UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10‑Q

(Mark One)

☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2018.

OR

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                    to

Commission file number 001-38134

Blue Apron Holdings, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	81‑4777373
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
40 West 23rd Street, New York, New York	10010
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (347) 719‑4312

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes ☒  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes ☒  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐	Accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ☐	Emerging growth company ☒
Non-accelerated filer ☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ☐  No ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each class of the issuer’s common stock as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Number of Shares Outstanding
Class A Common Stock, $0.0001 par value	77,760,073shares outstanding as of October 31, 2018
Class B Common Stock, $0.0001 par value	115,988,608shares outstanding as of October 31, 2018
Class C Capital Stock, $0.0001 par value	0shares outstanding as of October 31, 2018

BLUE APRON HOLDINGS, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I		FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	3
		Consolidated Balance Sheets	3
		Consolidated Statements of Operations	4
		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)	5
		Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	6
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	7
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	8
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures	35
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	36
PART II		OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	37
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	39
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	68
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	68
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	69
	Item 5.	Other Information	69
	Item 6.	Exhibits	69
SIGNATURES			70

1

NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy and plans, and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” or “continue,” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are only predictions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions described in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. The events and circumstances reflected in our forward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Some of the key factors that could cause actual results to differ from our expectations include:

· our expectations regarding our expenses and revenue, our ability to maintain and grow adjusted EBITDA and to achieve profitability, the sufficiency of our cash resources, and needs for additional financing;

· our ability to cost-effectively attract new customers and retain existing customers;

· our ability to expand our product offerings and distribution channels;

· our ability to maintain and grow the value of our brand and reputation;

· our ability to resume revenue growth or to manage future growth effectively;

· our expectations regarding, and the stability of, our supply chain, including potential shortages or interruptions in the supply or delivery of ingredients;

· our ability to maintain food safety and prevent food-borne illness incidents;

· changes in consumer tastes and preferences or in consumer spending;

· our ability to effectively compete;

· our ability to attract and retain qualified employees and key personnel;

· our ability to comply with modified or new laws and regulations applying to our business;

· our vulnerability to adverse weather conditions or natural disasters; and

· our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection.

While we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, whether as a result of any new information, future events, or otherwise, we have no current intention of doing so except to the extent required by applicable law.

2

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

BLUE APRON HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per-share data)

(Unaudited)

	September 30,		December 31,
	2018		2017
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	162,902	$	228,514
Accounts receivable, net		769		1,945
Inventories, net		33,393		41,927
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		9,851		7,824
Other receivables		979		2,539
Total current assets		207,894		282,749
Restricted cash		1,691		2,371
Property and equipment, net		216,838		230,828
Other noncurrent assets		1,786		1,761
TOTAL ASSETS	$	428,209	$	517,709
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	27,056	$	30,448
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		36,251		32,615
Current portion of long-term debt		41,324		—
Deferred revenue		21,584		27,646
Total current liabilities		126,215		90,709
Long-term debt		83,504		124,687
Facility financing obligation		71,868		70,347
Other noncurrent liabilities		6,551		8,116
TOTAL LIABILITIES		288,138		293,859
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT):
Class A common stock, par value of $0.0001 per share — 1,500,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017; 77,626,739 and 37,657,649 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively		8		4
Class B common stock, par value of $0.0001 per share — 175,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017; 116,121,942 and 153,727,228 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively		11		15
Class C common stock, par value of $0.0001 per share — 500,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017; 0 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017		—		—
Additional paid-in capital		587,584		572,528
Accumulated deficit		(447,532)		(348,697)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)		140,071		223,850
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	428,209	$	517,709

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

BLUE APRON HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except share and per-share data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
Net revenue	$	150,621	$	210,638	$	526,867	$	693,538
Operating expenses:
Cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization		102,406		164,444		347,894		496,495
Marketing		23,251		34,244		97,161		129,368
Product, technology, general, and administrative		48,345		65,744		148,933		194,627
Depreciation and amortization		8,599		8,774		25,688		18,337
Other operating expense		—		5,934		—		5,934
Total operating expenses		182,601		279,140		619,676		844,761
Income (loss) from operations		(31,980)		(68,502)		(92,809)		(151,223)
Interest income (expense), net		(1,943)		(1,281)		(5,568)		(4,803)
Other income (expense), net		—		(17,551)		—		(14,984)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(33,923)		(87,334)		(98,377)		(171,010)
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		(19)		133		(66)		(13)
Net income (loss)	$	(33,942)	$	(87,201)	$	(98,443)	$	(171,023)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Class A, Class B, and Class C common stockholders:
Basic	$	(0.18)	$	(0.47)	$	(0.51)	$	(1.60)
Diluted	$	(0.18)	$	(0.47)	$	(0.51)	$	(1.60)
Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share attributable to Class A, Class B, and Class C common stockholders:
Basic		193,194,248		184,737,720		192,248,756		106,836,062
Diluted		193,194,248		184,737,720		192,248,756		106,836,062

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

BLUE APRON HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
Net income (loss)	$	(33,942)	$	(87,201)	$	(98,443)	$	(171,023)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—		—		—		—
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(33,942)	$	(87,201)	$	(98,443)	$	(171,023)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

BLUE APRON HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

(In thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

														Accumulated
	Class A			Class B			Class C			Additional				Other				Total
	Common Stock			Common Stock			Common Stock			Paid-In		Treasury		Comprehensive		Accumulated		Stockholders'
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Capital		Stock		Loss		Deficit		Equity (Deficit)
Balance — December 31, 2017	37,657,649	$	4	153,727,228	$	15	—	$	—	$	572,528	$	—	$	—	$	(348,697)	$	223,850
Conversion from Class B to Class A common stock	37,937,260		4	(37,937,260)		(4)	—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock	2,021,545		—	331,974		—	—		—		219		—		—		—		219
Share-based compensation	—		—	—		—	—		—		14,445		—		—		—		14,445
Impact of adoption of accounting standard update	—		—	—		—	—		—		392		—		—		(392)		—
Settlement of acquisition holdback	10,285		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Net income (loss)	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—		(98,443)		(98,443)
Balance — September 30, 2018	77,626,739	$	8	116,121,942	$	11	—	$	—	$	587,584	$	—	$	—	$	(447,532)	$	140,071

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

BLUE APRON HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2018		2017
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	(98,443)	$	(171,023)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment		25,688		18,337
Loss (gain) on disposal of property and equipment		1,048		(30)
Loss on impairment		—		5,934
Changes in reserves and allowances		(382)		1,364
Share-based compensation		13,555		8,752
Non-cash interest expense		1,662		2,459
Loss (gain) on convertible notes		—		14,984
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables		1,774		(3,972)
Inventories		9,305		55
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(2,045)		(3,101)
Accounts payable		(2,184)		2,814
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		3,674		216
Deferred revenue		(6,062)		(4,516)
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities		(1,590)		4,962
Net cash from (used in) operating activities		(54,000)		(122,765)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Cash paid for acquisition		(250)		(1,177)
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash		680		1,595
Purchases of property and equipment		(12,903)		(116,094)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		858		—
Net cash from (used in) investing activities		(11,615)		(115,676)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net proceeds from debt issuances		—		144,349
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		219		816
Principal payments on capital lease obligations		(216)		(145)
Net proceeds from public offering		—		283,500
Payments of public offering costs		—		(5,253)
Net cash from (used in) financing activities		3		423,267
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(65,612)		184,826
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — Beginning of period		228,514		81,468
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — End of period	$	162,902	$	266,294
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds	$	110	$	190
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized	$	5,847	$	2,342
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING INFORMATION:
Acquisition (disposal) of property and equipment financed under capital lease obligations	$	184	$	(66)
Non-cash additions to property and equipment	$	889	$	19,823
Purchases of property and equipment in Accounts payable and Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	760	$	4,709

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

7

BLUE APRON HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Organization and Description of Business

When used in these notes, Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “Company.”

The Company creates original recipes, which are sent along with fresh, high-quality, seasonal ingredients, directly to customers for them to prepare, cook, and enjoy. The Company creates meal experiences around original recipes every week based on what’s in-season with farming partners and other suppliers. Customers can choose which recipes they would like to receive in a given week, and the Company delivers those recipes to their doorsteps along with the pre-portioned ingredients required to cook those recipes.

In addition to meals, the Company sells wine through Blue Apron Wine, a direct-to-consumer wine delivery service launched in September 2015. The Company also sells a curated selection of cooking tools, utensils, and pantry items through Blue Apron Market, an e-commerce marketplace launched in November 2014.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, results of operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. These unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2017 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 22, 2018 (the “Annual Report”). There have been no material changes in the Company's significant accounting policies from those that were disclosed in the Annual Report.

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”).

Use of Estimates

In preparing its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with GAAP, the Company is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs, and expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities which are reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying disclosures. The accounting estimates that require the most difficult and subjective judgments include revenue recognition, inventory valuation, leases, recoverability of long-lived assets, the fair value of share-based awards, recoverability of net deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance, and the recognition and measurement of income tax uncertainties and other contingencies. The Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors and adjusts those estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. Actual results could materially differ from the Company’s estimates and assumptions.

8

Emerging Growth Company Status

The Company is an "emerging growth company," as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act, and may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not "emerging growth companies." The Company may take advantage of these exemptions until the Company is no longer an "emerging growth company." Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an "emerging growth company" can take advantage of the extended transition period afforded by the JOBS Act for the implementation of new or revised accounting standards. The Company has elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards and as a result of this election, its financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates. The Company may take advantage of these exemptions up until the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the IPO or such earlier time that it is no longer an emerging growth company. The Company would cease to be an emerging growth company if it has more than $1.07 billion in annual revenue, has more than $700.0 million in market value of its stock held by non-affiliates (and it has been a public company for at least 12 months, and has filed one annual report on Form 10-K), or it issues more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt securities over a three-year period.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU 2014-09 affects any entity that enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The new guidance will supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. The new standard also includes enhanced disclosures which are significantly more comprehensive than those in existing revenue standards. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Principal versus Agent Considerations), to clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing), to clarify the implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations and licensing. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients), to clarify the implementation guidance on assessing collectibility, presentation of sales taxes, noncash consideration and completed contracts, and contract modifications at transition. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, (Revenue from Contracts with Customers), to clarify the guidance or to correct unintended application of guidance. In September 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Leases (Topic 840), and Leases (Topic 842): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to the Staff Announcement at the July 20, 2017 EITF Meeting and Rescission of Prior SEC Staff Announcements and Observer Comments, to add SEC paragraphs pursuant to an SEC Staff Announcement made at the July 20, 2017 Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) meeting. For the Company, the guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim reporting periods therein. The Company has substantially completed its assessment of the new standard and continues to make progress on its implementation. Based on the progress to date, the Company generally does not expect the adoption of the new standard to have a material impact on its revenue recognition accounting policy or its Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company expects to apply the new standard using the “modified retrospective approach,” with the cumulative effect of initially applying the new standard recognized at the date of initial application recorded as an adjustment to retained earnings.

In February 2016, the FASB issued its final standard on lease accounting, Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes Topic 840, Leases. The new accounting standard requires the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for all long-term leases, including operating leases, on the balance sheet. The new standard also provides additional guidance on the measurement of the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities and will require enhanced disclosures about the Company’s leasing arrangements. In September 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Leases (Topic 840), and Leases (Topic 842): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to the Staff Announcement at the July 20, 2017 EITF Meeting and Rescission of Prior SEC Staff Announcements and Observer Comments, to add SEC paragraphs pursuant to an SEC Staff Announcement made at the July 20, 2017 Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) meeting. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases, and ASU

9

No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, to improve and clarify certain aspects of ASU No. 2016-02. For the Company, the new standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact this new guidance may have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18 (“ASU 2016-18”), Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The standard is intended to eliminate diversity in practice in the treatment of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows and requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. For the Company, the amendments in ASU 2016-18 are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-15 (“ASU 2018-15”), Intangibles — Goodwill and Other — Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract. The standard is intended to clarify the accounting for implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract. For the Company, the amendments in ASU 2018-15 are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact this new guidance may have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09 (“ASU 2016-09”), Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Some of the areas of simplification apply only to non-public entities. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 as of January 1, 2018 using a modified retrospective approach electing to recognize gross stock compensation expense with actual forfeitures recognized as they occur, with a cumulative-effect adjustment to accumulated deficit of $0.4 million.

In May 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-09 (“ASU 2017-09”), Compensation–Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. The standard is intended to provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. The Company adopted ASU 2017-09 as of January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not impact the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

.

3. Inventories, Net

Inventories, net consist of the following:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Fulfillment	$	2,939	$	7,358
Product		30,454		34,569
Inventories, net	$	33,393	$	41,927

Product inventory primarily consists of bulk and prepped food, containers, and products available for resale. Fulfillment inventory consists of packaging used for shipping and handling. Product and fulfillment inventories are recognized as components of Cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations when sold.

10

4. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Deposits	$	865	$	2,346
Prepaid marketing		935		1,604
Prepaid rent		940		1,348
Prepaid insurance		4,541		—
Other current assets		2,570		2,526
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	9,851	$	7,824

5. Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment, net consists of the following:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Computer equipment	$	10,951	$	10,883
Capitalized software		13,422		10,427
Fulfillment equipment		51,239		45,581
Furniture and fixtures		3,832		4,188
Leasehold improvements		41,226		40,173
Buildings(1)		148,507		148,507
Construction in process		6,258		4,563
Property and equipment, gross		275,435		264,322
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(58,597)		(33,494)
Property and equipment, net	$	216,838	$	230,828

(1) Includes build-to-suit lease arrangements in Linden, New Jersey and Fairfield, California where the Company is considered the owner for accounting purposes, of which $62.1 million was included in Buildings as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Costs incurred directly by the Company relating to these arrangements were $82.3 million as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. The Company also capitalized the cost of interest for construction projects related to build-to-suit lease arrangements of $4.2 million as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

In October 2017, the Company performed a review of its real estate needs and decided to no longer pursue its planned build-out of the Fairfield facility. As a result, the Company is continuing to evaluate potential alternatives for the leased Fairfield property. As of September 30, 2018, the Company had future non-cancelable minimum lease payments of $37.6 million through 2028 related to this facility.

11

6. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Accrued compensation	$	14,008	$	13,009
Accrued credits and refunds reserve		1,323		1,079
Accrued marketing expenses		9,550		5,739
Accrued product expenses		2,045		—
Accrued shipping expenses		2,497		5,319
Other current liabilities		6,828		7,469
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	36,251	$	32,615

7. Deferred Revenue

Deferred revenue consists of the following:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Cash received prior to fulfillment	$	8,981	$	10,635
Gift cards, prepaid orders, and other		12,603		17,011
Deferred revenue	$	21,584	$	27,646

8. Debt

Revolving Credit Facility

In August 2016, the Company entered into a revolving credit and guaranty agreement (the “revolving credit facility”) with a maximum amount available to borrow of $150.0 million. In May 2017 and June 2017, the Company executed amendments to the agreement that each increased the total commitment by $25.0 million, resulting in a total commitment of $200.0 million. In October 2018, the Company amended and refinanced the revolving credit facility to, among other things, reduce the maximum amount available to borrow to $85.0 million and extend the maturity date of the facility to February 2021. For additional information on the refinancing of the revolving credit facility and the resulting changes to the terms of the agreement, see Note 14 Subsequent Events.

As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had $125.0 million in outstanding borrowings and $1.4 million in issued letters of credit under the revolving credit facility. Of the $125.0 million in outstanding borrowings as of September 30, 2018, the Company had $83.6 million classified as long-term debt and $41.4 million classified as current portion of long-term debt. The Company’s current portion of long-term debt represents the amount of repayment to be made in October 2018 in connection with the refinancing of the revolving credit facility. The remaining amount available to borrow as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was $73.6 million. The Company incurred and capitalized $0.5 million in deferred financing costs in connection with the revolving credit facility in August 2016. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the total unamortized deferred financing costs was $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

12

As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, outstanding borrowings of debt consisted of the following:

		September 30,			December 31,
	Maturity Date	2018			2017
		(In thousands)
Revolving credit facility	August 2019	$	125,000		$	125,000
Weighted average interest rate			4.59	%		3.47	%

As of September 30, 2018, borrowings under the revolving credit facility bore interest, at the Company’s option, at (1) a base rate based on the highest of prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and an adjusted LIBOR rate for a one month interest period plus 1.00%, plus in each case a margin ranging from 0.50% to 1.00% (the “base rate”) or (2) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.00%, based on the Company’s total leverage ratio for the preceding four fiscal quarters and the Company’s status as a public or non-public company (the “adjusted LIBOR rate”). As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $120.0 million utilizing the adjusted LIBOR rate. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $5.0 million utilizing the base rate. The Company is also obligated under the revolving credit facility to pay customary fees, including an unused commitment fee on undrawn amounts of 0.15%. The Company incurred unused commitment fees related to the revolving credit facility of $0.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively, and $0.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively.

The obligations under the revolving credit facility are guaranteed by the guarantor as defined in the credit agreement, Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. The Company’s obligations under the revolving credit facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries. The revolving credit facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness and liens, restrictions on affiliate transactions, restrictions on the sale or other disposition of collateral, and limitations on dividends and stock repurchases. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants under the revolving credit facility.

Facility Financing Obligation

As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had a  facility financing obligation of $71.9 million and $70.3 million, respectively, related to leased facilities in Linden and Fairfield under the build-to-suit accounting guidance.

9. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company records accruals for loss contingencies associated with legal matters when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. If the Company determines that a loss is reasonably possible, the Company discloses the matter, and, if estimable, the amount or range of the possible loss in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company is subject to a consolidated putative class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York alleging federal securities law violations in connection with the Company’s June 2017 initial public offering, or the IPO.  The amended complaint alleges that the Company and certain current and former officers and directors made material misstatements or omissions in the Company’s registration statement and prospectus that caused the stock price to drop.  Pursuant to a stipulated schedule entered by the parties, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on May 21, 2018.  Plaintiffs filed a response on July 12, 2018 and defendants filed a reply on August 13, 2018. The motion to dismiss remains pending before the court. The Company is also subject to two putative class action lawsuits filed in New York Supreme Court alleging federal securities law violations in connection with the IPO, which are substantially similar to the above-referenced federal court action.  The parties have entered into a stipulation staying one of the state court actions pending resolution of the motion to dismiss filed in the federal court action.  In the other state court action, no schedule has been entered by the court.  The Company is unable to provide any assurances as to the ultimate outcome of any of these lawsuits or that an adverse resolution of any of these lawsuits would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

13

The Company is subject to a shareholder derivative action filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery.  Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment challenging the validity of a provision of the Company’s Certification of Incorporation that requires shareholders to bring claims under the Securities Act of 1933 solely in federal court.  Pursuant to a stipulation entered by the parties, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment on May 16, 2018.  The parties filed responses on July 16, 2018.  A hearing on the motions was held on September 27, 2018.    The cross motions for summary judgment remain pending before the court. The Company is unable to provide any assurances as to the ultimate outcome of this lawsuit or that an adverse resolution of this lawsuit would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. 

