breit-10k_20201231.htm

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant: There is currently no established public market for the Registrant’s shares of common stock.

As of March 17, 2021, the issuer had the following shares outstanding: 783,834,057 shares of Class S common stock, 1,054,300,963 shares of Class I common stock, 47,308,129 shares of Class T common stock, and 146,970,893 shares of Class D common stock.

Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K incorporates information by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement with respect to its 2021 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the registrant’s fiscal year.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue” or other similar words or the negatives thereof. These may include our financial projections and estimates and their underlying assumptions, statements about plans, objectives and expectations with respect to future operations, statements with respect to acquisitions and statements regarding future performance. These factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in this document (or our prospectus and other filings). Except as otherwise required by federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and there are or may be important factors that could cause actual outcomes or results to differ materially from those indicated in such statements. A summary of principal risk factors that make investing in our securities risky and might cause such actual outcomes or results to differ is set forth below.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Moreover, unless we are required by law to update these statements, we will not necessarily update or revise any forward-looking statements included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report after the date hereof, either to conform them to actual results or to changes in our expectations. We urge you to carefully consider the foregoing summary together with the risks discussed in Part I., Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

We use our website (www.breit.com) as a channel of distribution of company information. The information we post through this channel may be deemed material. Accordingly, investors should monitor this channel, in addition to following our press releases and SEC filings. The contents of our website are not, however, a part of this report.

References herein to “Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust,” the “Company,” “BREIT,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and its subsidiaries unless the context specifically requires otherwise.

BREIT invests primarily in stabilized income-generating commercial real estate in the United States and, to a lesser extent, in real estate debt. Our objective is to bring Blackstone’s leading institutional quality real estate investment platform to income focused investors. We are externally managed by BX REIT Advisors L.L.C. (the “Adviser”), a subsidiary of The Blackstone Group Inc. (“Blackstone”). We were incorporated in Maryland in 2015. We are the sole general partner of BREIT Operating Partnership L.P. (“BREIT OP”), a Delaware limited partnership, and we own substantially all of our assets through BREIT OP. We currently operate our business in eight reportable segments: Multifamily, Industrial, Net Lease, Hotel, Self Storage, Retail, and Office Properties, and Investments in Real Estate Debt. Multifamily includes various forms of rental housing including apartments, student housing and manufactured housing. Net Lease includes the real estate assets of The Bellagio Las Vegas (“Bellagio”) and the unconsolidated interest in the MGM Grand and Mandalay Bay joint venture.

BREIT is a non-listed, perpetual life real estate investment trust (“REIT”). We qualified as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes and generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income to the extent we annually distribute all of our net taxable income to stockholders and maintain our qualification as a REIT.

As of March 17, 2021, we had received net proceeds of $24.1 billion from the sale of shares of our Class S, Class I, Class T and Class D common stock. We have contributed the net proceeds to BREIT OP in exchange for a corresponding number of Class S, Class I, Class T, and Class D units. BREIT OP has primarily used the net proceeds to make investments in real estate and real estate debt.

We are externally managed by our Adviser, and pursuant to the advisory agreement between us and the Adviser (the “Advisory Agreement”), we have delegated to the Adviser the authority to source, evaluate and monitor our investment opportunities and to make decisions related to the acquisition, management, financing and disposition of our assets, in accordance with our investment objectives, guidelines, policies and limitations, as well as provide us with our executive management team. Our board of directors will at all times have oversight and policy-making authority over us, including responsibility for governance, financial controls, compliance and disclosure.

Our Adviser is a part of Blackstone, a leading global investment manager with assets under management of $618.6 billion as of December 31, 2020. Blackstone’s alternative asset management businesses include private equity, real estate, insurance, hedge fund solutions, non-investment grade credit, secondary private equity funds of funds, infrastructure and multi-asset class strategies, all on a global basis.

In connection with the performance of its duties, our Adviser benefits from the resources, relationships, and expertise of the 541 professionals in Blackstone’s global real estate group, which is one of the largest real estate investment managers in the world with $187.2 billion of investor capital under management as of December 31, 2020. Blackstone's real estate group ("Blackstone Real Estate") has one centralized investment committee (the "Investment Committee") that meets weekly to review large new investments around the world. The Investment Committee includes all Senior Managing Directors in Blackstone Real Estate, as well as select senior executives of Blackstone.

Our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and other executive officers are senior Blackstone real estate professionals. Our Adviser, our executive officers, and other personnel supplied to us by our Adviser are each not obligated to dedicate any specific amount of time to our business. Our Adviser is subject to the supervision and oversight of our board of directors and has only such functions and authority as our board of directors delegates to it. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, our Adviser is entitled to receive a base management fee, and expense reimbursements. In addition, BREIT Special Limited Partner L.P. (the “Special Limited Partner”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Blackstone, is entitled to receive a performance participation allocation. See Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements and Item 13 “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more detail on the terms of the Advisory Agreement.

Our investment strategy is to acquire primarily stabilized, income-generating commercial real estate in the United States and to a lesser extent, invest in real estate debt and other securities. Our investment strategy capitalizes on Blackstone’s scale and the real-time information provided by its real estate holdings to identify and acquire our target investments at attractive pricing. We also benefit from Blackstone’s reputation and ability to transact in scale with speed and certainty, and its long-standing and extensive relationships in the real estate industry. After acquisition, we leverage Blackstone Real Estate’s established asset management team, which focuses on value creation through the oversight and improvement of the operating performance of Blackstone Real Estate’s portfolio holdings.

Our investments in primarily stabilized, income-generating U.S. commercial real estate focus on a range of asset types. These may include multifamily, industrial, net lease, hotel, retail, and office assets, as well as others, including, without limitation, healthcare, student housing, senior living, data centers, manufactured housing and storage properties. For a breakdown of our portfolio by asset type see the “Investments in Properties” section below.

Our real estate debt strategy is designed to generate current income and contribute to our overall net returns. Alongside our credit facilities and operating cash flow, our real estate debt investments may provide an additional source of liquidity. These liquidity sources are collectively used for cash management, satisfying any stock repurchases under our share repurchase plan and other purposes. We use the Blackstone Real Estate Debt Strategies team to assist in this portion of the portfolio. The Blackstone Real Estate Debt Strategies team leverages the competitive advantages of the broader Blackstone Real Estate platform and its own proprietary investment models to seek attractive real estate debt investment opportunities throughout the capital structure.

We believe that our structure as a perpetual-life REIT will allow us to acquire and manage our investment portfolio in a more active and flexible manner. We are not limited by a pre-determined operational period or the need to provide a “liquidity” event at the end of that period.

We invest primarily in stabilized, income-generating U.S. commercial real estate. We may invest to a lesser extent in Canadian and European cities and potentially elsewhere and opportunistically in equity of public and private real estate-related companies. We may also acquire assets that require some amount of capital investment in order to be renovated or repositioned. We generally will limit investment in new developments on a standalone basis, but may consider development that is ancillary to an overall investment.

We do not designate specific geography or sector allocations for the portfolio; rather we invest in regions or asset classes where we see the best opportunities that support our investment objectives.

The following charts describe the diversification of our investments in real estate⁽¹⁾ based on fair value as of December 31, 2020:

The following map identifies the top markets of our portfolio composition in real properties based on fair value as of December 31, 2020:

The select markets that are named represent all metropolitan statistical areas (“MSAs”) in which BREIT has at least a 2% weighting. BREIT is invested in additional MSAs which are not named above. Shading reflects the concentration of all real estate properties and unconsolidated investments in each state. Weighting is measured as the asset value of real estate properties and unconsolidated investments for each market against the total asset value of all (i) real estate properties, excluding the value of any third party interests in such real estate properties, and (ii) unconsolidated investments.

Our real estate debt investments focus on non-distressed public and private real estate debt, including, but not limited to, commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), real estate-related corporate credit, mortgages, loans, mezzanine and other forms of debt (including residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and other residential credit), interests of collateralized debt obligation and collateralized loan obligation vehicles and equity interests in public and private entities that invest in real estate debt as one of their core businesses, and may also include preferred equity and derivatives. Our investments in real estate debt are focused in the United States, but may also include securities issued or backed by real estate in Europe and certain other countries.

We use financial leverage to provide additional funds to support our investment activities. This allows us to make more investments than would otherwise be possible, resulting in a broader portfolio. Subject to the limitation on indebtedness for money borrowed in our charter described below, our target leverage ratio is in the range of 60%. Our leverage ratio is measured by dividing (i) consolidated

property-level and entity-level debt net of cash and loan-related restricted cash, by (ii) the asset value of real estate investments (measured using the greater of fair market value and the cost) plus the equity in our settled real estate debt portfolio. Indebtedness incurred (i) in connection with funding a deposit in advance of the closing of an investment or (ii) as other working capital advances, will not be included as part of the calculation above. The leverage ratio excludes our pro rata share of indebtedness within our unconsolidated investments. Real estate investments include our direct property investments, unconsolidated investments, and equity in public and private real estate-related companies. Our real estate debt portfolio may have embedded leverage, including through the use of reverse repurchase agreements and derivatives, including, but not limited to, total return swaps, securities lending arrangements and credit default swaps. During times of increased investment and capital market activity, but subject to the limitation on indebtedness for money borrowed in our charter described below, we may employ greater leverage in order to build a broader portfolio of assets. We may leverage our portfolio by assuming or incurring secured or unsecured property-level or entity-level debt.

Under our charter, we have a limitation that precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300% of the cost of our net assets, which approximates borrowing 75% of the cost of our investments (unless a majority of our independent directors approves any borrowing in excess of the limit and we disclose the justification for doing so to our stockholders), but such restriction does not restrict the amount of indebtedness we may incur with respect to any single investment.

For an overview of our borrowings, see Item 7 — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

We elected to be taxed as a REIT, under the Code commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2017, the year in which the proceeds from the Initial Offering were released from escrow. We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our taxable net income, subject to certain adjustments and excluding any net capital gain, in order for U.S. federal income tax not to apply to our earnings that we distribute. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our net taxable income, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our undistributed taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we pay out to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under U.S. federal tax laws.

Our qualification as a REIT also depends on our ability to meet various other requirements imposed by the Code, which relate to organizational structure, diversity of stock ownership, and certain restrictions with regard to the nature of our assets and the sources of our income. Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal income and excise taxes and state and local taxes on our income and assets. If we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT for any taxable year, we may be subject to material penalties as well as federal, state, and local income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and we would not be able to qualify as a REIT for the subsequent four full taxable years.

Furthermore, we have one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”) which pay federal, state, and local income tax on their net taxable income. See Item 1A—“Risk Factors—Risks Related to our REIT Status and Certain Other Tax Items” for additional tax status information.

As an owner of real estate, our operations are subject, in certain instances, to supervision and regulation by U.S. and other governmental authorities, and may be subject to various laws and judicial and administrative decisions imposing various requirements and restrictions, which, include among other things: (i) federal and state securities laws and regulations; (ii) federal, state and local tax laws and regulations, (ii) state and local laws relating to real property; (iv) federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances, and regulations, and (v) various laws relating to housing, including permanent and temporary rent control and stabilization laws, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Fair Housing Amendment Act of 1988, among others.

Compliance with the federal, state and local laws described above has not had a material, adverse effect on our business, assets, results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions, and we do not believe that our existing portfolio will require us to incur material expenditures to comply with these laws and regulations.

We face competition from various entities for investment opportunities in properties, including other REITs, pension funds, insurance companies, investment funds and companies, partnerships and developers. In addition to third-party competitors, other programs sponsored by the Adviser and its affiliates, particularly those with investment strategies that overlap with ours, will seek investment

opportunities under Blackstone’s prevailing policies and procedures. Many of these entities may have greater access to capital to make investments than we have.

In the face of this competition, we have access to our Adviser’s and Blackstone’s professionals and their industry expertise and relationships, which we believe provide us with a competitive advantage and help us source, evaluate and compete for potential investments. We believe these relationships will enable us to compete more effectively for attractive investment opportunities. However, we may not be able to achieve our business goals or expectations due to the competitive risks that we face. For additional information concerning these competitive risks, see Item 1A—“Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Investment Activities.”

We have no employees other than those employed by Simply Storage Management, which was acquired with the December 2020 acquisition of Simply Storage, none of whom are executive officers of the Company or are involved in the management of the Company. Our operations are conducted by the Adviser.

We are subject to conflicts of interest arising out of our relationship with Blackstone, including the Adviser and its affiliates. See Item 1A — “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest.”

Stockholders may obtain copies of our filings with the SEC, free of charge from the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov or from our website at www.breit.com.

We are providing the address to our website solely for the information of investors. The information on our website is not a part of, nor is it incorporated by reference into, this report.

You should specifically consider the following material risks in addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The occurrence of any of the following risks might have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. The risks and uncertainties discussed below are not the only ones we face, but do represent those risks and uncertainties that we believe are most significant to our business, operating results, financial condition, prospects and forward-looking statements. As used herein, the term “you” refers to our current stockholders or potential investors in our common stock, as applicable.

We have held most of our current investments for only a limited period of time and you will not have the opportunity to evaluate our future investments before we make them, which makes your investment more speculative.

We have held most of our current investments for a limited period of time and are not able to provide you with information to assist you in evaluating the merits of any specific properties or real estate debt that we may acquire, except for investments that may be described in one or more supplements to the prospectus for the Offering (the “Prospectus”). Because we have not held our current investments for a long period of time, it may be difficult for you to evaluate our success in achieving our investment objectives. We will continue to seek to invest substantially all of the future net offering proceeds from the Offering and certain private offerings, after the payment of fees and expenses, in the acquisition of or investment in interests in properties and real estate debt. However, because you will be unable to evaluate the economic merit of our future investments before we make them, you will have to rely entirely on the ability of the Adviser to select suitable and successful investment opportunities. Furthermore, the Adviser has broad discretion in selecting the types of properties we will invest in and the tenants of those properties, and you will not have the opportunity to evaluate potential investments. These factors increase the risk that your investment may not generate returns comparable to other real estate investment alternatives.

The Adviser manages our portfolio pursuant to very broad investment guidelines and generally is not required to seek the approval of our board of directors for each investment, financing or asset allocation decision made by it, which may result in our making riskier investments and which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our board of directors approved very broad investment guidelines that delegate to the Adviser the authority to execute acquisitions and dispositions of real estate and real estate debt on our behalf, in each case so long as such investments are consistent with the investment guidelines and our charter. The Adviser will implement on our behalf the strategies and discretionary approaches it believes from time to time may be best suited to prevailing market conditions in furtherance of that purpose, subject to the limitations under our investment guidelines and our charter. There can be no assurance that the Adviser will be successful in implementing any particular strategy or discretionary approach to our investment activities. Furthermore, the diversification and type of investments may differ substantially from our prior investments. For example, future investments may focus on different sectors of real estate or different geographic areas than is the case for our current investment portfolio. Our board of directors reviews our investment guidelines on an annual basis (or more often as it deems appropriate) and reviews our investment portfolio periodically. The prior approval of our board of directors or a committee of independent directors will be required only as set forth in our charter (including for transactions with affiliates of the Adviser) or for the acquisition or disposition of assets that are not in accordance with our investment guidelines. In addition, in conducting periodic reviews, our directors rely primarily on information provided to them by the Adviser. Furthermore, transactions entered into on our behalf by the Adviser may be costly, difficult or impossible to unwind when they are subsequently reviewed by our board of directors.

There is no public trading market for shares of our common stock; therefore, your ability to dispose of your shares will likely be limited to repurchase by us. If you do sell your shares to us, you may receive less than the price you paid.

There is no current public trading market for shares of our common stock, and we do not expect that such a market will ever develop. Therefore, repurchase of shares by us will likely be the only way for you to dispose of your shares. We expect to continue to repurchase shares at a price equal to the transaction price of the class of shares being repurchased on the date of repurchase (which will generally be equal to our prior month’s NAV per share) and not based on the price at which you initially purchased your shares. Subject to limited exceptions, shares repurchased within one year of the date of issuance will be repurchased at 95% of the transaction price. As a result, you may receive less than the price you paid for your shares when you sell them to us pursuant to our share repurchase plan. See Item 5—“Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities—Share Repurchases.”

Your ability to have your shares repurchased through our share repurchase plan is limited. We may choose to repurchase fewer shares than have been requested to be repurchased, in our discretion at any time, and the amount of shares we may repurchase is subject to caps. Further, our board of directors may make exceptions to, modify or suspend our share repurchase plan if it deems such action to be in our best interest and the best interest of our stockholders.

We may choose to repurchase fewer shares than have been requested in any particular month to be repurchased under our share repurchase plan, or none at all, in our discretion at any time. We may repurchase fewer shares than have been requested to be repurchased due to lack of readily available funds because of adverse market conditions beyond our control, the need to maintain liquidity for our operations or because we have determined that investing in real property or other illiquid investments is a better use of our capital than repurchasing our shares. In addition, the aggregate NAV of total repurchases (including repurchases at certain non-U.S. investor access funds primarily created to hold shares of our common stock but excluding any Early Repurchase Deduction applicable to the repurchased shares) is limited, in any calendar month, to no more than 2% of our aggregate NAV(measured using the aggregate NAV as of the end of the immediately preceding month) and, in any calendar quarter, to shares whose aggregate value is no more than 5% of our aggregate NAV (measured using the average aggregate NAV at the end of the immediately preceding three months). Further, our board of directors may make exceptions to, modify and suspend our share repurchase plan if, in its reasonable judgment, it deems such action to be in our best interest and the best interest of our stockholders. Our board of directors cannot terminate our share repurchase plan absent a liquidity event which results in stockholders receiving cash or securities listed on a national securities exchange or where otherwise required by law. If the full amount of all shares of our common stock requested to be repurchased in any given month are not repurchased, funds will be allocated pro rata based on the total number of shares of common stock being repurchased without regard to class and subject to the volume limitation. All unsatisfied repurchase requests must be resubmitted after the start of the next month or quarter, or upon the recommencement of the share repurchase plan, as applicable.

The vast majority of our assets consist of properties that cannot generally be readily liquidated without impacting our ability to realize full value upon their disposition. Therefore, we may not always have a sufficient amount of cash to immediately satisfy repurchase requests. Should repurchase requests, in our judgment, place an undue burden on our liquidity, adversely affect our operations or risk having an adverse impact on the Company as a whole, or should we otherwise determine that investing our liquid assets in real properties or other illiquid investments rather than repurchasing our shares is in the best interests of the Company as a whole, then we may choose to repurchase fewer shares than have been requested to be repurchased, or none at all. Upon suspension of our share repurchase plan, our board of directors will be required to consider at least quarterly whether the continued suspension of our share repurchase plan is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders; however, we are not required to authorize the recommencement of the share repurchase plan within any specified period of time. As a result, your ability to have your shares repurchased by us may be limited and at times you may not be able to liquidate your investment. See Item 5—“Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities—Share Repurchases.”

Economic events that may cause our stockholders to request that we repurchase their shares may materially adversely affect our cash flow and our results of operations and financial condition.

Economic events affecting the U.S. economy, such as the general negative performance of the real estate sector, could cause our stockholders to seek to sell their shares to us pursuant to our share repurchase plan at a time when such events are adversely affecting the performance of our assets. Even if we decide to satisfy all resulting repurchase requests, our cash flow could be materially adversely affected. In addition, if we determine to sell assets to satisfy repurchase requests, we may not be able to realize the return on such assets that we may have been able to achieve had we sold at a more favorable time, and our results of operations and financial condition, including, without limitation, breadth of our portfolio by property type and location, could be materially adversely affected.

We have incurred net losses under GAAP in the past and may incur net losses in the future, and we have an accumulated deficit and may continue to have an accumulated deficit in the future.

For the year ended December 31, 2020 and the year ended December 31, 2019, we had net loss attributable to our stockholders of approximately $853.4 million and $401.8 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $1.6 billion and $769.2 million, respectively. These amounts largely reflect the expense of real estate depreciation and amortization in accordance with GAAP, which was $1.4 billion and $824.0 million during these periods. For the year ended December 31, 2020 and the year ended December 31, 2019, our funds available for distribution, or FAD, was $743.7 million and $409.4 million, respectively.

Net loss and accumulated deficit are calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, which, among other things, requires depreciation of real estate investments to be calculated on a straight-line basis. As a result, our operating results imply that the value of our real estate investments will decrease evenly over a set time period. However, we believe that the value of real estate investments will fluctuate over time based on market conditions. Thus, in addition to GAAP financial metrics, management reviews certain non-GAAP financial metrics that exclude real estate-related depreciation and amortization, including FAD, as an additional meaningful

non-GAAP supplemental disclosure to provide information for considering our operating results. See Item 5—“Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities— Funds from Operations, Adjusted Funds from Operations and Funds Available for Distribution” for reconciliations of FAD to GAAP net loss attributable to common stockholders and for considerations on how to review this metric.

In light of the nature of our continuous public offering as well as ongoing and periodic private offerings in relation to our investment strategy and the need to be able to deploy potentially large amounts of capital quickly to capitalize on potential investment opportunities, if we have difficulty identifying and purchasing suitable properties on attractive terms, there could be a delay between the time we receive net proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in the Offering or any private offering and the time we invest the net proceeds. We may also from time to time hold cash pending deployment into investments or have less than our targeted leverage, which cash or shortfall in target leverage may at times be significant, particularly at times when we are receiving high amounts of offering proceeds and/or times when there are few attractive investment opportunities. Such cash may be held in an account for the benefit of our stockholders that may be invested in money market accounts or other similar temporary investments, each of which are subject to the management fees.

In the event we are unable to find suitable investments such cash may be maintained for longer periods which would be dilutive to overall investment returns. This could cause a substantial delay in the time it takes for your investment to realize its full potential return and could adversely affect our ability to pay regular distributions of cash flow from operations to you. It is not anticipated that the temporary investment of such cash into money market accounts or other similar temporary investments pending deployment into investments will generate significant interest, and investors should understand that such low interest payments on the temporarily invested cash may adversely affect overall returns. In the event we fail to timely invest the net proceeds of sales of our common stock or do not deploy sufficient capital to meet our targeted leverage, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

If we are unable to successfully integrate new investments and manage our growth, our results of operations and financial condition may suffer.

We have in the past and may in the future significantly increase the size and/or change the types of investments in our portfolio. We may be unable to successfully and efficiently integrate newly acquired investments into our existing portfolio or otherwise effectively manage our assets or growth. In addition, increases in the size of our investment portfolio and/or changes in our investment focus may place significant demands on our Adviser’s administrative, operational, asset management, financial and other resources which could lead to decreased efficiency. Any failure to effectively manage such growth or increase in scale could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

The amount and source of distributions we may make to our stockholders is uncertain, and we may be unable to generate sufficient cash flows from our operations to make distributions to our stockholders at any time in the future.

We have not established a minimum distribution payment level, and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including the risk factors described in the Prospectus. We have a limited track record and may not generate sufficient income to make distributions to our stockholders. Our board of directors (or a committee of our board of directors) will make determinations regarding distributions based upon, among other factors, our financial performance, debt service obligations, debt covenants, REIT qualification and tax requirements and capital expenditure requirements. Among the factors that could impair our ability to make distributions to our stockholders are:

As a result, we may not be able to make distributions to our stockholders at any time in the future, and the level of any distributions we do make to our stockholders may not increase or even be maintained over time, any of which could materially and adversely affect the value of your investment.

We may pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operations, including, without limitation, the sale of or repayment under our assets, borrowings or offering proceeds, and we have no limits on the amounts we may pay from such sources.

We may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to fully fund distributions to stockholders. Therefore, we may fund distributions to our stockholders from sources other than cash flow from operations, including, without limitation, the sale of or repayment under our assets, borrowings or offering proceeds (including from sales from our common stock or Operating Partnership units). The extent to which we pay distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations will depend on various factors, including the level of participation in our distribution reinvestment plan, the extent to which the Adviser elects to receive its management fee in Class I shares or Class I units and the Special Limited Partner elects to receive distributions on its performance participation interest in Class I units or Class B units, how quickly we invest the proceeds from this and any future offering and the performance of our investments, including our real estate debt portfolio. Funding distributions from the sale of or repayment under our assets, borrowings or proceeds of the Offering will result in us having less funds available to acquire properties or other real estate-related investments. As a result, the return you realize on your investment may be reduced. Doing so may also negatively impact our ability to generate cash flows. Likewise, funding distributions from the sale of additional securities will dilute your interest in us on a percentage basis and may impact the value of your investment especially if we sell these securities at prices less than the price you paid for your shares. We may be required to continue to fund our regular distributions from a combination of some of these sources if our investments fail to perform, if expenses are greater than our revenues or due to numerous other factors. We have not established a limit on the amount of our distributions that may be paid from any of these sources.

To the extent we borrow funds to pay distributions, we would incur borrowing costs and these borrowings would require a future repayment. The use of these sources for distributions and the ultimate repayment of any liabilities incurred could adversely impact our ability to pay distributions in future periods, decrease our NAV, decrease the amount of cash we have available for operations and new investments and adversely impact the value of your investment.

We may also defer operating expenses or pay expenses (including the fees of the Adviser or distributions to the Special Limited Partner) with shares of our common stock or Operating Partnership units in order to preserve cash flow for the payment of distributions. The ultimate repayment of these deferred expenses could adversely affect our operations and reduce the future return on your investment. We may repurchase shares or redeem Operating Partnership units from the Adviser or the Special Limited Partner shortly after issuing such units or shares as compensation. The payment of expenses in shares of our common stock or with Operating Partnership units will dilute your ownership interest in our portfolio of assets. There is no guarantee any of our operating expenses will be deferred and the Adviser and Special Limited Partner are under no obligation to receive future fees or distributions in shares of our common stock or Operating Partnership units and may elect to receive such amounts in cash.

Payments to the Adviser or the Special Limited Partner in the form of common stock or Operating Partnership units they elect to receive in lieu of fees or distributions will dilute future cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

The Adviser or the Special Limited Partner may choose to receive, and have in the past received, our common stock or Operating Partnership units in lieu of certain fees or distributions. The holders of all Operating Partnership units are entitled to receive cash from operations pro rata with the distributions being paid to us and such distributions to the holder of the Operating Partnership units will reduce the cash available for distribution to us and to our stockholders. Furthermore, under certain circumstances the Operating Partnership units held by the Adviser or the Special Limited Partner are required to be repurchased, in cash at the holder’s election, and there may not be sufficient cash to make such a repurchase payment; therefore, we may need to use cash from operations, borrowings, offering proceeds or other sources to make the payment, which will reduce cash available for distribution to you or for investment in our operations. Repurchases of our shares or Operating Partnership units from the Adviser paid to the Adviser as a management fee are not subject to the monthly and quarterly volume limitations or the Early Purchase Deduction, and such sales receive priority over other shares being put for repurchase during such period. Repurchases of our shares or Operating Partnership units from the Special Limited Partner distributed to the Special Limited Partner with respect to its performance participation interest are not subject to the Early Purchase Deduction, but such repurchases are subject to the monthly and quarterly volume limitations and do not receive priority over other shares being put for repurchase during such period.

Purchases and repurchases of shares of our common stock are not made based on the current NAV per share of our common stock.

Generally, our offering price per share and the price at which we make repurchases of our shares will equal the NAV per share of the applicable class as of the last calendar day of the prior month, plus, in the case of our offering price, applicable upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees. The NAV per share, if calculated as of the date on which you make your subscription request or repurchase request, may be significantly different than the transaction price you pay or the repurchase price you receive. Certain of our investments or liabilities are subject to high levels of volatility from time to time and could change in value significantly between

the end of the prior month as of which our NAV is determined and the date that you acquire or repurchase our shares, however the prior month’s NAV per share will generally continue to be used as the transaction price per share and repurchase price per share. In exceptional circumstances, we may in our sole discretion, but are not obligated to, offer and repurchase shares at a different price that we believe reflects the NAV per share of such stock more appropriately than the prior month’s NAV per share, including by updating a previously disclosed transaction price, in cases where we believe there has been a material change (positive or negative) to our NAV per share since the end of the prior month and we believe an updated price is appropriate. In such exceptional cases, the transaction price and the repurchase price will not equal our NAV per share as of any time.

Valuations and appraisals of our real estate and real estate debt are estimates of fair value and may not necessarily correspond to realizable value.

For the purposes of calculating our monthly NAV, our properties will generally initially be valued at cost, which we expect to represent fair value at that time. Thereafter, valuations of properties will be determined by the Adviser based in part on appraisals of each of our properties by independent third-party appraisal firms reviewed by our independent valuation advisor at least once per year in accordance with valuation guidelines approved by our board of directors. The Adviser will also conduct a monthly valuation of our properties that will be reviewed and confirmed for reasonableness by our independent valuation advisor. Investments in real estate debt and other securities with readily available market quotations will be valued monthly at fair market value. Certain investments, such as mortgages and mezzanine loans, are unlikely to have market quotations. In the case of loans acquired by us, preferred equity and private company investments, such initial value will generally be the acquisition price of such investment. In the case of loans originated by us, such initial value will generally be the par value of such loan. Each such investment will then be valued by the Adviser within the first three full months after we invest in such investment and no less than quarterly thereafter. Additionally, the Adviser may in its discretion consider material market data and other information that becomes available after the end of the applicable month in valuing our assets and liabilities and calculating our NAV for a particular month. For more information regarding our valuation process, see “Net Asset Value Calculation and Valuation Guidelines” in the Prospectus.

Although monthly valuations of each of our real properties will be reviewed and confirmed for reasonableness by our independent valuation advisor, such valuations are based on asset- and portfolio-level information provided by the Adviser, including historical operating revenues and expenses of the properties, lease agreements on the properties, revenues and expenses of the properties, information regarding recent or planned capital expenditures and any other information relevant to valuing the real property, which information will not be independently verified by our independent valuation advisor. Similarly, each month, our independent valuation advisor will review and confirm for reasonableness our quarterly valuations (and our monthly updates of such valuations) of our real estate debt and other securities for which market quotations are not readily available. However, such valuations are based on information provided by the Adviser, which information will not be verified by our independent valuation advisor.

Within the parameters of our valuation guidelines, the valuation methodologies used to value our properties and certain of our investments will involve subjective judgments and projections and may not be accurate. Valuation methodologies will also involve assumptions and opinions about future events, which may or may not turn out to be correct. Valuations and appraisals of our properties and other investments will be only estimates of fair value. Ultimate realization of the value of an asset depends to a great extent on economic, market and other conditions beyond our control and the control of the Adviser and our independent valuation advisor. Further, valuations do not necessarily represent the price at which an asset would sell, since market prices of assets can only be determined by negotiation between a willing buyer and seller. As such, the carrying value of an asset may not reflect the price at which the asset could be sold in the market, and the difference between carrying value and the ultimate sales price could be material. In addition, accurate valuations are more difficult to obtain in times of low transaction volume because there are fewer market transactions that can be considered in the context of the appraisal. There will be no retroactive adjustment in the valuation of such assets, the offering price of our shares of common stock, the price we paid to repurchase shares of our common stock or NAV-based fees we paid to the Adviser and Blackstone Securities Partners L.P. (the “Dealer Manager”), an affiliate of the Adviser, to the extent such valuations prove to not accurately reflect the realizable value of our assets. Because the price you will pay for shares of our common stock in the Offering, and the price at which your shares may be repurchased by us pursuant to our share repurchase plan are generally based on our prior month’s NAV per share, you may pay more than realizable value or receive less than realizable value for your investment.

Our NAV per share amounts may change materially if the appraised values of our properties materially change from prior appraisals or the actual operating results for a particular month differ from what we originally budgeted for that month.

We anticipate that the annual appraisals of our properties will be conducted on a rolling basis, such that properties may be appraised at different times but each property would be appraised at least once per year. When these appraisals are considered by the Adviser for purposes of valuing the relevant property, there may be a material change in our NAV per share amounts for each class of our common stock from those previously reported. In addition, actual operating results for a given month may differ from what we originally budgeted for that month, which may cause a material increase or decrease in the NAV per share amounts. We will not

retroactively adjust the NAV per share of each class reported for the previous month. Therefore, because a new annual appraisal may differ materially from the prior appraisal or the actual results from operations may be better or worse than what we previously budgeted for a particular month, the adjustment to take into consideration the new appraisal or actual operating results may cause the NAV per share for each class of our common stock to increase or decrease, and such increase or decrease will occur in the month the adjustment is made.

It may be difficult to reflect, fully and accurately, material events that may impact our monthly NAV.

The Adviser’s determination of our monthly NAV per share will be based in part on appraisals of each of our properties provided annually by independent third-party appraisal firms in individual appraisal reports reviewed by our independent valuation advisor and quarterly valuations of our real estate debt and other securities for which market prices are not readily available provided by the Adviser and reviewed by our independent valuation advisor, each in accordance with valuation guidelines approved by our board of directors. As a result, our published NAV per share in any given month may not fully reflect any or all changes in value that may have occurred since the most recent appraisal or valuation. The Adviser will review appraisal reports and monitor our real estate and real estate debt, and is responsible for notifying the independent valuation advisor of the occurrence of any property-specific or market-driven event it believes may cause a material valuation change in the real estate valuation, but it may be difficult to reflect fully and accurately rapidly changing market conditions or material events that may impact the value of our real estate and real estate debt or liabilities between valuations, or to obtain complete information regarding any such events in a timely manner. For example, an unexpected termination or renewal of a material lease, a material increase or decrease in vacancies or an unanticipated structural or environmental event at a property may cause the value of a property to change materially, yet obtaining sufficient relevant information after the occurrence has come to light and/or analyzing fully the financial impact of such an event may be difficult to do and may require some time. As a result, the NAV per share may not reflect a material event until such time as sufficient information is available and analyzed, and the financial impact is fully evaluated, such that our NAV may be appropriately adjusted in accordance with our valuation guidelines. Depending on the circumstance, the resulting potential disparity in our NAV may be in favor or to the detriment of either stockholders who repurchase their shares, or stockholders who buy new shares, or existing stockholders.

NAV calculations are not governed by governmental or independent securities, financial or accounting rules or standards.

The methods used by our Adviser and State Street to calculate our NAV, including the components used in calculating our NAV, is not prescribed by rules of the SEC or any other regulatory agency. Further, there are no accounting rules or standards that prescribe which components should be used in calculating NAV, and our NAV is not audited by our independent registered public accounting firm. We calculate and publish NAV solely for purposes of establishing the price at which we sell and repurchase shares of our common stock, and you should not view our NAV as a measure of our historical or future financial condition or performance. The components and methodology used in calculating our NAV may differ from those used by other companies now or in the future.

In addition, calculations of our NAV, to the extent that they incorporate valuations of our assets and liabilities, are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These valuations may differ from liquidation values that could be realized in the event that we were forced to sell assets.

Additionally, errors may occur in calculating our NAV, which could impact the price at which we sell and repurchase shares of our common stock and the amount of the Adviser’s management fee and the Special Limited Partner’s performance participation interest. The Adviser has implemented certain policies and procedures to address such errors in NAV calculations. If such errors were to occur, the Adviser, depending on the circumstances surrounding each error and the extent of any impact the error has on the price at which shares of our common stock were sold or repurchased or on the amount of the Adviser’s management fee or the Special Limited Partner’s performance participation interest, may determine in its sole discretion to take certain corrective actions in response to such errors, including, subject to Blackstone’s policies and procedures, making adjustments to prior NAV calculations. You should carefully review the disclosure of our valuation policies and how NAV will be calculated under “Net Asset Value Calculation and Valuation Guidelines” in the Prospectus.

Our board of directors may, in the future, adopt certain measures under Maryland law without stockholder approval that may have the effect of making it less likely that a stockholder would receive a “control premium” for his or her shares.

Corporations organized under Maryland law with a class of registered securities and at least three independent directors are permitted to elect to be subject, by a charter or bylaw provision or a resolution of its board of directors and notwithstanding any contrary charter or bylaw provision, to any or all of five provisions:

These provisions may discourage an extraordinary transaction, such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, all of which might provide a premium price for stockholders’ shares. In our charter, we have elected that vacancies on our board of directors be filled only by the remaining directors and for the remainder of the full term of the directorship in which the vacancy occurred. Through other provisions in our charter and bylaws, we vest in our board of directors the exclusive power to fix the number of directorships, provided that the number is not less than three. We have not elected to be subject to any of the other provisions described above, but our charter does not prohibit our board of directors from opting into any of these provisions in the future.

Further, under the Maryland Business Combination Act, we may not engage in any merger or other business combination with an “interested stockholder” (which is defined as (1) any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding voting stock and (2) an affiliate or associate of ours who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding stock) or any affiliate of that interested stockholder for a period of five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder. A person is not an interested stockholder if our board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which he would otherwise have become an interested stockholder. In approving a transaction, our board of directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms or conditions determined by our board of directors. After the five-year period ends, any merger or other business combination with the interested stockholder or any affiliate of the interested stockholder must be recommended by our board of directors and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:

These supermajority voting provisions do not apply if, among other things, our stockholders receive a minimum price (as defined in the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”)) for their common stock and the consideration is received in cash or in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder.

The statute permits various exemptions from its provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by our board of directors prior to the time the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Our board of directors has adopted a resolution exempting any business combination involving us and any person, including Blackstone, the Dealer Manager and the Adviser, from the provisions of this law, provided that such business combination is first approved by our board of directors.

Our charter permits our board of directors to authorize us to issue preferred stock on terms that may subordinate the rights of the holders of our current common stock or discourage a third party from acquiring us.

Our board of directors is permitted, subject to certain restrictions set forth in our charter, to authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval. Further, our board of directors may classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common or preferred stock into other classes or series of stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications, and terms or conditions of redemption of the stock and may amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares or the number of shares of any class or series that we have authority to issue without stockholder approval. Thus, our board of directors could authorize us to issue shares of preferred stock with terms and conditions that could subordinate the rights of the holders of our common stock or have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock.

Maryland law limits, in some cases, the ability of a third party to vote shares acquired in a “control share acquisition.”

The Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act provides that “control shares” of a Maryland corporation acquired in a “control share acquisition” have no voting rights except to the extent approved by stockholders by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares of stock owned by the acquirer, by officers or by employees who are directors of the corporation, are excluded

from shares entitled to vote on the matter. “Control shares” are voting shares of stock which, if aggregated with all other shares of stock owned by the acquirer or in respect of which the acquirer can exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquirer to exercise voting power in electing directors within specified ranges of voting power. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder approval or shares acquired directly from the corporation. A “control share acquisition” means the acquisition of issued and outstanding control shares. The control share acquisition statute does not apply: (1) to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or statutory share exchange if the Maryland corporation is a party to the transaction; or (2) to acquisitions approved or exempted by the charter or bylaws of the Maryland corporation. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share Acquisition Act any and all acquisitions of our stock by any person. There can be no assurance that this provision will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future. For a more detailed discussion on the Maryland laws governing control share acquisitions, see “Certain Provisions of Maryland Corporate Law and Our Charter and Bylaws—Control Share Acquisition” in the Prospectus.

Maryland law and our organizational documents limit our rights and the rights of our stockholders to recover claims against our directors and officers, which could reduce your and our recovery against them if they cause us to incur losses.

Maryland law provides that a director will not have any liability as a director so long as he or she performs his or her duties in accordance with the applicable standard of conduct. In addition, our charter generally limits the personal liability of our directors and officers for monetary damages subject to the limitations of the North American Securities Administrators Association’s Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts, as revised and adopted on May 7, 2007 (the “NASAA REIT Guidelines”) and Maryland law. Maryland law and our charter provide that no director or officer shall be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages unless the director or officer (1) actually received an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (2) was actively and deliberately dishonest as established by a final judgment as material to the cause of action. Moreover, our charter generally requires us to indemnify and advance expenses to our directors and officers for losses they may incur by reason of their service in those capacities unless their act or omission was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, they actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or, in the case of any criminal proceeding, they had reasonable cause to believe the act or omission was unlawful. Further, we have entered into separate indemnification agreements with each of our officers and directors. As a result, you and we may have more limited rights against our directors or officers than might otherwise exist under common law, which could reduce your and our recovery from these persons if they act in a manner that causes us to incur losses. In addition, we are obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by these persons in some cases. However, our charter provides that we may not indemnify our directors or officers, or the Adviser and its affiliates, for any liability or loss suffered by them or hold our directors or officers, the Adviser and its affiliates harmless for any liability or loss suffered by us, unless they have determined, in good faith, that the course of conduct that caused the loss or liability was in our best interests, they were acting on our behalf or performing services for us, the liability or loss was not the result of negligence or misconduct by our non-independent directors, the Adviser and its affiliates, or gross negligence or willful misconduct by our independent directors, and the indemnification or agreement to hold harmless is recoverable only out of our net assets or the proceeds of insurance and not from the stockholders. See “Management—Limited Liability and Indemnification of Directors, Officers, the Adviser and Other Agents” in the Prospectus.

Maryland law limits our stockholders’ ability to amend our charter or dissolve us without the approval of our board of directors.

Although the NASAA REIT Guidelines indicate that stockholders are permitted to amend our charter or terminate us without the necessity for concurrence by our board of directors, we are required to comply with the MGCL, which provides that any amendment to our charter or any dissolution of our company must first be declared advisable by our board of directors. Therefore, our stockholders may vote to authorize the amendment of our charter or the dissolution of our company, but only after such action has been declared advisable by our board of directors. Accordingly, the only proposals to amend our charter or to dissolve our company that will be presented to our stockholders will be those that have been declared advisable by our board of directors and also require approval by our stockholders.

You may experience dilution. Your interest in our assets will also be diluted if the Operating Partnership issues additional units.

Holders of our common stock will not have preemptive rights to any shares we issue in the future. Our charter authorizes us to issue up to 10,100,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 10,000,000,000 shares are classified as common stock, of which 500,000,000 shares are classified as Class T shares, 3,000,000,000 shares are classified as Class S shares, 500,000,000 shares are classified as Class D shares and 6,000,000,000 are classified as Class I shares, and 100,000,000 shares are classified as preferred stock. We have also issued shares in private offerings and Operating Partnership units to holders other than the Company, and expect to make more such issuances in the future. In addition, our board of directors may amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of authorized shares of capital stock or the number of authorized shares of capital stock of any class or series without stockholder approval. After you purchase shares of our common stock in the Offering, our board of directors may elect, without stockholder approval, to: (1) sell additional shares in this or future public offerings; (2) issue shares of our common stock or

units in our Operating Partnership in private offerings; (3) issue shares of our common stock or units in our Operating Partnership upon the exercise of the options we may grant to our independent directors or future employees; (4) issue shares of our common stock or units in our Operating Partnership to the Adviser or the Special Limited Partner, or their successors or assigns, in payment of an outstanding obligation to pay fees for services rendered to us or the performance participation allocation; (5) issue shares of our common stock or units in our Operating Partnership to sellers of properties we acquire, or (6) issue equity incentive compensation to certain employees of affiliated service providers or to third parties as satisfaction of obligations under incentive compensation arrangements. If you purchase shares of our common stock in the Offering, you will incur immediate dilution in the net tangible book value of your investment as a result of accumulated depreciation and amortization on our assets and costs and fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Offering. Net tangible book value does not reflect our estimated value per share nor does it necessarily reflect the value of our assets upon an orderly liquidation of the Company in accordance with our investment objectives. Furthermore, you may experience a dilution in the value of your shares depending on the terms and pricing of any share issuances (including the shares being sold in the Offering) and the value of our assets at the time of issuance. To the extent we issue additional shares of common stock after your purchase in the Offering, your percentage ownership interest in us will be diluted. Because we hold all of our assets through the Operating Partnership, to the extent we issue additional units of our Operating Partnership after you purchase in the Offering, your percentage ownership interest in our assets will be diluted. Because certain classes of the units of our Operating Partnership may, in the discretion of our board of directors, be exchanged for shares of our common stock, any merger, exchange or conversion between our Operating Partnership and another entity ultimately could result in the issuance of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, thereby diluting the percentage ownership interest of other stockholders. Because of these and other reasons, our stockholders may experience substantial dilution in their percentage ownership of our shares or their interests in the underlying assets held by our Operating Partnership. Operating Partnership units may have different and preferential rights to the claims of common units of our Operating Partnership which correspond to the common stock held by our stockholders. Certain units in our Operating Partnership may have different and preferential rights to the terms of the common Operating Partnership units which correspond to the common stock held by our stockholders.

We are not required to comply with certain reporting requirements, including those relating to auditor’s attestation reports on the effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial reporting, accounting standards and disclosure about our executive compensation, that apply to other public companies.

So long as our shares of common stock are not traded on a securities exchange, we will be deemed to be a “non-accelerated filer” under the Exchange Act, and as a non-accelerated filer, we will be exempt from compliance with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In addition, so long as we are externally managed by the Adviser and we do not directly compensate our executive officers, or reimburse the Adviser or its affiliates for salaries, bonuses, benefits and severance payments for persons who also serve as one of our executive officers or as an executive officer of the Adviser, we do not have any executive compensation.

Our UPREIT structure may result in potential conflicts of interest with limited partners in our Operating Partnership whose interests may not be aligned with those of our stockholders.

Our directors and officers have duties to our corporation and our stockholders under Maryland law and our charter in connection with their management of the corporation. At the same time, we, as general partner, have fiduciary duties under Delaware law to our Operating Partnership and to the limited partners in connection with the management of our Operating Partnership. Our duties as general partner of our Operating Partnership and its partners may come into conflict with the duties of our directors and officers to the corporation and our stockholders. Under Delaware law, a general partner of a Delaware limited partnership owes its limited partners the duties of good faith and fair dealing. Other duties, including fiduciary duties, may be modified or eliminated in the partnership’s partnership agreement. The partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership provides that, for so long as we own a controlling interest in our Operating Partnership, any conflict that cannot be resolved in a manner not adverse to either our stockholders or the limited partners may be resolved in favor of our stockholders.

Additionally, the partnership agreement expressly limits our liability by providing that we and our officers, directors, agents and employees will not be liable or accountable to our Operating Partnership for losses sustained, liabilities incurred or benefits not derived if we or our officers, directors, agents or employees acted in good faith. In addition, our Operating Partnership is required to indemnify us and our officers, directors, employees, agents and designees to the extent permitted by applicable law from and against any and all claims arising from operations of our Operating Partnership, unless it is established that: (1) the act or omission was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and either was committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty; (2) the indemnified party received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services; or (3) in the case of a criminal proceeding, the indemnified person had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful.

The provisions of Delaware law that allow the fiduciary duties of a general partner to be modified by a partnership agreement have not been tested in a court of law, and we have not obtained an opinion of counsel covering the provisions set forth in the partnership agreement that purport to waive or restrict our fiduciary duties.

Your investment return may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

We intend to continue to conduct our operations so that neither we, nor our Operating Partnership nor the subsidiaries of our Operating Partnership are investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). However, there can be no assurance that we and our subsidiaries will be able to successfully avoid operating as an investment company.

A change in the value of any of our assets could negatively affect our ability to maintain our exemption from regulation under the Investment Company Act. To maintain compliance with the applicable exemption under the Investment Company Act, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we may have to acquire additional assets that we might not otherwise have acquired or may have to forego opportunities to acquire assets that we would otherwise want to acquire and would be important to our investment strategy.

If we were required to register as an investment company but failed to do so, we would become subject to substantial regulation with respect to our capital structure (including our ability to use borrowings), management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act), and portfolio composition, including disclosure requirements and restrictions with respect to diversification and industry concentration, and other matters. Compliance with the Investment Company Act would, accordingly, limit our ability to make certain investments and require us to significantly restructure our business plan, which could materially adversely affect our NAV and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

We depend on the Adviser to develop appropriate systems and procedures to control operational risk.

Operational risks arising from mistakes made in the confirmation or settlement of transactions, from transactions not being properly booked, evaluated or accounted for or other similar disruption in our operations may cause us to suffer financial losses, the disruption of our business, liability to third parties, regulatory intervention or damage to our reputation. We depend on the Adviser and its affiliates to develop the appropriate systems and procedures to control operational risk. We rely heavily on our financial, accounting and other data processing systems. The ability of our systems to accommodate transactions could also constrain our ability to properly manage our portfolio. Generally, the Adviser will not be liable for losses incurred due to the occurrence of any such errors.

We are subject to the risk that our trading orders may not be executed in a timely and efficient manner due to various circumstances, including, without limitation, systems failure or human error. As a result, we could be unable to achieve the market position selected by the Adviser or might incur a loss in liquidating our positions. Since some of the markets in which we may effect transactions are over-the-counter or interdealer markets, the participants in such markets are typically not subject to credit evaluation or regulatory oversight comparable to that which members of exchange-based markets are subject. We are also exposed to the risk that a counterparty will not settle a transaction in accordance with its terms and conditions, thereby causing us to suffer a loss.

Cybersecurity risks could result in the loss of data, interruptions in our business, damage to our reputation, and subject us to regulatory actions, increased costs and financial losses, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Our operations are highly dependent on our information systems and technology and we rely heavily on our and Blackstone’s financial, accounting, treasury, communications and other data processing systems. Such systems may fail to operate properly or become disabled as a result of tampering or a breach of the network security systems or otherwise. In addition, such systems are from time to time subject to cyberattacks which may continue to increase in sophistication and frequency in the future. Attacks on Blackstone and its affiliates and their portfolio companies’ and service providers’ systems could involve, and in some instances have in the past involved, attempts that are intended to obtain unauthorized access to our proprietary information or personal identifying information of our stockholders, destroy data or disable, degrade or sabotage our systems, or divert or otherwise steal funds, including through the introduction of computer viruses and other malicious code.

Cyber security incidents and cyber-attacks have been occurring globally at a more frequent and severe level and will likely continue to increase in frequency in the future. Our information and technology systems as well as those of Blackstone, its portfolio entities and other related parties, such as service providers, may be vulnerable to damage or interruption from cyber security breaches, computer viruses or other malicious code, “phishing” attempts and other forms of social engineering, network failures, computer and

telecommunication failures, infiltration by unauthorized persons and other security breaches, usage errors by their respective professionals or service providers, power, communications or other service outages and catastrophic events such as fires, tornadoes, floods, hurricanes and earthquakes. Cyberattacks and other security threats could originate from a wide variety of external sources, including cyber criminals, nation state hackers, hacktivists and other outside parties. Cyberattacks and other security threats could also originate from the malicious or accidental acts of insiders, such as employees, or third-party agents and consultants of the Company. There has been an increase in the frequency and sophistication of the cyber and security threats Blackstone faces, with attacks ranging from those common to businesses generally to those that are more advanced and persistent, which may target Blackstone because Blackstone holds a significant amount of confidential and sensitive information about its investors, its portfolio companies and potential investments. As a result, Blackstone may face a heightened risk of a security breach or disruption with respect to this information. There can be no assurance that measures Blackstone takes to ensure the integrity of its systems will provide protection, especially because cyberattack techniques used change frequently or are not recognized until successful.

If unauthorized parties gain access to such information and technology systems, they may be able to steal, publish, delete or modify private and sensitive information, including nonpublic personal information related to shareholders (and their beneficial owners) and material nonpublic information. Although Blackstone has implemented, and its portfolio entities and service providers may implement, various measures to manage risks relating to these types of events, such systems could prove to be inadequate and, if compromised, could become inoperable for extended periods of time, cease to function properly or fail to adequately secure private information. Blackstone does not control the cyber security plans and systems put in place by third-party service providers, and such third-party service providers may have limited indemnification obligations to Blackstone, its portfolio entities and us, each of which could be negatively impacted as a result. Breaches such as those involving covertly introduced malware, impersonation of authorized users and industrial or other espionage may not be identified even with sophisticated prevention and detection systems, potentially resulting in further harm and preventing them from being addressed appropriately. The failure of these systems or of disaster recovery plans for any reason could cause significant interruptions in Blackstone’s, its affiliates’, their portfolio entities’ or our operations and result in a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data, including personal information relating to shareholders, material nonpublic information and the intellectual property and trade secrets and other sensitive information in the possession of Blackstone and portfolio entities. We, Blackstone or a portfolio entity could be required to make a significant investment to remedy the effects of any such failures, harm to their reputations, legal claims that they and their respective affiliates may be subjected to, regulatory action or enforcement arising out of applicable privacy and other laws, adverse publicity and other events that may affect their business and financial performance.

The costs related to cyber or other security threats or disruptions may not be fully insured or indemnified by other means. In addition, we could also suffer losses in connection with updates to, or the failure to timely update, our information systems and technology. In addition, we have become increasingly reliant on third-party service providers for certain aspects of our business, including for our administration, as well as for certain information systems and technology, including cloud-based services. These third-party service providers could also face ongoing cyber security threats and compromises of their systems and as a result, unauthorized individuals could gain access to certain confidential data.

Cybersecurity has become a top priority for regulators around the world. Many jurisdictions in which Blackstone operates have laws and regulations relating to data privacy, cybersecurity and protection of personal information, including, as examples the General Data Protection Regulation in the European Union that went into effect in May 2018 and the California Consumer Privacy Act that went into effect in January 2020. Some jurisdictions have also enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals and government agencies of data security breaches involving certain types of personal data. Breaches in security, whether malicious in nature or through inadvertent transmittal or other loss of data, could potentially jeopardize Blackstone, its employees’ or our investors’ or counterparties’ confidential, proprietary and other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through Blackstone’s computer systems and networks, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in its, its employees’, our investors’, our counterparties’ or third parties’ business and operations, which could result in significant financial losses, increased costs, liability to our investors and other counterparties, regulatory intervention and reputational damage. Furthermore, if Blackstone fails to comply with the relevant laws and regulations or fail to provide the appropriate regulatory or other notifications of breach in a timely manner, it could result in regulatory investigations and penalties, which could lead to negative publicity and reputational harm and may cause our investors or Blackstone fund investors and clients to lose confidence in the effectiveness of our or Blackstone’s security measures.

Furthermore, Blackstone’s portfolio companies also rely on data processing systems and the secure processing, storage and transmission of information, including payment and health information. A disruption or compromise of these systems could have a material adverse effect on the value of these businesses.

Finally, Blackstone’s technology, data and intellectual property and the technology, data and intellectual property of its portfolio companies are also subject to a heightened risk of theft or compromise to the extent Blackstone and its portfolio companies engage in operations outside the United States, in particular in those jurisdictions that do not have comparable levels of protection of proprietary information and assets such as intellectual property, trademarks, trade secrets, know-how and customer information and records. In

addition, Blackstone and its portfolio companies may be required to compromise protections or forego rights to technology, data and intellectual property in order to operate in or access markets in a foreign jurisdiction. Any such direct or indirect compromise of these assets could have a material adverse impact on such businesses.

Compliance with the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest by participating broker-dealers may negatively impact our ability to raise capital in the Offering, which could harm our ability to achieve our investment objectives.

Commencing June 30, 2020, broker-dealers are required to comply with Regulation Best Interest, which, among other requirements, establishes a new standard of conduct for broker-dealers and their associated persons when making a recommendation of any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities to a retail customer. The full impact of Regulation Best Interest on participating broker-dealers cannot be determined at this time, and it may negatively impact whether participating broker-dealers and their associated persons recommend the Offering to certain retail customers. In particular, under SEC guidance concerning Regulation Best Interest, a broker-dealer recommending an investment in our shares should consider a number of factors, including but not limited to cost and complexity of the investment and reasonably available alternatives in determining whether there is a reasonable basis for the recommendation. Broker-dealers may recommend a more costly or complex product as long as they have a reasonable basis to believe is in the best interest of a particular retail customer. However, if broker-dealers instead choose alternatives to our shares, many of which likely exist, our ability to raise capital will be adversely affected. If Regulation Best Interest reduces our ability to raise capital in the Offering, it may harm our ability to achieve our objectives.

Our operating results will be affected by economic and regulatory changes that impact the real estate market in general.

We are subject to risks generally attributable to the ownership of real property, including:

All of these factors are beyond our control. Any negative changes in these factors could affect our performance and our ability to meet our obligations and make distributions to stockholders.

The real estate industry generally and the success of our investment activities in particular will both be affected by global and national economic and market conditions generally and by the local economic conditions where our properties are located. These factors may affect the level and volatility of real estate prices, which could impair our profitability or result in losses. In addition, general fluctuations in the market prices of securities and interest rates may affect our investment opportunities and the value of our investments. Blackstone’s financial condition may be adversely affected by a significant economic downturn and it may be subject to legal, regulatory, reputational and other unforeseen risks that could have a material adverse effect on Blackstone’s businesses and operations (including the Adviser).

A depression, recession or slowdown in the U.S. real estate market or one or more regional real estate markets, and to a lesser extent, the global economy (or any particular segment thereof) would have a pronounced impact on us, the value of our assets and our profitability, impede the ability of our assets to perform under or refinance their existing obligations, and impair our ability to effectively deploy our capital or realize upon investments on favorable terms. We would also be affected by any overall weakening of, or disruptions in, the financial markets. Any of the foregoing events could result in substantial losses to our business, which losses will likely be exacerbated by the presence of leverage in our capital structure or our investments’ capital structures.

Market disruptions in a single country could cause a worsening of conditions on a regional and even global level, and economic problems in a single country are increasingly affecting other markets and economies. A continuation of this trend could result in problems in one country adversely affecting regional and even global economic conditions and markets. For example, concerns about the fiscal stability and growth prospects of certain European countries in the last economic downturn had a negative impact on most economies of the Eurozone and global markets. The occurrence of similar crises in the future could cause increased volatility in the economies and financial markets of countries throughout a region, or even globally.

Additionally, political leaders in certain European nations have recently been elected on protectionist platforms, fueling doubts about the future of global free trade. The U.S. government has imposed tariffs on certain foreign goods, including steel and aluminum and has indicated a willingness to impose tariffs on imports of other products. Some foreign governments, including China, have instituted retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. goods and have indicated a willingness to impose additional tariffs on U.S. products. Global trade disruption, significant introductions of trade barriers and bilateral trade frictions, together with any future downturns in the global economy resulting therefrom, could adversely affect our performance.

For example, as a result of the 2008 financial crisis, the availability of debt financing secured by commercial real estate had been significantly restricted as a result of tightened lending standards for a prolonged period. As a result of the uncertainties in the credit market, real estate investors were unable to obtain debt financing on attractive terms, which adversely affected investment returns on acquisitions or their ability to make acquisitions or property improvements. Any future financial market disruptions (including financial market distributions related COVID-19) may force us to use a greater proportion of our offering proceeds to finance our acquisitions and fund property improvements, reducing the cash available to pay distributions or satisfy repurchase requests and reducing the number of acquisitions we would otherwise make.

Certain countries have been susceptible to epidemics and pandemics, most recently COVID-19, which has been designated as a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The outbreak of such epidemics or pandemics, together with the resulting restrictions on travel or quarantines imposed, have had a negative impact on the economy and business activity globally (including in the markets in which we invest), and thereby could adversely affect the performance of our investments. Furthermore, the rapid development of epidemics or pandemics could preclude prediction as to their ultimate adverse impact on economic and market conditions, and, as a result, present material uncertainty and risk with respect to us and the performance of our investments. These epidemics or pandemics could have particularly adverse impacts on certain industries, such as the hospitality and leisure industries, and may also have particular negative effects on certain regions in which we own investments.

The current outbreak of the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, has caused severe disruptions in the U.S. and global economy and has had an adverse impact on our performance and results of operations.

Beginning in the first quarter of 2020, there was a global outbreak of a novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”), which has spread to over 100 countries, including the United States, and has spread to every state in the United States. The World Health Organization has designated COVID-19 as a pandemic, and numerous countries, including the United States, have declared national emergencies with respect to COVID-19. The global impact of the outbreak has been widespread and many countries have reacted by instituting quarantines and restrictions on travel, closing financial markets and/or restricting trading, and limiting operations of non-essential businesses. Such actions have created disruption in global supply chains, and are adversely impacting many industries. Although vaccines for COVID-19 are being made available to the general public in the U.S. and around the world, it will take time for the vaccine to materially affect the spread of the virus and the outbreak could have a continued adverse impact on economic and market conditions.

The outbreak of COVID-19 has had and may in the future have an adverse impact on our NAV, results of operations (including FFO, AFFO and FAD), cash flows and fundraising, and may have an adverse impact on our ability to source new investments, obtain financing, fund distributions to stockholders and satisfy repurchase requests, among other factors. Although many or all facets of our business have been or could in the future be impacted by COVID-19, we currently believe the following impacts to be among the most important to us:

The immediately preceding outcomes are those we consider to be most important as a result of the pandemic. We have also experienced and may experience other negative impacts to our business as a result of the pandemic that could exacerbate other risks described in the Prospectus, including:

The rapid development and fluidity of this situation precludes any prediction as to the ultimate adverse impact of COVID-19 on economic and market conditions, and, as a result, present uncertainty and risk with respect to us and the performance of our investments. While certain geographies have to date experienced relatively low infection levels and disruption to businesses, others have experienced consistently high or accelerating levels. The full extent of the impact and effects of COVID-19 will depend on future developments, including, among other factors, the duration and spread of the outbreak, along with related travel advisories, quarantines and restrictions, the recovery time of the disrupted supply chains and industries, the impact of labor market interruptions, the impact of government interventions, and uncertainty with respect to the duration of the global economic slowdown. COVID-19 and the current financial, economic and capital markets environment, and future developments in these and other areas present uncertainty and risk with respect to our performance, results of operations and ability to pay distributions and satisfy repurchase requests.

We have in the past and may in the future invest in real estate located outside of the United States and real estate debt issued in, and/or backed by real estate in, countries outside the United States, including Canada, Europe and potentially elsewhere. Non-U.S. real estate and real estate-related investments involve certain factors not typically associated with investing in real estate and real estate-related investments in the U.S., including risks relating to (i) currency exchange matters, including fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the U.S. dollar and the various non-U.S. currencies in which such investments are denominated, and costs associated with conversion of investment principal and income from one currency into another; (ii) differences in conventions relating to documentation, settlement, corporate actions, stakeholder rights and other matters; (iii) differences between U.S. and non-U.S. real estate markets, including potential price volatility in and relative illiquidity of some non-U.S. markets; (iv) the absence of uniform accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards, practices and disclosure requirements and differences in government supervision and regulation; (v) certain economic, social and political risks, including potential exchange-control regulations, potential restrictions on non-U.S. investment and repatriation of capital, the risks associated with political, economic or social instability, including the risk of sovereign defaults, regulatory change, and the possibility of expropriation or confiscatory taxation or the imposition of withholding or other taxes on dividends, interest, capital gains, other income or gross sale or disposition proceeds, and adverse economic and political developments; (vi) the possible imposition of non-U.S. taxes on income and gains and gross sales or other proceeds recognized with respect to such investments; (vii) differing and potentially less well-developed or well-tested corporate laws regarding stakeholder rights, creditors’ rights (including the rights of secured parties), fiduciary duties and the protection of

investors; (viii) different laws and regulations including differences in the legal and regulatory environment or enhanced legal and regulatory compliance; (ix) political hostility to investments by foreign investors; and (x) less publicly available information. Furthermore, while we may have the capacity, but not the obligation, to mitigate such additional risks, including through the utilization of certain foreign exchange hedging instruments, there is no guarantee that we will be successful in mitigating such risks and in turn may introduce additional risks and expenses linked to such efforts.

Our portfolio is currently concentrated in certain industries and geographies and may in the future be concentrated in a limited number of industries, geographies or investments.

Our portfolio may be heavily concentrated at any time in only a limited number of industries, geographies or investments, and, as a consequence, our aggregate return may be substantially affected by the unfavorable performance of even a single investment. Currently, our portfolio is heavily concentrated in multifamily and industrial assets and geographically concentrated in the southern and western regions of the U.S., and in particular Las Vegas, Nevada. Concentration of our investments in a particular type of asset or geography, our portfolio makes us more susceptible to fluctuations in value resulting from adverse economic or business conditions affecting that particular type of asset or geography. Our concentration in Las Vegas exposes us to risks related to the economic health and other factors unique to that city, which is in turn largely reliant on the gaming and tourist industries. See “—Our investments in real estate associated with gaming facilities will be impacted by the risks associated with the gaming industry.” For investments that the Adviser intends to finance (directly or by selling assets), there is a risk that such financing may not be completed, which could result in us holding a larger percentage of our assets in a single investment and asset type than desired. Investors have no assurance as to the degree of diversification in our investments, either by geographic region or asset type.

We may change our investment and operational policies without stockholder consent.

Except for changes to the investment restrictions contained in our charter, which require stockholder consent to amend, we may change our investment and operational policies, including our policies with respect to investments, operations, indebtedness, capitalization and distributions, at any time without the consent of our stockholders, which could result in our making investments that are different from, and possibly riskier or more highly leveraged than, the types of investments described in the Prospectus. Our board of directors also approved very broad investment guidelines with which we must comply, but these guidelines provide the Adviser with broad discretion and can be changed by our board of directors. A change in our investment strategy may, among other things, increase our exposure to real estate market fluctuations, default risk and interest rate risk, all of which could materially affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We may have difficulty selling our properties, which may limit our flexibility and ability to pay distributions.

Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, it could be difficult for us to promptly sell one or more of our properties on favorable terms. Additionally, we have in the past and may in the future agree to lock-out or other provisions when we acquire a property that materially restrict us from selling such property or our interest in such property for a period of time. This may limit our ability to change our portfolio quickly in response to adverse changes in the performance of any such property or economic or market trends. In addition, U.S. federal tax laws that impose a 100% excise tax on gains from sales of dealer property by a REIT (generally, property held for sale, rather than investment) could limit our ability to sell properties and may affect our ability to sell properties without adversely affecting returns to our stockholders. These restrictions could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We acquire properties and portfolios of properties, including large portfolios that could result in changes to our capital structure. Our acquisition activities and their success are subject to the following risks:

In addition, while we will invest primarily in stabilized, income-generating real estate, we may also acquire assets that require some amount of capital investment in order to be renovated or repositioned. These investments are generally subject to higher risk of loss than investments in stabilized real estate and there is no guarantee that any renovation or repositioning will be successful, or that the actual costs will not be greater than our estimates.

The sale and disposition of real properties carry certain litigation risks at the property level that may reduce our profitability and the return on your investment.

The acquisition, ownership and disposition of real properties carry certain specific litigation risks. Litigation may be commenced with respect to a property acquired by us in relation to activities that took place prior to our acquisition of such property. In addition, at the time of disposition of an individual property, a potential buyer may claim that it should have been afforded the opportunity to purchase the asset or alternatively that such potential buyer should be awarded due diligence expenses incurred or statutory damages for misrepresentation relating to disclosure made, if such buyer is passed over in favor of another as part of our efforts to maximize sale proceeds. Similarly, successful buyers may later sue us under various damage theories, including those sounding in tort, for losses associated with latent defects or other problems not uncovered in due diligence.

Competition for investment opportunities may reduce our profitability and the return on your investment.

We face competition from various entities for investment opportunities in properties, including other REITs, real estate operating companies, pension funds, insurance companies, investment funds and companies, partnerships and developers, some of which are likely a source of reasonable alternatives under Regulation Best Interest. In addition to third-party competitors, other programs sponsored by the Adviser and its affiliates, particularly those with investment strategies that overlap with ours may seek investment opportunities in accordance with Blackstone’s prevailing policies and procedures. Some of these entities may have greater access to capital to acquire properties than we have. Competition from these entities may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to us or increase the bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell. Additionally, disruptions and dislocations in the credit markets could have a material impact on the cost and availability of debt to finance real estate acquisitions, which is a key component of our acquisition strategy. The lack of available debt on reasonable terms or at all could result in a further reduction of suitable investment opportunities and create a competitive advantage for other entities that have greater financial resources than we do. In addition, over the past several years, a number of real estate funds and publicly traded and non-traded REITs have been formed and others have been consolidated (and many such existing funds have grown in size) for the purpose of investing in real estate and/or real estate-related assets. Additional real estate funds, vehicles and REITs with similar investment objectives are expected to be formed in the future by other unrelated parties and further consolidations may occur (resulting in larger funds and vehicles). Consequently, it is expected that competition for appropriate investment opportunities would reduce the number of investment opportunities available to us and adversely affect the terms, including price, upon which investments can be made. This competition may cause us to acquire properties and other investments at higher prices or by using less-than-ideal capital structures, and in such case our returns will be lower and the value of our assets may not appreciate or may decrease significantly below the amount we paid for such assets. If such events occur, you may experience a lower return on your investment.

We may make a substantial amount of joint venture investments, including with Blackstone affiliates. Joint venture investments could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on the financial condition of our joint venture partners and disputes between us and our joint venture partners.

We have made joint venture investments with third parties and we may, subject to the requirements in our charter, continue to co-invest in the future with Blackstone affiliates or third parties in partnerships or other entities that own real properties. We have entered into, and expect to continue to enter into, joint ventures as part of an acquisition with the seller of the properties. We may acquire non-controlling interests or shared control interests in joint ventures. Even if we have some control in a joint venture, we would not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority regarding the joint venture. Investments in joint ventures may, under certain circumstances, involve risks not present were another party not involved, including the possibility that joint venture partners might become bankrupt or fail to fund their required capital contributions. Joint venture partners may have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals, and may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives. Such investments may also have the potential risk of impasses on decisions, such as a sale, because neither we nor the joint venture partner would have full control over the joint venture. Disputes between us and joint venture partners may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and directors from focusing their time and effort on our business. Consequently, actions by or disputes with joint venture partners might result in subjecting properties owned by the joint venture to additional risk. In some cases, our joint venture partner may be entitled to property management fees, promote or other

incentive fee payments as part of the arrangement of the joint venture. In addition, we may in certain circumstances be liable for the actions of our joint venture partners.

In addition, in connection with any investments in which we participate alongside any Other Blackstone Accounts, the Adviser may decline to exercise, or delegate to a third party, certain control, foreclosure and similar governance rights relating to such shared investments for legal, tax, regulatory or other reasons. There is no guarantee that we will be able to co-invest with any Other Blackstone Account. We will not participate in joint ventures in which we do not have or share control to the extent that we believe such participation would potentially threaten our status as a non-investment company exempt from the Investment Company Act. This may prevent us from receiving an allocation with respect to certain investment opportunities that are suitable for both us and one or more Other Blackstone Accounts.

If we have a right of first refusal to buy out a joint venture partner, we may be unable to finance such a buy-out if it becomes exercisable or we are required to purchase such interest at a time when it would not otherwise be in our best interest to do so. If our interest is subject to a buy/sell right, we may not have sufficient cash, available borrowing capacity or other capital resources to allow us to elect to purchase an interest of a joint venture partner subject to the buy/sell right, in which case we may be forced to sell our interest as the result of the exercise of such right when we would otherwise prefer to keep our interest. In some joint ventures we may be obligated to buy all or a portion of our joint venture partner’s interest in connection with a crystallization event, and we may be unable to finance such a buy-out when such crystallization event occurs, which may result in interest or other penalties accruing on the purchase price. If we buy our joint venture partner’s interest we will have increased exposure in the underlying investment. The price we use to buy our joint venture partner’s interest or sell our interest is typically determined by negotiations between us and our joint venture partner and there is no assurance that such price will be representative of the value of the underlying property or equal to our then-current valuation of our interest in the joint venture that is used to calculate our NAV. Finally, we may not be able to sell our interest in a joint venture if we desire to exit the venture for any reason or if our interest is likewise subject to a right of first refusal of our joint venture partner, our ability to sell such interest may be adversely impacted by such right. Joint ownership arrangements with Blackstone affiliates may also entail further conflicts of interest. Joint venture partners may receive ongoing fees in connection with providing service to the joint venture or its properties, including promote fees, beyond their equity investment, which would reduce the amount of our economic interest.

Some additional risks and conflicts related to our joint venture investments (including joint venture investments with Blackstone affiliates) include:

Furthermore, we may have conflicting fiduciary obligations if we acquire properties with our affiliates or other related entities; as a result, in any such transaction we may not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties.

“Other Blackstone Accounts” means investment funds, REITs, vehicles, accounts, products and/or other similar arrangements sponsored, advised, and/or managed by Blackstone or its affiliates, whether currently in existence or subsequently established (in each case, including any related successor funds, alternative vehicles, supplemental capital vehicles, surge funds, over-flow funds, co-investment vehicles and other entities formed in connection with Blackstone or its affiliates side-by-side or additional general partner investments with respect thereto).

Acquiring or attempting to acquire multiple properties in a single transaction may adversely affect our operations.

We have in the past and may in the future acquire multiple properties in a single transaction. Portfolio acquisitions typically are more complex and expensive than single-property acquisitions, and the risk that a multiple-property acquisition does not close may be greater than in a single-property acquisition. Portfolio acquisitions may also result in us owning investments in geographically dispersed markets, placing additional demands on the Adviser in managing the properties in the portfolio. In addition, a seller may require that a group of properties be purchased as a package and/or also include certain additional investments or transactions even though, were it not part of the overall transaction, we may not want to purchase one or more properties included in such portfolio or participate in additional investments or transactions. In these situations, if we are unable to identify another person or entity to acquire the unwanted properties or investments, or if the seller imposes a lock-out period or other restriction on a subsequent sale, we may be required to operate such properties or attempt to dispose of such properties or investments (if not subject to a lock-out period). We may also share the acquisition of large portfolios of properties with our affiliates, which can result in conflicts of interest, including as to the allocation of properties within the portfolio and the prices attributable to such properties. See “Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest—We may invest in joint ventures with Other Blackstone Accounts or divide a pool of investments among us and Other Blackstone Accounts.” It may also be difficult for the Adviser to fully analyze each property in a large portfolio, increasing the risk that properties do not perform as anticipated. We also may be required to accumulate a large amount of cash to fund such acquisitions. We would expect the returns that we earn on such cash to be less than the returns on investments in real property. Therefore, acquiring multiple properties in a single transaction may reduce the overall yield on our portfolio.

