cfit-424b3.htm

This Supplement No. 12 supplements, and should be read in conjunction with, our prospectus dated June 3, 2021, Supplement No. 1, dated June 8, 2021, Supplement No. 2, dated June 15, 2021, Supplement No. 3 dated July 20, 2021, Supplement No. 4 dated July 30, 2021, Supplement No. 5 dated August 17, 2021, Supplement No. 6 dated September 16, 2021, Supplement No. 7 dated October 15, 2021, Supplement No. 8 dated October 22, 2021, Supplement No. 9 dated November 16, 2021, Supplement No. 10 dated December 2, 2021, and Supplement No. 11 dated December 16, 2021. Defined terms used in this Supplement No. 12 shall have the meaning given to them in the prospectus unless the context otherwise requires. The purposes of this Supplement are as follows:

The transaction price for each share class of our common stock for subscriptions accepted as of February 1, 2022 (and repurchases as of January 31, 2022) is as follows:

A detailed calculation of the NAV per share is set forth below. The purchase price of our common stock for each share class equals the transaction price of such class, plus applicable upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees. Subject to certain specific limitations and holding period requirements defined in our share repurchase program, the repurchase price for each share class will be based upon the transaction price of such class.

We calculate NAV per share in accordance with the valuation guidelines that have been approved by our board of directors. Our NAV per share, which is updated as of the last calendar day of each month, is posted on our website at www.cfincometrust.com and is made available on our toll-free, automated telephone line at 855-9-CANTOR. Please refer to “Net Asset Value Calculation and Valuation Guidelines” in the prospectus for how our NAV is determined. We have engaged Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc. (“Stanger”) to serve as our independent valuation firm. Our advisor is ultimately responsible for determining our NAV.

The following table provides a breakdown of the major components of our NAV pursuant to our valuation guidelines:

Components of NAV	December 31, 2021			November 30, 2021
Investment in real estate	$	718,540,000		$	631,870,000
Investments in real estate-related assets		35,121,327			35,121,272
Cash and cash equivalents		19,276,144			20,502,377
Other assets		8,275,758			8,195,530
Debt obligations (at fair market value)		(357,212,043	)		(340,502,474	)
Due to related parties(1)		(3,427,549	)		(2,428,777	)
Accounts payable and other liabilities		(7,920,477	)		(7,440,369	)
Accrued performance participation allocation		(4,679,999	)		(4,123,734	)
Distribution fee payable the following month(2)		(43,310	)		(39,500	)
Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries		(163,687,171	)		(109,813,452	)
Sponsor Support repayment / special unit holder interest in liquidation		—			—
Net asset value	$	244,242,680		$	231,340,873
Number of outstanding shares		9,505,648			9,103,099

(1) Excluding the full distribution fee liability of $267,284. Distribution fee only relates to Class TX, Class T, Class S and Class D shares of common stock.

(2) The distribution fee that is payable as of December 31, 2021 related to Class TX, Class T, Class S and Class D shares of common stock is shown in the table below. The non-current distribution fee payable of $223,974 is not due as of December 31, 2021.

Due to rounding, numbers presented throughout this document may not add up to precisely to the totals provided and percentages may not precisely reflect the absolute figures.

NAV Per Share	Class AX, IX and I Shares			Class TX Shares			Class T Shares			Class D Shares			Class S Shares			Total
Total gross assets at fair value	$	604,180,600		$	108,406,265		$	45,618,263		$	22,649,613		$	358,488		$	781,213,229
Distribution fees due and payable		—			(31,565	)		(10,178	)		(1,487	)		(80	)		(43,310	)
Debt obligations		(276,263,353	)		(49,569,084	)		(20,859,085	)		(10,356,602	)		(163,919	)		(357,212,043	)
Due to related parties		(2,650,824	)		(475,629	)		(200,148	)		(99,375	)		(1,573	)		(3,427,549	)
Accounts payable and other liabilities		(6,125,598	)		(1,099,097	)		(462,509	)		(229,638	)		(3,635	)		(7,920,477	)
Accrued performance participation allocation		(3,619,453	)		(649,427	)	(273,284)				(135,687	)		(2,148	)		(4,679,999	)
Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries		(126,593,623	)		(22,714,304	)		(9,558,369	)		(4,745,761	)		(75,114	)		(163,687,171	)
Monthly NAV	$	188,927,749		$	33,867,159		$	14,254,690		$	7,081,063		$	112,019		$	244,242,680
Number of outstanding shares		7,351,550			1,319,066			555,074			275,596			4,362			9,505,648
NAV per share	$	25.70		$	25.68		$	25.68		$	25.69		$	25.68