The Company is subject to a lawsuit filed in California Superior Court under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) on behalf of certain non-exempt employees in the Company’s Richmond, California fulfillment center.  The complaint was filed on October 16, 2017, and alleges that the Company failed to pay wages and overtime, provide required meal and rest breaks, provide suitable resting facilities and provide accurate wage statements, to non-exempt employees in violation of California law.  The parties are presently engaged in discovery in the PAGA case and were discussing mediation when plaintiffs’ counsel filed a separate class action lawsuit, also in California Superior Court, alleging largely the same claims, but for a longer period. The Company believes that it is likely that the two cases will be consolidated.  The Company is currently unable to provide any assurances as to the ultimate outcome of these lawsuits or that adverse resolution of these lawsuits would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

On July 20, 2018, one of the Company’s suppliers, West Liberty Foods, L.L.C., (i) made an arbitration demand against the Company with JAMS, and (ii) together with certain related entities, filed a lawsuit against the Company in Iowa state court.  The arbitration demand alleges breach of contract, fraud, and other common law claims in connection with, among other things, a dispute under the supply agreement between the parties related to the purchase of certain beef and poultry inventory of the supplier.  The lawsuit, which has been removed to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, alleges breach of oral contract and other common law claims in connection with a purported agreement between the Company and the supplier relating to the supplier’s acquisition of another company.  The Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on November 14, 2018. The Company is currently unable to provide any assurances as to the ultimate outcome of this matter or that an adverse resolution of this matter would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Although the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that it may incur losses in these cases, the Company is currently unable to estimate the amount of such losses due to the early stages of the litigation, among other factors.

In addition, from time to time the Company may become involved in legal proceedings or be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of its business.  Although the results of such litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company currently believes that the final outcome of these ordinary course matters will not have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows.

On June 21, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court decided, in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., that state and local jurisdictions may, at least in certain circumstances, enforce a sales and use tax collection obligation on remote vendors that have no physical presence in the jurisdiction.  A number of states have already begun, or have positioned themselves to begin, requiring sales and use tax collection by remote vendors and/or by online marketplaces.  The details and effective dates of these collection requirements vary from state to state. The Company is in the process of determining how and when its collection practices will need to change in other jurisdictions.  It is possible that one or more jurisdictions may assert that the Company has liability for periods for which it has not collected sales, use or other similar taxes, and if such an assertion or assertions were successful it could result in substantial tax liabilities, including for past sales as well as penalties and interest, which could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and operating results.

14

10. Share-based Compensation

The Company recognized share-based compensation for share-based awards of $4.6 million and $5.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized $4.4 million and $5.4 million of share-based compensation in Product, technology, general, and administrative expenses and $0.2 million and $0.4 million in Cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization, respectively. The Company recognized share-based compensation for share-based awards of $13.6 million and $8.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized $12.6 million and $8.4 million of share-based compensation in Product, technology, general, and administrative expenses and $1.0 million and $0.4 million in Cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization, respectively.

Performance Stock Options

In February 2018, the Company granted options to purchase 1,594,162 shares of its Class A common stock with an exercise price of $3.10 to certain employees, including the Company’s executive officers. In May 2018, the Company granted additional options to purchase 428,905 shares of its Class A common stock with an exercise price of $3.05. In August 2018, the Company granted additional options to purchase 318,814 shares of its Class A common stock with an exercise price of $2.23. Such options are subject to vesting conditions that are tied to the achievement of certain stock price targets through June 30, 2020 and financial targets through December 31, 2019. The fair value of the stock price target options was determined utilizing the Monte Carlo simulation valuation model resulting in a total grant date fair value of $0.5 million. The fair value of the financial target options was determined utilizing the Black-Scholes option-pricing model resulting in a total grant date fair value of $1.9 million.

11. Earnings per Share

Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.

Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the diluted net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares, including potential dilutive common shares assuming the dilutive effect of outstanding common stock options and convertible preferred stock. For periods in which the Company has reported net loss, diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is the same as basic net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, because dilutive common shares are not assumed to have been issued if their effect is anti-dilutive.

The rights, including the liquidation and dividend rights, of the Class A, Class B, and Class C common stock are substantially the same, other than voting rights. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company did not have any outstanding shares of Class C common stock.

Upon the closing of the Company’s IPO on July 5, 2017, all of the outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock automatically converted into 85,190,551 shares of Class B common stock at the applicable conversion rates then in effect. Subsequent to the closing of the IPO, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding. Accordingly, the two-class method is not applicable for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017 as the participating securities were converted into Class B common stock.

15

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2018						2017
	Class A		Class B		Class C		Class A		Class B		Class C
(in thousands, except share and per-share data)
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	(11,881)	$	(22,061)	$	—	$	(13,565)	$	(73,636)	$	—
Undistributed earnings reallocated to convertible preferred stock		—		—		—		—		—		—
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(11,881)	$	(22,061)	$	—	$	(13,565)	$	(73,636)	$	—
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders—basic		67,624,607		125,569,641		—		28,738,339		155,999,381		—
Effect of dilutive securities		—		—		—		—		—		—
Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders—diluted		67,624,607		125,569,641		—		28,738,339		155,999,381		—
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders—basic (1)	$	(0.18)	$	(0.18)	$	—	$	(0.47)	$	(0.47)	$	—
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders—diluted (1)	$	(0.18)	$	(0.18)	$	—	$	(0.47)	$	(0.47)	$	—

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018						2017
	Class A		Class B		Class C		Class A		Class B		Class C
(in thousands, except share and per-share data)
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	(29,870)	$	(68,573)	$	—	$	(15,513)	$	(155,489)	$	(21)
Undistributed earnings reallocated to convertible preferred stock		—		—		—		—		—		—
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(29,870)	$	(68,573)	$	—	$	(15,513)	$	(155,489)	$	(21)
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders—basic		58,333,161		133,915,595		—		9,690,657		97,132,114		13,291
Effect of dilutive securities		—		—		—		—		—		—
Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders—diluted		58,333,161		133,915,595		—		9,690,657		97,132,114		13,291
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders—basic (1)	$	(0.51)	$	(0.51)	$	—	$	(1.60)	$	(1.60)	$	(1.60)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders—diluted (1)	$	(0.51)	$	(0.51)	$	—	$	(1.60)	$	(1.60)	$	(1.60)

(1) Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders — diluted may not recalculate due to rounding.

16

The following have been excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders as their effect would have been antidilutive:

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2018			2017
	Class A	Class B	Class C	Class A	Class B	Class C
Stock options	—	8,889,801	—	—	10,729,269	—
Restricted shares	—	19,973	—	—	34,973	—
Restricted stock units	11,345,771	—	—	5,288,963	—	—
Total anti-dilutive securities	11,345,771	8,909,774	—	5,288,963	10,764,242	—

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018			2017
	Class A	Class B	Class C	Class A	Class B	Class C
Stock options	—	8,844,834	—	—	10,600,725	—
Restricted shares	—	23,686	—	—	38,686	—
Restricted stock units	11,165,411	—	—	1,782,363	—	—
Total anti-dilutive securities	11,165,411	8,868,520	—	1,782,363	10,639,411	—

12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of financial instruments is determined based on assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability at the balance sheet date. Certain assets are categorized based on the following fair value hierarchy of market participant assumptions:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 — Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value of the asset or liability and supported by little or no market activity.

The Company uses observable market data when available, and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value.

The following are the major categories of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1), significant other observable inputs (Level 2) and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

	September 30, 2018
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Money market accounts	$	154,788	$	—	$	—	$	154,788
Total financial assets	$	154,788	$	—	$	—	$	154,788

17

	December 31, 2017
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Money market accounts	$	162,963	$	—	$	—	$	162,963
Total financial assets	$	162,963	$	—	$	—	$	162,963

As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had $154.8 million and $163.0 million, respectively, in financial assets held in money market accounts, all of which were classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. The Company measured the money market accounts at fair value. The Company classified its money market accounts as Level 1 because the values of these assets are determined using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. During the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and  2017, the Company did not have realized gains or losses related to its financial assets.

As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company did not have any assets or liabilities classified as Level 2 or Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

13. Restructuring Costs

In October 2017, the Company implemented a company-wide realignment of personnel to support its strategic priorities. This realignment resulted in a reduction of approximately 6% of the Company’s total workforce across both the Company’s corporate offices and fulfillment centers. The following table summarizes the related accruals recorded in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities:

	Employee-Related Costs
	(In thousands)
Balance — December 31, 2017	$	675
Charges		—
Cash payments		(541)
Other		(134)
Balance — September 30, 2018	$	—

14. Subsequent Events

Revolving Credit Facility Refinancing

On October 9, 2018, the Company amended and refinanced its existing revolving credit facility.  The refinancing of the revolving credit facility, among other things, reduced the maximum amount available to borrow from $200.0 million to $85.0 million and extended the final maturity from August 26, 2019 to February 26, 2021.  In connection with the refinancing, the Company repaid $41.4 million of indebtedness. Upon completion of the refinancing, the Company had $83.6 million in outstanding borrowings and $1.4 million in issued letters of credit under the revolving credit facility. In conjunction with the refinancing, the Company incurred customary fees and expenses of approximately $0.9 million, which will be capitalized as deferred financing costs and amortized over the new term.

Borrowings under the amended revolving credit facility bear interest, at the Company’s option, at (1) a base rate based on the highest of prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and an adjusted LIBOR rate for a one month interest period plus 1.00%, plus in each case a margin of 3.00% (the “base rate”),  or (2) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a margin of 4.00% (the “adjusted LIBOR rate”). The Company is also obligated under the revolving credit facility to pay customary fees, including an unused commitment fee on undrawn amounts of 0.15%.

The obligations under the amended revolving credit facility are guaranteed by the guarantor as defined in the credit agreement, Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. The Company’s obligations under the revolving credit facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. The amended refinanced revolving credit facility makes certain changes to affirmative and financial reporting covenants and various negative covenants restricting the activities of the

18

Company. In addition, the amended revolving credit facility requires the Company to comply with certain additional financial covenants, including to maintain a minimum aggregate liquidity balance of $50.0 million and, in the event the Company has positive consolidated total net debt, maintain minimum quarterly consolidated adjusted EBITDA in excess of certain specified thresholds.

Restructuring Costs

On November 13, 2018, the Company implemented a workforce reduction to support its strategic priorities, which resulted in a reduction of approximately 4% of the Company’s total workforce. As a result, the Company expects to incur approximately $1.6 million in employee-related expenses, primarily consisting of severance payments, substantially all of which will result in cash expenditures. The Company expects to recognize such expenses in Other operating expense during the fourth quarter of 2018. In addition, the Company is evaluating if the carrying value of its long-lived assets may not be recoverable and is subject to a potential impairment charge.

19

Item 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2018.  The following discussion contains forward‑looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates, and beliefs.  Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward‑looking statements.  Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, particularly in the section titled “Risk Factors” under Part II, Item 1A, below.  In this discussion, we use financial measures that are considered non‑GAAP financial measures under Securities and Exchange Commission rules.  These rules require supplemental explanation and reconciliation, which is included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  Investors should not consider non‑GAAP financial measures in isolation from or in substitution for, financial information presented in compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  In the below discussion, we use the term basis points to refer to units of one‑hundredth of one percent.

Overview

Blue Apron creates incredible experiences. Founded in 2012, we are building a consumer lifestyle brand that symbolizes the emotional human connections that are formed through the cooking experiences we create.

Our core product is the meal experience we help our customers create.  These experiences extend from discovering new recipes, ingredients, and cooking techniques to preparing meals with families and loved ones to sharing photos and stories of culinary triumphs. Central to these experiences are the original recipes we design and send along with fresh, seasonal ingredients directly to our customers.  We do this by employing technology and expertise across many disciplines—demand planning, recipe creation, recipe merchandising, and marketing—to drive our end-to-end value chain. We offer our customers two flexible plans—our 2‑Person Plan and our Family Plan.  Our recipes are accompanied by printed and digital content, including how‑to instructions and the stories of our suppliers and specialty ingredients.  We also sell wine, which can be paired with our meals, through Blue Apron Wine, our direct‑to‑consumer wine delivery service. Through Blue Apron Market, our e‑commerce marketplace, we sell a curated selection of cooking tools, utensils, and pantry items, which are tested and recommended by our culinary team.

Key Financial and Operating Metrics

We use the following key financial and operating metrics to evaluate our business and operations, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, project our future performance, and make strategic decisions.  You should read the key financial and operating metrics in conjunction with the following discussion of our results of operations and financial condition together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Net revenue	$	150,621	$	210,638	$	526,867	$	693,538
Adjusted EBITDA	$	(18,812)	$	(48,034)	$	(53,566)	$	(118,200)
Net cash from (used in) operating activities	$	(15,397)	$	(52,074)	$	(54,000)	$	(122,765)

20

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,		December 31,		March 31,		June 30,		September 30,
	2017		2017		2018		2018		2018
Orders (in thousands)		3,605		3,196		3,474		3,122		2,647
Customers (in thousands)		856		746		786		717		646
Average Order Value	$	58.16	$	57.99	$	56.58	$	57.34	$	56.79
Orders per Customer		4.2		4.3		4.4		4.4		4.1
Average Revenue per Customer	$	245	$	248	$	250	$	250	$	233

Orders

We define Orders as the number of paid orders by our Customers across our meal, wine and market products sold on our e‑commerce platforms in any reporting period, inclusive of orders that may have eventually been refunded or credited to customers.  Orders, together with Average Order Value, is an indicator of the net revenue we expect to recognize in a given period.  We view Orders delivered as a key indicator of our scale and financial performance.  Orders has limitations as a financial and operating metric as it does not reflect the product mix chosen by our customers or the purchasing behavior of our customers.  Because of these and other limitations, we consider, and you should consider, Orders in conjunction with our other metrics, including net revenue, net income (loss), adjusted EBITDA, Average Order Value and Orders per Customer.

Customers

We determine our number of Customers by counting the total number of individual customers who have paid for at least one Order from Blue Apron across our meal, wine or market products sold on our e‑commerce platforms in a given reporting period.  For example, the number of Customers in the three months ended September 30, 2018 was determined based on the total number of individual customers who paid for at least one Order across our meal, wine or market products in the three months ended September 30, 2018.  We view the number of Customers as a key indicator of our scale and financial performance.  Customers has limitations as a financial and operating metric as it does not reflect the product mix chosen by our customers, Order frequency, or the purchasing behavior of our customers.  Because of these and other limitations, we consider, and you should consider, Customers in conjunction with our other metrics, including net revenue, net income (loss), adjusted EBITDA, Orders per Customer and Average Revenue per Customer.

Average Order Value

We define Average Order Value as our net revenue from our meal, wine and market products sold on our e‑commerce platforms in a given reporting period divided by the number of Orders in that period.  We view Average Order Value as a key indicator of the mix of our product offerings chosen by our customers, the mix of promotional discounts, and the purchasing behavior of our customers.

Orders per Customer

We define Orders per Customer as the number of Orders in a given reporting period divided by the number of Customers in that period. We view Orders per Customer as a key indicator of our customers’ purchasing patterns, including their repeat purchase behavior.

Average Revenue per Customer

We define Average Revenue per Customer as our net revenue from our meal, wine and market products sold on our e‑commerce platforms in a given reporting period divided by the number of Customers in that period.  We view Average Revenue per Customer as a key indicator of our customers’ purchasing patterns, including their repeat purchase behavior.

21

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA is a non‑GAAP financial measure defined by us as net income (loss) before interest income (expense), net, other operating expense, other income (expense), net, benefit (provision) for income taxes, depreciation and amortization and share‑based compensation expense.  We have presented adjusted EBITDA in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q because it is a key measure used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our operating performance, generate future operating plans and make strategic decisions regarding the allocation of capital.  In particular, we believe that the exclusion of certain items in calculating adjusted EBITDA can produce a useful measure for period‑to‑period comparisons of our business.  Accordingly, we believe that adjusted EBITDA provides useful information in understanding and evaluating our operating results.  Please see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a discussion of the use of non‑GAAP financial measures and for a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), the most directly comparable measure calculated in accordance with GAAP.

Components of Our Results of Operations

Net Revenue

We generate net revenue primarily from the sale of meals to customers through our 2‑Person and Family Plans.  We also generate net revenue through sales of Blue Apron Wine, which we began offering in September 2015, and through sales on Blue Apron Market, which we launched in November 2014. In addition, we sell products of BN Ranch, a premium supplier of sustainable beef, poultry and lamb, which we acquired in February 2017. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, we derived substantially all of our net revenue from sales of our meals.  We deduct promotional discounts and customer credits and refunds expected to be issued to determine net revenue.  Customers who receive a damaged meal or wine order or are dissatisfied with a meal or wine order and contact us within seven days of receipt of the order may receive a full or partial refund, full or partial credit against future purchase, or replacement, at our sole discretion.  Credits only remain available for customers who maintain a valid account with us.  Customers who return an unused, undamaged Blue Apron Market product within 30 days of receipt receive a full refund.

Our business is seasonal in nature and, as a result, our revenue and expenses and associated revenue trends fluctuate from quarter to quarter.  For example, we anticipate that the first quarter of each year will generally represent our strongest quarter in terms of customer engagement.  Conversely, during the summer months and the end of year holidays, when people are vacationing more often or have less predictable weekly routines, we generally anticipate lower customer engagement. In addition, our net revenue is impacted by our marketing strategies, including the timing and amount of paid advertising and promotional activity. For example, our planned reduction in marketing expense, while we focus on opportunities with customers that exhibit higher affinity, is expected to negatively impact our net revenue. We also anticipate that our net revenue will be impacted by the timing and success of our ongoing product and channel expansion.

Credit card charges are recorded in deferred revenue until the criteria for revenue recognition have been met.  Because we generally charge credit cards in advance of shipment and, historically, customers have most frequently requested delivery of their meals earlier in the week, our deferred revenue balance at the end of a financial reporting period may fluctuate significantly based on the day of the week on which that period ends.  Consequently, large changes in deferred revenue at any particular time are not meaningful indicators of our financial results or future revenue trends.

Cost of Goods Sold, excluding Depreciation and Amortization

Cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization, consists of product and fulfillment costs.  Product costs include the cost of food, packaging for food that is portioned prior to delivery to customers, labor and related personnel costs incurred to portion food for our meals, inbound shipping costs, and cost of products sold through Blue Apron Wine, Blue Apron Market, and BN Ranch.  Fulfillment costs consist of costs incurred in the shipping and handling of inventory including the shipping costs to our customers, labor and related personnel costs related to receiving, inspecting, warehousing, picking inventory, and preparing customer orders for shipment, and the cost of packaging materials and shipping supplies. Over time, we expect such expenses to decrease as a percentage of net revenue as we continue to focus on operational improvements and optimizing our fulfillment center operations.

22

Marketing

Our marketing expenses consist primarily of costs incurred to acquire new customers, retain existing customers and build our brand awareness through various offline and online paid advertising channels, including television, digital and social media, direct mail, radio and podcasts, email, and brand activations.

Also included in marketing expenses are the costs of orders through our customer referral program, in which certain existing customers may invite others to receive a complimentary meal delivery, as well as costs paid to third parties to market our products.  The cost of the customer referral program is based on our costs incurred for fulfilling a complimentary meal delivery, including product and fulfillment costs.  We expect to continue to incur marketing expenses to attract and retain customers as well as to promote brand awareness.  We anticipate that our marketing expenses, which are affected by our strategic priorities, the seasonal trends in our business, the competitive landscape of our market, and the timing and success of our ongoing product expansion, will fluctuate from quarter‑to‑quarter and have a significant impact on our quarterly results of operations.

Product, Technology, General and Administrative

Product, technology, general and administrative expenses consist of costs related to the development of our products and technology, general and administrative expenses and overhead expenses, which include: payroll and related expenses for employees involved in the application, production, and maintenance of our platform and other technology infrastructure costs; payroll and related expenses for employees performing corporate and other managerial functions; facilities costs such as occupancy and rent costs for our corporate offices and fulfillment centers; and payment processing fees, professional fees, and other general corporate and administrative costs. We expect these expenses to decrease in absolute dollars in 2018 compared to 2017 as we realize the savings from the personnel realignment implemented in October 2017 and continue to focus on expense management.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization consists of depreciation expense for our property and equipment and amortization expense for capitalized software development costs.

