NPORT-EX 2 poi_fhconmunimicrofund.htm POI - FEDERATED HERMES CONSERVATIVE MUNICIPAL MICROSHORT FUND EDGAR HTML
Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund
Portfolio of Investments
November 30, 2021 (unaudited)
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
       
1
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS—96.1%
 
 
 
Arizona—0.8%
 
$ 90,000
 
Phoenix, AZ Civic Improvement Corp. - Wastewater System, Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2016), 5.000%, 7/1/2022
$92,531    
 
 
California—4.0%
 
475,000
 
Los Angeles, CA MFH Revenue Bonds (CORE Related/ GALA Rentals, LP), SPEAR’s 3a7 (Series DBE-8081) VRDNs, (Deutsche Bank
AG LIQ)/(Deutsche Bank AG LOC), 0.450%, 12/2/2021
475,000   
 
 
Colorado—2.9%
 
100,000
 
Adams & Arapahoe Counties, CO Joint School District #28J, General Obligation Bonds (Series 2017A), (GTD by Colorado School
Credit Enhancement Program), 5.000%, 12/1/2021
100,000   
243,928
 
Colorado HFA (Steele San Juan, LLC), Mizuho 3a-7 (Series 2021-MIZ9068) VRENs, (GTD by Mizuho Bank Ltd.)/(Mizuho Bank Ltd.
LIQ), 0.300%, 12/2/2021
243,928   
 
 
TOTAL
343,928
 
 
Connecticut—0.9%
 
100,000
 
Connecticut State Special Transportation Fund, RBC Muni Products (Series G-110) TOBs, (Royal Bank of Canada LIQ)/(Royal Bank
of Canada LOC), 0.230%, Optional Tender 4/1/2022
100,000   
 
 
Florida—2.8%
 
250,000
 
Brevard County, FL Health Facilities Authority (Health First, Inc.), Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2014),
5.000%, 4/1/2022
253,923   
75,000
 
Fort Myers, FL Capital Improvement Revenue Authority, (Series 2018A), 5.000%, 12/1/2021
75,000    
 
 
TOTAL
328,923
 
 
Illinois—8.5%
 
75,000
 
Champaign, IL, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2013), 4.000%, 12/15/2021
75,104    
75,000
 
Glenview, IL, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2012B), 4.000%, 12/1/2021
75,000    
500,000
 
Illinois Finance Authority (Saint Xavier University), (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs, (Huntington National Bank LOC),
0.140%, 12/2/2021
500,000   
200,000
 
Illinois State, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2021A), 5.000%, 3/1/2022
202,382   
75,000
 
McHenry County, IL Conservation District, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2014), 5.000%, 2/1/2022
75,588    
75,000
 
St. Charles, IL Park District, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2017B), 5.000%, 12/15/2021
75,127    
 
 
TOTAL
1,003,201
 
 
Indiana—1.0%
 
120,000
 
Greater Clark County, IN Community Schools Corp., UT GO First Mortgage Bonds (Series 2019), (GTD by Indiana State School
Aid Intercept Program), 4.000%, 1/15/2022
120,541   
 
 
Massachusetts—3.5%
 
410,000
 
Quincy, MA BANs, 1.500%, 1/14/2022
410,676   
 
 
Montana—6.1%
 
715,000
 
Montana State Board of Housing (HRDC IX Affordable Housing Solutions LP), Mizuho 3a-7 (2021-MIZ9061) VRENs, (GTD by
Mizuho Bank Ltd.)/(Mizuho Bank Ltd. LIQ), 0.300%, 12/2/2021
715,000   
 
 
Multi-State—9.3%
 
600,000
 
Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust, PUTTERs 3a-7 (VMTP 5027) Daily VRDNs, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ),
0.220%, 12/1/2021
600,000   
500,000
 
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund, Series D Weekly VRDPs, 0.250%, 12/1/2021
500,000   
 