The following table reconciles stockholders’ equity per our unaudited consolidated balance sheet to our NAV:

Reconciliation of Stockholders’ Equity to NAV	December 31, 2021
Stockholders’ equity under U.S. GAAP	$	353,941,593
Adjustments:
Unrealized appreciation of real estate		35,986,760
Unrealized appreciation of real estate-related assets		3,663,001
Acquisition costs		(6,161,481)
Deferred financing costs, net		(3,798,470)
Accrued distribution fee⁽¹⁾		223,974
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		26,957,999
Fair value adjustment of debt obligations		2,675,141
Deferred rent receivable		(5,716,375)
Derivative liabilities, at fair value		157,709
Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries		(163,687,171)
NAV	$	244,242,680

Note:(1) Accrued distribution fee only relates to Class TX, Class T, Class S and Class D shares of common stock.

In accordance with our current valuation procedures, our NAV was based in part upon: (i) the most recent appraised value of the GR Property, the FM Property, the CO Property, the Walgreens DST Properties, the SF Property, the Buchanan Property, and the De Anza Property, the Keller Property, the Summerfield Property, the Lewisville Property, Madison Ave Property, the Valencia Property, the Kacey Property and the Industry Property; (ii) the fair market value of our Debt Investments (as defined below); (iii) the fair market value of our loans payable; (iv) the estimated non-controlling interest held in our Consolidated JVs (as defined below); (v) the value of our interest in the Station DST (as defined below); and (vi) the net tangible assets and liabilities of the Company (including our advisor’s estimate of the Performance Participation Allocation as defined and discussed below) as of December 31, 2021, as outlined in more detail below.

Pursuant to our valuation guidelines we engaged Stanger to provide its appraised market value of the SF Property as of September 30, 2021, the Buchanan Property as of August 31, 2021, the FM Property as of December 31, 2021, the GR Property, and the Walgreens DST Properties as of March 31, 2021, the De Anza Property and the CO Property as of July 31, 2021 and the Keller Property as of November 30, 2021 (collectively, the “Stanger Appraised Properties”). In addition, Stanger reviewed and relied upon the appraised value of the Summerfield Property prepared by a third-party with an effective date of January 5,

