exv99w4

Diluted EPS, before FX on LTD

Operating Ratio, before

Return on Capital

Free Cash ⁽¹⁾

and other specified items ($) ⁽¹⁾

other specified items (%) ⁽¹⁾

Employed (%) ⁽¹⁾

(in millions of dollars)

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

“2007 was a year with many challenges including a very strong Canadian dollar and volatile fuel prices. However, we delivered in-line with our EPS guidance making this the fourth consecutive year that we met or exceeded our guidance.”

MICHAEL LAMBERT
Executive Vice-President
and Chief Financial Officer


For the year ended December 31
(in millions except percentages and per share data)	2007			2006



Revenues	$	4,707.6		$	4,583.2
Operating income		1,164.2			1,128.6
Income, before FX on LTD and other specified items ⁽¹⁾		672.8			627.5
Net income		946.2			796.3

Diluted earnings per share, before FX on LTD and other specified items ⁽¹⁾		4.32			3.95
Diluted earnings per share		6.08			5.02
Dividends declared per share		0.90			0.75

Free cash ⁽¹⁾		303.4			244.9
Additions to properties		893.2			793.7
Operating ratio, before other specified items ⁽¹⁾		75.3	%		75.4	%
Return on capital employed ⁽¹⁾		9.5	%		10.2	%

⁽¹⁾These earnings measures have no standardized meaning prescribed by Canadian GAAP and, therefore, are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures of other companies. These earnings measures and other specified items are described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis in Section 6.0 “Non-GAAP Earnings” and Section 10.0 “Other specified items”.

CP is proud to be the official rail freight services provider for the Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games. On September 24, 2007, CP unveiled the first of its new Olympic Games branded locomotives. These GE Evolution Series locomotives offer the latest in green locomotive technology. Compared to locomotives manufactured 20 years ago, the Evolution Series locomotives produce 60 % fewer smog pollutants and are 20 % more fuel efficient. Canadian Pacific will connect Canadians with the spirit of the 2010 Winter Games through its close connection to the hundreds of communities in Canada in which it operates.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			1



LINES OF BUSINESS


CP’s diverse customer and traffic base and a continued focus on our proven strategy of quality revenue growth, consisting of a disciplined yield focus and aggressive market development drove good results in 2007 despite some volatility in some of the markets. Our destination markets have a healthy diversification linked to global, cross-border and domestic markets. Less than 40 % of CP’s book of business is directly linked to North American GDP. With key customer investments in new capacity, a growing portfolio of strategic accounts and strong global fundamentals and markets, CP is “in-motion” and poised to continue its strong performance.

BULK
Our bulk portfolio makes up approximately 44 % of our revenues and is made up of grain, coal, sulphur and fertilizers. These commodities have a global reach with more than two-thirds of our bulk portfolio exported overseas. Strong economic growth in Asia has led to the steady upgrade of diets higher in protein, which in turn is creating demand for increased fertilizers and grain. Continued demand for Canadian metallurgical coal, used in the steel industry, has also supported solid Canadian coal exports. With strong global demand for these bulk products in 2007, CP delivered 4 % year-over-year bulk revenue growth in 2007 against a strong year in 2006.

INTERMODAL
Our Intermodal line of business, representing 29 % of freight revenues, handles goods moving in containers. This encompasses both domestic movements within North America, and the international portion of the business that moves import and export containers from the ports of Vancouver, Montreal, New York/New Jersey and Philadelphia to various destinations within Canada and the US, and from key markets within North America to various ports for export. With continuing strong demand for overseas products, combined with our strategic and diversified customer base, our Intermodal business has delivered consistent growth since 2003.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
2

We have invested in terminals, containers, rail cars and technology systems and we are seeing that investment pay off. CP delivered another strong year in 2007 with 5 % year-over-year revenue growth.

MERCHANDISE

The “Merchandise” line of business is made up of manufactured and semi-manufactured goods that generally move in less than full train shipments. It includes automotive, forest, industrial and consumer products and makes up 27 % of CP’s revenue. Industrial and consumer products, including pipe, chemicals and energy, structural steel and dimensional machinery are key requirements in Alberta’s

rapidly expanding oil sands developments and this business drove year-over-year growth of 4 % in 2007. CP’s strategic partners in the automotive business include the “New Domestics” who continue to grow through new investments like Toyota’s Woodstock, Ontario facility that will be exclusively served by CP when it opens this fall. With key strategic partners and the recent announcement to expand our infrastructure in Alberta’s Industrial Heartland, CP is positioned for growth in its Merchandise franchise.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			3

EXECUTION EXCELLENCE

We’ve delivered over the past four years by focusing on Execution Excellence. It’s at the core of our game plan that builds on our fundamentals of quality revenue growth, improved productivity and our talented and dedicated people. It’s how we’ve been successful in the past and how we are creating both near term performance improvement and shareholder value going forward.

QUALITY REVENUE GROWTH

Our quality revenue growth initiatives have delivered topline growth over the last three years as rail fundamentals remain strong and continue to provide pricing opportunities. Our diverse franchise and the global nature of our Book of Business provides balance and has tempered the impact of some of the slowdowns we have seen in some sectors of the North American economy. In 2007, continuing strong demand in global markets drove a market environment that supported improved yield.

PRODUCTIVITY

A relentless focus on improving fluidity in all aspects of our business has produced results. Our three core design principles of velocity, balance and network approach have driven improvements. Initiatives that have improved asset velocity, streamlined processes, and eliminated waste and rework have yielded productivity gains and resulted in cost savings. In 2007, we faced a number of operating challenges, but with our balanced Integrated Operating Plan, we found ways to deliver improved unit cost performance. We moved a record workload of 246 billion GTMs while maintaining our position as the industry leader in train operations safety.

PEOPLE

An engaged and productive workforce is the very foundation of our success. The ideas and ingenuity of our people are constantly challenging the status quo; looking for ways to do things better, more efficiently, more safely. Every employee at CP is charged with pursuing Execution Excellence, in the delivery of a superior product that meets our customers’ needs. Through our people we will achieve our vision of being the safest, most fluid railway in North America.





		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
4

CHAIRMAN’S LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

February 19, 2008

Today’s North American rail industry is playing a pivotal and growing role in driving the continent’s economic prosperity and competitiveness, and Canadian Pacific is at the centre of the action. CP is leading the industry in train operations safety and in finding new, innovative ways to improve efficiency at all levels of the Organization to provide best-in-class scheduled railway service for its customers.

CP is growing both organically and by seizing new opportunities, such as the Company’s two major initiatives in 2007 – the acquisition of the Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation (DM&E); and its expansion into Alberta’s growing Industrial Heartland.

There are strong, natural synergies between CP and the DM&E; a growing regional railroad. In addition to the purchase price of US$1.48 billion, CP has committed to spending an additional US$300 million for further upgrading of the DM&E over the next several years. The purchase is still subject to approval by the US Surface Transportation Board (STB) and that decision is expected by late September 2008.

CP’s network expansion in Alberta’s Industrial Heartland northeast of Edmonton positions the Company for growth tied to Canada’s booming oil sands region. Over $20 billion is earmarked for development in the Industrial Heartland, and two major oil sands upgraders are already under construction there.

In our capacity of advising management on the development of the Company’s strategy, your Board was actively involved in both decisions. The Board holds regular strategy sessions with management where we review in detail the Company’s strategic directions.

The Board monitors implementation of the strategy by management, approves major transactions and tracks the outcomes of these transactions on an ongoing basis.

To assist in the fulfillment of Board responsibilities, we’ve continued with our education and orientation program for Directors to ensure they are fully conversant with CP and the railway industry. The program includes orientation, site visits, education sessions and a Directors’ Handbook. In 2007, the Board toured CP’s network management centre in Calgary as well as rail facilities in southern Ontario, including a customer auto facility and associated rail infrastructure. Board meetings were held in Cambridge, Ontario, Montreal and Calgary.

We also enhanced our Board committee structure in 2007.

We changed the composition of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Instead of being composed of all independent members of the Board, it is now composed of the chairpersons of all five Board committees.

In recognition of its expanded oversight mandate, the Environmental and Safety Committee has been renamed the Health, Safety, Security and Environment Committee. CP’s President and Chief Executive Officer Fred Green joined the committee so it can benefit from his strong interest and expertise in health, safety, security and environmental matters. This further demonstrates the Board’s commitment to working with management to ensure the Company always sets as a priority the health and safety of employees and the public, the security of the railway, and environmental stewardship.

The Board is pleased that management is continuing to enhance disclosure and financial reporting controls in accordance with best practices. Again this year, management

is reporting that its internal controls are effective in accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Stephen Bachand is retiring from the Board in May and on behalf of the whole Board I wish to thank him for his years of valuable service and in particular for the important contributions he made to deliberations on corporate governance, management resources and compensation, and pensions. In 2007, we were pleased to welcome Krystyna Hoeg to the Board and we already appreciate the level of insight she brings to our discussions.

In closing I want to thank Fred Green, his management team and all of the Company’s employees for their impressive efforts in 2007. They grasped opportunities, responded quickly to challenges and delivered solid results. In his letter, Fred Green refers to North America’s ‘rail renaissance’. CP is a leader in that renaissance and by applying the latest technologies and through the ingenuity of CP employees, I am confident your Company will continue to lead the way.

JOHN E. CLEGHORN, O.C., FCA
Chairman of Board


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			5

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

February 19, 2008

Canadian Pacific is a company in motion, focused on delivering solid results for our shareholders and making a great franchise even better by building on our significant operational and financial strengths. Our vision is to be the safest, most fluid railway in North America and achieving this goal is based on driving quality revenue growth, improving productivity and developing our people. Through the disciplined implementation of these three pillars, CP is emerging as a high-performance organization and we are positioned to grow.

CP’s financial results in 2007 were in-line with our target range despite significant headwinds, including extreme weather events across our network, labour disruptions, fuel price escalation and a stronger Canadian dollar. We overcame these challenges and met our earnings per share guidance for the fourth consecutive year.

Through our Integrated Operating Plan and co-production agreements with other railways, we have already delivered more than $100 million in savings and productivity improvements in the past three years and plan to deliver more in the future.

We will continue to improve productivity and performance through ‘Execution Excellence’.

With a record of solid financial and operational performance, we are now well-positioned for growth. We announced two strategic initiatives in 2007 that have added an exciting new dimension to our franchise.

We acquired Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation (DM&E), the largest regional railroad in the US.

We also moved forward with our plan to expand capacity in Alberta’s booming Industrial Heartland northeast of Edmonton. In 2007, we assembled a rail corridor and lands for development of freight yards and transload facilities.

We continue to see growth in Asia-Pacific trade through the Port of Vancouver, and we are encouraged that the support of the governments of Canada and British Columbia will keep a focus on the need for infrastructure investment in the Pacific Gateway corridor. It is critical that all supply chain partners are engaged to ensure adequate capacity to handle future growth.

Safety is the hallmark of CP’s culture and our corporate identity and we continue to be the industry leader in train operation safety.

However, for CP’s leadership team, this is not good enough. We recognize that we must continuously earn our position as a safety leader, so we are accelerating plans to further improve our safety program. We were deeply saddened last year by the loss of one of our colleagues, locomotive engineer Lonnie Plasko, in a train derailment in British Columbia, and this tragedy is a reminder that our work on safety is never complete.

2007 was a busy year for collective agreements with our unions and we now have several new, progressive agreements in place that have been ratified.

CP continues to invest in the communities where we operate and where our employees and their families live. Our popular Holiday Train program again played an important role in 2007 in raising food, money and awareness for local food banks in Canada and the US. CP will help British Columbia mark its 150th anniversary in 2008 by sponsoring the CP BC ‘Spirit of 150’ Rail Tour, a historic train pulled by CP’s Empress 2816 steam locomotive that will visit communities along CP’s route in the province. CP is also proud to be the official rail freight services provider for the Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
6

Winter Games. To be part of this great Canadian event, which will engage our employees and the communities in which we operate, over the next two years, is truly exciting.

I believe North America’s rail renaissance is here to stay, but over the next 20 years the rail industry will need to reach new performance levels in order to meet many challenges – demographic changes; safety and security; environmental issues and climate change; volume growth; and a need for asset renewal. This will require our industry to fundamentally re-engineer core work processes through implementation of new and emerging technologies. At CP, we have created a 20-year ‘Railway of the Future’ vision, complete with specific design objectives that will be our roadmap to addressing these industry issues.

North America’s environmental challenges alone offer the rail industry a significant leadership opportunity. By its nature, rail is an environmentally friendly mode of transport; one double-stack intermodal train takes approximately 250 trucks off of our congested and publicly-funded highways. CP has made significant progress in reducing

its carbon footprint through a number of initiatives. From 1990 through 2006, CP’s freight volumes (as measured by revenue ton-miles) increased 37 %, while our overall emissions increased only 4 %.

Although the economic forecast for 2008 holds the uncertainty of a softer US economy, an increase in fuel costs and a strong Canadian dollar, CP entered the year with good market demand for its bulk commodity franchise. Rail fundamentals are strong by historic standards, and CP’s diverse portfolio and the global nature of our business positions us well. In 2008, we are projecting growth in diluted earnings per share of 8 % to 11 %, revenue growth of 4 % to 6 %, and free cash flow in excess of $250 million.

2007 was a year with many unique external forces including stock market uncertainty, a strengthening Canadian dollar, a major increase in fuel prices and unprecedented credit issues in the marketplace. We are fortunate to have such a seasoned and knowledgeable Board of Directors during these times and I wish to thank our Chairman John Cleghorn and our Board of Directors for their solid guidance and counsel during the year.

CP is indeed a company in motion. We have a great franchise with an excellent book of business serving North America and the fast-growing Asian economy. Our team is committed to becoming a safer, more efficient railroad and we are confident that our approach to creating value, not only for our shareholders but also our customers and our employees, will succeed through 2008 and beyond.

FRED GREEN
Chief Executive Officer


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			7

TABLE OF CONTENTS


1.0	Business Profile	9

2.0	Strategy	9

3.0	Additional Information	9

4.0	Financial Highlights	10

5.0	Operating Results	11
5.1	Income	11
5.2	Diluted Earnings per Share	12
5.3	Operating Ratio	12
5.4	Return on Capital Employed	12
5.5	Impact of Foreign Exchange on Earnings	12

6.0	Non-GAAP Earnings	14

7.0	Lines of Business	16
7.1	Volumes	16
7.2	Revenues	17
7.2.1	Freight Revenues	18
7.2.2	Other Revenues	20
7.2.3	Freight Revenue per Carload	20

8.0	Performance Indicators	21
8.1	Safety Indicators	21
8.2	Efficiency and Other Indicators	21

9.0	Operating Expenses, Before Other Specified Items	22


10.0	Other Specified Items	24

11.0	Other Income Statement Items	25

12.0	Quarterly Financial Data	27

13.0	Fourth-quarter Summary	28
13.1	Operating Results	28
13.2	Non-GAAP Earnings	28
13.3	Revenues	28
13.4	Operating Expenses, Before Other Specified Items	29
13.5	Other Income Statement Items	30
13.6	Liquidity and Capital Resources	30

14.0	Changes in Accounting Policy	30
14.1	2007 Accounting Changes	30
14.2	Future Accounting Changes	31

15.0	Liquidity and Capital Resources	31
15.1	Operating Activities	32
15.2	Investing Activities	32
15.3	Financing Activities	32
15.4	Free Cash	33

16.0	Balance Sheet	34

17.0	Financial Instruments	36


18.0	Off-balance Sheet Arrangements	39

19.0	Acquisition	40

20.0	Contractual Commitments	41

21.0	Future Trends and Commitments	41

22.0	Business Risks and Enterprise Risk Management	44
22.1	Competition	44
22.2	Liquidity	45
22.3	Environmental Laws and Regulations	45
22.4	Regulatory Authorities	45
22.5	Labour Relations	46
22.6	Network Capacity and Volume	47
22.7	Financial Risks	47
22.8	General and Other Risks	48

23.0	Critical Accounting Estimates	48

24.0	Systems, Procedures and Controls	51

25.0	Forward-looking Information	51

26.0	Glossary of Terms	55


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
8

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

February 19, 2008

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) supplements the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes for year ended December 31, 2007. Except where otherwise indicated, all financial information reflected herein is expressed in Canadian dollars. All information has been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), except as described in Section 6.0 of this MD&A. In this MD&A, “our”, “us”, “we”, “CP” and “the Company” refer to Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (“CPRL”), CPRL and its subsidiaries, CPRL and one or more of its subsidiaries, or one or more of CPRL’s subsidiaries, as the context may require. Other terms not defined in the body of this MD&A are defined in Section 26.0.

Unless otherwise indicated, all comparisons of results for the fourth quarter of 2007 and 2006 are against the results for the fourth quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively. Unless otherwise indicated, all comparisons of results for 2007 and 2006 are against the results for 2006 and 2005, respectively.

1.0 Business Profile

Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, through its subsidiaries, operates a transcontinental railway in Canada and the United States and provides logistics and supply chain expertise. Through our subsidiaries, we provide rail and intermodal transportation services over a network of approximately 13,200 miles, serving the principal business centres of Canada from Montreal, Quebec, to Vancouver, British Columbia, and the US Northeast and Midwest regions. Our railway feeds directly into the US heartland from the East and West coasts. Agreements with other carriers extend our market reach east of Montreal in Canada, throughout the US and into Mexico. Through our subsidiaries, we transport bulk commodities, merchandise freight and intermodal traffic. Bulk commodities include grain, coal, sulphur and fertilizers. Merchandise freight consists of finished vehicles and automotive parts, as well as forest and industrial and consumer products. Intermodal traffic consists largely of high-value, time-sensitive retail goods in overseas containers that can be transported by train, ship and truck, and in domestic containers and trailers that can be moved by train and truck.

2.0 Strategy

Our vision is to become the safest and most fluid railway in North America. Through the ingenuity of our people, it is our objective to create long-term value for customers, shareholders and employees by profitably growing within the reach of our rail franchise and through strategic additions. We seek to accomplish this objective through the following three-part strategy:

□

generating quality revenue growth by realizing the benefits of demand growth in our bulk, intermodal and merchandise business lines with targeted infrastructure capacity investments linked to global trade opportunities;

□

improving productivity by leveraging strategic marketing and operating partnerships, executing a scheduled railway through our Integrated Operating Plan (“IOP”) and driving more value from existing assets and resources by improving “fluidity”; and

□

continuing to develop a dedicated, professional and knowledgeable workforce that is committed to safety and sustainable financial performance through steady improvement in profitability, increased free cash flow and a competitive return on investment.

3.0 Additional Information

Additional information, including our Consolidated Financial Statements, MD&A, Annual Information Form, press releases and other required filing documents, is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com in Canada, on EDGAR at www.sec.gov in the US and on our website at www.cpr.ca. The aforementioned documents are issued and made available in accordance with legal requirements and are not incorporated by reference into this MD&A.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			9

4.0 Financial Highlights


For the year ended December 31 (in millions, except percentages and per-share data)	2007			2006			2005



Revenues	$	4,707.6		$	4,583.2		$	4,391.6
Operating income, before other specified items ⁽¹⁾		1,164.2			1,128.6			1,001.5
Operating income		1,164.2			1,128.6			991.2
Income, before FX on LTD and other specified items ⁽¹⁾		672.8			627.5			528.4
Net income		946.2			796.3			543.0

Basic earnings per share		6.14			5.06			3.43
Diluted earnings per share, before FX on LTD and other specified items ⁽¹⁾		4.32			3.95			3.30
Diluted earnings per share		6.08			5.02			3.39
Dividends declared per share		0.9000			0.7500			0.5825

Free cash ⁽¹⁾		303.4			244.9			92.0
Total assets as at December 31		13,365.0			11,415.9			10,891.1
Total long-term financial liabilities as at December 31		6,562.3			5,320.4			5,390.3

Operating ratio, before other specified items ⁽¹⁾		75.3	%		75.4	%		77.2	%
Return on capital employed ⁽¹⁾		9.5	%		10.2	%		9.4	%

⁽¹⁾ These earnings measures have no standardized meanings prescribed by Canadian GAAP and, therefore, are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures of other companies. These earnings measures and other specified items are described in Section 6.0. A reconciliation of income and diluted EPS, before FX on LTD and other specified items, to net income and diluted EPS, as presented in the financial statements is provided in Section 6.0. A reconciliation of free cash to GAAP cash position is provided in Section 15.4.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
10

5.0 Operating Results

5.1 INCOME

Operating income in 2007 was $1,164.2 million, up $35.6 million, or 3.2 %, from $1,128.6 million in 2006.

The growth in 2007 operating income reflected:

□		record shipments reflecting continued strong growth in bulk and intermodal products;

□		import and export growth in intermodal shipments;

□		higher revenues resulting from increased freight rates; and

□		lower compensation and benefits expenses.

These were partially offset by:

□		higher fuel prices driven by higher refining charges and West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) prices, net of fuel recoveries;

□		higher costs reflecting record volumes in 2007;

□		the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $34 million; and

□		higher costs associated with network disruptions, mainly driven by harsh weather conditions.

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $946.2 million, up $149.9 million, or 18.8 %, from $796.3 million in 2006. Net income in 2007 increased primarily due to:

□		FX gains on US dollar-denominated long-term debt (“LTD”), reflecting a strengthening in the Canadian dollar;

□		higher operating income; and

□		the recognition of equity earnings, starting in October 2007, following our acquisition of the Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation (“DM&E” discussed further in Section 19.0), which reduced Other income and charges.

These increases were partially offset by the after-tax change in estimated fair value of our investment in Canadian third party asset-backed commercial paper (“ABCP” discussed further in Section 11.2).

Operating income in 2006 was $1,128.6 million, an increase of $137.4 million, or 13.9 %, from $991.2 million in 2005.

Operating income, before other specified items, was $1,128.6 million in 2006, up $127.1 million, or 12.7 %, from $1,001.5 million in 2005. The growth in 2006 operating income, before other specified items reflected:

□		higher revenues due to increased freight rates across the majority of our business lines;

□		strong grain volumes;

□		expense reductions from co-production initiatives and operational benefits produced by our IOP (discussed further in Section 21.3);

□		reductions in management and administrative positions; and

□		the $18 million gain from the sale of our Latta subdivision (discussed further in Section 21.5).

The growth in 2006 operating income, before other specified items, was partially offset by:

□		a significant reduction in coal volumes (discussed further in Section 7.2.1.2);

□		higher fuel costs;

□		higher material costs for freight car and locomotive repairs and train servicing; and

□		the net impact of the change in FX on US dollar-denominated revenues and expenses.

There were no other specified items in operating income in 2006.

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $796.3 million, an increase of $253.3 million, or 46.6 %, from $543.0 million in 2005. Net income in 2006 included a future income tax benefit of $176.0 million recorded in the second quarter of 2006 as a result of reduced Canadian federal and provincial income tax rates (discussed further in Section 10.0).


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			11

Fuel prices remained volatile. During 2007, we continued to take steps to mitigate the impact of high prices with fuel recovery programs and hedging (discussed further in Section 17.6.1).

5.2 DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Diluted EPS, which is defined in Section 26.0, was $6.08 in 2007, an increase of $1.06, or 21.1 %, from 2006. Diluted EPS was $5.02 in 2006, an increase of $1.63, or 48.1 %, from 2005. The increases in both 2007 and 2006 reflected an increase in net income, as well as the positive impact of the reduction in the number of shares outstanding due to our share repurchase plan (discussed further in Section 16.5).

Diluted EPS excluding FX gains and losses on long-term debt (“FX on LTD”) and other specified items was $4.32 in 2007, an increase of $0.37, or 9.4 %, from 2006. Diluted EPS excluding FX on LTD and other specified items was $3.95 in 2006, an increase of $0.65, or 19.7 %, from 2005. The increases in both 2007 and 2006 were mainly due to a higher income before FX on LTD and other specified items, as well as the positive impact of the share repurchase program. Diluted EPS excluding FX on LTD and other specified items is discussed further in Section 6.0.

5.3 OPERATING RATIO

Our operating ratio, before other specified items, improved to 75.3 % in 2007, compared with 75.4 % in 2006 and 77.2 % in 2005. The operating ratio provides the percentage

of revenues used to operate the railway. A lower percentage normally indicates higher efficiency in the operation of the railway. Other specified items are discussed further in Section 10.0.

5.4 RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED

Return on capital employed (“ROCE”) at December 31, 2007 was 9.5 %, compared with 10.2 % in 2006 and 9.4 % in 2005. The decrease in 2007 was primarily due to an increase in net debt resulting from the bridge financing obtained for the acquisition of DM&E, partially offset by an increase in earnings. The improvement in 2006 reflected higher profitability of investments in the railway over the four quarters ended December 31, 2006, compared to the four quarters ended December 31, 2005, primarily driven by higher revenues and improved operating ratio. ROCE is discussed further in Section 6.0.

5.5 IMPACT OF FOREIGN
EXCHANGE ON EARNINGS

Fluctuations in FX affect our results because US dollar-denominated revenues and expenses are translated into Canadian dollars. US dollar-denominated revenues and expenses are reduced when the Canadian dollar strengthens in relation to the US dollar. Operating income is also reduced because more revenues than expenses are generated in US dollars.

The Canadian dollar strengthened against the US dollar by approximately 4 % in 2007 and by approximately 7 % in 2006. The

average FX rate for converting US dollars to Canadian dollars decreased to $1.08 in 2007 from $1.13 in 2006 and $1.21 in 2005. The adjoining table shows the approximate impact of the change in FX on our revenues and expenses, and income before FX on LTD and other specified items in 2007 and 2006. This analysis does not include the impact of the change in FX on balance sheet accounts or FX hedging activity.

On average, a $0.01 strengthening (or weakening) of the Canadian dollar reduces (or increases) annual operating income by approximately $3 million to $6 million. However, a large movement in FX can lead to a change in operating income that falls outside of the aforementioned range. FX fluctuations decreased operating income by approximately $34 million in 2007 and approximately $28 million in 2006, as illustrated in the adjoining table. From time to time, we use FX forward contracts to partially hedge the impact on our business of FX transaction gains and losses and other economic factors. In addition, we have designated a portion of our US dollar-denominated LTD as a hedge of our net investment in self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries. Our hedging instruments are discussed further in Section 17.0.

In 2007, there was a higher proportion of US dollar-denominated grain traffic, compared with Canadian dollar-denominated grain traffic.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
12

EFFECT ON EARNINGS DUE TO THE CHANGE IN FOREIGN EXCHANGE


For the year ended December 31 (in millions, except foreign exchange rate)	2007 vs. 2006			2006 vs. 2005



Average annual foreign exchange rates	$1.08 vs. $1.13			$1.13 vs. $1.21



Freight revenues
Grain		$ (24	)		$ (24	)
Coal		(5	)		(7	)
Sulphur and fertilizers		(9	)		(10	)
Forest products		(10	)		(16	)
Industrial and consumer products		(20	)		(25	)
Automotive		(8	)		(12	)
Intermodal		(13	)		(19	)
Other revenues		(2	)		(1	)

Unfavourable effect		(91	)		(114	)

Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits		13			22
Fuel		23			30
Materials		2			3
Equipment rents		7			12
Depreciation and amortization		3			4
Purchased services and other		9			15

Favourable effect		57			86

Unfavourable effect on operating income		(34	)		(28	)

Other expenses
Other income and charges		–			–
Interest expense		7			11
Income tax expense, before FX on LTD and other specified items ⁽¹⁾		7			7

Unfavourable effect on income, before FX on LTD and other specified items ⁽¹⁾		$ (20	)		$ (10	)


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			13

6.0 Non-GAAP Earnings

We present non-GAAP earnings and cash flow information in this MD&A to provide a basis for evaluating underlying earnings and liquidity trends in our business that can be compared with the results of our operations in prior periods. These non-GAAP earnings exclude foreign currency translation effects on LTD, which can be volatile and short term, and other specified items (discussed further in Section 10.0) that are not among our normal ongoing revenues and operating expenses. The adjoining table details a reconciliation of income, before FX on LTD and other specified items, to net income, as presented in the financial statements. Free

cash is calculated as cash provided by operating activities, less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid, and adjusted for the acquisition of DM&E and the investment in ABCP. Free cash is discussed further and is reconciled to the increase in cash as presented in the financial statements in Section 15.4. Earnings measures that exclude FX on LTD and other specified items, ROCE, net-debt to net-debt-plus-equity ratio and free cash as described in this MD&A have no standardized meanings and are not defined by Canadian GAAP and, therefore, are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. ROCE reported quarterly represents the

return over the current quarter and the previous three quarters. The measure is used by management to assess profitability of investments in the railway. ROCE is measured as income before FX on LTD and other specified items plus after-tax interest expense divided by average net debt plus equity. It does not have a comparable GAAP measure to which it can be reconciled. Net-debt to net-debt-plus-equity ratio (discussed further in Section 15.3.1) represents one of many metrics used in assessing the Company’s capital structure and debt servicing capabilities, and it does not have a comparable GAAP measure to which it can be reconciled.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
14

SUMMARIZED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME


	For the year ended									For the three months ended
(reconciliation of non-GAAP earnings to GAAP earnings)	December 31									December 31
(in millions, except diluted EPS and operating ratio)	2007			2006			2005			2007			2006



Revenues	$	4,707.6		$	4,583.2		$	4,391.6		$	1,188.3		$	1,190.4
Operating expenses, before other specified items		3,543.4			3,454.6			3,390.1			882.8			870.3
Operating income, before other specified items		1,164.2			1,128.6			1,001.5			305.5			320.1
Other income and charges		17.3			27.8			18.1			(3.8	)		6.4
Interest expense		204.3			194.5			204.2			63.4			49.8
Income tax expense, before income tax on FX on LTD and other specified items ⁽¹⁾		269.8			278.8			250.8			60.8			82.9

Income, before FX on LTD and other specified items ⁽¹⁾		672.8			627.5			528.4			185.1			181.0

Foreign exchange (gains) losses on long-term debt
FX on LTD – (gains) losses		(169.8	)		0.1			(44.7	)		(8.3	)		44.9
Income tax expense on FX on LTD		44.3			7.1			22.4			(3.1	)		(9.5	)

FX on LTD, net of tax – (gains) losses		(125.5	)		7.2			(22.3	)		(11.4	)		35.4
Other specified items
Change in estimated fair value of ABCP		21.5			–			–			–			–
Income tax on change in estimated fair value of ABCP		(6.5	)		–			–			–			–
Change in estimated fair value of ABCP, net of tax		15.0			–			–			–			–
Income tax benefits due to tax rate reductions		(162.9	)		(176.0	)		–			(145.8	)		–
Special charge for labour restructuring and asset impairment		–			–			44.2			–			–
Special credit related to environmental remediation		–			–			(33.9	)		–			–
Income tax on other specified items		–			–			(2.6	)		–			–

Other specified items, net of tax		(147.9	)		(176.0	)		7.7			(145.8	)		–

Net income	$	946.2		$	796.3		$	543.0		$	342.3		$	145.6



Diluted EPS, before FX on LTD and other specified items ⁽¹⁾	$	4.32		$	3.95		$	3.30		$	1.20		$	1.15
Diluted EPS, related to FX on LTD, net of tax ⁽¹⁾		0.81			(0.04	)		0.14			0.07			(0.23	)
Diluted EPS, related to other specified items, net of tax ⁽¹⁾		0.95			1.11			(0.05	)		0.94			–

Diluted EPS, as determined by GAAP	$	6.08		$	5.02		$	3.39		$	2.21		$	0.92



Operating ratio, before other specified items ⁽¹⁾		75.3	%		75.4	%		77.2	%		74.3	%		73.1	%
Operating ratio, related to other specified items ⁽¹⁾		0.3	%		–			0.2	%		–			–

Operating ratio		75.6	%		75.4	%		77.4	%		74.3	%		73.1	%


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			15

6.1 FOREIGN EXCHANGE GAINS AND LOSSES ON LONG-TERM DEBT

FX on LTD arises mainly as a result of translating US dollar-denominated debt into Canadian dollars. We calculate FX on LTD using the difference in FX rates at the beginning and at the end of each reporting period. The FX gains and losses are mainly unrealized and can only be realized when net US dollar-denominated LTD matures or is settled. Income, before FX on LTD and other specified items, is disclosed in the table above and excludes FX on LTD from our earnings in order to eliminate the impact of volatile short-term exchange rate fluctuations. At December 31, 2007, for every $0.01 the Canadian dollar strengthens (or weakens) relative to the US dollar, the conversion of US dollar-denominated long-term debt to Canadian dollars creates a pre-tax FX gain (or loss) of approximately $6 million, net of hedging.

On a pre-tax basis, we recorded the following FX on LTD as the Canadian dollar exchange rate changed at the end of each reporting period:

□		FX gains on LTD of $169.8 million in 2007, as the Canadian dollar exchange rate strengthened to $0.9913 relative to the US dollar;

□		FX losses on LTD of $0.1 million in 2006, as the Canadian dollar exchange rate weakened to $1.1654 relative to the US dollar; and

□

FX gains on LTD of $44.7 million in 2005, as the Canadian dollar exchange rate strengthened to $1.1630 relative to the US dollar.

Income tax expense (or benefit) related to FX on LTD is discussed further in Section 11.4.

7.0 Lines of Business

7.1 VOLUMES

Changes in freight volumes generally contribute to corresponding changes in freight revenues and certain variable expenses, such as fuel, equipment rents and crew costs.

Volume continued to grow as we moved record volumes, as measured by total revenue ton-miles (“RTM”), in 2007. Volumes in 2007, as measured by total carloads, increased by 79,800, or 3 %, and RTMs increased by approximately 6.5 billion, or 5 %. In 2006, total carloads decreased by 58,100, or 2 %, and RTMs decreased by approximately 2.4 billion, or 2 %.

These increases in carloads and RTMs in 2007 were mainly due to:

□		strong Intermodal growth due to strength in global markets and continued offshore sourcing trends;

□		strong global demand for bulk products; and

□		increase in average length of haul.

These increases were partially offset by continued weakness in Forest products due to a slowdown in the US housing market and the impact of the strengthening of the Canadian dollar on Canadian producers. In addition, total carloads in 2007, while up, were adversely affected by the sale of our Latta subdivision in the second quarter of 2006 (discussed further in Section 21.5), which reduced our carloads by approximately 23,000.

The decline in carloads in 2006 was due to both the sale of our Latta subdivision (discussed further in Section 21.5) and the Nickel Spur, which reduced our carloads by 45,000 loads in 2006 (67,000 on an annual basis), as well as a decline in coal carloads due to decreased shipments by our primary coal customer.

With regard to RTMs in 2006, a 16 % increase in grain RTMs due to the strong export market for these products, was more than offset by RTM decreases of 18 %, 13 % and 11 % in Coal, Sulphur and fertilizers, and Forest products, respectively (discussed further in Section 7.2.1). The sale of our Latta subdivision and the Nickel Spur had a lesser impact on RTMs than on carloads, as traffic on both lines was short-haul in nature.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
16

VOLUMES


For the year ended December 31	2007		2006		2005



Carloads (in thousands)
Grain		385.0		382.8		338.7
Coal		269.1		281.7		352.3
Sulphur and fertilizers		209.8		178.3		201.8
Forest products		114.1		135.0		153.7
Industrial and consumer products		313.3		316.0		322.2
Automotive		168.5		165.3		168.1
Intermodal		1,238.1		1,159.0		1,139.4

Total carloads		2,697.9		2,618.1		2,676.2



Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
Grain		30,690		30,127		26,081
Coal		20,629		19,650		23,833
Sulphur and fertilizers		21,259		17,401		20,080
Forest products		7,559		8,841		9,953
Industrial and consumer products		16,987		16,844		15,936
Automotive		2,471		2,450		2,361
Intermodal		29,757		27,561		27,059

Total revenue ton-miles		129,352		122,874		125,303

7.2 REVENUES

Our revenues are primarily derived from transporting freight. Other revenues are generated mainly from leasing of certain assets, switching fees, land sales and income from business partnerships.

At December 31, 2007, one customer comprised 11.5 % of total revenues and 6.2 % of total accounts receivable. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the same customer comprised 11.5 % and 14.5 % of total revenues and 5.6 % and 8.0 % of total accounts receivable, respectively.


For the year ended December 31 (in millions)	2007		2006		2005



Grain	$	938.9	$	904.6	$	754.5
Coal		573.6		592.0		728.8
Sulphur and fertilizers		502.0		439.3		447.1
Forest products		275.8		316.4		333.9
Industrial and consumer products		627.9		603.8		542.9
Automotive		319.0		314.4		298.0
Intermodal		1,318.0		1,256.8		1,161.1

Total freight revenues		4,555.2		4,427.3		4,266.3

Other revenues		152.4		155.9		125.3

Total revenues	$	4,707.6	$	4,583.2	$	4,391.6


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			17

7.2.1 Freight Revenues

Freight revenues are earned from transporting bulk, merchandise and intermodal goods, and include fuel recoveries billed to our customers. Freight revenues were $4,555.2 million for 2007, an increase of $127.9 million, or 2.9 %. Freight revenues were $4,427.3 million in 2006, an increase of $161.0 million, or 3.8 %.

Freight revenues for 2007 increased mainly due to continued strong growth in bulk products and intermodal shipments along with increases in freight rates including fuel recoveries. These increases were partially offset by:

□		a decrease in coal freight rates;

□		continued weakness in Forest products, mainly lumber and panel, and certain Industrial and consumer products; and

□		the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $89 million.

Freight revenues in 2006 increased mainly due to:

□		higher freight rates, including fuel recoveries;

□		strong growth in grain shipments; and

□		strong growth in the Alberta economy.

This increase was partially offset by the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $113 million and reduced coal volumes.