In the event we obtain options to acquire properties, we may lose the amount paid for such options whether or not the underlying property is purchased.

We may obtain options to acquire certain properties. The amount paid for an option, if any, is normally surrendered if the property is not purchased and may or may not be credited against the purchase price if the property is purchased. Any unreturned option payments will reduce the amount of cash available for further investments or distributions to our stockholders.

In our due diligence review of potential investments, we may rely on third-party consultants and advisors and representations made by sellers of potential portfolio properties, and we may not identify all relevant facts that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating potential investments.

Before making investments, due diligence will typically be conducted in a manner that we deem reasonable and appropriate based on the facts and circumstances applicable to each investment. Due diligence may entail evaluation of important and complex business, financial, tax, accounting, environmental, social governance, real property and legal issues. Outside consultants, legal advisors, appraisers, accountants, investment banks and other third parties, including affiliates of the Adviser or Blackstone, may be involved in the due diligence process to varying degrees depending on the type of investment, the costs of which will be borne by us. Such involvement of third-party advisors or consultants may present a number of risks primarily relating to the Adviser’s reduced control of the functions that are outsourced. Where affiliates of Blackstone are utilized, the Adviser’s management fee will not be offset for the fees paid or expenses reimbursed to such affiliates. In addition, if the Adviser is unable to timely engage third-party providers, the ability to evaluate and acquire more complex targets could be adversely affected. In the due diligence process and making an assessment regarding a potential investment, the Adviser will rely on the resources available to it, including information provided by the target of the investment and, in some circumstances, third-party investigations. The due diligence investigation carried out with respect to any investment opportunity may not reveal or highlight all relevant facts that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating such

investment opportunity, particularly for large portfolio investments. Moreover, such an investigation will not necessarily result in the investment being successful. There can be no assurance that attempts to provide downside protection with respect to investments, including pursuant to risk management procedures described in the Prospectus, will achieve their desired effect and potential investors should regard an investment in us as being speculative and having a high degree of risk.

There can be no assurance that the Adviser will be able to detect or prevent irregular accounting, employee misconduct or other fraudulent practices or material misstatements or omissions during the due diligence phase or during our efforts to monitor and disclose information about the investment on an ongoing basis or that any risk management procedures implemented by us will be adequate.

When conducting due diligence and making an assessment regarding an investment, the Adviser will rely on the resources available to it, including information provided or reported by the seller of the investment and, in some circumstances, third-party investigations. The due diligence investigation that the Adviser carries out with respect to any investment opportunity may not reveal or highlight all relevant facts that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating such investment opportunity. Moreover, such an investigation will not necessarily result in the investment being successful. Conduct occurring at the portfolio property, even activities that occurred prior to our investment therein, could have an adverse impact us.

In the event of fraud by the seller of any portfolio property, we may suffer a partial or total loss of capital invested in that property. An additional concern is the possibility of material misrepresentation or omission on the part of the seller. Such inaccuracy or incompleteness may adversely affect the value of our investments in such portfolio property. We will rely upon the accuracy and completeness of representations made by sellers of portfolio properties in the due diligence process to the extent reasonable when we make our investments, but cannot guarantee such accuracy or completeness.

In addition, we rely on information, including financial information and non-GAAP metrics, provided by sellers of our investments for disclosure to our investors about potential acquisitions or current assets owned by us. Accordingly, although we believe such information to be accurate, such information cannot be independently verified by the Adviser, and in some cases such information has not been independently reviewed or audited while under our ownership or control or at all. We cannot assure you that that the financial statements or metrics of properties we have acquired or will acquire would not be materially different if such statements or metrics had been independently audited or reviewed.

Consultants, legal advisors, appraisers, accountants, investment banks and other third parties may be involved in the due diligence process and/or the ongoing operation of our portfolio properties to varying degrees depending on the type of investment. For example, certain asset management and finance functions, such as data entry relating to a portfolio property, may be outsourced to a third-party service provider whose fees and expenses will be borne by such portfolio property or us. Such involvement of third-party advisors or consultants may present a number of risks primarily relating to our reduced control of the functions that are outsourced.

We may be subject to expenses and liabilities related to employees of certain portfolio entities owned by us.

We may be subject to expenses and liabilities related to employees of certain portfolio entities owned by us. As part of our acquisition of Simply Self Storage in December 2020 (the “Simply Storage Acquisition”), we acquired Simply Storage Management. Simply Storage Management is our first portfolio entity with employees and we may have others in the future. Such expenses and liabilities include compensation, overhead and other administrative costs, as well as potential liabilities that are commonly faced by employers, such as workers’ disability and compensation claims, potential labor disputes, and other employee-related liabilities and grievances. We may also be subject to other operational risks from such employees, including cybersecurity risks or as a result of employee error or malfeasance. In addition, we may encounter unforeseen costs and expenses associated with acquiring such portfolio entities and such expenses may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

The exit by the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) from the E.U. could adversely affect us.

The U.K. formally left the E.U. on January 31, 2020. There followed an implementation period, during which EU law continued to apply in the U.K. and the U.K. maintained its E.U. single market access rights and E.U. customs union membership. The implementation period expired in December 31, 2020. Consequently, the U.K. has become a third country vis-à-vis the EU, without access to the single market or membership of the E.U. customs union.

On December 30, 2020, the U.K. and the E.U. signed a trade and cooperation agreement (the “TCA”) to govern their on-going relationship. The TCA was officially ratified by the U.K. Parliament on December 30, 2020, and is currently awaiting ratification by the E.U. Parliament and Council. The TCA has applied provisionally since January 1, 2021, pending the E.U.’s formal ratification. It

is anticipated that further details of the relationship between the U.K. and the E.U. will continue to be negotiated even after formal ratification of the TCA.

Over time, U.K. regulated firms and other U.K. businesses may be adversely affected by the terms of the TCA (assuming it is formally ratified by the E.U.), as compared with the position prior to the expiry of the implementation period on December 31, 2020. For example, the TCA introduces new customs checks, as well as new restrictions on the provision of cross-border services and on the free movement of employees. These changes have the potential to materially impair the profitability of a business, and to require it to adapt or even relocate.

Although it is probable that any adverse effects flowing from the U.K.’s withdrawal from the E.U. will principally affect the U.K. (and those having an economic interest in, or connected to, the U.K.), given the size and global significance of the U.K.’s economy, unpredictability about the implications of its withdrawal from the E.U., the E.U. (and countries outside the E.U.) is likely to be an ongoing source of instability, produce significant currency fluctuations, and/or have other adverse effects on international markets, international trade agreements and/or other existing cross-border cooperation arrangements (whether economic, tax, fiscal, legal, regulatory or otherwise). The withdrawal of the U.K. from the E.U. could therefore adversely affect us. In addition, although it seems less likely now than at the time of Britain’s referendum, the withdrawal of the U.K. from the E.U. could have a further destabilizing effect if any other member states were to consider withdrawing from the E.U., presenting similar and/or additional potential risks and consequences to our business and financial results.

We rely on property managers to operate our properties and leasing agents to lease vacancies in our properties.

The Adviser hires property managers to manage our properties and leasing agents to lease vacancies in our properties. These property managers may be our affiliates or partners in joint ventures that we enter into. We may also use portfolio entities owned by us to provide these property management, leasing and similar services. The property managers have significant decision-making authority with respect to the management of our properties. We are particularly dependent on property managers of any hospitality and leisure properties we invest in. In cases where we use third party property managers, our ability to direct and control how our properties are managed on a day-to-day basis may be limited. Thus, the success of our business may depend in large part on the ability of our property managers to manage the day-to-day operations and the ability of our leasing agents to lease vacancies in our properties. In cases where we use one of our portfolio entities to provide property management services, we will directly incur the expenses of property management and the other costs and obligations associated with operating the portfolio entity, including the compensation of our portfolio entity employees. Any adversity experienced by, or problems in our relationship with, our property managers or leasing agents could adversely impact the operation and profitability of our properties.

We depend on tenants for our revenue, and therefore our revenue is dependent on the success and economic viability of our tenants. Our reliance on single or significant tenants in certain buildings may decrease our ability to lease vacated space and could adversely affect our income, performance, operations and ability to pay distributions.

Rental income from real property, directly or indirectly, constitutes a significant portion of our income. Delays in collecting accounts receivable from tenants could adversely affect our cash flows and financial condition. In addition, the inability of a single major tenant or a number of smaller tenants to meet their rental obligations would adversely affect our income. Therefore, our financial success is indirectly dependent on the success of the businesses operated by the tenants in our properties or in the properties securing debts we may own. The weakening of the financial condition of or the bankruptcy or insolvency of a significant tenant or a number of smaller tenants and vacancies caused by defaults of tenants or the expiration of leases may adversely affect our operations, performance and our ability to pay distributions.

Generally, under U.S. bankruptcy law, a debtor tenant has 120 days to exercise the option of assuming or rejecting the obligations under any unexpired lease for nonresidential real property, which period may be extended once by the bankruptcy court for an additional 90 days. If the tenant assumes its lease, the tenant must cure all defaults under the lease and may be required to provide adequate assurance of its future performance under the lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, we will have a claim against the tenant’s bankruptcy estate. Although rent owing for the period between filing for bankruptcy and rejection of the lease may be afforded administrative expense priority and paid in full, pre-bankruptcy arrears and amounts owing under the remaining term of the lease will be afforded general unsecured claim status (absent collateral securing the claim). Moreover, amounts owing under the remaining term of the lease will be capped. Other than equity and subordinated claims, general unsecured claims are the last claims paid in a bankruptcy and therefore funds may not be available to pay such claims in full.

Some of our properties may be leased to a single or significant tenant and, accordingly, may be suited to the particular or unique needs of such tenant. We may have difficulty replacing such a tenant if the floor plan of the vacant space limits the types of businesses that can use the space without major renovation. In addition, the resale value of the property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the value of the leases of such property.

For example, we are dependent on a subsidiary of MGM as the sole tenant of The Bellagio Las Vegas (the “Bellagio”)as well as the MGM Grand Las Vegas and Mandalay Bay. The rental revenue we are entitled to receive from MGM comprises a sizeable portion of our overall revenue and therefore risks related to MGM’s financial condition will expose us to risk, including adverse impacts to MGM’s business as a result of changes in market or economic conditions, natural disasters, outbreaks of an infectious disease, pandemic or any other serious public health concern, negative developments in the economy or political climate that depress travel activity, or other factors that may impact MGM’s operations or the operation of these properties. As a result, MGM has been, and may in the future be, required to suspend operations at these properties for what could be an extended period of time. Additionally, while these properties are currently suited to MGM’s needs, should MGM default under any of these leases, we may have difficulty finding a replacement tenant, any replacement tenant may not be of the same quality as MGM, the terms of any new lease may be less favorable than the terms of the current lease, or we may be required to incur significant expense to modify the properties to suit a new tenant.

Similarly, certain of our other properties, including certain industrial warehouses and student housing properties, are leased out to single tenants or tenants that are otherwise reliant on a single enterprise to remain in business and our hotel properties are generally operated by a single operator. Adverse impacts to such tenants, businesses or operators, including as a result of changes in market or economic conditions, natural disasters, outbreaks of an infectious disease, pandemic or any other serious public health concern, political events or other factors that may impact the operation of these properties, may have negative effects on our business and financial results. As a result, such tenants or operators have been, and may in the future be, required to suspend operations at our properties for what could be an extended period of time. Further, if such tenants default under their leases or such operators are unable to operate our properties, we may not be able to promptly enter into a new lease or operating arrangement for such properties, rental rates or other terms under any new leases or operating arrangement may be less favorable than the terms of the current lease or operating arrangement or we may be required to make capital improvements to such properties for a new tenant or operator, any of which could adversely impact our operating results.

We may not be able to lease properties that are vacant or become vacant because a tenant decides not to renew its lease or by the continued default of a tenant under its lease. In addition, certain of the properties we acquire may have some level of vacancy at the time of acquisition. Certain other properties may be specifically suited to the particular needs of a tenant and may become vacant after we acquire them. Even if a tenant renews its lease or we enter into a lease with a new tenant, the terms of the new lease may be less favorable than the terms of the old lease. In addition, the resale value of the property could be diminished because the market value may depend principally upon the value of the property’s leases. If we are unable to promptly renew or enter into new leases, or if the rental rates are lower than expected, our results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected. For example, following the termination or expiration of a tenant’s lease there may be a period of time before we will begin receiving rental payments under a replacement lease. During that period, we will continue to bear fixed expenses such as interest, real estate taxes, maintenance, security, repairs and other operating expenses. In addition, declining economic conditions may impair our ability to attract replacement tenants and achieve rental rates equal to or greater than the rents paid under previous leases. Increased competition for tenants may require us to make capital improvements to properties which would not have otherwise been planned. Any unbudgeted capital improvements that we undertake may divert cash that would otherwise be available for distributions or for satisfying repurchase requests. Ultimately, to the extent that we are unable to renew leases or re-let space as leases expire, decreased cash flow from tenants will result, which could adversely impact our operating results.

We may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a tenant can be found for a property at an attractive lease rate or an investment in a property can be sold. No assurance can be given that we will have funds available to correct those defects or to make those improvements. In acquiring a property, we may agree to lock-out provisions that materially restrict us from selling that property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed on that property. These factors and others that could impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties could significantly affect our financial condition and operating results.

Most leases with retail tenants contain provisions giving the particular tenant the exclusive right to sell particular types of merchandise or provide specific types of services within the particular retail center. These provisions may limit the number and types of prospective tenants interested in leasing space in a particular retail property.

We face significant competition from owners, operators and developers of properties. Substantially all of our properties will face competition from similar properties in the same market. This competition may affect our ability to attract and retain tenants and may

reduce the rents we are able to charge. These competing properties may have vacancy rates higher than our properties, which may result in their owners being willing to lease available space at lower prices than the space in our properties. If one of our properties were to lose an anchor tenant, this could impact the leases of other tenants, who may be able to modify or terminate their leases as a result.

We may seek to negotiate longer-term leases to reduce the cash flow volatility associated with lease rollovers, provided that contractual rent increases are generally included. In addition, where appropriate, we will seek leases that provide for operating expenses, or expense increases, to be paid by the tenants. These leases may allow tenants to renew the lease with pre-defined rate increases. If we do not accurately judge the potential for increases in market rental rates, or if our negotiated increases provide for a discount to then-current market rental rates (in exchange for lower volatility), we may set the rental rates of these long-term leases at levels such that even after contractual rental increases, the resulting rental rates are less than then-current market rental rates. Further, we may be unable to terminate those leases or adjust the rent to then-prevailing market rates. As a result, our income and distributions to our stockholders could be lower than if we did not enter into long-term leases.

We may experience material losses or damage related to our properties and such losses may not be covered by insurance.

We may experience material losses related to our properties arising from natural disasters, such as extreme weather events, climate change, earthquakes or floods, and acts of God, vandalism or other crime, faulty construction or accidents, fire, outbreaks of an infectious disease, pandemic or any other serious public health concern, war, acts of terrorism or other catastrophes. We plan to carry insurance covering our properties under policies the Adviser deems appropriate. The Adviser will select policy specifications and insured limits that it believes to be appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice. Insurance policies on our properties may include some coverage for losses that are generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to terrorism, earthquakes and floods, but we cannot assure you that it will be adequate to cover all losses and some of our policies will be insured subject to limitations involving large deductibles or co-payments and policy limits that may not be sufficient to cover losses. In general, losses related to terrorism are becoming harder and more expensive to insure against. In some cases, the insurers exclude terrorism, in others the coverage against terrorist acts is limited, or available only for a significant price. A similar dynamic has been unfolding with respect to certain weather and fire events, with insurers excluding certain investments that have high risk of weather, earthquake or fire events. As the effects of climate change increase, we expect the frequency and impact of weather and climate related events and conditions could increase as well. As a result, not all investments may be insured against terrorism, weather or fire. If we or one or more of our tenants experience a loss that is uninsured or that exceeds policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those properties. In addition, if the damaged properties are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these properties were irreparably damaged. Certain of these events, such as war or an outbreak of an infectious disease, could have a broader negative impact on the global or local economy, thereby affecting us or the Adviser.

We could become subject to liability for environmental violations, regardless of whether we caused such violations.

We could become subject to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance with environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations generally govern wastewater discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid hazardous materials, the remediation of contaminated property associated with the disposal of solid and hazardous materials and other health and safety-related concerns. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on tenants, owners or managers for the costs of investigation or remediation of contaminated properties, regardless of fault or the legality of the original disposal. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances, and regulations, a current or former owner or manager of real property may be liable for the cost to remove or remediate hazardous or toxic substances, wastes, or petroleum products on, under, from, or in such property. These costs could be substantial and liability under these laws may attach whether or not the owner or manager knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such contamination. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the contamination, each liable party may be held entirely responsible for all of the clean-up costs incurred.

In addition, third parties may sue the owner or manager of a property for damages based on personal injury, natural resources, or property damage and/or for other costs, including investigation and clean-up costs, resulting from the environmental contamination. The presence of contamination on one of our properties, or the failure to properly remediate a contaminated property, could give rise to a lien in favor of the government for costs it may incur to address the contamination, or otherwise adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the property or borrow using the property as collateral. In addition, if contamination is discovered on our properties, environmental laws may impose restrictions on the manner in which the property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures or prevent us from entering into leases with prospective tenants. There can be no assurance that future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability, or that the environmental

condition of our properties will not be affected by the operations of the tenants, by the existing condition of the land, by operations in the vicinity of the properties. There can be no assurance that these laws, or changes in these laws, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. We could also suffer losses if reserves or insurance proceeds prove inadequate to cover any such matters. The cost to perform any remediation, and the cost to defend against any related claims, could exceed the value of the relevant investment, and in such cases we could be forced to satisfy the claims from other assets and investments. We may have an indemnity from a third party purporting to cover these liabilities, but there can be no assurance as to the financial viability of any indemnifying party at the time a claim arises. In addition, some environmental laws create a lien on a contaminated asset in favor of governments or government agencies for costs they may incur in connection with the contamination.

Our costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “ADA”) may affect cash available for distributions.

Any domestic properties we acquire will generally be subject to the ADA. Under the ADA, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The ADA has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services be made accessible and available to people with disabilities. The ADA’s requirements could require removal of access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties or, in some cases, an award of damages. We may not acquire properties that comply with the ADA or we may not be able to allocate the burden on the seller or other third party, such as a tenant, to ensure compliance with the ADA in all cases.

Our properties are, and any properties we acquire in the future will be, subject to property taxes that may increase in the future, which could adversely affect our cash flow.

Our properties are, and any properties we acquire in the future will be, subject to real and personal property taxes that may increase as property tax rates change and as the properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. Some of our leases may provide that the property taxes, or increases therein, are charged to the lessees as an expense related to the properties that they occupy. As the owner of the properties, however, we are ultimately responsible for payment of the taxes to the government. If property taxes increase, our tenants may be unable (or not obligated) to make the required tax payments, ultimately requiring us to pay the taxes. In addition, we are generally responsible for property taxes related to any vacant space. If we purchase residential properties, the leases for such properties typically will not allow us to pass through real estate taxes and other taxes to residents of such properties. Consequently, any tax increases may adversely affect our results of operations at such properties.

Certain of our investments are in the form of ground leases, which provide limited rights to the underlying property.

We hold and may in the future invest from time to time in real properties that are subject to ground leases. As a lessee under a ground lease, we may be exposed to the possibility of losing the property upon termination, or an earlier breach by us, of the ground lease, which may adversely impact our investment performance. Furthermore, ground leases generally provide for certain provisions that limit the ability to sell certain properties subject to the lease. In order to assign or transfer rights and obligations under certain ground leases, we will generally need to obtain consent of the landlord of such property, which, in turn, could adversely impact the price realized from any such sale.

Certain of our industrial properties may be special use and/or build-to-suit and may be difficult to sell or relet upon tenant defaults or lease terminations.

Certain of our industrial properties may include special use and/or build-to-suit properties. These types of properties are relatively illiquid compared to other types of real estate and financial assets and this illiquidity will limit our ability to quickly change our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. With such properties, if the current lease is terminated or not renewed, we may be required to renovate the property or to make rent concessions in order to lease the property to another tenant, finance the property or sell the property. In addition, in the event we are forced to sell the property, we may have difficulty selling it to a party other than the tenant or borrower due to the special purpose for which the property may have been designed. These and other limitations may affect our ability to sell or relet our industrial properties and adversely affect our results of operations at such properties.

Certain properties may require an expedited transaction, which may result in limited information being available about the property prior to its acquisition.

Investment analyses and decisions by the Adviser may be required to be undertaken on an expedited basis to take advantage of investment opportunities. In such cases, the information available to the Adviser at the time of making an investment decision may be

limited, and the Adviser may not have access to detailed information regarding the investment property or portfolio of properties, such as physical characteristics, environmental matters, zoning regulations or other local conditions affecting such investment. Therefore, no assurance can be given that the Adviser will have knowledge of all circumstances that may adversely affect an investment, and we may make investments which we would not have made if more extensive due diligence had been undertaken. Because large portfolios of properties still generally require diligence to analyze individual properties, these risks are exacerbated in expedited transactions of large portfolios. In addition, the Adviser may use consultants, legal advisors, appraisers, accountants, investment banks and other third parties in connection with its evaluation and/or diligence of certain investments. No assurance can be given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided by such third parties, and we may incur liability as a result of such third parties’ actions.

In some cases, the success of an investment will depend, in part, on our ability to restructure and effect improvements in the operations of a property. The activity of identifying and implementing restructuring programs and operating improvements at property entails a high degree of uncertainty. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully identify and implement such restructuring programs and improvements.

Our industrial tenants may be adversely affected by a decline in manufacturing activity in the United States.

Fluctuations in manufacturing activity in the United States may adversely affect our industrial tenants and therefore the demand for and profitability of our industrial properties. Trade agreements with foreign countries have given employers the option to utilize less expensive foreign manufacturing workers. Outsourcing manufacturing activities could reduce the demand for U.S. workers, thereby reducing the profitability of our industrial tenants and the demand for and profitability of our industrial properties.

We could be negatively impacted by the condition of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac and by changes in government support for multifamily housing.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are a major source of financing for multifamily real estate in the United States. We expect to utilize loan programs sponsored by these entities as a key source of capital to finance our growth and our operations. In September 2008, the U.S. government increased its control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and placed both companies into a government conservatorship under the Federal Housing Finance Agency. In December 2009, the U.S. Treasury increased its financial support for these conservatorships. In February 2011, the Obama administration released its blueprint for winding down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and for reforming the system of housing finance. Since that time, members of Congress have introduced and Congressional committees have considered a substantial number of bills that include comprehensive or incremental approaches to winding down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac or changing their purposes, businesses or operations. A decision by the U.S. government to eliminate or downscale Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or to reduce government support for multifamily housing more generally may adversely affect interest rates, capital availability, development of multifamily communities and the value of multifamily assets and, as a result, may adversely affect our future growth and operations. Any potential reduction in loans, guarantees and credit-enhancement arrangements from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could jeopardize the effectiveness of the multifamily sector’s derivative securities market, potentially causing breaches in loan covenants, and through reduced loan availability, impact the value of multifamily assets, which could impair the value of a significant portion of multifamily communities. Specifically, the potential for a decrease in liquidity made available to the multifamily sector by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could:

Short-term leases expose us to the effects of declining market rent and could adversely impact our ability to make cash distributions to you.

Substantially all of our multifamily leases are on a short-term basis. Because these leases generally permit the residents to leave at the end of the lease term without penalty, our rental revenues would be impacted by declines in market rents more quickly than if our leases were for longer terms.

Increased levels of unemployment could adversely affect the occupancy and rental rates of any multifamily residential properties we acquire.

Increased levels of unemployment in multifamily markets could significantly decrease occupancy and rental rates. In times of increasing unemployment, multifamily occupancy and rental rates have historically been adversely affected by:

These factors generally have contributed to lower rental rates. To the extent that we invest in any multifamily residential properties, our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make distributions to you may be adversely affected if these factors do not improve or worsen.

If any credit market disruptions or economic slowdowns occur, any investments in multifamily residential properties may face increased competition from single-family homes and condominiums for rent, which could limit our ability to retain residents, lease apartment units or increase or maintain rents.

Any multifamily communities in which we invest may compete with numerous housing alternatives in attracting residents, including single-family homes and condominiums available for rent. Such competitive housing alternatives may become more prevalent in a particular area in the event of any tightening of mortgage lending underwriting criteria, homeowner foreclosures, declines in single-family home and condominium sales or lack of available credit. The number of single-family homes and condominiums for rent in a particular area could limit our ability to retain residents, lease apartment units or increase or maintain rents.

The multifamily residential properties in which we invest must comply with the Fair Housing Amendment of 1988.

The multifamily residential properties in which we invest domestically, if any, must comply with the Fair Housing Amendment Act of 1988 (“FHAA”) which requires that multifamily communities first occupied after March 13, 1991 be accessible to handicapped residents and visitors. Compliance with the FHAA could require removal of structural barriers to handicapped access in a community, including the interiors of apartment units covered under the FHAA. Recently there has been heightened scrutiny of multifamily housing communities for compliance with the requirements of the FHAA and the ADA and an increasing number of substantial enforcement actions and private lawsuits have been brought against multifamily communities to ensure compliance with these requirements. Noncompliance with the FHAA and the ADA could result in the imposition of fines, awards of damages to private litigants, payment of attorneys’ fees and other costs to plaintiffs, substantial litigation costs and substantial costs of remediation.

The impacts of climate-related initiatives at the U.S. federal and state levels remain uncertain at this time but could result in increased operating costs.

Government authorities and various interest groups are promoting laws and regulations that could limit greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions due to concerns over contributions to climate change. The United States Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, has moved to regulate GHG emissions from large stationary sources, including electricity producers, and mobile sources, through fuel efficiency and other requirements, using its existing authority under the Clean Air Act. Moreover, certain state and regional programs are being implemented to require reductions in GHG emissions. Any additional taxation or regulation of energy use, including as a result of (i) the regulations that EPA has proposed or may propose in the future, (ii) state programs and regulations, or (iii) renewed GHG legislative efforts by future Congresses, could result in increased operating costs that we may not be able to effectively pass on to our tenants. In addition, any increased regulation of GHG emissions could impose substantial costs on our industrial tenants. These

costs include, for example, an increase in the cost of the fuel and other energy purchased by our industrial tenants and capital costs associated with updating or replacing their trucks earlier than planned. Any such increased costs could impact the financial condition of our industrial tenants and their ability to meet their lease obligations and to lease or re-lease our properties.

Rent control and other changes in applicable laws, or noncompliance with applicable laws, could adversely affect our multifamily residential properties.

Lower revenue growth or significant unanticipated expenditures may result from changes in rent control or rent stabilization laws or other residential landlord/tenant laws. Municipalities may implement, consider or be urged by advocacy groups to consider rent control or rent stabilization laws and regulations or take other actions that could limit our ability to raise rents based on market conditions. For example, in 2016 in Mountain View, California, voters passed a referendum that limits rent increases on existing tenants (but not on new move-ins) in communities built before 1995. These initiatives and any other future enactments of rent control or rent stabilization laws or other laws regulating multifamily housing, as well as any lawsuits against us arising from such rent control or other laws, may reduce rental revenues or increase operating costs. Such laws and regulations may limit our ability to charge market rents, increase rents, evict tenants or recover increases in our operating costs and could make it more difficult for us to dispose of properties in certain circumstances. Expenses associated with investments in residential properties, such as debt service, real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in rental income from such properties.

The hospitality or leisure market is seasonal, highly competitive and generally subject to greater volatility than our other market segments.

The hospitality or leisure business is seasonal, highly competitive and influenced by factors such as general and local economic conditions, location, room rates, quality, service levels, reputation and reservation systems, among many other factors. The hospitality or leisure industry generally experiences seasonal slowdown in the third quarter and, to a lesser extent, in the fourth quarter of each year. As a result of such seasonality, there will likely be quarterly fluctuations in results of operations of any hospitality or leisure properties that we own. There are many competitors in this market, and these competitors may have substantially greater marketing and financial resources than those available to us. Competition also comes from non-traditional hospitality sources, such as home-sharing platforms. This competition, along with other factors, such as over-building in the hospitality or leisure industry and certain deterrents to traveling, may increase the number of rooms available and may decrease the average occupancy and room rates of our hospitality or leisure properties. The demand for rooms at any hospitality or leisure properties that we may acquire will change much more rapidly than the demand for space at other properties that we acquire. In addition, any such properties that we may own may be adversely affected by factors outside our control, such as extreme weather conditions or natural disasters, terrorist attacks or alerts, outbreaks of contagious diseases, airline strikes, economic factors and other considerations affecting travel. These factors could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to stockholders.

Student housing properties are typically leased during leasing seasons, and our properties are therefore highly dependent on the effectiveness of our marketing and leasing efforts and personnel during such seasons. Additionally, our student housing properties are generally on short-term leases, exposing us to increased leasing risk. We may not be able to re-lease our properties on similar terms, if we are able to re-lease our properties at all. The terms of renewal or re-lease (including the cost of required renovations) may be less favorable to us than the prior lease. If we are unable to re-lease all or a substantial portion of our properties, or if the rental rates upon such re-leasing are significantly lower than expected rates, our cash flows from operations could be adversely affected.

Prior to the commencement of each new lease period, we prepare the units for new incoming residents. Other than revenue generated by in-place leases for returning residents, we do not generally recognize lease revenue during this period referred to as “turn” as we have no leases in place. In addition, during turn, we incur expenses preparing our units for occupancy, which we recognize immediately. This lease turn period results in seasonality in our operating results, and as a result, we may experience significantly reduced cash flows during such periods.

In addition, we may be adversely affected by a change in university admission policies. For example, if a university reduces the number of student admissions, the demand for our student housing properties may be reduced and our occupancy rates may decline. Our student housing properties also compete with university-owned student housing and other national and regional owner-operators of off-campus student housing in a number of markets as well as with smaller local owner-operators.

Retailers leasing our properties will face continued competition from shopping via the internet, discount or value retailers, factory outlet centers, wholesale clubs, mail order catalogues and operators and television shopping networks. Such competition could adversely affect our tenants and, consequently, our revenues and funds available for distribution.

Retail properties depend on anchor tenants to attract shoppers and could be adversely affected by the loss of a key anchor tenant.

Retail properties, like other properties, are subject to the risk that tenants may be unable to make their lease payments or may decline to extend a lease upon its expiration. A lease termination by a tenant that occupies a large area of a retail center (commonly referred to as an anchor tenant) could impact leases of other tenants. Other tenants may be entitled to modify the terms of their existing leases in the event of a lease termination by an anchor tenant, or the closure of the business of an anchor tenant that leaves its space vacant even if the anchor tenant continues to pay rent. Any such modifications or conditions could be unfavorable to us as the property owner and could decrease rents or expense recoveries. Additionally, major tenant closures may result in decreased customer traffic, which could lead to decreased sales at other stores. In the event of default by a tenant or anchor store, we may experience delays and costs in enforcing our rights as landlord to recover amounts due to us under the terms of our agreements with those parties.

Some businesses are rapidly evolving to make employee telecommuting, flexible work schedules, open workplaces and teleconferencing increasingly common. These practices enable businesses to reduce their space requirements. A continuation of the movement towards these practices could over time erode the overall demand for office space and, in turn, place downward pressure on occupancy, rental rates and property valuations, each of which could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our stockholders. We may also be negatively impacted by competition from other short-term office or shared space leasing companies.

We could be negatively impacted by increased competition, decreased demand and restrictive zoning ordinances in the manufactured housing markets in which we invest.

The manufactured housing industry is generally subject to many of the same national and regional economic and demographic factors that affect the housing industry generally. These factors, including shortage of consumer financing, public’s perception, consumer confidence, inflation, regional population and employment trends, availability of and cost of alternative housing, weather conditions and general economic conditions, tend to impact manufactured homes to a greater degree than traditional residential homes. Our operating results from our manufactured housing investments may be adversely affected by: (i) competition from other available manufactured housing sites or available land for the placement of manufactured homes outside of established communities and alternative forms of housing (such as apartment buildings and site built single-family homes) and (ii) local real estate market conditions such as the oversupply of manufactured housing sites or a reduction in demand for manufactured housing sites in an area. In addition, the inability to secure zoning permits from local authorities may pose the most significant barrier to entry for developing new manufactured housing sites.

We may hold loans secured by manufactured homes, which generally have higher delinquency and default rates than standard residential mortgage loans due to various factors, including, among other things, the manner in which borrowers have handled previous credit, the absence or limited extent of borrowers’ prior credit history, limited financial resources, frequent changes in or loss of employment and changes in borrowers’ personal or domestic situations that affect their ability to repay loans. Any substantial economic slowdown could increase delinquencies, defaults, repossessions and foreclosures with respect to manufactured homes. Also, the value of manufactured homes may depreciate over time, which can negatively impact the manufactured home industry and lead to increased defaults and delinquencies and lower recovery rates upon default.

Our investments in real estate associated with gaming facilities will be impacted by the risks associated with the gaming industry.

We invest in real estate associated with gaming facilities, which are subject to risks associated with the gaming industry, including changes in consumer trends, the impact of gaming regulations on us and/or our tenants, reductions in discretionary consumer spending and corporate spending on conventions and business development and preferences, changes in laws or foreign monetary policies that impact consumer behavior, and other factors over which we have no control. Economic contraction, economic uncertainty or the perception by potential customers of weak or weakening economic conditions may cause a decline in demand for hotels, casino

resorts, trade shows and conventions. Such investments may also be affected by risks relating to the tourism industry for the geographic areas in which our properties are located, including cost and availability of air services or other travel methods.

The gaming industry is characterized by a high degree of competition among a large number of participants, including riverboat casinos, dockside casinos, land-based casinos, video lottery, sweepstakes and poker machines not located in casinos, Native American gaming, internet lotteries and other internet wagering gaming services and, in a broader sense, gaming operators face competition from all manner of leisure and entertainment activities. Gaming competition is intense in the markets where our facilities are located. Recently, there has been additional significant competition in the gaming industry as a result of the upgrading or expansion of facilities by existing market participants, the entrance of new gaming participants into a market, the growth of general internet and electronic sports-related gaming and legislative changes, including relating to sports betting. As competing properties and new markets are opened, we and our tenants may be negatively impacted.

Our self-storage investments are subject to risks from fluctuating demand and competition in the self-storage industry.

Our self-storage investments are subject to operating risks common to the self-storage industry, which include business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocation of businesses and changing demographics, changes in supply of, or demand for, similar or competing self-storage properties in an area and the excess amount of self-storage space in a particular market, changes in market rental rates and inability to collect rents from customers. The self-storage industry has at times experienced overbuilding in response to perceived increases in demand. A recurrence of overbuilding might cause our self-storage investments to experience a decrease in occupancy levels, as well as limit the ability to increase rents and offer discounted rents.

We invest in commercial properties subject to net leases, which could subject us to losses.

We invest in commercial properties subject to net leases. Typically, net leases require the tenants to pay substantially all of the operating costs associated with the properties. As a result, the value of, and income from, investments in commercial properties subject to net leases will depend, in part, upon the ability of the applicable tenant to meet its obligations to maintain the property under the terms of the net lease. If a tenant fails or becomes unable to so maintain a property, we will be subject to all risks associated with owning the underlying real estate. In addition, we may have limited oversight into the operations or the managers of these properties, subject to the terms of the net leases.

Certain commercial properties subject to net leases in which we invest are occupied by a single tenant and, therefore, the success of such investments are largely dependent on the financial stability of each such tenant. A default of any such tenant on its lease payments to us would cause us to lose the revenue from the property and cause us to have to find an alternative source of revenue to meet any mortgage payment and prevent a foreclosure if the property is subject to a mortgage. In the event of a default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-letting our property. If a lease is terminated, we may also incur significant losses to make the leased premises ready for another tenant and experience difficulty or a significant delay in re-leasing such property.

In addition, net leases typically have longer lease terms and, thus, there is an increased risk that contractual rental increases in future years will fail to result in fair market rental rates during those years.

We may acquire these investments through sale-leaseback transactions, which involve the purchase of a property and the leasing of such property back to the seller thereof. If we enter into a sale-leaseback transaction, we will seek to structure any such sale-leaseback transaction such that the lease will be characterized as a “true lease” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, thereby allowing us to be treated as the owner of the property for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, we cannot assure you that the IRS will not challenge such characterization. In the event that any such sale-leaseback transaction is challenged and recharacterized as a financing transaction or loan for U.S. federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such property would be disallowed, and the timing of our income inclusion could differ from that of the lease payments. If a sale-leaseback transaction were so recharacterized (or otherwise not respected as a lease), we might fail to satisfy the REIT qualification “asset tests” or “income tests” and, consequently, lose our REIT status effective with the year of recharacterization. Alternatively, the amount of our REIT taxable income could be recalculated, which might also cause us to fail to meet the REIT distribution requirement for a taxable year.

If a tenant of a net lease defaults and we are unable to find a replacement tenant, we may attempt to hold and operate the relevant property ourselves through a taxable REIT subsidiary, which would subject income on the property to corporate-level taxation, thereby reducing our funds available for distribution. In certain circumstances, depending on how much capacity we have available of the total value we are permitted to hold in taxable REIT subsidiaries under applicable rules, we may not be able to hold and operate the property in a taxable REIT subsidiary, which could result in the property and the related income not satisfying the REIT qualification asset and income tests and could jeopardize our REIT status.

Technological or other innovations may disrupt the markets and sectors in which we operate and subject us to increased competition or negatively impact the tenants of our properties and the value of our properties.

Current trends in the real estate market and the sectors in which we invest generally have been toward disrupting the industry with technological or other innovations, and multiple young companies have been successful in capitalizing on this trend toward disruption. In this period of rapid technological and commercial innovation, new businesses and approaches may be created that could affect us, tenants of our properties or our investments or alter the market practices that help frame our strategy. For example, the value of our hospitality properties is affected by competition from the non-traditional hospitality sector (such as short-term rental services), our office properties are affected by competition from shared office spaces (including co-working environments), our retail properties may be affected by changes in consumer behavior, including increased shopping via the internet, and our warehouse industrial properties may be affected if supply chains evolve in a way that decreases the need for traditional warehousing. Any of these new approaches could damage our investments, significantly disrupt the market in which we operate and subject us to increased competition, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of investments. Moreover, given the pace of innovation in recent years, the impact on a particular investment may not have been foreseeable at the time we made the investment. Furthermore, we could base investment decisions on views about the direction or degree of innovation that prove inaccurate and lead to losses.

Investments in real estate debt are subject to risks including various creditor risks and early redemption features which may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

The debt and other interests in which we may invest may include secured or unsecured debt at various levels of an issuer’s capital structure. The real estate debt in which we may invest may not be protected by financial covenants or limitations upon additional indebtedness, may be illiquid or have limited liquidity, and may not be rated by a credit rating agency. Real estate debt is also subject to other creditor risks, including (i) the possible invalidation of an investment transaction as a “fraudulent conveyance” under relevant creditors’ rights laws, (ii) so-called lender liability claims by the issuer of the obligation and (iii) environmental liabilities that may arise with respect to collateral securing the obligations. Our investments may be subject to early redemption features, refinancing options, pre-payment options or similar provisions which, in each case, could result in the issuer repaying the principal on an obligation held by us earlier than expected, resulting in a lower return to us than anticipated or reinvesting in a new obligation at a lower return to us.

Our debt investments face prepayment risk and interest rate fluctuations that may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

During periods of declining interest rates, the issuer of a security or borrower under a loan may exercise its option to prepay principal earlier than scheduled, forcing us to reinvest the proceeds from such prepayment in lower yielding securities or loans, which may result in a decline in our return. Debt investments frequently have call features that allow the issuer to redeem the security at dates prior to its stated maturity at a specified price (typically greater than par) only if certain prescribed conditions are met. An issuer may choose to redeem debt if, for example, the issuer can refinance the debt at a lower cost due to declining interest rates or an improvement in the credit standing of the issuer. In addition, the market price of our investments will change in response to changes in interest rates and other factors. During periods of declining interest rates, the market price of fixed-rate debt investments generally rises. Conversely, during periods of rising interest rates, the market price of such investments generally declines. The magnitude of these fluctuations in the market price of debt investments is generally greater for securities with longer maturities. If the U.S. Federal Reserve or other relevant central banks increase benchmark interest rates, this could also negatively impact the price of debt instruments and could adversely affect the value of our investments and the NAV and price per share of our shares.

Reinvestment risk could affect the price for our shares or their overall returns.

Reinvestment risk is the risk that income from our portfolio will decline if we invest the proceeds from matured, traded or called securities at market interest rates that are below our real estate debt portfolio’s current earnings rate. A decline in income could affect the NAV of our shares or their overall returns.

Debt-oriented real estate investments face a number of general market-related risks that can affect the creditworthiness of issuers, and modifications to certain loan structures and market terms make it more difficult to monitor and evaluate investments.

Any deterioration of real estate fundamentals generally, and in the United States in particular, could negatively impact our performance by making it more difficult for issuers to satisfy their debt payment obligations, increasing the default risk applicable to

issuers, and/or making it relatively more difficult for us to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns. Changes in general economic conditions will affect the creditworthiness of issuers and/or real estate collateral relating to our investments and may include economic and/or market fluctuations, changes in environmental and zoning laws, casualty or condemnation losses, regulatory limitations on rents, decreases in property values, changes in the appeal of properties to tenants, changes in supply and demand for competing properties in an area (as a result, for instance, of overbuilding), fluctuations in real estate fundamentals (including average occupancy, operating income and room rates for hotel properties), the financial resources of tenants, changes in availability of debt financing which may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or impracticable, changes in building, environmental and other laws, energy and supply shortages, various uninsured or uninsurable risks, natural disasters, political events, trade barriers, currency exchange controls, changes in government regulations (such as rent control), changes in real property tax rates and operating expenses, changes in interest rates, changes in the availability of debt financing and/or mortgage funds which may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or impracticable, increased mortgage defaults, increases in borrowing rates, outbreaks of an infectious disease, epidemics/pandemics or other serious public health concerns, negative developments in the economy or political climate that depress travel activity (including restrictions on travel or quarantines imposed), environmental liabilities, contingent liabilities on disposition of assets, acts of God, terrorist attacks, war, demand and/or real estate values generally and other factors that are beyond the control of the Adviser. Such changes may develop rapidly and it may be difficult to determine the comprehensive impact of such changes on our investments, particularly for investments that may have inherently limited liquidity. These changes may also create significant volatility in the markets for our investments which could cause rapid and large fluctuations in the values of such investments. There can be no assurance that there will be a ready market for the resale of our debt investments because such investments may not be liquid. Illiquidity may result from the absence of an established market for the investments, as well as legal or contractual restrictions on their resale by us. The value of securities of companies which service the real estate business sector may also be affected by such risks.

The Adviser cannot predict whether economic conditions generally, and the conditions for real estate debt investing in particular, will deteriorate in the future. Declines in the performance of the U.S. and global economies or in the real estate debt markets could have a material adverse effect on our investment activities. In addition, market conditions relating to real estate debt investments have evolved since the financial crisis, which has resulted in a modification to certain loan structures and market terms. For example, it has become increasingly difficult for real estate debt investors in certain circumstances to receive full transparency with respect to underlying investments because transactions are often effectuated on an indirect basis through pools or conduit vehicles rather than directly with the borrower. These and other similar changes in loan structures or market terms may make it more difficult for us to monitor and evaluate investments.

The operating and financial risks of issuers and the underlying default risk across capital structures may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our securities investments involve credit or default risk, which is the risk that an issuer or borrower will be unable to make principal and interest payments on its outstanding debt when due. The risk of default and losses on real estate debt instruments will be affected by a number of factors, including global, regional and local economic conditions, interest rates, the commercial real estate market in general, an issuer’s equity and the financial circumstances of the issuer, as well as general economic conditions. Such default risk will be heightened to the extent we make relatively junior investments in an issuer’s capital structure since such investments are structurally subordinate to more senior tranches in such issuer’s capital structure, and our overall returns would be adversely affected to the extent one or more issuers is unable to meet its debt payment obligations when due. To the extent we hold an equity or “mezzanine” interest in any issuer that is unable to meet its debt payment obligations, such equity or mezzanine interest could become subordinated to the rights of such issuer’s creditors in a bankruptcy. See “—We invest in subordinated debt, which is subject to greater credit risk than senior debt” below. Furthermore, the financial performance of one or more issuers could deteriorate as a result of, among other things, adverse developments in their businesses, changes in the competitive environment or an economic downturn. As a result, underlying properties or issuers that we expected to be stable may operate, or expect to operate, at a loss or have significant fluctuations in ongoing operating results, may otherwise have a weak financial condition or be experiencing financial distress and subject our investments to additional risk of loss and default.

We generally invest in high-yield debt which is generally subject to more risk than higher rated securities.

Debt that is, at the time of purchase, rated below investment grade (below Baa by Moody’s and below BBB by S&P and Fitch), an equivalent rating assigned by another nationally recognized statistical rating organization or unrated but judged by the Adviser to be of comparable quality are commonly referred to as “high-yield” securities.

Investments in high-yield securities generally provide greater income and increased opportunity for capital appreciation than investments in higher quality securities, but they also typically entail greater price volatility and principal and income risk, including the possibility of issuer default and bankruptcy. High-yield securities are regarded as predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s continuing ability to meet principal and interest payments. Debt instruments in the lowest investment grade category also may

be considered to possess some speculative characteristics by certain rating agencies. In addition, analysis of the creditworthiness of issuers of high-yield securities may be more complex than for issuers of higher quality securities.

High-yield securities may be more susceptible to real or perceived adverse economic and competitive industry conditions than investment grade securities. A projection of an economic downturn or of a period of rising interest rates, for example, could cause a decline in high yield security prices because the advent of a recession could lessen the ability of an issuer to make principal and interest payments on its debt obligations. If an issuer of high yield securities defaults, in addition to risking non-payment of all or a portion of interest and principal, we may incur additional expenses to seek recovery. The market prices of high-yield securities structured as zero-coupon, step-up or payment-in-kind securities will normally be affected to a greater extent by interest rate changes, and therefore tend to be more volatile than the prices of securities that pay interest currently and in cash.

The secondary market on which high-yield securities are traded may be less liquid than the market for investment grade securities. Less liquidity in the secondary trading market could adversely affect the price at which we could sell a high yield security, and could adversely affect the NAV of our shares. Adverse publicity and investor perceptions, whether or not based on fundamental analysis, may decrease the values and liquidity of high yield securities, especially in a thinly-traded market. When secondary markets for high yield securities are less liquid than the market for investment grade securities, it may be more difficult to value the securities because such valuation may require more research, and elements of judgment may play a greater role in the valuation because there is less reliable, objective data available. During periods of thin trading in these markets, the spread between bid and asked prices is likely to increase significantly and we may have greater difficulty selling our portfolio securities. We will be more dependent on the Adviser’s research and analysis when investing in high-yield securities.

Some of our securities investments may become distressed, which securities would have a high risk of default and may be illiquid.

While it is generally anticipated that our real estate-related investments will focus primarily on investments in non-distressed real estate-related interests (based on our belief that there is not a low likelihood of repayment), our investments may become distressed following our acquisition thereof. Additionally, we may invest in real estate debt investments that we believe are available to purchase at “discounted” rates or “undervalued” prices. Purchasing real estate debt at what may appear to be “undervalued” or “discounted” levels is no guarantee that these investments will generate attractive returns to us or will not be subject to further reductions in value. There is no assurance that such investments can be acquired at favorable prices, that such investments will not default, or that the market for such interests will improve. In addition, the market conditions for real estate debt investments may deteriorate further, which could have an adverse effect on the performance of our investments.

During an economic downturn or recession, securities of financially troubled or operationally troubled issuers are more likely to go into default than securities of other issuers. Securities of financially troubled issuers and operationally troubled issuers are less liquid and more volatile than securities of companies not experiencing financial difficulties. The market prices of such securities are subject to erratic and abrupt market movements and the spread between bid and asked prices may be greater than normally expected. Investment in the securities of financially troubled issuers and operationally troubled issuers involves a high degree of credit and market risk. There is no assurance that the Adviser will correctly evaluate the value of the assets collateralizing such investments or the prospects for a successful reorganization or similar action.

These financial difficulties may never be overcome and may cause issuers to become subject to bankruptcy or other similar administrative proceedings, or may require a substantial amount of workout negotiations or restructuring, which may entail, among other things, an extension of the term, a substantial reduction in the interest rate, a substantial writedown of the principal of such investment and other concessions which could adversely affect our returns on the investment. There is a possibility that we may incur substantial or total losses on our investments and in certain circumstances, subject us to certain additional potential liabilities that may exceed the value of our original investment therein.

For example, under certain circumstances, a lender who has inappropriately exercised control over the management and policies of a debtor may have its claims subordinated or disallowed or may be found liable for damages suffered by parties as a result of such actions. In any reorganization or liquidation proceeding relating to our investments, we may lose our entire investment, may be required to accept cash or securities with a value less than our original investment and/or may be required to accept different terms, including payment over an extended period of time. In addition, under certain circumstances payments to us may be reclaimed if any such payment or distribution is later determined to have been a fraudulent conveyance, preferential payment, or similar transactions under applicable bankruptcy and insolvency laws. Furthermore, bankruptcy laws and similar laws applicable to administrative proceedings may delay our ability to realize on collateral for loan positions we held, or may adversely affect the economic terms and priority of such loans through doctrines such as equitable subordination or may result in a restructure of the debt through principles such as the “cramdown” provisions of the bankruptcy laws.

However, even if a restructuring were successfully accomplished, a risk exists that, upon maturity of such investment, replacement “takeout” financing will not be available, resulting in an inability by the issuer to repay the investment. Although unlikely, it is possible that the Adviser may find it necessary or desirable to foreclose on collateral securing one or more real estate debt we acquire. The foreclosure process varies jurisdiction by jurisdiction and can be lengthy and expensive. Issuers often resist foreclosure actions by asserting numerous claims, counterclaims and defenses against the holder of a real estate loan, including, without limitation, lender liability claims and defenses, even when such assertions may have no basis in fact, in an effort to prolong the foreclosure action, which often prolongs and complicates an already difficult and time consuming process. In some states or other jurisdictions, foreclosure actions can take up to several years or more to conclude. During the foreclosure proceedings, an issuer may have the ability to file for bankruptcy, potentially staying the foreclosure action and further delaying the foreclosure process. Foreclosure litigation tends to create a negative public image of the collateral property and may result in disrupting ongoing leasing, management, development and other operations of the property. In the event we foreclose on an investment, we will be subject to the risks associated with owning and operating real estate.

Certain risks associated with CMBS may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We invest a portion of our assets in pools or tranches of CMBS, including horizontal and other risk retention investments. The collateral underlying CMBS generally consists of commercial mortgages on real property that has a multifamily or commercial use, such as retail space, office buildings, warehouse property and hotels, and which from time to time include assets or properties owned directly or indirectly by one or more Other Blackstone Accounts. CMBS have been issued in a variety of issuances, with varying structures including senior and subordinated classes. The commercial mortgages underlying CMBS generally face the risks described above in “—We may invest in commercial mortgage loans which are non-recourse in nature and include limited options for financial recovery in the event of default; an event of default may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.”

Mortgage-backed securities may also have structural characteristics that distinguish them from other securities. The interest rate payable on these types of securities may be set or effectively capped at the weighted average net coupon of the underlying assets themselves. As a result of this cap, the return to investors in such a security would be dependent on the relevant timing and rate of delinquencies and prepayments of mortgage loans bearing a higher rate of interest. In general, early prepayments will have a greater impact on the yield to investors. Federal and state law may also affect the return to investors by capping the interest rates payable by certain mortgagors. Certain mortgage-backed securities may provide for the payment of only interest for a stated period of time. In addition, in a bankruptcy or similar proceeding involving the originator or the servicer of the CMBS (often the same entity or an affiliate), the assets of the issuer of such securities could be treated as never having been truly sold to the originator to the issuer and could be substantively consolidated with those of the originator, or the transfer of such assets to the issuer could be voided as a fraudulent transfer.

The credit markets, including the CMBS market, have periodically experienced decreased liquidity on the primary and secondary markets during periods of market volatility. Such market conditions could re-occur and would impact the valuations of our investments and impair our ability to sell such investments if we were required to liquidate all or a portion of our CMBS investments quickly. Additionally, certain of our securities investments, such as horizontal or other risk retention investments in CMBS, may have certain holding period and other restrictions that limit our ability to sell such investments.

Concentrated CMBS investments may pose specific risks beyond the control of the Adviser that may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Default risks with respect to CMBS investments may be further pronounced in the case of single-issuer CMBSs or CMBSs secured by a small or less diverse collateral pool, which is the majority of our real estate debt portfolio. At any one time, a portfolio of CMBS may be backed by commercial mortgage loans disproportionately secured by properties in only a few states, regions or foreign countries. As a result, such investments may be more susceptible to geographic risks relating to such areas, including adverse economic conditions, declining home values, adverse events affecting industries located in such areas and other factors beyond the control of the Adviser relative to investments in multi-issuer CMBS or a pool of mortgage loans having more diverse property locations.

The quality of the CMBS is dependent on the credit quality and selection of the mortgages for each issuance.

CMBS are also affected by the quality of the credit extended. As a result, the quality of the CMBS is dependent upon the selection of the commercial mortgages for each issuance and the cash flow generated by the commercial real estate assets, as well as the relative diversification of the collateral pool underlying such CMBS and other factors such as adverse selection within a particular tranche or issuance.

There are certain risks associated with the insolvency of obligations backing mortgage-backed securities and other investments.

The real estate loans backing the mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and other investments may be subject to various laws enacted in the jurisdiction or state of the borrower for the protection of creditors. If an unpaid creditor files a lawsuit seeking payment, the court may invalidate all or part of the borrower’s debt as a fraudulent conveyance, subordinate such indebtedness to existing or future creditors of the borrower or recover amounts previously paid by the borrower in satisfaction of such indebtedness, based on certain tests for borrower insolvency and other facts and circumstances, which may vary by jurisdiction. There can be no assurance as to what standard a court would apply in order to determine whether the borrower was “insolvent” after giving effect to the incurrence of the indebtedness constituting the mortgage backing the MBS and other investments, or that regardless of the method of valuation, a court would not determine that the borrower was “insolvent” after giving effect to such incurrence. In addition, in the event of the insolvency of a borrower, payments made on such mortgage loans could be subject to avoidance as a “preference” if made within a certain period of time (which may be as long as one year and one day) before insolvency.

Our MBS investments may be subject to interest shortfalls due to interest collected from the underlying loans not being sufficient to pay accrued interest to all of the MBS interest holders. Interest shortfalls to the MBS trust will occur when the servicer does not advance full interest payments on defaulted loans. The servicer in a MBS trust is required to advance monthly principal and interest payments due on a delinquent loan. Once a loan is delinquent for a period of time (generally 60 days), the servicer is required to obtain a new appraisal to determine the value of the property securing the loan. The servicer is only required to advance interest based on the lesser of the loan amount or 90%, generally, of the appraised value. Interest shortfalls occur when 90%, generally, of the appraised value is less than the loan amount and the servicer does not advance interest on the full loan amount. The resulting interest shortfalls impact interest payments on the most junior class in the trust first. As interest shortfalls increase, more senior classes may be impacted. Over time, senior classes may be reimbursed for accumulated shortfalls if the delinquent loans are resolved, but there is no guarantee that shortfalls will be collected. Interest shortfalls to the MBS trust may also occur as a result of accumulated advances and expenses on defaulted loans. When a defaulted loan or foreclosed property is liquidated, the servicer will be reimbursed for accumulated advances and expenses prior to payments to MBS bond holders. If proceeds are insufficient to reimburse the servicer or if a defaulted loan is modified and not foreclosed, the servicer is able to make a claim on interest payments that is senior to the bond holders to cover accumulated advances and expenses. If the claim is greater than interest collected on the loans, interest shortfalls could impact one or more bond classes in a MBS trust until the servicer’s claim is satisfied.

We have acquired and expect in the future to acquire MBS affiliated with Blackstone.

We have acquired and expect in the future to acquire MBS whereby mortgages underlying the MBS were issued or acquired by, properties underlying the mortgages in the MBS are owned by, and/or the MBS is serviced or structured by, a Blackstone affiliate. While we may acquire such MBS from third parties on terms already negotiated by and agreed with third parties and will forgo certain non-economic rights (including voting rights) in such MBS as long as the affiliation persists, which we believe should mostly mitigate any conflicts of interest, there is no assurance that such procedures will adequately address all of the conflicts of interest that may arise or will address such conflicts in a manner that results in the allocation of a particular investment opportunity to us or is otherwise favorable to us. Since certain of our executives are also executives of Blackstone, the same personnel may determine the price and terms for the investments for both us and these entities and there can be no assurance that any procedural protections, such as obtaining market prices or other reliable indicators of fair value, will prevent the consideration we pay for these investments from exceeding their fair value or ensure that we receive terms for a particular investment opportunity that are as favorable as those available from an independent third party.

Our CMBS investments face risks associated with extensions that may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our CMBS and other investments may be subject to extension, resulting in the term of the securities being longer than expected. Extensions are affected by a number of factors, including the general availability of financing in the market, the value of the related mortgaged property, the borrower’s equity in the mortgaged property, the financial circumstances of the borrower, fluctuations in the business operated by the borrower on the mortgaged property, competition, general economic conditions and other factors. Such extensions may also be made without the Adviser’s consent.

There are certain risks associated with the servicers of commercial real estate loans underlying CMBS and other investments.

The exercise of remedies and successful realization of liquidation proceeds relating to commercial real estate loans underlying CMBS and other investments may be highly dependent on the performance of the servicer or special servicer. The servicer may not be

appropriately staffed or compensated to immediately address issues or concerns with the underlying loans. Such servicers may exit the business and need to be replaced, which could have a negative impact on the portfolio due to lack of focus during a transition. Special servicers frequently are affiliated with investors who have purchased the most subordinate bond classes, and certain servicing actions, such as a loan extension instead of forcing a borrower pay off, may benefit the subordinate bond classes more so than the senior bonds. While servicers are obligated to service the portfolio subject to a servicing standard and maximize the present value of the loans for all bond classes, servicers with an affiliate investment in the CMBS or other investments may have a conflict of interest. There may be a limited number of special servicers available, particularly those which do not have conflicts of interest. In addition, to the extent any such servicers fail to effectively perform their obligations pursuant to the applicable servicing agreements, such failure may adversely affect our investments.

We may invest in commercial mortgage loans which are non-recourse in nature and include limited options for financial recovery in the event of default; an event of default may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We may invest from time to time in commercial mortgage loans, including mezzanine loans and B-notes, which are secured by multifamily, commercial or other properties and are subject to risks of delinquency and foreclosure and risks of loss. Commercial real estate loans are generally not fully amortizing, which means that they may have a significant principal balance or balloon payment due on maturity. Full satisfaction of the balloon payment by a commercial borrower is heavily dependent on the availability of subsequent financing or a functioning sales market, as well as other factors such as the value of the property, the level of prevailing mortgage rates, the borrower’s equity in the property and the financial condition and operating history of the property and the borrower. In certain situations, and during periods of credit distress, the unavailability of real estate financing may lead to default by a commercial borrower. In addition, in the absence of any such takeout financing, the ability of a borrower to repay a loan secured by an income-producing property will depend upon the successful operation of such property rather than upon the existence of independent income or assets of the borrower. If the net operating income of the property is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Furthermore, we may not have the same access to information in connection with investments in commercial mortgage loans, either when investigating a potential investment or after making an investment, as compared to publicly traded securities.

Commercial mortgage loans are usually non-recourse in nature. Therefore, if a commercial borrower defaults on the commercial mortgage loan, then the options for financial recovery are limited in nature. To the extent the underlying default rates with respect to the pool or tranche of commercial real estate loans in which we directly or indirectly invest increase, the performance of our investments related thereto may be adversely affected. Default rates and losses on commercial mortgage loans will be affected by a number of factors, including global, regional and local economic conditions in the area where the mortgage properties are located, the borrower’s equity in the mortgage property, the financial circumstances of the borrower, tenant mix and tenant bankruptcies, property management decisions, including with respect to capital improvements, property location and condition, competition from other properties offering the same or similar services, environmental conditions, real estate tax rates, tax credits and other operating expenses, governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies, acts of God, terrorism, social unrest and civil disturbances. A continued decline in specific commercial real estate markets and property valuations may result in higher delinquencies and defaults and potentially foreclosures. In the event of default, the lender will have no right to assets beyond collateral attached to the commercial mortgage loan. The overall level of commercial mortgage loan defaults remains significant and market values of the underlying commercial real estate remain distressed in many cases. It has also become increasingly difficult for lenders to dispose of foreclosed commercial real estate without incurring substantial investment losses, ultimately leading to a decline in the value of such investments.

In the event of any default under a mortgage or real estate loan held directly by us, we will bear a risk of loss of principal to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral and the principal and accrued interest of the mortgage or real estate loan, which could have a material adverse effect on our profitability. In the event of the bankruptcy of a mortgage or real estate loan borrower, the mortgage or real estate loan to such borrower will be deemed to be secured only to the extent of the value of the underlying collateral at the time of bankruptcy (as determined by the bankruptcy court), and the lien securing the mortgage or real estate loan will be subject to the avoidance powers of the bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession to the extent the lien is unenforceable under state law. Additionally, in the event of a default under any senior debt, the junior or subordinate lender generally forecloses on the equity, purchases the senior debt or negotiates a forbearance or restructuring arrangement with the senior lender in order to preserve its collateral.

We may invest in structured products or similar products that may include structural and legal risks.

We have and in the future may invest from time to time in structured products, including pools of mortgages, loans and other real estate-related interests. These investments may include debt securities issued by a private investment fund that invests, on a leveraged basis, in bank loans, high-yield debt or other asset groups, certificates issued by a structured investment vehicle that holds pools of commercial mortgage loans. We have and in the future may also invest in credit risk transfer notes that, while not structured products, face similar risks as structured products because they are debt securities issued by governmental agencies but their value depends in part on a pool of mortgage loans. Our investments in structured products are subject to a number of risks, including risks related to the

fact that the structured products will be leveraged, and other structural and legal risks related thereto. Utilization of leverage is a speculative investment technique and will generally magnify the opportunities for gain and risk of loss borne by an investor investing in the subordinated debt securities. Many structured products contain covenants designed to protect the providers of debt financing to such structured products. A failure to satisfy those covenants could result in the untimely liquidation of the structured product and a complete loss of our investment therein. In addition, if the particular structured product is invested in a security in which we are also invested, this would tend to increase our overall exposure to the credit of the issuer of such securities, at least on an absolute, if not on a relative basis. The value of an investment in a structured product will depend on the investment performance of the assets in which the structured product invests and will, therefore, be subject to all of the risks associated with an investment in those assets. These risks include the possibility of a default by, or bankruptcy of, the issuers of such assets or a claim that the pledging of collateral to secure any such asset constituted a fraudulent conveyance or preferential transfer that can be subordinated to the rights of other creditors of the issuer of such asset or nullified under applicable law.

We have and may in the future acquire and sell residential credit investments, which may subject us to legal, regulatory and other risks that could adversely impact our business and financial results.

We have and may in the future invest directly and indirectly in residential credit investments, which may include performing loans, nonperforming loans, residential mortgage loans and RMBS, which represent interests in pools of residential mortgage loans secured by one to four family residential mortgage loans. Investments in residential credit (including RMBS) are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including credit, market, interest rate, structural and legal risk. These risks may be magnified by volatility in the economy and in real estate markets generally. Any downturn in the U.S. or global economies may adversely affect the financial condition of residential owners and tenants, making it more difficult for them to meet their periodic repayment obligations relating to residential real estate. Residential credits are not traded on an exchange and there may be a limited market for the securities, especially when there is a perceived weakness in the mortgage and real estate market sectors. In addition, interest and principal payments for RMBS are made more frequently than traditional debt securities and the principal of any RMBS may often be prepaid at any time because the underlying residential mortgage loans may be prepaid at any time.

Residential mortgage loans are obligations of the borrowers thereunder only and are not typically insured or guaranteed by any other person or entity, although such loans may be securitized by government agencies and the securities issued may be guaranteed. The rate of defaults and losses on residential mortgage loans will be affected by a number of factors, including general economic conditions and those in the geographic area where the mortgaged property is located, the terms of the mortgage loan, the borrower’s equity in the mortgaged property, and the financial circumstances of the borrower. Certain mortgage loans may be of sub-prime credit quality (i.e., do not meet the customary credit standards of Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”)). Delinquencies and liquidation proceedings are more likely with sub-prime mortgage loans than with mortgage loans that satisfy customary credit standards. If a residential mortgage loan is in default, foreclosure of such residential mortgage loan may be a lengthy and difficult process, and may involve significant expenses. Furthermore, the market for defaulted residential mortgage loans or foreclosed properties may be very limited.

Residential mortgage loans in an issue of RMBS may also be subject to various U.S. federal and state laws, foreign laws, public policies and principles of equity that protect consumers which, among other things, may regulate interest rates and other fees, require certain disclosures, require licensing of originators, prohibit discriminatory lending practices, regulate the use of consumer credit information, and regulate debt collection practices. In addition, a number of legislative proposals have been introduced in the United States at the federal, state, and municipal level that are designed to discourage predatory lending practices. Violation of such laws, public policies, and principles may limit the servicer’s ability to collect all or part of the principal or interest on a residential mortgage loan, entitle the borrower to a refund of amounts previously paid by it, or subject the servicer to damages and administrative enforcement. Any such violation could also result in cash flow delays and losses on the related issue of RMBS.

Our investments in RMBS, which may include government mortgage pass-through securities and non-agency RMBS, are subject to certain other risks which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our investments in RMBS are subject to the risks of defaults, foreclosure timeline extension, fraud, home price depreciation and unfavorable modification of loan principal amount, interest rate and amortization of principal accompanying the underlying residential mortgage loans. To the extent that assets underlying our investments are concentrated geographically, by property type or in certain other respects, we may be subject to certain of the foregoing risks to a greater extent. In the event of defaults on the residential mortgage loans that underlie our investments in RMBS and the exhaustion of any underlying or any additional credit support, we may not realize our anticipated return on our investments and we may incur a loss on these investments. At any one time, a portfolio of RMBS may be backed by residential mortgage loans with disproportionately large aggregate principal amounts secured by properties in only a few states or regions in the United States or in only a few foreign countries. As a result, the residential mortgage loans may be more susceptible to geographic risks relating to such areas, such as adverse economic conditions, adverse political changes, adverse events affecting industries located in such areas and natural hazards affecting such areas, than would be the case for a pool of

mortgage loans having more diverse property locations. We may also acquire non-agency RMBS, which are backed by residential property but, in contrast to agency RMBS, their principal and interest are not guaranteed by federally chartered entities such as the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and, in the case of the Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”), the U.S. government. In addition, we may invest in government mortgage pass-through securities, which represent participation interests in pools of residential mortgage loans purchased from individual lenders by a federal agency or originated by private lenders and guaranteed by a federal agency, including those issued or guaranteed by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Ginnie Mae certificates are direct obligations of the U.S. Government and, as such, are backed by the “full faith and credit” of the United States. Fannie Mae is a federally chartered, privately owned corporation and Freddie Mac is a corporate instrumentality of the United States. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac certificates are not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States but the issuing agency or instrumentality has the right to borrow, to meet its obligations, from an existing line of credit with the U.S. Treasury. The U.S. Treasury has no legal obligation to provide such line of credit and may choose not to do so.

We will face risks related to our investments in collateralized debt obligations.

We may also invest from time to time in collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”). CDOs include, among other things, collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) and other similarly structured securities. A CLO is a trust typically collateralized by a pool of loans, which may include, among others, domestic and foreign senior secured loans, senior unsecured loans and subordinate corporate loans, including loans that may be rated below investment grade or equivalent unrated loans. CDOs may charge a management fee and administrative expenses. For CLOs, the cash flows from the trust are split into two or more portions, called tranches, varying in risk and yield. The riskiest portion is the “equity” tranche which bears the bulk of defaults from the bonds or loans in the trust and serves to protect the other, more senior tranches from default in all but the most severe circumstances. Since it is partially protected from defaults, a senior tranche from a CLO trust typically has higher ratings and lower yields than the underlying securities, and can be rated investment grade. Despite the protection from the equity tranche, CLO tranches can experience substantial losses due to actual defaults, increased sensitivity to defaults due to collateral default and disappearance of protecting tranches, market anticipation of defaults and aversion to CLO securities as a class. The risks of an investment in a CDO depend largely on the type of the collateral and the class of the CDO in which we invest.

Normally, CLOs and other CDOs are privately offered and sold, and thus are not registered under the securities laws. As a result, certain investments in CDOs may be characterized as illiquid securities and volatility in CLO and CDO trading markets may cause the value of these investments to decline. Moreover, if the underlying mortgage portfolio has been overvalued by the originator, or if the values subsequently decline and, as a result, less collateral value is available to satisfy interest and principal payments and any other fees in connection with the trust or other conduit arrangement for such securities, we may incur significant losses. Also, with respect to the CLOs and CDOs in which we may invest, control over the related underlying loans will be exercised through a special servicer or collateral manager designated by a “directing certificate holder” or a “controlling class representative,” or otherwise pursuant to the related securitization documents. We may acquire classes of CLOs or CDOs for which we may not have the right to appoint the directing certificate holder or otherwise direct the special servicing or collateral management. With respect to the management and servicing of those loans, the related special servicer or collateral manager may take actions that could adversely affect our interests. In addition to the risks associated with debt instruments (e.g., interest rate risk and credit risk), CDOs carry additional risks including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the quality of the collateral may decline in value or default; (iii) the possibility that we may invest in CDOs that are subordinate to other classes; and (iv) the complex structure of the security may not be fully understood at the time of investment and may produce disputes with the issuer or unexpected investment results.

We invest in subordinated debt, which is subject to greater credit risk than senior debt.

We have in the past and may in the future from time to time invest in debt instruments, including junior tranches of CMBS and “mezzanine” or junior mortgage loans (e.g., B-Notes), that are subordinated in an issuer’s capital structure. To the extent we invest in subordinated debt of an issuer’s capital structure, including subordinated CMBS bonds or other “mezzanine” debt, such investments and our remedies with respect thereto, including the ability to foreclose on any collateral securing such investments, will be subject to the rights of holders of more senior tranches in an issuer’s capital structure and, to the extent applicable, contractual inter-creditor, co-lender and participation agreement provisions.

Investments in subordinated debt involve greater credit risk of default and loss than the more senior classes or tranches of debt in an issuer’s capital structure. Subordinated tranches of debt instruments (including mortgage-backed securities) absorb losses from default before other more senior tranches of such instruments, which creates a risk particularly if such instruments (or securities) have been issued with little or no credit enhancement or equity. As a result, to the extent we invest in subordinate debt instruments (including mortgage-backed securities), we would likely receive payments or interest distributions after, and must bear the effects of losses or defaults on, the senior debt (including underlying mortgage loans, senior mezzanine debt or senior CMBS bonds) before, the holders of other more senior tranches of debt instruments with respect to such issuer.

Although not directly secured by the underlying real estate, mezzanine loans are also subject to risk of subordination and share certain characteristics of subordinate loan interests described above. As with commercial mortgage loans, repayment of a mezzanine loan is dependent on the successful operation of the underlying commercial properties and, therefore, is subject to similar considerations and risks. Mezzanine loans may also be affected by the successful operation of other properties, but mezzanine loans are not secured by interests in the underlying commercial properties.

With most mezzanine loans, the bulk of the loan balance is payable at maturity with a one-time “balloon payment.” Full satisfaction of the balloon payment by a borrower is heavily dependent on the availability of subsequent financing or a functioning sales market, and full satisfaction of a loan will be affected by a borrower’s access to credit or a functioning sales market. In certain situations, and during periods of credit distress, the unavailability of real estate financing may lead to default by a borrower. In addition, in the absence of any such takeout financing, the ability of a borrower to repay a loan may be impaired. Moreover, mezzanine loans are usually non-recourse in nature. Therefore, if a borrower defaults on the loan, then the options for financial recovery are limited in nature. To the extent the underlying default rates with respect to the pool or tranche of commercial real estate loans in which we directly or indirectly invests increase, the performance of our investments related thereto may be adversely affected.

