10-Q/A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

Amendment No. 1

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                     to                     

Commission File Number 0-25196

CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	51-0110823
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
814 Wheeling Avenue, Cambridge, Ohio 43725-9757
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (740) 435-2020

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting Corporation. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

    Yes  ¨     No  x

As of August 8, 2011, the latest practicable date, 7,205,595 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $1.00 par value, were outstanding.

Camco Financial Corporation

INDEX

		Page
Explanatory Note			3
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition		5
	Consolidated Statements of Earnings		6
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income		7
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		8
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		10
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		26
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		40
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		40
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION			40
SIGNATURES			43

2

Camco Financial Corporation

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2011

EXPLANATORY NOTE

Camco Financial Corporation (the Camco”) is filing this Amendment No. 1 (“Amended Report”) to its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, which was originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on August 15, 2011 (the “Original Report”), to restate the Camco’s unaudited consolidated financial statements for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 and amend related disclosures in the Selected Financial Data and Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

On January 17, 2012, the Boards of Directors of Camco and Advantage Bank, Camco’s wholly owned subsidiary, received notice from Advantage’s regulators, the FDIC and Ohio Department of Financial Institutions (“ODFI”), that Advantage must restate its Call Report previously filed with the FDIC to reflect an additional provision to Advantage’s allowance for loan losses of at least $1.6 million as of June 30, 2011. This impacted our previously issued unaudited consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended June 30,2011, contained in the Original Report.

As a result, Camco is filing this Amended Report to amend Part 1. “Financial Statements” and Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” to reflect a restatement of the financial statements in connection with the following:

• Camco’s net loss after tax for the three months ended June 30, 2011, is $1.5 million compared to earnings of $137,000. Loss per basic share for the second quarter of 2011 is $(.20), compared to the originally reported earnings per share of $.02. Due to the adjustments to the financial results for the second quarter of 2011, Camco’s after tax net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2011, is $811,000 compared to net earnings of $789,000. Loss per basic share for the six months ended 2011 is $(.11), compared to the originally reported basic earnings per share of $.11.

• The provision for losses on loans for the second quarter of 2011 increased from $197,000 to $1.8 million. As a result of the increased provision for loan losses, the allowance for loan losses as of June 30, 2011 increased to $18.4 million, or 70.4% of non-performing loans, compared to the originally reported amount of $16.8 million, or 64.3% of non-performing loans.

• Loans receivable net declined to $639.7 million from the previously reported level of $641.3 million and total assets declined to $765.9 million from the previously reported level of $767.5 million.

• Total stockholders’ equity at June 30, 2011 declined $1.6 million to $44.5 million from $46.1 million.

For the specific line items restated and a more detailed description of the changes made in this restatement See Part 1, Item 9, “Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements”.

3

Camco Financial Corporation

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2011

EXPLANATORY NOTE

While we are amending only certain portions of our Original Report, for convenience and ease of future reference, we are filing the entire Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, in this Amended Report.

This Amended Report also includes currently-dated certifications from the Camco’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Camco has not modified or updated disclosures presented in the Original Report, except as required to specifically reflect the effects of the restatement in the Amended Report. Accordingly, this Amended Report does not reflect other events occurring after the Original Report, nor does it modify or update those disclosures affected by other subsequent events. Information not affected by the restatement is unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time of the Original Report.

4

Item 1. Financial Statements

Camco Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(In thousands, except share data)

		September 30,			September 30,
	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	13,074		$	13,143
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions		29,308			15,971
Cash and cash equivalents		42,382			29,114
Securities available for sale, at market		10,921			30,768
Securities held to maturity, at cost		3,663			3,948
Loans held for sale – at lower of cost or fair value		3,699			2,208
Loans receivable – net		639,683			667,840
Office premises and equipment – net		9,389			9,928
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		14,216			10,096
Federal Home Loan Bank stock – at cost		9,888			29,888
Accrued interest receivable		3,164			3,521
Mortgage servicing rights – at lower of cost or market		3,979			3,841
Prepaid expenses and other assets		4,649			4,426
Cash surrender value of life insurance		19,739			19,388
Prepaid federal income taxes		554			—
Total assets	$	765,926		$	814,966
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits	$	631,647		$	651,816
Other Borrowings		11,715			11,530
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		68,765			92,934
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance		488			2,413
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		8,816			10,170
Total liabilities		721,431			768,863
Commitments		—			—
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock – $1 par value; authorized 100,000 shares; no shares outstanding		—			—
Common stock – $1 par value; authorized 29,900,000 shares; 8,884,508 shares issued at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		8,885			8,885
Unearned compensation		(47	)		(94	)
Additional paid-in capital		60,459			60,260
Retained earnings		(675	)		136
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) net of related tax effects		(13	)		1,030
Treasury stock -1,678,913 shares at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, at cost		(24,114	)		(24,114	)
Total stockholders’ equity		44,495			46,103
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	765,926		$	814,966

5

Camco Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(In thousands, except per share data)

		September 30,			September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended June 30,
(unaudited)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Interest and dividend income
Loans	$	17,740		$	18,561		$	8,839		$	9,281
Investment securities		439			1,073			84			495
Other interest-earning accounts		503			673			157			333
Total interest and dividend income		18,682			20,307			9,080			10,109
Interest Expense
Deposits		4,107			5,689			1,918			2,744
Borrowings		1,529			1,989			726			992
Total interest expense		5,636			7,678			2,644			3,736
Net interest income		13,046			12,629			6,436			6,373
Provision for losses on loans		2,810			6,117			1,797			5,212
Net interest income after provision for losses on loans		10,236			6,512			4,639			1,161
Other income
Late charges, rent and other		565			737			203			328
Loan servicing fees		605			637			298			320
Service charges and other fees on deposits		1,032			1,116			529			598
Gain (loss) on sale of loans		—			490			(92	)		261
Mortgage servicing rights – net		139			(94	)		(132	)		(124	)
Gain (loss) on sale of investments & fixed assets		1,280			(1	)		2			(1	)
Income on cash surrender value of life insurance		437			435			220			220
Total other income		4,058			3,320			1,028			1,602
General, administrative and other expenses
Employee compensation and benefits		6,531			6,654			3,153			3,269
Occupancy and equipment		1,452			1,485			691			743
Federal deposit insurance premiums and other insurance		1,097			1,094			494			591
Data processing		561			566			277			286
Advertising		182			170			96			89
Franchise taxes		348			534			178			269
Postage, supplies and office expenses		471			567			253			274
Travel and training		121			118			56			65
Professional services		702			784			320			462
Deposit and transaction processing expenses		367			378			200			185
Real estate owned and other expenses		1,655			831			825			409
Loan expenses		1,081			736			598			333
Total general, administrative and other expense		14,568			13,917			7,141			6,975
Loss before federal income taxes		(274	)		(4,085	)		(1,474	)		(4,212	)
Federal income taxes (benefit)		537			(115	)		(11	)		(113	)
NET LOSS	$	(811	)	$	(3,970	)	$	(1,463	)	$	(4,099	)
LOSS PER SHARE
Basic	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.55	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.57	)
Diluted	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.55	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.57	)

6

Camco Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In thousands)

		September 30,			September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended June 30,
(unaudited)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net loss	$	(811	)		(3,970	)	$	(1,463	)	$	(4,099	)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized holding gains on securities during the period, net of tax effects of $(103) and $99, $(143) and $64 for the respective periods		1,043			193			21			125
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in net earnings, net of taxes of $(441) and $0 in 2011 and 2010, respectively		(1,276	)		—			—			—
Comprehensive loss	$	(1,044	)	$	(3,777	)	$	(1,442	)	$	(3,974	)

7

Camco Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

		September 30,			September 30,
	2011			2010
	(unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss for the period	$	(811	)	$	(3,970	)
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Amortization of deferred loan origination fees		(159	)		67
Amortization of premiums and discounts on investment and mortgage-backed securities – net		30			8
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights – net		72			546
Depreciation and amortization		668			628
Provision for losses on loans		2,810			6,117
Stock option expense		199			138
Deferred compensation		47			31
Provisions for losses on REO		259			192
Loss on sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure		285			30
Gain on sale of loans		—			(490	)
(Gain) or loss on sale of investments and fixed assets		(1,280	)		1
Loans originated for sale in the secondary market		(34,614	)		(29,293	)
Proceeds from sale of loans in the secondary market		33,123			28,589
Net increase in cash surrender value of life insurance		(351	)		(351	)
Increase (decrease) in cash due to changes in:
Accrued interest receivable		357			320
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(777	)		(629	)
Accrued interest and other liabilities		(818	)		(949	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(960	)		985
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:
Principal repayments, maturities on securities held to maturity		282			195
Principal repayments, maturities on securities available for sale		4,971			17,842
Purchases of investment securities designated as available for sale		(12,615	)		—
Purchases of investment securities designated as held to maturity		—			(828	)
Proceeds from sale of investments		27,161			—
Redemption of FHLB Stock		20,000			—
Loan principal repayments		108,208			73,863
Loan disbursements and purchased loans		(90,452	)		(100,079	)
Proceeds from sale of office premises and equipment		4			10
Proceeds from sale of life insurance		—			160
Additions to office premises and equipment		(129	)		(219	)
Proceeds from sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure		2,876			1,521
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		60,306			(7,535	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating and investing activities balance carried forward		59,346			(6,550	)

8

Camco Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)

For the six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

		September 30,			September 30,
	2011			2010
Net cash provided by (used in) operating and investing activities (balance brought forward)	$	59,346		$	(6,550	)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Net decrease in deposits		(20,169	)		(7,030	)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings		42,317			87,606
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings		(66,301	)		(76,848	)
Decrease in advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance		(1,925	)		(1,764	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(46,078	)		1,964
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		13,268			(4,586	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		29,114			38,153
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	42,382		$	33,567
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest on deposits and borrowings	$	5,699		$	7,690
Income taxes paid		580			—
Transfers from loans to real estate acquired through foreclosure		7,540			2,682

9

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Camco Financial Corporation (“Camco” or the “Corporation”) included in Camco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. However, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire year.

2. Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Camco and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Advantage Bank (“Advantage” or the “Bank”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

On March 31, 2011, Camco Financial Corporation dissolved Camco Title Agency, Inc. and sold certain of its assets to a third party. The balance sheet and results of operations of Camco Title are not material to the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, Camco Title’s operations resulted in net income of $15,000.

3. Critical Accounting Policies

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” as well as disclosures found elsewhere in this quarterly report, are based upon Camco’s consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with US GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires Camco to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is critical in the preparation of financial statements. These factors include, among other things, whether the estimates are significant to the financial statements, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other information including third parties or available prices, and sensitivity of the estimates to changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be utilized under US GAAP.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of mortgage servicing rights and the valuation of deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

We believe the accounting estimates related to the allowance for loan losses, the capitalization, amortization, and valuation of mortgage servicing rights, deferred income taxes and other real estate are “critical accounting estimates” because: (1) the estimates are highly susceptible to change from period to period because they require us to make assumptions concerning the changes in the types and volumes of the portfolios, rates of future prepayments, and anticipated economic conditions, and (2) the impact of recognizing an impairment or loan loss could have a material effect on Camco’s assets reported on the balance sheet as well as its net earnings.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses reflect management’s evaluation of credit risk after careful consideration of all information available to management. In developing this assessment, management must rely on estimates and exercise judgment regarding matters where the ultimate outcome is unknown such as economic factors, developments affecting companies in specific industries and issues with respect to single borrowers. Depending on changes in circumstances, future assessments of credit risk may yield materially different results, which may require an increase or a decrease in the allowance for loan losses.

10

Each quarter, management analyzes the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses based on review of the loans in the portfolio along with an analysis of external factors (including current economy, unemployment rates, housing price depreciation, etc.) and historical delinquency and loss trends. The allowance is developed through specific components: 1) the specific allowance for loans subject to individual analysis, 2) the allowance for classified loans not otherwise subject to individual analysis and 3) the allowance for non-classified loans (primarily homogenous).

Classified loans with indication or acknowledgment of deterioration are subject to individual analysis. Loan classifications are those used by regulators consisting of Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful and Loss. In evaluating these loans for impairment, the measure of expected loss is based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, a loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. All other classified assets and non-classified assets are combined with the homogenous loan pools and segregated into collateral codes. Loss rate factors are developed for each collateral code which is used to estimate losses and determine an allowance. The loss factors for each code are derived from historical delinquency, classification, and charge-off rates and adjusted for economic factors and an estimated loss scenario. While the Corporation strives to reflect all known risk factors in its evaluations, these evaluations are by their nature imprecise and based in part on factors beyond the Bank’s control.

The allowance is reviewed by management to determine whether the amount is considered adequate to absorb probable, incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is an estimate based on management’s current judgment about the credit quality of the loan portfolio. This evaluation includes specific loss estimates on certain individually reviewed loans, statistical loss estimates for collateral codes that are based on historical loss experience, and general loss estimates that are based upon the size, quality, and concentration characteristics of the various loan portfolios, adverse situations that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay, and current economic and industry conditions. Also considered as part of that judgment is a review of the Bank’s trends in delinquencies and loan losses, as well as trends in delinquencies and losses for the region and nationally, and economic factors. While the Corporation strives to reflect all known risk factors in its evaluations, these evaluations are by their nature imprecise and based in part on factors beyond the Bank’s control.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

To determine the fair value of its mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) each reporting quarter, the Corporation provides information to a third party valuation firm, representing loan information in each pooling period accompanied by escrow amounts. The third party then evaluates the possible impairment of MSRs as described below.

MSRs are recognized as separate assets or liabilities when loans are sold with servicing retained. A pooling methodology, in which loans with similar characteristics are “pooled” together, is applied for valuation purposes. Once pooled, each grouping of loans is evaluated on a discounted earnings basis to determine the present value of future earnings that the Bank could expect to realize from the portfolio. Earnings are projected from a variety of sources including loan service fees, net interest earned on escrow balances, miscellaneous income and costs to service the loans. The present value of future earnings is the estimated fair value for the pool, calculated using consensus assumptions that a third party purchaser would utilize in evaluating a potential acquisition of the MSRs.