Other Operating Expense

Other operating expense consists of impairment losses relating to long-lived assets in our fulfillment centers for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Interest Income (Expense), Net

Interest income and expense consists primarily of interest expense associated with our revolving credit facility, capital lease financings, and build-to-suit lease financings offset by interest income on cash and cash equivalents balances.

Other Income and Expense

Other income and expense consists of the mark-to-market loss on the debt derivative related to our convertible notes, as well as the loss upon the automatic conversion and settlement of the convertible notes, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Benefit (Provision) for Income Taxes

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Acts was enacted into law. The new legislation contains several key provisions including the reduction of the corporate income tax rate to 21% effective January 1, 2018 as well as a variety of other changes including the limitation of the tax deductibility of interest expense, acceleration of expensing of certain business assets, and reductions in the amount of executive pay that could qualify as a tax deduction.  ASC 740, Income Taxes, requires us to recognize the effect of the tax law changes in the period of enactment. However, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or SAB118, which permits us to record provisional amounts during a measurement period which is

23

similar to the measurement period used when accounting for business combinations. As of September 30, 2018, we have made our best estimates of our income taxes based on our interpretation of the new legislation as we are still accumulating data to finalize the underlying calculations.  In accordance with SAB 118, this estimate is considered provisional and will be finalized before December 22, 2018.

Our provision for income taxes and our effective tax rates are affected by permanent differences between GAAP and statutory tax laws, certain one‑time items, and the impact of valuation allowances.  Our tax provision results from state taxes in certain jurisdictions in which we do not have net operating losses. For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, we recorded nominal tax expense, resulting in an effective tax rate of (0.1)% and 0.2%, respectively.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, we recorded nominal tax expense, resulting in an effective tax rate of (0.1)% and (0.01)%.  We continue to maintain a valuation allowance for federal and certain state tax jurisdictions. 

As of December 31, 2017, we had U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of $195.2 million and state net operating loss carryforwards of $96.4 million.  The federal and state net operating loss carryforwards are subject to limitations under applicable tax laws and will expire at various dates beginning in 2033, if not utilized.

Results of Operations

The following sets forth our consolidated statements of operations data for each of the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Net revenue	$	150,621	$	210,638	$	526,867	$	693,538
Operating expenses:
Cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization		102,406		164,444		347,894		496,495
Marketing		23,251		34,244		97,161		129,368
Product, technology, general, and administrative		48,345		65,744		148,933		194,627
Depreciation and amortization		8,599		8,774		25,688		18,337
Other operating expense		—		5,934		—		5,934
Total operating expenses		182,601		279,140		619,676		844,761
Income (loss) from operations		(31,980)		(68,502)		(92,809)		(151,223)
Interest income (expense), net		(1,943)		(1,281)		(5,568)		(4,803)
Other income (expense), net		—		(17,551)		—		(14,984)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(33,923)		(87,334)		(98,377)		(171,010)
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		(19)		133		(66)		(13)
Net income (loss)	$	(33,942)	$	(87,201)	$	(98,443)	$	(171,023)

24

The following table sets forth our consolidated statements of operations data as a percentage of net revenue for each of the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
Net revenue	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Operating expenses:
Cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization	68.0	%	78.1	%	66.0	%	71.6	%
Marketing	15.4	%	16.3	%	18.4	%	18.7	%
Product, technology, general, and administrative	32.1	%	31.2	%	28.3	%	28.1	%
Depreciation and amortization	5.7	%	4.2	%	4.9	%	2.6	%
Other operating expense	—	%	2.8	%	—	%	0.9	%
Total operating expenses	121.2	%	132.5	%	117.6	%	121.8	%
Income (loss) from operations	(21.2)	%	(32.5)	%	(17.6)	%	(21.8)	%
Interest income (expense), net	(1.3)	%	(0.6)	%	(1.1)	%	(0.7)	%
Other income (expense), net	—	%	(8.3)	%	—	%	(2.2)	%
Income (loss) before income taxes	(22.5)	%	(41.5)	%	(18.7)	%	(24.7)	%
Benefit (provision) for income taxes	(0.0)	%	0.1	%	(0.0)	%	(0.0)	%
Net income (loss)	(22.5)	%	(41.4)	%	(18.7)	%	(24.7)	%

Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

Net Revenue

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2018		2017		% Change
	(In thousands)
Net revenue	$	150,621	$	210,638	(28)	%

Net revenue decreased by $60.0 million, or 28%, to $150.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from $210.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017.  The decrease in net revenue was primarily due to a decrease in Customers during the three months ended September 30, 2018 as we remain deliberate in our marketing investments while we implement our multi-product, multi-channel strategy. 

Operating Expenses

Cost of Goods Sold, excluding Depreciation and Amortization

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2018			2017			% Change
	(In thousands)
Cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization	$	102,406		$	164,444		(38)	%
% of net revenue		68.0	%		78.1	%

Cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization, decreased by $62.0 million, or 38%, to $102.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from $164.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017.  This reduction was primarily driven by a decrease in Orders and operational efficiencies. As a percentage of net revenue, cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization, decreased to 68.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from 78.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The improvement in

25

cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization, as a percentage of net revenue, led by our Linden fulfillment center, was primarily due to:

· a decrease of 570 basis points in food and product packaging costs driven by enhanced planning and procurement strategies, improved pricing with suppliers, as well as process improvements in our fulfillment center operations; and

· a decrease of 440 basis points in labor costs largely due to process improvements in our fulfillment center operations.

Marketing

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2018			2017			% Change
	(In thousands)
Marketing	$	23,251		$	34,244		(32)	%
% of net revenue		15.4	%		16.3	%

Marketing expenses decreased by $11.0 million, or 32%, to $23.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from $34.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017.  As a percentage of net revenue, marketing expenses decreased to 15.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from 16.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2017. This decrease as a percentage of net revenue primarily included a decrease of 410 basis points for various offline paid advertising channels and a decrease of 180 basis points in our customer referral program primarily driven by a decrease in the mix of customer referral orders versus total Orders. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of 510 basis points in various online paid advertising channels as we focus on our most efficient acquisition channels.

Product, Technology, General and Administrative

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2018			2017			% Change
	(In thousands)
Product, technology, general and administrative	$	48,345		$	65,744		(26)	%
% of net revenue		32.1	%		31.2	%

Product, technology, general and administrative expenses decreased by $17.4 million, or 26%, to $48.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from $65.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017.  This decrease was primarily due to increased focus on expense management, including:

· a decrease of $7.6 million in facilities costs for our corporate offices and fulfillment centers, including occupancy and rent;

· a decrease of $7.3 million in personnel costs primarily driven by lower headcount in corporate and other managerial positions reflecting the company-wide realignment that was implemented in October 2017; and

· a decrease of $2.5 million in corporate overhead and administrative costs, which includes a decrease of $1.3 million in payment processing fees driven by lower net revenue.

As a percentage of net revenue, product, technology, general and administrative expenses increased 90 basis points to 32.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from 31.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 driven by investments to support our business and execute on key business initiatives, such as our ongoing product expansion.

26

In November 2018, we implemented a workforce reduction to support its strategic priorities, which resulted in a reduction of approximately 4% of our total workforce. As a result, we expect to incur approximately $1.6 million in employee-related expenses, primarily consisting of severance payments, substantially all of which will result in cash expenditures. We expect to recognize such expenses in Other operating expense during the fourth quarter of 2018. We expect annual savings beginning in 2019 of approximately $16.0 million, including $15.0 million to product, technology, general and administrative expenses and $1.0 million to cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization. In addition, we are evaluating if the carrying value of our long-lived assets may not be recoverable and is subject to a potential impairment charge.

Depreciation and Amortization

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2018			2017			% Change
	(In thousands)
Depreciation and amortization	$	8,599		$	8,774		(2)	%
% of net revenue		5.7	%		4.2	%

Depreciation and amortization decreased by $0.2 million, or 2%, to $8.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from $8.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017.  As a percentage of net revenue, depreciation and amortization increased to 5.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from 4.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2017.

Other Operating Expense 

Other operating expense for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $0.0 million and $5.9 million, respectively.  Other operating expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017 includes non-cash impairment charges on fulfillment center long-lived assets primarily related to the transition of all of our Jersey City, New Jersey fulfillment center operations to our new fulfillment center in Linden, New Jersey.

Income (Loss) from Operations

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2018			2017			% Change
	(In thousands)
Income (loss) from operations	$	(31,980)		$	(68,502)		(53)	%
% of net revenue		(21.2)	%		(32.5)	%

Income (loss) from operations for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $(32.0) million and $(68.5) million, respectively. This change was due to a decrease in operating expenses of $96.5 million, which was partially offset by a decrease in net revenue of $60.0 million.  As a percentage of net revenue, income (loss) from operations was (21.2)% and (32.5)% for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  This decrease was primarily driven by decreases as a percentage of net revenue in cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization, other operating expense and marketing expense, partially offset by an increase in depreciation and amortization and product, technology, general and administrative expense as a percentage of net revenue. 

Interest Income (Expense), Net

Interest income (expense), net for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $(1.9) million and $(1.3) million, respectively.  This increase was primarily due to an increase of $0.6 million of interest expense associated with our build-to-suit lease financings and an increase of $0.4 million of interest incurred on outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility, partially offset by increased interest income on cash and cash equivalents of $0.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2018 and a decrease of $0.1 million of non-cash discount amortization related to our convertible notes in the three months ended September 30, 2017.

27

Other Income (Expense), net

Other income (expense), net for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $0.0 million and $(17.6) million, respectively. Other income (expense), net for the three months ended September 30, 2017 reflects a non-cash loss related to the automatic conversion and settlement of the convertible notes upon the closing of the IPO on July 5, 2017.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, reflects state income taxes in certain jurisdictions in which net operating losses were not available to offset our tax obligations.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

Net Revenue

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2018		2017		% Change
	(In thousands)
Net revenue	$	526,867	$	693,538	(24)	%

Net revenue decreased by $166.7 million, or 24%, to $526.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 from $693.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.  The decrease in net revenue was primarily due to a decrease in Customers during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 as we remain deliberate in our marketing investments while we implement our multi-product, multi-channel strategy. Net revenue was also impacted, in part, by our decision in the second half of 2017 to deliberately prioritize operational stability and effectiveness.

Operating Expenses

Cost of Goods Sold, excluding Depreciation and Amortization

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2018			2017			% Change
	(In thousands)
Cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization	$	347,894		$	496,495		(30)	%
% of net revenue		66.0	%		71.6	%

Cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization, decreased by $148.6 million, or 30%, to $347.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 from $496.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.  This decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in Orders and operational efficiencies.  As a percentage of net revenue, cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization, decreased to 66.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 from 71.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.  The improvement in cost of goods sold, excluding depreciation and amortization, as a percentage of net revenue was primarily due to:

· a decrease of 370 basis points in food and product packaging costs driven by enhanced planning and procurement strategies as well as improved pricing with suppliers;

· a decrease of 110 basis points in labor largely due to process improvements in our fulfillment center operations; and

28

· a decrease of 70 basis points in shipping and fulfillment packaging costs largely due to process improvements in our fulfillment center operations, including enhancements in fulfillment packaging and expense management.

Marketing

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2018			2017			% Change
	(In thousands)
Marketing	$	97,161		$	129,368		(25)	%
% of net revenue		18.4	%		18.7	%

Marketing expenses decreased by $32.2 million, or 25%, to $97.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 from $129.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease was primarily driven by decreased investment in various offline paid advertising channels and our customer referral program, partially offset by an increase in online paid advertising channels. As a percentage of net revenue, marketing expenses decreased to 18.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 from 18.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.  This decrease as a percentage of net revenue primarily included a decrease of 380 basis point for various offline paid advertising channels and a decrease of 150 basis points in our customer referral program largely due to a decrease in the mix of customer referral orders versus total Orders. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of 510 basis points for various online paid advertising channels as we focus on our most efficient acquisition channels.

Product, Technology, General and Administrative

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2018			2017			% Change
	(In thousands)
Product, technology, general and administrative	$	148,933		$	194,627		(23)	%
% of net revenue		28.3	%		28.1	%

Product, technology, general and administrative expenses decreased by $45.7 million, or 23%, to $148.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 from $194.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.  This decrease was primarily due to increased focus on expense management, including:

· a decrease of $20.0 million in facilities costs for our corporate offices and fulfillment centers, including occupancy and rent;

· a decrease of $17.6 million in personnel costs primarily driven by lower headcount in corporate and other managerial positions as a result of the company-wide realignment that was implemented in October 2017; and

· a decrease of $7.9 million in corporate overhead and administrative costs, which includes a decrease of $3.4 million in payment processing fees driven by lower net revenue.

As a percentage of net revenue, product, technology, general and administrative expenses increased 20 basis points to 28.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 from 28.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 driven by investments to support our business and execute on key business initiatives such as our ongoing product expansion.

29

Depreciation and Amortization

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2018			2017			% Change
	(In thousands)
Depreciation and amortization	$	25,688		$	18,337		40	%
% of net revenue		4.9	%		2.6	%

Depreciation and amortization increased by $7.4 million, or 40%, to $25.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 from $18.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.  This increase was primarily driven by investment in our property and equipment in our fulfillment centers to support key business initiatives, such as fulfillment center and other operational improvements and our ongoing product expansion.  As a percentage of net revenue, depreciation and amortization increased to 4.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 from 2.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Other Operating Expense 

Other operating expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $0.0 million and $5.9 million, respectively.  Other operating expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 includes non-cash impairment charges on fulfillment center long-lived assets primarily related to the transition of all of our Jersey City fulfillment center operations to our new fulfillment center in Linden, New Jersey.

Income (loss) from Operations

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2018			2017			% Change
	(In thousands)
Income (loss) from operations	$	(92,809)		$	(151,223)		(39)	%
% of net revenue		(17.6)	%		(21.8)	%

Income (loss) from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $(92.8) million and $(151.2) million, respectively.  This change was due to a decrease in operating expenses of $225.1 million, which was partially offset by a decrease in net revenue of $166.7 million.  As a percentage of net revenue, income (loss) from operations was (17.6)% and (21.8)% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  This change as a percentage of net revenue was primarily driven by operational efficiencies and expense management.

Interest income (expense), net

Interest income (expense), net for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $(5.6) million and $(4.8) million, respectively. This increase in interest expense was primarily due to an increase of $2.9 million of interest associated with our build-to-suit lease financings and an increase of $1.6 million of interest incurred on outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility, partially offset by increased interest income on cash and cash equivalents of $1.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and a decrease of $2.3 million of non-cash discount amortization related to our convertible notes in the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Other income (expense), net

Other income (expense), net for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $0.0 million and $(15.0) million, respectively. Other income (expense), net for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 reflects a non-cash loss related to the automatic conversion and settlement of the convertible notes upon the closing of the IPO on July 5, 2017.

30

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, reflects state income taxes in certain jurisdictions in which net operating losses were not available to offset our tax obligations.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

To provide additional information regarding our financial results, we monitor and have presented within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. This non-GAAP financial measure is not based on any standardized methodology prescribed by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, and is not necessarily comparable to similarly-titled measures presented by other companies.

We define adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) before interest income (expense), net, other operating expense, other income (expense), net, benefit (provision) for income taxes, depreciation and amortization and share-based compensation expense. We have presented adjusted EBITDA in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q because it is a key measure used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our operating performance, generate future operating plans and make strategic decisions regarding the allocation of capital. In particular, we believe that the exclusion of certain items in calculating adjusted EBITDA can produce a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business.

We use adjusted EBITDA to evaluate our operating performance and trends and make planning decisions. We believe adjusted EBITDA helps identify underlying trends in our business that could otherwise be masked by the effect of the expenses that we exclude. Accordingly, we believe that adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results, enhancing the overall understanding of our past performance and future prospects, and allowing for greater transparency with respect to key financial metrics used by our management in its financial and operational decision-making.

Our adjusted EBITDA is not prepared in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered in isolation of, or as an alternative to, measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. There are a number of limitations related to the use of adjusted EBITDA rather than net income (loss), which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. Some of these limitations are:

· adjusted EBITDA excludes share-based compensation expense, as share-based compensation expense has recently been, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future, a significant recurring expense for our business and an important part of our compensation strategy; 

· adjusted EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization expense and, although these are non-cash expenses, the assets being depreciated may have to be replaced in the future; 

· adjusted EBITDA excludes other operating expense, as other operating expense represents impairment losses;

· adjusted EBITDA does not reflect interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest, which reduces cash available to us; 

· adjusted EBITDA excludes other expense, as other expense represents a one-time loss on the extinguishment of convertible notes;

· adjusted EBITDA does not reflect income tax payments that reduce cash available to us; and 

· other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate adjusted EBITDA differently, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure.

31

Because of these limitations, we consider, and you should consider, adjusted EBITDA together with other operating and financial performance measures presented in accordance with GAAP. The following table presents a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), the most directly comparable measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, for each of the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Reconciliation of net income (loss) to adjusted EBITDA
Net income (loss)	$	(33,942)	$	(87,201)	$	(98,443)	$	(171,023)
Share-based compensation		4,569		5,760		13,555		8,752
Depreciation and amortization		8,599		8,774		25,688		18,337
Other operating expense		—		5,934		—		5,934
Interest (income) expense, net		1,943		1,281		5,568		4,803
Other (income) expense, net		—		17,551		—		14,984
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		19		(133)		66		13
Adjusted EBITDA	$	(18,812)	$	(48,034)	$	(53,566)	$	(118,200)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash requirements are principally for working capital and capital expenditures to support our business, including investment and automation at our fulfillment centers.  Historically, we have financed our operations through private sales of equity securities and payments received from customers.  We have raised a total of $194.9 million from the sale of convertible preferred stock, net of costs associated with such financings. In 2016, we entered into a revolving credit facility, which we amended and refinanced in October 2018. In 2017, we issued and sold $64.6 million in aggregate principal amount of convertible notes. In 2017, we also closed our IPO of 30,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, generating proceeds of $278.0 million, net of the underwriting discount and other offering expenses. The proceeds from the IPO are being used for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. Upon the completion of the IPO, all outstanding convertible preferred stock and the outstanding aggregate principal amount of, and all accrued and unpaid interest on, our outstanding convertible notes each automatically converted into shares of our Class B common stock. Subsequent to the closing of the IPO, there were no convertible notes outstanding.Total debt, net of debt issuance costs, was $124.8 million as of September 30, 2018 and $124.7 million as of December 31, 2017. As of September 30, 2018, the current portion of long-term debt of $41.3 million represents the amount of repayment made upon the refinancing of the revolving credit facility in October 2018. For additional information on the refinancing of the revolving credit facility, see “—Revolving Credit Facility” below and Note 14 Subsequent Events, included in Part I, Item 1, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, money market accounts, and amounts held by third‑party financial institutions for credit and debit card transactions, which generally settle within three business days.  Because we generally charge credit cards in advance of shipment and, historically, customers have most frequently requested delivery of their meals earlier in the week, amounts due for credit and debit card transactions as of the end of a financial reporting period may fluctuate significantly based upon the day of the week on which that period ends.

Total restricted cash was $1.7 million as of September 30, 2018 and $2.4 million as of December 31, 2017.  Restricted cash reflects pledged cash deposited into savings accounts that is used as security primarily for fulfillment centers and office space leases.  As of September 30, 2018, $1.7 million of our restricted cash is classified as a long-term asset.  