B-Notes and A/B Structures may pose additional risks that may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We may invest in B-notes, which are mortgage loans typically (i) secured by a first mortgage on a commercial property or group of related properties and (ii) subordinated to an A-note portion of the same first mortgage secured by the same collateral (which we would not expect to hold). As a result, if a borrower defaults, there may not be sufficient funds remaining to repay B-note holders after payment to the A-note holders. Since each transaction is privately negotiated, B-notes can vary in their structural characteristics and risks. In addition to the risks described above, certain additional risks apply to B-note investments, including those described herein. The B-note portion of a loan is typically small relative to the overall loan, and is in the first loss position. As a means to protect against the holder of the A-note from taking certain actions or, receiving certain benefits to the detriment of the holder of the B-note, the holder of the B-note often (but not always) has the right to purchase the A-note from its holder. If available, this right may not be meaningful to us. For example, we may not have the capital available to protect our B-note interest or purchasing the A-note may alter our overall portfolio and risk/return profile to the detriment of our stockholders. In addition, a B-note may be in the form of a “rake bond.” A “rake bond” is a CMBS backed solely by a single promissory note secured by a mortgaged property, which promissory note is subordinate in right of payment to one or more separate promissory notes secured by the same mortgaged property.

We may invest in a wide range of real estate debt pursuant to our broad investment guidelines.

Pursuant to our broad investment guidelines, our real estate debt investments may include, but are not limited to, CMBS, real estate-related corporate credit, mortgages, loans, mezzanine and other forms of debt (including residential mortgage-backed securities and other residential credit and debt of real estate-related companies), preferred equity and derivatives, and such investments may not be secured by real estate assets. The Adviser may also employ new investment techniques or invest in new instruments that it believes will help achieve our investment objectives, whether or not such investment techniques or instruments are specifically defined herein, so long as such investments are consistent with the investment guidelines and our charter. New investment techniques or instruments may not be thoroughly tested in the market before being employed and may have operational or theoretical shortcomings which could result in unsuccessful investments and, ultimately, losses to us. In addition, any new investment technique or instrument developed by us may be more speculative than earlier investment techniques or instruments and may involve material and unanticipated risks. Our board of directors may also change our investment guidelines without the consent of our stockholders.

We invest in real estate-related equity, which is subordinate to any indebtedness, but involves different rights.

We have in the past and may in the future invest from time to time in non-controlling preferred equity positions, common equity and other real estate-related interests. Preferred equity investments generally rank junior to all existing and future indebtedness, including commercial mezzanine and mortgage loans, but rank senior to the owners’ common equity. Preferred equity investments typically pay a dividend rather than interest payments and often have the right for such dividends to accrue if there is insufficient cash flow to pay currently. These interests are not secured by the underlying real estate, but upon the occurrence of a default, the preferred equity provider typically has the right to effectuate a change of control with respect to the ownership of the property. In addition, equity investments may be illiquid or have limited liquidity due to lock-out periods, limited trading volume or other limitations or prohibitions against their transfer, sale, pledge or disposition, including any necessary registration with the SEC requiring coordination with the issuer for the sale of such securities. Our investments in real estate-related equity securities will involve risks relating to the particular issuer of the equity securities, including the financial condition and business outlook of the issuer. Issuers of real estate-related equity securities are subject to their own operating and other expenses and may be subject to a management fee and/or performance-based compensation (e.g., promote), which we as equity holders will indirectly bear. Issuers of real estate-related

common equity securities generally invest in real estate or real estate-related assets and are subject to the inherent risks associated with real estate discussed in “—General Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate.”

We invest in real estate corporate debt, which consists of secured and unsecured obligations issued by companies in the business of owning and/or operating real estate-related businesses.

We have in the past and may in the future invest in corporate debt obligations of varying maturities issued by U.S. and foreign corporations and other business entities, which may include loans, corporate bonds, debentures, notes and other similar corporate debt instruments, including convertible securities. Bonds are fixed or variable rate debt obligations, including bills, notes, debentures, money market instruments and similar instruments and securities. Corporate debt is generally used by corporations and other issuers to borrow money from investors. The issuer pays the investor a rate of interest and normally must repay the amount borrowed on or before maturity. The rate of interest on corporate debt may be fixed, floating or variable, and may vary inversely with respect to a reference rate. The rate of return or return of principal on some debt obligations may be linked or indexed to the level of exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and a foreign currency or currencies. Debt instruments may be acquired with warrants attached. Certain bonds are “perpetual” in that they have no maturity date.

Our investments in real estate-related corporate credit are subject to a number of risks, including interest rate risk, credit risk, high yield risk, issuer risk, foreign (non-U.S.) investment risk, inflation/deflation risk, liquidity risk, smaller company risk and management risk. We generally will not have direct recourse to real estate assets owned or operated by the issuers of the corporate debt obligations that we invest in and the value of such corporate debt obligations may be impacted by numerous factors and may not be closely tied to the value of the real estate held by the corporate issuer.

We invest in equity of other REITs that invest in real estate or real estate debt as one of their core businesses and other real estate-related companies, which subjects us to certain risks including those risks associated with an investment in our own common stock.

REITs that invest primarily in real estate or real estate debt are subject to the risks of the real estate market, the real estate debt market and the securities market.

REITs are dependent upon specialized management skills, have limited diversification and are, therefore, subject to risks inherent in financing a limited number of projects. REITs may be subject to a management fees and other expenses, and so when we invest in REITs we will bear our proportionate share of the costs of the REITs’ operations. Investing in REITs and real estate-related companies involves certain unique risks in addition to those risks associated with investing in the real estate industry in general. The market value of REIT shares and the ability of the REIT to distribute income may be adversely affected by several factors, including the risks described herein that relate to an investment in our common stock. REITs depend generally on their ability to generate cash flow to make distributions to shareholders, and certain REITs have self-liquidation provisions by which mortgages held may be paid in full and distributions of capital returns may be made at any time. In addition, distributions received by us from REITs may consist of dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Generally, dividends received by us from REIT shares and distributed to our stockholders will not constitute “qualified dividend income” eligible for the reduced tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income. In addition, the performance of a REIT may be affected by changes in the tax laws or by its failure to qualify for tax-free pass-through of income.

REITs (especially mortgage REITs) are also subject to interest rate risk. Rising interest rates may cause REIT investors to demand a higher annual yield, which may, in turn, cause a decline in the market price of the equity securities issued by a REIT.

Investing in certain REITs and real estate-related companies, which often have small market capitalizations, may also involve the same risks as investing in other small capitalization companies. REITs and real estate-related companies may have limited financial resources and their securities may trade less frequently and in limited volume and may be subject to more abrupt or erratic price movements than larger company securities.

Certain of our investments, including those that may be in a development phase, if any, are expected to require additional financing to satisfy their working capital requirements or development strategies. The amount of such additional financing needed will depend upon the maturity and objectives of the particular asset, which may be an unfavorable price at such time. Each round of financing (whether from us or other investors) is typically intended to provide enough capital to reach the next major milestone in an asset’s life-cycle. If the funds provided are not sufficient, additional capital may be required to be raised at a price unfavorable to the existing investors, including us. In addition, we may make additional debt and equity investments or exercise warrants, options, convertible

securities or other rights that were acquired in the initial investment in such portfolio company in order to preserve our proportionate ownership when a subsequent financing is planned, or to protect our investment when such portfolio company’s performance does not meet expectations. The availability of capital is generally a function of capital market conditions that are beyond the control of us or any portfolio company. There can be no assurance that we or any portfolio company will be able to predict accurately the future capital requirements necessary for success or that additional funds will be available from any source. Failure to provide sufficient additional capital with respect to an investment could adversely affect our performance.

We will face “spread widening” risk related to our investment in securities.

For reasons not necessarily attributable to any of the risks set forth herein (for example, supply/demand imbalances or other market forces), the market spreads of the securities in which we invest may increase substantially causing the securities prices to fall. It may not be possible to predict, or to hedge against, such “spread widening” risk. The perceived discount in pricing described under “—Some of our securities investments may become distressed, which securities would have a high risk of default and may be illiquid.” may still not reflect the true value of the real estate assets underlying such real estate debt in which we may invest, and therefore further deterioration in value with respect thereto may occur following our investment therein. In addition, mark-to-market accounting of our investments will have an interim effect on the reported value prior to realization of an investment.

We have in the past and may in the future enter into derivatives transactions including, but not limited to, options contracts, futures contracts, options on futures contracts, forward contracts, interest rate swaps, total return swaps, credit default swaps and other swap agreements for investment, hedging or leverage purposes. Derivative instruments, especially when purchased in large amounts, may not be liquid in all circumstances, so that in volatile markets we may not be able to close out a position without incurring a loss. Our use of derivative instruments may be particularly speculative and involves investment risks and transaction costs to which we would not be subject absent the use of these instruments, and use of derivatives generally involves leverage in the sense that the investment exposure created by the derivatives may be significantly greater than our initial investment in the derivative. Leverage magnifies investment, market and certain other risks. Thus, the use of derivatives may result in losses in excess of principal and greater than if they had not been used. The value of such derivatives also depends upon the price of the underlying instrument or commodity. Such derivatives and other customized instruments also are subject to the risk of non-performance by the relevant counterparty. In addition, actual or implied daily limits on price fluctuations and speculative position limits on the exchanges or over-the-counter markets in which we may conduct our transactions in derivative instruments may prevent prompt liquidation of positions, subjecting us to the potential of greater losses. Derivative instruments that may be purchased or sold by us may include instruments not traded over-the-counter or on an exchange. The risk of nonperformance by the obligor on such an instrument may be greater and the ease with which we can dispose of or enter into closing transactions with respect to such an instrument may be less than in the case of an exchange-traded instrument. In addition, significant disparities may exist between “bid” and “asked” prices for derivative instruments that are traded over-the-counter and not on an exchange. Such over-the-counter derivatives are also subject to types and levels of investor protections or governmental regulation that may differ from exchange traded instruments.

The ability to successfully use derivative investments depends on the ability of the Adviser. The skills needed to employ derivatives strategies are different from those needed to select portfolio investments and, in connection with such strategies, the Adviser must make predictions with respect to market conditions, liquidity, market values, interest rates or other applicable factors, which may be inaccurate. The use of derivative investments may require us to sell or purchase portfolio investments at inopportune times or for prices below or above the current market values, may limit the amount of appreciation we can realize on an investment or may cause us to hold a security that we might otherwise want to sell. We will also be subject to credit risk with respect to the counterparties to our derivatives contracts (whether a clearing corporation in the case of exchange-traded instruments or another third party in the case of over-the-counter instruments). In addition, the use of derivatives will be subject to additional unique risks associated with such instruments including a lack of sufficient asset correlation, heightened volatility in reference to interest rates or prices of reference instruments and duration/term mismatch, each of which may create additional risk of loss.

Failure to obtain and maintain an exemption from being regulated as a commodity pool operator could subject us to additional regulation and compliance requirements that could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Registration with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) as a “commodity pool operator” or any change in our operations (including, without limitation, any change that causes us to be subject to certain specified covered statutory disqualifications) necessary to maintain our ability to rely upon the exemption from being regulated as a commodity pool operator could adversely affect our ability to implement our investment program, conduct our operations and/or achieve our objectives and subject us to certain additional costs, expenses and administrative burdens. Furthermore, any determination by us to cease or to limit

investing in interests that may be treated as “commodity interests” in order to comply with the regulations of the CFTC may have a material adverse effect on our ability to implement our investment objectives and to hedge risks associated with our operations.

Although not anticipated to be a large component of our investment strategy, we have the ability to invest in securities that are traded (publicly or through other active markets (including through private transactions)) and are, therefore, subject to the risks inherent in investing in traded securities. When investing in traded securities, we may be unable to obtain financial covenants or other contractual governance rights, including management rights that it might otherwise be able to obtain in making privately negotiated investments. Moreover, we may not have the same access to information in connection with investments in traded securities, either when investigating a potential investment or after making the investment, as compared to privately negotiated investments. Furthermore, we may be limited in our ability to make investments, and to sell existing investments, in traded securities because Blackstone may be deemed to have material, non-public information regarding the issuers of those securities or as a result of other internal policies or requirements. The inability to sell traded securities in these circumstances could materially adversely affect the investment results. In addition, securities acquired of a public company may, depending on the circumstances and securities laws of the relevant jurisdiction, be subject to lock-up periods.

The current regulatory environment in the United States may be impacted by future legislative developments, such as amendments to key provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). The current U.S. President has a legislative agenda that includes certain deregulatory measures for the U.S. financial services industry, including changes to the Volcker Rule, capital and risk retention requirements, the Financial Stability Oversight Council’s authority and other aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act. The U.S. Department of the Treasury has issued a series of recommendations in several reports for streamlining banking regulation and changing key features of the Dodd-Frank Act and other measures taken by regulators following the 2008 financial crisis.

The outcome of the upcoming congressional and other elections creates uncertainty with respect to legal, tax and regulatory regimes in which we and our investments, as well as the Adviser and its affiliates, will operate. Any significant changes in, among other things, economic policy (including with respect to interest rates and foreign trade), the regulation of the investment management industry, tax law, immigration policy and/or government entitlement programs could have a material adverse impact on us and our investments.

We may utilize non-recourse securitizations of certain of our CMBS investments, which may expose us to risks that could result in losses.

We may seek to utilize non-recourse securitizations of certain of our CMBS investments to the extent consistent with REIT and 1940 Act requirements. This would likely involve us creating a special-purpose vehicle, contributing a pool of our assets to the entity, and selling interests in the entity on a non-recourse basis to purchasers (whom we would expect to be willing to accept a lower interest rate to invest in investment-grade loan pools). We would expect to retain all or a portion of the equity in the securitized pool of loans or investments. Prior to any such financing, we may use short-term facilities to finance the acquisition of securities until a sufficient quantity of securities had been accumulated, at which time we would refinance these facilities through a securitization, such as a CMBS, or issuance of CLOs, or the private placement of loan participations or other long-term financing. If we were to employ this strategy, we would be subject to the risk that we would not be able to acquire, during the period that our short-term facilities are available, a sufficient amount of eligible securities to maximize the efficiency of a CMBS, CLO or private placement issuance. We also would be subject to the risk that we would not be able to obtain short-term credit facilities or would not be able to renew any short-term credit facilities after they expire should we find it necessary to extend our short-term credit facilities to allow more time to seek and acquire the necessary eligible securities for a long-term financing. The inability to consummate securitizations of our portfolio to finance our loans and investments on a long-term basis could require us to seek other forms of potentially less attractive financing or to liquidate assets at an inopportune time or price, which could adversely affect our performance and our ability to grow our business. Moreover, conditions in the capital markets, including volatility and disruption in the capital and credit markets, may not permit a non-recourse securitization at any particular time or may make the issuance of any such securitization less attractive to us even when we do have sufficient eligible assets. We may also suffer losses if the value of the mortgage loans we acquire declines prior to securitization. Declines in the value of a mortgage loan can be due to, among other things, changes in interest rates and changes in the credit quality of the loan. In addition, transaction costs incurred in executing transactions impact any liability that we may incur, or may be required to reserve for, in connection with executing a transaction can cause a loss to us. To the extent that we incur a loss executing or participating in future securitizations for the reasons described above or for other reasons, it could materially and adversely impact our business and financial condition.

In addition, the securitization of investments in our portfolio might magnify our exposure to losses because any equity interest we retain in the issuing entity would be subordinate to the notes issued to investors and we would, therefore, absorb all of the losses sustained with respect to a securitized pool of assets before the owners of the notes experience any losses. The inability to securitize our portfolio may hurt our performance and our ability to grow our business. At the same time, the securitization of our loans or investments might expose us to losses, as the residual loans or investments in which we do not sell interests will tend to be riskier and more likely to generate losses. Moreover, the Dodd Frank Act contains a risk retention requirement for all asset-backed securities, which requires both public and private securitizers to retain not less than 5% of the credit risk of the assets collateralizing any asset-backed security issuance. Significant restrictions exist, and additional restrictions may be added in the future, regarding who may hold risk retention interests, the structure of the entities that hold risk retention interests and when and how such risk retention interests may be transferred. Therefore such risk retention interests will generally be illiquid. As a result of the risk retention requirements, we may be required to purchase and retain certain interests in a securitization into which we sell mortgage loans and/or when we act as issuer, may be required to sell certain interests in a securitization at prices below levels that such interests have historically yielded and/or may be required to enter into certain arrangements related to risk retention that we have not historically been required to enter into and, accordingly, the risk retention rules may increase our potential liabilities and/or reduce our potential profits in connection with securitization of mortgage loans. It is likely, therefore, that these risk retention rules will increase the administrative and operational costs of asset securitizations.

We may find it necessary or desirable to foreclose on certain of the loans or CMBS we acquire, and the foreclosure process may be lengthy and expensive.

We may find it necessary or desirable to foreclose on certain of the loans or CMBS we acquire, and the foreclosure process may be lengthy and expensive. The protection of the terms of the applicable loan, including the validity or enforceability of the loan and the maintenance of the anticipated priority and perfection of the applicable security interests may not be adequate. Furthermore, claims may be asserted by lenders or borrowers that might interfere with enforcement of our rights. Borrowers may resist foreclosure actions by asserting numerous claims, counterclaims and defenses against us, including, without limitation, lender liability claims and defenses, even when the assertions may have no basis in fact, in an effort to prolong the foreclosure action and seek to force the lender into a modification of the loan or a favorable buy-out of the borrower’s position in the loan. In some states, foreclosure actions can take several years or more to litigate. At any time prior to or during the foreclosure proceedings, the borrower may file for bankruptcy or its equivalent, which would have the effect of staying the foreclosure actions and further delaying the foreclosure process and potentially result in a reduction or discharge of a borrower’s debt. Foreclosure may create a negative public perception of the related property, resulting in a diminution of its value, and in the event of any such foreclosure or other similar real estate owned-proceeding, we would also become the subject to the various risks associated with direct ownership of real estate, including environmental liabilities. Even if we are successful in foreclosing on a loan, the liquidation proceeds upon sale of the underlying real estate may not be sufficient to recover our cost basis in the loan, resulting in a loss to us. Furthermore, any costs or delays involved in the foreclosure of the loan or a liquidation of the underlying property will further reduce the net proceeds and, thus, increase the loss.

Any adverse changes in the global credit markets could make it more difficult for us to obtain favorable financing. Our ability to generate attractive investment returns for its shareholders will be adversely affected to the extent we are unable to obtain favorable financing terms. If we are unable to obtain favorable financing terms, it may not be able to adequately leverage our portfolio, may face increased financing expenses or may face increased restrictions on its investment activities, any of which would negatively impact our performance.

We will incur mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which may increase our business risks, could hinder our ability to make distributions and could decrease the value of your investment.

The acquisition of investment properties may be financed in substantial part by borrowing, which increases our exposure to loss. Under our charter, we have a limitation that precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300% of our net assets, which approximates borrowing 75% of the cost of our investments (unless a majority of our independent directors approves any borrowing in excess of the limit and we disclose the justification for doing so to our stockholders), but such restriction does not restrict the amount of indebtedness we may incur with respect to any single investment. Our target leverage ratio is in the range of 60%. Our leverage ratio is measured by dividing (i) consolidated property-level and entity-level debt net of cash and loan-related restricted cash, by (ii) the asset value of real estate investments (measured using the greater of fair market value and cost) plus the equity in our settled real estate debt investments. See “Investment Objectives and Strategies—Borrowing Policies.” We may exceed our target leverage ratio, particularly during a market downturn or in connection with a large acquisition. The use of leverage involves a high degree of financial risk and will increase the exposure of the investments to adverse economic factors such as rising interest rates, downturns in

the economy or deteriorations in the condition of the investments. Principal and interest payments on indebtedness (including mortgages having “balloon” payments) will have to be made regardless of the sufficiency of cash flow from the properties. Our investments will be impaired by a smaller decline in the value of the properties than is the case where properties are owned with a proportionately smaller amount of debt.

We may incur or increase our mortgage debt by obtaining loans secured by a portfolio of some or all of the real estate acquired and may borrow under mortgages on properties after they are acquired. Depending on the level of leverage and decline in value, if mortgage payments are not made when due, one or more of the properties may be lost (and our investment therein rendered valueless) as a result of foreclosure by the mortgagee(s). A foreclosure may also have substantial adverse tax consequences for us.

Many of these same issues also apply to credit facilities which are expected to be in place at various times as well. For example, the loan documents for such facilities may include various coverage ratios, the continued compliance with which may not be completely within our control. If such coverage ratios are not met, the lenders under such credit facilities may declare any unfunded commitments to be terminated and declare any amounts outstanding to be due and payable. We may also rely on short-term financing that would be especially exposed to changes in availability.

Although borrowings by us have the potential to enhance overall returns that exceed our cost of funds, they will further diminish returns (or increase losses on capital) to the extent overall returns are less than our cost of funds. As a result, the possibilities of profit and loss are increased. Borrowing money to purchase properties provides us with the advantages of leverage, but exposes us to greater market risks and higher current expenses.

Generally, commercial real estate financings are structured as non-recourse to the borrower, which limits a lender’s recourse to the property pledged as collateral for the loan, and not the other assets of the borrower or to any parent of borrower, in the event of a loan default. However, lenders customarily will require that a creditworthy parent entity enter into so-called “recourse carveout” guarantees to protect the lender against certain bad-faith or other intentional acts of the borrower in violation of the loan documents. A “bad boy” guarantee typically provides that the lender can recover losses from the guarantors for certain bad acts, such as fraud or intentional misrepresentation, intentional waste, willful misconduct, criminal acts, misappropriation of funds, voluntary incurrence of prohibited debt and environmental losses sustained by lender. In addition, “bad boy” guarantees typically provide that the loan will be a full personal recourse obligation of the guarantor, for certain actions, such as prohibited transfers of the collateral or changes of control and voluntary bankruptcy of the borrower. These financing arrangements with respect to our investments generally require “bad boy” guarantees from us and/or the Operating Partnership and in the event that such a guarantee is called, our assets could be adversely affected. Moreover, our “bad boy” guarantees could apply to actions of the joint venture partners associated with our investments. While the Adviser expects to negotiate indemnities from such joint venture partners to protect against such risks, there remains the possibility that the acts of such joint venture partner could result in liability to us under such guarantees. We may provide “bad boy” guarantees on behalf of Other Blackstone Accounts investing alongside us and as such guarantees are not for borrowed money, they will typically not be included under our leverage limitations.

If we draw on a line of credit to fund repurchases or for any other reason, our financial leverage ratio could increase beyond our target.

We have lines of credits with financial institutions that are either unsecured or secured by certain of our assets as well as an uncommitted line of credit from an affiliate of Blackstone and we may seek to obtain additional lines of credit in an effort to provide for a ready source of liquidity for any business purpose, including to fund repurchases of shares of our common stock in the event that repurchase requests exceed our operating cash flow and/or net proceeds from our continuous offering. There can be no assurances that we will be able to borrow under or maintain our existing lines of credit or obtain additional lines of credit on financially reasonable terms. In addition, we may not be able to obtain lines of credit of an appropriate size for our business. If we borrow under a line of credit to fund repurchases of shares of our common stock, our financial leverage will increase and may exceed our target leverage ratio. Our leverage may remain at the higher level until we receive additional net proceeds from our continuous offering or generate sufficient operating cash flow or proceeds from asset sales to repay outstanding indebtedness. In connection with a line of credit, distributions may be subordinated to payments required in connection with any indebtedness contemplated thereby. We may utilize a line of credit for the benefit of Other Blackstone Accounts which may invest alongside us in one or more investments. In such circumstances, we generally intend to disclose such arrangements as part of our reporting and enter into arrangements to cause any Other Blackstone Accounts to bear (or reimburse us for) their pro rata share of any costs and expenses (including interest payments) allocable to such extensions of credit.

Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our loan payments and adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Interest we pay on our loan obligations will reduce cash available for distributions. We have and will likely in the future obtain variable rate loans, and as a result, increases in interest rates could increase our interest costs, which could reduce our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to you. In addition, if we need to repay existing loans during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments at times that may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments. While we cannot predict factors which may or may not affect interest rates, during the year ended December 31, 2020, a 10% increase or decrease in the one-month U.S. denominated LIBOR rate would have resulted in an increase or decrease to our interest expense of $2.7 million.

Volatility in the financial markets and challenging economic conditions could adversely affect our ability to secure debt financing on attractive terms and our ability to service or refinance any future indebtedness that we may incur.

The volatility of the global credit markets could make it more difficult to obtain favorable financing for investments. During periods of volatility, which often occur during economic downturns, generally credit spreads widen, interest rates rise, and investor demand for high yield debt declines. These trends result in reduced willingness by investment banks and other lenders to finance new investments and deterioration of available terms. If the overall cost of borrowing increases, either by increases in the index rates or by increases in lender spreads, the increased costs may result in future acquisitions generating lower overall economic returns and potentially reducing future cash flow available for distribution. Disruptions in the debt markets negatively impact our ability to borrow monies to finance the purchase of, or other activities related to, real estate assets. If we are unable to borrow monies on terms and conditions that we find acceptable, we likely will have to reduce the number of properties we can purchase, and the return on the properties we do purchase may be lower. In addition, we may find it difficult, costly or impossible to refinance indebtedness that is maturing. Moreover, to the extent that such marketplace events are not temporary, they could have an adverse impact on the availability of credit to businesses generally and could lead to an overall weakening of the U.S. economy.

Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

When providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that affect our distribution and operating policies and our ability to obtain additional loans. Loan documents we enter into may contain covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage or dispose of the property or discontinue insurance coverage. In addition, loan documents may limit our ability to enter into or terminate certain operating or lease agreements related to the property. Loan documents may also require lender approval of certain actions and as a result of the lender’s failure to grant such approval, we may not be able to take a course of action we deem most profitable. These or other limitations may adversely affect our flexibility and our ability to make distributions to you and the value of your investment.

If we enter into financing arrangements involving balloon payment obligations, it may adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Some of our financing arrangements may require us to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at maturity. Our ability to make a balloon payment is uncertain and may depend upon our ability to obtain replacement financing or our ability to sell particular properties. At the time the balloon payment is due, we may or may not be able to refinance the balloon payment on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the particular property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment. Such a refinancing would be dependent upon interest rates and lenders’ policies at the time of refinancing, economic conditions in general and the value of the underlying properties in particular. The effect of a refinancing or sale could affect the rate of return to stockholders and the projected time of disposition of our assets.

We use reverse repurchase agreements to finance our securities investments, which may expose us to risks that could result in losses.

We use reverse repurchase agreements as a form of leverage to finance our securities investments, and the proceeds from reverse repurchase agreements are generally invested in additional securities. There is a risk that the market value of the securities acquired from the proceeds received in connection with a reverse repurchase agreement may decline below the price of the securities underlying the reverse repurchase agreement that we have sold but remain obligated to repurchase. Reverse repurchase agreements also involve the risk that the counterparty liquidates the securities we delivered to it under the reverse repurchase agreements following the occurrence of an event of default under the applicable repurchase agreement by us. In addition, there is a risk that the market value of the securities we retain may decline. If the buyer of securities under a reverse repurchase agreement were to file for bankruptcy or experiences insolvency, we may be adversely affected. Furthermore, our counterparty may require us to provide

additional margin in the form of cash, securities or other forms of collateral under the terms of the derivative contract. Also, in entering into reverse repurchase agreements, we bear the risk of loss to the extent that the proceeds of the reverse repurchase agreement are less than the value of the underlying securities. In addition, the interest costs associated with reverse repurchase agreements transactions may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, and, in some cases, we may be worse off than if we had not used such instruments.

Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Subject to any limitations required to maintain qualification as a REIT, we may seek to manage our exposure to interest rate volatility by using interest rate hedging arrangements, such as interest rate cap or collar agreements and interest rate swap agreements. These agreements involve risks, such as the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements and that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes. These interest rate hedging arrangements may create additional assets or liabilities from time to time that may be held or liquidated separately from the underlying property or loan for which they were originally established. Hedging may reduce the overall returns on our investments. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Changes to, or the elimination of, LIBOR may adversely affect interest expense related to borrowings under our credit facilities and real estate-related investments.

We pay interest under our credit facilities, and receive interest payments on certain of our real estate debt investments, based on LIBOR, which is the subject of recent national, international and regulatory guidance and proposals for reform.

In a speech on July 27, 2017, Andrew Bailey, the Chief Executive of the Financial Conduct Authority of the U.K. (“FCA”), announced the FCA’s intention to cease sustaining LIBOR after 2021. The FCA has statutory powers to require panel banks to contribute to LIBOR where necessary. The FCA has decided not to ask, or to require, that panel banks continue to submit contributions to LIBOR beyond the end of 2021. The administrator of LIBOR has announced it will consult on its intention to cease the publication of the one week and two month LIBOR settings immediately following the LIBOR publication on December 31, 2021, and the remaining USD LIBOR settings immediately following the LIBOR publication on June 30, 2023. The U.S. Federal Reserve System, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation have issued guidance encouraging market participants to adopt alternatives to LIBOR in new contracts as soon as practicable and no later than December 31, 2021, and the FCA has indicated that market participants should not rely on LIBOR being available after 2021. The U.S. Federal Reserve, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a steering committee comprised of large U.S. financial institutions, has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), a new index calculated by short-term repurchase agreements, backed by Treasury securities, as its preferred alternative rate for LIBOR. At this time, it is not possible to predict how markets will respond to SOFR or other alternative reference rates as the transition away from LIBOR is anticipated in coming years.

Our debt includes floating-rate loans and reverse repurchase agreements for which the interest rates are tied to LIBOR and real estate debt investments with interest payments based on LIBOR. There is currently no definitive information regarding the future utilization of LIBOR or of any particular replacement rate. In addition, any benchmark may perform differently during any phase-out period than in the past. As such, the potential effect of any such event on our cost of capital and net investment income cannot yet be determined, and any changes to benchmark interest rates could increase our financing costs or decrease the income we earn on our real estate debt investments, which could impact our results of operations, cash flows and the market value of our investments. In addition, we may need to renegotiate certain of our loan agreements that extend past December 31, 2021, or June 30, 2023, depending on the applicable LIBOR tenor and pending the outcome of the LIBOR administrator’s consultation. Such amendments and restructurings could require us to incur significant expense and may subject us to disputes or litigation over the appropriateness or comparability to the relevant benchmark of the replacement reference rates. Moreover, the elimination of LIBOR and/or changes to another index could result in mismatches with the interest rate of investments that we are financing. In addition, the overall financial markets may be disrupted as a result of the phase-out or replacement of LIBOR. We are assessing the impact of a potential transition from LIBOR; however, we cannot reasonably estimate the impact of the transition at this time.

We depend on the Adviser to select our investments and otherwise conduct our business, and any material adverse change in its financial condition or our relationship with the Adviser could have a material adverse effect on our business and ability to achieve our investment objectives.

Our success is dependent upon our relationship with, and the performance of, the Adviser in the acquisition and management of our real estate portfolio, and our corporate operations. The Adviser may suffer or become distracted by adverse financial or operational problems in connection with Blackstone’s business and activities unrelated to us and over which we have no control. Should the Adviser fail to allocate sufficient resources to perform its responsibilities to us for any reason, we may be unable to achieve our investment objectives or to pay distributions to our stockholders.

The termination or replacement of the Adviser could trigger a repayment event under our mortgage loans for some of our properties, the credit agreement governing any of our lines of credit and our repurchase agreements.

Lenders for certain of our properties may request provisions in the mortgage loan documentation that would make the termination or replacement of the Adviser an event requiring the immediate repayment of the full outstanding balance of the loan. The termination or replacement of the Adviser could trigger repayment of outstanding amounts under the credit agreements governing our lines of credit that we may obtain or under the repurchase agreements that we may enter into. If a repayment event occurs with respect to any of our properties, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

The Adviser’s inability to retain the services of key real estate professionals could hurt our performance.

The Adviser’s power to approve the acquisition of a particular investment, finance or refinance any new or existing investment or dispose of an existing investment rests with the Investment Committee, sub-committees of the Investment Committee or particular professionals employed by the Adviser, depending on the size and type of the investment. Accordingly, our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of certain key real estate professionals employed by the Adviser, each of whom would be difficult to replace. There is ever increasing competition among alternative asset firms, financial institutions, private equity firms, investment advisors, investment managers, real estate investment companies, real estate investment trusts and other industry participants for hiring and retaining qualified investment professionals and there can be no assurance that such professionals will continue to be associated with the us or the Adviser, particularly in light of our perpetual-life nature, or that replacements will perform well. Neither we nor the Adviser have employment agreements with these individuals and they may not remain associated with us. If any of these persons were to cease their association with us, our operating results could suffer. Our future success depends, in large part, upon the Adviser’s ability to attract and retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing professionals. If the Adviser loses or is unable to obtain the services of highly skilled professionals, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered.

Any material adverse change to the Dealer Manager’s ability to successfully build and maintain a network of licensed broker-dealers could have a material adverse effect on our business and the Offering.

The dealer manager for the Offering is Blackstone Securities Partners L.P. Any material adverse change to the ability of our Dealer Manager to build and maintain a network of licensed securities broker-dealers and other agents could have a material adverse effect on our business and the Offering. If the Dealer Manager is unable to build and maintain a sufficient network of participating broker-dealers to distribute shares in the Offering, our ability to raise proceeds through the Offering and implement our investment strategy may be adversely affected. In addition, the Dealer Manager currently serves and may serve as dealer manager for other issuers. As a result, the Dealer Manager may experience conflicts of interest in allocating its time between the Offering and such other issuers, which could adversely affect our ability to raise proceeds through the Offering and implement our investment strategy. Further, the participating broker-dealers retained by the Dealer Manager may have numerous competing investment products, some with similar or identical investment strategies and areas of focus as us, which they may elect to emphasize to their retail clients.

You will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review in connection with the Offering and, if a conflict of interest arises between us and Blackstone, we may incur additional fees and expenses.

Because the Adviser and the Dealer Manager are affiliates of Blackstone Real Estate, our sponsor, you will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review and investigation of the type normally performed by an unaffiliated, independent underwriter and its counsel in connection with a securities offering. If any situation arises in which our interests are in conflict with those of the Adviser, the Dealer Manager or its affiliates, and we are required to retain independent counsel, we will incur additional fees and expenses.

The fees we pay in connection with the Offering and the agreements entered into with Blackstone and its affiliates were not determined on an arm’s-length basis and therefore may not be on the same terms we could achieve from a third party.

The compensation paid to the Adviser, Dealer Manager and other Blackstone affiliates for services they provide us was not determined on an arm’s-length basis. All service agreements, contracts or arrangements between or among Blackstone and its affiliates, including the Adviser and us, were not negotiated at arm’s-length. Such agreements include our Advisory Agreement, the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement, our dealer manager agreement (the “Dealer Manager Agreement”), and any property related corporate services and other agreements we may enter into with affiliates of the Adviser from time to time.

We do not own the Blackstone name, but we may use it as part of our corporate name pursuant to a trademark license agreement with an affiliate of Blackstone. Use of the name by other parties or the termination of our trademark license agreement may harm our business.

We have entered into a trademark license agreement (“Trademark License Agreement”), with Blackstone TM L.L.C. (the “Licensor”), an affiliate of Blackstone, pursuant to which it has granted us a fully paid-up, royalty-free, non-exclusive, non-transferable license to use the name “Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.”. Under this agreement, we have a right to use this name for so long as the Adviser (or another affiliate of the Licensor) serves as our advisor (or another advisory entity) and the Adviser remains an affiliate of the Licensor under the Trademark License Agreement. The Trademark License Agreement may also be earlier terminated by either party as a result of certain breaches or for convenience upon 90 days’ prior written notice, provided that upon notification of such termination by us, the Licensor may elect to effect termination of the Trademark License Agreement immediately at any time after 30 days from the date of such notification. The Licensor and its affiliates, such as Blackstone, will retain the right to continue using the “Blackstone” name. We will further be unable to preclude the Licensor from licensing or transferring the ownership of the “Blackstone” name to third parties, some of whom may compete with us. Consequently, we will be unable to prevent any damage to goodwill that may occur as a result of the activities of the Licensor, Blackstone or others. Furthermore, in the event that the Trademark License Agreement is terminated, we will be required to, among other things, change our name. Any of these events could disrupt our recognition in the market place, damage any goodwill we may have generated and otherwise harm our business.

Various potential and actual conflicts of interest will arise, and these conflicts may not be identified or resolved in a manner favorable to us.

Blackstone has conflicts of interest, or conflicting loyalties, as a result of the numerous activities and relationships of Blackstone, the Dealer Manager, the Adviser and the affiliates, partners, members, shareholders, officers, directors and employees of the foregoing, some of which are described herein. However, not all potential, apparent and actual conflicts of interest are included herein, and additional conflicts of interest could arise as a result of new activities, transactions or relationships commenced in the future. If any matter arises that we and our affiliates (including the Adviser) determine in our good faith judgment constitutes an actual and material conflict of interest, we and our affiliates (including the Adviser) will take such actions as we determine appropriate to mitigate the conflict. Transactions between us and Blackstone or its affiliates will require approval by our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors. There can be no assurance that our board of directors or Blackstone will identify or resolve all conflicts of interest in a manner that is favorable to us.

The Adviser faces a conflict of interest because the fees it receives for services performed are based in part on our NAV, which the Adviser is ultimately responsible for determining.

The Adviser is paid a management fee for its services based on our NAV, which is calculated by State Street, based on valuations provided by the Adviser. In addition, the distributions to be received by the Special Limited Partner with respect to its performance participation interest in the Operating Partnership are based in part upon the Operating Partnership’s net assets (which is a component of our NAV). The calculation of our NAV includes certain subjective judgments with respect to estimating, for example, the value of our portfolio and our accrued expenses, net portfolio income and liabilities, and therefore, our NAV may not correspond to realizable value upon a sale of those assets. The Adviser may benefit by us retaining ownership of our assets at times when our stockholders may be better served by the sale or disposition of our assets in order to avoid a reduction in our NAV. If our NAV is calculated in a way that is not reflective of our actual NAV, then the purchase price of shares of our common stock or the price paid for the repurchase of your shares of common stock on a given date may not accurately reflect the value of our portfolio, and your shares may be worth less than the purchase price or more than the repurchase price. The valuation of our investments will affect the amount and timing of the management fee paid to the Adviser and the Special Limited Partner’s performance participation interest. As a result, there may be circumstances where the Adviser is incentivized to determine valuations that are higher than the actual fair value of our investments.

The Adviser’s management fee and the Special Limited Partner’s performance participation interest may not create proper incentives or may induce the Adviser and its affiliates to make certain investments, including speculative investments, that increase the risk of our real estate portfolio.

We pay the Adviser a management fee regardless of the performance of our portfolio. The Adviser’s entitlement to a management fee, which is not based upon performance metrics or goals, might reduce its incentive to devote its time and effort to seeking investments that provide attractive risk-adjusted returns for our portfolio. We would be required to pay the Adviser a management fee in a particular period even if we experienced a net loss or a decline in the value of our portfolio during that period.

The existence of the Special Limited Partner’s 12.5% performance participation interest in our Operating Partnership, which is based on our total distributions plus the change in NAV per share, may create an incentive for the Adviser to make riskier or more speculative investments on our behalf or cause us to use more leverage than it would otherwise make in the absence of such performance-based compensation. In addition, the change in NAV per share will be based on the value of our investments on the applicable measurement dates and not on realized gains or losses. As a result, the performance participation interest may receive distributions based on unrealized gains in certain assets at the time of such distributions and such gains may not be realized when those assets are eventually disposed of.

Because the management fee and performance participation are based on our NAV, the Adviser may also be motivated to accelerate acquisitions in order to increase NAV or, similarly, delay or curtail repurchases to maintain a higher NAV, and the Dealer Manager may also be incentivized to sell more shares of our common stock to increase aggregate NAV, which would, in each case, increase amounts payable to the Adviser and the Special Limited Partner, but may make it more difficult for us to efficiently deploy new capital.

Blackstone personnel work on other projects and conflicts may arise in the allocation of personnel between us and other projects.

The Adviser and its affiliates will devote such time as they determine to be necessary to conduct our business affairs in an appropriate manner. However, Blackstone personnel, including members of the Investment Committee, will work on other projects, serve on other committees (including boards of directors) and source potential investments for and otherwise assist the investment programs of Other Blackstone Accounts and their portfolio entities, including other investment programs to be developed in the future. Time spent on these other initiatives diverts attention from our activities, which could negatively impact us. Furthermore, Blackstone and Blackstone personnel derive financial benefit from these other activities, including fees and performance-based compensation. Our sponsor’s personnel share in the fees and performance-based compensation generated by Other Blackstone Accounts. These and other factors create conflicts of interest in the allocation of time by such personnel.

Blackstone is subject to a number of conflicts of interest, regulatory oversight and legal and contractual restrictions due to its multiple business lines, which may reduce the synergies that we expect to draw on or otherwise reduce the opportunities available to us.

Blackstone has multiple business lines, including the Blackstone Capital Markets Group, which Blackstone, Other Blackstone Accounts and their portfolio entities and third parties, will in certain circumstances, engage for debt and equity financings and to provide other investment banking, brokerage, investment advisory or other services. As a result of these activities, Blackstone is subject to a number of actual and potential conflicts of interest, greater regulatory oversight and more legal and contractual restrictions than if it had one line of business. For example, Blackstone may come into possession of information that limits our ability to engage in potential transactions. Similarly, other Blackstone businesses and their personnel may be prohibited by law or contract from sharing information with the Adviser or its affiliates that would be relevant to monitoring our investments and other activities. Additionally, Blackstone or Other Blackstone Accounts can be expected to enter into covenants that restrict or otherwise limit our ability to make investments in, or otherwise engage in, certain businesses or activities. For example, Other Blackstone Accounts could have granted exclusivity to a joint venture partner that limits us and Other Blackstone Accounts from owning assets within a certain distance of any of the joint venture’s assets, or Blackstone or an Other Blackstone Account could have entered into a non-compete in connection with a sale or other transaction. These types of restrictions may negatively impact our ability to implement our investment program. Finally, certain personnel who are members of the investment team or investment committee may be excluded from participating in certain investment decisions due to conflicts involving other businesses or for other reasons, including other business activities, in which case we will not benefit from their experience. Our stockholders will not receive a benefit from any fees earned by Blackstone or its personnel from these other businesses.

Blackstone has implemented policies and procedures to address conflicts that arise as a result of its various activities, as well as regulatory and other legal considerations. Some of these policies and procedures, such as Blackstone’s information wall policy, also have the effect of reducing firm-wide synergies and collaboration that the Adviser could otherwise expect to utilize for purposes of identifying and managing attractive investments. Blackstone personnel may be unable, for example, to assist with our activities of as a

result of these walls. There can be no assurance that additional restrictions won’t be imposed that would further limit the ability of Blackstone to share information internally.

Blackstone is under no obligation to decline any engagements or investments in order to make an investment opportunity available to us. Blackstone has long-term relationships with a significant number of corporations and their senior management. The Adviser and its affiliates will consider those relationships when evaluating an investment opportunity, which may result in the Adviser or its affiliates choosing not to make such an investment due to such relationships (e.g., investments in a competitor of a client or any other person with whom Blackstone has a relationship). We may be forced to sell or hold existing investments as a result of investment banking relationships or other relationships that Blackstone and its affiliates may have or transactions or investments Blackstone and its affiliates may make or have made. Therefore, there can be no assurance that all potentially suitable investment opportunities that come to the attention of Blackstone will be made available to us. See “—Certain Other Blackstone Accounts have similar or overlapping investment objectives and guidelines, and we will not be allocated certain opportunities and may be allocated only opportunities with lower relative returns” below. We may also co-invest with clients of Blackstone or other persons with whom Blackstone has a relationship in particular investment opportunities, and other aspects of these Blackstone relationships could influence the decisions made by the Adviser and its affiliates with respect to our investments and otherwise result in a conflict.

Blackstone, its affiliates and their related parties and personnel participate in underwriting and lending syndicates and otherwise act as arrangers of financing, including with respect to the public offering and private placement of debt or equity securities issued by, and loan proceeds borrowed by us or our subsidiaries or advising on such transactions. Underwritings and financings can be on a firm commitment basis or on an uncommitted, or “best efforts”, basis, and the underwriting or financing parties are under no duty to provide any commitment unless specifically set forth in the relevant contract. Blackstone can be expected to also provide placement or other similar services to purchasers or sellers of securities, including loans or instruments issued by its portfolio entities. A Blackstone broker-dealer will from time to time act as the managing underwriter, a member of the underwriting syndicate or broker for us or our subsidiaries, or as dealer, broker or advisor to a counterparty to us or our subsidiaries, and purchase securities from or sell securities to us, our subsidiaries, Other Blackstone Accounts or their portfolio entities, or advise on such transactions. Blackstone will also from time to time, on our behalf or on behalf of other parties to a transaction involving us, effect transactions, including transactions in the secondary markets, subject to applicable law that result in commissions or other compensation paid to Blackstone by us or the counterparty to the transaction, thereby creating a potential conflict of interest. Subject to applicable law, Blackstone will from time to time receive underwriting fees, discounts, placement commissions, loan modification or restructuring fees, servicing fees, capital markets, advisory fees, lending arrangement fees, asset/property management fees, insurance (including title insurance fees), incentive fees, consulting fees, monitoring fees, commitment fees, syndication fees, origination fees, organizational fees, operational fees, loan servicing fees, and financing and divestment fees (or, in each case, rebates in lieu of any such fees, whether in the form of purchase price discounts or otherwise, even in cases where Blackstone, an Other Blackstone Account or their portfolio entities are purchasing debt) or other compensation with respect to the foregoing activities, which are not required to be shared with us or our stockholders. Our independent directors will approve any transactions in which a Blackstone broker-dealer acts as underwriter, as broker for us, or as dealer, broker or advisor, on the other side of a transaction with us only where such directors believe in good faith that such transactions are appropriate for us, and our stockholders, by executing a subscription agreement for our shares, consent to all such transactions, along with other transactions involving conflicts described herein, to the fullest extent permitted by law. Sales of securities for our account will from time to time be bunched or aggregated with orders for other accounts of Blackstone including Other Blackstone Accounts. It could be impossible, as determined by the Adviser and its affiliates in their sole discretion, to receive the same price or execution on the entire volume of securities sold, and the various prices will, in certain circumstances, therefore be averaged which may be disadvantageous to us. When Blackstone serves as underwriter with respect to securities held by us or any of our subsidiaries, we could be subject to a “lock-up” period following the offering under applicable regulations during which time we would be unable to sell any securities subject to the “lock-up”. This may prejudice our ability to dispose of such securities at an opportune time. Blackstone employees are generally permitted to invest in alternative investment funds, real estate funds, hedge funds or other investment vehicles, including our potential competitors. Our stockholders will not receive any benefit from any such investments.

On October 1, 2015, Blackstone spun off its financial and strategic advisory services, restructuring and reorganization advisory services, and its Park Hill fund placement businesses and combined these businesses with PJT Partners Inc. (“PJT”), an independent financial advisory firm founded by Paul J. Taubman. While the combined business operates independently from Blackstone and is not an affiliate thereof, it is expected that there will be substantial overlapping ownership between Blackstone and PJT for a considerable period of time going forward. Therefore, conflicts of interest will arise in connection with transactions between or involving us, on the one hand, and PJT, on the other. The pre-existing relationship between Blackstone and its former personnel involved in financial and strategic advisory services at PJT, the overlapping ownership and co-investment and other continuing arrangements between PJT and Blackstone can be expected to influence the Adviser to select or recommend PJT to perform services for us (the cost of which will generally be borne directly or indirectly by us). Given that PJT is no longer an affiliate of Blackstone, the Adviser and its affiliates will be free to cause us to transact with PJT generally without restriction under our charter notwithstanding the relationship between Blackstone and PJT. See also “— The Adviser may face conflicts of interests in choosing our service providers and certain service

providers may provide services to the Dealer Manager, the Adviser or Blackstone on more favorable terms than those payable by us” below.

Blackstone receives or obtains various kinds of data and information from us, Other Blackstone Accounts and portfolio entities, including data and information relating to business operations, trends, budgets, customers and other metrics, some of which is sometimes referred to as “big data”. Blackstone can be expected to be better able to anticipate macroeconomic and other trends, and otherwise develop investment themes, as a result of its access to (and rights regarding) this data and information from us, Other Blackstone Account and portfolio entities. Blackstone has entered and will continue to enter into information sharing and use arrangements, which will give Blackstone access to (and rights regarding) data that it would not otherwise obtain in the ordinary course, with us, Other Blackstone Accounts, portfolio entities, related parties and service providers. Although Blackstone believes that these activities improve Blackstone’s investment management activities on our behalf and on behalf of Other Blackstone Accounts, information obtained from us and portfolio entities also provides material benefits to Blackstone or Other Blackstone Accounts without compensation or other benefit accruing to us or our stockholders. For example, information from a portfolio entity can be expected to enable Blackstone to better understand a particular industry and execute trading and investment strategies in reliance on that understanding for Blackstone and Other Blackstone Accounts that do not own an interest in the portfolio entity, without compensation or benefit to us or the portfolio entities.

Furthermore, except for contractual obligations to third parties to maintain confidentiality of certain information, and regulatory limitations on the use of material nonpublic information, Blackstone is generally free to use data and information from our activities to assist in the pursuit of Blackstone’s various other activities, including to trade for the benefit of Blackstone or an Other Blackstone Account. For example, Blackstone’s ability to trade in securities of an issuer relating to a specific industry may, subject to applicable law, be enhanced by information of a portfolio entity in the same or related industry. Such trading is expected to provide a material benefit to Blackstone without compensation or other benefit to us or our stockholders.

The sharing and use of “big data” and other information presents potential conflicts of interest and investors acknowledge and agree that any benefits received by Blackstone or its personnel (including fees (in cash or in kind), costs and expenses) will not offset the Adviser’s management fee or otherwise be shared with investors. As a result, the Adviser has an incentive to pursue investments that have data and information that can be utilized in a manner that benefits Blackstone or Other Blackstone Accounts.

Other present and future activities of Blackstone and its affiliates (including the Adviser and the Dealer Manager) will from time to time give rise to additional conflicts of interest relating to us and our investment activities. In the event that any such conflict of interest arises, we will attempt to resolve such conflicts in a fair and equitable manner. Investors should be aware that conflicts will not necessarily be resolved in favor of our interests.

Blackstone engages various advisors and operating partners who may co-invest alongside us, and there can be no assurance that such advisors and operating partners will continue to serve in such roles.

Blackstone, its affiliates and their personnel and related parties engage and retain strategic advisors, consultants, senior advisors, industry experts, joint venture and other partners and professionals, any of whom might be current or former executives or other personnel of the Adviser, its affiliates, portfolio entities or Other Blackstone Accounts (collectively, “Consultants”), to provide a variety of services. Similarly, we, Other Blackstone Accounts and portfolio entities retain and pay compensation to Consultants to provide services, or to undertake a build-up strategy to acquire and develop assets and businesses in a particular sector or involving a particular strategy. Any amounts paid by us or a portfolio entity to Consultants in connection with the above services, including cash fees, profits, or equity interests in a portfolio entity, discretionary bonus awards, performance-based compensation (e.g., promote), retainers and expense reimbursements, will be treated as our expenses or expenses of the portfolio entity, as the case may be, and will not, even if they have the effect of reducing any retainers or minimum amounts otherwise payable by the Adviser, be chargeable to the Adviser or deemed paid to or received by the Adviser, or offset or reduce any management fees to the Adviser. Also, Consultants may co-invest alongside us in investments, participate in long-term incentive plans of a portfolio entity, which generally will result in us being allocated a smaller share of an investment. Consultants’ benefits described in this paragraph may continue after termination of status as a Consultant.

The time, dedication and scope of work of a Consultant varies considerably. In some cases, a Consultant advises our sponsor on transactions, provides the Adviser with industry-specific insights and feedback on investment themes, assists in transaction due diligence, and makes introductions to, and provides reference checks on, management teams. In other cases, Consultants take on more extensive roles, including serving as executives or directors on the boards of portfolio entities and contributing to the identification and origination of new investment opportunities. We may rely on these Consultants to recommend the Adviser and us as a preferred investment partner and carry out our investment program, but there is no assurance that any Consultant will continue to be involved with us for any length of time. We, Blackstone, and/or portfolio companies can be expected to have formal or informal arrangements with Consultants that may or may not have termination options and may include compensation, no compensation, or deferred

compensation until occurrence of a future event, such as commencement of a formal engagement. In certain cases, Consultants have attributes of Blackstone “employees” (e.g., they can be expected to have dedicated offices at Blackstone, receive administrative support from Blackstone personnel, participate in general meetings and events for Blackstone personnel or work on Blackstone matters as their primary or sole business activity, have Blackstone-related e-mail addresses or business cards and participate in certain benefit arrangements typically reserved for Blackstone employees), even though they are not Blackstone employees, affiliates or personnel for purposes of the Dealer Manager Agreement and the Advisory Agreement, and their salary and related expenses are paid by us or by portfolio entities without any reduction or offset to the Adviser’s management fees. Some Consultants work only for us and/or portfolio entities, while other Consultants may have other clients. In particular, in some cases, Consultants, including those with a “Senior Advisor” title, have been and will be engaged with the responsibility to source and recommend transactions to the Adviser potentially on a full-time and/or exclusive basis and, notwithstanding any overlap with the responsibilities of the Adviser under the Advisory Agreement, the compensation to such Consultants could be borne fully by us (with no reduction or offset to the management fee paid to the Adviser). If such Senior Advisors generate investment opportunities on our behalf, such members may receive special additional fees or allocations comparable to those received by a third party in an arm’s length transaction. Consultants could have conflicts of interest between their work for us and portfolio entities, on the one hand, and themselves or other clients, on the other hand, and the Adviser is limited in its ability to monitor and mitigate these conflicts. Additionally, Consultants could provide services on behalf of both us and Other Blackstone Accounts, and any work performed by Consultants retained on our behalf could benefit such Other Blackstone Accounts (and alternatively, work performed by Consultants on behalf of Other Blackstone Accounts could benefit us), and the sponsor shall have no obligation to allocate any portion of the costs to be borne by us in respect of such Consultant to such Other Blackstone Accounts.

We may source, sell and/or purchase assets either to or from the Adviser and its affiliates or issued by affiliates of the Adviser, and such transactions may cause conflicts of interest.

We may directly or indirectly source, sell and/or purchase all or any portion of an asset (or portfolio of assets/investments) to or from the Adviser and its affiliates or their respective related parties, including parties which such affiliates or related parties, or Other Blackstone Accounts, own or have invested in. Such transactions will be subject to the approval of a majority of directors (including a majority of our independent directors) not otherwise interested in the transaction. We may also source, sell to and/or purchase from third parties interests in or assets issued by affiliates of the Adviser or their respective related parties and such transactions would not require approval by our independent directors or an offset of any fees we otherwise owe to the Adviser or its affiliates. The transactions referred to in this paragraph involve conflicts of interest, as our sponsor and its affiliates may receive fees and other benefits, directly or indirectly, from or otherwise have interests in both parties to the transaction.

Certain Other Blackstone Accounts have similar or overlapping investment objectives and guidelines, and we will not be allocated certain opportunities and may be allocated only opportunities with lower relative returns.

Blackstone invests its own capital and third-party capital on behalf of Other Blackstone Accounts in a wide variety of investment opportunities on a global basis. Not every opportunity suitable for us will be allocated to us in whole or in part. First, certain exceptions exist that allow specified types of investment opportunities that fall within our investment objectives or strategy to be allocated in whole or in part to Blackstone itself or Other Blackstone Accounts, such as strategic investments made by Blackstone itself (whether in financial institutions or otherwise) and investments by Other Blackstone Accounts that have investment objectives or guidelines similar to or overlapping with ours.It is expected that some activities of Blackstone, Other Blackstone Accounts and portfolio entities will compete with us for one or more investment opportunities that are consistent with our investment objectives, and as a result such investment opportunities may only be available on a limited basis, or not at all, to us. The Adviser may have conflicting loyalties in determining whether an investment opportunity should be allocated to us or an Other Blackstone Account. Our sponsor has adopted guidelines and policies, which it can be expected to update from time to time, regarding allocation of investment opportunities.

With respect to Other Blackstone Accounts with investment objectives or guidelines that overlap with ours but that do not have priority over us (including the Private Core+ Accounts), investment opportunities are allocated among us and one or more Other Blackstone Accounts in accordance with our sponsor’s prevailing policies and procedures on a basis that the Adviser and its affiliates believe to be fair and reasonable in their sole discretion, which is generally pro rata based on relative available capital, subject to the following considerations: (i) any applicable investment objectives or focus of ours and such Other Blackstone Accounts (which, for us, includes our primary objective of providing attractive current income in the form of regular, stable cash distributions), (ii) any investment limitations, parameters or contractual provisions of ours and such Other Blackstone Accounts (e.g., joint venture investments between us and an Other Blackstone Account must be on the same terms and satisfy the restrictions of all participants, such as lowest leverage targeted by any participant), (iii) the sector, geography/location, expected return profile, expected distribution rates, anticipated cash flows, expected stability or volatility of cash flows, leverage profile, risk profile, and other features of the applicable investment opportunity and its impact on portfolio concentration and diversification, (including, but not limited to, (A) allocations necessary for us or Other Blackstone Accounts to maintain a particular concentration in a certain type of investment (e.g.,

if an Other Blackstone Account follows a liquid strategy pursuant to which it sells a type of investment more or less frequently than us and we or such Other Blackstone Account needs a non pro rata additional allocation to maintain a particular concentration in that type of investment) and (B) whether a particular fund already has its desired exposure to the investment, sector, industry, geographic region or markets in question), (iv) avoiding allocation that could result in de minimis or odd lot investments and (v) legal, tax, accounting, regulatory and other considerations deemed relevant by the Adviser and its affiliates (including, without limitation, maintaining our qualification as a REIT and our status as a non-investment company exempt from the Investment Company Act).

Currently, Private Core+ Accounts invest in “core+” real estate and real estate-related assets in the United States and Canada (which are generally substantially stabilized assets generating relatively stable cash flow), with a focus on office, multifamily, industrial, retail and life sciences assets in major U.S. markets. To the extent an investment satisfies the investment objectives of us and the Private Core+ Accounts on the same terms, including at the lower leverage targeted by the Private Core+ Accounts, such investment will be generally allocated in accordance with Blackstone’s prevailing policies and procedures described above (including maintaining our status as a non-investment company exempt from the Investment Company Act). Certain Other Blackstone Accounts also invest in real estate debt with investment objectives or guidelines that overlap with ours but do not have priority over us. To the extent an investment satisfies the investment objectives of us and such Other Blackstone Accounts, such investment will be allocated in accordance with Blackstone’s prevailing policies and procedures described above. There may be instances where an overlapping investment opportunity would have satisfied our primary investment objective of providing attractive current income in the form of regular, stable cash distributions assuming our targeted leverage ratio in the range of 60%, but which does not satisfy our investment objectives at the lower targeted leverage ratio of the Private Core+ Accounts. If the Adviser and its affiliates determine to use the lower leverage ratio, such overlapping investment opportunity would not be allocated to us in whole or part. A sharing of the investment opportunity at different leverage ratios would not be possible because such joint venture investments with the Private Core+ Accounts must be on the same terms (including leverage ratio).

Furthermore, certain of the Other Blackstone Accounts that invest in “opportunistic” real estate and real estate-related assets globally (which often are undermanaged assets and with higher potential for equity appreciation) have priority over us with respect to such investment opportunities (together with future accounts with similar investment strategies, the “Select Opportunistic Blackstone Accounts”) and select investments (e.g., certain core+ life sciences investments) will be first offered to certain Other Blackstone Accounts (which we generally expect to have investment strategies distinct from ours but can overlap to some extent). The Select Opportunistic Blackstone Accounts had approximately $13.8 billion of unused capital commitments as of December 31, 2020. Other Blackstone Accounts having priority over us will result in fewer investment opportunities being made available to us.

The Adviser and its affiliates calculate available capital, weigh the factors described above (which will not be weighted equally) and make other investment allocation decisions in accordance with their prevailing policies and procedures in their sole discretion, taking into account a variety of considerations, which may include, without limitation, net asset value, any actual or anticipated allocations, expected future fundraising and uses of capital, applicable investment guidelines, excuse rights and investor preferences, any or all reserves, vehicle sizes, targeted amounts of securities as determined by the Adviser and its affiliates, geographic limitations and actual or anticipated capital needs or other factors determined by the Adviser and its affiliates. The manner in which our available capital is determined may differ from, or subsequently change with respect to, Other Blackstone Accounts. The amounts and forms of leverage utilized for investments will also be determined by the Adviser and its affiliates in their sole discretion. Any differences or adjustments with respect to the manner in which available capital is determined with respect to us or Other Blackstone Accounts may adversely impact our allocation of particular investment opportunities. There is no assurance that any conflicts arising out of the foregoing will be resolved in our favor. Blackstone is entitled to amend its policies and procedures at any time without prior notice or our consent.

The amount of performance-based compensation charged and/or management fees paid by us may be less than or exceed the amount of performance-based compensation charged and/or management fees paid by Other Blackstone Accounts. Such variation may create an incentive for our sponsor to allocate a greater percentage of an investment opportunity to us or such Other Blackstone Accounts, as the case may be.

Under certain circumstances, our Adviser may determine not to pursue some or all of an investment opportunity within our investment objectives and guidelines, including without limitation, as a result of business, reputational or other reasons applicable to us, Other Blackstone Accounts, Blackstone or its affiliates. In addition, the Adviser and its affiliates may determine that we should not pursue some or all of an investment opportunity, including, by way of example and without limitation, because we have already invested sufficient capital in the investment, sector, industry, geographic region or markets in question, as determined by the Adviser and its affiliates in their good faith discretion, or the investment is not appropriate for us for other reasons as determined by the Adviser and

its affiliates in their good faith reasonable sole discretion. In any such case Blackstone could, thereafter, offer such opportunity to other parties, including Other Blackstone Accounts, portfolio entities, joint venture partners, related parties or third parties. Any such Other Blackstone Accounts may be advised by a different Blackstone business group with a different investment committee, which could determine an investment opportunity to be more attractive than the Adviser believes to be the case. In any event, there can be no assurance that the Adviser’s assessment will prove correct or that the performance of any investments actually pursued by us will be comparable to any investment opportunities that are not pursued by us. Blackstone, including its personnel, will, in certain circumstances, receive compensation from any such party that makes the investment, including an allocation of carried interest or referral fees, and any such compensation could be greater than amounts paid by us to the Adviser. In some cases Blackstone earns greater fees when Other Blackstone Accounts participate alongside or instead of us in an investment.

When the Adviser and its affiliates determine not to pursue some or all of an investment opportunity for us that would otherwise be within our investment objectives and strategies, and Blackstone provides the opportunity or offers the opportunity to Other Blackstone Accounts, Blackstone, including its personnel (including real estate personnel), can be expected to receive compensation from the Other Blackstone Accounts, whether or not in respect of a particular investment, including an allocation of carried interest or referral fees, and any such compensation could be greater than amounts paid by us to the Adviser. As a result, the Adviser (including real estate personnel who receive such compensation) could be incentivized to allocate investment opportunities away from us to or source investment opportunities for Other Blackstone Accounts.

The Adviser and its affiliates make good faith determinations for allocation decisions based on expectations that will, in certain circumstances, prove inaccurate. Information unavailable to the Adviser, or circumstances not foreseen by the Adviser at the time of allocation, may cause an investment opportunity to yield a different return than expected. For example, an investment opportunity that the Adviser and its affiliates determine to be consistent with the return objective of Other Blackstone Accounts rather than us may not match the expectations and underwriting of the Adviser and its affiliates and generate an actual return that would have been appropriate for us. Conversely, an investment that the Adviser and its affiliates expect to be consistent with our return objectives will, in certain circumstances, fail to achieve them. There is no assurance that any conflicts arising out of the foregoing will be resolved in our favor. Blackstone is entitled to amend its policies and procedures at any time without prior notice or our consent.

Our board of directors has adopted a resolution that renounces our interest or expectancy with respect to business opportunities and competitive activities.

Our board of directors has adopted a resolution that renounces our interest or expectancy in, or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, business opportunities, and provides that none of Blackstone or its affiliates, our directors or any person our directors control must refrain from competing with us or present to us such business opportunities. Under this resolution Blackstone and its affiliates and our directors or any person our directors control would not be obligated to present to us opportunities unless those opportunities are expressly offered to such person in his or her capacity as a director or officer and intended exclusively for us or any of our subsidiaries, and those persons will be able to engage in competing activities without any restriction imposed as a result of Blackstone’s or its affiliates’ status as a stockholder or Blackstone’s affiliates’ status as our officers or directors.

We co-invest with Blackstone affiliates and such investments are at times in different parts of the capital structure of an issuer and may otherwise involve conflicts of interest. When we hold investments in which Other Blackstone Accounts have a different principal investment, conflicts of interest arise between us and Other Blackstone Accounts, and the Adviser may take actions that are adverse to us.

We co-invest with Other Blackstone Accounts in investments that are suitable for both us and such Other Blackstone Accounts. We may hold an interest in an investment that is different (including with respect to relative seniority) than the interests held by Other Blackstone Accounts (and in certain circumstances, the Adviser will be unaware of an Other Blackstone Account’s participation, as a result of information walls or otherwise). In these situations, conflicts of interest will arise. In order to mitigate any such conflicts of interest, in certain circumstances we will likely recuse ourselves from participating in any decisions relating or with respect to such investment by us or the applicable investments by the Other Blackstone Accounts, or by establishing groups separated by information barriers (which can be expected to be temporary and limited purpose in nature) within Blackstone to act on behalf of each of the clients. Despite these, and any of the other actions described below that the Adviser may take to mitigate the conflict, Blackstone may be required to take action when it will have conflicting loyalties between its duties to us and such Other Blackstone Accounts, which may adversely impact us. In that regard, actions may be taken for the Other Blackstone Accounts that are adverse to us (and vice versa). If the Other Blackstone Account maintains voting rights with respect to the securities it holds, or if we do not recuse ourselves, Blackstone may be required to take action where it will have conflicting loyalties between its duties to us and such Other Blackstone Account, which may adversely impact us. If we recuse ourselves from decision-making, we will generally rely upon a third party to make the decisions, and the third party could have conflicts or otherwise make decisions that Blackstone would not have made.

There can be no assurance that any conflict will be resolved in our favor. Conflicts can also be expected to arise in determining the amount of an investment, if any, to be allocated among potential investors and the respective terms thereof. There can be no assurance that the return on our investment will be equivalent to or better than the returns obtained by the other affiliates participating in the transaction. In addition, it is anticipated that in a bankruptcy proceeding our interest will likely be subordinated or otherwise adversely affected by virtue of such Other Blackstone Accounts’ involvement and actions relating to such investment. For example, in circumstances where we hold a junior mezzanine interest in an issuer, holders of more senior classes of debt issued by such entity (which may include Other Blackstone Accounts) may take actions for their benefit (particularly in circumstances where such issuer faces financial difficulty or distress) that further subordinate or adversely impact the value of our investment in such issuer.

In connection with negotiating loans, bank or securitization financings in respect of our real estate-related transactions, Blackstone will generally obtain the right to participate on its own behalf (or on behalf of vehicles it manages) in a portion of the financings with respect to such Blackstone-sponsored transactions (including transactions where the underlying collateral includes property owned by Other Blackstone Accounts) upon an agreed upon set of terms. We do not believe that this arrangement has an effect on the overall terms and conditions negotiated with the arrangers of such senior loans other than as described in the preceding sentence. If we make or have an investment in a property in which an Other Blackstone Account has a mezzanine or other debt investment, or vice versa, Blackstone may have conflicting loyalties between its duties to us and to other affiliates. Such investments may inherently give rise to conflicts of interest or perceived conflicts of interest between or among the various classes of securities that may be held by such entities. Because of the affiliation with Blackstone, the Adviser may have a greater incentive to invest in Blackstone-sponsored financings (as compared to real estate-related financings sponsored by other real estate firms or financial sponsors). In certain circumstances, we may be required to commit funds necessary for an investment prior to the time that all anticipated debt (senior and/or mezzanine) financing has been secured. In such circumstance, Other Blackstone Accounts and/or Blackstone itself (using, in whole or in part, its own balance sheet capital), may provide bridge or other short-term financing and/or commitments, which at the time of establishment are intended to be replaced and/or syndicated with longer-term financing. In any such circumstance, the Other Blackstone Accounts and/or Blackstone itself may receive compensation for providing such financing and/or commitment (including origination, ticking or commitment fees), which fees will not be shared with and/or otherwise result in an offset of the management fee paid to the Adviser. The conflicts applicable to Other Blackstone Accounts who invest in different securities of issuers will apply equally to Blackstone itself in such situations.

To the extent that we make or have an investment in, or through the purchase of debt obligations become a lender to, a company in which an Other Blackstone Account has a debt or equity investment (including through investments in CMBS where the underlying properties are owned by Other Blackstone Accounts), or if an Other Blackstone Account participates in a separate tranche of a financing with respect to a portfolio entity, Blackstone will generally have conflicting loyalties between its duties to us and to Other Blackstone Accounts. In that regard, actions may be taken for the Other Blackstone Accounts that are adverse to us (and vice versa). Moreover, we will generally “follow the vote” of other similarly situated third-party creditors (if any) in voting and governance matters where conflicts of interest exist and will have a limited ability to separately protect our investment and will be dependent upon such third parties’ actions (which may not be as capable as the Adviser and may have other conflicts arising from their other relationships, both with Blackstone and other third parties that could impact their decisions). In addition, conflicts can also be expected to arise in determining the amount of an investment, if any, to be allocated among potential investors and the respective terms thereof.

We may seek to participate in investments relating to (i) the refinancing or modifications of loan investments or portfolios held or proposed to be acquired by certain Other Blackstone Accounts, and Other Blackstone Accounts may refinance a loan currently held by us and/or (ii) portfolio entities of one or more Other Blackstone Accounts, including primary or secondary issuances of loans or other interests by such portfolio entities. While it is expected that our participation in connection with any such transactions will generally be negotiated by third parties, such transactions will give rise to potential or actual conflicts of interest.

We may invest in joint ventures with Other Blackstone Accounts or divide a pool of investments among us and Other Blackstone Accounts.

To the extent we acquire properties through joint ventures with Other Blackstone Accounts, such investments will be allocated as described above, and we may be allocated interests in such joint ventures that are smaller than the interests of the Other Blackstone Accounts. Generally, we expect the level of control we have with respect to any joint venture will correspond to our economic interest in such joint venture. We will not participate in joint ventures in which we do not have or share control to the extent that we believe such participation would potentially threaten our status as a non-investment company exempt from the Investment Company Act. This may prevent us from receiving an allocation with respect to certain investment opportunities that are suitable for both us and one or more Other Blackstone Accounts. Such joint venture investments will involve risks and conflicts of interests. See “—Risks Related Investments in Real Estate—We may make a substantial amount of joint venture investments, including with Blackstone affiliates. Joint venture investments could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on the financial condition of our joint venture partners and disputes between us and our joint venture partners.”

Our sponsor may have an opportunity to acquire a portfolio or pool of assets, securities and instruments in a single or related transactions with a particular seller that it determines in its sole discretion should be divided and allocated among us and Other Blackstone Accounts, including where certain of such assets, securities or instruments are specifically allocated (in whole or in part) to us and such Other Blackstone Accounts. Such allocations generally would be based on its assessment of, among other things, the expected returns and risk profile of the portfolio and each of the assets therein and may provide greater benefits to Other Blackstone Accounts than to us (or vice versa). For example, some of the assets in a pool may have an opportunistic return profile not appropriate for us. Also, a pool may contain both debt and equity instruments that our sponsor determines should be allocated to different funds. In all of these situations, the combined purchase price paid to a seller would be allocated among the multiple assets, securities and instruments in the pool based on a determination by the seller, by a third-party valuation firm and/or by the Adviser and its affiliates, and therefore among us and the Other Blackstone Accounts acquiring any of the assets, securities and instruments, although our sponsor could, in certain circumstances, allocate value to us and such Other Blackstone Accounts on a different basis than the contractual purchase price. To the extent that any such allocations would cause us to participate in a transaction with Other Blackstone Accounts for a portfolio or pool of assets, securities and instruments that we otherwise may not have acquired individually, our sponsor will have conflicting loyalties between its duties to us and to Other Blackstone Accounts.

Similarly, there will likely be circumstances in which we and Other Blackstone Accounts will sell assets in a single or related transactions to a buyer. In some cases a counterparty will require an allocation of value in the purchase or sale contract, though our sponsor could determine such allocation of value is not accurate and should not be relied upon. Unless an appraisal is required by our charter, our sponsor will generally rely upon internal analysis to determine the ultimate allocation of value, though it could also obtain third-party valuation reports. Regardless of the methodology for allocating value, our sponsor will have conflicting duties to us and Other Blackstone Accounts when they buy or sell assets together in a portfolio, including as a result of different financial incentives our sponsor has with respect to different vehicles, most clearly when the fees and compensation, including performance-based compensation, earned from the different vehicles differ. There can be no assurance that our investment will not be valued or allocated a purchase price that is higher or lower than it might otherwise have been allocated if such investment were acquired or sold independently rather than as a component of a portfolio shared with Other Blackstone Accounts.