2021, the Lewisville Property prepared by a third-party with an effective date of June 15, 2021, the Madison Ave Property prepared by a third-party with an effective date of June 18, 2021, the Valencia Property prepared by a third-party with an effective date of May 28, 2021, the Kacey Property prepared by a third-party with an effective date of September 21, 2021, and the Industry Property prepared by a third-party with an effective date of October 1, 2021 (together the “Third-Party Appraisals”) (collectively the Stanger Appraised Properties and the Third-Party Appraisals are the “Appraised Properties”). Pursuant to our engagement agreement with Stanger, the appraisals of the Stanger Appraised Properties were prepared utilizing the income approach to value, specifically using a direct capitalization analysis for the GR Property and the Walgreens DST Properties and both a direct capitalization analysis and discounted cash flow analysis (“DCF”) for the FM Property, the CO Property, the SF Property, the Buchanan Property, the De Anza Property and the Keller Property. In addition, a sales comparison approach was conducted for the SF Property, given the size of the SF Property. The direct capitalization analysis is based upon the estimated net operating income of the Stanger Appraised Properties capitalized at an appropriate capitalization rate considering property characteristics and competitive position, the credit profile of the tenant/guarantor under the leases encumbering the Stanger Appraised Properties, the terms of the leases encumbering the Stanger Appraised Properties, and market conditions as of the date of value. The DCF analysis is based upon multi-year cash flow projections for each applicable property prepared in accordance with the lease which currently encumbers each property. Each property was assumed to be sold after the expiration of the initial lease term and any renewal terms deemed materially favorable to the tenant, or for which exercise was deemed likely based on other factors. The reversion value of the property which can be realized upon sale is calculated based on the current economic rental rate deemed reasonable for the property, escalated at a rate indicative of current expectations in the marketplace for the property. The projected market rate net operating income of the property for the year following the year of sale is then capitalized at an appropriate capitalization rate reflecting the age and anticipated functional and economic obsolescence and competitive position of the property to determine its reversion value. Net proceeds of sale are determined by deducting estimated costs incurred at the time of sale, estimated at 2% of the gross reversion value. Finally, the discounted present value of the cash flow stream from operations (including any estimated releasing costs at the end of the assumed current lease term) and the discounted present value of the net proceeds from sale are summed to arrive at a total estimated value for the property. The capitalization rates applied to the Stanger Appraised Properties ranged from 4.00% to 6.25%, with a weighted average of approximately 4.89%. The discount rates applied to the estimated net cash flow from operations of the Stanger Appraised Properties for which a DCF analysis was conducted ranged from 4.75% to 7.25%, with a weighted average of approximately 5.89%. The discount rates applied to the estimated residual value of the Stanger Appraised Properties for which a DCF analysis was conducted ranged from 5.75% to 7.25%, with a weighted average of approximately 6.25%. The residual capitalization rates applied to the Stanger Appraised Properties for which a DCF analysis was conducted ranged from 4.25% to 6.50%, with a weighted average of approximately 5.36%. Where both a direct capitalization analysis and DCF was utilized, the indicated value from each approach was reviewed and a final appraised value was concluded. While a sales comparison approach was not conducted, other than for the SF Property, Stanger reviewed regional property sale data for each Stanger Appraised Property in order to assist in the selection of capitalization rates applied in the appraisals and to observe transaction prices per square foot in the Stanger Appraised Properties’ regional markets. For the SF Property, the sales comparison approach conducted utilized the price per square foot from recent market sales and adjusted such indicated price per square foot to a price per square foot deemed reasonable for the SF Property, taking into account factors such as property size, location, the fact that the existing tenant has provided notice that it will not be exercising its extension option and condition/quality and the date of sale. The aggregate appraised value of the Stanger Appraised Properties was $427,040,000. The appraised values of the Stanger Appraised Properties are subject to the general assumptions and limiting conditions set forth in the appraisal reports rendered to the Company by Stanger.

The Third-Party Appraisals utilized the income approach to value (the direct capitalization analysis, discounted cash flow analysis or both) and the sales comparison approach. As with the Stanger Appraised Properties, the direct capitalization analysis utilized was based upon the estimated net operating income of the property capitalized at an appropriate capitalization rate considering property characteristics and competitive position and market conditions as of the appraisal’s date of value. The DCF analysis was based upon multi-year cash flow projections for each property employing a DCF analysis, prepared in accordance with the lease or leases which currently encumber the property. The reversion value of the property, which can be realized upon sale, is calculated based on the current economic rental rate deemed reasonable for the property, escalated at a rate indicative of current expectations in the marketplace for the property. Finally, the discounted present value of the cash flow stream from operations and the discounted present value of the net proceeds from sale are summed to arrive at a total estimated value for the property. The sales comparison approach utilized the price per square foot from recent market sales of similar properties and adjusted such indicated price per square foot to a price per square foot deemed reasonable for the property, considering such factors as property size, location, condition/quality and conditions of sale, property rights sold and date of sale.

In accordance with our valuation procedures, the Lancaster PE and the Chicago Jr Mezz (individually a “Debt Investment” and collectively the “Debt Investments”) were included in the determination of NAV at their estimated fair market value as of December 31, 2021, as determined by Stanger. The Debt Investments estimated value was based upon taking, for each Debt Investment, the loan payments over the remaining anticipated term and discounting such payments to present value at a discount rate range equal to the current estimated market interest rate on financing similar to the applicable Debt Investments. To provide their opinion of value of the Debt Investments, Stanger first reviewed the terms of each of the Debt Investments as contained in the loan documents. Stanger then reviewed mezzanine loan market terms at or around December 31, 2021 to ascertain current market interest rate levels for loans similar to the Debt Investments. This review was conducted by (i) recent interviews of participants in the mezzanine / preferred equity market, (ii) reviewing recent mezzanine loan transactions, as available, and (iii) reviewing published surveys available at or around December 31, 2021. Stanger also observed changes in yields and pricing of Albertsons publicly traded debt securities from the prior valuation date and the current valuation date. Based on Stanger’s reviews above and taking into consideration the Debt Investments’ unique factors, including, but not limited to, loan-to-value (based on the appraised value of the collateral), debt service coverage/debt yield, collateral property type, age and location, financial information pertaining to the lessee of the collateral properties, prepayment terms, and loan origination date, maturity date and extension terms, a market interest rate range was determined for each Debt Investment to utilize in the determination of the fair market value of the Debt Investments. The discount rate applied to the future payments of our Debt Investments was 7.65% for both facilities. The aggregate fair value of the Debt Investments was approximately $25,472,000.

