XML 20 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Significant accounting policies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2018
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Significant accounting policies
Significant accounting policies

Derivative financial instruments

We may use derivative financial instruments, primarily interest rate swap contracts, to hedge our exposure to interest rate risk. Such derivative financial instruments are initially recorded at fair value on the date on which a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured to fair value at period end. Any gains or losses arising from changes in fair value on derivative contracts not designated for hedge accounting are recorded in interest expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income.

Goodwill

For the reporting units included within our Jamaica reportable segment that recognized goodwill from the business combination with the Sagicor Parties (as defined in Note 4), we will review goodwill for impairment as of October 1st each year or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment. There is no change to our approach over existing goodwill associated with the reporting units within our Yucatán Peninsula reportable segment.

Standards adopted
Standard
 
Description
 
Date of Adoption
 
Effect on the Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), as clarified and amended by ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-12 and ASU 2016-20
 
This standard provides companies with a single model for use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific revenue guidance. The core principle of the model is to recognize revenue when control of the goods or services transfers to the customer, as opposed to recognizing revenue when the risks and rewards transfer to the customer under the existing revenue guidance.
 
January 2018
 
We applied the modified retrospective transition method to all contracts upon the adoption of ASU 2014-09. We provided the additional required disclosures, but the cumulative adjustment from our comparative periods was zero in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 3.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities as clarified and amended by ASU 2018-03
 
This standard significantly revises the accounting related to the classification and measurement of investment in equity securities and the presentation of certain fair value changes of financial liabilities measured at fair value. It also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments.
 
January 2018
 
The adoption of ASU 2016-01 reduced our disclosure requirements, but did not impact our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. We are no longer required to disclose the method and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of our financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)
 
This standard amends Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 230 to add or clarify guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. ASC 230 lacks consistent principles for evaluating the classification of cash payments and receipts in the statement of cash flows. This has led to diversity in practice and, in certain circumstances, financial statement restatements. Therefore, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15 with the intent of reducing diversity in practice with respect to eight types of cash flows.
 
January 2018
 
The adoption of ASU 2016-15 provided clarification to existing requirements and did not have a material effect on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory
 
This standard requires that an entity recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. Prior to this ASU, an entity was prohibited from recognizing the income tax consequences of an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset had been sold to an outside party.
 
January 2018
 
The adoption of ASU 2016-16 did not have a material effect on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. We have limited intra-entity asset transfers, or intercompany sales, other than inventory that would require income tax recognition.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business
 
This standard provides guidance that will enable more consistency in accounting for transactions when determining if they represent acquisitions or disposals of assets or of a business. Under the ASU, when determining whether an integrated set of assets and activities constitutes a business, entities must go through a “screen.”
 
January 2018
 
The adoption of ASU 2017-01 simplified our decision making process of determining whether a purchase constitutes a business combination or an acquisition of assets. We applied this guidance to our acquisition of the Sagicor Assets (as defined in Note 4), which was accounted for as a business combination.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ASU No. 2017-05, Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Non-financial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Non-financial Assets
 
The standard clarifies the scope and accounting of a financial asset that meets the definition of an in substance non-financial asset and the definition of an in substance non-financial asset. The ASU also adds guidance for partial sales of non-financial assets.
 
January 2018
 
We utilized the modified retrospective transition method upon the adoption of ASU 2017-05 and the cumulative adjustment from our comparative periods was zero in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, as we historically have not sold material non-financial assets in our normal course of business.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Standards not yet adopted
Standard
 
Description
 
Date of Adoption
 
Effect on the Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842)
 
This standard introduces a lessee model that brings most leases on the balance sheet. This will increase a lessee’s reported assets and liabilities—in some cases very significantly. Lessor accounting remains substantially similar to current U.S. GAAP.
 
January 2019
 
We are currently evaluating ASU 2016-02 noting that we have not determined the full impact of adoption of ASU 2016-02 on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. However, we expect to adopt this standard prospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening equity in accordance with the alternative transition method outlined in ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements.

The potential impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements is largely based upon the population of long-term leases in effect at the date of adoption, but we expect the most significant leases to consist of our corporate offices. We expect to record a right of use asset and corresponding lease liability for our operating leases with an original term of greater than one year where we are the lessee. We do not expect material changes to the recognition of operating lease expense in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement
 
The standard modifies the disclosure requirements of ASC 820 by eliminating and modifying certain disclosures related to the fair value hierarchy and adding new disclosures related to Level 3 fair value measurements.
 
January 2020
 
We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2018-13 to have a material impact our disclosures as we do not have any recurring or nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ASU No. 2018-14, Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans
 
The standard adds requirements for an entity to disclose (i) the weighted-average interest crediting rates used in cash balance pension plans, (ii) a description of the reasons for significant gains and losses affecting the benefit obligation and (iii) an explanation of any other significant changes in the benefit obligation or plan assets. It also removes certain disclosures for defined benefit plans.
 
January 2020
 
We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2018-14 to have a material impact on our disclosures. We do not have a cash balance pension plan and do not expect gains or losses on our pension obligation to be material to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ASU No. 2018-15, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other— Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract
 
The standard aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software.
 
January 2020
 
We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2018-15 to have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as implementation costs for our hosting arrangements that are service contracts are immaterial.