Blackstone may structure certain investments such that Blackstone will face conflicting fiduciary duties to us and certain debt funds.

It is expected that Blackstone will structure certain investments such that one or more mezzanine or other investment funds, structured vehicles or other collective investment vehicles primarily investing in senior secured loans, distressed debt, subordinated debt, high-yield securities, CMBS and other similar debt instruments managed by affiliates of Blackstone (collectively, “Debt Funds”) are offered the opportunity to participate in the debt tranche of an investment allocated to us. The Adviser and its affiliates owe fiduciary duties to the Debt Funds as well as to us. If the Debt Funds purchase high-yield securities or other debt instruments related to a property or real estate company that we hold an investment in (or if we make or have an investment in or, through the purchase of debt obligations become a lender to, a company or property in which a Debt Fund or an Other Blackstone Account or another Blackstone real estate fund or vehicle has a mezzanine or other debt investment), the Adviser and its affiliates will face a conflict of interest in respect of the advice given to, or the decisions made with regard to, the Debt Funds, such Other Blackstone Accounts and us (e.g., with respect to the terms of such high-yield securities or other debt instruments, the enforcement of covenants, the terms of recapitalizations and the resolution of workouts or bankruptcies). Similarly, certain Other Blackstone Accounts can be expected to invest in securities of publicly traded companies that are actual or potential investments of ours. The trading activities of Other Blackstone Accounts may differ from or be inconsistent with activities that are undertaken for our account in any such securities. In addition, we may not pursue an investment otherwise within our investment objectives and guidelines as a result of such trading activities by Other Blackstone Accounts.

Blackstone may raise and/or manage Other Blackstone Accounts, which could result in the reallocation of Blackstone personnel and the direction of potential investments to such Other Blackstone Accounts.

Blackstone reserves the right to raise and/or manage Other Blackstone Accounts, including opportunistic and stabilized and substantially stabilized real estate funds or separate accounts, dedicated managed accounts, investments suitable for lower risk, lower return funds or higher risk, higher return funds, real estate debt obligation and trading investment vehicles, real estate funds primarily making investments globally, in a particular region outside of the U.S. and Canada, or in a single sector of the real estate investment space (e.g., office, industrial, retail or multifamily) or making non-controlling investments in public and private debt and equity securities and/or investment funds that may have the same or similar investment objectives or guidelines as us or investments,

including those raised by us and one or more managed accounts (or other similar arrangements structured through an entity) for the benefit of one or more specific investors (or related group of investors) which, in each case, may have investment objectives or guidelines that overlap with ours. See “—Certain Other Blackstone Accounts have similar or overlapping investment objectives and guidelines, and we will not be allocated certain opportunities and may be allocated only opportunities with lower relative returns.” In particular, we expect that there will be overlap of real estate and real estate debt investment opportunities with certain Other Blackstone Accounts that are actively investing and similar overlap with future Other Blackstone Accounts. The closing of an Other Blackstone Account could result in the reallocation of Blackstone personnel, including reallocation of existing real estate professionals, to such Other Blackstone Account. In addition, potential investments that may be suitable for us may be directed toward such Other Blackstone Account.

Blackstone’s potential involvement in financing a third party’s purchase of assets from us could lead to potential or actual conflicts of interest.

We may from time to time dispose of all or a portion of an investment by way of a third-party purchaser’s bid where Blackstone or one or more Other Blackstone Accounts is providing financing as part of such bid or acquisition of the investment or underlying assets thereof. This may include the circumstance where Blackstone or one or more Other Blackstone Accounts is making commitments to provide financing at or prior to the time such third-party purchaser commits to purchase such investments or assets from us. Such involvement of Blackstone or one or more Other Blackstone Accounts as such a provider of debt financing in connection with the potential acquisition of portfolio investments by third parties from us may give rise to potential or actual conflicts of interest.

We may provide debt financing in connection with acquisitions by third parties of assets owned by Other Blackstone Accounts.

We may provide financing as part of a third-party purchaser’s bid or acquisition of (or investment in) a portfolio entity (or the underlying assets of) owned by one or more Other Blackstone Accounts (or in connection with the acquisitions by one or more Other Blackstone Accounts or their affiliates of assets or interests (and/or portfolios thereof) owned by a third party). This may include making commitments to provide financing at, prior to or around the time that any such purchaser commits to or makes such investments. We may make investments and provide debt financing with respect to portfolio entities in which Other Blackstone Accounts and/or affiliates hold or subsequently acquire an interest. While the terms and conditions of any such arrangements will generally be on market terms, the involvement of the Other Blackstone Accounts or affiliates in such transactions may affect credit decisions and the terms of such transactions or arrangements and/or may otherwise influence the Adviser’s decisions, which will give rise to potential or actual conflicts of interest and which may adversely impact us. For example, such transactions may involve the partial or complete payoff of such loans (with related proceeds being received by the applicable Other Blackstone Accounts) and/or otherwise result in restructurings of terms and pricing relating to such existing loans with the borrowers thereof in respect of which such Other Blackstone Accounts may receive refinancing proceeds and/or a retained interest in such loans in accordance with such restructuring arrangements. Additionally, in certain situations we may not commit to provide financing until a third party has committed to make a deposit in connection with the acquisition of an investment from an Other Blackstone Account, which may result in us being disadvantaged in the overall bid process or potentially not consummating the investment.

Disputes between Blackstone and our joint venture partners who have pre-existing investments with Blackstone may affect our investments relating thereto.

Some of the third-party operators and joint-venture partners with which the Adviser may elect to co-invest our capital may have pre-existing investments with Blackstone. The terms of these preexisting investments may differ from the terms upon which we invest with such operators and partners. To the extent a dispute arises between Blackstone and such operators and partners, our investments relating thereto may be affected.

Certain principals and employees will, in certain circumstances, be involved in and have a greater financial interest in the performance of other Blackstone funds or accounts, and such activities may create conflicts of interest in making investment decisions on our behalf.

Certain Blackstone personnel will, in certain circumstances, be subject to a variety of conflicts of interest relating to their responsibilities to us, Other Blackstone Accounts and portfolio entities, and their outside personal or business activities, including as members of investment or advisory committees or boards of directors of or advisors to investment funds, corporations, foundations or other organizations. Such positions create a conflict if such other entities have interests that are adverse to those of us, including if such other entities compete with us for investment opportunities or other resources. The Blackstone personnel in question may have a greater financial interest in the performance of the other entities than our performance. This involvement may create conflicts of interest in making investments on our behalf and on behalf of such other funds, accounts and other entities. Although the Adviser will generally seek to minimize the impact of any such conflicts, there can be no assurance they will be resolved favorably for us. Also, Blackstone personnel are generally permitted to invest in alternative investment funds, private equity funds, real estate funds, hedge

funds and other investment vehicles, as well as engage in other personal trading activities relating to companies, assets, securities or instruments (subject to Blackstone’s Code of Ethics requirements), some of which will involve conflicts of interests. Such personal securities transactions will, in certain circumstances, relate to securities or instruments, which can be expected to also be held or acquired by us or Other Blackstone Accounts, or otherwise relate to companies or issuers in which we have or acquire a different principal investment (including, for example, with respect to seniority). There can be no assurance that conflicts of interest arising out of such activities will be resolved in our favor. Investors will not receive any benefit from any such investments, and the financial incentives of Blackstone personnel in such other investments could be greater than their financial incentives in relation to us.

The Adviser may face conflicts of interests in choosing our service providers and certain service providers may provide services to the Dealer Manager, the Adviser or Blackstone on more favorable terms than those payable by us.

Certain third-party advisors and other service providers and vendors to us (including accountants, administrators, lenders, bankers, brokers, attorneys, consultants, title agents, property managers and investment or commercial banking firms) are owned by Blackstone, us or Other Blackstone Accounts or provide goods or services to, or have other business, personal, financial or other relationships with, Blackstone, the Other Blackstone Accounts and their portfolio entities, the Dealer Manager, the Adviser and affiliates and personnel of the foregoing. Also, advisors, lenders, investors, commercial counterparties, vendors and service providers (including any of their affiliates or personnel) to us could have other commercial or personal relationships with Blackstone, Other Blackstone Accounts and their respective affiliates, personnel or family members of personnel of the foregoing.

Although Blackstone selects service providers and vendors it believes are most appropriate in the circumstances based on its knowledge of such service providers and vendors (which knowledge is generally greater in the case of service providers and vendors that have other relationships to Blackstone), the relationship of service providers and vendors to Blackstone as described above will, in certain circumstances, influence Blackstone in deciding whether to select, recommend or form such an advisor or service provider to perform services for us, the cost of which will generally be borne directly or indirectly by us, and incentivize Blackstone to engage such service provider over a third party, utilize the services of such service providers and vendors more frequently than would be the case absent the conflict, or to cause us to pay such service providers and vendors higher fees or commissions than would be the case absent the conflict. The incentive could be created by current income and/or the generation of enterprise value in a service provider or vendor; Blackstone may also have an incentive to invest in or create service providers and vendors to realize on these opportunities. Furthermore, Blackstone will from time to time encourage third-party service providers to Other Blackstone Accounts to use other service providers and vendors in which Blackstone has an interest, and Blackstone has an incentive to use third-party service providers who do so as a result of the additional business for the related service providers and vendors. Fees paid to or value created in these service providers and vendors do not offset or reduce the Adviser’s management fee and are not otherwise shared with us.

In the case of brokers of securities, our sponsor has a best execution policy that it updates from time to time to comply with regulatory requirements in applicable jurisdictions.

Blackstone, Other Blackstone Accounts, portfolio entities, and personnel and related parties of the foregoing will receive fees and compensation, including performance-based and other incentive fees, for products and services provided to us, such as fees for asset, development and property management; arranging, underwriting, syndication or refinancing of a loan or investment (or other additional fees, including acquisition fees, loan modification or restructuring fees); loan servicing; special servicing; other servicing; administrative services; advisory services on purchase or sale of an asset or company; other advisory services; investment banking and capital market services; placement agent services; fund administration; internal legal and tax planning services; information technology products and services; insurance procurement; brokerage solutions and risk management services; data extraction and management products and services; fees for monitoring and oversight of loans, property, title and/or other types of insurance and related services; and other products and services (including but not limited to restructuring, consulting, monitoring, commitment, syndication, origination, organizational and financing, and divestment services). Such parties will also provide products and services for fees to Blackstone, Other Blackstone Accounts and portfolio entities, and their personnel and related parties, as well as third parties. Through its Innovations group, Blackstone incubates businesses that can be expected to provide goods and services to us, our portfolio properties, Other Blackstone Accounts and their affiliates, as well as other Blackstone related parties and third parties. By contracting for a product or service from a business related to Blackstone, we would provide not only current income to the business and its stakeholders, but could also create significant enterprise value in them, which would not be shared with us or our stockholders and could benefit Blackstone directly and indirectly. Also, Blackstone, Other Blackstone Accounts and portfolio entities, and their personnel and related parties will, in certain circumstances, receive compensation or other benefits, such as through additional ownership interests or otherwise, directly related to the consumption of products and services by us. We will incur expense in negotiating for any such fees and services. Finally, Blackstone and its personnel and related parties may also receive compensation for origination expenses and with respect to unconsummated transactions.

Portfolio entities of Other Blackstone Accounts are and will be counterparties or participants in agreements, transactions and other arrangements with us for the provision of goods and services, purchase and sale of assets and other matters. In addition, certain of our

portfolio entities may be counterparties or participants in agreements, transactions and other arrangements with Other Blackstone Accounts for the provision of goods and services, purchase and sale of assets and other matters. These agreements, transactions and other arrangements will involve payment of fees and other amounts, none of which will result in any offset to the management fees we pay to the Adviser notwithstanding that some of the services provided by such portfolio entity are similar in nature to the services provided by the Adviser. Generally, we may engage Blackstone-affiliated portfolio entities or allow our portfolio entities to be engaged by Blackstone-affiliated entities only if a majority of our board of directors, and a majority of the affiliate transaction committee (which is comprised of each of our independent directors) not otherwise interested in the transaction approve the transaction as being fair and reasonable to us and on terms and conditions no less favorable to us than those available from unaffiliated third parties.

We may engage portfolio entities of Other Blackstone Accounts and Other Blackstone Accounts may engage our portfolio entities to provide some or all of the following services: (a) corporate support services (including, without limitation, accounting/audit (including valuation support services), account management, corporate secretarial services, data management, directorship services, finance/budget, human resources, information technology, judicial processes, legal, operational coordination (i.e., coordination with JV partners, property managers), risk management, tax and treasury; (b) loan management (including, without limitation, monitoring, restructuring and work-out of performing, sub-performing and nonperforming loans, administrative services, and cash management); (c) management services (i.e., management by a portfolio entity, Blackstone affiliate or third party (e.g., a third-party manager) of operational services); (d) operational services (i.e., general management of day to day operations, including, without limitation, construction management, leasing services, project management and property management); and (e) transaction support services (including, without limitation, managing relationships with brokers and other potential sources of investments, identifying potential investments, coordinating with investors, assembling relevant information, conducting financial and market analyses and modelling, coordinating closing/post-closing procedures for acquisitions, dispositions and other transactions, coordination of design and development works, overseeing brokers, lawyers, accountants and other advisors, providing legal and accounting services, assistance with due diligence, preparation of project feasibilities, site visits, and specification of technical analysis and review of (i) design and structural work, (ii) architectural, façade and external finishes, (iii) certifications, (iv) operations and maintenance manuals and (v) statutory documents).

Such portfolio entities of Other Blackstone Accounts that can be expected to provide services to us include, without limitation, the following, and may include additional portfolio entities that may be formed or acquired in the future:

LivCor. We have engaged LivCor, L.L.C., a portfolio company owned by a Blackstone-advised fund for certain of our multifamily properties.

Equity Office Management/Equity Office Properties. We have engaged Equity Office Management, L.L.C., a portfolio company owned by Blackstone-advised funds for certain of our office properties.

ShopCore. We have engaged ShopCore Properties TRS Management LLC, a portfolio company owned by a Blackstone-advised fund for certain of our retail properties.

Link. We have engaged Link Industrial Properties Holdco LLC, a portfolio company owned by a Blackstone-advised fund for certain of our industrial properties.

BRE Hotels and Resorts. We have engaged BRE Hotels & Resorts LLC, a portfolio company controlled (but not owned) by a Blackstone-advised fund for certain of our hotel properties.

Revantage. We have engaged Revantage Corporate Services, LLC, a portfolio company owned by a Blackstone-advised fund, to provide corporate support services (including, without limitation, accounting, legal, tax, and treasury, as applicable) and transaction support services to certain of our investments directly.

We compensate these service providers and vendors owned by the Other Blackstone Accounts for services rendered to us, including through promote or other incentive-based compensation payable to their management teams and other related parties. The incentive-based compensation paid with respect to a portfolio entity or property will vary from the incentive based compensation paid with respect to other portfolio entities and properties; as a result the management team or other related parties may have greater incentives with respect to certain properties and portfolio entities relative to others, and the performance of certain properties and portfolio entities may provide incentives to retain management that also service other properties and portfolio entities. Such service providers and vendors may charge for certain goods and services at rates generally consistent with those available in the market for similar goods and services. The discussion regarding the determination of market rates below applies equally in respect of the fees and expenses of the portfolio entity service providers, if charged at rates generally consistent with those available in the market. Such

service providers and vendors may also pass through expenses for other services on a cost reimbursement, no-profit or break-even basis, in which case the service provider allocates costs and expenses directly associated with work performed for our benefit to us, along with any related tax costs and an allocation of the service provider’s overhead, including any of the following: salaries, wages, benefits and travel expenses; marketing and advertising fees and expenses; legal, accounting and other professional fees and disbursements; office space and equipment; insurance premiums; technology expenditures, including hardware and software costs; costs to engage recruitment firms to hire employees; diligence expenses; one-time costs, including costs related to building-out and winding-down a portfolio property; taxes; and other operating and capital expenditures. Any of the foregoing costs, although allocated in a particular period, will, in certain circumstances, relate to activities occurring outside the period, and therefore we could pay more than our pro rata portion of fees for services. The allocation of overhead among the entities and assets to which services are provided can be expected to be based on any of a number of different methodologies, including, without limitation, “cost” basis as described above, “time-allocation” basis, “per unit” basis, “per square footage” basis or “fixed percentage” basis. There can be no assurance that a different manner of allocation would result in our bearing less or more costs and expenses. A service provider may subcontract certain of its responsibilities to other portfolio entities. In such circumstances, the relevant subcontractor could invoice the portfolio entity for fees (or in the case of a cost reimbursement arrangement, for allocable costs and expenses) in respect of the services provided by the subcontractor. The portfolio entity, if charging on a cost reimbursement, no-profit or break-even basis, would in turn allocate those costs and expenses as it allocates other fees and expenses as described above. Similarly, Other Blackstone Accounts, their portfolio entities and Blackstone may engage our portfolio entities to provide services, and these portfolio entities will generally charge for services in the same manner described above, but we generally will not be reimbursed for any costs (such as start-up costs) relating to such portfolio entity incurred prior to such engagement.

We, Other Blackstone Accounts and their affiliates are expected to enter into joint ventures with third parties to which the service providers and vendors described above will provide services. In some of these cases, the third-party joint venture partner may negotiate to not pay its pro rata share of fees, costs and expenses to be allocated as described above, in which case we, Other Blackstone Accounts and their affiliates that also use the services of the portfolio entity service provider will, directly or indirectly, pay the difference, or the portfolio entity service provider will bear a loss equal to the difference. Portfolio entity service providers described in this section are generally owned and controlled by one or more Blackstone funds such as Other Blackstone Accounts. In certain instances a similar company could be owned or controlled by Blackstone directly. Service providers described in this risk factor are generally owned and controlled by a Blackstone fund, such as the Other Blackstone Accounts.

Blackstone has a general practice of not entering into any arrangements with advisors, vendors or service providers that provide lower rates or discounts to Blackstone itself compared to those available to us for the same services. However, legal fees for unconsummated transactions are often charged at a discount rate, such that if we consummate a higher percentage of transactions with a particular law firm than Blackstone, Other Blackstone Accounts and their affiliates, we could indirectly pay a higher net effective rate for the services of that law firm than Blackstone or Other Blackstone Accounts or their affiliates. Also, advisors, vendors and service providers often charge different rates or have different arrangements for different types of services. For example, advisors, vendors and service providers often charge fees based on the complexity of the matter as well as the expertise and time required to handle it. Therefore, to the extent the types of services used by us are different from those used by Blackstone, Other Blackstone Accounts and their affiliates and personnel, we can be expected to pay different amounts or rates than those paid by such other persons. Similarly, Blackstone, the Other Blackstone Accounts and affiliates and we can be expected to enter into agreements or other arrangements with vendors and other similar counterparties (whether such counterparties are affiliated or unaffiliated with Blackstone) from time to time whereby such counterparty will, in certain circumstances, charge lower rates (or no fee) or provide discounts or rebates for such counterparty’s products or services depending on the volume of transactions in the aggregate or other factors.

In addition to the service providers (including portfolio entity service providers) and vendors described above, we will engage in transactions with one or more businesses that are owned or controlled by Blackstone directly, not through one of its funds, including the businesses described below. These businesses will, in certain circumstances, also enter into transactions with other counterparties of ours. Blackstone could benefit from these transactions and activities through current income and creation of enterprise value in these businesses. Furthermore, Blackstone will from time to time encourage our third-party service providers to use other Blackstone-affiliated service providers and vendors in connection with our business and the business of portfolio entities and unaffiliated entities, and Blackstone has an incentive to use third-party service providers who do so as a result of the indirect benefit to Blackstone and additional business for the related service providers and vendors. No fees charged by these service providers and vendors will offset or reduce the Adviser’s management fees. Furthermore, Blackstone, the Other Blackstone Accounts and their affiliates and related parties will use the services of these Blackstone affiliates, including at different rates. Although Blackstone believes the services provided by its affiliates are equal or better than those of third parties, Blackstone directly benefits from the engagement of these affiliates, and there is therefore an inherent conflict of interest.

Blackstone-affiliated service providers and vendors, include, without limitation:

CTIMCO. CT Investment Management LLC (“CTIMCO”), is the investment management business operated by Blackstone Real Estate Debt Strategies that specializes in real estate-related debt investments with a focus on mortgage loans that are backed by commercial real estate assets, which may be engaged by us and Other Blackstone Accounts as a special servicer. Special servicers are responsible for managing underlying loans of the CMBS that are in default, including exercising remedies. The fees for special servicers are set forth in a pooling and servicing arrangement at the creation of the CMBS. See “—General Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate Debt—There are certain risks associated with the servicers of commercial real estate loans underlying CMBS and other investments.” In cases where we and/or Other Blackstone Accounts control the controlling class of securities in a CMBS that has the power to appoint or remove the special servicer, we and/or Other Blackstone Accounts may determine to appoint or replace an existing third party special servicer with CTIMCO. In any such replacement, CTIMCO would be entitled to receive the same fees that the former third party special servicer was entitled to receive (including any arrangements, if any, entered into with the former special servicer by which the special servicer agreed to share a portion of its fee with us and/or Other Blackstone Accounts pro rata based on ownership of the controlling class of the CMBS). As special servicer, CTIMCO would be obligated to act in the best interests of all holders of securities of the CMBS, not just the class or classes of securities held by us. As a result, CTIMCO may not always act in our best interest.

LNLS. Lexington National Land Services (“LNLS”) is a Blackstone affiliate that (i) acts as a title agent in facilitating and issuing title insurance, (ii) provides title support services for title insurance underwriters and (iii) acts as escrow agent in connection with investments by us, Other Blackstone Accounts and their affiliates and related parties, and third parties. In exchange for such services LNLS earns fees, which would have otherwise been paid to third parties. If LNLS is involved in a transaction in which we participate, LNLS will benchmark such fees to the extent market data is available except when LNLS is providing such services in a state where the insurance premium or escrow fee, as applicable, is regulated by the state or when LNLS is part of a syndicate of title insurance companies where the insurance premium is negotiated by other title insurance underwriters or their agents.

Certain Blackstone-affiliated service providers and their respective personnel may receive a management promote, an incentive fee and other performance-based compensation in respect of our investments. Furthermore, Blackstone-affiliated service providers can be expected to charge costs and expenses based on allocable overhead associated with personnel working on relevant matters (including salaries, benefits and other similar expenses), provided that these amounts will not exceed market rates as determined to be appropriate under the circumstances. Generally, we may engage Blackstone-affiliated service providers only if a majority of our board of directors, and a majority of the affiliate transaction committee (which is comprised of each of our independent directors), not otherwise interested in the transaction approve the transaction as being fair and reasonable to us and on terms and conditions no less favorable to us than those available from unaffiliated third parties.

The Adviser and its affiliates will make determinations of market rates (i.e., rates that fall within a range that the Adviser and its affiliates has determined is reflective of rates in the applicable market and certain similar markets, though not necessarily equal to or lower than the median rate of comparable firms) based on its consideration of a number of factors, which are generally expected to include the experience of the Adviser and its affiliates with non-affiliated service providers as well as benchmarking data and other methodologies determined by the Adviser and its affiliates to be appropriate under the circumstances. In respect of benchmarking, while Blackstone often obtains benchmarking data regarding the rates charged or quoted by third parties for services similar to those provided by Blackstone affiliates in the applicable market or certain similar markets, relevant comparisons may not be available for a number of reasons, including, without limitation, as a result of a lack of a substantial market of providers or users of such services or the confidential or bespoke nature of such services (e.g., within property management services, different assets may receive different property management services). In addition, benchmarking data is based on general market and broad industry overviews, rather than determined on an asset by asset basis. As a result, benchmarking data does not take into account specific characteristics of individual assets then owned or to be acquired (such as location or size), or the particular characteristics of services provided. For these reasons, such market comparisons may not result in precise market terms for comparable services. Expenses to obtain benchmarking data will be borne by us or by Other Blackstone Accounts and will not offset the management fee we pay to the Adviser. Finally, in certain circumstances third-party benchmarking may be considered unnecessary, including because the price for a particular good or service is mandated by law (e.g., title insurance in rate regulated states). Some of the services performed by Blackstone-affiliated service providers could also be performed by our sponsor from time to time and vice versa. Fees paid by us to Blackstone-affiliated service providers do not offset or reduce the management fee we pay to the Adviser and are not otherwise shared with us.

For more information regarding our relationships with Blackstone entities providing services to us or our subsidiaries, see “Selected Information Regarding our Operations—Related Party Transactions” in the Prospectus, as well as “Transactions with Related Persons and Certain Control Persons—Our Relationship with Our Adviser and Blackstone—Affiliate Service Agreements” in our definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, and “Related Party Transactions” in the notes to our consolidated financial statements appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, each as incorporated herein by reference.

Blackstone and Other Blackstone Accounts operate in multiple industries, including the real estate related information technology industry, and provide products and services to or otherwise contract with us, among others. In connection with any such investment,

Blackstone and Other Blackstone Accounts (or their respective portfolio entities and personnel and related parties) can be expected to make referrals or introductions to us or other portfolio entities in an effort, in part, to increase the customer base of such companies or businesses or because such referrals or introductions will, in certain circumstances, result in financial benefits, such as cash payments, additional equity ownership, participation in revenue share, accruing to the party making the introduction. In the alternative, Blackstone may form a joint venture (or other business relationship) with such a portfolio entity to implement such arrangements, pursuant to which the joint venture or business provides services (including, without limitation, corporate support services, loan management services, management services, operational services, risk management services, data management services, consulting services, brokerage services, insurance procurement, placement, brokerage and consulting services, and other services to such portfolio entities) that are referred to the joint venture or business by Blackstone. Such joint venture or business could use data obtained from such portfolio entities. We typically will not share in any fees, economics, equity or other benefits accruing to Blackstone, Other Blackstone Accounts and their respective portfolio entities as a result of such introduction.

We will enter into agreements regarding group procurement (such as CoreTrust, an independent group purchasing organization), benefits management, purchase of title and other insurance policies (which can be expected to include brokerage or placement thereof) and will otherwise enter into operational, administrative or management related initiatives. Blackstone will allocate the cost of these various services and products purchased on a group basis among us, Other Blackstone Accounts and portfolio entities. Some of these arrangements result in commissions, discounts, rebates or similar payments to Blackstone and its personnel, or Other Blackstone Accounts and their portfolio entities, including as a result of transactions entered into by us, and such commissions or payment will not offset the management fee payable to the Adviser. Blackstone can be expected to also receive consulting, usage or other fees from the parties to these group procurement arrangements. To the extent that a portfolio entity of an Other Blackstone Account is providing such a service, such portfolio entity and such Other Blackstone Account will benefit. Further, the benefits received by the particular portfolio entity providing the service will, in certain circumstances, be greater than those received by us in receiving the service. Conflicts exist in the allocation of the costs and benefits of these arrangements.

We will purchase or bear premiums, fees, costs and expenses (including any expenses or fees of insurance brokers) to insure us, our portfolio properties, the Adviser, Blackstone and their respective directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives and other indemnified parties, against liability in connection with our activities. This includes a portion of any premiums, fees, costs and expenses for one or more “umbrella”, group or other insurance policies maintained by Blackstone that cover one or more of us and Other Blackstone Accounts, the Adviser and Blackstone (including their respective directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives and other indemnified parties). The Adviser and its affiliates will make judgments about the allocation of premiums, fees, costs and expenses for such “umbrella”, group or other insurance policies among one or more of us and Other Blackstone Accounts, the Adviser and Blackstone on a fair and reasonable basis, in their discretion, and may make corrective allocations should they determine subsequently that such corrections are necessary or advisable. For example, some property insurance could be allocated on a property-by-property basis in accordance with the relative values of the respective assets that are insured by such policies.

Additionally, we and Other Blackstone Accounts (and their portfolio entities) will, in certain circumstances, jointly contribute to a pool of funds that can be expected to be used to pay losses that are subject to the deductibles on any group insurance policies, which contributions may similarly be allocated in accordance with the relative values of the respective assets that are insured by such policies (or other factors that Blackstone may reasonably determine).

In respect of such insurance arrangements, Blackstone may make corrective allocations from time to time should it determine subsequently that such adjustments are necessary or advisable.

We and Other Blackstone Accounts have self-insured through a captive insurance company (the “captive”) owned entirely by its participants (including us and such Other Blackstone Accounts). This arrangement is expected to provide us with greater control over our insurance program and reduce overall costs of insurance through lower premiums and reduction or elimination of insurance brokerage costs. An affiliate of our sponsor manages the captive, oversees its operations and service providers, provides a guarantee for a letter of credit to help capitalize it and receives a fee based on a percentage of the premiums (subject to the benchmarking process described above). A third-party insurance services firm will provide brokerage, administration and insurer management services. The fees and expenses of the captive, including insurance premiums and fees paid to its manager, will be borne by us and Other Blackstone Accounts pro rata based on estimates of insurance premiums that would have been payable for each party’s respective properties, as benchmarked by third parties, and will be paid by each participant annually. While we do not expect to provide any funding in addition to such annual contribution, it is possible that each member of the captive, including us, is required to make additional capital contributions in certain circumstances. While the captive is expected to be beneficial to us, there can be no assurance that different allocations or arrangements than those described above would not result in us and our portfolio properties bearing less (or more) premiums, deductibles, fees, costs and expenses for insurance policies relative to Other Blackstone Accounts or otherwise.

Blackstone or an affiliate of Blackstone formed in the future may provide data management services to portfolio properties and may also provide such services directly to us and Other Blackstone Accounts (collectively, “Data Holders”). Such services may include assistance with obtaining, analyzing, curating, processing, packaging, organizing, mapping, holding, transforming, enhancing, marketing and selling such data (among other related data management and consulting services) for monetization through licensing or sale arrangements with third parties and, subject to the requirements under our charter (including any necessary approval of by our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors not interested in the transaction) and any other applicable contractual limitations, with us, Other Blackstone Accounts, portfolio properties and other Blackstone affiliates and associated entities (including funds in which Blackstone and Other Blackstone Accounts make investments, and portfolio entities thereof). Where Blackstone believes appropriate, data from one Data Holder may be pooled with data from other Data Holders. Any revenues arising from such pooled data sets would be allocated between applicable Data Holders on a fair and reasonable basis as determined by the Blackstone in its discretion, with Blackstone able to make corrective allocations should it determine subsequently that such corrections were necessary or advisable. Blackstone is expected to receive compensation for such data management services, which may include a percentage of the revenues generated through any licensing or sale arrangements with respect to the relevant data, and which compensation is also expected to include fees, royalties and cost and expense reimbursement (including start-up costs and allocable overhead associated with personnel working on relevant matters (including salaries, benefits and other similar expenses)). Additionally, Blackstone is also expected to determine to share the products from such data management services within Blackstone or its affiliates (including Other Blackstone Accounts or their portfolio entities) at no charge and, in such cases, the Data Holders may not receive any financial or other benefit from having provided such data to Blackstone. The potential receipt of such compensation by Blackstone may create incentives for the Adviser to cause us to invest in portfolio entities with a significant amount of data that it might not otherwise have invested in or on terms less favorable than it otherwise would have sought to obtain.

We may be subject to potential conflicts of interest as a consequence of family relationships that Blackstone employees have with other real estate professionals.

Additionally, certain personnel and other professionals of Blackstone have family members or relatives that are actively involved in industries and sectors in which we invest or have business, personal, financial or other relationships with companies in such industries and sectors (including the advisors and service providers described above) or other industries, which gives rise to potential or actual conflicts of interest. For example, such family members or relatives might be officers, directors, personnel or owners of companies or assets which are actual or potential investments of us or our other counterparties and portfolio properties. Moreover, in certain instances, we can be expected to purchase or sell companies or assets from or to, or otherwise transact with, companies that are owned by such family members or relatives or in respect of which such family members or relatives have other involvement. In most such circumstances, we will not be precluded from undertaking any of these investment activities or transactions. To the extent Blackstone determines appropriate, conflict mitigation strategies may be put in place with respect to a particular circumstance, such as internal information barriers or recusal, disclosure or other steps determined appropriate by the Adviser.

Certain properties owned by us and/or an Other Blackstone Account will, in certain circumstances, be leased out to tenants that are affiliates of Blackstone, including but not limited to Other Blackstone Accounts and/or their respective portfolio companies, which would give rise to a conflict of interest. In such events, the Adviser will endeavor to ensure that such conflicts are resolved in a fair and equitable manner, subject to applicable oversight of the board of directors.

We have entered into an uncommitted line of credit with Blackstone Holdings Finance Co. L.L.C., an affiliate of Blackstone, pursuant to which we may borrow up to $100.0 million at an interest rate equal to the then-current interest rate offered by an unaffiliated third-party lender or, if no such rate is available, LIBOR plus 2.50%. Because this line of credit is with an affiliate of Blackstone, the terms of the agreement were not negotiated at arm’s-length. Blackstone may face conflicts of interest in connection with any borrowings or disputes under this uncommitted line of credit.

The personnel of the Dealer Manager and the Adviser may trade in securities for their own accounts, subject to restrictions applicable to Blackstone personnel.

The officers, directors, members, managers and employees of the Dealer Manager and the Adviser can be expected to trade in securities and make personal investments for their own accounts, subject to restrictions and reporting requirements as may be required by law and Blackstone policies, or otherwise determined from time to time by the Dealer Manager or the Adviser. Such personal securities transactions and investments will, in certain circumstances, result in conflicts of interest, including to the extent they relate to (i) a company in which we hold or acquire an interest (either directly through a privately negotiated investment or indirectly

through the purchase of securities or other traded instruments related thereto) and (ii) entities that have interests which are adverse to ours or pursue similar investment opportunities as us.

We have and continue to expect to have a diverse stockholder group and the interests of our stockholders may conflict with one another and may conflict with the interests of investors in other vehicles that we co-invest with.

Our stockholders may have conflicting investment, tax and other interests with respect to their investments in us and with respect to the interests of investors in other investment vehicles managed or advised by the Adviser or its affiliates that participate in the same investments as us. The conflicting interests of individual stockholders with respect to other stockholders and relative to investors in other investment vehicles and investors relate to, among other things, the nature, structuring, financing, tax profile and timing of disposition of investments. In certain circumstances, we may provide financing, guarantees, enter into currency or derivative transactions or other similar arrangements for access funds primarily created to hold shares of our common stock, including in order to support currency hedging programs at such access funds. These arrangements may cause us to use our funds for such arrangements as opposed to alternative uses and could expose us to certain risks. The Adviser may as a result have conflicts in making these decisions, which may be more beneficial for one or more (but not all) stockholder than for other stockholders. In addition, we may make investments that may have a negative impact on related investments made by the stockholders in separate transactions. In selecting and structuring investments appropriate for us, the Adviser considers the investment, tax and other objectives of us (including our qualification as a REIT) and our stockholders (and those of investors in other investment vehicles managed or advised by the Adviser or its affiliates) that participate in the same investments as us, not the investment, tax or other objectives of any stockholder individually. In addition, certain investors may also be limited partners in Other Blackstone Accounts, including supplemental capital vehicles and co-investment vehicles that invest alongside us in one or more investments, which could create conflicts for the Adviser in the treatment of different investors.

Stockholders may also include affiliates of Blackstone, such as Other Blackstone Accounts, affiliates of portfolio entities, charities or foundations associated with Blackstone personnel and current or former Blackstone personnel, Blackstone’s senior advisors and operating partners, and any such affiliates, funds or persons may also invest in us. Except as provided in our charter, all of these Blackstone-related stockholders will have equivalent rights to vote and withhold consents as nonrelated stockholders. Nonetheless, Blackstone may have the ability to influence, directly or indirectly, these Blackstone-related stockholders.

We may be subject to additional potential conflicts of interests as a consequence of Blackstone’s status as a public company.

As a consequence of Blackstone’s status as a public company, our officers, directors, members, managers and employees and those of the Adviser may take into account certain considerations and other factors in connection with the management of the business and affairs of us and our affiliates that would not necessarily be taken into account if Blackstone were not a public company.

We, Other Blackstone Accounts and their portfolio entities may engage in permissible political activities with the intent of furthering our or their business interests or otherwise.

We, Other Blackstone Accounts and their portfolio entities may, in the ordinary course of our or their respective businesses, make political contributions to elected officials, candidates for elected office or political organizations, hire lobbyists or engage in other permissible political activities with the intent of furthering our or their business interests or otherwise. In certain circumstances, there may be initiatives where such activities are coordinated by Blackstone for the benefit of us, Other Blackstone Accounts and/or their portfolio entities. The interests advanced by a portfolio entity through such activities may, in certain circumstances, not align with or be adverse to our interests, the interests of our stockholders or the interests of Other Blackstone Accounts or their other portfolio entities. The costs of such activities may be allocated among us, Other Blackstone Accounts and their portfolio entities (and borne indirectly by our stockholders). While the costs of such activities will typically be borne by the entity undertaking such activities, such activities may also directly or indirectly benefit us, Other Blackstone Accounts, their portfolio entities or Blackstone. There can be no assurance that any such activities will be successful in advancing our interests or the interests of an Other Blackstone Accounts or a portfolio entity or otherwise benefit such entities.

If we do not maintain our qualification as a REIT, we will be subject to tax as a regular corporation and could face a substantial tax liability.

We expect to continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code. However, qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which only a limited number of judicial or administrative interpretations exist. Notwithstanding the availability of cure provisions in the Code, various compliance requirements could be failed, which could

jeopardize our REIT status. Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any tax year, then:

To maintain our REIT status, we may have to borrow funds on a short-term basis during unfavorable market conditions.

To qualify as a REIT, we generally must distribute annually to our stockholders a minimum of 90% of our net taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends-paid deduction and excluding net capital gains. We will be subject to regular corporate income taxes on any undistributed REIT taxable income each year. Additionally, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions paid by us in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from previous years. Payments we make to our stockholders under our share repurchase plan will not be taken into account for purposes of these distribution requirements. If we do not have sufficient cash to make distributions necessary to preserve our REIT status for any year or to avoid taxation, we may be forced to borrow funds or sell assets even if the market conditions at that time are not favorable for these borrowings or sales. These options could increase our costs or reduce our equity.

Compliance with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities, which may hinder or delay our ability to meet our investment objectives and reduce your overall return.

To qualify as a REIT, we are required at all times to satisfy tests relating to, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the ownership of our stock and the amounts we distribute to our stockholders. Compliance with the REIT requirements may impair our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits. For example, we may be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution.

Compliance with REIT requirements may force us to liquidate or restructure otherwise attractive investments.

To qualify as a REIT, at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets must consist of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified real estate assets. The remainder of our investments in securities (other than qualified real estate assets and government securities) generally cannot include more than 10% of the voting securities (other than securities that qualify for the straight debt safe harbor) of any one issuer or more than 10% of the value of the outstanding securities of more than any one issuer unless we and such issuer jointly elect for such issuer to be treated as a “taxable REIT subsidiary” under the Code. Debt will generally meet the “straight debt” safe harbor if the debt is a written unconditional promise to pay on demand or on a specified date a certain sum of money, the debt is not convertible, directly or indirectly, into stock, and the interest rate and the interest payment dates of the debt are not contingent on the profits, the borrower’s discretion, or similar factors. Additionally, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 20% of the value of our assets may be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must dispose of a portion of our assets within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions in order to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. In order to satisfy these requirements and maintain our qualification as a REIT, we may be forced to liquidate assets from our portfolio or not make otherwise attractive investments. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.

Our charter does not permit any person or group to own more than 9.9% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our outstanding common stock or of our outstanding capital stock of all classes or series, and attempts to acquire our common stock or our capital stock of all other classes or series in excess of these 9.9% limits would not be effective without an exemption (prospectively or retroactively) from these limits by our board of directors.

For us to qualify as a REIT under the Code, not more than 50% of the value of our outstanding stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (including certain entities treated as individuals for this purpose) during the last half of a taxable year. For the purpose of assisting our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, among other purposes, our charter prohibits beneficial or constructive ownership by any person or group of more than 9.9%, in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of our outstanding common stock, or 9.9% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our outstanding capital stock of all classes or series, which we refer to as the “Ownership Limit.” The constructive ownership rules under the Code and our charter are complex and may cause shares of the outstanding common stock owned by a group of related persons to be deemed to be constructively owned by one person. As a result, the acquisition of less than 9.9% of our outstanding common stock or our capital stock by a person could cause another person to constructively own in excess of 9.9% of our outstanding common stock or our capital stock, respectively, and thus violate the Ownership Limit. There can be no assurance that our board of directors, as permitted in the charter, will not decrease this Ownership Limit in the future. Any attempt to own or transfer shares of our common stock or capital stock in excess of the Ownership Limit without the consent of our board of directors will result either in the shares in excess of the limit being transferred by operation of our charter to a charitable trust, and the person who attempted to acquire such excess shares not having any rights in such excess shares, or in the transfer being void.

The Ownership Limit may have the effect of precluding a change in control of us by a third party, even if such change in control would be in the best interests of our stockholders or would result in receipt of a premium to the price of our common stock (and even if such change in control would not reasonably jeopardize our REIT status).

The exemptions to the ownership limit granted to date may limit our board of directors’ power to increase the ownership limit or grant further exemptions in the future.

Non-U.S. holders may be subject to U.S. federal income tax upon their disposition of shares of our common stock or upon their receipt of certain distributions from us.

In addition to any potential withholding tax on ordinary dividends, a non-U.S. holder (as such term is defined below under “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of U.S. Holders of Our Common Stock” in the Prospectus), other than a “qualified shareholder” or a “qualified foreign pension fund,” that disposes of a “U.S. real property interest” (“USRPI”) (which includes shares of stock of a U.S. corporation whose assets consist principally of USRPIs), is generally subject to U.S. federal income tax under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980, as amended (“FIRPTA”), on the amount received from such disposition. Such tax does not apply, however, to the disposition of stock in a REIT that is “domestically controlled.” Generally, a REIT is domestically controlled if less than 50% of its stock, by value, has been owned directly or indirectly by non-U.S. persons during a continuous five-year period ending on the date of disposition or, if shorter, during the entire period of the REIT’s existence. We cannot assure you that we will qualify as a domestically controlled REIT. If we were to fail to so qualify, amounts received by a non-U.S. holder on certain dispositions of shares of our common stock (including a redemption) would be subject to tax under FIRPTA, unless (i) our shares of common stock were regularly traded on an established securities market and (ii) the non-U.S. holder did not, at any time during a specified testing period, hold more than 10% of our common stock. See “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders of Our Common Stock—Sales of Our Common Stock” in the Prospectus.

A non-U.S. holder other than a “qualified shareholder” or a “qualified foreign pension fund,” that receives a distribution from a REIT that is attributable to gains from the disposition of a USRPI as described above, including in connection with a repurchase of our common stock, is generally subject to U.S. federal income tax under FIRPTA to the extent such distribution is attributable to gains from such disposition, regardless of whether the difference between the fair market value and the tax basis of the USRPI giving rise to such gains is attributable to periods prior to or during such non-U.S. holder’s ownership of our common stock. In addition, a repurchase of our common stock, to the extent not treated as a sale or exchange, may be subject to withholding as an ordinary dividend. See “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations – Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders of Our Common Stock – Distributions, and – Repurchases of our Common Stock” in the Prospectus.

We seek to act in the best interests of the Company as a whole and not in consideration of the particular tax consequences to any specific holder of our stock. Potential non-U.S. holders should inform themselves as to the U.S. tax consequences, and the tax consequences within the countries of their citizenship, residence, domicile, and place of business, with respect to the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock.

Investments outside the United States may subject us to additional taxes and could present additional complications to our ability to satisfy the REIT qualification requirements.

Non-U.S. investments may subject us to various non-U.S. tax liabilities, including withholding taxes. In addition, operating in functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar and in environments in which real estate transactions are typically structured differently than they are in the United States or are subject to different legal rules may present complications to our ability to structure non-U.S. investments in a manner that enables us to satisfy the REIT qualification requirements.

We may incur tax liabilities that would reduce our cash available for distribution to you.

Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we may become subject to U.S. federal income taxes and related state and local taxes. For example, net income from the sale of properties that are “dealer” properties sold by a REIT (a “prohibited transaction” under the Code) will be subject to a 100% tax. We may not make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes applicable to REITs. Similarly, if we were to fail an income test (and did not lose our REIT status because such failure was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect) we would be subject to tax on the income that does not meet the income test requirements. We also may decide to retain net capital gain we earn from the sale or other disposition of our investments and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability unless they file U.S. federal income tax returns and thereon seek a refund of such tax. We also may be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, including franchise, payroll, mortgage recording and transfer taxes, either directly or at the level of the other companies through which we indirectly own our assets, such as our taxable REIT subsidiaries, which are subject to full U.S. federal, state, local and foreign corporate-level income taxes. Any taxes we pay directly or indirectly will reduce our cash available for distribution to you.

Our board of directors is authorized to revoke our REIT election without stockholder approval, which may cause adverse consequences to our stockholders.

Our charter authorizes our board of directors to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if it determines that changes to U.S. federal income tax laws and regulations or other considerations mean it is no longer in our best interests to qualify as a REIT. Our board of directors has fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders and could only cause such changes in our tax treatment if it determines in good faith that such changes are in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders. In this event, we would become subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income and we would no longer be required to distribute most of our net income to our stockholders, which may cause a reduction in the total return to our stockholders.

You may have current tax liability on distributions you elect to reinvest in our common stock.

If you participate in our distribution reinvestment plan, you will be deemed to have received, and for U.S. federal income tax purposes will be taxed on, the amount reinvested in shares of our common stock to the extent the amount reinvested was not a tax-free return of capital. Therefore, unless you are a tax-exempt entity, you may be forced to use funds from other sources to pay your tax liability on the reinvested dividends.

Generally, ordinary dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for reduced U.S. federal income tax rates.

Currently, the maximum tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income payable to certain non-corporate U.S. stockholders is 20%. Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rate. Although this does not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends payable by REITs, the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause certain non-corporate investors to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including our common stock. However, under the Tax Reform Bill, commencing with taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2018 and continuing through 2025, individual taxpayers may be entitled to claim a deduction in determining their taxable income of 20% of ordinary REIT dividends (dividends other than capital gain dividends and dividends attributable to certain qualified dividend income received by us), which temporarily reduces the effective tax rate on such dividends. See “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of U.S. Holders of Our Common Stock—Distributions Generally” in the Prospectus. You are urged to consult with your tax advisor regarding the effect of this change on your effective tax rate with respect to REIT dividends.

We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could increase our tax liability, reduce our operating flexibility and reduce the price of our common stock.

In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in shares of our common stock.

Additional changes to the tax laws are likely to continue to occur, and we cannot assure you that any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of our stockholders. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets. You are urged to consult with your tax advisor with respect to the impact of the recent legislation on your investment in our shares and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our shares. Although REITs generally receive certain tax advantages compared to entities taxed as regular corporations, it is possible that future legislation would result in a REIT having fewer tax advantages, and it could become more advantageous for a company that invests in real estate to elect to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a corporation. As a result, our charter authorizes our board of directors to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if it determines that changes to U.S. federal income tax laws and regulations or other considerations mean it is no longer in our best interests to qualify as a REIT. The impact of tax reform on an investment in our shares is uncertain. Prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding changes in tax laws.

The failure of a mezzanine loan to qualify as a real estate asset could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.

We may acquire mezzanine loans, for which the IRS has provided a safe harbor but not rules of substantive law. Pursuant to the safe harbor, if a mezzanine loan meets certain requirements, it will be treated by the IRS as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, and interest derived from the mezzanine loan will be treated as qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the REIT 75% income test. We may acquire mezzanine loans that do not meet all of the requirements of this safe harbor. In the event we own a mezzanine loan that does not meet the safe harbor, the IRS could challenge such loan’s treatment as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset and income tests and, if such a challenge were sustained, we could fail to qualify as a REIT.

If our Operating Partnership failed to qualify as a partnership or is not otherwise disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we would cease to qualify as a REIT.

If the IRS were to successfully challenge the status of our Operating Partnership as a partnership or disregarded entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes, it would be taxable as a corporation. In the event that this occurs, it would reduce the amount of distributions that our Operating Partnership could make to us. This would also result in our failing to qualify as a REIT and becoming subject to a corporate-level tax on our income, which would substantially reduce our cash available to pay distributions and the yield on your investment.

If the fiduciary of an employee benefit plan subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or ERISA, fails to meet the fiduciary and other standards under ERISA, the Code or common law as a result of an investment in our stock, the fiduciary could be subject to civil penalties.

There are special considerations that apply to investing in our shares on behalf of a trust, pension, profit sharing or 401(k) plans, health or welfare plans, trusts, individual retirement accounts, or IRAs, or Keogh plans. If you are investing the assets of any of the entities identified in the prior sentence in our common stock, you should satisfy yourself that:

Failure to satisfy the fiduciary standards of conduct and other applicable requirements of ERISA, the Code, or other applicable statutory or common law may result in the imposition of civil penalties, and can subject the fiduciary to equitable remedies. In addition, if an investment in our shares constitutes a non-exempt prohibited transaction under Title I of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code, the fiduciary that authorized or directed the investment may be subject to the imposition of excise taxes with respect to the amount invested.

If our assets at any time are deemed to constitute “plan assets” under ERISA, that may lead to the rescission of certain transactions, tax or fiduciary liability and our being held in violation of certain ERISA and Code requirements.

Stockholders subject to ERISA should consult their own advisors as to the effect of ERISA on an investment in the shares. As discussed under “Certain ERISA Considerations,” if our assets are deemed to constitute “plan assets” of stockholders that are Covered Plans (as defined below) (i) certain transactions that we might enter into in the ordinary course of our business might have to be rescinded and may give rise to certain excise taxes and fiduciary liability under Title I of ERISA and/or Section 4975 of the Code; (ii) our management, as well as various providers of fiduciary or other services to us (including the Adviser), and any other parties with authority or control with respect to us or our assets, may be considered fiduciaries or otherwise parties in interest or disqualified persons for purposes of the fiduciary responsibility and prohibited transaction provisions of Title I of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code; and (iii) the fiduciaries of stockholders that are Covered Plans would not be protected from “co-fiduciary liability” resulting from our decisions and could be in violation of certain ERISA requirements.

Accordingly, prospective investors that are (i) “employee benefit plans” (within the meaning of Section 3(3) of ERISA), which are subject to Title I of ERISA; (ii) “plans” defined in Section 4975 of the Code, which are subject to Section 4975 of the Code (including “Keogh” plans and “individual retirement accounts”); or (iii) entities whose underlying assets are deemed to include plan assets within the meaning of Section 3(42) of ERISA and the regulations thereunder (e.g., an entity of which 25% or more of the total value of any class of equity interests is held by “benefit plan investors”) (each such plan, account and entity described in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) we refer to as “Covered Plans”) should consult with their own legal, tax, financial and other advisors prior to investing to review these implications in light of such investor’s particular circumstances. The sale of our common stock to any Covered Plan is in no respect a representation by us or any other person associated with the offering of our shares of common stock that such an investment meets all relevant legal requirements with respect to investments by plans generally or any particular plan, or that such an investment is appropriate for plans generally or any particular plan.

We depend on the availability of public utilities and services, especially for water and electric power. Any reduction, interruption or cancellation of these services may adversely affect us.

Public utilities, especially those that provide water and electric power, are fundamental for the sound operation of our assets. The delayed delivery or any material reduction or prolonged interruption of these services could allow tenants to terminate their leases or result in an increase in our costs, as we may be forced to use backup generators or other replacements for the reduced or interrupted utilities, which also could be insufficient to fully operate our facilities and could result in our inability to provide services.

A license, approval or permit may be required to acquire certain investments and their direct or indirect holding companies (or registration may be required before an acquisition can be completed). There can be no guarantee of when and if such a license, approval or permit will be obtained or if the registration will be effected.

Investments are usually governed by a complex series of legal documents and contracts. As a result, the risk of dispute over interpretation or enforceability of the documentation may be higher than for other investments. In addition, it is not uncommon for investments to be exposed to a variety of other legal risks. These can include, but are not limited to, environmental issues, land expropriation and other property-related claims, industrial action and legal action from special interest groups.

Our use of short sales for investment and/or risk management purposes subjects us to risks associated with selling short. We may engage in short sales where we do not own or have the right to acquire the security sold short at no additional cost. Our loss on a short sale theoretically could be unlimited in a case where we are unable, for whatever reason, to close out a short position.

Our short selling strategies may limit our ability to benefit from increases in the markets. Short selling also involves a form of financial leverage that may exaggerate any losses. Also, there is the risk that the counterparty to a short sale may fail to honor its contractual terms, causing a loss to us. Finally, SEC, FINRA or other regulations relating to short selling may restrict our ability to engage in short selling.

We may incur contingent liabilities in connection with the disposition of investments.

In connection with the disposition of an investment, we may be required to make certain representations about the business, financial affairs and other aspects (such as environmental, property, tax, insurance, and litigation) of such investment typical of those made in connection with the sale of a business or other investment comparable to the investment being sold. We may also be required to indemnify the purchasers of such investment to the extent that any such representations are inaccurate or with respect to certain potential liabilities. These arrangements may result in the incurrence of contingent liabilities for which the Adviser may establish reserves or escrow accounts.

We may utilize a wide variety of derivative and other hedging instruments for risk management purposes, the use of which is a highly specialized activity that may entail greater than ordinary investment risks. Any such derivatives and other hedging transactions may not be effective in mitigating risk in all market conditions or against all types of risk (including unidentified or unanticipated risks), thereby resulting in losses to us. Engaging in derivatives and other hedging transactions may result in a poorer overall performance for us than if we had not engaged in any such transaction, and the Adviser may not be able to effectively hedge against, or accurately anticipate, certain risks that may adversely affect our investment portfolio. In addition, our investment portfolio will always be exposed to certain risks that cannot be fully or effectively hedged, such as credit risk relating both to particular securities and counterparties as well as interest rate risks. See “—We invest in derivatives, which involve numerous risks” above.

For an overview of our real estate investments, see Item 7 — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Portfolio.”

Our principal executive and administrative offices are located in leased space at 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154. We consider these facilities to be suitable and adequate for the management and operations of our business.

From time to time, we may be involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. As of December 31, 2020, we were not involved in any material legal proceedings.

The Offering consists of four classes of shares of our common stock, Class S shares, Class I shares, Class T shares, and Class D shares. The share classes have different upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees, and different ongoing stockholder servicing fees. Other than the differences in upfront selling commissions, dealer manager fees, and ongoing stockholder servicing fees, each class of common stock has the same economics and voting rights. Shares of our common stock are not listed for trading on a stock exchange or other securities market and there is no established public trading market for our common stock. As of March 17, 2021 there were 62,668 holders of record of our Class S common stock, 25,467 holders of record of our Class I common stock, 9,341 holders of record of our Class T common stock and 14,628 holders of record of our Class D common stock. This does not include the number of stockholders that hold shares in “street name” through banks or broker-dealers. The following table details the selling commissions, dealer manager fees, and stockholder servicing fees for each applicable share class as of December 31, 2020:

For Class S shares sold in the Offering (other than as part of our distribution reinvestment plan), investors will pay upfront selling commissions of up to 3.5% of the transaction price. For Class T shares sold in the Offering (other than as part of our distribution reinvestment plan), investors will pay upfront selling commissions of up to 3.0% of the transaction price and upfront dealer manager fees of 0.5% of the transaction price, however such amounts may vary at certain participating broker-dealers, provided that the sum will not exceed 3.5% of the transaction price. For Class D shares sold in the Offering (other than as part of our distribution reinvestment plan), investors will pay upfront selling commissions of up to 1.5% of the transaction price.

The Dealer Manager, a registered broker-dealer affiliated with the Adviser, serves as the dealer manager for the Offering and is entitled to receive stockholder servicing fees of 0.85% per annum of the aggregate NAV for Class S shares and Class T shares. For Class T shares such stockholder servicing fee includes an advisor stockholder servicing fee of 0.65% per annum, and a dealer stockholder servicing fee of 0.20% per annum, of the aggregate NAV for the Class T shares, however, with respect to Class T shares sold through certain participating broker-dealers, the advisor stockholder servicing fee and the dealer stockholder servicing fee may be other amounts, provided that the sum of such fees will always equal 0.85% per annum of the NAV of such shares. For Class D shares, a stockholder servicing fee equal to 0.25% per annum of the aggregate NAV for the Class D shares.

The Dealer Manager anticipates that all or a portion of the upfront selling commissions, dealer manager and stockholder servicing fees will be retained by, or reallowed (paid) to, participating broker-dealers. Through December 31, 2020, the Dealer Manager had not retained any upfront selling commissions, dealer manager or stockholder servicing fees.

The purchase price per share for each class of our common stock will generally equal our prior month’s NAV per share, as determined monthly, plus applicable selling commissions and dealer manager fees. Our NAV for each class of shares is based on the net asset values of our investments (including real estate debt), the addition of any other assets (such as cash on hand) and the deduction of any liabilities, including the allocation/accrual of any performance participation, and any stockholder servicing fees applicable to such class of shares. Please refer to “Net Asset Value Calculation and Valuation Guidelines” in the Prospectus for the Current Offering for further details on how our NAV is determined.

The following table presents our monthly NAV per share for each of the four classes of shares since our inception through December 31, 2020:

	Class S Shares		Class I Shares		Class T Shares		Class D Shares
January 31, 2017	$	10.0000	$	10.0100	$	—	$	—
February 28, 2017		10.0200		10.0300		—		—
March 31, 2017		10.0200		10.0200		—		—
April 30, 2017		10.0455		10.0495		—		—
May 31, 2017		10.1828		10.1868		—		10.1604
June 30, 2017		10.2904		10.2791		10.1721		10.2648
July 31, 2017		10.3173		10.3092		10.2256		10.2603
August 31, 2017		10.4074		10.3997		10.2883		10.3536
September 30, 2017		10.4662		10.4579		10.3239		10.3763
October 31, 2017		10.5060		10.4973		10.3549		10.4114
November 30, 2017		10.5174		10.5094		10.3622		10.4141
December 31, 2017		10.5750		10.5671		10.4175		10.4712
January 31, 2018		10.6339		10.6236		10.4684		10.5217
February 28, 2018		10.6714		10.6602		10.4985		10.5539
March 31, 2018		10.6795		10.6646		10.5050		10.5602
April 30, 2018		10.7134		10.6985		10.5372		10.5928
May 31, 2018		10.7321		10.7158		10.5525		10.6087
June 30, 2018		10.7620		10.7446		10.5802		10.6315
July 31, 2018		10.7959		10.7773		10.6120		10.6633
August 31, 2018		10.8268		10.8064		10.6411		10.6907
September 30, 2018		10.8508		10.8290		10.6629		10.7133
October 31, 2018		10.8806		10.8579		10.6909		10.7417
November 30, 2018		10.8862		10.8625		10.6957		10.7459
December 31, 2018		10.8222		10.7984		10.6318		10.6820
January 31, 2019		10.8756		10.8524		10.6835		10.7359
February 28, 2019		10.9142		10.8906		10.7202		10.7724
March 31, 2019		10.9458		10.9218		10.7502		10.8019
April 30, 2019		10.9756		10.9480		10.7769		10.8304
May 31, 2019		11.0625		11.0350		10.8612		10.9146
June 30, 2019		11.1022		11.0755		10.9007		10.9481
July 31, 2019		11.2241		11.1969		11.0191		11.0660
August 31, 2019		11.3286		11.3030		11.1221		11.1661
September 30, 2019		11.4074		11.3816		11.2000		11.2407
October 31, 2019		11.4263		11.4008		11.2193		11.2588
November 30, 2019		11.4634		11.4379		11.2553		11.2945
December 31, 2019		11.4725		11.4473		11.2642		11.3022
January 31, 2020		11.5029		11.4776		11.2933		11.3311
February 29, 2020		11.4430		11.4183		11.2339		11.2715
March 31, 2020		10.4637		10.4391		10.2709		10.3054
April 30, 2020		10.4825		10.4493		10.2997		10.3487
May 31, 2020		10.5798		10.5464		10.3947		10.4438
June 30, 2020		10.7439		10.7100		10.5557		10.6047
July 31, 2020		10.7800		10.7471		10.5914		10.6392
August 31, 2020		10.9604		10.9271		10.7676		10.8166
September 30, 2020		11.2015		11.1686		11.0048		11.0532
October 31, 2020		11.3607		11.3279		11.1613		11.2028
November 30, 2020		11.4751		11.4424		11.2733		11.3124
December 31, 2020		11.5878		11.5547		11.3847		11.4213

We calculate NAV per share in accordance with the valuation guidelines that have been approved by our board of directors. Our total NAV presented in the following tables includes the NAV of our Class S, Class I, Class T, and Class D common stock, as well as the partnership interests of BREIT OP held by parties other than the Company. The following table provides a breakdown of the major components of our NAV as of December 31, 2020 ($ and shares/units in thousands):

The following table provides a breakdown of our total NAV and NAV per share/unit by class as of December 31, 2020 ($ and shares/units in thousands, except per share/unit data):

Set forth below are the weighted averages of the key assumptions in the discounted cash flow methodology used in the December 31, 2020 valuations, based on property types.

These assumptions are determined by the Adviser and reviewed by our independent valuation advisor. A change in these assumptions would impact the calculation of the value of our property investments. For example, assuming all other factors remain unchanged, the changes listed below would result in the following effects on our investment values:

The following table reconciles stockholders’ equity and BREIT OP Partners’ Capital per our consolidated balance sheet to our NAV ($ in thousands):

The following details the adjustments to reconcile stockholders’ equity and BREIT OP Partners’ Capital to our NAV:

Beginning March 31, 2017, we declared monthly distributions for each class of our common stock, which are generally paid 20 days after month-end. We have paid distributions consecutively each month since such time. Each class of our common stock received the same aggregate gross distribution per share, which was $0.6354 per share for the year ended December 31, 2020. The net distribution varies for each class based on the applicable stockholder servicing fee, which is deducted from the monthly distribution per share and paid directly to the applicable distributor.

The following table details the net distribution for each of our share classes for the year ended December 31, 2020:

For the year ended December 31, 2020, we declared distributions in the amount of $948.0 million. The following table outlines the tax character of our distributions paid in 2020 as a percentage of total distributions. The distribution declared on December 31, 2020 was paid on January 20, 2021 and is excluded from the analysis below as it will be a 2021 tax event.

The following table details the net distribution for each of our share classes for the year ended December 31, 2019:

For the year ended December 31, 2019, we declared distributions in the amount of $433.6 million. The following table outlines the tax character of our distributions paid in 2019 as a percentage of total distributions. The distribution declared on December 31, 2019 was paid on January 22, 2020 and is excluded from the analysis below as it is a 2020 tax event.

The following table details the net distribution for each of our share classes for the year ended December 31, 2018:

For the year ended December 31, 2018, we declared distributions in the amount of $173.9 million. The following table outlines the tax character of our distributions paid in 2018 as a percentage of total distributions. The distribution declared on December 31, 2018 was paid on January 22, 2019 and is excluded from the analysis below as it is a 2019 tax event.

The following table details our distributions declared during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 ($ in thousands):

Funds from Operations, Adjusted Funds from Operations and Funds Available for Distribution

We believe funds from operations (“FFO”) is a meaningful supplemental non-GAAP operating metric. Our consolidated financial statements are presented under historical cost accounting which, among other things, requires depreciation of real estate investments to be calculated on a straight-line basis. As a result, our operating results imply that the value of our real estate investments will decrease evenly over a set time period. However, we believe that the value of real estate investments will fluctuate over time based on market conditions and as such, depreciation under historical cost accounting may be less informative. FFO is a standard REIT industry metric defined by the National Associational of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). FFO, as defined by NAREIT and presented below, is calculated as net income or loss (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”)), excluding (i) depreciation and amortization, (ii) impairment of investments in real estate, plus (iii) net gains or losses from sales of real estate, and (iv) similar adjustments for non-controlling interests and unconsolidated entities.

We also believe that adjusted FFO (“AFFO”) is a meaningful non-GAAP supplemental disclosure of our operating results. AFFO further adjusts FFO in order for our operating results to reflect the specific characteristics of our business by adjusting for items we believe are not related to our core operations. Our adjustments to FFO to arrive at AFFO include removing the impact of (i) straight-line rental income and expense, (ii) amortization of above- and below-market lease intangibles, (iii) amortization of mortgage premium/discount, (iv) unrealized losses (gains) from changes in fair value of financial instruments, (v) net forfeited investment deposits, (vi) amortization of restricted stock awards, (vii) non-cash performance participation allocation or other non-cash incentive compensation awards even if repurchased by us, (viii) gain or loss on involuntary conversion, (ix) losses (gains) on extinguishment of debt, and (x) similar adjustments for non-controlling interests and unconsolidated entities.

We also believe funds available for distribution (“FAD”) is an additional meaningful non-GAAP supplemental disclosure that provides useful information for considering our operating results and certain other items relative to the amount of our distributions by removing the impact of certain non-cash items from our operating results. FAD is calculated as AFFO excluding (i) management fee paid in shares or BREIT OP units even if repurchased by us, (ii) realized losses (gains) on financial instruments, and including deductions for (iii) recurring tenant improvements, leasing commissions, and other capital expenditures, (iv) stockholder servicing fees paid during the period, and (v) similar adjustments for non-controlling interests and unconsolidated entities. FAD is not indicative of cash available to fund our cash needs and does not represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, as it excludes adjustments for working capital items and actual cash receipts from interest income recognized on investments in real estate debt. Cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP would generally be adjusted for such items. Furthermore, FAD is adjusted for stockholder servicing fees and recurring tenant improvements, leasing commissions, and other capital expenditures, which are not considered when determining cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP.

FFO, AFFO, and FAD should not be considered to be more relevant or accurate than the GAAP methodology in calculating net income (loss) or in evaluating our operating performance. In addition, FFO, AFFO, and FAD should not be considered as alternatives to net income (loss) as indications of our performance or as alternatives to cash flows from operating activities as indications of our liquidity, but rather should be reviewed in conjunction with these and other GAAP measurements. Further, FFO, AFFO, and FAD are not intended to be used as liquidity measures indicative of cash flow available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss attributable to BREIT stockholders to FFO, AFFO and FAD attributable to BREIT stockholders ($ in thousands):

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we sold equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act as described below. As described in Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements, the Adviser is entitled to an annual management fee payable monthly in cash, shares of common stock, or BREIT OP Units, in each case at the Adviser's election. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Adviser elected to receive its management fees in Class I shares. We issued 18.5 million unregistered Class I shares to the Adviser in satisfaction of the 2020 management fees through November 2020. Additionally, we issued 1.9 million unregistered Class I shares to the Adviser in January 2021 in satisfaction of the December 2020 management fee.

The Special Limited Partner is also entitled to an annual performance participation allocation. As further described in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, the 2020 performance participation allocation became payable on December 31, 2020 and in January 2021, we issued approximately 15.5 million Class I units and 1.1 million Class B units in BREIT OP to the Special Limited Partner as payment for the 2020 performance participation allocation. Each Class I unit is exchangeable into one Class I share. Each issuance to the Adviser and the Special Limited Partner was made pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

As further described in Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements, we issued incentive compensation awards to certain employees of affiliated portfolio company service providers that entitle them to receive an allocation of total return over a certain hurdle amount, as determined by us. The 2020 portfolio company incentive compensation awards of $1.1 million became payable on December 31, 2020 and in January 2021, we issued approximately 0.1 million Class I units in BREIT OP to certain employees of our

affiliated portfolio companies. The 2019 portfolio company incentive compensation awards of $14.7 million became payable on December 31, 2019 and in January 2020, we issued approximately 1.3 million Class I units in BREIT OP to certain employees of our affiliated portfolio companies.

We have also sold Class I shares to feeder vehicles primarily created to hold Class I shares that offers interests in such feeder vehicles to non-U.S. persons. The offer and sale of Class I shares to the feeder vehicles was exempt from the registration provisions of the Securities Act by virtue of Section 4(a)(2) and Regulation S thereunder. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we received $3.8 billion from selling 334.5 million unregistered Class I shares to such vehicles. We intend to use the net proceeds from such sales for the purposes set forth in the prospectus for our Current Offering and in a manner within the investment guidelines approved by our board of directors, who serve as fiduciaries to our stockholders.

Under our share repurchase plan, to the extent we choose to repurchase shares in any particular month, we will only repurchase shares as of the opening of the last calendar day of that month (each such date, a “Repurchase Date”). Repurchases will be made at the transaction price in effect on the Repurchase Date (which will generally be equal to our prior month’s NAV per share), except that shares that have not been outstanding for at least one year will be repurchased at 95% of the transaction price (an “Early Repurchase Deduction”) subject to certain limited exceptions. Settlements of share repurchases will generally be made within three business days of the Repurchase Date. The Early Repurchase Deduction will not apply to shares acquired through our distribution reinvestment plan.

The aggregate NAV of total repurchases of Class S shares, Class I shares, Class T shares and Class D shares (including repurchases at certain non-U.S. investor access funds primarily created to hold shares of the Company but excluding any Early Repurchase Deduction applicable to the repurchased shares) is limited to no more than 2% of our aggregate NAV per month based on the aggregate NAV of the prior month and no more than 5% of our aggregate NAV per calendar quarter based on the average of the aggregate NAV per month over the prior three months.

In the event that we determine to repurchase some but not all of the shares submitted for repurchase during any month, shares submitted for repurchase during such month will be repurchased on a pro rata basis. All unsatisfied repurchase requests must be resubmitted after the start of the next month or quarter, or upon the recommencement of the share repurchase plan, as applicable.

Should repurchase requests, in our judgment, place an undue burden on our liquidity, adversely affect our operations or risk having an adverse impact on the Company as a whole, or should we otherwise determine that investing our liquid assets in real properties or other investments rather than repurchasing our shares is in the best interests of the Company as a whole, then we may choose to repurchase fewer shares than have been requested to be repurchased, or none at all. Further, our board of directors may modify and suspend our share repurchase plan if it deems such action to be in our best interest and the best interest of our stockholders. In the event that we determine to repurchase some but not all of the shares submitted for repurchase during any month, shares repurchased at the end of the month will be repurchased on a pro rata basis.

If the transaction price for the applicable month is not made available by the tenth business day prior to the last business day of the month (or is changed after such date), then no repurchase requests will be accepted for such month and stockholders who wish to have their shares repurchased the following month must resubmit their repurchase requests.

During the three months ended December 31, 2020, we repurchased shares of our common stock in the following amounts, which represented all of the share repurchase requests received for the same period.

As of December 31, 2020, the Special Limited Partner continues to hold 23,788 Class I units in BREIT OP. The redemption of Class I units, Class B units and shares held by the Adviser acquired as payment of the Adviser’s management fee are not considered part of our share repurchase plan.

The following table sets forth our selected financial and operating data for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017 and for the period March 2, 2016 through December 31, 2016. The following selected consolidated historical financial data should be read in conjunction with the information set forth under Item 7. — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto that appear on pages F-4 to F-38 of this report.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical data, this discussion contains forward-looking statements about our business, operations and financial performance based on current expectations that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those in this discussion as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those discussed in Part I Item 1A — “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

BREIT invests primarily in stabilized income-generating commercial real estate in the United States and, to a lesser extent, real estate debt. Our objective is to bring Blackstone’s leading institutional-quality real estate investment platform to income-focused investors. We are externally managed by BX REIT Advisors L.L.C. (the “Adviser”), a subsidiary of The Blackstone Group Inc. (“Blackstone”). We were incorporated in Maryland in 2015. We are the sole general partner of BREIT Operating Partnership L.P. (“BREIT OP”), a Delaware limited partnership, and we own substantially all of our assets through BREIT OP. We currently operate our business in eight reportable segments: Multifamily, Industrial, Net Lease, Hotel, Self Storage, Retail, and Office Properties, and Investments in Real Estate Debt. Multifamily includes various forms of rental housing including apartments, student housing and manufactured housing. Net Lease includes the real estate assets of The Bellagio Las Vegas (“Bellagio”) and the unconsolidated interest in the MGM Grand and Mandalay Bay joint venture.

BREIT is a non-listed, perpetual life real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that qualifies as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) for U.S. federal income tax. We generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income to the extent we annually distribute all of our net taxable income to stockholders and maintain our qualification as a REIT.

As of December 31, 2020, there is an ongoing global outbreak of a novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”). In March 2020, the World Health Organization designated COVID-19 as a pandemic, and numerous countries, including the United States, declared national emergencies with respect to COVID-19. The United States and other countries reacted to the COVID-19 outbreak with unprecedented government intervention, including interest rate cuts and economic stimulus. The global impact of the outbreak rapidly evolved (and continues to do so), and many countries reacted by instituting, or strongly encouraging, quarantines and restrictions on travel, closing financial markets and/or restricting trading, limiting operations of non-essential offices, retail centers, hotels, and other businesses, and taking other restrictive measures designed to help slow the spread of COVID-19. Businesses also implemented similar precautionary measures. Such measures, as well as the general uncertainty surrounding the dangers and impact of COVID-19, have created disruption in the U.S. and global economies. Despite significant market rebounds across many asset classes, the continued rapid development of this situation and uncertainty regarding potential economic recovery precludes any prediction as to the ultimate adverse impact of COVID-19 on financial market and economic conditions. Moreover, with the continued spread of COVID-19, governments and businesses are likely to continue to take aggressive measures to help slow its spread. For this reason, among others, as COVID-19 continues to spread, the potential impacts, including a global, regional, or other economic recession, are increasingly uncertain and difficult to assess.