In order to determine the net asset value attributable to the non-controlling interest and any promoted interest in the Battery Street SF JV, the Keller JV, the Summerfield DST, the Valencia DST, the Kacey DST the CF Net Lease Portfolio IV DST and the Industry DST (collectively the “Consolidated JVs”), Stanger utilized the most recent property appraisal, the most recent balance sheet provided for the Consolidated JVs to determine the tangible assets and tangible liabilities of the Consolidated JVs, and determined any promote due to the third party JV partner, as applicable. This net asset value was then multiplied by the ownership interest held by parties other than us to determine the non-controlling interest adjustment related to the Consolidated JVs utilized in the Company’s December 31, 2021 NAV.

Stanger performed a valuation of the property-level debt by reviewing available market data for comparable liabilities and applying a selected discount rate to the stream of future debt payments. The discount rate was selected based on several factors including U.S. Treasury yields as of the valuation date, as well as loan-specific items such as loan-to-value ratio, debt service coverage ratio, collateral property location, age, type, lease term and lessee credit quality, prepayment terms, and maturity and loan origination date. The discount rates applied to the future debt payments of our long-term debt ranged from 2.10% to 4.35%, with a weighted average of approximately 3.44%. Stanger’s valuation of the long-term debt is based in part on the appraised values of the encumbered Appraised Properties, which represent the collateral associated with the long-term debt as well as certain other assumptions and limiting conditions, including: (i) Stanger was provided with loan documents and other factual loan information by our advisor and has relied upon and assumed that such information is correct in all material respects and no warranty is given by Stanger as to the accuracy of such information; (ii) each collateral property is assumed to be free and clear of liens (other than the mortgage being valued); (iii) information furnished by others, upon which all or portions of Stanger’s value opinion is based, is believed to be reliable but has not been verified, and no warranty is given as to the accuracy of such information; (iv) no material change has occurred in the value of the collateral properties from the date of last appraisal through the loan valuation date and (v) each mortgage is assumed to be salable, transferable or assumable between parties and is further assumed not to be in default. Stanger’s opinion of the long-term debt value was predicated on the above assumptions.

The special unit holder in our operating partnership is entitled to receive an allocation equal to 12.5% of the Total Return to our shareholders, subject to a 5% Hurdle Amount and a High Water Mark, with 100% catch-up (the “Performance Participation Allocation”) based upon a full calendar year. For calculation of the Performance Participation Allocation for 2020 only, the Performance Participation Allocation was based upon the time period from July 31, 2020 (the date such Performance Participation Allocation became effective) through the December 31, 2020. The Total Return, Hurdle Amount, High Water Mark and Catch-Up are defined in our prospectus. While the Performance Participation Allocation is due annually, commencing with 2021, we accrue such fee monthly. Stanger reviewed and discussed with our advisor its calculation of the Performance Participation Allocation. Our advisor’s Performance Participation Allocation estimate as of the Valuation Date

The value of the beneficial interests in the Station DST was based upon the Station DST Property appraisal prepared by Stanger with an effective date of December 31, 2021 in accordance with the methodology outlined in the Appraisal of Consolidated Real Estate above, the fair market value of the mortgage loan encumbering the Station DST Property as of December 31, 2021 conducted in accordance with the methodology outlined in Fair Value of Long Term Debt above, the other tangible assets and liabilities of the Station DST such as cash and reserves, each reflecting our ownership interest in the Station DST (15%).

Assuming all other factors remain unchanged, the table below presents the estimated increase or decrease to our December 31, 2021 NAV for a change in the going-in capitalization rate and, where a DCF analysis was utilized, discount rates and terminal capitalization rates used in the Appraised Properties’ appraisals and the Station DST Property appraisal, a 5% change in the discount rates used to value our Debt Investments and a 5% change in the discount rates used to value our long-term debt and the mortgage debt encumbering the Station DST Property.

