XML 33 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Fair Value
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2020
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Fair Value
The following tables summarize our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019:
September 30, 2020
(In thousands)Fair Value
Carrying AmountLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Financial assets:
Short-term investments (1)
$19,973 $— $19,973 $— 
Financial liabilities:
Derivative instruments - interest rate swaps (2)
$104,258 $— $104,258 $— 
December 31, 2019
(In thousands)Fair Value
Carrying AmountLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Financial assets:
Short-term investments (1)
$59,474 $— $59,474 $— 
Financial liabilities:
Derivative instruments - interest rate swaps (2)
$65,078 $— $65,078 $— 
___________________
(1) The carrying value of these investment is equal to their fair value due to the short-term nature of the investments as well as their credit quality.
(2) The fair values of our interest rate swap derivative instruments were estimated using advice from a third-party derivative specialist, based on contractual cash flows and observable inputs comprising interest rate curves and credit spreads, which are Level 2 measurements as defined under ASC 820.
The estimated fair values of our financial instruments as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 for which fair value is only disclosed are as follows:
September 30, 2020December 31, 2019
(In thousands)Carrying AmountFair ValueCarrying AmountFair Value
Financial assets:
Investments in leases - financing receivables (1)
$2,600,228 $2,666,800 $— $— 
Investments in loans (1)
533,713 536,521 — — 
Cash and cash equivalents144,057 144,057 1,101,893 1,101,893 
Financial liabilities:
Debt (2)
   Revolving Credit Facility$— $— $— $— 
   Term Loan B Facility2,079,760 2,023,875 2,076,962 2,110,500 
   Second Lien Notes— — 498,480 538,358 
2025 Notes739,749 745,313 — — 
2026 Notes1,232,405 1,257,813 1,231,227 1,287,500 
2027 Notes739,316 737,813 — — 
2029 Notes985,330 1,017,500 984,894 1,045,000 
2030 Notes985,272 988,750 — — 
____________________
(1)These investments represent the (i) JACK Cleveland/Thistledown Lease Agreement and the MTA Properties, and (ii) the Amended and Restated ROV Loan, the Chelsea Piers Mortgage Loan and the Forum Convention Center Mortgage Loan, all of which were made during the nine months ended September 30, 2020. Given the proximity of the date of our investment to the date of the financial statements, we determined that the fair value materially approximates the purchase price of the acquisition of these financial assets.
(2)The fair value of our debt instruments was estimated using quoted prices for identical or similar liabilities in markets that are not active and, as such, these fair value measurements are considered Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Gain Upon Lease Modification in Connection with the Eldorado Transaction
On July 20, 2020, in connection with the Eldorado Transaction and as required under ASC 842, we reassessed the lease classification of the Las Vegas Master Lease Agreement, Regional Master Lease Agreement and Joliet Lease Agreement and determined the leases meet the definition of a sales-type lease, including the land component of Caesars Palace Las Vegas. As a result of the reclassifications of the Caesars Lease Agreements from direct financing and operating leases to sales-type leases, we recorded the investments at their estimated fair values as of the modification date and recognized a net gain equal to the difference in fair value of the asset and its carrying value immediately prior to the modification.
We valued the real estate portfolio using a rent multiple taking into consideration a variety of factors, including (i) asset quality and location, (ii) property and lease-level cash flows and (iii) supply and demand dynamics of each property’s respective market. With respect to certain assets for which we have signed sale agreements that will be removed from the Regional Master Lease Agreement upon consummation of such transactions, which includes Bally’s Atlantic City and Louisiana Downs, these assets were recorded at fair value using the contract price less costs to sell.
In the current quarter, as a result of the re-measurement of the Caesars Lease Agreements to fair value, we recognized a $333.4 million gain upon lease modification in our Statement of Operations.
The following table summarizes our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in relation to the gain upon modification of the Caesars Lease Agreements as of the modification date during the three months ended September 30, 2020:
July 20, 2020
(In thousands)Fair Value
Carrying AmountLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Financial assets:
Investments in sales-type leases - Caesars Lease Agreements (1)
$10,228,465 $— $— $10,228,465 
Investments in sales-type leases - assets subject to sales agreements (2)
$24,266 $— $24,266 $— 
____________________
(1) The fair value measurement of the Caesars Lease Agreements excludes the MTA Properties Acquisitions, HLV Additional Rent Acquisition and CPLV Additional Rent Acquisition as these transactions occurred in connection with the Eldorado Transaction and the investments are measured at historical cost.
(2) Represents the Bally’s Atlantic City and Louisiana Downs assets, which are each currently subject to sales agreements. The fair value of these investments is based on the contract price and represents a Level 2 measurement as defined in ASC 820.
The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs used in non-recurring Level 3 fair value measurements:
(In thousands)Significant Assumptions
Asset Type
Fair Value(1)
Valuation TechniqueRange
Weighted Average(2)
Investment in sales-type lease - Casinos$10,228,465 Rent Multiple
9.75x - 15.50x
13.0x
____________________
(1) The fair value measurement of the Caesars Lease Agreements excludes the MTA Properties Acquisitions, HLV Additional Rent Acquisition and CPLV Additional Rent Acquisition as these transactions occurred in connection with the Eldorado Transaction and the investments are measured at historical cost.
(2) Weighted by relative fair value.