The outbreak of COVID-19 and its impact on the current financial, economic and capital markets environment, and future developments in these and other areas present uncertainty and risk with respect to our financial condition and results of operations. We expect that these impacts are likely to continue to some extent as the outbreak persists and potentially even longer. The rapid development and fluidity of this situation preclude any prediction as to the ultimate adverse impact of COVID-19 on economic and market conditions, and, as a result, present material uncertainty and risk with respect to us and the performance of our investments. The full extent of the impact and effects of COVID-19 will depend on future developments, including, among other factors, the duration and spread of the outbreak, along with related travel advisories, quarantines and restrictions, the effectiveness and efficiency of distribution of vaccines, the recovery time of the disrupted supply chains and industries, the impact of labor market interruptions, the impact of government interventions, and uncertainty with respect to the duration of the global economic slowdown. For additional discussion with respect to the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our liquidity and capital resources, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.

In accordance with local government guidance and social distancing recommendations, the majority of the employees of our Adviser have been working remotely. The Adviser’s technology infrastructure has proven to be robust and capable of supporting this model. The Adviser has implemented rigorous protocols for remote work, including increased cadence of group calls and updates, and frequent communication across leadership and working levels. The Adviser is leveraging technology to ensure its teams stay connected and productive, and that its culture remains strong even in these unusual circumstances. The Adviser continues to operate under normal course across investment, asset management and corporate support functions.

In mid-July, the Adviser’s U.S. offices began a phased reopening, consistent with local government guidelines, on a voluntary basis with social distancing and other safety protocols in place. The Adviser continues to closely monitor applicable public health and government guidance.

Beginning in April 2020, rent collections at our real estate assets were impacted by COVID-19. Rent collections for revenue recognized during the period from April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 from real estate properties were an average of 1.6% lower compared to a typical year⁽¹⁾. Based on rent collections and other factors, we reserved $41.2 million of bad debt expense for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Certain of our tenants impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic have requested rental assistance. As a result, we have granted $12.2 million of rent deferral, representing 0.8% of total rental revenue for the period from April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. It is expected that the deferred rent will generally be paid back over a period of three to 12 months. However, it is possible that tenants may not be able to meet their deferred rent obligations. Additionally, we have granted $0.5 million of rent abatements to certain retail tenants for the period from April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020.

Beginning in March 2020 and continuing through the end of the fourth quarter, our hotel segment experienced a material decrease in occupancy, ADR, and RevPAR due to the full closure of our two full-service hotels and our select service property located in Hawaii, along with a material decrease in occupancy at our other select service hotels. These conditions impacted the performance of our hotel assets beginning in March 2020 with the most significant decline in performance during April and May as these hotels remained closed or were impacted by reduced capacity as quarantines and travel restrictions were in place. Although we have begun to see a modest rebound in our hotel portfolio beginning in June 2020 as certain states began easing quarantines and travel restrictions, hotel performance continues to be significantly below historical levels. Our full-service hotels and select service hotel in Hawaii have re-opened but occupancy remains limited. Since the end of the year, we continue to see a modest rebound in our hotel performance. See “—Results of Operations – Same Property Results of Operations”. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded a $12.3 million GAAP impairment loss on two of our hotel properties. The impairment charges align the GAAP carrying value of the hotels with the fair values already recorded within the Net Asset Value. For additional information see “—Portfolio – Impact of COVID-19 – Impairment Analysis” below.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant market pricing and liquidity dislocation in March 2020, causing a broad-based market decline across securities including CMBS. Although our securities recovered the majority of the price declines, the pandemic continues to have an impact on our investments in real estate debt, which consist mostly of single asset, single borrower CMBS with assets and borrowers that the Adviser believes to be of high quality. See “—Results of Operations – Income (Loss) on Investments in Real Estate Debt”.

For additional discussion with respect to the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our NAV and liquidity and capital resources see “—Impact of COVID-19 on Our NAV” and “—Liquidity and Capital Resources” below and Item 1A. “Risk Factors”.

The following chart outlines the allocation of our investments in real estate⁽⁵⁾ and real estate debt based on fair value as of December 31, 2020:

The following charts further describe the diversification of our investments in real estate⁽¹⁾ based on fair value as of December 31, 2020:

Our investments in real estate primarily consisted of the following segments as of December 31, 2020:

As of December 31, 2020, we owned 1,370 properties consisting of a diversified portfolio of income producing assets primarily focused in Multifamily and Industrial properties, and to a lesser extent Net Lease, Hotel, Self Storage, Retail, and Office properties, concentrated in growth markets across the U.S. The following table provides a summary of our portfolio as of December 31, 2020:

The following table provides information regarding our portfolio of real properties as of December 31, 2020:

Segment and Investment	Number of Properties		Location	Acquisition Date	Ownership Interest⁽¹⁾	Sq. Feet (in thousands)/ Units/Keys⁽²⁾	Occupancy Rate⁽³⁾
Multifamily:
TA Multifamily Portfolio		6	Various	April 2017	100%	2,514 units	93%
Emory Point		1	Atlanta, GA	May 2017	100%	750 units	94%
Nevada West Multifamily		3	Las Vegas, NV	May 2017	100%	972 units	95%
Mountain Gate & Trails Multifamily		2	Las Vegas, NV	June 2017	100%	539 units	95%
Elysian West Multifamily		1	Las Vegas, NV	July 2017	100%	466 units	95%
Gilbert Multifamily		2	Gilbert, AZ	Sept. 2017	90%	748 units	96%
Domain & GreenVue Multifamily		2	Dallas, TX	Sept. 2017	100%	803 units	94%
ACG II Multifamily		4	Various	Sept. 2017	94%	932 units	95%
Olympus Multifamily		3	Jacksonville, FL	Nov. 2017	95%	1,032 units	94%
Amberglen West Multifamily		1	Hillsboro, OR	Nov. 2017	100%	396 units	90%
Aston Multifamily Portfolio		19	Various	Various	100%	4,122 units	95%
Talavera and Flamingo Multifamily		2	Las Vegas, NV	Dec. 2017	100%	674 units	96%
Walden Pond & Montair Multifamily Portfolio		2	Everett, WA & Thornton, CO	Dec. 2017	95%	635 units	96%
Signature at Kendall Multifamily		1	Miami, FL	Dec. 2017	100%	546 units	95%
The Boulevard		1	Phoenix, AZ	April 2018	100%	294 units	97%
Blue Hills Multifamily		1	Boston, MA	May 2018	100%	472 units	92%
Wave Multifamily Portfolio		6	Various	May 2018	100%	2,199 units	96%
ACG III Multifamily		2	Gresham, OR & Turlock, CA	May 2018	95%	475 units	94%
Carroll Florida Multifamily		2	Jacksonville & Orlando, FL	May 2018	100%	716 units	95%
Solis at Flamingo		1	Las Vegas, NV	June 2018	95%	524 units	95%
Velaire at Aspera		1	Phoenix, AZ	July 2018	100%	286 units	95%
Coyote Multifamily Portfolio		6	Phoenix, AZ	Aug. 2018	100%	1,752 units	95%
Avanti Apartments		1	Las Vegas, NV	Dec. 2018	100%	414 units	96%
Gilbert Heritage Apartments		1	Phoenix, AZ	Feb. 2019	90%	256 units	97%
Roman Multifamily Portfolio		14	Various	Feb. 2019	100%	3,743 units	95%
Elevation Plaza Del Rio		1	Phoenix, AZ	April 2019	90%	333 units	97%
Courtney at Universal Multifamily		1	Orlando, FL	April 2019	100%	355 units	94%
Citymark Multifamily 2-Pack		2	Various	April 2019	95%	608 units	96%
Tri-Cities Multifamily 2-Pack		2	Richland & Kennewick, WA	April 2019	95%	428 units	98%
Raider Multifamily Portfolio		4	Las Vegas, NV	Various	100%	1,514 units	95%
Bridge II Multifamily Portfolio		6	Various	Various	100%	2,363 units	95%
Miami Doral 2-Pack		2	Miami, FL	May 2019	100%	720 units	94%
Davis Multifamily 2-Pack		2	Various	May 2019	100%	454 units	97%
Slate Savannah		1	Savannah, GA	May 2019	90%	272 units	95%
Amara at MetroWest		1	Orlando, FL	May 2019	95%	411 units	93%
Colorado 3-Pack		3	Denver & Fort Collins, CO	May 2019	100%	855 units	95%
Edge Las Vegas		1	Las Vegas, NV	June 2019	95%	296 units	94%
ACG IV Multifamily		2	Various	June 2019	95%	606 units	96%
Perimeter Multifamily 3-Pack		3	Atlanta, GA	June 2019	100%	691 units	93%
Anson at the Lakes		1	Charlotte, NC	June 2019	100%	694 units	93%
San Valiente Multifamily		1	Phoenix, AZ	July 2019	95%	604 units	95%
Edgewater at the Cove		1	Oregon City, OR	Aug. 2019	100%	244 units	91%
Haven 124 Multifamily		1	Denver, CO	Sept. 2019	100%	562 units	95%
Villages at McCullers Walk Multifamily		1	Raleigh, NC	Oct. 2019	100%	412 units	92%
Canopy at Citrus Park Multifamily		1	Largo, FL	Oct. 2019	90%	318 units	96%
Ridge Multifamily Portfolio		4	Las Vegas, NV	Oct. 2019	90%	1,220 units	96%
Charleston on 66th Multifamily		1	Tampa, FL	Nov. 2019	95%	258 units	95%
Evolve at Timber Creek Multifamily		1	Garner, NC	Nov. 2019	100%	304 units	97%
Solis at Towne Center Multifamily		1	Glendale, AZ	Nov. 2019	100%	240 units	93%
Arches at Hidden Creek Multifamily		1	Chandler, AZ	Nov. 2019	98%	432 units	91%
Terra Multifamily		1	Austin, TX	Dec. 2019	100%	372 units	92%
Arium Multifamily Portfolio		5	Various	Dec. 2019	100%	1,684 units	95%
Easton Gardens Multifamily		1	Columbus, OH	Feb. 2020	95%	1,064 units	96%
Acorn Multifamily Portfolio		21	Various	Feb. & May 2020	98%	8,309 units	94%
Indigo West Multifamily		1	Orlando, FL	March 2020	100%	456 units	92%
The Sixes Multifamily		1	Holly Springs, GA	Sept. 2020	100%	340 units	96%
Park & Market Multifamily		1	Raleigh, NC	Oct. 2020	100%	409 units	93%
Cortland Lex Multifamily		1	Alpharetta, GA	Oct. 2020	100%	360 units	96%
The Palmer Multifamily		1	Charlotte, NC	Oct. 2020	90%	318 units	94%
Grizzly Multifamily Portfolio		2	Atlanta, GA & Nashville, TN	Oct. & Nov. 2020	100%	767 units	69%

Segment and Investment	Number of Properties		Location	Acquisition Date	Ownership Interest⁽¹⁾	Sq. Feet (in thousands)/ Units/Keys⁽²⁾	Occupancy Rate⁽³⁾
Jaguar Multifamily Portfolio		11	Various	Nov. & Dec. 2020	100%	3,788 units	96%
Kansas City Multifamily Portfolio		2	Overland Park & Olathe, Kansas	Dec. 2020	100%	620 units	60%
Highroads MH		3	Phoenix, AZ	April 2018	99%	265 units	95%
Evergreen Minari MH		2	Phoenix, AZ	June 2018	99%	115 units	94%
Southwest MH		14	Various	June 2018	99%	3,065 units	79%
Hidden Springs MH		1	Desert Hot Springs, CA	July 2018	99%	317 units	86%
SVPAC MH		2	Phoenix, AZ	July 2018	99%	234 units	94%
Royal Vegas MH		1	Las Vegas, NV	Oct. 2018	99%	176 units	77%
Riverest MH		1	Tavares, FL	Dec. 2018	99%	130 units	88%
Angler MH Portfolio		5	Phoenix, AZ	April 2019	99%	940 units	86%
Florida MH 4-Pack		4	Various	April & July 2019	99%	795 units	80%
Impala MH		3	Phoenix & Chandler, AZ	July 2019	99%	333 units	98%
Clearwater MHC 2-Pack		2	Clearwater, FL	March & Aug. 2020	99%	207 units	98%
Legacy MH Portfolio		7	Various	April 2020	99%	1,896 units	85%
May Manor MH		1	Lakeland, FL	June 2020	99%	297 units	83%
Royal Oaks MH		1	Petaluma, CA	Nov. 2020	99%	94 units	100%
Southeast MH Portfolio		41	Various	Dec. 2020	99%	8,563 units	87%
EdR Student Housing Portfolio		20	Various	Sept. 2018	95%	10,610 units	91%
Total Multifamily		286				87,978 units

Industrial:
Stockton Industrial Park		1	Stockton, CA	Feb. 2017	100%	878 sq. ft.	86%
HS Industrial Portfolio		36	Various	April 2017	100%	5,838 sq. ft.	97%
Fairfield Industrial Portfolio		11	Fairfield, NJ	Sept. 2017	100%	578 sq. ft.	99%
Southeast Industrial Portfolio		5	Various	Nov. 2017	100%	1,927 sq. ft.	100%
Kraft Chicago Industrial Portfolio		3	Aurora, IL	Jan. 2018	100%	1,693 sq. ft.	100%
Canyon Industrial Portfolio		145	Various	March 2018	100%	21,174 sq. ft.	96%
HP Cold Storage Industrial Portfolio		6	Various	May 2018	100%	2,252 sq. ft.	100%
Meridian Industrial Portfolio		106	Various	Nov. 2018	99%	14,011 sq. ft.	96%
Stockton Distribution Center		1	Stockton, CA	Dec. 2018	100%	987 sq. ft.	100%
Summit Industrial Portfolio		8	Atlanta, GA	Dec. 2018	100%	631 sq. ft.	91%
4500 Westport Drive		1	Harrisburg, PA	Jan. 2019	100%	179 sq. ft.	100%
Morgan Savannah		1	Savannah, GA	April 2019	100%	357 sq. ft.	100%
Minneapolis Industrial Portfolio		34	Minneapolis, MN	April 2019	100%	2,460 sq. ft.	93%
Atlanta Industrial Portfolio		61	Atlanta, GA	May 2019	100%	3,779 sq. ft.	91%
D.C. Powered Shell Warehouse Portfolio		9	Ashburn & Manassas, VA	June 2019	90%	1,471 sq. ft.	100%
Patriot Park Industrial Portfolio		2	Durham, NC	Sept. 2019	100%	323 sq. ft.	100%
Denali Industrial Portfolio		18	Various	Sept. 2019	100%	4,098 sq. ft.	100%
Jupiter 12 Industrial Portfolio		315	Various	Sept. 2019	100%	63,965 sq. ft.	94%
2201 Main Street		1	San Diego, CA	Oct. 2019	100%	260 sq. ft.	N/A
Triangle Industrial Portfolio		37	Greensboro, NC	Jan. 2020	100%	2,783 sq. ft.	91%
Midwest Industrial Portfolio		27	Various	Feb. 2020	100%	5,940 sq. ft.	94%
Pancal Industrial Portfolio		12	Various	Feb. & April 2020	100%	2,109 sq. ft.	100%
Grainger Distribution Center		1	Jacksonville, FL	March 2020	100%	297 sq. ft.	100%
Diamond Industrial		1	Rico Rivera, CA	Aug. 2020	100%	243 sq. ft.	100%
Inland Empire Industrial Portfolio		2	Etiwanda & Fontana, CA	Sept. 2020	100%	404 sq. ft.	100%
Shield Industrial Portfolio		13	Various	Dec. 2020	100%	2,079 sq. ft.	100%
7520 Georgetown Industrial		1	Indianapolis, IN	Dec. 2020	100%	425 sq. ft.	100%
Total Industrial		858				141,141 sq. ft.

Net Lease:
Bellagio Net Lease		1	Las Vegas, NV	Nov. 2019	95%	8,507 sq. ft.	N/A
MGM Grand Net Lease		1	Las Vegas, NV	Feb. 2020	49.9%	6,917 sq. ft.	N/A
Mandalay Bay Net Lease		1	Las Vegas, NV	Feb. 2020	49.9%	9,324 sq. ft.	N/A
Total Net Lease		3				24,748 sq. ft.

Hotel:
Hyatt Place UC Davis		1	Davis, CA	Jan. 2017	100%	127 keys	43%
Hyatt Place San Jose Downtown		1	San Jose, CA	June 2017	100%	240 keys	30%
Florida Select-Service 4-Pack		4	Tampa & Orlando, FL	July 2017	100%	476 keys	46%
Hyatt House Downtown Atlanta		1	Atlanta, GA	Aug. 2017	100%	150 keys	49%
Boston/Worcester Select-Service 3-Pack		3	Boston & Worcester, MA	Oct. 2017	100%	374 keys	45%
Henderson Select-Service 2-Pack		2	Henderson, NV	May 2018	100%	228 keys	56%
Orlando Select-Service 2-Pack		2	Orlando, FL	May 2018	100%	254 keys	49%

Segment and Investment	Number of Properties		Location	Acquisition Date	Ownership Interest⁽¹⁾	Sq. Feet (in thousands)/ Units/Keys⁽²⁾	Occupancy Rate⁽³⁾
Corporex Select Service Portfolio		5	Various	Aug. 2018	100%	601 keys	46%
JW Marriott San Antonio Hill Country Resort		1	San Antonio, TX	Aug. 2018	100%	1,002 keys	29%
Hampton Inn & Suites Federal Way		1	Seattle, WA	Oct. 2018	100%	142 keys	40%
Staybridge Suites Reno		1	Reno, NV	Nov. 2018	100%	94 keys	68%
Salt Lake City Select Service 3 Pack		3	Salt Lake City, UT	Nov. 2018	60%	454 keys	44%
Courtyard Kona		1	Kailua-Kona, HI	March 2019	100%	452 keys	26%
Raven Select Service Portfolio		21	Various	June 2019	100%	2,555 keys	47%
Urban 2-Pack		1	Chicago, IL	July 2019	100%	337 keys	19%
Hyatt Regency Atlanta		1	Atlanta, GA	Sept. 2019	100%	1,260 keys	27%
RHW Select Service Portfolio		9	Various	Nov. 2019	100%	923 keys	58%
Total Hotel		58				9,669 keys

Self Storage:
East Coast Storage Portfolio		21	Various	Aug. 2019	98%	1,347 sq. ft.	93%
Phoenix Storage 2-Pack		2	Phoenix, AZ	March 2020	98%	111 sq. ft.	94%
Cactus Storage Portfolio		18	Various	Sept. & Oct. 2020	98%	1,250 sq. ft.	86%
Caltex Storage Portfolio		4	Various	Nov. & Dec. 2020	98%	273 sq. ft.	86%
Simply Self Storage		102	Various	Dec. 2020	100%	8,588 sq. ft.	89%
Florida Self Storage Portfolio		2	Cocoa & Rockledge, FL	Dec. 2020	98%	158 sq. ft.	69%
Pace Storage Portfolio		1	Pace, FL	Dec. 2020	98%	74 sq. ft.	99%
Total Self Storage		150				11,801 sq. ft.

Retail:
Bakers Centre		1	Philadelphia, PA	March 2017	100%	237 sq. ft.	100%
Plaza Del Sol Retail		1	Burbank, CA	Oct. 2017	100%	166 sq. ft.	100%
Vista Center		1	Miami, FL	Aug. 2018	100%	91 sq. ft.	92%
El Paseo Simi Valley		1	Simi Valley, CA	June 2019	100%	109 sq. ft.	97%
Towne Center East		1	Signal Hill, CA	Sept. 2019	100%	163 sq. ft.	100%
Plaza Pacoima		1	Pacoima, CA	Oct. 2019	100%	204 sq. ft.	100%
Canarsie Plaza		1	Brooklyn, NY	Dec. 2019	100%	274 sq. ft.	98%
SoCal Grocery Portfolio		6	Various	Jan. 2020	100%	689 sq. ft.	92%
Total Retail		13				1,933 sq. ft.

Office:
EmeryTech Office		1	Emeryville, CA	Oct. 2019	100%	228 sq. ft.	95%
Coleman Highline Office		1	San Jose, CA	Oct. 2020	100%	357 sq. ft.	100%
Total Office		2				585 sq. ft.

Total Investments in Real Estate		1,370

Subsequent to December 31, 2020, we acquired an aggregate of $0.4 billion of real estate across four separate transactions, exclusive of closing costs. The acquisitions were related to multifamily and industrial properties.

We review our real estate investments for impairment each quarter or when there is an event or change in circumstances that indicates an impaired value. If the GAAP depreciated cost basis of a real estate investment exceeds the undiscounted cash flows of such real estate investment, the investment is considered impaired and the GAAP depreciated cost basis is reduced to the fair value of the investment. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized impairment charges on a GAAP basis of $12.3 million on two hotel properties within our portfolio. The GAAP impairment charge was a result of updates to the undiscounted cash flow assumptions to account for a decrease in occupancy, future cash flows, and the terminal value as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The impairment charge aligns the GAAP carrying value of the hotels with the fair value already recorded within the Net Asset Value. If the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to adversely impact economic and market conditions or if our expected holding period for assets changes, subsequent tests for impairment could result in additional impairment charges in the future. Certain investments within our portfolio, specifically our hotel assets, are more susceptible to future impairment considerations due to the significant declines in occupancy as a result of extended closures and uncertainty around future cash flows. We can provide no assurance that material impairment charges with respect to our investments in real estate and unconsolidated entities will not occur during future periods. Accordingly, we will continue to monitor circumstances and events in future periods to determine whether any additional impairment charges are warranted.

The following schedule details the expiring leases at our industrial, net lease, retail, and office properties by annualized base rent and square footage as of December 31, 2020 ($ and square feet data in thousands). The table below excludes our multifamily and self storage properties as substantially all leases at such properties expire within 12 months.

The following charts further describe the diversification of our investments in real estate debt by credit rating and collateral type based on fair value as of December 31, 2020:

As of December 31, 2020, our real estate debt consisted of 194 investments in CMBS, 15 investments in RMBS, 10 corporate bond investments and nine real estate loans. The following table details our investments in real estate debt as of December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

Subsequent to December 31, 2020, we purchased an aggregate of $0.2 billion of investments in real estate debt.

The following table sets forth information regarding our consolidated results of operations ($ in thousands):

	For the Year Ended December 31,						2020 vs. 2019
	2020			2019			$
Revenues
Rental revenue	$	2,235,872		$	1,201,613		$	1,034,259
Hotel revenue		248,909			432,892			(183,983	)
Other revenue		66,867			51,767			15,100
Total revenues		2,551,648			1,686,272			865,376
Expenses
Rental property operating		751,779			469,966			281,813
Hotel operating		261,472			304,710			(43,238	)
General and administrative		25,653			18,170			7,483
Management fee		224,776			108,115			116,661
Performance participation allocation		192,648			141,396			51,252
Impairment of investments in real estate		12,343			—			12,343
Depreciation and amortization		1,362,151			824,039			538,112
Total expenses		2,830,822			1,866,396			964,426
Other income (expense)
Income from unconsolidated entities		88,571			—			88,571
Income (loss) from investments in real estate debt		(120,917	)		213,062			(333,979	)
Net gain on dispositions of real estate		113,173			35,035			78,138
Interest income		2,228			3,041			(813	)
Interest expense		(715,159	)		(487,517	)		(227,642	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(10,356	)		—			(10,356	)
Other income (expense)		54,232			2,260			51,972
Total other income (expense)		(588,228	)		(234,119	)		(354,109	)
Net loss	$	(867,402	)	$	(414,243	)	$	(453,159	)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in third party joint ventures	$	2,417		$	5,671		$	(3,254	)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in BREIT OP		11,586			6,801			4,785
Net loss attributable to BREIT stockholders	$	(853,399	)	$	(401,771	)	$	(451,628	)
Net loss per share of common stock — basic and diluted	$	(0.53	)	$	(0.54	)	$	0.01

Due to the significant amount of acquisitions of real estate and real estate debt we have made since December 31, 2019, our revenues and operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 are not comparable. Additionally, as discussed in the recent developments section, our portfolio has been impacted by COVID-19. See below for a discussion of the properties in our portfolio that were owned for the full years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, general and administrative expenses increased $7.5 million compared to the corresponding period in 2019. The increase was primarily due to various corporate level expenses related to the increased size of our portfolio.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the management fee increased $116.7 million compared to the corresponding period in 2019. The increase was primarily due to the growth of our NAV by $7.9 billion from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2020.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the unrealized performance participation allocation increased $51.3 million compared to the corresponding period in 2019. The increase was primarily due to the growth of our NAV. The performance participation allocation is measured annually and any amount earned by the Special Limited Partner becomes payable as of December 31 of the applicable year.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized impairment charges of $12.3 million on two of our hotel properties. We did not recognize any impairment during the corresponding period in 2019. For additional information see “—Portfolio – Impact of COVID-19 – Impairment Analysis” above.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, depreciation and amortization increased $538.1 million compared to the corresponding period in 2019. The increase was driven by the growth in our portfolio, which increased from 1,054 properties as of December 31, 2019 to 1,370 properties as of December 31, 2020.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded $88.6 million of income from unconsolidated entities. We did not have any unconsolidated entities in 2019.

During the year ended December 31 2020, income from our investments in real estate debt decreased $334.0 million compared to the corresponding period in 2019. The decrease was primarily attributable to $269.6 million of unrealized losses and $20.1 million of realized losses during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to $51.5 million of unrealized gains and $7.3 million of realized gains during the corresponding period in 2019. Although we continued to see a recovery in pricing across securities during the second, third and fourth quarters of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant market pricing and liquidity dislocation in March 2020, causing a broad-based market decline impacting the value of certain of our investments in real estate debt.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, net gain on dispositions of real estate increased $78.1 million as compared to the corresponding period in 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded $113.2 million of net gain from the sales of seven multifamily properties, one industrial property and one hotel property, whereas during the year ended December 31, 2019 we recorded $35.0 million of net gain from the disposition of two industrial properties and the sale of the parking garage attached to the Hyatt Place San Jose Downtown.

During the year ended December 31 2020, interest expense increased $227.6 million compared to the corresponding period in 2019. The increase was primarily due to the growth in our portfolio of real estate and investments in real estate debt and the related indebtedness of such investments, which increased from $20.1 billion to $22.3 billion.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, other income (expense) increased $52.0 million compared to the corresponding period in 2019. The increase was primarily due to $28.6 million of unrealized gains on our investments in equity securities, $22.8 million of dividends earned on our investments in equity securities, $15.0 million of realized gains on our investments in equity securities and $8.0 million of income earned from the forfeiture of a deposit on a portfolio of properties whereby the purchase and sale agreement was terminated by the potential buyer, partially offset by a $20.8 million forfeited deposit related to a transaction we decided not to pursue.

Refer to Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 for discussion of our consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, which specific discussion is incorporated herein by reference.

We evaluate our consolidated results of operations on a same property basis, which allows us to analyze our property operating results excluding acquisitions during the periods under comparison. Properties in our portfolio are considered same property if they were owned for the full periods presented, otherwise they are considered non-same property. Recently developed properties that have not achieved stabilized occupancy (defined as 90% or greater for properties other than hotels) and properties held for sale are excluded

from same property results and are considered non-same property. We do not consider our investments in real estate debt segment to be same property.

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, our same property portfolio consisted of 321 industrial, 105 multifamily, 25 hotel, and three retail properties.

Same property operating results are measured by calculating same property net operating income (“NOI”). Same property NOI is a supplemental non-GAAP disclosure of our operating results that we believe is meaningful as it enables management to evaluate the impact of occupancy, rents, leasing activity, and other controllable property operating results at our real estate. We define same property NOI as operating revenues less operating expenses, which exclude (i) impairment of investments in real estate (ii) depreciation and amortization, (iii) interest expense, and (iv) other non-property related revenue and expense items such as (a) general and administrative expenses, (b) management fee, (c) performance participation allocation, (d) affiliate incentive compensation awards, (e) income from unconsolidated entities, (f) income (loss) from investments in real estate debt, (g) net gain on dispositions of real estate, (h) interest income, (i) loss on extinguishment of debt, and (j) other income (expense).

Our same property NOI may not be comparable to that of other REITs and should not be considered to be more relevant or accurate in evaluating our operating performance than the current GAAP methodology used in calculating net income (loss).

The following table reconciles GAAP net loss attributable to BREIT stockholders to same property NOI for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 ($ in thousands):

The following table details the components of same property NOI for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 ($ in thousands):

The following table details hotel and non-hotel same property NOI for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 ($ in thousands):

Same property rental revenue decreased $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to 2019. The decrease was due a $14.8 million increase in our bad debt reserve, primarily as a result of COVID-19, and a $1.2 million decrease in tenant reimbursement income, partially offset by a $14.2 million increase in base rental revenue. Our bad debt reserve represents the amount of rental revenue we anticipate we will not be able to collect from our tenants.

The following table details the changes in base rental revenue period over period ($ in thousands):

Same property hotel revenue decreased $176.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the corresponding period in 2019. ADR for the hotels in our same property portfolio decreased from $167 to $135 while occupancy decreased 37% and RevPAR decreased from $131 to $56 during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the corresponding period in 2019. The decreases can be attributed to the closure of our full-service hotel in San Antonio, Texas from March 26, 2020 through June 15, 2020 and significantly reduced occupancy at our hotels as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Same property other revenue decreased $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the corresponding period in 2019. The decrease was primarily due to lower non-recurring lease related fees such as late fees, lease termination fees, and other miscellaneous fees at our multifamily properties and decreased golf course revenues at our full-service hotel in San Antonio, Texas as a result of decreased occupancy due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Same property rental property operating expenses decreased $4.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the corresponding period in 2019. The decrease in rental property operating expenses was primarily the result of a decrease in general operating expenses at our student housing properties due to students leaving campus during the COVID-19 pandemic and a decrease in snow removal expenses at our industrial properties.

Same property hotel operating expenses decreased $83.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the corresponding period in 2019. The decrease in hotel operating expenses was primarily the result of the closure of our full-service hotel in San Antonio, Texas from March 26, 2020 through June 15, 2020 and reduced occupancy at our hotels as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Due to our substantial fundraising and continued deployment of the net proceeds raised into new property acquisitions, non-same property NOI is not comparable period over period. We expect the non-same property NOI variance period over period to continue as we raise more proceeds from selling shares of our common stock and invest in additional new property acquisitions. Additionally, as discussed in the recent developments section, our portfolio has been impacted by COVID-19.

The global outbreak of COVID-19 continues to adversely impact global commercial activity and has contributed to significant volatility in financial markets. While the long-term impact of COVID-19 to our business is not yet fully known, we believe we are well positioned from a liquidity perspective with $5.0 billion of immediate liquidity as of March 1, 2021, made up of $3.8 billion of undrawn line of credit capacity and $1.2 billion of cash on hand.

Our primary needs for liquidity and capital resources are to fund our investments, make distributions to our stockholders, repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase plan, operating expenses, capital expenditures, margin calls under our reverse repurchase agreements, and to pay debt service on our outstanding indebtedness we may incur. Our operating expenses include, among other things, fees and expenses related to managing our properties and other investments, the management fee we pay to the Adviser (to the extent the Adviser elects to receive the management fee in cash), the performance participation allocation that BREIT OP pays to the Special Limited Partner (to the extent the Special Limited Partner elects to receive the performance participation allocation in cash), and general corporate expenses.

Our cash needs for acquisitions and other investments will be funded primarily from the sale of shares of our common stock and through the assumption or incurrence of debt. During the second quarter, we experienced a decline in net proceeds received from the sale of shares of our common stock compared to recent quarters as a result of COVID-19. However, subsequent to June 30, 2020, we have started to see an increase in net proceeds received from the sale of shares of our common stock compared to the second quarter. In addition, we experienced an elevated level of repurchases under our repurchase plan during March 2020, which has subsequently tapered back towards historical levels. We continue to believe that our current liquidity position is sufficient to meet our expected investment activity. Other potential future sources of capital include secured or unsecured financings from banks or other lenders and

proceeds from the sale of assets. If necessary, we may use financings or other sources of capital in the event of unforeseen significant capital expenditures.

Our indebtedness includes loans secured by our properties, master repurchase agreements with Barclays Bank PLC (the “Barclays MRA”), Royal Bank of Canada (the “RBC MRA”), Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (the “Citi MRA”), Bank of America Merrill Lynch (the “BAML MRA”), Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A. (the “MS MRA”), and MUFG Securities EMEA PLC (the “MUFG MRA”) secured by our investments in real estate debt, and unsecured lines of credit.

During April 2020, we entered into an asset-specific Total Return Swap (“TRS”) and sale of a financial asset, collectively accounted for as a secured financing with Deutsche Bank (the “DB Secured Financing”) in the amount of $246.9 million. The DB Secured Financing is secured by one of our term loans and bears interest equal to the three-month EURIBOR plus 1.8% per annum. Additionally, as part of the DB Secured Financing, we are responsible for providing in cash, the equivalent of any decline in value on the underlying collateral. The DB Secured Financing is denominated in euro, therefore any foreign exchange is recorded as a component of Income (Loss) from Investments in Real Estate Debt on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

During July 2020, we entered into a TRS with Citibank, N.A. (the “Citi Term Loan TRS”) in order to finance certain of our term loans. The Citi Term Loan TRS bears interest equal to the three-month or one-month USD LIBOR plus a spread, dependent upon the collateral. Additionally, as part of the Citi Term Loan TRS, we are responsible for providing, in cash, the equivalent of any decline in value on the underlying collateral.

							Principal Balance as of
Indebtedness	Weighted Average Interest Rate⁽¹⁾		Weighted Average Maturity Date⁽²⁾⁽³⁾		Maximum Facility Size		December 31, 2020		December 31, 2019
Fixed rate loans:
Fixed rate mortgages	3.8%		8/15/2027		N/A		$	13,124,595	$	12,424,717
Mezzanine loan		—		—	N/A			—		195,878
Total fixed rate loans	3.8%		8/15/2027					13,124,595		12,620,595
Variable rate loans:
Floating rate mortgages	L+1.8%		2/10/2026		N/A			4,544,044		1,826,435
Variable rate term loans	L+1.7%		3/3/2024		N/A			1,761,920		1,533,561
Variable rate secured revolving credit facilities	L+1.5%		6/18/2026		$	2,161,920		481,725		1,063,837
Variable rate mezzanine loans	L+4.1%		2/13/2025		N/A			202,200		—
Total variable rate loans	L+1.8%		8/14/2025					6,989,889		4,423,833
Total loans secured by properties	3.1%		12/4/2026					20,114,484		17,044,428

Secured financings on investments in real estate debt:
Barclays MRA			9/29/2021			750,000		750,000		750,000
Other MRAs⁽⁴⁾			4/3/2021		N/A			1,098,587		2,342,137
DB Secured Financing			4/2/2022		N/A			275,319		—
Citi Term Loan TRS			7/9/2021		N/A			17,087		—
Total secured financings on investments in real estate debt⁽⁵⁾	1.6%							2,140,993		3,092,137

Unsecured loans:
Unsecured variable rate revolving credit facility	L+2.5%		2/22/2023			1,475,000		—		—
Affiliate line of credit⁽⁶⁾	L+2.5%		1/22/2022			150,000		—		—
Total unsecured loans						1,625,000		—		—
							.		.
Total indebtedness							$	22,255,477	$	20,136,565

We had registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), two offerings for an aggregate of up to $17.0 billion in shares of common stock (the “Previous Offerings”) and accepted gross offering proceeds of $16.3 billion during the period January 1, 2017 to February 1, 2021. The Company subsequently registered with the SEC a follow-on offering of up to $24.0 billion in shares of common stock, consisting of up to $20.0 billion in shares in its primary offering and up to $4.0 billion in shares pursuant to its distribution reinvestment plan, which we began using to offer shares of our common stock in February 2021 (the “Current Offering” and with the Previous Offerings, the “Offering”). The share classes have different upfront selling commissions and ongoing stockholder servicing fees.

As of March 17, 2021, we had received net proceeds of $24.1 billion from selling an aggregate of 2,176,834,017 shares of our common stock (consisting of 845,686,569 Class S shares, 1,121,810,460 Class I shares, 55,085,386 Class T shares, and 154,251,602 Class D shares).

The following table provides a breakdown of the net change in our cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash ($ in thousands):

Cash flows provided by operating activities increased $0.4 billion during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the corresponding period in 2019 due to increased cash flows from the operations of investments in real estate and income on our investments in real estate debt. Cash flows provided by operating activities increased $0.3 billion during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the corresponding period in 2018 due to increased cash flows from the operations of investments in real estate and income on our investments in real estate debt.

Cash flows used in investing activities decreased $10.0 billion during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the corresponding period in 2019 primarily due to a decrease of $9.1 billion in the acquisition of real estate investments, a net decrease of $2.0 billion of investments in real estate debt, an increase of $0.4 billion in proceeds from disposition of real estate partially offset by an increase of $0.8 billion in investments in unconsolidated entities and an increase of $0.7 billion in the purchase of real estate-related equity securities. Cash flows used in investing activities increased $9.5 billion during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the corresponding period in 2018 primarily due to an increase of $8.7 billion in the acquisition of real estate investments and $1.4 billion of real estate debt offset by an increase of $0.5 billion in proceeds from the sale or settlement of real estate debt.

Cash flows provided by financing activities decreased $11.2 billion during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the corresponding period in 2019 primarily due to a net decrease of $9.4 billion in borrowings, an increase of $1.2 billion in repurchases of common stock, a decrease of $0.3 billion in subscriptions received in advance and a $0.3 billion increase in distributions. Cash flows provided by financing activities increased $9.8 billion during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the corresponding period in 2018 primarily due to a net increase of $4.9 billion in borrowings, an increase of $4.7 billion in proceeds from the issuance of our common stock.

The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with GAAP involve significant judgments and assumptions and require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. These judgments will affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities and our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. With different estimates or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported in our consolidated financial statements. The following is a summary of our significant accounting policies that we believe are the most affected by our judgments, estimates, and assumptions. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for further descriptions of the below accounting policies.

Upon the acquisition of a property, we assess the fair value of the acquired tangible and intangible assets (including land, buildings, tenant improvements, “above-market” and “below-market” leases, acquired in-place leases, other identified intangible assets and

assumed liabilities) and we allocate the purchase price to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, which are on a relative fair value basis. The most significant portion of the allocation is to building and land and requires the use of market based estimates and assumptions. We assess and consider fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and/or capitalization rates, as well as other available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known and anticipated trends, and market and economic conditions.

The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant. We also consider an allocation of purchase price of other acquired intangibles, including acquired in-place leases that may have a customer relationship intangible value, including (but not limited to) the nature and extent of the existing relationship with the tenants, the tenants’ credit quality and expectations of lease renewals.

Acquired above-market and below-market leases are recorded at their fair values (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) equal to the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (2) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases. Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values that are based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. Factors to be considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, we include real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, we consider leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.

Management reviews its real estate properties for impairment each quarter or when there is an event or change in circumstances that indicates an impaired value. If the carrying amount of the real estate investment is no longer recoverable and exceeds the fair value of such investment, an impairment loss is recognized. The impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value. The evaluation of anticipated future cash flows is highly subjective and is based in part on assumptions regarding future occupancy, rental rates and capital requirements that could differ materially from actual results. Since cash flows on real estate properties considered to be “long-lived assets to be held and used” are considered on an undiscounted basis to determine whether an asset has been impaired, our strategy of holding properties over the long term directly decreases the likelihood of recording an impairment loss. If our strategy changes or market conditions otherwise dictate an earlier sale date, an impairment loss may be recognized, and such loss could be material to our results. If we determine that an impairment has occurred, the affected assets must be reduced to their fair value.

Rental revenue — primarily consists of base rent and tenant reimbursement income arising from tenant leases at our industrial, multifamily, net lease, self storage, retail and office properties. Base rent is recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease, including any rent steps or abatement provisions. We recognize revenue upon the acquisition of related property or when a tenant takes possession of the leased space. Tenant reimbursement income primarily consists of amounts due from tenants for costs related to common area maintenance, real estate taxes, and other recoverable costs included in lease agreements. We recognize acquired in-place “above-” and “below-market” leases at their fair values and the amortization of these leases is recognized over the original term of the respective leases as an adjustment to rental revenue.

Hotel revenue — consists of income from our hotel properties. Hotel revenue consists primarily of room revenue and food and beverage revenue. Room revenue is recognized when the related room is occupied and other hotel revenue is recognized when the service is rendered.

We evaluate the collectability of our receivables related to rental revenue on an individual lease basis. Management exercises judgment in assessing collectability and considers the length of time a receivable has been outstanding, tenant credit-worthiness, payment history, available information about the financial condition of the tenant, current economic trends, among others. Tenant receivables that are deemed uncollectible are recognized as a reduction of rental revenue.

Our investments in real estate debt consist of securities and loans. We elected to classify our real estate debt securities as trading securities, therefore we carry such investments at fair value. Our investments in loans are also carried at fair value as we elected the fair value option. Investments with readily available actively quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.

In determining the fair value of our investments in real estate debt, we generally utilize third-party pricing service providers and broker-dealer quotations on the basis of the last available bid price. In determining the fair value of a particular investment, pricing service providers may use broker-dealer quotations, reported trades or valuation estimates from their internal pricing models to determine the reported price. The pricing service providers’ internal models for securities such as real estate debt generally consider the attributes applicable to a particular class of the security (e.g., credit rating, seniority), current market data, and estimated cash flows for each class and incorporate deal collateral performance such as prepayment speeds and default rates, as available. These investments are classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.

Certain of our investments in real estate debt, such as mezzanine loans, are unlikely to have readily available market quotations. In such cases, we determine fair value by utilizing or reviewing certain of the following (i) market yield data, (ii) discounted cash flow modeling, (iii) collateral asset performance, (iv) local or macro real estate performance, (v) capital market conditions, (vi) debt yield or loan-to-value ratios and (vii) borrower financial condition and performance. We classify these investments as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. Judgments used to determine fair value of Level 3 instruments are more significant than those required when determining the fair value of instruments classified as Level 1 or 2 due to the inherent uncertainty of the estimates and judgments used. These values may differ materially from the values that would have been used had a ready market for these investments existed. External factors may cause those values and the values of those investments for which readily observable inputs exists, to increase or decrease over time, impacting the value of our investments and therefore our Income (loss) from Investments in Real Estate Debt.

See Note 2 — “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our consolidated financial statements in this annual report on Form 10-K for a discussion concerning recent accounting pronouncements.

We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

The following table aggregates our contractual obligations and commitments with payments due subsequent to December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

We are exposed to interest rate risk with respect to our variable-rate indebtedness, whereas an increase in interest rates would directly result in higher interest expense costs. We seek to manage our exposure to interest rate risk by utilizing a mix of fixed and floating rate financings with staggered maturities and through interest rate protection agreements to fix or cap a portion of our variable rate debt. As of December 31, 2020, the outstanding principal balance of our variable rate indebtedness was $9.1 billion and consisted of mortgage notes, term loans, secured and unsecured revolving credit facilities and secured financings on investments in real estate debt.

Certain of our mortgage notes, term loans, secured and unsecured revolving credit facilities and secured financings are variable rate and indexed to one-month U.S. Dollar denominated LIBOR, three-month U.S. Dollar denominated LIBOR, six-month U.S. Dollar denominated LIBOR, three-month GBP denominated LIBOR, or three-month Euro denominated LIBOR (collectively, the “Reference Rates”). For the year ended December 31, 2020, a 10% increase in the Reference Rates would have resulted in increased interest expense of $2.9 million.

LIBOR and certain other floating rate benchmark indices to which our floating rate loans and other loan agreements are tied, including, without limitation, the Euro Interbank Offered Rate, or collectively, IBORs, are the subject of recent national, international and regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. In a speech on July 27, 2017, Andrew Bailey, the Chief Executive of the Financial Conduct Authority of the U.K., or the FCA, announced the FCA’s intention to cease sustaining LIBOR after 2021. The FCA has statutory powers to require panel banks to contribute to LIBOR where necessary. The FCA has decided not to ask, or to require, that panel banks continue to submit contributions to LIBOR beyond the end of 2021. The FCA has indicated that it expects that the current panel banks will voluntarily sustain LIBOR until the end of 2021. On November 30, 2020, the FCA announced that subject to confirmation following its consultation with the administrator of LIBOR, it would cease publication of the one-week and two-month USD LIBOR immediately after December 31, 2021 and cease publication of the remaining tenors immediately after June 30, 2023. Additionally, the Federal Reserve Board has advised banks to stop entering into new USD LIBOR based contracts. The U.S. Federal Reserve, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a steering committee comprised of large U.S. financial institutions, has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, a new index calculated by short-term repurchase agreements, backed by Treasury securities, as its preferred alternative rate for LIBOR. At this time, it is not possible to predict how markets will respond to SOFR or other alternative reference rates as the transition away from the IBOR benchmarks is anticipated in coming years. Refer to “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Debt Financing — Changes to, or the elimination of, LIBOR may adversely affect interest expense related to borrowings under our credit facilities and real estate-related investments” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As of December 31, 2020, we held $4.6 billion of investments in real estate debt. Our investments in real estate debt are primarily floating-rate and indexed to one of the Reference Rates and as such, exposed to interest rate risk. Our net income will increase or decrease depending on interest rate movements. While we cannot predict factors which may or may not affect interest rates, during the year ended December 31, 2020, a 10% increase or decrease in the Reference Rates would have resulted in an increase or decrease to income from investments in real estate debt of $0.2 million.

We may also be exposed to market risk with respect to our investments in real estate debt due to changes in the fair value of our investments. We seek to manage our exposure to market risk with respect to our investments in real estate debt by making investments in real estate debt backed by different types of collateral and varying credit ratings. The fair value of our investments may fluctuate, thus the amount we will realize upon any sale of our investments in real estate debt is unknown. As of December 31, 2020, the fair value at which we may sell our investments in real estate debt is not known, but a 10% change in the fair value of our investments in real estate debt may result in an unrealized gain or loss of $456.7 million.

For the financial statements required by this item and the reports of the independent accountants thereon required by Item 14(a)(2). See the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1. The supplementary financial data required by Item 302 of Regulation S-K appears in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, and summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K was made under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (a) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is timely recorded, processed, summarized and reported and (b) include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There have been no changes in our “internal control over financial reporting” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during our most recent quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management of Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc., is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of its consolidated financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“generally accepted accounting principles”).

Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets of the Company; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Company’s management and directors; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. Based on this assessment, management has determined that Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, was effective.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than April 30, 2021 with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act.

The agreements and other documents filed as exhibits to this report are not intended to provide factual information or other disclosure other than with respect to the terms of the agreements or other documents themselves, and you should not rely on them for that purpose. In particular, any representations and warranties made by us in these agreements or other documents were made solely within the specific context of the relevant agreement or document and may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Allocation of Purchase Price for Investments in Real Estate — Refer to Notes 2, 3, and 4 to the financial statements

The Company has completed the acquisitions of 31 real estate investments, comprising 324 properties, for an aggregate purchase price of $7.5 billion during 2020. The Company accounted for these acquisitions as asset acquisitions. Accordingly, the purchase price paid for assets acquired and liabilities assumed was allocated, based on fair value, to building, land, fixtures, furniture and equipment, in-place leases and other intangible assets and liabilities and assumed mortgages payable. The method for determining fair value varied depending on the type of real estate investment and associated assets acquired and liabilities assumed and involved management making significant estimates related to assumptions such as future cash flows, capitalization rates, discount rates, and sales comparables. We identified the allocation of purchase price as a critical audit matter because of the significant estimates management makes to determine the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. This required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists, when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s assumptions.

Our audit procedures related to the allocation of purchase price for investments in real estate for the Company included the following, among others:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2020			2019			2018
Revenues
Rental revenue	$	2,235,872		$	1,201,613		$	558,664
Hotel revenue		248,909			432,892			138,433
Other revenue		66,867			51,767			26,161
Total revenues		2,551,648			1,686,272			723,258
Expenses
Rental property operating		751,779			469,966			243,093
Hotel operating		261,472			304,710			97,248
General and administrative		25,653			18,170			10,982
Management fee		224,776			108,115			42,659
Performance participation allocation		192,648			141,396			37,484
Impairment of investments in real estate		12,343			—			—
Depreciation and amortization		1,362,151			824,039			406,295
Total expenses		2,830,822			1,866,396			837,761
Other income (expense)
Income from unconsolidated entities		88,571			—			—
Income (loss) from investments in real estate debt		(120,917	)		213,062			55,323
Net gain on dispositions of real estate		113,173			35,035			—
Interest income		2,228			3,041			410
Interest expense		(715,159	)		(487,517	)		(233,184	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(10,356	)		—			—
Other income (expense)		54,232			2,260			489
Total other income (expense)		(588,228	)		(234,119	)		(176,962	)
Net loss	$	(867,402	)	$	(414,243	)	$	(291,465	)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in third party joint ventures	$	2,417		$	5,671		$	6,188
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in BREIT OP		11,586			6,801			4,221
Net loss attributable to BREIT stockholders	$	(853,399	)	$	(401,771	)	$	(281,056	)
Net loss per share of common stock — basic and diluted	$	(0.53	)	$	(0.54	)	$	(0.91	)
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding, basic and diluted		1,598,175			748,841			309,686

																						Non-controlling			Non-controlling
	Par Value															Accumulated						Interests			Interests
	Common			Common			Common			Common			Additional			Deficit and			Total			Attributable			Attributable
	Stock			Stock			Stock			Stock			Paid-in			Cumulative			Stockholders'			to Third Party			to BREIT OP			Total
	Class S			Class I			Class T			Class D			Capital			Distributions			Equity			Joint Ventures			Unitholders			Equity
Balance at December 31, 2017	$	1,301		$	307		$	56		$	40		$	1,616,720		$	(132,633	)	$	1,485,791		$	23,848		$	—		$	1,509,639

Common stock issued	$	1,428		$	778		$	174		$	261		$	2,846,022		$	—		$	2,848,663		$	—		$	—		$	2,848,663
Offering costs		—			—			—			—			(178,833	)		—			(178,833	)		—			—			(178,833	)
Distribution reinvestment		63			24			4			4			101,890			—			101,985			—			—			101,985
Common stock/units repurchased		(22	)		(28	)		(1	)		(1	)		(56,375	)		—			(56,427	)		—			—			(56,427	)
Amortization of restricted stock grants		—			2			—			—			212			—			214			—			—			214
Net loss ($1,035 allocated to redeemable non-controlling interests)		—			—			—			—			—			(281,056	)		(281,056	)		(6,188	)		(3,186	)		(290,430	)
Distributions declared on common stock ($0.6286 per share)		—			—			—			—			—			(173,859	)		(173,859	)		—			—			(173,859	)
Contributions from non-controlling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			47,615			99,978			147,593
Acquired non-controlling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			12,802			—			12,802
Distributions to non-controlling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(2,485	)		(1,716	)		(4,201	)
Allocation to redeemable non-controlling interests		—			—			—			—			(2,192	)		—			(2,192	)		—			—			(2,192	)
Balance at December 31, 2018	$	2,770		$	1,083		$	233		$	304		$	4,327,444		$	(587,548	)	$	3,744,286		$	75,592		$	95,076		$	3,914,954

Common stock issued	$	2,485		$	3,712		$	167		$	531		$	7,702,275		$	—		$	7,709,170		$	—		$	—		$	7,709,170
Offering costs		—			—			—			—			(315,523	)		—			(315,523	)		—			—			(315,523	)
Distribution reinvestment		121			74			9			16			245,115			—			245,335			—			—			245,335
Common stock/units repurchased		(68	)		(130	)		(11	)		(4	)		(236,156	)		—			(236,369	)		—			(718	)		(237,087	)
Amortization of restricted stock grants		—			4			—			—			396			—			400			—			2,000			2,400
Net loss ($1,663 allocated to redeemable non-controlling interests)		—			—			—			—			—			(401,771	)		(401,771	)		(4,416	)		(6,393	)		(412,580	)
Distributions declared on common stock ($0.6363 per share)		—			—			—			—			—			(433,566	)		(433,566	)		—			—			(433,566	)
Contributions from non-controlling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			109,196			69,761			178,957
Distributions to non-controlling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(22,577	)		(8,005	)		(30,582	)
Allocation to redeemable non-controlling interests		—			—			—			—			(6,830	)		—			(6,830	)		—			—			(6,830	)
Balance at December 31, 2019	$	5,308		$	4,743		$	398		$	847		$	11,716,721		$	(1,422,885	)	$	10,305,132		$	157,795		$	151,721		$	10,614,648

Common stock issued	$	1,963		$	5,096		$	85		$	433		$	8,528,669		$	—		$	8,536,246		$	—		$	—		$	8,536,246
Offering costs		—			—			—			—			(217,398	)		—			(217,398	)		—			—			(217,398	)
Distribution reinvestment		209			194			13			32			492,216			—			492,664			—			—			492,664
Common stock/units repurchased		(451	)		(767	)		(37	)		(71	)		(1,450,843	)		—			(1,452,169	)		—			(2,927	)		(1,455,096	)
Amortization of restricted stock grants		—			4			—			—			396			—			400			—			1,394			1,794
Net loss ($1,606 allocated to redeemable non-controlling interests)		—			—			—			—			—			(853,399	)		(853,399	)		(825	)		(11,572	)		(865,796	)
Distributions declared on common stock ($0.6354 per share)		—			—			—			—			—			(948,034	)		(948,034	)		—			—			(948,034	)
Contributions from non-controlling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			15,119			63,226			78,345
Distributions and redemptions to non-controlling interests		—			—			—			—			(1,946	)		—			(1,946	)		(28,836	)		(13,870	)		(44,652	)
Allocation to redeemable non-controlling interests		—			—			—			—			(8,770	)		—			(8,770	)		—			—			(8,770	)
Balance at December 31, 2020	$	7,029		$	9,270		$	459		$	1,241		$	19,059,045		$	(3,224,318	)	$	15,852,726		$	143,253		$	187,972		$	16,183,951

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2020			2019			2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(867,402	)	$	(414,243	)	$	(291,465	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Management fee		224,776			108,115			42,659
Performance participation allocation		192,648			141,396			37,484
Impairment of investments in real estate		12,343			—			—
Depreciation and amortization		1,362,151			824,039			406,295
Net gain on dispositions of real estate		(113,173	)		(35,035	)		—
Loss on extinguishment of debt		10,356			—			—
Unrealized (gain) loss on changes in fair value of financial instruments		241,554			(47,651	)		24,746
Income from unconsolidated entities		(88,571	)		—			—
Distributions from unconsolidated entities		80,663			—			—
Other items		(28,888	)		(8,812	)		5,495
Change in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) / decrease in other assets		(72,005	)		(117,527	)		(67,540	)
Increase / (decrease) in due to affiliates		4,347			3,893			2,099
Increase / (decrease) in other liabilities		13,105			146,752			92,909
Net cash provided by operating activities		971,904			600,927			252,682
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions of real estate		(6,547,909	)		(15,669,598	)		(7,005,983	)
Capital improvements to real estate		(327,205	)		(199,768	)		(102,273	)
Proceeds from dispositions of real estate		434,880			79,118			—
Pre-acquisition costs and deposits		(11,692	)		—			(8,331	)
Investment in unconsolidated entities		(808,312	)		—			—
Purchase of investments in real estate debt		(1,232,955	)		(2,944,340	)		(1,561,772	)
Proceeds from settlement of investments in real estate debt		993,229			739,591			193,932
Purchase of real estate-related equity securities		(718,771	)		—			—
Sale of real estate-related equity securities		179,904			—			—
Net cash used in investing activities		(8,038,831	)		(17,994,997	)		(8,484,427	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		7,513,895			7,431,641			2,701,651
Offering costs paid		(95,069	)		(77,156	)		(44,066	)
Subscriptions received in advance		508,817			796,729			166,542
Repurchase of common stock		(1,200,517	)		(75,279	)		(49,466	)
Repurchase of management fee shares		(171,300	)		(114,843	)		—
Redemption of redeemable non-controlling interest		(83,625	)		(35,435	)		(8,400	)
Redemption of affiliate service provider incentive compensation awards		(2,239	)		(718	)		—
Borrowings from mortgage notes, term loans, and secured revolving credit facilities		8,860,936			17,399,268			7,318,059
Repayments from mortgage notes, term loans, and secured revolving credit facilities		(6,834,346	)		(8,328,912	)		(2,767,093	)
Borrowings under repurchase agreements		2,228,336			1,831,464			1,156,189
Settlement of repurchase agreements		(3,209,683	)		(453,050	)		(125,314	)
Borrowings from affiliate line of credit		175,000			2,105,500			1,239,400
Repayments on affiliate line of credit		(175,000	)		(2,105,500	)		(1,244,650	)
Borrowings from unsecured revolving credit facilities		130,000			240,000			—
Repayments on unsecured revolving credit facilities		(130,000	)		(240,000	)		—
Payment of financing costs		(72,881	)		(116,126	)		(46,634	)
Contributions from non-controlling interests		27,124			132,852			147,593
Distributions and redemptions to non-controlling interests		(46,755	)		(39,607	)		(4,413	)
Distributions		(420,945	)		(153,669	)		(58,769	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		7,001,748			18,197,159			8,380,629
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash		(65,179	)		803,089			148,884
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year		1,109,702			306,613			157,729
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of year	$	1,044,523		$	1,109,702		$	306,613
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash to the consolidated balance sheets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	333,388		$	204,269		$	68,089
Restricted cash		711,135			905,433			238,524
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	1,044,523		$	1,109,702		$	306,613

Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. (“BREIT” or the “Company”) invests primarily in stabilized income-oriented commercial real estate in the United States and, to a lesser extent, in real estate debt. The Company is the sole general partner of BREIT Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“BREIT OP”). BREIT Special Limited Partner L.P. (the “Special Limited Partner”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Blackstone Group Inc. (together with its affiliates, “Blackstone”), owns a special limited partner interest in BREIT OP. Substantially all of the Company’s business is conducted through BREIT OP. The Company and BREIT OP are externally managed by BX REIT Advisors L.L.C. (the “Adviser”). The Adviser is part of the real estate group of Blackstone, a leading global investment manager, which serves as the Company’s sponsor. The Company was formed on November 16, 2015 as a Maryland corporation and qualifies as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company had received net proceeds of $21.2 billion from selling shares of the Company’s common stock through both the Offering, as defined below, and unregistered shares. The Company had previously registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) two offerings for an aggregate of up to $17.0 billion in shares of common stock (the “Previous Offerings”) and accepted gross offering proceeds of $16.3 billion during the period January 1, 2017 to February 1, 2021. The Company subsequently registered with the SEC a follow-on offering of up to $24.0 billion in shares of common stock, consisting of up to $20.0 billion in shares in its primary offering and up to $4.0 billion in shares pursuant to its distribution reinvestment plan, which the Company began using to offer shares of our common stock in February 2021 (the “Current Offering” and with the Previous Offerings, the “Offering”). The Company intends to sell any combination of four classes of shares of its common stock, with a dollar value up to the maximum aggregate amount of the Current Offering. The share classes have different upfront selling commissions, dealer manager fees and ongoing stockholder servicing fees. The Company intends to continue selling shares on a monthly basis.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company owned 1,370 properties and had 228 positions in real estate debt investments. The Company currently operates in eight reportable segments: Multifamily, Industrial, Net Lease, Hotel, Self Storage, Retail, and Office properties, and Investments in Real Estate Debt. Multifamily includes various forms of rental housing including apartments, student housing and manufactured housing. Net Lease includes the real estate assets of The Bellagio Las Vegas (“Bellagio”) and the unconsolidated interest in the MGM Grand and Mandalay Bay joint venture, as further described in Note 4 – Investments in Unconsolidated Entities. Financial results by segment are reported in Note 14 — Segment Reporting.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of the Company, the Company’s subsidiaries and joint ventures in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company consolidates all entities in which it has a controlling financial interest through majority ownership or voting rights and variable interest entities whereby the Company is the primary beneficiary. In determining whether the Company has a controlling financial interest in a partially owned entity and the requirement to consolidate the accounts of that entity, the Company considers whether the entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and whether it is the primary beneficiary. The Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE when it has (i) the power to direct the most significant activities impacting the economic performance of the VIE and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits significant to the VIE. When the requirements for consolidation are not met and the Company has significant influence over the operations of the entity, the investment is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Equity method investments are initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s pro-rata share of net income, contributions, and distributions.

BREIT OP and each of the Company’s joint ventures are considered to be a VIE. The Company consolidates these entities, excluding its equity method investment, because it has the ability to direct the most significant activities of the entities such as purchases, dispositions, financings, budgets, and overall operating plans.

For consolidated joint ventures, the non-controlling partner’s share of the assets, liabilities and operations of the joint ventures is included in non-controlling interests as equity of the Company. The non-controlling partner’s interest is generally computed as the joint venture partner’s ownership percentage. Certain of the joint ventures formed by the Company provide the other partner a profits interest based on certain internal rate of return hurdles being achieved. Any profits interest due to the other partner is reported within non-controlling interests.

In July 2020, the Company acquired the remaining 10.0% interest in one of its consolidated VIEs for $19.3 million. As of December 31, 2020, the joint venture is no longer a VIE. As of December 31, 2020, the total assets and liabilities of the Company’s consolidated VIEs, excluding BREIT OP, were $11.5 billion and $8.0 billion, respectively, compared to $9.5 billion and $6.6 billion as of December 31, 2019. Such amounts are included on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

One of the Company’s joint ventures is accounted for under the equity method of accounting as the requirements for consolidation are not met. As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s investment in the joint venture which owns the real estate of the MGM Grand and Mandalay Bay is not consolidated. Refer to Note 4 for additional details on the Company’s investments in unconsolidated entities.

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the balance sheet. The ongoing novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic and restrictions on non-essential businesses have caused disruption in the U.S. and global economies. Despite significant market rebounds across many asset classes, the continued rapid development of this situation and uncertainty regarding potential economic recovery precludes any prediction as to the ultimate adverse impact of COVID-19 on financial market and economic conditions. The estimates and assumptions underlying these consolidated financial statements are based on the information available as of December 31, 2020, including judgments about the financial market and economic conditions which may change over time. Actual results may ultimately differ materially from those estimates.

In accordance with the guidance for business combinations, the Company determines whether the acquisition of a property qualifies as a business combination, which requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed constitute a business. If the property acquired does not constitute a business, the Company accounts for the transaction as an asset acquisition. The guidance for business combinations states that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets to be acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the asset or set of assets is not a business. All property acquisitions to date have been accounted for as asset acquisitions.

Whether the acquisition of a property acquired is considered a business combination or asset acquisition, the Company recognizes the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquired entity. In addition, for transactions that are business combinations, the Company evaluates the existence of goodwill or a gain from a bargain purchase. The Company expenses acquisition-related costs associated with business combinations as they are incurred. The Company capitalizes acquisition-related costs associated with asset acquisitions.

Upon acquisition of a property, the Company assesses the fair value of acquired tangible and intangible assets (including land, buildings, tenant improvements, “above-market” and “below-market” leases, acquired in-place leases, other identified intangible assets and assumed liabilities) and allocates the purchase price to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities. The Company assesses and considers fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize discount and/or capitalization rates that it deems appropriate, as well as other available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known and anticipated trends, and market and economic conditions.

The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant. The Company records acquired above-market and below-market leases at their fair values (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) equal to the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (2) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases. The Company records acquired in-place lease values based on the Company’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. Factors to be considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected

lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, the Company considers leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.

The Company also considers an allocation of purchase price of other acquired intangibles, including acquired in-place leases that may have a customer relationship intangible value, including (but not limited to) the nature and extent of the existing relationship with the tenants, the tenants’ credit quality and expectations of lease renewals. Based on its acquisitions to date, the Company’s allocation to customer relationship intangible assets has not been material.

Intangible assets and intangible liabilities are recorded as a component of Other Assets and Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses, and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amortization of acquired above-market and below-market leases is recorded as an adjustment to Rental Revenue on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The amortization of below-market and pre-paid ground leases are recorded as an adjustment to Rental Property Operating or Hotel Operating Expenses, as applicable, on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The amortization of in-place leases is recorded as an adjustment to Depreciation and Amortization Expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The cost of buildings and improvements includes the purchase price of the Company’s properties and any acquisition-related costs, along with any subsequent improvements to such properties. The Company’s investments in real estate are stated at cost and are generally depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

Significant improvements to properties are capitalized. When assets are sold or retired, their costs and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts with the resulting gains or losses reflected in net income or loss for the period.

Repairs and maintenance are expensed to operations as incurred and are included in Rental Property Operating and Hotel Operating Expenses on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company’s management reviews its real estate properties for impairment each quarter or when there is an event or change in circumstances that indicates an impaired value. If the GAAP depreciated cost basis of a real estate investment exceeds the undiscounted cash flows of such real estate investment, the investment is considered impaired and the GAAP depreciated cost basis is reduced to the fair value of the investment. The impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value. The evaluation of anticipated future cash flows is highly subjective and is based in part on assumptions regarding future occupancy, rental rates and capital requirements that could differ materially from actual results. Since cash flows on real estate properties considered to be “long-lived assets to be held and used” are considered on an undiscounted basis to determine whether an asset has been impaired, the Company’s strategy of holding properties over the long term directly decreases the likelihood of recording an impairment loss. If the Company’s strategy changes or market conditions otherwise dictate an earlier sale date, an impairment loss may be recognized and such loss could be material to the Company’s results. If the Company determines that an impairment has occurred, the affected assets must be reduced to their fair value. During the year ended December 31, 2020, two of the Company’s hotel assets were deemed to be impaired resulting in $12.3 million of impairment charges. Refer to Note 3 for additional details of the impairments. No such impairment occurred during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

The Company classifies the assets and liabilities related to its real estate investments as held for sale when a sale is probable to occur within one year. The Company considers a sale to be probable when a binding contract has been executed, the buyer has posted a non-refundable deposit, and there are limited contingencies to closing. The Company classifies held for sale assets and liabilities at the lower of depreciated cost or fair value less closing costs. Held for sale assets and liabilities are presented within other assets and other liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Notes 3 and 10 for additional details.

Investments in unconsolidated entities are initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s pro-rata share of net income, contributions, and distributions. The Company’s investments in unconsolidated entities are periodically assessed for

impairment and an impairment loss is recorded when the fair value of the investment falls below the carrying value and such decline is determined to be other-than-temporary.

The Company’s investments in real estate debt consists of securities and loans. The Company has elected to classify its real estate debt securities as trading securities and carry such investments at fair value. As such, the resulting unrealized gains and losses of such securities are recorded as a component of Income/(Loss) from Investments in Real Estate Debt on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company elected the fair value option (“FVO”) for its investments in loans. As such, the resulting unrealized gains and losses of such loans are recorded as a component of Income/(Loss) from Investments in Real Estate Debt on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Interest income from the Company’s investments in real estate debt is recognized over the life of each investment using the effective interest method and is recorded on the accrual basis. Recognition of premiums and discounts associated with these investments is deferred and recorded over the term of the investment as an adjustment to yield. Interest income is recorded as a component of Income/(Loss) from Investments in Real Estate Debt on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Cash and cash equivalents represent cash held in banks, cash on hand, and liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. The Company may have bank balances in excess of federally insured amounts; however, the Company deposits its cash and cash equivalents with high credit-quality institutions to minimize credit risk.

As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, restricted cash primarily consists of $508.8 million and $787.7 million, respectively, of cash received for subscriptions prior to the date in which the subscriptions are effective, which is held in a bank account controlled by the Company’s transfer agent but in the name of the Company. Other restricted cash consists of amounts in escrow related to real estate taxes, insurance in connection with mortgages at certain of our properties, security deposits, collateral for swaps and margin for secured financings on investments in real estate debt.

The Company’s deferred charges include financing and leasing costs. Deferred financing costs include legal, structuring, and other loan costs incurred by the Company for its financing agreements. Deferred financing costs related to the Company’s mortgage notes and term loans are recorded as an offset to the related liability and amortized over the term of the applicable financing instruments. Deferred financing costs related to the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facilities are recorded as a component of Other Assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortized over the term of the applicable financing agreements. Deferred leasing costs incurred in connection with new leases, which consist primarily of brokerage and legal fees, are recorded as a component of Other Assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortized over the life of the related lease.

The Company’s investments in equity securities of public real estate-related companies and its investments in a preferred equity security are reported at fair value. As such, the resulting unrealized gains and losses are recorded as a component of Other Income (Expense) on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Dividend income from the Company’s equity securities of public real estate-related companies is recognized on the ex-dividend, while dividend income on its investment in a preferred equity security accrues daily based on the stated terms of the agreement and is payable quarterly in cash. Dividend income is recorded as a component of Other Income (Expense) on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Equity securities are recorded as a component of Other Assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company’s sources of revenue and the related revenue recognition policies are as follows:

Rental revenue — primarily consists of base rent and tenant reimbursement income arising from tenant leases at the Company’s industrial, multifamily, net lease, self storage, retail and office properties. Base rent is recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease, including any rent steps or abatement provisions. The Company begins to recognize revenue upon the acquisition of the related property or when a tenant takes possession of the leased space. Tenant reimbursement income primarily consists of amounts due from tenants for costs related to common area maintenance, real estate taxes, and other recoverable costs included in lease agreements.

Hotel revenue — consists of income from the Company’s hotel properties. Hotel revenue consists primarily of room revenue and food and beverage revenue. Room revenue is recognized when the related room is occupied and other hotel revenue is recognized when the service is rendered.

Organization costs are expensed as incurred and recorded as a component of General and Administrative Expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and offering costs are charged to equity as such amounts are incurred.

The Adviser agreed to advance $10.2 million of certain organization and offering costs on behalf of the Company (including legal, marketing and fulfillment, regulatory, due diligence, administrative, accounting, tax, transfer agent and other expenses attributable to the Company’s organization, but excluding upfront selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) through December 31, 2017. Such costs are recorded as a component of Due to Affiliates on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and are being reimbursed to the Adviser pro rata over 60 months beginning January 1, 2018. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company reimbursed $2.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively, to the Adviser for such costs.

Blackstone Advisory Partners L.P. (the “Dealer Manager”), a registered broker-dealer affiliated with the Adviser, serves as the dealer manager for the Offering. The Dealer Manager is entitled to receive selling commissions and dealer manager fees based on the transaction price of each applicable class of shares sold in the Offering. The Dealer Manager is also entitled to receive a stockholder servicing fee of 0.85%, 0.85% and 0.25% per annum of the aggregate net asset value (“NAV”) of the Company’s outstanding Class S shares, Class T shares, and Class D shares, respectively. There is no stockholder servicing fee with respect to Class I shares.

The following table details the selling commissions, dealer manager fees, and stockholder servicing fees for each applicable share class as of December 31, 2020:

For Class S shares sold in the Offering (other than as part of the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan), investors will pay upfront selling commissions of up to 3.5% of the transaction price. For Class T shares sold in the Offering (other than as part of the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan), investors will pay upfront selling commissions of up to 3.0% of the transaction price and upfront dealer manager fees of 0.5% of the transaction price, however such amounts may vary at certain participating broker-dealers, provided that the sum will not exceed 3.5% of the transaction price. For Class D shares sold in the Offering (other than as part of the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan), investors will pay upfront selling commissions of up to 1.5% of the transaction price.

The Dealer Manager is entitled to receive stockholder servicing fees of 0.85% per annum of the aggregate NAV for Class S shares and Class T shares. For Class T shares such stockholder servicing fee includes, an advisor stockholder servicing fee of 0.65% per annum, and a dealer stockholder servicing fee of 0.20% per annum, of the aggregate NAV for the Class T shares, however, with respect to Class T shares sold through certain participating broker-dealers, the advisor stockholder servicing fee and the dealer stockholder servicing fee may be other amounts, provided that the sum of such fees will always equal 0.85% per annum of the NAV of such shares. For Class D shares, a stockholder servicing fee equal to 0.25% per annum of the aggregate NAV for the Class D shares.

The Dealer Manager has entered into agreements with the selected dealers distributing the Company’s shares in the Offering, which provide, among other things, for the re-allowance of the full amount of the selling commissions and dealer manager fees and all of the stockholder servicing fees received by the Dealer Manager to such selected dealers. Through December 31, 2020, the Dealer Manager had not retained any upfront selling commissions, dealer manager, or stockholder servicing fees. The Company will cease paying the

stockholder servicing fee with respect to any Class S share, Class T share or Class D share held in a stockholder’s account at the end of the month in which the total selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees paid with respect to the shares held by such stockholder within such account would exceed, in the aggregate, 8.75% (or, in the case of Class T shares sold through certain participating broker-dealers, a lower limit as set forth in any applicable agreement between the Dealer Manager and a participating broker-dealer) of the gross proceeds from the sale of such shares (including the gross proceeds of any shares issued under the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan with respect thereto). The Company will accrue the full cost of the stockholder servicing fee as an offering cost at the time each Class S, Class T, and Class D share is sold during the Offering. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had accrued $605.4 million and $478.5 million, respectively, of stockholder servicing fees related to Class S shares, Class D shares and Class T shares sold and recorded such amount as a component of Due to Affiliates on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company qualifies to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Company generally will not be subject to federal corporate income tax to the extent it distributes 100% of its taxable income to its stockholders. REITs are subject to a number of other organization and operational requirements. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.