Events that may significantly affect the estimates used are changes in interest rates and the related impact on mortgage loan prepayment speeds and the payment performance of the underlying loans. The interest rate for net interest earned on escrow balances, which is supplied by management, takes into consideration the investment portfolio average yield as well as current short duration investment yields. Management believes this methodology provides a reasonable estimate. Mortgage loan prepayment speeds are calculated by the third party provider utilizing the Economic Outlook as published by the Office of Chief Economist of Freddie Mac in estimating prepayment speeds and provides a specific scenario with each evaluation. Based on the assumptions discussed, pre-tax projections are prepared for each pool of loans serviced. These earnings figures approximate the cash flow that could be received from the servicing portfolio. Valuation results are presented quarterly to management. At that time, management reviews the information and MSRs are marked to lower of amortized cost or fair value for the current quarter.

11

Federal Income Taxes

Camco recognizes expense for federal income taxes currently payable as well as for deferred federal taxes for estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets. Realization of a deferred tax asset is dependent upon generating sufficient taxable income in the carry forward periods to cover net operating losses generated by the reversal of temporary differences. A valuation allowance is provided by way of a charge to income tax expense if it is determined that it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. If different assumptions and conditions were to prevail, the valuation allowance may not be adequate to absorb unrealized deferred taxes and the amount of income taxes payable may need to be adjusted by way of a charge or credit to expense.

Income tax returns are subject to audit by the IRS. Income tax expense for current and prior periods is subject to adjustment based upon the outcome of such audits. During 2011, the IRS began an examination of the Company’s tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2009. Accrual of income taxes payable and valuation allowances against deferred tax assets are estimates subject to change based upon the outcome of future events.

Other Real Estate

Assets acquired through or instead of foreclosure, primarily other real estate owned, are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. New real estate appraisals are generally obtained at the time of foreclosure and are used to establish fair value. If fair value declines, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Estimating the initial and ongoing fair value of these properties involves a number of factors and judgments including holding time, costs to complete, holding costs, discount rate, absorption and other factors.

4. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed based upon the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed including the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under outstanding stock options. The computations were as follows for the periods ending June 30, 2011 and 2010.

		September 30,			September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	For the six months ended June 30,						For the three months ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(In thousands, except per share information)
BASIC:
Net Loss	$	(811	)	$	(3,970	)	$	(1,463	)	$	(4,099	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		7,206			7,206			7,206			7,206
Basic loss per share	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.55	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.57	)
DILUTED:
Net Loss	$	(811	)	$	(3,970	)	$	(1,463	)	$	(4,099	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		7,206			7,206			7,206			7,206
Dilutive effect of stock options		—			—			—			—
Total common shares and dilutive potential common shares		7,206			7,206			7,206			7,206
Diluted loss per share	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.55	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.57	)

Anti-dilutive options to purchase 604,583 and 480,092 shares of common stock with respective weighted-average exercise prices of $4.97 and $13.86 were outstanding at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, but were excluded from the computation of common share equivalents for each of the six months ended, because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares.

12

Anti-dilutive options to purchase 609,583 and 480,092 shares of common stock with respective weighted-average exercise prices of $4.93 and $13.86 were outstanding at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, but were excluded from the computation of common share equivalents for each of the three month periods, because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares.

5. Stock Option Plans

The Corporation follows a fair-value based method for valuing stock-based compensation that measures compensation cost at the grant date based on the fair value of the award.

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the modified Black-Scholes options-pricing model. The following table details the fair value and assumptions used to value stock options as of the grant date that were granted during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:

		September 30,			September 30,
	2011			2010
Fair value, calculated	$	1.49		$	1.65
Exercise Price	$	2.14		$	2.51
Risk-free interest rate		3.58	%		3.61	%
Expected stock price volatility		57.30	%		51.62	%
Expected dividend yield		—			—
Expected Life		10 years			10 years

A summary of the status of the Corporation’s stock option plans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and changes during the periods ending on those dates is presented below:

		September 30,			September 30,		September 30,			September 30,
	Six Months ended June 30, 2011					Year ended December 31, 2010
	Shares			Weighted- average exercise price		Shares			Weighted- average exercise price
Outstanding at beginning of period		463,642		$	$5.84		260,833		$	10.59
Granted		161,538			2.14		260,729			2.51
Exercised		—			—		—
Forfeited		(15,597	)		3.06		(57,920	)		12.21
Expired		—			—		—			—
Outstanding at end of period		609,583		$	4.93		463,642		$	5.84
Options exercisable at period end		339,264		$	6.92		257,037		$	8.24
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year				$	1.49				$	1.65

13

The following information applies to options outstanding at June 30, 2011:

	September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
		Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices		Number Outstanding		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable		Weighted- Average Exercise Price
$1.90 - $2.51			475,746		8.8	$	2.39		209,263	$	2.44
$8.92			20,988		6.6		8.92		17,122		8.92
$11.36 - $14.16			56,974		4.1		13.44		56,974		13.44
$16.13 - $17.17			55,875		2.9		16.45		55,875		16.45
			609,583		7.8	$	4.93		339,264	$	6.92

6. Fair Value

The carrying value of certain financial assets and liabilities is impacted by the application of fair value measurements, either directly or indirectly. In certain cases, an asset or liability is measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis, such as available-for-sale investment securities. In other cases, management must rely on estimates or judgments to determine if an asset or liability not measured at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or whether a valuation reserve should be established. Given the inherent volatility, the use of fair value measurements may have a significant impact on the carrying value of assets or liabilities, or result in material changes to the financial statements, from period to period.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: The carrying amount reported in the consolidated statements of financial condition for cash and cash equivalents is deemed to approximate fair value.

Investment Securities: Fair value for investment securities is based on quoted market prices and dealer quotes.

Loans Held for Sale: Fair value for loans held for sale is the contracted sales price of loans committed for delivery, which is determined on the date of sale commitment.

Loans Receivable: The loan portfolio has been segregated into categories with similar characteristics, such as one- to four-family residential real estate, multi-family residential real estate, installment and other. These loan categories were further delineated into fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans. The fair values for the resultant loan categories were computed via discounted cash flow analysis, using current interest rates offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock: The carrying amount presented in the consolidated statements of financial condition is deemed to approximate fair value.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable: The carrying value for accrued interest approximates fair value.

Deposits: The fair values of deposits with no stated maturity, such as money market demand deposits, savings and NOW accounts have been analyzed by management and assigned estimated maturities and cash flows which are then discounted to derive a value. The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank: The fair value of these advances is estimated using the rates currently offered for similar advances of similar remaining maturities or, when available, quoted market prices.

14

Repurchase Agreements: The fair value of repurchase agreements is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using rates currently offered for similar maturities.

Subordinated Debentures: The fair value of subordinated debentures is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using rates currently offered for smaller maturities.

Advances by Borrowers for Taxes and Insurance: The carrying amount of advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance is deemed to approximate fair value.

Based on the foregoing methods and assumptions, the carrying value and fair value of the Corporation’s financial instruments are as follows:

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying value		Fair value		Carrying value		Fair value
	(In thousands)
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	42,382	$	42,382	$	29,114	$	29,114
Investment securities available for sale		10,921		10,921		30,768		30,768
Investment securities held to maturity		3,663		3,712		3,948		3,993
Loans held for sale		3,699		3,775		2,208		2,254
Loans receivable		639,683		641,459		667,840		643,646
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		9,888		9,888		29,888		29,888
Accrued interest receivable		3,164		3,164		3,521		3,521
Financial liabilities
Deposits	$	631,647	$	619,677	$	651,816	$	642,893
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		68,765		73,375		92,934		97,711
Repurchase agreements		6,715		6,715		6,530		6,530
Subordinated debentures		5,000		4,883		5,000		4,839
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance		488		488		2,413		2,413
Accrued interest payable		1,582		1,582		1,646		1,646

Listed below are three levels of inputs that Camco uses to measure fair value:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Level 1 inputs for assets or liabilities that are not actively traded. Also consists of an observable market price for a similar asset or liability. This includes the use of “matrix pricing” used to value debt securities absent the exclusive use of quoted prices.

Level 3: Consists of unobservable inputs that are used to measure fair value when observable market inputs are not available. This could include the use of internally developed models, financial forecasting, etc.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability between market participants at the balance sheet date. When possible, the Corporation looks to active and observable markets to price identical assets or liabilities. When identical assets and liabilities are not traded in active markets, the Corporation looks to observable market data for similar assets and liabilities. However, certain assets and liabilities are not traded in observable markets and Camco must use other valuation methods to develop a fair value. The fair value of impaired loans is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, which is estimated through third party appraisals or internal estimates of collateral values.

15

The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis:

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
(in thousands)	Balance		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
June 30, 2011
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government sponsored enterprises	$	9,076	$	—		9,076	$	—
Corporate equity securities		95		—		52		43
Mortgage-backed securities		1,750		—		1,750		—
December 31, 2010
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government sponsored enterprises	$	2,065	$	—	$	2,065	$	—
Corporate equity securities		98		—		55		43
Mortgage-backed securities		28,605		—		28,605		—
The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis:
			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
(in thousands)	Balance		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
June 30, 2011
Impaired loans	$	20,432					$	20,432
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		14,216						14,216
December 31, 2010
Impaired loans	$	20,518					$	20,518
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		10,096						10,096

Impaired loans are measured and reported at fair value when management believes collection of contractual interest and principal payments is doubtful. Management’s determination of the fair value for these loans represents the estimated net proceeds to be received from the sale of the collateral based on observable market prices and market value provided by independent, licensed or certified appraisers.

Fair value for real estate acquired through foreclosure is generally determined by obtaining recent appraisals on the properties. Other types of valuing include broker price opinions and valuations pertaining to the current and anticipated deterioration in the regional economy and real estate market, as evidenced by, among other things, changes in the local population, unemployment rates, increasing vacancy rates, borrower delinquencies, declining property values and rental prices, differences between foreclosure appraisals and real estate owned sales prices, and an increase in concessions and other forms of discounting or other items approved by our asset classification committee. The fair value under such appraisals is determined by using one of the following valuation techniques: income, cost or comparable sales. The fair value is then reduced by management’s estimate for the direct costs expected to be incurred in order to sell the property. Holding costs or maintenance expenses are recorded as period costs when occurred and are not included in the fair value estimate.

7. Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established through a provision which is charged to expense and represents management’s best estimate of probable losses that could be incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance is necessary to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The Corporation’s allowance for possible loan loss methodology is based on historical loss experience by type of credit and internal risk grade, specific

16

homogeneous risk pools and specific loss allocations, with adjustments for current events and conditions. The provision for possible loan losses reflects loan quality trends, including the levels of and trends related to non-accrual loans, past due loans, potential problem loans, criticized loans and net charge-offs or recoveries, among other factors. The amount of the provision reflects not only the necessary allowance for possible loan losses related to newly identified criticized loans, but it also reflects actions taken related to other loans including, among other things, any necessary increases or decreases in required allowances for specific loans or loan pools.

The current level of the allowance is directionally consistent with classified assets, non-accrual loans and delinquency. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of the allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond the Corporation’s control, including, among other things, the performance of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, the economy, changes in interest rates and comments of the regulatory authorities toward loan classifications.

The Corporation’s allowance for possible loan losses consists of three elements: (i) specific valuation allowances on probable losses on specific loans; (ii) historical valuation allowances based on historical loan loss experience for similar loans with similar characteristics and trends, adjusted, as necessary, to reflect the impact of current conditions; and (iii) general valuation allowances based on general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to the Corporation.

Loans identified as losses by management, internal loan review and/or bank examiners are charged-off. Furthermore, consumer loan accounts are charged-off automatically based on regulatory requirements.

Change in the allowance for loan losses and loan balances as of June 30, 2011 are summarized as follows:

		Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,
(in thousands)	Construction			Consumer			Multi- Family			Land, Farm & Ag Loans			Residential			Commercial  & Non- Residential			Commercial and Industrial			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance December 31, 2010	$	166		$	246		$	2,860		$	849		$	8,050		$	3,638		$	1,061		$	16,870
Charge-offs		—			(57	)		(33	)		(107	)		(1,447	)		(579	)		(9	)		(2,232	)
Recoveries		—			2			116			204			383			109			89			903
Provision (1)		(141	)		(77	)		(10	)		(318	)		1,988			1,934			(566	)		2,810
Ending balance June 30, 2011	$	25		$	114		$	2,933		$	628		$	8,974			5,102		$	575		$	18,351
Ending balance
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	666		$	—		$	1,034		$	2,661		$	33		$	4,394
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	25		$	114		$	2,267		$	628			7,940		$	2,441		$	542		$	13,957
Portfolio balances:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	44,501		$	3,506		$	73,645		$	13,536		$	332,875		$	138,606		$	32,282		$	638,951
Individually evaluated for impairment
With no related allowance		—			—			24			1,037			397			893			—			2,351
With related allowance		—			—			4,032			183			5,342			8,126			397			18,081
Ending balance	$	44,501		$	3,506		$	77,701		$	14,757		$	338,614		$	147,625		$	32,679		$	659,383

(1) Reclassifications of portfolio balance between Commercial and Industrial and Commercial & Non-Residential created a portion of the change in provision for the current period.

17

Change in the allowance for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2010 and loan balances as of December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:

		Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,
(in thousands)	Construction			Consumer			Multi- Family			Land, Farm & Ag Loans			Residential			Commercial  & Non- Residential			Commercial and Industrial			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance January 1, 2010	$	338		$	98		$	731		$	628		$	10,519		$	3,148		$	637		$	16,099
Charge-offs		(482	)		(28	)		(1,535	)		(2,283	)		(7,530	)		(3,688	)		(3,399	)		(18,945	)
Recoveries		39			9			103			247			490			157			211			1,256
Provision		271			167			3,561			2,257			4,571			4,021			3,612			18,460
Ending balance December 31, 2010	$	166		$	246		$	2,860		$	849		$	8,050		$	3,638		$	1,061		$	16,870
Ending balance
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	256		$	1,171		$	170		$	1,597
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	166		$	246		$	2,860		$	849		$	7,794		$	2,467		$	891		$	15,273
Portfolio balances:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	26,530		$	3,828		$	71,162		$	10,905		$	369,755		$	155,326		$	27,607		$	665,113
Individually evaluated for impairment
With no related allowance		—			—			3,180			1,549			3,122			4,122			706			12,679
With related allowance		—			—			—			—			2,706			4,503			630			7,839
Ending balance	$	26,530		$	3,828		$	74,342		$	12,454		$	375,583		$	163,951		$	28,943		$	685,631

Non-accrual and Past Due Loans. Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when, the loan is more than three payments past due as well as when required by regulatory provisions. Loans may be placed on non-accrual status regardless of whether or not such loans are considered past due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest income is recognized when the loan is returned to accrual status and all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current for a minimum of six months or future payments are reasonably assured.

