samples.
Figure 9-2 summarizes the results of the total Ag standards submissions. There is substantially more variation in the Ag standards results as one would expect in this grade range. In addition, most of the original assays are gravimetric finish which have a detection limit of 5 ppm or 0.15 oz/ton. There are only five standards results below 0.15 oz/ton out of 6,498 Ag standards analyzed. With some standards values as low as 0.20 oz/ton it would not be out of line to see an indication of subtle bias if the lowest value that can be reported is 0.15 oz/ton.
Hycroft Property
Page 44
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 9-1:    Results of Submitted Gold Standards 2005 - 2013
image_18a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by IMC, 2023.
Hycroft Property
Page 45
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 9-2:    Results of Submitted Silver Standards 2005 - 2013
image_19a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by IMC, 2023.
Hycroft Property
Page 46
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

9.2.2    Blanks 2008 - 2014
Blank samples are inserted periodically to confirm that metal is not carried over from one sample to the subsequent sample in the sample stream. Figure 9-3 summarizes the results of the blank submissions for gold from 2008 to 2014. The figure indicates that the majority of samples reported back as trace or small values.
However, occasional samples have been reported near or above heap leach feed grade. Of the 2,260 standards in Figure 9-3, 5.9% reported higher than 0.005 oz/ton and 5.6% reported higher than 0.010 oz/ton. Although small percentages, there is room for improvement.
One expects that some of the samples were not blanks but were mistakenly inserted standards. The average of the values that are above 0.005 oz/ton is about 0.019 oz/ton, which is quite close to the standard value of the Cove 2 standard.
Figure 9-3:    Results of Blank Submissions
image_20a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by IMC, 2021.
9.2.3    Check Assays 2011 - 2012
Assay pulps were submitted to a second lab as check assays during 2011–2012. The primary lab was ALS and the check lab was AAL. The results are summarized in Figure 9-4 through Figure 9-5 as XY plots.
The variability in the results is more than one would expect from pulp submissions, but there does not appear to be an observable bias in the laboratory comparisons. The line on the graphs illustrates a 1:1 relationship as a comparison.
Hycroft Property
Page 47
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 9-4:    Check Assay Results, Fire Assay Gold 2011 - 2012
image_21a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by IMC, 2021.
Figure 9-5:    Check Assay Results, Fire Assay Silver 2011 – 2011
image_22a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by IMC, 2021.
Hycroft Property
Page 48
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

9.2.4    Standards 2021 – 2022
All recent drilling completed by Hycroft utilizes standards, blanks, and duplicate assays for QAQC confirmation of the database. Hycroft analyzes the data as it is received to confirm that the results are within appropriate acceptance ranges.
Diamond drilling was the primary method used during 2021 and RC drilling was the primary method during 2022. An analysis of RC to DDH during 2021 and 2022 indicates that both can be used for mineral resource estimation. In addition, two assay laboratories were used in 2021 and 2022. Bureau Veritas, Mineral Laboratories, USA (Sparks, Nevada) and Paragon Geochemical Laboratories (Sparks, Nevada) were both used to assay Hycroft samples during this period.
Paragon and Bureau Veritas results have been analyzed separately and both provide similar results. The figures presented for the 2021 through 2022 QAQC show both laboratories combined as a summary of the overall results. The majority of the silver QAQC was applied to cyanide silver assays. Since those are not used in this estimate, the gold QAQC information is shown.
The standards that do not check well amount to about 2.4% of the submitted standards. Those out-of-range results tend to line up with other standards or blank values. This implies swaps in standards submissions or in data recording rather than outright errors in the assay.
Figure 9-6 illustrates the standards results for the 495 submitted gold standards during 2021 and 2022.
Figure 9-6:    Standards Results, 2021 – 2022
image_23a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by IMC, 2023
9.2.5    Blank Analysis Results 2021 - 2022
Blanks are inserted and analyzed to confirm that there is no sample-to-sample contamination. Figure 9-7 illustrates the results of blank submissions during 2021 – 2022. The results indicate only 1 value reported with a potentially economic gold grade out of 495 blank submissions.
Hycroft Property
Page 49
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 9-7:    Blank Results, 2021 – 2022
image_24a.jpg
Source: Figure by IMC, 2022
9.2.6    Duplicate Assays, 2021 - 2022
Duplicate pulps were er-assayed to confirm the repeatability of results from the assay lab. During 2021-2022, 314 duplicates were re-assayed. Figure 9-7 summarizes the results of the duplicate checks. There are two results that are higher than expected. Those reflect an error rate for or out-of-bounds results of about 0.64%.
Figure 9-7:    Duplicate Assay Results, 2021 – 2022
image_25a.jpg
Source: Figure by IMC 2023
Hycroft Property
Page 50
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

9.2.7    DDH vs RC for Post-2000 Samples
The drillhole database at Hycroft is predominately based on RC drilling with some diamond core drilling (DDH). Prior to 2000, the database does not provide a record regarding the type of drilling applied, although it was reported to be largely RC.
Since 2000, the database records whether the drilling was RC, DDH, or sonic. The sonic drilling was applied in stockpiles which are a minor component of the remaining mineral resource.
The RC data was compared to DDH drilling using the nearest neighbor method that was described in the previous sub-section. Table 9-1 summarizes the results of that comparison.
Table 9-1:    Nearest Neighbor Sample Comparison of RC Gold Composites versus DDH Gold Composites
Maximum Separation Distance ftNumber of Sample
Pairs
RC Mean
oz/ton
DDH Mean
Oz/ton
Ratio of the
Means
T-Statistic
101710.0060.0071.170.865
203880.0060.0061.000.585
306160.0060.0071.170.529
407940.0060.0071.171.225
501,0170.0060.0071.171.435
T-Statistics is the Smith-Satterthwaite T for Large Populations
The results indicate that the RC and DDH drilling information provide similar results for the post-2005 drilling and that they can be combined for estimation of mineral resources.
9.2.8    Old vs. New Drilling
Previous Technical Reports regarding the Hycroft mineral resources had reported that all gold assays prior to 2000 were factored upward. Those in acid leach alteration were factored upward by 1.32 and all others upward by 1.19 (Hycroft Project Mill Expansion Feasibility Study Technical Report, October 31, 2016 and Technical Report, Allied Nevada Gold Corp, Hycroft Mine, October 2011).
Detailed checks on the certificates of assay indicate that the gold assay information provided to IMC for use in this estimation of mineral resources has not been factored in any way and the database matches the original certificate of assay.
A comparison of pre-2000 drilling and gold assay results versus the post-2005 gold assay results indicates that the old data averages higher grade than the new data when compared on a nearest neighbor basis. To identify the source of this bias, the pre-2000 data was analyzed on a year-by-year basis against the post-2005 drilling assay data. The post-2005 data has been illustrated to be reliable based on the QAQC analysis reported on previous pages and on the DDH-RC comparisons reported in the previous sub-section.
A nearest neighbor analysis was completed comparing 1999 drilling versus post-2005. That was followed by analysis of 1998 versus post-2005. This process was completed annually for all years prior to 2000. The results for years 1988 through 1999 were stable and compare acceptably with the post-2005 data. However, once 1987 and earlier years were compared against the post-2005 data, an obvious high bias was identified in the 1982 to 1987 data.
To summarize the results, the 1982-1987 data is compared to the post-2005 data on a nearest sample basis. These results were completed for sample distances as close as 5ft for assay data.
Hycroft Property
Page 51
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Table 9-2:    Nearest Neighbor Sample Comparison of 1982-1987 Gold Assays versus Post-2005 Gold Assays
Maximum Separation Distance ftNumber of Sample
Pairs
1982-1987 Mean
oz/ton
Post-2005 Mean
Oz/ton
Ratio of the
Means
T-Statistic
51030.0220.0131.693.82
102370.0250.0181.393.51
206300.0200.0121.677.99
301,3130.0180.0101.8010.46
402,0270.0180.0101.8014.26
T-Statistic is the Smith-Satterthwaite T for Large Populations
The above data excludes the stockpile drilling and includes all hard-rock data that is located within the block model area.
The results of Table 9-2 indicate that the 1982-1987 gold assays are between 1.39 and 1.80 times higher than the post-2005 gold assays. The T-Statistic reported on the right side of the table is comfortably above the value of 2.0 for all of the sample separation distances. If the T-Statistic is greater than 2.0 one should reject that the two data sets are similar.
The above analysis indicates that the 1982-1987 data is high biased and unreliable relative to the more modern post-2005 drilling and assaying. The 1982-1987 drilling is reported to be RC drilling completed by an early predecessor of the current Hycroft management. Hycroft and IMC have not found any record regarding the RC sampling methods that were applied during that time that would shed light on the cause or source of this bias.
Roughly half of the 1982 to 1987 database been mined out. Historic information indicates that production reconciliation was difficult during that period. However, the1982-1987 data does indicate the presence of mineralization. In order to capture that mineralization in the potential resource, IMC has completed the following steps.
1)    The 1982-1987 gold data (composites) were multiplied by 0.56 to remove the observed high bias. There are no fire silver assays recorded during that time period.
2)    The block gold grades without 1982-1987 data were frozen so that they could not be changed.
3)    The block grade estimation for gold was repeated including the bias corrected 1982-1987 data.
4)    If a block received a gold grade in this process that was not previously assigned, it was added to the model and coded as “inferred” class mineralization.
5)    The resource floating cone was regenerated with the additional 1982-1987 inferred resource blocks.
In summary, a bias corrected version of the 1982-1987 data was incorporated so that any component of the resource based on that data is coded as “inferred”.
9.2.9    Downhole Surveys
The Hycroft mine operates on a local mine survey grid that is rotated 15.85 degrees from the Nevada state plane coordinate system. Down hole survey data from the drill rigs reports directly in true north coordinates, requiring all holes to be rotated into the Hycroft grid.
Hycroft personnel have spent substantial time checking the down hole survey bearings against the original down hole survey logs. The data is stored in both state plane, and the Hycroft grid in the Hycroft system. Hycroft and IMC have confirmed that the down hole surveys used for mineral resource estimation are in the Hycroft mine grid, consistent with the resource model and historical and potentially future mine planning.
9.3    QP Comment
The work outlined in this section is a summary of nearly a year’s worth of data verification and checking by Hycroft and IMC personnel. As a result, the Hycroft and IMC teams have gained significant confidence in this data set. IMC holds the opinion that the database as utilized in this statement of mineral resources inclusive of the edits and corrections
Hycroft Property
Page 52
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

outlined is conservative and appropriate for the estimation of mineral resources. The 1982-1987 data has been incorporated so that it only contributes to inferred category mineral resource after correction of the high bias of that data.

Hycroft Property
Page 53
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

10    MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING
Hycroft has been operating the Mine as an open pit mine and run-of-mine (ROM) heap leach facility for their oxide ores to produce gold and silver since 2008. Prior to that, Vista Gold operated the Mine in a similar manner. The cumulative performance statistics and metallurgical test data gathered for the direct cyanidation of high-grade ROM oxide ore via heap leach are extensive and not the focus of this report. The following subsections focus on testwork done by Hycroft on extraction of Au and Ag from their refractory sulfide mineralization.
The metallurgical test programs conducted on the Hycroft sulfide mineral deposits over the years has consisted of comminution, flotation, concentrate oxidation, and cyanide leaching tests on mineralized materials, flotation tailings, and oxidized sulfide concentrate samples. The samples were mostly derived from drill cores. The bulk of the flotation tests were conducted at G&T Metallurgical Services (G&T) and SGS Canada Mineral Lakefield (SGS), both located in Canada, and by Hazen Research Inc (Hazen). located in Colorado. Oxidation testing was primarily conducted by Hazen, SGS and Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (KCA). G&T (ISO – 9001:2008) and SGS (ISO – 17025:2017) both have ISO accreditation, and Hazen and KCA do not have accreditation. All laboratories are independent of Hycroft.
In general, core samples for metallurgical testing were selected to represent the mineralized materials, taking samples from five mineralization domains, as they were classified at the time. The main sources were Central, Brimstone and Vortex domains.
10.1    Mineralized Materials and Sampling
Hycroft mineralized materials are classified as “oxide,” “transition,” or “sulfide,” depending on the solubility of its gold content in cyanide solution (refractoriness). Materials having cyanide soluble gold contents of 70% or higher are classified as oxide. Those with cyanide soluble gold contents below 30% are considered sulfide. The remainder, with cyanide soluble contents between 30 to 70% are considered transition. The classification has been shown to have no strong correlation with sulfide sulfur content.
10.1.1    Hycroft Mineralization Domains
The Hycroft mineral deposit consists of five process domains, namely Bay, Boneyard, Brimstone, Central, and Vortex.
Table 10-1 is a summary of the data for average total sulfur, sulfide sulfur, and the ratio of sulfide sulfur to total sulfur from 95 oxide, 158 transition and 417 sulfide samples originating from the Brimstone, Central, and Vortex domains. It shows that the classification of the ores as oxide, transition, or sulfide is essentially a measure of refractoriness and has little correlation with the sulfide-sulfur content of the minerals. Sulfide-sulfur: total sulfur ratio averages slightly over 80% for the entire dataset. This indicates that degree of oxidation of sulfur is the same among oxides, sulfides, and transition.
Hycroft Property
Page 54
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Table 10-1:    Average Sulfur Contents of Oxide, Transition and Sulfide Mineralized Materials
Total S (ST), %
OxideTransSulfide
Brimstone2.552.412.25
Central2.942.822.48
Vortex2.472.662.33
Unclassified4.282.922.61
All3.002.742.43
Sulfide S (S=), %
OxideTransSulfide
Brimstone2.192.061.87
Central2.362.261.80
Vortex2.092.231.91
Unclassified3.292.232.09
All2.452.231.93
S=:ST Ratio
OxideTransSulfide
Brimstone0.8390.8390.820
Central0.8100.8060.797
Vortex0.8800.8270.833
Unclassified0.8400.8230.843
All0.8490.8190.824
10.1.2    Samples for Metallurgical Testing
Table 10-2 below lists the number of samples selected to span the three main domains and distributed in the mineral deposit.
Individual core samples selected for testing may be found in copies of the test reports analyzed for this study.
Table 10-2:    Summary of Test Samples
TestsNumber of Samples per Domain
CentralBrimstoneVortexComposite*
Crushing (CWi)1157
Axb (Drop Wt & SMC)136932
Bond BWi2461658
Bond RWi2105
Bond Abrasion31512
Flotation11132448
10.2    Comminution Tests
The Hycroft mineral deposit has been thoroughly characterized for its comminution properties in the previous studies. The comminution tests were conducted at laboratories of SGS, G&T, Hazen, and Phillips. These include crushing and grinding work indices, JKSimMet parameters A, b and ta, and abrasion indices.
Hycroft Property
Page 55
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

A summary of the 80th percentile comminution test results is in Table 10-3 below. For the Axb parameter, because hardness competence increases as Axb decreases, the 80th percentile in hardness competence corresponds to the 20th percentile of Axb.
Table 10-3:    Grindability Test Summary
ParameterUnitValue
CWikWh/ton18.6
RWikWh/ton21.2
BWikWh/ton20.1
Axbunitless34.2
SPI (min)min102.4
Ai (g)g0.623
10.3    Flotation
10.3.1    Review of Flotation Testwork
Refractory gold, in Hycroft’s sulfide mineralized materials, is believed to be associated in iron sulfides, primarily pyrite and marcasite. The goals of these tests are to determine the floatability of the sulfides, and the recovery of Au and Ag in the sulfide concentrate. The ability to recover Au and Ag in the sulfide concentrate reduces the volume of material to be treated.
Initial flotation testwork was performed by SGS in March of 2009 and continued at several laboratories until April of 2014. During this time frame, the testing program began with bench-scale tests and moved into pilot plant scale flotation tests at G&T and Hazen.
10.3.1.1    SGS Minerals Services (Lakefield) – March 2009
Six drums containing samples representing the Hycroft Project were sent to SGS Minerals Services (Lakefield) on September 5, 2008.
The initial flotation test series consisted of three bench-scale rougher kinetics tests to evaluate the effect of primary grind size on flotation response. A standard set of bulk sulfide collectors consisting of xanthate (PAX) and dithiophosphate (Cytec AF 208) was applied along with Dowfroth 250 frother. An additional five bench-scale tests were run to investigate other reagent schemes and grind sizes.
Flotation testwork was conducted on the Master Composite sample. The flotation investigation consisted of the following:
    Two-stage cleaner flotation applying the flowsheet developed in phase 1 testing (program 12012-001),
    Cyanide leaching of the 2nd cleaner flotation concentrate, and
    Cyanide leaching of the recombined rougher and 1st cleaner scavenger tailing.
SGS stated “In terms of sulfide flotation, it appears that beyond about 10% mass pull, recoveries were on the same grade vs. recovery curve regardless of grind fineness”.
10.3.1.2    SGS Minerals Services (Lakefield) – Nov 2010
Batch tests were completed on 33 sulfide zone composites representing the Vortex (18), Cut 5 (4), Bay Area (10), and Bone Yard (1) deposits of the Hycroft mine sulfide resource. Several rock types were represented in the composites. The testwork examined the metallurgical variability of the samples in response to the flotation (and cyanidation) flowsheet previously developed for the Master Composite in program 12012-001.
Metallurgical variability testing consisted of rougher flotation followed by concentrate regrinding and two-stage cleaning. In the initial set of tests, the 2nd cleaner concentrate was cyanide leached. After reviewing the data from those tests, cyanide leaching was refocused on the rougher and 1st cleaner scavenger tailing.
Hycroft Property
Page 56
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

From these tests, recovery of Au in rougher flotation ranged from ~62% in ~15% mass in (Test F-2, P80 of ~103 μm) to ~69% in ~17% mass (Test F-1, P80 of ~128 μm). At the same mass pulls, Ag recovery ranged from 74% (Test F-2) to 85% (Test F-1). The addition of a dithiophosphate collector (Cytec A208) in Test F-5 further improved Au recoveries to 80.1 Au % at a mass pull of 14.6%.
10.3.1.3    KCA Batch Tests – Jan 2011
In December 2010, the laboratory facility of KCA in Reno, Nevada received material from the Hycroft project. Portions of the received material were combined as directed to generate six (6) composite samples for testing. Initial testwork was conducted by KCA and reported (PAX, pH, and Grind Flotation Kinetics Study, January 2011). Additional flotation tests were conducted with leach tests on the products.
10.3.1.4    KCA Locked Cycle Tests – May 2011
Portions of the six (6) composites were combined to generate two (2) master composites, a Sulfide Master Composite, and a Mixed Master Composite. Additional flotation tests with leach tests on the tails were conducted using material from these composites.
10.3.1.5    G&T Metallurgical Services Ltd. – Feb 2011
Five separate shipments of samples were received at G&T Metallurgical Services Ltd between August 31 and December 3, 2010. The samples consisted of half HQ core with a total estimated weight of about 2.9 tons. These samples were used to construct the thirty-nine composites that were used for flotation and cyanidation tests.
On the first set of twenty-four composites, a single batch cleaner flotation test was completed. On the second set of samples, M1 to M17, a much simpler flowsheet was applied, simplifying the reagent scheme to PAX and MIBC. The flotation froths obtained were more stable and more characteristic of a standard sulfide froth compared to the original flowsheet. The samples responded relatively well to flotation. For all thirty-nine samples, the flotation recoveries, on average, measured about 78 percent for Au and 67 percent for Ag to the rougher concentrate.
On average, the rougher recoveries using this revised flowsheet on M1 to M17 measured 78 percent for Au and 83 percent for Ag. These metal recoveries tended to track sulfide sulfur recovery to the rougher concentrate. Table 10-4 and Table 10-5 show the results of this testwork.
Hycroft Property
Page 57
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Table 10-4:    G&T Composites 1 through 24 Flotation Test Results
Sample IDS(t)
(%)
S(s)
(%)
Au (oz/ton)Ag (oz/ton)Rougher Conc Weight Pull, (%)Au Recovery to conc, (%)Ag Recovery to conc, (%)Type
G&T Composite 10.700.620.0093.96813.380.177.3Sulfide
G&T Composite 22.482.490.14511.13613.279.663.2Transition
G&T Composite 32.292.280.07611.87212.282.761.9Transition
G&T Composite 41.251.220.00818.0169.160.427.7Sulfide
G&T Composite 51.501.400.0450.49612.983.183.6Sulfide
G&T Composite 61.641.510.02723.13615.088.372.6Sulfide
G&T Composite 71.361.290.0109.50415.794.537.8Sulfide
G&T Composite 81.331.260.0274.00013.189.450.5Sulfide
G&T Composite 94.303.810.0210.60216.586.588.5Sulfide
G&T Composite 102.232.040.0141.94611.680.560.1Sulfide
G&T Composite 112.802.720.0278.06417.888.153.9Transition
G&T Composite 121.571.250.1131.6808.373.644.8Oxide
G&T Composite 132.322.020.0651.47211.656.168.2Transition
G&T Composite 142.081.340.0041.8187.889.530.2Sulfide
G&T Composite 151.781.710.0435.37610.894.063.2Transition
G&T Composite 162.642.270.0220.62714.977.276.9Sulfide
G&T Composite 170.450.340.0930.1985.228.127.5Oxide
G&T Composite 181.331.080.0140.07411.858.761.2Sulfide
G&T Composite 192.001.760.0120.26615.769.950.3Sulfide
G&T Composite 2013.7011.800.0450.99231.293.787.1Sulfide
G&T Composite 212.061.970.0190.59813.185.674.9Sulfide
G&T Composite 221.731.700.0250.46413.161.260.7Sulfide
G&T Composite 231.721.310.0162.09911.187.553.7Sulfide
G&T Composite 242.001.920.0243.58415.585.438.9Sulfide
 
Average Sulfides2.562.250.0204.24614.280.760.7 
Average All2.392.130.0374.66613.478.158.9 
Hycroft Property
Page 58
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Table 10-5:    G&T Composites M-1 through M-17 Flotation Test Results
Sample IDS(t)
(%)
S(s)
(%)
Au (oz/ton)Ag (oz/ton)Rougher Conc Weight Pull, (%)Au Recovery to conc, (%)Ag Recovery to conc, (%)Type
G&T Composite M-11.981.810.0380.37813.486.482.4Sulfide
G&T Composite M-22.621.750.0131.08214.282.185.9Sulfide
G&T Composite M-31.201.120.0140.27212.773.683.2Sulfide
G&T Composite M-41.621.550.0200.15018.179.776.8Sulfide
G&T Composite M-51.811.700.0130.12818.876.972.7Sulfide
G&T Composite M-61.921.790.0160.25320.879.176.4Sulfide
G&T Composite M-7No Data       
G&T Composite M-8No Data       
G&T Composite M-92.252.060.0110.58610.989.792.7Sulfide
G&T Composite M-102.502.000.0122.45411.676.796.0Sulfide
G&T Composite M-111.551.490.0161.4758.380.496.4Sulfide
G&T Composite M-121.861.300.0163.84010.480.497.3Sulfide
G&T Composite M-136.342.990.0461.04313.085.786.8Sulfide
G&T Composite M-145.532.320.0200.28816.088.284.1Transition
G&T Composite M-152.321.150.0241.5847.044.961.3Oxide
G&T Composite M-162.512.430.0170.48614.374.687.8Transition
G&T Composite M-171.521.390.0170.25916.165.162.8Sulfide
 
Average Sulfides2.261.750.0190.99314.079.784.1 
Average All2.501.790.0200.94313.777.682.8 
10.3.1.6    Hazen Research, Inc. – August 2011
For this investigation, 38 drill hole composite samples from five mineralized material types. Initially, flotation was performed with sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS) and copper sulfate (CuSO4). In subsequent tests, the NaHS and CuSO4 were eliminated and lead nitrate (Pb(NO3)2) was added as a modifying agent. The pH ranged from neutral to 10.5, after modifying agents were used. The redox potential was also monitored.
A series of 91 small-scale flotation experiments was performed on 4.4-lbs splits from the 38 composites. The objective of the flotation work was to define the variability among the composite samples.
The next 41 small-scale flotation experiments were performed on Composites 1–38, except for Composites 6, 8, 9, and 10, using rougher flotations following G&T Metallurgical conditions and conditions recommended by Hazen. Rougher weight pulls ran from 4.9% to 30.7%, with Au and Ag recoveries running from 26.9% to 97.6% and 17.1 to 98.7%, respectively.
The rougher concentrate assays ranged from 0.032 oz/ton Au (Test 3346-82) to 1.536 oz/ton Au (Test 3346-40) and from 0.224 oz/ton Ag (Test 3346-82) to almost 73.601 oz/ton Ag (Test 3346-68). The Au and Ag recovered in the rougher concentrates ranged from 27% (Test 3346-52) to 91% (Test 3346-68) and from 17% (Test 3346-52) to almost 99% (Test 3346-68), respectively.
10.3.1.7    Fitness of Grind for Flotation Tests
Most flotation tests on Hycroft samples were performed on materials that were ground at 80 percent finer than 100 microns. Several other tests were also conducted at finer and coarser grinds. The general trend indicates that flotation can achieve good recoveries at grinds ranging from 100 to 150 microns. Recoveries tended to decrease with grinds finer than 100 microns or coarser than 150 microns.
Hycroft Property
Page 59
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

10.3.1.8    Reagent Suite
Both G&T and Hazen concluded that flotation tests using NaHS as a sulfurizing agent, as well as tests done at alkaline pH, generally performed poorly.
The exploratory and variability flotation test results presented above showed that sulfide mineralized materials can be floated for Au and Ag. The reagents used were strong, non-selective sulfide collectors. Frothing was achieved with either methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC) or Dowfroth 250 (DF250), or both. Table 10-6 summarizes the reagent schemes applied by G&T, SGS, and Hazen. In all laboratory tests, the reagent dosages were high.
Table 10-6:    Flotation Reagent Schemes Studied
Reagent, (lb/ton)Laboratory
G&THazenSGS
NaHS0, 2.562.1
PAX0.5520.546, 0.4160.21
3418A0, 0.064-0.1240.055
MIBC0.05-0.128, 0.1920.02-0.064
DF2500.02-0.0640.095
Based on the results of tests from the three laboratories, particularly G&T, the simple reagent scheme can be further developed. Several tests indicate Cytec’s AEROPHINE 3418A Promoter (sodium diisobutyldithiophosphinate) may improve Au and Ag recovery.
10.3.2    Flotation Time
Flotation kinetics were not systematically studied when the flotation tests were being conducted. However, flotation data from the G&T work on M Composites included recoveries from froth collected at 4, 8, 12, and 16 minutes. Fifteen rougher flotation tests were performed. Kinetics plots for Au and Ag from this work are shown in Figure 10-1, which shows only a few data points to avoid clutter, but shows the recovery curves fitted to the data points by asymptotic curve fitting.
From each of the 15 sets of data, the maximum recovery, Rmax and kinetics constant, K were derived from the asymptotic lines.
The results show that the average laboratory flotation time required to attain 95% of the maximum recovery is 19 minutes for gold and 17 minutes for silver.
10.4    Direct Cyanidation
Direct cyanidation of concentrate bulk samples (P80 = 325 mesh, or 44 microns) taken from all zones of the deposit were conducted early on in 2010. These tests yielded poor results with recoveries from Brimstone and Vortex samples in the mid-20% range for Au and 80% range for Ag, while the other samples yielded recoveries ranging from 45 to 50% for Au and 55 to 83% for Ag.
A good measure of recovery by direct cyanidation is the ratio of cyanide soluble metal to the total assay of the metal, that is, AuCN/AuFA and AgCN/AgFA. These ratios have been determined for a large number of exploration samples and have been included in the resource database. The cyanide soluble ratios for Au have been utilized in resource estimation, particularly to route certain minerals with higher cyanide soluble Au to the heap leach pad.
10.5    Concentrate Oxidation Tests
Oxidation tests on Hycroft concentrates included POX, roasting, atmospheric oxidation, and other oxidation methods. The results indicated that all these processes would work, with varying degrees of recovery. The following is a summary of the results of these tests.
In 2007, Hycroft began to explore milling options to expand production by processing their refractory sulfide mineralized materials. This included the production of flotation concentrates followed by oxidative treatments of the concentrates.
Hycroft Property
Page 60
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

The focus of this testwork was primarily on oxidation methods typically employed in the gold industry for refractory mineralized materials, POX, and roasting.
In 2012, Hycroft tested a suite of alternative oxidation methods, including chlorination, atmospheric alkaline oxidation (AAO), and fine-grinding with intense cyanidation. The goal was to develop an economically viable process that would be less expensive to build and operate than a POX autoclave facility. Initial results were positive; indicating that the Hycroft rougher concentrates were amenable to oxidation under atmospheric conditions, using trona as the acid neutralizing agent. Pilot plant testing was conducted on three main domains to confirm these results at Hazen Research Inc.

Hycroft Property
Page 61
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 10-1:    Recovery vs. Time Plot, G&T Kamloops Tests, M Composites
image_26a.jpgimage_27a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by M3, 2016.
Hycroft Property
Page 62
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

In 2016, Hycroft began developing an AAO demonstration plant at the mine site utilizing trona to process 100% of the flotation concentrates and produce doré onsite. Accounting for the historical and current performance of the oxide heap leach operations, oxide heap leach metallurgical testing combined with results from all bench-scaled tests, pilot and demonstration plant Mill-AAO metallurgical testing, the individual process recoveries for each processing stream for Au and Ag were calculated and are presented in Table 10-7. This was the basis for the NI 43-101 Feasibility Study Technical Report published in 2016 (Ibrado, A. et al, 2016).
Table 10-7:    Estimated Metallurgical Recoveries from 2016 Feasibility Study – Au and Ag
AuAg
Contained (koz)Recovered (koz)Recovery
(%)
Contained
(koz)
Recovered (koz)Recovery
(%)
Heap Leach3,8751,93349.921,24221,24215.5
Mill-AAO Sulfide7,7975,69673.0287,693287,69381.6
TOTAL11,6727,62965.4489,447308,93563.1
10.5.1    Atmospheric Oxidation – Batch Tests
The focus of testing over the years 2013 through 2016 was to develop a process to oxidize sulfide concentrates under atmospheric conditions. The process was envisioned to be conducted in an agitated slurry at elevated temperatures, using oxygen as the oxidant and trona as the neutralizing agent for the acid produced. Several batch oxidation tests using trona were done at Hazen under various conditions on concentrates from Central, Brimstone, and Vortex composites.
Batch tests using trona showed that full oxidation is not required to attain high recoveries in subsequent cyanide leaching, consistent with the findings of earlier oxidation studies. About 85% of the Au and 92% of the Ag can be recovered by cyanidation if 60% of the sulfide-sulfur content in the concentrate is oxidized. The results for Au are shown in Figure 10-2.
The reaction kinetics were also found to be improved by higher temperatures up to 167ºF. Higher reaction temperatures (around 194ºF) were tested but returned slower oxidation kinetics, perhaps due to the decreased oxygen solubility in the laboratory bench-scale setting.