7.2.1.1 Grain

Canadian grain products, consisting mainly of durum, spring wheat, barley, canola, flax, rye and oats, are primarily transported to ports for export and to Canadian and US markets for domestic consumption. US grain products mainly include durum, spring wheat, corn, soybeans and barley and are shipped from the midwestern US to other points in the Midwest, the Pacific Northwest and the northeastern US. Grain revenues in 2007 were $938.9 million, an increase of $34.3 million, or 3.8 %. Grain

revenues in 2006 were $904.6 million, an increase of $150.1 million, or 19.9%.

Grain revenues increased in 2007 primarily due to:

□		a large carryover from the first half of the 2006/07 crop year benefiting the first two quarters of 2007;

□		a strong export program as a result of strong commodity prices and demand for North American grain; and

□		higher freight rates.

These increases were partially offset by the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $24 million in 2007. In 2007, there was a higher proportion of US-dollar denominated grain traffic, compared with Canadian-dollar denominated grain traffic.

Grain revenues increased in 2006 primarily due to:

□		a strong Canadian grain crop reflecting improved quality;

□		a large carryover from the 2005/06 crop year;

□		increased shipments of western Canadian grain to the US as a result of a trade tariff being lifted; and

□		higher freight rates.

These increases in grain revenues were partially offset by the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $24 million.

7.2.1.2 Coal

Our Canadian coal business consists primarily of metallurgical coal transported from southeastern British Columbia (“BC”) to the ports of Vancouver, BC and Thunder Bay, Ontario, and to the US Midwest. Our US coal business consists primarily of the transportation of thermal coal and petroleum coke within the US Midwest. Coal revenues in 2007 were $573.6 million, a decrease of $18.4 million, or 3.1 %. Coal revenues in 2006 were $592.0 million, a decrease of $136.8 million, or 18.8 %.

Coal revenues decreased in 2007 primarily due to:

□		decreased freight rates;

□		decrease in carloads due to the sale of the Latta subdivision in the first half of 2006; and

□		the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $5 million.

These decreases were partially offset by increased volumes due to continued strong global demand for metallurgical coal.

The decline in coal revenues in 2006 was due to reduced export coal sales volumes by our primary coal customer and to the sale of our Latta subdivision. The decline also reflected a one-time positive adjustment of $23 million in 2005 for services provided to our primary coal customer in 2004 and the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $7 million. Additionally, the sale of the Latta subdivision resulted in a decline of approximately 23,000 carloads of US coal in 2006 (representing approximately 40,000 carloads on an annual basis).

7.2.1.3 Sulphur and Fertilizers

Sulphur and fertilizers include potash, chemical fertilizers and sulphur shipped mainly from western Canada to the ports of Vancouver, BC, and Portland, Oregon, and to other Canadian and US destinations. Sulphur and fertilizers revenues in 2007 were $502.0 million, an increase of $62.7 million, or 14.3 %. Revenues in 2006 were $439.3 million, a decrease of $7.8 million, or 1.7 %.

Sulphur and fertilizers revenues increased in 2007 primarily due to an increase in demand for nutrients for bio fuels, partially offset by the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $9 million.

The decline in 2006 was primarily due to the protracted global potash price negotiations which delayed the start of the shipping year until the third quarter of 2006 and the negative impact of the change in FX of


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
18

approximately $10 million. Volumes rebounded following the completion of the negotiations; however, in 2006 Sulphur and fertilizers volumes were 23,500 carloads below 2005 volumes.

7.2.1.4 Forest Products

Forest products include lumber, wood pulp, paper products and panel transported from key producing areas in western Canada, Ontario and Quebec to various destinations in North America. Forest products revenues in 2007 were $275.8 million, a decrease of $40.6 million, or 12.8 %. Revenues in 2006 were $316.4 million, a decrease of $17.5 million, or 5.2 %.

Forest products revenues declined in 2007 primarily due to:

□		continued soft demand for lumber and panel products caused by a significant slowdown in the US housing market and continued impact from the sub-prime mortgage crisis;

□		difficult market conditions for our Forest product customers due to the softwood lumber agreement with the US which led to reduced volumes and extended plant shut downs;

□		the impact of the strengthening of the Canadian dollar, which has led to decreased market competitiveness for Canadian producers; and

□		the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $10 million.

These decreases were partially offset by growth in pulp volumes and price increases which lessened the impact from the volume decline.

Forest products revenues declined in 2006 primarily due to:

□		reduced volumes from a softening demand for lumber and panel caused by a decrease in US housing starts;

□		difficult market conditions for our Forest product customers caused by a strong Canadian dollar and softwood lumber agreement with the US which led to reduced volumes and extended plant shut downs; and

□		the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $16 million.

Offsetting these factors was our strong yield and pricing, which softened the impact from the volume decline.

7.2.1.5 Industrial and Consumer Products

Industrial and consumer products include chemicals, plastics, aggregates, steel, and mine and energy-related products (other than coal) shipped throughout North America. Industrial and consumer products revenues in 2007 were $627.9 million, an increase of $24.1 million, or 4.0 %. Revenues in 2006 were $603.8 million, an increase of $60.9 million, or 11.2 %.

Industrial and consumer products revenues increased in 2007 primarily due to strength in chemical, energy, and plastics shipments to and from Alberta as well as increases in freight rates, which were partially offset by decreased steel volumes as a result of decreased drilling activity for natural gas. The increases were also partially offset by the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $20 million.

Industrial and consumer products revenues increased in 2006 primarily due to:

□		strong demand for steel, energy products and aggregates, largely driven by Alberta oil and gas activity and a strong Alberta economy;

□		strong worldwide demand for base metals; and

□		increased freight rates.

The higher revenues were partially offset by the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $25 million.

7.2.1.6 Automotive

Automotive consists primarily of the transportation of domestic and import vehicles as well as automotive parts from North American assembly plants and the Port of Vancouver to destinations in Canada and the US. Automotive revenues in 2007 were $319 million, an increase of $4.6 million, or 1.5 %. Revenues in 2006 were $314.4 million, an increase of $16.4 million, or 5.5 %.

Automotive revenues in 2007 were up, reflecting carload growth as new domestics (such as Toyota and Honda) and import volumes continue to increase. Increased volumes from key shippers as a result of certain port of call changes by shipping lines also had a favourable impact on Automotive revenues. These increases were partially offset by the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $8 million in 2007.

The increase in Automotive revenues in 2006 was primarily due to higher freight rates and increased volumes of imported vehicles, which created growth in long-haul traffic. These increases were partially offset by extended plant shutdowns by domestic auto producers and the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $12 million.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			19

7.2.1.7 Intermodal

Intermodal consists of domestic and international (import-export) container traffic. Our domestic business consists primarily of retail goods moving in containers between eastern and western Canada and to and from the US. The international business handles containers of mainly retail goods between the ports of Vancouver, Montreal, New York/New Jersey and Philadelphia and inland Canadian and US destinations. Intermodal revenues in 2007 were $1,318.0 million, an increase of $61.2 million, or 4.9 %. Revenues in 2006 were $1,256.8 million, an increase of $95.7 million, or 8.2 %.

Intermodal revenues increased in 2007 primarily due to growth in import and export container shipments from the ports of Vancouver and Montreal and increased freight rates, partially offset by the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $13 million.

International intermodal revenues increased in 2006 as a result of higher freight rates and container volume growth at the ports of Vancouver and Montreal driven by strong global trade. Revenue growth in domestic intermodal was due to increased freight rates, volume and long-haul traffic. These increases were partially offset by an extended strike at a facility at the Port of Philadelphia as well as the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $19 million.

7.2.2 Other Revenues

Other revenues are generated from leasing certain assets, switching fees, land sales, and business partnerships. Other revenues in 2007 were $152.4 million, a decrease of $3.5 million. Other revenues in 2006 were $155.9 million, an increase of $30.6 million.

The decrease in Other revenues in 2007 was primarily due to a gain of approximately $18 million realized from the sale of our Latta subdivision in second-quarter 2006 (discussed further in Section 21.5), partially offset by an increase in land sales in 2007.

Other revenues increased in 2006 due to a gain of approximately $18 million realized from the sale of our Latta subdivision and increased land sales, in particular, the sale of a property to a university in Montreal.

7.2.3 Freight Revenue per Carload

Freight revenue per carload is the amount of freight revenue earned for every carload moved, calculated by dividing the freight revenue for a commodity by the number of carloads of the commodity transported in the period.

In 2007, total freight revenue per carload remained relatively unchanged from 2006. This reflected 2.0 % improvements in freight rates and mix, which were offset by the negative impact of the change in FX.

Total freight revenue per carload in 2006 increased by $97, or 6.1 %, from 2005. The increase in 2006 was due to higher freight rates, the impact of the sale of our Latta subdivision and Nickel Spur, and an increase in the average length of haul. The increases more than offset the negative impact of the change in FX.

FREIGHT REVENUE PER CARLOAD


For the year ended December 31 ($)	2007		2006		2005



Freight revenue per carload		1,688		1,691		1,594



Grain		2,439		2,363		2,228
Coal		2,132		2,102		2,069
Sulphur and fertilizers		2,393		2,464		2,216
Forest products		2,417		2,344		2,172
Industrial and consumer products		2,004		1,911		1,685
Automotive		1,893		1,902		1,773
Intermodal		1,065		1,084		1,019


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
20

8.0 Performance Indicators

The indicators listed in this table are key measures of our operating performance. Definitions of these performance indicators are provided in Section 26.0.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (1)


For the year ended December 31	2007		2006		2005



Safety indicators
FRA personal injuries per 200,000 employee-hours		2.1		2.0		2.4
FRA train accidents per million train-miles		2.0		1.6		2.3
Efficiency and other indicators
Gross ton-miles (“GTM”) of freight (millions)		246,322		236,405		242,100
Car miles per car day		142.3		137.3		124.0
US gallons of locomotive fuel consumed per 1,000 GTMs – freight and yard		1.21		1.20		1.18
Terminal dwell (hours)		22.2		20.8		25.8
Average train speed (miles per hour)		23.2		24.8		22.0
Number of active employees – end of period		15,382		15,327		16,295
Freight revenue per RTM (cents)		3.52		3.60		3.40


⁽¹⁾ Certain comparative period figures have been updated to reflect new information.

8.1 SAFETY INDICATORS

Safety is a key priority for our management and Board of Directors. Our two main safety indicators – personal injuries and train accidents – follow strict US Federal Railroad Administration (“FRA”) reporting guidelines.

The FRA personal injury rate per 200,000 employee-hours was 2.1 in 2007, compared with 2.0 in 2006 and 2.4 in 2005.

The FRA train accident rate in 2007 was 2.0 accidents per million train-miles, compared with 1.6 and 2.3, respectively, in 2006 and 2005.

8.2 EFFICIENCY AND
OTHER INDICATORS

In 2007, CP moved record freight volumes, as measured by GTMs and RTMs. In addition, CP’s IOP generated savings in operating costs driven by increased train weights, yard productivity and improvements in car miles per car day. Offsetting these benefits were:

□

difficult weather-related operating conditions, primarily in the first quarter of 2007 and December 2007;

□		a change in traffic mix largely driven by an increase in intermodal trains; and

□		the impact of having to compress required track maintenance programs into a shorter work season due to the 26-day strike by CP’s maintenance of way employees in Canada during the second quarter of 2007 (“CP strike”).

GTMs increased 4.2 % to a record of approximately 246.3 billion in 2007. The increase in 2007 was mainly due to increased potash, intermodal and coal traffic. GTMs declined 2.4 % in 2006. The decrease in 2006 was mainly due to lower coal and potash volumes partially offset by higher grain volumes. Fluctuations in GTMs normally drive fluctuations in certain variable costs, such as fuel and train crew costs.

Car miles per car day increased 3.6 % in 2007 and increased 10.7 % in 2006. Car miles per car day increased in both years, as the higher level of demand was handled more efficiently through improved car ordering and tactical fleet management and IOP improvements.

US gallons of locomotive fuel consumed per 1,000 GTMs in both freight and yard activity increased 0.8 % and 1.7 % in 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in both years was primarily due to a change in traffic mix largely driven by an increase in intermodal trains. The increases were partially offset by improved execution of our IOP and successful fuel-conservation efforts. In addition, mild winter weather in the first quarter of 2006 helped to reduce fuel consumption in 2006.

Terminal dwell, the average time a freight car resides in a terminal, increased 6.7 % in 2007. The increase in 2007 was primarily due to weather-related issues and concentrated track maintenance programs following the end of the CP strike. Terminal dwell decreased 19.4 % in 2006. The improvement in 2006 was largely due to better processes within our yards and providing seven-day-a-week outlets for all our traffic which minimized the number of times freight cars are handled. Reducing the time freight cars spend waiting in terminals also enabled us to decrease our fleet of cars used.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			21

Average train speed decreased 6.5 % in 2007. Average train speed in 2007 was negatively impacted by:

□		an increase in the number of bulk trains, which operate at slower speeds and experienced more queuing for unloading in 2007;

□		network disruptions, which were primarily related to weather events;

□		temporary power and crew shortages; and

□		concentrated track maintenance programs following the end of the CP strike.

Average train speed increased 12.7 % in 2006. Trains moved at faster speeds for longer distances as a result of our expanded track capacity in western Canada, adhering to

our IOP, and co-production agreements with other railroads that allowed us to move trains more efficiently. Train speed also increased as a result of transporting less bulk volumes, which move in heavy trains that travel more slowly.

The number of active employees at December 31, 2007 increased by 55, or 0.4 %. The primary driver for this increase was a higher number of employees working on capital projects in December 2007, due to work schedule delays resulting from the CP strike. The number of active employees at December 31, 2006 decreased by 5.9 %. This decrease was mainly due to job reductions made under restructuring initiatives and fewer employees working

on capital projects. Approximately 7 % of employees were assigned to capital projects at December 31, 2007, compared with approximately 6 % at December 31, 2006.

Freight revenue per RTM decreased by 2.2 % in 2007. The decrease was primarily driven by the negative impact of the change in FX and a decrease in coal freight rates, as well as a change in our overall traffic mix as a result of an increase in the shipment of long haul US grain traffic to the Pacific Northwest and shipment of long haul potash from Saskatchewan to the Port of Vancouver. Freight revenue per RTM increased 5.9 % in 2006. The increase was due to higher freight rates, partially offset by the negative impact of the change in FX.

9.0 Operating Expenses, Before Other Specified Items

OPERATING EXPENSES, BEFORE OTHER SPECIFIED ITEMS



For the year ended December 31	2007				2006				2005
(in millions)	Expense⁽¹⁾		% of revenue		Expense⁽¹⁾		% of revenue		Expense⁽¹⁾		% of revenue



Compensation and benefits	$	1,284.2		27.3	$	1,327.6		29.0	$	1,322.1		30.1
Fuel		746.8		15.9		650.5		14.2		588.0		13.4
Materials		215.5		4.6		212.9		4.6		203.3		4.6
Equipment rents		207.5		4.4		181.2		4.0		210.0		4.8
Depreciation and amortization		472.0		10.0		464.1		10.1		445.1		10.1
Purchased services and other		617.4		13.1		618.3		13.5		621.6		14.2

Total	$	3,543.4		75.3	$	3,454.6		75.4	$	3,390.1		77.2

Operating expenses, before other specified items, were $3,543.4 million in 2007, up $88.8 million, or 2.6%. These expenses were $3,454.6 million in 2006, up $64.5 million, or 1.9%, from $3,390.1 million in 2005.

Operating expenses in 2007 increased primarily due to:

□

higher fuel prices driven by higher refining charges and WTI prices;

□

record volumes as measured by GTMs and RTMs in 2007, including change in traffic mix largely driven by an increase in intermodal trains;

□		increased equipment rent expense; and

□		higher costs associated with network disruptions,mainly driven by harsh weather conditions.

These increases in operating expenses were partially offset by the positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $57 million and a decrease in compensation and benefits expense.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
22

Operating expenses in 2006 were higher primarily due to:

□		higher fuel costs;

□		the increased price of materials used for freight car repairs, primarily related to the replacement of wheel sets, and train servicing; and

□		increased depreciation and amortization expense.

These increases were partially offset by improved operating efficiencies, cost-containment initiatives, lower GTMs, and the positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $86 million. In addition, the higher fuel costs were largely recovered in revenue through our fuel recovery program and through the benefits of hedging.

9.1 COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS

Compensation and benefits expense includes employee wages, salaries and fringe benefits. Compensation and benefits expense was $1,284.2 million in 2007, a decrease of $43.4 million. This expense was $1,327.6 million in 2006, an increase of $5.5 million from $1,322.1 million in 2005.

Compensation and benefits expense decreased in 2007 primarily due to:

□		lower incentive and stock-based compensation;

□		lower pension expenses;

□		the positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $13 million; and

□		a settlement gain in the third quarter of 2007 on the release of certain post-retirement benefit liabilities due to the assumption of these obligations by a US national multi-employer benefit plan.

These decreases were partially offset by increased labour expenses due to higher volumes and the negative impact of inflation.

In 2006, compensation and benefits expense increased as a result of inflation, higher pension expenses, and higher stock-

based compensation costs prior to the implementation in the second quarter of 2006 of our Total Return Swap Program (discussed further in Section 17.7.1). These increases were mostly offset by:

□		reduced costs as a result of restructuring initiatives (discussed further in Section 21.10);

□		savings realized from efficiencies gained through our IOP (discussed further in Section 21.3) as well as other productivity improvements;

□		reduced costs as a result of lower freight volumes; and

□		the positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $22 million.

9.2 FUEL

Fuel expense consists of the cost of fuel used by locomotives and includes provincial, state and federal fuel taxes and the impact of our hedging program. Fuel expense was $746.8 million in 2007, an increase of $96.3 million. This expense was $650.5 million in 2006, an increase of $62.5 million from 2005.

Fuel expense in 2007 increased primarily due to:

□		higher refining margins and WTI prices;

□		increased consumption driven by increased volumes;

□		a lower hedge position in 2007; and

□		a higher rate of fuel consumption, driven by harsh weather conditions and change in traffic mix largely driven by an increase in intermodal trains.

The increases were partially offset by the positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $23 million. Fuel price increases are also mitigated by our fuel recovery program.

Fuel expense in 2006 increased due to higher crude oil prices and refining charges, and an unfavourable change in our fuel

consumption rate due to a higher proportion of non-bulk freight traffic. These increases were partially offset by:

□		the favourable settlement of prior period recoveries including a fuel excise tax refund;

□		reduced workload; and

□		the positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $30 million.

9.3 MATERIALS

Materials expense includes the cost of materials used for track, locomotive, freight car, and building maintenance. Materials expense was $215.5 million in 2007, an increase of $2.6 million. This expense was $212.9 million in 2006, an increase of $9.6 million from $203.3 million in 2005.

The increase in 2007 was mainly due to the higher cost of materials used for freight car repairs and train servicing, primarily driven by higher wheel consumption as a result of increased volume and harsh winter operating conditions in first-quarter 2007, and an increase in locomotive repair and servicing costs. These increases were partially offset by cost recoveries from third parties and pricing arrangements for wheels.

The increase in 2006 was mainly due to the higher cost of materials for freight car repairs, primarily driven by price increases for replacement of wheel sets and other freight car materials, and train servicing. The increase was partially offset by the positive impact of the change in FX.

9.4 EQUIPMENT RENTS

Equipment rents expense includes the cost to lease freight cars, intermodal equipment and locomotives from other companies, including railways. Equipment rents expense was $207.5 million in 2007, an increase of $26.3 million. This expense was $181.2 million in 2006, a decrease of $28.8 million from $210.0 million in 2005.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			23

Equipment rents expense in 2007 increased mainly due to:

□		reductions in receipts for the use of our railcars from other railways and customers;

□		higher equipment rental payments to other railways as a result of network disruptions, mainly driven by harsh weather conditions; and

□		higher locomotive leasing costs, primarily driven by increased volume.

These increases were partially offset by the positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $7 million.

The decrease in 2006 was mainly due to more efficient movement of traffic over our network which reduced the number of cars on line, resulting in lower equipment rental payments to other railways and reduced locomotive lease costs. Higher charges to customers for loading and unloading delays and the positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $12 million also contributed to the decrease in 2006. The decrease in 2006 was partially offset by favourable adjustments in 2005 for freight car rentals pertaining to prior periods.

9.5 DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

Depreciation and amortization expense represents the charge associated with the use of track and roadway, buildings, locomotives, freight cars and other depreciable assets. Depreciation and amortization expense was $472.0 million in 2007, an increase of $7.9 million. This expense was $464.1 million in 2006, an increase of $19.0 million from $445.1 million in 2005. The increases in both 2007 and 2006 were primarily due to additions to capital assets for track and locomotives, which were partially offset by asset retirements and rate adjustments.

9.6 PURCHASED SERVICES AND OTHER

Purchased services and other expense encompasses a wide range of costs, including expenses for joint facilities, personal injury

and damage, environmental remediation, property and other taxes, contractor and consulting fees, and insurance. Purchased services and other expense was $617.4 million in 2007, a decrease of $0.9 million. This expense was $618.3 million in 2006, a decrease of $3.3 million from $621.6 million in 2005.

The decrease in purchased services and other expense in 2007 was mainly due to the positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $9 million, which was mainly offset by an increase in maintenance costs for locomotives.

The decrease in 2006 was largely due to lower joint-facility and inter-railway expenditures resulting from our co-production initiatives, adherence to our IOP which reduced crew transportation costs, and the positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $15 million. The decreases were partially offset by higher building maintenance expenses and contract locomotive servicing costs.

10.0 Other Specified Items

Other specified items are material transactions that may include, but are not limited to, restructuring and asset impairment charges, gains and losses on non-routine sales of assets, unusual income tax adjustments, and other items that do not typify normal business activities.

In 2007, there were three other specified items included in net income, as follows:

□		In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Government of Canada substantially enacted legislation to reduce corporate income tax rates starting in 2008. We recorded a future income tax benefit of $145.8 million to reflect the positive impact of these tax rate reductions on our future income tax balance as at December 31, 2006.

□		In the third quarter of 2007, we recorded a charge of $21.5 million ($15.0 million after tax) to reflect the change in the

		estimated fair value of ABCP (discussed further in Section 11.2).

□		In the second quarter of 2007, the Government of Canada substantially enacted legislation to reduce corporate income tax rates starting in 2011. We recorded a future income tax benefit of $17.1 million to reflect the positive impact of these tax rate reductions on our future income tax balance as at December 31, 2006.

In 2006, there was one other specified item included in net income:

□

In the second quarter of 2006, the Government of Canada and the governments of the provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba introduced legislation to reduce corporate income tax rates over a period of several years. We recorded a future income tax benefit of $176.0 million to reflect the positive impact of these tax rate reductions on our future income tax balance as at December 31, 2005.

In 2005, there were two other specified items included in operating income, as follows:

□		A new restructuring initiative to reduce management and administrative costs, which resulted in a special charge of $44.2 million ($28.3 million after tax) in the fourth quarter of 2005. The restructuring was intended to eliminate more than 400 positions (discussed further in Section 21.10).

□		As a result of a settlement reached in the third quarter of 2005, we recognized a reduction of $33.9 million ($20.6 million after tax) to a special charge initially taken in the fourth quarter of 2004 (discussed further in Section 21.7). As part of the settlement we received $3.6 million in cash and were able to reduce an environmental remediation liability related to one of our properties by $30.3 million.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
24

11.0 Other Income Statement Items

11.1 OTHER INCOME AND CHARGES

Other income and charges consist of amortization of the discounted portion of certain long-term accruals, gains and losses due to the impact of the change in FX on working capital, various costs related to financing, gains and losses associated with changes in the fair value of non-hedging derivative instruments, other non-operating expenditures and equity earnings. Other income and charges were $17.3 million in 2007, a decrease of $10.5 million from 2006 and were $27.8 million in 2006, an increase of $9.7 million from $18.1 million in 2005.

The decrease in 2007 was mainly due to the inclusion of the equity earnings of DM&E starting in October 2007 (discussed further in Section 19.0).

The increase in 2006 was mainly due to the negative impact of the change in FX on working capital balances in 2006, and lower realized gains on non-hedge derivative instruments.

11.2 CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF CANADIAN THIRD PARTY ASSET-BACKED COMMERCIAL PAPER

At December 31, 2007, the Company held ABCP issued by a number of trusts with an original cost of $143.6 million. At the dates the Company acquired these investments they were rated R1 (High) by Dominion Bond Rating Service (“DBRS”), the highest credit rating issued for commercial paper, and backed by R1 (High) rated assets and liquidity agreements. These investments matured during the third quarter of 2007 but, as a result of liquidity issues in the ABCP market, did not settle on maturity. As a result, the Company has classified its ABCP as long-term investments after initially classifying them as Cash and cash equivalents.

On August 16, 2007, an announcement was made by a group representing banks, asset providers and major investors that they had agreed in principle to a long-term proposal and interim agreement to convert the ABCP into long-term floating rate notes maturing no earlier than the scheduled maturity of the underlying assets. On September 6, 2007, a pan-Canadian restructuring committee consisting of major investors was formed. The committee was created to propose a solution to the liquidity problem affecting the ABCP and has retained legal and financial advisors to oversee the proposed restructuring process.

The ABCP in which the Company has invested has not traded in an active market since mid-August 2007 and there are currently no market quotations available. The ABCP in which the Company has invested continues to be rated R1 (High, Under Review with Developing Implications) by DBRS.

A Standstill Agreement is in place that commits investors not to take any action that would precipitate an event of default. It is expected that the restructuring of the ABCP will occur in April 2008 if approval by investors is obtained to do so. This approval will be requested on a trust by trust basis most likely during April 2008.

On December 23, 2007, the pan-Canadian restructuring committee provided certain details about the expected restructuring. Based on this and other public information it is estimated that, of the $143.6 million of ABCP in which the Company has invested:

□

$12.5 million is represented by traditional securitized assets and the Company will, on restructuring, receive replacement long-term floating rate notes that are expected to receive a AAA credit rating;

□		$119.0 million is represented by a combination of leveraged collaterized debt, synthetic assets and traditional securitized assets and the Company will, on restructuring, receive replacement senior and subordinated long-term floating rate notes. The senior notes are expected to obtain a AAA rating while the subordinated notes are likely to be unrated; and

□		$12.1 million is represented by assets that have an exposure to US sub-prime mortgages. On restructuring, the Company is likely to receive long-term floating rate notes that may be rated, although at this time the pan-Canadian restructuring committee has provided no indication of the likely rating these notes may receive.

The valuation technique used by the Company to estimate the fair value of its investment in ABCP at December 31, 2007, incorporates probability weighted discounted cash flows considering the best available public information regarding market conditions and other factors that a market participant would consider for such investments. The assumptions used in determining the estimated fair value reflect the public statements made by the pan-Canadian restructuring committee that it expects the ABCP will be converted into various long-term floating rate notes, as discussed above, with maturities matching the maturities of the underlying assets and bearing market interest rates commensurate with the nature of the underlying assets and their associated cash flows and the credit rating and risk associated with the long-term floating rate notes. The interest rates and maturities of the various long-term floating rate notes, discount rates and credit losses modelled are:


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			25




Probability weighted average interest rate		4.6 %
Weighted average discount rate		5.3 %
Maturity of long-term floating rate notes	five to seven years
Credit losses	nil to 25 % on a going concern basis, 5 % to 50 % on a liquidation basis

Interest rates and credit losses vary by each of the different replacement long-term floating rate notes to be issued as each has different credit ratings and risks. Interest rates and credit losses also vary by the different probable cash flow scenarios that have been modelled.

Discount rates vary dependent upon the credit rating of the replacement long-term floating rate notes.

Maturities vary by different replacement long-term floating rate notes as a result of the expected maturity of the underlying assets.

One of the probable cash flow scenarios modelled is a liquidation scenario whereby, if the restructuring is not successfully completed, recovery of the Company’s investment is through the liquidation of the underlying assets of the ABCP trusts.

In addition, assumptions have also been made as to the amount of restructuring costs that the Company will bear.

Based on additional information that became available during the fourth quarter of 2007, the probability weighted discounted cash flows resulted in an estimated fair value of the Company’s ABCP of $122.1 million at December 31, 2007. The reduction in fair value of $21.5 million compared to the original cost of the ABCP was recorded as a charge to income in the third quarter of 2007 with no further changes required in the fourth quarter of 2007.

in the value of the Company’s investment in ABCP which could impact the Company’s near term earnings.

11.3 INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest expense includes interest on long-term debt and capital leases, net of interest income. Interest expense was $204.3 million in 2007, an increase of $9.8 million from 2006. The expense was $194.5 million in 2006, a decrease of $9.7 million from $204.2 million in 2005.

Interest expense in 2007 increased primarily due to the issuance of US$450 million notes and the use of bridge financing to fund the acquisition of DM&E (discussed further in Section 15.3). These increases were partially offset by higher interest income generated from higher cash balances, the repayment of a $143.0 million secured equipment loan and the positive impact from the change in FX on US dollar-denominated interest expense.

Interest expense in 2006 decreased due to the positive impact of the change in FX and the retirement of $250-million Medium Term Notes in June 2005 (discussed further in Section 15.3). The improvements were partially offset by higher interest charges on variable-interest rate debt tied to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), which increased relative to the comparable period.

11.4 INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense was $144.7 million in 2007, an increase of $34.8 million from 2006. Income tax expense was $109.9 million in 2006, a decrease of $160.7 million from $270.6 million in 2005. The 2007 increase was mainly due to an increase in FX gains on LTD and a lower future income tax benefit

of $162.9 million recorded in 2007 resulting from tax rate changes implemented by the Government of Canada and certain provincial governments in 2007, compared with the impact of tax rate changes of $176.0 million in 2006 implemented by the Government of Canada and certain provincial governments in 2006. The reduction in tax expense in 2006, compared with 2005, was mainly due to a positive adjustment of $176.0 million taken in the second quarter of 2006, partially offset by an increase in taxes as a result of higher income.

The effective income tax rate for 2007 was 13.3 %, compared with 12.1 % and 33.3 % for 2006 and 2005, respectively. The normalized rates (income tax rate based on income adjusted for FX on LTD, DM&E equity income, and other specified items) for 2007, 2006 and 2005 were 29.0 %, 30.8 % and 32.2 %, respectively. The change in the normalized tax rate in 2007, compared with 2006, was mainly due to lower Canadian federal and provincial corporate income tax rates and tax planning initiatives. The reduction in our effective income tax rate in 2006, compared with 2005, was due to changes in Canadian federal and provincial corporate income tax rates and tax planning initiatives.

We expect a normalized 2008 income tax rate of between 29 % and 31 %. The outlook on our normalized income tax rate is based on certain assumptions about events and developments that may or may not materialize or that may be offset entirely or partially by other events and developments (see Section 22.0 and Section 23.4 for a discussion of these assumptions and other factors affecting our expectations for 2008).


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
26

We will have an increase in our cash tax payments in future years.

Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2005, certain capital losses were no longer available to offset capital gains arising from FX on LTD and other capital transactions. Following a review of impending transactions during third-quarter 2005, we concluded that our remaining unrecognized capital loss carryforwards for tax would more than likely be utilized. Consequently, we recorded a

future tax asset for all previously unrecognized capital loss carryforwards. As a result, any future capital gains recorded, including FX on LTD, will be taxable, where historically they had resulted in no net tax expense. A reclassification moves previously recognized capital losses that historically were allocated to unrealized FX on LTD gains and includes them in the calculation of income tax for other realized capital transactions, which are included in income tax expense before income tax on FX on LTD. With the

reclassification, the tax benefit of these losses is matched to the transactions that utilize them. As a result of this review, the income tax associated with FX on LTD, which is a non-GAAP measure, increased by $6.3 million in 2007 and increased by $7.2 million in 2006. The income tax expense, before income tax on FX on LTD, which is a non-GAAP measure (discussed further in Section 6.0), was reduced by the same amount in 2007 and 2006, respectively.

12.0 Quarterly Financial Data


For the quarter ended
(in millions, except per share data)	2007								2006

	Dec. 31		Sep. 30		Jun. 30		Mar. 31		Dec. 31		Sept. 30		Jun. 30		Mar. 31


Total revenue	$	1,188.3	$	1,187.9	$	1,215.5	$	1,115.9	$	1,190.4	$	1,151.3	$	1,131.0	$	1,110.5
Operating income		305.5		321.7		307.7		229.3		320.1		299.1		282.6		226.8
Net income		342.3		218.6		256.7		128.6		145.6		163.8		378.1		108.8
Operating income, before other specified items ⁽¹⁾		305.5		321.7		307.7		229.3		320.1		299.1		282.6		226.8
Income, before FX on LTD and other specified items ⁽¹⁾		185.1		190.3		174.8		122.6		181.0		169.7		160.7		116.1

Basic earnings per share	$	2.23	$	1.43	$	1.66	$	0.83	$	0.93	$	1.05	$	2.39	$	0.69
Diluted earnings per share		2.21		1.41		1.64		0.82		0.92		1.04		2.37		0.68
Diluted earnings per share, before FX on LTD and other specified items ⁽¹⁾		1.20		1.23		1.12		0.78		1.15		1.07		1.00		0.72

⁽¹⁾These earnings measures have no standardized meanings prescribed by Canadian GAAP and, therefore, are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures of other companies. These earnings measures and other specified items are described in Section 6.0. A reconciliation of income and diluted EPS, before FX on LTD and other specified items, to net income and diluted EPS, as presented in the financial statements is provided in Section 6.0.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			27

12.1 QUARTERLY TRENDS

Volumes of and, therefore, revenues from certain goods are stronger during different periods of the year. First-quarter revenues can be lower mainly due to winter weather conditions, closure of the Great Lakes ports and reduced transportation of retail goods. Second- and third-quarter revenues generally improve over the first quarter as fertilizer volumes are typically highest during the second quarter and demand for construction-related goods is generally highest in the third quarter. Revenues are typically strongest in the fourth quarter, primarily as a result of the transportation of grain after the harvest, fall fertilizer programs and increased demand for retail goods moved by rail. Operating income is also affected by seasonal fluctuations. Operating income is typically lowest in the first quarter due to higher operating costs associated with winter conditions. Net income is also influenced by seasonal fluctuations in customer demand and weather-related issues.

13.0 Fourth-quarter Summary

13.1 OPERATING RESULTS

In the fourth quarter of 2007, GTMs remained relatively unchanged at approximately 62.1 billion, a decrease of 0.1 %. RTMs were approximately 32.5 billion, an increase of 1.5 %. The increase in RTMs were primarily due to growth in intermodal shipments and increased shipments of long haul potash from Saskatchewan to the Port of Vancouver, partially offset by reduced lumber and panel volumes.

Operating income for the three-month period ended December 31, 2007, was $305.5 million, a decrease of $14.6 million from $320.1 million.

The decrease in operating income was primarily due to:

□

an increase in fuel costs driven by higher WTI prices, net of fuel recoveries;

□		the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $23 million;

□		harsh weather conditions that affected the entire supply chain in December 2007; and

□		higher purchased services and other costs (discussed further in Section 13.4.6).

These decreases were partially offset by revenue growth in Intermodal as well as Industrial and consumer products and lower compensation and benefits expenses.

We reported net income of $342.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2007, an increase of $196.7 million from $145.6 million.

The increase in net income was mainly due to:

□		a future income tax benefit of $145.8 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2007 as a result of Canadian rate reductions applied to opening future income tax balances (discussed further in Section 10.0);

□		an increase in FX gains on LTD as a result of a strengthening of the Canadian dollar;

□		lower income tax expense; and

□		the recognition of equity earnings, starting in October 2007, following our acquisition of DM&E (discussed further in Section 19.0), which reduced Other income and charges.

These increases were partially offset by a lower operating income and higher interest expense (discussed further in Section 11.3).

Diluted EPS was $2.21 in the fourth quarter of 2007, an increase of $1.29 from $0.92.

13.2 NON-GAAP EARNINGS

A discussion of non-GAAP earnings and a reconciliation of income, before FX on LTD and other specified items, to net income as presented in the financial statements for the fourth quarters of 2007 and 2006, is included in Section 6.0.

Income, before FX on LTD and other specified items, was $185.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2007, an increase of $4.1 million from $181.0 million. The increase was mainly driven by higher other revenues and lower materials expense, partially offset by higher fuel costs.

13.3 REVENUES

Total revenues were $1,188.3 million in fourth-quarter 2007, a decrease of $2.1 million from $1,190.4 million. This decrease was primarily driven by the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $66 million, mainly offset by higher revenues from Industrial and consumer products and Intermodal.

13.3.1 Grain

Grain revenues in the fourth quarter of 2007 were $257.5 million, a decrease of $4.1 million from $261.6 million. This decrease was primarily driven by:

□		the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $17 million;

□		weaker Canadian wheat and durum shipments to Thunder Bay and Montreal; and

□		harsh weather conditions that affected the entire supply chain in December 2007.

These decreases were partially offset by strong shipments of US grain to the Pacific Northwest, Minnesota/Wisconsin, and Eastern Canada.

13.3.2 Coal

Coal revenues were $131.2 million in fourth-quarter 2007, a decrease of $18.1 million from $149.3 million. The decrease in revenues was primarily due to:

□		the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $3 million;

□		harsh weather conditions that affected the entire supply chain in December 2007, which pushed some volumes into 2008; and

□		a decrease in freight rates.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
28

13.3.3 Sulphur and Fertilizers

Sulphur and fertilizers revenues were $121.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2007, a decrease of $0.8 million from $122.0 million. The decrease was primarily driven by the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $7 million and declining sulphur shipments out of northern Alberta due to declining supply, mainly offset by strong shipments of both export and domestic potash.

13.3.4 Forest Products

Forest products revenues were $61.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2007, a decrease of $9.7 million from $71.2 million.

This decrease was mainly due to:

□		continued soft demand for lumber and panel products caused by a significant slowdown in the US housing market and continued impact from the sub-prime mortgage crisis;

□		difficult market conditions for our Forest product customers caused by a strong Canadian dollar and softwood lumber

□		trade agreements which have lead to reduced volumes, shipper bankruptcies and extended plant shut downs; and

□		the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $7 million.