The Company leases its hotel investments to wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). The TRSs are subject to taxation at the federal, state and local levels, as applicable. Revenues related to the hotels’ operations such as room revenue, food and beverage revenue and other revenue are recorded in the TRS along any with corresponding expenses. The Company accounts for applicable income taxes by utilizing the asset and liability method. As such, the Company records deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences resulting from the difference between the carrying value of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is provided if the Company believes all or some portion of the deferred tax asset may not be realized. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 the Company recorded a net tax benefit of $2.5 million, $0.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively, within Other Income on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The deferred benefit for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 is $5.8 million, $3.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively. The current expense for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 is $3.3 million, $2.2 million, and $0.9 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company recorded a deferred tax asset of $10.7 million, $4.9 million, and $1.8 million, respectively, due to its hotel investments within Other Assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Under normal market conditions, the fair value of an investment is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., the exit price). Additionally, there is a hierarchal framework that prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment and the state of the marketplace, including the existence and transparency of transactions between market participants. Investments with readily available actively quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.

Investments measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following levels within the fair value hierarchy:

Level 1 — quoted prices are available in active markets for identical investments as of the measurement date. The Company does not adjust the quoted price for these investments.

Level 2 — quoted prices are available in markets that are not active or model inputs are based on inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable as of the measurement date.

Level 3 — pricing inputs are unobservable and include instances where there is minimal, if any, market activity for the investment. These inputs require significant judgment or estimation by management or third parties when determining fair value and generally represent anything that does not meet the criteria of Levels 1 and 2. Due to the inherent uncertainty of these estimates, these values may differ materially from the values that would have been used had a ready market for these investments existed.

The Company’s investments in real estate debt are reported at fair value. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company’s investments in real estate debt consisted of commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), which are mortgage-related fixed income securities, corporate bonds, term loans, and mezzanine loans of real estate-related companies. The Company determines the fair value of its investments in real estate debt by generally utilizing third-party pricing service providers and broker-dealer quotations on the basis of last available bid price.

In determining the fair value of a particular investment, pricing service providers may use broker-dealer quotations, reported trades or valuation estimates from their internal pricing models to determine the reported price. The pricing service providers’ internal models for securities such as real estate debt generally consider the attributes applicable to a particular class of the security (e.g., credit rating, seniority), current market data, and estimated cash flows for each class and incorporate deal collateral performance such as prepayment speeds and default rates, as available.

Certain of the Company’s investments in real estate debt, such as mezzanine loans, are unlikely to have readily available market quotations. In such cases, the Company will generally determine the initial value based on the acquisition price of such investment if acquired by the Company or the par value of such investment if originated by the Company. Following the initial measurement, the Company will determine fair value by utilizing or reviewing certain of the following (i) market yield data, (ii) discounted cash flow modeling, (iii) collateral asset performance, (iv) local or macro real estate performance, (v) capital market conditions, (vi) debt yield or loan-to-value ratios and (vii) borrower financial condition and performance.

In determining the fair value of public equity securities, the Company utilizes the closing price of such securities in the principal market in which the security trades (Level 1 inputs). During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company made an investment in a preferred equity security, which is reflected at its fair value as of December 31, 2020 (Level 2 inputs). In determining the fair value, the Company utilizes inputs such as stock volatility, discount rate, and risk-free interest rate. As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s $599.2 million of equity securities were recorded as a component of Other Assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company did not own equity securities as of December 31, 2019.

The following table details our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis ($ in thousands):

The following table details our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs ($ in thousands):

The following table contains the quantitative inputs and assumptions used for items categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy ($ in thousands):

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company did not utilize any quantitative inputs and assumptions as the investment was purchased during December 2019 and therefore reflected at its initial investment value.

Certain of the Company’s assets are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments, such as when there is evidence of impairment, and therefore measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. The Company reviews its real estate properties for impairment each quarter or when there is an event of change in circumstances that could indicate the carrying amount of the real estate value may not be recoverable.

As part of the Company’s quarterly impairment review procedures, two of the Company’s hotel assets were deemed to be impaired during the year ended December 31, 2020 resulting in a $12.3 million impairment charge. Refer to Note 3 for additional details of the impairments.

The Company estimated the fair value of the impaired properties using a discounted cash flow analysis that utilized Level 3 inputs. The key assumptions utilized during the year ended December 31, 2020 were the discount rate (weighted average of 8.7%) and the exit capitalization rate (weighted average of 7.8%). There are inherent uncertainties in making these estimates such as macroeconomic conditions.

As of December 31, 2020, the fair value of the Company’s mortgage notes, term loans, and secured revolving credit facilities, secured financings on investments in real estate debt, and unsecured revolving credit facilities was approximately $48.6 million above carrying value. As of December 31, 2019, the fair value of the Company’s mortgage notes, term loans, and secured revolving credit facilities, secured financings on investments in real estate debt, and unsecured revolving credit facilities was approximately $54.9 million above carrying value. Fair value of the Company’s indebtedness is estimated by modeling the cash flows required by the Company’s debt agreements and discounting them back to the present value using the appropriate discount rate. Additionally, the Company considers current market rates and conditions by evaluating similar borrowing agreements with comparable loan-to-value ratios and credit profiles. The inputs used in determining the fair value of the Company’s indebtedness are considered Level 3.

Basic net loss per share of common stock is determined by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. All classes of common stock are allocated net income/(loss) at the same rate per share and receive the same gross distribution per share.

The restricted stock grants of Class I shares held by our directors are considered to be participating securities because they contain non-forfeitable rights to distributions. The impact of these restricted stock grants on basic and diluted earnings per common share (“EPS”) has been calculated using the two-class method whereby earnings are allocated to the restricted stock grants based on dividends declared and the restricted stocks’ participation rights in undistributed earnings. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the effects of the two-class method on basic and diluted EPS were not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company’s stock-based compensation consists of incentive compensation awards issued to certain employees of affiliate portfolio company service providers. Such awards vest over the life of the awards and stock-based compensation expense is recognized for these awards in net income on a straight-line basis over the applicable vesting period of the award, based on the value of the awards at grant, as adjusted for forfeitures. Refer to Note 9 for additional information.

In April 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) staff issued a question and answer document (the “Lease Modification Q&A”) focused on the application of lease accounting guidance to lease concessions provided as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In accordance with the Lease Modification Q&A, the Company has made a policy election to not account for concessions as a lease modification if the total cash flows after the lease concessions are substantially the same, or less than, the cash flows in the original lease. However, if in the future, a concession is granted that modifies the terms and significantly alters the cash flows of the original lease, the Company will account for the changes as a lease modification. The Company has granted concessions as a result of the pandemic to certain tenants to defer rental payments until a later date. The Company continued to recognize rental revenue for such tenants during the period, while also considering any necessary bad debt reserves. As of December 31, 2020, the

Company has granted $12.2 million of rental deferral requests. It is expected that the deferred rent will generally be paid back over a period of three to 12 months. However, it is possible that tenants may not be able to meet their deferred rent obligations.

In March 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2020-04 “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting”. ASU 2020-04 provides optional expedients and exceptions to GAAP requirements for modifications on debt instruments, leases, derivatives, and other contracts, related to the expected market transition from LIBOR, and certain other floating rate benchmark indices, or collectively, IBORs, to alternative reference rates. ASU 2020-04 generally considers contract modifications related to reference rate reform to be an event that does not require contract remeasurement at the modification date nor a reassessment of a previous accounting determination. The guidance in ASU 2020-04 is optional and may be elected over time, through December 31, 2022, as reference rate reform activities occur. Once ASU 2020-04 is elected, the guidance must be applied prospectively for all eligible contract modifications. The Company has not adopted any of the optional expedients or exceptions as of December 31, 2020, but will continue to evaluate the possible adoption of any such expedients or exceptions during the effective period as circumstances evolve.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company acquired interests in 31 real estate investments, which were comprised of 94 multifamily, 94 industrial, 129 self storage, six retail, and one office property.

The following table provides further details of the properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company acquired interests in 53 real estate investments, which were comprised of 443 industrial, 78 multifamily, 34 hotel, 21 self storage, four retail, one office and one net lease property.

The following table provides further details of the properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2019 ($ in thousands):

The following table further details the purchase price allocation for the properties acquired during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 ($ in thousands):

The weighted-average amortization periods for the acquired in-place lease intangibles, above-market lease intangibles, and below-market lease intangibles of the properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2020 were 3, 7, and 5 years, respectively. The weighted-average amortization periods for the acquired in-place lease intangibles, above-market lease intangibles, and below-market ground lease intangibles of the properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2019 were 3, 6, and 6 years, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recognized a $12.3 million impairment charge on two of its hotel properties. The impairment charges were a result of updates to the undiscounted cash flow assumptions to account for a decrease in occupancy, future cash flows, and the terminal value as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. If the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to adversely impact economic and market conditions or if the Company’s expected holding period for assets changes, subsequent tests for impairment could result in additional impairment charges in the future. Certain investments within the Company’s portfolio, specifically its hotel assets, are more susceptible to future impairment considerations due to the significant declines in occupancy as a result of extended closures, decreases in travel and uncertainty around future cash flows. The Company can provide no assurance that material impairment charges with respect to the Company’s investments in real estate and unconsolidated entities will not occur during future periods. Accordingly, the Company will continue to monitor circumstances and events in future periods to determine whether any additional impairment charges are warranted. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company did not recognize an impairment charge.

The following table details the properties disposed during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 ($ in thousands):

As of December 31, 2020, there were no properties classified as held for sale. As of December 31, 2019, six properties were classified as held for sale. Subsequent to December 31, 2019 all six properties were sold. The held for sale assets and liabilities are components of Other Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following table is a summary of the assets and liabilities of the Company’s properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2019 ($ in thousands):

On February 14, 2020, the Company closed a transaction to form a new joint venture with MGM Growth Properties LLC (“MGP”) to acquire the Las Vegas real estate assets of the MGM Grand and Mandalay Bay for $4.6 billion (the “BREIT MGP JV”). MGP owns 50.1% of the joint venture, and the Company owns 49.9%. At closing, the joint venture entered into a long-term triple net master lease agreement with MGM Resorts International (“MGM”), which provides the joint venture with a full corporate guarantee of rent payments by MGM. The lease has an initial annual rent of $292.0 million with an initial term of 30 years with two 10-year extension options for MGM. The lease agreement provides that the rent will escalate 2% annually for the first 15 years and then the greater of (i) 2% or (ii) the increase in the consumer price index during the prior year, subject to a cap of 3%.

The following table provides a summarized balance sheet of the unconsolidated entities along with a reconciliation to the Company’s investment in unconsolidated entities ($ in thousands):

The following table provides summarized operating data of the unconsolidated entities along with a reconciliation to the Company’s income from unconsolidated entities ($ in thousands):

The following tables detail the Company’s investments in real estate debt ($ in thousands):

The following table details the collateral type of the properties securing the Company’s investments in real estate debt ($ in thousands):

The following table details the credit rating of the Company’s investments in real estate debt ($ in thousands):

The Company’s investments in real estate debt included CMBS and loans collateralized by properties owned by Blackstone-advised investment vehicles and CMBS collateralized by loans originated or acquired by Blackstone-advised investment vehicles. The following table details the Company’s affiliate investments in real estate debt ($ in thousands):

Such CMBS were purchased in fully or over-subscribed offerings. Each investment in such CMBS by Blackstone and its affiliates (including the Company) represented a minority participation in any individual tranche. The Company acquired its minority participation interests from third-party investment banks on market terms negotiated by the majority third-party investors. Blackstone and its affiliates (including the Company) will forgo all non-economic rights (including voting rights) in such CMBS as long as the Blackstone-advised investment vehicles either own the properties collateralizing, loans underlying, or have an interest in a different part of the capital structure related to such CMBS.

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company’s investments in real estate debt also included $179.6 million and $186.8 million, respectively, of CMBS collateralized by pools of commercial real estate debt, a portion of which included certain of the Company’s mortgage notes. The Company recognized $10.1 million, $6.9 million, and $0.7 million of interest income related to such CMBS during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.

As described in Note 2, the Company classifies its investments in real estate debt as trading securities and has elected the FVO for its investments in loans. As such, the Company records these investments at fair value in Investments in Real Estate Debt on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company recorded an unrealized loss of $187.2 million, an unrealized gain of $51.5 million and an unrealized loss of $24.7 million, respectively, related to investments in real estate debt. Such unrealized gains and losses were recorded as a component of Income/(Loss) from Investments in Real Estate Debt on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The unrealized losses recognized during the year ended December 31, 2020 were primarily the result of significant declines in pricing in March 2020. Although there was a continued recovery in pricing across securities during the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant market pricing and liquidity dislocation in March 2020, causing a broad-based market decline impacting the unrealized value of certain of the Company’s investments in real estate debt.

During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company recognized a net realized loss of $20.1 million, a net realized gain of $7.3 million and a net realized gain of $0.2 million, respectively, due to the sale or paydowns of certain of the Company’s investments in real estate debt.

The following table details the mortgage notes, term loans, and secured revolving credit facilities secured by the Company’s properties ($ in thousands):

The following table details the future principal payments due under the Company’s mortgage notes, term loans, and secured revolving credit facilities as of December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company paid off certain of its loans at carrying value in conjunction with the sale of the underlying property or a refinancing. As such, the Company incurred a realized loss on extinguishment of debt of $10.4 million resulting from the acceleration of related deferred financing costs, prepayment penalties and transactions costs, which are recorded on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. No such losses were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

The Company is subject to various financial and operational covenants pursuant to certain of the executed mortgage notes, term loans, and secured revolving credit facilities agreements. These covenants require the Company, to maintain certain financial ratios, which may include leverage, debt yield, and debt service coverage, among others. As of December 31, 2020, the Company believes it was in compliance with all of its loan covenants. The Company’s continued compliance with these covenants depends on many factors and could be impacted by current or future economic conditions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Company has entered into master repurchase agreements with Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (the “Citi MRA”), Royal Bank of Canada (the “RBC MRA”), Bank of America Merrill Lynch (the “BAML MRA”), Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A. (the “MS MRA”), MUFG Securities EMEA PLC (the “MUFG MRA”), and Barclays Bank PLC (the “Barclays MRA”) to provide the Company with additional financing capacity secured by certain of the Company’s investments in real estate debt. The terms of the Citi MRA, RBC MRA, BAML MRA, MS MRA, and MUFG MRA provide the lenders the ability to determine the size and terms of the financing provided based upon the particular collateral pledged by the Company from time-to-time and may require us to provide additional margin in the form of cash, securities or other forms of collateral should the market value of the pledged collateral decline. The Barclays MRA has a maximum facility size of $750.0 million and repurchase agreements under the Barclays MRA have longer dated

maturity compared to the Company’s other master repurchase agreements. Additionally, the Barclays MRA contains specific spread and advance rate provisions based on the rating of the underlying investments in real estate debt. The Company is in compliance with all financial covenants of the Barclays MRA.

During April 2020, the Company entered into an asset-specific Total Return Swap (“TRS”) and sale of a financial asset, collectively accounted for as a secured financing with Deutsche Bank (the “DB Secured Financing”) in the amount of $246.9 million. The DB Secured Financing is secured by one of the Company’s term loans and bears interest equal to the three-month EURIBOR plus 1.8% per annum. Additionally, as part of the DB Secured Financing, the Company is responsible for providing in cash, the equivalent of any decline in value on the underlying collateral. The DB Secured Financing is denominated in euro, therefore any foreign exchange is recorded as a component of Income (Loss) from Investments in Real Estate Debt on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

During July 2020, the Company entered into a TRS with Citibank, N.A. (the “Citi Term Loan TRS”) in order to finance certain of the Company’s term loans. The Citi Term Loan TRS bears interest equal to the three-month or one-month USD LIBOR plus a spread, dependent upon the collateral. Additionally, as part of the Citi Term Loan TRS, the Company is responsible for providing, in cash, the equivalent of any decline in value on the underlying collateral.

The following tables detail the Company’s secured financings on investments in real estate debt ($ in thousands):

The weighted average interest rate of the Company’s secured financings on investments in real estate debt was 1.6% (L+1.6%) and 3.0% (L+1.3%) for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The term “L” refers to the relevant floating benchmark rates, which include USD LIBOR, GBP LIBOR and EURIBOR, as applicable to each secured financing.

The Company is party to an unsecured line of credit with multiple banks. The line of credit expires on February 22, 2023 and may be extended for one year. Interest under the line of credit is determined based on one-month U.S. dollar-denominated LIBOR plus 2.5%. As of December 31, 2020, the capacity of the unsecured line of credit was $1.5 billion. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had a $24.8 million letter of credit outstanding, which reduced the available capacity of the unsecured line of credit. As of December 31, 2019, the capacity of the unsecured line of credit was $900.0 million and there was a $30.0 million letter of credit outstanding. There were no outstanding borrowings on the line of credit as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

The Company is party to an unsecured, uncommitted line of credit (the “Line of Credit”) up to a maximum amount of $100.0 million with Blackstone Holdings Finance Co. L.L.C. (“Lender”), an affiliate of Blackstone. The Line of Credit expires on January 22, 2022, and may be extended for up to 12 months, subject to Lender approval. The interest rate is the then-current rate offered by a third-party lender, or, if no such rate is available, LIBOR plus 2.5%. Interest under the Line of Credit is determined based on a one-month U.S. dollar-denominated LIBOR, which was 0.1% and 1.8% as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Each advance under the Line of Credit is repayable on the earliest of (i) the expiration of the Line of Credit, (ii) Lender’s demand and (iii) the date on which the Adviser no longer acts as the Company’s investment adviser, provided that the Company will have 180 days to make such repayment in the cases of clauses (i) and (ii) and 45 days to make such repayment in the case of clause (iii). To the extent the Company has not repaid all loans and other obligations under the Line of Credit when repayment is required, the Company is obligated to apply the net cash proceeds from the Offering and any sale or other disposition of assets to the repayment of such loans and other obligations; provided that the Company will be permitted to (x) make payments to fulfill any repurchase requests pursuant to the Company’s share repurchase plan, (y) use funds to close any acquisition of property that the Company committed to prior to receiving a demand notice and (z) make quarterly distributions to the Company’s stockholders at per share levels consistent with the immediately preceding fiscal quarter and as otherwise required for the Company to maintain its REIT status. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had no outstanding balance under the Line of Credit.

The following table details the components of due to affiliates ($ in thousands):

The Special Limited Partner holds a performance participation interest in BREIT OP that entitles it to receive an allocation of BREIT OP’s total return to its capital account. Total return is defined as distributions paid or accrued plus the change in NAV. Under the BREIT OP agreement, the annual total return will be allocated solely to the Special Limited Partner after the other unit holders have received a total return of 5% (after recouping any loss carryforward amount) and such allocation will continue until the allocation between the Special Limited Partner and all other unit holders is equal to 12.5% and 87.5%, respectively. Thereafter, the Special Limited Partner will receive an allocation of 12.5% of the annual total return. The allocation of the performance participation interest is ultimately determined at the end of each calendar year and will be paid in cash, Class I units of BREIT OP, or Class B units of BREIT OP, at the election of the Special Limited Partner. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company recognized $192.6 million, $141.4 million and $37.5 million, respectively, of Performance Participation Allocation Expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations.

In January 2021, the Company issued approximately 15.5 million Class I units and 1.1 million Class B units in BREIT OP to the Special Limited Partner as payment for the 2020 performance participation allocation. Such units were issued at the NAV per unit as of December 31, 2020. Subsequent to the Class I units and Class B units being issued, 9.7 million of such units were redeemed for $111.9 million and 1.1 million of such units were exchanged for unregistered Class I shares in the Company. In January 2020, the Company issued approximately 11.7 million Class I units and 0.7 million Class B units in BREIT OP to the Special Limited Partner as payment for the 2019 performance participation allocation. Such Class I units were issued at the NAV per unit as of December 31, 2019. Subsequent to the Class I units and Class B units being issued, 7.3 million of such units were redeemed for $83.6 million and 0.8 million of such units were exchanged for unregistered Class I shares in the Company. In January 2019, the Company issued

approximately 3.5 million Class I units in BREIT OP to the Special Limited Partner as payment for the 2018 performance participation allocation. Such Class I units were issued at the NAV per unit as of December 31, 2018. Subsequent to the Class I units being issued, 0.4 million of such units were redeemed for $4.3 million and 1.1 million of such units were exchanged for unregistered Class I shares in the Company. As of December 31, 2020, Blackstone and its employees, including the Company’s executive officers, continue to own an aggregate of $214.7 million worth of shares of the Company and Class I and Class B units of BREIT OP. The remaining Class I units held by the Special Limited Partner are included in Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Adviser is entitled to an annual management fee equal to 1.25% of the Company’s NAV, payable monthly, as compensation for the services it provides to the Company. The management fee can be paid, at the Adviser’s election, in cash, shares of common stock, or BREIT OP units. The Adviser has elected to receive the management fee in shares of the Company’s common stock to date. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company incurred management fees of $224.8 million, $108.1 million, and $42.7 million, respectively.

The Company issued 18.5 million, 8.4 million, and 3.8 million, unregistered Class I shares to the Adviser as payment for the 2020, 2019, and 2018 management fees, respectively, and also had a payable of $22.3 million and $13.9 million related to management fees as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, which is included in Due to Affiliates on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. During January 2021, 2020, and 2019, the Adviser was issued 1.9 million, 1.2 million, and 0.5 million, respectively, unregistered Class I shares as payment for the management fee accrued as of December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018. The shares issued to the Adviser for payment of the management fee were issued at the applicable NAV per share at the end of each month for which the fee was earned. During 2020 the Adviser submitted 16.4 million Class I shares for repurchase resulting in a total repurchase of $180.0 million. During 2019, the Adviser submitted 10.3 million Class I shares for repurchase resulting in a total repurchase of $114.8 million.

The Company has engaged BRE Hotels and Resorts (“BRE”), a portfolio company controlled by a Blackstone-advised fund, to provide, as applicable, operational services (including, without limitation, property management), corporate support services (including, without limitation, accounting, legal and tax) and transaction support services for the Company’s hotel properties.

The Company has engaged LivCor, LLC (“LivCor”), a portfolio company owned by a Blackstone-advised fund, to provide, as applicable, operational services (including, without limitation, property management and construction management), corporate support services (including, without limitation, accounting, information technology, legal, tax and human resources) and transaction support services for the Company’s multifamily properties.

Beginning March 2019, the Company engaged Link Industrial Properties LLC (“Link”), a portfolio company owned by a Blackstone-advised fund, to provide the services that Gateway had previously provided to the Company’s industrial properties. The Company previously engaged Gateway Industrial Properties L.L.C. (“Gateway”), a portfolio company owned by a Blackstone-advised fund, to provide, as applicable, operational services (including, without limitation, property management, leasing, and construction management), corporate support services (including, without limitation, accounting, information technology, legal, tax and human resources) and transaction support services for the Company’s industrial properties.

The Company has engaged Equity Office Management, L.L.C. (“EOM”), a portfolio company owned by Blackstone-advised funds, to provide, as applicable, operational services (including, without limitation, property management, leasing, and construction management), corporate support services (including, without limitation, accounting, information technology, legal, tax and human resources) and transaction support services for the Company’s office properties.

The Company has engaged ShopCore Properties TRS Management LLC (“ShopCore”), a portfolio company owned by a Blackstone-advised fund, to provide, as applicable, operational services (including, without limitation, property management, construction management and leasing services), corporate support services (including, without limitation, accounting, information technology, legal, tax and human resources) and transaction support services for the Company’s retail properties.

The Company has engaged Revantage Corporate Services, LLC (“Revantage”), a portfolio company owned by a Blackstone-advised fund, to provide, as applicable, corporate support services (including, without limitation, accounting, legal, tax, treasury, valuation services, information technology and data management), and transaction support services to certain of the Company’s investments directly.

The Company issued incentive compensation awards to certain employees of the affiliate portfolio company service providers described above on January 1, 2020 that entitles them to receive an allocation of total return over a certain hurdle amount, as determined by the Company (the “2020 Awards”). The Company has determined the value of the 2020 Awards to be zero.

The Company issued incentive compensation awards to certain employees of the affiliate portfolio company service providers described above on January 1, 2019 that entitles them to receive an allocation of total return over a certain hurdle amount, as determined by the Company. The value of the award at January 1, 2019 was $8.0 million and will be amortized over the four year service period, as adjusted for forfeitures. As of December 31, 2020, the total unrecognized compensation cost relating to the portfolio company incentive compensation awards was $3.4 million and is expected to be recognized over a period of 2 years from December 31, 2020.

The 2018 portfolio company incentive compensation awards of $4.7 million became payable on December 31, 2018 and, in January 2019, the Company issued approximately 0.4 million of fully vested Class I units in BREIT OP to certain employees of such companies. During the year ended December 31, 2019, certain employees of affiliate portfolio company service providers submitted 64,393 Class I units issued as part of the 2018 incentive compensation awards for repurchase resulting in a total repurchase of $0.7 million.

None of Blackstone, the Adviser, or the affiliate portfolio company service providers receive any incentive compensation from the aforementioned arrangements.

The following table details the amounts incurred for affiliate service providers during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 ($ in thousands):

Affiliate service provider expenses and incentive compensation awards are included as a component of Rental Property Operating and Hotel Operating expense, as applicable, in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The following table details the capitalized transaction support service fees incurred for affiliate service providers ($ in thousands):

Transaction support service fees were capitalized to Investments in Real Estate on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Neither Blackstone nor the Adviser receives any fees from the aforementioned arrangements.

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had $50.8 million and $42.1 million, respectively, of accrued repurchases of Class I shares due to the Adviser. Additionally, as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Adviser had advanced $2.3 million and $2.0 million, respectively, of expenses on the Company’s behalf for general corporate expenses provided by unaffiliated third parties.

During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company engaged an affiliate of the Adviser to perform certain internal audit and compliance functions. For each of the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company had incurred $40,000 of fees for such services.

Blackstone owns Lexington National Land Services (“LNLS”), a title agent company. LNLS acts as an agent for one or more underwriters in issuing title policies and/or providing support services in connection with investments by the Company, Blackstone and their affiliates and related parties and third parties. LNLS focuses on transactions in rate-regulated states where the cost of title insurance is non-negotiable. LNLS will not perform services in non-regulated states for the Company, unless (i) in the context of a portfolio transaction that includes properties in rate-regulated states, (ii) as part of a syndicate of title insurance companies where the rate is negotiated by other insurers or their agents, (iii) when a third party is paying all or a material portion of the premium or (iv) when providing only support services to the underwriter. LNLS earns fees, which would have otherwise been paid to third parties, by providing title agency services and facilitating placement of title insurance with underwriters. Blackstone receives distributions from LNLS in connection with investments by the Company based on its equity interest in LNLS. In each case, there will be no related offset to the Company.

During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company paid LNLS $6.1 million and $14.8 million, respectively, for title services related to 39 and 43 investments, respectively, and such costs were capitalized to Investments in Real Estate or recorded as deferred financing costs, which is a reduction to Mortgage Notes, Term Loans, and Secured Revolving Credit Facilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

On July 28, 2020, the Company became a member of a captive insurance company owned by the Company and other funds and accounts managed by Blackstone. A Blackstone affiliate provides oversight and management services to the captive and receives fees based on a percentage of premiums of such policies. The fees and expenses of the captive, including insurance premiums and fees paid to the Blackstone affiliate to manage it, are borne by the Company and the other Blackstone-managed funds and accounts pro rata based on estimates of insurance premiums that would have been payable for each party’s respective properties, as benchmarked by third parties.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company contributed capital to the captive in amount equal to $29.1 million for insurance premiums and its pro rata share of other expenses. Of this amount, $0.5 million was attributable to the fee paid to a Blackstone affiliate to provide oversight and management services. The capital contributed and fees paid to the captive are in place of insurance premiums and fees previously paid to third parties. The Company did not contribute any capital to the captive for years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had a receivable of $3.9 million and $3.6 million, respectively, from Livcor and such amounts are included in Other Assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had a receivable of $7.8 million from funds affiliated with the Adviser for post-closing settlements related to the Jupiter 12 Industrial Portfolio acquisition. Such amount is included in Other Assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following table details the components of other liabilities ($ in thousands):

The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of the Company’s intangible assets and liabilities consisted of the following ($ in thousands):

The estimated future amortization on the Company’s intangibles for each of the next five years and thereafter as of December 31, 2020 is as follows ($ in thousands):

The Company is authorized to issue preferred stock and four classes of common stock consisting of Class S shares, Class I shares, Class T shares, and Class D shares. The Company’s board of directors has the ability to establish the preferences and rights of each class or series of preferred stock, without stockholder approval, and as such, it may afford the holders of any series or class of preferred stock preferences, powers and rights senior to the rights of holders of common stock. The differences among the common share classes relate to upfront selling commissions, dealer manager fees and ongoing stockholder servicing fees. See Note 2 for a further description of such items. Other than the differences in upfront selling commissions, dealer manager fees and ongoing stockholder servicing fees, each class of common stock has the same economic and voting rights.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company had authority to issue 10,100,000,000 shares, consisting of the following:

The following tables detail the movement in the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock (in thousands):

The Company has adopted a share repurchase plan whereby, subject to certain limitations, stockholders may request on a monthly basis that the Company repurchases all or any portion of their shares. Should repurchase requests, in the Company’s judgment, place an undue burden on its liquidity, adversely affect its operations or risk having an adverse impact on the Company as a whole, or should the Company otherwise determine that investing its liquid assets in real properties or other illiquid investments rather than repurchasing its shares is in the best interests of the Company as a whole, then the Company may choose to repurchase fewer shares than have been requested to be repurchased, or none at all. Further, the Company’s board of directors may modify and suspend the

Company’s share repurchase plan if it deems such action to be in the Company’s best interest and the best interest of its stockholders. In the event that the Company determines to repurchase some but not all of the shares submitted for repurchase during any month, shares repurchased at the end of the month will be repurchased on a pro rata basis.

For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company repurchased shares and BREIT OP units for $1.5 billion, $0.2 billion, and $0.1 billion, respectively. The Company had no unfulfilled repurchase requests during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

The Company generally intends to distribute substantially all of its taxable income, which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP, to its stockholders each year to comply with the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.

Each class of common stock receives the same gross distribution per share. The net distribution varies for each class based on the applicable stockholder servicing fee, which is deducted from the monthly distribution per share and paid directly to the applicable distributor. The following tables detail the aggregate distributions declared for each applicable class of common stock:

Distributions for the year ended December 31, 2020 were characterized, for federal income tax purposes, as 100.0% return of capital. Distributions for the year ended December 31, 2019 were characterized, for federal income tax purposes, as 8.75% ordinary income, 1.17% capital gains and 90.08% return of capital. Of the 8.75%, 8.60% and 0.15% of the distributions paid in 2019 were non-qualified and qualified, respectively. Distributions for the year ended December 31, 2018 were characterized, for federal income tax purposes, as 3.11% ordinary income and 96.89% return of capital. Of the 3.11%, 0.51% and 2.60% of the distributions paid in 2018 were non-qualified and qualified, respectively.

In connection with its performance participation interest, the Special Limited Partner holds Class I units in BREIT OP. See Note 9 for further details of the Special Limited Partner’s performance participation interest. Because the Special Limited Partner has the ability to redeem its Class I units for Class I shares in the Company or cash, at the election of the Special Limited Partner, the Company has classified these Class I units as Redeemable Non-controlling Interest in mezzanine equity on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following table details the redeemable non-controlling interest activity related to the Special Limited Partner for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 ($ in thousands):

In addition to the Special Limited Partner’s interest noted above, certain of the Company’s third party joint ventures also have a redeemable non-controlling interest in such joint ventures. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, $29.8 million and $20.9 million, respectively, related to such third party joint ventures was included in Redeemable Non-controlling Interests on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Redeemable Non-controlling Interests are recorded at the greater of their carrying amount, adjusted for their share of the allocation of income or loss and distributions, or their redemption value, which is equivalent to fair value, of such interests at the end of each measurement period. Accordingly, the Company recorded an allocation adjustment of $8.8 million, $6.8 million and $2.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, between Additional Paid-in Capital and Redeemable Non-controlling Interest.

On July 27, 2018, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement (the “A&R OP Agreement”) for BREIT OP. The A&R OP Agreement amended the limited partnership agreement governing BREIT OP to provide for a new class of units (“Class B Units”) of BREIT OP, among other changes. Class B Units are available to certain suitable investors in private placements generally utilizing a “draw-down” structure. Class B Units are sold at their NAV per unit, which will equal the NAV per Class I unit of BREIT OP and will generally correspond to the NAV per share of the Company’s Class I shares.

Class B Units are subject to the same fees and expenses of Class I Units and do not have any preferential rights relative to the Company’s interest in BREIT OP, nor are they exchangeable for any shares of the Company’s common stock. Holders of the Class B Units have a right to redeem their units for cash in a manner similar to the ability of the Company’s stockholders to have their shares repurchased under the Company’s share repurchase plan. Class B Unit redemptions are subject to similar limitations as share repurchases under the Company’s share repurchase plan, namely the early repurchase deduction and caps on monthly and quarterly repurchases (calculated on an aggregate basis with shares of the Company’s common stock submitted for repurchase for the applicable period). The redemption rights of the Class B unitholders do not affect the terms of the Company’s share repurchase plan. Class B Units have the same limited voting rights as the other BREIT OP units and such rights do not affect the Company’s exclusive power, as general partner of BREIT OP, to manage and conduct the business of BREIT OP.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, BREIT OP received $9.0 million in Class B Unit subscriptions from an entity advised by Blackstone Insurance Solutions. No such subscriptions were received during the year ended December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, there were 10,055,358 and 9,268,500 Class B Units outstanding, respectively. Class B Units are recorded as a component of Non-controlling Interests on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company issued $0.8 million and $64.7 million, respectively, of Class I Units as consideration for acquisitions of real estate. The Company did not issue any Class I units as consideration for acquisitions of real estate during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Certain of the Company’s investments in real estate are subject to ground leases. The Company’s ground leases are classified as either operating leases or financing leases based on the characteristics of each lease. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had 15 ground leases classified as operating and two ground leases classified as financing. Each of the Company’s ground leases were acquired as part of the acquisition of real estate and no incremental costs were incurred for such ground leases. The Company’s ground leases are non-cancelable, and two of the Company’s operating leases contain renewal options for additional 99 and 10 year terms.

The following table details the future lease payments due under the Company’s ground leases as of December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

The Company utilized its incremental borrowing rate, which was between 5% and 7%, to determine its lease liabilities. As of December 31, 2020, the weighted average remaining lease term of the Company’s operating leases and financing leases was 56 years and 76 years, respectively.

Payments under the Company’s ground leases primarily contain fixed payment components that may include periodic increases fixed to an index or periodic fixed percentage escalations. One of the Company’s ground leases contains a variable component based on a percentage of revenue.

The following table details the fixed and variable components of the Company’s operating leases ($ in thousands):

The following table details the fixed and variable components of the Company’s financing leases ($ in thousands):

Lease costs recognized during the year ended December 31, 2018 are presented under the standard in effect prior to the Company’s adoption of ASU 2016-02.

The Company’s rental revenue primarily consists of rent earned from operating leases at the Company’s multifamily, industrial, net lease, self storage, retail, and office properties. Leases at the Company’s industrial, retail, and office properties generally include a fixed base rent and certain leases also contain a variable component. The variable component of the Company’s operating leases at its industrial, retail, and office properties primarily consist of the reimbursement of operating expenses such as real estate taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance costs. Rental revenue earned from leases at the Company’s multifamily properties primarily consist of a fixed base rent and certain leases contain a variable component that allows for pass-through of certain operating expenses such as utilities. Rental revenue earned from leases at the Company’s self storage properties primarily consist of a fixed base rent. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company changed its presentation for the payment of leasing commissions in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows to investing activities from operating activities to better align with how the Company assesses its overall investments in its properties. The Company does not believe the change in presentation to be material as the Company had $28.7 million of leasing commissions during the year ended December 31, 2020.

Rental revenue from the Company’s lease at the Bellagio consists of a fixed annual rent that escalates annually throughout the term of the lease and the tenant is generally responsible for all property-related expenses, including taxes, insurance and maintenance. The Company assessed the classification of the Bellagio lease and determined the lease was an operating lease. The Company’s assessment included the consideration of the present value of the lease payments over the lease term and the residual value of the assets under the lease.

Leases at the Company’s industrial, retail, office, and net lease properties are generally longer term and may contain extension and termination options at the lessee’s election. Leases at the Company’s multifamily and self storage properties are short term in nature, generally not greater than 12 months in length.

The following table details the components of operating lease income from leases in which the Company is the lessor ($ in thousands):

The Company increased the reserve for bad debt expense in the amount of $41.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 primarily as a result of COVID-19. The bad debt reserve represents the amount of rental revenue the Company anticipates it will not be able to collect from its tenants and is included in Rental Revenue on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The following table details the undiscounted future minimum rents the Company expects to receive for its industrial, net lease, retail and office properties as of December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands). Leases at the Company’s multifamily and self storage properties are short term, generally 12 months or less, and are therefore not included.

The Company operates in eight reportable segments: Multifamily properties, Industrial properties, Net Lease properties, Hotel properties, Self Storage properties, Retail properties, Office properties, and Investments in Real Estate Debt. The Company allocates resources and evaluates results based on the performance of each segment individually. The Company believes that Segment Net Operating Income is the key performance metric that captures the unique operating characteristics of each segment.

The following table details the financial results by segment for the year ended December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

	Multifamily			Industrial			Net Lease			Hotel			Self Storage			Retail			Office			Investments in Real Estate Debt			Total
Revenues:
Rental revenue	$	976,873		$	834,532		$	331,178		$	—		$	22,874		$	54,047		$	16,368		$	—		$	2,235,872
Hotel revenue		—			—			—			248,909			—			—			—			—			248,909
Other revenue		50,256			5,438			—			6,397			3,076			1,198			502			—			66,867
Total revenues		1,027,129			839,970			331,178			255,306			25,950			55,245			16,870			—			2,551,648

Expenses:
Rental property operating		471,413			243,831			701			—			12,753			17,541			5,540			—			751,779
Hotel operating		—			—			—			261,472			—			—			—			—			261,472
Total expenses		471,413			243,831			701			261,472			12,753			17,541			5,540			—			1,013,251
Income from unconsolidated entities		—			—			88,571			—			—			—			—			—			88,571
Income from investments in real estate debt		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(120,917	)		(120,917	)
Income from investments in equity securities		37,679			14,005			12,578			—			—			—			2,194			—			66,456
Segment net operating income (loss)	$	593,395		$	610,144		$	431,626		$	(6,166	)	$	13,197		$	37,704		$	13,524		$	(120,917	)	$	1,572,507

Depreciation and amortization	$	(544,927	)	$	(550,121	)	$	(114,530	)	$	(90,820	)	$	(19,484	)	$	(32,528	)	$	(9,741	)	$	—		$	(1,362,151	)

Other income (expense):
General and administrative																										(25,653	)
Management fee																										(224,776	)
Performance participation allocation																										(192,648	)
Impairment of investments in real estate																										(12,343	)
Net gain on dispositions of real estate																										113,173
Interest income																										2,228
Interest expense																										(715,159	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt																										(10,356	)
Other income (expense)																										(12,224	)
Net loss																									$	(867,402	)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in third party joint ventures																									$	2,417
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in BREIT OP																										11,586
Net loss attributable to BREIT stockholders																									$	(853,399	)

The following table details the financial results by segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 ($ in thousands):

	Multifamily			Industrial			Net Lease			Hotel			Self Storage			Retail			Office			Investments in Real Estate Debt		Total
Revenues:
Rental revenue	$	673,173		$	461,939		$	42,317		$	—		$	6,191		$	15,869		$	2,124		$	—	$	1,201,613
Hotel revenue		—			—			—			432,892			—			—			—			—		432,892
Other revenue		39,340			2,312			—			8,858			778			398			81			—		51,767
Total revenues		712,513			464,251			42,317			441,750			6,969			16,267			2,205			—		1,686,272

Expenses:
Rental property operating		322,773			137,401			—			—			3,454			5,539			799			—		469,966
Hotel operating		—			—			—			304,710			—			—			—			—		304,710
Total expenses		322,773			137,401			—			304,710			3,454			5,539			799			—		774,676
Income from investments in real estate debt		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			213,062		213,062
Segment net operating income	$	389,740		$	326,850		$	42,317		$	137,040		$	3,515		$	10,728		$	1,406		$	213,062	$	1,124,658

Depreciation and amortization	$	(427,209	)	$	(291,940	)	$	(14,858	)	$	(72,765	)	$	(7,374	)	$	(8,640	)	$	(1,253	)	$	—	$	(824,039	)

Other income (expense):
General and administrative																									(18,170	)
Management fee																									(108,115	)
Performance participation allocation																									(141,396	)
Net gain on dispositions of real estate																									35,035
Interest income																									3,041
Interest expense																									(487,517	)
Other income (expense)																									2,260
Net loss																								$	(414,243	)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in third party joint ventures																								$	5,671
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in BREIT OP																									6,801
Net loss attributable to BREIT stockholders																								$	(401,771	)

The following table details the financial results by segment for the year ended December 31, 2018 ($ in thousands):

	Multifamily			Industrial			Hotel			Retail			Investments in Real Estate Debt		Total
Revenues:
Rental revenue	$	345,619		$	203,084		$	—		$	9,961		$	—	$	558,664
Hotel revenue		—			—			138,433			—			—		138,433
Other revenue		22,945			578			2,485			153			—		26,161
Total revenues		368,564			203,662			140,918			10,114			—		723,258

Expenses:
Rental property operating		176,800			62,824			—			3,469			—		243,093
Hotel operating		—			—			97,248			—			—		97,248
Total expenses		176,800			62,824			97,248			3,469			—		340,341
Income from investments in real estate debt		—			—			—			—			55,323		55,323
Segment net operating income	$	191,764		$	140,838		$	43,670		$	6,645		$	55,323	$	438,240

Depreciation and amortization	$	(257,201	)	$	(116,206	)	$	(27,944	)	$	(4,944	)	$	—	$	(406,295	)

Other income (expense):
General and administrative																(10,982	)
Management fee																(42,659	)
Performance participation allocation																(37,484	)
Interest income																410
Interest expense																(233,184	)
Other income (expense)																489
Net loss															$	(291,465	)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in third party joint ventures															$	6,188
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in BREIT OP																4,221
Net loss attributable to BREIT stockholders															$	(281,056	)

From time to time, the Company may be involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company was not involved in any material legal proceedings.

The following tables detail the Company’s quarterly results ($ in thousands, except per share data):

Subsequent to December 31, 2020, the Company acquired an aggregate of $0.4 billion of real estate across four separate transactions, exclusive of closing costs. The acquisitions were related to multifamily and industrial properties.

Subsequent to December 31, 2020, the Company closed a transaction to acquire an interest in two portfolios of industrial assets for a total purchase price of $0.9 billion.

Subsequent to December 31, 2020, the Company purchased an aggregate of $0.2 billion of investments in real estate debt.

Subsequent to December 31, 2020, the Company received $2.9 billion of proceeds from the sale of its common stock in the Offering and otherwise.

Schedule III—Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands)

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Multifamily Properties:
Mid Rise Apartments	Atlanta, GA	$	130,000	$	—	$	171,709	$	116	$	5,857	$	116	$	177,566	$	177,682	$	(23,546	)	2017
High Rise Apartments	Orlando, FL		63,600		10,030		97,652		26		11,112		10,056		108,764		118,820		(13,951	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Addison, TX		36,140		9,382		37,786		54		2,271		9,436		40,057		49,493		(4,888	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Orlando, FL		43,225		11,567		57,128		210		6,502		11,777		63,630		75,407		(7,693	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Palm Beach Gardens, FL		69,777		24,422		73,818		434		7,115		24,856		80,933		105,789		(10,221	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Gurnee, IL		41,340		10,899		42,850		430		5,092		11,329		47,942		59,271		(6,042	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Lenexa, KS		20,767		2,156		28,655		166		2,074		2,322		30,729		33,051		(3,855	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Henderson, NV		37,783		4,745		47,195		36		889		4,781		48,084		52,865		(6,225	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		37,487		6,071		46,952		17		709		6,088		47,661		53,749		(6,275	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		46,110		6,593		51,158		8		939		6,601		52,097		58,698		(6,677	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		33,704		6,632		37,909		100		1,850		6,732		39,759		46,491		(4,878	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		26,281		5,569		29,208		95		2,041		5,664		31,249		36,913		(3,951	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		75,400		17,565		80,840		218		1,377		17,783		82,217		100,000		(11,220	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Gilbert, AZ		40,484		16,489		53,056		100		847		16,589		53,903		70,492		(6,303	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Gilbert, AZ		48,129		15,574		54,663		63		92		15,637		54,755		70,392		(6,368	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Dallas, TX		47,600		16,678		47,939		80		686		16,758		48,625		65,383		(5,658	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Richardson, TX		42,500		11,754		49,788		79		760		11,833		50,548		62,381		(5,761	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Modesto, CA		24,500		2,765		33,715		111		2,672		2,876		36,387		39,263		(4,039	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Flagstaff, AZ		18,142		3,344		30,331		72		1,174		3,416		31,505		34,921		(3,599	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Olympia, WA		22,884		3,940		27,206		41		1,559		3,981		28,765		32,746		(3,474	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Gilbert, AZ		33,164		10,679		28,170		74		2,834		10,753		31,004		41,757		(3,431	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Jacksonville, FL		42,828		11,548		55,009		533		5,239		12,081		60,248		72,329		(7,135	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Jacksonville, FL		22,802		4,034		28,288		94		1,065		4,128		29,353		33,481		(3,346	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Jacksonville, FL		22,368		3,996		29,314		106		1,031		4,102		30,345		34,447		(3,434	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Nashville, TN		20,987		3,910		20,056		504		2,042		4,414		22,098		26,512		(2,615	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Grand Prairie, TX		16,503		3,514		18,039		318		3,444		3,832		21,483		25,315		(2,323	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Sumner, TN		23,357		2,222		32,374		65		505		2,287		32,879		35,166		(3,585	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Louisville, KY		8,352		1,285		11,025		146		1,596		1,431		12,621		14,052		(1,387	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	North Richland Hills, TX		15,277		3,922		21,937		269		2,013		4,191		23,950		28,141		(2,560	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Mansfield, TX		26,013		3,810		32,854		103		2,132		3,913		34,986		38,899		(3,975	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Austin, TX		49,733		8,371		52,576		1,206		4,338		9,577		56,914		66,491		(6,211	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Round Rock, TX		20,502		3,851		25,309		71		1,940		3,922		27,249		31,171		(3,070	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Murfreesboro, TN		24,457		2,674		29,863		119		1,771		2,793		31,634		34,427		(3,352	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	San Antonio, TX		13,308		2,454		14,742		100		1,701		2,554		16,443		18,997		(1,789	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Buda, TX		20,704		3,809		23,117		114		798		3,923		23,915		27,838		(2,878	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Fair Oaks Ranch, TX		22,055		4,629		27,813		72		467		4,701		28,280		32,981		(2,989	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	San Marcos, TX		19,558		3,147		21,147		129		789		3,276		21,936		25,212		(2,449	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Louisville, KY		7,845		2,205		13,227		205		1,595		2,410		14,822		17,232		(1,570	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Louisville, KY		10,952		2,118		14,118		27		192		2,145		14,310		16,455		(1,429	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Louisville, KY		11,050		1,680		12,500		16		857		1,696		13,357		15,053		(1,312	)	2017

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Garden Style Apartments	Nashville, TN		5,356		1,795		12,033		124		840		1,919		12,873		14,792		(1,285	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Carrollton, TX		—		3,393		9,871		169		1,628		3,562		11,499		15,061		(1,208	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Louisville, KY		—		295		1,927		6		91		301		2,018		2,319		(206	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Hillsboro, OR		62,732		9,176		81,990		1		614		9,177		82,604		91,781		(8,923	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		33,897		14,447		34,871		90		2,740		14,537		37,611		52,148		(4,511	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		41,177		14,801		46,622		61		2,826		14,862		49,448		64,310		(5,955	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Thornton, CO		44,325		9,711		47,052		732		3,556		10,443		50,608		61,051		(5,637	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Everett, WA		47,705		19,105		46,552		366		4,152		19,471		50,704		70,175		(6,320	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Miami, FL		95,299		28,419		103,131		315		237		28,734		103,368		132,102		(12,612	)	2017
Garden Style Apartments	Sacramento, CA		99,990		19,181		124,339		284		4,733		19,465		129,072		148,537		(13,159	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Tumwater, WA		53,049		16,515		57,382		117		5,287		16,632		62,669		79,301		(7,037	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		46,940		23,755		43,057		113		3,497		23,868		46,554		70,422		(5,333	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	University Place, WA		32,672		9,427		37,072		61		3,196		9,488		40,268		49,756		(4,094	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Milwaukie, OR		26,835		8,306		30,319		135		1,679		8,441		31,998		40,439		(3,449	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Liberty Lake, WA		29,904		5,501		31,785		160		5,162		5,661		36,947		42,608		(3,758	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Randolph, MA		86,191		16,236		108,066		181		2,970		16,417		111,036		127,453		(10,352	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Orlando, FL		36,881		7,989		48,397		312		4,263		8,301		52,660		60,961		(5,094	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Jacksonville, FL		37,338		8,186		43,909		162		2,352		8,348		46,261		54,609		(4,647	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Gresham, OR		33,268		4,825		49,266		146		1,397		4,971		50,663		55,634		(4,801	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Turlock, CA		22,951		2,241		35,067		97		1,706		2,338		36,773		39,111		(3,349	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		47,190		22,388		47,117		240		2,561		22,628		49,678		72,306		(5,533	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Phoenix, AZ		29,728		8,738		37,766		79		2,439		8,817		40,205		49,022		(4,289	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Glendale, AZ		40,671		12,242		49,800		8		420		12,250		50,220		62,470		(6,260	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Glendale, AZ		25,610		6,505		32,193		58		2,460		6,563		34,653		41,216		(3,145	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Tempe, AZ		42,703		11,433		52,606		183		3,458		11,616		56,064		67,680		(5,162	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Phoenix, AZ		35,043		9,847		42,718		224		4,199		10,071		46,917		56,988		(4,272	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Chandler, AZ		29,600		7,521		36,794		76		2,500		7,597		39,294		46,891		(3,567	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Surprise, AZ		44,982		10,845		55,009		49		3,857		10,894		58,866		69,760		(5,724	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Peoria, AZ		22,745		4,833		27,719		36		2,459		4,869		30,178		35,047		(2,566	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		44,687		4,630		59,893		153		2,473		4,783		62,366		67,149		(4,641	)	2018
Garden Style Apartments	Phoenix, AZ		39,179		11,626		46,444		96		61		11,722		46,505		58,227		(3,804	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Moreno Valley, CA		61,710		9,483		82,211		17		1,509		9,500		83,720		93,220		(5,900	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Temecula, CA		60,424		6,541		82,161		39		162		6,580		82,323		88,903		(5,588	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Santa Fe Springs, CA		28,220		10,795		44,758		27		291		10,822		45,049		55,871		(2,938	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	St. Petersburg, FL		43,506		12,618		50,172		90		2,803		12,708		52,975		65,683		(3,402	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Orlando, FL		39,260		8,422		59,988		82		289		8,504		60,277		68,781		(3,960	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Lewisville, TX		31,169		5,777		40,840		31		563		5,808		41,403		47,211		(2,881	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Englewood, CO		45,500		6,685		65,881		75		128		6,760		66,009		72,769		(4,112	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Centennial, CO		35,037		6,492		44,555		81		1,930		6,573		46,485		53,058		(3,211	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Hillsboro, OR		32,299		7,011		45,819		8		232		7,019		46,051		53,070		(2,984	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Portland, OR		—		4,006		24,748		2		273		4,008		25,021		29,029		(1,598	)	2019

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Garden Style Apartments	Charlotte, NC		35,463		8,328		43,217		948		720		9,276		43,937		53,213		(3,522	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Woodstock, GA		34,856		8,236		42,166		25		800		8,261		42,966		51,227		(2,840	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Ladson, SC		30,738		6,512		35,603		35		1,046		6,547		36,649		43,196		(2,750	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Hopkinton, MA		46,865		9,298		52,822		15		378		9,313		53,200		62,513		(3,590	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Henderson, NV		64,844		13,651		81,360		120		633		13,771		81,993		95,764		(4,684	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Henderson, NV		63,205		12,949		74,610		110		512		13,059		75,122		88,181		(4,857	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Henderson, NV		49,374		9,009		55,495		54		505		9,063		56,000		65,063		(3,540	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		—		17,312		72,129		33		206		17,345		72,335		89,680		(3,169	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Orlando, FL		51,986		10,521		62,358		60		236		10,581		62,594		73,175		(3,845	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Lithia Springs, GA		26,046		6,054		31,725		22		726		6,076		32,451		38,527		(2,189	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		37,700		12,345		41,864		220		1,290		12,565		43,154		55,719		(3,032	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Charlotte, NC		33,000		7,280		31,350		63		3,466		7,343		34,816		42,159		(1,986	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Charlotte, NC		46,600		9,181		56,344		41		3,135		9,222		59,479		68,701		(2,953	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Phoenix, AZ		51,000		18,229		56,120		24		3,258		18,253		59,378		77,631		(3,131	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Corona Hills, CA		62,833		14,083		80,264		100		2,754		14,183		83,018		97,201		(5,276	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Moreno Valley, CA		45,475		10,070		58,439		21		1,756		10,091		60,195		70,286		(3,549	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Lakeland, FL		41,800		8,788		49,612		101		3,521		8,889		53,133		62,022		(3,256	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Peoria, AZ		46,150		11,935		55,630		54		238		11,989		55,868		67,857		(4,259	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Kennewick, WA		20,131		2,755		24,092		198		1,881		2,953		25,973		28,926		(1,790	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Richland, WA		23,254		2,725		27,396		61		1,562		2,786		28,958		31,744		(1,939	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Woodland, CA		18,873		3,201		29,394		6		1,101		3,207		30,495		33,702		(1,686	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Puyallup, WA		61,384		14,387		71,631		172		3,120		14,559		74,751		89,310		(4,183	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Orlando, FL		51,810		8,559		60,029		147		4,401		8,706		64,430		73,136		(3,930	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Charlotte, NC		35,422		12,883		86,351		448		382		13,331		86,733		100,064		(5,221	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Chandler, AZ		55,278		17,512		60,177		61		1,167		17,573		61,344		78,917		(3,225	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Ococee, FL		63,292		17,226		76,229		31		779		17,257		77,008		94,265		(3,403	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Huntersville, NC		38,430		8,868		48,880		41		529		8,909		49,409		58,318		(2,188	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Arlington, TX		34,000		13,290		35,267		44		280		13,334		35,547		48,881		(1,580	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Orlando, FL		35,400		5,197		48,490		11		851		5,208		49,341		54,549		(1,857	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Oviedo, FL		38,878		7,594		49,002		87		1,499		7,681		50,501		58,182		(2,037	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Largo, FL		45,600		8,822		56,744		22		134		8,844		56,878		65,722		(2,502	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Tampa, FL		37,375		8,514		45,818		3		53		8,517		45,871		54,388		(2,117	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Westminster, CO		54,625		6,235		72,861		44		326		6,279		73,187		79,466		(3,913	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Westminster, CO		52,723		6,523		66,313		23		219		6,546		66,532		73,078		(3,833	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Loveland, CO		36,127		5,020		42,672		3		201		5,023		42,873		47,896		(2,503	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Raleigh, NC		27,760		5,151		34,409		52		64		5,203		34,473		39,676		(2,258	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Jacksonville, FL		31,689		4,327		41,150		12		79		4,339		41,229		45,568		(2,539	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Henderson, NV		44,050		8,205		49,247		78		1,161		8,283		50,408		58,691		(3,215	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Oregon City, OR		21,556		34,849		29,218		5		41		34,854		29,259		64,113		(1,629	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Garner, NC		40,700		6,181		43,921		4		864		6,185		44,785		50,970		(1,970	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Northglenn, CO		48,022		14,198		126,198		102		2,840		14,300		129,038		143,338		(6,046	)	2019

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		51,900		16,341		60,038		12		975		16,353		61,013		77,366		(2,684	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		42,500		10,559		50,075		8		542		10,567		50,617		61,184		(2,295	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		35,500		9,308		43,490		10		542		9,318		44,032		53,350		(1,967	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Las Vegas, NV		23,500		6,257		27,266		29		380		6,286		27,646		33,932		(1,219	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Miami, FL		66,226		17,618		82,333		42		152		17,660		82,485		100,145		(4,691	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Miami, FL		69,753		17,721		81,590		101		212		17,822		81,802		99,624		(4,674	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Dunwoody, GA		27,400		2,837		39,187		30		659		2,867		39,846		42,713		(2,121	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Atlanta, GA		34,000		3,332		50,184		26		1,085		3,358		51,269		54,627		(2,719	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Atlanta, GA		35,000		4,203		51,699		19		797		4,222		52,496		56,718		(2,802	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Phoenix, AZ		72,818		18,048		78,354		145		2,934		18,193		81,288		99,481		(4,539	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Savannah, GA		28,925		5,613		35,434		122		25		5,735		35,459		41,194		(2,414	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Glendale, AZ		22,783		9,359		31,129		27		738		9,386		31,867		41,253		(1,672	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Austin, TX		21,800		10,358		51,589		3		63		10,361		51,652		62,013		(2,106	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Raleigh, NC		—		12,329		63,193		47		186		12,376		63,379		75,755		(3,416	)	2019
Garden Style Apartments	Irving, TX		74,526		21,692		90,742		16		254		21,708		90,996		112,704		(3,015	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Dallas, TX		51,393		19,822		51,005		7		65		19,829		51,070		70,899		(1,756	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Irving, TX		47,953		13,218		60,595		12		87		13,230		60,682		73,912		(1,941	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Carrollton, TX		37,024		11,489		43,255		8		105		11,497		43,360		54,857		(1,572	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Fort Worth, TX		21,356		7,454		20,485		9		100		7,463		20,585		28,048		(751	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Houston, TX		52,189		15,026		58,642		7		62		15,033		58,704		73,737		(1,898	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	San Antonio, TX		24,182		4,124		26,223		—		21		4,124		26,244		30,368		(870	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Apopka, FL		92,696		26,990		101,199		2,522		1,019		29,512		102,218		131,730		(3,446	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Saint Petersburg, FL		53,008		10,532		61,670		121		188		10,653		61,858		72,511		(1,894	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Brandon, FL		49,046		12,576		56,468		27		46		12,603		56,514		69,117		(1,969	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Decatur, GA		71,520		18,872		77,893		3		93		18,875		77,986		96,861		(2,583	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Lawrenceville, GA		59,293		14,432		63,570		14		75		14,446		63,645		78,091		(2,238	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Alpharetta, GA		45,767		13,203		44,631		2		80		13,205		44,711		57,916		(1,813	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Columbus, OH		60,044		8,842		70,529		16		136		8,858		70,665		79,523		(2,015	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Canal Winchester, OH		24,660		5,771		28,765		3		20		5,774		28,785		34,559		(1,095	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Durham, NC		38,800		9,737		41,148		—		71		9,737		41,219		50,956		(1,452	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Charlotte, NC		38,800		10,890		41,088		—		16		10,890		41,104		51,994		(1,492	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Mooresville, NC		29,920		5,160		36,438		—		21		5,160		36,459		41,619		(1,121	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Denver, CO		75,824		15,371		87,383		78		116		15,449		87,499		102,948		(2,758	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Altamonte Springs, FL		77,700		17,053		94,740		19		60		17,072		94,800		111,872		(2,266	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Durham, NC		38,638		11,076		51,315		5		27		11,081		51,342		62,423		(1,362	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Columbus, OH		108,000		24,259		101,270		14		1,036		24,273		102,306		126,579		(3,813	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Orlando, FL		55,586		11,004		74,107		41		938		11,045		75,045		86,090		(2,219	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Holly Springs, GA		58,984		9,979		59,792		—		—		9,979		59,792		69,771		(584	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Raleigh, NC		45,481		4,659		99,823		—		—		4,659		99,823		104,482		(591	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Alpharetta, GA		58,984		17,729		65,821		—		42		17,729		65,863		83,592		(635	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Atlanta, GA		—		17,098		89,292		—		6		17,098		89,298		106,396		(724	)	2020

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Garden Style Apartments	Nashville, TN		—		14,006		87,118		—		—		14,006		87,118		101,124		(402	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Charlotte, NC		—		11,096		48,561		—		9		11,096		48,570		59,666		(481	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Parker, CO		63,000		16,502		81,557		—		—		16,502		81,557		98,059		(320	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Jacksonville, FL		63,000		12,922		79,134		—		—		12,922		79,134		92,056		(303	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Atlanta, GA		116,500		31,267		139,612		—		—		31,267		139,612		170,879		(504	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Charlotte, NC		31,000		9,782		34,570		—		—		9,782		34,570		44,352		(137	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Plano, TX		36,500		10,682		41,121		—		20		10,682		41,141		51,823		(174	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Richardson, TX		60,500		18,577		70,954		—		—		18,577		70,954		89,531		(288	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Orlando, FL		63,000		14,318		69,795		—		14		14,318		69,809		84,127		(222	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Tampa, FL		19,270		5,408		26,377		—		—		5,408		26,377		31,785		(40	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Orlando, FL		43,500		11,724		50,750		—		—		11,724		50,750		62,474		(78	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Marietta, GA		50,175		25,878		61,332		—		—		25,878		61,332		87,210		(95	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Columbus, OH		7,885		1,081		4,728		—		—		1,081		4,728		5,809		(7	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Overland Park, KS		—		8,523		59,554		—		—		8,523		59,554		68,077		(96	)	2020
Garden Style Apartments	Olathe, KS		—		8,030		38,847		—		—		8,030		38,847		46,877		(73	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Phoenix, AZ		18,185		29,613		739		382		17		29,995		756		30,751		(1,406	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Mesa, AZ		14,742		22,145		782		65		359		22,210		1,141		23,351		(1,572	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Apache Junction, AZ		13,996		19,276		266		123		1,781		19,399		2,047		21,446		(1,575	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Mesa, AZ		13,317		17,180		423		51		1		17,231		424		17,655		(1,090	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Apache Junction, AZ		10,307		14,542		236		52		4		14,594		240		14,834		(780	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Mesa, AZ		5,818		8,476		382		54		—		8,530		382		8,912		(563	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Indio, CA		6,906		7,220		193		176		29		7,396		222		7,618		(607	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	San Marcos, CA		5,407		6,236		309		117		30		6,353		339		6,692		(506	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Mesa, AZ		5,920		7,820		461		94		13		7,914		474		8,388		(547	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Indio, CA		5,820		6,540		113		109		182		6,649		295		6,944		(709	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Apache Junction, AZ		3,077		6,400		245		22		—		6,422		245		6,667		(502	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Apache Junction, AZ		5,625		8,146		219		1		2		8,147		221		8,368		(534	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Apache Junction, AZ		3,681		6,793		206		9		6		6,802		212		7,014		(475	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Apache Junction, AZ		2,459		4,163		149		71		12		4,234		161		4,395		(368	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Mesa, AZ		6,077		8,763		164		11		1		8,774		165		8,939		(797	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Cottonwood, AZ		2,230		3,313		81		16		—		3,329		81		3,410		(278	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Cottonwood, AZ		4,541		5,238		244		67		12		5,305		256		5,561		(601	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Chandler, AZ		3,334		4,293		78		37		3		4,330		81		4,411		(257	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Apache Junction, AZ		2,298		3,835		61		22		2		3,857		63		3,920		(228	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Desert Hot Springs, CA		12,342		15,223		707		256		55		15,479		762		16,241		(1,440	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Apache Junction, AZ		5,637		7,527		289		48		46		7,575		335		7,910		(531	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Apache Junction, AZ		2,471		5,503		365		15		5		5,518		370		5,888		(492	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Las Vegas, NV		6,075		7,682		220		70		68		7,752		288		8,040		(609	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Tavares, FL		5,864		4,390		1,244		6		38		4,396		1,282		5,678		(659	)	2018
Manufactured Housing Community	Apache Junction, AZ		4,032		5,163		25		3		14		5,166		39		5,205		(478	)	2019
Manufactured Housing Community	Peoria, AZ		4,376		8,878		1,229		42		5		8,920		1,234		10,154		(818	)	2019

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Manufactured Housing Community	Glendale, AZ		10,984		20,791		1,354		20		43		20,811		1,397		22,208		(1,298	)	2019
Manufactured Housing Community	Mesa, AZ		5,451		8,589		1,280		266		206		8,855		1,486		10,341		(924	)	2019
Manufactured Housing Community	Phoenix, AZ		6,384		8,996		499		9		—		9,005		499		9,504		(699	)	2019
Manufactured Housing Community	Naples, FL		—		3,664		383		17		32		3,681		415		4,096		(172	)	2019
Manufactured Housing Community	Waldorf, MD		4,754		5,741		656		65		210		5,806		866		6,672		(388	)	2019
Manufactured Housing Community	Winter Haven, FL		8,369		11,585		381		6		88		11,591		469		12,060		(331	)	2019
Manufactured Housing Community	Tarpon Springs, FL		7,547		8,980		491		23		206		9,003		697		9,700		(764	)	2019
Manufactured Housing Community	Chandler, AZ		9,101		12,111		321		—		—		12,111		321		12,432		(635	)	2019
Manufactured Housing Community	Phoenix, AZ		7,080		9,757		189		10		—		9,767		189		9,956		(633	)	2019
Manufactured Housing Community	Chandler, AZ		4,289		5,532		584		12		—		5,544		584		6,128		(346	)	2019
Manufactured Housing Community	Clearwater, FL		4,040		6,468		198		5		—		6,473		198		6,671		(145	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Clearwater, FL		—		9,099		808		—		—		9,099		808		9,907		(99	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	LaBelle, FL		22,751		32,857		1,232		4		—		32,861		1,232		34,093		(528	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Leesburg, FL		15,293		22,749		1,025		—		—		22,749		1,025		23,774		(527	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Leesburg, FL		10,671		17,759		435		—		40		17,759		475		18,234		(343	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	LaBelle, FL		1,564		5,736		461		2		—		5,738		461		6,199		(147	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Mesa, AZ		32,677		52,564		810		22		9		52,586		819		53,405		(820	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Puyallup, WA		14,593		23,000		907		4		—		23,004		907		23,911		(311	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Harrison, OH		23,381		33,479		2,999		5		—		33,484		2,999		36,483		(1,052	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Lakeland, FL		12,293		19,114		373		2		—		19,116		373		19,489		(309	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Petaluma, CA		—		12,275		1,393		—		—		12,275		1,393		13,668		(58	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Sorrento, FL		—		60,502		3,358		—		—		60,502		3,358		63,860		(77	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Arcadia, FL		23,217		30,093		6,947		—		—		30,093		6,947		37,040		(83	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	St. Petersburg, FL		21,429		47,205		1,263		—		—		47,205		1,263		48,468		(50	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Saint Cloud, FL		24,450		29,789		2,605		—		—		29,789		2,605		32,394		(37	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Stockbridge, GA		9,155		22,299		265		—		—		22,299		265		22,564		(62	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Melbourne, FL		13,042		24,669		933		—		—		24,669		933		25,602		(52	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Sorrento, FL		10,922		29,438		342		—		—		29,438		342		29,780		(22	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	McDonough, GA		—		13,168		1,496		—		—		13,168		1,496		14,664		(64	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	St. Petersburg, FL		10,402		17,169		960		—		—		17,169		960		18,129		(52	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Vero Beach, FL		11,756		19,117		983		—		—		19,117		983		20,100		(50	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	St. Petersburg, FL		—		15,491		785		—		—		15,491		785		16,276		(31	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Tucson, AZ		9,820		12,620		1,838		—		—		12,620		1,838		14,458		(30	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Lithia Springs, GA		—		13,779		140		—		—		13,779		140		13,919		(48	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Bonita Springs, FL		—		9,036		1,044		—		—		9,036		1,044		10,080		(14	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	West Palm Beach, FL		8,522		13,230		646		—		—		13,230		646		13,876		(27	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Sarasota, FL		6,120		8,933		596		—		—		8,933		596		9,529		(21	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Melbourne, FL		6,247		7,766		283		—		—		7,766		283		8,049		(7	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Webster, FL		5,264		3,780		4,427		—		—		3,780		4,427		8,207		(38	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	St. Cloud, FL		5,799		8,461		791		—		—		8,461		791		9,252		(23	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Sarasota, FL		—		6,880		9		—		—		6,880		9		6,889		(17	)	2020

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Manufactured Housing Community	Clearwater, FL		4,191		7,157		661		—		—		7,157		661		7,818		(16	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	North Jupiter, FL		—		5,357		628		—		—		5,357		628		5,985		(5	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Port Orange, FL		3,716		6,558		513		—		—		6,558		513		7,071		(15	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Wildwood, FL		4,712		4,939		281		—		—		4,939		281		5,220		(12	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Stuart, FL		—		7,142		419		—		—		7,142		419		7,561		(16	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Wildwood, FL		3,535		5,255		504		—		—		5,255		504		5,759		(15	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Ormond Beach, FL		4,215		6,907		521		—		—		6,907		521		7,428		(17	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Apache Junction, AZ		3,484		4,674		979		—		—		4,674		979		5,653		(21	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Dade City, FL		4,224		4,259		673		—		—		4,259		673		4,932		(17	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Zephyrhills, FL		—		2,783		626		—		—		2,783		626		3,409		(13	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Starke, FL		—		4,279		1,257		—		—		4,279		1,257		5,536		(9	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Fort Myers, FL		—		2,924		754		—		—		2,924		754		3,678		(11	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Cedar Key, FL		—		3,082		—		—		—		3,082		—		3,082		—		2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Hallandale Beach, FL		2,663		4,702		—		—		—		4,702		—		4,702		(9	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Apache Junction, AZ		2,249		3,131		215		—		—		3,131		215		3,346		(11	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	St. Petersburg, FL		—		3,513		105		—		—		3,513		105		3,618		(2	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Ocala, FL		1,892		3,722		284		—		—		3,722		284		4,006		(20	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Inglis, FL		—		1,393		267		—		—		1,393		267		1,660		(6	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Prescott Valley, AZ		4,274		5,091		541		—		—		5,091		541		5,632		(23	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Mesa, AZ		7,610		11,514		1,631		—		—		11,514		1,631		13,145		(33	)	2020
Manufactured Housing Community	Clover, SC		—		3,356		172		—		—		3,356		172		3,528		(17	)	2020
Student Housing	Tempe, AZ		97,149		14,180		111,719		2		246		14,182		111,965		126,147		(8,579	)	2018
Student Housing	Tuscaloosa, AL		65,931		16,579		74,404		—		957		16,579		75,361		91,940		(5,879	)	2018
Student Housing	Tucson, AZ		67,269		5,956		82,701		9		250		5,965		82,951		88,916		(6,337	)	2018
Student Housing	State College, PA		65,018		8,422		76,294		30		1,914		8,452		78,208		86,660		(6,228	)	2018
Student Housing	Blacksburg, VA		64,532		12,698		71,693		259		263		12,957		71,956		84,913		(5,879	)	2018
Student Housing	State College, PA		51,294		8,456		59,511		26		371		8,482		59,882		68,364		(4,810	)	2018
Student Housing	Orlando, FL		48,066		4,854		60,003		75		1,509		4,929		61,512		66,441		(4,819	)	2018
Student Housing	Charlottesville, VA		47,130		175		70,119		276		1,644		451		71,763		72,214		(5,476	)	2018
Student Housing	Boulder, CO		42,221		9,300		47,270		43		958		9,343		48,228		57,571		(3,768	)	2018
Student Housing	Greenville, NC		45,961		8,458		45,948		69		84		8,527		46,032		54,559		(3,645	)	2018
Student Housing	Tucson, AZ		39,290		5,128		57,842		—		70		5,128		57,912		63,040		(4,435	)	2018
Student Housing	Kent, OH		36,477		3,052		41,735		20		448		3,072		42,183		45,255		(3,321	)	2018
Student Housing	Riverside, CA		29,818		3,966		40,159		32		1,010		3,998		41,169		45,167		(3,134	)	2018
Student Housing	Louisville, KY		34,266		10,401		31,231		88		79		10,489		31,310		41,799		(2,529	)	2018
Student Housing	Charlottesville, VA		6,071		1,809		6,385		19		48		1,828		6,433		8,261		(509	)	2018
Student Housing	Boulder, CO		26,742		8,330		26,688		—		789		8,330		27,477		35,807		(2,145	)	2018
Student Housing	Auburn, AL		21,924		3,835		28,175		—		—		3,835		28,175		32,010		(2,219	)	2018
Student Housing	Berkeley, CA		12,552		4,584		16,540		6		405		4,590		16,945		21,535		(1,317	)	2018
Student Housing	Charlottesville, VA		15,237		3,134		17,545		—		169		3,134		17,714		20,848		(1,361	)	2018
Student Housing	Athens, GA		46,200		4,931		68,771		4		354		4,935		69,125		74,060		(5,422	)	2018
Total Multifamily Properties:		$	8,236,432	$	3,008,130	$	10,278,677	$	22,608	$	257,778	$	3,030,738	$	10,536,455	$	13,567,193	$	(732,991	)

			Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances	Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Industrial Properties:
Cold Storage Warehouse	Stockton, CA	(B)	$	14,488	$	50,262	$	—	$	—	$	14,488	$	50,262	$	64,750	$	(4,646	)	2018
Cold Storage Warehouse	Union City, CA	(B)		6,785		46,830		—		168		6,785		46,998		53,783		(3,456	)	2018
Cold Storage Warehouse	Aberdeen, MD	(B)		5,789		38,820		—		—		5,789		38,820		44,609		(3,224	)	2018
Cold Storage Warehouse	Atlanta, GA	(B)		3,134		30,130		—		1,608		3,134		31,738		34,872		(3,019	)	2018
Cold Storage Warehouse	Austin, TX	(B)		3,132		19,010		—		3,004		3,132		22,014		25,146		(1,751	)	2018
Cold Storage Warehouse	Stockton, CA	(B)		2,287		15,817		—		—		2,287		15,817		18,104		(1,377	)	2018
Warehouse	Stockton, CA	(C)		10,079		21,240		—		541		10,079		21,781		31,860		(3,502	)	2017
Warehouse	Alpharetta, GA	(C)		998		7,705		—		17		998		7,722		8,720		(822	)	2017
Warehouse	Lithia Springs, GA	(C)		1,105		8,687		—		—		1,105		8,687		9,792		(1,084	)	2017
Warehouse	Austell, GA	(C)		5,344		97,869		—		2,658		5,344		100,527		105,871		(11,650	)	2017
Warehouse	Austell, GA	(C)		1,336		5,481		—		182		1,336		5,663		6,999		(805	)	2017
Warehouse	Austell, GA	(C)		1,342		5,761		—		192		1,342		5,953		7,295		(883	)	2017
Warehouse	Lombard, IL	(C)		483		3,489		—		42		483		3,531		4,014		(394	)	2017
Warehouse	Carol Stream, IL	(C)		1,184		4,511		—		—		1,184		4,511		5,695		(569	)	2017
Warehouse	Elgin, IL	(C)		620		2,733		—		74		620		2,807		3,427		(349	)	2017
Warehouse	Elgin, IL	(C)		1,118		5,172		—		205		1,118		5,377		6,495		(581	)	2017
Warehouse	Libertyville, IL	(C)		850		4,340		—		63		850		4,403		5,253		(597	)	2017
Warehouse	Carol Stream, IL	(C)		757		6,727		—		52		757		6,779		7,536		(746	)	2017
Warehouse	Addison, IL	(C)		888		5,810		—		1,606		888		7,416		8,304		(804	)	2017
Warehouse	Carol Stream, IL	(C)		837		5,902		—		85		837		5,987		6,824		(686	)	2017
Warehouse	Bensenville, IL	(C)		1,001		7,908		—		597		1,001		8,505		9,506		(962	)	2017
Warehouse	Glendale Heights, IL	(C)		416		2,837		—		46		416		2,883		3,299		(334	)	2017
Warehouse	Roselle, IL	(C)		1,166		6,812		—		77		1,166		6,889		8,055		(824	)	2017
Warehouse	Hanover Park, IL	(C)		1,090		5,342		—		—		1,090		5,342		6,432		(664	)	2017
Warehouse	Bolingbrook, IL	(C)		1,892		4,023		—		65		1,892		4,088		5,980		(566	)	2017
Warehouse	Bolingbrook, IL	(C)		2,313		9,953		—		318		2,313		10,271		12,584		(1,243	)	2017
Warehouse	Romeoville, IL	(C)		860		4,193		—		—		860		4,193		5,053		(461	)	2017
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(C)		632		2,416		—		28		632		2,444		3,076		(297	)	2017
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(C)		707		4,911		—		9		707		4,920		5,627		(584	)	2017
Warehouse	Mechanicsburg, PA	(C)		1,467		21,649		—		—		1,467		21,649		23,116		(2,439	)	2017
Warehouse	Middletown, PA	(C)		866		12,492		—		53		866		12,545		13,411		(1,383	)	2017
Warehouse	Mechanicsburg, PA	(C)		399		2,984		—		5		399		2,989		3,388		(423	)	2017
Warehouse	Grand Prairie, TX	(C)		1,027		5,762		—		255		1,027		6,017		7,044		(782	)	2017
Warehouse	Dallas, TX	(C)		863		3,943		—		976		863		4,919		5,782		(614	)	2017
Warehouse	Grand Prairie, TX	(C)		1,052		6,266		—		293		1,052		6,559		7,611		(814	)	2017
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(C)		937		5,149		—		20		937		5,169		6,106		(619	)	2017
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(C)		590		4,064		—		—		590		4,064		4,654		(442	)	2017
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(C)		1,662		11,944		—		474		1,662		12,418		14,080		(1,381	)	2017
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(C)		1,645		12,220		—		154		1,645		12,374		14,019		(1,333	)	2017
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(C)		1,294		8,167		—		33		1,294		8,200		9,494		(896	)	2017

			Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances	Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(C)		1,149		5,722		—		29		1,149		5,751		6,900		(692	)	2017
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(C)		1,178		7,520		—		570		1,178		8,090		9,268		(979	)	2017
Warehouse	Allen, TX	(C)		2,474		15,664		—		411		2,474		16,075		18,549		(2,098	)	2017
Warehouse	Jacksonville, FL	(C)		3,056		20,161		—		160		3,056		20,321		23,377		(1,727	)	2017
Warehouse	Jonesboro, GA	(C)		2,804		14,537		—		—		2,804		14,537		17,341		(1,630	)	2017
Warehouse	La Vergne, TN	(C)		3,574		16,037		—		228		3,574		16,265		19,839		(1,860	)	2017
Warehouse	Jacksonville, FL	(C)		2,261		15,933		—		—		2,261		15,933		18,194		(1,552	)	2017
Warehouse	Jacksonville, FL	(C)		3,291		22,985		—		212		3,291		23,197		26,488		(2,315	)	2017
Warehouse	Aurora, IL	(C)		17,424		43,812		—		—		17,424		43,812		61,236		(4,616	)	2018
Warehouse	Aurora, IL	(C)		8,455		34,026		—		—		8,455		34,026		42,481		(3,224	)	2018
Warehouse	Aurora, IL	(C)		10,116		23,150		—		—		10,116		23,150		33,266		(2,617	)	2018
Warehouse	Fairfield, NJ	(B)		1,232		2,755		—		3		1,232		2,758		3,990		(343	)	2017
Warehouse	Fairfield, NJ	(B)		1,767		4,676		—		102		1,767		4,778		6,545		(503	)	2017
Warehouse	Fairfield, NJ	(B)		3,223		4,180		—		6		3,223		4,186		7,409		(568	)	2017
Warehouse	Fairfield, NJ	(B)		1,093		4,074		—		23		1,093		4,097		5,190		(441	)	2017
Warehouse	Fairfield, NJ	(B)		1,101		1,674		—		59		1,101		1,733		2,834		(208	)	2017
Warehouse	Fairfield, NJ	(B)		1,170		1,900		—		5		1,170		1,905		3,075		(226	)	2017
Warehouse	Fairfield, NJ	(B)		4,219		5,936		—		33		4,219		5,969		10,188		(621	)	2017
Warehouse	Fairfield, NJ	(B)		4,725		6,013		—		7		4,725		6,020		10,745		(641	)	2017
Warehouse	Fairfield, NJ	(B)		2,131		2,408		—		6		2,131		2,414		4,545		(291	)	2017
Warehouse	Fairfield, NJ	(B)		4,194		8,677		—		26		4,194		8,703		12,897		(947	)	2017
Warehouse	Fairfield, NJ	(B)		843		1,375		—		211		843		1,586		2,429		(184	)	2017
Warehouse	Marietta, GA	(D)		1,604		5,329		—		146		1,604		5,475		7,079		(438	)	2018
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(D)		3,052		15,804		—		119		3,052		15,923		18,975		(1,046	)	2018
Warehouse	Jacksonville, FL	(D)		2,658		13,081		—		798		2,658		13,879		16,537		(891	)	2018
Warehouse	Olive Branch, MS	(D)		2,111		8,074		—		236		2,111		8,310		10,421		(571	)	2018
Warehouse	Charlotte, NC	(D)		404		1,747		—		517		404		2,264		2,668		(165	)	2018
Warehouse	Jacksonville, FL	(D)		1,676		4,982		—		—		1,676		4,982		6,658		(381	)	2018
Warehouse	Jacksonville, FL	(D)		2,735		9,996		—		1,348		2,735		11,344		14,079		(787	)	2018
Warehouse	Marietta, GA	(D)		1,348		4,339		—		—		1,348		4,339		5,687		(330	)	2018
Warehouse	Roswell, GA	(B)		1,422		7,407		—		—		1,422		7,407		8,829		(650	)	2018
Warehouse	Marietta, GA	(D)		968		4,017		—		—		968		4,017		4,985		(283	)	2018
Warehouse	Miami, FL	(D)		930		200		—		435		930		635		1,565		(80	)	2018
Warehouse	Miami, FL	(D)		1,703		4,155		—		7		1,703		4,162		5,865		(252	)	2018
Warehouse	Miami, FL	(D)		5,879		18,428		—		6,514		5,879		24,942		30,821		(1,439	)	2018
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(D)		4,120		19,411		—		161		4,120		19,572		23,692		(1,298	)	2018
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(D)		1,628		7,773		—		53		1,628		7,826		9,454		(483	)	2018
Warehouse	La Vergne, TN	(D)		2,857		11,214		—		187		2,857		11,401		14,258		(844	)	2018
Warehouse	Miami, FL	(D)		2,398		5,742		—		66		2,398		5,808		8,206		(352	)	2018
Warehouse	Miami, FL	(D)		2,461		6,351		—		21		2,461		6,372		8,833		(391	)	2018
Warehouse	Miami, FL	(D)		3,011		6,953		—		566		3,011		7,519		10,530		(454	)	2018

			Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances	Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Miami, FL	(D)		1,628		3,619		—		37		1,628		3,656		5,284		(226	)	2018
Warehouse	Miami, FL	(D)		2,260		4,504		—		472		2,260		4,976		7,236		(299	)	2018
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(D)		1,819		6,452		—		479		1,819		6,931		8,750		(507	)	2018
Warehouse	La Vergne, TN	(D)		5,425		19,245		—		318		5,425		19,563		24,988		(1,543	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(B)		1,100		3,028		—		183		1,100		3,211		4,311		(267	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(B)		626		2,620		—		—		626		2,620		3,246		(181	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(B)		1,182		5,431		—		110		1,182		5,541		6,723		(393	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(B)		339		696		—		—		339		696		1,035		(61	)	2018
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(D)		2,110		8,670		—		20		2,110		8,690		10,800		(620	)	2018
Warehouse	Jacksonville, FL	(D)		868		10,261		—		—		868		10,261		11,129		(625	)	2018
Warehouse	Winston-Salem, NC	(B)		954		4,952		—		—		954		4,952		5,906		(366	)	2018
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(D)		4,894		18,503		—		—		4,894		18,503		23,397		(1,245	)	2018
Warehouse	Newport News, VA	(D)		1,085		6,140		—		82		1,085		6,222		7,307		(420	)	2018
Warehouse	Port Wentworth, GA	(D)		380		16,575		—		443		380		17,018		17,398		(991	)	2018
Warehouse	Hampton, VA	(D)		2,064		12,393		—		—		2,064		12,393		14,457		(861	)	2018
Warehouse	Port Wentworth, GA	(D)		6,739		23,769		—		5,290		6,739		29,059		35,798		(1,898	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(D)		2,533		5,951		—		—		2,533		5,951		8,484		(584	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(D)		299		749		—		—		299		749		1,048		(68	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(D)		1,445		3,940		—		—		1,445		3,940		5,385		(358	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(D)		371		799		—		22		371		821		1,192		(77	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(D)		1,793		2,170		—		107		1,793		2,277		4,070		(266	)	2018
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(D)		4,241		13,551		—		163		4,241		13,714		17,955		(982	)	2018
Warehouse	Winston-Salem, NC	(B)		510		3,336		—		—		510		3,336		3,846		(222	)	2018
Warehouse	Winston-Salem, NC	(B)		441		1,361		—		10		441		1,371		1,812		(125	)	2018
Warehouse	Winston-Salem, NC	(B)		857		6,272		—		—		857		6,272		7,129		(422	)	2018
Warehouse	Atlanta, GA	(B)		1,284		6,592		—		—		1,284		6,592		7,876		(480	)	2018
Warehouse	Atlanta, GA	(B)		1,096		9,332		—		—		1,096		9,332		10,428		(605	)	2018
Warehouse	Charlotte, NC	(D)		689		3,167		—		—		689		3,167		3,856		(233	)	2018
Warehouse	Wesley Chapel, FL	(B)		1,566		2,284		—		575		1,566		2,859		4,425		(242	)	2018
Warehouse	Wesley Chapel, FL	(B)		277		3,914		—		—		277		3,914		4,191		(254	)	2018
Warehouse	Wesley Chapel, FL	(B)		228		9,203		—		—		228		9,203		9,431		(535	)	2018
Warehouse	Davenport, FL	(D)		3,560		14,868		—		2,341		3,560		17,209		20,769		(1,294	)	2018
Warehouse	Davenport, FL	(D)		4,763		22,356		—		1		4,763		22,357		27,120		(1,468	)	2018
Warehouse	Davenport, FL	(D)		1,454		8,874		—		804		1,454		9,678		11,132		(851	)	2018
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(D)		1,549		5,482		—		29		1,549		5,511		7,060		(350	)	2018
Warehouse	Wesley Chapel, FL	(B)		1,283		5,023		—		—		1,283		5,023		6,306		(357	)	2018
Warehouse	Wesley Chapel, FL	(B)		1,757		7,989		—		—		1,757		7,989		9,746		(585	)	2018
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(D)		1,444		4,115		—		41		1,444		4,156		5,600		(271	)	2018
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(D)		1,549		2,334		—		—		1,549		2,334		3,883		(175	)	2018
Warehouse	Richmond, VA	(B)		888		6,888		—		351		888		7,239		8,127		(485	)	2018
Warehouse	Richmond, VA	(B)		3,413		21,838		—		—		3,413		21,838		25,251		(1,496	)	2018

			Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances	Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(D)		1,777		4,785		—		571		1,777		5,356		7,133		(410	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(D)		1,360		4,721		—		—		1,360		4,721		6,081		(353	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(D)		1,289		5,579		—		—		1,289		5,579		6,868		(419	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(D)		1,323		4,540		—		23		1,323		4,563		5,886		(360	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(D)		1,649		5,985		—		82		1,649		6,067		7,716		(450	)	2018
Warehouse	Piedmont, SC	(D)		1,165		4,802		—		664		1,165		5,466		6,631		(373	)	2018
Warehouse	Rural Hall, NC	(D)		1,226		8,023		—		1,315		1,226		9,338		10,564		(625	)	2018
Warehouse	Raleigh, NC	(D)		915		5,603		—		118		915		5,721		6,636		(384	)	2018
Warehouse	Raleigh, NC	(D)		749		6,459		—		307		749		6,766		7,515		(439	)	2018
Warehouse	Charlotte, NC	(D)		437		1,577		—		105		437		1,682		2,119		(154	)	2018
Warehouse	Rural Hall, NC	(D)		1,432		8,694		—		163		1,432		8,857		10,289		(634	)	2018
Warehouse	Sandston, VA	(D)		1,799		9,087		—		124		1,799		9,211		11,010		(684	)	2018
Warehouse	Charlotte, NC	(D)		302		3,195		—		—		302		3,195		3,497		(197	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(D)		2,312		5,978		—		52		2,312		6,030		8,342		(524	)	2018
Warehouse	Richmond, VA	(B)		515		5,380		—		132		515		5,512		6,027		(462	)	2018
Warehouse	Rural Hall, NC	(D)		1,971		9,903		—		—		1,971		9,903		11,874		(742	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(D)		2,207		6,846		—		51		2,207		6,897		9,104		(565	)	2018
Warehouse	Sandston, VA	(D)		897		3,903		—		—		897		3,903		4,800		(286	)	2018
Warehouse	Norcross, GA	(D)		973		5,466		—		—		973		5,466		6,439		(384	)	2018
Warehouse	Rural Hall, NC	(D)		416		2,489		—		—		416		2,489		2,905		(182	)	2018
Warehouse	Jacksonville, FL	(D)		1,163		5,239		—		—		1,163		5,239		6,402		(365	)	2018
Warehouse	Norcross, GA	(D)		748		4,333		—		—		748		4,333		5,081		(301	)	2018
Warehouse	Norcross, GA	(D)		674		2,730		—		6		674		2,736		3,410		(213	)	2018
Warehouse	Norcross, GA	(D)		840		4,012		—		—		840		4,012		4,852		(285	)	2018
Warehouse	Charlotte, NC	(D)		389		2,574		—		15		389		2,589		2,978		(180	)	2018
Warehouse	Louisville, KY	(B)		3,607		10,097		—		1,323		3,607		11,420		15,027		(970	)	2018
Warehouse	Norcross, GA	(B)		1,074		4,347		—		20		1,074		4,367		5,441		(362	)	2018
Warehouse	Norcross, GA	(B)		368		2,026		—		2		368		2,028		2,396		(148	)	2018
Warehouse	Norcross, GA	(B)		336		1,763		—		—		336		1,763		2,099		(136	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(D)		2,757		5,480		—		—		2,757		5,480		8,237		(526	)	2018
Warehouse	Norcross, GA	(B)		733		4,521		—		25		733		4,546		5,279		(306	)	2018
Warehouse	Norcross, GA	(B)		562		2,308		—		—		562		2,308		2,870		(179	)	2018
Warehouse	Norcross, GA	(B)		397		2,235		—		—		397		2,235		2,632		(179	)	2018
Warehouse	Norcross, GA	(B)		429		2,046		—		—		429		2,046		2,475		(165	)	2018
Warehouse	Norcross, GA	(B)		563		875		—		84		563		959		1,522		(109	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(B)		2,060		6,344		—		484		2,060		6,828		8,888		(660	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(B)		1,839		8,067		—		31		1,839		8,098		9,937		(745	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(B)		2,110		5,437		—		23		2,110		5,460		7,570		(517	)	2018
Warehouse	Memphis, TN	(B)		1,168		7,233		—		129		1,168		7,362		8,530		(523	)	2018
Warehouse	Charlotte, NC	(D)		601		3,495		—		—		601		3,495		4,096		(243	)	2018
Warehouse	Richmond, VA	(D)		1,464		11,053		—		38		1,464		11,091		12,555		(750	)	2018

			Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances	Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Kissimmee, FL	(D)		212		9,857		—		—		212		9,857		10,069		(608	)	2018
Warehouse	Jacksonville, FL	(D)		2,505		15,947		—		—		2,505		15,947		18,452		(1,082	)	2018
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(D)		3,684		18,694		—		31		3,684		18,725		22,409		(1,314	)	2018
Warehouse	Jacksonville, FL	(D)		610		4,613		—		745		610		5,358		5,968		(305	)	2018
Warehouse	Miami, FL	(D)		954		2,593		—		10		954		2,603		3,557		(159	)	2018
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(E)		879		3,391		—		—		879		3,391		4,270		(254	)	2018
Warehouse	Conyers, GA	(E)		634		4,435		—		20		634		4,455		5,089		(306	)	2018
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(E)		505		3,056		—		35		505		3,091		3,596		(213	)	2018
Warehouse	Atlanta, GA	(E)		418		4,462		—		31		418		4,493		4,911		(291	)	2018
Warehouse	Atlanta, GA	(E)		634		6,064		—		—		634		6,064		6,698		(394	)	2018
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(E)		1,199		3,713		—		141		1,199		3,854		5,053		(288	)	2018
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(E)		762		3,039		—		—		762		3,039		3,801		(196	)	2018
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(E)		1,167		4,070		—		2		1,167		4,072		5,239		(297	)	2018
Warehouse	Stockton, CA	(E)		11,025		73,084		—		—		11,025		73,084		84,109		(5,118	)	2017
Warehouse	Mechanicsburg, PA	(E)		1,184		10,393		—		858		1,184		11,251		12,435		(754	)	2019
Warehouse	Roseville, MN	(E)		1,174		5,598		—		5		1,174		5,603		6,777		(328	)	2019
Warehouse	New Brighton, MN	(E)		1,828		5,281		—		183		1,828		5,464		7,292		(436	)	2019
Warehouse	Marietta, GA	(E)		2,780		4,330		—		16		2,780		4,346		7,126		(291	)	2019
Warehouse	New Brighton, MN	(E)		2,088		6,555		—		43		2,088		6,598		8,686		(434	)	2019
Warehouse	New Brighton, MN	(E)		1,231		4,252		—		—		1,231		4,252		5,483		(257	)	2019
Warehouse	New Brighton, MN	(E)		1,385		5,934		—		564		1,385		6,498		7,883		(587	)	2019
Warehouse	New Brighton, MN	(E)		2,062		6,553		—		18		2,062		6,571		8,633		(389	)	2019
Warehouse	New Brighton, MN	(E)		431		1,927		—		83		431		2,010		2,441		(135	)	2019
Warehouse	New Brighton, MN	(E)		362		4,054		—		109		362		4,163		4,525		(248	)	2019
Warehouse	New Brighton, MN	(E)		1,611		3,909		—		287		1,611		4,196		5,807		(289	)	2019
Warehouse	New Brighton, MN	(E)		1,111		2,811		—		—		1,111		2,811		3,922		(185	)	2019
Warehouse	New Brighton, MN	(E)		790		2,478		—		—		790		2,478		3,268		(161	)	2019
Warehouse	New Brighton, MN	(E)		664		2,690		—		24		664		2,714		3,378		(156	)	2019
Warehouse	New Brighton, MN	(E)		537		1,508		—		—		537		1,508		2,045		(88	)	2019
Warehouse	Golden Valley, MN	(E)		1,466		10,577		—		40		1,466		10,617		12,083		(670	)	2019
Warehouse	Golden Valley, MN	(E)		2,176		1,789		—		—		2,176		1,789		3,965		(184	)	2019
Warehouse	Brooklyn Park, MN	(E)		2,616		10,434		—		39		2,616		10,473		13,089		(660	)	2019
Warehouse	Eagan, MN	(E)		2,721		9,283		—		36		2,721		9,319		12,040		(525	)	2019
Warehouse	Brooklyn Park, MN	(E)		1,505		3,969		—		—		1,505		3,969		5,474		(262	)	2019
Warehouse	Crystal, MN	(E)		1,859		6,354		—		—		1,859		6,354		8,213		(434	)	2019
Warehouse	Brooklyn Center, MN	(E)		1,679		4,694		—		45		1,679		4,739		6,418		(301	)	2019
Warehouse	Minneapolis, MN	(E)		4,010		10,777		—		54		4,010		10,831		14,841		(665	)	2019
Warehouse	Blaine, MN	(E)		4,514		3,456		—		—		4,514		3,456		7,970		(264	)	2019
Warehouse	Blaine, MN	(E)		2,378		2,723		—		—		2,378		2,723		5,101		(186	)	2019
Warehouse	Fridley, MN	(E)		2,043		5,005		—		—		2,043		5,005		7,048		(350	)	2019
Warehouse	Burnsville, MN	(E)		1,729		3,780		—		19		1,729		3,799		5,528		(264	)	2019

			Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances	Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Burnsville, MN	(E)		1,935		6,614		—		89		1,935		6,703		8,638		(418	)	2019
Warehouse	Eagan, MN	(E)		1,942		7,544		—		66		1,942		7,610		9,552		(418	)	2019
Warehouse	Burnsville, MN	(E)		1,094		3,017		—		—		1,094		3,017		4,111		(194	)	2019
Warehouse	Burnsville, MN	(E)		1,196		2,762		—		—		1,196		2,762		3,958		(202	)	2019
Warehouse	Eagan, MN	(E)		1,302		4,099		—		30		1,302		4,129		5,431		(260	)	2019
Warehouse	Eagan, MN	(E)		2,296		7,344		—		286		2,296		7,630		9,926		(472	)	2019
Warehouse	Eagan, MN	(E)		2,121		4,488		—		130		2,121		4,618		6,739		(308	)	2019
Warehouse	Eagan, MN	(E)		1,558		5,259		—		—		1,558		5,259		6,817		(337	)	2019
Warehouse	Groveport, OH	(F)		4,606		42,666		—		110		4,606		42,776		47,382		(4,200	)	2018
Warehouse	Plainfield, IN	(F)		4,956		29,250		—		203		4,956		29,453		34,409		(2,554	)	2018
Warehouse	Addison, IL	(F)		6,603		30,931		—		731		6,603		31,662		38,265		(2,889	)	2018
Warehouse	Crest Hill, IL	(F)		5,957		31,177		—		2,394		5,957		33,571		39,528		(3,131	)	2018
Warehouse	Landover, MD	(F)		9,479		24,030		—		1,564		9,479		25,594		35,073		(2,365	)	2018
Warehouse	Northlake, TX	(F)		3,898		32,898		—		110		3,898		33,008		36,906		(2,825	)	2018
Warehouse	Glen Rock, PA	(F)		6,792		28,003		—		—		6,792		28,003		34,795		(2,975	)	2018
Warehouse	Niles, IL	(F)		11,223		16,678		—		—		11,223		16,678		27,901		(1,534	)	2018
Warehouse	Davenport, FL	(F)		3,126		23,200		—		86		3,126		23,286		26,412		(2,209	)	2018
Warehouse	Englewood, CO	(F)		7,097		17,420		—		172		7,097		17,592		24,689		(1,836	)	2018
Warehouse	Englewood, CO	(F)		6,948		17,281		—		49		6,948		17,330		24,278		(1,832	)	2018
Warehouse	Greenwood, IN	(F)		2,174		21,869		—		42		2,174		21,911		24,085		(2,155	)	2018
Warehouse	Hodgkins, IL	(F)		7,040		21,744		—		—		7,040		21,744		28,784		(1,787	)	2018
Warehouse	Lithia Springs, GA	(F)		5,594		18,685		—		280		5,594		18,965		24,559		(1,712	)	2018
Warehouse	Englewood, CO	(F)		6,282		15,371		—		130		6,282		15,501		21,783		(1,556	)	2018
Warehouse	Ontario, CA	(F)		5,766		16,688		—		155		5,766		16,843		22,609		(1,506	)	2018
Warehouse	Puyallup, WA	(F)		3,611		18,207		—		—		3,611		18,207		21,818		(1,532	)	2018
Warehouse	Carson, CA	(F)		15,959		7,447		—		—		15,959		7,447		23,406		(738	)	2018
Warehouse	Naperville, IL	(F)		4,125		17,768		—		750		4,125		18,518		22,643		(1,675	)	2018
Warehouse	Coppell, TX	(F)		1,841		14,694		—		1,894		1,841		16,588		18,429		(2,595	)	2018
Warehouse	Austell, GA	(F)		2,598		17,964		—		502		2,598		18,466		21,064		(1,604	)	2018
Warehouse	Winchester, VA	(F)		3,347		17,763		—		173		3,347		17,936		21,283		(1,558	)	2018
Warehouse	Hatfield, PA	(F)		2,431		16,102		—		640		2,431		16,742		19,173		(1,461	)	2018
Warehouse	Lebanon, IN	(F)		2,273		18,491		—		1,198		2,273		19,689		21,962		(1,748	)	2018
Warehouse	RanchoCucamonga, CA	(F)		4,962		13,018		—		156		4,962		13,174		18,136		(1,183	)	2018
Warehouse	San Bernardino, CA	(F)		7,363		10,063		—		—		7,363		10,063		17,426		(896	)	2018
Warehouse	Mahwah, NJ	(F)		3,672		11,139		—		—		3,672		11,139		14,811		(1,035	)	2018
Warehouse	Irving, TX	(F)		3,858		14,623		—		206		3,858		14,829		18,687		(1,328	)	2018
Warehouse	Somerset, NJ	(F)		12,807		5,044		—		—		12,807		5,044		17,851		(5,414	)	2018
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(F)		2,558		18,601		—		—		2,558		18,601		21,159		(1,587	)	2018
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(F)		1,918		14,391		—		414		1,918		14,805		16,723		(1,417	)	2018
Warehouse	Logan Township, NJ	(F)		3,713		13,206		—		—		3,713		13,206		16,919		(1,432	)	2018
Warehouse	Groveport, OH	(F)		2,455		14,574		—		1,397		2,455		15,971		18,426		(1,490	)	2018

			Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances	Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Sunrise, FL	(F)		6,916		10,491		—		954		6,916		11,445		18,361		(1,092	)	2018
Warehouse	Mahwah, NJ	(F)		3,647		11,882		—		71		3,647		11,953		15,600		(1,060	)	2018
Warehouse	Winchester, VA	(F)		1,830		15,296		—		27		1,830		15,323		17,153		(1,388	)	2018
Warehouse	Fairburn, GA	(F)		1,034		15,747		—		—		1,034		15,747		16,781		(1,647	)	2018
Warehouse	West Chicago, IL	(F)		3,055		12,863		—		85		3,055		12,948		16,003		(1,220	)	2018
Warehouse	Rialto, CA	(F)		4,538		10,073		—		—		4,538		10,073		14,611		(917	)	2018
Warehouse	Grand Prairie, TX	(F)		2,915		13,886		—		1,681		2,915		15,567		18,482		(1,337	)	2018
Warehouse	Mahwah, NJ	(F)		4,226		9,939		—		—		4,226		9,939		14,165		(1,140	)	2018
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(F)		3,171		11,017		—		—		3,171		11,017		14,188		(968	)	2018
Warehouse	Grand Prairie, TX	(F)		2,868		12,244		—		—		2,868		12,244		15,112		(1,107	)	2018
Warehouse	Irving, TX	(F)		2,663		7,457		—		2,763		2,663		10,220		12,883		(718	)	2018
Warehouse	Fort Worth, TX	(F)		1,744		11,298		—		—		1,744		11,298		13,042		(1,044	)	2018
Warehouse	West Chicago, IL	(F)		3,091		6,985		—		671		3,091		7,656		10,747		(1,035	)	2018
Warehouse	Alsip, IL	(F)		3,375		10,713		—		1,205		3,375		11,918		15,293		(1,156	)	2018
Warehouse	Plano, TX	(F)		1,640		10,542		—		—		1,640		10,542		12,182		(967	)	2018
Warehouse	Mahwah, NJ	(F)		4,357		8,369		—		—		4,357		8,369		12,726		(985	)	2018
Warehouse	Elkridge, MD	(F)		2,165		9,448		—		413		2,165		9,861		12,026		(865	)	2018
Warehouse	Naperville, IL	(F)		2,959		8,247		—		374		2,959		8,621		11,580		(1,103	)	2018
Warehouse	Chicago, IL	(F)		1,292		9,416		—		—		1,292		9,416		10,708		(816	)	2018
Warehouse	Simi Valley, CA	(F)		3,450		7,390		—		662		3,450		8,052		11,502		(786	)	2018
Warehouse	West Chicago, IL	(F)		2,631		6,142		—		80		2,631		6,222		8,853		(705	)	2018
Warehouse	Dallas, TX	(F)		2,874		8,296		—		70		2,874		8,366		11,240		(911	)	2018
Warehouse	Arlington Heights, IL	(F)		1,957		8,373		—		139		1,957		8,512		10,469		(728	)	2018
Warehouse	Tacoma, WA	(F)		2,380		10,368		—		93		2,380		10,461		12,841		(929	)	2018
Warehouse	Elkridge, MD	(F)		1,873		9,918		—		268		1,873		10,186		12,059		(1,087	)	2018
Warehouse	Oakland, NJ	(F)		1,725		8,336		—		—		1,725		8,336		10,061		(761	)	2018
Warehouse	Aurora, CO	(F)		2,185		8,706		—		733		2,185		9,439		11,624		(865	)	2018
Warehouse	Devens, MA	(F)		2,520		8,604		—		—		2,520		8,604		11,124		(984	)	2018
Warehouse	St. Charles, IL	(F)		2,255		7,559		—		23		2,255		7,582		9,837		(882	)	2018
Warehouse	Exton, PA	(F)		2,946		7,647		—		—		2,946		7,647		10,593		(777	)	2018
Warehouse	Carrollton, TX	(F)		1,382		9,429		—		25		1,382		9,454		10,836		(884	)	2018
Warehouse	Denver, CO	(F)		2,212		9,525		—		69		2,212		9,594		11,806		(886	)	2018
Warehouse	Phoenix, AZ	(F)		3,406		7,520		—		127		3,406		7,647		11,053		(840	)	2018
Warehouse	Landover, MD	(F)		2,848		6,215		—		215		2,848		6,430		9,278		(697	)	2018
Warehouse	San Bernardino, CA	(F)		5,325		6,349		—		—		5,325		6,349		11,674		(696	)	2018
Warehouse	Franklin Park, IL	(F)		3,254		7,017		—		185		3,254		7,202		10,456		(663	)	2018
Warehouse	Landover, MD	(F)		2,790		6,526		—		81		2,790		6,607		9,397		(702	)	2018
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(F)		1,207		8,299		—		947		1,207		9,246		10,453		(866	)	2018
Warehouse	Charlotte, NC	(F)		1,465		9,055		—		376		1,465		9,431		10,896		(845	)	2018
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(F)		1,481		8,418		—		1,414		1,481		9,832		11,313		(820	)	2018
Warehouse	Farmers Branch, TX	(F)		1,328		8,774		—		61		1,328		8,835		10,163		(840	)	2018

			Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances	Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Batavia, IL	(F)		1,407		8,221		—		309		1,407		8,530		9,937		(928	)	2018
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(F)		1,179		7,848		—		783		1,179		8,631		9,810		(750	)	2018
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(F)		1,204		8,334		—		751		1,204		9,085		10,289		(840	)	2018
Warehouse	Farmers Branch, TX	(F)		1,174		7,951		—		—		1,174		7,951		9,125		(836	)	2018
Warehouse	Erlanger, KY	(F)		1,431		7,595		—		285		1,431		7,880		9,311		(768	)	2018
Warehouse	Grand Prairie, TX	(F)		1,582		8,328		—		172		1,582		8,500		10,082		(807	)	2018
Warehouse	Upper Chichester, PA	(F)		1,746		6,924		—		25		1,746		6,949		8,695		(665	)	2018
Warehouse	Baltimore, MD	(F)		1,001		6,016		—		1,749		1,001		7,765		8,766		(606	)	2018
Warehouse	Federal Way, WA	(F)		2,687		6,465		—		401		2,687		6,866		9,553		(715	)	2018
Warehouse	Carrollton, TX	(F)		1,336		7,407		—		133		1,336		7,540		8,876		(667	)	2018
Warehouse	San Diego, CA	(F)		3,284		6,130		—		—		3,284		6,130		9,414		(533	)	2018
Warehouse	Mahwah, NJ	(F)		2,812		5,786		—		—		2,812		5,786		8,598		(636	)	2018
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(F)		1,163		6,738		—		136		1,163		6,874		8,037		(684	)	2018
Warehouse	Erlanger, KY	(F)		925		5,934		—		789		925		6,723		7,648		(663	)	2018
Warehouse	Baltimore, MD	(F)		1,259		6,430		—		150		1,259		6,580		7,839		(636	)	2018
Warehouse	Auburn, WA	(F)		1,991		6,873		—		—		1,991		6,873		8,864		(606	)	2018
Warehouse	Largo, FL	(F)		2,052		5,554		—		—		2,052		5,554		7,606		(617	)	2018
Warehouse	Mechanicsburg, PA	(F)		1,257		5,981		—		—		1,257		5,981		7,238		(595	)	2018
Warehouse	Annapolis Junction, MD	(F)		1,227		5,022		—		1,159		1,227		6,181		7,408		(924	)	2018
Warehouse	San Bernardino, CA	(F)		2,023		5,767		—		—		2,023		5,767		7,790		(551	)	2018
Warehouse	Frederick, MD	(F)		1,008		5,549		—		60		1,008		5,609		6,617		(488	)	2018
Warehouse	Elk Grove Village, IL	(F)		3,150		3,193		—		94		3,150		3,287		6,437		(344	)	2018
Warehouse	Sanford, FL	(F)		1,137		5,628		—		—		1,137		5,628		6,765		(541	)	2018
Warehouse	Erlanger, KY	(F)		855		5,671		—		193		855		5,864		6,719		(553	)	2018
Warehouse	Carrollton, TX	(F)		956		5,467		—		88		956		5,555		6,511		(557	)	2018
Warehouse	Aurora, CO	(F)		1,116		5,455		—		41		1,116		5,496		6,612		(555	)	2018
Warehouse	Coppell, TX	(F)		799		4,848		—		1,712		799		6,560		7,359		(958	)	2018
Warehouse	Lakewood, WA	(F)		618		6,264		—		—		618		6,264		6,882		(562	)	2018
Warehouse	Wood Dale, IL	(F)		2,460		3,404		—		30		2,460		3,434		5,894		(334	)	2018
Warehouse	Addison, TX	(F)		928		5,880		—		147		928		6,027		6,955		(623	)	2018
Warehouse	Gurnee, IL	(F)		954		4,418		—		501		954		4,919		5,873		(500	)	2018
Warehouse	Aurora, CO	(F)		1,135		4,788		—		74		1,135		4,862		5,997		(470	)	2018
Warehouse	Sanford, FL	(F)		893		5,053		—		—		893		5,053		5,946		(503	)	2018
Warehouse	Baltimore, MD	(F)		905		4,454		—		376		905		4,830		5,735		(564	)	2018
Warehouse	Dallas, TX	(F)		1,432		4,942		—		202		1,432		5,144		6,576		(530	)	2018
Warehouse	Wood Dale, IL	(F)		2,312		3,814		—		10		2,312		3,824		6,136		(358	)	2018
Warehouse	Baltimore, MD	(F)		957		4,398		—		95		957		4,493		5,450		(523	)	2018
Warehouse	Simi Valley, CA	(F)		1,558		4,273		—		60		1,558		4,333		5,891		(388	)	2018
Warehouse	Baltimore, MD	(F)		913		3,281		—		10		913		3,291		4,204		(362	)	2018
Warehouse	Erlanger, KY	(F)		798		4,821		—		208		798		5,029		5,827		(452	)	2018
Warehouse	San Bernardino, CA	(F)		1,686		3,826		—		111		1,686		3,937		5,623		(389	)	2018

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Erlanger, KY	(F)			628		5,117		—		269		628		5,386		6,014		(537	)	2018
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(F)			1,022		3,917		—		368		1,022		4,285		5,307		(413	)	2018
Warehouse	Grand Prairie, TX	(F)			1,606		3,708		—		145		1,606		3,853		5,459		(431	)	2018
Warehouse	Fort Lauderdale, FL	(F)			1,347		3,889		—		161		1,347		4,050		5,397		(439	)	2018
Warehouse	Garland, TX	(F)			907		4,097		—		—		907		4,097		5,004		(394	)	2018
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(F)			1,045		3,795		—		—		1,045		3,795		4,840		(353	)	2018
Warehouse	Rosedale, MD	(F)			1,214		3,140		—		54		1,214		3,194		4,408		(324	)	2018
Warehouse	Itasca, IL	(F)			981		3,751		—		—		981		3,751		4,732		(352	)	2018
Warehouse	Clearwater, FL	(F)			1,357		3,355		—		—		1,357		3,355		4,712		(325	)	2018
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(F)			787		3,584		—		16		787		3,600		4,387		(391	)	2018
Warehouse	San Diego, CA	(F)			1,749		3,260		—		438		1,749		3,698		5,447		(359	)	2018
Warehouse	Elk Grove Village, IL	(F)			1,696		2,831		—		—		1,696		2,831		4,527		(294	)	2018
Warehouse	Wood Dale, IL	(F)			1,796		2,784		—		156		1,796		2,940		4,736		(318	)	2018
Warehouse	Fort Worth, TX	(F)			691		4,545		—		—		691		4,545		5,236		(490	)	2018
Warehouse	Suwanee, GA	(F)			305		4,057		—		200		305		4,257		4,562		(396	)	2018
Warehouse	Baltimore, MD	(F)			705		2,828		—		83		705		2,911		3,616		(324	)	2018
Warehouse	West Chicago, IL	(F)			1,308		2,906		—		29		1,308		2,935		4,243		(360	)	2018
Warehouse	San Bernardino, CA	(F)			1,513		2,665		—		179		1,513		2,844		4,357		(301	)	2018
Warehouse	West Chester, PA	(F)			769		2,626		—		—		769		2,626		3,395		(250	)	2018
Warehouse	Suwanee, GA	(F)			271		3,484		—		140		271		3,624		3,895		(314	)	2018
Warehouse	Frederick, MD	(F)			593		3,222		—		155		593		3,377		3,970		(348	)	2018
Warehouse	Frederick, MD	(F)			425		2,522		—		604		425		3,126		3,551		(375	)	2018
Warehouse	Frederick, MD	(F)			441		2,526		—		105		441		2,631		3,072		(253	)	2018
Warehouse	Dallas, TX	(F)			903		2,774		—		93		903		2,867		3,770		(293	)	2018
Warehouse	Dallas, TX	(F)			757		2,352		—		—		757		2,352		3,109		(235	)	2018
Warehouse	Simi Valley, CA	(F)			813		2,740		—		41		813		2,781		3,594		(256	)	2018
Warehouse	Erlanger, KY	(F)			278		2,001		—		199		278		2,200		2,478		(211	)	2018
Warehouse	West Chicago, IL	(F)			719		2,247		—		—		719		2,247		2,966		(216	)	2018
Warehouse	Dallas, TX	(F)			800		2,484		—		24		800		2,508		3,308		(243	)	2018
Warehouse	Erlanger, KY	(F)			323		2,586		—		118		323		2,704		3,027		(268	)	2018
DC Powered Shell Warehouse	Ashburn, VA		25,563		12,796		24,209		—		—		12,796		24,209		37,005		(945	)	2019
DC Powered Shell Warehouse	Ashburn, VA		25,561		12,555		23,343		—		—		12,555		23,343		35,898		(914	)	2019
DC Powered Shell Warehouse	Ashburn, VA		18,676		12,475		23,205		—		—		12,475		23,205		35,680		(909	)	2019
DC Powered Shell Warehouse	Manassas, VA		25,347		4,807		36,314		—		—		4,807		36,314		41,121		(1,422	)	2019
DC Powered Shell Warehouse	Manassas, VA		17,378		3,342		25,131		—		—		3,342		25,131		28,473		(986	)	2019
DC Powered Shell Warehouse	Manassas, VA		23,739		4,842		36,535		—		—		4,842		36,535		41,377		(1,431	)	2019
DC Powered Shell Warehouse	Manassas, VA		17,336		3,184		23,956		—		—		3,184		23,956		27,140		(940	)	2019
DC Powered Shell Warehouse	Sterling, VA		24,270		12,955		23,239		—		—		12,955		23,239		36,194		(665	)	2019
DC Powered Shell Warehouse	Sterling, VA		24,630		12,999		23,318		—		—		12,999		23,318		36,317		(667	)	2019
Warehouse	Hebron, KY	(G)			1,551		10,318		—		—		1,551		10,318		11,869		(510	)	2019
Warehouse	Hebron, KY	(G)			1,106		4,903		—		6		1,106		4,909		6,015		(277	)	2019

			Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances	Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Hebron, KY	(G)		2,071		7,744		—		—		2,071		7,744		9,815		(719	)	2019
Warehouse	Hebron, KY	(G)		1,181		9,455		—		260		1,181		9,715		10,896		(619	)	2019
Warehouse	Cincinnati, OH	(G)		2,937		27,172		—		309		2,937		27,481		30,418		(1,364	)	2019
Warehouse	Cincinnati, OH	(G)		1,114		8,004		—		79		1,114		8,083		9,197		(413	)	2019
Warehouse	West Chester, OH	(G)		947		5,888		—		88		947		5,976		6,923		(358	)	2019
Warehouse	West Chester, OH	(G)		812		3,623		—		50		812		3,673		4,485		(229	)	2019
Warehouse	Grove City, OH	(G)		1,532		14,716		—		599		1,532		15,315		16,847		(797	)	2019
Warehouse	Grove City, OH	(G)		1,364		10,919		—		—		1,364		10,919		12,283		(761	)	2019
Warehouse	Grove City, OH	(G)		1,501		11,155		—		676		1,501		11,831		13,332		(807	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(G)		1,775		5,022		—		—		1,775		5,022		6,797		(438	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(G)		2,828		10,418		—		186		2,828		10,604		13,432		(817	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(G)		3,613		15,816		—		303		3,613		16,119		19,732		(1,156	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(G)		1,904		5,350		—		82		1,904		5,432		7,336		(330	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(G)		1,248		3,266		—		60		1,248		3,326		4,574		(268	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(G)		5,841		15,477		—		210		5,841		15,687		21,528		(1,627	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(G)		1,244		4,790		—		73		1,244		4,863		6,107		(557	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		2,536		2,732		—		—		2,536		2,732		5,268		(275	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		2,520		2,000		—		—		2,520		2,000		4,520		(231	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		2,559		1,748		—		—		2,559		1,748		4,307		(126	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		4,677		4,419		—		—		4,677		4,419		9,096		(325	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		1,647		2,234		—		—		1,647		2,234		3,881		(198	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		2,590		3,873		—		—		2,590		3,873		6,463		(246	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		867		1,173		—		—		867		1,173		2,040		(81	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		927		1,182		—		—		927		1,182		2,109		(89	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		890		940		—		—		890		940		1,830		(68	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		2,411		4,065		—		83		2,411		4,148		6,559		(292	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		992		1,846		—		—		992		1,846		2,838		(127	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		419		696		—		—		419		696		1,115		(46	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		222		328		—		—		222		328		550		(25	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		907		1,717		—		—		907		1,717		2,624		(112	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		957		1,757		—		—		957		1,757		2,714		(116	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		3,334		7,998		—		107		3,334		8,105		11,439		(470	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		5,039		8,078		—		—		5,039		8,078		13,117		(547	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		321		508		—		10		321		518		839		(43	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		344		437		—		—		344		437		781		(27	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		1,338		2,950		—		—		1,338		2,950		4,288		(189	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		693		1,662		—		—		693		1,662		2,355		(127	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		1,283		2,760		—		13		1,283		2,773		4,056		(173	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		679		1,168		—		—		679		1,168		1,847		(59	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		501		942		—		—		501		942		1,443		(63	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		899		2,208		—		—		899		2,208		3,107		(132	)	2019

			Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances	Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		519		1,059		—		—		519		1,059		1,578		(55	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		670		1,157		—		127		670		1,284		1,954		(81	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		482		811		—		30		482		841		1,323		(47	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		1,046		2,271		—		—		1,046		2,271		3,317		(138	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		1,455		3,673		—		132		1,455		3,805		5,260		(221	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		1,678		4,341		—		500		1,678		4,841		6,519		(333	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		205		338		—		—		205		338		543		(31	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		420		1,356		—		—		420		1,356		1,776		(80	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		418		464		—		89		418		553		971		(31	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		760		627		—		—		760		627		1,387		(48	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		2,083		4,557		—		—		2,083		4,557		6,640		(261	)	2019
Warehouse	Stone Mountain, GA	(H)		620		562		—		—		620		562		1,182		(47	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		797		700		—		—		797		700		1,497		(45	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		625		935		—		20		625		955		1,580		(59	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		1,382		3,591		—		—		1,382		3,591		4,973		(264	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		1,781		2,845		—		50		1,781		2,895		4,676		(185	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		1,814		3,280		—		59		1,814		3,339		5,153		(210	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		1,940		3,395		—		15		1,940		3,410		5,350		(217	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		2,478		525		—		—		2,478		525		3,003		(78	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		515		276		—		—		515		276		791		(25	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		385		384		—		—		385		384		769		(27	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		1,940		4,198		—		—		1,940		4,198		6,138		(250	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		1,017		1,047		—		—		1,017		1,047		2,064		(82	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		1,597		2,995		—		54		1,597		3,049		4,646		(195	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		309		354		—		—		309		354		663		(34	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		473		1,049		—		—		473		1,049		1,522		(66	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		536		642		—		—		536		642		1,178		(42	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		2,382		4,121		—		—		2,382		4,121		6,503		(239	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		2,518		2,731		—		251		2,518		2,982		5,500		(192	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		296		469		—		9		296		478		774		(33	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		391		724		—		—		391		724		1,115		(47	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		478		834		—		87		478		921		1,399		(49	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		731		377		—		—		731		377		1,108		(33	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		817		1,270		—		—		817		1,270		2,087		(92	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		324		225		—		—		324		225		549		(26	)	2019
Warehouse	Tucker, GA	(H)		973		1,844		—		—		973		1,844		2,817		(125	)	2019
Warehouse	Denver, CO	(E)		1,141		6,588		—		—		1,141		6,588		7,729		(279	)	2019
Warehouse	Denver, CO	(E)		1,200		6,624		—		320		1,200		6,944		8,144		(300	)	2019
Warehouse	Denver, CO	(E)		2,172		14,053		—		55		2,172		14,108		16,280		(578	)	2019
Warehouse	Aurora, CO	(E)		1,457		7,862		—		114		1,457		7,976		9,433		(312	)	2019
Warehouse	Aurora, CO	(E)		1,288		8,523		—		38		1,288		8,561		9,849		(327	)	2019

			Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances	Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Aurora, CO	(E)		1,442		8,481		—		353		1,442		8,834		10,276		(328	)	2019
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(E)		1,865		12,821		—		134		1,865		12,955		14,820		(580	)	2019
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(E)		1,342		9,229		—		—		1,342		9,229		10,571		(381	)	2019
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(E)		897		6,341		—		7		897		6,348		7,245		(280	)	2019
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(E)		1,915		12,028		—		27		1,915		12,055		13,970		(515	)	2019
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(E)		1,687		10,404		—		43		1,687		10,447		12,134		(448	)	2019
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(E)		1,700		11,419		—		151		1,700		11,570		13,270		(492	)	2019
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(E)		3,418		24,959		—		61		3,418		25,020		28,438		(1,117	)	2019
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(E)		1,639		5,993		—		—		1,639		5,993		7,632		(302	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)		608		4,965		—		137		608		5,102		5,710		(188	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)		336		2,432		—		—		336		2,432		2,768		(117	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)		276		1,366		—		—		276		1,366		1,642		(65	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)		767		6,325		—		—		767		6,325		7,092		(315	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)		1,352		11,787		—		208		1,352		11,995		13,347		(493	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)		806		5,974		—		24		806		5,998		6,804		(346	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)		422		3,369		—		—		422		3,369		3,791		(281	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)		639		4,778		—		95		639		4,873		5,512		(219	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)		914		7,058		—		22		914		7,080		7,994		(291	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)		759		5,713		—		—		759		5,713		6,472		(384	)	2019
Warehouse	Denver, CO	(E)		5,769		38,154		—		11		5,769		38,165		43,934		(1,536	)	2019
Warehouse	Aurora, CO	(E)		4,825		33,000		—		196		4,825		33,196		38,021		(1,320	)	2019
Warehouse	Aurora, CO	(E)		1,387		10,144		—		—		1,387		10,144		11,531		(403	)	2019
Warehouse	Denver, CO	(E)		3,255		20,188		—		36		3,255		20,224		23,479		(1,737	)	2019
Warehouse	Denver, CO	(E)		6,000		35,892		—		96		6,000		35,988		41,988		(2,385	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		3,822		11,058		—		28		3,822		11,086		14,908		(847	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		1,884		6,848		—		—		1,884		6,848		8,732		(840	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		1,900		6,911		—		20		1,900		6,931		8,831		(847	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		1,499		4,176		—		49		1,499		4,225		5,724		(167	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		1,251		2,923		—		—		1,251		2,923		4,174		(120	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		631		1,546		—		—		631		1,546		2,177		(64	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		1,274		2,870		—		5		1,274		2,875		4,149		(114	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		648		1,666		—		27		648		1,693		2,341		(69	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		1,183		2,878		—		100		1,183		2,978		4,161		(353	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		2,241		4,479		—		—		2,241		4,479		6,720		(179	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		3,672		9,435		—		58		3,672		9,493		13,165		(1,018	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		2,670		4,863		—		90		2,670		4,953		7,623		(502	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		2,216		4,928		—		34		2,216		4,962		7,178		(499	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		2,451		5,554		—		46		2,451		5,600		8,051		(512	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		2,015		3,847		—		32		2,015		3,879		5,894		(373	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		2,539		7,015		—		—		2,539		7,015		9,554		(292	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)		2,895		5,674		—		174		2,895		5,848		8,743		(238	)	2019

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)			2,007		2,003		—		104		2,007		2,107		4,114		(98	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)			2,939		6,071		—		15		2,939		6,086		9,025		(269	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)			3,457		8,168		—		53		3,457		8,221		11,678		(722	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)			2,980		7,056		—		17		2,980		7,073		10,053		(568	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)			2,947		7,001		—		45		2,947		7,046		9,993		(549	)	2019
Warehouse	Reno, NV	(E)			2,263		2,591		—		18		2,263		2,609		4,872		(117	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)			344		3,189		—		99		344		3,288		3,632		(172	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)			407		3,706		—		16		407		3,722		4,129		(173	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)			238		2,509		—		16		238		2,525		2,763		(106	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)			512		4,670		—		18		512		4,688		5,200		(385	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)			169		1,710		—		9		169		1,719		1,888		(76	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)			212		1,504		—		58		212		1,562		1,774		(69	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX	(E)			467		2,517		—		69		467		2,586		3,053		(117	)	2019
Warehouse	El Paso, TX	(E)			1,153		4,579		—		—		1,153		4,579		5,732		(182	)	2019
Warehouse	El Paso, TX	(E)			1,849		5,877		—		1,260		1,849		7,137		8,986		(878	)	2019
Warehouse	El Paso, TX	(E)			3,487		30,918		—		272		3,487		31,190		34,677		(3,501	)	2019
Warehouse	El Paso, TX	(E)			1,932		16,812		—		175		1,932		16,987		18,919		(736	)	2019
Warehouse	Austin, TX		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		2019
Warehouse	Austin, TX		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		2019
Warehouse	Austin, TX		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		2019
Warehouse	El Paso, TX	(E)			1,270		7,997		—		72		1,270		8,069		9,339		(352	)	2019
Warehouse	El Paso, TX	(E)			828		6,543		—		—		828		6,543		7,371		(586	)	2019
Warehouse	Grand Prairie, TX	(E)			1,840		9,890		—		58		1,840		9,948		11,788		(527	)	2019
Warehouse	Arlington, TX	(E)			603		3,171		—		64		603		3,235		3,838		(138	)	2019
Warehouse	Arlington, TX	(E)			1,139		7,141		—		36		1,139		7,177		8,316		(287	)	2019
Warehouse	Arlington, TX	(E)			1,054		6,454		—		—		1,054		6,454		7,508		(301	)	2019
Warehouse	Arlington, TX	(E)			1,230		7,085		—		35		1,230		7,120		8,350		(291	)	2019
Warehouse	Arlington, TX	(E)			617		3,469		—		—		617		3,469		4,086		(168	)	2019
Warehouse	Arlington, TX	(E)			624		3,417		—		86		624		3,503		4,127		(160	)	2019
Warehouse	Grand Prairie, TX	(E)			353		2,529		—		—		353		2,529		2,882		(125	)	2019
Warehouse	Grand Prairie, TX	(E)			339		2,560		—		212		339		2,772		3,111		(127	)	2019
Warehouse	Dallas, TX	(E)			1,204		6,060		—		92		1,204		6,152		7,356		(305	)	2019
Warehouse	Fort Worth, TX	(E)			3,455		26,591		—		—		3,455		26,591		30,046		(1,074	)	2019
Warehouse	Fort Worth, TX	(E)			1,936		12,303		—		—		1,936		12,303		14,239		(524	)	2019
Warehouse	Fort Worth, TX	(E)			5,181		39,971		—		1,340		5,181		41,311		46,492		(1,641	)	2019
Warehouse	Fort Worth, TX	(E)			5,074		37,036		—		—		5,074		37,036		42,110		(1,568	)	2019
Warehouse	Irving, TX	(I)			875		31,181		—		—		875		31,181		32,056		(1,835	)	2019
Warehouse	Irving, TX	(I)			517		18,989		—		—		517		18,989		19,506		(1,023	)	2019
Warehouse	Hanover, MD	(I)			4,767		27,566		—		1,268		4,767		28,834		33,601		(1,144	)	2019
Warehouse	Frederick, MD	(I)			5,371		12,508		—		403		5,371		12,911		18,282		(973	)	2019
Warehouse	Frederick, MD	(I)			5,816		15,008		—		13		5,816		15,021		20,837		(1,206	)	2019
Warehouse	Frederick, MD	(I)			6,983		4,464		—		414		6,983		4,878		11,861		(626	)	2019
Warehouse	Alexandria, VA	(I)			4,432		17,495		—		198		4,432		17,693		22,125		(1,832	)	2019

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Lockbourne, OH	(I)			7,278		72,702		—		—		7,278		72,702		79,980		(3,430	)	2019
Warehouse	Lenexa, KS	(I)			1,775		13,457		—		104		1,775		13,561		15,336		(1,015	)	2019
Warehouse	Florence, KY	(I)			1,378		8,574		—		34		1,378		8,608		9,986		(347	)	2019
Warehouse	Florence, KY	(I)			1,650		9,633		—		384		1,650		10,017		11,667		(478	)	2019
Warehouse	New Hope, MN	(I)			2,022		6,249		—		—		2,022		6,249		8,271		(328	)	2019
Warehouse	New Hope, MN	(I)			1,880		6,080		—		26		1,880		6,106		7,986		(294	)	2019
Warehouse	Eden Prairie, MN	(I)			1,377		7,171		—		41		1,377		7,212		8,589		(370	)	2019
Warehouse	Glenn Dale, MD	(I)			7,614		5,510		—		2,661		7,614		8,171		15,785		(435	)	2019
Warehouse	Ashland, VA	(I)			566		7,345		—		—		566		7,345		7,911		(846	)	2019
Warehouse	Ashland, VA	(I)			579		7,321		—		531		579		7,852		8,431		(597	)	2019
Warehouse	Chester, VA	(I)			1,504		10,823		—		—		1,504		10,823		12,327		(796	)	2019
Warehouse	Chester, VA	(I)			1,594		12,734		—		—		1,594		12,734		14,328		(1,056	)	2019
Warehouse	Chester, VA	(I)			1,732		11,642		—		5		1,732		11,647		13,379		(747	)	2019
Warehouse	Chester, VA	(I)			862		3,711		—		—		862		3,711		4,573		(293	)	2019
Warehouse	Chester, VA	(I)			1,159		13,316		—		503		1,159		13,819		14,978		(1,178	)	2019
Warehouse	Chester, VA	(I)			1,072		12,311		—		—		1,072		12,311		13,383		(951	)	2019
Warehouse	Chesapeake, VA	(I)			3,434		19,890		—		334		3,434		20,224		23,658		(933	)	2019
Warehouse	Chesapeake, VA	(I)			1,099		8,819		—		25		1,099		8,844		9,943		(490	)	2019
Warehouse	Chesapeake, VA	(I)			2,107		8,957		—		84		2,107		9,041		11,148		(406	)	2019
Warehouse	Chesapeake, VA	(I)			1,886		15,959		—		87		1,886		16,046		17,932		(1,318	)	2019
Warehouse	Chesapeake, VA	(I)			2,377		16,613		—		261		2,377		16,874		19,251		(748	)	2019
Warehouse	Chesapeake, VA	(I)			1,123		6,407		—		—		1,123		6,407		7,530		(476	)	2019
Warehouse	Hampton, VA	(I)			4,125		20,294		—		—		4,125		20,294		24,419		(1,834	)	2019
Warehouse	Hampton, VA	(I)			2,592		7,121		—		31		2,592		7,152		9,744		(756	)	2019
Warehouse	Hampton, VA	(I)			1,412		5,441		—		82		1,412		5,523		6,935		(643	)	2019
Warehouse	Marietta, GA		—		2,346		15,267		—		2		2,346		15,269		17,615		(576	)	2019
Warehouse	Lawrenceville, GA	(I)			769		4,744		—		—		769		4,744		5,513		(183	)	2019
Warehouse	Lawrenceville, GA	(I)			781		4,931		—		35		781		4,966		5,747		(180	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL		—		8,890		55,986		—		1,146		8,890		57,132		66,022		(2,216	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)			2,811		15,921		—		11		2,811		15,932		18,743		(610	)	2019
Warehouse	Atlanta, GA	(I)			1,619		17,944		—		—		1,619		17,944		19,563		(1,407	)	2019
Warehouse	McDonough, GA	(I)			3,897		50,132		—		—		3,897		50,132		54,029		(2,728	)	2019
Warehouse	Suwanee, GA	(I)			1,191		6,529		—		14		1,191		6,543		7,734		(398	)	2019
Warehouse	Kennesaw, GA	(I)			1,446		13,104		—		—		1,446		13,104		14,550		(1,107	)	2019
Warehouse	Lakeland, FL	(I)			1,573		16,074		—		62		1,573		16,136		17,709		(1,776	)	2019
Warehouse	Lakeland, FL	(I)			760		9,465		—		28		760		9,493		10,253		(1,048	)	2019
Warehouse	McDonough, GA	(I)			6,583		92,136		—		—		6,583		92,136		98,719		(4,346	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)			691		3,827		—		—		691		3,827		4,518		(150	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)			798		3,590		—		—		798		3,590		4,388		(139	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)			735		4,416		—		36		735		4,452		5,187		(164	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)			864		4,212		—		14		864		4,226		5,090		(164	)	2019

			Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances	Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)		765		4,280		—		8		765		4,288		5,053		(172	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)		1,211		6,371		—		69		1,211		6,440		7,651		(240	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)		1,141		5,641		—		33		1,141		5,674		6,815		(223	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)		1,203		6,587		—		—		1,203		6,587		7,790		(256	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)		1,295		7,497		—		—		1,295		7,497		8,792		(291	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)		8,897		37,911		—		2,546		8,897		40,457		49,354		(2,241	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		489		1,781		—		—		489		1,781		2,270		(69	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		1,534		8,500		—		—		1,534		8,500		10,034		(1,045	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		435		2,430		—		—		435		2,430		2,865		(293	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		825		6,061		—		—		825		6,061		6,886		(235	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		838		6,304		—		109		838		6,413		7,251		(248	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		1,234		3,861		—		84		1,234		3,945		5,179		(154	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		939		4,361		—		—		939		4,361		5,300		(164	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		949		4,995		—		—		949		4,995		5,944		(188	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		328		3,384		—		35		328		3,419		3,747		(136	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		348		3,681		—		36		348		3,717		4,065		(145	)	2019
Warehouse	Lakeland, FL	(I)		1,765		18,029		—		71		1,765		18,100		19,865		(725	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		1,434		6,347		—		66		1,434		6,413		7,847		(257	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		1,755		12,076		—		—		1,755		12,076		13,831		(482	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		1,352		5,760		—		—		1,352		5,760		7,112		(232	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		943		2,998		—		—		943		2,998		3,941		(115	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		1,481		6,753		—		52		1,481		6,805		8,286		(279	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		1,733		9,922		—		509		1,733		10,431		12,164		(385	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		687		5,039		—		30		687		5,069		5,756		(198	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		2,432		6,326		—		142		2,432		6,468		8,900		(526	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		603		3,593		—		8		603		3,601		4,204		(273	)	2019
Warehouse	Tampa, FL	(I)		562		2,644		—		90		562		2,734		3,296		(216	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)		1,893		7,633		—		68		1,893		7,701		9,594		(939	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)		2,431		12,051		—		107		2,431		12,158		14,589		(1,227	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)		1,862		8,683		—		—		1,862		8,683		10,545		(351	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)		1,932		10,485		—		—		1,932		10,485		12,417		(417	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)		2,281		10,943		—		—		2,281		10,943		13,224		(434	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)		5,043		26,535		—		128		5,043		26,663		31,706		(2,997	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)		3,509		22,120		—		90		3,509		22,210		25,719		(844	)	2019
Warehouse	Orlando, FL	(I)		1,664		9,596		—		—		1,664		9,596		11,260		(383	)	2019
Warehouse	Ball Ground, GA	(I)		2,988		2,196		—		—		2,988		2,196		5,184		(124	)	2019
Warehouse	Benicia, CA	(I)		6,132		—		—		—		6,132		—		6,132		—		2019
Warehouse	Reading, PA	(I)		272		8,180		—		4		272		8,184		8,456		(663	)	2019
Warehouse	Reading, PA	(I)		497		17,111		—		236		497		17,347		17,844		(1,407	)	2019
Warehouse	The Colony, TX	(I)		11,646		—		—		598		11,646		598		12,244		—		2019
Warehouse	Chester, VA	(I)		8,072		—		—		—		8,072		—		8,072		—		2019

			Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances	Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Minneapolis, MN	(I)		2,178		7,490		—		81		2,178		7,571		9,749		(394	)	2019
Warehouse	Elkwood, VA	(I)		1,548		7,990		—		59		1,548		8,049		9,597		(974	)	2019
Warehouse	West Chester, OH	(I)		2,009		10,872		—		26		2,009		10,898		12,907		(443	)	2019
Warehouse	Harrison, OH	(I)		1,177		6,574		—		88		1,177		6,662		7,839		(362	)	2019
Warehouse	Harrison, OH	(I)		1,103		1,379		—		49		1,103		1,428		2,531		(139	)	2019
Warehouse	Bridgewater, NJ	(I)		12,005		37,225		—		1,287		12,005		38,512		50,517		(1,453	)	2019
Warehouse	Bridgewater, NJ	(I)		1,831		4,428		—		15		1,831		4,443		6,274		(184	)	2019
Warehouse	Whippany, NJ	(I)		3,416		10,264		—		200		3,416		10,464		13,880		(434	)	2019
Warehouse	Joliet, IL	(I)		4,811		21,868		—		119		4,811		21,987		26,798		(1,191	)	2019
Warehouse	Joliet, IL	(I)		6,390		29,626		—		—		6,390		29,626		36,016		(1,677	)	2019
Warehouse	Joliet, IL	(I)		3,179		—		—		—		3,179		—		3,179		—		2019
Warehouse	Joliet, IL	(I)		630		—		—		—		630		—		630		—		2019
Warehouse	Rochelle, IL	(I)		3,648		28,007		—		51		3,648		28,058		31,706		(1,564	)	2019
Warehouse	Romeoville, IL	(I)		921		4,659		—		—		921		4,659		5,580		(459	)	2019
Warehouse	Burr Ridge, IL	(I)		2,673		8,591		—		136		2,673		8,727		11,400		(369	)	2019
Warehouse	Lincolnshire, IL	(I)		1,059		4,159		—		—		1,059		4,159		5,218		(156	)	2019
Warehouse	Vernon Hills, IL	(I)		2,283		10,356		—		25		2,283		10,381		12,664		(790	)	2019
Warehouse	Bolingbrook, IL	(I)		3,078		12,386		—		2		3,078		12,388		15,466		(800	)	2019
Warehouse	Bolingbrook, IL	(I)		2,006		11,960		—		—		2,006		11,960		13,966		(720	)	2019
Warehouse	Middletown, PA	(I)		3,227		37,526		—		837		3,227		38,363		41,590		(2,532	)	2019
Warehouse	Harrisburg, PA	(I)		5,660		43,333		—		490		5,660		43,823		49,483		(1,631	)	2019
Warehouse	Lemoyne, PA	(I)		6,979		66,937		—		—		6,979		66,937		73,916		(5,111	)	2019
Warehouse	Carlisle, PA	(I)		6,851		40,424		—		—		6,851		40,424		47,275		(2,602	)	2019
Warehouse	Carlisle, PA	(I)		6,992		36,908		—		—		6,992		36,908		43,900		(2,192	)	2019
Warehouse	Mountain Top, PA	(I)		4,382		23,560		—		195		4,382		23,755		28,137		(2,170	)	2019
Warehouse	Mechanicsburg, PA	(I)		1,102		9,727		—		72		1,102		9,799		10,901		(1,131	)	2019
Warehouse	Mechanicsburg, PA	(I)		3,916		27,686		—		268		3,916		27,954		31,870		(3,584	)	2019
Warehouse	Mechanicsburg, PA	(I)		1,431		9,601		—		10		1,431		9,611		11,042		(1,195	)	2019
Warehouse	Independence, KY	(I)		1,892		13,243		—		8		1,892		13,251		15,143		(764	)	2019
Warehouse	Fairfield, OH	(I)		1,721		9,206		—		—		1,721		9,206		10,927		(415	)	2019
Warehouse	Shawnee, KS	(I)		2,179		11,911		—		198		2,179		12,109		14,288		(772	)	2019
Warehouse	Hebron, KY	(I)		2,309		19,211		—		74		2,309		19,285		21,594		(2,294	)	2019
Warehouse	Erlanger, KY	(I)		672		5,139		—		139		672		5,278		5,950		(410	)	2019
Warehouse	Florence, KY	(I)		1,710		13,371		—		34		1,710		13,405		15,115		(999	)	2019
Warehouse	Florence, KY	(I)		1,750		19,283		—		4,872		1,750		24,155		25,905		(2,505	)	2019
Warehouse	Florence, KY	(I)		764		1,613		—		—		764		1,613		2,377		(144	)	2019
Warehouse	Florence, KY	(I)		782		1,833		—		—		782		1,833		2,615		(174	)	2019
Warehouse	Florence, KY	(I)		785		4,932		—		25		785		4,957		5,742		(548	)	2019
Warehouse	Mounds View, MN	(I)		366		3,810		—		17		366		3,827		4,193		(417	)	2019
Warehouse	Mounds View, MN	(I)		1,464		13,392		—		—		1,464		13,392		14,856		(1,776	)	2019
Warehouse	Mounds View, MN	(I)		738		7,051		—		—		738		7,051		7,789		(773	)	2019

			Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances	Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Mounds View, MN	(I)		1,406		5,279		—		21		1,406		5,300		6,706		(218	)	2019
Warehouse	Plymouth, MN	(I)		3,247		6,024		—		698		3,247		6,722		9,969		(616	)	2019
Warehouse	Eagan, MN	(I)		2,716		14,630		—		117		2,716		14,747		17,463		(653	)	2019
Warehouse	West Chester, OH	(I)		1,590		10,320		—		9		1,590		10,329		11,919		(1,276	)	2019
Warehouse	West Chester, OH	(I)		1,342		8,382		—		91		1,342		8,473		9,815		(391	)	2019
Warehouse	Romeoville, IL	(I)		7,625		17,104		—		3,405		7,625		20,509		28,134		(877	)	2019
Warehouse	Romeoville, IL	(I)		2,358		16,127		—		—		2,358		16,127		18,485		(629	)	2019
Warehouse	Coppell, TX	(J)		14,809		56,188		—		—		14,809		56,188		70,997		(2,597	)	2019
Warehouse	DFW Airport, TX	(I)		349		12,858		—		—		349		12,858		13,207		(554	)	2019
Warehouse	DFW Airport, TX	(I)		438		15,373		—		—		438		15,373		15,811		(663	)	2019
Warehouse	DFW Airport, TX	(I)		348		12,563		—		—		348		12,563		12,911		(516	)	2019
Warehouse	Dallas, TX	(H)		1,297		10,933		—		—		1,297		10,933		12,230		(386	)	2019
Warehouse	Carrollton, TX	(H)		1,840		9,599		—		100		1,840		9,699		11,539		(444	)	2019
Warehouse	Carrollton, TX	(H)		1,648		6,793		—		47		1,648		6,840		8,488		(285	)	2019
Warehouse	Allen, TX	(H)		2,933		18,579		—		211		2,933		18,790		21,723		(1,471	)	2019
Warehouse	Dallas, TX	(H)		5,571		41,168		—		304		5,571		41,472		47,043		(2,696	)	2019
Warehouse	El Paso, TX	(H)		883		8,760		—		—		883		8,760		9,643		(752	)	2019
Warehouse	El Paso, TX	(H)		1,338		10,012		—		—		1,338		10,012		11,350		(917	)	2019
Warehouse	El Paso, TX	(H)		519		4,170		—		58		519		4,228		4,747		(381	)	2019
Warehouse	El Paso, TX	(H)		1,007		8,060		—		190		1,007		8,250		9,257		(762	)	2019
Warehouse	El Paso, TX	(H)		1,367		12,476		—		6		1,367		12,482		13,849		(1,102	)	2019
Warehouse	El Paso, TX	(H)		1,631		11,722		—		105		1,631		11,827		13,458		(1,021	)	2019
Warehouse	North Las Vegas, NV	(H)		9,777		57,535		—		—		9,777		57,535		67,312		(2,297	)	2019
Warehouse	Jeffersonville, IN	(H)		5,735		36,396		—		—		5,735		36,396		42,131		(1,526	)	2019
Warehouse	Elgin, IL	(H)		1,788		10,789		—		31		1,788		10,820		12,608		(544	)	2019
Warehouse	Broadview, IL	(H)		4,403		5,962		—		—		4,403		5,962		10,365		(244	)	2019
Warehouse	North Aurora, IL	(H)		1,718		6,938		—		27		1,718		6,965		8,683		(538	)	2019
Warehouse	Schaumburg, IL	(H)		2,639		7,761		—		65		2,639		7,826		10,465		(341	)	2019
Warehouse	New Berlin, WI	(H)		1,143		8,597		—		—		1,143		8,597		9,740		(617	)	2019
Warehouse	Aurora, IL	(H)		1,454		7,700		—		—		1,454		7,700		9,154		(876	)	2019
Warehouse	Aurora, IL	(H)		686		3,311		—		69		686		3,380		4,066		(218	)	2019
Warehouse	Bedford Park, IL	(H)		8,125		9,767		—		546		8,125		10,313		18,438		(741	)	2019
Warehouse	Bedford Park, IL	(H)		3,764		17,610		—		—		3,764		17,610		21,374		(1,176	)	2019
Warehouse	Bensenville, IL	(H)		2,003		8,149		—		10		2,003		8,159		10,162		(322	)	2019
Warehouse	Bedford Park, IL	(H)		3,256		11,031		—		215		3,256		11,246		14,502		(469	)	2019
Warehouse	Middletown, PA	(H)		4,459		51,911		—		532		4,459		52,443		56,902		(3,516	)	2019
Warehouse	Addison, IL	(H)		1,777		2,847		—		88		1,777		2,935		4,712		(143	)	2019
Warehouse	Fremont, OH	(H)		567		7,357		—		—		567		7,357		7,924		(611	)	2019
Warehouse	Fremont, OH	(H)		474		5,812		—		20		474		5,832		6,306		(533	)	2019
Warehouse	Fremont, OH	(H)		191		1,461		—		—		191		1,461		1,652		(52	)	2019
Warehouse	Fremont, OH	(H)		226		1,455		—		—		226		1,455		1,681		(52	)	2019