Hycroft Property
Page 63
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 10-2:    Au Extraction vs. Sulfide Oxidation
image_28a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by M3, 2019.
10.5.2    Hycroft Mill Demonstration Plant
Hycroft Mining built a demonstration plant with nominal capacity of 10 ton/d at the Hycroft mine site. The plant consisted of a ball mill, a rougher flotation bank, concentrate and tailing thickeners, a regrind mill, oxidation tanks, neutralization tanks, an oxidized concentrate thickener, cyanide leach tanks, CCD thickeners, and a Merrill-Crowe precipitation package. It was operated continuously as an integrated plant, with concentrate surge capacity before oxidation and a pregnant solution storage before Merrill-Crowe. A report on the results of conclusions from the demonstration plant was presented in 2019 (M3 Engineering & Technology et al., 2019).
The demonstration plant was operated with Central and Brimstone materials that were mined from exposed mineralization at the surface of the current open pit.
Highlights of the demonstration plant test results are shown in Figure 10-3 for Central materials. For clarity, only results from Tank 1 (TK1) and Tank 5 (TK5) are shown. Oxidation levels of 60% or better were achieved when the correct steady- state testing conditions were maintained.
Hycroft Property
Page 64
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 10-3:    Oxidation of Central Flotation Concentrate: Sulfate Spike Test
image_29a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by M3, 2019.
Once the concentrates were oxidized, Au and Ag recoveries significantly improved over the direct cyanidation recoveries. The results of cyanide leaching of oxidized concentrate are shown on Figure 10-4 as recovery of Au and Ag during the demonstration plant operation. The graph starts with Central concentrate and then switches to Brimstone concentrates on June 11, 2016. Recovery of Au and Ag from Central concentrate peak at around 85%. Au recovery from Brimstone reaches 80 percent while Ag recoveries from Brimstone peaked at 90%. The general shape of the lines roughly follows the degree of oxidation of the concentrate.
Figure 10-4:    Demonstration Plant Cyanide Leach Recovery of Au and Ag
image_30a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by M3, 2019.
10.5.3    Pressure Oxidation
Previous POX testwork was performed primarily by Hazen and SGS on various flotation concentrates of Hycroft sulfide mineralized materials samples, composites thereof and two transition samples. POX testwork has also been performed by Hazen and SGS under both alkaline and acidic environments.
Hycroft Property
Page 65
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

The following is a list all POX testwork reports provided to Ausenco:
    Hazen Project 11232 Report and Appendices A-F, POX-CIL Evaluation of Hycroft Flotation Concentrates.
    Hazen Project 11243-01 Report and Appendix, Evaluation of Hycroft Blend Flotation Concentrate.
    Hazen Project 11307 Report and Appendix, Evaluation of Kappes, Cassiday & Associates Flotation Concentrate.
    SGS Project 13224-001/003 Final Report, An Investigation into Oxidative Pre-treatment of Hycroft Flotation Concentrates.
    SGS Hycroft Project – 12012-001 Report 3, The Recovery of Au and Ag from Hycroft Project Sulfide Samples, Allied Nevada Gold Corporation.
    Kappes, Cassidy & Associates Project No. 189 C, Hycroft Pressure Oxidation and Leach Testwork.
Previous testwork on alkaline POX had been conducted on flotation concentrates. Table 10-8 summarizes the alkaline POX test results conducted by Hazen, SGS.
The results indicate that: 1) an operating temperature range of 212° F to 437°F; 2) 40 psi oxygen overpressure; and 3) 240 minutes to 360 minutes residence time. The limited dataset for alkaline POX indicated poorer gold and silver recoveries.
Table 10-8:    Hycroft Alkaline POX Testwork Summary
Flotation Concentrates Samples
Sulfide (Stotal)
(wt%)
Au
(ppm)
Ag
(ppm)
AC Temp.
(°F)
Solids
(wt%)
AC Retention Time
(min)
Oxygen Over-pressure
(Psig)
Caustic Consumption
(lb/ton)
NaCN Consumption
(lb/ton)
Au recovery
(%)
Ag recovery
(%)
Brimstone40.111.641843720256405.421.698.572.9
40.111.641821240360406.066.854.371.2
Hycroft
Blend Float Concentrate
38.518.1210343726240400.150.264.335.8
38.518.1210343726240401.461.663.852.0
38.518.1210343726240402.953.363.882.1
Previous testwork on acid POX had been conducted on flotation concentrates to determine operating criteria. Table 10-9 summarizes the acid POX test results conducted by Hazen, SGS and KCA.
The results indicate that: 1) an operating temperature range of 374°F to 437°F; 2) 100 psi oxygen overpressure; and 3) 60 minutes’ residence time produce the highest cyanide amenability for Au and Ag recovery. The POX tests also indicate that the concentrates may be prone to form jarosites, which inhibits Ag recovery. The evidence for jarosite formation is:
    Color of the acidic autoclaved pulp is yellow on discharge and reddish brown when conditioned with a lime boil.
    Ag recovery is higher when the pulp is treated with a lime boil, a procedure which subjects the hot pulp for several hours to alkaline conditions.
The gold and silver recoveries from rougher concentrate POX discharge material that has been lime boiled and then leached with cyanide was in the mid-90s and 80s, respectively (Table 10-9).
Acid POX followed by lime boil was evaluated in the development of the mineral resource, in part, due to the ability to consistently achieve sulfide oxidation. Sulfide oxidation through POX is expected to be consistently above 95% whereas sulfide oxidation through AAO did not consistently achieve the 60% target (Figure 10-3). Therefore, gold and silver recoveries from POX residue would be higher and more stable compared to AAO. Other reasons for evaluating POX included:
    Acquiring trona in quantities required to operate an AAO circuit was problematic.
    Limestone is a more cost-effective reagent for acid neutralization.
    Cyanide consumption after pressure oxidation is reduced compared to AAO.
Soda ash was considered as an alternative to trona but was less cost effective than limestone.
Hycroft Property
Page 66
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

10.5.4    Roasting
Roaster testwork was conducted on the Brimstone concentrate from a pilot plant to determine optimum conditions for processing. The results indicate that the optimum roast temperatures are between 797°F and 842°F.
During the tests, average recoveries of 89% Au and 74% Ag were achievable from the concentrates by varying the leach and roast conditions slightly for the majority of the concentrate produced.

Hycroft Property
Page 67
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_34a.jpg

Table 10-9:    Hycroft Acid POX Testwork Summary
Sulfide Concentrate Samples Tested
Sulfide (S=)
(wt%)
Au (ppm)
Ag (ppm[1])
Temp (°F)Solids
(wt%)
Autoclave retention time
(min)
Oxygen Over-pressure
(Psig)
Lime Boil Time
(hr)
Cyan. Conc. (ppt [6])
Sulfide Oxidation (%)Au recovery (%)Ag recovery (%)Test Lab
Brimstone40.111.60418374206010021-97.589.0Hazen
Cut 436.911.40168374206010021-94.094.1Hazen
Camel37.79.33152374206010021-97.789.9Hazen
Bay22.16.0352.3374206010021-97.575.3Hazen
Bone Yard31.95.9795.3374206010021-96.086.0Hazen
Hycroft Blend38.518.102103401156010021-100.077.1Hazen
Sulfide Master Ro18.94.90432401156010061-87.065.8Hazen
Mixed Master Ro9.38.50193401156010061-82.886.4Hazen
Central Blk Sul Ro8.42.472637420601002198.893.690.5SGS
Central Blk Sul Cl35.610.1013137420601002199.894.094.2SGS
Vortex Blk Sul Ro9.12.9327637420601002198.697.773.5SGS
Vortex Blk Sul Cl32.310.8097637420601002199.896.072.2SGS
Central Sul Cl30.710.3075037420601002198.193.581.9SGS
Brimstone Sul Cl34.77.9339237420601002183.653.649.5SGS
Vortex Sul Cl35.48.0335037420601002194.294.589.2SGS
POX 1 Cl con F-16 [2]
31.15.931584378.1901000-3198.871.85.5SGS
POX 2 Cl con F-25 [3]
33.99.381554378.2901000-3198.664.319.1SGS
POX 3 Cl con F-26 [4]
24.24.951654359901000-3197.672.772.7SGS
Brimstone Sul Cl [5]
33.97.13383428303001002299.994.097.0KCA
[1] Fire Assay
[2] No lime boil, no NaCl
[3] No lime boil, 1.34 oz/g NaCl
[4] No lime boil, 2.67 oz/g NaCl
Hycroft Mine
Page 68
Technical Report Summary of Initial Assessment on the Hycroft MineMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_34a.jpg

[5] H2SO4 added to autoclave feed
[6] ppt parts per thousand

Hycroft Mine
Page 69
Technical Report Summary of Initial Assessment on the Hycroft MineMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg
10.6    Deleterious Elements
The deleterious element assay for five bulk samples from Hazen Research Inc is shown in Table 10-10 below.
Table 10-10:    Deleterious Element Assay
Sample IDHg, (ppm)
Cut 4 Bin-03, -08, and -184.19
Brimstone Bin-14 and -202.68
Camel Conglomerate Bin -26, -27, and -282.35
Boneyard Bin-9, -16, and -2315.70
Bay Bulk Bin-7, -11, and -249.96
Mercury present in the mineralized materials in moderate to high levels are deleterious element and impact the gold recovery process. This is managed by zinc precipitation then retorted to capture the mercury.
10.7    QP Comment
From 2009 to 2016, the laboratories (G&T, SGS, Hazen, and KCA) conducted metallurgical testworks on the Hycroft sulfide mineral deposit. These laboratories are independent of Hycroft and specialize in metallurgical testwork for gold deposits.
These international laboratories are leaders in metallurgical and mineralogical testing, and the analytical procedures used in the analysis are conventional industry practices.

Hycroft Property
Page 70
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg
11    MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES
Mineral resources for the Hycroft deposit were developed using conventional block modeling methods and open pit optimization software to estimate the component of mineralization that has reasonable prospect of economic extraction. The mineral resource was developed in accordance with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule SK-1300 for Mineral Projects. The estimate of mineral resources reflects in-place mineralization as the point of reference. This work was completed by IMC with John Marek P.E. acting as the Engineer of Record.
The model was assembled to support production prediction for future mine planning, and for the Hycroft initial assessment presented in this text.
11.1    Model Location
The block model is assembled in the existing local mine grid. That grid is rotated 15.85 degrees (right rotation looking down) compared to true north. Table 11-1 summarizes the block size and block limits.
Table 11-1:    Block Size and Model Size
Model LocationFrom CoordinatesTo CoordinatesNumber of Blocks
Easting Limit13,00026,000325
Northing Limit35,44054,800484
Elevation Limits2,2006,600110
Block Size40 x 40 x 40 ft
Note: Coordinates are the outside edges of the blocks. The model is assembled in the mine grid.
The drillhole database and the block model are all in the mine grid. To the user, there does not appear to be a rotation because the mine grid is treated as if there were no rotation. The block size selection will be discussed in a later sub-section.
11.2    Database
The drillhole database was assembled over many years by multiple companies using at least four different drill methods. That history and the verification of the historical information has been discussed in previous sections.
There are stockpiles and historical leach pads at the mine that are within the block model area. Many of those have been drilled after the original excavation of hard rock by sonic or rotary methods. The stockpile holes have been used to estimate the stockpile and leach pad areas, they have not been used to estimate in-situ rock. In total, the Hycroft database contains 5601 drillholes with 500,214 sample intervals. Within the area of the block model, there are 5,532 drillholes with 490,452 drill intervals amounting to 2,537,335 ft of drilling. Table 11-2 summarizes the amount of drilling and assay information that was used to assemble the block model.
Hycroft Property
Page 71
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg
Table 11-2:    Data Available for the Assembly of the Resource Model for Au, and Ag
Number ofTotal in
Model
Stockpile DrillingIn-Situ Rock DrillingTotal In-Situ Rock Remaining
After 31 Jan ‘21
Assays for In-situ Estimation After Removal of 1982-1987 Drilling
Holes5,5321885,3444,7493974
Assay Intervals490,4523,269487,183361,293434,634
Au Fire Assays455,3062,354452,952340,818401,696
Au Cn Assays342,3671,955340,412251,288289,355
Ag Fire Assays302,2802,339299,941263,990299,941
Ag Cn Assays327,3912,126325,265246,397310,403
The column titled In-Situ Rock Remaining, is intended to illustrate the amount of information remaining in the ground after historical mining. All of the in-situ rock drilling was used to estimate the block grades in the in-situ rock. The last column indicates how much of the information was used to estimate measured and indicated class mineralization.
Sulfide sulfur was estimated from a combination of two data sources. A set of sample composites were established by weighing pulp material from the drillholes to represent 25 ft composites from selected holes during 2011 and 2014. Specific holes were selected to provide coverage over the zone of the deposit being considered for flotation mill treatment. Those 25 ft samples were analyzed by LECO methods to determine sulfide sulfur percent by weight. In addition, all recent drilling in 2021 and 2022 sent to Buena Veritas were assayed for sulfide sulfur using the LECO method on each 5 ft interval. Those 5ft intervals were composited to 25ft and combined with the historical LECO database for block grade estimation. The combined sulfide sulfur LECO database contains 9,782, composites that are each 25ft long averaging 1.56% sulfide sulfur.
Mercury was sampled as part of an ICP program with 7,306 composite intervals from 373 drillholes with nominal composite length of 40 ft. There are 6,738 intervals from that data set assayed for mercury by ICP methods.
11.3    Basic Statistics
The assay values of economic interest at the mine are gold, silver, and sulfide sulfur. Sulfide sulfur has an impact on the operating cost of the concentrate treatment plant. In addition, the cyanide soluble assays of Au and Ag are of interest because they provide a basis to establish the best metallurgical process based on the ability of Au and Ag to dissolve into cyanide solution.
Table 11-3 presents the basic statistics of the assay database used to assemble the model. The stockpile assays are not included in the table and the assay data from 1982 through 1987 have been removed. The entire database listed on Table 11-3 was used for block grade estimation even though some of the assay values would be located above current post mining topography. Drilling data from 1982 through 1987 was bias corrected and used to contribute to inferred class mineralization only.
Table 11-3:    Assay Database (No Stockpile Assays, and No Drilling from 1982 through 1987)
CommodityNumber of AssaysMean GradeStandard Deviation of GradeMaximum Value
Fire Au401,6960.0064 oz/ton0.016 oz/ton3.150 oz/ton
Cyanide Sol Au289,3550.0029 oz/ton0.018 oz/ton6.000 oz/ton
Cn Au/FaAu281,1710.370.371.00
Fire Ag299,9410.20 oz/ton1.91 oz/ton647.50 oz/ton
Sulfide Sulfur9,7821.56%1.55%42.86%
From the Combined LECO database
Hycroft Property
Page 72
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg
Table 11-3 also illustrates that Au cyanide soluble assays exist on roughly 72% of the database. Ag fire assays exist on 75% database. During leach operations, cyanide Ag assays were routinely completed, however fire Ag assays were not common. Estimation of total or fire Ag will consequently be limited by the smaller number of available assays. Cyanide Ag assays were not used for block grade estimation due to uncertainty in that data identified during checks of the certificates of assay.
Since 72% of the data have received cyanide Au assays, the ratio of cyanide Au / fire Au was estimated rather than cyanide Au directly. Although not statistically optimum, the process is necessary and common in the industry. The ratio of cyanide soluble Au to fire assay Au (CnAu/FaAu = Cnratau) is used during mine planning to allocate material to the proper treatment process. When the Cnratau is calculated, values over 1.0 are set back to 1.0. The basic statistics of Cnratau are also summarized on Table 11-3. In simple terms, the cyanide to fire ratio reflects the degree of oxidation in the rock mass.
11.3.1    Geology
The geology of the Hycroft deposit has been presented in previous report sections. The primary occurrences which have control on the grade distribution at Hycroft are Lithology, Alteration, and Structure. Each have impacts on mineralization.
11.3.2    Lithology
The main lithology or rock types in the Hycroft deposit are:
    Alluvium
    Tuffaceous Lake Bed Sediment, Part of the Tertiary Sulfur Group
    Camel Conglomerate. Part of the Tertiary Sulfur Group, and eroded from the Kamma Volcanics
    Kamma Volcanics, Tertiary, but older than the sulfur group conglomerates and sediments.
    Auld Lang Sign (ALS)
    Jurassic laminated siltstone, the basement of the deposit.
The Alluvium is typically barren and was not assigned grade within the model. The primary mineral hosts are the Camel and Kamma units. There is minor mineralization in the ALS but since there is little drilling it has not been estimated in this resource model.
Interpreted solids representing the above rock types were provided by Hycroft and checked against logging by IMC. IMC found them appropriate for use in development of the resource model. Figure 11-1 is an east–west cross-section illustrating the major rock types looking north.
Assay values were back coded from the lithology solids prior to boundary analysis.
11.3.3    Alteration
Alteration consists of:
    Argillic;
    Silicic; and
    Propylitic.
Hycroft provided alteration solids to IMC. IMC checked those solids against the logged database and found them to be acceptable for use in development of the resource model. In summary, when propylitic alteration was encountered, boundary analysis and basic statistics indicated that it was statistically similar to the argillic altered material, and it was combined with argillic during block grade estimation.
Silicic alteration is prevalent and tends to be deeper and generally more prevalent in the eastern portion of the deposit. Boundary and statistical analysis indicate that the silicic altered material is generally higher grade than the argillic-propylitic altered rock. Figure 11-2 is an east–west cross-section through the interpreted alterations, looking north.
Assay values were back coded from the alteration solids prior to boundary analysis.
Hycroft Property
Page 73
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg
11.3.4    Structure
Several north–south striking basin and range faults cut through the Hycroft deposit. In addition to those faults, the deposit is cut by the Ramp Fault and the West dipping East Fault. The East Fault is interpreted to be a thick shear zone and appears to be the orientation and possibly the conduit of mineralization in the eastern portion of the deposit. The footwall of the East Fault has minor mineralization, but grades were not estimated in the footwall within this model.
Figure 11-3 is a map view of the faults and the numbering system assigned by IMC to the fault blocks between the faults. The fault block numbers will be used to define the domains and search parameters for block grade estimation.
Assay intervals were back coded from the structure block solids prior to boundary analysis.
Hycroft Property
Page 74
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_40a.jpg

Figure 11-1:    East–West Cross-Section 43,000N Looking North, showing Hycroft Rock Types
image_37a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by IMC, 2022.
Figure 11-2:    East–West Cross-Section 43,000N Looking North, showing Hycroft Alterations
image_38a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by IMC, 2022.
Hycroft Property
Page 75
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

Figure 11-3:    Hycroft Structure Interpretation
image_41a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by IMC, 2021.
Hycroft Property
Page 76
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

11.4    Domains
Domains for grade estimation are a combination of structure, alteration, and lithology. The domain boundaries were developed by studying the basic statistics and by performing boundary analysis between contacting structural domains.
Boundary analysis selects the assay (or composite) information from both sides of the boundary being tested at several different separation distances. IMC then completes a series of statistical hypothesis tests to confirm if the data on either side of the boundary could have come from the same or different statistical populations.
As a result of the boundary analysis, IMC arrived at 14 domains, primarily based on the results analyzing the Au assay information.
The domains are summarized on Table 11-4.
Table 11-4:    Population Domains for Grade Estimation
Population Domain NumberAlteration Type and CodeLithology Type and CodeStructure
Block
Code
Description
1Acid Lch 501AllAllAcid Leach Alteration
2Arg+Prop 502+504Tsg 4AllArgillic Lake Sediments
3Silicic 503Tsg 4AllSilicic Lake Sediments
4Arg+Prop 502+504All10Argillic West of the Range Fault
5Arg+Prop 502+504All101Argillic Between Range and West Splay
6Arg+Prop 502+504All102Argillic Between West Splay and Central
7Arg+Prop 502+504All203, 204Argillic Between West Splay and Central South
8Arg+Prop 502+504All104, 105, 201, 202, 205, 207, 501Argillic Between Central Fault and East Footwall
9Silicic 503All10Silicic West of the Range Fault
10Silicic 503All101Silicic Between Range and West Splay
11Silicic 503All102Silicic Between West Splay and Central
12Silicic 503All203, 204Silicic Between West Splay and Central South
13Silicic 503All104, 105, 201, 202, 205, 207, 501Silicic Between Central Fault and East Footwall
14All2AllAlluvium, not estimated
11.5    Assay Caps
Prior to grade estimation, high-grade outliers were capped to limit undue impact on block grade estimation. Cumulative frequency plots were studied within each of the domains in order to set cap values. In all cases, only a small
Hycroft Property
Page 77
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

percentage of high valued samples were capped, generally less than 0.5% of the database. Table 11-5 summarizes the cap values that were applied to assays prior to calculating composites.
Table 11-5:    Assay Cap Values
Population Domain NumberAlteration Type and CodeLithology Type and CodeStructure
Block
Code
DescriptionCap Values Au (oz/ton)Cap Values Ag (oz/ton)
1Acid Lch 501AllAllAcid Leach Alteration0.2004.00
2Arg+Prop 502+504Tsg 4AllArgillic Lake Sediments0.0450.60
3Silicic 503Tsg 4AllSilicic Lake Sediments0.0250.70
4Arg+Prop 502+504All10Argillic West of the Range Fault0.0371.50
5Arg+Prop 502+504All101Argillic Between Range and West Splay0.0700.35
6Arg+Prop 502+504All102Argillic Between West Splay and Central0.1500.80
7Arg+Prop 502+504All203, 204Argillic Between West Splay and Central South0.15010.00
8Arg+Prop 502+504All104, 105, 201, 202, 205, 207, 501Argillic Between Central Fault and East Footwall0.30050.00
9Silicic 503All10Silicic West of the Range Fault0.03050.00
10Silicic 503All101Silicic Between Range and West Splay0.0954.50
11Silicic 503All102Silicic Between West Splay and Central0.25020.00
12Silicic 503All203, 204Silicic Between West Splay and Central South0.25090.00
13Silicic 503All104, 105, 201, 202, 205, 207, 501Silicic Between Central Fault and East Footwall0.30045.00
14All2AllAlluvium, not estimated
The gold cyanide to fire assay ratio was capped at 1.0 to assure that there were no values with cyanide assay greater than fire assay when estimating the model.
In all cases above, the sonic drilling and the drilling in the Crofoot leach dump were excluded from the analysis as they do not represent in-situ mineralization.
11.6    Bench Height Confirmation
Prior to compositing, a test was completed to confirm the selection of bench height for the model. The assay database was composited to alternative bench height intervals of 20 ft to 45 ft in 5-foot intervals. For each set of composites, the number of composites above cutoff and the average grade of those composites above cutoff were calculated. The number of composites multiplied by the average grade is used as an approximation of contained metal above cutoff. Multiple cutoffs of 0.002, 0.003, 0.004, and 0.005 oz/ton Au were tested at each of the bench heights. The sonic drilling and Crofoot leach pad drilling were not included.
The resulting graph is shown on Figure 11-4. Each line represents a different cutoff grade. The graph indicates that a bench height of 35 ft could result in a slight improvement in the recovery of Au compared to other tested heights.
Hycroft Property
Page 78
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

Figure 11-4:    Bench Height Analysis
image_42a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by IMC, 2021.
The improvement at 35 ft would be between 0.3% and 1.1% difference in recoverable metal compared to the current operating 40 ft bench. The improvement due to 35 ft benches is not sufficient to warrant a change to the planned operational practice of 40 ft.
11.7    Composites
The assay data was composited to 40 ft downhole or length composites for input to grade estimation. The compositing was applied to the capped grades noted in a previous sub-section. Lithology, alteration, and structure block were assigned to each 40 ft composite on a majority basis. Lithology, alteration, and structure block were not respected in the composite process allowing composites to straddle a boundary. Table 11-6 summarizes the basic statistics of the composited assay data.
Hycroft Property
Page 79
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

Table 11-6:    Basic Statistics of 40-ft Length Composites, In-Situ Rock, Eliminating Years 1982 to 1987
Population Domain NumberAlteration Type and CodeLithology Type and CodeStructure
Block
Code
DescriptionStatistics Summary for 40-ft Composites
StatisticAu oz/tonAg oz/tonCnAu/ FaAu Ratio
1Acid Lch 501AllAllAcid Leach AlterationN =
Mean =
Std =
Max =
5,628
0.0046
0.0075
0.1325
1,726
0.1012
0.2413
2.9454
3.705
0.5740
0.3044
1.0000
2Arg+Prop 502+504Tsg 4AllArgillic Lake SedimentsN =
Mean =
Std =
Max =
1,017
0.0012
0.0015
0.0167
974
0.0609
0.2087
6.4275
611
0.5208
0.4048
1.0000
3Silicic 503Tsg 4AllSilicic Lake SedimentsN =
Mean =
Std =
Max =
92
0.0026
0.0036
0.0139
89
0.00731
0.0775
0.4949
41
0.3859
0.4098
1.000
4Arg+Prop 502+504All10Argillic West of the Range FaultN =
Mean =
Std =
Max =
473
0.0024
0.0037
0.0290
455
0.0568
0.0628
0.7984
198
0.2512
0.3020
1.0000
5Arg+Prop 502+504All101Argillic Between Range and West SplayN =
Mean =
Std =
Max =
306
0.0024
0.0040
0.0280
285
0.0498
0.0369
0.2840
192
0.5818
0.3436
1.0000
6Arg+Prop 502+504All102Argillic Between West Splay and CentralN =
Mean =
Std =
Max =
1396
0.0047
0.0072
0.0710
826
0.0673
0.0746
1.2504
981
0.5159
0.3238
1.0000
Hycroft Property
Page 80
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

7Arg+Prop 502+504All203, 204Argillic Between West Splay and Central SouthN =
Mean =
Std =
Max =
3,738
0.0036
0.0065
0.1200
2,759
0.0803
0.1634
2.7958
2,228
0.4267
0.3648
1.0000
8Arg+Prop 502+504All104, 105, 201, 202, 205, 207, 501Argillic Between Central Fault and East FootwallN =
Mean =
Std =
Max =
9,422
0.0034
0.0062
0.1.09
8,058
0.1155
0.3888
14.219
5,676
0.3728
0.3510
1.0000
9Silicic 503All10Silicic West of the Range FaultN =
Mean =
Std =
Max =
1,040
0.0055
0.0055
0.0255
1,033
0.1735
0.5793
10.212
558
0.1756
0.2487
1.0000
10Silicic 503All101Silicic Between Range and West SplayN =
Mean =
Std =
Max =
190
0.0078
0.0104
4.5000
172
0.1225
0.2198
1.6540
122
0.4527
0.2931
1.0000
11Silicic 503All102Silicic Between West Splay and CentralN =
Mean =
Std =
Max =
1,800
0.0094
0.0095
0.1265
1,300
0.1322
0.2488
4.8170
1,384
0.4757
0.2414
1.0000
Hycroft Property
Page 81
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

12Silicic 503All203, 204Silicic Between West Splay and Central SouthN =
Mean =
Std =
Max =
6,682
0.0101
0.0090
0.1502
3,960
0.2076
0.5392
16.514
5,467
0.3037
0.2919
1.0000
13Silicic 503All104, 105, 201, 202, 205, 207, 501Silicic Between Central Fault and East FootwallN =
Mean =
Std =
Max =
16,706
0.0085
0.0088
0.1936
13,808
0.3165
0.7614
26.777
13,565
0.2762
0.2853
1.0000
11.8    Variography
Variograms were calculated for each of the 13 mineralized domains to provide guidance in the selection of search distance and direction for grade estimation. Multiple variograms were run on Au, Ag, sulfide sulfur, and the Cnratau variable.
Figure 11-5 and Figure 11-6 illustrate just a few of the Au and Ag variograms that were completed. Figure 11-5 represents the Au and Ag in the Silicic material between the West Spay and Central Faults (domain 12). Figure 11-6 represents Au and Ag in the Silicic material between the Central Fault and the Footwall of the East Fault (domain 13). These are two of the more important mineralized domains that will contribute to the Mineral Resource.
Hycroft Property
Page 82
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

Figure 11-5:    Variograms for Silicic Material Between the West Splay and Central Faults
Au
North–South    East–West
image_43a.jpg
Ag
North–South East–West
image_44a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by IMC, 2022.
Hycroft Property
Page 83
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

Figure 11-6:    Variograms in Silicic Material Between the Central Fault and the East Fault Footwall
Au
North–South    East–West
image_45a.jpg
Ag
North–South    East–West
image_46a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by IMC, 2022.
Hycroft Property
Page 84
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

11.9    Block Grade Estimation
Block grade estimation was done in two passes:
1)    The methods described in the following text were applied to the database where the 1982-1987 assay information was excluded. The block grade estimates from that work inclusive of class were locked so that they could not be changed.
2)    The 1982-1987 data gold grades were multiplied by 0.56 to remove the observed bias and the model gold grades were estimated. Any gold block grades that were added in this second pass were included in the model and coded as “inferred.”
Block grade estimation was broken into three groups of estimates:
    Au, Ag, and Mercury
    Cnratau
    Sulfide Sulfur
The boundaries and controls on each of the three were different as might be expected with the differences in geologic occurrence in each of the three cases.
The Au and Ag were estimated using the 40 ft composites of the assay database discussed previously. Cnratau estimation utilized the same database and composites but with different boundary controls.
Sulfide sulfur was estimated using a separate composite database of LECO analysis for sulfide sulfur as discussed previously.
The block grade estimation for gold was completed in two passes:
1)    Block grades were estimated without the 1982 to 1987 drilling, applying the methods described here in text.
2)    The mineral resource classes of measured, indicated, and inferred were established without the use of the 1982-1987 data.
3)    A second pass of gold block grade estimation was made incorporating the 1982 to 1987 data after the bias correction of 0.56 was applied. Any blocks that were added in addition to those in Step 2 above were coded as Inferred.
The estimation of mercury was added later in response to questions from the project process team and is based on a separate database of ICP analysis that was completed on later drilling.
Inverse distance methods were used for most of the block value estimations. Test runs of ordinary kriging were also completed. The intent of selecting the inverse distance method was to develop a better planning model with less smoothing during block estimation. The intent was to provide an estimate of block values that would be predictive of actual mine head grades once appropriate mining cutoffs were applied.
11.9.1    Gold, Silver, and Mercury
Gold, silver, and mercury utilized the 13 domains defined previously. Those domain boundaries were treated as “hard” boundaries during estimation. All three metals were estimated using the 40 ft composites noted earlier and inverse distance cubed (1/d3) as the estimation method. Search parameters are provided on Table 11-7.
Silver was treated differently from gold due to the large number of trace values that now exist in the fire silver assay database. Roughly 6.4% of the fire silver composites are less than 0.02 oz/ton and 38% are less than 0.04 oz/ton. Incorporating these low values into block grade estimation would result in a low-grade bias for the silver mineralized zones. To address this issue, IMC applied the following grade boundary procedure.
1)    A nearest neighbor block assignment was completed using the identical search parameters as the grade estimate on Table 11-7. A maximum of one and a minimum of one composite was applied.
2)    Nearest neighbor blocks with a grade above 0.02 oz/ton were coded as mineralized. Nearest neighbor blocks with grade less than 0.02 oz/ton were treated as low grade.
3)    Inverse distance grade estimation was applied to each of the 13 established domains with an additional hard boundary within each domain based on the 0.02 oz/ton grade boundary. The result was 2 sub-domains within each of the 13 normal domains.
Hycroft Property
Page 85
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

4)    Search radii and orientation for the inside and outside estimate are as shown for silver on Table 11-7.
Within some domains, a high-grade search limit was applied where composites above a certain grade were not used beyond half of the normal search distance. This process includes the high-grade values but limits their extent to minimize high-grade smearing over neighboring low-grade values.
The grade estimation for all three metals used a maximum of ten composites with a maximum of three composites per drillhole. A single composite could be used to assign a block grade, but that grade would be considered as inferred category (Class is discussed later in this section).