We define working capital as the difference between our current assets (excluding cash and cash equivalents) and current liabilities (excluding current portion of long-term debt).  Our working capital was $(39.9) million as of September 30, 2018 and $(36.5) million as of December 31, 2017.

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, together with cash generated from operations, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months.  Our future capital requirements and the

32

availability and accessibility to additional funds will depend on many factors, including those described in the section titled “Risk Factors” under Part II, Item 1A, below.

The following table presents the major components of net cash flows from and used in operating, investing, and financing activities for the periods indicated.

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		September 30,
	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Net cash from (used in) operating activities	$	(54,000)	$	(122,765)
Net cash from (used in) investing activities		(11,615)		(115,676)
Net cash from (used in) financing activities		3		423,267
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(65,612)		184,826
Cash and cash equivalents–beginning of period		228,514		81,468
Cash and cash equivalents–end of period	$	162,902	$	266,294

Net Cash from (used in) Operating Activities

Net cash from (used in) operating activities consists of net income (loss) adjusted for certain non‑cash items and changes in operating assets and liabilities.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, net cash from (used in) operating activities was $(54.0) million and consisted of net income (loss) of $(98.4) million, non‑cash items of $41.6 million and a net change in operating assets and liabilities of $2.9 million. Changes in operating assets and liabilities were primarily driven by decreases in receivables and inventory of $11.0 million, increases in accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $3.7 million, offset by decreases in accounts payable, deferred revenue, and other noncurrent assets and liabilities of $(9.8) million and increases in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $(2.0) million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, net cash from (used in) operating activities was $(122.8) million and consisted of net income (loss) of $(171.0) million, non-cash items of $51.8 million and a net change in operating assets and liabilities of $(3.5) million. Changes in operating assets and liabilities were primarily driven by increases in accounts payable of $2.8 million and other non-current assets and liabilities of $5.0 million, partially offset by a decrease in deferred revenue of $(4.5) million and increases in receivables and prepaid expenses and other current assets of $(4.0) million and $(3.1) million, respectively.

Net Cash from (used in) Investing Activities

Net cash from (used in) investing activities primarily relates to capital expenditures to support our business initiatives and drive efficiency in fulfillment center operations and investment in software development.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, net cash from (used in) investing activities was $(11.6) million and consisted primarily of $(12.9) million for purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized software costs, and a $(0.3) million payment for an acquisition holdback, partially offset by $0.9 million of proceeds from the sale of fixed assets and a $0.7 million decrease in restricted cash. Cash paid for capital expenditures in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was driven by the continued investments in automation equipment at our fulfillment centers, the acquisition of fixed assets to support business initiatives and ongoing product expansion and software capitalization. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, net cash from (used in) investing activities was $(115.7) million and consisted primarily of $(116.1) million for purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized software costs, and $(1.2) million of cash paid for an acquisition, partially offset by a decrease in non-current restricted cash of $1.6 million. In the future we expect to incur capital expenditures primarily related to automation equipment in our fulfillment centers in order to optimize and drive efficiency in our operations.  As of September 30, 2018, our projected capital expenditures are expected to amount to approximately $15.0 million to $18.0 million in the aggregate for 2018, with similar amounts expected for 2019. The timing and amount of our projected expenditures is dependent upon a number of factors, including the anticipated and actual growth in our business, and may vary significantly from our estimates.

33

Net Cash from (used in) Financing Activities

Net cash from (used in) financing activities primarily relates to proceeds from equity offerings and our net borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, net cash from (used in) financing activities was $0.0 million and consisted of proceeds from the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units, almost entirely offset by principal payments on capital lease obligations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, financing activities from (used in) financing activities was $423.3 million in cash and consisted primarily of $278.2 million in proceeds from our initial public offering net of the underwriting discount and other offering expenses, $80.0 million in borrowings under our revolving credit facility net of issuance costs, and $64.4 million in proceeds from convertible notes net of issuance costs. The proceeds from borrowings under the revolving credit facility have primarily been used to finance our capital expenditures.

Revolving Credit Facility

In August 2016, we entered into a revolving credit and guaranty agreement with a maximum amount available to borrow of $150.0 million. In May 2017 and June 2017, we executed amendments to the agreement that each increased the total commitment by $25.0 million, resulting in a total commitment of $200.0 million. In October 2018, we amended and refinanced the revolving credit facility (the “credit facility refinancing”) to, among other things, reduce the maximum amount available to borrow from $200.0 million to $85.0 million and extend the final maturity of the revolving credit facility from August 26, 2019 to February 26, 2021.

As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had $125.0 million in outstanding borrowings and $1.4 million in issued letters of credit under the revolving credit facility. In connection with the refinancing, we repaid $41.4 million of indebtedness. Upon completion of the credit facility refinancing, we had $83.6 million in outstanding borrowings and $1.4 million in issued letters of credit under the revolving credit facility.

Prior to the credit facility refinancing, borrowings under the revolving credit facility bore interest, at our option, at (1) a base rate based on the highest of prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and an adjusted LIBOR rate for a one‑month interest period plus 1.00% (“the base rate”), plus in each case a margin ranging from 0.50% to 1.00% or (2) an adjusted LIBOR rate (“the eurodollar rate”) plus a margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.00%, based on our total leverage ratio for the preceding four fiscal quarters and our status as a public or non‑public company. Subsequent to the credit facility refinancing, base rate loans bear interest at a rate equal to the base rate plus 3.00% and eurodollar rate loans will bear interest at a rate equal to the eurodollar rate plus 4.00%. We are also obligated under the revolving credit facility to pay certain customary fees, including an unused commitment fee on undrawn amounts of 0.15%.

The obligations under the revolving credit facility are guaranteed by the guarantor as defined in the credit agreement, Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. Obligations under the revolving credit facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of the guarantor and its subsidiaries. The revolving credit facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness and liens, restrictions on affiliate transactions, restrictions on the sale or other disposition of collateral, and limitations on dividends and stock repurchases. The amended revolving credit facility makes certain changes to affirmative and financial reporting covenants and various negative covenants restricting the activities of Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries. In addition, the amended revolving credit facility requires us to comply with certain additional financial covenants, including to maintain a minimum aggregate liquidity balance of $50.0 million and, in the event we have positive consolidated total net debt, maintain minimum quarterly consolidated adjusted EBITDA in excess of certain specified thresholds.  As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under the revolving credit facility.

Contractual Obligations

Other than the borrowings disclosed above in the "Revolving Credit Facility" section and changes which occur in the normal course of business, as of September 30, 2018, there were no significant changes to the contractual obligations reported at December 31, 2017 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

34

Off‑Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we did not have any off‑balance sheet arrangements, except for operating leases entered into in the normal course of business.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates

In preparing our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities that are reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying disclosures.  The accounting estimates that require the most difficult and subjective judgments include revenue recognition, inventory valuation, leases, recoverability of long-lived assets, the fair value of share-based awards, recoverability of net deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance, and the recognition and measurement of income tax uncertainties and other contingencies.  Therefore, we consider these to be our critical accounting policies.  Accordingly, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis.  Our actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions.  See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for information about these critical accounting policies, as well as a description of our other accounting policies.

Emerging Growth Company Status

We are an "emerging growth company," as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act, and may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not "emerging growth companies."  We may take advantage of these exemptions until we are no longer an "emerging growth company." Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an "emerging growth company" can take advantage of the extended transition period afforded by the JOBS Act for the implementation of new or revised accounting standards.  We have elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards and as a result of this election, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates.  We may take advantage of these exemptions up until the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the IPO or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company.  We would cease to be an emerging growth company if we have more than $1.07 billion in annual revenue, have more than $700.0 million in market value of our stock held by non-affiliates (and we have been a public company for at least 12 months, and have filed one annual report on Form 10-K), or we issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt securities over a three-year period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For information about recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements and Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements, included in Part I, Item 1, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and Index to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures

We are exposed to certain market risks in the ordinary course of our business. These risks primarily consist of interest rates, food prices and inflation as follows:

Interest Rates

Our cash and cash equivalents consist of cash, money market accounts, and amounts held by third‑party financial institutions for credit and debit card transactions.  The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing return without significantly increasing risk.  Because our cash and cash equivalents have a relatively short maturity, the fair value of our portfolio of cash and cash equivalents is not particularly sensitive to interest rate changes.

35

We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our revolving credit facility.  See “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Revolving Credit Facility” above.

Food Prices

Our profitability is dependent on, among other things, our ability to anticipate and react to food costs.  We have been able to effectively manage cost variations resulting from a number of factors, including market conditions, shortages or interruptions in supply due to weather or other conditions beyond our control and inflation, through our recipe creation process.  We typically begin working with our suppliers months in advance to plan our supply needs, while maintaining flexibility to adjust our recipes, and therefore our ingredients, in the weeks leading up to shipment.  However, substantial increases in food prices could impact our operating results to the extent that such increases cannot be mitigated through our recipe planning.

Inflation Risk

We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition.  If our costs were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures, we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases.  Our inability or failure to do so could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of September 30, 2018 our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2018 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

36

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is subject to a consolidated putative class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York alleging federal securities law violations in connection with the Company’s June 2017 initial public offering, or the IPO.  The amended complaint alleges that the Company and certain current and former officers and directors made material misstatements or omissions in the Company’s registration statement and prospectus that caused the stock price to drop.  Pursuant to a stipulated schedule entered by the parties, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on May 21, 2018.  Plaintiffs filed a response on July 12, 2018 and defendants filed a reply on August 13, 2018. The motion to dismiss remains pending before the court.  The Company is also subject to two putative class action lawsuits filed in New York Supreme Court alleging federal securities law violations in connection with the IPO, which are substantially similar to the above-referenced federal court action.  The parties have entered into a stipulation staying one of the state court actions pending resolution of the motion to dismiss filed in the federal court action.  In the other state court action, no schedule has been entered by the court.  The Company is unable to provide any assurances as to the ultimate outcome of any of these lawsuits or that an adverse resolution of any of these lawsuits would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

The Company is subject to a shareholder derivative action filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery.  Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment challenging the validity of a provision of the Company’s Certification of Incorporation that requires shareholders to bring claims under the Securities Act of 1933 solely in federal court.  Pursuant to a stipulation entered by the parties, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment on May 16, 2018.  The parties filed responses on July 16, 2018.  A hearing on the motions was held on September 27, 2018.    The cross motions for summary judgment remain pending before the court.    The Company is unable to provide any assurances as to the ultimate outcome of this lawsuit or that an adverse resolution of this lawsuit would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. 

The Company is subject to a lawsuit filed in California Superior Court under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) on behalf of certain non-exempt employees in the Company’s Richmond, California fulfillment center.  The complaint was filed on October 16, 2017, and alleges that the Company failed to pay wages and overtime, provide required meal and rest breaks, provide suitable resting facilities and provide accurate wage statements, to non-exempt employees in violation of California law.  The parties are presently engaged in discovery in the PAGA case and were discussing mediation when plaintiffs’ counsel filed a separate class action lawsuit, also in California Superior Court, alleging largely the same claims, but for a longer period.  The Company believes that it is likely that the two cases will be consolidated. The Company is currently unable to provide any assurances as to the ultimate outcome of these lawsuits or that adverse resolution of these lawsuits would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

On July 20, 2018, one of the Company’s suppliers, West Liberty Foods, L.L.C., (i) made an arbitration demand against the Company with JAMS, and (ii) together with certain related entities, filed a lawsuit against the Company in Iowa state court.  The arbitration demand alleges breach of contract, fraud, and other common law claims in connection with, among other things, a dispute under the supply agreement between the parties related to the purchase of certain beef and poultry inventory of the supplier.  The lawsuit, which has been removed to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, alleges breach of oral contract and other common law claims in connection with a purported agreement between the Company and the supplier relating to the supplier’s acquisition of another company.  The Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on November 14, 2018. The Company is currently unable to provide any assurances as to the ultimate outcome of this matter or that an adverse resolution of this matter would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In addition, from time to time the Company may become involved in legal proceedings or be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of its business.  Although the results of such litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company currently believes that the final outcome of these ordinary course matters will not have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows.  Regardless of the outcome, any such litigation and claims can have an adverse impact on the Company because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.

37

For additional information on our legal contingencies, see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

38

Item 1A.

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our Class A common stock involves a high degree of risk.  Certain factors may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operation.  You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes, and in our other filings with the SEC.  Our business, financial condition, operating results, cash flow and prospects could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks or uncertainties.  In that case, the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

We have a limited operating history and a novel business model, which make it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and the risks and challenges we may encounter.

We have a limited operating history and a novel business model, which make it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and the risks and challenges we may encounter in seeking to execute on our strategies.  These risks and difficulties include our ability to:

· forecast our revenues and plan our operating expenses;

· retain existing customers and attract new customers;

· manage our personnel and operations;

· our ability to expand our product offerings and distribution channels;

· achieve and maintain profitability;

· maintain and grow the value of our brand and reputation;

· maintain and scale our supply chain while avoiding material disruptions or adverse incidents in our operations;

· maintain relationships with our existing suppliers and secure relationships with new suppliers to supply quality ingredients for use in our product offerings;

· scale and adapt our supply chain, production, operations and expenses, including marketing expenses, in response to customer demand and seasonal trends;

· adapt to evolving trends in the ways consumers purchase, prepare and consume food, as well as in how consumers interact with technology;

· comply with laws and regulations applicable to our business, including food safety, employment and health and safety regulations; and

· hire, integrate, and retain talented employees with a broad and varied range of skills and expertise.

If the demand for our products does not develop or is not sustained as we expect, or if we fail to address the needs of our customers or fail to maintain relationships with our suppliers, our business would be materially harmed.  The cumulative effects of these factors or our inability to manage any of the risks and challenges identified above and elsewhere in this section could result in, among other things, large fluctuations and unpredictability in our quarterly and annual operating results, meaning that comparing our operating results on a period‑to‑period basis may not be meaningful and that we might fail to meet industry, financial analyst or investor expectations for any period.  If we are

39

unable to successfully address these risks and challenges, our business, financial condition and operating results would be materially adversely affected.

We have a history of losses, and we may be unable to achieve or sustain profitability.

We have experienced net losses in each year since our inception.  In the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we incurred net losses of $210.1 million, $54.9 million and $47.0 million, respectively.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, we incurred net losses of $98.4 million and $171.0 million, respectively. We anticipate that we will continue to incur substantial operating expenses in the foreseeable future as we continue to invest to attract new customers, invest in our distribution and fulfillment infrastructure, expand our product offerings and distribution channels, hire additional employees and enhance our technology and infrastructure capabilities.  These efforts may prove more expensive than we anticipate, and we may not succeed in increasing our revenue and margins sufficiently to offset these higher expenses.  We incur significant expenses in developing our technology, building out our fulfillment centers, obtaining and storing ingredients and other products, and marketing the products we offer.  In addition, many of our expenses, including the costs associated with our existing and future fulfillment centers, are fixed.  Accordingly, we may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability, and we may incur significant losses for the foreseeable future.

If we fail to retain our existing customers, cost‑effectively acquire new customers, or increase the number of customers we serve, or if we fail to derive revenue from our customers consistent with our historical performance, our business could be materially adversely affected.

Our success, and our ability to resume revenue growth and operate profitably, depends in part on our ability to retain existing customers, to cost‑effectively acquire new customers, and to keep customers engaged so that they continue to purchase products from us. If we are unable to retain our existing customers,  cost‑effectively acquire new customers, or keep customers engaged, or increase the number of customers we serve, our business, financial condition and operating results would be materially adversely affected. For example, the number of our Customers declined to 646,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2018 from 856,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2017, and our revenue declined to $150.6 million from $210.6 million in those same periods.  Further, if customers do not perceive our product offerings to be of sufficient value and quality, or if we fail to offer new and relevant product offerings, we may not be able to attract or retain customers or engage existing customers so that they continue to purchase products from us. Many of our new customers originate from referrals from existing customers, and therefore we must ensure that our existing customers remain loyal to us in order to continue receiving those referrals.

Our new customers typically evaluate whether our product offerings fit their lifestyles, tastes and preferences before deciding whether to continue purchasing our product offerings and, if so, the frequency at which they make purchases. Our net revenue in any period is essentially a function of our ability to attract and retain customers and the frequency and size of the orders placed by those customers. While an increase in order frequency or size could potentially offset losses of customers and, similarly, an increase in the number of customers could potentially offset a reduction in the frequency or size of the orders placed by our customers, any inability by us to continue to derive net revenue from our existing customers consistent with our historical performance could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We spend significant amounts on advertising and other marketing activities, such as television, digital and social media, direct mail, radio and podcasts, and email, to acquire new customers, retain and engage existing customers, and promote our brand, and we expect our marketing expenses to continue to comprise a significant portion of our operating expenses. For 2017, 2016, and 2015, our marketing expenses were $154.5 million, $144.1 million, and $51.4 million, respectively, representing approximately 17.5%, 18.1%, and 15.1% of net revenue, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, our marketing expenses were $23.3 million and $34.2 million, respectively, representing approximately 15.4% and 16.3% of net revenue, respectively. Despite our focus on marketing activities, we may fail to identify cost‑efficient marketing opportunities as we scale our investments in marketing or fail to fully understand or estimate the conditions and behaviors that drive customer behavior. If any of our marketing activities prove less successful than anticipated in attracting new customers or retaining existing customers, we may not be able to recover our marketing spend, our cost to acquire new customers may increase, and our existing customers may

40

reduce the frequency or size of their purchases from us. In addition, our third‑party marketing partners may not provide adequate value for their services. Any of the foregoing events could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

If we fail to resume revenue growth or to manage future growth effectively, our business could be materially adversely affected.

Our net revenue increased from $340.8 million in 2015 to $795.4 million in 2016 to $881.2 million in 2017, but has since declined. For example, our net revenue declined to $150.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from $210.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017.  As we scaled our business, the number of our full-time employees increased from 2,997 at December 31, 2015 to 5,028 at December 31, 2016, but decreased to 4,163 at December 31, 2017 and to 2,898 at September 30, 2018.  If we fail to resume revenue growth or if our revenues further decline, our business, financial condition and operating results would be materially adversely affected. In addition, any future growth and expansion of our business and our product offerings will place significant demands on our management and operations teams and require significant additional management, financial, operational, technological and other resources to meet our needs, which may not be available in a cost‑effective manner or at all.  We are also required to manage relationships with various suppliers and other third parties, and expend time and effort to integrate new suppliers into our fulfillment operations.  If we do not resume revenue growth or if we do not effectively manage any future growth, we may not be able to execute on our business plan, respond to competitive pressures, take advantage of market opportunities, satisfy customer requirements or maintain high‑quality product offerings.

We are in the process of implementing significant reorganization activities in our business, including the recent reduction of the size of our organization. These and other reorganization activities could have long-term adverse effects on our business, including additional attrition in personnel and the failure to achieve the anticipated benefits and savings from these activities.

We are in the process of implementing significant reorganization activities in our business to adjust our cost structure, and we may engage in similar reorganization activities in the future. In November 2018, we implemented a reduction in the number of our employees by approximately 4%, which included departures of members of our management team, and in October 2017 we implemented a company-wide realignment of personnel that resulted in a reduction of approximately 6% of our total workforce across our corporate offices and fulfillment centers. These actions resulted in the loss of employees across various functions, the loss of institutional knowledge and expertise and the reallocation and combination of certain roles and responsibilities across our organization, all of which could adversely affect our operations. In addition, there is a risk of reduced employee morale and, as result, we may face further employee attrition. 

