XML 26 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Fair Value Measurements  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 9. Fair Value Measurements

 

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, trade payables, short-term borrowings and the current portions of long-term debt approximate carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. For assets and liabilities of a long-term nature, the Company determines fair value based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Market or observable inputs are the preferred source of values, followed by unobservable inputs or assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. The Company applies the following hierarchy in determining fair value:

 

·

Level 1, defined as observable inputs being quoted prices in active markets for identical assets;

 

·

Level 2, defined as observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and

 

·

Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other participants therefore requiring assumptions based on the best information available.

 

The estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, which includes debt subject to the effects of interest rate risk, was based on dealer quotes considering current market rates and was approximately $2,457.2 million compared to carrying value of $2,460.0 million, not including debt issuance costs, discount and premium as of September 30, 2017. As the Company’s ratio of its aggregate debt balance has trended from quoted market prices in active markets to quoted prices in non-active markets, the Company has concluded that the fair value of debt should be classified as a Level 2.