 
TOTAL
1,100,000
 
 
Nebraska—0.6%
 
75,000
 
Nebraska Public Power District, (General Revenue Bonds, Series 2017B), 5.000%, 1/1/2022
75,294    
 
 
Nevada—2.0%
 
235,000
 
Nevada Housing Division (Lake Mead West AHP LP), (Series 2021-XF1120) Weekly VRDNs, (Deutsche Bank AG LIQ)/(Deutsche
Bank AG LOC), 0.300%, 12/2/2021
235,000   
 
 
New Jersey—11.7%
 
150,000
 
Alpha Borough, NJ BANs, 1.000%, 3/4/2022
150,258   
75,000
 
Evesham Township, NJ, UT GO Bonds (Series 2014), 4.000%, 6/1/2022
76,398    
260,000
 
Jersey City, NJ, (Series 2021A) BANs, 1.500%, 1/12/2022
260,400   
1

Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
       
1
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS—continued
 
 
 
New Jersey—continued
 
$146,967
 
Moonachie, NJ BANs, 1.000%, 10/14/2022
$147,831   
257,000
 
Oceanport, NJ BANs, 1.000%, 2/24/2022
257,418   
173,050
 
Pine Beach, NJ BANs, 1.000%, 10/28/2022
174,002   
315,000
 
Southampton Township, NJ BANs, 1.000%, 7/6/2022
316,328   
 
 
TOTAL
1,382,635
 
 
New York—3.7%
 
200,000
 
Hempstead, NY Union Free School District, (Series A) RANs, 1.000%, 6/30/2022
200,890   
200,000
 
New York State Energy Research & Development Authority (National Grid Generation LLC), (1997 Series A) Weekly VRDNs,
(NatWest Markets PLC LOC), 0.110%, 12/1/2021
200,000   
34,800
 
Rhinebeck, NY CSD, General Obligation Bonds (Series 2021), 3.000%, 6/15/2022
35,305    
 
 
TOTAL
436,195
 
 
North Carolina—0.7%
 
75,000
 
Warren County, NC, Water District General Obligation Refunding Bonds (Series 2015), 5.000%, 6/1/2022
76,751    
 
 
Ohio—4.8%
 
260,000
 
Akron, OH Parking Facilities Revenue, (Income Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2015), 5.000%, 12/1/2021
260,000   
75,000
 
Gahanna-Jefferson, OH City School District, UT GO School Facilities Construction & Improvement Bonds (Series 2021), (Assured
Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS), 2.000%, 12/1/2021
75,000    
150,000
 
Harrison, OH BANs, 2.000%, 10/25/2022
151,973   
75,000
 
Ohio State University, General Receipts Bonds (Series 2010D), 5.000%, 12/1/2021
75,000    
 
 
TOTAL
561,973
 
 
Oklahoma—3.0%
 
350,000
 
Garfield County, OK Industrial Authority Pollution Control (Oklahoma Gas and Electric Co.), (Series 1995-A) Weekly VRDNs,
0.130%, 12/1/2021
350,000   
 
 
Pennsylvania—8.0%
 
465,000
 
East Hempfield Township, PA IDA (BGT Realty), (Series of 2005) Weekly VRDNs, (Fulton Bank, N.A. LOC), 0.460%, 12/2/2021
465,000   
145,000
 
McGuffey, PA School District, General Obligation Bonds (Series A of 2021), (Build America Mutual Assurance INS),
2.000%, 2/1/2022
145,389   
60,000
 
Northampton County, PA IDA (Binney & Smith Inc.), (Series 1997B) Weekly VRDNs, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC),
0.220%, 12/1/2021
60,000    
100,000
 
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority (Republic Services, Inc.), (Series 2010B) TOBs, 0.200%, Mandatory
Tender 1/3/2022
100,006   
180,000
 