These and any other reorganization activities in which we may engage in the future, as well other ongoing cost reduction activities, reduce our available talent, assets, capabilities and other resources and could slow improvements in our products and services, adversely affect our ability to respond to competition and limit our ability to satisfy customer demands.  As a result, our management may need to divert a disproportionate amount of its attention away from our day-to-day strategic and operational activities, and devote a substantial amount of time to managing the organizational changes brought about by the reorganization. Due to our limited resources, we may not be able to effectively manage the changes in our business operations resulting from the reorganization, which may result in weaknesses in our operations, risks that we may not be able to comply with legal and regulatory requirements, loss of business opportunities, loss of employees and reduced productivity among remaining employees. If we are unable to effectively manage these activities, our expenses may be higher than expected, and we may not be able to implement our business strategy or achieve the anticipated benefits and savings from any such activities.  We may also determine to take additional measures to reduce costs, which could result in further disruptions to our operations and present additional challenges to the effective management of our company. In addition, delays in implementing planned restructuring activities, unexpected costs or the failure to meet targeted improvements may diminish the operational or financial benefits we realize from such actions. Any of the circumstances described above could materially adversely affect our business and operating and financial results.

41

We may require additional capital to fund our existing operations or the expansion of our business, and our inability to obtain such capital could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

To support our existing operations or the expansion of our business, we must have sufficient capital to continue to make investments and to fund our operations.  We cannot assure you that our existing cash and cash equivalents, together with cash generated from operations and available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility, will be sufficient to allow us to fund our existing operations or any such expansion.  If cash flows from operations are not sufficient, we may need additional equity or debt financing to provide the funds required to expand or operate our business.  If such financing is not available, or we are unable to refinance our revolving credit facility, on satisfactory terms or at all, we may be unable to expand or operate our business or to develop new business at the rate desired, and our operating results may suffer.  Debt financing increases expenses, may contain covenants that restrict the operation of our business, and must be repaid regardless of operating results.  For example, covenants contained in our revolving credit agreement include limitations on our ability to pay dividends; create, incur or assume indebtedness or liens; consummate a merger, sale, disposition or similar transaction; engage in transactions with affiliates; and make investments.  Our revolving credit facility also requires us to use a portion of the proceeds of certain equity issuances to repay indebtedness outstanding under the revolving credit facility.  Equity financing, or debt financing that is convertible into equity, could result in dilution to our existing stockholders.

Our inability to obtain adequate capital resources, whether in the form of equity or debt, to fund our business and growth strategies may require us to delay, scale back or eliminate some or all of our operations or the expansion of our business, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

The amount of our indebtedness could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results and prevent us from fulfilling our debt-related obligations. Furthermore, restrictive covenants in our revolving credit facility may limit our ability to pursue our business strategies, and the failure to comply with such restrictions could materially adversely affect our business.

As of October 31, 2018, we had $83.6 million in outstanding borrowings and $1.4 million in issued letters of credit under our revolving credit facility. Our debt could have important consequences for our business, including: making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our debt or to our trade or other creditors; increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic or industry conditions; limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund our existing operations or the expansion of our business, particularly when the availability of financing in the capital markets may be limited; requiring a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations for the payment of interest on our debt and thus reducing our ability to use our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate requirements; limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industries in which we operate; and placing us at a competitive disadvantage to less-leveraged competitors.

We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available to us under our revolving credit facility or otherwise in an amount sufficient to enable us to repay our indebtedness or fund our other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness, on or before its maturity. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations. For example, the October 2018 amendment to our revolving credit facility, among other things, increased the interest rates applicable to loans under the revolving credit facility and added covenants requiring us and our subsidiaries to maintain minimum aggregate amounts of liquidity (defined to include our and our subsidiaries’ unrestricted cash and cash equivalents) and, in the event we have positive consolidated total net debt, maintain minimum quarterly consolidated adjusted EBITDA in excess of certain specified thresholds.  We may not be able to comply with the minimum liquidity and adjusted EBITDA covenants contained in our revolving credit facility.

Our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our debt obligations depends on our financial condition and operating performance and the condition of the debt and capital markets, which are subject to prevailing

42

economic, industry and competitive conditions, as well as certain financial, business, legislative, political, regulatory and other factors beyond our control.  If our cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we could face substantial liquidity problems, be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures,  strategic acquisitions, investments and partnerships, dispose of material assets or operations, seek additional debt or equity capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. We cannot assure you that any such actions, if necessary, could be effected on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or on terms that would be advantageous to our stockholders or on terms that would not require us to breach the terms and conditions of our existing or future debt agreements, and our financial position and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

The restrictions contained in the revolving credit facility could limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions, meet capital needs or make acquisitions or could otherwise restrict our business and growth strategies, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. 

If we cannot make scheduled payments on our debt or if we fail to comply with the covenants under the revolving credit facility, we will be in default and the lenders could declare all outstanding principal and interest to be due and payable immediately, terminate their commitments to loan money and foreclose against the assets securing their borrowings, and we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation.

Food safety and food‑borne illness incidents or advertising or product mislabeling may materially adversely affect our business by exposing us to lawsuits, product recalls or regulatory enforcement actions, increasing our operating costs and reducing demand for our product offerings.

Selling food for human consumption involves inherent legal and other risks, and there is increasing governmental scrutiny of and public awareness regarding food safety.  Unexpected side effects, illness, injury or death related to allergens, food‑borne illnesses or other food safety incidents (including food tampering or contamination) caused by products we sell, or involving suppliers that supply us with ingredients and other products, could result in the discontinuance of sales of these products or our relationships with such suppliers, or otherwise result in increased operating costs or harm to our reputation.  Shipment of adulterated products, even if inadvertent, can result in criminal or civil liability.  Such incidents could also expose us to product liability, negligence or other lawsuits, including consumer class action lawsuits.  Any claims brought against us may exceed or be outside the scope of our existing or future insurance policy coverage or limits.  Any judgment against us that is in excess of our policy limits or not covered by our policies or not subject to insurance would have to be paid from our cash reserves, which would reduce our capital resources.

The occurrence of food‑borne illnesses or other food safety incidents could also adversely affect the price and availability of affected ingredients, resulting in higher costs, disruptions in supply and a reduction in our sales.  Furthermore, any instances of food contamination, whether or not caused by our products, could subject us or our suppliers to a food recall pursuant to the Food Safety Modernization Act of the United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and comparable state laws.  Food recalls could result in significant losses due to their costs, the destruction of product inventory, lost sales due to the unavailability of the product for a period of time and potential loss of existing customers and a potential negative impact on our ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers due to negative consumer experiences or as a result of an adverse impact on our brand and reputation.

In addition, food companies have been subject to targeted, large‑scale tampering as well as to opportunistic, individual product tampering, and we could be a target for product tampering.  Forms of tampering could include the introduction of foreign material, chemical contaminants and pathological organisms into consumer products as well as product substitution.  In the near future, FDA requirements will require companies like us to analyze, prepare and implement mitigation strategies specifically to address tampering designed to inflict widespread public health harm.  If we do not adequately address the possibility, or any actual instance, of product tampering, we could face possible seizure or recall of our products and the imposition of civil or criminal sanctions, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

43

Our business depends on a strong and trusted brand, and any failure to maintain, protect or enhance our brand, including as a result of events outside our control, could materially adversely affect our business.

We have developed a strong and trusted brand, and we believe our success depends on our ability to maintain and grow the value of the Blue Apron brand.  Maintaining, promoting and positioning our brand and reputation will depend on, among other factors, the success of our food safety, quality assurance, marketing and merchandising efforts and our ability to provide a consistent, high‑quality customer experience.  Any negative publicity, regardless of its accuracy, could materially adversely affect our business.  Brand value is based in large part on perceptions of subjective qualities, and any incident that erodes the loyalty of our customers or suppliers, including adverse publicity or a governmental investigation or litigation, could significantly reduce the value of our brand and significantly damage our business.

We believe that our customers hold us and our products to a high food safety standard.  Therefore, real or perceived quality or food safety concerns or failures to comply with applicable food regulations and requirements, whether or not ultimately based on fact and whether or not involving us (such as incidents involving our competitors), could cause negative publicity and lost confidence in our company, brand or products, which could in turn harm our reputation and sales, and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

In addition, in recent years, there has been a marked increase in the use of social media platforms and other forms of Internet‑based communications that provide individuals with access to broad audiences, and the availability of information on social media platforms is virtually immediate, as can be its impact.  Many social media platforms immediately publish the content their participants post, often without filters or checks on accuracy of the content posted.  Furthermore, other Internet‑based or traditional media outlets may in turn reference or republish such social media content to an even broader audience.  Information concerning us, regardless of its accuracy, may be posted on such platforms at any time.  Information posted may be adverse to our interests or may be inaccurate, each of which may materially harm our brand, reputation, performance, prospects and business, and such harm may be immediate and we may have little or no opportunity to respond or to seek redress or a correction.

The value of our brand also depends on effective customer support to provide a high‑quality customer experience, which requires significant personnel expense.  If not managed properly, this expense could impact our profitability.  Failure to manage or train our own or outsourced customer support representatives properly could compromise our ability to handle customer complaints effectively.

Changes in consumer tastes and preferences or in consumer spending and other economic or financial market conditions could materially adversely affect our business.

Our operating results may be materially adversely affected by changes in consumer tastes.  Our success depends in part on our ability to anticipate the tastes, eating habits and lifestyle preferences of consumers and to offer products that appeal to consumer tastes and preferences.  Consumer tastes and preferences may change from time to time and can be affected by a number of different trends and other factors that are beyond our control.  For example, our sales could be materially adversely affected by changes in consumer demand in response to nutritional and dietary trends, dietary concerns regarding items such as calories, sodium, carbohydrates or fat, or concerns regarding food safety.  Our competitors may react more efficiently and effectively to these changes than we can.  We cannot provide any assurances regarding our ability to respond effectively to changes in consumer health perceptions or our ability to adapt our product offerings to trends in eating habits.  If we fail to anticipate, identify or react to these changes and trends, or to introduce new and improved products on a timely basis, we may experience reduced demand for our products, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

In addition, the business of selling food products over the Internet is dynamic and continues to evolve.  The market segment for food delivery has grown significantly, and this growth may not continue.  If customers cease to find value in this model or otherwise lose interest in our product offerings or our business model generally, we may not acquire new customers in numbers sufficient to grow our business or retain existing customers at rates consistent with our business model, and our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

44

Furthermore, preferences and overall economic conditions that impact consumer confidence and spending, including discretionary spending, could have a material impact on our business.  Economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income such as employment levels, business conditions, changes in housing market conditions, the availability of credit, interest rates, tax rates, fuel and energy costs, the effect of natural disasters or acts of terrorism, and other matters could reduce consumer spending or cause consumers to shift their spending to lower‑priced alternatives, each of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

If we fail to successfully develop new product offerings and enhance our existing product offerings, our ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers, and our business, financial condition and operating results, may be materially adversely affected.

Our customers have a wide variety of options for purchasing food, including traditional and online grocery stores and restaurants, and consumer tastes and preferences may change from time to time.  Our ability to retain existing customers, attract new customers and increase customer engagement with us will depend in part on our ability to successfully create and introduce new product offerings and to improve upon and enhance our existing product offerings.  As a result, we may introduce significant changes to our existing product offerings, develop and introduce new and unproven product offerings, or offer our products through new distribution channels.  If our new or enhanced product offerings are unsuccessful, including because they fail to generate sufficient revenue or operating profit to justify our investments in them, our business and operating results could be materially adversely affected.  Furthermore, new customer demands, tastes or interests, superior competitive offerings or a deterioration in our product quality or our ability to bring new or enhanced product offerings to market quickly and efficiently could negatively affect the attractiveness of our products and the economics of our business and require us to make substantial changes to and additional investments in our product offerings or business model.  In addition, we frequently experiment with and test different product offerings and marketing and pricing strategies.  If these experiments and tests are unsuccessful, or if the product offerings and strategies we introduce based on the results of such experiments and tests do not perform as expected, our ability to retain existing customers, attract new customers, and increase customer engagement may be adversely affected.

Developing and launching new product offerings or enhancements to our existing product offerings involves significant risks and uncertainties, including risks related to the reception of such product offerings by our existing and potential future customers, increases in operational complexity, unanticipated delays or challenges in implementing such offerings or enhancements, increased strain on our operational and internal resources (including an impairment of our ability to accurately forecast demand and related supply) and negative publicity in the event such new or enhanced product offerings are perceived to be unsuccessful.  We have scaled our business rapidly, and significant new initiatives have in the past resulted in, and in the future may result in, operational challenges affecting our business.  In addition, developing and launching new product offerings and enhancements to our existing product offerings may involve significant upfront capital investments and such investments may not prove to be justified.  Any of the foregoing risks and challenges could materially adversely affect our ability to attract and retain customers as well as our visibility into expected operating results, and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Changes in food costs and availability could materially adversely affect our business.

The success of our business depends in part on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in food and supply costs and availability.  We are susceptible to increases in food costs as a result of factors beyond our control, such as general economic conditions, market changes, increased competition, general risk of inflation, exchange rate fluctuations, seasonal fluctuations, shortages or interruptions, weather conditions, changes in global climates, global demand, food safety concerns, generalized infectious diseases, changes in law or policy, declines in fertile or arable lands, product recalls and government regulations.  In particular, food deflation could reduce the attractiveness of our product offerings relative to competing products and thus impede our ability to increase overall sales, while food inflation, particularly periods of rapid inflation, could reduce our operating margins as there may be a lag between the time of the price increase and the time at which we are able to increase the price of our product offerings.  We generally do not have long‑term supply contracts or guaranteed purchase commitments with our food suppliers, and we do not hedge our commodity risks.  In limited circumstances, we may enter into strategic purchasing commitment contracts with certain suppliers, but many of these contracts are relatively short in duration and may provide only limited

45

protection from price fluctuations, and the use of these arrangements may limit our ability to benefit from favorable price movements.  As a result, we may not be able to anticipate, react to or mitigate against cost fluctuations which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Any increase in the prices of the ingredients most critical to our recipes, or scarcity of such ingredients, such as vegetables, poultry, beef, pork and seafood, would adversely affect our operating results.  Alternatively, in the event of cost increases or decrease of availability with respect to one or more of our key ingredients, we may choose to temporarily suspend including such ingredients in our recipes, rather than paying the increased cost for the ingredients.  Any such changes to our available recipes could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Increased competition presents an ongoing threat to the success of our business.

We expect competition in food sales generally, and with companies providing food delivery in particular, to continue to increase.  We compete with other food and meal‑delivery companies, the supermarket industry, a wide array of food retailers (including natural and organic, specialty, conventional, mass, discount and other food retail formats), conventional supermarkets, other food retailers, and online supermarket retailers.  We also compete with a wide array of casual dining and quick‑service restaurants and other food service businesses in the restaurants industry, as well as a broad range of online wine retailers, wine specialty stores and retail liquor stores.  In addition, we compete with food manufacturers, consumer packaged goods companies, providers of logistics services, and other food and ingredient producers.  Any international expansion of our business will present additional challenges from competition unique to each new market, compounded by the fact that we currently do not have experience offering our products outside of the United States.

We believe that our ability to compete depends upon many factors both within and beyond our control, including:

· the size and composition of our customer base;

· our reputation and brand strength relative to our competitors;

· consumer tastes and preferences;

· the flexibility and variety of our product offerings relative to our competitors;

· our selling and marketing efforts;

· the quality and price of products offered by us and our competitors;

· our ability to comply with, and manage the costs of complying with, laws and regulations applicable to our business;

· the convenience of the experience that we provide; and

· our ability to cost‑effectively source, market and distribute the products we offer and to manage our operations.

Some of our current competitors have, and potential competitors may have, longer operating histories, larger fulfillment infrastructures, greater technical capabilities, significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources and larger customer bases than we do.  In addition, business combinations and consolidation in and across the industries in which we compete could further increase the competition we face and result in competitors with significantly greater resources and customer bases than us.  Further, some of our other current or potential competitors may be smaller, less regulated, and have a greater ability to reposition their product offerings than companies that, like us, operate at a larger scale.  These factors may allow our competitors to derive greater sales and profits from their existing customer base, acquire customers at lower costs, respond more quickly than we can to changes in consumer demand and tastes, or otherwise compete with us effectively, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating

46

results.  These competitors may engage in more extensive research and development efforts, undertake more far‑reaching marketing campaigns and adopt more aggressive pricing policies, which may allow them to build larger customer bases or generate additional sales more effectively than we do.

If we lose key management or fail to meet our need for qualified employees with specialized skills, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

Our success is dependent upon our ability to retain key management, particularly Bradley J. Dickerson, our president and chief executive officer,  Ilia M. Papas, our chief technology officer, and Alan Blake, our chief supply chain officer.  Messrs. Dickerson, Papas and Blake and our other executive officers are employees “at will” and could elect to terminate their employment with us at any time.  For example, in November 2017, Matthew B. Salzberg resigned as our president and chief executive officer and transitioned to the role of executive chairman.  We do not maintain “key person” insurance on the lives of Messrs. Dickerson, Papas or Blake or other executive officers.

Our success is also dependent upon our ability to attract, retain and effectively deploy qualified employees, including management, possessing a broad range of skills and expertise.  We may need to offer higher compensation and other benefits in order to attract and retain key personnel in the future, and, to attract top talent, we must offer competitive compensation packages before we have the opportunity to validate the productivity and effectiveness of new employees.  Additionally, we may not be able to hire new employees quickly enough to meet our needs, and we must effectively deploy our workforce in order to efficiently allocate our internal resources.  If we fail to meet our hiring needs, successfully integrate our new hires or effectively deploy our existing personnel, our efficiency and ability to meet our forecasts and our employee morale, productivity and retention could all suffer.  Any of these factors could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

If we do not successfully maintain, operate and build out our fulfillment centers and logistics channels, including by expanding our use of automation, and manage our ongoing real property and operational needs, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

If we do not successfully maintain, operate and build out our fulfillment centers, we may experience insufficient or excess fulfillment capacity, increased costs, impairment charges or other harm to our business.  We have encountered in the past, and may encounter in the future, difficulty in hiring a sufficient number of employees to adequately staff our fulfillment centers, requiring us to use temporary workers through third parties at greater cost and with lower levels of performance.  If we do not have sufficient fulfillment capacity or experience problems or delays in fulfilling orders, our customers may experience delays in receiving their meal deliveries, which could harm our reputation and our customer relationships and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.  In addition, any disruption in, or the loss of operations at, one or more of our fulfillment centers, even on a short term basis, could delay or postpone production of our products, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.  For example, unexpected complexities and costs arose with the launch of our Linden, New Jersey fulfillment center in late 2017, which adversely affected our revenue expectations, the rollout of our new product offerings, and our ability to acquire and retain new customers.