Hycroft Property
Page 86
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_50a.jpg
Table 11-7:    Grade Estimation Parameters for Au, Ag, and Mercury
Population Domain NumberAlteration Type and CodeLithology Type and CodeStructure
Block
Code
DescriptionStatistics Summary for 40 ft Composites
VariableOrientation, DegreesSearch Radii, ftMethod Inv DistHG Limit GradeHG Limit Search ft
Dip DirPlungeRotat.PrimSecondPerp
1Acid Lch 501AllAllAcid Leach AlterationAu
Ag
Mercury
2702702700
0
0
0
0
0
270
270
270
270
270
270
50
50
50
3
3
3
NA
NA
NA


2Arg+Prop 502+504Tsg 4AllArgillic Lake SedimentsAu
Ag
Mercury
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
270
270
270
270
270
270
50
50
50
3
3
3
0.008
NA
NA
135

3Silicic 503Tsg 4AllSilicic Lake SedimentsAu
Ag
Mercury
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
270
270
270
270
270
270
50
50
50
3
3
3
0.100
NA
NA
135

4Arg+Prop 502+504All10Argillic West of the Range FaultAu
Ag
Mercury
2702702700
0
0
0
0
0
150
150
150
150
150
150
50
50
50
3
3
3
0.010
0.300
NA
75
75
5Arg+Prop 502+504All101Argillic Between Range and West SplayAu
Ag
Mercury
2702702700
0
0
0
0
0
300
300
300
300
300
300
50
50
50
3
3
3
NA
NA
NA
6Arg+Prop 502+504All102Argillic Between West Splay and CentralAu
Ag
Mercury
2702702700
0
0
0
0
0
200
200
200
200
200
200
50
50
50
3
3
3
NA
NA
NA
7Arg+Prop 502+504All203, 204Argillic Between West Splay and Central SouthAu
Ag
Mercury
2702702700
0
0
0
0
0
250
250
250
250
250
250
50
50
50
3
3
3
0.100
0.600
NA
125
125
8Arg+Prop 502+504All104, 105, 201, 202, 205, 207, 501Argillic Between Central Fault and East FootwallAu
Ag
Mercury
285
285
285
-40
-40
0
0
0
0
300
300
300
300
300
300
50
50
50
3
3
3
0.080
1.500
NA
150
150
Hycroft Mine
Page 87
Technical Report Summary of Initial Assessment on the Hycroft MineMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_50a.jpg
9Silicic 503All10Silicic West of the Range FaultAu
Ag
Mercury
270
270
270
0
0
0
0
0
0
200
200
200
200
200
200
50
50
50
3
3
3
0.020
0.800
NA
100
100
10Silicic 503All101Silicic Between Range and West SplayAu
Ag
Mercury
270
270
270
0
0
0
0
0
0
300
300
300
300
300
300
50
50
50
3
3
3
0.030
0.500
NA
150
150
11Silicic 503All102Silicic Between West Splay and CentralAu
Ag
Mercury
270
270
270
0
0
0
0
0
0
300
300
300
300
300
300
50
50
50
3
3
3
0.070
0.600
NA
150
150
12Silicic 503All203, 204Silicic Between West Splay and Central SouthAu
Ag
Mercury
270
270
270
0
0
0
0
0
0
250
250
250
250
250
250
50
50
50
3
3
3
0.024
1.000
NA
125
125
13Silicic 503All104, 105, 201, 202, 205, 207, 501Silicic Between Central Fault and East FootwallAu
Ag
Mercury
285
285
285
-40
-40
0
0
0
0
300
300
300
300
300
300
50
50
50
3
3
3
0.100
2.000
NA
150
150

Hycroft Mine
Page 88
Technical Report Summary of Initial Assessment on the Hycroft MineMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

11.9.2    Cyanide Ratio
About 72% of the assay database for fire Au was also assayed for cyanide soluble Au. The cyanide soluble assay is a direct indication of the cyanide amenability of the mineralized material to Au and Ag recovery by cyanidation. Much of the upper portion of the deposit received cyanide soluble assays for Au and Ag.
The Au cyanide assays are the most consistent set of data to estimate the cyanide recovery of the ore. Cnratau was used to indicate cyanide amenability and oxidation. The ratio, where it is available, can be interpolated as an indication of oxidation that has occurred in the rock mass.
The domains selected for Au, Ag, and mercury mineralization reflect the original hydrothermal mineralization. The cyanide ratio however reflects the oxidation process as a secondary impact.
A review of cross-sections of the cyanide ratio data indicated two populations of Cnratau:
    A generally horizontal band near topography reflecting surface water and oxidation that looks like a conventional oxidation blanket.
    Isolated values at depth that likely reflect oxidation downward along structure with limited later extent.
To estimate Cnratau, a boundary was developed between the upper oxide blanket and the lower structural controlled oxidation. This was completed by visual analysis of Cnratau cross-sections.
The boundary surface was defined as a horizontal plane on the 4000 elevation from the east edge of the model to the 19,000 east line. From there the surface trends upward to the 4400 elevation at the 21,000 east line. From 21,000 east to the east edge of the model the 4400 elevation is applied. Blocks above the surface were coded with a value of 1 in a variable called “Contrat.” Blocks below the surface were coded with a Contrat value of 2.
Table 11-8 summarizes the parameters used to estimate the Cnratau within each block. Once the ratio was assigned, block values of cyanide soluble Au could be calculated where required. Composite requirements: max =10, min =1, max per hole =3.
Table 11-8:    Estimation Parameters for Cyanide Ratio
Cn Ratio
Domain
“Contrat”
Structure Block CodeDescriptionStatistics Summary for 40 ft Composites
VariableOrientation, DegreesSearch Radii, Ft.Method Inv Dist
Dip DirPlungeRotationPrimSecondPerp.
1AllNear Surface Oxidation, East of Central FaultCnratau000700700503
2104, 105, 201, 202, 205, 207, 501Structural Oxidation, East of Central FaultCnratau285-400150150503
310, 101, 102, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206Structural Oxidation, West of Central FaultCnratau270-900150150503
11.9.3    Sulfide Sulfur
Sulfide sulfur was estimated to provide an improved localized cost for concentrate processing. The cost of concentrate processing is dependent on the amount of sulfide sulfur in the mill feed. Most of the sulfide sulfur is in the form of pyrite. Pyrite exists everywhere throughout the deposit, including in the oxidized portion. In particular, the acid leach alteration
Hycroft Mine
Page 89
Technical Report Summary of Initial Assessment on the Hycroft MineMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

type also contains native sulfur which also reports to the LECO assay method for sulfide sulfur. The acid leach alteration was broken out separately for estimation and is not planned for flotation processing.
The presence of sulfide sulfur is not impacted by the oxidation state or rock type. Population tests indicate that the only independent population is the acid leach alteration. The dip orientation for the estimation parameters were however adjusted based on structure.
The sulfide sulfur LECO data was performed on selected drillholes. Physical composites 25 ft long were assembled for submittal to LECO analysis by Hycroft. Once a hole was selected, the 25 ft downhole composites were continuous for the length of the hole. These composites were used for input for block estimation without further compositing. Additional 25ft composites from the recent 5ft LECO assays were combined with the original historical LECO composite data.
Table 11-9 summarizes the estimation parameters used to assign sulfide sulfur to the model blocks.
Table 11-9:    Sulfide Sulfur Estimation Parameters
Alteration Type
“hyc_alt”
Structure Block CodeDescriptionStatistics Summary for 40 ft Composites
VariableOrientation, DegreesSearch Radii, FtMethod Inv DistHG
Search Limit
Dip DirPlungeRotationPrimSecondPerp.
501AllAcid Leach AlterationSulfd000650650200310% 40ft
All but 501104, 105, 201, 202, 205, 207, 501Lith and laceration East of Central FaultSulfd285-400650650200310% 40ft
All but 50110, 101, 102, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206Lith and Laceration West of Central FaultSulfd000650650200310% 40ft
Due to the low number of sulfide sulfur composites, default values were assigned based on alteration type to those blocks without estimated sulfide sulfur. Sulfide sulfur is an input to project cost so leaving blocks unestimated would underestimate project costs.
The default values were assigned as follows in Table 11-10. Default values were assigned to blocks that were estimated for Au or Ag and did not receive a sulfide sulfur value from the estimation process noted on Table 11-10.
Table 11-10:    Sulfide Sulfur Default Values if Not Estimated
Alteration Type “hyc_alt”DescriptionDefault Sulfide Sulfur %
501Acid Leach1.8972
502Argillic1.6092
503Silicic1.8762
504Propylitic1.6090
0 or 505Unassigned1.7477
Hycroft Mine
Page 90
Technical Report Summary of Initial Assessment on the Hycroft MineMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

Defaults used if Blocks are Not Estimated
Defaults Assigned if Au or Ag >0
11.9.4    Density
Bulk density was assigned to in-situ rock based on density data collected by Hycroft and their predecessors. Average density values were set based on alteration type within the hard or in-situ units. The exception was the ALS rock type which was assigned a single value not impacted by alteration.
Alluvium, back fill, and stockpiles were guided by the few test values available but were generally based on the density values assigned to an earlier block model completed in 2019. There is a slight increase in the density of sulfide stockpiles compared to general back fill or dump stockpiles.
Table 11-11 summarizes the densities assigned to the model.
Table 11-11:    Density Assigned to the Block Model
Alteration Type “hyp_alt”Lithology Code “hyc_geol”DescriptionSpecific GravityLbs/Cu ftKtons per Model Block
501AllAcid Leach2.2654141.364.524
502AllArgillic2.2094137.874.412
503AllSilicic2.5055156.345.033
504AllPropylitic2.3193144.724.631
2Alluvium1.7808111.123.556
7Auld Lang Syne2.6520165.485.296
Stockpile “stkptyp”Specific GravityLbs/Cu ftKtons per Block
802 80108 80109 80110 80100, NW+Gen Fill Sulfide Stkps 80101 80102 80103 80104 + 80105 80106 80107, Central+Brim Stkps 80120, Crofoot Leach Pad1.6026100.003.2000
1.7049106.393.4040
2.0000124.803.9936
11.9.5    Stockpile Grade Estimation
The Hycroft pits have incurred both backfilling and in-pit stockpiling. In particular, potential sulfide mill feed that has been incurred during the mining of oxide heap leach ores have been stockpiled. That material is potential future mill feed to a sulfide processing facility.
Hycroft provided interpreted solids based on survey of many of the stockpiles. Where possible they provided the average tonnage and grade of each stockpile based on their mineralized material control information when the material was mined. In addition, there were a number of additional in-pit fill areas that were modeled within a previous 2019 model. Most of those were in the north area of the project in the old Bay pit.
IMC utilized the Hycroft solids to code model blocks as stockpile or fill. Where the 2019 model had additional backfill codes, IMC utilized those codes in an effort to account for all in-pit materials. In addition, the Crofoot leach pad is located west of the Central Pit area. That material has been coded in order to prevent assignment of grade from original in-situ assay samples.
Some of the stockpiles at Hycroft have been drilled by Sonic drilling and sampling methods. The grade of those stockpiles that contained sonic drilling was assigned with the sonic assays. Where there were no sonic assays in a
Hycroft Mine
Page 91
Technical Report Summary of Initial Assessment on the Hycroft MineMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

stockpile block, the historical production control grades provided by Hycroft were assigned to the stockpile blocks. Densities were assigned as summarized in the previous sub-section.
Blocks were assigned stockpile codes as summarized on Table 11-12.
Table 11-12:    Stockpile Grade Estimation of Assignments
Stockpile CodesLocationVariables Estimated
Au, Ag, Sulfide Sulfur, CnAu/FaAu Ratio
80100Brim Pit
80101Brim PitSearch DistancesEstimation Method
80102Crusher StockpileNorth ftEast ftVert ft
80104Central Pit6006002001/D1
80120Crofoot Pad
Stockpile Grades Assigned by Hycroft Production History
Stockpile CodesLocationAu
oz/ton
Ag
oz/ton
Sulfide Sulfur
%
CnAu/FaAu Ratio
80103Central Pit0.01310.23081.890.25
80105Central Pit0.01480.65142.510.20
802General Fill0.00000.00000.000.00
80108NW Area0.00000.00000.000.00
80109NW Area0.00000.00000.000.00
80110NW Area0.00000.00000.000.00
The Crofoot leach pad (code 80120) was assigned a confidence class of inferred. All other stockpiles with grade were assigned a confidence class for indicated.
11.9.6    Treatment of 1982 – 1987 Data
The observed high bias with the 1982 – 1987 data was discussed and illustrated in Section 9. The areas that were sampled with that drill data did contain mineralization because roughly half of the 1982-1987 data was actually mined out. To fairly and conservatively represent that mineralization, the 1982-1987 drill data was included using the following steps.
1)    The procedures described in the previous sub-sections and in Section 11.10 regarding classification were first completed using the drill hole composites that had excluded the 1982 to 1987 drill data.
2)    Once completed, the block gold grades and the block class codes were stored in separate variables.
3)    The 1982-1987 composite data was corrected for high bias by multiplying each composite by a factor of 0.56, based on the nearest neighbor comparison to post-2005 data described in Section 9.0.
4)    The gold estimation procedure was repeated using the identical parameters as described in the previous sub-sections and in item 1.0 above.
5)    Any additional blocks that were estimated in pass 2 were added to the gold grade and coded as “inferred.”
The procedure outlined above did not change the gold block grade of the blocks estimated in pass 1 without the 1982-1987 data. It was not necessary to update the silver because there were no silver assays within the 1982-1987 data. Sulfide sulfur defaults were updated to cover the 1982 to 1987 supported inferred blocks.
Hycroft Mine
Page 92
Technical Report Summary of Initial Assessment on the Hycroft MineMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_52.jpg

11.10    Classification
Individual blocks in the model were assigned classification codes as defined within S-K 1300. As noted earlier, the stockpiles were assigned classification codes of 2 for Indicated class and the Crofoot stockpile was assigned a code of 3 for inferred.
The in-situ rock values were assigned classification codes based on the inverse distance estimation of Au. During that estimation process, the number of composites that were used to estimate the block was stored along with the distance between the block and the closest composite. Those two parameters were used to assign classification code in the following manner to blocks estimated without the 1982-1987 data.
If closest distance <= 125 ft and number of composites = 10,    Class=1 Measured
    Else if
If closest distance <=225 ft and number of composites >=4,    Class=2 Indicated
Otherwise
Remaining Blocks                        Class=3, Inferred
The process was actually completed in reverse order to that summarized above so that indicated overprinted inferred and both were overprinted by measured where required.
After the above coding was complete, the additional blocks that resulted from inclusion of the bias corrected 1982-1987 data were coded as inferred.
11.11    Model Verification
The block model was verified by several methods before being used to determine mineral resources.
    Detailed Visual Checks of Drilling versus Block Estimates;
    Swath Plots;
    IMC Smear Check;
    A brief review of production reconciliation
The visual check of the block model was one of the most useful and informative processes that was used to confirm the practicality of the block model. IMC completed visual checks on plan and section for all of the estimated variables in the model. In addition to IMC visual checks, the Hycroft engineering and geology team on site also reviewed the model and helped IMC identify and correct coding issues prior to finalizing the block model.
11.11.1    Swath Plots
Swath plots are a practice now common among resource modelers to provide a visual indication if the block model follows the grade trends indicated by the supporting data and if there is any observable local bias in the block grade estimation.
Figure 11-7 illustrates the average grades of contained composites and block model grades for horizontal slices through the block model for Au and Ag. The Ag model has smoothed out the composite grade distribution and indicates a model low bias of Ag. This is due to the number of trace value Ag composites and the under sampling of fire silver relative to fire gold. The 1982-1987 data was not included in the drill composites for the gold swath plots.
Figure 11-8 illustrates the composite and block grade comparison for vertical slices in the east–west orientation. The smoothing issue of Ag is also present on the vertical sections.
In both plots, only in-situ block grades are being compared to non-sonic drill composites. Stockpiles have been removed from the swath plots.

Hycroft Mine
Page 93
Technical Report Summary of Initial Assessment on the Hycroft MineMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 11-7:    Horizontal Swath Plots for Gold and Silver
image_53a.jpgimage_54a.jpg
image_55a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by IMC, 2022.
Hycroft Mine
Page 94
Technical Report Summary of Initial Assessment on the Hycroft MineMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Figure 11-8:    Vertical Swath Plots for Gold and Silver
image_56a.jpg
image_57a.jpg
Source: Figure prepared by IMC, 2022.
Hycroft Mine
Page 95
Technical Report Summary of Initial Assessment on the Hycroft MineMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

11.11.2    Smear Check
IMC used a simple test to understand the amount of grade smoothing within the block model and to confirm that the model grades are not high biased. The proprietary test is referred to as the “smear check” within IMC.
The procedure is as follows:
    A range of cutoff grades are selected for the check process. Typically, they bracket the potential planning cutoff grades.
    For each cutoff grade being tested, the blocks above cutoff are identified.
    All composites contained within those blocks are identified.
    The average grade of the composites and blocks are tabulated.
    The percentage of the contained composites less than cutoff are calculated.
Table 11-13 summarizes the results for both Au and Ag in-situ rock. Stockpiles and sonic drillholes have been removed from this analysis.
Table 11-13:    IMC Smear Check, Below End 2021 Topography, Without stockpile blocks or drilling, and without data from 1982 through 1987 Drilling.
Au Composites vs Model Au 1/D3
Cutoff Grade% Comps Less than CutoffNumber of Comps In ShapeComposite Grade oz/tonNumber of Blocks in ShapeModel Grade oz/ton
0.00210.2723,9450.009623,9590.008
0.00310.5021.4550.009538,1230.008
0.00412.3619,3920.010447,2080.009
0.00514.5417,4490.011422,0710.010
0.00616.4815,3950.011367,7370.011
0.00718.3013,4390.012315,0790.011
0.00819.1011,4260.013263,2450.012
0.00919.319,5800.014217,3410.013
0.01020.398,0150.015176,9060.014
Ag Composites vs Model Ag 1/D3
Cutoff Grade% Comps Less than CutoffNumber of Comps In ShapeComposite Grade oz/tonNumber of Blocks in ShapeModel Grade oz/ton
0.10012.8712,1160.409364,3050.330
0.20016.436,8840.609184,3150.513
0.30018.704,1550.851103,7680.723
0.40019.172,8791.07569,2870.912
0.50019.322,1481.28949,1101.104
0.60019.491,6981.48937,0871.285
0.70019.021,3931.68129,2831.455
0.80018.731,1801.84823,5321.628
0.90019.789912.04019,3691.796
1.00020.548572.20716,2361.960
Hycroft Property
Page 96
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

The test results are positive. In all cases the model grade is properly less than the grade of the contained composites because the model block grade estimation utilized composite data that was located outside of the shape being tested. If the model grade were higher than the grade of the contained composites, there would be indication of high bias within the model.
The percentage of composites less than the tested cutoff is reasonable in the range of applicable cutoff grades. Percentages in the range of 15% are typical for well zoned deposits. The higher percentage levels in the high-grade ranges are typical of the smoothing process that result with any grade estimator.
11.11.3    Reconciliation
Reconciliation of the block model against production is of limited value at Hycroft due to the lack of detailed data regarding long term production history. Due to the multiple owners over the years, much of the historical information that would be necessary for a rigorous production reconciliation is not available.
The current ownership operated the heap leach facility from 2019 through mid-2021. Most of the leach pad loading during 2019 was from existing stockpiles which would not provide validation information for the in-situ block model. From 2020 through 2021, there are 19 months of heap leach production data that is available for reconciliation. That tonnage amounts to about 65% of one year at the contemplated sulfide production rate. That 19 months of production was a mix of oxide to the pad and stockpiling of sulfides encountered in the mining process. That volume of material would provide a general indication of model response but is not of sufficient volume to provide a definitive verification of the model.
The previous Technical Report Summary (February 2022) completed a model estimate of production history. At that time, the model matched production tonnage within 4% and was roughly 30% low in grade. The block model described in this text would produce nearly identical tonnage estimates as that in February of 2022 but would show somewhat higher grades of gold and lower grades of silver based on the changes and corrections applied to the database as discussed earlier in this report.
11.12    Mineral Resources
The mineral resource at the Hycroft property is currently envisioned to be produced from a conventional hard rock open pit mine feeding two alternative process facilities.
    Run of Mine (ROM) cyanide heap leaching, producing a gold and silver doré or
    Flotation milling followed by pressure oxidation (Pox) of the concentrate to make a gold and silver doré.
The terms of reference for this estimate of mineral resources are mineralization in-place. The procedures described in the following paragraphs establish that the stated mineral resources have reasonable prospects of economic extraction.
Mineral resources were developed using the block model and pit optimization software to determine the mineralization with reasonable expectation of economic extraction as defined by S-K 1300. That software compares the cost of production versus the benefit or metal sales to develop an estimated open pit geometry. The pit walls of the resulting pit are at breakeven economics where costs equal benefits.
The cutoff grade that is reported for this statement of mineral resources is based on the estimated costs on Table 11-4 and the metal prices. The internal or marginal cutoff is applied and reported where the benefits of selling the recovered metal will pay for the processing and fixed general and administrative costs.
Table 11-14 summarizes the economic parameters that were used to define the optimized pit that defined the Mineral Resource. The process operating costs were developed by Ausenco during 2022 based on process testing and cost estimation work available at that time. Mine operating cost estimates were developed by IMC based on preliminary mine planning and cost estimation during early 2022.
It should be noted that the processing cost for each block that is considered for flotation and Pox processing changes based on the sulfide sulfur content of the block. As a result, the cutoff grade is presented in terms of income, net of processing: Income – All processing costs. A marginal or internal cutoff grade is consequently $0.01/ton. In order to provide an illustration of the cutoff in terms of equivalent gold, a range of equivalent gold cutoffs are shown.
Metal prices for Mineral Resource were US$1,900/oz Au and US$24.50/oz Ag. Spot prices for gold and silver in 2022 ranged from US$1,628 to $2,039/oz Au and US$17.77 to US$26.18/oz Ag respectively. The prices selected for determination of mineral resources are an approximation of current metal prices and do not include extensive price extrapolation. Table 11-15 summarizes the mineral resource.
Hycroft Property
Page 97
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

The risks to the Mineral Resource are project costs and project recoveries, as well as metal prices that can have a substantial impact on the Mineral Resource both positively and negatively. Hycroft mineral resources are sensitive to engineered and estimated parameters of operating costs, recovery, and metal price. That sensitivity may result in future variation in the mineral resource as costs and recoveries are refined.
Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and detailed economic considerations have not been applied. Modifying factors for mine and process design have not been applied.
Table 11-15 represents the total amount of material in the ground that meets the requirements for Mineral Resource. Table 11-16 presents the identical mineral resource information converted directly to metric units.
The categories of measured, indicated, and inferred reflect different drill densities as noted in Section 11.10. Uncertainties in the drill database have been minimized by the following two treatment components of the database:
1)    The 1982 through 1987 drilling and assay data, which appears biased, has been corrected for bias and incorporated only in the estimation of inferred mineral resources.
2)    The cyanide soluble silver assays which measure cyanide amenable silver content have not been used in the mineral resource estimate.
The qualified person holds the opinion that all relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the project of economic extraction could be resolved with further work and that this statement of mineral resources meets the requirements to show reasonable expectation of economic extraction.

Hycroft Property
Page 98
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Table 11-14:    Economic Parameters for Mineral Resourcesimage_60a.jpg
Hycroft Property
Page 99
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Mining Cost, Base$1.45/ton material moved
+Bench Incremental Cost Below 4660$0.016/ton per bench of depth
Categorization of Oxidation Type Based on the AuCN/AuFA Ratio = Cnratau
Oxide ≥0.7
Transition between 0.3 and 0.7
   
Sulfide ≤0.3
Process Cost
Process Cost, Partial$8.61/ton of feed to float plant
Labor$0.88/ton of feed to float plant
Maintenance$0.66/ton of feed to float plant
Total Mill Cost for Sulfide and Transition$10.15/ton of feed to float plant
ROM Leach for Oxide$2.75/ton of feed to ROM Leach
ROM Leach for Sulfide and Transition$3.15/ton of feed to ROM Leach
Mine Site G&A$0.44/ton feed, at 57,100 tpd
Process Recoveries
Flotation Recovery
    Mill+ConcPOX
Gold80.0%of AuFA
Silver80.0%of AgFA
Sulfide80.5%of (sulfd%)
Mass Pull14.0%
Concentrate Leach Recovery95.0%
Overall Recovery, Mill + Con AAO76%of Mill+Conc POX
ROM leach RecoveryOxideTransitionSulfide
Gold75.0%75.0%75.0%Of (AuCN)
Silver12.2%12.2%12.2%Of (AuCN)
Flotation Concentrate Treatment Costs
Mill + ConcPOX
    Mill+ConcPOX
Sulfide Grade for Illustration1.80%
Sulfide Dependent Consumables$4.24=2.3564 x sulfide sulfur
AuAg
Con Solution Recovery and Payable98.0%98.0%
Leach Process Payable

99.9%98.0%
Total Process, at Average Sulfide Sulfur
    Mill+ConcPOX
Mill + Conc POX + G&A$14.83/ton ore flotation
ROM Leach Cost +G&A (Oxide Only)$3.19/ton of ore to ROM Leach
ROM Leach Cost+G&A (Transition+Sulfide)$3.59/ton of ore to ROM Leach
Dore Transport and Refining Cost
Gold$5.00/oz
Silver$0.50/oz
Metal Price AssumptionsInternal Cutoff, Gold Equivalent, oz/ton
Gold $/ozSilver $/ozMill+ConcPOXROM Heap Leach
$1,900$24.500.0105$0.0023 oz/ton (AuCN)
Gold Equivalent. Equation, MillAu+0.0127 x Ag
Gold Equivalent ROM LeachAuCN+0.0020 x Ag
Hycroft Property
Page 100
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg



Hycroft Property
Page 101
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Table 11-15:    Hycroft Mineral Resources as of March 2023, Imperial Units
ClassificationApproximate
Cutoff, AuEq
Au oz/ton
KtonsAu
oz/ton
Ag
oz/ton
Sulfide
Sulfur%
Au Contained Ounces (000)Ag Contained Ounces (000)
Heap Leach Resource
Measured
0.00294,1620.0080.172.1475315,725
Indicated
0.00259,7510.0070.131.784367,529
Meas + Ind
0.002153,9130.0080.152.001,18923,254
Inferred
0.00246,1180.0070.141.623376,549
Mill, Flotation + Concentrate by POX and Cyanide Leach Process
Measured0.010402,7350.0130.501.785,236200,965
Indicated0.010346,3080.0120.391.584,156136,445
Meas + Ind0.010749,0430.0130.451.699,391337,410
Inferred0.010249,4940.0120.361.523,01989,568
Combined Mineral Resources Leach Plus Process Plant
Measured0.002 - 0.010496,8970.0120.441.855,989216,690
Indicated0.002 - 0.010406,0590.0110.351.614,592143,974
Meas + Ind0.002 - 0.010902,9560.0120.401.7410,581360,664
Inferred0.002 - 0.010295,6120.0110.331.543,35696,117
Total material in the Pit (Ktons) =3,631,287
Notes:
Mineral resources based on metal prices of $1,900/troy oz Au and $24.50/troy oz Ag
Cutoffs are income – process cost = NPR = NSR – Process Opex
Numbers may not match exactly due to rounding.
Mineral resources are contained within a computer-generated optimized pit. Total material in that pit is approximately 3.63 billion tons
All units are imperial. Ktons means 1,000 short tons of 2,000 lbs. Au and Ag grades are in troy ounces/short ton.
Hycroft Property
Page 102
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Table 11-16:    Hycroft Mineral Resources as of March 2023, Metric Units
Classification
Approximate
Cutoff, AuEq
Au (g/ton)
KtonnesAu
g/tonne
Ag
g/tonne
Sulfide
Sulfur %
Au Contained
Ounces (000) 
Ag Contained Ounces (000)
Heap Leach Resource
Measured0.0785,4240.2745.722.1475315,725
Indicated0.0754,2060.2504.321.784367,529
Meas + Ind0.07139,6300.2655.172.001,18923,254
Inferred0.0741,8380.2504.861.623376,549
Flotation Mill + Concentrate by POX and Cyanide Leach Process Plant
Measured0.34365,3610.44517.091.785,236200,965
Indicated0.34314,1710.41113.491.584,156136,445
Meas + Ind0.34679,5320.42915.431.699,391337,410
Inferred0.34226,3410.41412.291.523,01989,568
Combined Mineral Resources Leach Plus Process Plant
Measured0.07 – 0.34450,7850.41314.931.855,989216,690
Indicated0.07 – 0.34368,3770.38712.141.614,592143,974
Meas + Ind0.07 – 0.34819,1620.40113.681.7410,581360,664
Inferred0.07 – 0.34268,1790.38911.141.543,35696,117
Total Material in the Pit, Ktonnes =3,294,304
Notes:
Mineral resources based on metal prices of $1,900/troy oz Au and $24.50/troy oz Ag
Cutoffs are income – process cost = NPR = NSR – Process Opex
Numbers may not match exactly due to rounding.
Mineral resources are contained within a computer-generated optimized pit. Total material in that pit is approximately 3.29 billion tonnes.
All units are metric, Ktonnes means 1,000 metric tons, Au and Ag grades are in grams / metric tonne.
Hycroft Property
Page 103
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

12    MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE
This section is not relevant to the TRS.
Hycroft Property
Page 104
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

13    MINING METHODS
This section is not relevant to the TRS.

Hycroft Property
Page 105
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

14    PROCESSING AND RECOVERY METHODS
This section is not relevant to the TRS.

Hycroft Property
Page 106
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

15    INFRASTRUCTURE
This section is not relevant to the TRS.
Hycroft Property
Page 107
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

16    MARKET STUDIES
This section is not relevant to the TRS.

Hycroft Property
Page 108
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

17    ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, AND PLANS, NEGOTIATIONS, OR AGREEMENTS WITH LOCAL INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS
This section is not relevant to the TRS.