Partially offsetting these factors was our strong yield and pricing, which reduced the impact from the volume decline.

13.3.5 Industrial and Consumer Products

Industrial and consumer products revenues were $157.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2007, an increase of $9.4 million from $148.5 million. The increase was due mainly to:

□		higher freight rates;

□		strong worldwide demand for base metals; and

□

strong demand for chemical, plastics and energy products largely driven by Alberta oil activity and a strong Alberta economy.

The higher revenues were partially offset by the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $14 million.

13.3.6 Automotive

Automotive revenues were $77.0 million in fourth-quarter 2007, an increase of $2.1 million from $74.9 million. The increase was primarily due to a surge in shipping by new domestic manufacturers (such as Toyota and Honda) in the fourth quarter of 2007 to meet their year end volume targets, partially offset by the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $6 million.

13.3.7 Intermodal

Intermodal revenues grew in the fourth quarter of 2007 to $336.3 million, an increase of $12.3 million from $324.0 million. In the international business, growth was primarily due to higher freight rates and container volume growth at all four ports we serve (Vancouver, Montreal, New York/New Jersey and Philadelphia) driven by increasing global trade. Growth in domestic intermodal was due to increased freight rates and volumes as well as an increase in traffic from the US to Western Canada. These increases were partially offset by the negative impact of the change in FX of approximately $10 million.

13.3.8 Other Revenues

Other revenues were $45.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2007, an increase of $6.8 million from $38.9 million. The increase was primarily due to higher land sales.

13.4 OPERATING EXPENSES, BEFORE OTHER SPECIFIED ITEMS

Operating expenses, before other specified items, in the fourth quarter of 2007 were $882.8 million, an increase of $12.5 million from $870.3 million.

13.4.1 Compensation and Benefits

Compensation and benefits expense in fourth-quarter 2007 was $308.4 million, a decrease of $13.8 million from $322.2 million. The decrease was primarily driven by:

□		the positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $10 million;

□		lower incentive compensation; and

□		reduced costs from restructuring initiatives (discussed further in Section 21.10).

These decreases were partially offset by the negative impact of inflation.

13.4.2 Fuel

Fuel expense was $196.3 million in fourth-quarter 2007, an increase of $25.1 million from $171.2 million. The increase was primarily driven by higher WTI prices and a higher rate of fuel consumption, primarily due to harsh weather conditions. These increases were partially offset by the positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $18 million and the result of a favourable fuel tax ruling.

13.4.3 Materials

Materials expense was $47.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2007, a decrease of $5.8 million from $53.7 million. The decrease was mainly due to lower cost of materials used for freight car repairs and train servicing, primarily driven by reductions in wheel consumption and wheel prices, as well as a positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $1 million. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in locomotive repair and servicing costs.

13.4.4 Equipment Rents

Equipment rents expense was $45.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2007, a decrease of $2.7 million from $47.8 million. The decrease was largely due to the positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $5 million and


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			29

a reduction in freight car lease costs. These decreases were partially offset by higher equipment rental payments to other railways as a result of network disruptions, mainly driven by harsh weather conditions. Reductions in receipts for the use of our railcars from other railways and customers also partially offset the decrease in equipment rents expense.

13.4.5 Depreciation
and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense was $116.3 million in fourth-quarter 2007, an increase of $0.4 million from $115.9 million, largely due to additions to capital assets. This was partially offset by asset retirements and the positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $2 million.

13.4.6 Purchased Services and Other

Purchased services and other expense was $168.8 million in fourth-quarter 2007, an increase of $9.3 million from $159.5 million. The increase was mainly due to increased casualty costs, primarily driven by weather-related incidents and recognition of anticipated future environmental costs at certain identified sites across our network. The increase was partially offset by the positive impact of the change in FX of approximately $7 million.

13.5 OTHER INCOME
STATEMENT ITEMS

In the fourth-quarter 2007, there was a gain due to FX on LTD of $8.3 million ($11.4 million after tax), compared with a loss of $44.9 million ($35.4 million after tax) in the same period of 2006. The gain was due to the impact of the change in FX on US dollar-denominated debt.

Other income and charges were a recovery of $3.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2007, a decrease of $10.2 million from a $6.4 million expense in fourth-quarter 2006. This decrease was primarily due to the inclusion of the equity earnings of DM&E starting in October 2007.

Interest expense was $63.4 million in fourth-quarter 2007, an increase of $13.6 million from $49.8 million in the same period of 2006. The increase was primarily due to the issuance of US$450 million notes and the use of bridge financing to fund the acquisition of DM&E (discussed further in Section 15.3), partially offset by higher interest income generated from higher cash balances and the positive impact from the change in FX on US dollar-denominated interest expense.

13.6 LIQUIDITY AND
CAPITAL RESOURCES

For the three months ended December 31, 2007, we held $378.1 million in cash and short-term investments, which was an increase of $38.9 million compared with the three months ended September 30, 2007. For the three months ended December 31, 2006, we held $124.3 million in cash and short-term investments, which was an increase of $77.9 million compared with the three months ended September 30, 2006. The lower increase in cash and short-term investments during the fourth quarter of 2007 was primarily due to increased investing costs from the acquisition of DM&E (discussed further in Section 19.0) and the timing of capital expenditures, partially offset by funds received from the bridge financing (discussed further in Section 15.3) along with short-term borrowings and increased cash from operations.

14.0 Changes in Accounting Policy

14.1 2007 ACCOUNTING CHANGES

14.1.1 Financial Instruments, Hedging and Comprehensive Income

On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the following accounting standards issued by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (“CICA”): Section 3855 “Financial Instruments

– Recognition and Measurement”, Section 3861 “Financial Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation”, Section 3865 “Hedges,” Section 1530 “Comprehensive Income” and Section 3251 “Equity”. These sections require certain financial instruments and hedge positions to be recorded at their fair value. They also introduce the concept of comprehensive income and accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”). Adoption of these standards was on a retrospective basis without restatement of prior periods, except for the restatement of equity balances to reflect the reclassification of “Foreign currency translation adjustments” to “AOCI” and “Other Comprehensive Loss”.

The impact of the adoption of these standards on January 1, 2007, was an increase in net assets of $18.0 million, a reduction in “Foreign currency translation adjustments” of $66.4 million, an increase in “Retained earnings” of $4.0 million, and the recognition of “AOCI” of $80.4 million.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
30

taxes” by $11.6 million. AOCI is comprised of foreign currency gains and losses on the net investment in self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries, foreign currency gains and losses related to long-term debt designated as a hedge of the net investment in self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries, effective portions of gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of cash flow hedging instruments, and the reclassification of cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments. The adjustment to opening retained earnings reflects the change in measurement basis, from original cost to fair value or amortized cost, of certain financial assets, financial liabilities, transaction costs associated with the Company’s long-term debt and previously deferred gains and losses on derivative instruments that were settled in prior years and which, had they currently existed, did not meet the criteria for hedge accounting under Accounting Standard Section 3865. The amounts recorded on the adoption of these standards differed from the estimated amounts disclosed in Note 3 to the 2006 annual financial statements as a result of the refinement of certain estimates used at the year end.

14.1.2 Accounting Changes

Effective from January 1, 2007, the CICA amended Accounting Standard Section 1506 “Accounting Changes” to prescribe the criteria for changing accounting policies and related accounting treatment and disclosures of accounting changes. Changes in accounting policies are permitted when required by a primary source of GAAP, for example when a new accounting section is first adopted, or when the change in accounting policy results in more reliable and relevant financial information being reflected in the financial statements.

The adoption of this amended accounting standard did not impact the financial statements of the Company.

14.2 FUTURE ACCOUNTING CHANGES

14.2.1 Financial Instrument and Capital Disclosures

The CICA has issued the following accounting standards effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2008: Section 3862 “Financial Instruments –Disclosures”, Section 3863 “Financial Instruments – Presentation”, and Section 1535 “Capital Disclosures”.

Section 3862 “Financial Instruments – Disclosures” and Section 3863 “Financial Instruments – Presentation” replace Section 3861 “Financial Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation”, revising disclosures related to financial instruments, including hedging instruments, and carrying forward unchanged presentation requirements.

Section 1535 “Capital Disclosures” will require the Company to provide disclosures about the Company’s capital and how it is managed.

The adoption of these new accounting standards will not impact the amounts reported in the Company’s financial statements as they primarily relate to disclosure.

14.2.2 Inventories

Effective January 1, 2008, the CICA has issued accounting standard Section 3031 “Inventories”. Section 3031 “Inventories” provides guidance on the method of determining the cost of the Company’s materials and supplies. The new accounting standard specifies that inventories are to be valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The Company currently reflects materials and supplies at the lower of cost and replacement value. The standard requires the reversal of previously recorded write downs to realizable value when there is clear evidence that net realizable value has increased. Additional disclosures will also be required. It is not anticipated that the adoption of Section 3031 “Inventories” will have a material

impact on CP’s financial statements. Any adjustment on the adoption of Section 3031 “Inventories” will be recognized in 2008 as an adjustment to opening inventory and opening retained earnings.

14.2.3 Goodwill and intangible assets

In February 2008, the CICA issued accounting standard Section 3064 “Goodwill, and intangible assets”, replacing accounting standard Section 3062 “Goodwill and other intangible assets” and accounting standard Section 3450 “Research and development costs”. Various changes have been made to other sections of the CICA Handbook for consistency purposes. The new Section will be applicable to financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008. Accordingly, the Company will adopt the new standards for its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. Section 3064 establishes standards for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of goodwill subsequent to its initial recognition and of intangible assets by profit-oriented enterprises. Standards concerning goodwill are unchanged from the standards included in the previous Section 3062. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this new Section.

15.0 Liquidity and Capital Resources

We believe adequate amounts of cash and cash equivalents are available in the normal course of business to provide for ongoing operations, including the obligations identified in the tables in Section 20.0 and Section 21.8. We are not aware of any trends or expected fluctuations in our liquidity that would create any deficiencies. Liquidity risks is discussed in Section 22.2. The following discussion of operating, investing and financing activities describes our indicators of liquidity and capital resources.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			31

15.1 OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Cash provided by operating activities was $1,314.6 million in 2007, an increase of $263.6 million from 2006. Cash provided by operating activities was $1,051.0 million in 2006, an increase of $0.3 million from $1,050.7 million in 2005.

The increase in 2007, compared with 2006, was mainly due to higher net cash generated through improved working capital, reduced pension contributions, higher cash earnings and reduced income tax and restructuring payments.

The change in 2006, compared with 2005, was minimal, as the increase in cash earnings was largely offset by:

□		higher income tax payments associated with the sale of our Latta subdivision (discussed further in Section 21.5);

□		higher restructuring payments;

□		a higher year-end working capital balance, primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable from higher freight revenues; and

□		increased pension contributions.

There are no specific or unusual requirements relating to our working capital. In addition, there are no unusual restrictions on any subsidiary’s ability to transfer funds to CPRL.

15.2 INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Cash used in investing activities was $2,514.3 million in 2007, an increase of $1,820.6 million from 2006. Cash used in investing activities was $693.7 million in 2006, a decrease of $175.5 million from $869.2 million in 2005.

Cash used in investing activities was higher in 2007 primarily due to the acquisition of DM&E, increased capital expenditures, and the investment in ABCP in the third quarter of 2007 (discussed further in this section and Section 11.2).

The decrease in cash used in investing activities in 2006 was mainly due to decreased cash capital spending in 2006 and proceeds from the sale of our Latta subdivision.

At September 30, 2007, the Company held ABCP with an original cost of $143.6 million. At the dates the Company acquired these investments, they were rated R1 (High) by DBRS, the highest credit rating issued for commercial paper, and backed by R1 (High) rated assets, and liquidity agreements. These investments matured during the third quarter of 2007 but due to liquidity issues in the ABCP market, did not settle on maturity. As a result, the Company has classified its ABCP as long-term investments after initially classifying them as Cash and cash equivalents. This change in the classification of the Company’s ABCP, for accounting purposes, does not impact CP’s liquidity requirements for normal operations or the acquisition of DM&E. ABCP is further discussed in Section 11.2.

Capital spending in 2008 is projected to be between $885 million and $895 million, which is similar to the 2007 capital program. While the expected total capital program for 2008 remains relatively unchanged from 2007 spending levels, it will incorporate an increase for the maintenance and upgrade of rail, ballast, crossties and other basic right-of-way infrastructure components for which some spending was deferred in 2007 due to the CP strike. There will also be an increase in investments in information technology to improve the systems that manage railway operations and customer shipments, as well as investments planned to increase capacity of track and signalling systems in key corridors to improve end-to-end fluidity and increase train speed over the existing network. There will also be increases in investments in modifications and upgrades to the freight car fleet to ensure customers continue to receive the quality of rail cars they require. This includes the ongoing program to upgrade government-owned grain cars to reduce grain spillage and

protect wildlife along CP’s right-of-way as well as upgrades to the automotive rail car fleet. These increases will be offset by reduced spending levels on strategic land purchases as these were largely completed in 2007. These capital investments do not include capital spending programs for the DM&E (discussed further in Section 19.0). Our capital spending outlook is based on certain assumptions about events and developments that may not materialize or that may be offset entirely or partially by other events and developments (see Section 22.0 for a discussion of these assumptions and other factors affecting our expectations for 2008).

We intend to finance capital expenditures with cash from operations but may partially finance these expenditures with new debt. Our decision whether to acquire equipment through the use of capital and debt or through operating leases will be influenced by such factors as the need to keep our capital structure within debt covenants and to maintain financial ratios that would preserve our investment grade standing, as well as the amount of cash flow we believe can be generated from operations and the prevailing capital market conditions.

15.3 FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Cash provided by financing activities was $1,453.5 million in 2007, an increase of $1,808.3 million. Cash used in financing activities was $354.8 million in 2006, a decrease of $57.9 million, compared with $412.7 million in 2005.

The increase in 2007 was primarily due to:

□		the US$1.27 billion bridge financing to fund the acquisition of DM&E (discussed further in this section);

□		the issuance of US$450 million of 5.95 % 30-year notes, which are unsecured and carry a negative pledge, for net proceeds of CAD$485.1 million; and

□		short-term borrowings of $229.7 million.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
32

These increases were partially offset by the repayment of two debt instruments, a $143.0 million secured equipment loan and a $19.0 million obligation under a capital lease.

The decrease in cash used in 2006 was due to lower long-term debt repayments, mainly from the 2005 repayment of our 7.2 % $250-million Medium Term Notes and higher proceeds from the issue of shares for stock options exercised in 2006. These items were partially offset by increased purchases of shares through the Company’s share repurchase program (discussed further in Section 16.5) and higher dividend payments to our shareholders.

CP filed a US$1.5 billion base shelf prospectus in May 2007 and a CAD$1.5 billion medium term notes prospectus in June 2007 to provide the financial flexibility to offer debt securities for sale. This allowed CP to issue US$450 million of 5.95 % 30-year notes in May 2007 under the US-dollar base shelf prospectus which was used to repay long-term debt, to repurchase CP shares through normal course issuer bids (discussed further in Section 16.5), and to partially finance the acquisition of DM&E on October 4, 2007.

In October 2007, CP entered into an eighteen-month US$1.8 billion credit agreement to provide bridge financing specifically to fund the acquisition of DM&E (discussed further in Section 19.0). The credit facility bears interest at a variable rate based on LIBOR. On October 4, 2007, CP drew down US$1.27 billion from this credit agreement to close the acquisition of DM&E.

We also have available, as sources of financing, unused credit facilities of up to $408 million.

15.3.1 Net-debt to Net-debt-plus-equity Ratio

At December 31, 2007, our net-debt to net-debt-plus-equity ratio (discussed further in Section 6.0) increased to 42.5%,

compared with 37.2 % and 39.6 % at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net debt is the sum of long-term debt, long-term debt maturing within one year and short-term borrowing, less cash and short-term investments. This sum is divided by total net debt plus total shareholders’ equity as presented on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The increase in 2007 was primarily due to:

□		the bridge financing obtained for the acquisition of DM&E;

□		an increase in short-term borrowing of $229.7 million; and

□		the investment in ABCP (discussed further in Section 11.2).

		These increases were partially offset by an increase in equity driven by earnings and the impact of the strengthening of the Canadian dollar.

		The improvement in 2006 was primarily due to an increase in equity driven by earnings, partially offset by the impact of the reduced capital stock and contributed surplus as a result of CP’s share repurchase program.

15.3.2 Security Ratings

Our unsecured long-term debt securities are currently rated “Baa3”, “BBB” and “BBB” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), Standard and Poor’s Corporation (“S&P”) and DBRS, respectively. With the acquisition of the DM&E, CP’s ratings were downgraded in the fourth quarter of 2007 by DBRS and Moody’s from “BBB(high)” and “Baa2”, respectively. Our rating with S&P remained unchanged but with a negative outlook. CP intends to permanently finance the DM&E acquisition in a manner that preserves our investment grade rating.

15.4 FREE CASH

Free cash is a non-GAAP measure that management considers to be an indicator of liquidity. Free cash is calculated as cash provided by operating activities, less cash

used in investing activities and dividends paid, and adjusted for the acquisition of DM&E and the investment in ABCP. Free cash is adjusted for the DM&E acquisition, as it is not indicative of normal day-to-day investments in the Company’s asset base. In addition, free cash excludes the investment in ABCP, as this reflects a change in presentation for accounting purposes and does not result in a change in cash flow.

We generated free cash of $303.4 million in 2007 compared with $244.9 million in 2006 and $92.0 million in 2005. The increase in 2007, compared with 2006, was largely due to the increase in cash generated by operating activities (as discussed in Section 15.1), partially offset by increased capital spending, lower proceeds from disposal of transportation properties and a higher dividend payment. The increase in 2006, compared with 2005, was due to a decrease in capital spending in 2006 and proceeds from the sale of our Latta subdivision, partially offset by higher dividend payments to our shareholders.

We expect to generate a lower amount of free cash in 2008, compared with 2007, as a result of increased income tax payments, mainly due to the Company now being cash tax payable (discussed further in Section 11.4) and less favourable improvements in the change in working capital compared with 2007. The decrease in free cash in 2008 will be largely offset by higher cash earnings. Our free cash outlook is based on certain assumptions about events and developments that may not materialize or that may be offset entirely or partially by other events and developments (see Section 22.0 and Section 25.0 for a discussion of these assumptions and other factors affecting our expectations for 2008). Our free cash outlook relies on the assumptions established for earnings and capital expenditures, which are discussed in Section 7.2, Section 9.0, Section 11.0 and Section 15.0.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			33

CALCULATION OF FREE CASH


(reconciliation of free cash to GAAP cash position)
For the year ended December 31 (in millions)	2007			2006			2005



Cash provided by operating activities	$	1,314.6		$	1,051.0		$	1,050.7
Cash used in investing activities		(2,514.3	)		(693.7	)		(869.2	)
Dividends paid		(133.1	)		(112.4	)		(89.5	)
Add back acquisition of DM&E ⁽¹⁾		1,492.6			–			–
Add back investment in ABCP ⁽²⁾		143.6			–			–

Free cash ⁽³⁾		303.4			244.9			92.0
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities, excluding dividend payment		1,586.6			(242.4	)		(323.2	)
Acquisiton of DM&E ⁽¹⁾		(1,492.6	)		–			–
Investment in ABCP ⁽²⁾		(143.6	)		–			–

Increase/(decrease) in cash, as shown on the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows		253.8			2.5			(231.2	)
Net cash at beginning of period		124.3			121.8			353.0

Net cash at end of period	$	378.1		$	124.3		$	121.8

⁽¹⁾ The acquisition of DM&E is discussed further in Section 19.0.

⁽²⁾ The investment in ABCP is discussed further in Section 11.2.

⁽³⁾ Free cash has no standardized meanings prescribed by Canadian GAAP and, therefore, is unlikely to be comparable to similar measures of other companies. Free cash is discussed further in this section and in Section 6.0.

16.0 Balance Sheet

16.1 ASSETS

Assets totalled $13,365.0 million at December 31, 2007, compared with $11,415.9 million at December 31, 2006 and $10,891.1 million at December 31, 2005.

The increase in assets in 2007 was mainly due to an increase in cash and investments including our investment in DM&E (discussed further in Section 19.0).

The increase in assets in 2006 was mainly due to:

□		capital additions, most of which were locomotives and track replacement;

□		an increase in accounts receivable due to higher freight rates which have increased amounts billed to customers;

□		higher materials and supplies, mainly fuel stock and engineering inventory; and

□		pension contributions made in excess of pension expense recognized in income.

These increases were partially offset by a reduction in assets held for sale in 2006.

16.2 TOTAL LIABILITIES

Our combined short-term and long-term liabilities were $7,907.1 million at December 31, 2007, compared with $6,559.4 million at December 31, 2006 and $6,507.0 million at December 31, 2005.

The increase in total liabilities in 2007 was due mainly to:

□		an increase in short-term borrowing;

□		an increase in long-term debt resulting from the issuance in second-quarter 2007 of US$450 million of 5.95 % 30-year notes (net proceeds of $485.1 million), which are unsecured but carry a negative pledge; and

□		bridge financing to fund the acquisition of DM&E (discussed further in Section 15.3).

These increases were partially offset by the repayment of a $143.0 million secured

equipment loan in the first quarter of 2007 and a $19.0 million obligation under capital lease, as well as FX gains on LTD.

The increase in total liabilities in 2006 was due mainly to an increase in the future income tax liability, driven by tax on income generated in 2006, partially offset by a reduction in accounts payable.

16.3 ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Effective January 1, 2007, new accounting standards were introduced affecting how CP accounts for certain unrealized gains and losses by creating a new category of equity called “AOCI”. Amounts previously reported as “Foreign currency translation adjustment” were reclassified to AOCI retroactively. Unrealized gains and losses on hedges net of related future income taxes were transferred to AOCI prospectively (discussed further in Section 14.0).


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
34

16.4 EQUITY

At December 31, 2007, our Consolidated Balance Sheet reflected $5,457.9 million in equity, compared with an equity balance of $4,856.5 million at December 31, 2006 and $4,384.1 million at December 31, 2005. The increase in equity was primarily due to growth in retained income driven by net income and the issuance of Common Shares for stock options exercised. The increase was partially offset by shares repurchased under normal course issuer bids and dividends.

16.5 SHARE CAPITAL

Our Articles of Incorporation authorize for issuance an unlimited number of Common Shares and an unlimited number of First Preferred Shares and Second Preferred Shares. At January 31, 2008, 153,332,228 Common Shares and no Preferred Shares were issued and outstanding.

We also have a Management Stock Option Incentive Plan (“MSOIP”) under which key officers and employees are granted options to purchase CP shares. Each option granted can be exercised for one Common Share. At January 31, 2008, 6.9 million options were outstanding under our MSOIP and Directors’ Stock Option Plan, and 3.6 million Common Shares have been reserved for issuance of future options.

From time to time, the Company repurchases its own shares for cancellation. Purchases are typically made through the facilities of the Toronto Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange. The prices that we pay for any shares will be the market price at the time of purchase.

On June 1, 2006, we completed the filings for a normal course issuer bid (the “2006 NCIB”) to enable us, during June 6, 2006 to June 5, 2007, to purchase for cancellation up to 3,936,000, or 2.5 % of our 158,321,252 Common Shares outstanding as of May 31, 2006. The filing was necessary to effect the repurchase of up to 5,500,000 Common Shares in the calendar year 2006, as authorized by our Board of Directors on February 21, 2006 (representing 3.5 % of our Common Shares outstanding as of December 31, 2005). Of the 3,936,000 shares authorized under the 2006 NCIB, 3,435,992 shares were purchased in 2006 at an average price per share of $56.66 and 249,990 shares were purchased in 2007 at an average price per share of $64.11.

On March 1, 2007, we announced our intention, subject to regulatory approval, to purchase up to 5,500,000 shares during 2007, by way of normal course issuer bid purchases or private agreement purchases. On March 26, 2007, we completed the filings for a normal course issuer bid (the “2007 NCIB”) to enable us, during March 28, 2007 to March 27, 2008, to purchase for cancellation up to 4,975,000, or 3.2 % of our 155,534,263 Common Shares outstanding as of March 15, 2007.

On April 24, 2007, we received approval from our Board of Directors, subject to regulatory approval, to amend our existing 2007 NCIB to permit the purchase for cancellation of up to 15,500,000 of our outstanding Common Shares during 2007 and, if not completed in 2007, in 2008. This represents approximately 10 % of the public float of our Common Shares outstanding

at March 15, 2007. On April 27, 2007, our 2007 NCIB was amended to increase the number of shares CP may purchase. The increase allows CP to purchase up to 15,250,010 of its common shares during the 12-month period ending March 27, 2008. This represents approximately 9.8 % of the public float of common shares outstanding on March 15, 2007, the date of CP’s previously filed notice. Of the shares authorized under the 2007 NCIB, 2,684,800 shares were purchased by September 30, 2007 at an average price per share of $73.64.

During the third quarter of 2007, the share buyback program was suspended and no shares were repurchased in anticipation of the acquisition of the DM&E. As of December 31, 2007, the program had not been reinstated.

In addition to the normal course issuer bids, CP purchased 275,000 shares privately for cancellation on March 29, 2007 at an average price of $63.12 pursuant to a notice of intention to make an exempt issuer bid filed on March 23, 2007.

At December 31, 2007, a total of 3,209,790 shares have been purchased in 2007 at an average price of $71.99.

Shareholders may obtain, without charge, a copy of our Notice of Intention to Make a Normal Course Issuer Bid by writing to The Office of the Corporate Secretary, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Suite 920, Gulf Canada Square, 401 – 9th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta T2P 4Z4, by telephone at (403) 319-7165 or 1-866-861-4289, by fax at (403) 319-6770, or by e-mail at Shareholder@cpr.ca.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			35

16.6 DIVIDENDS

Dividends declared by the Board of Directors in the last three years are as follows:


Dividend amount	Record date	Payment date



$0.1325	March 25, 2005	April 25, 2005
$0.1500	June 24, 2005	July 25, 2005
$0.1500	September 30, 2005	October 31, 2005
$0.1500	December 30, 2005	January 30, 2006
$0.1875	March 31, 2006	April 24, 2006
$0.1875	June 30, 2006	July 31, 2006
$0.1875	September 29, 2006	October 30, 2006
$0.1875	December 29, 2006	January 29, 2007
$0.2250	March 30, 2007	April 30, 2007
$0.2250	June 29, 2007	July 30, 2007
$0.2250	September 28, 2007	October 29, 2007
$0.2250	December 28, 2007	January 28, 2008
$0.2475	March 28, 2008	April 28, 2008

17.0 Financial Instruments

From January 1, 2007, certain financial instruments, including those classified as loans and receivables, available for sale, held for trading and financial liabilities, are initially measured at fair value and subsequently measured at fair value or amortized cost. Amortization is calculated using the effective interest rate for the instrument. Financial instruments that will be realized within the normal operating cycle are measured at their carrying amount as this approximates fair value.

17.1 FAIR VALUE OF NON-DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount of consideration that would be agreed upon in an arm’s length transaction between willing parties. We use the following methods and assumptions to estimate fair value of each class of financial instruments for which carrying amounts are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows:

17.1.1 Loans and Receivables

“Accounts receivable and other current assets” – The carrying amounts included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

“Investments” – Long-term receivable balances are carried at amortized cost based on an initial fair value determined using discounted cash flow analysis using observable market-based inputs.

17.1.2 Financial Liabilities

“Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” and “short-term borrowing” – The carrying amounts included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

“Long-term debt” – The carrying amount of long-term debt is at amortized cost based on an initial fair value determined using the quoted market prices for the same or similar debt instruments.

17.1.3 Available for Sale

“Investments” – Our equity investments recorded on a cost basis have a carrying value that equals cost as fair value cannot be reliably established as there are no quoted prices in an active market for these investments. Our equity investments recorded on an equity basis have a carrying value equal to cost plus our share of the investees net income, less any dividends received. These investments are not traded on a liquid market.

17.1.4 Held for Trading

“Other assets and deferred charges” and “Deferred liabilities” – Derivative instruments that are designated as hedging instruments are measured at fair value determined using the quoted market prices for the same or similar instruments. Derivative instruments that are not designated in hedging relationships are classified as held for trading and measured at fair value determined using quoted market prices for the same or similar instruments and changes in the fair values of such derivative instruments are recognized in net income as they arise.

“Cash and cash equivalents” – The carrying amounts included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

“Investments” – ABCP (discussed further in Section 11.2) is carried at fair value, which has been determined using valuation techniques that incorporate probability weighted discounted future cash flows reflecting market conditions and other factors that a market participant would consider.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
36

17.1.5 Carrying Value and Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying values of financial instruments equal or approximate their fair values with the exception of long-term debt which has a carrying value of approximately $4,177.2 million and a fair value of approximately $4,302.6 million at December 31, 2007.

17.2 DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Commencing January 1, 2007, all derivative instruments are recorded at their fair value. Any change in the fair value of derivatives not designated as hedges is recognized in the period in which the change occurs in the Statement of Consolidated Income in the line item to which the derivative instrument is related. On the Consolidated Balance Sheet they are classified in “Other assets and deferred charges”, “Deferred liabilities”, “Accounts receivable and other current assets” or “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” as applicable. Prior to 2007, only derivative instruments that did not qualify as hedges or were not designated as hedges were carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet in “Other assets and deferred charges” or “Deferred liabilities”. Gains and losses arising from derivative instruments will affect the following income statement lines: “Revenues”, “Compensation and benefits”, “Fuel”, “Other income and charges”, “Foreign exchange (gains) losses on long-term debt” and “Interest expense”.

hedging of a cash flow hedge relationship become ineffective, previously unrealized gains and losses remain within “AOCI” until the hedged item is settled and, prospectively, future changes in value of the derivative are recognized in income. The change in value of the effective portion of a cash flow hedge remains in “AOCI” until the related hedged item settles, at which time amounts recognized in “AOCI” are reclassified to the same income or balance sheet account that records the hedged item. Prior to January 1, 2007, the periodic change in the fair value of an effective hedging instrument prior to settlement was not recognized in the financial statements.

Prior to January 1, 2007, if a derivative was not an effective hedge, its book value was adjusted to its market value each quarter and the associated gains or losses were included in “Other income and charges” on our Statement of Consolidated Income.

Our policy with respect to using derivative financial instruments is to selectively reduce volatility associated with fluctuations in interest rates, FX rates and the price of fuel. We document the relationship between the hedging instruments and their associated hedged items, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for the use of the hedging instruments. This documentation includes linking the derivatives that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets or liabilities on our Balance Sheet, commitments or forecasted transactions. At the time a derivative contract is entered into, and at least quarterly, we assess whether the derivative item is effective in offsetting the changes in fair value or cash flows of the hedged items. The derivative qualifies for hedge accounting treatment if it is effective in substantially mitigating the risk it was designed to address.

It is not our intent to use financial derivatives or commodity instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

17.3 CREDIT RISK

We are exposed to counterparty credit risk in the event of non-performance by counterparties. In order to mitigate this risk, limits are set by our Board of Directors for counterparty transactions and we conduct regular monitoring of the credit standing of the counterparties or their guarantors. We do not anticipate any losses with respect to counterparty credit risk.

17.4 INTEREST RATE MANAGEMENT

17.4.1 Interest Rate Swaps

In 2003 and 2004, we entered into fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreements totalling US$200 million to convert a portion of our US$400-million 6.25 % notes to floating-rate debt. We pay an average floating rate that fluctuates quarterly based on LIBOR. These swaps expire in 2011 and are accounted for as a fair value hedge. Accounting for these notes at the floating interest rate increased “Interest expense” on our Statement of Consolidated Income by $1.1 million in 2007 (2006 – $0.7 million). At December 31, 2007, an unrealized gain, derived from the fair value of the swap, of $5.5 million was reflected in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” and “Deferred liabilities” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value was calculated utilizing swap, currency and basis-spread curves from Bloomberg. From January 1, 2007, the change in fair value of the swap is reflected in “Interest expense” in the Statement of Consolidated Income. These swaps are fully effective.

17.4.2 Interest and
Treasury Rate Locks

In the second quarter of 2007, CP entered into a bond forward totalling $350 million to fix the benchmark interest rate on certain long-term notes the Company expects to issue in the future. The effective portion of any gains or losses from this arrangement,


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			37

which is accounted for as a cash flow hedge, will be amortized to income as interest is paid on the related debt. At the end of 2007, we reclassified $2.3 million from “Other comprehensive income” to interest expense, largely as a result of the delay in issuing debt. At December 31, 2007, the fair value of the bond forward was a $30.6 million loss. This unrealized loss was reflected in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities”, with the offset, net of taxes, reflected in “AOCI” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of the bond forward was calculated using swap and basis spread curves from Bloomberg.

At December 31, 2007, net unamortized losses for previously settled interest and treasury rate locks of $2.0 million was reflected in “AOCI” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These gains and losses are being amortized to income as interest is paid on the related debt. The amortization of these gains and losses resulted in an increase in interest expense and a decrease in “Other comprehensive income” on the Statement of Consolidated Income of $3.2 million in 2007. The amortization of these net losses increased interest expense by $3.1 million in 2006.

17.5 FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT

We enter into foreign exchange risk management transactions primarily to manage fluctuations in the exchange rate between Canadian and US currencies. From time to time, we use foreign exchange forward contracts as part of our foreign exchange risk management strategy. We have designated a portion of our US dollar-denominated long-term debt as a hedge of our net investment in self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries.

17.5.1 Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts on Revenue

From time to time, we hedge a portion of our US dollar-denominated freight revenues earned in Canada by selling forward US dollars. We had no forward sales of US dollars outstanding at December 31, 2007 nor at December 31, 2006. “Freight revenues” on our Statement of Consolidated Income did not include any gain or loss on forward contracts for 2007 as no forward hedges settled, compared with realized gains of $3.9 million in 2006.

17.5.2 Currency Forward on Long-term Debt

In June 2007, the Company entered into a deliverable currency forward derivative agreement. This derivative will lock in the amount of Canadian dollars that the Company will repay when its US$400 million 6.25 % note matures in October 2011. At December 31, 2007, an unrealized loss, measured as the fair value of this derivative instrument, of $15.7 million was included in “Foreign exchange (gains) losses on long-term debt” on our Statement of Consolidated Income and “Deferred liabilities” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value was calculated by using the forward curve from Bloomberg and discounting the future cash flow using the applicable bond yield.

17.6 FUEL PRICE MANAGEMENT

Swaps and fuel cost recovery programs, together with fuel conservation practices, are the key elements of our program to manage the risk arising from fuel price volatility.

17.6.1 Crude Oil Swaps

From time to time, CP may enter into crude oil or heating oil swap contracts to help mitigate future price increases related to the

purchase of fuel. As both fuel purchases and commodity swap contracts have an element of FX variability, the company may also enter into FX forward contracts to manage this element of fuel-price risk. Gains and losses on the commodity swaps coupled with gains and losses on FX forward contracts partially offset changes in the cash cost of fuel.

Commodity swap contracts and FX forward contracts are accounted for as cash flow hedges. Unrealized gains or losses related to the effective portion of these swaps are deferred in “AOCI” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet until the related fuel purchases are realized, at which time the gains and losses are recorded in income.

The fair value of commodity swaps was derived using the current market value of WTI, as quoted by independent third parties. The fair value of foreign currency forward contracts was calculated utilizing forward curves from Bloomberg. These commodity swap contracts and forward contracts settle between 2008 and 2009.

At December 31, 2007, the fair value of our commodity swaps was $21.4 million resulting in the recognition of an unrealized gain in “Accounts receivable and other current assets” and “Other assets and deferred charges” with the offset, net of tax, reflected in “AOCI” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. During 2007, the change in fair value of $10.3 million, before tax, resulted in a decrease to “Other comprehensive income” on our Statement of Consolidated Income.

At December 31, 2007, the fair value of the forward purchases of US dollars was $3.5 million. This unrealized loss was recognized in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” and “Deferred liabilities” with the offset, net of tax, reflected in “AOCI” on our


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
38

Consolidated Balance Sheet. During 2007, the change in fair value of $0.4 million, before tax, resulted in a decrease to “Other Comprehensive Income” on our Statement of Consolidated Income.

In 2007, “Fuel expense” was reduced by $16.5 million (2006 – $29.1 million) as a result of $19.1 million in realized gains (2006 – $33.7 million) arising from settled swaps, partially offset by $2.6 million in realized losses (2006 – $4.6 million) arising from the settled FX forward contracts. Included in the $19.1 million realized gains on commodity swaps in 2007 were $1.7 million in realized gains from settled derivatives that were not designated as hedges.

For every US$1.00 increase in the price of WTI, fuel expense before hedging will increase by approximately $7 to $8 million, assuming current FX rates and fuel consumption levels. At December 31, 2007 we had fuel hedges for approximately 3 % and 2 % of our estimated fuel purchases in 2008 and 2009, respectively. There are no hedges in place for purchases in 2010 and beyond. We have a fuel risk mitigation program to moderate the impact of increases in fuel prices, which includes these swaps and fuel recoveries.

17.7 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE MANAGEMENT

17.7.1 Total Return Swap (“TRS”)

During May 2006, CP entered into a TRS to reduce the volatility and total cost to the Company over time of four stock-based compensation programs: share appreciation rights (“SAR”) and deferred share units (“DSU”), restricted share units (“RSU”) and performance share units (“PSU”) (discussed further in Section 21.6). The value of the TRS derivative is linked to the market value

of our stock. Unrealized gains and losses on the TRS partially offset the costs and benefits recognized in these stock-based compensation programs due to fluctuations in share price during the period the TRS is in place. “Compensation and Benefits” expense on our Statement of Consolidated Income included an unrealized loss on these swaps of $2.6 million in 2007 (2006 – unrealized losses of $1.2 million). At December 31, 2007, the unrealized loss of $3.8 million on the TRS was included in “Deferred liabilities” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

18.0 Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

18.1 SALE OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

We have sold through our accounts receivable securitization program a portion of our freight receivables to raise funds for operations. Under the program, which has a term of five years expiring in September 2009, we have sold an undivided co-ownership interest in $120.0 million of eligible freight receivables to an unrelated trust. The trust is a multi-seller trust and we are not the primary beneficiary. We may increase this sale amount up to a program limit of $200.0 million.