We have designed and built our own fulfillment center infrastructure, including customizing third‑party inventory and package handling software systems, which is tailored to meet the specific needs of our business.  Furthermore, we are expanding the use of automated production equipment and processes in our existing fulfillment centers and are incorporating automated production equipment and processes into our new Linden, New Jersey fulfillment center.  To the extent we add capacity, capabilities and automated production equipment and processes to our fulfillment centers, our fulfillment operations will become increasingly complex and challenging.  Any failure to hire, train or retain employees capable of operating our fulfillment centers could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.  We also may be unable to procure and implement automated production equipment and processes on a timely basis, and they may not operate as intended or achieve anticipated cost efficiencies.  For example, suppliers could miss their equipment delivery schedules, new production lines and operations could improve less rapidly than expected, or not at all, the equipment or processes could require longer design time than anticipated or redesigning after installation, and new production technology may involve equipment and processes with which we are not fully experienced.  Difficulties we experience in automating our fulfillment processes could impair our

47

ability to reduce costs and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.  Furthermore, we may in the future contract with third parties to conduct certain of our fulfillment processes and operations on our behalf.  Interruptions or failures in these services could delay or prevent the delivery of our products and adversely affect our ability to fulfill our customers’ orders.  In addition, any disruption in the operation of our fulfillment centers, including due to factors such as earthquakes, weather, fires, floods, power losses, telecommunications failures, acts of war or terrorism, human errors and similar events or disruptions, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We will need to continue to maintain sufficient fulfillment and storage capacity in order to meet our customer demand, and, to the extent we grow in the future, we may need to add additional fulfillment and storage capacity in order to meet customer demand.    For example, we recently launched a new fulfillment center in Linden, New Jersey, which increased our overall fulfillment capacity. If we do not successfully manage our ongoing real property and operational needs or if we redeploy these facilities for other uses or vacate these facilities, we may experience insufficient or excess fulfillment capacity, increased costs, impairment charges or other harm to our business, financial condition and operating results.  For example, in 2017 we recorded impairment charges of $9.5 million on long-lived assets primarily related to the transition of all of our Jersey City fulfillment center operations to our new fulfillment center in Linden, New Jersey, as well as our decision to no longer pursue the planned build-out of the Fairfield facility. As a result of the strategic actions announced in November 2018, we are evaluating if the carrying value of our long-lived assets may not be recoverable and subject to a potential impairment charge. For further discussion, see “Note 14” in our Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, we expect to incur capital expenditures in our fulfillment centers in order to optimize and drive efficiency in our operations. For a discussion of our projected future capital expenditures, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”  The timing and amount of our projected capital expenditures is dependent upon a number of factors, and may vary significantly from our estimates. We  cannot assure you that any future capital expenditures will be timely or effectively integrated into our existing operations, any new fulfillment centers will be timely constructed or effectively integrated into our existing fulfillment operations, that our fulfillment software systems will continue to meet our business needs, or that we will be able to execute on our strategic plans or recruit qualified managerial and operational personnel necessary to support our strategic plans.  Any changes to our overall fulfillment capacity or existing fulfillment center operations will put pressure on our managerial, financial, operational, technological and other resources.

If we resume growth, we may be unable to effectively expand our fulfillment operations and increase our fulfillment capacity or to effectively control expansion‑related expenses, or if we grow faster than we anticipate, we may exceed our fulfillment center capacity sooner than we anticipate, we may experience problems fulfilling orders in a timely manner or our customers may experience delays in receiving their purchases, any of which could harm our reputation and our relationships with our customers.  Many of the expenses and investments with respect to our fulfillment centers are fixed, and any expansion of such fulfillment centers will require additional investment of capital.  We expect to continue to incur capital expenditures in the future for our fulfillment center operations.  We may incur such expenses or make such investments in advance of expected sales, and such expected sales may not occur.

Our ability to source quality ingredients and other products is critical to our business, and any disruption to our supply or supply chain could materially adversely affect our business.

We depend on frequent deliveries of ingredients and other products from a variety of local, regional, national and international suppliers, and some of our suppliers may depend on a variety of other local, regional, national and international suppliers to fulfill the purchase orders we place with them.  The availability of such ingredients and other products at competitive prices depends on many factors beyond our control, including the number and size of farms, ranches and vineyards that provide crops, livestock and raw materials for making wine that meet our quality and production standards.

We rely on our suppliers, and their supply chains, to meet our quality and production standards and specifications and supply ingredients and other products in a timely and safe manner.  We have developed and implemented a series of measures to ensure the safety and quality of our third party‑supplied products, including using contract specifications, certificates of identity for some products or ingredients, sample testing by suppliers and sensory based testing.  However, no safety and quality measures can eliminate the possibility that suppliers may provide us with

48

defective or out‑of‑specification products against which regulators may take action or which may subject us to litigation or require a recall.  Suppliers may provide us with food that is or may be unsafe, food that is below our quality standards or food that is improperly labeled.  In addition to a negative customer experience, we could face possible seizure or recall of our products and the imposition of civil or criminal sanctions if we incorporate a defective or out‑of‑specification item into one of our deliveries.

Furthermore, there are many factors beyond our control which could cause shortages or interruptions in the supply of our ingredients and other products, including adverse weather, environmental factors, natural disasters, unanticipated demand, labor or distribution problems, changes in law or policy, food safety issues by our suppliers and their supply chains, and the financial health of our suppliers and their supply chains.  Production of the agricultural products used in our business may also be materially adversely affected by drought, water scarcity, temperature extremes, scarcity of agricultural labor, changes in government agricultural programs or subsidies, import restrictions, scarcity of suitable agricultural land, crop conditions, crop or animal diseases or crop pests.  Failure to take adequate steps to mitigate the likelihood or potential effect of such events, or to effectively manage such events if they occur, may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results, particularly in circumstances where an ingredient or product is sourced from a single supplier or location.

In addition, unexpected delays in deliveries from suppliers that ship directly to our fulfillment centers or increases in transportation costs (including through increased fuel costs) could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.  Labor shortages or work stoppages in the transportation industry, long‑term disruptions to the national transportation infrastructure, reduction in capacity and industry‑specific regulations such as hours‑of‑service rules that lead to delays or interruptions of deliveries could also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We currently source certain of our ingredients from suppliers located outside of the United States.  Any event causing a disruption or delay of imports from suppliers located outside of the United States, including weather, drought, crop‑related diseases, the imposition of import or export restrictions, restrictions on the transfer of funds or increased tariffs, destination‑based taxes, value‑added taxes, quotas or increased regulatory requirements, could increase the cost or reduce the supply of our ingredients and the other materials required by our product offerings, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.  Furthermore, our suppliers’ operations may be adversely affected by political and financial instability, resulting in the disruption of trade from exporting countries, restrictions on the transfer of funds or other trade disruptions, each of which could adversely affect our access or ability to source ingredients and other materials used in our product offerings on a timely or cost‑effective basis.

The reliable and cost‑effective storage, transport and delivery of ingredients and other products and our product offerings is critical to our business, and any interruptions, delays or failures could materially adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition and operating results.

We maintain arrangements with third parties to store ingredients and other products, to deliver ingredients and other products from our suppliers to our fulfillment centers and to transport ingredients and other products between our fulfillment centers.  Interruptions or failures in these services could delay or prevent the delivery of these ingredients and other products to us and therefore adversely affect our ability to fulfill our customers’ orders.  These interruptions may be due to events that are beyond our control or the control of the third parties with whom we contract.  In addition, we are in the process of expanding our internal capabilities with respect to storing ingredients and other products and transporting ingredients and other products both from our suppliers to our storage locations and fulfillment centers and between our storage locations and fulfillment centers.  These expansion efforts may fail to meet our expectations and may not prove to be cost‑effective or as operationally efficient as our current arrangements with third parties, each of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We also maintain arrangements with third‑party transport carriers to deliver the food products we sell to our customers.  Interruptions, delays or failures in these carrier services could prevent the timely or proper delivery of these products, which may result in significant product inventory losses given the highly perishable nature of our food products.  These interruptions may be due to events that are beyond our control or the control of these carriers, including adverse weather and natural disasters.  If we are not able to maintain acceptable pricing and other terms with these

49

carriers or they experience performance problems or other difficulties, we may not be able to deliver orders in a timely manner and meet customer expectations, and our business and reputation could suffer.

We rely on third‑party transport carriers for the delivery of our wines to our customers.  State and federal laws regulate the ability of transport carriers to transport wine, and carriers may be required to obtain licenses in order to deliver wine to our customers.  Changes in our access to those carriers, including changes in prices or changes in our relationships with those carriers, changes in the laws allowing third‑party transport of wine, or regulatory discipline against licenses held by those carriers, could materially adversely affect our wine business.

Delivery of the products we sell to our customers could also be affected or interrupted by the merger, acquisition, insolvency, or government shut‑down of the carriers we engage to make deliveries.  If the products we sell are not delivered in proper condition or on a timely basis, our business and reputation could suffer.

Any failure to adequately store, maintain and deliver quality perishable foods could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our ability to adequately store, maintain and deliver quality perishable foods is critical to our business.  We store food products, which are highly perishable, in refrigerated fulfillment centers and ship them to our customers inside boxes that are insulated with thermal liners and frozen refrigerants to maintain appropriate temperatures in transit and use refrigerated third‑party delivery trucks to support temperature control for shipments to certain locations.  Keeping our food products at specific temperatures maintains freshness and enhances food safety.  In the event of extended power outages, natural disasters or other catastrophic occurrences, failures of the refrigeration systems in our fulfillment centers or third‑party delivery trucks, failure to use adequate packaging to maintain appropriate temperatures, or other circumstances both within and beyond our control, our inability to store highly perishable inventory at specific temperatures could result in significant product inventory losses as well as increased risk of food‑borne illnesses and other food safety risks.  Improper handling or storage of food by a customer—without any fault by us—could result in food‑borne illnesses, which could nonetheless result in negative publicity and harm to our brand and reputation.  Further, we may contract with third parties to conduct certain fulfillment processes and operations on our behalf.  Any failure by such third party to adequately store, maintain or transport perishable foods could negative impact the quality and merchantability of our products and the experience of our customers. The occurrence of any of these risks could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our historical revenue growth has masked seasonal fluctuations in our operating results.  As our revenue increases at a more moderate rate, or declines, or as seasonal patterns become more pronounced, seasonality could have a material impact on our results.

Our business is seasonal in nature, which impacts the levels at which customers engage with our products and brand, and, as a result, the trends of our revenue and our expenses fluctuate from quarter to quarter.  For example, we anticipate that the first quarter of each year will generally represent our strongest quarter in terms of customer engagement. Conversely, during the summer months and the end of year holidays, when people are vacationing more often or have less predictable weekly routines, we generally anticipate lower customer engagement.  In addition, our marketing strategies and expenditures, which may be informed by these seasonal trends, will impact our quarterly results of operations.  These trends may cause our revenue and our cash requirements to vary from quarter to quarter depending on the variability in the volume and timing of sales.  We believe that these seasonal trends have affected and will continue to affect our quarterly results.  See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”  Our historical revenue growth has masked the impact of seasonality, but as our revenue increases at a more moderate rate, or declines, or as seasonal spending by our customers becomes more pronounced, seasonality could have a more significant impact on our operating results from period to period.

50

We rely on our proprietary technology and data to forecast customer demand and to manage our supply chain, and any failure of this technology could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We rely on our proprietary technology and data to forecast demand and predict our customers’ orders, determine the amounts of ingredients and other supply to purchase, and to optimize our in‑bound and out‑bound logistics for delivery and transport of our supply to our fulfillment centers and of our product offerings to customers.  If this technology fails or produces inaccurate results at any step in this process—such as if the data we collect from customers is insufficient or incorrect, if we over or underestimate future demand, or if we fail to optimize delivery routes to our customers—we could experience increased food waste or shortages in key ingredients, the operational efficiency of our supply chain may suffer (including as a result of excess or shortage of fulfillment center capacity) or our customers may experience delays or failures in the delivery of our product offerings, for example by missing ingredients.  Moreover, forecasts based on historical data, regardless of any historical patterns or the quality of the underlying data, are inherently uncertain, and unforeseen changes in consumer tastes or external events could result in material inaccuracy of our forecasts, which could result in disruptions in our business and our incurrence of significant costs and waste.  Furthermore, any interruptions or delays in our ability to use or access our proprietary technology could lead to interruptions or delays in our supply chain.  The occurrence of any of the foregoing risks could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

The termination of, or material changes to, our relationships with key suppliers or vendors could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We currently depend on a limited number of suppliers for some of our key ingredients.  We strive to work with suppliers that engage in certain growing, raising or farming standards that we believe are superior to conventional practices and that can deliver products that are specific to our quality, food safety and production standards.  Currently, there are a limited number of meat and seafood suppliers that are able to simultaneously meet our standards and volume requirements.  As such, these suppliers could be difficult to replace if we were no longer able to rely on them.  We also work with suppliers that grow specialty or unique ingredients for us.  It can take a significant amount of time and resources to identify, develop and maintain relationships with certain suppliers, including suppliers that grow specialty or unique products for us.  In the event of any disruptions to our relationships with our specialty crop growers, the ingredients they grow for us would be difficult to replace.  The termination of, or material changes to, arrangements with key suppliers or vendors, disagreements with key suppliers or vendors as to payment or other terms, or the failure of a key supplier or vendor to meet its contractual obligations to us may require us to contract with alternative suppliers or vendors.  For example, the failure of a key supplier to meet its obligations to us or otherwise deliver ingredients at the volumes that meet our quality and production standards could require us to make purchases from alternative suppliers or make changes to our product offerings.  If we have to replace key suppliers or vendors, we may be subject to pricing or other terms less favorable than those we currently enjoy, and it may be difficult to identify and secure relationships with alternative suppliers or vendors that are able to meet our volume requirements, food safety and quality or other standards.  If we cannot replace or engage suppliers or vendors who meet our specifications and standards in a short period of time, we could encounter increased expenses, shortages of ingredients and other items, disruptions or delays in customer shipments or other harm.  In this event, we could experience a significant reduction in sales and incur higher costs for replacement goods and customer refunds during the shortage or thereafter, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

In our wine business, we rely on the use of third‑party alternating proprietorship winemaking facilities.  We rely on the host or owner of such facilities to ensure that the facilities are operational and maintained in good condition.  Changes in our access to those facilities, including changes in prices or changes in our relationships with the third parties who own and operate those facilities, or regulatory discipline against licenses held by those third parties, or any failure by such third parties to maintain their facilities in good condition, may impair our ability to produce wines at such facilities and could materially adversely affect our wine business.

51

Higher labor costs due to statutory and regulatory changes could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Various federal and state labor laws govern our relationships with our employees and affect operating costs.  These laws include employee classifications as exempt or non‑exempt, minimum wage requirements, unemployment tax rates, workers’ compensation rates, overtime, family leave, workplace health and safety standards, payroll taxes, citizenship requirements and other wage and benefit requirements for employees classified as non‑exempt.  As our employees are paid at rates set above, but related to, the applicable minimum wage, further increases in the minimum wage could increase our labor costs.  Significant additional government regulations could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Unionization activities may disrupt our operations and adversely affect our profitability.

Although none of our employees is currently covered under a collective bargaining agreement, our employees may elect to be represented by labor unions in the future.  For example, in April 2018, a local labor union filed an election petition with the National Labor Relations Board seeking to represent certain employees at our Linden, New Jersey facility, however, such employees subsequently voted to not be represented by the union. If a significant number of our employees were to become unionized and collective bargaining agreement terms were to deviate significantly from our current compensation and benefits structure, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.  In addition, a labor dispute involving some or all of our employees may harm our reputation, disrupt our operations and reduce our revenues, and the resolution of labor disputes may increase our costs.

Disruptions in our data and information systems could harm our reputation and our ability to run our business.

We rely extensively on data and information systems for our supply chain, order processing, fulfillment operations, financial reporting, human resources and various other operations, processes and transactions.  Furthermore, a significant portion of the communications between, and storage of personal data of, our personnel, customers and suppliers depends on information technology.  Our data and information systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, security breaches (including breaches of our transaction processing or other systems that could result in the compromise of confidential customer data), catastrophic events, data breaches and usage errors by our employees or third‑party service providers.  Our data and information technology systems may also fail to perform as we anticipate, and we may encounter difficulties in adapting these systems to changing technologies or expanding them to meet the future needs of our business.  If our systems are breached, damaged or cease to function properly, we may have to make significant investments to fix or replace them, suffer interruptions in our operations, incur liability to our customers and others or face costly litigation, and our reputation with our customers may be harmed.  We also rely on third‑parties for a majority of our data and information systems, including for third‑party hosting and payment processing.  If these facilities fail, or if they suffer a security breach or interruption or degradation of service, a significant amount of our data could be lost or compromised and our ability to operate our business and deliver our product offerings could be materially impaired.  In addition, various third parties, such as our suppliers and payment processors, also rely heavily on information technology systems, and any failure of these systems could also cause loss of sales, transactional or other data and significant interruptions to our business.  Any material interruption in the data and information technology systems we rely on, including the data or information technology systems of third‑parties, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our business is subject to data security risks, including security breaches.

We, or our third‑party vendors on our behalf, collect, process, store and transmit substantial amounts of information, including information about our customers.  We take steps to protect the security and integrity of the information we collect, process, store or transmit, but there is no guarantee that inadvertent or unauthorized use or disclosure will not occur or that third parties will not gain unauthorized access to this information despite such efforts.  Security breaches, computer malware, computer hacking attacks and other compromises of information security measures have become more prevalent in the business world and may occur on our systems or those of our vendors in the future.  Large Internet companies and websites have from time to time disclosed sophisticated and targeted attacks on

52

portions of their websites, and an increasing number have reported such attacks resulting in breaches of their information security.  We and our third‑party vendors are at risk of suffering from similar attacks and breaches.  Although we take steps to maintain confidential and proprietary information on our information systems, these measures and technology may not adequately prevent security breaches and we rely on our third‑party vendors to take appropriate measures to protect the security and integrity of the information on those information systems.  Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to or to sabotage information systems change frequently and may not be known until launched against us, we may be unable to anticipate or prevent these attacks.  In addition, a party who is able to illicitly obtain a customer’s identification and password credentials may be able to access the customer’s account and certain account data.

Any actual or suspected security breach or other compromise of our security measures or those of our third‑party vendors, whether as a result of hacking efforts, denial‑of‑service attacks, viruses, malicious software, break‑ins, phishing attacks, social engineering or otherwise, could harm our reputation and business, damage our brand and make it harder to retain existing customers or acquire new ones, require us to expend significant capital and other resources to address the breach, and result in a violation of applicable laws, regulations or other legal obligations.  Our insurance policies may not be adequate to reimburse us for direct losses caused by any such security breach or indirect losses due to resulting customer attrition.

We rely on email and other messaging services to connect with our existing and potential customers.  Our customers may be targeted by parties using fraudulent spoofing and phishing emails to misappropriate passwords, payment information or other personal information or to introduce viruses through Trojan horse programs or otherwise through our customers’ computers, smartphones, tablets or other devices.  Despite our efforts to mitigate the effectiveness of such malicious email campaigns through product improvements, spoofing and phishing may damage our brand and increase our costs.  Any of these events or circumstances could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We are subject to risks associated with payments to us from our customers and other third parties, including risks associated with fraud.

Nearly all of our customers’ payments are made by credit card or debit card.  We currently rely exclusively on one third‑party vendor to provide payment processing services, including the processing of payments from credit cards and debit cards, and our business would be disrupted if this vendor becomes unwilling or unable to provide these services to us and we are unable to find a suitable replacement on a timely basis.  We are also subject to payment brand operating rules, payment card industry data security standards and certification requirements, which could change or be reinterpreted to make it more difficult or impossible for us to comply.  If we fail to comply with these rules or requirements, we may be subject to fines and higher transaction fees and lose our ability to accept credit and debit card payments from customers, which would make our services less convenient and attractive to our customers and likely result in a substantial reduction in revenue.  We may also incur losses as a result of claims that the customer did not authorize given purchases, fraud, erroneous transmissions and customers who have closed bank accounts or have insufficient funds in their accounts to satisfy payments owed to us.

We are subject to, or voluntarily comply with, a number of other laws and regulations relating to the payments we accept from our customers and third parties, including with respect to money laundering, money transfers, privacy, and information security, and electronic fund transfers.  These laws and regulations could change or be reinterpreted to make it difficult or impossible for us to comply.  If we were found to be in violation of any of these applicable laws or regulations, we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties and higher transaction fees or lose our ability to accept credit and debit card payments from our customers, process electronic funds transfers or facilitate other types of online payments, which may make our services less convenient and less attractive to our customers and diminish the customer experience.