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(H)			635		1,335		—		—		635		1,335		1,970		(62	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(H)			290		655		—		27		290		682		972		(31	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(H)			1,242		3,274		—		70		1,242		3,344		4,586		(157	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(H)			730		2,336		—		43		730		2,379		3,109		(105	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(H)			849		1,970		—		122		849		2,092		2,941		(98	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(H)			882		2,357		—		49		882		2,406		3,288		(111	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(H)			526		1,284		—		50		526		1,334		1,860		(61	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(H)			1,554		5,286		—		83		1,554		5,369		6,923		(246	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(H)			369		701		—		25		369		726		1,095		(36	)	2019
Warehouse	Sauk Village, IL	(H)			1,822		8,843		—		155		1,822		8,998		10,820		(622	)	2019
Warehouse	Columbus, OH	(H)			850		5,210		—		—		850		5,210		6,060		(201	)	2019
Warehouse	Columbus, OH	(H)			809		4,254		—		—		809		4,254		5,063		(159	)	2019
Warehouse	Columbus, OH	(H)			814		4,594		—		—		814		4,594		5,408		(186	)	2019
Warehouse	Columbus, OH	(H)			703		5,022		—		—		703		5,022		5,725		(188	)	2019
Warehouse	Columbus, OH	(H)			619		4,390		—		48		619		4,438		5,057		(168	)	2019
Warehouse	Columbus, OH	(H)			1,281		6,406		—		241		1,281		6,647		7,928		(250	)	2019
Warehouse	Columbus, OH	(H)			1,184		10,712		—		53		1,184		10,765		11,949		(403	)	2019
Warehouse	Columbus, OH	(H)			1,392		8,357		—		82		1,392		8,439		9,831		(326	)	2019
Warehouse	Columbus, OH	(H)			875		3,958		—		658		875		4,616		5,491		(332	)	2019
Warehouse	Plainfield, IN	(H)			6,165		42,062		—		—		6,165		42,062		48,227		(2,614	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(H)			2,671		7,987		—		424		2,671		8,411		11,082		(302	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(H)			4,827		27,999		—		—		4,827		27,999		32,826		(3,112	)	2019
Warehouse	Louisville, KY	(H)			1,882		13,721		—		46		1,882		13,767		15,649		(796	)	2019
Warehouse	Louisville, KY	(H)			2,392		19,106		—		35		2,392		19,141		21,533		(1,236	)	2019
Warehouse	Groveport, OH	(H)			3,065		26,553		—		75		3,065		26,628		29,693		(1,335	)	2019
Warehouse	San Bernardino, CA		—		4,053		122,805		—		—		4,053		122,805		126,858		(4,946	)	2019
Warehouse	York, PA	(K)			14,330		105,091		—		—		14,330		105,091		119,421		(4,213	)	2019
Warehouse	Kennesaw, GA	(K)			1,901		15,871		—		—		1,901		15,871		17,772		(699	)	2019
Warehouse	DeSoto, TX	(K)			8,135		75,384		—		—		8,135		75,384		83,519		(3,239	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(K)			4,111		21,788		—		37		4,111		21,825		25,936		(1,198	)	2019
Warehouse	Hanover Park, IL	(K)			4,707		34,315		—		—		4,707		34,315		39,022		(2,144	)	2019
Warehouse	Joliet, IL	(K)			9,172		48,773		—		—		9,172		48,773		57,945		(2,039	)	2019
Warehouse	Garland, TX	(K)			2,515		16,087		—		—		2,515		16,087		18,602		(993	)	2019
Warehouse	Hanover Park, IL	(K)			2,663		9,508		—		14		2,663		9,522		12,185		(864	)	2019
Warehouse	Bolingbrook, IL	(K)			3,105		24,504		—		437		3,105		24,941		28,046		(1,383	)	2019
Warehouse	Joliet, IL	(K)			4,534		25,549		—		—		4,534		25,549		30,083		(1,408	)	2019
Warehouse	Elgin, IL	(K)			2,437		14,505		—		—		2,437		14,505		16,942		(785	)	2019
Warehouse	Carol Stream, IL	(K)			3,385		6,796		—		191		3,385		6,987		10,372		(373	)	2019
Warehouse	Hanover Park, IL	(K)			4,433		22,731		—		954		4,433		23,685		28,118		(1,729	)	2019
Warehouse	Braselton, GA	(J) , (K)			6,808		69,899		—		—		6,808		69,899		76,707		(2,857	)	2019
Warehouse	Atlanta, GA	(J)			3,876		22,104		—		996		3,876		23,100		26,976		(835	)	2019

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Bedford Park, IL	(J)			6,773		20,325		—		301		6,773		20,626		27,399		(1,182	)	2019
Warehouse	Melrose Park, IL	(J)			3,568		11,536		—		36		3,568		11,572		15,140		(631	)	2019
Warehouse	Kutztown, PA	(J)			10,017		41,496		—		—		10,017		41,496		51,513		(1,769	)	2019
Warehouse	Dallas, TX	(J)			7,885		40,243		—		—		7,885		40,243		48,128		(1,816	)	2019
Warehouse	Dallas, TX	(J)			6,683		24,880		—		32		6,683		24,912		31,595		(1,302	)	2019
Warehouse	Louisville, KY	(J)			2,611		14,870		—		104		2,611		14,974		17,585		(1,215	)	2019
Warehouse	Fairburn, GA	(J)			3,672		22,803		—		—		3,672		22,803		26,475		(986	)	2019
Warehouse	Houston, TX	(J)			2,323		11,491		—		97		2,323		11,588		13,911		(892	)	2019
Warehouse	North Las Vegas, NV	(J)			14,730		79,955		—		—		14,730		79,955		94,685		(3,060	)	2019
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN	(J)			5,206		24,991		—		328		5,206		25,319		30,525		(1,109	)	2019
Warehouse	Dallas, TX	(J)			7,302		51,914		—		1,341		7,302		53,255		60,557		(2,896	)	2019
Warehouse	Louisville, KY	(J)			1,910		9,700		—		8		1,910		9,708		11,618		(381	)	2019
Warehouse	Louisville, KY	(J)			891		6,379		—		—		891		6,379		7,270		(632	)	2019
Warehouse	Louisville, KY	(J)			1,925		10,498		—		786		1,925		11,284		13,209		(806	)	2019
Warehouse	North Las Vegas, NV	(J)			11,297		53,855		—		—		11,297		53,855		65,152		(2,085	)	2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX		—		330		—		—		—		330		—		330		—		2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX		—		330		—		—		—		330		—		330		—		2019
Warehouse	San Antonio, TX		—		330		—		—		—		330		—		330		—		2019
Warehouse	Austin, TX		—		268		—		—		—		268		—		268		—		2019
Warehouse	Elk Grove Village, IL	(I)			2,885		10,771		—		150		2,885		10,921		13,806		(422	)	2019
Warehouse	Erlanger, KY	(K)			1,694		56,340		—		—		1,694		56,340		58,034		(2,279	)	2019
Warehouse	San Diego, CA	(G)			27,661		—		—		—		27,661		—		27,661		(85	)	2019
Warehouse	Pooler, GA		—		3,910		20,283		—		—		3,910		20,283		24,193		(1,087	)	2019
Warehouse	Durham, NC	(L)			2,164		12,665		—		83		2,164		12,748		14,912		(709	)	2019
Warehouse	Durham, NC	(L)			2,117		12,202		—		792		2,117		12,994		15,111		(598	)	2019
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			1,750		5,658		—		406		1,750		6,064		7,814		(296	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			1,030		2,680		—		60		1,030		2,740		3,770		(126	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			1,756		5,610		—		465		1,756		6,075		7,831		(299	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			1,718		5,724		—		898		1,718		6,622		8,340		(232	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			1,195		3,809		—		321		1,195		4,130		5,325		(155	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			940		3,016		—		241		940		3,257		4,197		(165	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			744		2,962		—		288		744		3,250		3,994		(135	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			766		3,315		—		311		766		3,626		4,392		(180	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			899		3,297		—		317		899		3,614		4,513		(214	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			743		1,986		—		300		743		2,286		3,029		(175	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			1,967		6,303		—		72		1,967		6,375		8,342		(286	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			1,432		4,494		—		284		1,432		4,778		6,210		(250	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			2,908		9,847		—		100		2,908		9,947		12,855		(453	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			1,822		5,567		—		—		1,822		5,567		7,389		(314	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			1,778		5,389		—		—		1,778		5,389		7,167		(271	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			1,607		7,015		—		209		1,607		7,224		8,831		(298	)	2020

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			1,367		5,697		—		—		1,367		5,697		7,064		(281	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			1,862		6,664		—		100		1,862		6,764		8,626		(348	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			1,464		6,953		—		100		1,464		7,053		8,517		(274	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			3,303		24,042		—		100		3,303		24,142		27,445		(883	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC		—		307		—		—		—		307		—		307		—		2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC		—		871		—		—		—		871		—		871		—		2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			2,073		5,220		—		—		2,073		5,220		7,293		(300	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC	(L)			1,718		4,389		—		—		1,718		4,389		6,107		(269	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC		—		347		483		—		—		347		483		830		(66	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC		—		439		1,023		—		5		439		1,028		1,467		(91	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC		—		418		471		—		—		418		471		889		(62	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC		—		392		868		—		—		392		868		1,260		(76	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC		—		389		975		—		—		389		975		1,364		(47	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC		—		426		986		—		—		426		986		1,412		(88	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC		—		434		1,072		—		—		434		1,072		1,506		(92	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC		—		785		614		—		—		785		614		1,399		(101	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC		—		675		1,047		—		—		675		1,047		1,722		(98	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC		—		679		925		—		160		679		1,085		1,764		(118	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC		—		392		915		—		—		392		915		1,307		(75	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC		—		517		413		—		—		517		413		930		(72	)	2020
Warehouse	Greensboro, NC		—		836		885		—		—		836		885		1,721		(118	)	2020
Warehouse	Wood Dale, IL	(M)			2,296		4,689		—		—		2,296		4,689		6,985		(181	)	2020
Warehouse	Wood Dale, IL	(M)			3,355		14,337		—		—		3,355		14,337		17,692		(487	)	2020
Warehouse	Elk Grove Village, IL	(M)			850		1,906		—		53		850		1,959		2,809		(89	)	2020
Warehouse	Elk Grove Village, IL	(M)			2,904		8,352		—		—		2,904		8,352		11,256		(305	)	2020
Warehouse	Elk Grove Village, IL	(M)			2,871		6,303		—		—		2,871		6,303		9,174		(207	)	2020
Warehouse	Carol Stream, IL	(M)			1,527		5,063		—		15		1,527		5,078		6,605		(200	)	2020
Warehouse	Hanover Park, IL	(M)			1,015		4,108		—		16		1,015		4,124		5,139		(162	)	2020
Warehouse	Hillside, IL	(M)			3,723		6,089		—		—		3,723		6,089		9,812		(251	)	2020
Warehouse	Munster, IN	(M)			2,157		17,245		—		594		2,157		17,839		19,996		(669	)	2020
Warehouse	Skokie, IL	(M)			2,519		4,648		—		—		2,519		4,648		7,167		(153	)	2020
Warehouse	Skokie, IL	(M)			1,680		2,242		—		—		1,680		2,242		3,922		(81	)	2020
Warehouse	Wheeling, IL	(M)			4,774		6,513		—		—		4,774		6,513		11,287		(267	)	2020
Warehouse	Lincolnshire, IL	(M)			1,519		4,028		—		—		1,519		4,028		5,547		(143	)	2020
Warehouse	Pleasant Prairie, WI	(M)			4,782		29,398		—		214		4,782		29,612		34,394		(1,033	)	2020
Warehouse	Pleasant Prairie, WI	(M)			2,854		15,468		—		—		2,854		15,468		18,322		(548	)	2020
Warehouse	Pleasant Prairie, WI	(M)			2,551		14,861		—		—		2,551		14,861		17,412		(560	)	2020
Warehouse	Sturtevant, WI	(M)			3,793		30,694		—		214		3,793		30,908		34,701		(1,002	)	2020
Warehouse	Sturtevant, WI	(M)			930		6,901		—		—		930		6,901		7,831		(241	)	2020
Warehouse	Sturtevant, WI	(M)			1,483		12,527		—		—		1,483		12,527		14,010		(471	)	2020
Warehouse	Sturtevant, WI	(M)			2,258		15,075		—		—		2,258		15,075		17,333		(516	)	2020

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Warehouse	Mt. Pleasant, WI	(M)			5,820		27,392		—		214		5,820		27,606		33,426		(1,010	)	2020
Warehouse	Oak Creek, WI	(M)			1,510		3,715		—		—		1,510		3,715		5,225		(173	)	2020
Warehouse	Oak Creek, WI	(M)			840		5,482		—		—		840		5,482		6,322		(198	)	2020
Warehouse	Oak Creek, WI	(M)			1,705		10,593		—		—		1,705		10,593		12,298		(363	)	2020
Warehouse	Cudahy, WI	(M)			1,781		10,072		—		246		1,781		10,318		12,099		(350	)	2020
Warehouse	Milwaukee, WI	(M)			1,555		10,957		—		—		1,555		10,957		12,512		(357	)	2020
Warehouse	Milwaukee, WI	(M)			2,111		16,642		—		316		2,111		16,958		19,069		(583	)	2020
Warehouse	Fairfield, CA	(G)			8,314		35,048		—		76		8,314		35,124		43,438		(997	)	2020
Warehouse	West Sacramento, CA	(G)			3,627		23,917		—		—		3,627		23,917		27,544		(574	)	2020
Warehouse	Stockton, CA	(G)			4,698		31,509		—		76		4,698		31,585		36,283		(896	)	2020
Warehouse	Lathrop, CA	(G)			3,831		29,007		—		—		3,831		29,007		32,838		(633	)	2020
Warehouse	Lathrop, CA	(G)			2,606		10,627		—		—		2,606		10,627		13,233		(280	)	2020
Warehouse	Ontario, CA	(G)			13,046		8,899		—		221		13,046		9,120		22,166		(424	)	2020
Warehouse	Ontario, CA	(G)			2,272		2,402		—		—		2,272		2,402		4,674		(87	)	2020
Warehouse	Ontario, CA	(G)			2,498		1,272		—		34		2,498		1,306		3,804		(72	)	2020
Warehouse	Ontario, CA	(G)			2,817		2,932		—		20		2,817		2,952		5,769		(115	)	2020
Warehouse	Las Vegas, NV	(G)			1,064		7,230		—		—		1,064		7,230		8,294		(269	)	2020
Warehouse	Las Vegas, NV	(G)			2,407		11,583		—		89		2,407		11,672		14,079		(378	)	2020
Warehouse	Las Vegas, NV	(G)			2,397		8,278		—		76		2,397		8,354		10,751		(243	)	2020
Warehouse	Jacksonville, FL	(G)			2,904		21,419		—		53		2,904		21,472		24,376		(552	)	2020
Warehouse	Pico Rivera, CA		—		26,532		35,674		—		2		26,532		35,676		62,208		(400	)	2020
Warehouse	Fontana, CA		—		11,919		18,822		—		—		11,919		18,822		30,741		(178	)	2020
Warehouse	Etiwanda, CA		—		18,744		9,606		—		—		18,744		9,606		28,350		(170	)	2020
Warehouse	Livermore, CA		—		17,911		51,072		—		—		17,911		51,072		68,983		(124	)	2020
Warehouse	San Diego, CA		—		7,650		29,133		—		—		7,650		29,133		36,783		(70	)	2020
Warehouse	Fontana, CA		—		12,325		27,313		—		—		12,325		27,313		39,638		(67	)	2020
Warehouse	Irwindale, CA		—		9,367		13,998		—		—		9,367		13,998		23,365		(33	)	2020
Warehouse	East Brunswick, NJ		—		4,314		13,545		—		—		4,314		13,545		17,859		(32	)	2020
Warehouse	East Brunswick, NJ		—		8,157		31,389		—		—		8,157		31,389		39,546		(72	)	2020
Warehouse	East Brunswick, NJ		—		4,902		14,705		—		—		4,902		14,705		19,607		(37	)	2020
Warehouse	Sharon Hill, PA		—		6,257		24,626		—		—		6,257		24,626		30,883		(57	)	2020
Warehouse	Sharon Hill, PA		—		4,956		16,209		—		—		4,956		16,209		21,165		(39	)	2020
Warehouse	Palmer Township, PA		—		2,664		22,550		—		—		2,664		22,550		25,214		(59	)	2020
Warehouse	Malvern, PA		—		1,874		2,693		—		—		1,874		2,693		4,567		(11	)	2020
Warehouse	Jessup, MD		—		5,037		21,671		—		—		5,037		21,671		26,708		(48	)	2020
Warehouse	Springfield, VA		—		1,969		3,741		—		—		1,969		3,741		5,710		(10	)	2020
Warehouse	Indianapolis, IN		—		4,447		18,125		—		—		4,447		18,125		22,572		(44	)	2020
Total Industrial Properties:				$	2,109,655	$	9,095,308	$	—	$	148,752	$	2,109,655	$	9,244,060	$	11,353,715	$	(608,710	)

Net Lease Properties:
Bellagio	Las Vegas, NV	$	3,010,000	$	1,451,755	$	2,757,601	$	—	$	12	$	1,451,755	$	2,757,613	$	4,209,368	$	(129,387	)	2019
Total Net Lease Properties:		$	3,010,000	$	1,451,755	$	2,757,601	$	—	$	12	$	1,451,755	$	2,757,613	$	4,209,368	$	(129,387	)

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Hotel Properties:
Full Service Hotel	Atlanta, GA	$	243,700	$	30,482	$	289,353	$	—	$	903	$	30,482	$	290,256	$	320,738	$	(13,762	)	2019
Full Service Hotel	San Antonio, TX		202,500		84,218		474,529		351		11,191		84,569		485,720		570,289		(65,144	)	2018
Select Service Hotel	Davis, CA		20,500		526		24,778		14		748		540		25,526		26,066		(6,676	)	2017
Select Service Hotel	San Jose, CA		26,654		10,746		36,138		60		1,558		10,806		37,696		48,502		(8,094	)	2017
Select Service Hotel	Oldsmar, FL		40,403		2,088		13,234		17		352		2,105		13,586		15,691		(2,772	)	2017
Select Service Hotel	Oldsmar, FL		31,009		1,069		8,724		—		700		1,069		9,424		10,493		(2,095	)	2017
Select Service Hotel	Temple Terrace, FL		22,563		2,706		12,351		87		1,092		2,793		13,443		16,236		(3,992	)	2017
Select Service Hotel	Lake Mary, FL		10,000		1,941		10,979		3		176		1,944		11,155		13,099		(2,728	)	2017
Select Service Hotel	Atlanta, GA		21,200		5,714		26,296		11		268		5,725		26,564		32,289		(5,268	)	2017
Select Service Hotel	Worcester, MA		14,200		1,646		20,149		31		1,018		1,677		21,167		22,844		(4,049	)	2017
Select Service Hotel	Worcester, MA		10,900		738		14,663		11		149		749		14,812		15,561		(2,367	)	2017
Select Service Hotel	Chelsea, MA		24,700		1,825		37,505		1		36		1,826		37,541		39,367		(5,437	)	2017
Select Service Hotel	Orlando, FL		15,188		2,836		19,097		—		—		2,836		19,097		21,933		(3,371	)	2018
Select Service Hotel	Orlando, FL		17,503		2,786		18,706		10		141		2,796		18,847		21,643		(3,210	)	2018
Select Service Hotel	Henderson, NV		11,000		1,764		15,784		—		111		1,764		15,895		17,659		(2,522	)	2018
Select Service Hotel	Henderson, NV		10,400		1,576		14,188		4		85		1,580		14,273		15,853		(2,195	)	2018
Select Service Hotel	Phoenix, AZ		12,400		3,265		14,456		15		141		3,280		14,597		17,877		(2,978	)	2018
Select Service Hotel	Tampa, FL		16,300		1,746		11,796		—		409		1,746		12,205		13,951		(1,857	)	2018
Select Service Hotel	Rohnert Park, CA		8,300		2,538		26,306		—		1,889		2,538		28,195		30,733		(3,361	)	2018
Select Service Hotel	Reno, NV		17,300		2,462		31,127		5		1,851		2,467		32,978		35,445		(4,016	)	2018
Select Service Hotel	Salt Lake City, UT		10,100		983		16,534		—		957		983		17,491		18,474		(2,045	)	2018
Select Service Hotel	Federal Way, WA		17,616		2,894		30,395		—		88		2,894		30,483		33,377		(2,886	)	2018
Select Service Hotel	Reno, NV		8,455		1,705		14,754		—		1,301		1,705		16,055		17,760		(2,832	)	2018
Select Service Hotel	Salt Lake City, UT		—		4,204		40,065		87		90		4,291		40,155		44,446		(4,081	)	2018
Select Service Hotel	Salt Lake City, UT		—		8,743		16,725		16		91		8,759		16,816		25,575		(2,003	)	2018
Select Service Hotel	Salt Lake City, UT		—		3,592		24,007		8		34		3,600		24,041		27,641		(3,690	)	2018
Select Service Hotel	Chicago,, IL		25,347		14,792		26,617		—		193		14,792		26,810		41,602		(1,415	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Kailua-Kona, HI		52,194		4,804		94,476		160		7,888		4,964		102,364		107,328		(11,202	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Longmont, CO		2,646		586		2,580		33		70		619		2,650		3,269		(272	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Miramar, FL		11,494		2,556		12,326		9		95		2,565		12,421		14,986		(618	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Salt Lake City, UT		10,942		1,248		19,229		1		88		1,249		19,317		20,566		(861	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Durham, NC		12,047		2,809		12,407		22		1,468		2,831		13,875		16,706		(653	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	West Palm Beach, FL		10,721		1,004		9,628		3		35		1,007		9,663		10,670		(471	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Fort Walton Beach, FL		10,002		1,966		8,214		13		102		1,979		8,316		10,295		(393	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	West Palm Beach, FL		10,279		1,651		8,083		—		121		1,651		8,204		9,855		(434	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Denver, CO		9,560		3,950		10,417		7		367		3,957		10,784		14,741		(653	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Clearwater, FL		9,008		2,648		8,186		—		1,284		2,648		9,470		12,118		(493	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Longmont, CO		6,473		1,759		7,988		10		47		1,769		8,035		9,804		(293	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Novi, MI		8,897		3,014		14,185		26		442		3,040		14,627		17,667		(686	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Plantation, FL		12,213		1,675		12,110		27		287		1,702		12,397		14,099		(676	)	2019

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Select Service Hotel	Miramar, FL		12,434		2,447		12,381		2		128		2,449		12,509		14,958		(621	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Salt Lake City, UT		5,868		906		11,131		—		69		906		11,200		12,106		(509	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Silver Spring, MD		12,434		3,310		11,947		9		3,180		3,319		15,127		18,446		(552	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Longmont, CO		4,295		1,640		8,540		10		21		1,650		8,561		10,211		(399	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Austin, TX		11,163		6,316		14,808		40		341		6,356		15,149		21,505		(821	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	San Antonio, TX		2,653		517		2,482		31		163		548		2,645		3,193		(339	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	San Antonio, TX		6,110		3,069		7,501		3		254		3,072		7,755		10,827		(375	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Oak Brook, IL		13,926		—		22,116		44		126		44		22,242		22,286		(974	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Bloomington, IN		12,213		—		24,783		—		74		—		24,857		24,857		(1,066	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Glendale, AZ		9,852		4,726		12,458		2		17		4,728		12,475		17,203		(564	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Glendale, AZ		7,374		3,781		10,724		—		17		3,781		10,741		14,522		(494	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Colorado Springs, CO		7,000		4,213		9,630		—		11		4,213		9,641		13,854		(434	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Colorado Springs, CO		8,000		4,387		12,455		5		4		4,392		12,459		16,851		(506	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Colorado Springs, CO		—		3,943		6,751		—		20		3,943		6,771		10,714		(331	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Colorado Springs, CO		—		4,685		6,770		—		51		4,685		6,821		11,506		(320	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Colorado Springs, CO		—		3,152		12,805		—		2,160		3,152		14,965		18,117		(554	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Colorado Springs, CO		—		5,868		10,233		—		47		5,868		10,280		16,148		(422	)	2019
Select Service Hotel	Scottsdale, AZ		—		5,327		11,517		—		33		5,327		11,550		16,877		(541	)	2019
Total Hotel Properties:		$	1,118,036	$	287,542	$	1,718,117	$	1,188	$	44,582	$	288,730	$	1,762,699	$	2,051,429	$	(192,373	)

Self Storage Properties:
Self Storage	Miami, FL	$	10,143	$	2,955	$	10,622	$	—	$	129	$	2,955	$	10,751	$	13,706	$	(515	)	2019
Self Storage	Fort Pierce, FL		5,903		1,619		7,147		—		43		1,619		7,190		8,809		(415	)	2019
Self Storage	Fort Myers, FL		3,914		1,456		4,214		—		24		1,456		4,238		5,694		(232	)	2019
Self Storage	Winter Haven, FL		4,266		1,546		4,393		—		77		1,546		4,470		6,016		(335	)	2019
Self Storage	Dundee, FL		4,067		1,165		5,773		—		34		1,165		5,807		6,972		(295	)	2019
Self Storage	Fayetteville, NC		4,611		1,408		6,092		—		32		1,408		6,124		7,532		(322	)	2019
Self Storage	Fayetteville, NC		4,406		1,067		5,836		—		50		1,067		5,886		6,953		(307	)	2019
Self Storage	Hope Mills, NC		3,959		1,821		4,821		—		23		1,821		4,844		6,665		(281	)	2019
Self Storage	Vinton, VA		4,291		1,177		5,228		—		23		1,177		5,251		6,428		(274	)	2019
Self Storage	Raleigh, NC		3,728		1,094		4,344		—		20		1,094		4,364		5,458		(228	)	2019
Self Storage	Apex, NC		3,473		1,077		3,522		—		56		1,077		3,578		4,655		(187	)	2019
Self Storage	Raleigh, NC		2,744		1,000		1,637		—		201		1,000		1,838		2,838		(86	)	2019
Self Storage	Tallahassee, FL		6,715		3,092		7,174		—		119		3,092		7,293		10,385		(421	)	2019
Self Storage	Tallahassee, FL		2,942		705		3,735		—		—		705		3,735		4,440		(192	)	2019
Self Storage	Pensacola, FL		4,534		324		6,445		—		159		324		6,604		6,928		(317	)	2019
Self Storage	Neptune, NJ		7,111		1,997		8,606		—		33		1,997		8,639		10,636		(459	)	2019
Self Storage	Staten Island, NY		4,732		4,231		2,681		—		45		4,231		2,726		6,957		(136	)	2019
Self Storage	Chattanooga, TN		5,225		1,377		6,244		—		405		1,377		6,649		8,026		(324	)	2019
Self Storage	Belcamp, MD		5,001		791		6,503		—		71		791		6,574		7,365		(322	)	2019
Self Storage	Summerville, SC		3,306		3,117		2,225		—		23		3,117		2,248		5,365		(116	)	2019

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Self Storage	Moncks Corner, SC		2,929		1,043		1,499		—		7		1,043		1,506		2,549		(84	)	2019
Self Storage	Phoenix, AZ		3,381		723		3,347		—		—		723		3,347		4,070		(92	)	2020
Self Storage	Phoenix, AZ		5,416		1,877		6,737		—		—		1,877		6,737		8,614		(201	)	2020
Self Storage	Tucson, AZ		4,300		770		5,426		—		—		770		5,426		6,196		(60	)	2020
Self Storage	Tucson, AZ		4,200		727		4,807		—		—		727		4,807		5,534		(53	)	2020
Self Storage	Tucson, AZ		4,300		544		5,107		—		17		544		5,124		5,668		(56	)	2020
Self Storage	Stockton, CA		8,800		1,783		9,413		—		—		1,783		9,413		11,196		(86	)	2020
Self Storage	Spring Valley, CA		7,400		3,503		5,915		—		—		3,503		5,915		9,418		(52	)	2020
Self Storage	Orlando, FL		3,200		1,055		2,774		—		—		1,055		2,774		3,829		(33	)	2020
Self Storage	Sarasota, FL		3,100		691		3,101		—		7		691		3,108		3,799		(34	)	2020
Self Storage	Waterford, MI		4,050		1,525		6,276		—		—		1,525		6,276		7,801		(55	)	2020
Self Storage	Willoughby, OH		4,300		1,897		5,391		—		—		1,897		5,391		7,288		(71	)	2020
Self Storage	Willoughby, OH		4,200		659		5,582		—		—		659		5,582		6,241		(61	)	2020
Self Storage	Cleveland, OH		5,100		1,083		7,418		—		—		1,083		7,418		8,501		(81	)	2020
Self Storage	Aurora, OH		7,500		1,835		9,226		—		—		1,835		9,226		11,061		(124	)	2020
Self Storage	Knoxville, TN		3,350		1,750		3,704		—		—		1,750		3,704		5,454		(33	)	2020
Self Storage	Corpus Christi, TX		7,200		2,091		8,800		—		—		2,091		8,800		10,891		(81	)	2020
Self Storage	Houston, TX		3,100		709		3,141		—		—		709		3,141		3,850		(36	)	2020
Self Storage	Pasadena, TX		3,500		1,224		2,898		—		—		1,224		2,898		4,122		(34	)	2020
Self Storage	Baytown, TX		5,000		1,924		4,739		—		28		1,924		4,767		6,691		(62	)	2020
Self Storage	Houston, TX		4,400		2,613		3,303		—		—		2,613		3,303		5,916		(51	)	2020
Self Storage	San Antonio, TX		4,600		956		5,609		—		—		956		5,609		6,565		(22	)	2020
Self Storage	Fresno, CA		4,750		1,083		5,270		—		35		1,083		5,305		6,388		(32	)	2020
Self Storage	Euless, TX		5,900		2,801		5,758		—		—		2,801		5,758		8,559		(45	)	2020
Self Storage	Rosenberg, TX		2,467		862		2,448		—		—		862		2,448		3,310		(3	)	2020
Self Storage	Pace, FL		—		1,378		4,434		—		—		1,378		4,434		5,812		(6	)	2020
Self Storage	Cocoa, FL		—		919		6,166		—		—		919		6,166		7,085		(6	)	2020
Self Storage	Rockledge, FL		—		1,691		9,324		—		—		1,691		9,324		11,015		(10	)	2020
Self Storage	Osprey, FL		8,050		1,893		13,583		—		1		1,893		13,584		15,477		(16	)	2020
Self Storage	Windermere, FL		9,850		2,924		15,082		—		7		2,924		15,089		18,013		(18	)	2020
Self Storage	Gibsonton, FL		14,400		4,053		19,467		—		3		4,053		19,470		23,523		(23	)	2020
Self Storage	Baltimore, MD		8,214		1,713		11,274		—		2		1,713		11,276		12,989		(13	)	2020
Self Storage	Houston, TX		7,947		1,296		10,360		—		—		1,296		10,360		11,656		(12	)	2020
Self Storage	Palmetto, FL		10,664		3,745		20,775		—		—		3,745		20,775		24,520		(24	)	2020
Self Storage	Pensacola, FL		6,125		2,361		17,733		—		—		2,361		17,733		20,094		(21	)	2020
Self Storage	Oklahoma City, OK		4,525		1,211		6,127		—		2		1,211		6,129		7,340		(8	)	2020
Self Storage	Oklahoma City, OK		3,403		1,031		5,702		—		—		1,031		5,702		6,733		(7	)	2020
Self Storage	Oklahoma City, OK		2,957		1,119		4,364		—		4		1,119		4,368		5,487		(5	)	2020
Self Storage	Ardmore, OK		3,403		1,837		6,694		4		5		1,841		6,699		8,540		(8	)	2020
Self Storage	Cypress, TX		3,980		844		6,066		—		—		844		6,066		6,910		(7	)	2020
Self Storage	Olive Branch, MS		9,998		2,802		22,049		—		2		2,802		22,051		24,853		(25	)	2020

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Self Storage	Denham Springs, LA		4,985		1,885		10,898		—		—		1,885		10,898		12,783		(13	)	2020
Self Storage	Norman, OK		4,281		1,543		5,866		—		—		1,543		5,866		7,409		(7	)	2020
Self Storage	Norman, OK		5,309		2,203		9,493		—		—		2,203		9,493		11,696		(11	)	2020
Self Storage	Ardmore, OK		1,117		513		2,934		4		—		517		2,934		3,451		(3	)	2020
Self Storage	Palatine, IL		2,400		770		1,940		—		—		770		1,940		2,710		(3	)	2020
Self Storage	Lakeville, MN		5,223		1,407		3,259		—		4		1,407		3,263		4,670		(5	)	2020
Self Storage	Oklahoma City, OK		2,281		982		2,362		—		—		982		2,362		3,344		(4	)	2020
Self Storage	Moore, OK		2,038		559		2,419		—		—		559		2,419		2,978		(3	)	2020
Self Storage	Woodbury, MN		6,700		2,041		6,607		—		—		2,041		6,607		8,648		(8	)	2020
Self Storage	New Brighton, MN		7,900		3,080		10,350		—		—		3,080		10,350		13,430		(12	)	2020
Self Storage	Brentwood, TN		8,100		1,986		10,640		—		—		1,986		10,640		12,626		(13	)	2020
Self Storage	Frisco, TX		4,800		1,564		4,377		—		—		1,564		4,377		5,941		(5	)	2020
Self Storage	Smyrna, TN		6,576		1,657		8,224		—		—		1,657		8,224		9,881		(10	)	2020
Self Storage	Allen, TX		6,933		1,262		6,073		—		—		1,262		6,073		7,335		(7	)	2020
Self Storage	Frisco, TX		5,352		2,006		6,073		—		—		2,006		6,073		8,079		(7	)	2020
Self Storage	McKinney, TX		8,083		1,826		6,443		—		2		1,826		6,445		8,271		(8	)	2020
Self Storage	Orange, CA		17,250		10,704		13,390		—		—		10,704		13,390		24,094		(20	)	2020
Self Storage	Cypress, CA		14,000		3,752		13,654		—		—		3,752		13,654		17,406		(17	)	2020
Self Storage	Santa Fe Springs, CA		15,086		5,948		8,457		—		—		5,948		8,457		14,405		(12	)	2020
Self Storage	Hauppauge, NY		10,954		1,498		12,463		—		—		1,498		12,463		13,961		(14	)	2020
Self Storage	Lindenhurst , NY		15,347		3,326		19,039		—		—		3,326		19,039		22,365		(23	)	2020
Self Storage	Huntington Station, NY		12,140		1,811		14,079		—		—		1,811		14,079		15,890		(16	)	2020
Self Storage	Seattle, WA		25,378		17,127		13,954		—		—		17,127		13,954		31,081		(21	)	2020
Self Storage	Glen Rock, NJ		—		3,100		—		—		—		3,100		—		3,100		—		2020
Self Storage	Flowery Branch, GA		6,988		1,027		8,304		—		—		1,027		8,304		9,331		(10	)	2020
Self Storage	Marietta, GA		2,447		1,094		2,809		—		1		1,094		2,810		3,904		(4	)	2020
Self Storage	Decatur, GA		5,068		1,495		7,052		—		—		1,495		7,052		8,547		(8	)	2020
Self Storage	Augusta, GA		5,463		771		5,737		—		—		771		5,737		6,508		(7	)	2020
Self Storage	Woodstock, GA		4,546		1,172		5,685		—		—		1,172		5,685		6,857		(7	)	2020
Self Storage	Sanford, FL		6,810		1,536		9,180		—		—		1,536		9,180		10,716		(11	)	2020
Self Storage	Naples, FL		9,021		1,368		10,754		—		—		1,368		10,754		12,122		(13	)	2020
Self Storage	Ormond Beach, FL		6,524		2,605		11,617		—		1		2,605		11,618		14,223		(14	)	2020
Self Storage	Spring Hill, FL		3,910		913		6,173		—		1		913		6,174		7,087		(7	)	2020
Self Storage	Winter Garden, FL		8,092		1,456		13,774		—		2		1,456		13,776		15,232		(15	)	2020
Self Storage	Palm Bay, FL		9,688		2,428		14,852		—		—		2,428		14,852		17,280		(18	)	2020
Self Storage	Cocoa, FL		6,957		1,788		10,980		—		—		1,788		10,980		12,768		(13	)	2020
Self Storage	Palm Bay, FL		5,202		1,837		7,072		4		—		1,841		7,072		8,913		(8	)	2020
Self Storage	Valrico, FL		6,665		2,854		7,166		—		2		2,854		7,168		10,022		(8	)	2020
Self Storage	Land O' Lakes, FL		9,756		1,574		12,194		—		3		1,574		12,197		13,771		(14	)	2020
Self Storage	Altamonte Springs, FL		9,182		2,504		13,968		—		—		2,504		13,968		16,472		(17	)	2020
Self Storage	Orlando, FL		7,078		2,102		10,389		2		—		2,104		10,389		12,493		(12	)	2020

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Self Storage	Allentown, PA		7,985		2,781		12,114		—		—		2,781		12,114		14,895		(15	)	2020
Self Storage	Barnegat, NJ		8,106		1,754		12,985		—		2		1,754		12,987		14,741		(15	)	2020
Self Storage	Englishtown, NJ		9,214		2,487		14,051		—		—		2,487		14,051		16,538		(16	)	2020
Self Storage	Trenton, NJ		8,481		1,853		12,736		—		7		1,853		12,743		14,596		(15	)	2020
Self Storage	Marmora, NJ		5,598		2,381		11,891		—		—		2,381		11,891		14,272		(13	)	2020
Self Storage	Neptune Township, NJ		7,510		2,159		11,610		—		1		2,159		11,611		13,770		(13	)	2020
Self Storage	Fairhaven, MA		5,234		1,647		5,388		—		—		1,647		5,388		7,035		(7	)	2020
Self Storage	East Falmouth, MA		11,751		3,544		20,064		—		—		3,544		20,064		23,608		(24	)	2020
Self Storage	Middletown, RI		8,501		2,196		11,457		—		—		2,196		11,457		13,653		(13	)	2020
Self Storage	Seattle, WA		23,584		4,773		23,693		—		—		4,773		23,693		28,466		(25	)	2020
Self Storage	St. Clair Shores, MI		6,229		799		7,732		—		1		799		7,733		8,532		(9	)	2020
Self Storage	Linden, MI		5,169		1,773		6,698		—		—		1,773		6,698		8,471		(9	)	2020
Self Storage	Grand Rapids, MI		10,056		1,451		12,476		—		—		1,451		12,476		13,927		(15	)	2020
Self Storage	Flint, MI		5,940		933		7,971		—		—		933		7,971		8,904		(9	)	2020
Self Storage	Waterford, MI		10,577		1,957		12,724		—		—		1,957		12,724		14,681		(15	)	2020
Self Storage	Wixom, MI		9,059		1,568		11,156		—		1		1,568		11,157		12,725		(13	)	2020
Self Storage	Saline, MI		9,111		3,059		9,673		—		—		3,059		9,673		12,732		(12	)	2020
Self Storage	Wyoming, MI		4,237		1,352		4,933		—		—		1,352		4,933		6,285		(6	)	2020
Self Storage	Wheeling, IL		4,514		1,147		1,117		—		—		1,147		1,117		2,264		(2	)	2020
Self Storage	Bolingbrook, IL		5,772		1,300		5,750		—		—		1,300		5,750		7,050		(7	)	2020
Self Storage	St. Charles, IL		14,185		2,641		15,883		—		—		2,641		15,883		18,524		(19	)	2020
Self Storage	Zionsville, IN		1,892		677		2,203		—		—		677		2,203		2,880		(3	)	2020
Self Storage	Lafayette, IN		5,129		1,095		6,274		—		—		1,095		6,274		7,369		(7	)	2020
Self Storage	West Lafayette, IN		8,636		1,640		7,727		—		—		1,640		7,727		9,367		(9	)	2020
Self Storage	Lafayette, IN		3,567		721		3,657		—		—		721		3,657		4,378		(4	)	2020
Self Storage	Lafayette, IN		4,829		1,016		5,261		—		—		1,016		5,261		6,277		(6	)	2020
Self Storage	Lafayette, IN		7,190		1,365		7,861		—		—		1,365		7,861		9,226		(9	)	2020
Self Storage	Munster, IN		6,185		1,295		8,715		—		—		1,295		8,715		10,010		(10	)	2020
Self Storage	Valparaiso, IN		6,854		2,487		12,221		—		—		2,487		12,221		14,708		(13	)	2020
Self Storage	Southlake, TX		11,330		2,437		15,541		—		—		2,437		15,541		17,978		(17	)	2020
Self Storage	Navarre, FL		11,769		2,145		20,014		—		—		2,145		20,014		22,159		(22	)	2020
Self Storage	Columbus, OH		4,384		911		5,825		—		—		911		5,825		6,736		(7	)	2020
Self Storage	Collierville, TN		3,659		975		5,704		—		—		975		5,704		6,679		(7	)	2020
Self Storage	Memphis, TN		3,643		1,095		4,852		—		—		1,095		4,852		5,947		(6	)	2020
Self Storage	Memphis, TN		2,791		871		4,486		—		—		871		4,486		5,357		(5	)	2020
Self Storage	Memphis, TN		2,588		754		4,052		—		—		754		4,052		4,806		(5	)	2020
Self Storage	Memphis, TN		3,734		1,187		4,785		—		—		1,187		4,785		5,972		(6	)	2020
Self Storage	Collierville, TN		4,502		1,465		6,578		—		—		1,465		6,578		8,043		(8	)	2020
Self Storage	Memphis, TN		2,842		924		4,414		—		—		924		4,414		5,338		(5	)	2020
Self Storage	Southaven, MS		5,433		1,862		7,503		—		—		1,862		7,503		9,365		(9	)	2020
Self Storage	Southaven, MS		3,736		1,799		4,152		—		—		1,799		4,152		5,951		(6	)	2020

				Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition				Gross Amounts at which Carried at the Close of Period
Description	Location	Encumbrances		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Land and Land Improvements		Building and Building Improvements		Total		Accumulated Depreciation⁽¹⁾			Year Acquired
Self Storage	Olive Branch, MS		11,060		3,437		15,765		—		—		3,437		15,765		19,202		(19	)	2020
Self Storage	Chickasha, OK		3,395		762		3,961		—		—		762		3,961		4,723		(5	)	2020
Self Storage	Oklahoma City, OK		2,804		878		3,836		—		—		878		3,836		4,714		(4	)	2020
Self Storage	Oklahoma City, OK		2,150		698		2,700		—		—		698		2,700		3,398		(3	)	2020
Self Storage	Stillwater, OK		1,895		612		2,903		—		—		612		2,903		3,515		(3	)	2020
Self Storage	Oklahoma City, OK		2,073		550		2,272		—		—		550		2,272		2,822		(3	)	2020
Self Storage	Bixby, OK		7,720		1,822		7,052		—		—		1,822		7,052		8,874		(8	)	2020
Total Self Storage Properties:		$	927,263	$	279,673	$	1,177,247	$	14	$	1,715	$	279,687	$	1,178,962	$	1,458,649	$	(8,424	)

Retail Properties:
Shopping Center	Philadelphia, PA	$	32,000	$	19,335	$	31,757	$	—	$	1,800	$	19,335	$	33,557	$	52,892	$	(5,151	)	2017
Shopping Center	Burbank, CA		27,390		24,100		18,317		149		898		24,249		19,215		43,464		(3,408	)	2017
Shopping Center	Miami, FL		20,250		17,085		14,854		443		—		17,528		14,854		32,382		(1,659	)	2018
Shopping Center	Brooklyn, NY		80,400		73,427		35,704		—		2		73,427		35,706		109,133		(1,116	)	2019
Shopping Center	Simi Valley, CA		23,600		22,282		13,400		18		12		22,300		13,412		35,712		(1,138	)	2019
Shopping Center	Pacoima, CA		31,200		38,015		9,103		—		31		38,015		9,134		47,149		(622	)	2019
Shopping Center	Signal Hill, CA		38,550		32,808		14,722		—		46		32,808		14,768		47,576		(722	)	2019
Shopping Center	Irvine, CA		60,750		54,585		33,088		—		81		54,585		33,169		87,754		(1,004	)	2020
Shopping Center	Huntington Beach, CA		30,250		28,955		18,668		—		246		28,955		18,914		47,869		(602	)	2020
Shopping Center	Lake Forest, CA		29,400		22,451		12,663		—		273		22,451		12,936		35,387		(406	)	2020
Shopping Center	Huntington Beach, CA		28,500		25,629		16,122		—		479		25,629		16,601		42,230		(526	)	2020
Shopping Center	Mission Viejo, CA		15,800		12,320		6,938		—		277		12,320		7,215		19,535		(235	)	2020
Shopping Center	Dana Point, CA		14,100		14,026		7,659		12		68		14,038		7,727		21,765		(243	)	2020
Total Retail Properties:		$	432,190	$	385,018	$	232,995	$	622	$	4,213	$	385,640	$	237,208	$	622,848	$	(16,832	)

Office Properties:
Office	Emeryville, CA	$	75,900	$	29,719	$	86,396	$	—	$	3,368	$	29,719	$	89,764	$	119,483	$	(3,642	)	2019
Office	San Jose, CA		167,700		50,457		184,849		—		—		50,457		184,849		235,306		(837	)	2020
Total Office Properties:		$	243,600	$	80,176	$	271,245	$	—	$	3,368	$	80,176	$	274,613	$	354,789	$	(4,479	)

Portfolio Total		$	13,967,521	$	7,601,949	$	25,531,190	$	24,432	$	460,420	$	7,626,381	$	25,991,610	$	33,617,991	$	(1,693,196	)

The total included on Schedule III does not include Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment totaling $495.4 million. Accumulated Depreciation does not include $122.3 million of accumulated depreciation related to Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment.

The following table summarizes activity for real estate and accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 ($ in thousands):

		Page
PART I.

ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	3

ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	9

ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	77

ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	77

ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	77

ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	77

PART II.

ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	78

ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	87

ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	88

ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	107

ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	107

ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	108

ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	108

ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	108

PART III.

ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	109

ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	109

ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	109

ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	109

ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	109

PART IV.

ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	110

ITEM 16.	FORM 10-K SUMMARY	112

SIGNATURES		113

Components of NAV	December 31, 2020
Investments in real estate	$	37,671,984
Investments in real estate debt		4,566,306
Investments in unconsolidated entities		855,185
Cash and cash equivalents		333,388
Restricted cash		711,135
Other assets		836,239
Mortgage notes, term loans, and revolving credit facilities, net		(20,024,734	)
Secured financings on investments in real estate debt		(2,140,993	)
Subscriptions received in advance		(508,817	)
Other liabilities		(757,920	)
Accrued performance participation allocation		(192,648	)
Management fee payable		(22,253	)
Accrued stockholder servicing fees ⁽¹⁾		(6,589	)
Non-controlling interests in joint ventures		(270,030	)
Net asset value	$	21,050,253
Number of outstanding shares/units		1,821,889

NAV Per Share	Class S Shares		Class I Shares		Class T Shares		Class D Shares		Third-party Operating Partnership Units⁽¹⁾		Total
Monthly NAV	$	8,144,540	$	10,712,085	$	523,046	$	1,417,854	$	252,728	$	21,050,253
Number of outstanding shares/units		702,853		927,080		45,943		124,141		21,872		1,821,889
NAV Per Share/Unit as of December 31, 2020	$	11.5878	$	11.5547	$	11.3847	$	11.4213	$	11.5547

Property Type	Discount Rate	Exit Capitalization Rate
Multifamily	7.5%	5.2%
Industrial	6.7%	5.4%
Net Lease	7.4%	6.8%
Hotel	9.3%	9.6%
Self Storage	7.3%	6.2%
Retail	7.7%	6.6%
Office	7.6%	6.2%

	December 31, 2020
Stockholders’ equity		15,852,726
Non-controlling interests attributable to BREIT OP unitholders		187,972
Redeemable non-controlling interest		274
Total partners' capital of BREIT OP under U.S. GAAP		16,040,972
Adjustments:
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		2,650,146
Unrealized net real estate and debt appreciation		1,757,289
Accrued stockholder servicing fee		598,822
Organization and offering costs		4,090
Accrued affiliate incentive compensation awards		(1,066	)
NAV	$	21,050,253

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☒	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐

Declaration Date	Class S Shares		Class I Shares		Class T Shares		Class D Shares
January 31, 2020	$	0.0451	$	0.0534	$	0.0452	$	0.0510
February 29, 2020		0.0451		0.0529		0.0452		0.0506
March 31, 2020		0.0451		0.0529		0.0452		0.0506
April 30, 2020		0.0451		0.0524		0.0452		0.0503
May 31, 2020		0.0451		0.0527		0.0452		0.0505
June 30, 2020		0.0451		0.0526		0.0452		0.0504
July 31, 2020		0.0451		0.0529		0.0452		0.0506
August 31, 2020		0.0451		0.0529		0.0452		0.0506
September 30, 2020		0.0451		0.0528		0.0452		0.0506
October 31, 2020		0.0451		0.0533		0.0452		0.0509
November 30, 2020		0.0451		0.0531		0.0452		0.0508
December 31, 2020		0.0451		0.0535		0.0453		0.0511
Total	$	0.5412	$	0.6354	$	0.5425	$	0.6080

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2020					For the Year Ended December 31, 2019					For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
	Amount		Percentage			Amount		Percentage			Amount		Percentage
Distributions
Payable in cash	$	439,522		46	%	$	169,669		39	%	$	63,631		37	%
Reinvested in shares		508,512		54	%		263,897		61	%		110,228		63	%
Total distributions	$	948,034		100	%	$	433,566		100	%	$	173,859		100	%
Sources of Distributions
Cash flows from operating activities	$	948,034		100	%	$	433,566		100	%	$	173,859		100	%
Offering proceeds		—		—	%		—		—	%		—		—	%
Total sources of distributions	$	948,034		100	%	$	433,566		100	%	$	173,859		100	%

Cash flows from operating activities	$	971,904				$	600,927				$	252,682
Funds from Operations	$	406,071				$	358,565				$	110,527
Adjusted Funds from Operations	$	691,205				$	420,284				$	164,597
Funds Available for Distribution	$	743,685				$	409,385				$	168,009

Month of:	Total Number of Shares Repurchased⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		Repurchases as a Percentage of NAV⁽²⁾			Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Repurchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Shares Pending Repurchase Pursuant to Publicly Announced Plans or Programs⁽³⁾
October 2020		9,280,047		0.6	%	$	11.11		7,529,843		—
November 2020		6,139,739		0.4	%		11.30		4,360,776		—
December 2020		11,676,791		0.7	%		11.43		7,233,289		—
Total		27,096,577	N/M			$	11.29		19,123,908		—

													For the Period March 2, 2016 through
	For the Year Ended December 31,												December 31,
	2020			2019			2018			2017			2016
Operating Data (in thousands)
Total revenues	$	2,551,648		$	1,686,272		$	723,258		$	157,932		$	—
Total expenses		2,830,822			1,866,396			837,761			226,858			115
Total other income (expense)		(588,228	)		(234,119	)		(176,962	)		(18,624	)		—
Net loss		(867,402	)		(414,243	)		(291,465	)		(87,550	)		(115	)
Net loss attributable to BREIT stockholders	$	(853,399	)	$	(401,771	)	$	(281,056	)	$	(86,258	)	$	(115	)

Per Share Data
Net loss per share of common stock — basic and diluted	$	(0.53	)	$	(0.54	)	$	(0.91	)	$	(0.90	)	$	(5.74	)
Gross distributions declared per share of common stock⁽¹⁾	$	0.64		$	0.64		$	0.63		$	0.48		$	—

Balance Sheet Data (in thousands)
Total assets	$	40,684,015		$	33,039,823		$	13,237,158		$	4,625,308		$	200
Investments in real estate, net		32,457,713			26,326,868			10,259,687			3,406,555			—
Investments in real estate debt		4,566,306			4,523,260			2,259,913			915,742			—
Mortgage notes, term loans, and secured revolving credit facilities, net		19,976,161			16,929,659			6,833,269			2,111,291			—
Secured financings on investments in real estate debt		2,140,993			3,092,137			1,713,723			682,848			—
Total equity		16,183,951			10,614,648			3,914,954			1,509,639			85

Segment	Number of Properties		Sq. Feet (in thousands)/ Units/Keys	Occupancy Rate⁽¹⁾	Average Effective Annual Base Rent Per Leased Square Foot/Units/Keys⁽²⁾		Gross Asset Value⁽³⁾ ($ in thousands)		Segment Revenue⁽⁴⁾		Percentage of Total Revenues
Multifamily⁽⁵⁾		286	87,978 units	93%	$	13,604	$	15,176,465	$	1,027,129	39%
Industrial		858	141,141 sq. ft.	95%	$	5.03		13,497,613		839,970	32%
Net lease		3	24,748 sq. ft.	N/A	N/A			5,213,035		419,749	16%
Hotel		58	9,669 keys	41%	$127.62/$52.82			1,975,615		255,306	9%
Self Storage		150	11,801 sq. ft.	89%	$	11.48		1,609,709		25,950	1%
Retail		13	1,933 sq. ft.	96%	$	23.47		667,900		55,245	2%
Office		2	585 sq. ft.	98%	$	37.10		386,832		16,870	1%
Total		1,370					$	38,527,169	$	2,640,219	100%

Year	Number of Expiring Leases		Annualized Base Rent⁽¹⁾		% of Total Annualized Base Rent Expiring	Square Feet		% of Total Square Feet Expiring
2021		445		77,677	8%		15,278	11%
2022		549		117,090	12%		22,389	16%
2023		460		112,836	11%		22,537	16%
2024		386		83,481	8%		15,912	12%
2025		309		69,492	7%		12,416	9%
2026		164		80,225	8%		16,996	12%
2027		97		44,516	5%		8,744	6%
2028		81		34,323	3%		5,697	4%
2029		55		35,733	4%		4,476	3%
2030		55		54,618	6%		5,882	4%
Thereafter		45		273,762	28%		9,329	7%
Total		2,646	$	983,753	100%		139,656	100%

	December 31, 2020
Type of Security/Loan	Number of Positions		Weighted Average Coupon⁽¹⁾	Weighted Average Maturity Date⁽²⁾	Face Amount/ Notional⁽³⁾		Cost Basis		Fair Value
CMBS - floating		131	L+2.8%	3/1/2025	$	2,878,598	$	2,849,161	$	2,675,210
CMBS - fixed		54	4.0%	5/21/2028		978,513		941,784		915,371
Corporate bonds		10	5.0%	5/3/2027		179,398		178,219		183,203
CMBS - zero coupon		4	N/A	3/10/2027		236,090		137,665		141,632
RMBS - fixed		15	4.5%	10/24/2049		22,429		22,602		22,510
CMBS - interest only		5	2.3%	4/14/2028		2,257,282		21,214		21,215
Total real estate securities		219	3.2%	3/29/2026	N/M			4,150,645		3,959,141
Term loans		8	L+3.1%	1/7/2022		488,824		438,445		486,273
Mezzanine loans		1	L+6.9%	12/15/2024		134,750		134,424		120,892
Total real estate loans		9	L+3.8%	8/8/2022		623,574		572,869		607,165
Total investments in real estate debt		228	3.5%	10/3/2025	N/M		$	4,723,514	$	4,566,306

	Year Ended December 31,						2020 vs. 2019
	2020			2019			$			%
Net loss attributable to BREIT stockholders	$	(853,399	)	$	(401,771	)	$	(451,628	)	112%
Adjustments to reconcile to same property NOI
General and administrative		25,653			18,170			7,483		41%
Management fee		224,776			108,115			116,661		108%
Performance participation allocation		192,648			141,396			51,252		36%
Affiliate incentive compensation awards		1,394			2,000			(606	)	(30%)
Impairment of investments in real estate		12,343			—			12,343		NM
Depreciation and amortization		1,362,151			824,039			538,112		65%
Income from unconsolidated entities		(88,571	)		—			(88,571	)	NM
Income from real estate debt		120,917			(213,062	)		333,979		(157%)
Net gain on dispositions of real estate		(113,173	)		(35,035	)		(78,138	)	223%
Interest income		(2,228	)		(3,041	)		813		(27%)
Interest expense		715,159			487,517			227,642		47%
Loss on extinguishment of debt		10,356			—			10,356		NM
Other income (expense)		(54,232	)		(2,260	)		(51,972	)	2300%
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in third party joint ventures		(2,417	)		(5,671	)		3,254		(57%)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in BREIT OP		(11,586	)		(6,801	)		(4,785	)	70%
NOI		1,539,791			913,596			626,195		69%
Non-same property NOI		1,018,747			298,046			720,701		242%
Same property NOI	$	521,044		$	615,550		$	(94,506	)	(15%)

					2020 vs. 2019
								Change in Average
								Effective Annual
	Year Ended December 31,				Change in Base		Change in	Base Rent Per Leased
	2020		2019		Rental Revenue		Occupancy Rate	Square Foot/Unit⁽¹⁾
Multifamily	$	452,739	$	440,093	$	12,646	—%	+3%
Industrial		251,422		250,191		1,231	—%	+1%
Retail⁽²⁾		9,942		9,664		278	+1%	+2%
Total base rental revenue	$	714,103	$	699,948	$	14,155

Obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years
Indebtedness ⁽¹⁾	$	26,239,230	$	2,611,111	$	2,546,521	$	8,387,284	$	12,694,314
Ground leases		964,245		7,063		14,667		15,441		927,074
Organizational and offering costs		4,090		2,045		2,045		—		—
Other		5,395		2,398		2,997		—		—
Total	$	27,212,960	$	2,622,617	$	2,566,230	$	8,402,725	$	13,621,388

Exhibit Number	Exhibit Description

3.1	Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference)

3.2	Articles of Amendment of Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc., dated August 15, 2019 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference)

3.3	Articles of Amendment of Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc., dated March 27, 2020 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference)

3.4	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-213043) filed on August 30, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference)

4.1*	Share Repurchase Plan

4.2	Distribution Reinvestment Plan (included as Appendix A in Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-249070) filed on January 15, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference)

4.3*	Description of Securities of Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.

10.1	Second Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement, by and among Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc., BREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. and BX REIT Advisors L.L.C. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 19, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference)

10.2	Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of BREIT Operating Partnership L.P., by and between Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc., BREIT Special Limited Partner L.P. (fka BREIT Special Limited Partner L.L.C.) and the limited partners party thereto from time to time (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference)

10.3	Registration Rights Agreement, by and among Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc., BREIT Special Limited Partner L.L.P. (f/k/a BREIT Special Limited Partner L.L.C.) and BX REIT Advisors L.L.C. (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference)

10.4	Trademark License Agreement, by and among Blackstone TM L.L.C., Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. and BREIT Operating Partnership L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference)

10.5	Valuation Services Agreement, by and among Altus Group U.S. Inc., Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. and BREIT Operating Partnership L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference)

10.6	Form of Indemnification Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-213043) filed on August 30, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference)

10.7	Form of Independent Directors Restricted Stock Award Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-213043) filed on August 30, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference)

10.8	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated January 20, 2017, between a subsidiary of the Company and 173ODRE9 GL Owner, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference)

Exhibit Number	Exhibit Description

10.9	Uncommitted Unsecured Line of Credit, dated January 23, 2017, between the Company, as borrower, and Blackstone Holdings Finance Co. L.L.C., as lender (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference)

10.9.1	Notice of Facility Reduction, dated January 15, 2020 (filed as Exhibit 10.10.1 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-225566) filed on March 27, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference)

10.9.2*	Notice of Facility Reduction, dated December 23, 2020

10.10	Transaction Agreement, dated as of June 2, 2019, by and among the Sellers named therein, the Acquired Companies named therein, the Seller Representative named therein, BRE Jupiter LLC, GLP US Management Holdings LLC and the Merger Subs named therein (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference)

10.11	Memorandum of Designation and Understanding, dated as of June 2, 2019, by and among BRE Jupiter LLC, Blackstone Real Estate Partners VIII L.P., Blackstone Real Estate Partners IX L.P. and Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference)

10.12	Lease, dated as of November 15, 2019, by and between BCORE Paradise LLC and Bellagio LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 24, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference)

10.13	Amended and Restated Dealer Manager Agreement, by and between Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. and Blackstone Advisory Partners L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 1, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference)

10.14	Form of Selected Dealer Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 1, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference)

21.1*	Subsidiaries of the Registrant

31.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS+	XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH+	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.SCH+	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB+	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE+	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF+	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

		BLACKSTONE REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

March 17, 2021		/s/ Frank Cohen
Date		Frank Cohen
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)


Consolidated Financial Statements:

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019	F-4

Consolidated Statements of Operations for Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018	F-5

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018	F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018	F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-9

	December 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Assets
Investments in real estate, net	$	32,457,713		$	26,326,868
Investments in unconsolidated entities		816,220			—
Investments in real estate debt		4,566,306			4,523,260
Cash and cash equivalents		333,388			204,269
Restricted cash		711,135			905,433
Other assets		1,799,253			1,079,993
Total assets	$	40,684,015		$	33,039,823

Liabilities and Equity
Mortgage notes, term loans, and secured revolving credit facilities, net	$	19,976,161		$	16,929,659
Secured financings on investments in real estate debt		2,140,993			3,092,137
Unsecured revolving credit facilities		—			—
Due to affiliates		887,660			690,143
Other liabilities		1,465,194			1,692,087
Total liabilities		24,470,008			22,404,026

Commitments and contingencies		—			—
Redeemable non-controlling interests		30,056			21,149

Equity
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, 100,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019		—			—
Common stock — Class S shares, $0.01 par value per share, 3,000,000 shares authorized; 702,853 and 530,813 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively		7,029			5,308
Common stock — Class I shares, $0.01 par value per share, 6,000,000 shares authorized; 927,080 and 474,279 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively		9,270			4,743
Common stock — Class T shares, $0.01 par value per share, 500,000 shares authorized; 45,943 and 39,767 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively		459			398
Common stock — Class D shares, $0.01 par value per share, 500,000 shares authorized; 124,141 and 84,657 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively		1,241			847
Additional paid-in capital		19,059,045			11,716,721
Accumulated deficit and cumulative distributions		(3,224,318	)		(1,422,885	)
Total stockholders' equity		15,852,726			10,305,132
Non-controlling interests attributable to third party joint ventures		143,253			157,795
Non-controlling interests attributable to BREIT OP unitholders		187,972			151,721
Total equity		16,183,951			10,614,648
Total liabilities and equity	$	40,684,015		$	33,039,823

Supplemental disclosures:
Interest paid	$	674,594	$	461,354	$	208,042
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Assumption of mortgage notes in conjunction with acquisitions of real estate	$	944,112	$	1,202,713	$	208,480
Assumption of other liabilities in conjunction with acquisitions of real estate	$	5,688	$	71,784	$	66,525
Issuance of BREIT OP units as consideration for acquisitions of real estate	$	770	$	64,698	$	—
Recognition of financing lease liability	$	—	$	56,008	$	—
Assumed operating ground lease liabilities	$	—	$	50,612	$	—
Acquired non-controlling interests	$	—	$	—	$	12,802
Accrued capital expenditures and acquisition related costs	$	13,402	$	17,589	$	2,452
Contributions from non-controlling interests	$	—	$	2,520	$	—
Accrued distributions	$	34,682	$	34,849	$	13,644
Accrued stockholder servicing fee due to affiliate	$	126,872	$	240,043	$	136,420
Redeemable non-controlling interest issued as settlement of performance participation allocation	$	141,396	$	37,484	$	16,974
Exchange of redeemable non-controlling interest for Class I shares	$	9,228	$	11,620	$	—
Exchange of redeemable non-controlling interest for Class I or Class B units	$	48,543	$	—	$	—
Allocation to redeemable non-controlling interest	$	8,770	$	6,830	$	2,192
Distribution reinvestment	$	492,664	$	245,335	$	101,985
Accrued common stock repurchases	$	83,350	$	46,247	$	6,961
Accrued common stock repurchases due to affiliate	$	50,844	$	—	$	—
Payable for investments in real estate debt	$	—	$	362	$	—
Payable for real-estate related equity securities	$	16,691	$	—	$	—
Issuance of BREIT OP units as settlement of affiliate incentive compensation awards	$	—	$	4,714	$	—

Description		Depreciable Life
Building		30 - 42 years
Building- and land improvements		10 years
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		1 - 10 years
Lease intangibles		Over lease term

	December 31, 2020								December 31, 2019
	Level I		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level I		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Investments in real estate debt	$	—	$	4,445,414	$	120,892	$	4,566,306	$	—	$	4,389,184	$	134,076	$	4,523,260
Equity securities		327,935		271,250		—		599,185		—		—		—		—
Total	$	327,935	$	4,716,664	$	120,892	$	5,165,491	$	—	$	4,389,184	$	134,076	$	4,523,260

	Investments in Real Estate Debt
Balance as of December 31, 2018	$	—
Purchases		134,076
Balance as of December 31, 2019	$	134,076

Included in net income
Accretion included in interest income		348
Unrealized loss included in income (loss) from investments in real estate debt		(13,532	)

Balance as of December 31, 2020	$	120,892

	Fair Value			Valuation Technique		Unobservable Input		Rate		Impact to Valuation from an Increase in Input
Investments in Real Estate Debt	$	120,892		Discounted cash flow		Yield		10.3%		Decrease

Segments	Number of Transactions		Number of Properties		Sq. Feet (in thousands)/ Units⁽¹⁾/ Keys	Purchase Price⁽²⁾
Multifamily properties		15		94	27,488 units	$	4,150,838
Self Storage properties		6		129	10,454 sq. ft.		1,444,074
Industrial properties		8		94	14,280 sq. ft.		1,358,578
Retail properties		1		6	689 sq. ft.		287,392
Office properties		1		1	357 sq. ft.		263,649
		31		324		$	7,504,531

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2020			For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
Building and building improvements	$	4,977,086		$	12,533,926
Land and land improvements		2,053,340			3,703,788
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		77,737			167,030
In-place lease intangibles		390,209			634,868
Above-market lease intangibles		6,915			20,899
Below-market ground lease⁽¹⁾		—			15,985
Below-market lease intangibles		(27,699	)		(105,495	)
Other		26,943			26,067
Total purchase price	$	7,504,531		$	16,997,068
Assumed mortgage notes⁽²⁾		944,112			1,202,713
Net purchase price	$	6,560,419		$	15,794,355

	For the Year Ended						For the Year Ended
	December 31, 2020						December 31, 2019
Segments	Number of Properties		Net Proceeds		Net Gain		Number of Properties		Net Proceeds		Net Gain
Multifamily properties		7	$	295,855	$	77,617		—	$	—	$	—
Hotel properties⁽¹⁾		1		134,537		35,185		—		44,292		29,686
Industrial properties		1		4,488		371		2		34,826		5,349
		9	$	434,880	$	113,173		2	$	79,118	$	35,035


Assets:	December 31, 2019
Investments in real estate, net	$	141,344
Other assets		2,035
Total assets	$	143,379

Liabilities:
Mortgage notes	$	104,314
Other liabilities		4,097
Total liabilities	$	108,411

	December 31, 2020
Total assets	$	4,618,979
Total liabilities		(3,002,080	)
Total equity of BREIT MGP JV		1,616,899

MGP's share		810,066
BREIT's share		806,833
BREIT outside basis		9,387
Investments in unconsolidated entities	$	816,220

	For the Period February 14, 2020 through December 31, 2020
Total revenue	$	346,482
Net income of BREIT MGP JV	$	177,757

MGP's share		89,056
BREIT's share		88,701
Amortization of BREIT outside basis		(130	)
Income from unconsolidated entities	$	88,571

	December 31, 2020							December 31, 2019
Collateral⁽¹⁾	Number of Positions		Cost Basis		Fair Value		Percentage Based on Fair Value	Number of Positions		Cost Basis		Fair Value		Percentage Based on Fair Value
Hospitality		78	$	2,046,529	$	1,904,256	42%		75	$	2,252,556	$	2,259,102	50%
Multifamily		58		748,086		797,840	17%		61		596,184		613,470	14%
Office		36		720,665		681,596	15%		37		793,782		794,881	18%
Industrial		29		612,884		610,504	13%		14		375,975		378,147	8%
Diversified		18		234,527		225,077	5%		10		219,215		219,798	5%
Other		5		238,202		213,654	5%		5		238,202		240,558	5%
Net Lease		3		105,246		117,219	3%		—		—		—	—%
Retail		1		17,375		16,160	—%		1		17,374		17,304	—%
Total		228	$	4,723,514	$	4,566,306	100%		203	$	4,493,288	$	4,523,260	100%

	December 31, 2020							December 31, 2019
Credit Rating	Number of Positions		Cost Basis		Fair Value		Percentage Based on Fair Value	Number of Positions		Cost Basis		Fair Value		Percentage Based on Fair Value
BB		81	$	1,435,891	$	1,381,221	30%		72	$	1,598,930	$	1,610,643	36%
B		52		1,186,975		1,114,977	24%		40		906,609		909,587	20%
Not rated		28		997,411		1,004,027	22%		33		764,941		773,791	17%
BBB		48		797,918		753,393	17%		45		885,891		891,272	20%
A		11		262,097		267,023	6%		10		319,031		320,140	7%
CCC		3		32,402		34,839	1%		—		—		—	—%
AAA		4		10,044		10,047	—%		2		9,554		9,550	—%
AA		1		776		779	—%		1		8,332		8,277	—%
Total		228	$	4,723,514	$	4,566,306	100%		203	$	4,493,288	$	4,523,260	100%

							Principal Balance Outstanding⁽³⁾
Indebtedness	Weighted Average Interest Rate⁽¹⁾		Weighted Average Maturity Date⁽²⁾		Maximum Facility Size		December 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Fixed rate loans:
Fixed rate mortgages	3.8%		8/15/2027		N/A		$	13,124,595		$	12,424,717
Mezzanine loan		—		—	N/A			—			195,878
Total fixed rate loans	3.8%		8/15/2027					13,124,595			12,620,595
Variable rate loans:
Floating rate mortgages	L+1.8%		2/10/2026		N/A			4,544,044			1,826,435
Variable rate term loans	L+1.7%		3/3/2024		N/A			1,761,920			1,533,561
Variable rate secured revolving credit facilities	L+1.5%		6/18/2026		$	2,161,920		481,725			1,063,837
Variable rate mezzanine loans	L+4.1%		2/13/2025		N/A			202,200			—
Total variable rate loans	L+1.8%		8/14/2025					6,989,889			4,423,833
Total loans secured by the Company's properties	3.1%		12/4/2026					20,114,484			17,044,428
Premium on assumed debt, net								15,191			10,794
Deferred financing costs, net								(153,514	)		(125,563	)
Mortgage notes, term loans, and secured revolving credit facilities, net							$	19,976,161		$	16,929,659