The following table details non-accrual loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

		September 30,		September 30,
(in thousands)	Non-Accrual June 30, 2011		Non-Accrual December 31, 2010
Construction	$	22	$	1,791
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		381		—
Residential		18,810		21,498
Commercial		6,207		7,717
Consumer		86		39
Commercial and industrial		68		706
Multi Family		495		2,028
Total	$	26,069	$	33,779

18

An age analysis of past due loans, segregated by class of loans were as follows:

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
June 30, 2011 (in thousands)	Loans 30- 59 Days Past Due		Loans 60 - 89 or More Days Past Due		Loans 90+ Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Accruing Loans 90 Days Past Due
Construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	0	$	44,501	$	44,501	$	—
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		73		—		164		237		14,520		14,757		—
Residential / prime		1,425		319		4,778		6,522		249,900		256,422		—
Residential / subprime		5,783		846		9,360		15,989		66,203		82,192		—
Commercial		—		—		4,605		4,605		143,020		147,625		—
Consumer		2		39		34		75		3,431		3,506
Commercial and industrial		16		—		68		84		32,595		32,679		—
Multi Family		—		—		495		495		77,206		77,701		—
Total	$	7,299	$	1,204	$	19,504	$	28,007	$	631,376	$	659,383	$	—
December 31, 2010 (in thousands)	Loans 30- 59 Days Past Due		Loans 60 - 89 or More Days Past Due		Loans 90+ Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Accruing Loans 90 Days Past Due
Construction	$	75	$	—	$	1,057	$	1,132	$	25,398	$	26,530	$	—
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		—		—		—		—		12,454		12,454		—
Residential / prime		624		343		5,366		6,333		280,266		286,599		—
Residential / subprime		5,077		1,451		11,119		17,647		71,337		88,984		—
Commercial		—		2,766		3,301		6,067		157,884		163,951		—
Consumer		36		3		18		57		3,771		3,828
Commercial and industrial		85		—		706		791		28,152		28,943		—
Multi Family		85		—		1,685		1,770		72,572		74,342		—
Total	$	5,982	$	4,563	$	23,252	$	33,797	$	651,834	$	685,631	$	—

Although we believe that the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2011 is adequate to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio at that date based upon the available facts and circumstances, there can be no assurance that additions to the allowance for loan losses will not be necessary in future periods, which could adversely affect our results of operations. Unemployment rates in our markets and Ohio in general, are close to the National average, but we are still experiencing some decline in values of residential real estate. Ohio in general has not experienced significant increases in home values over the past five years like many regions in the U.S., which should comparatively mitigate losses on loans. Nonetheless, these factors, compounded by a very uncertain national economic outlook, may continue to increase the level of future losses beyond our current expectations.

Impaired loans. Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable Advantage will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled principal and interest payments. Impairment is evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of a similar nature and on an individual loan basis for other larger commercial credits. If a loan is impaired, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, of collateral if payment is expected solely from the collateral or at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the loan’s fair sale value. Interest payments on impaired loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount is reasonably assured in which case interest is recognized on an accrual basis. Impaired loans or portions of loans are charged off when deemed uncollectible.

19

We have included the following information with respect to impairment measurements relating to collateral-dependent loans for better understanding of our process and procedures relating to fair value of financial instruments:

• Based on policy, a loan is typically deemed impaired (non-performing) once it has gone over three payments or 90 days delinquent. Our management of the troubled credit will vary as will the timing of valuations, loan loss provision and charge offs based on a multitude of factors such as, cash flow of the business/borrower, responsiveness of the borrower, communication with the commercial banker, property inspections, property deterioration, and delinquency. Typically, a nonperforming, non-homogeneous collateral dependent loan will be valued and adjusted (if needed) within a time frame as short as 30 days or as many as 180 days after determination of impairment. If impaired, the collateral is then evaluated and an updated appraisal is most typically ordered. Upon receipt of an appraisal or other valuation, we complete an analysis to determine if the impaired loan requires a specific reserve or to be charged down to estimated net realizable value. The time frame may be as short as 30 days or as much as 180 days, when an appraisal is ordered.

• Camco’s credit risk management process consistently monitors key performance metrics across both the performing and non-performing assets to identify any further degradation of credit quality. Additionally, impaired credits are monitored in weekly loan committee asset quality discussions, monthly Asset Classification Committee meetings and quarterly loan loss reserve reviews. Strategy documents and exposure projections are completed on a monthly basis to ensure that the current status of the troubled asset is clearly understood and reported.

• The Asset Classification Committee oversees the management of all impaired loans and any subsequent loss provision or charge off that is considered. When a loan is deemed impaired, the valuation is obtained to determine any existing loss that may be present as of the valuation date. Policy dictates that any differences from fair market value, less costs to sell, are to be recognized as loss during the current period (loan loss provision or charge off). Any deviations from this policy will be identified by amount and contributing reasons for the policy departure during our quarterly reporting process.

• Camco’s policies dictate that an impaired loan subject to partial charge off will remain in a nonperforming status until it is brought current. Typically, this occurs when a loan is paid current and completes a period of on-time payments that demonstrate that the loan can perform and/or there is some certainty payments will continue. Camco monitors through various system reports any loan whose terms have been modified. These reports identify troubled debt restructures, modifications, and renewals.

• When circumstances do not allow for an updated appraisal or Camco determines that an appraisal is not needed, the underlying collateral’s fair market value is estimated in the following ways:

• Camco’s personnel property inspections combined with original appraisal review

• Broker price opinions

• Various on-line fair market value estimation programs (i.e. Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, etc).

20

Impaired loans are set forth in the following table:

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
June 30, 2011 (in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		1,037		1,037		—		1,095		23
Residential		397		1,181		—		398		—
Commercial		893		2,762		—		901		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—
Multi Family		24		253		—		66		—
Total	$	2,351	$	5,233	$	—	$	2,460	$	23
With a related specific allowance recorded:
Construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		183		183		16		165		22
Residential		5,343		6,100		1,018		5,624		63
Commercial		8,126		8,345		2,661		8,149		106
Consumer		—
Commercial and industrial		397		397		33		406		10
Multi Family		4,032		4,755		666		4,046		95
Total	$	18,081	$	19,780	$	4,394	$	18,390	$	296

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
December 31, 2010 (in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Construction	$	1,549	$	5,558	$	—	$	3,389	$	—
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		—		—		—		—		—
Residential		3,122		4,854		—		3,866		19
Commercial		4,122		8,239		—		5,765		6
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial		706		1,208		—		1,035		11
Multi Family		3,180		5,166		—		3,786		3
Total	$	12,679	$	25,025	$	—	$	17,841	$	39
With a related specific allowance recorded:
Construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		—		—		—		—		—
Residential		2,706		3,306		256		3,078		—
Commercial		4,503		4,521		1,171		4,589		131
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial		630		630		170		383		—
Multi Family		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	7,839	$	8,457	$	1,597	$	8,050	$	131

The Corporation categorizes loans and leases into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Corporation analyzes loans and leases individually by classifying the loans and leases as to credit risk. The loans monitored utilizing the risk categories listed below refer to commercial, commercial and industrial, construction, land, farmland and agriculture loans. All non-homogeneous loans are monitored through delinquency reporting. This analysis is performed on a quarterly basis. The Corporation uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

21

• Uncriticized Assets

Uncriticized assets exhibit no material problems, credit deficiencies or payment problems. These assets generally are well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the value of the asset or underlying collateral. Such credits are graded as follows: Excellent (1), Good (2) or Satisfactory (3).

• Watch (Grade 4)

Watch rated credits are of acceptable credit quality, but exhibit one or more characteristics which merit closer monitoring or enhanced structure. Such characteristics include higher leverage, lower debt service coverage, industry issues or a construction loan without preleasing commitments (generally multifamily projects).

• Special Mention Assets (Grade 5)

Special Mention Assets have potential weaknesses or pose financial risk that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Bank’s credit position at some future date. Special Mention Assets are not adversely classified and do not expose the Bank to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

• Substandard Assets (Grade 6)

An asset classified Substandard is protected inadequately by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor, or by the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. The possibility that liquidation would not be timely requires a substandard classification even if there is little likelihood of total loss.

Assets classified as Substandard may exhibit one or more of the following weaknesses:

• The primary source of repayment is gone or severely impaired and the Bank may have to rely upon a secondary source.

• Loss does not seem likely but sufficient problems have arisen to cause the Bank to go to abnormal lengths to protect its position in order to maintain a high probability of repayment.

• Obligors are unable to generate enough cash flow for debt reduction.

• Collateral has deteriorated.

• The collateral is not subject to adequate inspection and verification of value (if the collateral is expected to be the source of repayment).

• Flaws in documentation leave the Bank in a subordinated or unsecured position if the collateral is needed for the repayment of the loan.

• For assets secured by real estate, the appraisal does not conform to FDIC appraisal standards or the assumptions underlying the appraisal are demonstrably incorrect.

• Doubtful Assets (Grade 7)

An asset classified Doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified as Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

• Loss Assets (Grade 8)

An asset, or portion thereof, classified loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that its continuance on the books is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value; rather, it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off an essentially worthless asset (or portion thereof), even through partial recovery may occur in the future.

Loans and leases not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans and leases.

22

Based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of non-homogenous loans and leases is as follows:

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	(Dollars in Thousands)
June 30, 2011	Pass		Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Total
Construction	$	27,632	$	16,847	$	—	$	22	$	44,501
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		12,781		182		—		1,794		14,757
Commercial		104,595		20,285		1,686		21,059		147,625
Commercial and industrial		26,327		5,649		129		584		32,679
Multi Family*		57,171		13,822		1,989		4,719		77,701
Total	$	228,506	$	56,775	$	3,803	$	28,179	$	317,263
December 31, 2010	Pass		Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Total
Construction	$	12,743	$	10,514	$	329	$	2,944	$	26,530
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		11,822		632		—		—		12,454
Commercial		124,478		11,982		6,158		21,333		163,951
Commercial and industrial		22,488		4,416		165		1,874		28,943
Multi Family*		66,074		1,861		3,227		3,180		74,342
Total	$	237,605	$	29,405	$	9,879	$	29,331	$	306,220

Homogeneous loans are monitored at 60+ days delinquent. See the above schedule related to change in allowance for loans which includes all class of loans including the loans related to residential and consumer.

* The increase in Multi Family is principally due to multi-family construction loans that have not yet stabilized.

8. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

FASB ASU 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, which provides additional guidance to help creditors in determining whether a creditor has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties for purposes of determining whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in this update are effective for the Corporation beginning in the quarter ended September 30, 2011 and are to be applied retrospectively to January 1, 2011. In addition, the modification disclosures described in ASU 2010-20, which were subsequently deferred by ASU 2011-01, Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings, will be effective on a prospective basis beginning in the quarter ended September 30, 2011. The Corporation has not completed an evaluation of the impact of ASU 2011-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

The FASB has issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. This ASU represents the converged guidance of the FASB and the IASB (the Boards) on fair value measurement. The collective efforts of the Boards and their staffs, reflected in ASU 2011-04, have resulted in common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements, including a consistent meaning of the term “fair value.” The Boards have concluded the common requirements will result in greater comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments to the Codification in this ASU are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public entities is not permitted. The impact of adoption of this ASU is not expected to be material.

FASB ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, which provides entities with the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income, along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. Regardless of whether an entity chooses to present comprehensive income in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements, the entity is required to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s)

23

where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. This update should be applied retrospectively effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. We anticipate this statement will be adopted with our 2012 annual financial statements.

9. Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statement

Subsequent to the Corporation’s filing of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Corporation and Advantage received notice from Advantage’s regulators, the FDIC and Ohio Department of Financial Institutions (“ODFI”), that Advantage must restate its Call Report previously filed with the FDIC for the quarters ended June 30 and September 30, 2011. As a result, Camco also had to amend its Y9C and Y9LP as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2011. None of the amounts as of December 31, 2010 in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been restated.