53

Our results could be adversely affected by natural disasters, public health crises, political crises or other catastrophic events.

Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, earthquakes, droughts and other adverse weather and climate conditions; unforeseen public health crises, such as pandemics and epidemics; crop or animal diseases; crop pests; political crises, such as terrorist attacks, war and other political instability or uncertainty; or other catastrophic events, whether occurring in the United States or internationally, could disrupt our operations or the operations of one or more of our suppliers.  In particular, these types of events could impact our supply chain from or to the impacted region given our dependency on frequent deliveries of ingredients and other products from a variety of local, regional and national suppliers.  In addition, these types of events could adversely affect consumer spending in the impacted regions or our ability to deliver our products to our customers.  To the extent any of these events occur, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

We may be unsuccessful in making, integrating and maintaining acquisitions, joint ventures, partnerships and strategic investments.

We expect to evaluate and consider a wide array of potential strategic transactions and partnerships, including acquisitions and dispositions of businesses, joint ventures, new technologies, services, partnerships, products and other assets and strategic investments.  Any of these transactions could be material to our business, financial condition and operating results.  The process of integrating any acquired business or operating any joint venture may create unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures.  We may face difficulties in incorporating supply or distribution channels, technology and rights into our existing product offerings, and we may experience unanticipated expenses relating to these and other integration processes.  We may also face known and unknown liabilities associated with a company we acquire,  in which we invest or with which we partner.

We may not realize the anticipated benefits of any or all of our acquisitions, joint ventures, partnerships or investments in the time frame expected or at all.  Valuations supporting our acquisitions and strategic investments could change rapidly.  Following any such transaction, we could determine that such valuations have experienced impairments or other‑than‑temporary declines in fair value which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results through the write‑off of goodwill and other impairment charges.

Failure to establish and maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price.

We are not currently required to comply with the rules of the SEC implementing Section 404 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act and are therefore not required to make a formal assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for that purpose.  As a public company, we are required to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act, which requires management to certify financial and other information in our quarterly and annual reports and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of controls over financial reporting.  Though we are required to disclose changes made in our internal controls and procedures on a quarterly basis, we are not required to make our first annual assessment of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 until the year following our first annual report required to be filed with the SEC.  As an emerging growth company, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 until the later of the year following our first annual report required to be filed with the SEC or the date we are no longer an emerging growth company.  At such time, our independent registered public accounting firm, and management, may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not satisfied with the level at which our controls are documented, designed or operating.

To comply with the requirements of being a public company, we have undertaken various actions, and may need to take additional actions, such as implementing new internal controls and procedures and hiring additional accounting or internal audit staff.  Testing and maintaining internal control can divert our management’s attention from other matters that are important to the operation of our business.  Additionally, when evaluating our internal control over financial reporting, we may identify material weaknesses that we may not be able to remediate in time to meet the applicable deadline imposed upon us for compliance with the requirements of Section 404.  If we identify any material

54

weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting or are unable to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting once we are no longer an emerging growth company, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price of our Class A common stock could be materially adversely affected, and we could become subject to investigations by the stock exchange on which our securities are listed, the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

We may be accused of infringing or violating the intellectual property rights of others.

Other parties have claimed or may claim in the future that we infringe or violate their trademarks, patents, copyrights, domain names, publicity rights or other proprietary rights.  Such claims, regardless of their merit, could result in litigation or other proceedings and could require us to expend significant financial resources and attention by our management and other personnel that otherwise would be focused on our business operations, result in injunctions against us that prevent us from using material intellectual property rights, or require us to pay damages to third parties.  We may need to obtain licenses from third parties who allege that we have infringed or violated their rights, but such licenses may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all.  In addition, we may not be able to obtain or use on terms that are favorable to us, or at all, licenses or other rights with respect to intellectual property that we do not own, which would require us to develop alternative intellectual property.  To the extent we rely on open source software, we may face claims from third parties that claim ownership of the open source software or derivative works that were developed using such software, or otherwise seek to enforce the terms of the applicable open source license.  Similar claims might also be asserted regarding our in‑house software.  These risks have been amplified by the increase in intellectual property claims by third parties whose sole or primary business is to assert such claims.  As knowledge of our business expands, we are likely to be subject to intellectual property claims against us with increasing frequency, scope and magnitude.  We may also be obligated to indemnify affiliates or other partners who are accused of violating third parties’ intellectual property rights by virtue of those affiliates or partners’ agreements with us, and this could increase our costs in defending such claims and our damages.  Furthermore, such affiliates and partners may discontinue their relationship with us either as a result of injunctions or otherwise.  The occurrence of these results could harm our brand or materially adversely affect our business, financial position and operating results.

We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property rights.

We regard our customer lists and other consumer data, trademarks, service marks, domain names, copyrights, trade dress, trade secrets, know‑how, proprietary technology and similar intellectual property as critical to our success.  We cannot be sure that our intellectual property portfolio will not be infringed, violated or otherwise challenged by third parties, or that we will be successful in enforcing, defending or combatting any such infringements, violations, or challenges.  We also cannot be sure that the law might not change in a way that would affect the nature or extent of our intellectual property ownership.

We rely on registered and unregistered trademark, copyright and trade secret protection and other intellectual property protections under applicable law to protect these proprietary rights.  While we have taken steps toward procuring trademark registration for several of our trademarks in key countries around the world and have entered or may enter into contracts to assist with the procurement and protection of our trademarks, we cannot assure you that our common law, applied‑for, or registered trademarks are valid and enforceable, that our trademark registrations and applications or use of our trademarks will not be challenged by known or unknown third parties, or that any pending trademark applications will issue or provide us with any competitive advantage.  Effective intellectual property protection may not be available to us or may be challenged by third parties.  Furthermore, regulations governing domain names may not protect our trademarks and other proprietary rights that may be displayed on or in conjunction with our website and other marketing media.  We may be unable to prevent third parties from acquiring or retaining domain names that are similar to, infringe upon, or diminish the value of our trademarks and other proprietary rights.

55

We also rely on confidentiality, supplier, license and other agreements with our employees, suppliers and others.  There is no guarantee that these third parties will comply with these agreements and refrain from misappropriating our proprietary rights.  Misappropriation of our proprietary rights could materially adversely affect our business, financial position and operating results.

We may not be able to discover or determine the extent of any unauthorized use or infringement or violation of our intellectual property or proprietary rights.  Third parties also may take actions that diminish the value of our proprietary rights or our reputation.  The protection of our intellectual property may require the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.  Moreover, the steps we take to protect our intellectual property may not adequately protect our proprietary rights or prevent third parties from continuing to infringe or misappropriate these rights.  We also cannot be certain that others will not independently develop or otherwise acquire equivalent or superior technology or other intellectual property rights, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary.  Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others or to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity.  Such litigation could be costly, time‑consuming and distracting to management, result in a diversion of resources, the impairment or loss of portions of our intellectual property and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.  Furthermore, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights may be met with defenses, counterclaims and countersuits attacking the validity and enforceability of our intellectual property rights.  These steps may be inadequate to protect our intellectual property.  We will not be able to protect our intellectual property if we are unable to enforce our rights or if we do not detect unauthorized use of our intellectual property.  Despite our precautions, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to use information that we regard as proprietary to create product offerings that compete with ours.

We currently operate only in the United States.  To the extent that we determine to expand our business internationally, we will encounter additional risks, including different, uncertain or more stringent laws relating to intellectual property rights and protection.

Risks Related to Government Regulation of Our Food Operations

We are subject to extensive governmental regulations, which require significant expenditures and ongoing compliance efforts.

We are subject to extensive federal, state and local regulations.  Our food processing facilities and products are subject to inspection by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or USDA, the FDA and various state and local health and agricultural agencies.  Applicable statutes and regulations governing food products include rules for labeling the content of specific types of foods, the nutritional value of that food and its serving size, as well as rules that protect against contamination of products by food‑borne pathogens and food production rules addressing the discharge of materials and pollutants and animal welfare.  Many jurisdictions also provide that food producers adhere to good manufacturing or production practices (the definitions of which may vary by jurisdiction) with respect to processing food.  Recently, the food safety practices and procedures in the meat processing industry have been subject to more intense scrutiny and oversight by the USDA, and future outbreaks of diseases among cattle, poultry or pigs could lead to further governmental regulation of our business or of our suppliers.  In addition, our fulfillment centers are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to workplace safety and workplace health.  Failure to comply with all applicable laws and regulations could subject us or our suppliers to civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, product recalls or seizures and criminal sanctions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.  Furthermore, compliance with current or future laws or regulations could require us to make significant expenditures or otherwise materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

56

Even inadvertent, non‑negligent or unknowing violations of federal, state or local regulatory requirements could expose us to adverse governmental action and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, which governs the shipment of foods in interstate commerce, generally does not distinguish between intentional and unknowing, non‑negligent violations of the law’s requirements.  Most state and local laws operate similarly.  Consequently, almost any deviation from subjective or objective requirements of the FDCA or state or local law leaves us vulnerable to a variety of civil and criminal penalties.  In the future, we may deploy new equipment, update our facilities or occupy new facilities.  These activities require us to adjust our operations and regulatory compliance systems to meet rapidly changing conditions.  Although we have adopted and implemented systems to prevent the production of unsafe or mislabeled products, any failure of those systems to prevent or anticipate an instance or category of deficiency could result in significant business interruption and financial losses to us.  The occurrence of events that are difficult to prevent completely, such as the introduction of pathogenic organisms from the outside environment into our facilities, also may result in the failure of our products to meet legal standards.  Under these conditions we could be exposed to civil and criminal regulatory action.

In some instances we may be responsible or held liable for the activities and compliance of our third‑party vendors and suppliers, despite limited visibility into their operations.  Although we monitor and carefully select our third‑party vendors and suppliers, they may fail to adhere to regulatory standards, our safety and quality standards or labor and employment practices, and we may fail to identify deficiencies or violations on a timely basis or at all.  In addition, recent legislation in California called the Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010 requires us to audit our suppliers with respect to certain risks related to slavery and human trafficking and to mitigate any such risks in our operations, and any failure to disclose issues or other non‑compliance could subject us to action by the California Attorney General.

We cannot assure you that we will always be in full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations or that we will be able to comply with any future laws and regulations.  Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Changes to law, regulation or policy applicable to foods could leave us vulnerable to adverse governmental action and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

The food industry is highly regulated.  We invest significant resources in our efforts to comply with the local, state and federal food regulatory regimes under which we operate.  However, we cannot assure you that existing laws and regulations will not be revised or that new, more restrictive laws, regulations, guidance or enforcement policies will not be adopted or become applicable to us, our suppliers or the products we distribute.  We also operate under a business model that is relatively new to the food industry, in which we rapidly source, process, store and package meal ingredients—including fresh fruits and vegetables, and poultry, beef and seafood, each of which may be subject to a unique regulatory regime—and ship them directly to consumers in the course of e‑commerce transactions.  Our business model leaves our business particularly susceptible to changes in and reinterpretations of compliance policies of the FDA and other government agencies, and some of our competitors may interpret the applicability of the same or similar laws and regulations to their businesses differently than we interpret them.  Furthermore, certain recently promulgated FDA regulations, such as the requirements regarding food defense, are not yet in effect, and it is unclear how the FDA may interpret and enforce many other recent regulations, presenting considerable future uncertainty.  Under the current administration, recent and ongoing changes in senior federal government officials and policy priorities create additional uncertainty.

Our existing compliance structures may be insufficient to address the changing regulatory environment and changing expectations from government regulators regarding our business model.  This may result in gaps in compliance coverage or the omission of necessary new compliance activity.  Furthermore, the expansion of our business internationally would require us to comply with foreign laws and regulations, including those related to food safety, employment and health and safety, each of which may be materially different than the laws and regulations applicable to us in the United States.  In addition, and regardless of our prospective compliance status, our business, financial

57

condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected by future changes in applicable law and regulations.

Our facilities and operations are governed by numerous and sometimes conflicting registration, licensing and reporting requirements.

Our fulfillment centers are required to be registered with the federal government and, depending on their location, are also subject to the authority of state and local governments.  In some cases, disparate registration and licensing requirements lead to legal uncertainty, inconsistent government classifications of our operations and unpredictable governmental actions.  Regulators may also change prior interpretations of governing licensing and registration requirements.  Our relatively new business model leaves us particularly susceptible to these factors.  If we misapply or misidentify licensing or registration requirements, fail to maintain our registrations or licenses or otherwise violate applicable requirements, our products may be subject to seizure or recall and our operations subject to injunction.  This could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Similarly, we are required to submit reports to the FDA’s Reportable Food Registry in the event that we determine a product may present a serious danger to consumers.  The reporting requirement may be triggered based on a subjective assessment of incomplete and changing facts.  Our inventory moves very rapidly throughout our supply and distribution chain.  Should we fail, in a timely fashion, to identify and report a potentially reportable event which, subsequently, is determined to have been reportable, government authorities may institute civil or criminal enforcement actions against us, and may result in civil litigation against us or criminal charges against certain of our employees.  This could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Good manufacturing process standards and food safety compliance metrics are complex, highly subjective and selectively enforced.

The federal regulatory scheme governing food products establishes guideposts and objectives for complying with legal requirements rather than providing clear direction on when particular standards apply or how they must be met.  For example, FDA regulations referred to as Hazard Analysis and Risk‑Based Preventive Controls for Human Food require that we evaluate food safety hazards inherent to our specific products and operations.  We must then implement “preventive controls” in cases where we determine that qualified food safety personnel would recommend that we do so.  Determining what constitutes a food safety hazard, or what a qualified food safety expert might recommend to prevent such a hazard, requires evaluating a variety of situational factors.  This analysis is necessarily subjective, and a government regulator may find our analysis or conclusions inadequate.  Similarly, the standard of “good manufacturing practice” to which we are held in our food production operations relies on a hypothesis regarding what individuals and organizations qualified in food manufacturing and food safety would find to be appropriate practices in the context of our operations.  Our business model, and the scale and nature of our operations, have relatively few meaningful comparisons among traditional food companies.  Government regulators may disagree with our analyses and decisions regarding the good manufacturing practices appropriate for our operations.

Decisions made or processes adopted by us in producing our meals are subject to after‑the‑fact review by government authorities, sometimes years after the fact.  Similarly, governmental agencies and personnel within those agencies may alter, clarify or even reverse previous interpretations of compliance requirements and the circumstances under which they will institute formal enforcement activity.  It is not always possible accurately to predict regulators’ responses to actual or alleged food‑production deficiencies due to the large degree of discretion afforded regulators.  We may be vulnerable to civil or criminal enforcement action by government regulators if they disagree with our analyses, conclusions, actions or practices.  This could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Packaging, labeling and advertising requirements are subject to varied interpretation and selective enforcement.

We operate under a novel business model in which we source, process, store and package meal ingredients and ship them directly to consumers.  Most FDA requirements for mandatory food labeling are decades old and were adopted prior to the advent of large‑scale, direct‑to‑consumer food sales and e‑commerce platforms.  Consequently, we, like our

58

competitors, must make judgments regarding how best to comply with labeling and packaging regulations and industry practices not designed with our specific business model in mind.  Government regulators may disagree with these judgments, leaving us open to civil or criminal enforcement action.  This could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We are subject to detailed and complex requirements for how our products may be labeled and advertised, which may also be supplemented by guidance from governmental agencies.  Generally speaking, these requirements divide information into mandatory information that we must present to consumers and voluntary information that we may present to consumers.  Packaging, labeling, disclosure and advertising regulations may describe what mandatory information must be provided to consumers, where and how that information is to be displayed physically on our materials or elsewhere, the terms, words or phrases in which it must be disclosed, and the penalties for non‑compliance.

Voluntary statements made by us or by certain third parties, whether on package labels or labeling, on websites, in print, in radio, on social media channels, or on television, can be subject to FDA regulation, Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, regulation, USDA regulation, state and local regulation, or any combination of the foregoing.  These statements may be subject to specific requirements, subjective regulatory evaluation, and legal challenges by plaintiffs.  FDA, FTC, USDA and state‑ and local‑level regulations and guidance can be confusing and subject to conflicting interpretations.  Guidelines, standards and market practice for, and consumers’ understandings of, certain types of voluntary statements, such as those characterizing the nutritional and other attributes of food products, continue to evolve rapidly, and regulators may attempt to impose civil or criminal penalties against us if they disagree with our approach to using voluntary statements.  Furthermore, in recent years the FDA has increased enforcement of its regulations with respect to nutritional, health and other claims related to food products, and plaintiffs have commenced legal actions against a number of companies that market food products positioned as “natural” or “healthy,” asserting false, misleading and deceptive advertising and labeling claims, including claims related to such food being “all natural” or that they lack any genetically modified ingredients.  Should we become subject to similar claims or actions, consumers may avoid purchasing products from us or seek alternatives, even if the basis for the claim is unfounded, and the cost of defending against any such claims could be significant.  The occurrence of any of the foregoing risks could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Risks Related to Government Regulation of our Wine Business

If we do not comply with the specialized regulations and laws that regulate the alcoholic beverage industry, our business could be materially adversely affected.

Alcoholic beverages are highly regulated at both the federal and state levels.  Regulated areas include production, importation, product labeling, taxes, marketing, pricing, delivery, ownership restrictions, prohibitions on sales to minors, and relationships among alcoholic beverage producers, wholesalers and retailers.  We cannot assure you that we will always be in full compliance with all applicable regulations or laws, that we will be able to comply with any future regulations and laws, that we will not incur material costs or liabilities in connection with compliance with applicable regulatory and legal requirements, or that such regulations and laws will not materially adversely affect our wine business.

Licenses issued by state and federal alcoholic beverage regulatory agencies are required in order to produce, sell and ship wine.  We have state and federal licenses, and must remain in compliance with state and federal laws in order to keep our licenses in good standing.  Compliance failures can result in fines, license suspension or license revocation.  In some cases, compliance failures can also result in cease and desist orders, injunctive proceedings or other criminal or civil penalties.  If our licenses do not remain in good standing, our wine business could be materially adversely affected.

Our wine business relies substantially on state laws that authorize the shipping of wine by out‑of‑state producers directly to in‑state consumers.  Those laws are relatively new in many states, and it is common for the laws to be modified.  Adverse changes to laws allowing a producer to ship wine to consumers across state lines could materially adversely affect our wine business.

59

Other Risks Related to Government Regulation

Government regulation of the Internet, e‑commerce and other aspects of our business is evolving, and we may experience unfavorable changes in or failure to comply with existing or future regulations and laws.