At December 31, 2007, the outstanding undivided co-ownership interest held by an unrelated trust under our accounts receivable securitization program was $120.0 million (2006 – $120.0 million). Losses of $5.8 million on the securitization program in 2007 (2006 – losses of $5.0 million) were included in “Other income and charges” on our Statement of Consolidated Income.

We provide a credit enhancement amount to absorb all credit losses. The trust has no recourse to the co-ownership interest

in receivables that we retain, other than in respect of the credit enhancement amount. This amount was recognized as a retained interest. At December 31, 2007, the fair value of the retained interest was approximately 18.7 % of the receivables sold, or $22.5 million (2006 – fair value of approximately 19.1 %, or $22.9 million) and was included in “Accounts receivable and other current assets” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of the retained interest approximated the carrying value as a result of the short collection cycle of the receivables and expected credit losses amounting to less than 0.05 % of total receivables. Proceeds from collections reinvested in the accounts receivable securitization program were $1,478.9 million for 2007, compared with $1,475.7 million for 2006. Receivables funded under the securitization program may not include delinquent, defaulted or written-off receivables, or receivables that do not meet certain obligor-specific criteria, including concentrations in excess of prescribed limits. We maintain an adequate allowance for doubtful accounts based on expected collectibility of accounts receivable. Credit losses are based on specific identification of uncollectible accounts and the application of historical percentages by aging category. At December 31, 2007, allowances of $18.4 million (2006 – $19.2 million) were recorded in “Accounts receivable”. In 2007, $2.7 million (2006 – $6.5 million) of accounts receivable were written off to “Purchased services and other”.

We have retained the responsibility for servicing, administering and collecting freight receivables sold. Even though we act as collector of all of the securitized receivables, we have no claim against the trust’s co-ownership interest in the securitized


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			39

receivables. We do not receive a fee for our servicing responsibilities. The benefits we receive for servicing the receivables approximate the related costs. The average servicing period is approximately one month. At December 31, 2007, a servicing asset of $0.1 million (2006 – $0.1 million) and a servicing liability of $0.1 million (2006 – $0.1 million) were recorded.

The securitization program is subject to our standard reporting and credit-rating requirements. This includes provision of a monthly portfolio report that the pool of eligible receivables satisfies pre-established criteria that are reviewed and approved by DBRS and are standard for agreements of this nature. Failure to comply with these provisions would trigger termination of the program. In the event the program is terminated prior to maturity, we expect to have sufficient liquidity remaining in our revolving credit facility to meet our payment obligations. We have complied with all termination tests during the program.

18.2 GUARANTEES

At December 31, 2007 we have certain guarantees, including, but not limited to, residual value guarantees on certain leased equipment, of $321.7 million, compared with $442.5 million at December 31, 2006. In addition, we have residual value guarantees of $11.0 million related to our investment in DM&E at December 31, 2007. Management estimates that we will have no

net payments under these residual guarantees. We have accrued for all guarantees where performance under these guarantees is expected (discussed further in Note 22 to the 2007 annual financial statements). These accruals do not include any amounts for residual value guarantees.

19.0 Acquisition

19.1 DAKOTA, MINNESOTA & EASTERN RAILROAD CORPORATION

In September 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of DM&E, a Class II railroad with approximately 2,500 miles of track in the US Midwest and primary customers in agri-products and merchandise. DM&E is connected to the CP network at Minneapolis, Chicago and Winona. DM&E has connections to and traffic interchanges with all seven Class I railroads and is proximate to the Powder River Basin (“PRB”), which contains the largest deposit of low-cost, low-sulphur coal in North America.

Effective October 4, 2007, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of DM&E for a purchase price of approximately US$1.5 billion, including acquisition costs. Future contingent payments of up to US$1.05 billion, may become payable up to December 31, 2025 upon the achievement of certain milestones towards the completion of a track expansion into the

PRB and the achievement of certain traffic volume targets. Any contingent payments that may be made would be recorded as additional goodwill. The acquisition has been financed with cash on hand and debt (discussed further in Section 15.3).

The purchase is subject to review and approval by the US Surface Transportation Board (“STB”), during which time the shares of DM&E have been placed in a voting trust. The Company anticipates that the STB will complete its review and provide a final ruling during 2008. During the review period, the investment in the DM&E will be accounted for on an equity basis. Equity income for the three months and year ended December 31, 2007 of $12.3 million has been included in “Other income and charges”.

If the proposed transaction is approved by the STB, the acquisition will be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Under this method, the Company will prepare its consolidated financial statements reflecting a line-by-line consolidation of DM&E and the allocation of the purchase price to acquire DM&E to the fair values of their assets and liabilities.

The Company is in the process of obtaining third-party valuations of certain assets. Preliminary purchase price allocation is disclosed in Note 11 to the 2007 annual financial statements.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
40

20.0 Contractual Commitments

The accompanying table indicates our known obligations and commitments to make future payments for contracts, such as debt and capital lease and commercial arrangements.

PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD


					1 – 3		3 – 5		After
Contractual commitments at December 31, 2007 (in millions)	Total		< 1 year		years		years		5 years



Long-term debt	$	3,944.4	$	22.7	$	1,650.8	$	459.8	$	1,811.1
Capital lease obligations		277.0		8.3		32.9		13.8		222.0
Operating lease obligations ⁽¹⁾		661.1		129.4		169.4		128.8		233.5
Supplier purchase obligations		693.5		171.9		189.7		143.4		188.5
Other long-term liabilities reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheet ⁽²⁾		2,749.2		123.4		206.9		184.5		2,234.4

Total contractual obligations	$	8,325.2	$	455.7	$	2,249.7	$	930.3	$	4,689.5

⁽¹⁾ Residual value guarantees on certain leased equipment with a maximum exposure of $332.7 million (discussed in Section 18.2) are not included in the minimum payments shown above, as management estimates that we will not be required to make payments under these residual guarantees.

⁽²⁾ Includes expected cash payments for restructuring, environmental remediation, asset retirement obligations, post-retirement benefits, workers’ compensation benefits, long-term disability benefits, pension benefit payments for our non-registered supplemental pension plans, future income tax liabilities and certain other deferred liabilities. Projected payments for post-retirement benefits, workers’ compensation benefits and long-term disability benefits include the anticipated payments for years 2008 to 2016. Pension contributions for our registered pension plans are not included due to the volatility in calculating them. Pension payments are discussed further in Section 21.9. Future income tax liabilities may vary according to changes in tax rates, tax regulations and the operating results of the Company. As the cash impact in any particular year cannot be reasonably determined, all long-term future tax liabilities have been reflected in the “after 5 years” category in this table. Future income taxes are further discussed in Section 23.4.

21.0 Future Trends and Commitments

21.1 CHANGE IN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Effective April 3, 2007, Executive Vice-President, Operations, Neal Foot retired.

On June 1, 2007, Kathryn McQuade joined CP as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.

21.2 AGREEMENTS AND RECENT DEVELOPMENT

During the first half of 2007, we announced our intention to assemble a rail corridor to access the Alberta Industrial Heartland northeast of Edmonton that serves the Alberta oil sands development.

During the second quarter of 2007, CP negotiated two new partnership agreements for the management of the railway’s information technology application

development and support. The agreements represent a corporate outsourcing initiative and are intended to improve CP’s information technology cost structure while providing capability and quality enhancement.

21.3 INTEGRATED OPERATING PLAN

Our IOP is the foundation for our scheduled railway operations, through which we strive to provide quality service for customers and improve asset utilization to achieve high levels of efficiency. The key principles upon which our IOP is built include moving freight cars across the network with as few handlings as possible, creating balance in directional flow of trains in our corridors by day of week, and minimizing the time that locomotives and freight cars are idle.

Under our IOP, trains are scheduled to run consistently at times agreed upon with our customers. To accomplish this, we establish

a plan for each rail car that covers its entire trip from point of origin to final destination. Cars with similar destinations are consolidated into blocks. This reduces delays at intermediate locations by simplifying processes for employees, eliminating the duplication of work and helping to ensure traffic moves fluidly through rail yards and terminals. These measures improve transit times for shipments throughout our network and increase car availability for customers. Our IOP also increases efficiency by more effectively scheduling employee shifts, locomotive maintenance, track repair and material supply.

We have capitalized on the new capabilities of our network, our upgraded locomotive fleet and the IOP to operate longer and heavier trains. This has reduced associated expenses, simplified the departure of shipments from points of origin and provided lower-cost capacity for growth.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			41

We are committed to continuously improving scheduled railway operations as a means to achieve additional efficiencies that will enable further growth without the need to incur significant capital expenditures to accommodate the growth. During 2007, execution of our IOP generated productivity and efficiency improvements that reduced expenses in key areas, while improving service reliability to support rate increases and grow market share. Areas of expense reduction included labour, purchased services and equipment costs.

21.4 CANADIAN GOVERNMENT COVERED HOPPER CARS

CP transports grain throughout North America in covered hopper cars. The overall covered hopper fleet consists of owned, leased and managed freight cars. The managed segment consists of cars provided by federal and provincial governments for the purpose of transporting regulated grain. In 2006, the Canadian federal government announced its intention to retain ownership of its cars and negotiate new operating agreements with CP. The new operating agreement with CP became effective July 1, 2007 and sets out the terms and operating conditions governing approximately 6,300 federal covered hopper cars allocated to CP.

21.5 SALE OF LATTA SUBDIVISION

On May 26, 2006, the STB approved the sale of our Latta subdivision to Indiana Rail Road Co. (“INRD”). The Latta subdivision, located in the State of Indiana, is a rail line between Fayette, near Terre Haute, and Bedford. The sale also included rights of INRD to use certain track of CSX Transportation between Chicago, Illinois, and Louisville, Kentucky. INRD assumed all rail operations on the line beginning May 27, 2006. The sale of this

portion of our operations did not materially impact our financial results. This sale was not segregated as a discontinued operation on our financial statements because it did not generate its own identifiable cash flow. Total annual carloads associated with this subdivision were approximately 54,000, of which approximately 40,000 were for coal traffic. The carloads affected were for relatively short distances on CP. CP recognized an $18 million gain from the sale of our Latta subdivision.

21.6 STOCK PRICE

The market value of our Common Shares increased $2.82 per share on the Toronto Stock Exchange in 2007 (from $61.40 to $64.22). The market value of our Common Shares increased $12.69 per share on the Toronto Stock Exchange in 2006 (from $48.71 to $61.40). These changes in share price caused corresponding increases in the value of our outstanding SARs, DSUs, RSUs and PSUs in both years. Effective the second quarter of 2006, we put in place a TRS (discussed in Section 17.7.1) to mitigate gains and losses associated with the effect of our share price on the SARs, DSUs, RSUs and PSUs. Excluding the impact of our TRS, the cost of our SARs, DSUs, RSUs and PSUs was $13.7 million in 2007 based on the change in share price during 2007. This cost was $32.4 million in 2006 based on the change in the share price during 2006.

21.7 ENVIRONMENTAL

In 2004, we recorded a $90.9 million charge for costs associated with investigation, characterization, remediation and other applicable actions related to environmental contamination at a CP-owned property in the US, which includes areas previously leased to third parties.

In 2005, we reached a binding settlement in relation to a lawsuit with a potentially responsible party involving portions of past environmental contamination at the above-mentioned property in the US. The lawsuit against this other party has been dismissed and the party has accepted responsibility for designated portions of the property and paid us a settlement sum in partial payment of the response costs we have incurred.

As a result of the settlement, we were able to reverse accrued liabilities related to the property and recognize a total reduction of $33.9 million to the special charges accrued in prior years. Under applicable accounting rules, this reduction could not be recognized until the outcome of the lawsuit or any binding settlement with the other responsible party became known.

We continue to be responsible for remediation work on portions of a property in the State of Minnesota and continue to retain liability accruals for remaining future expected costs. The costs are expected to be incurred over approximately 10 years. The state’s voluntary investigation and remediation program will oversee the work to ensure it is completed in accordance with applicable standards.

21.8 CERTAIN OTHER FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS

In addition to the financial commitments mentioned previously in Section 18.0 and Section 20.0, we are party to certain other financial commitments set forth in the adjacent table and discussed opposite.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
42

CERTAIN OTHER FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS


	Amount of commitment per period
					2009 &		2011 &		2013 &
At December 31, 2007 (in millions)	Total		2008		2010		2012		beyond



Letters of credit	$	337.3	$	337.3	$	–	$	–	$	–
Capital commitments		504.2		278.7		68.2		47.3		110.0
Offset financial liability		190.3		190.3		–		–		–

Total commitments	$	1,031.8	$	806.3	$	68.2	$	47.3	$	110.0

21.8.1 Letters of Credit

Letters of credit are obtained mainly to provide security to third parties as part of various agreements, such as required by our workers’ compensation and pension fund requirements. We are liable for these contract amounts in the case of non-performance under these agreements. As a result, our available line of credit is adjusted for contractual amounts obtained through letters of credit currently included within our revolving credit facility.

21.8.2 Capital Commitments

We remain committed to maintaining our current high level of plant quality and renewing our franchise. As part of this commitment, we are obligated to make various capital purchases related to track programs, locomotive acquisitions and overhauls, freight cars, and land. At December 31, 2007, we had multi-year capital commitments of $504.2 million in the form of signed contracts, largely for locomotive overhaul agreements. Payments for these commitments are due in 2008 through 2016. These expenditures are expected to be financed by cash generated from operations or by issuing new debt.

21.8.3 Offset Financial Liability

We entered into a bank loan to finance the acquisition of certain equipment. This loan is offset by a financial asset with the same institution. At December 31, 2007, the loan had a balance of $195.4 million, offset

by a financial asset of $190.3 million. The remainder is included in “Long-term debt” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

21.9 PENSION PLAN DEFICIT

The defined benefit pension plans’ deficit was $415.3 million as at December 31, 2007. A plan surplus or deficit is calculated as the difference between an actuarially estimated future obligation for pension payments and the fair market value of the assets available to pay this liability. The pension obligation is discounted using a discount rate that is a blended interest rate of high-quality corporate debt instruments. The discount rate is one of the factors that can influence a plan’s deficit. Other factors include the actual return earned on the assets, and rates used, based on management’s best estimates, for future salary increases and inflation.

We estimate that every 1.0 percentage point increase (or decrease) in the discount rate can cause our defined benefit pension plans’ deficit to decrease (or increase) by approximately $625 million, reflecting the changes to both the pension obligations and the value of the pension funds’ debt securities. Similarly, for every 1.0 percentage point the actual return on assets varies above (or below) the estimated return for the year, the deficit would decrease (or increase) by approximately $75 million. Adverse experience with respect to these factors could eventually increase funding and pension expense significantly, while

favourable experience with respect to these factors could eventually decrease funding and pension expense significantly.

Between 47 % and 53 % of the plans’ assets are invested in public equity securities. As a result, stock market performance is the key driver in determining the pension funds’ asset performance. Most of the plans’ remaining assets are invested in debt securities, which, as mentioned above, provide a partial offset to the increase (or decrease) in our pension deficit caused by decreases (or increases) in the discount rate.

The deficit will fluctuate according to future market conditions and funding will be revised as necessary to reflect such fluctuations. We will continue to make contributions to the pension plans that, as a minimum, meet pension legislative requirements.

We made contributions of $86.4 million to the defined benefit pension plans in 2007, compared with $209.5 million in 2006.

The minimum 2008 contribution requirement for our main pension plan will be set out in an updated actuarial valuation as at January 1, 2008 (to be finalized in June 2008). At this time, we expect our pension contribution in 2008 to be similar to 2007. Future pension contributions will be highly dependent on our actual experience with such variables as investment returns, interest rate fluctuations and demographic changes, as well as on any changes in the regulatory environment.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			43

21.10 RESTRUCTURING

Restructuring initiatives were announced in 2003 and 2005 to improve efficiency in our administrative areas by eliminating 1,220 management and administrative positions. The total targeted reductions for these initiatives were successfully achieved by the end of the third quarter of 2006. We will continue to hire selectively in specific areas of the business, as required by growth or changes in traffic patterns.

Cash payments related to severance under all restructuring initiatives and to our environmental remediation program (described in Section 23.1) totalled $61.0 million in 2007, compared with $96.3 million in 2006 and $69.0 million in 2005. Payments relating to all restructuring liabilities amounted to $47.0 million, compared with $76.8 million in 2006 and $50.6 in 2005. Payments relating to the labour liabilities were $46.8 million in 2007, compared with $71.8 million in 2006 and $50.5 million in 2005.

Cash payments for restructuring and environmental initiatives are estimated to be $61 million in 2008, $42 million in 2009, $35 million in 2010, and a total of $122 million over the remaining years through 2025, which will be paid in decreasing amounts. All payments will be funded from general operations. Of these amounts, cash payments related only to the restructuring initiatives are expected to be $41 million in 2008, $25 million in 2009, $21 million in 2010, and a total of $53 million over the remaining years through 2025. These amounts include residual payments to protected employees for previous restructuring plans that have been completed.

21.11 INDEMNIFICATIONS

liabilities, damages, costs and expenses arising out of the performance of the trustee’s obligations under the agreement, except as a result of misconduct by the trustee. The indemnity includes liabilities, costs or expenses relating to any legal reporting or notification obligations of the trustee with respect to the defined contribution option of the pension plans or otherwise with respect to the assets of the pension plans that are not part of the fund. The indemnity survives the termination or expiry of the agreement with respect to claims and liabilities arising prior to the termination or expiry. At December 31, 2007, we had not recorded a liability associated with this indemnification, as we do not expect to make any payments pertaining to it.

Pursuant to our by-laws, we indemnify all our current and former directors and officers. In addition to the indemnity provided for in our by-laws, we also indemnify our directors and officers pursuant to indemnity agreements. We carry a liability insurance policy for directors and officers, subject to a maximum coverage limit and certain deductibles in cases where a director or officer is reimbursed for any loss covered by the policy.

22.0 Business Risks and Enterprise Risk Management

In the normal course of our operations, we are exposed to various business risks and uncertainties that can have an effect on our financial condition. While some financial exposures are reduced through insurance and hedging programs we have in place, there are certain cases where the financial risks are not fully insurable or are driven by external factors beyond our influence or control.

As part of the preservation and delivery of value to our shareholders, we have developed an integrated Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) framework to support consistent achievement of key business objectives through daily pro-active management of risk. The objective of the

program is to identify events that result from risks, thereby requiring active management. Each event identified is assessed based on the potential severity and the ability of the risk to impact our financial position and reputation, taking into account existing management control and likelihood. Risk mitigation strategies are formulated to accept, treat, transfer, or eliminate the exposure to the identified events.

The following is a discussion of key areas of business risks and uncertainties that we have identified through our ERM framework and our mitigating strategies. The risk areas below are listed in no particular order, as risks are evaluated on both severity and probability. Readers are cautioned that the following is not an exhaustive list of all the risks we are exposed to, nor will our mitigation strategies eliminate all risks listed.

22.1 COMPETITION

We face significant competition for freight transportation in Canada and the US, including competition from other railways and trucking companies. We are subject to competition for freight traffic from other Class I railways, particularly Canadian National Railway Company (“CN”), Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway, CSX Corporation, Norfolk Southern Corporation and Union Pacific Corporation. Competition is based mainly on price, quality of service and access to markets. Competition with the trucking industry is generally based on freight rates, flexibility of service and transit time performance. The cost structure and service of our competitors could impact our competition and have a materially adverse impact on our business or operating results.

To mitigate competition risk, our strategies include:

□

creating long-term value for customers, shareholders and employees by profitably growing within the reach of our rail franchise and through strategic additions to enhance access to markets and quality of service;


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
44

□		improving handling through IOP to reduce costs and enhance quality of service; and

□		exercising a disciplined yield approach to competitive contract renewals and bids.

22.2 LIQUIDITY

CP has long term debt ratings of Baa3, BBB, and BBB from Moody’s, S&P, and DBRS respectively. The ratings of Moody’s and DBRS have a stable outlook. The S&P rating has a negative outlook.

CP has the following liquidity lines available:

□		a five year revolving credit facility of $945 million, with an accordion feature to $1,150 million, of which $408 million was available on December 31, 2007. The facility expires in December 2012;

□		an accounts receivable securitization program that provides up to $200 million in invested amount. On December 31, 2007, $80 million in available capacity remained. The program expires in September 2009; and

□		an 18 month US$1.8 billion temporary credit facility to acquire the DM&E. On October 4, 2007, US$1.27 billion was drawn to close the transaction. The facility expires in April 2009.

These facilities are arranged with a core group of highly rated international banks. They incorporate pre-agreed pricing. The revolving credit facility and the temporary credit facility are available on next day terms. The accounts receivable securitization program capacity is available on five days notice.

CP plans to access both Canadian and US capital markets to secure long term financing for the temporary credit facility. Market conditions allowing, CP will access debt capital markets in various maturities periodically prior to the expiry of the temporary credit facility in order to minimize risk and optimize pricing. It is CP’s intention to manage its long term financing structure to maintain

its investment grade rating. CP may decide to enter certain derivative instruments to reduce interest rate and foreign exchange exposure in advance of these issuances.

Surplus cash is invested into a range of short dated money market instruments meeting or exceeding the parameters of our investment policy.

22.3 ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS
AND REGULATIONS

Our operations and real estate assets are subject to extensive federal, provincial, state and local environmental laws and regulations governing emissions to the air, discharges to waters and the handling, storage, transportation and disposal of waste and other materials. If we are found to have violated such laws or regulations it could materially affect our business or operating results. In addition, in operating a railway, it is possible that releases of hazardous waste or materials and derailments or other accidents may occur that could cause harm to human health or to the environment. Costs of remediation, damages and changes in regulations could materially affect our operating results and reputation.

We have implemented a comprehensive Environmental Management System, to facilitate the reduction of environmental risk. An annual Corporate Environmental Plan states our environmental goals, objectives, strategies and tactics.

Specific environmental programs are in place to address areas such as air emissions, wastewater, management of vegetation, chemicals and waste, storage tanks and fuelling facilities. We also undertake environmental impact assessments. There is continued focus on preventing spills and other incidents that have a negative impact on the environment. There is an established Strategic Emergency Response Contractor network and spill equipment kits located across Canada and the US to ensure a

rapid and efficient response in the event of an environmental incident. In addition, emergency preparedness and response plans are regularly updated and tested.

We have developed an environmental audit program that comprehensively, systematically and regularly assesses our facilities for compliance with legal requirements and our policies for conformance to accepted industry standards. Included in this is a corrective action follow-up process and semi-annual review by the Environmental and Safety Committee established by the Board of Directors.

We focus on key strategies, identifying tactics and actions to support commitments to the community. Our strategies include:

□		protecting the environment;

□		ensuring compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations;

□		promoting awareness and training;

□		managing emergencies through preparedness; and

□		encouraging involvement, consultation and dialogue with communities along our lines.

22.4 REGULATORY AUTHORITIES

22.4.1 Regulatory Change

Our railway operations are subject to extensive federal laws, regulations and rules in both Canada and the US which directly affect how we manage many aspects of our railway operation and business activities. Our operations are primarily regulated by the Canadian Transport Agency (“Agency”) and Transport Canada in Canada and the FRA and STB in the US. Various other federal regulators directly and indirectly affect our operations in areas such as health, safety, security and environment and other matters, all of which may affect our business or operating results.

The Canada Transportation Act (“CTA”) contains shipper rate and service remedies, including final-offer arbitration, competitive


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			45

line rates, and compulsory inter-switching. These shipper protections also extend to western Canadian grain transportation.

In Canada, Bill C-11, legislation amending the CTA, was passed and is now in effect as law. These amendments include, but are not limited to, amendments concerning the grain revenue cap, commuter and passenger access, and railway noise. The grain revenue cap is a cap imposed by Canadian federal law on the amount of revenue we may earn for the transportation of certain grain from western Canada to Vancouver for export or to Thunder Bay. The resulting grain revenue cap adjustment calculation reflecting the change in the cost of maintaining grain hopper cars has been issued by the Agency. The Agency has decided that the grain revenue cap should be adjusted down by $2.59 per tonne retroactive to August 1, 2007. CP has announced its intention to appeal this decision. Noise complaints have been filed with the Agency, and these noise complaints have been resolved through mediation. There is no assurance as to the impact of these guidelines and any future complaints filed on CP. Amendments concerning Final Offer Arbitration, agency review of the reasonableness of ancillary services and other shipper issues have been introduced by the Canadian federal government in Bill C-8. It is expected that Bill C-8 will become law in 2008. No assurance can be given as to the effect on CP of the provisions of Bill C-11 or C-8 or as to the content, timing or effect on CP of any anticipated additional legislation.

The FRA has jurisdiction over safety-related aspects of our railway operations in the US. State and local regulatory agencies may also exercise limited jurisdiction over certain safety and operational matters of local significance.

The commercial aspects of CP’s railway operations in the US are subject to regulation by the STB. The STB has published new rules

for the imposition of fuel surcharges and has promulgated proposed new rules for the handling of disputes by small and medium shippers. It is too early to assess the possible impact on CP of new rules and any rules or regulation which might be forthcoming as a result of current STB reviews.

To mitigate statutory and regulatory impacts, we are actively and extensively engaged throughout the different levels of government and regulators, both directly and indirectly through industry associations, including the Association of American Railroads (“AAR”) and the Railway Association of Canada (“RAC”).

22.4.2 Security

We are subject to statutory and regulatory directives in the US that address security concerns. Because CP plays a critical role in the North American transportation system, our rail lines, facilities, and equipment, including rail cars carrying hazardous materials, could be direct targets or indirect casualties of terrorist attacks. Future decisions by the US government on security matters or decisions by the industry in response to security threats to the North American rail network could have a materially adverse effect on our business or operating results. In addition, insurance premiums for some or all of our current coverage could increase significantly, or certain coverage may not be available to us in the future.

We strive to ensure our customers have unlimited access to North American markets by working closely with Canadian and US regulators and other railways to facilitate the safe and secure movement of goods between Canada and the US We also take all necessary precautions to prevent smuggling or other illegal activities. We have taken the following steps to reduce the risks associated with the cross-border transportation of goods:

□

we are a certified carrier with the US Customs and Border Protection’s (“CBP”)

		Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (“C-TPAT”) and Partners in Protection (“PIP”) programs that seek to strengthen overall supply chain and border security;

□		we are an approved carrier in Canada Border Services Agency (“CBSA”) programs to streamline clearance at the border for imports from the US;

□		we have implemented several regulatory security frameworks that focus on the provision of advanced electronic cargo information and improved security technology at border crossings, including the implementation of Vehicle and Cargo Inspection System (“VACIS”) at five of our border crossings;

□		we have also worked with the AAR to develop and put in place an extensive industry-wide security plan to address terrorism and security-driven efforts seeking to restrict the routings and operational handlings of certain hazardous materials; and

□		we are working with the Transport Security Administration to reduce toxic inhalation risk in high threat urban areas.

22.5 LABOUR RELATIONS

Certain of our union agreements are currently under renegotiation. We cannot guarantee these negotiations will be resolved in a timely manner or on favourable terms. Work stoppage may occur if the negotiations are not resolved, which could materially impact business or operating results.

At December 31, 2007, approximately 79 % of our workforce was unionized and approximately 81 % of our workforce was located in Canada. Unionized employees are represented by a total of 34 bargaining units. Agreements are in place with all of seven bargaining units that represent our employees in Canada and 14 of 27 bargaining units that


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
46

represent employees in our US operations. The following is a negotiations status summary:

22.5.1 Canada

□		On January 26, 2008, CP and the Canadian Auto Workers (“CAW”), representing employees who maintain and repair locomotives and freight cars, reached a tentative three-year agreement extending through to the end of 2010. This agreement was ratified on February 15, 2008.

□		On December 5, 2007, CP and the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference (“TCRC-RTE”), which represents employees who operate trains, reached a tentative five-year agreement extending through to the end of 2011. This agreement was ratified on February 13, 2008.

□		On July 18, 2007, a three-year agreement extending through to December 31, 2009 with the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference (“TCRC-MWED”), which represents employees who maintain track infrastructure and perform capital programs, was ratified.

□		A five-year collective agreement with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, representing signal maintainers, extends to the end of 2009.

□		A four-year collective agreement with the Canadian Pacific Police Association, representing CP Police sergeants and constables, extends to the end of 2009.

□		A three-year agreement with the Steelworkers Union, representing intermodal operation and clerical employees extends to the end of 2009.

□		A three-year collective agreements, with the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference, Rail Canada Traffic Controllers, representing employees who control train traffic, extends to the end of 2008.

22.5.2 US

We are party to collective agreements with 14 bargaining units of our Soo Line Railroad Company (“Soo Line”) subsidiary and 13 bargaining units of our Delaware and Hudson Railway (“D&H”) subsidiary. Most US Class I railroads negotiate labour agreements collectively on a national basis. Soo Line and D&H have elected to negotiate independently of the national bargaining process.

With respect to Soo Line, negotiations are underway with four bargaining units representing track maintainers, conductors, car repair employees, and sheet metal workers. Agreements with the bargaining unit representing locomotive engineers, train dispatchers, yard supervisors, clerks, machinists, boilermaker and blacksmiths, mechanical supervisors, electricians and signal repair employees extends through 2009. A tentative agreement with the bargaining unit representing mechanical labourers is subject to ratification.

D&H has agreements in place with five unions representing mechanical supervisors, mechanical labourers, machinists, police and yard supervisors. Negotiations are underway with electricians, track maintainers, conductors, locomotive engineers, clerks, signal repair employees and engineering supervisors. A tentative agreement with the bargaining unit representing car repairers is subject to ratification.

22.6 NETWORK CAPACITY
AND VOLUME

Our operating and hence financial position are subject to capacity constraints and fluctuations in traffic volumes:

22.6.1 Capacity

Significant increases in rail traffic volumes have created capacity challenges for North American railways. In particular, a rapid surge in exports and imports has created pressure on railway systems to and from the Pacific Coast. In 2005, we completed a major expansion

of our track network in western Canada between the prairies and the Port of Vancouver on the Pacific Coast. Any further expansion will be tied to ongoing market conditions and the continuation of a stable regulatory environment in Canada. We are also maximizing our freight handling capacity by acquiring new and more powerful locomotives and replacing older freight cars with more efficient and higher-capacity freight cars.

In January 2006, CP and CN entered into an agreement, which assists in the optimization of railway infrastructure in the lower mainland of BC.

22.6.2 Volume

We have a substantial investment in fixed plant and equipment and, therefore, have a limited ability to adjust production levels in response to significant and short-term declines in traffic volumes, potentially resulting in a cyclical adverse impact on predicted future earnings levels. However, we actively manage our processes and resources to control variable costs, increase efficiency and mitigate the negative effects of declines in freight traffic.

We will continue our focus on quality revenue growth and cost management, as well as improved utilization of our asset base.

22.7 FINANCIAL RISKS

22.7.1 Pension Funding
Status Volatility

Our main Canadian defined benefit pension plan can produce significant volatility in pension funding requirements, given the pension fund’s $7.5 billion size, the differing drivers of the pension asset and liability values, and Canadian statutory pension funding requirements. CP has made several changes to the plan’s investment policy over the last several years to reduce this volatility, without increasing the expected long-term costs of maintaining this plan. These investment policy changes include: reducing the plan’s public equity markets exposure,


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			47

with the funds redirected to less volatile Canadian commercial real estate and private market infrastructure; increasing the duration of the plan’s fixed income assets so as to better match the sensitivity of the plan’s liabilities to interest rate movements; and hedging approximately 50 % of the plan’s foreign currency exposure.

22.7.2 Fuel Cost Volatility

Fuel expense constitutes a significant portion of CP’s operating costs and can be influenced by a number of factors such as geopolitical events, weather, or unplanned infrastructure failures.

Our mitigation strategy includes a fuel cost recovery program and from time to time derivative instruments (specific instruments currently used are discussed further in Section 17.6). While fluctuations in fuel cost are mitigated, the risk cannot be completely eliminated due to timing and the volatility in the market.

22.7.3 Foreign Exchange Risk

Although we conduct our business primarily in Canada, a significant portion of our revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities including debt are denominated in US dollars. Consequently, our results are affected by fluctuations in the exchange rate between these currencies. The value of the Canadian dollar is affected by a number of domestic and international factors, including, without limitation, economic performance, Canadian, US and international monetary policies and US debt levels. Changes in the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and other currencies (including the US dollar) make the goods transported by us more or less competitive in the world marketplace and, in turn, positively or negatively affect our revenues and expenses. To manage this exposure to fluctuations in exchange rates between Canadian and US dollars, we may sell or purchase US dollar forwards at fixed rates in future periods. To the extent that exchange rates decline below the rate fixed

by forward contracts (Canadian dollar strengthening relative to the US dollar), we will not receive the full benefit of these contracts to purchase US dollars. If we sell the US dollar forward, we will not receive the full benefit should the exchange rate increase (Canadian dollar weakening relative to the US dollar) above the fixed rate of the forward contract. Foreign exchange management is discussed further in Section 17.5.

22.7.4 Interest Rate Risk

In order to meet our capital structure requirements, we may enter into long-term debt agreements. These debt agreements expose us to increased interest costs on future fixed debt instruments and existing variable rate debt instruments should market rates increase. In addition, the present value of our assets and liabilities will also vary with interest rate changes. To manage our interest rate exposure, we may enter into forward rate agreements such as treasury rate locks or bond forwards that lock in rates for a future date, thereby protecting ourselves against interest rate increases. We may also enter into swap agreements whereby one party agrees to pay a fixed rate of interest while the other party pays a floating rate. Contingent on the direction of interest rates, we may incur higher costs depending on our contracted rate. Interest rate management is discussed further in Section 17.4.

22.8 GENERAL AND OTHER RISKS

There are factors and developments that are beyond the influence or control of the railway industry generally and CP specifically which may have a material adverse effect on our business or operating results. Our freight volumes and revenues are largely dependent upon the performance of the North American and global economies, which remains uncertain, and other factors affecting the volumes and patterns of international trade. We are also sensitive to factors including, but not limited to, natural disasters, security threats, weather, insect populations,

commodity pricing, global supply and demand, and supply chain efficiency, as well as developments affecting North America’s agricultural, mining, forest products, consumer products, import/export and automotive sectors.

23.0 Critical
Accounting Estimates

To prepare financial statements that conform with Canadian GAAP, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Using the most current information available, we review our estimates on an ongoing basis, including those related to environmental liabilities, pensions and other benefits, property, plant and equipment, future income taxes, and legal and personal injury liabilities.

The development, selection and disclosure of these estimates, and this MD&A, have been reviewed by the Board of Directors’ Audit, Finance and Risk Management Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors.

23.1 ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES

We estimate the probable costs to be incurred in the remediation of property contaminated by past railway use. We screen and classify sites according to typical activities and scale of operations conducted, and we develop remediation strategies for each property based on the nature and extent of the contamination, as well as the location of the property and surrounding areas that may be adversely affected by the presence of contaminants. We also consider available technologies, treatment and disposal facilities and the acceptability of site-specific plans based on the local regulatory environment. Site-specific plans range from containment


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
48

and risk management of the contaminants through to the removal and treatment of the contaminants and affected soils and ground water. The details of the estimates reflect the environmental liability at each property. We are committed to fully meeting our regulatory and legal obligations with respect to environmental matters.

Liabilities for environmental remediation may change from time to time as new information about previously untested sites becomes known. The net liability may also vary as the courts decide legal proceedings against outside parties responsible for contamination. These potential charges, which cannot be quantified at this time, are not expected to be material to our financial position, but may materially affect income in the period in which a charge is recognized. Material increases to costs would be reflected as increases to “Deferred liabilities” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and to “Special charges” within operating expenses on our Statement of Consolidated Income.

At December 31, 2007, the accrual for environmental remediation on our Consolidated Balance Sheet amounted to $104.0 million, of which the long-term portion amounting to $84.2 million was included in “Deferred liabilities” and the short-term portion amounting to $19.8 million was included in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities”. Costs incurred under our environmental remediation program are charged against the accrual. Total payments were $14.0 million in 2007 and $19.5 million in 2006. The US dollar-denominated portion of the liability was affected by the change in FX, resulting in a decrease in environmental liabilities of $9.7 million in 2007 and $0.2 million in 2006.

23.2 PENSIONS AND OTHER BENEFITS

We have defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans. Other benefits include post-retirement medical and life insurance for pensioners, and some post-employment workers’ compensation and

long-term disability benefits in Canada. Workers’ compensation benefits are described in Section 23.5. Pension and post-retirement benefits liabilities are subject to various external influences and uncertainties, as described in Section 21.9.

Pension costs are actuarially determined using the projected-benefit method prorated over the credited service periods of employees. This method incorporates our best estimates of expected plan investment performance, salary escalation and retirement ages of employees. The expected return on fund assets is calculated using market-related asset values developed from a five-year average of market values for the fund’s public equity securities (with each prior year’s market value adjusted to the current date for assumed investment income during the intervening period) plus the market value of the fund’s fixed income, real estate and infrastructure securities. The discount rate we use to determine the benefit obligation is based on market interest rates on high-quality corporate debt instruments with matching cash flows. Unrecognized actuarial gains and losses in excess of 10 % of the greater of the benefit obligation and the market-related value of plan assets are amortized over the expected average remaining service period of active employees expected to receive benefits under the plan (approximately 11 years). Prior service costs arising from plan amendments are amortized over the expected average remaining service period of active employees who were expected to receive benefits under the plan at the date of amendment. A transitional asset and obligation, which arose from implementing the CICA Accounting Standard Section 3461 “Employee Future Benefits” effective January 1, 2000, are being amortized over the expected average remaining service period of active employees who were expected to receive benefits under the plan at January 1, 2000 (approximately 13 years).