		September 30,			September 30,		September 30,
As a result of the restatement, the following line items were adjusted:	Restated			Previously Reported		Effect of Change
Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2011 (unaudited):
Loans receivable – net	$	639,683		$	641,283	$	(1,600	)
Total assets		765,926			767,526		(1,600	)
Retained earnings		(675	)		925		(1,600	)
Total stockholders’ equity		44,495			46,095		(1,600	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		765,926			767,526		(1,600	)
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) Three Months ended June 30, 2011
Provision for losses on loans	$	1,797		$	197	$	1,600
Net interest income after provision for losses on loans		4,639			6,239		1,600
Earnings (Loss) before federal income tax expenses (benefit)		(1,474	)		126		(1,600	)
Net earnings (loss)		(1,463	)		137		(1,600	)
Comprehensive income (loss)		(1,442	)		158		(1,600	)
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic		(.20	)		.02		(.22	)
Diluted		(.20	)		.02		(.22	)
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) Six Months ended June 30, 2011
Provision for losses on loans	$	2,810		$	1,210	$	1,600
Net interest income after provision for losses on loans		10,236			11,836		1,600
Earnings (loss) before federal income tax expenses (benefit)		(274	)		1,326		(1,600	)
Net earnings (loss)		(811	)		789		(1,600	)
Comprehensive income (loss)		(1,044	)		556		(1,600	)
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic		(.11	)		11		(.22	)
Diluted		(.11	)		.11		(.22	)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Net earnings (loss) for the period	$	(811	)	$	789	$	(1,600	)
Provision for losses on loans		2,810			1,210		1,600

24

8. Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statement (continued)

		September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
As a result of the restatement, the following line items were adjusted:	Restated			Previously Reported			Effect of Change
Nonaccrual and delinquent loans
Allowance for loan losses	$	18,351		$	16,751		$	1,600
Non-performing assets to total assets		3.95	%		3.94	%		.01	%
ALLL as a percent of nonperforming loans		5.26	%		5.25	%		0.01	%
ALLL as a percent of nonperforming loans		70.4	%		64.3	%		6.10	%
Allowance for loan losses by loan category
Construction	$	25		$	23		$	2
Consumer		114			100			14
Multi-Family		2,933			2,632			301
Land, Farm & Ag Loans		628			744			(116	)
Residential		8,974			7,967			1,007
Commercial & Non-Residential		5,102			4,782			320
Commercial and Industrial		575			503			72
Total		18,351			16,751			1,600
Collectively evaluated for impairment
Construction	$	25		$	23		$	2
Consumer		114			100			14
Multi-Family		2,267			1,966			301
Land, Farm & Ag Loans		628			744			(116	)
Residential		7,940			6,933			1,007
Commercial & Non-Residential		2,441			2,121			320
Commercial and Industrial		542			470			72
Total		13,957			12,357			1,600
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Carrying amount	$	639,683		$	641,283		$	(1,600	)
Fair value		641,459			643,059			(1,600	)
Regulatory Capital – Camco Financial Corporation
Total capital to risk-weighted assets		9.33	%		9.57	%		(.24	)%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		8.06	%		8.30	%		(.24	)%
Tier 1 leverage to average assets		6.28	%		6.49	%		(.21	)%
Regulatory Capital – Advantage Bank
Total capital to risk-weighted assets		8.88	%		9.12	%		(.24	)%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		7.61	%		7.85	%		(.24	)%
Tier 1 leverage to average assets		5.94	%		6.14	%		(.20	)%
Average Balances, Yield, Rate and Volume Data
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
Noninterest-earning assets	$	67,405		$	67,805		$	(400	)
Total average assets		780,342			780,742			(400	)
Total average shareholders’ equity		45,613			46,013			(400	)
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		780,342			780,742			(400	)

25

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
As a result of the restatement, the following line items were adjusted:	Restated		Previously Reported		Effect of Change
Average Balances, Yield, Rate and Volume Data
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Noninterest-earning assets	$	75,067	$	75,257	$	(190	)
Total average assets		795,613		795,803		(190	)
Total average shareholders’ equity		45,875		46,065		(190	)
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		795,613		795,803		(190	)
See Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further discussion on the “Provisions for Losses on Loans”.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

Forward Looking Statements

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) and this Form 10-Q include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), as amended, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as may, might, could, would, believe, expect, intend, plan, seek, anticipate, estimate, project or continue or the negative thereof or comparable terminology. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this document regarding our outlook, financial position and results of operation, liquidity, capital resources and interest rate sensitivity are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements also include, but are not limited to:

• anticipated changes in industry conditions created by state and federal legislation and regulations;

• anticipated changes in general interest rates and the impact of future interest rate changes on our profitability, capital adequacy and the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities;

• retention of our existing customer base and our ability to attract new customers;

• the development of new products and services and their success in the marketplace;

• the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; and

• statements regarding our anticipated loan and deposit account growth, expense levels, liquidity and capital resources and projections of earnings.

These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Although we believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance such expectations will prove to have been correct. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements included herein include, but are not limited to:

• competition in the industry and markets in which we operate;

• changes in general interest rates;

• rapid changes in technology affecting the financial services industry;

• changes in government regulation; and

• general economic and business conditions

This MD&A is intended to give stockholders a more comprehensive review of the issues facing management than could be obtained from an examination of the financial statements alone. This analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related footnotes and the selected financial data elsewhere in this annual report. As used herein and except as the context may otherwise require, references to “Camco,” “the Corporation”, “we,” “us,” or “our” means, collectively, Camco Financial Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiay, Advantage Bank, and through March 31, 2011, its formerly wholly-owned subsidiary, Camco Title Agency.

26

Overview

Management’s Discussion and Analysis is intended to give stockholders a more comprehensive review of the issues facing management than could be obtained from an examination of the financial statements alone. This analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related footnotes and the selected financial data in the annual report. As used herein and except as the context may otherwise require, references to “Camco,” “the Corporation”, “we,” “us,” or “our” means, collectively, Camco Financial Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Advantage Bank (“Advantage” or the “Bank”) and, through March 31, 2011, Camco Title Agency.

The deterioration in the economic conditions of the country that began in 2008 and continues today has created challenges for the Corporation, including the following:

• Volatile equity markets that declined significantly

• Stress on the banking industry with significant financial assistance to many financial institutions, extensive regulatory and congressional scrutiny and regulatory requirements

• Low interest rate environment particularly given the government involvement in the financial markets, and

• Continued high levels of unemployment nationally and in our local markets

The above factors resulted in the continued movement of loans to nonperforming status during the past few years. In addition, many of these loans are collateral dependent real estate loans that the Bank is required to write down to fair value less estimated costs to sell, with the fair values determined primarily based on third party appraisals. Beginning in 2009 and continuing through 2011 appraised values decreased significantly. As a result, the Bank’s evaluation of the loan portfolio and allowance for loan losses resulted in higher than normal net charge-offs and the need to record higher provision for loan losses over the past few years.

In 2011, the Corporation took steps to improve capital ratios through the reduction of assets and borrowings. Assets were reduced through the sale of $27.2 million in investments that created a gain of $1.2 million. The Bank used the proceeds of the sale to pay $21.0 million in FHLB borrowings including a prepayment penalty of $216,000.

The Corporation is addressing credit quality issues by directing the efforts of experienced workout specialists solely to manage the resolution of nonperforming assets. We continue to deal with the economic challenges in our markets, through our loan charge-offs and provision for loan losses as we recognize the results of these current economic conditions and issues related to higher than normal unemployment. The real estate market continues to create a very challenging environment as bankruptcies, foreclosures and unemployment continue to be high in Ohio.

It is the Corporation’s goal to remove the majority of the nonperforming assets from its balance sheet while still obtaining reasonable value for these assets. Given the current conditions in the real estate market, accomplishing this goal is a tremendous undertaking, requiring both time and considerable effort of staff. We believe that we are taking steps forward in managing our classified assets. We have devoted and will continue to devote substantial management resources toward the resolution of all delinquent and non-performing assets, but no assurance can be made that management’s efforts will be successful.

We have found that “core” deposit growth continues to be challenging but have continued to work with commercial borrowers to build banking relationships. The extended low rate environment and increased competition for deposits continue to put pressure on marginal funding costs, despite continued lower rates in 2010 and 2011.

Discussion of Financial Condition Changes from December 31, 2010 to June 30, 2011

At June 30, 2011, Camco’s consolidated assets totaled $765.9 million, a decrease of $49.0 million, or 6.0%, from December 31, 2010. The decrease in total assets resulted primarily from decreases in investment securities and loans receivable and the redemption of FHLB stock, which were offset partially by increases in cash and cash equivalents. Further deterioration of the residential loan market and fewer new purchases may continue to shift the loan portfolio toward commercial loans. The current loan rates may continue to slow residential lending and the sale of fixed rate loans, therefore it is likely that the gain on sale will continue to be less in 2011 than was previously experienced in 2010. Additionally, in the second quarter of 2011 we sold three portfolio loans at a loss of $433,000 which was offset by our current year to date gain on the sale of mortgage loans of $433,000. When comparing the six months ended June 2011 versus 2010 the gain on sale of mortgage loans decreased $57,000. Any growth in deposits would most likely be used to reduce outstanding borrowings and brokered deposits or fund

27

commercial loan volume. Loan volume increased in June and we have a larger pipeline going into the second half of 2011. Management’s overall focus at the Bank has been on managing credit, reducing risk within the loan portfolio and enhancing liquidity and capital in a distressed economic environment. Continuous progress is being made on addressing these issues, but we expect the distressed economic environment to continue through 2011.

Cash and interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions totaled $42.4 million at June 30, 2011, an increase of $13.3 million, or 45.6%, from December 31, 2010. Cash has increased as we have begun to restructure the balance sheet by decreasing assets and liabilities when possible to improve our capital position.

As of June 30, 2011 securities totaled $14.6 million, a decrease of $20.1 million, or 58.0%, from December 31, 2010, due to the sale of $27.2 million in securities, principal repayments and maturities of $5.3 million and the change in the fair value of securities available for sale of $1.6 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011. These were offset partially by purchases of $12.6 million which were primarily investment securities at a weighted rate of 1.28%. Additionally, $20.0 million of FHLB stock was redeemed during the first quarter 2011.

Loans receivable, including loans held for sale, totaled $643.4 million at June 30, 2011, a decrease of $26.7 million, or 4.0%, from December 31, 2010. The decrease resulted primarily from principal repayments of $108.2 million and loan sales of $33.1 million offset partially by loan disbursements totaling $125.1 million. Principal repayments are slightly higher than 2010 on loans and our ability to originate new loans has not been as strong as 2010 in the first half of 2011. The reduction in residential real estate loan balances was intensified by the secondary market offering historically low long-term fixed rates during most of 2010.

Loan originations during the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, included $71.8 million of commercial loans, $45.7 million in loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate and $7.5 million in consumer and other loans. Our intent is to continue to service our communities in 1-4 family residential, consumer and commercial real estate lending in the future and continue with our strategic plan of generating additional lending opportunities and core relationships. However, we have currently seen lending volumes of acceptable risk diminished somewhat due to a slowing economy and competition in the market areas. Loan repayments are being used to reduce borrowings and maintain current liquidity levels.

During 2011, the yield on loans was 5.57% a decrease of 10 basis points as compared to 5.67% for 2010. The decrease in yield is due to lower average loan balances coupled with lower effective rates in the loan portfolio during 2011. We continue to have adjustable rate loans re-price at the current lower rate environment and new loans are originated at the current lower market rates.

The allowance for loan losses totaled $18.4 million and $16.9 million at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, representing 70.4% and 49.9% of nonperforming loans, respectively, at those dates. Nonperforming loans (loans with three payments delinquent plus nonaccrual loans) totaled $26.1 million and $33.8 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, constituting 4.0% and 4.9% of total net loans, including loans held for sale. The decrease in non-accrual loan balances is due to credit quality efforts that are discussed above. During 2011 provision for loan losses decreased while the balance in the allowance was $1.5 million higher than the December balance. See the Allowance for loan losses footnote above for additional information related to change in allowance, delinquency and etc. Net charge-offs totaled $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

28

The following table sets forth information with respect to Advantage’s nonperforming assets for the periods indicated.

		September 30,			September 30,			September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
Loans accounted for on nonaccrual basis: (dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010			December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
Total nonperforming loans	$	26,069		$	33,779		$	36,449		$	53,528		$	25,515
Other real estate owned		14,216			10,096			9,660			5,841			5,034
Total nonperforming assets	$	40,285		$	43,875		$	46,109		$	59,369		$	30,549
Allowance for loan losses	$	18,351		$	16,870		$	16,099		$	15,747		$	6,623
Nonperforming loans as a percent of total net loans		3.95	%		4.92	%		5.40	%		6.91	%		3.13	%
Nonperforming assets to total assets		5.26	%		5.38	%		5.47	%		5.93	%		2.99	%
Allowances for loan losses as a percent of nonperforming loans		70.4	%		49.9	%		44.2	%		29.4	%		26.0	%
Memo section:
Troubled debt restructurings
Loans and leases restructured and in compliance with modified terms	$	12,543		$	7,122		$	16,645		$	11,440		$	—
Loans and leases restructured and not in compliance with modified terms	$	8,373		$	9,276		$	4,783		$	12,882		$	—

Nonaccrual status denotes loans greater than three payments past due, loans for which, in the opinion of management, the collection of additional interest is unlikely, or loans that meet nonaccrual criteria as established by regulatory authorities. Payments received on a nonaccrual loan are either applied to the outstanding principal balance or recorded as interest income, depending on management’s assessment of the collectability of the loan.

At June 30, 2011, the Corporation’s other real estate owned (REO) consisted of 185 repossessed properties with a net book value of $14.2 million, an increase of $4.1 million due primarily to two large relationships. Initial loss is recorded as a charge to the allowance for loan losses. Thereafter, if there is a further deterioration in value, a specific valuation allowance is established and charged to operations. The Corporation reflects costs to carry REO as period costs in operations when incurred. When property is acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure, it is initially recorded at the fair value of the related assets at the date of foreclosure, less estimated costs to sell the property.

The Corporation works with borrowers to avoid foreclosure if possible. Furthermore, if it becomes inevitable that a borrower will not be able to retain ownership of their property, the Corporation often seeks a deed in lieu of foreclosure in order to gain control of the property earlier in the recovery process. The strategy of pursuing deeds in lieu of foreclosure more aggressively should result in a reduction in the holding period for nonperforming assets and ultimately reduce economic losses.

Deposits totaled $631.6 million at June 30, 2011, a decrease of $20.2 million, or 3.1%, from the total at December 31, 2010. The following table details our deposit portfolio balances and the average rate paid on our deposit portfolio at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

		September 30,		September 30,			September 30,		September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	June 30, 2011					December 31, 2010					Change
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate			Balance			Rate
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	47,663		0.00	%	$	46,597		0.00	%	$	1,066			0.00	%
Interest-bearing demand		68,106		0.20			65,679		0.30			2,427			(0.10	)
Money market		109,793		0.46			96,294		0.69			13,499			(0.23	)
Savings		42,037		0.10			38,665		0.25			3,372			(0.15	)
Certificates of deposit – retail		358,014		1.77			392,098		1.93			(34,084	)		(0.16	)
Certificates of deposit – brokered		6,034		2.89			12,483		3.60			(6,449	)		(0.71	)
Total deposits	$	631,647		1.14	%	$	651,816		1.38	%	$	(20,169	)		(0.24	)

29

The decrease in certificates of deposits was primarily due to decreases in public funds and brokered deposits coupled with non-core customers (only certificate of deposit account). We continue to focus and implement our strategy of improving the long-term funding mix of the Bank’s deposit portfolio by developing “core relationships” with customers within our communities, small businesses and adding commercial and retail checking accounts. The Corporation is focused on its collection of core deposits. Core deposit balances, generated from customers throughout the Bank’s branch network, are generally a stable source of funds similar to long-term funding, but core deposits such as checking and savings accounts are typically less costly than alternative fixed-rate funding. The Corporation believes that this cost advantage makes core deposits a superior funding source, in addition to providing cross-selling opportunities and fee income possibilities. To the extent the Bank grows its core deposits, the cost of funds should decrease, thereby increasing the Bank’s net interest margin.