Westmoreland County, PA, UT GO Bonds (Series 2013A), 5.000%, 12/1/2021
180,000   
 
 
TOTAL
950,395
 
 
Tennessee—1.2%
 
145,000
 
Metropolitan Government Nashville & Davidson County, TN, General Obligation Improvement Bonds (Series 2013A),
5.000%, 1/1/2022
145,574   
 
 
Texas—13.5%
 
500,000
 
Austin, TX Affordable Public Finance Authority (LDG Belmont LP), (Series 2021-XF1102) Weekly VRDNs, (Deutsche Bank AG
LIQ)/(Deutsche Bank AG LOC), 0.300%, 12/2/2021
500,000   
500,000
 
North Central Texas HFDC (Gala at Waxahachie, LP), Tender Option Bond Trust Certificates (Series 2021-XF1099) Weekly VRDNs,
(Deutsche Bank AG LIQ)/(Deutsche Bank AG LOC), 0.300%, 12/2/2021
500,000   
250,000
 
Port of Corpus Christi Authority of Nueces County, TX (Flint Hills Resources LLC), (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs,
0.130%, 12/1/2021
250,000   
350,000
 
Port of Port Arthur Navigation District of Jefferson County, TX (Motiva Enterprises LLC), (Series 2010A) Daily VRDNs,
0.050%, 12/1/2021
350,000   
 
 
TOTAL
1,600,000
 
 
Virginia—1.5%
 
175,000
 
Lynchburg, VA Economic Development Authority (Centra Health Obligated Group), (Series 2017C) Weekly VRDNs, (Truist Bank
LOC), 0.140%, 12/2/2021
175,000   
 
 
West Virginia—3.8%
 
200,000
 
Mason County, WV (Appalachian Power Co.), PCRBs (Series L), 2.750%, 10/1/2022
203,848   
250,000
 
West Virginia State Hospital Finance Authority (Cabell Huntington Hospital), (Series 2008A) Weekly VRDNs, (Truist Bank LOC),
0.140%, 12/2/2021
250,000   
 
 
TOTAL
453,848
2

Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
       
1
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS—continued
 
 
 
Wisconsin—1.8%
 
$115,000
 
Grafton, WI, UT GO Promissory Notes (Series 2019A), 2.000%, 6/1/2022
$115,995   
100,000
 
La Crosse, WI IDA (GGP Inc.), (Series A) Weekly VRDNs, (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 0.220%, 12/2/2021
100,000   
 
 
TOTAL
215,995
 
 
TOTAL SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS
(IDENTIFIED COST $11,347,866)
11,348,460
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—5.1%
 
 
 
Louisiana—1.3%
 
150,000
 
Louisiana Stadium and Exposition District, BANS (Series 2021), 4.000%, 7/3/2023
156,616   
 
 
New Jersey—2.3%
 
198,599
 
Hillsdale Borough, NJ BANs, 1.000%, 12/2/2022
199,798   
75,000
 
Vernon Township, NJ, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A), 4.000%, 1/1/2023
77,980    
 
 
TOTAL
277,778
 
 
New York—1.5%
 
175,000
 
New York State Thruway Authority, General Revenue Bonds (Series 2012I), 5.000%, 1/1/2023
175,679   
 
 
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS
(IDENTIFIED COST $609,951)
610,073
 
 
TOTAL INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES—101.2%
(IDENTIFIED COST $11,957,817)
11,958,533
 
 
OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET—(1.2)%2
(146,668)
 