“Other assets and deferred charges” on our

December 31, 2007 Consolidated Balance Sheet included prepaid pension costs of $1,103.1 million. This accrued benefit asset is increased mainly by amounts contributed to the plans by the Company, partially offset by the amount of pension expense for the year. Our Consolidated Balance Sheet also included $0.2 million in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” and $0.8 million in “Deferred liabilities” for pension obligations.

The obligations with respect to post-retirement benefits, including health care and life insurance for pensioners, and post-employment benefits, including some workers’ compensation and long-term disability benefits in Canada, are actuarially determined and accrued using the projected-benefit method prorated over the credited service periods of employees. Fluctuations in the post-retirement benefit obligation are caused by changes in the discount rate used. A 1.0 percentage point increase (decrease) in the discount rate would decrease (increase) the liability by approximately $50 million. We included post-retirement benefits accruals of $201.6 million in “Deferred liabilities” and post-retirement benefits accruals of $18.8 million in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” on our December 31, 2007 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Pension and post-retirement benefits expenses were included in “Compensation and benefits” on our December 31, 2007 Statement of Consolidated Income. Combined pension and post-retirement benefits expenses (excluding self-insured workers compensation and long-term disability benefits) were $98.2 million in 2007, compared with $122.1 million in 2006.

Pension expense consists of defined benefit pension expense plus defined contribution pension expense (equal to contributions). Pension expense was $65.6 million in 2007, compared with $78.4 million in 2006. Defined benefit pension expense was $62.4 million in 2007, compared with $75.4 million in 2006. Defined contribution


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			49

pension expense was $3.2 million in 2007, compared with $3.0 million in 2006. Post-retirement benefits expense was $32.6 million in 2007, compared with $43.6 million in 2006.

23.3 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

We depreciate the cost of properties, net of salvage, on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the property group. We follow the group depreciation method under which a single depreciation rate is applied to the total cost in a particular class of property, despite differences in the service life or salvage value of individual properties within the same class. Under the group depreciation method, retirements or disposals of properties in the normal course of business are accounted for by charging the cost of the property less any net salvage to accumulated depreciation.

Due to the capital intensive nature of the railway industry, depreciation represents a significant part of our operating expenses. The estimated useful lives of properties have a direct impact on the amount of depreciation expense charged and the amount of accumulated depreciation recorded as a component of “Net properties” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. At December 31, 2007, accumulated depreciation was $5,103.9 million. Depreciation expense relating to properties amounted to $472.0 million in 2007, compared with $464.1 million in 2006.

We undertake regular depreciation studies to establish the estimated useful life of each property group. The studies use statistical analysis and historical retirement records whenever feasible to estimate service lives and salvage rates. In cases where there are new asset types or there is insufficient retirement experience, the useful lives and salvage parameters are based on engineering or other expert opinions in the field. Beginning in 2006 management performed the depreciation studies with the

assistance of external consultants. Revisions to the estimated useful lives and net salvage projections for properties constitute a change in accounting estimate and we address these prospectively by amending depreciation rates. It is anticipated that there will be changes in the estimates of weighted average useful lives and net salvage for each property group as assets are acquired, used and retired. Substantial changes in either the useful lives of properties or the salvage assumptions could result in significant changes to depreciation expense. For example, if the estimated average life of road locomotives, our largest asset group, increased (or decreased) by 5 %, annual depreciation expense would decrease (or increase) by approximately $3.0 million.

We review the carrying amounts of our properties when circumstances indicate that such carrying amounts may not be recoverable based on future undiscounted cash flows. When such properties are determined to be impaired, recorded asset values are revised to the fair value and an impairment loss is recognized.

Depreciation expense increased $7.9 million in 2007 from the previous year primarily due to capital additions to locomotives and track investment.

23.4 FUTURE INCOME TAXES

We account for future income taxes in accordance with the CICA Accounting Standard Section 3465 “Income Taxes”, which is based on the liability method. This method focuses on a company’s balance sheet and the temporary differences otherwise calculated from the comparison of book versus tax values. It is assumed that such temporary differences will be settled in the future at substantively enacted tax rates. This valuation process determines the future income tax assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date.

In determining future income taxes, we make estimates and assumptions regarding future tax matters, including estimating the timing of the realization and settlement of future income tax assets (including the benefit of tax losses) and liabilities. Future income taxes are calculated using the current substantively enacted federal and provincial future income tax rates, which may differ in future periods.

In 2007, we reduced our future income tax liability by $162.9 million (2006 –$176 million) due to a reduction in income tax rates by the Government of Canada and certain provincial governments (discussed in Section 11.4).

Following a review of impending transactions during third-quarter 2005, we concluded that our remaining unrecognized capital loss carryforwards for tax would more than likely be utilized, and we recorded a future tax asset for all previously unrecognized capital loss carryforwards. As a result, any future capital gains recorded, including FX on LTD, will be taxable, where historically they had resulted in no net tax expense.

As a result of this review, we made further reclassifications of income tax allocated to unrealized FX on LTD (for non-GAAP reporting purposes, see Section 6.0). These reclassifications moved previously recognized capital losses that have historically been allocated to unrealized FX on LTD gains and included them in the calculation of income tax for other capital transactions, which are included in income tax expense, before income tax on FX on LTD and other specified items (see Section 6.0).

Future income tax expense totalling $38.7 million was included in income tax for 2007 and $75.3 million was included in income tax 2006. The change in future income tax expense for 2007 was primarily due to tax rate changes implemented by the Canadian federal and provincial governments (discussed further in Section 11.4). At December 31, 2007, future income tax


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
50

liabilities of $1,701.5 million were recorded as a long-term liability and comprised largely of temporary differences related to accounting for properties. Future income tax benefits of $67.3 million realizable within one year were recorded as a current asset.

23.5 LEGAL AND PERSONAL INJURY LIABILITIES

We are involved in litigation in Canada and the US related to our business. Management is required to establish estimates of potential liability arising from incidents, claims and pending litigation, including personal injury claims and certain occupation-related and property damage claims.

These estimates are determined on a case-by-case basis. They are based on an assessment of the actual damages incurred, current legal advice with respect to the expected outcome of the legal action, and actuarially determined assessments with respect to settlements in other similar cases. We employ experienced claims adjusters who investigate and assess the validity of individual claims made against us and estimate the damages incurred.

A provision for incidents, claims or litigation is recorded based on the facts and circumstances known at the time. We accrue for likely claims when the facts of an incident become known and investigation results provide a reasonable basis for estimating the liability. The lower end of the range is accrued if the facts and circumstances permit only a range of reasonable estimates and no single amount in that range is a better estimate than any other. Additionally, for administrative expediency, we keep a general provision for lesser-value injury cases. Facts and circumstances related to asserted claims can change, and a process is in place to monitor accruals for changes in accounting estimates.

With respect to claims related to occupational health and safety in the provinces of Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba and BC, estimates administered through the

Workers’ Compensation Board (“WCB”) are actuarially determined. In the provinces of Saskatchewan and Alberta, we are assessed for an annual WCB contribution. As a result, this amount is not subject to estimation by management.

Railway employees in the US are not covered by a workers’ compensation program, but are covered by US federal law for railway employees. Although we manage in the US using a case-by-case comprehensive approach, for accrual purposes, a combination of case-by-case analysis and statistical analysis is utilized.

In 2005, we conducted a study to better measure the level of accruals for asbestos claims from retired US employees, and to better calibrate the case-by-case accruals for other US employee claims to recent safety and other experience trends. The result of the study was to increase our liability accrual for such claims by $4.1 million with a corresponding charge to operating expense. These studies are now being conducted on an annual basis. In 2006 and 2007, adjustment to the liability was not significant.

Provisions for incidents, claims and litigation charged to income, which are included in “Purchased services and other” on our Statement of Consolidated Income, amounted to $46.9 million in 2007 and $41.1 million in 2006.

Accruals for incidents, claims and litigation, including WCB accruals, totalled $153.6 million, net of insurance recoveries, at December 31, 2007. The total accrual included $102.1 million in “Deferred liabilities” and
$78.5 million in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities”, offset by $10.7 million in “Other assets and deferred charges” and $16.3 million in “Accounts receivable”.

23.6 CANADIAN THIRD PARTY ASSET-BACKED COMMERCIAL PAPER

At December 31, 2007, ABCP has been valued at its estimated fair value (discussed further in Section 11.2). ABCP, at its estimated

fair value of $122.1 million, was included in “Investments”. The estimated change in fair value of $21.5 million was recognized as a charge to income in “Change in fair value of Canadian third party asset-backed commercial paper” in the third quarter of 2007.

Continuing uncertainties regarding the value of the assets which underlie the ABCP, the amount and timing of cash flows and the outcome of the restructuring process could give rise to a further material change in the value of the Company’s investment in ABCP which would impact the Company’s near term earnings.

24.0 Systems, Procedures and Controls

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e) of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as amended)) to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to them. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have a process to evaluate these disclosure controls and are satisfied that they are adequate for ensuring that such material information is made known to them.

25.0 Forward-looking Information

This MD&A, especially but not limited to this section, contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (US) and other relevant securities legislation relating but not limited to our operations, anticipated financial performance, business prospects and strategies. Forward-looking information typically contains statements with words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “plan” or similar words suggesting future outcomes.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			51

Readers are cautioned to not place undue reliance on forward-looking information because it is possible that we will not achieve predictions, forecasts, projections and other forms of forward-looking information. In addition, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

By its nature, our forward-looking information involves numerous assumptions, inherent risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the following factors: changes

in business strategies; general North American and global economic and business conditions; the availability and price of energy commodities; the effects of competition and pricing pressures; industry capacity; shifts in market demands; changes in laws and regulations, including regulation of rates; changes in taxes and tax rates; potential increases in maintenance and operating costs; uncertainties of litigation; labour disputes; risks and liabilities arising from derailments; timing of completion of capital and maintenance projects; currency and interest rate fluctuations; effects of changes

in market conditions on the financial position of pension plans and liquidity of investments; various events that could disrupt operations, including severe weather conditions; security threats and governmental response to them; and technological changes.

There are more specific factors that could cause actual results to differ from those described in the forward-looking statements contained in this MD&A. These more specific factors are identified and discussed in Section 22.0 and elsewhere in this MD&A with the particular forward-looking statement in question.

25.1 2007 FINANCIAL OUTLOOK

The following is the original 2007 guidance we provided in November of 2006:


2007 financial outlook	Original guidance ⁽²⁾	Date approved	Key assumptions underlying our original guidance



Total revenues	Increase of 4 % – 6 %	Nov 15, 2006	□ average crude oil prices of US$65 per barrel;

Total operating expenses	Increase of 3 % – 5 %	Nov 15, 2006	□ average FX rate of $1.10 per US dollar; and

Adjusted Diluted EPS ⁽¹⁾	$4.30 – $4.45	Nov 15, 2006	□ tax rate of 30 % – 32 %

Capital expenditures	$885 – $895 million	Nov 15, 2006

Free Cash ⁽¹⁾	In excess of $200 million	Nov 15, 2006

⁽²⁾ Certain portions of the guidance have subsequently been updated. The updates are discussed further below.

We subsequently revised certain of our 2007 guidance. The following is the most updated 2007 guidance we provided:

2007 financial outlook

Updated guidance

Date approved

Actual

Variance

Revised key assumptions

Total revenues

Just below range of increase of 4 % – 6 %

Oct 28, 2007

2.7%

-130 basis points

□ average crude oil prices of US$69 per barrel;

Total operating expenses

Increase of 3 % – 5 %

Nov 15, 2006

2.6%

- 40 basis points

□ average FX rate of $1.08 per US dollar; and

Adjusted Diluted EPS ⁽¹⁾

Lower end of or below $4.30 – $4.45

Dec 11, 2007

$4.32

N/A

tax rate of 30 % – 32%

Capital expenditures

$885 – $895 million

Nov 15, 2006

$902 million

+ $7 million

Free Cash ⁽¹⁾

In excess of $300 million

Apr 17, 2007

$303 million

N/A


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
52

25.1.1 2007 Guidance Updates

In April 2007, we revised our free cash to be in excess of $300 million, primarily due to an approximate $50 million reduction in our estimated cash pension funding requirement.

In October 2007, the original key assumptions were revised to reflect market conditions. As such, two revisions to guidance were made in our October 29, 2007 press release where the original target of 4 % to 6 % growth in total revenues was revised

to just below the lower end of the range and adjusted diluted EPS was to be at the lower end of the original target range of $4.30 to $4.45.

In our December 12, 2007 press release, our adjusted diluted EPS was revised to the bottom of or below the original target range of $4.30 to $4.45 primarily due to higher costs associated with network disruptions, mainly driven by harsh weather conditions, and a large increase in fuel price which was partially mitigated by our fuel recovery programs.

25.1.2 Variance from 2007 Guidance

Total revenue growth for 2007 was below our revised guidance primarily due to network disruptions, mainly driven by harsh weather conditions, and the negative impact of the change in FX.

Total operating expenses for 2007 were below our guidance primarily due to lower compensation and benefits expenses (further discussed in Section 9.1) and the positive impact of the change in FX.

Capital expenditures were above our guidance primarily due to the buyout of certain leased locomotives under favourable terms.

25.2 2008 FINANCIAL OUTLOOK

The following is the original 2008 guidance we provided in October 2007:


2008 financial outlook	Guidance	Date approved	Key 2008 assumptions



Total revenues	Increase of 4 % – 6 %	Oct 29, 2007	□ average crude oil prices of US$80 per barrel;

Total operating expenses	Increase of 3 % – 5 %	Oct 29, 2007	□ average FX rate of $1.00 per US dollar;

Adjusted diluted EPS ⁽¹⁾	$4.70 – $4.85	Oct 29, 2007	□ North American economic (GDP) growth of 2.5 %; and

Capital expenditures	$885 – $895 million	Oct 29, 2007	□ tax rate of 29 % – 31 %

Free Cash ⁽¹⁾	In excess of $250 million	Oct 29, 2007


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			53

25.2.1 2008 Guidance Updates

We subsequently revised certain of our 2008 guidance. The following is the most updated 2008 guidance we provided:


2008 financial outlook	Guidance	Date approved	Key 2008 assumptions



Total revenues	Increase of 4% – 6%	Oct 29, 2007	□ average crude oil prices of US$87 per barrel ⁽²⁾;

Total operating expenses	Increase of 3 % – 5 %	Oct 29, 2007	□ average FX rate of $1.00 per US dollar;

Adjusted diluted EPS ⁽¹⁾	$4.65 – $4.80	Feb 19, 2008	□ North American economic (GDP) growth of 2.5 %; and

Capital expenditures	$885 – $895 million	Oct 29, 2007	□ tax rate of 29% – 31%.

Free Cash ⁽¹⁾	In excess of $250 million	Oct 29, 2007

⁽²⁾ This assumption had been revised in our January 29, 2008 press release.

In our February 20, 2008 press release, our adjusted diluted EPS was revised downward to the range of $4.65 to $4.80. This was the result of the prospective application of the Canadian Transportation Agency’s adjustment to the grain revenue

entitlement under the CTA (discussed further in Section 22.4.1). The retroactive component of this adjustment could affect our adjusted diluted EPS by an additional $0.08 per share.

The purpose of our guidance is to provide shareholders transparency with respect to

management’s expectations of our operations and financial performance. Undue reliance should not be placed on this guidance and other forward-looking information for other purposes.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
54

26.0 Glossary of Terms

ABCP Canadian third party asset-backed commercial paper.

Average train speed The average speed attained as a train travels between terminals, calculated by dividing the total train miles traveled by the total hours operated. This calculation does not include the travel time or the distance traveled by: i) trains used in or around CP’s yards; ii) passenger trains; and iii) trains used for repairing track. The calculation also does not include the time trains spend waiting in terminals.

Car miles per car day The total car-miles for a period divided by the total number of active cars.

Total car-miles includes the distance travelled by every car on a revenue-producing train and a train used in or around our yards.

A car-day is assumed to equal one active car. An active car is a revenue-producing car that is generating costs to CP on an hourly or mileage basis. Excluded from this count are i) cars that are not on the track or are being stored; ii) cars that are in need of repair; iii) cars that are used to carry materials for track repair; iv) cars owned by customers that are on the customer’s tracks; and v) cars that are idle and waiting to be reclaimed by CP.

Carloads Revenue-generating shipments of containers, trailers and freight cars.

CICA Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.

CPRL Canadian Pacific Railway Limited.

CP, the Company CPRL, CPRL and its subsidiaries, CPRL and one or more of its subsidiaries, or one or more of CPRL’s subsidiaries.

Diluted EPS Calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding, adjusted for the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options, as calculated using the Treasury Stock Method. This method assumes options that have an exercise price below the market price of the shares are exercised and the proceeds are used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period.

Diluted EPS, before FX on LTD and other specified items A variation of the calculation of diluted EPS, which is calculated by dividing income, before FX on LTD and other specified items, by the weighted average number of shares outstanding, adjusted for outstanding stock options using the Treasury Stock Method, as described above under “Diluted EPS”.

D&H Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc., a wholly owned indirect US subsidiary of CPRL.

DM&E Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation

EPS Earnings per share.

Fluidity Obtaining more value from our existing assets and resources.

Foreign Exchange or FX The value of the Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar (exclusive of any impact on market demand).

FRA US Federal Railroad Administration, a regulatory agency whose purpose is to promulgate and enforce rail safety regulations; administer railroad assistance programs; conduct research and development in support of improved railroad safety and national rail transportation policy; provide for the rehabilitation of Northeast Corridor rail passenger service; and consolidate government support of rail transportation activities.

FRA personal injury rate per 200,000 employee-hours The number of personal injuries, multiplied by 200,000 and divided by total employee-hours. Personal injuries are defined as injuries that require employees to lose time away from work, modify their normal duties or obtain medical treatment beyond minor first aid. Employee-hours are the total hours worked, excluding vacation and sick time, by all employees, excluding contractors.

FRA train accidents rate The number of train accidents, multiplied by 1,000,000 and divided by total train-miles. Train accidents included in this metric meet or exceed the FRA reporting threshold of US$8,200 in damage.

Freight revenue per carload The amount of freight revenue earned for every carload moved, calculated by dividing the freight revenue for a commodity by the number of carloads of the commodity transported in the period.

Freight revenue per RTM The amount of freight revenue earned for every RTM moved, calculated by dividing the total freight revenue by the total RTMs in the period.

FX on LTD Foreign exchange gains and losses on long-term debt.

GAAP Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

GTMs or gross ton-miles The movement of total train weight over a distance of one mile. Total train weight is comprised of the weight of the freight cars, their contents and any inactive locomotives. An increase in GTMs indicates additional workload.

IOP Integrated Operating Plan, the foundation for our scheduled railway operations.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			55

LIBOR London Interbank Offered Rate.

MD&A Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Number of active employees The number of actively employed workers during the last month of the period. This includes employees who are taking vacation and statutory holidays and other forms of short-term paid leave, and excludes individuals who have a continuing employment relationship with us but are not currently working.

Operating ratio The ratio of total operating expenses to total revenues. A lower percentage normally indicates higher efficiency.

Return on capital employed or ROCE Income before FX on LTD and other specified items plus after-tax interest expense divided by average net debt plus equity.

RTMs or revenue ton-miles The movement of one revenue-producing ton of freight over a distance of one mile.

Soo Line Soo Line Railroad Company, a wholly owned indirect US subsidiary of CPRL.

STB US Surface Transportation Board, a regulatory agency with jurisdiction over railway rate and service issues and rail restructuring, including mergers and sales.

Terminal dwell The average time a freight car resides at a specified terminal location. The timing starts with a train arriving in the terminal, a customer releasing the car to us, or a car arriving that is to be transferred to another railway. The timing ends when the train leaves, a customer receives the car from us or the freight car is transferred to another railway. Freight cars are excluded if: i) a train is moving through the terminal without stopping; ii) they are being stored at the terminal; iii) they are in need of repair; or iv) they are used in track repairs.

US gallons of locomotive fuel consumed per 1,000 GTMs The total fuel consumed in freight and yard operations for every 1,000 GTMs traveled. This is calculated by dividing the total amount of fuel issued to our locomotives, excluding commuter and non-freight activities, by the total freight-related GTMs. The result indicates how efficiently we are using fuel.

WCB Workers’ Compensation Board, a mutual insurance corporation providing workplace liability and disability insurance in Canada.

WTI West Texas Intermediate, a commonly used index for the price of a barrel of crude oil.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
56

MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING

The information in this report is the responsibility of management. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles and include some amounts based on management’s best estimates and careful judgment. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Canadian Pacific Railway Company and all of its subsidiaries (the “Company”). The financial information of the Company included in the Company’s Annual Report is consistent with that in the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements have been approved by the Board of Directors.

Our Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and approving the consolidated financial statements and for overseeing management’s performance of its financial reporting responsibilities. The Board of Directors carries out its responsibility for the consolidated financial statements principally through its Audit, Finance and Risk Management Committee (the Audit

Committee), consisting of six members, all of whom are outside directors. The Audit Committee reviews the consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis with management and the independent auditors prior to submission to the Board for approval. The Audit Committee meets regularly with management, internal auditors, and the independent auditors to review accounting policies, and financial reporting. The Audit Committee also reviews the recommendations of both the independent and internal auditors for improvements to internal controls, as well as the actions of management to implement such recommendations. The internal and independent auditors have full access to the Audit Committee, with or without the presence of management.

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Because of its inherent limitations, internal

control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework”. Based on this assessment, management determined that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their report, which is included herein.

MICHAEL LAMBERT
Executive Vice-President
and Chief Financial Officer

February 19, 2008

FRED J. GREEN
Chief Executive Officer


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			57

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY LIMITED

We have completed integrated audits of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and an audit of its 2005 consolidated financial statements. Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited as at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits of the Company’s financial statements as at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and for each of the years then ended in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). We conducted our audit of the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. A financial statement audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2007 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

We have also audited Canadian Pacific Railway Limited’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
58

responsibility is to express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition,

use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Chartered Accountants
Calgary, Alberta

February 19, 2008


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			59

STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME


Year ended December 31 (in millions of Canadian dollars, except per share data)	2007			2006		2005



Revenues
Freight (Note 23)	$	4,555.2		$	4,427.3	$	4,266.3
Other		152.4			155.9		125.3

		4,707.6			4,583.2		4,391.6

Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits		1,284.2			1,327.6		1,322.1
Fuel		746.8			650.5		588.0
Materials		215.5			212.9		203.3
Equipment rents		207.5			181.2		210.0
Depreciation and amortization		472.0			464.1		445.1
Purchased services and other		617.4			618.3		621.6

		3,543.4			3,454.6		3,390.1

Operating income, before the following:		1,164.2			1,128.6		1,001.5
Special credit for environmental remediation (Note 18)		–			–		(33.9	)
Special charge for labour restructuring (Note 18)		–			–		44.2

Operating income		1,164.2			1,128.6		991.2
Other income and charges (Note 4)		17.3			27.8		18.1
Change in fair value of Canadian third party asset-backed commercial paper (Note 11)		21.5			–		–
Foreign exchange (gain) loss on long-term debt		(169.8	)		0.1		(44.7	)
Net interest expense (Note 5)		204.3			194.5		204.2
Income tax expense (Note 6)		144.7			109.9		270.6

Net income	$	946.2		$	796.3	$	543.0



Basic earnings per share (Note 7)	$	6.14		$	5.06	$	3.43



Diluted earnings per share (Note 7)	$	6.08		$	5.02	$	3.39

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
60

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET


As at December 31 (in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007		2006



Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	378.1	$	124.3
Accounts receivable and other current assets (Note 8)		542.8		615.7
Materials and supplies		179.5		158.6
Future income taxes (Note 6)		67.3		106.3

		1,167.7		1,004.9
Investments (Note 11)		1,668.6		64.9
Net properties (Note 12)		9,293.1		9,122.9
Other assets and deferred charges (Note 13)		1,235.6		1,223.2

Total assets	$	13,365.0	$	11,415.9



Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Current liabilities
Short-term borrowing	$	229.7	$	–
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		980.8		1,002.6
Income and other taxes payable		68.8		16.0
Dividends payable		34.5		29.1
Long-term debt maturing within one year (Note 14)		31.0		191.3

		1,344.8		1,239.0
Deferred liabilities (Note 16)		714.6		725.7
Long-term debt (Note 14)		4,146.2		2,813.5
Future income taxes (Note 6)		1,701.5		1,781.2
Shareholders’ equity
Share capital (Note 19)		1,188.6		1,175.7
Contributed surplus (Note 19)		42.4		32.3
Accumulated other comprehensive income (Note 9)		39.6		66.4
Retained income		4,187.3		3,582.1

		5,457.9		4,856.5

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	13,365.0	$	11,415.9

Commitments and contingencies (Note 22).
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



Approved on behalf of the Board:	J.E. Cleghorn, Director	R. Phillips, Director

STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS


Year ended December 31 (in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007			2006			2005



Operating activities
Net income	$	946.2		$	796.3		$	543.0
Add (deduct) items not affecting cash
Depreciation and amortization		472.0			464.1			445.1
Future income taxes (Note 6)		38.7			75.3			258.0
Change in fair value of Canadian third party asset-backed commercial paper (Note 11)		21.5			–			–
Environmental remediation charge (Note 18)		–			–			(30.9	)
Restructuring and impairment charge (Note 18)		–			–			44.2
Foreign exchange (gain) loss on long-term debt		(169.8	)		0.1			(44.7	)
Amortization of deferred charges		12.1			16.5			19.5
Restructuring and environmental payments (Note 18)		(61.0	)		(96.3	)		(69.0	)
Other operating activities, net		4.6			(103.4	)		(91.2	)
Change in non-cash working capital balances related to operations (Note 10)		50.3			(101.6	)		(23.3	)

Cash provided by operating activities		1,314.6			1,051.0			1,050.7

Investing activities
Additions to properties (Note 12)		(893.2	)		(793.7	)		(884.4	)
Reduction in investments and other assets		0.2			2.2			2.0
Net proceeds from disposal of transportation properties		14.9			97.8			13.2
Acquisition of Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation (Note 11)		(1,492.6	)		–			–
Investment in Canadian third party asset-backed commercial paper (Note 11)		(143.6	)		–			–

Cash used in investing activities		(2,514.3	)		(693.7	)		(869.2	)

Financing activities
Dividends paid		(133.1	)		(112.4	)		(89.5	)
Issuance of CP Common Shares		30.4			66.6			31.8
Purchase of CP Common Shares (Note 19)		(231.1	)		(286.4	)		(80.6	)
Increase in short-term borrowing		229.7			–			–
Issuance of long-term debt (Note 14)		1,745.3			2.8			–
Repayment of long-term debt		(187.7	)		(25.4	)		(274.4	)

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities		1,453.5			(354.8	)		(412.7	)

Cash position
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		253.8			2.5			(231.2	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		124.3			121.8			353.0

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	378.1		$	124.3		$	121.8

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY


Year ended December 31 (in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007			2006



Share capital
Balance, beginning of year	$	1,175.7		$	1,141.5
Shares issued under stock option plans (Note 19)		37.4			71.0
Shares purchased (Note 19)		(24.5	)		(36.8	)

Balance, end of year		1,188.6			1,175.7

Contributed surplus
Balance, beginning of year		32.3			245.1
Movement in stock-based compensation		10.1			10.3
Shares purchased		–			(223.1	)

Balance, end of year		42.4			32.3

Accumulated other comprehensive income
Balance, beginning of year		66.4			67.5
Adjustment for change in accounting policy (Note 2)		14.0			–

Adjusted balance, beginning of year		80.4			67.5
Other comprehensive loss (Note 9)		(40.8	)		(1.1	)

Balance, end of year		39.6			66.4

Retained income
Balance, beginning of year		3,582.1			2,930.0
Adjustment for change in accounting policy (Note 2)		4.0			–

Adjusted balance, beginning of year		3,586.1			2,930.0
Net income for the year		946.2			796.3
Shares purchased (Note 19)		(206.6	)		(26.5	)
Dividends		(138.4	)		(117.7	)

Balance, end of year		4,187.3			3,582.1

Total accumulated other comprehensive income and retained income		4,226.9			3,648.5



Shareholders’ equity, end of year	$	5,457.9		$	4,856.5

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
64

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2007

1. Summary of significant accounting policies

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (“CPRL”) and all of its subsidiaries, including variable-interest entities (“VIE”) for which CPRL is the primary beneficiary and the proportionate share of the accounts of jointly controlled enterprises (collectively referred to as “CP” or “the Company”), and have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

These consolidated financial statements are expressed in Canadian dollars, except where otherwise indicated. The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period, the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Management regularly reviews its estimates, including those related to restructuring and environmental liabilities, pensions and other benefits, depreciable lives of properties, future income tax assets and liabilities, as well as legal and personal injury liabilities based upon currently available information. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES

The following list sets out CPRL’s principal railway operating subsidiaries, including the jurisdiction of incorporation and the percentage of voting securities owned directly or indirectly by CPRL as of December 31, 2007.


	Incorporated under	Percentage of voting securities
Principal subsidiary	the laws of	held directly or indirectly by CPRL



Canadian Pacific Railway Company	Canada		100	%
Soo Line Railroad Company (“Soo Line”)	Minnesota		100	%
Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc. (“D&H”)	Delaware		100	%
Mount Stephen Properties Inc. (“MSP”)	Canada		100	%

Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern Railroad Corporation (“DM&E”) was acquired in October, 2007 and is wholly owned. The purchase is subject to review and approval by the U.S. Surface Transportation Board (“STB”), during which time the shares of DM&E have been placed in a voting trust.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Railway freight revenues are recognized based on the percentage of completed service method. Other revenue is recognized as service is performed or contractual obligations are met. Volume rebates are accrued as a reduction of freight revenues based on estimated volumes and contract terms as freight service is provided.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents includes marketable short-term investments that are readily convertible to cash with original maturities of less than 3 months. Short-term investments are stated at fair value, which approximates cost.

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, other than those held through self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries, are translated into Canadian dollars at the year-end exchange rate for monetary items and at the historical exchange rates for non-monetary items. Foreign currency revenues and expenses are translated at the exchange rate in effect on the dates of the related transactions. Foreign currency gains and losses, other than those arising from the translation of the Company’s net investment in self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries, are included in income.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			65

The accounts of the Company’s self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries are translated into Canadian dollars using the year-end exchange rate for assets and liabilities and the average exchange rates during the year for revenues and expenses. Exchange gains and losses arising from translation of these foreign subsidiaries’ accounts are included in other comprehensive loss. A portion of the U.S. dollar-denominated long-term debt has been designated as a hedge of the net investment in self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries. As a result, unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses on a portion of the U.S. dollar-denominated long-term debt are offset against foreign exchange gains and losses arising from translation of self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries’ accounts.

PENSIONS AND OTHER BENEFITS

Pension costs are actuarially determined using the projected-benefit method prorated over the credited service periods of employees. This method incorporates management’s best estimates of expected plan investment performance, salary escalation and retirement ages of employees. The expected return on fund assets is calculated using market-related asset values developed from a five-year average of market values for the fund’s public equity securities (with each prior year’s market value adjusted to the current date for assumed investment income during the intervening period) plus the market value of the fund’s fixed income, real estate and infrastructure securities. The discount rate used to determine the benefit obligation is based on market interest rates on high-quality corporate debt instruments with matching cash flows. Unrecognized actuarial gains and losses in excess of 10 % of the greater of the benefit obligation and the market-related value of plan assets are amortized over the expected average remaining service period of active employees expected to receive benefits under the plan (approximately 11 years). Prior service costs arising from plan amendments are amortized over the expected average remaining service period of active employees who were expected to receive benefits under the plan at the date of amendment. Transitional assets and obligations, which arose from implementing the CICA Accounting Standard Section 3461 “Employee Future Benefits” effective January 1, 2000, are being amortized over the expected average remaining service period of active employees who were expected to receive benefits under the plan at January 1, 2000 (approximately 13 years).

Benefits other than pensions, including health care, some workers’ compensation and long-term disability benefits in Canada and life insurance, are actuarially determined and accrued on a basis similar to pension costs.

MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES

Materials and supplies on hand are valued at the lower of average cost and replacement value.

NET PROPERTIES

Fixed asset additions and major renewals are recorded at cost, including direct costs, directly attributable indirect costs and attributed carrying costs. The Company capitalizes development costs for major new computer systems, including the related variable indirect costs. In addition, CP capitalizes the cost of major overhauls and large refurbishments. When depreciable property is retired or otherwise disposed of in the normal course of business, the book value, less net salvage proceeds, is charged to accumulated depreciation. However, when removal costs exceed the salvage value on assets and the Company had no legal obligation to remove, the net removal cost is charged to income in the period in which the asset is removed and is not charged to accumulated depreciation. When there is a legal obligation associated with the retirement of property, plant and equipment, a liability is initially recognized at its fair value and a corresponding asset retirement cost is added to the gross book value of the related asset and amortized to expense over the estimated term to retirement. The Company reviews the carrying amounts of its properties whenever changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying amounts may not be recoverable based on future undiscounted cash flows. When such properties are determined to be impaired, recorded asset values are revised to the fair value and an impairment loss is recognized.

Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line basis at rates based on the estimated service life, taking into consideration the projected annual usage of depreciable property, except for rail and other track material in the U.S., which is based directly on usage. Usage is based on volumes of traffic.

Assets to be disposed of are included in “Other assets and deferred charges” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. They are reported at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value, less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated.

Equipment under capital lease is included in properties and depreciated over the period of expected use.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
66

Estimated service life used for principal categories of properties is as follows:


Assets	Years



Diesel locomotives		28 to 35

Freight cars		21 to 46

Ties		35 to 41

Rails – in first position		27 to 29
– in other than first position		55

Computer system development costs		5 to 15

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL AND COMMODITY INSTRUMENTS

Derivative financial and commodity instruments may be used from time to time by the Company to manage its exposure to price risks relating to foreign currency exchange rates, stock-based compensation, interest rates and fuel prices. When CP utilizes derivative instruments in hedging relationships, CP identifies, designates and documents those hedging transactions and regularly tests the transactions to demonstrate effectiveness in order to continue hedge accounting.

Commencing January 1, 2007, all derivative instruments are recorded at their fair value. Any change in the fair value of derivatives not designated as hedges is recognized in the period in which the change occurs in the Statement of Consolidated Income in the line item to which the derivative instrument is related. On the Consolidated Balance Sheet they are classified in “Other assets and deferred charges”, “Deferred liabilities”, “Accounts receivable and other current assets” or “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” as applicable. Prior to 2007, only derivative instruments that did not qualify as hedges or were not designated as hedges were carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet in “Other assets and deferred charges” or “Deferred liabilities”. Gains and losses arising from derivative instruments affect the following income statement lines: “Revenues”, “Compensation and benefits”, “Fuel”, “Other income and charges”, “Foreign exchange (gains) losses on long-term debt” and “Interest expense”.

For fair value hedges, the periodic change in value is recognized in income, on the same line as the changes in values of the hedged items are also recorded. For a cash flow hedge, the change in value of the effective portion is recognized in “Other comprehensive loss”. Any ineffectiveness within an effective cash flow hedge is recognized in income as it arises in the same income account as the hedged item when realized. Should a cash flow hedge relationship become ineffective, previously unrealized gains and losses remain within “Accumulated other comprehensive income” (“AOCI”) until the hedged item is settled and, prospectively, future changes in value of the derivative are recognized in income. The change in value of the effective portion of a cash flow hedge remains in “AOCI” until the related hedged item settles, at which time amounts recognized in “AOCI” are reclassified to the same income or balance sheet account that records the hedged item. Prior to January 1, 2007, the periodic change in the fair value of an effective hedging instrument prior to settlement was not recognized in the financial statements.

In the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows, cash flows relating to derivative instruments designated as hedges are included in the same line as the related item.

The transitional date for the assessment of embedded derivatives was January 1, 2001.

The Company from time to time enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge anticipated sales in U.S. dollars, the related accounts receivable and future capital acquisitions. Foreign exchange translation gains and losses on foreign currency-denominated derivative financial instruments used to hedge anticipated U.S. dollar-denominated sales are recognized as an adjustment of the revenues when the sale is recorded. Those used to hedge future capital acquisitions are recognized as an adjustment of the property amount when the acquisition is recorded.

The Company also occasionally enters into foreign exchange forward contracts as part of its short-term cash management strategy. These contracts are not designated as hedges due to their short-term nature and are carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized in income in the period in which the change occurs.

The Company enters into interest rate swaps to manage the risk related to interest rate fluctuations. These swap agreements require the periodic exchange of payments without the exchange of the principal amount on which the payments are based. Interest expense on the debt is adjusted to include the payments owing or receivable under the interest rate swaps.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			67

The Company from time to time enters into bond forwards to fix interest rates for anticipated issuances of debt. These agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges.

The Company has a fuel-hedging program under which CP acquires future crude oil contracts for a portion of its diesel fuel purchases to reduce the risk of price volatility affecting future cash flows. In addition, foreign exchange forward contracts are used as part of the fuel-hedging program to manage the foreign exchange variability component of CP’s fuel price risk. The gains or losses on the hedge contracts are applied against the corresponding fuel purchases in the period during which the hedging contracts mature.

The Company enters into derivatives called Total Return Swaps (“TRS”) to mitigate fluctuations in stock appreciation rights (“SAR”), deferred share units (“DSU”), performance share units (“PSU”) and restricted share units (“RSU”). These are not designated as hedges and are recorded at market value with the offsetting gain or loss reflected in “Compensation and benefits”.