In 2010, we implemented a number of organizational and product development initiatives including a new suite of commercial and small business checking accounts, enhancements to our online business cash management system, and the launch of remote deposit capture solution. We believe these products will continue to help us be more competitive for business checking accounts. Additionally, in 2011 we plan to implement paperless statements which will be less costly and more efficient for many customers.

We anticipate an additional $6.4 million in maturities of brokered deposits throughout the remainder of 2011. This will help to maintain the Bank’s margin. Further, by growing core deposits we will improve the long-term funding mix of the Bank’s deposit portfolio by aggregating small business, commercial and retail checking accounts.

Effective January 1, 2010, interest rates paid by Advantage on deposits became subject to limitations as a result of a consent order Advantage entered into with the FDIC and Ohio Division of Financial Institutions in July 2009 (“Consent Order”). Deposits solicited by the Bank cannot significantly exceed the prevailing rates in our market areas. The FDIC has implemented by regulation the statutory language “significantly exceeds” as meaning more than 75 basis points. Although the rule became effective January 1, 2010, Advantage has utilized these standards since mid year 2009.

Advances from the FHLB and other borrowings totaled $68.8 million at June 30, 2011, a decrease of $24.2 million, or 26.0%, from the total at December 31, 2010. The decrease in borrowings was primarily due to early payoff of $21.0 million of borrowings that had a prepayment penalty of $216,000. The sale of investments provided the cash to pay off such borrowings and decrease reliance on this non core funding.

Stockholders’ equity totaled $44.5 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Net changes included the decrease from the sale of investments which decreased accumulated other comprehensive income related to the fair value of our investment securities in the amount of $1.0 million coupled with a net loss of $811,000.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

Camco’s net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2011, totaled $811,000, a decrease of $3.2 million, from the net loss of $4.0 million reported in the comparable 2010 period. On a per share basis, the net loss during the first half of 2011 was $(0.11), compared to $(0.55) per share in the first half of 2010. The increase in earnings was primarily attributable to decreased provision for losses on loans, increased gain on sale of investments which was offset partially by increased general, administrative and other expenses.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income totaled $13.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $417,000, or 3.3%, compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2010, generally reflecting the effects of a $47.9 million decrease in the average balance of interest bearing liabilities coupled with the average cost of funding decreasing by 44 basis points year to year. Net interest margin increased to 3.62% in 2011 compared to 3.32% of 2010.

The following table presents for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of interest income from average interest-earning assets and the resulting yields, and the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates, and the net interest margin. The table does not reflect any effect of income taxes. Balances are based on the average of month-end balances which, in the opinion of management, do not differ materially from daily balances.

30

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,			September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	2011							2010
Six Months Ended June 30, (Dollars in thousands)	Average outstanding balance		Interest earned / paid		Average yield/ rate			Average outstanding balance		Interest earned / paid		Average yield/ rate
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable (1)	$	636,523	$	17,740		5.57	%	$	653,612	$	18,561		5.67	%
Securities		23,856		439		3.68	%		50,149		1,073		4.28	%
FHLB stock		12,745		493		7.74	%		29,888		671		4.49	%
Other Interest-bearing accounts		47,422		10		.04	%		26,932		2		0.01	%
Total interest-earning assets		720,546		18,682		5.19	%		760,581		20,307		5.34	%
Noninterest-earning assets (2)		75,067							90,781
Total average assets	$	795,613						$	851,362
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits		598,741		4,107		1.37	%		611,745		5,689		1.86	%
FHLB advances and other		89,877		1,529		3.40	%		124,813		1,989		3.19	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		688,618		5,636		1.64	%		736,558		7,678		2.08	%
Noninterest-bearing deposits		50,042							41,399
Noninterest-bearing liabilities		11,078							13,182
Total average liabilities		749,738							791,139
Total average shareholders’ equity		45,875							60,223
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	795,613						$	851,362
Net interest income/Interest rate spread			$	13,046		3.55	%			$	12,629		3.26	%
Net interest margin (3)						3.62	%						3.32	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities						104.64	%						103.30	%

⁽¹⁾  Includes loans held for sale. Loan fees are immaterial.

⁽²⁾  Includes nonaccrual loans, mortgage servicing rights and allowance for loan losses

⁽³⁾  Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets

Interest income on loans totaled $17.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $821,000, or 4.4%, from the comparable 2010 period. The decrease resulted primarily from a decrease in the average balance outstanding of $17.1 million, or 2.6%, from the comparable 2010 period. As discussed previously this is primarily related to the sale of securities and the redemption of FHLB stock in the first quarter of 2011. A 10 basis point decrease in the average yield in the 2011 period also negatively impacted interest income on loans.

Interest income on securities totaled $439,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $634,000, or 59.1%, from the first half of 2010. The decrease was due primarily to a $26.3 million decrease in the average balance coupled with a 60 basis point decrease in the average yield, to 3.68% for the 2011 period.

Dividend income on FHLB stock is paid a quarter in arrears, therefore, due to our redemption of $20.0 million in January 2011 the yield is inflated for the current period by the number of days of interest received in January related to the extra $20.0 million of stock. Interest income will decrease in the 3rd quarter and we believe the yield on the asset will be comparable to previous year quarter. Interest income on other interest bearing accounts continues to be low due to higher balances needed to compensate for charges at correspondent banks, leaving less balance for interest calculation offset partially by a slight increase in rates. We have increased cash on hand balances due to the sale of investments at the end of June 2011. We will continue to deploy cash when available by paying down advances, borrowings and higher cost brokered deposits in order to generate additional income.

Interest expense on deposits totaled $4.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $1.6 million, or 27.8%, compared to the same period in 2010 due primarily to a 49 basis point decrease in the average cost of deposits to 1.37% in the current period, coupled with a $13.0 million, or 2.1%, decrease in average interest bearing deposits outstanding. While the cost of deposits was lower in 2011 compared to 2010, the cost of funds in 2011 is expected to stabilize as rates have been at low levels for the past few years. However, we will continue to re-price certificates of deposit in 2011, which should decrease costs slightly if rates continue to be at the current low levels. Although, competitive pressures may limit our ability to reduce interest rates paid on deposits.

31

Interest expense on borrowings totaled $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 a decrease of $460,000, or 23.1%, from the same 2010 six month period. The decrease resulted primarily from a $34.9 million, or 28.0%, decrease in the average borrowings outstanding, offset partially by a 21 basis point increase in the average cost of borrowings to 3.40%.

Provision for Losses on Loans

A provision for losses on loans is charged to earnings to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level considered appropriate by management based on historical experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by the Bank, the status of past due principal and interest payments, general economic conditions, particularly as such conditions relate to the Bank’s market areas, and other factors related to the collectability of the Bank’s loan portfolio.

Camco’s loan quality has been negatively impacted by conditions within our market areas which has caused declines in real estate values and deterioration in the financial condition of some of our borrowers. These conditions have led Camco to downgrade the loan quality ratings on various loans through our loan review process. In addition, some of our loans became under-collateralized due to reductions in the estimated net realizable fair value of the underlying collateral. As a result, Camco’s provision for loan losses, net charge-offs and nonperforming loans have been significantly higher than historical levels since 2008.

Camco’s net loan charge-offs and provision for loan losses in recent quarters has been impacted by ongoing workout efforts on existing impaired loans. The efforts have included negotiating reduced payoffs and the sale of underlying collateral –or short sales coupled with charging down values to net realizable or fair value of the underlying collateral. Management believes these actions are prudent during the current economic environment.

Based upon an analysis of these factors, the continued economic outlook and new production we recorded a provision for losses on loans to $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $6.1 million for the same period in 2010. A portion of the provision was due to the Boards of Directors of Camco and Advantage receiving notice from Advantage’s regulators, the FDIC and ODFI, that Advantage must reflect an additional provision to its allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”) of at least $1.6 million as of June 30, 2011.

We believe our loans are adequately reserved for probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio at June 30, 2011. However, there can be no assurance that the loan loss allowance will be adequate to absorb actual losses.

Other Income

Other income totaled $4.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $738,000, or 22.2%, from the comparable 2010 period. The increase in other income was primarily attributable to a $1.3 million increase in gain on sale of investments, offset partially by the decrease in gain on sale of loans.

Gain on sale of loans decreased due to the sale of three portfolio loans at a loss of $433,000 which was offset by our current year to date gain on the sale of or mortgage banking activity of $433,000, which was a slight decrease of $57,000 from the 2010 period.

General, Administrative and Other Expense

General, administrative and other expense totaled $14.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 an increase of $651,000 or 4.7%, from the comparable period in 2010. The increase in general, administrative and other expense was due to increases in real estate owned and loan expenses, partially offset by decreases in franchise taxes.

The increase in real estate owned expense of $824,000 and loan expenses of $345,000 is reflective of the large real estate owned portfolio and expenses related to ownership such as real estate taxes, and upkeep of properties. These expenses were coupled with the continued decrease in real estate values that have negatively impacted our portfolio values and caused a write down to fair market value. The increase in loan expenses are reflective of additional expenses related to classified assets and the legal aspects related to collection efforts or litigation.

32

The decrease in franchise taxes is calculated utilizing equity levels. The decrease in expense relates to decreased equity levels. Camco filed a Form S-1 on July 11, 2011 for a potential rights offering with a proposed maximum aggregate offering price of $22.5 million. If Camco pursues the rights offering its franchise taxes will increase due to an increase in equity.

Federal income taxes totaled $537,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $652,000 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase reflects the change for 2011 in the valuation allowance against the Corporation’s net deferred tax asset. In 2011, the Corporation sold available for sale investments that were no longer carrying a deferred position and recorded tax expense related to such transactions.

The Corporation recorded a 100% valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset in 2010 considering, based on the available evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. In making such judgments, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. A cumulative tax loss position is considered significant negative evidence in assessing the realization of a net deferred tax asset, which is difficult to overcome. Reversal of the valuation allowance can be realized in the future based on estimates of projected taxable income.

The Corporation has a net operating loss carryforward for tax purposes of approximately $1 million at June 30, 2011. This compares to a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $13.0 million at December 31, 2010. The net operating loss carryforward was substantially reduced during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as the Corporation generated approximately $12.0 million of taxable income during that period, primarily due to the redemption of the FHLB stock which resulted in taxable income of approximately $10.0 million. As the Corporation executes plans to return to profitability future earnings may benefit from the current operating loss carry-forwards.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

Camco’s net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2011, totaled $1.5 million, an increase in earnings of $2.6 million, from the net loss of $4.1 million, reported in the comparable 2010 period. On a per share basis, the net loss during the second quarter of 2011 were $(0.20), compared to a loss of $(0.57) per share in the second quarter of 2010. The increase in earnings was primarily attributable to a decreased provision for loan and lease losses of $3.4 million. As previously stated the allowance for loan and lease losses totaled $18.4 million and $16.9 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, representing 70.4% and 49.9% of nonperforming loans, respectively, at those dates.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income totaled $6.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $63,000, or 1.0%, compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2010, generally reflecting the effects of a $61.6 million decrease in the average balance of interest bearing liabilities coupled with the average cost of funding decreasing by 46 basis points year to year. Net interest margin increased to 3.61% in the second quarter of 2011 compared to 3.39% in the second quarter of 2010.

The following table presents for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of interest income from average interest-earning assets and the resulting yields, and the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates, and the net interest margin. The table does not reflect any effect of income taxes. Balances are based on the average of month-end balances which, in the opinion of management, do not differ materially from daily balances.

33

		000000		000000		000000			000000		000000		000000
	2011							2010
Three Months Ended June 30, (Dollars in thousands)	Average outstanding balance		Interest earned / paid		Average yield/ rate			Average outstanding balance		Interest earned / paid		Average yield/ rate
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable (1)	$	631,496	$	8,839		5.60	%	$	651,552	$	9,281		5.70	%
Securities		16,437		84		2.04	%		44,952		495		4.40	%
FHLB stock		9,888		154		6.23	%		29,888		332		4.44	%
Other Interest-bearing accounts		55,116		3		0.02	%		25,155		1		0.02	%
Total interest-earning assets		712,937		9,080		5.09	%		751,547		10,109		5.38	%
Noninterest-earning assets (2)		67,405							98,182
Total average assets	$	780,342						$	849,729
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits		595,021		1,918		1.29	%		610,144		2,744		1.80	%
FHLB advances and other		79,862		726		3.64	%		126,367		992		3.14	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		674,883		2,644		1.57	%		736,511		3,736		2.03	%
Noninterest-bearing deposits		49,427							42,124
Noninterest-bearing liabilities		10,419							11,148
Total average liabilities		734,729							789,783
Total average shareholders’ equity		45,613							59,946
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	780,342						$	849,729
Net interest income/Interest rate spread			$	6,436		3.52	%			$	6,373		3.35	%
Net interest margin (3)						3.61	%						3.39	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities						105.6	%						102.0	%

⁽¹⁾  Includes loans held for sale. Loan fees are immaterial.

⁽²⁾  Includes nonaccrual loans, mortgage servicing rights and allowance for loan losses

⁽³⁾  Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets

Interest income on loans totaled $8.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $442,000, or 4.8%, from the comparable 2010 period. The decrease resulted primarily from a decrease in the average balance outstanding of $20.1 million, or 3.1%, from the comparable 2010 period. As discussed previously this is primarily related to the sale of securities and the redemption of FHLB stock in the first quarter of 2011. A 10 basis point decrease in the average yield in the 2011 period also negatively impacted interest income on loans.

Interest income on securities totaled $84,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $411,000, or 83.0%, from the second quarter of 2010. The decrease was due primarily to a $28.5 million decrease in the average balance coupled with a 236 basis point decrease in the average yield, to 2.04% for the 2011 period.