 
TOTAL NET ASSETS—100%
$11,811,865
Securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) represent 14.0% of the portfolio as calculated based upon total market value.
1
Current rate and current maturity or next reset date shown for floating rate notes and variable rate notes/demand instruments. Certain variable rate securities are
not based on a published reference rate and spread but are determined by the issuer or agent and are based on current market conditions. These securities do
not indicate a reference rate and spread in their description above.
2
Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities.
Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at November 30, 2021.
Investment Valuation
In calculating its net asset value (NAV), the Fund generally values investments as follows:
Fixed-income securities are fair valued using price evaluations provided by a pricing service approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees (the “Trustees”).
Shares of other mutual funds or non-exchange-traded investment companies are valued based upon their reported NAVs, or NAV per share practical expedient, as applicable.
For securities that are fair valued in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Trustees, certain factors may be considered, such as: the last traded or purchase price of the security, information obtained by contacting the issuer or dealers, analysis of the issuer’s financial statements or other available documents, fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, the movement of the market in which the security is normally traded, public trading in similar securities or derivative contracts of the issuer or comparable issuers, movement of a relevant index, or other factors including but not limited to industry changes and relevant government actions.
If any price, quotation, price evaluation or other pricing source is not readily available when the NAV is calculated, if the Fund cannot obtain price evaluations from a pricing service or from more than one dealer for an investment within a reasonable period of time as set forth in the Fund’s valuation policies and procedures, or if information furnished by a pricing service, in the opinion of the valuation committee (“Valuation Committee”), is deemed not representative of the fair value of such security, the Fund uses the fair value of the investment determined in accordance with the procedures described below. There can be no assurance that the Fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it sold the investment at approximately the time at which the Fund determines its NAV per share, and the actual value obtained could be materially different.
Fair Valuation Procedures
The Trustees have ultimate responsibility for determining the fair value of investments for which market quotations are not readily available. The Trustees have appointed a Valuation Committee comprised of officers of the Fund, Federated Investment Management Company (the “Adviser”), and certain of the Adviser’s affiliated companies to assist in determining fair value and in overseeing the calculation of the NAV. The Trustees have also authorized the use of pricing services recommended by the Valuation Committee to provide fair value evaluations of the current value of certain investments for purposes of calculating the NAV. The Valuation Committee employs various methods for reviewing third-party pricing-service evaluations including periodic reviews of third-party pricing services’ policies, procedures and valuation methods (including key inputs, methods, models and assumptions), transactional back-testing,
3

comparisons of evaluations of different pricing services, and review of price challenges by the Adviser based on recent market activity. In the event that market quotations and price evaluations are not available for an investment, the Valuation Committee determines the fair value of the investment in accordance with procedures adopted by the Trustees. The Trustees periodically review and approve the fair valuations made by the Valuation Committee and any changes made to the procedures.
Factors considered by pricing services in evaluating an investment include the yields or prices of investments of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, call rights and other potential prepayments, terms and type, reported transactions, indications as to values from dealers and general market conditions. Some pricing services provide a single price evaluation reflecting the bid-side of the market for an investment (a “bid” evaluation). Other pricing services offer both bid evaluations and price evaluations indicative of a price between the prices bid and asked for the investment (a “mid” evaluation). The Fund normally uses bid evaluations for any U.S. Treasury and Agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and municipal securities. The Fund normally uses mid evaluations for any other types of fixed-income securities and any OTC derivative contracts. In the event that market quotations and price evaluations are not available for an investment, the fair value of the investment is determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Trustees.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.). Also includes securities valued at amortized cost.
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
As of November 30, 2021, all investments of the Fund utilized Level 2 inputs in valuing the Fund’s assets carried at fair value.
The following acronym(s) are used throughout this portfolio:
 
BANs
—Bond Anticipation Notes
CSD
—Central School District
GO
—General Obligation
GTD
—Guaranteed
HFA
—Housing Finance Authority
HFDC
—Health Facility Development Corporation
IDA
—Industrial Development Authority
INS
—Insured
LIQ
—Liquidity Agreement
LOC
—Letter of Credit
MFH
—Multi-Family Housing
PCRBs
—Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
PUTTERs
—Puttable Tax-Exempt Receipts
RANs
—Revenue Anticipation Notes
TOBs
—Tender Option Bonds
UT
—Unlimited Tax
VMTP
—Variable Municipal Term Preferred
VRDNs
—Variable Rate Demand Notes
VRDPs
—Variable Rate Demand Preferreds
VRENs
—Variable Rate Extendible Notes
4