Hycroft Property
Page 109
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

18    CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS
This section is not relevant to the TRS.

Hycroft Property
Page 110
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

19    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
This section is not relevant to the TRS.

Hycroft Property
Page 111
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

20    ADJACENT PROPERTIES
The Rosebud mine is located about 4.7 miles south south-east of the Hycroft mine (Figure 20-1) Rosebud was operated as an underground stope mine between 1997 and 2000 by a joint venture between Hecla and Newmont. Much of the following information is available online at mindat.org.
Figure 20-1:    Location of Rosebud Property
imagea.jpg
Source: Hycroft, 2023
Hycroft Property
Page 112
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

The deposit is part of a large, low-sulfidation hydrothermal system extending throughout most of the Kamma Mountains. Specifically, the deposit is a low-temperature epithermal, quartz-sericite, gold and silver deposit within Miocene andesitic and rhyolitic volcanics and volcaniclastics. The volcanics unconformably overlie a Jurassic/Triassic metasediment basement, which also hosts precious metal mineralization.
Main structural elements include the east-west trending South Ridge Fault and the northeast trending Rosebud Shear, which displays up to 2,000 feet of left-lateral displacement and about 400 feet of normal displacement. The South Ridge Fault is a mineralized listric normal fault which acted as a conduit for mineralizing fluids.
The mining method was overhand cut and fill with access via a decline. Equipment was rubber-tired, including drill jumbos, rock bolters, 3.5-yard loaders, and 20-ton haul trucks. Typical ore panels were 14 feet high, 18 feet wide and about 80 feet long. These were backfilled with cemented materials batched at the surface and hauled underground.
Ore was direct shipped to the Carlin district for processing.
The property is currently held by Rosebud Exploration, LLC. a private entity.
The QP has been unable to verify the information in this section and the information is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization on the property that is the subject of the technical report summary.

Hycroft Property
Page 113
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

21    OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION
This section is not relevant to the TRS.

Hycroft Property
Page 114
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

22    INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
22.1    Introduction
The purpose of this initial assessment is to disclose the latest update of mineral resource estimate as it is Hycroft’s intent to further develop their sulfide mineral resource.
22.2    Geology and Mineralization
The Hycroft Mine is located on the western flank of the Kamma Mountains in the Basin and Range physiographic province of northwestern Nevada. The Kamma Mountain Range formed during Miocene to Quaternary Epoch from the uplift of Jurassic basement rock and emplacement of Tertiary volcanic and sedimentary rocks. The stratigraphy along the western flank of the range is down-dropped to the west, along a series of north to northeast striking normal faults. These faults served as conduits of hydrothermal fluids that deposited the Hycroft mineralization.
The Hycroft deposit is a low-sulfidation, epithermal, hot springs system that contains gold and silver mineralization formed approximately 4.0 million years ago (Ebert, 1996) when hydrothermal fluids were fed upward along high angle, normal faults. Low-grade Au and Ag mineralization was co-deposited with silica and potassium feldspar throughout porous rock types. A subsequent drop in permeability, due to sealing of the system, led to over pressuring and subsequent repeated hydrothermal brecciation. Additional precious metal mineralization was deposited during this event as breccia zones, veins, and sulfide flooding. Au and Ag mineralization was followed approximately 0.4 to 2.0 million years ago by an intense event of high sulfidation acid leaching of the mineralized volcanic rocks coincident with a drop in the regional water table which allowed steam heated sulfur gases to condense into sulfuric acid and leach the upper portion of the mineralized rocks.
Younger rocks at the mine are Tertiary conglomerate, siltstone, and fanglomerate of the Sulphur Group (locally termed “Camel Conglomerate”). These rocks are comprised of sediment eroded from the underlying Kamma Volcanics and Jurassic ALS Formation. The Sulphur Group is divided into three main units: a clast-supported coarse conglomerate, a matrix-supported conglomerate, and an underlying tuffaceous lake sediment. This unit outcrops throughout the mine site with increasing thickness to the west. Oxidation of sulfide mineralization occurs to variable depths over the entire deposit, depending upon proximity to faults, extent of acid leaching, and depth to water table. Sulfide content through the deposit is variable, ranging from 0% to 20%.
The deposit is typically broken into six major zones based on geology, mineralization, and alteration. These include Brimstone, Vortex, Central, Bay, Boneyard, and Camel Hill. The boundaries are typically the major faults, namely Break, East and Ramp.
22.3    History
Mining in the Sulfur District, where the Mine is located, began in the late 1800s for native sulfur, then for high-grade Ag. Mining for Au and Ag officially began as a small heap leach operation in 1983 at the Lewis Mine followed by mining at the Crofoot Mine. Hycroft gained control of the property and drilled 3,212 exploration holes, totaling 965,552 ft, between 1985 and 1999 with the bulk of this drilling focused on oxide Au mineralization at Central, Bay and Brimstone.
During 1983 to 1998, the Mine produced approximately 1.2 Moz of Au and 2.5Moz of Ag from its heap leach operation of oxide ore, with little to no focus on the sulfide mineralized materials. An additional 58,700 oz of Au was produced from the leaching operations from 1999 through 2004. In September 2007, Hycroft initiated the construction of a 21,000 gpm North Merrill-Crowe processing plant, a three-stage crushing facility, and the expansion of the North Heap Leach pad. In April 2019, active mining began with a focus on transition and sulfide mineralized materials, however only heap leach of oxide ore was processed during this time with production of Au and Ag continuing through until 2021. To date, the Mine’s heap leach operations from 2007 through 2021 have totaled approximately 1M oz of Au and over 5.0 M oz of Ag and processing of sulfide mineralized materials is still under development.
22.4    Exploration and Drilling
For this study, IMC developed the Hycroft exploration model which includes data from 1981 to 2018 and includes 5,601 holes, representing 2,588,826 ft of drilling. At this time, there are 5,323 drillholes in the resource model area of which 188 have been drilled to define stockpiles or leach pad. In addition to drilling, Hycroft has conducted additional geophysical surveys, soil and rock chip sampling programs, field mapping, historical data compilation, and regional
Hycroft Property
Page 115
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

reconnaissance at the Mine site. Further work in 2022 included a hyperspectral imaging flyover. Both LWIR and SWIR imaging was collected with the intent of helping identify key minerals on the surface to focus reconnaissance mapping and soils programs. These efforts were designed to improve the understanding of the known mineralization, as well as provide data for further exploration of the greater property position.
The drilling data at Hycroft pre-2000 has no historical quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) information to support it. The post-2005 drilling data (no drilling in 2000 to 2004) has QA/QC information that is sufficient but not best practice. Hycroft has a history where Au fire assays collected prior to 2000 were factored upward in order to better correlate with blast hole assay results pre-2000. That factor process has been removed from the database for application to this mineral resource. With this correction, IMC has accepted the database for determination of the Mine’s mineral resources.
22.5    Metallurgical Testing
Previous Hycroft metallurgical test programs conducted on the Hycroft deposit consisted of a series of comminution, flotation, concentrate oxidation, and cyanide leaching tests on mineralized materials, flotation tailing, and oxidized sulfide concentrate. Samples for metallurgical testwork were mostly derived from drilled core samples selected to represent the mineral deposit and taken from the five main mineralization domains.
Comminution testwork demonstrate the Hycroft rock mineralization exhibits very high rock competency both in the SAG and ball mills with an 80th percentile for JKSimMet Axb parameters and Bond ball millwork indices around 20 kWh/t.
Initial flotation testwork including bench-scale and pilot plant tests were performed by SGS in March of 2009 and continued at several other laboratories until April 2014. The flotation testwork can be summarized as follows:
    The general trend indicated that flotation could achieve better recoveries with particle size (P80) ranging from 100 to 150 microns, but tended to decrease with grinds finer than 100 microns or coarser than 150 microns;
    Tests with NaHS did not improve recoveries;
    Flotation tests performed at neutral pH, in general, outperformed tests conducted at alkaline pH;
    Strong non-selective sulfide collectors, particularly PAX at 0.21 to 0.55 lb/ton showed better recoveries;
    Several tests indicate Cytec’s AEROPHINE 3418A Promoter (sodium diisobutyldithiophosphinate) may improve Au and Ag recovery;
    Variability flotation tests conducted by G&T [G&T Metallurgical Services, 2011] yielded an average mass pull of 13.8%; and
    The same set of tests indicated a flotation time of 19 minutes for gold and 17 minutes for silver to achieve target recoveries.
Oxidation testwork on Hycroft concentrates from the aforementioned flotation testwork included POX, roasting, ambient pressure alkaline oxidation and other oxidation methods including chlorination, fine grinding with intense cyanidation, and the Albion process. The following is a summary of the results of the predominant testwork studies conducted:
    Results from acid POX testwork on rougher concentrate showed percent Au and Ag recoveries in the mid-90s and 80s, respectively under the following autoclave operating conditions: temperatures between 374°F to 437°F; 100 psi oxygen overpressure; and 60minutes residence time provided the POX discharge material was lime boiled prior to cyanide leaching. Test work from alkaline POX was limited in scope to 10 total samples and showed similar percent recoveries for gold but silver recoveries were lower in the 65 to 70 % range.
    Roaster testwork was conducted on the Brimstone concentrate from a pilot plant to determine optimum conditions for processing. The results indicate that optimum roast temperatures are between 797°F and 842°F. During the tests, average recoveries of 89% Au and 74% Ag were achievable by varying the leach and roast conditions slightly for the majority of the concentrate produced.
    Early batch testwork results were positive and indicated that Hycroft concentrates were amenable to oxidation under atmospheric conditions, using trona to create the appropriate alkaline environment to promote oxidation. Continuous pilot plant testing on Hycroft’s three main domains conducted by Hazen confirmed the findings of the batch tests. Pilot plant tests were run using 600 lb of trona per ton of concentrate, at 167°F, 25-micron grind size, 20% solids and 48 hours total residence time. Different material types oxidized at varying rates, with Vortex materials oxidizing the fastest followed by Central and then Brimstone. The Master Composite oxidation rate was comparable to Brimstone. At 60% sulfide oxidation, 85% Au and 80-84% Ag recoveries were achievable by atmospheric oxidation for all material types tested.
Hycroft Property
Page 116
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

    In 2016, the viability of the AAO process using trona was demonstrated in a 10-ton-per-day integrated pilot plant at the mine site. This plant included primary grinding of 3/8-inch material, followed by flotation, atmospheric oxidation, cyanide leaching, CCD, and precipitation. The results of the on-site demonstration plant were highly variable. Gold recoveries peaked at 80% and silver recoveries were high at 90% for the Brimstone materials tested, but these recoveries were not consistent over time.
22.6    Mineral Resources
Mineral resources were developed based on a conventional computer-based block model of the deposit and the application of open pit optimization software to determine the mineralization with reasonable expectation of economic extraction.
Each block was evaluated to determine which process provides the best net return after operating cost. The two processes identified were:
    ROM cyanide heap leaching of oxide ore; and
    Milling, Flotation, POX followed by Cyanide Leach and Merrill-Crowe.
Mineral resources were based on metal prices of $1,900/troy oz Au and $24.50/troy oz Ag. Mineral resources were contained within a computer-generated optimized pit. Total material in that pit is 3.63 billion tons.
22.7    Risks
22.7.1    Mineral Resource Estimate
The risks to the Mineral Resource are project costs and project recoveries as well as metal prices that can have a substantial impact both positive and negative.
22.7.2    Mineral Processing
Hycroft has been operating the run-of-mine heap leach facility, to produce gold and silver since 2008. The cumulative performance statistics and metallurgical test data gathered are extensive and strongly support the current heap leach recovery assumptions for oxide mineralized materials. 
The process method for processing sulfide mineralized materials by using flotation followed by an oxidative treatment of the concentrates showed that the process method worked well from previous test work.  
The process operating cost assumed for this report has some risks that could impact economics and these need to be managed and mitigated by additional studies.  
The process plant reagent unit costs can change quite quickly depending on various factors which result in the higher or lower process operating cost estimate. 
The reagent unit price change is in response to increases in raw material and energy costs that are being driven by the continued inflationary environment in many industries, particularly commodity materials.

Hycroft Property
Page 117
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

23    RECOMMENDATIONS
23.1    Introduction
The QPs preparing this report recommend Hycroft proceed with an initial assessment or pre-feasibility study which includes an economic analysis, to move the property forward toward the development of a process plant to treat sulfide mineralized materials. The budget for the recommended work program is outlined in Table 23-1.
Table 23-1:    Recommended Work Program
DescriptionCost $US
Phase 1:
Variability Study$100,000
POx Benchtop Study$50,000
TOTAL$150,000
23.2    Proposed Exploration Program
IMC recommends Hycroft update and improve the interpretation of the fault boundaries and drill target areas within the mine area that are not well-defined. IMC also recommends continued diligence in clean-up of the drilling data base as time and budgets allow.
23.3    Proposed Metallurgical Studies
The Ausenco QPs are recommend that Hycroft complete testwork focused on optimizing grind size, mass pull percentage, flotation reagent suite, POX, equipment sizing, residence times, lime/limestone and oxygen consumption. Previous metallurgical testing with rougher concentrate demonstrated that the refractory Hycroft mineralized materials were amenable to POX followed by lime boil to prevent silver jarosite formation in the autoclaves. Completion of process engineering, base line and background studies to include process facility layouts, open-pit designs and infrastructure evaluations as well as additional studies are recommended, including additional drilling to convert mineral resources to mineral reserves.
Hycroft has already initiated additional testwork on comminution flotation, POX, leaching, solids/liquid separation, and Merrill-Crowe processes of their sulfide mineralized materials. Results from these tests should allow Hycroft to:
    Complete metallurgical variability testing on a broad range of samples from a broad range of locations within the deposit, covering all significant mineralized material types and all grade ranges. In order of priority this should focus on the first five years of production (at least 100 samples), production years 6-10 (at least 50 samples), and beyond production year 10 (at least 50 samples). The variability testing will include but is not limited to the following: material characterization, comminution testing, flotation testing, and direct cyanide leach testing.
    Optimize flotation reagent suite in flotation circuit to reduce operating costs.
    Investigate POX discharge solution neutralization chemistry and limestone/lime consumption.
    Optimize mass pull percentage. The level of sulfide grade in the concentrate is suspected to have enough energy to drive reactions in an autoclave. This information is needed to understand if pre-heating is required ahead of pressure oxidation.
    Optimize cyanide addition and understand cyanide consumption in leach circuit and levels of free/WAD cyanide post leach.
Variability testwork is progressing, and work on this will continue through 2023.
Hycroft Property
Page 118
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

24    REFERENCES
Bailey, E.H, and Phoenix, D.A., 1944, QuickAg Deposits in Nevada, University of Nevada Bulletin, v.38, no.5.
Bates, W.R., 2001, A proposed Exploration Program for the Hycroft Mine, unpublished Vista Au report.
Bureau of Land Management (BLM). 2019. Hycroft Mine Phase II Expansion Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-NV-W030-2015-007. Prepared by U.S. Bureau of Land Management Winnemucca District Office Black Rock Field Office in Coordination with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region Division of Migratory Bird Management. May 2019.
California’s Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD), OSHPD Seismic Design Maps Website for Hycroft Mine, Reference: ASCE 7-16, Site Class: D, Risk Category: Visited 20 Aug 2021. I Available at: https://seismicmaps.org/.
Clark. I.C., 1918, Recently Recognized Alunite Deposits at Sulphur, Humboldt County, Nevada, Engineering and Mining Journal, v.106, no.4.
Couch, B.F and Carpenter, J. A., 1943, Nevada’s metal and mineral production (1859-1940 inclusive), Univ. Nevada Bulletin, v.37, no.4 Geology and Mining Services no.38.
Friberg, R.S., 1980, Detailed Evaluation Report of the Sulphur Au Ag prospect, Humboldt and Pershing Counties, Nevada. Unpublished Homestake Mining Company Report, 32p.
Fulton and Smith, 1932, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology File Manuscript
GISTM, 2020. Global Industry Standards on Tailings Management. Co-convened by the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI). August 2020.
Hazen Research Inc., February 2011, POX-CIL Evaluation of Hycroft Flotation Concentrates, Hazen Project 11232 Report and Appendices A-F.
Hazen Research Inc., May 2011, Evaluation of Hycroft Blend Flotation Concentrate, Hazen Project 11243-01 Report and Appendix.
Hazen Research Inc., June 2011, Evaluation of Kappes, Cassiday & Associates Flotation Concentrate, Hazen Project 11307 Report and Appendix.
Hazen Research Inc., February 2014, Atmospheric Alkaline Oxidation Pre-treatment Pilot Plant of Hycroft Flotation Concentrates, Hazen Project 11859
Hycroft Property
Page 119
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Hazen Research Inc., February 2014, Phase 2 Atmospheric Alkaline Oxidation of Hycroft Flotation Concentrate, Hazen Project 11821
Humboldt County Building Department 2018 Code Amendments. Visited 20 August 2021. Available at: https://www.humboldtcountynv.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3415/2018-Code-Admendments-Approved.
Hycroft Mining Management. April 2021. Hycroft Building a World-Class Operation. PowerPoint presentation from April 20, 2021. http://www.hycroftmining.com/wp-content/uploads/2021-Presentation-4-19-21.pdf.
Hycroft Resources and Development, Inc. (HRDI). 2017. Fact Sheet Pursuant to Hycroft Mine Project, Permit Number: NEV0094114. Renewal 2017, Fact Sheet Revision 01. https://ndep.nv.gov/uploads/documents/NEV0094114dfsFY20.pdf.
Hycroft Resources and Development, Inc. (HRDI). 2018. Hycroft Mine Amendment to Plan of Operations (NVN-064641) Phase II Expansion Project. Prepared for the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Black Rock Field Office, Winnemucca, Nevada. April 2014. Revised June 2014, Revised January 2017, Revised March 2017, and Revised June 2018.
Hynes-Griffin, M.E., and Franklin, A. G. (1984). “Rationalizing the seismic coefficient method.” Miscellaneous Paper GL-84-13, Geotechnical Laboratory, U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Ibrado, A.S., Roth, D.K., Snider, J.W., Brown, R.A., Harris, D.A., Pennstrom, W.J., Peterson, A.T. NI43-101Technical Report Mill Expansion Feasibility Study Technical Report, Winnemucca, Nevada, USA. Prepared by M3 for Allied Nevada Gold Corp., Effective date: November 03, 2014.
Jones, J.C. 1921, Report on the Property of the Ag Camel Mining and Development Company, Sulphur, Nevada. Unpublished Ag Camel Mining and Development Company Report, 6p.
Kappes, Cassidy & Associates, 2013, Hycroft Pressure Oxidation and Leach Test Work, Project No. 189 C / Report I.D. KCA0120225_HY18_02 / Mainfile No. 7665.
M3 Engineering & Technology, Newman, S., DeLong, R.F., Clarkson, B. M., Carew, T., Hartmann, M., Technical Report Summary: Heap Leaching Feasibility Study. Prepared by M3 for Hycroft, Effective date: July 31, 2019.
McLean, D.A., 1991, Geology of the Crofoot Mine; unpublished Hycroft Resources and Development Inc. Report, 11p.
MMW, 2012. Review of Seismogenic Potential of the Kamma (East) Fault and Design Ground Motions, Proposed Heap Leach Facilities, Hycroft Mine, Humboldt County, Nevada. Report prepared by Michael W. West & Associates, Inc. for Knight Piesold & Company. December 18, 2012.
Pershing County Building Commercial Building Guide, Minimum Standards for Building Plans, New Commercial Project Permit Application Checklist: For commercial structures, such as Groups: A, B, E, F, H, I, M, R, and S
Hycroft Property
Page 120
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

occupancies. Visited 16 Aug 2021. Available at: https:// www.pershingcountynv.gov/document_center /Department/Building%20Department/CommercialGuidelines-002.pdf.
Prenn, Neil, 2006, Technical Report – Vista Au Corp., Hycroft Mine, Winnemucca, Nevada, USA, 43-101 Technical Report prepared by Mine Development Associates, 142p.
SGS Minerals Services, 2009, The Recovery of Au and Ag from Hycroft Project Sulphide Samples, Allied Nevada Au Corporation – Hycroft Project – 12012-001 (Report 3).
SGS Minerals Services, 2013, An Investigation into Oxidative Pretreatment of Hycroft Flotation Concentrates, SGS Project 13224-001/003 – Final Report.
Shawn Gooch, P.E., May 2020) Hycroft Resources and Development, Inc. (HDRI) Hycroft Mine Project NEV0094114 (Renewal 2017, Fact Sheet Revision 01).
SRK Consulting Inc (SRK), 2022, Preliminary Estimate of Dewatering Requirements to Support 2021 Pre-Feasibility Study Technical Memorandum.
USGS, 2014. United States Geologic Survey - Unified Hazard Tool. Website tool. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/interactive/index.php
Vandenburg, W.O., 1938, Reconnaissance of Mining Districts in Humboldt County, Nevada; U.S. Bureau of Mines Circular 6995, 47p.
Wallace, A.B., 1980, Geology of the Sulphur District, Southwestern Humboldt County, Nevada, unpublished report for the Soc. Econ. Geol. Field Trip, 1984.
Ware, G.H., 1989, Surface Mapping, Sampling and Selected Cross-Sections, unpublished report for Hycroft Resources & Development.
Wilden R., 1964, Geology of Mineral Deposits of Humboldt County, Nevada, Nevada Bureau of Mines Bulletin 59, 154p
Wildlife Resource Consultants, LLC (WRC). 2017. Hycroft Mine 2017 Raptor Nesting Surveys and Auen Eagle Monitoring Report. Unpublished. Prepared for EM Strategies. Cedarville, California. September 20, 2017.
Wilson, S. E., 2008, Technical Report - Allied Nevada Gold Corp., Hycroft Mine, Winnemucca, Nevada, USA.
Wilson, S.E., 2011, Technical Report – Allied Nevada Gold Corp, Hycroft Mine, Hycroft Mine, Winnemucca, Nevada, USA, March 31, 2011

Hycroft Property
Page 121
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

25    RELIANCE ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE REGISTRANT
Table 25-1 provides a detailed list of information provided by Hycroft (Registrant) for matters discussed in this Technical Report Summary.
Table 25-1:    Information Provided by Hycroft
CategoryTRS SectionReliance
Legal MattersSection 3 Property Description and LocationInformation and documentation regarding mineral titles, surface land agreements, current permitting status, royalties, and other agreements provided by Hycroft.
The QPs consider it reasonable to rely upon Hycroft for this information because Hycroft, along with its legal and other advisors, are best positioned to access and interpret existing information and documentation concerning these legal matters and interpretation of the same is outside of the expertise of the Qualified Persons.