Dividend income on FHLB stock was consistent with the previous year. Interest on such stock is paid a quarter in arrears, therefore, due to our redemption of $20.0 million in January 2011 the yield is inflated for the current period. We believe the yield on the asset will be comparable to the third quarter of 2010 from the third quarter of 2011. Interest income on other interest bearing accounts continues to be low due to higher balances needed to compensate for charges at correspondent banks leaving less balance for interest calculation, which is offset partially by a slight increase in rates. Cash on hand balances were increased due to the sale of investments at the end of June 2011 but we continue to deploy the cash by paying down advances, borrowings and higher cost brokered deposits when available in order to generate additional income.

Interest expense on deposits totaled $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $826,000, or 30.1%, compared to the same quarter in 2010 due primarily to a 51 basis point decrease in the average cost of deposits to 1.29% in the current quarter, coupled with a $15.1 million, or 2.5%, decrease in average interest bearing deposits outstanding. While the cost of deposits was lower in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010, the cost in 2011 is expected to stabilize as rates have been at low levels over the past two years. However, we will continue to re-price certificates of deposit in 2011, which should decrease costs slightly if rates continue to be at the current low levels. However, competitive pressures may limit our ability to reduce interest rates paid on deposits.

34

Interest expense on borrowings totaled $726,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 a decrease of $266,000, or 26.8%, from the same 2010 three-month period. The decrease resulted primarily from a $46.5 million, or 36.8%, decrease in the average borrowings outstanding offset partially by a 50 basis point increase in the average cost of borrowings to 3.64%.

Provision for Losses on Loans

A provision for losses on loans is charged to earnings to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level considered appropriate by management based on historical experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by the Bank, the status of past due principal and interest payments, general economic conditions, particularly as such conditions relate to the Bank’s market areas, and other factors related to the collectability of the Bank’s loan portfolio.

Camco’s loan quality has been negatively impacted by the conditions within our market areas which has caused declines in real estate values and deterioration in the financial condition of some of our borrowers. These conditions have led Camco to downgrade the loan quality ratings on various loans through our loan review process throughout the past two years. In addition, some of our loans became under-collateralized due to reductions in the estimated net realizable fair value of the underlying collateral. As a result, Camco’s provision for loan losses, net charge-offs and nonperforming loans have been significantly higher than historical levels since 2008.

Camco’s net loan charge-offs and provision for loan losses in recent quarters has been impacted by ongoing workout efforts on existing impaired loans. The efforts have included negotiating reduced payoffs and the sale of underlying collateral –or short sales coupled with charging down values to net realizable or fair value of the underlying collateral. Management believes these actions are prudent during the current economic environment.

Based upon an analysis of these factors, the continued economic outlook and new loan quality production, we increased the provision for losses on loans to strengthen our allowance in previous quarters. Due to the previous strengthening of the allowance and the decrease in our non-accrual and classified assets we determined that a much lesser provision was needed for this quarter. An additional $1.8 million was added to the provision for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $5.2 million for the same period in 2010. We believe our loans are adequately reserved for probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio at June 30, 2011. However, there can be no assurance that the loan loss allowance will be adequate to absorb actual losses.

Other Income

Other income totaled $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 a decrease of $574,000, or 35.8%, from the comparable 2010 period. The decrease in other income was primarily attributable to a $353,000, or 135.3% decrease in gain on sale of loans related to losses on three portfolio loans of $283,000, which was offset partially by our current year to date gain on the sale of or mortgage banking activity of $191,000, offset partially by normal residential fixed rate secondary market activity. This was coupled with the liquidation of Camco Title on March 31, 2011 and earnings related to the subsidiary in the previous period.

General, Administrative and Other Expense

General, administrative and other expense totaled $7.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $166,000 or 2.4%, from the comparable period in 2010. The increase in general, administrative and other expense was due to increases in real estate owned and loan expenses partially offset by decreases in employee compensation and professional services.

The increase in real estate owned expense of $416,000 and loan expenses of $265,000 is reflective of the large real estate owned portfolio and expenses related to ownership such as real estate taxes, and upkeep of properties. These expenses were coupled with the continued falling of real estate values that have negatively impacted our portfolio values and caused a write down to fair market value. The increase in loan expenses are reflective of additional expenses related to classified assets and the legal aspects related to collection efforts or litigation.

35

The decrease in employee compensation is due to a decrease in the total number of employees. The Corporation has made it a priority to identify cost savings opportunities throughout its operations and is committed to maintaining cost control measures, believing that the effort will play a major role in improving its performance. The Corporation also believes that its technology allows it to be efficient in its back-office operations. In addition, as the level of nonperforming assets is reduced, the operating costs associated with carrying those assets, such as maintenance, legal proceedings, insurance and taxes will decrease.

Federal Income Taxes

Federal income tax benefit totaled $11,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 a decrease of $102,000, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. This decrease reflects the change in our 100% valuation allowance that was taken in September 2010 on the Corporation’s deferred tax asset. At June 30, 2011, the Corporation has a federal net operating loss carry-forward of approximately $1 million available to offset future taxable income.

The Corporation recorded a 100% valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset in 2010 considering, based on the available evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. In making such judgments, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. A cumulative tax loss position is considered significant negative evidence in assessing the realization of a net deferred tax asset, which is difficult to overcome. Reversal of the valuation allowance can be realized in the future based on estimates of projected taxable income.

The Corporation has a net operating loss carryforward for tax purposes of approximately $1 million at June 30, 2011. This compares to a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $13.0 million at December 31, 2010. The net operating loss carryforward was substantially reduced during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as the Corporation generated approximately $12.0 million of taxable income during that period, primarily due to the redemption of the FHLB stock which resulted in taxable income of approximately $10.0 million. As the Corporation executes plans to return to profitability future earnings may benefit from the current operating loss carry-forwards.

Additional Capital

The Corporation’s Tier 1 capital at June 30, 2011 did not meet the requirements set forth in the Consent Order or the Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”) that Camco entered into with the Federal Reserve Board of Governors (“FRB”) on March 4, 2009 as those agreements are discussed under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below. As a result, the Corporation will need to increase capital levels to meet the standards set forth by the FDIC, ODFI and FRB. The Corporation has engaged an investment banking firm and has developed a capital plan that includes, but is not limited to, the potential for balance sheet reduction, the sale of branches, issuing common stock, preferred stock, debt or some combination of those issuances, or other financing alternatives that will be treated as capital. Although the Corporation anticipates raising additional capital, the Board of Directors has not yet determined the type, timing, amount, or terms of possible securities to be issued in the offering, and there are no assurances that an offering will be completed or that the Corporation will succeed in this endeavor. On July 11, 2011, the Board decided to file a Form S-1 for a public rights offering. This is only one of several alternatives currently being evaluated by the Board and there is no assurance that this be the final capital raising measure pursued. However, the Board believed it was prudent to make the filing so that it could move quickly once its evaluation of available alternatives is complete. In addition, a transaction, which would likely involve equity financing would result in substantial dilution to current stockholders and could adversely affect the price of the Corporation’s common stock.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is the Corporation’s ability to generate adequate cash flows to meet the demands of its customers and provide adequate flexibility for the Corporation to take advantage of market opportunities. Cash is used to fund loans, purchase investments, fund the maturity of liabilities, and at times to fund deposit outflows and operating activities. The Corporation’s principal sources of funds are deposits; amortization, prepayments and sales of loans; maturities, sales and principal receipts from securities; borrowings; and operations. Managing liquidity entails balancing the need for cash or the ability to borrow against the objectives of maximizing profitability and minimizing interest rate risk. The most liquid types of assets typically carry the lowest yields.

36

Camco is a single bank holding company with its primary source of liquidity derived from dividends received from the Bank which are dependent on the Bank’s cash flow and earnings. Ohio statutes also impose certain limitations on a bank’s payment of dividends and other capital distributions. Currently, a Consent Order prohibits the Bank from paying a dividend to Camco without prior approval of the FDIC and ODFI. Camco has $5.0 million in trust preferred securities outstanding with a maturity date of 2037 and a provision that provides for a deferment of interest payment for up to 20 consecutive quarters without default, if required. Based on notification received from the FRB on April 30, 2009, Camco was required to exercise this provision to defer interest payments and has deferred a total of nine quarters as of June 30, 2011. Further, as a result of entering into the MOU, Camco is prohibited from paying dividends to our stockholders without first obtaining the approval of the FRB. Our ability to pay dividends to stockholders is dependent on our net earnings. Increases in loan losses or higher regulatory capital reserve requirements may also jeopardize our ability to pay dividends.

The objective of the Bank’s liquidity management is to maintain ample cash flows to meet obligations for depositor withdrawals, fund the borrowing needs of loan customers, and to fund ongoing operations. Core relationship deposits are the primary source of the Bank’s liquidity. As such, the Bank focuses on deposit relationships with local business and consumer clients with a strategy to increase the number of services/products per client. The Corporation views such deposits as the foundation of its long-term liquidity because it believes such core deposits are more stable and less sensitive to changing interest rates and other economic factors compared to large time deposits or wholesale purchased funds.

Liquidity is monitored and assessed daily in order to meet deposit, loan and operational needs of the Bank. A liquidity contingency funding plan at both the Camco and Bank levels identifies liquidity thresholds and red flags that may evidence liquidity concerns or future crises. The contingency plan details specific actions to be taken by management and the Board of Directors should such an incident arise and identifies sources of both asset and liability based liquidity. In conjunction with the Corporation’s asset/liability and interest rate risk management activities, we actively monitor liquidity risk and analyze various scenarios that could impact or impair Camco’s ability to access emergency funding during a liquidity crisis.

Liquid assets consist of cash and interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions, investments and mortgage-backed securities. Approximately $9.4 million, or 65.4%, of our investment portfolio is expected to mature or prepay during the next 12 months. While these maturities could provide a source of liquidity in the short term, the collateral requirements of public deposits and repurchase agreements limit our ability to use these funds freely. State and local political subdivision deposits equaled $2.0 million at June 30, 2011, and $4.2 million at December 31, 2010.

Liquidity sources also include deposits, borrowings and principal and interest repayments on loans. While scheduled loan repayments and maturing investments are relatively predictable, deposit flows and early loan and security prepayments are influenced more by interest rates, general economic conditions, and competition and are difficult to predict. Approximately $206.4 million of the Corporation’s certificate of deposit portfolio is scheduled to mature during the next 12 months. Depositors continue a preference toward short-term certificates or other issuances less than 18 months. The shorter term preference places additional liquidity pressure on the Corporation, however, management has seen a weakening in competition for deposits in the current economic environment. A material loss of these short-term deposits could force us to seek funding through contingency sources, which may negatively impact earnings.

Management may augment liquidity and core deposit funding utilizing diversified and reliable sources of wholesale funds. Borrowings with up to 90 days maturity may be used to compensate for reduction in other sources of funds or to support lending activities. The Bank’s loan portfolio and FHLB stock provide collateral to support its borrowing needs. Management believes that its focus on core relationship deposits coupled with access to borrowing through reliable counterparties provides reasonable and prudent assurance that ample liquidity is available. However, depositor or counterparty behavior could change in response to competition, economic or market situations or other unforeseen circumstances, which could have liquidity implications that may require different strategic or operational actions. One wholesale funding source historically used by the Bank is brokered deposits. At June 30, 2011, such deposits have declined to $6.4 million, exclusive of CDARS deposits and will be repaid by the end August 2011.

FHLB advances are another funding source. While significant strategic and tactical focus is currently being placed on deposit growth, borrowings and additional borrowing capacity at the FHLB are still vital sources of liquidity and growth funding. However, our total borrowing capacity at the FHLB is dependent on the level of eligible collateral assets held by the Bank and the Bank’s credit rating with the FHLB. Available capacity at the FHLB has been increased by pay downs of advances during 2011. The inability of the Bank to access contingency funding from the FHLB may significantly limit our growth and negatively affect earnings, however, the Bank has improved on-balance-sheet liquidity in response to FHLB’s higher collateral maintenance requirements.

37

We plan to continue to monitor our funding sources through wholesale deposits and FHLB borrowings, but recognize that our current credit risk profile may restrict these sources. Our Funds Management Group monitors the market deposit rates to allow for competitive pricing in order to raise funds through deposits. Funds in excess of loan demand and available borrowing repayments will be held in short-term investments or federal funds sold. We are taking these actions to proactively prepare for the possibility of continued balance sheet management opportunities, possible credit markets deteriorations and non-performing loan status changes, which may change our borrowing capacity at the FHLB further.

The following table sets forth information regarding the Bank’s obligations and commitments to make future payments under contract as of June 30, 2011.

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	Payments due by period
	Less than 1 year		1 – 3 Years		3 – 5 years		More than 5 years		Total
	(In thousands)
Contractual obligations:
Operating lease obligations	$	187	$	458	$	384	$	28	$	1,057
Advances from the FHLB		10,000		32,305		20,222		6,238		68,765
Repurchase agreements		6,715		—		—		—		6,715
Certificates of deposit		204,892		117,235		42,165		6		364,048
Subordinated debentures (1)		—		—		—		5,000		5,000
Ohio equity funds for housing		103		201		292		36		632
Amount of commitments expiring per period:
Commitments to originate loans:
Revolving open-end lines secured by 1-4 residential properties	$	42,300	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	42,300
Not secured by real estate		18,822		—		—		—		18,822
One- to four-family construction loan		1,535		—		—		—		1,535
Commercial real estate, other construction loan and land development		21,709		—		—		—		21,709
Commercial and industrial and other unused commitments		8,678		—		—		—		8,678
Letters of credit		350		—		—		—		350
Total contractual obligations	$	315,291	$	150,199	$	63,063	$	11,308	$	539,861

(1) The subordinated debentures are redeemable, at Camco’s option.

The debentures mature on September 15, 2037.

We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds available to meet our current loan commitments. Based upon historical deposit flow data, the Bank’s competitive pricing in its market and management’s experience, we believe that a significant portion of our maturing certificates of deposit in the next 12 months will remain with the Bank, but recognize the risk related to a large portion of the certificates of deposit maturing within three years.

Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term management process. In the event that we should require funds beyond our ability to generate them internally, additional funds are available through the use of FHLB advances, internet deposits, and through the sales of loans or securities.