RESTRUCTURING ACCRUAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION

Restructuring liabilities are recorded at their present value. The discount related to liabilities incurred in 2003 and subsequent years is amortized to “Compensation and benefits” and “Purchased services and other” over the payment period. The discount related to liabilities incurred prior to 2003 is amortized to “Other income and charges” over the payment period. Environmental remediation accruals cover site-specific remediation programs. Provisions for labour restructuring and environmental remediation costs are recorded in “Deferred liabilities”, except for the current portion, which is recorded in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities”.

INCOME TAXES

The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Future income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using substantively enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in income tax rates on future income tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period during which the change occurs.

EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share are calculated using the weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share are calculated using the Treasury Stock Method for determining the dilutive effect of options.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

CP follows the fair value based approach to accounting for stock-based compensation applying to options issued for years beginning in 2003. Compensation expense and an increase in contributed surplus are recognized for stock options over their vesting period based on their estimated fair values on the date of grants, as determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Forfeitures and cancellations of options are accounted for when they occur except for tandem options where forfeitures are estimated on the grant date.

Any consideration paid by employees on exercise of stock options is credited to share capital when the option is exercised and the recorded fair value of the option is removed from contributed surplus and credited to share capital. Compensation expense is also recognized for SARs, DSUs, PSUs and RSUs, using the intrinsic method, and employee share purchase plans, using the issue price, by amortizing the cost over the vesting period or over the period from the grant date to the date employees become eligible to retire when this is shorter than the vesting period, with the liability for SARs, DSUs, PSUs and RSUs marked-to-market until exercised. Forfeitures and cancellations of SARs, DSUs, PSUs and RSUs are accounted for when they occur. The SAR liability is settled to “Share capital” when a SAR is cancelled due to the exercise of a tandem option.

2. New accounting policies

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, HEDGING AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the following accounting standards issued by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (“CICA”): Section 3855 “Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement”, Section 3861 “Financial Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation”, Section 3865 “Hedges”, Section 1530 “Comprehensive Income” and Section 3251 “Equity”. These sections require certain financial instruments and hedge positions to be recorded at their fair value. They also introduce the concept of comprehensive income and AOCI. Adoption of these standards was on a retrospective basis without restatement of prior periods, except for the restatement of equity balances to reflect the reclassification of “Foreign currency translation adjustments” to “AOCI” and “Other Comprehensive Loss”.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
68

The impact of the adoption of these standards on January 1, 2007, was an increase in net assets of $18.0 million, a reduction in “Foreign currency translation adjustments” of $66.4 million, an increase in “Retained income” of $4.0 million, and the recognition of “AOCI” of $80.4 million.

The fair value of hedging instruments at January 1, 2007, was $31.7 million reflected in “Other assets and deferred charges” and “Accounts receivable and other current assets” and $4.8 million reflected in “Deferred liabilities” and “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities”. The inclusion of transaction costs within “Long-term debt” at amortized cost reduced “Long-term debt” by $33.4 million with an associated reduction in “Other assets and deferred charges” of $26.9 million. Deferred gains and losses on previously settled hedges were reclassified to “AOCI” and “Retained income” with a resultant decrease in “Other assets and deferred charges” of $4.8 million. The recognition of certain other financial instruments at fair value or amortized cost resulted in reductions in “Long-term debt” of $2.8 million, “Investments” of $1.5 million and “Other assets and deferred charges” of $0.4 million. The adoption of these standards increased the liability for “Future income taxes” by $11.6 million. AOCI is comprised of foreign currency gains and losses on the net investment in self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries, foreign currency gains and losses related to long-term debt designated as a hedge of the net investment in self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries’ effective portions of gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of cash flow hedging instruments, and the reclassification of cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments. The adjustment to opening retained income reflects the change in measurement basis, from original cost to fair value or amortized cost, of certain financial assets, financial liabilities, transaction costs associated with the Company’s long-term debt and previously deferred gains and losses on derivative instruments that were settled in prior years and which, had they currently existed, did not meet the criteria for hedge accounting under Accounting Standard Section 3865. The amounts recorded on the adoption of these standards differed from the estimated amounts disclosed in Note 3 to the 2006 annual financial statements as a result of the refinement of certain estimates used at the year end.

ACCOUNTING CHANGES

Effective from January 1, 2007, the CICA has amended Accounting Standard Section 1506 “Accounting Changes” to prescribe the criteria for changing accounting policies and related accounting treatment and disclosures of accounting changes. Changes in accounting policies are permitted when required by a primary source of GAAP, for example when a new accounting section is first adopted, or when the change in accounting policy results in more reliable and relevant financial information being reflected in the financial statements.

The adoption of this amended accounting standard did not impact the financial statements of the Company.

3. Future accounting changes

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT AND CAPITAL DISCLOSURES

The CICA has issued the following accounting standards effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2008: Section 3862 “Financial Instruments – Disclosures”, Section 3863 “Financial Instruments – Presentation”, and Section 1535 “Capital Disclosures”.

Section 1535 “Capital Disclosures” will require the Company to provide disclosures about the Company’s capital and how it is managed.

The adoption of these new accounting standards will not impact the amounts reported in the Company’s financial statements as they primarily relate to disclosure.

INVENTORIES

Effective January 1, 2008, the CICA has issued accounting standard Section 3031 “Inventories”. Section 3031 “Inventories” will provide guidance on the method of determining the cost of CP’s materials and supplies. The new accounting standard specifies that inventories are to be valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. CP currently reflects materials and supplies at the lower of cost and replacement value. The standard requires the reversal of previously recorded write downs to realizable value when there is clear evidence that net realizable value has increased. Additional disclosures will also be required. It is not anticipated that the adoption of Section 3031 “Inventories” will have a material impact on CP’s financial statements. Any adjustment on the adoption of Section 3031 “Inventories” will be recognized in 2008 as an adjustment to opening inventory and opening retained income.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			69

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

In February 2008, the CICA has issued accounting standard Section 3064 “Goodwill, and intangible assets”, replacing accounting standard Section 3062 “Goodwill and other intangible assets” and accounting standard Section 3450 “Research and development costs”. Various changes have been made to other sections of the CICA Handbook for consistency purposes. The new Section will be applicable to financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008. Accordingly, the Company will adopt the new standards for its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. Section 3064 establishes standards for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of goodwill subsequent to its initial recognition and of intangible assets by profit-oriented enterprises. Standards concerning goodwill are unchanged from the standards included in the previous Section 3062. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this new Section.

4. Other income and charges


(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007			2006			2005



Amortization of discount on accruals recorded at present value	$	8.1		$	10.0		$	15.4
Other exchange losses (gains)		5.8			6.5			(2.2	)
Loss on sale of accounts receivable (Note 8)		5.8			5.0			3.5
Loss (gain) on non-hedging derivative instruments		1.5			(1.2	)		(6.6	)
Equity income in Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation, net of tax (Note 11)		(12.3	)		–			–
Other		8.4			7.5			8.0


Total other income and charges	$	17.3		$	27.8		$	18.1

5. Interest expense


(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007			2006			2005



Interest expense	$	219.6		$	200.5		$	211.8
Interest income		(15.3	)		(6.0	)		(7.6	)


Net interest expense	$	204.3		$	194.5		$	204.2



Gross cash interest payments	$	208.9		$	192.8		$	199.6

Interest expense includes interest on capital leases of $21.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 (2006 – $24.2 million; 2005 – $24.7 million).


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
70

6. Income taxes

The following is a summary of the major components of the Company’s income tax expense:


(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007			2006			2005



Canada (domestic)
Current income tax expense	$	69.8		$	3.3		$	10.3

Future income tax expense
Origination and reversal of temporary differences		163.8			194.7			213.9
Effect of tax rate decreases		(162.9	)		(176.0	)		–
Recognition of previously unrecorded tax losses		–			–			(17.2	)
Effect of hedge of net investment in self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries		(9.7	)		0.6			(2.1	)
Other		(6.9	)		(2.3	)		(1.0	)

Total future income tax expense		(15.7	)		17.0			193.6

Total income taxes (domestic)	$	54.1		$	20.3		$	203.9



Other (foreign)
Current income tax expense	$	36.2		$	31.3		$	2.3

Future income tax expense
Origination and reversal of temporary differences		64.7			62.5			64.4
Other		(10.3	)		(4.2	)		–

Total future income tax expense		54.4			58.3			64.4

Total income taxes (foreign)	$	90.6		$	89.6		$	66.7



Total
Current income tax expense	$	106.0		$	34.6		$	12.6
Future income tax expense		38.7			75.3			258.0

Total income taxes (domestic and foreign)	$	144.7		$	109.9		$	270.6


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			71

The provision for future income taxes arises from temporary differences in the carrying values of assets and liabilities for financial statement and income tax purposes and the effect of loss carry forwards. The items comprising the future income tax assets and liabilities are as follows:


(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007		2006



Future income tax assets
Restructuring liability	$	39.7	$	64.5
Amount related to tax losses carried forward		53.9		83.6
Liabilities carrying value in excess of tax basis		35.6		84.1
Future environmental remediation costs		35.1		42.7
Other		28.7		21.4

Total future income tax assets		193.0		296.3

Future income tax liabilities
Capital assets carrying value in excess of tax basis		1,495.5		1,567.3
Other long-term assets carrying value in excess of tax basis		300.0		338.0
Other		33.7		65.9

Total future income tax liabilities		1,827.2		1,971.2

Total net future income tax liabilities		1,634.2		1,674.9
Current future income tax assets		67.3		106.3

Long-term future income tax liabilities	$	1,701.5	$	1,781.2

The Company’s consolidated effective income tax rate differs from the expected statutory tax rates. Expected income tax expense at statutory rates is reconciled to income tax expense as follows:


(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007			2006			2005



Expected income tax expense at Canadian enacted statutory tax rates	$	333.6		$	298.6		$	291.8
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
Large corporations tax		–			(5.6	)		8.3
Gains and equity income not subject to tax		(62.5	)		(22.0	)		(22.0	)
Foreign tax rate differentials		33.8			6.6			2.7
Effect of tax rate decreases		(162.9	)		(176.0	)		–
Recognition of previously unrecorded tax losses		–			–			(17.2	)
Other		2.7			8.3			7.0

Income tax expense	$	144.7		$	109.9		$	270.6

The Company has no unbenefited capital losses at December 31, 2007 and 2006.

In 2007, legislation was enacted to reduce Canadian federal corporate income tax rates over a period of several years. As a result of these changes, the Company recorded a $162.9 million benefit in future tax liability and income tax expense related to the revaluation of its future income tax balances as at December 31, 2006.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
72

In 2006, federal and provincial legislation was substantively enacted to reduce Canadian corporate income tax rates over a period of several years. As a result of these changes, the Company recorded a $176.0 million reduction in future tax liability and income tax expense related to the revaluation of its future income tax balances as at December 31, 2005.

Cash taxes paid in the year ended December 31, 2007, was $6.7 million (2006 – $50.9 million; 2005 – $7.6 million).

7. Earnings per share

At December 31, 2007, the number of shares outstanding was 153.3 million (2006 – 155.5 million).

Basic earnings per share have been calculated using net income for the year divided by the weighted average number of CPRL shares outstanding during the year.

Diluted earnings per share have been calculated using the Treasury Stock Method, which gives effect to the dilutive value of outstanding options. After the spin-off of CP from Canadian Pacific Limited (“CPL”) in October 2001, CPL stock options held by CPL employees were exchanged for CP replacement options. At December 31, 2007, there were 0.2 million replacement options outstanding (2006 – 0.2 million; 2005 – 0.4 million). Since the spin-off, CPRL has issued new stock options to CP employees. At December 31, 2007, there were 4.3 million new options outstanding (2006 – 4.3 million; 2005 – 5.5 million). These new option totals at December 31, 2007 exclude 2.4 million options (2006 – 2.3 million; 2005 – 2.0 million) for which there are tandem SARs outstanding (see Note 21), as these are not included in the dilution calculation.

The number of shares used in the earnings per share calculations is reconciled as follows:


(in millions)	2007		2006		2005



Weighted average shares outstanding		154.0		157.3		158.4
Dilutive effect of stock options		1.6		1.5		1.7

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding		155.6		158.8		160.1




(in dollars)		2007		2006		2005



Basic earnings per share	$	6.14	$	5.06	$	3.43



Diluted earnings per share	$	6.08	$	5.02	$	3.39

In 2007, 3,183 options (2006 – 379,908; 2005 – 1,000) were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effects were not dilutive.

8. Accounts receivable

The Company maintains an adequate allowance for doubtful accounts based on expected collectibility of accounts receivable. Credit losses are based on specific identification of uncollectible accounts and the application of historical percentages by aging category. At December 31, 2007, allowances of $18.4 million (2006 – $19.2 million) were recorded in “Accounts receivable”. During 2007, provisions of $2.7 million of accounts receivable (2006 – $6.5 million) were recorded within “Purchased services and other”.

The Company renewed its accounts receivable securitization program for a term of five years to September 2009. Under the terms of the renewal, the Company sold an undivided co-ownership interest in $120.0 million of eligible freight receivables to an unrelated trust. The trust is a multi-seller trust and CP is not the primary beneficiary. The Company may increase the sale amount up to a program limit of $200.0 million. At December 31, 2007, the outstanding undivided co-ownership interest held by the trust under the accounts receivable securitization program was $120.0 million (2006 – $120.0 million).

The undivided co-ownership interest is sold on a fully serviced basis and the Company receives no fee for ongoing servicing responsibilities. The average servicing period is approximately one month. A servicing asset of $0.1 million and a liability of $0.1 million have been recorded, as the benefit the Company derives from servicing the receivables approximates the value of the activity.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			73

Receivables funded under the securitization program may not include delinquent, defaulted or written-off receivables, nor receivables that do not meet certain obligor-specific criteria, including concentrations in excess of prescribed limits.

The Company provides a credit enhancement amount to absorb credit losses. The trust has no recourse to the co-ownership interest in receivables retained by the Company, other than in respect of the credit enhancement amount. This amount is recognized by the Company as a retained interest and included in accounts receivable. At December 31, 2007, the fair value of the retained interest was 18.7 % of the receivables sold or $22.5 million (2006 – 19.1 % or $22.9 million). The fair value approximated carrying value as a result of the short collection cycle and negligible credit losses. The Company cannot enter into an agreement with a third party with respect to its retained interest.

The securitization program is subject to standard reporting and credit-rating requirements for CP. The reporting includes provision of a monthly portfolio report that the pool of eligible receivables satisfies pre-established criteria that are reviewed and approved by Dominion Bond Rating Service and are standard for agreements of this nature. Failure to comply with these provisions would trigger termination of the program.

In 2007, the Company recognized a loss of $5.8 million (2006 – $5.0 million; 2005 – $3.5 million) on the securitization program. The loss is included in “Other income and charges” on the Statement of Consolidated Income.

The table below summarizes certain cash flows related to the transfer of receivables:


(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007		2006		2005



Proceeds from collections reinvested	$	1,478.9	$	1,475.7	$	1,480.6

9. Other comprehensive loss and accumulated other comprehensive income

Components of other comprehensive loss and the related tax effects are as follows:


				Income tax
	Before tax			(expense)			Net of tax
(in millions of Canadian dollars)	amount			recovery			amount



For the year ended December 31, 2007
Unrealized foreign exchange gain on translation of U.S. dollar-denominated long-term debt designated as a hedge of the net investment in U.S. subsidiaries	$	71.0		$	(9.7	)	$	61.3
Unrealized foreign exchange loss on translation of the net investment in U.S. subsidiaries		(78.4	)		–			(78.4	)
Realized gain on cash flow hedges settled in the period		(12.8	)		4.8			(8.0	)
Increase in unrealized holding losses on cash flow hedges		(26.2	)		9.1			(17.1	)
Realized loss on cash flow hedges settled in prior periods		2.2			(0.8	)		1.4

Other comprehensive loss	$	(44.2	)	$	3.4		$	(40.8	)



For the year ended December 31, 2006
Unrealized foreign exchange loss on translation of U.S. dollar-denominated long-term debt designated as a hedge of the net investment in U.S. subsidiaries	$	(3.7	)	$	0.5		$	(3.2	)
Unrealized foreign exchange gain on translation of the net investment in U.S. subsidiaries		2.1			–			2.1

Other comprehensive loss	$	(1.6	)	$	0.5		$	(1.1	)



For the year ended December 31, 2005
Unrealized foreign exchange gain on translation of U.S. dollar-denominated long-term debt designated as a hedge of the net investment in U.S. subsidiaries	$	11.7		$	(2.1	)	$	9.6
Unrealized foreign exchange loss on translation of the net investment in U.S. subsidiaries		(19.1	)		–			(19.1	)

Other comprehensive loss	$	(7.4	)	$	(2.1	)	$	(9.5	)


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
74

Changes in the balances of each classification within AOCI are as follows:


				Adjustment			Adjusted
				for change in			opening
	Opening			accounting			balance						Closing
	balance			policy			Jan. 1			Period			balance
(in millions of Canadian dollars)	Jan. 1			(Note 2)			(Note 2)			change			Dec. 31



Year ended December 31, 2007
Foreign exchange on U.S. dollar debt designated as a hedge of the net investment in U.S. subsidiaries	$	234.9		$	0.4		$	235.3		$	61.3		$	296.6
Foreign exchange on net investment in U.S. subsidiaries		(168.5	)		–			(168.5	)		(78.4	)		(246.9	)
Increase (decrease) in unrealized effective gains (losses) on cash flow hedges		–			18.9			18.9			(25.1	)		(6.2	)
Deferred loss on settled hedge instruments		–			(5.3	)		(5.3	)		1.4			(3.9	)

Accumulated other comprehensive income	$	66.4		$	14.0		$	80.4		$	(40.8	)	$	39.6



Year ended December 31, 2006
Foreign exchange on U.S. dollar debt designated as a hedge of the net investment in U.S. subsidiaries	$	238.1								$	(3.2	)	$	234.9
Foreign exchange on net investment in U.S. subsidiaries		(170.6	)								2.1			(168.5	)

Accumulated other comprehensive income	$	67.5								$	(1.1	)	$	66.4

During the next twelve months, the Company expects $10.9 million of unrealized holding gains on derivative instruments to be realized and recognized in the Statement of Consolidated Income. Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges will mature during the period ending December 2009.

10. Change in non-cash working capital balances related to operations


(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007			2006			2005



(Use) source of cash:
Accounts receivable and other current assets	$	70.6		$	(101.0	)	$	(61.8	)
Materials and supplies		(28.7	)		(15.8	)		(14.6	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(45.5	)		(0.4	)		39.1
Income and other taxes payable		53.9			15.6			14.0

Change in non-cash working capital	$	50.3		$	(101.6	)	$	(23.3	)


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			75

11. Investments


For the year ended December 31 (in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007		2006



Rail investments accounted for on an equity basis	$	1,528.6	$	37.9
Other investments		140.0		27.0

Total investments	$	1,668.6	$	64.9

DAKOTA, MINNESOTA & EASTERN RAILROAD CORPORATION (“DM&E”)

Effective October 4, 2007, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation and its subsidiaries (DM&E), a Class II railroad with approximately 2,500 miles of track in the U.S. Midwest, for a purchase price of approximately US$1.5 billion, including acquisition costs.

The transaction is subject to review and approval by the United States Surface Transportation Board (STB), pending which the shares of DM&E have been placed into an independent voting trust. The voting trust is required by U.S. law so the Company does not exercise control over DM&E prior to approval of the transaction by the STB. The Company is currently accounting for the purchase by the equity method until such time as the acquisition has been approved by the STB; upon final approval the acquisition will be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. This final approval is not expected to be received until late 2008. As such the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the equity investment and equity earnings of DM&E for the period October 4 to December 31, 2007. The equity income from the Company’s investment in DM&E, which is recorded net of tax, was $12.3 million in 2007, and is recorded in “Other income and charges” on the Statement of Consolidated Income.

The purchase price included a $1.473 billion cash payment at the closing and future contingent payments of up to approximately US$1.05 billion, which may become payable upon achievement of certain milestones and transaction costs of $20 million incurred to December 31, 2007. The Company drew down US$1.27 billion from an eighteen-month credit agreement entered into in October 2007 specifically to fund the acquisition of DM&E. Future contingent payments of US$350 million would become due when construction starts of the Powder River Basin expansion project prior to December 31, 2025. Further future contingent payments of up to approximately US$700 million would become due upon the movement of specified volumes over the Powder River Basin extension prior to December 31, 2025. The contingent payments would be accounted for as an increase in the purchase price. Intangible assets acquired are subject to amortization. Neither the amortization of intangible assets nor goodwill are deductible for tax purposes.

The following table reflects the purchase price allocation, based on the fair value of DM&E’s assets, owned and leased, and liabilities acquired at acquisition, which is subject to final valuations, the impact of which is not expected to have a material effect on the result of operations.


October 4, 2007 (in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007



Current assets	$	91
Railroad properties		1,935
Intangible assets		50
Goodwill		163
Other assets		2

Total assets acquired		2,241

Current liabilities		104
Future income taxes		576
Debt and other liabilities		68

Total liabilities assumed		748

Investment in net assets of DM&E	$	1,493


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
76

ASSET-BACKED COMMERCIAL PAPER (“ABCP”)

At December 31, 2007, the Company held Canadian third party asset-backed commercial paper (“ABCP”) issued by a number of trusts with an original cost of $143.6 million. At the dates the Company acquired these investments they were rated R1 (High) by Dominion Bond Rating Service (“DBRS”), the highest credit rating issued for commercial paper, and backed by R1 (High) rated assets and liquidity agreements. These investments matured during the third quarter of 2007 but, as a result of liquidity issues in the ABCP market, did not settle on maturity. As a result, the Company has classified its ABCP as long-term assets within Investments after initially classifying them as Cash and cash equivalents.

On August 16, 2007, an announcement was made by a group representing banks, asset providers and major investors that they had agreed in principle to a long-term proposal and interim agreement to convert the ABCP into long-term floating rate notes maturing no earlier than the scheduled maturity of the underlying assets. On September 6, 2007, a pan-Canadian restructuring committee consisting of major investors was formed. The committee was created to propose a solution to the liquidity problem affecting the ABCP market and has retained legal and financial advisors to oversee the proposed restructuring process.

□		$12.5 million is represented by traditional securitized assets and the Company will, on restructuring, receive replacement long-term floating rate notes that are expected to receive a AAA credit rating;

□		$119.0 million is represented by a combination of leveraged collaterized debt, synthetic assets and traditional securitized assets and the Company will, on restructuring, receive replacement senior and subordinated long-term floating rate notes. The senior notes are expected to obtain a AAA rating while the subordinated notes are likely to be unrated; and

□		$12.1 million is represented by assets that have an exposure to U.S. sub-prime mortgages. On restructuring, the Company is likely to receive long-term floating rate notes that may be rated, although at this time the pan-Canadian restructuring committee has provided no indication of the likely rating these notes may receive.

The interest rates and maturities of the various long-term floating rate notes, discount rates and credit losses modelled are:




Probability weighted average interest rate		4.6%
Weighted average discount rate		5.3%
Maturity of long-term floating rate notes	five to seven years
Credit losses	nil to 25 % on a going concern basis 5 % to 50 % on a liquidation basis

Interest rates and credit losses vary by each of the different replacement long-term floating rate notes that are expected to be issued as each has different credit ratings and risks. Interest rates and credit losses also vary by the different probable cash flow scenarios that have been modelled.

Discount rates vary dependent upon the credit rating of the replacement long-term floating rate notes.

Maturities vary by different replacement long-term floating rate notes as a result of the expected maturity of the underlying assets.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			77

In addition, assumptions have also been made as to the amount of restructuring costs that the Company will bear.

Based on additional information that became publicly available during the fourth quarter of 2007, the probability weighted cash flows resulted in an estimated fair value of the Company’s investment in ABCP of $122.1 million at December 31, 2007. This was unchanged from the estimated fair value at September 30, 2007. The reduction in the fair value of $21.5 million compared to the original cost of the ABCP was recorded as a charge to income in the third quarter of 2007 with no further charges required in the fourth quarter of 2007.

In view of the continuing uncertainties regarding the value of the assets which underlie the ABCP, the amount and timing of cash flows and the outcome of the restructuring process could give rise to a further material change in the value of the Company’s investment in ABCP and could impact the Company’s near term earnings.

OTHER INVESTMENTS

Effective January 1, 2005 , CP’s 50 % investment in the Detroit River Tunnel Partnership (“DRTP”) has been accounted for on a proportionate consolidation basis. Summarized financial information for the Company’s interest in the DRTP is as follows:


(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007		2006



Current assets	$	0.8	$	0.9
Long-term assets		51.0		48.0
Current liabilities		2.5		2.1
Long-term liabilities		0.5		0.5
Revenues		12.9		12.8
Expenses		2.4		1.7
Net income		10.5		11.1
Cash provided by operating activities		9.4		8.9
Cash used in investing activities		1.9		1.4
Cash used in financing activities		7.7		7.3

Income before tax from CP’s investment in the DRTP was $10.5 million in 2007 (2006 – $11.1 million; 2005 – $8.2 million). The equity income (loss) from the Company’s investment in the CNCP Niagara-Windsor Partnership was $0.2 million in 2007 (2006 – ($0.6) million; 2005 – ($0.6) million). CP’s investment in the Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company generated equity income of $4.1 million in 2007 (2006 – $3.6 million; 2005 – $3.0 million). Equity income (loss) is recorded in “Other” revenues on the Statement of Consolidated Income.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
78

12. Net properties


			Accumulated		Net book
(in millions of Canadian dollars)	Cost		depreciation		value



2007
Track and roadway	$	8,828.0	$	2,852.1	$	5,975.9
Buildings		342.4		136.0		206.4
Rolling stock		3,593.7		1,485.4		2,108.3
Other		1,632.9		630.4		1,002.5

Total net properties	$	14,397.0	$	5,103.9	$	9,293.1



2006
Track and roadway	$	8,615.1	$	2,770.5	$	5,844.6
Buildings		344.8		154.1		190.7
Rolling stock		3,548.3		1,450.9		2,097.4
Other		1,625.6		635.4		990.2

Total net properties	$	14,133.8	$	5,010.9	$	9,122.9

At December 31, 2007, software development costs of $612.5 million (2006 – $609.8 million) and accumulated depreciation of $239.1 million (2006 – $239.8 million) were included in the category “Other”. Additions during 2007 were $48.8 million (2006 – $37.6 million; 2005 – $39.6 million) and depreciation expense was $50.5 million (2006 – $53.2 million; 2005 – $52.3 million).

At December 31, 2007, net properties included $503.4 million (2006 – $522.5 million) of assets held under capital lease at cost and related accumulated depreciation of $127.5 million (2006 – $112.4 million).

During 2007, capital assets were acquired under the Company’s capital program at an aggregate cost of $908.5 million (2006 – $818.6 million; 2005 – $906.0 million), $12.1 million of which were acquired by means of capital leases (2006 – $21.6 million; 2005 – $0.6 million), and $4.6 million of which were acquired by means of a non-monetary transaction. Cash payments related to capital purchases were $893.2 million in 2007 (2006 – $793.7 million; 2005 – $884.4 million). At December 31, 2007, $2.1 million (2006 – $3.5 million; 2005 – $9.4 million) remained in accounts payable related to the above purchases.

13. Other assets and deferred charges



(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007		2006



Prepaid pension costs	$	1,104.1	$	1,081.2
Other ⁽¹⁾		131.5		142.0

Total other assets and deferred charges	$	1,235.6	$	1,223.2

⁽¹⁾ At December 31, 2007, the category “Other” included assets held for sale that had a carrying value of $17.0 million (2006 – $1.0 million) that were reclassified from “Net properties”.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			79

14. Long-term debt

(in millions of Canadian dollars)

Currency in which payable

2007

2006

6.250 % Notes due 2011

US$

398.8

466.2

7.125 % Debentures due 2031

US$

341.4

407.9

9.450 % Debentures due 2021

US$

244.4

291.4

5.750 % Debentures due 2033

US$

235.5

291.4

4.90 % Medium Term Notes due 2010

CDN$

349.8

350.0

5.95 % 30 – year Notes

US$

432.1

–

5.41 % Senior Secured Notes due 2024

US$

130.4

160.3

6.91 % Secured Equipment Notes due 2008 – 2024

CDN$

212.9

223.2

7.49 % Equipment Trust Certificates due 2008 – 2021

US$

111.2

134.9

Secured Equipment Loan due 2007

US$

–

141.6

Secured Equipment Loan due 2008 – 2015

CDN$

144.2

149.6

Obligations under capital leases due 2008 – 2022 (5.20 % – 6.99 %)

US$

263.5

317.0

Obligations under capital leases due 2008 – 2031 (5.64 % – 5.65 %)

CDN$

13.5

21.9

Bridge financing due 2009

US$

1,256.3

–

Bank loan payable on demand due 2010 (5.883 %)

CDN$

5.1

4.7

4,139.1

2,960.1

Perpetual 4 % Consolidated Debenture Stock

US$

30.3

35.7

Perpetual 4 % Consolidated Debenture Stock

GB£

7.8

9.0

4,177.2

3,004.8

Less: Long-term debt maturing within one year

31.0

191.3

4,146.2

2,813.5

At December 31, 2007, the gross amount of long-term debt denominated in U.S. dollars was US$3,513.8 million (2006 – US$1,927.5 million).

Interest on each of the following instruments is paid semi-annually: 6.250 % Notes and 7.125 % Debentures on April 15 and October 15; 9.450 % Debentures on February 1 and August 1; 5.750 % Debentures on March 15 and September 15; and 4.90 % Medium Term Notes on June 15 and December 15 of each year. All of these Notes and Debentures are unsecured but carry a negative pledge.

The 5.41 % Senior Secured Notes due 2024 are secured by specific locomotive units with a carrying value at December 31, 2007, of $185.2 million. Equal blended semi-annual payments of principal and interest are made on March 3 and September 3 of each year, up to and including September 3, 2023. Final payment of the remaining interest and principal will be made on March 3, 2024.

The 6.91 % Secured Equipment Notes are full recourse obligations of the Company secured by a first charge on specific locomotive units with a carrying value at December 31, 2007 of $187.3 million. The Company made semi-annual payments of interest in the amount of $8.1 million on April 1 and October 1 of each year, up to and including October 1, 2004. Commencing April 1, 2005, and continuing on April 1 and October 1 of each year, the Company pays equal blended semi-annual payments of principal and interest of $10.9 million. Final payment of principal and interest is due October 1, 2024.

The 7.49 % Equipment Trust Certificates are secured by specific locomotive units with a carrying value at December 31, 2007, of $120.8 million. Semi-annual interest payments of US$4.4 million were made on January 15 and July 15 of each year, up to and including January 15, 2005. Beginning on July 15, 2005, and continuing on January 15 and July 15 of each year, the Company makes semi-annual payments that vary in amount and are interest-only payments or blended principal and interest payments. Final payment of the principal is due January 15, 2021.

The Secured Equipment Loan due 2008-2015 is secured by specific locomotive units with a carrying value of $154.2 million at December 31, 2007. The floating interest rate is calculated based on a six-month average Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (calculated based on an average of Bankers’


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
80

Acceptance rates) plus 53 basis points (2007 – 4.91 %; 2006 – 3.89 %). The Company makes blended payments of principal and interest semi-annually on February 1 and August 1 of each year.

The bank loan payable on demand matures in 2010 and carries an interest rate of 5.883 %. The amount of the loan at December 31, 2007, was $195.4 million (2006 – $184.2 million). The Company has offset against this loan a financial asset of $190.3 million (2006 – $179.5 million) with the same financial institution.

The Consolidated Debenture Stock, created by an Act of Parliament of 1889, constitutes a first charge upon and over the whole of the undertaking, railways, works, rolling stock, plant, property and effects of the Company, with certain exceptions.

During 2007, the Company issued US$450 million of 5.95 % 30 – year notes for net proceeds of CDN$485.1 million. The notes are unsecured, but carry a negative pledge. Interest is paid semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year.

In October 2007, the Company obtained bridge financing in the amount of US$1.27 billion for net proceeds of CDN$1.26 billion. The bridge financing is repayable in 2009 and is unsecured. The interest rate is floating and is calculated based on London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a spread (2007 – 5.53 %).

The Secured Equipment Loan due 2007 was secured by specific units of rolling stock. The interest rate was floating and was calculated based on a blend of one-month and three-month average LIBOR plus a spread (2007 – 7.43 %; 2006 – 5.57 %). The Company made blended payments of principal and interest quarterly on February 20, May 20, August 20 and November 20 of each year. The final interest and principal payment occurred on February 20, 2007.

Annual maturities and sinking fund requirements, excluding those pertaining to capital leases, for each of the five years following 2007 are (in millions): 2008 – $252.4; 2009 – $1,277.5; 2010 – $373.3; 2011 – $424.6; 2012 – $35.2.

At December 31, 2007, capital lease obligations included in long-term debt were as follows:


(in millions of Canadian dollars)	Year		Capital leases



		2008	$	27.8
		2009		28.9
		2010		41.5
		2011		22.2
		2012		24.5
	Thereafter			302.4

Total minimum lease payments				447.3
Less: Imputed interest				(170.3	)

Present value of minimum lease payments				277.0
Less: Current portion				(8.3	)

Long-term portion of capital lease obligations			$	268.7

The carrying value of the assets securing the capital lease obligations was $375.8 million at December 31, 2007.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			81

15. Financial instruments

FOREIGN EXCHANGE FORWARD CONTRACTS

During 2007, the company entered into a currency forward to fix the exchange rate on US$400 million 6.250 % Notes due 2011. At December 31, 2007, the unrealized loss on this currency forward was $15.7 million which has been recorded to “Foreign exchange on long-term debt”.

COMMODITY CONTRACTS

Exposure to fluctuations in fuel prices has been partially managed by selling or purchasing crude oil swaps. At December 31, 2007, the Company had entered into futures contracts, which are accounted for as cash flow hedges, to purchase approximately 396,000 barrels (2006 – 1,116,000 barrels) over the 2008-2009 period at average annual prices ranging from US$30.59 to US$38.19 per barrel (2006 – US$32.24 to US$41.59 over the 2007-2009 period). At December 31, 2007, the unrealized gain on crude oil futures was CDN$21.4 million (2006 – CDN$31.7 million). The Company from time to time uses foreign exchange forward contracts to manage the risk caused by foreign exchange variability on fuel purchases and commodity hedges. The Company enters into purchase contracts of U.S. dollars because the Canadian dollar cost of fuel increases if the U.S. dollar appreciates relative to the Canadian dollar. Gains and losses on the crude oil swaps, coupled with foreign exchange forward contracts, offset increases and decreases in the cash cost of fuel. At December 31, 2007, the Company had entered into foreign exchange forward contracts totaling US$14.2 million over the 2008-2009 period at exchange rates ranging from 1.2276 to 1.3008 (2006 – US$45.8 million over the 2007-2009 period at exchange rates ranging from 1.1759 to 1.3008), which are accounted for as cash flow hedges. At December 31, 2007, the unrealized loss on these forward contracts was CDN$3.5 million (2006 – CDN$3.1 million).

INTEREST RATE CONTRACTS

At December 31, 2007, the Company had outstanding interest rate swap agreements, classified as a fair value hedge, for a nominal amount of US$200 million (2006 – US$200.0 million). The swap agreements converted a portion of the Company’s fixed-interest-rate liability into a variable-rate liability for the 6.250 % Notes. At December 31, 2007, the unrealized gains on these interest rate swap agreements was CDN$5.5 million (2006 – CDN$2.8 million).

The following table discloses the terms of the swap agreements at December 31, 2007:





Expiration	October 15, 2011
Notional amount of principal (in CDN$ millions)	$ 198.3
Fixed receiving rate	6.250	%
Variable paying rate	6.655	%

Based on U.S. three-month LIBOR.

During 2007, the Company entered into agreements that established the benchmark rate on CDN$350.0 million of long-term debt, which is expected to be issued in 2008. The fair value of this instrument, which is accounted for as a cash flow hedge, was a loss of CDN$30.6 million at December 31, 2007. During the year, losses of CDN$2.3 million were recognised and recorded in “Net income” and unrealized losses of CDN$28.3 million were recorded in “Other comprehensive loss”.

In 2004 , the Company entered into agreements that established the borrowing rate on US$200.0 million of long-term debt, which was expected to be issued in the first half of 2005. Unrealized gains on this arrangement, which was accounted for as a cash flow hedge, were CDN$1.8 million at December 31, 2004. In the first quarter of 2005, the hedge was terminated as the Company decided not to issue the debt and the $5.8-million gain on settlement was recorded in “Other income and charges”.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
82

CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT

Counterparties to financial instruments expose the Company to credit losses in the event of non-performance. However, the Company does not anticipate non-performance that would materially impact the Company’s financial statements because dealings have been with counterparties of high credit quality and adequate provisions have been made. In addition, the Company believes there are no significant concentrations of credit risk ⁽¹⁾.