Hycroft Property
Page 122
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Appendix A – Hycroft Patented Claims
Claim NamePatent No.Mineral Survey No.
Admission Placer9084314355
Black Rock (portion)10648174688A
Black Rock (portion)10648174688A
Brime Stone Placer
aka Brimstone Placer
10017274600
Cold Sulphur Placer831513225
Green Rock Placer (portion)
aka Green Rock No. 1
1223182
4839
4857
Green Rock Placer (portion)
aka Green Rock No. 2
1223182
4839
4857
Green Rock Placer (portion)
aka Green Rock No. 3
1223182
4839
4857
Green Rock Placer (portion)
aka Green Rock No. 4
1223182
4839
4857
Hilltop Placer (portion)10086524598
Hilltop Placer (portion)10086524598
Hilltop Placer (portion)10086524598
Occult Placer (portion)10086524598
Occult Placer (portion)10086524598
Occult Placer (portion)10086524598
Scheol No. 9 Placer
aka Sheol No. 9 Placer
1008652
4598
Sheol No. 4 Placer (portion)9084314355
Sheol No. 5 Placer (portion)9084314355
Sheol No. 6 Placer9084314355
Sheol No. 7 Placer9084314355
Sheol No. 8 Placer9084314355
Sheol Nos. 4 & 5 Placer (portions)9084314355
Sheol Sulphur Mine No. 1 Placer9084314355
Sheol Sulphur Mine No. 2 Placer9084314355
Sheol Sulphur Mine No. 3 Placer9084314355
Swager Placer12136054839
West Virginia No. 110648174688A
West Virginia No. 210648174688A
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Appendix B – Hycroft Unpatented Claims
Unpatented Claim NameLocation DateClaimantBLM Serial NumberFiling County
Airstrip #14/09/1958Crofoot HenryNMC88292Humboldt
Airstrip #24/09/1958Crofoot HenryNMC88293Humboldt
Airstrip #34/09/1958Crofoot HenryNMC88294Humboldt
Airstrip #44/02/1958Crofoot HenryNMC88295Humboldt
Airstrip #54/02/1958Crofoot HenryNMC88296Humboldt
Airstrip Fraction7/27/1967Crofoot HenryNMC88297Humboldt
Albert3/11/1989Kolb Theodore ANMC546000Humboldt
Alunite11/04/1980Lewis Frank WNMC181012Humboldt
Alunite #211/04/1980Lewis Frank WNMC181013Humboldt
Anita3/11/1989Kolb Theodore ANMC545998Humboldt
Ashlode3/11/1989Kolb Theodore ANMC545999Humboldt
Blackrock #23/11/1989Kolb Theodore ANMC545996Humboldt
CKC #13/03/1973Crofoot Daniel MNMC88348Humboldt
CKC #103/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546001Humboldt
CKC #113/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546002Humboldt
CKC #133/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546003Humboldt
CKC #143/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546004Humboldt
CKC #158/14/1987Crofoot Daniel MNMC444112Humboldt
CKC #23/03/1973Crofoot Daniel MNMC88349Humboldt
CKC #34/03/1973Crofoot Daniel MNMC88350Humboldt
CKC #44/03/1973Crofoot Daniel MNMC88351Humboldt
CKC #54/03/1973Crofoot Daniel MNMC88352Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

CKC #64/03/1973Crofoot Daniel MNMC88353Humboldt
CKC #79/06/1973Crofoot Daniel MNMC88354Humboldt
DIA #18/25/1983Lewis Frank WNMC284248Humboldt
DIA #28/25/1983Lewis Frank WNMC284249Humboldt
DIA #38/25/1983Lewis Frank WNMC284250Humboldt
DIA #48/25/1983Lewis Frank WNMC284251Humboldt
DIA #58/25/1983Lewis Frank WNMC284252Humboldt
FG 2239/05/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939256Humboldt
FG 2249/05/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939257Humboldt
FG 2259/05/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939258Humboldt
FG 2709/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939291Humboldt
FG 2719/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939292Humboldt
FG 2729/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939293Humboldt
FG 2739/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939294Humboldt
FG 2749/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939295Humboldt
FG 3199/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939332Humboldt
FG 3209/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939333Humboldt
FG 3219/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939334Humboldt
FG 3229/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939335Humboldt
FG 3239/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939336Humboldt
FG 3689/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939373Humboldt
FG 3699/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939374Humboldt
FG 3709/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939375Humboldt
FG 3719/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939376Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 3729/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939377Humboldt
FG 3739/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939378Humboldt
FG 3749/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939379Humboldt
FG 3759/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939380Humboldt
FG 3769/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939381Humboldt
FG 4219/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939426Humboldt
FG 4239/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939428Humboldt
FG 4249/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939429Humboldt
FG 4259/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939430Humboldt
FG 4269/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939431Humboldt
FG 4279/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939432Humboldt
FG 4289/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939433Humboldt
FG 4299/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939434Humboldt
FG 4309/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939435Humboldt
FG 4319/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939436Humboldt
FG 4329/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939437Humboldt
FG4229/01/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939427Humboldt
HRDI 2244/15/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102182Humboldt
HRDI 2254/15/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102183Humboldt
HRDI 2264/15/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102184Humboldt
HRDI 2274/15/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102185Humboldt
HRDI 2284/15/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102186Humboldt
HRDI 2294/15/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102187Humboldt
HRDI 2304/15/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102188Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