38

As a result of the Camco Agreement with the FRB, Camco has elected to defer further interest payments on the subordinated debt securities relating to the trust preferred securities of Camco Financial Corporation Trust 1. The Company has the right under the indenture for the subordinated debt securities to defer interest payments for up to 20 consecutive calendar quarters. The deferral provisions for the securities were intended to provide the Corporation with a measure of financial flexibility during times of financial stress due to market conditions, such as the current state of the financial and real estate markets.

As a result of the Corporation’s election to exercise its contractual right to defer interest payments on its subordinated debt securities, it is likely that the Corporation will not have access to the trust preferred securities market until the Corporation becomes current on those obligations. This may also adversely affect the Corporation’s ability in the market to obtain debt financing. Therefore, the Corporation is likely to have greater difficulty in obtaining financing and, thus, will have fewer sources to enhance its capital and liquidity position. In addition, the Corporation will be unable to pay dividends on its common stock until such time as the Corporation is current on interest payments on its subordinated debt securities. Currently there is no market for trust preferred securities.

Camco and Advantage are required to maintain minimum regulatory capital pursuant to federal regulations. The following tables present certain information regarding compliance by Camco and Advantage with applicable regulatory capital requirements at June 30, 2011:

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	Actual					For capital Adequacy purposes						To be “well- capitalized” under prompt corrective action provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount			Ratio			Amount			Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)
Total capital to risk-weighted assets:
Camco Financial Corporation	$	56,841		9.33	%	>	$	48,740	>	8.0	%	>	$	60,925		10.0	%
Advantage Bank	$	53,977		8.88	%	>	$	48,625	>	8.0	%	>	$	60,781		10.0	%
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets:
Camco Financial Corporation	$	49,110		8.06	%	>	$	24,370	>	4.0	%	>	$	36,555		6.0	%
Advantage Bank	$	46,246		7.61	%	>	$	24,313	>	4.0	%	>	$	36,469		6.0	%
Tier I leverage to average assets:
Camco Financial Corporation	$	49,110		6.28	%	>	$	31,274	>	4.0	%	>	$	39,093		5.0	%
Advantage Bank	$	46,246		5.94	%	>	$	31,152	>	4.0	%	>	$	38,940		5.0	%

Federal law prohibits a financial institution from making a capital distribution to anyone or paying management fees to any person having control of the institution if, after such distribution or payment, the institution would be undercapitalized. Additionally, the payment of dividends by Advantage to Camco and by Camco to stockholders is subject to restriction by regulatory agencies. These restrictions normally limit dividends from the Bank to the sum of the Bank’s current and prior two years’ earnings, as defined by the agencies.

On March 4, 2009, Camco entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”) with the FRB. The MOU prohibits Camco from engaging in certain activities while the MOU is in effect, including, without the prior written approval of the FRB, (1) the declaration or payment of dividends to stockholders or (2) the repurchase of Camco’s stock.

On April 30, 2009, Camco was notified by the FRB that it had conducted a “surveillance review” as of December 31, 2008. Based on that review, the FRB notified Camco that it must (i) eliminate stockholder dividends and (ii) defer interest payments on its 30-year junior subordinated deferrable interest notes that were issued to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Camco Statutory Trust I, in its trust preferred financing that was completed in July 2007. These prohibitions were memorialized in a written agreement with the FRB on August 5, 2009 (the “Camco Agreement”). Camco and Camco Statutory Trust I, are permitted to defer interest and dividend payments, respectively, for up to five consecutive years without resulting in a default. As of June 30, 2011, Camco had deferred payments for nine quarters. Camco may not resume these dividend or interest payments until it receives approval from the FRB.

39

The Camco Agreement also requires Camco to obtain FRB approval prior to: (i) receiving dividends or any other form of payment representing a reduction in capital from Advantage; (ii) making any distributions of interest, principal or other sums on subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities; (iii) incurring, increasing or guaranteeing any debt; or (iv) repurchasing any Camco stock.

Advantage entered into the Consent Agreement with the FDIC and the ODFI that provided for the issuance of an order by the FDIC and the ODFI, which order was executed by the FDIC and ODFI on July 31, 2009 (the “Bank Agreement”). The Consent Agreement requires Advantage to, among other things, (i) increase its Tier 1 leverage capital ratio to 8%; and (ii) seek regulatory approval prior to declaring or paying any cash dividend. As a result of the Consent Agreement, Advantage is disqualified as a public depository under Ohio law and will incur higher premiums for FDIC insurance of its accounts. Advantage is not in compliance with the capital requirement of the Consent Order and must raise additional capital.

As a result of the recent downturn in the financial markets, the availability of many sources of capital (principally to financial service companies) has become significantly restricted or has become increasingly costly as compared to the prevailing market rates prior to the downturn. Management cannot predict when or if the capital markets will return to more favorable conditions.

There can be no assurances that the Corporation will be successful in its efforts to raise additional capital during 2011. An equity financing transaction would result in substantial dilution to the Corporation’s current stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of the Corporation’s common stock. We are unable to predict if these efforts will be successful, either on a short-term or long-term basis. Should these efforts be unsuccessful, due to the regulatory restrictions which exist that prohibit dividends between the Bank and Camco, which may cause Camco to be unable to meet its financial obligations in the normal course of business. Further, a material failure to comply with the provisions of the MOU, Camco Agreement or Consent Order could result in additional enforcement actions by the FDIC, the ODFI or the FRB.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not Applicable.

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

Camco’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of Camco’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of June 30, 2011. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that Camco’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011. During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, there were no changes in Camco’s internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect Camco’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Reevaluation

In connection with the revision to the financial statements as described in this Amended Report, management reevaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that Camco’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011. In making this determination, management concluded that the changes to the financial statements were within the range of generally accepted accounting principles related to the concept of an estimable ALLL. Management’s assessment of certain qualitative and subjective adjustments to the ALLL were based upon interpretation and judgment of subjective factors and were not the result of ineffective disclosure controls.

PART II

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of their respective businesses or operations, Camco or its subsidiaries may be named as a plaintiff, a defendant, or a party to a legal proceeding or any of their respective properties may be subject to various pending and threatened legal proceedings and various actual and potential claims. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, Camco cannot state what the eventual outcome of any such matters will be; however, based on current knowledge and after consultation with legal counsel, management believes that these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity of Camco.

40

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

There are no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Corporation’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The risk factors described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Corporation. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Corporation or that management currently deems to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect the Corporation’s business, financial condition and / or operating results. Moreover, the Corporation undertakes no obligation and disclaims any intention to publish revised information or updates to forward looking statements contained in such risk factors or in any other statement made ay any time by the Corporation or any of its directors, officers, employees or other representatives, unless and until any such revisions or updates are expressly required to be disclosed by securities laws or regulations.

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) Not applicable

(b) Not applicable

(c) Not applicable

ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable

ITEM 4. (Removed and Reserved)

ITEM 5. Other Information

Not applicable

41

ITEM 6. Exhibits

Exhibit 3(i)	Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Camco Financial Corporation, as amended	Incorporated by reference to Camco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, Film no. 04668873 (“2003 Form 10-K), Exhibit 3(i)
Exhibit 3(ii)	2003 Amended and Restated By-Laws of Camco Financial Corporation	Incorporated by reference to Camco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, Exhibit 3(ii)
Exhibit 10	2011 Incentive Award Plan	Incorporated by reference to Camco’s 8-K filed on April 26, 2011
Exhibit 31(i)	Section 302 certification by Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31(ii)	Section 302 Certification by Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32(i)	Section 1350 certification by Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32(ii)	Section 1350 certification by Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
Exhibit 101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
Exhibit 101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

42

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: February 3, 2012	By:	/s/ James E. Huston
		James E. Huston
		Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 3, 2012	By:	/s/ John E. Kirksey
		John E. Kirksey
		Chief Financial Officer

43

EX-31.I

Exhibit 31(i)

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, James E. Huston, certify that

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q/A of Camco Financial Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 3, 2012	/s/ James E. Huston
	James E. Huston, Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.II

Exhibit 31(ii)

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, John E. Kirksey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q/A of Camco Financial Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 3, 2012	/s/ John E. Kirksey
	John E. Kirksey Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer)

EX-32.I

Exhibit 32(i)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Camco Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James E. Huston, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By:	/s/ James E. Huston
James E. Huston, Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.II

Exhibit 32(ii)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Camco Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John E. Kirksey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By:	/s/ John E. Kirksey
John E. Kirksey, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

Principles of Consolidation

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Principles of Consolidation [Abstract]

Principles of Consolidation

2. Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Camco and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Advantage Bank (“Advantage” or the “Bank”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

On March 31, 2011, Camco Financial Corporation dissolved Camco Title Agency, Inc. and sold certain of its assets to a third party. The balance sheet and results of operations of Camco Title are not material to the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, Camco Title’s operations resulted in net income of $15,000.

XML

Basis of Presentation

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Basis of Presentation and Critical Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Camco Financial Corporation (“Camco” or the “Corporation”) included in Camco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. However, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire year.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$ 13,074	$ 13,143
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions	29,308	15,971
Cash and cash equivalents	42,382	29,114
Securities available for sale, at market	10,921	30,768
Securities held to maturity, at cost	3,663	3,948
Loans held for sale - at lower of cost or fair value	3,699	2,208
Loans receivable - net	639,683	667,840
Office premises and equipment - net	9,389	9,928
Real estate acquired through foreclosure	14,216	10,096
Federal Home Loan Bank stock - at cost	9,888	29,888
Accrued interest receivable	3,164	3,521
Mortgage servicing rights - at lower of cost or market	3,979	3,841
Prepaid expenses and other assets	4,649	4,426
Cash surrender value of life insurance	19,739	19,388
Prepaid federal income taxes	554	0
Total assets	765,926	814,966
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deposits	631,647	651,816
Other Borrowings	11,715	11,530
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank	68,765	92,934
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance	488	2,413
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	8,816	10,170
Total liabilities	721,431	768,863
Commitments
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock - $1 par value; authorized 100,000 shares; no shares outstanding
Common stock - $1 par value; authorized 29,900,000 shares; 8,884,508 shares issued at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010	8,885	8,885
Unearned compensation	(47)	(94)
Additional paid-in capital	60,459	60,260
Retained earnings	(675)	136
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) net of related tax effects	(13)	1,030
Treasury stock -1,678,913 shares at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, at cost	(24,114)	(24,114)
Total stockholders' equity	44,495	46,103
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 765,926	$ 814,966

XML

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Abstract]
Taxes on unrealized holding gains on securities	$ (143)	$ 64	$ (103)	$ 99
Adjustment for realized gains included in net earnings	$ (441)	$ 0	$ (441)	$ 0

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss for the period	$ (811)	$ (3,970)
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Amortization of deferred loan origination fees	(159)	67
Amortization of premiums and discounts on investment and mortgage-backed securities - net	30	8
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights - net	72	546
Depreciation and amortization	668	628
Provision for losses on loans	2,810	6,117
Stock option expense	199	138
Deferred compensation	47	31
Provisions for losses on REO	259	192
Loss on sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure	285	30
Gain on sale of loans		(490)
(Gain) or loss on sale of investments and fixed assets	(1,280)	1
Loans originated for sale in the secondary market	(34,614)	(29,293)
Proceeds from sale of loans in the secondary market	33,123	28,589
Net increase in cash surrender value of life insurance	(351)	(351)
Increase (decrease) in cash due to changes in:
Accrued interest receivable	357	320
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(777)	(629)
Accrued interest and other liabilities	(818)	(949)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	(960)	985
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:
Principal repayments, maturities on securities held to maturity	282	195
Principal repayments, maturities on securities available for sale	4,971	17,842
Purchases of investment securities designated as available for sale	(12,615)
Purchases of investment securities designated as held to maturity		(828)
Proceeds from sale of investments	27,161
Redemption of FHLB Stock	20,000
Loan principal repayments	108,208	73,863
Loan disbursements and purchased loans	(90,452)	(100,079)
Proceeds from sale of office premises and equipment	4	10
Proceeds from sale of life insurance		160
Additions to office premises and equipment	(129)	(219)
Proceeds from sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure	2,876	1,521
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	60,306	(7,535)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Net decrease in deposits	(20,169)	(7,030)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings	42,317	87,606
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings	(66,301)	(76,848)
Decrease in advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance	(1,925)	(1,764)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(46,078)	1,964
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	13,268	(4,586)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	29,114	38,153
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	42,382	33,567
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest on deposits and borrowings	5,699	7,690
Income taxes paid	580
Transfers from loans to real estate acquired through foreclosure	$ 7,540	$ 2,682

XML

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition [Abstract]
Preferred stock, par value	$ 1	$ 1
Preferred stock, shares authorized	100,000	100,000
Preferred stock, shares outstanding
Common stock, par value	$ 1	$ 1
Common stock, shares authorized	29,900,000	29,900,000
Common stock, shares issued	8,884,508	8,884,508
Treasury stock, shares	1,678,913	1,678,913

XML

Document and Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Aug. 08, 2011
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	CAMCO FINANCIAL CORP
Entity Central Index Key	0000016614
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2011
Amendment Flag	true
Amendment Description	Amendment No. 1
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		7,205,595

XML

Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Interest and dividend income
Loans	$ 8,839	$ 9,281	$ 17,740	$ 18,561
Investment securities	84	495	439	1,073
Other interest-earning accounts	157	333	503	673
Total interest and dividend income	9,080	10,109	18,682	20,307
Interest Expense
Deposits	1,918	2,744	4,107	5,689
Borrowings	726	992	1,529	1,989
Total interest expense	2,644	3,736	5,636	7,678
Net interest income	6,436	6,373	13,046	12,629
Provision for losses on loans	1,797	5,212	2,810	6,117
Net interest income after provision for losses on loans	4,639	1,161	10,236	6,512
Other income
Late charges, rent and other	203	328	565	737
Loan servicing fees	298	320	605	637
Service charges and other fees on deposits	529	598	1,032	1,116
Gain (loss) on sale of loans	(92)	261		490
Mortgage servicing rights - net	(132)	(124)	139	(94)
Gain (loss) on sale of investments & fixed assets	2	(1)	1,280	(1)
Income on cash surrender value of life insurance	220	220	437	435
Total other income	1,028	1,602	4,058	3,320
General, administrative and other expenses
Employee compensation and benefits	3,153	3,269	6,531	6,654
Occupancy and equipment	691	743	1,452	1,485
Federal deposit insurance premiums and other insurance	494	591	1,097	1,094
Data processing	277	286	561	566
Advertising	96	89	182	170
Franchise taxes	178	269	348	534
Postage, supplies and office expenses	253	274	471	567
Travel and training	56	65	121	118
Professional services	320	462	702	784
Deposit and transaction processing expenses	200	185	367	378
Real estate owned and other expenses	825	409	1,655	831
Loan expenses	598	333	1,081	736
Total general, administrative and other expense	7,141	6,975	14,568	13,917
Loss before federal income taxes	(1,474)	(4,212)	(274)	(4,085)
Federal income taxes (benefit)	(11)	(113)	537	(115)
NET LOSS	$ (1,463)	$ (4,099)	$ (811)	$ (3,970)
LOSS PER SHARE
Basic	$ (0.20)	$ (0.57)	$ (0.11)	$ (0.55)
Diluted	$ (0.20)	$ (0.57)	$ (0.11)	$ (0.55)

XML

Stock Option Plans

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Stock Option Plans [Abstract]

Stock Option Plans

5. Stock Option Plans

The Corporation follows a fair-value based method for valuing stock-based compensation that measures compensation cost at the grant date based on the fair value of the award.