INTEREST RATE EXPOSURE AND FAIR VALUES

The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk along with the total carrying amounts and fair values of its financial instruments are summarized in the following tables ⁽¹⁾:

Fixed interest rate maturing in

2007

At floating

2009

2013

Total carrying

(in millions of Canadian dollars)

interest rates

2008

to 2012

and after

value

Fair value

Financial assets ⁽¹⁾

Cash and short-term investments

378.1

–

378.1

Crude oil swaps, unrealized gain

–

21.4

Financial liabilities

Short-term borrowings

229.7

–

229.7

6.250 % Notes

–

396.5

–

396.5

413.8

7.125 % Debentures

–

347.0

374.0

9.450 % Debentures

–

247.8

300.5

5.750 % Debentures

–

247.8

226.2

5.950 % 30-year notes

–

446.1

403.8

4.90 % Medium Term Notes

–

350.0

–

350.0

351.9

5.41 % Senior Secured Notes

–

2.8

13.7

95.6

112.1

123.6

6.91 % Secured Equipment Notes

–

7.0

33.3

176.3

216.6

244.6

7.49 % Equipment Trust Certificates

–

4.4

42.6

98.2

145.2

124.4

Secured Equipment Loan

133.1

–

133.1

145.2

4 % Consolidated Debenture Stock

–

38.1

33.8

Obligations under capital leases

–

8.3

46.7

222.0

277.0

296.8

Bridge financing

1,259.0

–

1,259.0

Bank loan payable on demand

–

5.1

–

5.1

5.0

Transaction costs

–

(44.2

)

–

Total long-term debt

1,392.1

27.6

882.8

1,918.9

4,177.2

4,302.6

Notional amounts

Fair value

Foreign exchange forward contracts on fuel, unrealized loss

–

3.5

Interest rate swaps, unrealized loss

198.3

–

(198.3

)

–

5.5

Total return swap, unrealized loss

–

3.8

Interest rate forward, unrealized loss

–

30.6

Currency forward, unrealized loss

–

15.7

⁽¹⁾ The discussion provided relating to credit risk management and interest rate exposure and fair values and the information in the table above does not consider risks related to the Company’s investment in ABCP which is discussed in more detail in Note 11.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			83


			Fixed interest rate maturing in
2006	At floating				2008			2012		Total carrying
(in millions of Canadian dollars)	interest rates		2007		to 2011			and after		value		Fair value



Financial assets
Cash and short-term investments	$	124.3	$	–	$	–		$	–	$	124.3	$	124.3
Crude oil swaps, unrealized gain		–		–		–			–		–		31.7

Financial liabilities
6.250 % Notes		–		–		466.2			–		466.2		487.0
7.125 % Debentures		–		–		–			407.9		407.9		484.3
9.450 % Debentures		–		–		–			291.4		291.4		381.7
5.750 % Debentures		–		–		–			291.4		291.4		300.6
4.90 % Medium Term Notes		–		–		350.0			–		350.0		355.3
5.41 % Senior Secured Notes		–		3.8		17.5			139.0		160.3		157.8
6.91 % Secured Equipment Notes		–		6.6		31.1			185.5		223.2		259.0
7.49 % Equipment Trust Certificates		–		3.1		14.8			117.0		134.9		155.7
Secured Equipment Loan		141.6		–		–			–		141.6		141.6
Secured Equipment Loan		149.6		–		–			–		149.6		149.6
4 % Consolidated Debenture Stock		–		–		–			44.7		44.7		37.4
Obligations under capital leases		–		27.0		50.4			261.5		338.9		358.2
Bank loan payable on demand		–		4.7		–			–		4.7		4.7

Total long-term debt		291.2		45.2		930.0			1,738.4		3,004.8		3,272.9


	Notional amounts											Fair value



Foreign exchange forward contracts on fuel, unrealized loss		–		–		–			–		–		3.1
Interest rate swaps, unrealized loss		233.1		–		(233.1	)		–		–		2.8
Total return swap		–		–		–			–		1.2		1.2

The Company has determined the estimated fair values of its financial instruments based on appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessary to develop these estimates. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of what the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different assumptions or methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument:

□		Short-term financial assets and liabilities are valued at their carrying amounts as presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, which are reasonable estimates of fair value due to the relatively short period to maturity of these instruments.

□		The fair value of publicly traded long-term debt is determined based on market prices at December 31, 2007 and 2006. The fair value of other long-term debt is estimated based on rates currently available to the Company for long-term borrowings, with terms and conditions similar to those borrowings in place at the applicable Consolidated Balance Sheet date.

□		The fair value of derivative instruments is calculated based on market prices or rates at December 31, 2007 and 2006, which generally reflects the estimated amount the Company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the applicable Consolidated Balance Sheet date.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
84

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE MANAGEMENT

The Company entered into a TRS, effective in May 2006, in order to reduce the volatility and total cost to the Company over time of four types of stock-based compensation: SARs, DSUs, RSUs and PSUs. The value of the TRS derivative is linked to the market value of our stock and is intended to mitigate the impact on expenses of share value movements on SARs, DSUs, RSUs and PSUs. “Compensation and benefits” expense increased by $2.6 million (2006 – $1.2 million) for the year ended December 31, 2007 due to unrealized losses for these swaps. These losses substantially offset the benefits recognized in these stock-based compensation programs due to fluctuations in share price during the period the TRS was in place.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount of consideration that would be agreed upon in an arm’s length transaction between willing parties. The Company uses the following methods and assumptions to estimate fair value of each class of financial instruments for which carrying amounts are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows:

Loans and Receivables

Accounts receivable and other current assets The carrying amounts included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Investments Long-term receivable balances are carried at amortized cost based on an initial fair value determined using discounted cash flow analysis using observable market based inputs.

Financial Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings The carrying amounts included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Long-term debt The carrying amount of long-term debt is at amortized cost based on an initial fair value determined using the quoted market prices for the same or similar debt instruments.

Available for Sale

Investments The Company’s equity investments recorded on a cost basis have a carrying value that equals cost as fair value cannot be reliably established as there are no quoted prices in an active market for these investments. The Company’s equity investments recorded on an equity basis have a carrying value equal to cost plus the Company’s share of the investees net income, less any dividends received. These investments are not traded on a liquid market.

Held for Trading

Other assets and deferred charges and deferred liabilities Derivative instruments that are designated as hedging instruments are measured at fair value determined using the quoted market prices for the same or similar instruments. Derivative instruments that are not designated in hedging relationships are classified as held for trading and measured at fair value determined by using quoted market prices for the same or similar instruments and changes in the fair values of such derivative instruments are recognized in net income as they arise.

Cash and cash equivalents The carrying amounts included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Investments ABCP is carried at fair value, which has been determined using valuation techniques that incorporate probability weighted discounted future cash flows reflecting market conditions and other factors that a market participant would consider (see Note 11).

Carrying Value and Fair Value of Financial Instruments


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			85

16. Deferred liabilities


(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007		2006



Provision for restructuring and environmental remediation (Note 18)	$	234.0	$	309.0
Deferred workers’ compensation and personal injury accruals		161.4		162.5
Accrued employee benefits		222.0		208.4
Asset retirement obligations (Note 17)		29.1		30.9
Deferred revenue on rights-of-way license agreements		48.0		45.8
Deferred income credits		32.0		27.3
Stock-based compensation liabilities		75.0		76.6
Financial instruments		13.7		–
Other		92.1		54.1

		907.3		914.6
Less: Amount payable/realizable within one year		192.7		188.9

Total deferred liabilities	$	714.6	$	725.7

Deferred revenue on rights-of-way license agreements is being amortized to income on a straight-line basis over the related lease terms.

17. Asset retirement obligations

The Company has two liabilities related to asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) recorded in “Deferred liabilities”. These liabilities are discounted at 6.25 %. The accretion expense related to these AROs in 2007 was $1.9 million (2006 – $2.0 million; 2005 – $2.1 million), offset by payments made of $0.7 million and a reduction of $0.8 million due to a sale of a related asset (2006 – payments of $0.7 million and a reduction of $3.4 million due to a sale of a related asset; 2005 – payments of $0.6 million and a reduction of $1.0 million due to the sale of the related asset), and revisions to the estimated cash flows of $2.2 million thereby decreasing the ARO liability to $29.1 million at December 31, 2007 (2006 – $30.9 million; 2005 – $32.9 million). Accretion expense is included in “Depreciation and amortization” on the Statement of Consolidated Income.

Upon the ultimate retirement of grain-dependent branch lines, the Company has to pay a fee, levied under the Canada Transportation Act, of $30,000 per mile of abandoned track. The undiscounted amount of the liability was $50.4 million at December 31, 2007 (2006 – $51.9 million), which, when present valued, was $27.7 million at December 31, 2007 (2006 – $29.6 million). The payments are expected to be made in the 2008-2044 period.

The Company also has a liability on a joint facility that will have to be settled upon retirement based on a proportion of use during the life of the asset. The estimate of the obligation at December 31, 2007, was $16.0 million (2006 – $15.3 million), which, when present valued, was $1.4 million at December 31, 2007 (2006 – $1.3 million). For purposes of estimating this liability, the payment related to the retirement of the joint facility is anticipated to be in 37 years.

18. Restructuring accrual and environmental remediation

At December 31, 2007, the provision for restructuring and environmental remediation was $234.0 million (2006 – $309.0 million). The restructuring provision was primarily for labour liabilities for restructuring plans. Payments are expected to continue in diminishing amounts until 2025. The environmental remediation liability includes the cost of a multi-year soil remediation program for various sites, as well as a special charge taken in 2004 related to a specific property.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
86

Set out below is a reconciliation of CP’s liabilities associated with its restructuring and environmental remediation programs:


	Opening											Foreign			Closing
	balance		Accrued						Amortization			exchange			balance
(in millions of Canadian dollars)	Jan. 1		(reduced		)	Payments			of discount		⁽¹⁾	impact			Dec. 31



Year ended December 31, 2007
Labour liability for terminations and severances	$	187.4	$	(12.8	)	$	(46.8	)	$	6.1		$	(4.7	)	$	129.2
Other non-labour liabilities for exit plans		1.4		(0.2	)		(0.2	)		–			(0.2	)		0.8

Total restructuring liability		188.8		(13.0	)		(47.0	)		6.1			(4.9	)		130.0

Environmental remediation program		120.2		7.5			(14.0	)		–			(9.7	)		104.0

Total restructuring and environmental remediation liability	$	309.0	$	(5.5	)	$	(61.0	)	$	6.1		$	(14.6	)	$	234.0



Year ended December 31, 2006
Labour liability for terminations and severances	$	263.6	$	(14.1	)	$	(71.8	)	$	9.8		$	(0.1	)	$	187.4
Other non-labour liabilities for exit plans		5.8		0.7			(5.0	)		0.1			(0.2	)		1.4

Total restructuring liability		269.4		(13.4	)		(76.8	)		9.9			(0.3	)		188.8

Environmental remediation program		129.4		10.5			(19.5	)		–			(0.2	)		120.2

Total restructuring and environmental remediation liability	$	398.8	$	(2.9	)	$	(96.3	)	$	9.9		$	(0.5	)	$	309.0



Year ended December 31, 2005
Labour liability for terminations and severances	$	269.7	$	33.6		$	(50.5	)	$	12.0		$	(1.2	)	$	263.6
Other non-labour liabilities for exit plans		6.1		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		0.1			(0.2	)		5.8

Total restructuring liability		275.8		33.5			(50.6	)		12.1			(1.4	)		269.4

Environmental remediation program		172.9		(22.4	)		(18.4	)		–			(2.7	)		129.4

Total restructuring and environmental remediation liability	$	448.7	$	11.1		$	(69.0	)	$	12.1		$	(4.1	)	$	398.8

⁽¹⁾Amortization of discount is charged to income as “Compensation and benefits” (2007 – $3.3 million; 2006 – $5.1 million; 2005 – $0.7 million), “Purchased services and other” (2007 – nil; 2006 – nil; 2005 – $2.3 million) and “Other income and charges” (2007 – $2.8 million; 2006 – $4.8 million; 2005 – $9.2 million), as applicable.

New accruals and adjustments to previous accruals were a net reduction of $5.5 million in 2007, compared with net reduction of $2.9 million in 2006 and a net increase of $11.1 million in 2005.

In 2007, CP recorded a net reduction in the restructuring liability included in “Deferred liabilities”, of $13.0 million, mainly due to experience gains on termination costs for previously accrued labour initiatives. This reduction was partially offset by an increase in the environmental remediation liability, also included in “Deferred liabilities”, of $7.5 million. This net reduction was recorded in “Compensation and benefits” and “Purchased services and other”.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			87

In 2006, CP recorded a net reduction in the restructuring liability included in “Deferred liabilities”, of $13.4 million, mainly due to experience gains on termination costs for previously accrued labour initiatives. This reduction was partially offset by an increase in the environmental remediation liability, also included in “Deferred liabilities”, of $10.5 million. This net reduction was recorded in “Compensation and benefits” and “Purchased services and other”.

In 2005, CP established new restructuring initiatives to reduce labour costs, primarily in management and administrative areas, which were completed in 2006. These initiatives required recording a special charge of $44.2 million for labour restructuring, which included $43.1 million for labour restructuring liabilities and $1.1 million for accelerated recognition of stock-based compensation (included elsewhere in “Deferred liabilities” and in “Contributed surplus”). This charge was partially offset by a net reduction of $9.6 million (included in “Compensation and benefits” and “Purchased services and other”), largely due to experience gains on previously accrued amounts and minor new initiatives. The adjustment to the environmental remediation program was largely due to a binding settlement reached during the third quarter of 2005 with a potentially responsible party, resulting in a reduction of $33.9 million to the special charge recorded in 2004, including a $30.3-million reduction in the environmental liability. The $30.3-million reduction was partially offset by $7.9 million of other adjustments, due largely to monitoring and technical support costs related to multi-year sites.

In the fourth quarter of 2004, CP recorded a special charge of $90.9 million for investigation, characterization, remediation and other applicable actions related to environmental contamination at a CP-owned property in the U.S., which includes areas previously leased to third parties. CP is participating in the State of Minnesota’s voluntary investigation and clean-up program at the east side of the property. The property is the subject of ongoing fieldwork being undertaken in conjunction with the appropriate state authorities to determine the extent and magnitude of the contamination and the appropriate remediation plan. In 2005, CP filed with the State of Minnesota a response action plan for the east side of the property.

In the third quarter of 2005, a binding settlement was reached relating to a lawsuit with a potentially responsible party in relation to portions of past environmental contamination at the above-mentioned CP-owned property. As a result, the lawsuit against this party was dismissed. CP reduced accrued liabilities related to this property and recognized in 2005 a total reduction of $33.9 million to the special charge for environmental remediation recorded in 2004.

In the fourth quarter of 2005, CP recorded a special charge of $44.2 million for a labour restructuring initiative. The job reductions, mostly in management and administrative positions, were completed in 2006.

19. Shareholders’ equity

AUTHORIZED AND ISSUED SHARE CAPITAL

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation authorize for issuance an unlimited number of Common Shares and an unlimited number of First Preferred Shares and Second Preferred Shares. At December 31, 2007, no Preferred Shares had been issued.

An analysis of Common Share balances is as follows:


	2007			2006
(in millions)	Number			Number



Share capital, January 1		155.5			158.2
Shares issued under stock option plans		1.0			2.3
Shares repurchased		(3.2	)		(5.0	)

Share capital, December 31		153.3			155.5

The change in the Share capital balance includes $5.1 million (2006 – $3.3 million) related to the cancellation of the SARs liability on exercise of tandem stock options, and $0.7 million (2006 – $1.1 million) of stock-based compensation transferred from “Contributed surplus”.

The balance remaining in contributed surplus of $42.4 million relates to stock-based compensation recognized to date on unexercised options and will be attributed to share capital as options are exercised.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
88

In May 2005, the Company completed the necessary filings for a normal course issuer bid to purchase, for cancellation, up to 2.5 million of its outstanding Common Shares, representing 1.6 % of the approximately 159.0 million Common Shares outstanding just prior to the filing date. In March 2006, the normal course issuer bid was amended to increase the number of Common Shares eligible to be purchased to 3.3 million. Share repurchases were made during the 12-month period beginning June 6, 2005, and ending June 5, 2006. In June 2006, the Company completed the acquisition of Common Shares under the previous normal course issuer bid and filed a new normal course issuer bid to purchase, for cancellation, up to 3.9 million of its outstanding Common Shares. Under this filing, share purchases could have been made during the 12-month period beginning June 6, 2006, and ending June 5, 2007. Of the 3.9 million shares authorized for purchase under this filing, 3.4 million were purchased in 2006 at an average price per share of $56.66 and 0.2 million shares were purchased during the three months ended March 31, 2007 at an average price per share of $64.11.

In March 2007, the Company completed the filing for a new normal course issuer bid (“2007 NCIB”) to cover the period of March 28, 2007 to March 27, 2008 to purchase, for cancellation, up to 5.0 million of its outstanding Common Shares. Effective April 30, 2007, the 2007 NCIB was amended to purchase, for cancellation, up to 15.3 million of its outstanding Common Shares. Of the 15.3 million shares authorized under the 2007 NCIB, 2.7 million shares were purchased at an average price per share of $73.64.

In addition, pursuant to a notice of intention to make an exempt issuer bid filed on March 23, 2007, the Company purchased, for cancellation, 0.3 million shares through a private agreement with an arm’s length third party on March 29, 2007 at an average price of $63.12.

The purchases are made at the market price on the day of purchase, with consideration allocated to share capital up to the average carrying amount of the shares, and any excess allocated to contributed surplus and retained income. When shares are purchased, it takes three days before the transaction is settled and the shares are cancelled. The cost of shares purchased in a given month and settled in the following month is accrued in the month of purchase.

The table below summarizes the allocation of the cost of shares repurchased between share capital, contributed surplus and retained income.


(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007		2006



Share capital	$	24.5	$	36.8
Contributed surplus		–		223.1
Retained income		206.6		26.5

CP Common Shares repurchased	$	231.1	$	286.4

20. Pensions and other benefits

The Company has both defined benefit (“DB”) and defined contribution (“DC”) pension plans.

The DB plans provide for pensions based principally on years of service and compensation rates near retirement. Pensions for Canadian pensioners are partially indexed to inflation. Annual employer contributions to the DB plans, which are actuarially determined, are made on the basis of being not less than the minimum amounts required by federal pension supervisory authorities.

Other benefits include post-retirement health and life insurance for pensioners, and post-employment long-term disability and workers’ compensation benefits, which are based on Company-specific claims.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			89

At December 31, the elements of defined benefit cost for DB pension plans and other benefits recognized in the year included the following components:


	Pensions									Other benefits

(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007			2006			2005			2007			2006			2005



Current service cost (benefits earned by employees in the year)	$	97.6		$	101.9		$	75.7		$	16.8		$	15.1		$	13.8
Interest cost on benefit obligation		420.0			400.0			405.0			26.7			26.6			27.3
Actual return on fund assets		(275.9	)		(927.4	)		(849.8	)		(1.2	)		(0.6	)		(0.7	)
Actuarial (gain) loss		(1.4	)		35.2			693.7	⁽¹⁾		(1.1	)		(2.9	)		29.8
Plan amendments		22.5			1.3			56.5			–			(1.2	)		(6.7	)
Settlement gain		–			–			–			(10.7	)⁽²⁾		–			–

Elements of employee future benefit cost, before adjustments to recognize the long-term nature of employee future benefit costs		262.8			(389.0	)		381.1			30.5			37.0			63.5
Adjustments to recognize the long-term nature of employee future benefit costs:
Amortization of transitional (asset) obligation		(16.2	)		(16.2	)		(16.2	)		12.4			12.4			12.7
Difference between expected return and actual return on fund assets		(278.3	)		401.2			351.2			0.6			–			–
Difference between actuarial loss (gain) recognized and actual actuarial loss (gain) on benefit obligation		99.9			64.9			(638.1	)		6.8			9.1			(25.6	)
Difference between amortization of prior service costs and actual plan amendments		(5.8	)		14.5			(41.3	)		(0.2	)		1.0			6.7

Net benefit cost	$	62.4		$	75.4		$	36.7		$	50.1		$	59.5		$	57.3

⁽¹⁾ Actuarial loss for 2005 was largely a result of a decrease in the discount rate.

⁽²⁾ Settlement gain from certain post-retirement benefit obligations being assumed by a U.S. national multi-employer benefit plan.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
90

Information about the Company’s DB pension plans and other benefits, in aggregate, is as follows:


	Pensions						Other benefits

(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007			2006			2007			2006



Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at January 1	$	7,892.7		$	7,732.2		$	509.5		$	498.9
Current service cost		97.6			101.9			16.8			15.1
Interest cost		420.0			400.0			26.7			26.6
Employee contributions		53.4			53.9			0.2			0.2
Benefits paid		(436.9	)		(432.1	)		(35.7	)		(33.2	)
Foreign currency changes		(22.1	)		0.3			(9.3	)		0.3
Actuarial loss (gain)		(1.4	)		35.2			(1.1	)		(2.9	)
Plan amendments and other		22.5			1.3			–			4.5
Release due to settlement		–			–			(15.4	)		–

Benefit obligation at December 31	$	8,025.8		$	7,892.7		$	491.7		$	509.5

Change in fund assets:
Fair value of fund assets at January 1	$	7,649.2		$	6,890.1		$	11.9		$	11.9
Actual return on fund assets		275.9			927.4			1.2			0.6
Employer contributions		86.4			209.5			34.9			32.4
Employee contributions		53.4			53.9			0.2			0.2
Benefits paid		(436.9	)		(432.1	)		(35.7	)		(33.2	)
Foreign currency changes		(17.5	)		0.4			–			–

Fair value of fund assets at December 31	$	7,610.5		$	7,649.2		$	12.5		$	11.9

Funded status – plan deficit	$	(415.3	)	$	(243.5	)	$	(479.2	)	$	(497.6	)
Unamortized prior service cost		132.6			126.9			(0.7	)		(1.0	)
Unamortized net transitional (asset) obligation		(80.3	)		(96.5	)		61.7			74.1
Unamortized experience losses:
Deferred investment losses due to use of market-related value to determine net benefit cost		(181.2	)		(568.9	)		–			–
Unamortized net actuarial loss		1,647.3	⁽¹⁾		1,861.7	⁽¹⁾		101.9			118.9

Accrued benefit asset (liability) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet	$	1,103.1		$	1,079.7		$	(316.3	)	$	(305.6	)

⁽¹⁾The amount by which these losses exceed the 10 % corridor (representing 10 % of the benefit obligation) was equal to $844.7 million at December 31, 2007 (2006 – $1,072.4 million). Any such excess is amortized, commencing in the following year, over the expected average remaining service period of active employees expected to receive benefits under the plan (December 31, 2007 – 11 years; December 31, 2006 – 11 years). In 2007, $98.5 million was amortized and included in the net benefit cost (2006 – $100.1 million).


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			91

The accrued benefit asset (liability) is included on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows:


	Pensions						Other benefits

(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007			2006			2007			2006



Other assets and deferred charges	$	1,104.1		$	1,081.2		$	–		$	–
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(0.2	)		(0.3	)		(38.3	)		(21.5	)
Other long-term liabilities		(0.8	)		(1.2	)		(278.0	)		(284.1	)

Accrued benefit asset (liability) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet	$	1,103.1		$	1,079.7		$	(316.3	)	$	(305.6	)

The measurement date used to determine the plan assets and the accrued benefit obligation is December 31 (November 30 for U.S. pension plans). The most recent actuarial valuations for pension funding purposes were performed as at January 1, 2007. The next actuarial valuations for pension funding purposes will be performed as at January 1, 2008.

Included in the benefit obligation and fair value of fund assets at year end were the following amounts in respect of plans where the benefit obligation exceeded the fund assets:


	Pensions						Other benefits

(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007			2006			2007			2006



Benefit obligation	$	(8,025.8	)	$	(7,892.7	)	$	(491.7	)	$	(509.5	)
Fair value of fund assets		7,610.5			7,649.2			12.5			11.9

	$	(415.3	)	$	(243.5	)	$	(479.2	)	$	(497.6	)

Actuarial assumptions used were approximately:


(percentages)	2007			2006			2005



Benefit obligation at December 31:
Discount rate		5.60			5.40			5.25
Projected future salary increases		3.00			3.00			3.00
Health care cost trend rate		9.50	⁽¹⁾		10.00	⁽¹⁾		10.00	⁽¹⁾
Benefit cost for year ended December 31:
Discount rate		5.40			5.25			6.00
Expected rate of return on fund assets		8.00			8.00			8.00
Projected future salary increases		3.00			3.00			3.00
Health care cost trend rate		10.00	⁽¹⁾		10.00	⁽¹⁾		8.50	⁽²⁾

⁽¹⁾ The health care cost trend rate is projected to decrease by 0.5 % per year from a 10.0 % rate in 2006 and 2007 to approximately 5.0 % per year in 2017.

⁽²⁾ For this prior period, the health care cost trend rate was projected to decrease by 0.5 % per year to approximately 4.5 % per year in 2012.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
92

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects:


	One percentage			One percentage
Favourable (unfavourable) (in millions of Canadian dollars)	point increase			point decrease



Effect on the total of service and interest costs	$	(1.2	)	$	1.1
Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation	$	(14.8	)	$	14.0

PLAN ASSETS

The Company’s pension plan asset allocation, and the current weighted average permissible range for each major asset class, were as follows:

Percentage of plan

assets at December 31

Asset allocation (percentage)

Current permissible range

2007

2006

Equity securities

47 – 53

49.4

56.3

Debt securities

37 – 43

41.6

38.1

Real estate and infrastructure

8 – 12

9.0

5.6

Total

100.0

100.0

The Company’s investment strategy is to achieve a long-term (five- to ten-year period) real rate of return of 5.5 %, net of all fees and expenses. The Company’s best estimate of long-term inflation of 2.5 % yields a long-term nominal target of 8.0 %, net of all fees and expenses. In identifying the asset allocation ranges, consideration was given to the long-term nature of the underlying plan liabilities, the solvency and going-concern financial position of the plan, long-term return expectations and the risks associated with key asset classes as well as the relationships of their returns with each other, inflation and interest rates. When advantageous and with due consideration, derivative instruments may be utilized, provided the total value of the underlying asset represented by financial derivatives, excluding currency forwards, is limited to 20 % of the market value of the fund.

At December 31, 2007, fund assets consisted primarily of listed stocks and bonds, including 54,440 of the Company’s Common Shares (2006 – 132,600) at a market value of $3.5 million (2006 – $8.1 million) and 6.91 % Secured Equipment Notes issued by the Company at a par value of $3.9 million (2006 – $4.1 million) and at a market value of $4.3 million (2006 – $4.7 million).

CASH FLOWS

In 2007, the Company contributed $82.9 million to its registered pension plans (2006 – $202.0 million), including $3.2 million to the defined contribution plan (2006 – $3.1 million). In addition, the Company made payments directly to employees, their beneficiaries or estates or to third-party benefit administrators of $40.7 million (2006 – $42.0 million) with respect to supplemental pension plan benefits and other benefits.

DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN

Canadian non-unionized employees have the option to participate in the DC plan. The DC plan provides a pension based on total employee and employer contributions plus investment income earned on those contributions. Employee contributions are based on a percentage of salary. The Company matches employee contributions to a maximum percentage each year. In 2007, the net cost of this plan, which generally equals the employer’s required contribution, was $3.2 million (2006 – $3.0 million; 2005 – $3.1 million).


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			93

POST-EMPLOYMENT RESTRUCTURING BENEFITS

The Company accrues post-employment labour liabilities as part of its restructuring accruals (see Note 18) that are discounted at rates of 5.25 % and 6.75 %. The labour portion of the Company’s accrued restructuring liability was as follows:


(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007			2006



Change in liability:
Restructuring labour liability at January 1	$	160.8		$	224.8
Plan adjustment		(12.8	)		(14.1	)
Interest cost		8.9			12.0
Benefits paid		(36.8	)		(61.8	)
Foreign currency changes		(4.7	)		(0.1	)

Restructuring labour liability at December 31		115.4			160.8

Unfunded restructuring labour amount		(115.4	)		(160.8	)
Unamortized net transitional amount		(13.8	)		(26.6	)

Accrued restructuring labour liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet	$	(129.2	)	$	(187.4	)

21. Stock-based compensation

At December 31, 2007, the Company had several stock-based compensation plans, including a stock option plan, tandem SARs, a DSU plan, a RSU plan, a PSU plan and an employee stock savings plan. These plans resulted in a compensation cost in 2007 of $33.7 million (2006 – $52.1 million; 2005 – $38.7 million).

REPLACEMENT OPTIONS AND SARS

Due to the reorganization of Canadian Pacific Limited (“CPL”) and the spin-off of its subsidiary companies in October 2001, all CPL employees who held CPL options at the date of the spin-off received in exchange for their CPL options fully-vested replacement options and SARs in the spun-off companies, according to the reorganization ratio used for Common Shares. The exercise price of the CPL options and SARs was allocated among the replacement options and SARs of each of the spun-off companies, based on a formula using the weighted average trading price of the spun-off companies for their first 10 days of trading.

By agreement between CP and its former affiliates, the difference between the strike price and the exercise price of SARs of the former affiliates held by CP employees is recognized as an expense by CP. The difference between the strike price and the exercise price of CP SARs held by employees of the former affiliates is recovered from the former affiliates.

SARs are attached to 50 % of the options and there is a one-to-one cancellation ratio between those options and SARs.

STOCK OPTION PLANS AND SARS

Under the Company’s stock option plans, options are granted to eligible employees to purchase Common Shares of the Company at a price equal to the market value of the shares at the grant date. CP follows the fair value-based approach to accounting for stock-based compensation for options issued for years beginning in 2003. Compensation expense is recognized for stock options over the shorter of the vesting period or employee service period based on their estimated fair values on the dates of grant, as determined by the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Options granted between January 1 and December 31, 2002, are not recorded at fair value and, as such, no compensation expense has been recorded for these options.

Pursuant to the employee plan, options may be exercised upon vesting, which is between 24 and 36 months after the grant date, and will expire after 10 years (“regular options”).

Some options vest after 48 months, unless certain performance targets are achieved, in which case vesting is accelerated and will expire five years after the grant date (“performance-accelerated options”). Some options will only vest when certain performance targets are achieved and will expire, if the performance targets are not achieved within a specific time frame, and will expire five years and three months after the grant date (“performance-contingent options”).


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
94

At December 31, 2007, there were 3,602,761 (2006 – 669,864; 2005 – 1,836,254) Common Shares available for the granting of future options under the stock option plans, out of the 15,578,642 (2006 – 11,500,000; 2005 – 11,500,000) Common Shares currently authorized.

With the granting of regular options, employees are simultaneously granted SARs equivalent to one-half the number of regular options granted. A SAR entitles the holder to receive payment of an amount equal to the excess of the market value of a Common Share at the exercise date of the SAR over the related option exercise price. On an ongoing basis, a liability for SARs is accrued on the incremental change in the market value of the underlying stock and amortized to income over the vesting period. SARs may be exercised no earlier than two years and no later than 10 years after the grant date.

Where an option granted is a tandem award, the holder can choose to exercise an option or a SAR of equal intrinsic value.

In 2007, the expense for stock options was $10.7 million (2006 – $11.1 million; 2005 – $9.8 million) and for SARs was $8.7 million (2006 – $26.1 million; 2005 – $16.8 million).

The following is a summary of the Company’s fixed stock option plan as of December 31:


	2007					2006
				Weighted					Weighted
	Number of			average		Number of			average
	options			exercise price		options			exercise price



Outstanding, January 1		6,807,644		$	38.50		7,971,917		$	32.07
New options granted		1,304,500			62.60		1,467,900			57.80
Exercised		(972,281	)		31.99		(2,330,664	)		28.59
Forfeited/cancelled		(158,755	)		35.76		(301,509	)		39.07

Outstanding, December 31		6,981,108		$	43.97		6,807,644		$	38.50



Options exercisable at December 31		4,035,008		$	34.12		2,918,294		$	29.64

At December 31, 2007, the details of the stock options outstanding were as follows:


	Options outstanding						Options exercisable
			Weighted
			average		Weighted				Weighted
	Number of		years to		average		Number		average
Range of exercise prices	options		expiration		exercise price		of options		exercise price



$14.07 – $18.96		184,225		2	$	14.49		184,225	$	14.49
$27.62 – $36.64		2,812,483		4		31.31		2,812,483		31.31
$42.05 – $74.89		3,984,400		7		54.21		1,038,300		45.21

Total		6,981,108		6	$	43.97		4,035,008	$	34.12

DEFERRED SHARE UNIT PLAN AND OTHER

The Company established the DSU plan as a means to compensate and assist in attaining share ownership targets set for certain key employees and Directors. A DSU entitles the holder to receive, upon redemption, a cash payment equivalent to the market value of a Common Share at the redemption date. DSUs vest over various periods of up to 36 months and are only redeemable for a specified period after employment is terminated.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			95

Key employees may choose to receive DSUs in lieu of cash payments for certain incentive programs. In addition, when acquiring Common Shares to meet share ownership targets, key employees may be granted a matching number of DSUs up to 33 % of the shares and DSUs acquired during the first six months after becoming eligible under the plan and, thereafter, up to 25 %. Key employees have five years to meet their ownership targets.

An expense to income for DSUs is recognized over the vesting period for both the initial subscription price and the change in value between reporting periods. At December 31, 2007, there were 284,968 (2006 – 335,177; 2005 – 295,224) DSUs outstanding. In 2007, 46,050 (2006 – 65,781; 2005 – 47,891) DSUs were granted. In 2007, 96,259 (2006 – 26,137; 2005 – 44,167) DSUs were redeemed. In 2007, the expense for DSUs was $4.1 million (2006 – $6.8 million; 2005 – $4.1 million).

The Company issued 16,921 RSUs in 2007. The RSUs are subject to time vesting. They will vest on May 31, 2010, and will be cashed out based on the average closing price for the 10 days prior to May 31, 2010. An expense to income for RSUs is recognized over the vesting period. The Company issued 30,000 RSUs in 2005. These RSUs were forfeited in 2006 prior to vesting. An expense to income for RSUs was being recognized over the vesting period and was recovered upon cancellation. In 2007, the expense was $0.2 million (2006 – expense recovery of $0.6 million; 2005 – $0.6 million).

The Company issued 23,855 PSUs in 2007. The PSUs are contingent upon achieving certain performance targets, and would not become payable until 2010. The actual value of the PSUs will be based on the average closing price for the 10 days prior to the entitlement date. An expense to income for PSUs is recognized over the vesting period. In 2007, the expense was $0.7 million (2006 – nil; 2005 – nil).

Under the fair value method, the fair value of options at the grant date was $11.3 million for options issued in 2007 (2006 – $12.4 million; 2005 – $10.1 million). The weighted average fair value assumptions were approximately:


	2007			2006			2005



Expected option life (years)		4.00			4.50			4.50
Risk-free interest rate		3.90	%		4.07	%		3.49	%
Expected stock price volatility		22	%		22	%		24	%
Expected annual dividends per share	$	0.90		$	0.75		$	0.53
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year	$	12.97		$	12.99		$	9.66

EMPLOYEE SHARE PURCHASE PLAN

The Company has an employee share purchase plan whereby both employee and Company contributions are used to purchase shares on the open market for employees. The Company’s contributions are expensed over the one-year vesting period. Under the plan, the Company matches $1 for every $3 contributed by employees up to a maximum employee contribution of 6 % of annual salary.

At December 31, 2007, there were 12,181 participants (2006 – 11,682; 2005 – 8,989) in the plan. The total number of shares purchased in 2007 on behalf of participants, including the Company contribution, was 745,374 (2006 – 657,530; 2005 – 795,728). In 2007, the Company’s contributions totalled $10.4 million (2006 – $10.0 million; 2005 – $8.8 million) and the related expense was $8.9 million (2006 – $8.6 million; 2005 – $7.4 million).

22. Commitments and contingencies

In the normal course of its operations, the Company becomes involved in various legal actions, including claims relating to injuries and damage to property. The Company maintains provisions it considers to be adequate for such actions. While the final outcome with respect to actions outstanding or pending at December 31, 2007, cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management that their resolution will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

At December 31, 2007, the Company had committed to total future capital expenditures amounting to $504.2 million for the years 2008-2016.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
96

At December 31, 2007, the Company had a committed unused line of credit of $408.0 million available for short-term financing, effective until December 2012. The interest rate for this credit facility varies based on bank prime, Bankers’ Acceptances or LIBOR. At December 31, 2007, the Company also had a committed unused credit facility of US$530.0 million available for short-term financing requirements related to the acquisition of DM&E and related capital programs. The interest rate for this facility varies based on LIBOR.

Minimum payments under operating leases were estimated at $614.9 million in aggregate, with annual payments in each of the five years following 2007 of (in millions): 2008 – $120.3; 2009 – $86.8; 2010 – $68.9; 2011 – $60.9; 2012 – $58.0.

GUARANTEES

In the normal course of operating the railway, the Company enters into contractual arrangements that involve providing certain guarantees, which extend over the term of the contracts. These guarantees include, but are not limited to:

□		residual value guarantees on operating lease commitments of $321.7 million at December 31, 2007;

□		guarantees to pay other parties in the event of the occurrence of specified events, including damage to equipment, in relation to assets used in the operation of the railway through operating leases, rental agreements, easements, trackage and interline agreements;

□		indemnifications of certain tax-related payments incurred by lessors and lenders; and

□		certain amounts related to the Company’s investment in the DM&E. These include minimum lease payments of $46.2 million, residual value guarantees of $11.0 million, and a line of credit of US$10 million (see Note 11).

The maximum amount that could be payable under these guarantees, excluding residual value guarantees, cannot be reasonably estimated due to the nature of certain of these guarantees. All or a portion of amounts paid under guarantees to other parties in the event of the occurrence of specified events could be recoverable from other parties or through insurance. The Company has accrued for all guarantees that it expects to pay. At December 31, 2007, these accruals amounted to $7.0 million (2006 – $6.2 million).

INDEMNIFICATIONS

Pursuant to a trust and custodial services agreement with the trustee of the Canadian Pacific Railway Company Pension Trust Fund, we have undertaken to indemnify and save harmless the trustee, to the extent not paid by the fund, from any and all taxes, claims, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses arising out of the performance of the trustee’s obligations under the agreement, except as a result of misconduct by the trustee. The indemnity includes liabilities, costs or expenses relating to any legal reporting or notification obligations of the trustee with respect to the defined contribution option of the pension plans or otherwise with respect to the assets of the pension plans that are not part of the fund. The indemnity survives the termination or expiry of the agreement with respect to claims and liabilities arising prior to the termination or expiry. At December 31, 2007, we had not recorded a liability associated with this indemnification, as we do not expect to make any payments pertaining to it.