Mayo3/11/1989Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC545997Humboldt
NC 18/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027839Humboldt
NC 108/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027848Humboldt
NC 118/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027849Humboldt
NC 1108/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027948Humboldt
NC 1118/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027949Humboldt
NC 1128/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027950Humboldt
NC 1138/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027951Humboldt
NC 1148/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027952Humboldt
NC 1158/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027953Humboldt
NC 1168/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027954Humboldt
NC 1178/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027955Humboldt
NC 1188/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027956Humboldt
NC 1198/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027957Humboldt
NC 128/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027850Humboldt
NC 1208/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027958Humboldt
NC 1218/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027959Humboldt
NC 1228/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027960Humboldt
NC 1238/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027961Humboldt
NC 1248/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027962Humboldt
NC 1258/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027963Humboldt
NC 1268/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027964Humboldt
NC 1278/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027965Humboldt
NC 1288/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027966Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NC 1298/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027967Humboldt
NC 138/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027851Humboldt
NC 1308/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027968Humboldt
NC 1318/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027969Humboldt
NC 148/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027852Humboldt
NC 158/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027853Humboldt
NC 1518/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027989Humboldt
NC 1528/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027990Humboldt
NC 1538/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027991Humboldt
NC 1548/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027992Humboldt
NC 1558/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027993Humboldt
NC 1568/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027994Humboldt
NC 1578/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027995Humboldt
NC 1588/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027996Humboldt
NC 1598/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027997Humboldt
NC 168/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027854Humboldt
NC 1608/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027998Humboldt
NC 1618/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027999Humboldt
NC 1628/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028000Humboldt
NC 1638/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028001Humboldt
NC 1648/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028002Humboldt
NC 1658/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028003Humboldt
NC 1668/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028004Humboldt
NC 1678/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028005Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NC 1688/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028006Humboldt
NC 1698/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028007Humboldt
NC 1898/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028027Humboldt
NC 1908/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028028Humboldt
NC 1918/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028029Humboldt
NC 1928/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028030Humboldt
NC 1938/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028031Humboldt
NC 1948/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028032Humboldt
NC 1958/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028033Humboldt
NC 1968/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028034Humboldt
NC 1978/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028035Humboldt
NC 1988/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028036Humboldt
NC 1998/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028037Humboldt
NC 28/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027840Humboldt
NC 2008/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028038Humboldt
NC 2018/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028039Humboldt
NC 2028/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028040Humboldt
NC 2038/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028041Humboldt
NC 2048/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028042Humboldt
NC 2248/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028062Humboldt
NC 2258/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028063Humboldt
NC 2268/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028064Humboldt
NC 2278/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028065Humboldt
NC 2288/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028066Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NC 2298/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028067Humboldt
NC 2308/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028068Humboldt
NC 2318/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028069Humboldt
NC 2328/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028070Humboldt
NC 2338/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028071Humboldt
NC 2348/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028072Humboldt
NC 2358/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028073Humboldt
NC 2368/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028074Humboldt
NC 2378/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028075Humboldt
NC 2388/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028076Humboldt
NC 2398/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028077Humboldt
NC 2598/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028097Humboldt
NC 2608/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028098Humboldt
NC 2618/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028099Humboldt
NC 2628/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028100Humboldt
NC 2638/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028101Humboldt
NC 2648/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028102Humboldt
NC 2658/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028103Humboldt
NC 2668/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028104Humboldt
NC 2678/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028105Humboldt
NC 2688/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028106Humboldt
NC 2698/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028107Humboldt
NC 2708/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028108Humboldt
NC 2718/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028109Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NC 2728/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028110Humboldt
NC 2738/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028111Humboldt
NC 2938/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028131Humboldt
NC 2948/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028132Humboldt
NC 2958/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028133Humboldt
NC 2968/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028134Humboldt
NC 2978/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028135Humboldt
NC 2988/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028136Humboldt
NC 2998/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028137Humboldt
NC 38/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027841Humboldt
NC 3008/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028138Humboldt
NC 3018/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028139Humboldt
NC 3028/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028140Humboldt
NC 3038/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028141Humboldt
NC 3048/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028142Humboldt
NC 3058/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028143Humboldt
NC 318/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027869Humboldt
NC 328/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027870Humboldt
NC 338/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027871Humboldt
NC 348/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027872Humboldt
NC 358/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027873Humboldt
NC 368/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027874Humboldt
NC 378/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027875Humboldt
NC 388/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027876Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NC 398/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027877Humboldt
NC 48/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027842Humboldt
NC 408/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027878Humboldt
NC 418/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027879Humboldt
NC 428/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027880Humboldt
NC 438/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027881Humboldt
NC 448/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027882Humboldt
NC 458/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027883Humboldt
NC 468/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027884Humboldt
NC 478/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027885Humboldt
NC 488/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027886Humboldt
NC 498/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027887Humboldt
NC 58/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027843Humboldt
NC 68/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027844Humboldt
NC 698/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027907Humboldt
NC 78/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027845Humboldt
NC 708/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027908Humboldt
NC 718/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027909Humboldt
NC 728/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027910Humboldt
NC 738/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027911Humboldt
NC 748/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027912Humboldt
NC 758/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027913Humboldt
NC 768/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027914Humboldt
NC 778/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027915Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NC 788/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027916Humboldt
NC 798/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027917Humboldt
NC 88/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027846Humboldt
NC 808/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027918Humboldt
NC 818/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027919Humboldt
NC 828/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027920Humboldt
NC 838/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027921Humboldt
NC 848/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027922Humboldt
NC 858/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027923Humboldt
NC 868/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027924Humboldt
NC 878/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027925Humboldt
NC 888/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027926Humboldt
NC 898/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027927Humboldt
NC 98/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027847Humboldt
NC 908/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027928Humboldt
NFG 110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939506Humboldt
NFG 1010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939515Humboldt
NFG 10010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939604Humboldt
NFG 10110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939605Humboldt
NFG 10210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939606Humboldt
NFG 10310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939607Humboldt
NFG 10410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939608Humboldt
NFG 10510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939609Humboldt
NFG 10610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939610Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NFG 10710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939611Humboldt
NFG 10810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939612Humboldt
NFG 10910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939613Humboldt
NFG 1110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939516Humboldt
NFG 11010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939614Humboldt
NFG 11110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939615Humboldt
NFG 11210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939616Humboldt
NFG 11310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939617Humboldt
NFG 11410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939618Humboldt
NFG 11510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939619Humboldt
NFG 11610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939620Humboldt
NFG 11710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939621Humboldt
NFG 11810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939622Humboldt
NFG 11910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939623Humboldt
NFG 1210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939517Humboldt
NFG 12010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939624Humboldt
NFG 12110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939625Humboldt
NFG 12210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939626Humboldt
NFG 12310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939627Humboldt
NFG 12410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939628Humboldt
NFG 12510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939629Humboldt
NFG 12610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939630Humboldt
NFG 12710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939631Humboldt
NFG 12810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939632Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NFG 12910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939633Humboldt
NFG 1310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939518Humboldt
NFG 13010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939634Humboldt
NFG 13110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939635Humboldt
NFG 13210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939636Humboldt
NFG 13310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939637Humboldt
NFG 13410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939638Humboldt
NFG 13510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939639Humboldt
NFG 13610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939640Humboldt
NFG 13710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939641Humboldt
NFG 13810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939642Humboldt
NFG 13910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939643Humboldt
NFG 1410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939519Humboldt
NFG 14010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939644Humboldt
NFG 14110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939645Humboldt
NFG 14210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939646Humboldt
NFG 14310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939647Humboldt
NFG 14410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939648Humboldt
NFG 14510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939649Humboldt
NFG 14610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939650Humboldt
NFG 14710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939651Humboldt
NFG 14810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939652Humboldt
NFG 14910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939653Humboldt
NFG 1510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939520Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NFG 15010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939654Humboldt
NFG 15110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939655Humboldt
NFG 15210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939656Humboldt
NFG 15310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939657Humboldt
NFG 15410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939658Humboldt
NFG 15510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939659Humboldt
NFG 15610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939660Humboldt
NFG 15710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939661Humboldt
NFG 15810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939662Humboldt
NFG 15910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939663Humboldt
NFG 1610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939521Humboldt
NFG 16010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939664Humboldt
NFG 16110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939665Humboldt
NFG 16210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939666Humboldt
NFG 16310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939667Humboldt
NFG 16410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939668Humboldt
NFG 16510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939669Humboldt
NFG 16610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939670Humboldt
NFG 16710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939671Humboldt
NFG 16810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939672Humboldt
NFG 16910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939673Humboldt
NFG 1710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939522Humboldt
NFG 17010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939674Humboldt
NFG 17110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939675Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NFG 17210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939676Humboldt
NFG 17310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939677Humboldt
NFG 17410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939678Humboldt
NFG 17510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939679Humboldt
NFG 17610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939680Humboldt
NFG 17710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939681Humboldt
NFG 17810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939682Humboldt
NFG 17910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939683Humboldt
NFG 1810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939523Humboldt
NFG 18010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939684Humboldt
NFG 18110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939685Humboldt
NFG 18210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939686Humboldt
NFG 18310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939687Humboldt
NFG 18410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939688Humboldt
NFG 18510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939689Humboldt
NFG 18610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939690Humboldt
NFG 18710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939691Humboldt
NFG 1910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939524Humboldt
NFG 210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939507Humboldt
NFG 2010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939525Humboldt
NFG 2110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939526Humboldt
NFG 2210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939527Humboldt
NFG 2310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939528Humboldt
NFG 2410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939529Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NFG 2510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939530Humboldt
NFG 2610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939531Humboldt
NFG 2710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939532Humboldt
NFG 2810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939533Humboldt
NFG 2910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939534Humboldt
NFG 310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939508Humboldt
NFG 3010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939535Humboldt
NFG 3110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939536Humboldt
NFG 3210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939537Humboldt
NFG 3310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939538Humboldt
NFG 3410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939539Humboldt
NFG 3510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939540Humboldt
NFG 3610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939541Humboldt
NFG 3710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939542Humboldt
NFG 3810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939543Humboldt
NFG 3910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939544Humboldt
NFG 410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939509Humboldt
NFG 4010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939545Humboldt
NFG 4110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939546Humboldt
NFG 4210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939547Humboldt
NFG 4310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939548Humboldt
NFG 4410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939549Humboldt
NFG 4510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939550Humboldt
NFG 4610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939551Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NFG 4710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939552Humboldt
NFG 4810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939553Humboldt
NFG 4910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939554Humboldt
NFG 510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939510Humboldt
NFG 5010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939555Humboldt
NFG 5110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939556Humboldt
NFG 5210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939557Humboldt
NFG 5310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939558Humboldt
NFG 5410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939559Humboldt
NFG 5510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939560Humboldt
NFG 5610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939561Humboldt
NFG 5710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939562Humboldt
NFG 5810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939563Humboldt
NFG 5910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939564Humboldt
NFG 610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939511Humboldt
NFG 6010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939565Humboldt
NFG 6110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939566Humboldt
NFG 6210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939567Humboldt
NFG 6310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939568Humboldt
NFG 6410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939569Humboldt
NFG 6510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939570Humboldt
NFG 6610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939571Humboldt
NFG 6710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939572Humboldt
NFG 6810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939573Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NFG 6910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939574Humboldt
NFG 710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939512Humboldt
NFG 7010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939575Humboldt
NFG 7110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939576Humboldt
NFG 7210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939577Humboldt
NFG 7310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939578Humboldt
NFG 7410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939579Humboldt
NFG 7610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939580Humboldt
NFG 7810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939582Humboldt
NFG 7910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939583Humboldt
NFG 810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939513Humboldt
NFG 8010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939584Humboldt
NFG 8110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939585Humboldt
NFG 8210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939586Humboldt
NFG 8310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939587Humboldt
NFG 8410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939588Humboldt
NFG 8510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939589Humboldt
NFG 8610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939590Humboldt
NFG 8710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939591Humboldt
NFG 8810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939592Humboldt
NFG 8910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939593Humboldt
NFG 910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939514Humboldt
NFG 9010/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939594Humboldt
NFG 9110/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939595Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NFG 9210/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939596Humboldt
NFG 9310/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939597Humboldt
NFG 9410/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939598Humboldt
NFG 9510/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939599Humboldt
NFG 9610/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939600Humboldt
NFG 9710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939601Humboldt
NFG 9810/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939602Humboldt
NFG 9910/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939603Humboldt
NFG7710/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC939581Humboldt
NFRA 111/07/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC977833Humboldt
NFRA 211/07/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC977834Humboldt
NFRA 2011/08/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC977852Humboldt
NFRA 311/07/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC977835Humboldt
NFRA1611/07/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC977848Humboldt
NFRA1711/07/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC977849Humboldt
NFRA1811/07/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC977850Humboldt
NFRA1911/07/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC977851Humboldt
NH 15/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990154Humboldt
NH 105/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990163Humboldt
NH 1005/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990253Humboldt
NH 1015/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990254Humboldt
NH 1025/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990255Humboldt
NH 1035/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990256Humboldt
NH 1045/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990257Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 1055/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990258Humboldt
NH 1065/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990259Humboldt
NH 1075/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990260Humboldt
NH 1085/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990261Humboldt
NH 1095/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990262Humboldt
NH 115/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990164Humboldt
NH 1105/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990263Humboldt
NH 1115/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990264Humboldt
NH 1125/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990265Humboldt
NH 1135/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990266Humboldt
NH 1145/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990267Humboldt
NH 1155/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990268Humboldt
NH 1165/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990269Humboldt
NH 1175/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990270Humboldt
NH 1185/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990271Humboldt
NH 1195/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990272Humboldt
NH 125/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990165Humboldt
NH 1205/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990273Humboldt
NH 1215/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990274Humboldt
NH 1225/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990275Humboldt
NH 1235/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990276Humboldt
NH 1245/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990277Humboldt
NH 1255/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990278Humboldt
NH 1265/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990279Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 1275/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990280Humboldt
NH 1285/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990281Humboldt
NH 1295/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990282Humboldt
NH 135/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990166Humboldt
NH 1305/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990283Humboldt
NH 1315/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990284Humboldt
NH 1325/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990285Humboldt
NH 1335/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990286Humboldt
NH 1345/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990287Humboldt
NH 1355/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990288Humboldt
NH 1365/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990289Humboldt
NH 1375/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990290Humboldt
NH 1385/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990291Humboldt
NH 1395/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990292Humboldt
NH 145/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990167Humboldt
NH 1405/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990293Humboldt
NH 1415/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990294Humboldt
NH 1425/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990295Humboldt
NH 1435/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990296Humboldt
NH 1445/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990297Humboldt
NH 1455/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990298Humboldt
NH 1465/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990299Humboldt
NH 1475/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990300Humboldt
NH 1485/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990301Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 1495/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990302Humboldt
NH 155/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990168Humboldt
NH 1505/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990303Humboldt
NH 1515/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990304Humboldt
NH 1525/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990305Humboldt
NH 1535/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990306Humboldt
NH 1545/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990307Humboldt
NH 1555/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990308Humboldt
NH 1565/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990309Humboldt
NH 1575/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990310Humboldt
NH 1585/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990311Humboldt
NH 1595/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990312Humboldt
NH 165/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990169Humboldt
NH 1605/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990313Humboldt
NH 1615/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990314Humboldt
NH 1625/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990315Humboldt
NH 1635/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990316Humboldt
NH 1645/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990317Humboldt
NH 1655/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990318Humboldt
NH 1665/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990319Humboldt
NH 1675/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990320Humboldt
NH 1685/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990321Humboldt
NH 1695/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990322Humboldt
NH 175/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990170Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 1705/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990323Humboldt
NH 1715/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990324Humboldt
NH 1725/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990325Humboldt
NH 1735/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990326Humboldt
NH 1745/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990327Humboldt
NH 1755/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990328Humboldt
NH 1765/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990329Humboldt
NH 1775/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990330Humboldt
NH 1785/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990331Humboldt
NH 1795/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990332Humboldt
NH 185/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990171Humboldt
NH 1805/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990333Humboldt
NH 1815/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990334Humboldt
NH 1825/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990335Humboldt
NH 1835/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990336Humboldt
NH 1845/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990337Humboldt
NH 1855/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990338Humboldt
NH 1865/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990339Humboldt
NH 1875/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990340Humboldt
NH 1885/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990341Humboldt
NH 1895/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990342Humboldt
NH 195/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990172Humboldt
NH 1905/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990343Humboldt
NH 1915/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990344Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 1925/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990345Humboldt
NH 1935/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990346Humboldt
NH 1945/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990347Humboldt
NH 1955/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990348Humboldt
NH 1965/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990349Humboldt
NH 1975/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990350Humboldt
NH 1985/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990351Humboldt
NH 1995/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990352Humboldt
NH 25/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990155Humboldt
NH 205/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990173Humboldt
NH 2005/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990353Humboldt
NH 2015/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990354Humboldt
NH 2025/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990355Humboldt
NH 2035/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990356Humboldt
NH 2045/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990357Humboldt
NH 2055/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990358Humboldt
NH 2065/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990359Humboldt
NH 2075/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990360Humboldt
NH 2085/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990361Humboldt
NH 2095/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990362Humboldt
NH 215/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990174Humboldt
NH 2105/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990363Humboldt
NH 2115/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990364Humboldt
NH 2125/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990365Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 2135/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990366Humboldt
NH 2145/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990367Humboldt
NH 2155/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990368Humboldt
NH 2165/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990369Humboldt
NH 2175/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990370Humboldt
NH 2185/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990371Humboldt
NH 2195/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990372Humboldt
NH 225/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990175Humboldt
NH 2205/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990373Humboldt
NH 2215/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990374Humboldt
NH 2225/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990375Humboldt
NH 2235/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990376Humboldt
NH 2245/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990377Humboldt
NH 2255/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990378Humboldt
NH 2265/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990379Humboldt
NH 2275/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990380Humboldt
NH 2285/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990381Humboldt
NH 2295/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990382Humboldt
NH 235/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990176Humboldt
NH 2305/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990383Humboldt
NH 2315/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990384Humboldt
NH 2325/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990385Humboldt
NH 2335/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990386Humboldt
NH 2345/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990387Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 2355/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990388Humboldt
NH 2365/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990389Humboldt
NH 2375/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990390Humboldt
NH 2385/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990391Humboldt
NH 2395/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990392Humboldt
NH 245/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990177Humboldt
NH 2405/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990393Humboldt
NH 2415/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990394Humboldt
NH 2425/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990395Humboldt
NH 2435/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990396Humboldt
NH 2445/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990397Humboldt
NH 2455/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990398Humboldt
NH 2465/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990399Humboldt
NH 2475/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990400Humboldt
NH 2485/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990401Humboldt
NH 2495/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990402Humboldt
NH 255/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990178Humboldt
NH 2505/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990403Humboldt
NH 2515/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990404Humboldt
NH 2525/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990405Humboldt
NH 2535/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990406Humboldt
NH 2545/02/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990407Humboldt
NH 2555/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990408Humboldt
NH 2565/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990409Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 2575/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990410Humboldt
NH 2585/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990411Humboldt
NH 2595/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990412Humboldt
NH 265/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990179Humboldt
NH 2605/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990413Humboldt
NH 2615/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990414Humboldt
NH 2625/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990415Humboldt
NH 2635/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990416Humboldt
NH 2645/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990417Humboldt
NH 2655/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990418Humboldt
NH 2665/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990419Humboldt
NH 2675/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990420Humboldt
NH 2685/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990421Humboldt
NH 2695/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990422Humboldt
NH 275/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990180Humboldt
NH 2705/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990423Humboldt
NH 2715/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990424Humboldt
NH 2725/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990425Humboldt
NH 2735/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990426Humboldt
NH 2745/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990427Humboldt
NH 2755/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990428Humboldt
NH 2765/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990429Humboldt
NH 2775/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990430Humboldt
NH 2785/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990431Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 2795/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990432Humboldt
NH 285/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990181Humboldt
NH 2805/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990433Humboldt
NH 2815/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990434Humboldt
NH 2825/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990435Humboldt
NH 2835/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990436Humboldt
NH 2845/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990437Humboldt
NH 2855/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990438Humboldt
NH 2865/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990439Humboldt
NH 2875/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990440Humboldt
NH 2885/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990441Humboldt
NH 2895/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990442Humboldt
NH 295/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990182Humboldt
NH 2905/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990443Humboldt
NH 2915/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990444Humboldt
NH 2925/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990445Humboldt
NH 2935/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990446Humboldt
NH 2945/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990447Humboldt
NH 2955/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990448Humboldt
NH 2965/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990449Humboldt
NH 2975/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990450Humboldt
NH 2985/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990451Humboldt
NH 2995/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990452Humboldt
NH 35/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990156Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 305/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990183Humboldt
NH 3005/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990453Humboldt
NH 3015/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990454Humboldt
NH 3025/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990455Humboldt
NH 3035/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990456Humboldt
NH 3045/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990457Humboldt
NH 3055/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990458Humboldt
NH 3065/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990459Humboldt
NH 3075/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990460Humboldt
NH 3085/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990461Humboldt
NH 3095/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990462Humboldt
NH 315/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990184Humboldt
NH 3105/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990463Humboldt
NH 3115/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990464Humboldt
NH 3125/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990465Humboldt
NH 3135/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990466Humboldt
NH 3145/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990467Humboldt
NH 3155/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990468Humboldt
NH 3165/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990469Humboldt
NH 3175/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990470Humboldt
NH 3185/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990471Humboldt
NH 3195/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990472Humboldt
NH 325/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990185Humboldt
NH 3205/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990473Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 3215/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990474Humboldt
NH 3225/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990475Humboldt
NH 3235/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990476Humboldt
NH 3245/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990477Humboldt
NH 3255/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990478Humboldt
NH 3265/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990479Humboldt
NH 3275/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990480Humboldt
NH 3285/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990481Humboldt
NH 3295/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990482Humboldt
NH 335/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990186Humboldt
NH 3305/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990483Humboldt
NH 3315/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990484Humboldt
NH 3325/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990485Humboldt
NH 3335/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990486Humboldt
NH 3345/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990487Humboldt
NH 3355/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990488Humboldt
NH 3365/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990489Humboldt
NH 3375/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990490Humboldt
NH 3385/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990491Humboldt
NH 3395/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990492Humboldt
NH 345/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990187Humboldt
NH 3405/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990493Humboldt
NH 3415/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990494Humboldt
NH 3425/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990495Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 3435/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990496Humboldt
NH 3445/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990497Humboldt
NH 3455/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990498Humboldt
NH 3465/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990499Humboldt
NH 3475/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990500Humboldt
NH 3485/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990501Humboldt
NH 3495/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990502Humboldt
NH 355/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990188Humboldt
NH 3505/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990503Humboldt
NH 3515/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990504Humboldt
NH 3525/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990505Humboldt
NH 3535/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990506Humboldt
NH 3545/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990507Humboldt
NH 3555/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990508Humboldt
NH 3565/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990509Humboldt
NH 3575/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990510Humboldt
NH 3585/01/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990511Humboldt
NH 3594/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990512Humboldt
NH 365/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990189Humboldt
NH 3604/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990513Humboldt
NH 3614/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990514Humboldt
NH 3624/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990515Humboldt
NH 3634/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990516Humboldt
NH 3644/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990517Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 3654/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990518Humboldt
NH 3664/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990519Humboldt
NH 3674/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990520Humboldt
NH 3684/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990521Humboldt
NH 3694/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990522Humboldt
NH 375/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990190Humboldt
NH 3704/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990523Humboldt
NH 3714/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990524Humboldt
NH 3724/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990525Humboldt
NH 3734/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990526Humboldt
NH 3744/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990527Humboldt
NH 3754/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990528Humboldt
NH 3764/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990529Humboldt
NH 3774/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990530Humboldt
NH 3784/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990531Humboldt
NH 3794/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990532Humboldt
NH 385/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990191Humboldt
NH 3804/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990533Humboldt
NH 3814/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990534Humboldt
NH 3824/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990535Humboldt
NH 3834/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990536Humboldt
NH 3844/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990537Humboldt
NH 3854/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990538Humboldt
NH 3864/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990539Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 3874/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990540Humboldt
NH 3884/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990541Humboldt
NH 3894/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990542Humboldt
NH 395/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990192Humboldt
NH 3904/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990543Humboldt
NH 3914/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990544Humboldt
NH 3924/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990545Humboldt
NH 3934/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990546Humboldt
NH 3944/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990547Humboldt
NH 3954/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990548Humboldt
NH 3964/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990549Humboldt
NH 3974/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990550Humboldt
NH 3984/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990551Humboldt
NH 3994/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990552Humboldt
NH 45/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990157Humboldt
NH 405/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990193Humboldt
NH 4004/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990553Humboldt
NH 4014/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990554Humboldt
NH 4024/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990555Humboldt
NH 4034/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990556Humboldt
NH 4044/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990557Humboldt
NH 4054/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990558Humboldt
NH 4064/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990559Humboldt
NH 4074/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990560Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 4084/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990561Humboldt
NH 4094/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990562Humboldt
NH 415/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990194Humboldt
NH 4104/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990563Humboldt
NH 4114/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990564Humboldt
NH 4124/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990565Humboldt
NH 4134/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990566Humboldt
NH 4144/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990567Humboldt
NH 4154/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990568Humboldt
NH 4164/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990569Humboldt
NH 4174/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990570Humboldt
NH 4184/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990571Humboldt
NH 4194/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990572Humboldt
NH 425/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990195Humboldt
NH 4204/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990573Humboldt
NH 4214/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990574Humboldt
NH 4224/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990575Humboldt
NH 4234/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990576Humboldt
NH 4244/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990577Humboldt
NH 4254/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990578Humboldt
NH 4264/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990579Humboldt
NH 4274/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990580Humboldt
NH 4284/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990581Humboldt
NH 4294/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990582Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 435/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990196Humboldt
NH 4304/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990583Humboldt
NH 4314/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990584Humboldt
NH 4364/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990589Humboldt
NH 445/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990197Humboldt
NH 4404/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990593Humboldt
NH 4414/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990594Humboldt
NH 4444/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990597Humboldt
NH 4454/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990598Humboldt
NH 4464/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990599Humboldt
NH 4474/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990600Humboldt
NH 4484/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990601Humboldt
NH 4494/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990602Humboldt
NH 455/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990198Humboldt
NH 4514/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990604Humboldt
NH 4524/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990605Humboldt
NH 4534/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990606Humboldt
NH 4544/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990607Humboldt
NH 4554/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990608Humboldt
NH 4564/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990609Humboldt
NH 4574/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990610Humboldt
NH 4584/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990611Humboldt
NH 4594/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990612Humboldt
NH 465/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990199Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 4604/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990613Humboldt
NH 4614/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990614Humboldt
NH 4624/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990615Humboldt
NH 4634/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990616Humboldt
NH 4644/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990617Humboldt
NH 4654/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990618Humboldt
NH 4664/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990619Humboldt
NH 4674/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990620Humboldt
NH 4684/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990621Humboldt
NH 4694/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990622Humboldt
NH 475/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990200Humboldt
NH 4704/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990623Humboldt
NH 4714/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990624Humboldt
NH 4724/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990625Humboldt
NH 4734/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990626Humboldt
NH 4744/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990627Humboldt
NH 4754/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990628Humboldt
NH 4764/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990629Humboldt
NH 4774/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990630Humboldt
NH 4784/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990631Humboldt
NH 4794/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990632Humboldt
NH 485/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990201Humboldt
NH 4804/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990633Humboldt
NH 4814/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990634Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 4824/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990635Humboldt
NH 4834/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990636Humboldt
NH 4844/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990637Humboldt
NH 4854/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990638Humboldt
NH 4864/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990639Humboldt
NH 4874/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990640Humboldt
NH 4884/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990641Humboldt
NH 4894/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990642Humboldt
NH 495/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990202Humboldt
NH 4904/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990643Humboldt
NH 4914/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990644Humboldt
NH 4924/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990645Humboldt
NH 4934/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990646Humboldt
NH 4944/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990647Humboldt
NH 4954/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990648Humboldt
NH 4964/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990649Humboldt
NH 4974/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990650Humboldt
NH 4984/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990651Humboldt
NH 4994/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990652Humboldt
NH 55/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990158Humboldt
NH 505/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990203Humboldt
NH 5004/29/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990653Humboldt
NH 515/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990204Humboldt
NH 525/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990205Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 535/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990206Humboldt
NH 545/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990207Humboldt
NH 555/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990208Humboldt
NH 565/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990209Humboldt
NH 575/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990210Humboldt
NH 585/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990211Humboldt
NH 595/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990212Humboldt
NH 65/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990159Humboldt
NH 605/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990213Humboldt
NH 615/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990214Humboldt
NH 625/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990215Humboldt
NH 635/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990216Humboldt
NH 645/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990217Humboldt
NH 655/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990218Humboldt
NH 665/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990219Humboldt
NH 675/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990220Humboldt
NH 685/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990221Humboldt
NH 695/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990222Humboldt
NH 75/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990160Humboldt
NH 705/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990223Humboldt
NH 715/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990224Humboldt
NH 725/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990225Humboldt
NH 735/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990226Humboldt
NH 745/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990227Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 755/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990228Humboldt
NH 765/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990229Humboldt
NH 775/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990230Humboldt
NH 785/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990231Humboldt
NH 795/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990232Humboldt
NH 85/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990161Humboldt
NH 805/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990233Humboldt
NH 815/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990234Humboldt
NH 825/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990235Humboldt
NH 835/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990236Humboldt
NH 845/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990237Humboldt
NH 855/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990238Humboldt
NH 865/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990239Humboldt
NH 875/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990240Humboldt
NH 885/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990241Humboldt
NH 895/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990242Humboldt
NH 95/04/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990162Humboldt
NH 905/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990243Humboldt
NH 915/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990244Humboldt
NH 925/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990245Humboldt
NH 935/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990246Humboldt
NH 945/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990247Humboldt
NH 955/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990248Humboldt
NH 965/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990249Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NH 975/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990250Humboldt
NH 985/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990251Humboldt
NH 995/03/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990252Humboldt
NH4324/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990585Humboldt
NH4334/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990586Humboldt
NH4344/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990587Humboldt
NH4354/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990588Humboldt
NH4374/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990590Humboldt
NH4384/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990591Humboldt
NH4394/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990592Humboldt
NH4424/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990595Humboldt
NH4434/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990596Humboldt
NH4504/28/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990603Humboldt
Pacific #211/04/1980Lewis Frank WNMC181010Humboldt
RFG # 396/28/1987Lewis Frank WNMC436884Humboldt
RFG # 726/28/1987Lewis Frank WNMC436912Humboldt
RFG #0BF1/30/1980HrdiNMC143488Humboldt
RFG #112/20/1979HrdiNMC143252Humboldt
RFG #1012/20/1979HrdiNMC143261Humboldt
RFG #111/03/1980HrdiNMC143262Humboldt
RFG #121/03/1980HrdiNMC143263Humboldt
RFG #12A2/20/1980HrdiNMC143490Humboldt
RFG #1312/27/1979HrdiNMC143264Humboldt
RFG #13A2/20/1980HrdiNMC143491Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #151/03/1980HrdiNMC143266Humboldt
RFG #161/03/1980HrdiNMC143267Humboldt
RFG #1682/01/1980HrdiNMC143347Humboldt
RFG #1692/01/1980HrdiNMC143348Humboldt
RFG #171/03/1980HrdiNMC143268Humboldt
RFG #1702/01/1980HrdiNMC143349Humboldt
RFG #1712/01/1980HrdiNMC143350Humboldt
RFG #1721/31/1980HrdiNMC143351Humboldt
RFG #1731/31/1980HrdiNMC143352Humboldt
RFG #1741/31/1980HrdiNMC143353Humboldt
RFG #1751/31/1980HrdiNMC143354Humboldt
RFG #1761/31/1980HrdiNMC143355Humboldt
RFG #1771/31/1980HrdiNMC143356Humboldt
RFG #1782/01/1980HrdiNMC143357Humboldt
RFG #1792/01/1980HrdiNMC143358Humboldt
RFG #181/03/1980HrdiNMC143269Humboldt
RFG #1802/01/1980HrdiNMC143359Humboldt
RFG #1812/01/1980HrdiNMC143360Humboldt
RFG #1822/01/1980HrdiNMC143361Humboldt
RFG #1832/01/1980HrdiNMC143362Humboldt
RFG #1842/01/1980HrdiNMC143363Humboldt
RFG #1852/01/1980HrdiNMC143364Humboldt
RFG #1861/31/1980HrdiNMC143365Humboldt
RFG #1872/01/1980HrdiNMC143366Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #1881/31/1980HrdiNMC143367Humboldt
RFG #1892/01/1980HrdiNMC143368Humboldt
RFG #191/03/1980HrdiNMC143270Humboldt
RFG #1901/31/1980HrdiNMC143369Humboldt
RFG #1912/01/1980HrdiNMC143370Humboldt
RFG #1921/31/1980HrdiNMC143371Humboldt
RFG #1932/01/1980HrdiNMC143372Humboldt
RFG #1941/31/1980HrdiNMC143373Humboldt
RFG #1952/01/1980HrdiNMC143374Humboldt
RFG #1961/31/1980HrdiNMC143375Humboldt
RFG #1972/01/1980HrdiNMC143376Humboldt
RFG #1981/31/1980HrdiNMC143377Humboldt
RFG #1992/01/1980HrdiNMC143378Humboldt
RFG #1FS1/27/1980HrdiNMC143489Humboldt
RFG #212/20/1979HrdiNMC143253Humboldt
RFG #201/03/1980HrdiNMC143271Humboldt
RFG #2001/31/1980HrdiNMC143379Humboldt
RFG #2012/05/1980HrdiNMC143380Humboldt
RFG #201A2/05/1980HrdiNMC143504Humboldt
RFG #2021/03/1980HrdiNMC143381Humboldt
RFG #2031/30/1980HrdiNMC143382Humboldt
RFG #2041/30/1980HrdiNMC143383Humboldt
RFG #2051/30/1980HrdiNMC143384Humboldt
RFG #2061/30/1980HrdiNMC143385Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #2071/30/1980HrdiNMC143386Humboldt
RFG #2081/30/1980HrdiNMC143387Humboldt
RFG #2091/30/1980HrdiNMC143388Humboldt
RFG #211/03/1980HrdiNMC143272Humboldt
RFG #2101/30/1980HrdiNMC143389Humboldt
RFG #2111/30/1980HrdiNMC143390Humboldt
RFG #2121/30/1980HrdiNMC143391Humboldt
RFG #2131/30/1980HrdiNMC143392Humboldt
RFG #2141/30/1980HrdiNMC143393Humboldt
RFG #2151/30/1980HrdiNMC143394Humboldt
RFG #21582/14/1980HrdiNMC143505Humboldt
RFG #2161/30/1980HrdiNMC143395Humboldt
RFG #2171/30/1980HrdiNMC143396Humboldt
RFG #21782/14/1980HrdiNMC143506Humboldt
RFG #2182/13/1980HrdiNMC143397Humboldt
RFG #21882/04/1980HrdiNMC143508Humboldt
RFG #218A2/04/1980HrdiNMC143507Humboldt
RFG #2192/13/1980HrdiNMC143398Humboldt
RFG #21982/13/1980HrdiNMC143509Humboldt
RFG #221/03/1980HrdiNMC143273Humboldt
RFG #2201/31/1980HrdiNMC143399Humboldt
RFG #2211/31/1980HrdiNMC143400Humboldt
RFG #2221/31/1980HrdiNMC143401Humboldt
RFG #2231/31/1980HrdiNMC143402Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #2241/26/1980HrdiNMC143403Humboldt
RFG #2251/26/1980HrdiNMC143404Humboldt
RFG #2261/26/1980HrdiNMC143405Humboldt
RFG #2271/26/1980HrdiNMC143406Humboldt
RFG #22A2/20/1980HrdiNMC143492Humboldt
RFG #231/03/1980HrdiNMC143274Humboldt
RFG #238F1/29/1980HrdiNMC143510Humboldt
RFG #2391/26/1980HrdiNMC143407Humboldt
RFG #2392/22/1980HrdiNMC143598Humboldt
RFG #239A2/22/1980HrdiNMC143511Humboldt
RFG #2412/22/1979HrdiNMC143275Humboldt
RFG #2402/22/1980HrdiNMC143408Humboldt
RFG #2402/22/1980HrdiNMC143597Humboldt
RFG #2413/11/1980HrdiNMC143409Humboldt
RFG #241A3/11/1980HrdiNMC143596Humboldt
RFG #2423/11/1980HrdiNMC143410Humboldt
RFG #2432/01/1980HrdiNMC143411Humboldt
RFG #2442/03/1980HrdiNMC143412Humboldt
RFG #2452/03/1980HrdiNMC143413Humboldt
RFG #2462/03/1980HrdiNMC143414Humboldt
RFG #2472/03/1980HrdiNMC143415Humboldt
RFG #2482/03/1980HrdiNMC143416Humboldt
RFG #2512/22/1979HrdiNMC143276Humboldt
RFG #261/05/1980HrdiNMC143277Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #2621/11/1980HrdiNMC143487Humboldt
RFG #2641/11/1980HrdiNMC143417Humboldt
RFG #2651/11/1980HrdiNMC143418Humboldt
RFG #2661/17/1980HrdiNMC143419Humboldt
RFG #2671/17/1980HrdiNMC143420Humboldt
RFG #2681/17/1980HrdiNMC143421Humboldt
RFG #2691/17/1980HrdiNMC143422Humboldt
RFG #271/05/1980HrdiNMC143278Humboldt
RFG #2701/17/1980HrdiNMC143423Humboldt
RFG #2711/17/1980HrdiNMC143424Humboldt
RFG #281/05/1980HrdiNMC143279Humboldt
RFG #2883/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546067Humboldt
RFG #291/05/1980HrdiNMC143280Humboldt
RFG #2903/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546068Humboldt
RFG #2923/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546069Humboldt
RFG #2943/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546070Humboldt
RFG #2963/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546071Humboldt
RFG #2982/06/1980HrdiNMC143494Humboldt
RFG #2983/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546072Humboldt
RFG #29A2/06/1980HrdiNMC143493Humboldt
RFG #312/20/1979HrdiNMC143254Humboldt
RFG #3012/22/1979HrdiNMC143281Humboldt
RFG #3003/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546073Humboldt
RFG #3023/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546074Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #3043/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546075Humboldt
RFG #3051/18/1980HrdiNMC143444Humboldt
RFG #3061/18/1980HrdiNMC143445Humboldt
RFG #3071/18/1980HrdiNMC143446Humboldt
RFG #30A1/05/1980HrdiNMC143495Humboldt
RFG #3112/22/1979HrdiNMC143282Humboldt
RFG #3212/22/1979HrdiNMC143283Humboldt
RFG #3223/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546076Humboldt
RFG #3233/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546077Humboldt
RFG #3243/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546078Humboldt
RFG #3253/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546079Humboldt
RFG #3263/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546080Humboldt
RFG #3273/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546081Humboldt
RFG #3281/11/1980HrdiNMC143453Humboldt
RFG #3293/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546082Humboldt
RFG #333/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546005Humboldt
RFG #3301/11/1980HrdiNMC143455Humboldt
RFG #3313/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546083Humboldt
RFG #3321/11/1980HrdiNMC143457Humboldt
RFG #3333/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546084Humboldt
RFG #3341/11/1980HrdiNMC143459Humboldt
RFG #3353/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546085Humboldt
RFG #3361/11/1980HrdiNMC143461Humboldt
RFG #3373/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546086Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #3381/22/1980HrdiNMC143463Humboldt
RFG #3393/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546087Humboldt
RFG #3412/22/1979HrdiNMC143285Humboldt
RFG #3401/22/1980HrdiNMC143465Humboldt
RFG #3413/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546088Humboldt
RFG #3421/22/1980HrdiNMC143467Humboldt
RFG #3433/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546089Humboldt
RFG #353/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546006Humboldt
RFG #3581/31/1980HrdiNMC143469Humboldt
RFG #3591/31/1980HrdiNMC143470Humboldt
RFG #3612/22/1979HrdiNMC143287Humboldt
RFG #3601/31/1980HrdiNMC143471Humboldt
RFG #3611/31/1980HrdiNMC143472Humboldt
RFG #3621/31/1980Homestake Mng Co Of CaNMC143473Humboldt
RFG #362A2/05/1980HrdiNMC143512Humboldt
RFG #3631/31/1980HrdiNMC143474Humboldt
RFG #3641/31/1980Homestake Mng Co Of CaNMC143475Humboldt
RFG #364A2/05/1980HrdiNMC143513Humboldt
RFG #3651/31/1980HrdiNMC143476Humboldt
RFG #3661/31/1980Homestake Mng Co Of CaNMC143477Humboldt
RFG #366A2/06/1980HrdiNMC143514Humboldt
RFG #3671/31/1980HrdiNMC143478Humboldt
RFG #3682/01/1980Homestake Mng Co Of CaNMC143479Humboldt
RFG #3682/07/1980HrdiNMC143497Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #368A2/06/1980HrdiNMC143515Humboldt
RFG #36A2/07/1980HrdiNMC143496Humboldt
RFG #373/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546007Humboldt
RFG #383/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546008Humboldt
RFG #39A3/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546009Humboldt
RFG #412/20/1979HrdiNMC143255Humboldt
RFG #401/07/1980HrdiNMC143291Humboldt
RFG #40010/25/1980HrdiNMC175062Humboldt
RFG #40110/25/1980HrdiNMC175063Humboldt
RFG #40210/25/1980HrdiNMC175064Humboldt
RFG #40310/25/1980HrdiNMC175065Humboldt
RFG #40410/17/1980HrdiNMC175066Humboldt
RFG #40510/17/1980HrdiNMC175067Humboldt
RFG #40610/17/1980HrdiNMC175068Humboldt
RFG #40710/17/1980HrdiNMC175069Humboldt
RFG #40810/17/1980HrdiNMC175070Humboldt
RFG #40910/17/1980HrdiNMC175071Humboldt
RFG #411/07/1980HrdiNMC143292Humboldt
RFG #41010/17/1980HrdiNMC175072Humboldt
RFG #41110/17/1980HrdiNMC175073Humboldt
RFG #41210/17/1980HrdiNMC175074Humboldt
RFG #41310/17/1980HrdiNMC175075Humboldt
RFG #41410/17/1980HrdiNMC175076Humboldt
RFG #41510/17/1980HrdiNMC175077Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #41610/17/1980HrdiNMC175078Humboldt
RFG #41710/17/1980HrdiNMC175079Humboldt
RFG #41810/17/1980HrdiNMC175080Humboldt
RFG #41910/17/1980HrdiNMC175081Humboldt
RFG #423/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546010Humboldt
RFG #42010/17/1980HrdiNMC175082Humboldt
RFG #42110/17/1980HrdiNMC175083Humboldt
RFG #42210/17/1980HrdiNMC175084Humboldt
RFG #42310/17/1980HrdiNMC175085Humboldt
RFG #42410/17/1980HrdiNMC175086Humboldt
RFG #42510/17/1980HrdiNMC175087Humboldt
RFG #42610/17/1980HrdiNMC175088Humboldt
RFG #433/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546011Humboldt
RFG #443/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546012Humboldt
RFG #453/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546013Humboldt
RFG #463/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546014Humboldt
RFG #473/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546015Humboldt
RFG #483/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546016Humboldt
RFG #493/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546017Humboldt
RFG #512/20/1979HrdiNMC143256Humboldt
RFG #503/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546018Humboldt
RFG #513/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546019Humboldt
RFG #523/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546020Humboldt
RFG #52A3/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546021Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #533/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546022Humboldt
RFG #543/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546023Humboldt
RFG #551/09/1980HrdiNMC143306Humboldt
RFG #561/09/1980HrdiNMC143307Humboldt
RFG #573/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546024Humboldt
RFG #583/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546025Humboldt
RFG #593/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546026Humboldt
RFG #612/20/1979HrdiNMC143257Humboldt
RFG #603/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546027Humboldt
RFG #613/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546028Humboldt
RFG #623/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546029Humboldt
RFG #633/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546030Humboldt
RFG #643/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546031Humboldt
RFG #653/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546032Humboldt
RFG #663/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546033Humboldt
RFG #673/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546034Humboldt
RFG #67A3/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546035Humboldt
RFG #683/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546036Humboldt
RFG #68A3/10/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546037Humboldt
RFG #691/10/1980HrdiNMC143320Humboldt
RFG #712/20/1979HrdiNMC143258Humboldt
RFG #701/10/1980HrdiNMC143321Humboldt
RFG #713/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546038Humboldt
RFG #733/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546039Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #743/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546040Humboldt
RFG #753/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546041Humboldt
RFG #763/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546042Humboldt
RFG #773/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546043Humboldt
RFG #783/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546044Humboldt
RFG #793/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546045Humboldt
RFG #812/20/1979HrdiNMC143259Humboldt
RFG #803/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546046Humboldt
RFG #813/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546047Humboldt
RFG #81A3/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546048Humboldt
RFG #823/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546049Humboldt
RFG #833/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546050Humboldt
RFG #853/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546052Humboldt
RFG #863/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546053Humboldt
RFG #873/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546054Humboldt
RFG #883/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546055Humboldt
RFG #893/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546056Humboldt
RFG #912/20/1979HrdiNMC143260Humboldt
RFG #903/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546057Humboldt
RFG #913/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546058Humboldt
RFG #923/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546059Humboldt
RFG #933/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546060Humboldt
RFG #943/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546061Humboldt
RFG #953/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546062Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #973/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546063Humboldt
RFG 1025/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932886Humboldt
RFG 1265/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932903Humboldt
RFG 1285/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932904Humboldt
RFG 2585/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932912Humboldt
RFG 2605/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932913Humboldt
RFG 2865/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932914Humboldt
RFG 2875/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932915Humboldt
RFG 2895/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932916Humboldt
RFG 2915/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932917Humboldt
RFG 2935/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932918Humboldt
RFG 2955/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932919Humboldt
RFG 2975/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932920Humboldt
RFG 2995/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932921Humboldt
RFG 3015/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932922Humboldt
RFG 3035/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932923Humboldt
RFG 94A5/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC932885Humboldt
RFG Fraction #42710/17/1980HrdiNMC175089Humboldt
RFG#141/03/1980HrdiNMC143265Humboldt
RFG#328X5/15/1984Lewis Frank WNMC307553Humboldt
RFG#843/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC546051Humboldt
RFG-130-A1/08/2008Victory Exploration Inc.NMC985654Humboldt
RFGM 16/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008652Humboldt
RFGM 106/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008661Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFGM 10A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008716Humboldt
RFGM 116/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008662Humboldt
RFGM 11A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008717Humboldt
RFGM 126/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008663Humboldt
RFGM 12A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008718Humboldt
RFGM 12B6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008728Humboldt
RFGM 136/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008664Humboldt
RFGM 13A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008719Humboldt
RFGM 13B6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008729Humboldt
RFGM 146/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008665Humboldt
RFGM 14A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008720Humboldt
RFGM 156/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008666Humboldt
RFGM 166/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008667Humboldt
RFGM 176/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008668Humboldt
RFGM 1716/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008691Humboldt
RFGM 1726/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008692Humboldt
RFGM 1766/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008693Humboldt
RFGM 1776/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008694Humboldt
RFGM 177A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008725Humboldt
RFGM 1786/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008695Humboldt
RFGM 1796/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008696Humboldt
RFGM 186/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008669Humboldt
RFGM 1806/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008697Humboldt
RFGM 1816/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008698Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFGM 1826/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008699Humboldt
RFGM 1836/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008700Humboldt
RFGM 1846/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008701Humboldt
RFGM 1866/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008702Humboldt
RFGM 1876/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008703Humboldt
RFGM 18A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008721Humboldt
RFGM 196/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008670Humboldt
RFGM 26/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008653Humboldt
RFGM 206/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008671Humboldt
RFGM 20A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008722Humboldt
RFGM 216/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008672Humboldt
RFGM 226/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008673Humboldt
RFGM 22A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008723Humboldt
RFGM 22B6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008730Humboldt
RFGM 236/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008674Humboldt
RFGM 246/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008675Humboldt
RFGM 256/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008676Humboldt
RFGM 266/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008677Humboldt
RFGM 276/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008678Humboldt
RFGM 27A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008724Humboldt
RFGM 286/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008679Humboldt
RFGM 296/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008680Humboldt
RFGM 36/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008654Humboldt
RFGM 306/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008681Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFGM 316/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008682Humboldt
RFGM 326/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008683Humboldt
RFGM 336/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008684Humboldt
RFGM 346/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008685Humboldt
RFGM 3576/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008704Humboldt
RFGM 3586/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008705Humboldt
RFGM 358A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008726Humboldt
RFGM 3596/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008706Humboldt
RFGM 359A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008727Humboldt
RFGM 3606/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008707Humboldt
RFGM 3616/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008708Humboldt
RFGM 3636/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008709Humboldt
RFGM 3656/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008710Humboldt
RFGM 3676/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008711Humboldt
RFGM 46/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008655Humboldt
RFGM 406/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008686Humboldt
RFGM 416/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008687Humboldt
RFGM 426/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008688Humboldt
RFGM 436/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008689Humboldt
RFGM 56/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008656Humboldt
RFGM 576/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008690Humboldt
RFGM 66/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008657Humboldt
RFGM 6A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008712Humboldt
RFGM 76/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008658Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFGM 7A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008713Humboldt
RFGM 86/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008659Humboldt
RFGM 8A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008714Humboldt
RFGM 96/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008660Humboldt
RFGM 9A6/18/2009Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1008715Humboldt
SH 14/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990654Humboldt
SH 104/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990663Humboldt
SH 1004/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990753Humboldt
SH 1014/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990754Humboldt
SH 1024/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990755Humboldt
SH 1034/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990756Humboldt
SH 1044/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990757Humboldt
SH 1054/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990758Humboldt
SH 1064/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990759Humboldt
SH 1074/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990760Humboldt
SH 1084/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990761Humboldt
SH 1094/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990762Humboldt
SH 114/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990664Humboldt
SH 1104/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990763Humboldt
SH 1114/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990764Humboldt
SH 1124/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990765Humboldt
SH 1134/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990766Humboldt
SH 1144/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990767Humboldt
SH 1154/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990768Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 1164/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990769Humboldt
SH 1174/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990770Humboldt
SH 1184/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990771Humboldt
SH 1194/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990772Humboldt
SH 124/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990665Humboldt
SH 1204/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990773Humboldt
SH 1214/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990774Humboldt
SH 1224/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990775Humboldt
SH 1234/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990776Humboldt
SH 1244/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990777Humboldt
SH 1254/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990778Humboldt
SH 1264/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990779Humboldt
SH 1274/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990780Humboldt
SH 1284/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990781Humboldt
SH 1294/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990782Humboldt
SH 134/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990666Humboldt
SH 1304/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990783Humboldt
SH 1314/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990784Humboldt
SH 1324/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990785Humboldt
SH 1334/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990786Humboldt
SH 1344/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990787Humboldt
SH 1354/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990788Humboldt
SH 1364/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990789Humboldt
SH 1374/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990790Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 1384/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990791Humboldt
SH 1394/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990792Humboldt
SH 144/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990667Humboldt
SH 1404/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990793Humboldt
SH 1414/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990794Humboldt
SH 1424/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990795Humboldt
SH 1434/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990796Humboldt
SH 1444/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990797Humboldt
SH 1454/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990798Humboldt
SH 1464/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990799Humboldt
SH 1474/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990800Humboldt
SH 1484/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990801Humboldt
SH 1494/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990802Humboldt
SH 154/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990668Humboldt
SH 1504/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990803Humboldt
SH 1514/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990804Humboldt
SH 1524/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990805Humboldt
SH 1534/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990806Humboldt
SH 1544/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990807Humboldt
SH 1554/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990808Humboldt
SH 1564/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990809Humboldt
SH 1574/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990810Humboldt
SH 1584/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990811Humboldt
SH 1594/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990812Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 164/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990669Humboldt
SH 1604/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990813Humboldt
SH 1614/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990814Humboldt
SH 1624/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990815Humboldt
SH 1634/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990816Humboldt
SH 1644/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990817Humboldt
SH 1654/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990818Humboldt
SH 1664/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990819Humboldt
SH 1674/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990820Humboldt
SH 1684/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990821Humboldt
SH 174/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990670Humboldt
SH 184/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990671Humboldt
SH 194/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990672Humboldt
SH 24/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990655Humboldt
SH 204/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990673Humboldt
SH 214/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990674Humboldt
SH 224/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990675Humboldt
SH 234/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990676Humboldt
SH 244/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990677Humboldt
SH 254/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990678Humboldt
SH 264/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990679Humboldt
SH 274/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990680Humboldt
SH 284/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990681Humboldt
SH 294/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990682Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 34/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990656Humboldt
SH 304/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990683Humboldt
SH 314/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990684Humboldt
SH 324/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990685Humboldt
SH 334/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990686Humboldt
SH 344/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990687Humboldt
SH 354/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990688Humboldt
SH 3504/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991002Humboldt
SH 3514/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991003Humboldt
SH 3524/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991004Humboldt
SH 364/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990689Humboldt
SH 374/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990690Humboldt
SH 3734/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991025Humboldt
SH 3744/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991026Humboldt
SH 3754/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991027Humboldt
SH 3764/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991028Humboldt
SH 3774/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991029Humboldt
SH 3784/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991030Humboldt
SH 3794/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991031Humboldt
SH 384/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990691Humboldt
SH 3804/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991032Humboldt
SH 3814/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991033Humboldt
SH 394/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990692Humboldt
SH 3964/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991048Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 3974/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991049Humboldt
SH 3984/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991050Humboldt
SH 3994/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991051Humboldt
SH 4004/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991052Humboldt
SH 4014/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991053Humboldt
SH 4024/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991054Humboldt
SH 4034/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991055Humboldt
SH 4044/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991056Humboldt
SH 4054/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991057Humboldt
SH 4064/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991058Humboldt
SH 414/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990694Humboldt
SH 4194/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991071Humboldt
SH 424/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990695Humboldt
SH 4204/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991072Humboldt
SH 4214/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991073Humboldt
SH 4224/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991074Humboldt
SH 4234/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991075Humboldt
SH 4244/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991076Humboldt
SH 4254/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991077Humboldt
SH 4264/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991078Humboldt
SH 4274/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991079Humboldt
SH 4284/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991080Humboldt
SH 4294/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991081Humboldt
SH 434/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990696Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 4304/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991082Humboldt
SH 4394/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991090Humboldt
SH 444/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990697Humboldt
SH 4404/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991091Humboldt
SH 4414/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991092Humboldt
SH 4424/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991093Humboldt
SH 4434/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991094Humboldt
SH 4444/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991095Humboldt
SH 4454/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991096Humboldt
SH 4464/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991097Humboldt
SH 4474/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991098Humboldt
SH 4484/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991099Humboldt
SH 4494/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991100Humboldt
SH 454/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990698Humboldt
SH 4504/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991101Humboldt
SH 4514/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991102Humboldt
SH 4524/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991103Humboldt
SH 4534/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991104Humboldt
SH 4544/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991105Humboldt
SH 4554/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991106Humboldt
SH 4564/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991107Humboldt
SH 464/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990699Humboldt
SH 474/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990700Humboldt
SH 484/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990701Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 494/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990702Humboldt
SH 54/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990658Humboldt
SH 504/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990703Humboldt
SH 514/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990704Humboldt
SH 524/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990705Humboldt
SH 534/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990706Humboldt
SH 544/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990707Humboldt
SH 554/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990708Humboldt
SH 564/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990709Humboldt
SH 574/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990710Humboldt
SH 584/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990711Humboldt
SH 594/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990712Humboldt
SH 64/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990659Humboldt
SH 604/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990713Humboldt
SH 614/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990714Humboldt
SH 624/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990715Humboldt
SH 634/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990716Humboldt
SH 644/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990717Humboldt
SH 654/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990718Humboldt
SH 664/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990719Humboldt
SH 674/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990720Humboldt
SH 684/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990721Humboldt
SH 694/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990722Humboldt
SH 74/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990660Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 704/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990723Humboldt
SH 714/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990724Humboldt
SH 724/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990725Humboldt
SH 734/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990726Humboldt
SH 744/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990727Humboldt
SH 754/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990728Humboldt
SH 764/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990729Humboldt
SH 774/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990730Humboldt
SH 784/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990731Humboldt
SH 794/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990732Humboldt
SH 84/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990661Humboldt
SH 804/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990733Humboldt
SH 814/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990734Humboldt
SH 824/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990735Humboldt
SH 834/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990736Humboldt
SH 844/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990737Humboldt
SH 854/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990738Humboldt
SH 864/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990739Humboldt
SH 874/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990740Humboldt
SH 884/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990741Humboldt
SH 894/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990742Humboldt
SH 94/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990662Humboldt
SH 904/05/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990743Humboldt
SH 914/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990744Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 924/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990745Humboldt
SH 934/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990746Humboldt
SH 944/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990747Humboldt
SH 954/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990748Humboldt
SH 964/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990749Humboldt
SH 974/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990750Humboldt
SH 984/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990751Humboldt
SH 994/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990752Humboldt
SH44/20/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990657Humboldt
SH404/06/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990693Humboldt
SL 110/18/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1080086Humboldt
SL 210/18/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1080087Humboldt
SL 310/18/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1080088Humboldt
SL 410/18/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1080089Humboldt
SL 510/18/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1080090Humboldt
SL 610/18/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1080091Humboldt
Sulphate11/04/1980Lewis Frank WNMC181011Humboldt
Triple L #110/13/1979Lewis Frank WNMC127534Humboldt
Triple L #210/13/1979Lewis Frank WNMC127535Humboldt
Triple L #310/13/1979Lewis Frank WNMC127536Humboldt
Triple L #410/13/1979Lewis Frank WNMC127537Humboldt
Triple L #510/13/1979Lewis Frank WNMC127538Humboldt
WKM-19/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780688Humboldt
WKM-109/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780697Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

WKM-119/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780698Humboldt
WKM-129/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780699Humboldt
WKM-139/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780700Humboldt
WKM-149/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780701Humboldt
WKM-159/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780702Humboldt
WKM-169/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780703Humboldt
WKM-179/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780704Humboldt
WKM-189/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780705Humboldt
WKM-1910/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780706Humboldt
WKM-29/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780689Humboldt
WKM-2010/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780707Humboldt
WKM-2110/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780708Humboldt
WKM-2210/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780709Humboldt
WKM-2310/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780710Humboldt
WKM-2410/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780711Humboldt
WKM-2510/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780712Humboldt
WKM-2610/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780713Humboldt
WKM-2710/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780714Humboldt
WKM-2810/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780715Humboldt
WKM-2910/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780716Humboldt
WKM-39/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780690Humboldt
WKM-3010/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780717Humboldt
WKM-3110/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780718Humboldt
WKM-3210/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780719Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

