XML 57 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2020
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Delek applies the provisions of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements ("ASC 820"), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for its measurement and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 requires disclosures that categorize assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the measurement. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market-corroborated inputs. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability reflecting our assumptions about pricing by market participants.
Our commodity derivative contracts, which consist of commodity swaps, exchange-traded futures, options and physical commodity forward purchase and sale contracts (that do not qualify as normal purchases or normal sales exception under ASC 815), are valued based on exchange pricing and/or price index developers such as Platts or Argus and are, therefore, classified as Level 2.
Investment commodities, which represent those commodities (generally crude oil) physically on hand as a result of trading activities with physical forward contracts, are valued using published market prices of the commodity on the applicable exchange and are, therefore, classified as Level 1. Such investment stores, included in other current assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, are maintained on a weighted average cost basis for determining realized gains and losses on physical sales under forward contracts, and ending balances are adjusted to fair value at each reporting date. The unrealized gain (loss) on commodity investments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 totaled $0.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively, and totaled $0.1 million and $(1.9) million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively.
In April 2020, we entered into a contract with the Department of Energy to deposit one million barrels of crude oil into one of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve ("SPR") storage locations where they will be stored on our behalf until October 2020 for a fee of approximately 100,000 barrels. The fee of 100,000 barrels was recorded as a prepaid asset at cost, and the right to receive the 900,000 barrels was recorded as a financial asset (the "Right to receive crude oil barrels"), measured at fair value based on the value of the underlying commodity using published market prices of the commodity on the applicable exchange. Such asset is, therefore, classified as Level 2. The unrealized gain
on the underlying commodity related to the SPR financial asset for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 of $0.9 million and $10.6 million was recorded in other (income) expense, net.
Our RIN commitment contracts are future commitments to purchase or sell RINs at fixed prices and quantities, which are used to manage the costs associated with our RINs Obligation. These RIN commitment contracts are categorized as Level 2, and are measured at fair value based on quoted prices from an independent pricing service.
Our environmental credits obligation surplus or deficit is based on the amount of RINs or other emissions credits subject to fair value accounting that we must purchase, net of amounts internally generated and purchased and the price of those RINs or other emissions credits as of the balance sheet date, by refinery/obligor. The environmental credits obligation surplus or deficit is categorized as Level 2 if measured at fair value either directly through observable inputs or indirectly through market-corroborated inputs.
As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, we elected to account for our J. Aron step-out liability at fair value in accordance with ASC 825, as it pertains to the fair value option. This standard permits the election to carry financial instruments and certain other items similar to financial instruments at fair value on the balance sheet, with all changes in fair value reported in earnings. With respect to the amended and restated Supply and Offtake Agreements, such amendments being effective April 2020 for all the agreements, we apply fair value measurement as follows: (1) we determine fair value for our amended variable step-out liability based on changes in fair value related to market volatility based on a floating commodity-index price, and for our amended fixed step-out liability based on changes to interest rates and the timing and amount of expected future cash settlements where such obligation is categorized as Level 2. Gains (losses) related to changes in fair value due to commodity-index price are recorded as a component of cost of materials and other, and changes in fair value due to interest rate risk are recorded as a component of interest expense in the condensed consolidated statements of income; and (2) we determine fair value of the commodity-indexed revolving over/short inventory financing liability based on the market prices for the consigned crude oil and refined products collateralizing the financing/funding where such obligation is categorized as Level 2 and is presented in the current portion of the Obligation under Supply and Offtake Agreements on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Gains (losses) related to the change in fair value are recorded as a component of cost of materials and other in the condensed consolidated statements of income. Before the January 2020 amendments, we determined the fair value for the fixed price step-out liability based on changes to interest rates reflecting changes to the interest rate risk, with obligation categorized as Level 2.
For all other financial instruments, the fair value approximates the historical or amortized cost basis comprising our carrying value and therefore are not included in the table below.
The fair value hierarchy for our financial assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis was as follows (in millions):
 September 30, 2020
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets    
Commodity derivatives$— $1,349.8 $— $1,349.8 
Commodity investments1.0 — — 1.0 
Right to receive crude oil barrels— 36.6 — 36.6 
RIN commitment contracts— 2.9 — 2.9 
Total assets
1.0 1,389.3 — 1,390.3 
Liabilities 
Commodity derivatives— (1,345.7)— (1,345.7)
RIN commitment contracts— (1.1)— (1.1)
Environmental credits obligation deficit— (233.6)— (233.6)
J. Aron supply and offtake obligations— (323.2)— (323.2)
Total liabilities— (1,903.6)— (1,903.6)
Net assets (liabilities)$1.0 $(514.3)$— $(513.3)
 December 31, 2019
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets    
Commodity derivatives$— $240.3 $— $240.3 
Investment commodities12.1 — — 12.1 
RIN commitment contracts— 0.6 — 0.6 
Environmental credits obligation surplus— 16.8 — 16.8 
Total assets12.1 257.7 — 269.8 
Liabilities    
Commodity derivatives— (263.0)— (263.0)
RIN commitment contracts— (1.9)— (1.9)
Environmental credits obligation deficit— (18.5)— (18.5)
J. Aron supply and offtake obligations— (477.3)— (477.3)
Total liabilities— (760.7)— (760.7)
Net assets (liabilities)$12.1 $(503.0)$— $(490.9)
The derivative values above are based on analysis of each contract as the fundamental unit of account as required by ASC 820. In the table above, derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty are not netted where the legal right of offset exists. This differs from the presentation in the financial statements which reflects our policy, wherein we have elected to offset the fair value amounts recognized for multiple derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty and where the legal right of offset exists. As of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, $9.1 million and $38.8 million, respectively, of cash collateral was held by counterparty brokerage firms and has been netted in the financial statements with the net derivative positions with each counterparty. See Note 9 for further information regarding derivative instruments.