23. Segmented information

OPERATING SEGMENT

The Company operates in only one operating segment: rail transportation. Operating results by geographic areas, railway corridors or other lower level components or units of operation are not reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to make decisions about the allocation of resources to, or the assessment of performance of, such geographic areas, corridors, components or units of operation.

At December 31, 2007, one customer comprised 11.5 % (2006 – 11.5 %, 2005 – 14.5 %) of CP’s total revenues. At December 31, 2007, accounts receivable from this customer represented 6.2 % (2006 – 5.6 %) of CP’s “Accounts receivable and other current assets”.

During 2005, the Company prospectively recorded a $23.4-million adjustment to increase revenues in 2005 related to services provided in 2004. The adjustment reflected a change in estimate primarily as a result of a contract settlement with a customer.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			97

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION


(in millions of Canadian dollars)	Canada		United States		Total



2007
Revenues	$	3,716.4	$	991.2	$	4,707.6
Net properties	$	7,745.1	$	1,548.0	$	9,293.1

2006
Revenues	$	3,575.1	$	1,008.1	$	4,583.2
Net properties	$	7,539.3	$	1,583.6	$	9,122.9

2005
Revenues	$	3,404.1	$	987.5	$	4,391.6

The Company’s accounts have been adjusted to reflect an accounting basis that is more comparable with that employed by other Class 1 railways in North America. CP’s principal subsidiaries present unconsolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices for railways as prescribed in the regulations of the Canadian Transportation Agency and the Surface Transportation Board in the United States.

The condensed income statement and balance sheet information, which follows, includes the Canadian operations prepared in accordance with the Uniform Classification of Accounts issued by the Canadian Transportation Agency. The changes required to consolidate the Company’s operations are identified as consolidating entries.

CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION – 2007

Other

Consolidating

(in millions of Canadian dollars)

Canada

United States

countries

entries

Total

Revenues

3,715.9

991.2

–

0.5

4,707.6

Operating expenses

2,949.9

688.6

0.1

(95.2

)

3,543.4

Operating income (loss)

766.0

302.6

(0.1

)

95.7

1,164.2

Interest and other income and charges

230.7

43.8

(30.9

)

(0.5

)

243.1

Foreign exchange (gain) loss on long-term debt

(255.6

)

–

84.4

1.4

(169.8

)

Income taxes

99.8

89.5

0.7

(45.3

)

144.7

Net income (loss)

691.1

169.3

(54.3

)

140.1

946.2

Current assets

1,014.1

358.0

(89.8

)

(114.6

)

1,167.7

Net properties

5,925.7

1,487.5

–

1,879.9

9,293.1

Other long-term assets

2,766.7

1,559.8

515.1

(1,937.4

)

2,904.2

Total assets

9,706.5

3,405.3

425.3

(172.1

)

13,365.0

Current liabilities

1,158.7

232.1

0.3

(46.3

)

1,344.8

Long-term liabilities

5,648.9

1,809.0

–

(895.6

)

6,562.3

Shareholders’ equity

2,898.9

1,364.2

425.0

769.8

5,457.9

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

9,706.5

3,405.3

425.3

(172.1

)

13,365.0


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
98

CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION – 2006


					Other			Consolidating
(in millions of Canadian dollars)	Canada		United States		countries			entries			Total



Revenues	$	3,571.2	$	1,008.1	$	–		$	3.9		$	4,583.2
Operating expenses		2,833.9		736.5		–			(115.8	)		3,454.6

Operating income		737.3		271.6		–			119.7			1,128.6
Interest and other income and charges		196.5		42.0		(25.2	)		9.0			222.3
Foreign exchange (gain) loss on long-term debt		1.2		–		(1.3	)		0.2			0.1
Income taxes		69.6		86.7		0.5			(46.9	)		109.9

Net income	$	470.0	$	142.9	$	26.0		$	157.4		$	796.3



Current assets	$	813.5	$	293.2	$	18.1		$	(119.9	)	$	1,004.9
Net properties		5,673.0		1,569.3		–			1,880.6			9,122.9
Other long-term assets		1,241.7		67.9		414.4			(435.9	)		1,288.1

Total assets	$	7,728.2	$	1,930.4	$	432.5		$	1,324.8		$	11,415.9



Current liabilities	$	924.3	$	227.7	$	0.2		$	86.8		$	1,239.0
Long-term liabilities		4,299.0		1,076.2		–			(54.8	)		5,320.4
Shareholders’ equity		2,504.9		626.5		432.3			1,292.8			4,856.5

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	7,728.2	$	1,930.4	$	432.5		$	1,324.8		$	11,415.9

CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION – 2005


						Other			Consolidating
(in millions of Canadian dollars)	Canada			United States		countries			entries			Total



Revenues	$	3,397.9		$	987.5	$	–		$	6.2		$	4,391.6
Operating expenses		2,731.1			779.0		–			(109.7	)		3,400.4

Operating income		666.8			208.5		–			115.9			991.2
Interest and other income and charges		194.9			42.6		(22.1	)		6.9			222.3
Foreign exchange (gain) loss on long-term debt		(53.8	)		–		13.7			(4.6	)		(44.7	)
Income taxes		165.8			65.0		0.7			39.1			270.6

Net income	$	359.9		$	100.9	$	7.7		$	74.5		$	543.0

24. Reconciliation of Canadian and United States generally accepted accounting principles

The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with GAAP in Canada. The material differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP relating to measurement and recognition are explained below, along with their effect on the Company’s Statement of Consolidated Income and Consolidated Balance Sheet. Certain additional disclosures required under U.S. GAAP have not been provided, as permitted by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			99

ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the following CICA accounting standards Section 3855 “Financial Instruments, Recognition and Measurement”, Section 3861 “Financial Instruments, Presentation and Disclosure”, Section 3865 “Hedging”, Section 1530 “Comprehensive Income” and Section 3251 “Equity” on a retrospective basis without restatement of prior periods, with the exception that “Foreign currency translation adjustments” was reclassified to “AOCI” and “Other comprehensive income”, which largely harmonized the measurement and recognition rules for derivative instruments and hedging with U.S. GAAP. Transaction costs have been added to the fair value of the “Long-term debt” under Canadian GAAP whereas under U.S. GAAP such costs are recorded separately with “Other assets and deferred charges”.

Prior to January 1, 2007, the Company followed the CICA Accounting Guideline No. 13 “Hedging Relationships” (“AcG 13”), which harmonized the documentation standards for financial instruments and hedging with U.S. GAAP, as required by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FASB 133”). Under both Canadian and U.S. GAAP, gains or losses were included in the income statement when the hedged transaction occurs. However, under U.S. GAAP, the ineffective portion of a hedging derivative was immediately recognized in income and the effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that was designated and qualified as cash flow hedges were recorded as a component of AOCI. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that were designated and qualified as fair value hedges were recorded in income along with adjustments to the hedged item. Under Canadian GAAP, derivative instruments that qualified as hedges were not recorded on the balance sheet. Under U.S. GAAP, all derivative instruments were recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. Canadian GAAP required that gains and losses on derivatives meeting hedge accounting requirements be deferred and recognized when the hedged transaction occurs.

PENSIONS AND POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS

The CICA Section 3461 “Employee Future Benefits” permits amortization of net actuarial gains and losses only if the unamortized portion of these gains and losses exceeds 10 % of the greater of the benefit obligation and the market-related value of the plan assets the (“corridor”). This harmonized the Canadian GAAP treatment with FASB Statement No. 87 “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” (“FASB 87”) and FASB Statement No. 106 “Employers’ Accounting for Post-retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions” (“FASB 106”).

Prior to January 1, 2000, all actuarial gains and losses were amortized under Canadian GAAP. Upon transition to the CICA Section 3461 effective January 1, 2000, all unamortized gains and losses, including prior service costs, were accumulated into a net transitional asset, which is being amortized to income over approximately 13 years. This created a difference with U.S. GAAP in 2007, 2006 and 2005, under which prior service costs continued to be amortized over the expected average remaining service period and all other net gains accumulated prior to January 1, 2000, fell within the corridor. In 2007, 2006 and 2005, the difference was reduced due to amortization of losses outside the corridor for Canadian GAAP (see Note 20).

FASB Statement No. 158 “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 123R” (“FASB 158”) requires that the over or under funded status of defined benefit pension and other post-retirement plans be recognized on the balance sheet. FASB 158 became effective for years ending after December 15, 2006. The over or under funded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the benefit obligation, being the projected benefit obligation for pension plans and the accumulated benefit obligation for other post-retirement plans. In addition, any previously unrecognized actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs and credits that arise during the period will be recognized as a component of other comprehensive loss, net of tax. Under Canadian GAAP, the over or under funded status of defined benefit plans are not recognized on the balance sheet, nor does Canadian GAAP currently require the recognition of other comprehensive loss related to defined benefit pension and other post-retirement plans.

Adoption of FASB 158 on a prospective basis at December 31, 2006 resulted in a reduction in “Other assets and deferred charges” of $881.9 million, an increase in “Deferred liabilities” of $345.3 million, a reduction in “AOCI” of $838.8 million and an increase in deferred income tax assets of $388.4 million. The adoption of FASB 158 was reflected as an adjustment to closing “AOCI” at December 31, 2006. In addition, the “Minimum pension liability” of $43.6 million and an intangible asset of $3.9 million at December 31, 2006, with an associated $25.7 million (after tax) balance in “AOCI”, was reclassified to “Unfunded status of defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans”. Prior periods have not been restated.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
100

Prior to the adoption of FASB 158 in 2006, and in accordance with FASB 87, an additional minimum pension liability was required for unfunded plans. The additional minimum pension liability represented the excess of the unfunded accumulated benefit obligation over previously recorded pension cost liabilities and was also charged directly to shareholders’ equity, net of related deferred income taxes.

Under Canadian GAAP, there is no requirement to set up an unfunded pension liability based on an annual funded position test.

POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS

Post-employment benefits are covered by the CICA recommendations for accounting for employee future benefits. Consistent with accounting for post-retirement benefits, the policy permits amortization of actuarial gains and losses only if they fall outside of the corridor. Under FASB Statement No. 112 “Employers’ Accounting for Post-employment Benefits” (“FASB 112”), such gains and losses on post employment benefits that do not vest or accumulate are included immediately in income.

TERMINATION AND SEVERANCE BENEFITS

Termination and severance benefits are covered by the CICA Section 3461 and the CICA Emerging Issues Committee Abstract 134 “Accounting for Severance and Termination Benefits” (“EIC 134”). Upon transition to the CICA Section 3461 effective January 1, 2000, a net transitional asset was created and is being amortized to income over approximately 13 years. Under U.S. GAAP, the expected benefits were not accrued and are expensed when paid.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

FASB issued a revision to Statement No. 123 “Share-based Payment” (“FASB 123R”) which was effective for CP from January 1, 2006. FASB 123R requires the use of an option-pricing model to fair value, at the grant date, share-based awards issued to employees, including stock options, SARs and DSUs. SARs and DSUs are subsequently re-measured at fair value at each reporting period. Under Canadian GAAP, liability awards, such as SARs and DSUs, are accounted for using the intrinsic method. FASB 123R also requires that CP account for forfeitures on an estimated basis. Under Canadian GAAP, CP has elected to account for forfeitures on an actual basis as they occur. CP adopted FASB 123R on January 1, 2006 without restatement of prior periods using the modified prospective approach. In addition, on adoption of FASB 123R, CP has recognized compensation cost attributable to stock-based awards over the period from the grant date to the date the employee becomes eligible to retire when this is shorter than the vesting period (the “non-substantive vesting period approach”).

Previously CP recognized the compensation cost over the vesting period (the “nominal vesting period approach”). Canadian GAAP has similar provisions for the recognition of the compensation cost attributable to stock-based awards over the shorter of the period from grant date to vesting or eligibility for retirement. However, Canadian GAAP introduced these provisions with effect for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the Company adopted them with retroactive restatement of prior periods.

As a result of the adoption of FASB 123R, CP recorded a charge against income in 2006 of $3.0 million ($2.0 million net of tax) as a cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle and 2006 “Compensation and benefit” expense was decreased by $1.5 million ($0.9 million net of tax). There was no impact to cash flow amounts as a result of the adoption of FASB 123R.

Under FASB Interpretation No. 44 “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation” (“FIN 44”), compensation expense must be recorded if the intrinsic value of stock options is not exactly the same immediately before and after an equity restructuring. As a result of the CPL corporate reorganization in 2001, CPL underwent an equity restructuring, which resulted in replacement options in CPRL stock having a different intrinsic value after the restructuring than prior to it. Canadian GAAP did not require the revaluation of these options. The Company adopted on a prospective basis effective January 2003 the CICA Section 3870 “Stock-based Compensation and Other Stock-based Payments”, which requires companies to account for stock options at their fair value. Concurrently, the Company elected to adopt the fair value option under FASB Statement No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-based Compensation” (“FASB 123”).

INTERNAL USE SOFTWARE

Under the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position No. 98-1 “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use” (“SOP 98-1”), certain costs, including preliminary project phase costs, are to be expensed as incurred. These costs are capitalized under Canadian GAAP.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			101

CAPITALIZATION OF INTEREST

The Company expenses interest related to capital projects undertaken during the year unless specific debt is attributed to a capital program. FASB Statement No. 34 “Capitalization of Interest Cost” (“FASB 34”) requires interest costs to be capitalized for all capital programs. Differences in GAAP result in additional capitalization of interest under U.S. GAAP and subsequent related depreciation.

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Under U.S. GAAP, all derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet as either an asset or a liability measured at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are either recognized in earnings or in other comprehensive loss depending on whether specific hedge criteria are met. On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the equivalent Canadian standard for comprehensive income on a prospective basis, which is largely harmonized with FASB Statement No. 130 “Reporting Comprehensive Income” (“FASB 130”).

FASB 130 requires disclosure of the change in equity from transactions and other events related to non-owner sources during the period. In 2007 and the comparative periods presented, other comprehensive loss arose from foreign currency translation on the net investment in self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries, foreign currency translation related to long-term debt designated as a hedge of the net investment in self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries, unfunded pension liability (minimum pension liability in 2005) and changes in the fair value of derivative instruments. In 2006, the Company made an adjustment to reduce deferred income tax liability and reduce deferred income tax expense included in “Other comprehensive loss” by $54.6 million for amounts accumulated in “Other comprehensive loss” prior to 2003.

JOINT VENTURE

The CICA Section 3055 “Interest in Joint Ventures” requires the proportionate consolidation method to be applied to the recognition of interests in joint ventures in consolidated financial statements. The Company has a joint-venture interest in the DRTP. FASB Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18 “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock” (“APB 18”) requires the equity method of accounting to be applied to interests in joint ventures. This has no effect on net income as it represents a classification difference within the income statement and balance sheet. Equity income from DRTP in 2007 was $10.5 million (2006 – $11.2 million, 2005 – $8.2 million).

OFFSETTING CONTRACTS

FASB Financial Interpretation No. 39 “Offsetting of Amounts Relating to Certain Contracts” (“FIN 39”) does not allow netting of assets and liabilities among three parties. In 2003, the Company and one of its subsidiaries entered into a contract with a financial institution. Under Canadian GAAP, offsetting amounts with the same party and with a legal right to offset are netted against each other.

START-UP COSTS

Under EIC 27 “Revenues and Expenditures during the Pre-operating Period”, costs incurred for projects under development may be deferred until the projects are substantially complete. Upon completion, these costs are amortized based on the expected period and pattern of benefit of the expenditures. Under U.S. GAAP, these costs are to be expensed as incurred.

UNCERTAINTY IN TAX POSITIONS

In July 2006, FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Tax Positions” (“FIN 48”) introducing recognition and measurement criteria for income tax positions. An income tax position is a position taken in a filed tax return or a position that will be taken in a future tax return which has been reflected in the recognition and measurement of income or deferred tax assets or liabilities. Under the provisions of FIN 48 a tax position must be evaluated using a more likely than not recognition threshold based on the technical merits of the position and can only be recognized if it is more likely than not that this position will be sustainable on audit. If the position does not meet this threshold, no amount may be accrued. Additionally, the recognized tax position will be measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50 % likely to be realized on settlement. FIN 48 is effective for the Company commencing on January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 had no impact on the financial statements of the Company.


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
102

CAPITAL LEASES

Under FASB Statement No. 13 “Accounting for Leases” (“FASB 13”), which prescribes certain recognition criteria for a capital lease, certain leases, which the Company has recorded as capital leases under Canadian GAAP, do not meet the criteria for capital leases and are recorded as operating leases.

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

There are no material differences in the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows under U.S. GAAP.

FUTURE ACCOUNTING CHANGES

Measurement date of defined benefit pension

FASB 158 also requires, effective in 2008, that pension and other post-retirement benefit plans be measured as of the balance sheet date. The Company’s Canadian plans are already measured as of the balance sheet date, however, the U.S. pension plans currently have a November 30 measurement date. FASB 158 provides two approaches to transition to a fiscal year-end measurement date, both of which are applied prospectively. Under the first approach, the plan assets are measured on November 30, 2007, and then re-measured on January 1, 2008. Under the alternative approach, the plan assets are measured on November 30, 2007 and the next re-measurement is not until December 31, 2008. CP plans has elected to adopt this change in measurement date using the latter approach. The impact of adopting a plan measurement date at the balance sheet date for the Company’s U.S. plans is not anticipated to be material in 2008.

Fair value measurement

In September 2006, FASB issued FASB No. 157 “Fair Value Measurement” (“FASB 157”). This Statement provides guidance for using fair values to measure assets and liabilities. Under the standard, the definition of fair value focuses on the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability (an exit price), not the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability (an entry price). FASB 157 clarifies that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and sets out a fair value hierarchy with the highest priority being quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority being company specific unobservable data. FASB 157 is effective January 1, 2008. The potential impact of adoption on the Company’s financial statements is not anticipated to be material.

Fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities

In February 2007, FASB issued FASB No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“FASB 159”). This standard permits an entity to irrevocably elect fair value on a contract by contract basis as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for many financial instruments and certain other items. An entity electing the fair value option would be required to recognize changes in fair value in earnings. FASB 159 is effective January 1, 2008. At this time the Company has not elected to account for any instruments at fair value under the fair value option of FASB 159.

Business combinations

In December 2007, FASB issued FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007) “Business Combinations” (“FASB 141(revised)”) which replaces FASB Statement No. 141 “Business Combinations”. The new standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; and recognize and measure the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase. FASB 141 (revised) will be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. The adoption of this accounting standard will not impact the current financial statements of the Company.

Non-controlling interests in consolidated financial statements

In December 2007, FASB issued FASB Statement No. 160 “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (“FASB 160”) which requires the Company to report non-controlling interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial statements; and all transactions between an entity and non-controlling interests as equity transactions. FASB 160 is effective for the Company commencing on January 1, 2009 and its adoption is unlikely to impact the financial statements of the Company at that time.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			103

COMPARATIVE INCOME STATEMENT

Consolidated net income and Other comprehensive loss is reconciled from Canadian to U.S. GAAP in the following manner:


(in millions of Canadian dollars, except per share data)	2007			2006			2005



Net income – Canadian GAAP	$	946.2		$	796.3		$	543.0
Increased (decreased) by:
Pension costs		5.8			5.1			7.7
Post-retirement benefits costs		9.4			9.1			9.2
Post-employment benefits costs		7.2			6.7			(4.0	)
Termination and severance benefits		(8.8	)		(8.2	)		(9.4	)
Internal use software – additions		(12.0	)		(9.2	)		(9.8	)
Internal use software – depreciation		8.0			7.1			6.1
Stock-based compensation		(1.7	)		(3.0	)		(3.4	)
Loss on ineffective portion of hedges		(0.4	)		(0.9	)		(6.6	)
Capitalized interest – additions		14.0			4.1			4.4
Capitalized interest – depreciation		(4.5	)		(3.9	)		(3.9	)
Start-up costs		(0.8	)		(10.8	)		–
Fair value of financial instruments		–			(2.3	)		–
Future/deferred income tax expense related to net income		(40.7	)		(19.0	)		1.7

Income before cumulative catch-up adjustment		921.7			771.1			535.0

Cumulative catch-up adjustment on adoption of FASB 123R, net of tax		–			(2.0	)		–



Net income – U.S. GAAP	$	921.7		$	769.1		$	535.0
Other comprehensive loss – Canadian GAAP		(40.8	)		(1.1	)		(9.5	)
Increased (decreased) by:
Unrealized foreign exchange gain on designated net investment hedge		0.4			0.6			4.8
Unfunded pension and post-retirement liability adjustment		(186.6	)		–			–
Minimum pension liability adjustment		–			783.3			(254.3	)
Change in fair value of derivative instruments		–			16.6			86.5
Gain on derivative instruments realized in net income		–			(42.5	)		(55.9	)
Future (deferred) income tax recovery (expense) related to other comprehensive loss		35.7			(210.7	)		76.6

Other comprehensive (loss) income – U.S. GAAP	$	(191.3	)	$	546.2		$	(151.8	)



Earnings per share – U.S. GAAP
Basic earnings per share before cumulative catch-up adjustment on adoption of FASB 123R, net of tax	$	5.98		$	4.90		$	3.38



Basic earnings per share after cumulative catch-up adjustment on adoption of FASB 123R, net of tax	$	5.98		$	4.89		$	3.38



Diluted earnings per share before cumulative catch-up adjustment on adoption of FASB 123R, net of tax	$	5.92		$	4.86		$	3.34



Diluted earnings per share after cumulative catch-up adjustment on adoption of FASB 123R, net of tax	$	5.92		$	4.84		$	3.34


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
104

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (CONTINUED)


(in millions of Canadian dollars)	2007			2006



Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Investment in joint ventures	$	(0.4	)	$	(1.3	)
Income and other taxes payable
Investment in joint ventures		(0.1	)		(0.2	)
Long-term debt maturing within one year
Capital leases		(0.7	)		–

Long-term liabilities
Deferred liabilities
Termination and severance benefits		(10.2	)		(19.0	)
Post-employment benefit liability		5.2			16.4
Under funded status of defined benefit pension and other post-retirement plans		573.0			421.0
Derivative instruments		–			4.8
Investment in joint ventures		(0.5	)		(2.7	)
Stock-based compensation		0.2			(0.6	)
Long-term debt
Marked-to-market hedged portion of debt		–			(2.8	)
Bank loan (FIN 39)		190.3			179.5
Capital leases		(9.7	)		–
Transaction costs on long-term debt		36.0			–
Future/deferred income tax liability		(441.2	)		(437.2	)

Total liabilities		341.9			157.9

Shareholders’ equity
Share capital
Stock-based compensation		20.9			16.9
Contributed surplus
Stock-based compensation		5.2			8.3
Retained income		(156.8	)		(128.4	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Foreign currency translation adjustments		–			(2.1	)
Funding status of defined benefit pension and other post-retirement plans		(1,010.2	)		(858.8	)
Derivative instruments (FASB 133)		4.2			19.4

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	(794.8	)	$	(786.8	)


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			107

FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY


(in millions)	2007		2006			2005⁽¹⁾			2004⁽¹⁾			2003⁽¹⁾		⁽²⁾



Income Statement
Revenues
Freight
Grain	$	938.9	$	904.6		$	754.5		$	668.2		$	644.4
Coal		573.6		592.0			728.8			530.3			444.0
Sulphur and fertilizers		502.0		439.3			447.1			460.0			417.4
Forest products		275.8		316.4			333.9			322.0			328.8
Industrial and consumer products ⁽³⁾		627.9		603.8			542.9			481.4			459.9
Intermodal ⁽³⁾		1,318.0		1,256.8			1,161.1			1,034.7			926.4
Automotive		319.0		314.4			298.0			288.5			304.2

		4,555.2		4,427.3			4,266.3			3,785.1			3,525.1
Other ^{(3) (4) (6)}		152.4		155.9			125.3			117.8			135.6

Total revenues ^{(4) (6)}		4,707.6		4,583.2			4,391.6			3,902.9			3,660.7
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits		1,284.2		1,327.6			1,322.1			1,261.5			1,166.4
Fuel		746.8		650.5			588.0			440.0			393.6
Materials		215.5		212.9			203.3			178.5			179.2
Equipment rents		207.5		181.2			210.0			218.5			238.5
Depreciation		472.0		464.1			445.1			407.1			372.3
Purchased services and other		617.4		618.3			621.6			610.7			583.6

Total operating expenses, before other specified items ^{(4) (6)}		3,543.4		3,454.6			3,390.1			3,116.3			2,933.6

Operating income, before other specified items ^{(4) (6)}		1,164.2		1,128.6			1,001.5			786.6			727.1
Other income and charges, before foreign exchange gains and losses on long-term debt and other specified items ^{(4) (5) (6)}		17.3		27.8			18.1			36.1			33.5
Interest expense		204.3		194.5			204.2			218.6			218.7
Income tax expense, before foreign exchange gains and losses on long-term debt and income tax on other specified items ^{(4) (5) (6)}		269.8		278.8			250.8			172.4			147.0

Income, before foreign exchange gains and losses on long-term debt and other specified items ^{(4) (5) (6)}		672.8		627.5			528.4			359.5			327.9

Foreign exchange gain (loss) on long-term debt (net of income tax) ⁽⁵⁾		125.5		(7.2	)		22.3			94.4			224.4
Other specified items (net of income tax) ⁽⁴⁾		147.9		176.0			(7.7	)		(42.8	)		(153.2	)

Net income	$	946.2	$	796.3		$	543.0		$	411.1		$	399.1


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
108

⁽¹⁾Certain comparative period figures have been restated for retroactive application of a new accounting pronouncement on stock-based compensation for employees eligible to retire before vesting date.

⁽²⁾Restated. Effective January 1, 2004, CP adopted retroactively with restatement the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants’ new accounting standard for asset retirement obligations.

⁽³⁾In 2005, CP reclassified from “Other” revenue certain intermodal-related revenue items consisting of container storage revenue and terminal service fees as part of the intermodal line of business. Also, items relating to food and consumer products have been reclassed from the intermodal group to the renamed Industrial and Consumer Products group.

⁽⁴⁾Before other specified items as follows: For 2007, a $162.9 million income tax benefit was recorded due to Federal income tax rate reductions which was offset by a $21.5 million change in estimated fair value of Canadian third party asset-backed commercial paper ($15.0 million after tax); for 2006, a $176.0-million income tax benefit was recorded due to Federal and Provincial income tax rate reductions; for 2005, a $33.9-million ($20.6 million after tax) reduction to environmental remediation and a $44.2-million ($28.3 million after tax) special charge for labour restructuring; for 2004, a $19.0-million ($12.4 million after tax) reduction of a labour restructuring liability and a $90.9-million ($55.2 million after tax) special charge for environmental remediation; for 2003, a $215.1-million ($141.4 million after tax) special charge for labour restructuring and asset impairment, a $28.9-million ($18.4 million after tax) for a loss on transfer of assets to an outsourcing firm, a $59.3-million favourable adjustment related to the revaluation of future income taxes, and an unfavourable impact of $52.7 million for an increase in future income taxes resulting from the repeal of previously legislated income tax reductions.

⁽⁵⁾Before foreign exchange gain (loss) on long-term debt as follows: For 2007, a $169.8 million ($125.5 million after tax) foreign exchange gain on long-term debt; for 2006, a $0.1-million ($7.2 million after tax) foreign exchange loss on long-term debt; for 2005, a $44.7-million ($22.3 million after tax) foreign exchange gain on long-term debt; for 2004, a $94.4-million ($94.4 million after tax) foreign exchange gain on long-term debt; for 2003, a $209.5-million ($224.4 million after tax) foreign exchange gain on long-term debt.

⁽⁶⁾These are earnings measures that are not in accordance with GAAP and may not be comparable to similar measures of other companies. CP’s results, before foreign exchange gains and losses on long-term debt and other specified items as defined in this summary, are presented to provide the reader with information that is readily comparable to prior years’ results. By excluding foreign exchange gains and losses on long-term debt, the impact of volatile short-term exchange rate fluctuations, which can only be realized when long-term debt matures or is settled, is largely eliminated. By also excluding other specified items, the results better reflect ongoing operations at CP.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			109

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

COMMON SHARE MARKET PRICES

2007

2006

Toronto Stock Exchange (Canadian dollars)

High

Low

High

Low

First Quarter

66.33

60.06

60.85

45.55

Second Quarter

78.48

63.75

65.17

52.55

Third Quarter

91.00

67.37

57.97

51.05

Fourth Quarter

73.00

59.48

65.29

54.95

Year

91.00

59.48

65.29

45.55

New York Stock Exchange (U.S. dollars)

High

Low

High

Low

First Quarter

56.61

51.23

53.00

39.10

Second Quarter

73.95

55.36

57.73

47.10

Third Quarter

87.23

62.66

52.17

44.85

Fourth Quarter

74.38

60.31

57.32

48.75

Year

87.23

51.23

57.73

39.10

Number of registered shareholders at year end

18,152

Market prices at year end

Toronto Stock Exchange

CDN$

64.22

New York Stock Exchange

US$

64.64

SHAREHOLDER ADMINISTRATION

Common Shares

Computershare Investor Services Inc., with transfer facilities in Montreal, Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver, serves as transfer agent and registrar for the Common Shares in Canada. Computershare Trust Company NA, Denver, Colorado, serves as co-transfer agent and co-registrar for the Common Shares in the United States.

For information concerning dividends, lost share certificates, estate transfers or for change in share registration or address, please contact the transfer agent and registrar by telephone at 1-877-427-7245 toll free North America or International (514) 982-7555, visit their website at www.computershare.com; or write to:

Computershare Investor Services Inc.
100 University Avenue, 9th Floor
Toronto, Ontario Canada M5J 2Y1


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
110

4 % CONSOLIDATED DEBENTURE STOCK

Inquiries with respect to Canadian Pacific Railway Company’s 4 % Consolidated Debenture Stock should be directed as follows:

For stock denominated in U.S. currency – The Bank of New York Mellon at (212) 815-2719
or by e-mail at lesley.daley@bnymellon.com
and;
For stock denominated in pounds Sterling – BNY Trust Company of Canada at (416) 933-8504
or by e-mail at marcia.redway@bnymellon.com.

MARKET FOR SECURITIES

The Common Shares of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited are listed on the Toronto and New York stock exchanges. The Debenture Stock of Canadian Pacific Railway Company is listed on the London, England Stock Exchange (sterling) and on the New York Stock Exchange (U.S. currency).

TRADING SYMBOL

Common Shares – CP

DUPLICATE ANNUAL REPORTS

While every effort is made to avoid duplication, some Canadian Pacific Railway Limited registered shareholders may receive multiple copies of shareholder information mailings such as this Annual Report. Registered shareholders who wish to consolidate any duplicate accounts which are registered in the same name are requested to write to Computershare Investor Services Inc.

DIRECT DEPOSIT OF DIVIDENDS

Registered shareholders are offered the option of having their Canadian and U.S. dollar dividends directly deposited into their personal bank accounts in Canada and the United States on the dividend payment dates. Shareholders may obtain a direct deposit enrolment form from Computershare Investor Services Inc.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Canadian Pacific’s Board of Directors and its management are committed to a high standard of corporate governance. They believe effective corporate governance calls for the establishment of processes and structures that contribute to the sound direction and management of the Corporation’s business, with a view to enhancing shareholder value.

A detailed description of CP’s approach to corporate governance is contained in its Management Proxy Circular issued in connection with the 2008 Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders.

GOVERNANCE STANDARDS

Any significant differences between the Corporation’s corporate governance practices and those set forth in the corporate governance listing standards (“Listing Standards”) of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) are set forth on Canadian Pacific Railway Limited’s website www.cpr.ca under “Governance”.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

The certifications (the “302 Certifications”) of the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of each of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited and Canadian Pacific Railway Company required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) thereunder, have been filed with the SEC as an exhibit to the Annual Report of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited and Canadian Pacific Railway Company on Form 40-F. The 302 Certifications have also been filed in fulfillment of the requirements of Multilateral Instrument 52-109.


	2007 ANNUAL REPORT
			111

DIRECTORS & COMMITTEES

Stephen E. Bachand ^{(2) (4) * (5)}

Retired President and Chief Executive Officer
Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited
Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida

John E. Cleghorn, O.C., F.C.A. ^{(2) *}

Chairman
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
Toronto, Ontario

Tim W. Faithfull ^{(3) (4)}

Retired President and Chief Executive Officer
Shell Canada Limited
Oxford, Oxfordshire, England

Frederic J. Green ⁽³⁾

President and Chief Executive Officer
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
Calgary, Alberta

Krystyna T. Hoeg, C.A. ^{(1) (3)}

Former President and Chief Executive Officer
Corby Distilleries Limited
Toronto, Ontario

The Honourable John P. Manley ^{(1) (5)}

Senior Counsel
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Ottawa, Ontario

Linda J. Morgan ^{(3) (4)}

Partner
Covington & Burling LLP
Bethesda, Maryland

Madeleine Paquin ^{(1) (4)}

President and Chief Executive Officer
Logistec Corporation
Montreal, Quebec

Michael E.J. Phelps, O.C. ^{(2) (4) (5) *}

Chairman
Dornoch Capital Inc.
West Vancouver, British Columbia

Roger Phillips, O.C., S.O.M., F.Inst.P. ^{(1) * (2) (5)}

Retired President and Chief Executive Officer
IPSCO Inc.
Regina, Saskatchewan

Hartley T. Richardson ^{(1) (5)}

President and Chief Executive Officer
James Richardson & Sons, Limited
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Michael W. Wright ^{(1) (2) (3) *}

Retired Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
SUPERVALU INC.
Longboat Key, Florida

⁽¹⁾Audit, Finance and Risk
Management Committee

⁽²⁾Corporate Governance
and Nominating Committee

⁽³⁾Health, Safety, Security
and Environment Committee

⁽⁴⁾Management Resources
and Compensation Committee

⁽⁵⁾Pension Committee

* denotes chairman of the committee


		2007 ANNUAL REPORT
112

SENIOR OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY

John E. Cleghorn, O.C., F.C.A.

Chairman of the Board
Toronto, Ontario

Frederic J. Green ⁽¹⁾

President and Chief Executive Officer
Calgary, Alberta

Michael R. Lambert ⁽¹⁾

Executive Vice-President
and Chief Financial Officer
Calgary, Alberta

Kathryn B. McQuade ⁽¹⁾

Executive Vice-President
and Chief Operating Officer
Mesquite, Nevada

Marcella M. Szel ⁽¹⁾

Senior Vice-President, Marketing and Sales
Calgary, Alberta

Brock M. Winter ⁽¹⁾

Senior Vice-President, Operations
Calgary, Alberta

Allen H. Borak

Vice-President, Business Information
and Technology Services
Calgary, Alberta

Donald B. Campbell ⁽¹⁾

Vice-President, Corporate Planning
Calgary, Alberta

Brian W. Grassby

Vice-President and Comptroller
Calgary, Alberta

Paul A. Guthrie, Q.C. ⁽¹⁾

Vice-President, Law
Municipal District of Rocky View, Alberta

Jonathan Legg

Vice-President, Strategic Initiatives
Calgary, Alberta

Jane A. O’Hagan ⁽¹⁾

Vice-President, Strategy and External Affairs
Calgary, Alberta

Tracy A. Robinson

Vice-President and Treasurer
Calgary, Alberta

R. Andrew Shields ⁽¹⁾

Vice-President, Human Resources and
Industrial Relations
Calgary, Alberta

Donald F. Barnhardt

Corporate Secretary
Calgary, Alberta

Karen Fleming

Associate Corporate Secretary
Calgary, Alberta

⁽¹⁾Executive Committee of
Canadian Pacific Railway Company


		designed and produced by smith + associates www.smithandassoc.com Please recycle.

2008 ANNUAL
AND SPECIAL MEETING

The Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders will be held on Friday, May 9, 2008, at The Fairmont Winnipeg located at 2 Lombard Place, Winnipeg, Manitoba, at 9:00 a.m., Central Time.

SHAREHOLDER SERVICES

Shareholders having inquiries or wishing to obtain copies of the Corporation’s Annual Information Form may contact Shareholder Services at 1-866-861-4289 or (403) 319-7538, or by e-mail at shareholder@cpr.ca, or by writing to: Shareholder Services, Office of the Corporate Secretary, Canadian Pacific, Suite 920, Gulf Canada Square, 401- 9th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4Z4

INVESTOR RELATIONS

Financial information is available under the Investor Section on CP’s Web site at www.cpr.ca.

COMMUNICATIONS
AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS

Contact Communications and Public Affairs, Canadian Pacific, Suite 500, Gulf Canada Square, 401 - 9th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4Z4

Si vous désirez vous procurer la version française du présent rapport, veuillez vous adresser au : Services aux actionnaires, Bureau du secrétaire général, Canadien Pacifique, Suite 920, Gulf Canada Square, 401 - 9th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4Z4



	OUR VISION IS TO BE THE SAFEST, MOST FLUID RAILWAY IN NORTH AMERICA
	“At Canadian Pacific, we are committed to the safety of our employees and our communities and protecting the environment where we operate. As part of our protocol, every employee is instructed to first protect themselves and the safety of their colleagues, next look to the safety of the community, and then ensure that the environment is protected. Finally, when each of these criteria has been met, we turn to continuing train operations. Canadian Pacific operates through more than 900 communities and through some of the most incredible landscapes in North America. It is our responsibility to protect this legacy for future generations.”
	FRED J. GREEN President and Chief Executive Officer

1 Financial Highlights		9	Management’s Discussion and Analysis	112	Directors & Committees
5 Chairman’s Letter to Shareholders		60	Financial Statements	ibc	Senior Officers of the Company
6 CEO’s Letter to Shareholders		110	Shareholder Information