WKM-3310/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780720Humboldt
WKM-3410/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780721Humboldt
WKM-3510/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780722Humboldt
WKM-3610/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780723Humboldt
WKM-3710/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780724Humboldt
WKM-3810/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780725Humboldt
WKM-3910/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780726Humboldt
WKM-49/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780691Humboldt
WKM-4010/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780727Humboldt
WKM-4110/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780728Humboldt
WKM-4210/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780729Humboldt
WKM-4310/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780730Humboldt
WKM-4410/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780731Humboldt
WKM-4510/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780732Humboldt
WKM-4610/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780733Humboldt
WKM-4710/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780734Humboldt
WKM-4810/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780735Humboldt
WKM-59/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780692Humboldt
WKM-5010/01/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780736Humboldt
WKM-5110/02/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780737Humboldt
WKM-5210/02/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780738Humboldt
WKM-5310/02/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780739Humboldt
WKM-5410/02/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780740Humboldt
WKM-5510/02/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780741Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

WKM-5610/02/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780742Humboldt
WKM-5710/02/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780743Humboldt
WKM-5810/02/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780744Humboldt
WKM-69/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780693Humboldt
WKM-6010/06/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780745Humboldt
WKM-6210/06/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780746Humboldt
WKM-6410/06/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780747Humboldt
WKM-79/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780694Humboldt
WKM-89/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780695Humboldt
WKM-99/30/1997F W Lewis IncNMC780696Humboldt
FG 4912/18/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100166Pershing
FG 7112/18/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100167Pershing
HRD12124/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102169Pershing
HRDI 2184/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102176Pershing
HRDI 2194/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102177Pershing
HRDI 112/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100176Pershing
HRDI 1012/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100185Pershing
HRDI 1004/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102058Pershing
HRDI 1014/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102059Pershing
HRDI 1024/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102060Pershing
HRDI 1034/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102061Pershing
HRDI 1044/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102062Pershing
HRDI 1054/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102063Pershing
HRDI 1064/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102064Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

HRDI 1074/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102065Pershing
HRDI 1084/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102066Pershing
HRDI 1094/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102067Pershing
HRDI 1112/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100186Pershing
HRDI 1104/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102068Pershing
HRDI 1114/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102069Pershing
HRDI 1124/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102070Pershing
HRDI 1134/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102071Pershing
HRDI 1144/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102072Pershing
HRDI 1154/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102073Pershing
HRDI 1164/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102074Pershing
HRDI 1174/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102075Pershing
HRDI 1184/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102076Pershing
HRDI 1194/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102077Pershing
HRDI 1212/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100187Pershing
HRDI 1204/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102078Pershing
HRDI 1214/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102079Pershing
HRDI 1224/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102080Pershing
HRDI 1234/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102081Pershing
HRDI 1244/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102082Pershing
HRDI 1254/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102083Pershing
HRDI 1264/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102084Pershing
HRDI 1274/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102085Pershing
HRDI 1284/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102086Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

HRDI 1294/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102087Pershing
HRDI 1312/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100188Pershing
HRDI 1304/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102088Pershing
HRDI 1314/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102089Pershing
HRDI 1324/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102090Pershing
HRDI 1334/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102091Pershing
HRDI 1344/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102092Pershing
HRDI 1354/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102093Pershing
HRDI 1364/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102094Pershing
HRDI 1374/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102095Pershing
HRDI 1384/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102096Pershing
HRDI 1394/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102097Pershing
HRDI 1412/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100189Pershing
HRDI 1404/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102098Pershing
HRDI 1414/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102099Pershing
HRDI 1424/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102100Pershing
HRDI 1434/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102101Pershing
HRDI 1444/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102102Pershing
HRDI 1454/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102103Pershing
HRDI 1464/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102104Pershing
HRDI 1474/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102105Pershing
HRDI 1484/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102106Pershing
HRDI 1494/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102107Pershing
HRDI 1512/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100190Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

HRDI 1504/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102108Pershing
HRDI 1514/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102109Pershing
HRDI 1524/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102110Pershing
HRDI 1534/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102111Pershing
HRDI 1544/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102112Pershing
HRDI 1554/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102113Pershing
HRDI 1564/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102114Pershing
HRDI 1574/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102115Pershing
HRDI 1584/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102116Pershing
HRDI 1594/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102117Pershing
HRDI 1612/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100191Pershing
HRDI 1604/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102118Pershing
HRDI 1614/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102119Pershing
HRDI 1624/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102120Pershing
HRDI 1634/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102121Pershing
HRDI 1644/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102122Pershing
HRDI 1654/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102123Pershing
HRDI 1664/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102124Pershing
HRDI 1674/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102125Pershing
HRDI 1684/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102126Pershing
HRDI 1694/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102127Pershing
HRDI 1712/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100192Pershing
HRDI 1704/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102128Pershing
HRDI 1714/9/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102129Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

HRDI 1724/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102130Pershing
HRDI 1734/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102131Pershing
HRDI 1744/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102132Pershing
HRDI 1754/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102133Pershing
HRDI 1764/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102134Pershing
HRDI 1774/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102135Pershing
HRDI 1784/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102136Pershing
HRDI 1794/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102137Pershing
HRDI 1812/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100193Pershing
HRDI 1804/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102138Pershing
HRDI 1814/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102139Pershing
HRDI 1824/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102140Pershing
HRDI 1834/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102141Pershing
HRDI 1844/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102142Pershing
HRDI 1854/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102143Pershing
HRDI 1864/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102144Pershing
HRDI 1874/11/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102145Pershing
HRDI 1884/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102146Pershing
HRDI 1894/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102147Pershing
HRDI 1912/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100194Pershing
HRDI 1904/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102148Pershing
HRDI 1914/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102149Pershing
HRDI 1924/15/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102150Pershing
HRDI 1934/15/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102151Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

HRDI 1944/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102152Pershing
HRDI 1954/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102153Pershing
HRDI 1964/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102154Pershing
HRDI 1974/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102155Pershing
HRDI 1984/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102156Pershing
HRDI 1994/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102157Pershing
HRDI 212/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100177Pershing
HRDI 2012/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100195Pershing
HRDI 2004/15/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102158Pershing
HRDI 2014/15/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102159Pershing
HRDI 2024/10/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102160Pershing
HRDI 2034/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102161Pershing
HRDI 2044/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102162Pershing
HRDI 2054/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102163Pershing
HRDI 2064/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102164Pershing
HRDI 2074/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102165Pershing
HRDI 2084/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102166Pershing
HRDI 2094/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102167Pershing
HRDI 2112/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100196Pershing
HRDI 2104/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102168Pershing
HRDI 2114/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102170Pershing
HRDI 2134/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102171Pershing
HRDI 2144/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102172Pershing
HRDI 2154/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102173Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

HRDI 2164/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102174Pershing
HRDI 2174/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102175Pershing
HRDI 2212/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100197Pershing
HRDI 2204/16/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102178Pershing
HRDI 2214/15/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102179Pershing
HRDI 2224/15/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102180Pershing
HRDI 2234/15/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102181Pershing
HRDI 2312/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100198Pershing
HRDI 2412/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100199Pershing
HRDI 2512/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100200Pershing
HRDI 2612/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100201Pershing
HRDI 2712/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100202Pershing
HRDI 2812/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100203Pershing
HRDI 2912/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100204Pershing
HRDI 312/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100178Pershing
HRDI 3012/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100205Pershing
HRDI 3112/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100206Pershing
HRDI 3212/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100207Pershing
HRDI 3312/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100208Pershing
HRDI 3412/18/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100209Pershing
HRDI 3512/18/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100210Pershing
HRDI 3612/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100211Pershing
HRDI 3712/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100212Pershing
HRDI 3812/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100213Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

HRDI 3912/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100214Pershing
HRDI 412/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100179Pershing
HRDI 4012/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100215Pershing
HRDI 4112/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100216Pershing
HRDI 4212/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100217Pershing
HRDI 4312/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100218Pershing
HRDI 4412/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100219Pershing
HRDI 4512/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100220Pershing
HRDI 4612/17/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100221Pershing
HRDI 474/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102005Pershing
HRDI 484/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102006Pershing
HRDI 494/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102007Pershing
HRDI 512/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100180Pershing
HRDI 504/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102008Pershing
HRDI 514/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102009Pershing
HRDI 524/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102010Pershing
HRDI 534/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102011Pershing
HRDI 544/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102012Pershing
HRDI 554/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102013Pershing
HRDI 564/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102014Pershing
HRDI 574/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102015Pershing
HRDI 584/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102016Pershing
HRDI 594/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102017Pershing
HRDI 612/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100181Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

HRDI 604/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102018Pershing
HRDI 614/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102019Pershing
HRDI 624/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102020Pershing
HRDI 634/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102021Pershing
HRDI 644/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102022Pershing
HRDI 654/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102023Pershing
HRDI 664/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102024Pershing
HRDI 674/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102025Pershing
HRDI 684/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102026Pershing
HRDI 694/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102027Pershing
HRDI 712/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100182Pershing
HRDI 704/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102028Pershing
HRDI 714/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102029Pershing
HRDI 724/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102030Pershing
HRDI 734/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102031Pershing
HRDI 744/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102032Pershing
HRDI 754/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102033Pershing
HRDI 764/7/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102034Pershing
HRDI 774/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102035Pershing
HRDI 784/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102036Pershing
HRDI 794/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102037Pershing
HRDI 812/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100183Pershing
HRDI 804/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102038Pershing
HRDI 814/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102039Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

HRDI 824/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102040Pershing
HRDI 834/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102041Pershing
HRDI 844/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102042Pershing
HRDI 854/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102043Pershing
HRDI 864/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102044Pershing
HRDI 874/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102045Pershing
HRDI 884/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102046Pershing
HRDI 894/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102047Pershing
HRDI 912/16/2013Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1100184Pershing
HRDI 904/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102048Pershing
HRDI 914/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102049Pershing
HRDI 924/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102050Pershing
HRDI 934/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102051Pershing
HRDI 944/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102052Pershing
HRDI 954/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102053Pershing
HRDI 964/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102054Pershing
HRDI 974/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102055Pershing
HRDI 984/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102056Pershing
HRDI 994/8/2014Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1102057Pershing
NC 1028/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027940Pershing
NC 1038/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027941Pershing
NC 1048/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027942Pershing
NC 1058/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027943Pershing
NC 1068/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027944Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NC 1078/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027945Pershing
NC 1088/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027946Pershing
NC 1098/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027947Pershing
NC 1338/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027971Pershing
NC 1348/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027972Pershing
NC 1358/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027973Pershing
NC 1368/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027974Pershing
NC 1378/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027975Pershing
NC 1388/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027976Pershing
NC 1398/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027977Pershing
NC 1408/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027978Pershing
NC 1418/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027979Pershing
NC 1428/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027980Pershing
NC 1438/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027981Pershing
NC 1448/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027982Pershing
NC 1458/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027983Pershing
NC 1468/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027984Pershing
NC 1478/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027985Pershing
NC 1488/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027986Pershing
NC 1498/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027987Pershing
NC 1508/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027988Pershing
NC 1718/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028009Pershing
NC 1728/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028010Pershing
NC 1738/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028011Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NC 1748/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028012Pershing
NC 1758/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028013Pershing
NC 1768/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028014Pershing
NC 1778/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028015Pershing
NC 1788/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028016Pershing
NC 1798/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028017Pershing
NC 1808/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028018Pershing
NC 1818/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028019Pershing
NC 1828/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028020Pershing
NC 1838/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028021Pershing
NC 1848/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028022Pershing
NC 1858/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028023Pershing
NC 1868/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028024Pershing
NC 1878/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028025Pershing
NC 1888/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028026Pershing
NC 2068/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028044Pershing
NC 2078/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028045Pershing
NC 2088/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028046Pershing
NC 2098/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028047Pershing
NC 2108/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028048Pershing
NC 2118/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028049Pershing
NC 2128/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028050Pershing
NC 2138/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028051Pershing
NC 2148/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028052Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NC 2158/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028053Pershing
NC 2168/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028054Pershing
NC 2178/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028055Pershing
NC 2188/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028056Pershing
NC 2198/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028057Pershing
NC 2208/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028058Pershing
NC 2218/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028059Pershing
NC 2228/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028060Pershing
NC 2238/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028061Pershing
NC 2418/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028079Pershing
NC 2428/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028080Pershing
NC 2438/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028081Pershing
NC 2448/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028082Pershing
NC 2458/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028083Pershing
NC 2468/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028084Pershing
NC 2478/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028085Pershing
NC 2488/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028086Pershing
NC 2498/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028087Pershing
NC 2508/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028088Pershing
NC 2518/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028089Pershing
NC 2528/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028090Pershing
NC 2538/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028091Pershing
NC 2548/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028092Pershing
NC 2558/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028093Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NC 2568/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028094Pershing
NC 2578/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028095Pershing
NC 2588/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028096Pershing
NC 2758/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028113Pershing
NC 2768/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028114Pershing
NC 2778/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028115Pershing
NC 2788/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028116Pershing
NC 2798/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028117Pershing
NC 2808/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028118Pershing
NC 2818/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028119Pershing
NC 2828/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028120Pershing
NC 2838/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028121Pershing
NC 2848/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028122Pershing
NC 2858/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028123Pershing
NC 2868/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028124Pershing
NC 2878/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028125Pershing
NC 2888/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028126Pershing
NC 2898/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028127Pershing
NC 2908/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028128Pershing
NC 2918/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028129Pershing
NC 2928/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028130Pershing
NC 3078/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028145Pershing
NC 3088/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028146Pershing
NC 3098/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028147Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NC 3108/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028148Pershing
NC 3118/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028149Pershing
NC 3128/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028150Pershing
NC 3138/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028151Pershing
NC 3148/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028152Pershing
NC 3158/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028153Pershing
NC 3168/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028154Pershing
NC 3178/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028155Pershing
NC 3188/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028156Pershing
NC 3198/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028157Pershing
NC 3208/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028158Pershing
NC 3218/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028159Pershing
NC 3228/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028160Pershing
NC 3238/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028161Pershing
NC 3248/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028162Pershing
OS 19/11/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078793Pershing
OS 109/11/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078802Pershing
OS 119/11/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078803Pershing
OS 129/11/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078804Pershing
OS 29/11/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078794Pershing
OS 39/11/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078795Pershing
OS 49/11/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078796Pershing
OS 59/11/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078797Pershing
OS 69/11/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078798Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

OS 79/11/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078799Pershing
OS 89/11/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078800Pershing
OS 99/11/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078801Pershing
OSC 110/28/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035889Pershing
OSC 210/28/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035890Pershing
OSC 310/28/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035891Pershing
OSC 3511/1/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035895Pershing
OSC 3610/29/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035896Pershing
OSC 3710/29/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035897Pershing
OSC 3811/1/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035898Pershing
OSC 3910/29/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035899Pershing
OSC 410/28/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035892Pershing
OSC 4010/29/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035900Pershing
OSC 4111/1/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035901Pershing
OSC 4210/29/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035902Pershing
OSC 4310/29/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035903Pershing
OSC 4411/1/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035904Pershing
OSC 4510/29/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035905Pershing
OSC 4610/29/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035906Pershing
OSC 4710/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035907Pershing
OSC 4810/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035908Pershing
OSC 4910/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035909Pershing
OSC 510/28/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035893Pershing
OSC 5010/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035910Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

OSC 5110/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035911Pershing
OSC 5210/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035912Pershing
OSC 5310/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035913Pershing
OSC 5410/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035914Pershing
OSC 5510/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035915Pershing
OSC 5610/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035916Pershing
OSC 5710/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035917Pershing
OSC 5810/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035918Pershing
OSC 5910/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035919Pershing
OSC 610/28/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035894Pershing
OSC 6010/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035920Pershing
OSC 6110/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035921Pershing
OSC 6210/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035922Pershing
OSC 6310/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035923Pershing
OSC 6410/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035924Pershing
OSC 6510/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035925Pershing
OSC 6610/31/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035926Pershing
OSC 6711/1/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035927Pershing
OSC 6811/1/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035928Pershing
OSC 6911/1/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035929Pershing
OSC 7011/1/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035930Pershing
OSC 7111/1/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035931Pershing
OSC 7211/1/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035932Pershing
OSC 7311/1/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035933Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

OSC 7411/1/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035934Pershing
OSC 7511/1/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035935Pershing
OSC 7611/1/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1035936Pershing
RMK 19/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078774Pershing
RMK 109/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078783Pershing
RMK 119/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078784Pershing
RMK 129/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078785Pershing
RMK 139/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078786Pershing
RMK 149/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078787Pershing
RMK 159/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078788Pershing
RMK 169/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078789Pershing
RMK 179/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078790Pershing
RMK 189/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078791Pershing
RMK 199/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078792Pershing
RMK 29/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078775Pershing
RMK 39/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078776Pershing
RMK 49/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078777Pershing
RMK 59/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078778Pershing
RMK 69/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078779Pershing
RMK 79/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078780Pershing
RMK 89/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078781Pershing
RMK 99/27/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1078782Pershing
WCR 1007/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076520Pershing
WCR 1017/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076521Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

WCR 1027/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076522Pershing
WCR 1037/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076523Pershing
WCR 1047/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076524Pershing
WCR 1057/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076525Pershing
WCR 1067/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076526Pershing
WCR 1077/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076527Pershing
WCR 1087/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076528Pershing
WCR 1097/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076529Pershing
WCR 117/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076453Pershing
WCR 1107/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076530Pershing
WCR 1117/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076531Pershing
WCR 1127/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076532Pershing
WCR 1137/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076533Pershing
WCR 1147/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076534Pershing
WCR 1157/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076535Pershing
WCR 1167/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076536Pershing
WCR 1177/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076537Pershing
WCR 127/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076454Pershing
WCR 137/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076455Pershing
WCR 147/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076456Pershing
WCR 157/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076457Pershing
WCR 167/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076458Pershing
WCR 177/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076459Pershing
WCR 187/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076460Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

WCR 197/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076461Pershing
WCR 207/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076462Pershing
WCR 217/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076463Pershing
WCR 227/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076464Pershing
WCR 237/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076465Pershing
WCR 247/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076466Pershing
WCR 257/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076467Pershing
WCR 267/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076468Pershing
WCR 277/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076469Pershing
WCR 287/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076470Pershing
WCR 297/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076471Pershing
WCR 307/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076472Pershing
WCR 317/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076473Pershing
WCR 327/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076474Pershing
WCR 337/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076475Pershing
WCR 347/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076476Pershing
WCR 357/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076477Pershing
WCR 367/26/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076478Pershing
WCR 477/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076479Pershing
WCR 487/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076480Pershing
WCR 497/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076481Pershing
WCR 507/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076482Pershing
WCR 517/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076483Pershing
WCR 527/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076484Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

WCR 537/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076485Pershing
WCR 547/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076486Pershing
WCR 557/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076487Pershing
WCR 567/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076488Pershing
WCR 577/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076489Pershing
WCR 587/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076490Pershing
WCR 597/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076491Pershing
WCR 607/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076492Pershing
WCR 617/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076493Pershing
WCR 627/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076494Pershing
WCR 637/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076495Pershing
WCR 647/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076496Pershing
WCR 657/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076497Pershing
WCR 667/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076498Pershing
WCR 677/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076499Pershing
WCR 687/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076500Pershing
WCR 697/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076501Pershing
WCR 707/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076502Pershing
WCR 717/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076503Pershing
WCR 727/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076504Pershing
WCR 737/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076505Pershing
WCR 747/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076506Pershing
WCR 757/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076507Pershing
WCR 767/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076508Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

WCR 777/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076509Pershing
WCR 787/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076510Pershing
WCR 797/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076511Pershing
WCR 807/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076512Pershing
WCR 817/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076513Pershing
WCR 827/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076514Pershing
WCR 837/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076515Pershing
WCR 847/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076516Pershing
WCR 977/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076517Pershing
WCR 987/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076518Pershing
WCR 997/25/2012Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1076519Pershing
CKC#89/6/1973Crofoot Daniel MNMC 88355Pershing
CKC#99/6/1973Crofoot Daniel MNMC 88356Pershing
FG 19/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939059Pershing
FG 109/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939068Pershing
FG 1009/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939157Pershing
FG 1019/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939158Pershing
FG 1029/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939159Pershing
FG 1039/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939160Pershing
FG 1049/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939161Pershing
FG 1059/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939162Pershing
FG 1069/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939163Pershing
FG 1079/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939164Pershing
FG 1089/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939165Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 1099/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939166Pershing
FG 119/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939069Pershing
FG 1109/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939167Pershing
FG 1119/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939168Pershing
FG 1129/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939169Pershing
FG 1139/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939170Pershing
FG 1149/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939171Pershing
FG 1159/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939172Pershing
FG 1169/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939173Pershing
FG 129/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939070Pershing
FG 1219/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939174Pershing
FG 1229/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939175Pershing
FG 1239/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939176Pershing
FG 1249/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939177Pershing
FG 1259/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939178Pershing
FG 1269/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939179Pershing
FG 1279/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939180Pershing
FG 139/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939071Pershing
FG 1309/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939181Pershing
FG 1319/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939182Pershing
FG 1329/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939183Pershing
FG 1339/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939184Pershing
FG 1349/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939185Pershing
FG 1359/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939186Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 1369/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939187Pershing
FG 1379/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939188Pershing
FG 1389/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939189Pershing
FG 1399/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939190Pershing
FG 149/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939072Pershing
FG 1409/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939191Pershing
FG 1419/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939192Pershing
FG 1429/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939193Pershing
FG 1439/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939194Pershing
FG 1449/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939195Pershing
FG 1459/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939196Pershing
FG 1469/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939197Pershing
FG 1479/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939198Pershing
FG 1489/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939199Pershing
FG 1499/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939200Pershing
FG 159/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939073Pershing
FG 1509/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939201Pershing
FG 1519/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939202Pershing
FG 1529/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939203Pershing
FG 1539/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939204Pershing
FG 1549/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939205Pershing
FG 1559/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939206Pershing
FG 1569/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939207Pershing
FG 1579/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939208Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 1589/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939209Pershing
FG 1599/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939210Pershing
FG 169/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939074Pershing
FG 1609/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939211Pershing
FG 1619/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939212Pershing
FG 1629/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939213Pershing
FG 1649/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939214Pershing
FG 1659/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939215Pershing
FG 1669/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939216Pershing
FG 1679/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939217Pershing
FG 179/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939075Pershing
FG 1739/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939218Pershing
FG 1749/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939219Pershing
FG 1759/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939220Pershing
FG 1769/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939221Pershing
FG 1779/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939222Pershing
FG 1789/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939223Pershing
FG 1799/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939224Pershing
FG 189/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939076Pershing
FG 1809/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939225Pershing
FG 1819/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939226Pershing
FG 1829/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939227Pershing
FG 1839/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939228Pershing
FG 1849/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939229Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 1859/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939230Pershing
FG 1869/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939231Pershing
FG 1879/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939232Pershing
FG 1889/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939233Pershing
FG 1899/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939234Pershing
FG 199/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939077Pershing
FG 1909/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939235Pershing
FG 1919/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939236Pershing
FG 1929/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939237Pershing
FG 1939/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939238Pershing
FG 1949/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939239Pershing
FG 1959/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939240Pershing
FG 1969/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939241Pershing
FG 1979/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939242Pershing
FG 1989/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939243Pershing
FG 1999/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939244Pershing
FG 29/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939060Pershing
FG 209/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939078Pershing
FG 2009/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939245Pershing
FG 2019/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939246Pershing
FG 2029/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939247Pershing
FG 219/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939079Pershing
FG 2159/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939248Pershing
FG 2169/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939249Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 2179/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939250Pershing
FG 2189/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939251Pershing
FG 2199/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939252Pershing
FG 229/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939080Pershing
FG 2209/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939253Pershing
FG 2219/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939254Pershing
FG 2229/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939255Pershing
FG 2279/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939260Pershing
FG 2289/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939261Pershing
FG 2299/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939262Pershing
FG 239/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939081Pershing
FG 2309/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939263Pershing
FG 2319/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939264Pershing
FG 2329/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939265Pershing
FG 2339/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939266Pershing
FG 2349/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939267Pershing
FG 2359/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939268Pershing
FG 2369/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939269Pershing
FG 2379/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939270Pershing
FG 2389/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939271Pershing
FG 2399/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939272Pershing
FG 249/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939082Pershing
FG 2409/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939273Pershing
FG 2419/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939274Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 2429/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939275Pershing
FG 2439/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939276Pershing
FG 2449/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939277Pershing
FG 2459/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939278Pershing
FG 2469/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939279Pershing
FG 2479/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939280Pershing
FG 2489/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939281Pershing
FG 2499/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939282Pershing
FG 259/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939083Pershing
FG 269/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939084Pershing
FG 2629/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939283Pershing
FG 2639/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939284Pershing
FG 2649/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939285Pershing
FG 2659/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939286Pershing
FG 2669/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939287Pershing
FG 2679/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939288Pershing
FG 2689/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939289Pershing
FG 2699/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939290Pershing
FG 279/5/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939085Pershing
FG 2769/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939297Pershing
FG 2779/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939298Pershing
FG 2789/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939299Pershing
FG 2799/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939300Pershing
FG 289/5/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939086Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 2809/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939301Pershing
FG 2819/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939302Pershing
FG 2829/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939303Pershing
FG 2839/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939304Pershing
FG 2849/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939305Pershing
FG 2859/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939306Pershing
FG 2869/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939307Pershing
FG 2879/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939308Pershing
FG 2889/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939309Pershing
FG 2899/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939310Pershing
FG 299/5/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939087Pershing
FG 2909/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939311Pershing
FG 2919/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939312Pershing
FG 2929/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939313Pershing
FG 2939/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939314Pershing
FG 2949/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939315Pershing
FG 2959/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939316Pershing
FG 2969/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939317Pershing
FG 2979/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939318Pershing
FG 2989/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939319Pershing
FG 2999/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939320Pershing
FG 39/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939061Pershing
FG 309/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939088Pershing
FG 3009/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939321Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 3019/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939322Pershing
FG 3029/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939323Pershing
FG 319/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939089Pershing
FG 3119/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939324Pershing
FG 3129/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939325Pershing
FG 3139/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939326Pershing
FG 3149/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939327Pershing
FG 3159/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939328Pershing
FG 3169/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939329Pershing
FG 3179/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939330Pershing
FG 3189/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939331Pershing
FG 329/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939090Pershing
FG 3259/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939338Pershing
FG 3269/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939339Pershing
FG 3279/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939340Pershing
FG 3289/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939341Pershing
FG 3299/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939342Pershing
FG 339/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939091Pershing
FG 3309/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939343Pershing
FG 3319/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939344Pershing
FG 3329/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939345Pershing
FG 3339/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939346Pershing
FG 3349/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939347Pershing
FG 3359/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939348Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 3369/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939349Pershing
FG 3379/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939350Pershing
FG 3389/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939351Pershing
FG 3399/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939352Pershing
FG 349/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939092Pershing
FG 3409/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939353Pershing
FG 3419/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939354Pershing
FG 3429/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939355Pershing
FG 3439/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939356Pershing
FG 3449/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939357Pershing
FG 3459/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939358Pershing
FG 3469/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939359Pershing
FG 3479/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939360Pershing
FG 3499/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939362Pershing
FG 359/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939093Pershing
FG 3509/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939363Pershing
FG 3519/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939364Pershing
FG 369/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939094Pershing
FG 3609/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939365Pershing
FG 3619/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939366Pershing
FG 3629/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939367Pershing
FG 3639/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939368Pershing
FG 3649/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939369Pershing
FG 3659/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939370Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 3669/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939371Pershing
FG 3679/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939372Pershing
FG 379/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939095Pershing
FG 3789/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939383Pershing
FG 3799/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939384Pershing
FG 3809/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939385Pershing
FG 3819/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939386Pershing
FG 3829/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939387Pershing
FG 3839/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939388Pershing
FG 3849/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939389Pershing
FG 3859/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939390Pershing
FG 3869/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939391Pershing
FG 3879/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939392Pershing
FG 3889/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939393Pershing
FG 3899/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939394Pershing
FG 399/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939097Pershing
FG 3909/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939395Pershing
FG 3919/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939396Pershing
FG 3929/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939397Pershing
FG 3939/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939398Pershing
FG 3949/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939399Pershing
FG 3959/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939400Pershing
FG 3969/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939401Pershing
FG 3979/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939402Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 3989/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939403Pershing
FG 3999/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939404Pershing
FG 49/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939062Pershing
FG 409/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939098Pershing
FG 4009/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939405Pershing
FG 4019/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939406Pershing
FG 4029/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939407Pershing
FG 4039/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939408Pershing
FG 4049/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939409Pershing
FG 4059/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939410Pershing
FG 4069/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939411Pershing
FG 4079/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939412Pershing
FG 4089/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939413Pershing
FG 4099/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939414Pershing
FG 419/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939099Pershing
FG 4109/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939415Pershing
FG 4119/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939416Pershing
FG 4129/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939417Pershing
FG 4139/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939418Pershing
FG 4149/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939419Pershing
FG 4159/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939420Pershing
FG 4169/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939421Pershing
FG 4179/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939422Pershing
FG 4189/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939423Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 4199/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939424Pershing
FG 429/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939100Pershing
FG 4209/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939425Pershing
FG 439/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939101Pershing
FG 4349/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939439Pershing
FG 4359/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939440Pershing
FG 4369/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939441Pershing
FG 4379/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939442Pershing
FG 4389/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939443Pershing
FG 4399/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939444Pershing
FG 449/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939102Pershing
FG 4409/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939445Pershing
FG 4419/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939446Pershing
FG 4429/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939447Pershing
FG 4439/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939448Pershing
FG 4449/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939449Pershing
FG 4459/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939450Pershing
FG 4469/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939451Pershing
FG 4479/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939452Pershing
FG 4489/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939453Pershing
FG 4499/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939454Pershing
FG 459/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939103Pershing
FG 4509/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939455Pershing
FG 4519/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939456Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 4529/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939457Pershing
FG 4539/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939458Pershing
FG 4549/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939459Pershing
FG 4559/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939460Pershing
FG 4569/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939461Pershing
FG 4579/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939462Pershing
FG 4589/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939463Pershing
FG 4599/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939464Pershing
FG 469/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939104Pershing
FG 4609/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939465Pershing
FG 4619/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939466Pershing
FG 4629/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939467Pershing
FG 4639/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939468Pershing
FG 4649/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939469Pershing
FG 4659/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939470Pershing
FG 4669/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939471Pershing
FG 4679/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939472Pershing
FG 4689/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939473Pershing
FG 4699/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939474Pershing
FG 479/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939105Pershing
FG 4709/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939475Pershing
FG 4719/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939476Pershing
FG 4729/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939477Pershing
FG 4739/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939478Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 4749/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939479Pershing
FG 4759/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939480Pershing
FG 4769/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939481Pershing
FG 4779/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939482Pershing
FG 4789/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939483Pershing
FG 4799/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939484Pershing
FG 489/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939106Pershing
FG 4809/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939485Pershing
FG 4819/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939486Pershing
FG 4829/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939487Pershing
FG 4839/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939488Pershing
FG 4849/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939489Pershing
FG 4859/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939490Pershing
FG 4869/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939491Pershing
FG 4879/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939492Pershing
FG 4889/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939493Pershing
FG 4899/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939494Pershing
FG 499/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939107Pershing
FG 4909/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939495Pershing
FG 4919/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939496Pershing
FG 4929/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939497Pershing
FG 4939/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939498Pershing
FG 4949/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939499Pershing
FG 4959/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939500Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 4969/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939501Pershing
FG 4979/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939502Pershing
FG 4989/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939503Pershing
FG 4999/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939504Pershing
FG 59/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939063Pershing
FG 509/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939108Pershing
FG 5009/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939505Pershing
FG 519/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939109Pershing
FG 529/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939110Pershing
FG 539/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939111Pershing
FG 549/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939112Pershing
FG 559/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939113Pershing
FG 569/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939114Pershing
FG 579/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939115Pershing
FG 589/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939116Pershing
FG 599/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939117Pershing
FG 69/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939064Pershing
FG 609/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939118Pershing
FG 619/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939119Pershing
FG 629/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939120Pershing
FG 639/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939121Pershing
FG 649/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939122Pershing
FG 659/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939123Pershing
FG 669/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939124Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 679/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939125Pershing
FG 689/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939126Pershing
FG 699/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939127Pershing
FG 79/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939065Pershing
FG 709/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939128Pershing
FG 719/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939129Pershing
FG 739/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939131Pershing
FG 749/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939132Pershing
FG 759/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939133Pershing
FG 769/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939134Pershing
FG 779/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939135Pershing
FG 789/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939136Pershing
FG 799/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939137Pershing
FG 89/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939066Pershing
FG 809/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939138Pershing
FG 819/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939139Pershing
FG 829/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939140Pershing
FG 849/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939141Pershing
FG 859/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939142Pershing
FG 869/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939143Pershing
FG 879/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939144Pershing
FG 889/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939145Pershing
FG 899/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939146Pershing
FG 99/11/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939067Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 909/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939147Pershing
FG 919/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939148Pershing
FG 929/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939149Pershing
FG 939/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939150Pershing
FG 949/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939151Pershing
FG 959/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939152Pershing
FG 969/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939153Pershing
FG 979/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939154Pershing
FG 989/9/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939155Pershing
FG 999/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939156Pershing
FG3489/10/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939361Pershing
FG389/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939096Pershing
FG729/2/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939130Pershing
Nadine #11/20/2007HrdiNMC 946619Pershing
NC 1008/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027938Pershing
NC 1018/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027939Pershing
NC 188/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027856Pershing
NC 198/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027857Pershing
NC 208/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027858Pershing
NC 218/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027859Pershing
NC 228/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027860Pershing
NC 238/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027861Pershing
NC 248/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027862Pershing
NC 258/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027863Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NC 268/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027864Pershing
NC 278/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027865Pershing
NC 288/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027866Pershing
NC 298/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027867Pershing
NC 308/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027868Pershing
NC 518/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027889Pershing
NC 528/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027890Pershing
NC 538/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027891Pershing
NC 548/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027892Pershing
NC 558/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027893Pershing
NC 568/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027894Pershing
NC 578/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027895Pershing
NC 588/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027896Pershing
NC 598/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027897Pershing
NC 608/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027898Pershing
NC 618/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027899Pershing
NC 628/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027900Pershing
NC 638/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027901Pershing
NC 648/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027902Pershing
NC 658/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027903Pershing
NC 668/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027904Pershing
NC 678/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027905Pershing
NC 688/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027906Pershing
NC 928/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027930Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