Sensitivity Analysis	Range of NAV (Class AX, IX and I)									Range of NAV (Class TX)									Range of NAV (Class T)
	Low			Concluded			High			Low			Concluded			High			Low			Concluded			High
Estimated Per Share NAV	$	22.93		$	25.70		$	28.92		$	22.90		$	25.68		$	28.90		$	22.91		$	25.68		$	28.91
Capitalization Rate		5.28	%		5.03	%		4.78	%		5.28	%		5.03	%		4.78	%		5.28	%		5.03	%		4.78	%
Cash Flow Discount Rate		6.21	%		5.92	%		5.62	%		6.21	%		5.92	%		5.62	%		6.21	%		5.92	%		5.62	%
Residual Discount Rate		6.66	%		6.35	%		6.03	%		6.66	%		6.35	%		6.03	%		6.66	%		6.35	%		6.03	%
Terminal Capitalization Rate		5.91	%		5.63	%		5.35	%		5.91	%		5.63	%		5.35	%		5.91	%		5.63	%		5.35	%
Discount Rate - Debt Investments		8.03	%		7.65	%		7.27	%		8.03	%		7.65	%		7.27	%		8.03	%		7.65	%		7.27	%
Discount Rate - Long-Term Debt Consolidated		3.25	%		3.42	%		3.59	%		3.25	%		3.42	%		3.59	%		3.25	%		3.42	%		3.59	%

Sensitivity Analysis	Range of NAV (Class D)									Range of NAV (Class S)
	Low			Concluded			High			Low			Concluded			High
Estimated Per Share NAV	$	22.92		$	25.69		$	28.92		$	22.91		$	25.68		$	28.91
Capitalization Rate - Appraised Properties		5.28	%		5.03	%		4.78	%		5.28	%		5.03	%		4.78	%
Cash Flow Discount Rate - Appraised Properties		6.21	%		5.92	%		5.62	%		6.21	%		5.92	%		5.62	%
Residual Discount Rate - Appraised Properties		6.66	%		6.35	%		6.03	%		6.66	%		6.35	%		6.03	%
Terminal Capitalization Rate - Appraised Properties		5.91	%		5.63	%		5.35	%		5.91	%		5.63	%		5.35	%
Discount Rate - Debt Investments		8.03	%		7.65	%		7.27	%		8.03	%		7.65	%		7.27	%
Discount Rate - Long-Term Debt Consolidated		3.25	%		3.42	%		3.59	%		3.25	%		3.42	%		3.59	%

As of December 31, 2021, lease expirations related to our net lease portfolio of real estate assets, based on each asset’s fair value used in determining our NAV, were as follows:

As of December 31, 2021, the industry concentration of our portfolio of real estate assets, based on each asset’s fair value used in determining our NAV, was as follows:

As of December 31, 2021, the geographic concentration of our portfolio of real estate assets, based on each asset’s fair value used in determining our NAV, was as follows:

As of December 31, 2021, the investment type concentration of our portfolio of real estate assets, based on each asset’s fair value used in determining our NAV, was as follows:

As of December 31, 2021, the tenant credit profile concentration of our net lease portfolio of real estate assets, based on each asset’s fair value used in determining our NAV, was as follows:

¹Includes Daimler Trucks North America, LLC. Daimler Truck Holding AG, the parent company of Daimler Trucks North America, LLC, is rated BBB+ by Moody’s. Daimler Truck Holding AG does not guarantee the lease.

As of December 31, 2021, the maturity concentration of debt secured by our portfolio of real estate assets, based on principal balances and adjusted for ownership percentage, was as follows:

As of December 31, 2021, the weighted average lease term remaining of our portfolio of real estate assets (excluding multifamily, mezzanine and preferred equity investments), based on each asset’s fair value used in determining our NAV, was 9.6 years.

As of December 31, 2021, the weighted average occupancy of our portfolio of real estate assets, based on each asset’s fair value used in determining our NAV, was 99.2%. For our industrial, retail and office investments, occupancy includes all leased square footage as of the date indicated. For our multifamily investments, occupancy is defined as the percentage of units occupied on the date indicated.

	Transaction Price (per share)
Class S	$	25.68
Class I	$	25.70
Class T	$	25.68
Class D	$	25.69