We are subject to a number of regulations and laws that apply generally to businesses, as well as regulations and laws specifically governing the Internet and e‑commerce and the marketing, sale and delivery of goods and services over the Internet.  Existing and future regulations and laws may impede the growth and availability of the Internet and online services and may limit our ability to grow our business.  These laws and regulations, which continue to evolve, cover taxation, tariffs, privacy and data protection, data security, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution, mobile and other communications, advertising practices, electronic contracts, sales procedures, automatic subscription renewals, credit card processing procedures, consumer protections, the provision of online payment services, unencumbered Internet access to our services, the design and operation of websites, and the characteristics and quality of product offerings that are offered online.  We cannot guarantee that we have been or will be fully compliant in every jurisdiction, as it is not entirely clear how existing laws and regulations governing issues such as property ownership, sales and other taxes, consumer protection, libel and personal privacy apply or will be enforced with respect to the Internet and e‑commerce, as many of these laws were adopted prior to the advent of the Internet and e‑commerce and do not contemplate or address the unique issues they raise.  Moreover, as e‑commerce continues to evolve, increasing regulation and enforcement efforts by federal and state agencies and the prospects for private litigation claims related to our data collection, privacy policies or other e‑commerce practices become more likely.  In addition, the adoption of any laws or regulations, or the imposition of other legal requirements, that adversely affect our ability to market, sell, and deliver our products could decrease our ability to offer, or customer demand for, our offerings, resulting in lower revenue, and existing or future laws or regulations could impair our ability to expand our product offerings, which could also result in lower revenue and make us more vulnerable to increased competition.  Future regulations, or changes in laws and regulations or their existing interpretations or applications, could also require us to change our business practices, raise compliance costs or other costs of doing business and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Failure to comply with privacy‑related obligations, including federal and state privacy laws and regulations and other legal obligations, or the expansion of current or the enactment of new privacy‑related obligations could materially adversely affect our business.

A variety of federal and state laws and regulations govern the collection, use, retention, sharing, transfer and security of customer data.  We also may choose to comply with, or may be required to comply with, self‑regulatory obligations or other industry standards with respect to our collection, use, retention, sharing or security of customer data.

We strive to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, self‑regulatory requirements, policies and legal obligations relating to privacy, data usage, and data protection.  It is possible, however, that these laws, regulations and other obligations may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another and which may conflict with other rules or requirements or our practices.  We cannot guarantee that our practices have complied, comply, or will comply fully with all such laws, regulations, requirements and obligations.

We have posted our privacy policy which describes our practice related to the collection, use and disclosure of customer data on our website and in our mobile application.  Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with our posted privacy policy or with any federal or state laws, regulations, self‑regulatory requirements, industry standards, or other legal obligations could result in claims, proceedings or actions against us by governmental entities, customers or others, or other liabilities, or could result in a loss of customers, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.  In addition, a failure or perceived failure to comply with industry standards or with our own privacy policy and practices could result in a loss of customers and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Additionally, existing privacy‑related laws, regulations, self‑regulatory obligations and other legal obligations are evolving and are subject to potentially differing interpretations.  Various federal and state legislative and regulatory bodies may expand current laws or enact new laws regarding privacy matters, and courts may interpret existing

60

privacy‑related laws and regulations in new or different manners.  In addition, if we expand our business internationally we may be subject to non‑U.S. privacy, data protection, consumer protection and other laws and regulations, which in some cases are more restrictive than those in the United States.  For example, the European Union traditionally has imposed stricter obligations under such laws than the United States.  Consequently, the expansion of our operations internationally may require changes to the ways we collect and use consumer information.

Changes in privacy‑related laws, regulations, self‑regulatory obligations and other legal obligations, or changes in industry standards or consumer sentiment, could require us to incur substantial costs or to change our business practices, including changing, limiting or ceasing altogether the collection, use, sharing, or transfer of data relating to consumers.  Any of these effects could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

If government regulations relating to the Internet or other areas of our business change, we may need to alter the manner in which we conduct our business, or incur greater operating expenses, which could materially adversely affect our business.

The adoption or modification of laws or regulations relating to the Internet or other areas of our business could limit or otherwise adversely affect the manner in which we currently conduct our business.  In addition, the continued growth and development of the market for e‑commerce may lead to more stringent consumer protection laws, which may impose additional burdens on us.  If we are required to comply with new regulations or legislation or new interpretations of existing regulations or legislation, this compliance could cause us to incur additional expenses or alter our business model, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our failure to collect state or local sales, use or other similar taxes could result in substantial tax liabilities, including for past sales, as well as penalties and interest, and our business could be materially adversely affected.

In general, we have not historically collected state or local sales, use or other similar taxes in any jurisdictions in which we do not have a tax nexus, in reliance on court decisions or applicable exemptions that restrict or preclude the imposition of obligations to collect state and local sales, use and other similar taxes with respect to online sales of our products.  In addition, we have not historically collected state or local sales, use or other similar taxes in certain jurisdictions in which we do have a physical presence in reliance on applicable exemptions.  On June 21, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court decided, in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., that state and local jurisdictions may, at least in certain circumstances, enforce a sales and use tax collection obligation on remote vendors that have no physical presence in such jurisdiction.  A number of states have already begun, or have positioned themselves to begin, requiring sales and use tax collection by remote vendors and/or by online marketplaces.  The details and effective dates of these collection requirements vary from state to state. We are in the process of determining how and when our collection practices will need to change in the relevant jurisdictions.  It is possible that one or more jurisdictions may assert that we have liability for periods for which we have not collected sales, use or other similar taxes, and if such an assertion or assertions were successful it could result in substantial tax liabilities, including for past sales as well as penalties and interest, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Changes in tax treatment of companies engaged in e‑commerce could materially adversely affect the commercial use of our sites and our business, financial condition and operating results.

The decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., discussed above, permits state and local jurisdictions, in certain circumstances, to impose sales and use tax collection obligation on remote vendors, and a number of states have already begun imposing such obligations on Internet vendors and online marketplaces.  In addition, due to the global nature of the Internet, it is possible that various states or, if we expand internationally, foreign countries, might attempt to impose additional or new regulation on our business or levy additional or new sales, income or other taxes relating to our activities.  Tax authorities at the international, federal, state and local levels are currently reviewing the appropriate treatment of companies engaged in e‑commerce.  New or revised international, federal, state or local tax regulations may subject us or our customers to additional sales, income and other taxes.  New or revised taxes and, in particular, sales taxes, value‑added taxes and similar taxes (including sales and use taxes that we may be required to collect as a result of the Wayfair decision) are likely to increase costs to our customers and increase the cost of doing business online (including the cost of compliance processes necessary to capture data and collect and remit

61

taxes), and such taxes may decrease the attractiveness of purchasing products over the Internet.  Any of these events could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our ability to use our net operating losses to offset future taxable income may be subject to certain limitations which could subject our business to higher tax liability.

We may be limited in the portion of net operating loss carryforwards that we can use in the future to offset taxable income for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes.  As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of $195.2 million and $62.9 million, respectively, and state net operating loss carryforwards of $96.4 million and $42.0 million, respectively, that are available to offset future tax liabilities.  In general, Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, limits the ability of a company that undergoes an “ownership change” (generally defined as a greater than 50‑percentage‑point cumulative change (by value) in the equity ownership of certain stockholders over a rolling three‑year period) to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carry forwards and certain built‑in losses recognized in years after the ownership change.  Future changes in our stock ownership, some of which may be outside of our control, could result in an ownership change under Section 382 of the Code.  Furthermore, Section 383 of the Code generally limits the amount of tax liability in any post‑ownership change year that can be reduced by pre‑ownership change tax credit carryforwards.  If we were to undergo an “ownership change,” it could materially limit our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets. In addition, our federal and state net operating loss carryforwards will each expire at various dates beginning in 2033, if not utilized.  Our net operating loss carryforwards may expire unutilized or underutilized, which could prevent us from offsetting future taxable income. 

Risks Related to Our Class A Common Stock

The market price of our Class A common stock has been and may continue to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses for investors purchasing our shares.

The market price of our Class A common stock has been and could continue to be subject to significant fluctuations.  Some of the factors that may cause the market price of our Class A common stock to fluctuate include:

· price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;

· volatility in the market price and trading volume of comparable companies;

· actual or anticipated changes in our earnings or fluctuations in our operating results or in the expectations of securities analysts;

· announcements of new service offerings, strategic alliances or significant agreements by us or by our competitors;

· departure of key personnel;

· litigation involving us or that may be perceived as having an adverse effect on our business;

· changes in general economic, industry and market conditions and trends;

· investors’ general perception of us;

· sales of large blocks of our stock; and

· announcements regarding industry consolidation.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company.  For example, we are subject to several putative class action lawsuits alleging federal securities law violations in connection with our IPO.  Because of the past and the potential

62

future volatility of our stock price, we may become the target of additional securities litigation in the future.  Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources from our business.

Our quarterly operating results or other operating metrics may fluctuate significantly, which could cause the trading price of our Class A common stock to decline.

Our quarterly operating results and other operating metrics have fluctuated in the past and may in the future fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control and may be difficult to predict, including:

· the level of demand for our service offerings and our ability to maintain and increase our customer base;

· the timing and success of new service introductions by us or our competitors or any other change in the competitive landscape of our market;

· the mix of products sold;

· order rates by our customers;

· pricing pressure as a result of competition or otherwise;

· delays or disruptions in our supply chain;

· our ability to reduce costs;

· errors in our forecasting of the demand for our products, which could lead to lower revenue or increased costs;

· seasonal or other variations in buying patterns by our customers;

· increases in and timing of sales and marketing and other operating expenses that we may incur;

· levels of customer credits and refunds;

· adverse litigation judgments, settlements or other litigation‑related costs;

· food safety concerns, regulatory proceedings or other adverse publicity about us or our products;

· costs related to the acquisition of businesses, talent, technologies or intellectual property, including potentially significant amortization costs and possible write‑downs;

· changes in consumer tastes and preferences; and

· general economic conditions.

Any one of the factors above or the cumulative effect of some of the factors above may result in significant fluctuations in our operating results.

The variability and unpredictability of our quarterly operating results or other operating metrics could result in our failure to meet our expectations or those of any analysts that cover us or investors with respect to revenue or other operating results for a particular period.  If we fail to meet or exceed such expectations for these or any other reasons, the market price of our Class A common stock could fall substantially, and we could face costly lawsuits, including securities class action suits.

63

If securities or industry analysts cease publishing research or reports about us, our business or our market, or if they publish negative evaluations of our stock or the stock of other companies in our industry, the price of our stock and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our Class A common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may publish about us, our business, our market or our competitors.  If one or more of the analysts covering our business downgrade their evaluations of our stock or the stock of other companies in our industry, the price of our stock could decline.  If one or more of these analysts cease to cover our stock, we could lose visibility in the market for our stock, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.

Because we do not expect to pay any dividends on our Class A common stock for the foreseeable future, investors may never receive a return on their investment.

You should not rely on an investment in our Class A common stock to provide dividend income.  We do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends to holders of our Class A common stock in the foreseeable future.  Instead, we plan to retain any earnings to maintain and expand our existing operations.  Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their Class A common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any return on their investment.  As a result, investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our Class A common stock.

Our tri‑class capital structure has the effect of concentrating voting control with our executive chairman, Matthew B. Salzberg, and the other holders of Class B common stock.  This structure will limit or preclude your ability to influence corporate matters, including a change of control, and might affect the market price of our Class A common stock.

Our capital structure consists of three classes of stock: Class B common stock, with ten votes per share; Class A common stock, with one vote per share; and non‑voting Class C capital stock.  As of October 31, 2018, stockholders who held shares of Class B common stock, including our executive officers, employees and directors and their affiliates, together held approximately 93.7% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock; our executive officers, directors, 5% stockholders and their respective affiliated entities together held  approximately 84.5% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock; and our executive chairman, Matthew B. Salzberg, held approximately 38.3% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock.  Because of the ten‑to‑one voting ratio between the Class B common stock and Class A common stock, the holders of Class B common stock collectively will continue to control a majority of the combined voting power of our common stock and therefore be able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, so long as the outstanding shares of Class B common stock represent at least 9.1% of the total number of outstanding shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock.  This concentrated control will limit or preclude your ability to influence corporate matters, including a change of control of our company, for the foreseeable future, and might affect the market price of our Class A common stock.

Future transfers by holders of Class B common stock will generally result in those shares converting into Class A common stock, with limited exceptions and permitted transfers described in our restated certificate of incorporation.  In addition, each outstanding share of Class B common stock held by a stockholder who is a natural person, or held by the permitted transferees of such stockholder, will convert automatically into one share of Class A common stock upon the death or permanent and total disability of such stockholder, subject to a conversion delay of nine months in the event of the death or permanent and total disability of one of our founders, Matthew B. Salzberg, Ilia M. Papas or Matthew J. Wadiak.  The conversion of Class B common stock into Class A common stock will have the effect, over time, of increasing the relative voting power of those holders of Class B common stock who retain their shares of Class B common stock in the long term.  If, for example, Mr. Salzberg retains a significant portion of his holdings of Class B common stock for an extended period of time, he could, in the future, control a majority of the combined voting power of the Class A common stock and Class B common stock.

64

Substantial sales of shares of our Class A common stock could cause the market price of our Class A common stock to decline.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our Class A common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales might occur, could reduce the market price of our Class A common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity or other securities.  We are unable to predict the effect that such sales may have on the prevailing market price of our Class A common stock.

As of October 31, 2018, an aggregate of 23,481,708 shares of our common stock remained available for future grants under our equity incentive plans. Shares registered under our registration statements on Form S-8 are available for sale in the public market subject to vesting arrangements and exercise of options, and the restrictions of Rule 144 under the Securities Act.  If these additional shares are sold, or if it is perceived that they will be sold, in the public market, the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline.

Additionally, as of October 31, 2018, the holders of an aggregate of approximately 104 million shares of our common stock have rights, subject to certain conditions, to require us to file one or more registration statements covering their shares or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other stockholders. If we were to register these shares for resale, they could be freely sold in the public market. If these additional shares are sold, or if it is perceived that they will be sold, in the public market, the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline.

The exclusion of our Class A common stock from major stock indexes could adversely affect the trading market and price of our Class A common stock.

Several major stock index providers have announced they will begin to exclude, or are considering plans to exclude, from their indexes the securities of companies with unequal voting rights, such as Blue Apron.  Exclusion from stock indexes could make it more difficult, or impossible, for some fund managers to buy the excluded securities, particularly in the case of index tracking mutual funds and exchange traded funds.  The exclusion of our Class A common stock from major stock indexes could adversely affect the trading market and price of our Class A common stock.

Anti‑takeover provisions in our restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, might discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company or changes in our management and, therefore, depress the trading price of our Class A common stock.

Our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares of our Class A common stock.  These provisions may also prevent or delay attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our management.  Our corporate governance documents include provisions:

· establishing a classified board of directors with staggered three‑year terms so that not all members of our board are elected at one time;

· providing that directors may be removed by stockholders only for cause and only with a vote of the holders of at least 66‑2/3% of the votes that all our stockholders would be entitled to cast for the election of directors;

· limiting the ability of our stockholders to call and bring business before special meetings and to take action by written consent in lieu of a meeting;

· requiring advance notice of stockholder proposals for business to be conducted at meetings of our stockholders and for nominations of candidates for election to our board of directors;

65

· authorizing blank check preferred stock, which could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to our Class A common stock; and

· limiting the liability of, and providing indemnification to, our directors and officers.

As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which limits the ability of stockholders holding shares representing more than 15% of the voting power of our outstanding voting stock from engaging in certain business combinations with us.  Any provision of our restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our Class A common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our Class A common stock.

The existence of the foregoing provisions and anti‑takeover measures could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our Class A common stock.  They could also deter potential acquirers of our company, thereby reducing the likelihood that you could receive a premium for your Class A common stock in an acquisition.

Our restated certificate provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the sole and exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders. Our restated certificate of incorporation further provides that the federal district courts of the United States of the America are the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. These choice of forum provisions could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.

Our restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the sole and exclusive forum for (1) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of our company, (2) any action asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee or stockholder of our company to us or our stockholders, (3) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the General Corporation Law or as to which the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware confers jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery or (4) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine.  Our restated certificate of incorporation further provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.  These choice of forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees.  Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our management team has limited experience managing a public company.

Most members of our management team have limited experience managing a publicly traded company, interacting with public company investors and complying with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies.  Our management team may not successfully or efficiently manage our transition to being a public company subject to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under the federal securities laws and the scrutiny of securities analysts and investors.  These new obligations and constituents will require significant attention from our management team and could divert their attention away from the day‑to‑day management of our business, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

66

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain qualified board members.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and other applicable securities rules and regulations.  Compliance with these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time‑consuming or costly, and increase demand on our systems and resources, particularly after we are no longer an emerging growth company.  Among other things, the Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and operating results and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.  In order to maintain and, if required, improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting to meet this standard, significant resources and management oversight may be required.  As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could harm our business and operating results.  Although we have already hired additional employees to comply with these requirements, we may need to hire even more employees in the future, which will increase our costs and expenses.

We are currently evaluating our internal controls, identifying and remediating any deficiencies in those internal controls and documenting the results of our evaluation, testing and remediation.  We may not be able to complete our evaluation, testing and any required remediation in a timely fashion.  During the evaluation and testing process, if we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that we are unable to remediate before the end of the same fiscal year in which the material weakness is identified, we will be unable to assert that our internal controls are effective.  If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our auditors are unable to attest to management’s report on the effectiveness of our internal controls, which will be required after we are no longer an emerging growth company, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would cause the price of our Class A common stock to decline.

In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming.  These laws, regulations, and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies.  This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices.  We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expense and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue‑generating activities to compliance activities.  If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be harmed.

As a result of being a public company and these new rules and regulations, it is more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and in the future we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage.  These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee and compensation committee, and qualified executive officers.

We are an “emerging growth company,” and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make our Class A common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, and may remain an emerging growth company until the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of our initial public offering, subject to specified conditions.  For so long as we remain an emerging growth company, we are permitted, and intend, to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.  We would cease to be an emerging growth company if we have more than $1.07 billion in annual revenue, we have more than $700 million in market value of our stock held by non‑affiliates (and we have been a public company for at least 12 months and have filed one annual report on Form 10‑K) or we issue more than $1 billion of non‑convertible debt securities over a three‑year period.  These

67

exemptions include reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation and exemptions from the requirements to hold non‑binding advisory votes on executive compensation and golden parachute payments, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002, and not being required to comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements.  We cannot predict whether investors will find our Class A common stock less attractive if we rely on these exemptions.  If some investors find our Class A common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Class A common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

In addition, the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards.  This allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies.  We have elected to avail ourselves of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, while we are an emerging growth company we will not be subject to new or revised accounting standards at the same time that they become applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. Accordingly, we will incur additional costs in connection with complying with the accounting standards applicable to public companies at such time or times as they become applicable to us.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Recent Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities

None.

Use of Proceeds

On June 28, 2017, the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-218425) for our initial public offering of our Class A common stock was declared effective by the SEC. Shares of our Class A common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on June 29, 2017.

The underwriters of our initial public offering were Goldman, Sachs & Co., Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Barclays Capital Inc., Barclays Capital Inc., RBC Capital Markets, LLC, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Canaccord Genuity Inc., Needham & Company, LLC, Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Raymond James & Associates, Inc., and William Blair & Company, L.L.C. The offering commenced on June 28, 2017 and did not terminate until the sale of all of the shares offered.

We paid to the underwriters of our initial public offering an underwriting discount totaling approximately $16.5 million. In addition, we incurred expenses of approximately $5.5 million which, when added to the underwriting discount, amount to total expenses of approximately $22.0 million. Thus, the net offering proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses, were approximately $278.0 million. No offering expenses were paid directly or indirectly to any of our directors or officers (or their associates) or persons owning 10.0% or more of any class of our equity securities or to any other affiliates.

There has been no material change in the planned use of IPO proceeds from that described in the final prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on June 29, 2017.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

68

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit	Description
31.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1**	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2**	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
*	Filed herewith.
**	Furnished herewith.

69

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	BLUE APRON HOLDINGS, INC.
Date: November 14, 2018	/s/ Bradley J. Dickerson
	Bradley J. Dickerson
	President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
	(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: November 14, 2018	/s/ Timothy S. Bensley
	Timothy S. Bensley
	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

70