NC 938/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027931Pershing
NC 948/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027932Pershing
NC 958/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027933Pershing
NC 968/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027934Pershing
NC 978/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027935Pershing
NC 988/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027936Pershing
NC 998/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027937Pershing
NFRA 1011/8/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977842Pershing
NFRA 1111/8/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977843Pershing
NFRA 2111/8/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977853Pershing
NFRA 2211/8/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977854Pershing
NFRA 2511/8/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977857Pershing
NFRA 611/8/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977838Pershing
NFRA 711/8/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977839Pershing
NFRA 811/8/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977840Pershing
NFRA 911/8/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977841Pershing
RFG #1201/24/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141680Pershing
RFG #1211/24/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141681Pershing
RFG #1221/24/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141682Pershing
RFG #1231/24/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141683Pershing
RFG #1241/24/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141684Pershing
RFG #1251/24/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141685Pershing
RFG #1351/9/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141692Pershing
RFG #1371/9/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141694Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #1391/9/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141696Pershing
RFG #1411/9/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141698Pershing
RFG #1431/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141700Pershing
RFG #1451/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141702Pershing
RFG #1471/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141704Pershing
RFG #1481/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141705Pershing
RFG #1491/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141706Pershing
RFG #1501/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141707Pershing
RFG #1511/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141708Pershing
RFG #1521/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141709Pershing
RFG #1531/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141710Pershing
RFG #1541/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141711Pershing
RFG #1551/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141712Pershing
RFG #1561/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141713Pershing
RFG #1571/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141714Pershing
RFG #1581/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141715Pershing
RFG #1591/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141716Pershing
RFG #1601/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141717Pershing
RFG #1611/22/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141718Pershing
RFG #1621/23/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141719Pershing
RFG #1631/23/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141720Pershing
RFG #1641/23/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141721Pershing
RFG #1651/23/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141722Pershing
RFG #1661/23/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141723Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #1671/23/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141724Pershing
RFG #201A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141726Pershing
RFG #202A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141727Pershing
RFG #203A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141728Pershing
RFG #204A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141729Pershing
RFG #205A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141730Pershing
RFG #206A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141731Pershing
RFG #207A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141732Pershing
RFG #208A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141733Pershing
RFG #209A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141734Pershing
RFG #210A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141735Pershing
RFG #211A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141736Pershing
RFG #212A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141737Pershing
RFG #213A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141738Pershing
RFG #214A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141739Pershing
RFG #215A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141740Pershing
RFG #216A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141741Pershing
RFG #217A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141742Pershing
RFG #218A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141743Pershing
RFG #219A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141744Pershing
RFG #220A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141745Pershing
RFG #221A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141746Pershing
RFG #222A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141747Pershing
RFG #223A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141748Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #225A1/7/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141750Pershing
RFG #226A1/7/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141751Pershing
RFG #227A1/7/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141752Pershing
RFG #228A1/7/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141754Pershing
RFG #2291/25/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141755Pershing
RFG #229A1/7/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141756Pershing
RFG #230A1/7/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141758Pershing
RFG #2311/25/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141759Pershing
RFG #231A1/7/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141760Pershing
RFG #232A1/7/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141761Pershing
RFG #2331/26/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141762Pershing
RFG #233A1/7/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141763Pershing
RFG #234A1/7/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141765Pershing
RFG #235A1/7/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141767Pershing
RFG #236A1/8/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141769Pershing
RFG #237A1/8/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141771Pershing
RFG #238A1/8/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141772Pershing
RFG #239A1/8/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141773Pershing
RFG #240A1/8/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141774Pershing
RFG #241A1/8/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141775Pershing
RFG #2511/11/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141777Pershing
RFG #2531/11/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141779Pershing
RFG #2551/11/1980HrdiNMC 141781Pershing
RFG 1075/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932890Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG 1095/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932892Pershing
RFG 1115/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932894Pershing
RFG 1135/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932896Pershing
RFG 1145/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932897Pershing
RFG 1155/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932898Pershing
RFG 1165/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932899Pershing
RFG 1175/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932900Pershing
RFG 1185/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932901Pershing
RFG 1195/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932902Pershing
RFG 1425/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932908Pershing
RFG 1445/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932909Pershing
RFG 1465/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932910Pershing
RFG#224A1/7/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141749Pershing
SH 1694/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990822Pershing
SH 1704/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990823Pershing
SH 1714/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990824Pershing
SH 1724/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990825Pershing
SH 1734/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990826Pershing
SH 1744/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990827Pershing
SH 1754/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990828Pershing
SH 1764/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990829Pershing
SH 1774/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990830Pershing
SH 1784/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990831Pershing
SH 1794/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990832Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 1804/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990833Pershing
SH 1814/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990834Pershing
SH 1824/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990835Pershing
SH 1834/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990836Pershing
SH 1844/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990837Pershing
SH 1854/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990838Pershing
SH 1864/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990839Pershing
SH 1874/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990840Pershing
SH 1884/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990841Pershing
SH 1894/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990842Pershing
SH 1904/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990843Pershing
SH 1914/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990844Pershing
SH 1924/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990845Pershing
SH 1934/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990846Pershing
SH 1944/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990847Pershing
SH 1954/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990848Pershing
SH 1964/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990849Pershing
SH 1974/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990850Pershing
SH 1984/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990851Pershing
SH 1994/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990852Pershing
SH 2004/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990853Pershing
SH 2014/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990854Pershing
SH 2024/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990855Pershing
SH 2034/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990856Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 2044/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990857Pershing
SH 2054/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990858Pershing
SH 2064/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990859Pershing
SH 2074/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990860Pershing
SH 2084/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990861Pershing
SH 2094/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990862Pershing
SH 2104/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990863Pershing
SH 2114/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990864Pershing
SH 2124/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990865Pershing
SH 2134/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990866Pershing
SH 2144/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990867Pershing
SH 2154/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990868Pershing
SH 2164/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990869Pershing
SH 2174/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990870Pershing
SH 2184/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990871Pershing
SH 2194/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990872Pershing
SH 2204/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990873Pershing
SH 2214/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990874Pershing
SH 2224/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990875Pershing
SH 2234/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990876Pershing
SH 2244/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990877Pershing
SH 2254/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990878Pershing
SH 2264/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990879Pershing
SH 2274/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990880Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 2284/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990881Pershing
SH 2294/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990882Pershing
SH 2304/24/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990883Pershing
SH 2314/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990884Pershing
SH 2354/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990888Pershing
SH 2364/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990889Pershing
SH 2374/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990890Pershing
SH 2384/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990891Pershing
SH 2394/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990892Pershing
SH 2404/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990893Pershing
SH 2414/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990894Pershing
SH 2444/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990895Pershing
SH 2454/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990896Pershing
SH 2474/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990900Pershing
SH 2494/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990905Pershing
SH 2504/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990901Pershing
SH 2514/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990902Pershing
SH 2524/25/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990903Pershing
SH 2534/25/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990904Pershing
SH 2544/25/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990906Pershing
SH 2554/25/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990907Pershing
SH 2564/25/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990908Pershing
SH 2574/25/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990909Pershing
SH 2584/25/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990910Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 2594/25/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990911Pershing
SH 2604/25/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990912Pershing
SH 2614/25/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990913Pershing
SH 2624/25/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990914Pershing
SH 2634/25/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990915Pershing
SH 2654/25/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990917Pershing
SH 2664/25/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990918Pershing
SH 2694/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990921Pershing
SH 2704/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990922Pershing
SH 2714/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990923Pershing
SH 2724/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990924Pershing
SH 2734/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990925Pershing
SH 2744/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990926Pershing
SH 2764/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990928Pershing
SH 2774/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990929Pershing
SH 2784/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990930Pershing
SH 2794/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990931Pershing
SH 2804/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990932Pershing
SH 2814/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990933Pershing
SH 2824/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990934Pershing
SH 2844/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990936Pershing
SH 2854/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990937Pershing
SH 2864/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990938Pershing
SH 2884/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990940Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 2904/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC990942Pershing
SH 2914/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990943Pershing
SH 2924/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990944Pershing
SH 2934/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990945Pershing
SH 2944/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990946Pershing
SH 2964/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990948Pershing
SH 2974/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990956Pershing
SH 2984/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990957Pershing
SH 3004/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990950Pershing
SH 3014/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990951Pershing
SH 3034/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990953Pershing
SH 3044/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990954Pershing
SH 3054/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990955Pershing
SH 3074/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990959Pershing
SH 3084/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990960Pershing
SH 3094/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990961Pershing
SH 3104/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990962Pershing
SH 3114/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990963Pershing
SH 3124/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990964Pershing
SH 3134/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990965Pershing
SH 3144/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990966Pershing
SH 3154/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990967Pershing
SH 3164/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990968Pershing
SH 3174/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990969Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 3184/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990970Pershing
SH 3194/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990971Pershing
SH 3204/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990972Pershing
SH 3214/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990973Pershing
SH 3234/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990975Pershing
SH 3244/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990976Pershing
SH 3254/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990977Pershing
SH 3264/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990978Pershing
SH 3274/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990979Pershing
SH 3284/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990980Pershing
SH 3344/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990986Pershing
SH 3354/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990987Pershing
SH 3364/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990988Pershing
SH 3374/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990989Pershing
SH 3384/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990990Pershing
SH 3394/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990991Pershing
SH 3404/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990992Pershing
SH 3414/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990993Pershing
SH 3424/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990994Pershing
SH 3434/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990995Pershing
SH 3454/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990997Pershing
SH 3464/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990998Pershing
SH 3474/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990999Pershing
SH 3584/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991010Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 3594/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991011Pershing
SH 3604/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991012Pershing
SH 3614/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991013Pershing
SH 3624/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991014Pershing
SH 3634/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991015Pershing
SH 3644/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991016Pershing
SH 3654/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991017Pershing
SH 3664/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991018Pershing
SH 3674/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991019Pershing
SH 3684/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991020Pershing
SH 3704/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991022Pershing
SH 3874/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991039Pershing
SH 3884/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991040Pershing
SH 3894/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991041Pershing
SH 3904/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991042Pershing
SH 3914/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991043Pershing
SH 3924/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991044Pershing
SH 3934/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991045Pershing
SH 3944/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991046Pershing
SH 3954/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991047Pershing
SH 4124/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991064Pershing
SH 4134/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991065Pershing
SH 4144/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991066Pershing
SH 4154/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991067Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 4164/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991068Pershing
SH 4174/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991069Pershing
SH 4354/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991210Pershing
SH 4364/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991087Pershing
SH 4374/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991088Pershing
SH 4384/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991089Pershing
SH 4614/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991112Pershing
SH 4624/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991113Pershing
SH 4634/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991114Pershing
SH 4684/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991119Pershing
SH 4694/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991120Pershing
SH 4704/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991121Pershing
SH 4714/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991122Pershing
SH 4734/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991124Pershing
SH 4744/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991125Pershing
SH 4774/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991128Pershing
SH 4784/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991129Pershing
SH 4804/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991131Pershing
SH 4814/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991132Pershing
SH 4824/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991133Pershing
SH 4834/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991134Pershing
SH 4854/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991136Pershing
SH 4864/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991137Pershing
SH 4884/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991139Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 4894/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991140Pershing
SH 4904/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991141Pershing
SH 4914/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991142Pershing
SH 4924/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991143Pershing
SH 4934/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991144Pershing
SH 4974/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991148Pershing
SH 4984/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991149Pershing
SH 4994/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991150Pershing
SH 5004/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991151Pershing
SH 5014/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991152Pershing
SH 5024/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991153Pershing
SH 5034/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991154Pershing
SH 5044/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991155Pershing
SH 5054/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991156Pershing
SH 5074/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991158Pershing
SH 5084/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991159Pershing
SH 5094/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991160Pershing
SH 5104/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991161Pershing
SH 5114/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991162Pershing
SH 5124/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991163Pershing
SH 5134/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991164Pershing
SH 5144/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991165Pershing
SH 5154/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991166Pershing
SH 5164/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991167Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 5174/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991168Pershing
SH 5194/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991170Pershing
SH 5204/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991171Pershing
SH 5214/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991172Pershing
SH 5234/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991174Pershing
SH 5244/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991175Pershing
SH 5264/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991177Pershing
SH 5284/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991179Pershing
SH 5294/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991180Pershing
SH 5304/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991181Pershing
SH 5314/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991182Pershing
SH 5324/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991183Pershing
SH 5334/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991184Pershing
SH 5344/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991185Pershing
SH 5354/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991186Pershing
SH 5364/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991187Pershing
SH 5374/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991188Pershing
SH 5384/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991189Pershing
SH 5394/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991190Pershing
SH 5404/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991191Pershing
SH 5414/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991192Pershing
SH 5424/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991193Pershing
SH 5434/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991194Pershing
SH 5444/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991195Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 5454/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991196Pershing
SH 5464/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991197Pershing
SH 5484/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991199Pershing
SH 5494/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991200Pershing
SH 5504/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991201Pershing
SH 5514/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991202Pershing
SH 5524/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991203Pershing
SH 5534/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991204Pershing
SH 5544/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991205Pershing
SH 5554/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991206Pershing
SH 5564/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991207Pershing
SH 5574/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991208Pershing
SH 5583/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022749Pershing
SH 5593/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022750Pershing
SH 5603/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022751Pershing
SH 5613/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022752Pershing
SH 5623/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022753Pershing
SH 5633/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022754Pershing
SH 5643/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022755Pershing
SH 5653/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022756Pershing
SH 5663/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022757Pershing
SH 5673/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022758Pershing
SH 5683/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022759Pershing
SH 5693/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022760Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 5703/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022761Pershing
SH 5713/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022762Pershing
SH 5723/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022763Pershing
SH 5733/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022764Pershing
SH 5743/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022765Pershing
SH 5753/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022766Pershing
SH 5763/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022767Pershing
SH 5773/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022768Pershing
SH 5783/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022769Pershing
SH 5793/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022770Pershing
SH 5803/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022771Pershing
SH 5813/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022772Pershing
SH 5823/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022773Pershing
SH 5833/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022774Pershing
SH 5843/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022775Pershing
SH 5853/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022776Pershing
SH 5863/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022777Pershing
SH 5873/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022778Pershing
SH 5883/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022779Pershing
SH 5893/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022780Pershing
SH 5903/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022781Pershing
SH 5913/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022782Pershing
SH 5923/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022783Pershing
SH 5933/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022784Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 5943/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022785Pershing
SH 5953/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022786Pershing
SH 5963/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022787Pershing
SH 5973/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022788Pershing
SH 5983/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022789Pershing
SH 5993/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022790Pershing
SH 6003/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022791Pershing
SH 6013/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022792Pershing
SH 6023/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022793Pershing
SH 6033/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022794Pershing
SH 6043/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022795Pershing
SH 6053/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022796Pershing
SH 6063/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022797Pershing
SH 6073/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022798Pershing
SH 6083/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022799Pershing
SH 6093/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022800Pershing
SH 6103/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022801Pershing
SH 6113/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022802Pershing
SH 6123/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022803Pershing
SH 6133/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022804Pershing
SH 6143/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022805Pershing
SH 6153/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022806Pershing
SH 6163/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022807Pershing
SH 6173/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022808Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 6183/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022809Pershing
SH 6193/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022810Pershing
SH 6203/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022811Pershing
SH 6213/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022812Pershing
SH 6223/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022813Pershing
SH 6233/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022814Pershing
SH 6243/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022815Pershing
SH 6253/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022816Pershing
SH 6263/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022817Pershing
SH 6273/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022818Pershing
SH 6283/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022819Pershing
SH 6293/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022820Pershing
SH 6303/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022821Pershing
SH 6313/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022822Pershing
SH 6323/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022823Pershing
SH 6333/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022824Pershing
SH 2324/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990885Pershing
SH 2334/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990886Pershing
SH 2344/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990887Pershing
SH 2424/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990898Pershing
SH 2434/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990899Pershing
SH 2464/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990897Pershing
SH 2484/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991209Pershing
SH 2644/25/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990916Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 2674/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990919Pershing
SH 2684/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990920Pershing
SH 2754/23/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990927Pershing
SH 2834/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990935Pershing
SH 2874/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990939Pershing
SH 2894/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990941Pershing
SH 2954/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990947Pershing
SH 2994/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990949Pershing
SH 3024/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990952Pershing
SH 3064/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990958Pershing
SH 3224/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990974Pershing
SH 3444/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990996Pershing
SH 3694/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991021Pershing
SH 3864/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991038Pershing
SH 4184/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991070Pershing
SH 4574/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991108Pershing
SH 4584/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991109Pershing
SH 4594/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991110Pershing
SH 4604/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991111Pershing
SH 4644/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991115Pershing
SH 4654/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991116Pershing
SH 4664/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC991117Pershing
SH 4674/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991118Pershing
SH 4724/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991123Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 4754/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991126Pershing
SH 4764/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991127Pershing
SH 4794/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991130Pershing
SH 4844/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991135Pershing
SH 4874/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991138Pershing
SH 4944/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991145Pershing
SH 4954/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991146Pershing
SH 4964/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991147Pershing
SH 5064/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991157Pershing
SH 5184/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991169Pershing
SH 5224/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991173Pershing
SH 5254/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991176Pershing
SH 5274/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991178Pershing
SH 5474/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991198Pershing
SH 6343/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022825Pershing
SH 6353/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022826Pershing
SH 6363/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022827Pershing
SH 6373/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022828Pershing
SH 6383/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022829Pershing
SH 6393/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022830Pershing
SH 6403/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022831Pershing
SH 6413/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022832Pershing
SH 6423/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022833Pershing
SH 6433/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022834Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 6443/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022835Pershing
SH 6453/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022836Pershing
SH 6463/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022837Pershing
SH 6473/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022838Pershing
SH 6483/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022839Pershing
SH 6493/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022840Pershing
SH 6503/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022841Pershing
SH 6513/13/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 1022842Pershing
WCD 13/22/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 928826Pershing
WCD 174/21/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 928836Pershing
WCD 184/21/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 928837Pershing
WCD 194/21/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 928838Pershing
WCD 23/22/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 928827Pershing
WCD 204/21/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 928839Pershing
WCD 214/21/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 928840Pershing
WCD 224/21/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 928841Pershing
WCD 234/21/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 928842Pershing
WCD 244/21/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 928843Pershing
WCD 254/21/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 928844Pershing
WCD 264/21/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 928845Pershing
WCD 33/22/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 928828Pershing
WCD 44/22/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 928829Pershing
WCX 109/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941262Pershing
WCX 59/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941257Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

WCX 69/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941258Pershing
WCX 79/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941259Pershing
WCX 89/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941260Pershing
WCX 99/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941261Pershing
WCX 349/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941263Pershing
WCX 359/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941264Pershing
WCX 369/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941265Pershing
WCX 379/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941266Pershing
WCX 389/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941267Pershing
WCX 399/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941268Pershing
WCX 409/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941269Pershing
WCX 419/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941270Pershing
WCX 429/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941271Pershing
WCX 439/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941272Pershing
WCX 449/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941273Pershing
WCX 459/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941274Pershing
WCX 469/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941275Pershing
WCX 479/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941276Pershing
WCX 489/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941277Pershing
WCX 499/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941278Pershing
WCX 509/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941279Pershing
WCX 519/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941280Pershing
WCX 529/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941281Pershing
WCX 539/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941282Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

WCX 549/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941283Pershing
WCX 559/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941284Pershing
WCX 569/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941285Pershing
WCX 579/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941286Pershing
WCX 589/8/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 941287Pershing
WRC 103/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714261Pershing
WRC 113/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714262Pershing
WRC 123/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714263Pershing
WRC 133/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714264Pershing
WRC 143/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714265Pershing
WRC 153/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714266Pershing
WRC 163/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714267Pershing
WRC 173/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714268Pershing
WRC 193/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714270Pershing
WRC 13/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714252Pershing
WRC 183/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714269Pershing
WRC 23/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714253Pershing
WRC 203/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714271Pershing
WRC 213/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714272Pershing
WRC 223/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714273Pershing
WRC 233/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714274Pershing
WRC 243/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714275Pershing
WRC 253/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714276Pershing
WRC 263/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714277Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

WRC 273/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714278Pershing
WRC 283/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714279Pershing
WRC 293/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714280Pershing
WRC 33/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714254Pershing
WRC 303/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714281Pershing
WRC 313/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714282Pershing
WRC 323/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714283Pershing
WRC 333/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714284Pershing
WRC 343/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714285Pershing
WRC 353/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714286Pershing
WRC 363/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714287Pershing
WRC 373/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714288Pershing
WRC 383/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714289Pershing
WRC 393/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714290Pershing
WRC 43/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714255Pershing
WRC 403/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714291Pershing
WRC 413/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714292Pershing
WRC 423/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714293Pershing
WRC 433/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714294Pershing
WRC 443/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714295Pershing
WRC 453/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714296Pershing
WRC 463/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714297Pershing
WRC 473/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714298Pershing
WRC 483/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714299Pershing
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

WRC 493/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714300Pershing
WRC 53/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714256Pershing
WRC 503/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714301Pershing
WRC 513/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714302Pershing
WRC 523/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714303Pershing
WRC 533/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714304Pershing
WRC 543/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714305Pershing
WRC 553/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714306Pershing
WRC 563/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714307Pershing
WRC 573/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714308Pershing
WRC 583/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714309Pershing
WRC 63/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714257Pershing
WRC 603/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714311Pershing
WRC 73/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714258Pershing
WRC 83/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714259Pershing
WRC 823/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714313Pershing
WRC 843/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714315Pershing
WRC 873/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714317Pershing
WRC 883/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714318Pershing
WRC 893/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714319Pershing
WRC 93/13/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714260Pershing
WRC 903/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714320Pershing
WRC 913/14/1995Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 714321Pershing
CKC #128/14/1987Crofoot Daniel MNMC444109Pershing/Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

FG 2269/5/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939259Pershing/Humboldt
FG 2759/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939296Pershing/Humboldt
FG 3249/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939337Pershing/Humboldt
FG 3779/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939382Pershing/Humboldt
FG 4339/1/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 939438Pershing/Humboldt
NC 1328/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027970Pershing/Humboldt
NC 178/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027855Pershing/Humboldt
NC 1708/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028008Pershing/Humboldt
NC 2058/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028043Pershing/Humboldt
NC 2408/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028078Pershing/Humboldt
NC 2748/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028112Pershing/Humboldt
NC 3068/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1028144Pershing/Humboldt
NC 508/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027888Pershing/Humboldt
NC 918/14/2010Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC1027929Pershing/Humboldt
NFRA 1211/7/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977844Pershing/Humboldt
NFRA 1311/7/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977845Pershing/Humboldt
NFRA 1411/7/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977846Pershing/Humboldt
NFRA 1511/7/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977847Pershing/Humboldt
NFRA 2311/7/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977855Pershing/Humboldt
NFRA 2411/7/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977856Pershing/Humboldt
NFRA 411/7/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977836Pershing/Humboldt
NFRA 511/7/2007Victory Exploration Inc.NMC 977837Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #1013/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC 546065Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #1033/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC 546066Pershing/Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG #1271/9/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141686Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #1291/9/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141687Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #1311/9/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141688Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #1321/9/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141689Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #1331/9/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141690Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #1341/9/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141691Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #200A12/28/1979Lewis Frank WNMC 141725Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #2281/25/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141753Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #2301/25/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141757Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #2341/26/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141764Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #2351/26/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141766Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #2361/26/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141768Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #2371/30/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141770Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #2501/11/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141776Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #2521/11/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141778Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #2541/11/1980Lewis Frank WNMC 141780Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #2571/11/1980HadiNMC 141783Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #2591/11/1980HadiNMC 141784Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #2611/11/1980HadiNMC 141785Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #2631/11/1980HadiNMC 141786Pershing/Humboldt
RFG #993/11/1989Crofoot Daniel MNMC 546064Pershing/Humboldt
RFG 1045/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932887Pershing/Humboldt
RFG 1055/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932888Pershing/Humboldt
RFG 1065/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932889Pershing/Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

RFG 1085/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932891Pershing/Humboldt
RFG 1105/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932893Pershing/Humboldt
RFG 1125/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932895Pershing/Humboldt
RFG 1365/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932905Pershing/Humboldt
RFG 1385/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932906Pershing/Humboldt
RFG 1405/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932907Pershing/Humboldt
RFG 2565/20/2006Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 932911Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3484/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991000Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3494/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991001Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3294/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990981Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3304/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990982Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3314/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990983Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3324/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990984Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3334/22/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 990985Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3534/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991005Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3544/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991006Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3554/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991007Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3564/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991008Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3574/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991009Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3714/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991023Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3724/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991024Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3824/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991034Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3834/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991035Pershing/Humboldt
SH 3844/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991036Pershing/Humboldt
Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023


image_58.jpg
image_32.jpg

SH 3854/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991037Pershing/Humboldt
SH 4074/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991059Pershing/Humboldt
SH 4084/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991060Pershing/Humboldt
SH 4094/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991061Pershing/Humboldt
SH 4104/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991062Pershing/Humboldt
SH 4114/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991063Pershing/Humboldt
SH 4314/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991083Pershing/Humboldt
SH 4324/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991084Pershing/Humboldt
SH 4334/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991085Pershing/Humboldt
SH 4344/21/2008Hycroft Res & Dev IncNMC 991086Pershing/Humboldt

Hycroft PropertyAppendices
Initial Assessment Technical Report SummaryMarch 27, 2023