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the modified Black-Scholes options-pricing model. The following table details the fair value and assumptions used to value stock options as of the grant date that were granted during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:

		September 30,			September 30,
	2011			2010
Fair value, calculated	$	1.49		$	1.65
Exercise Price	$	2.14		$	2.51
Risk-free interest rate		3.58	%		3.61	%
Expected stock price volatility		57.30	%		51.62	%
Expected dividend yield		—			—
Expected Life		10 years			10 years

A summary of the status of the Corporation’s stock option plans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and changes during the periods ending on those dates is presented below:

		September 30,			September 30,		September 30,			September 30,
	Six Months ended June 30, 2011					Year ended December 31, 2010
	Shares			Weighted- average exercise price		Shares			Weighted- average exercise price
Outstanding at beginning of period		463,642		$	$5.84		260,833		$	10.59
Granted		161,538			2.14		260,729			2.51
Exercised		—			—		—
Forfeited		(15,597	)		3.06		(57,920	)		12.21
Expired		—			—		—			—
Outstanding at end of period		609,583		$	4.93		463,642		$	5.84
Options exercisable at period end		339,264		$	6.92		257,037		$	8.24
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year				$	1.49				$	1.65

The following information applies to options outstanding at June 30, 2011:

	September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
		Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices		Number Outstanding		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable		Weighted- Average Exercise Price
$1.90 - $2.51			475,746		8.8	$	2.39		209,263	$	2.44
$8.92			20,988		6.6		8.92		17,122		8.92
$11.36 - $14.16			56,974		4.1		13.44		56,974		13.44
$16.13 - $17.17			55,875		2.9		16.45		55,875		16.45
			609,583		7.8	$	4.93		339,264	$	6.92

XML

Earnings Per Share

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Earnings Per Share

4. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed based upon the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed including the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under outstanding stock options. The computations were as follows for the periods ending June 30, 2011 and 2010.

		September 30,			September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	For the six months ended June 30,						For the three months ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(In thousands, except per share information)
BASIC:
Net Loss	$	(811	)	$	(3,970	)	$	(1,463	)	$	(4,099	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		7,206			7,206			7,206			7,206
Basic loss per share	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.55	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.57	)
DILUTED:
Net Loss	$	(811	)	$	(3,970	)	$	(1,463	)	$	(4,099	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		7,206			7,206			7,206			7,206
Dilutive effect of stock options		—			—			—			—
Total common shares and dilutive potential common shares		7,206			7,206			7,206			7,206
Diluted loss per share	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.55	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.57	)

Anti-dilutive options to purchase 604,583 and 480,092 shares of common stock with respective weighted-average exercise prices of $4.97 and $13.86 were outstanding at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, but were excluded from the computation of common share equivalents for each of the six months ended, because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares.

Anti-dilutive options to purchase 609,583 and 480,092 shares of common stock with respective weighted-average exercise prices of $4.93 and $13.86 were outstanding at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, but were excluded from the computation of common share equivalents for each of the three month periods, because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares.

XML

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Recent Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

8. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

FASB ASU 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, which provides additional guidance to help creditors in determining whether a creditor has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties for purposes of determining whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in this update are effective for the Corporation beginning in the quarter ended September 30, 2011 and are to be applied retrospectively to January 1, 2011. In addition, the modification disclosures described in ASU 2010-20, which were subsequently deferred by ASU 2011-01, Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings, will be effective on a prospective basis beginning in the quarter ended September 30, 2011. The Corporation has not completed an evaluation of the impact of ASU 2011-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

The FASB has issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. This ASU represents the converged guidance of the FASB and the IASB (the Boards) on fair value measurement. The collective efforts of the Boards and their staffs, reflected in ASU 2011-04, have resulted in common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements, including a consistent meaning of the term “fair value.” The Boards have concluded the common requirements will result in greater comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments to the Codification in this ASU are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public entities is not permitted. The impact of adoption of this ASU is not expected to be material.

FASB ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, which provides entities with the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income, along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. Regardless of whether an entity chooses to present comprehensive income in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements, the entity is required to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. This update should be applied retrospectively effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. We anticipate this statement will be adopted with our 2012 annual financial statements.

XML

Fair Value

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Fair Value [Abstract]

Fair Value

6. Fair Value

The carrying value of certain financial assets and liabilities is impacted by the application of fair value measurements, either directly or indirectly. In certain cases, an asset or liability is measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis, such as available-for-sale investment securities. In other cases, management must rely on estimates or judgments to determine if an asset or liability not measured at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or whether a valuation reserve should be established. Given the inherent volatility, the use of fair value measurements may have a significant impact on the carrying value of assets or liabilities, or result in material changes to the financial statements, from period to period.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: The carrying amount reported in the consolidated statements of financial condition for cash and cash equivalents is deemed to approximate fair value.

Investment Securities: Fair value for investment securities is based on quoted market prices and dealer quotes.

Loans Held for Sale: Fair value for loans held for sale is the contracted sales price of loans committed for delivery, which is determined on the date of sale commitment.

Loans Receivable: The loan portfolio has been segregated into categories with similar characteristics, such as one- to four-family residential real estate, multi-family residential real estate, installment and other. These loan categories were further delineated into fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans. The fair values for the resultant loan categories were computed via discounted cash flow analysis, using current interest rates offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock: The carrying amount presented in the consolidated statements of financial condition is deemed to approximate fair value.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable: The carrying value for accrued interest approximates fair value.

Deposits: The fair values of deposits with no stated maturity, such as money market demand deposits, savings and NOW accounts have been analyzed by management and assigned estimated maturities and cash flows which are then discounted to derive a value. The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank: The fair value of these advances is estimated using the rates currently offered for similar advances of similar remaining maturities or, when available, quoted market prices.

Repurchase Agreements: The fair value of repurchase agreements is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using rates currently offered for similar maturities.

Subordinated Debentures: The fair value of subordinated debentures is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using rates currently offered for smaller maturities.

Advances by Borrowers for Taxes and Insurance: The carrying amount of advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance is deemed to approximate fair value.

Based on the foregoing methods and assumptions, the carrying value and fair value of the Corporation’s financial instruments are as follows:

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying value		Fair value		Carrying value		Fair value
	(In thousands)
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	42,382	$	42,382	$	29,114	$	29,114
Investment securities available for sale		10,921		10,921		30,768		30,768
Investment securities held to maturity		3,663		3,712		3,948		3,993
Loans held for sale		3,699		3,775		2,208		2,254
Loans receivable		639,683		641,459		667,840		643,646
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		9,888		9,888		29,888		29,888
Accrued interest receivable		3,164		3,164		3,521		3,521
Financial liabilities
Deposits	$	631,647	$	619,677	$	651,816	$	642,893
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		68,765		73,375		92,934		97,711
Repurchase agreements		6,715		6,715		6,530		6,530
Subordinated debentures		5,000		4,883		5,000		4,839
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance		488		488		2,413		2,413
Accrued interest payable		1,582		1,582		1,646		1,646

Listed below are three levels of inputs that Camco uses to measure fair value:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Level 1 inputs for assets or liabilities that are not actively traded. Also consists of an observable market price for a similar asset or liability. This includes the use of “matrix pricing” used to value debt securities absent the exclusive use of quoted prices.

Level 3: Consists of unobservable inputs that are used to measure fair value when observable market inputs are not available. This could include the use of internally developed models, financial forecasting, etc.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability between market participants at the balance sheet date. When possible, the Corporation looks to active and observable markets to price identical assets or liabilities. When identical assets and liabilities are not traded in active markets, the Corporation looks to observable market data for similar assets and liabilities. However, certain assets and liabilities are not traded in observable markets and Camco must use other valuation methods to develop a fair value. The fair value of impaired loans is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, which is estimated through third party appraisals or internal estimates of collateral values.

The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis:

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
(in thousands)	Balance		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
June 30, 2011
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government sponsored enterprises	$	9,076	$	—		9,076	$	—
Corporate equity securities		95		—		52		43
Mortgage-backed securities		1,750		—		1,750		—
December 31, 2010
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government sponsored enterprises	$	2,065	$	—	$	2,065	$	—
Corporate equity securities		98		—		55		43
Mortgage-backed securities		28,605		—		28,605		—
The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis:
			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
(in thousands)	Balance		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
June 30, 2011
Impaired loans	$	20,432					$	20,432
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		14,216						14,216
December 31, 2010
Impaired loans	$	20,518					$	20,518
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		10,096						10,096

Impaired loans are measured and reported at fair value when management believes collection of contractual interest and principal payments is doubtful. Management’s determination of the fair value for these loans represents the estimated net proceeds to be received from the sale of the collateral based on observable market prices and market value provided by independent, licensed or certified appraisers.

Fair value for real estate acquired through foreclosure is generally determined by obtaining recent appraisals on the properties. Other types of valuing include broker price opinions and valuations pertaining to the current and anticipated deterioration in the regional economy and real estate market, as evidenced by, among other things, changes in the local population, unemployment rates, increasing vacancy rates, borrower delinquencies, declining property values and rental prices, differences between foreclosure appraisals and real estate owned sales prices, and an increase in concessions and other forms of discounting or other items approved by our asset classification committee. The fair value under such appraisals is determined by using one of the following valuation techniques: income, cost or comparable sales. The fair value is then reduced by management’s estimate for the direct costs expected to be incurred in order to sell the property. Holding costs or maintenance expenses are recorded as period costs when occurred and are not included in the fair value estimate.

XML

Allowance for Loan Losses

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Allowance for Loan Losses [Abstract]

Allowance for Loan Losses

7. Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established through a provision which is charged to expense and represents management’s best estimate of probable losses that could be incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance is necessary to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The Corporation’s allowance for possible loan loss methodology is based on historical loss experience by type of credit and internal risk grade, specific homogeneous risk pools and specific loss allocations, with adjustments for current events and conditions. The provision for possible loan losses reflects loan quality trends, including the levels of and trends related to non-accrual loans, past due loans, potential problem loans, criticized loans and net charge-offs or recoveries, among other factors. The amount of the provision reflects not only the necessary allowance for possible loan losses related to newly identified criticized loans, but it also reflects actions taken related to other loans including, among other things, any necessary increases or decreases in required allowances for specific loans or loan pools.

The current level of the allowance is directionally consistent with classified assets, non-accrual loans and delinquency. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of the allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond the Corporation’s control, including, among other things, the performance of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, the economy, changes in interest rates and comments of the regulatory authorities toward loan classifications.

The Corporation’s allowance for possible loan losses consists of three elements: (i) specific valuation allowances on probable losses on specific loans; (ii) historical valuation allowances based on historical loan loss experience for similar loans with similar characteristics and trends, adjusted, as necessary, to reflect the impact of current conditions; and (iii) general valuation allowances based on general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to the Corporation.

Loans identified as losses by management, internal loan review and/or bank examiners are charged-off. Furthermore, consumer loan accounts are charged-off automatically based on regulatory requirements.

Change in the allowance for loan losses and loan balances as of June 30, 2011 are summarized as follows:

		Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,
(in thousands)	Construction			Consumer			Multi- Family			Land, Farm & Ag Loans			Residential			Commercial  & Non- Residential			Commercial and Industrial			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance December 31, 2010	$	166		$	246		$	2,860		$	849		$	8,050		$	3,638		$	1,061		$	16,870
Charge-offs		—			(57	)		(33	)		(107	)		(1,447	)		(579	)		(9	)		(2,232	)
Recoveries		—			2			116			204			383			109			89			903
Provision (1)		(141	)		(77	)		(10	)		(318	)		1,988			1,934			(566	)		2,810
Ending balance June 30, 2011	$	25		$	114		$	2,933		$	628		$	8,974			5,102		$	575		$	18,351
Ending balance
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	666		$	—		$	1,034		$	2,661		$	33		$	4,394
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	25		$	114		$	2,267		$	628			7,940		$	2,441		$	542		$	13,957
Portfolio balances:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	44,501		$	3,506		$	73,645		$	13,536		$	332,875		$	138,606		$	32,282		$	638,951
Individually evaluated for impairment
With no related allowance		—			—			24			1,037			397			893			—			2,351
With related allowance		—			—			4,032			183			5,342			8,126			397			18,081
Ending balance	$	44,501		$	3,506		$	77,701		$	14,757		$	338,614		$	147,625		$	32,679		$	659,383

(1) Reclassifications of portfolio balance between Commercial and Industrial and Commercial & Non-Residential created a portion of the change in provision for the current period.

Change in the allowance for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2010 and loan balances as of December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:

		Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,			Septr 30,
(in thousands)	Construction			Consumer			Multi- Family			Land, Farm & Ag Loans			Residential			Commercial  & Non- Residential			Commercial and Industrial			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance January 1, 2010	$	338		$	98		$	731		$	628		$	10,519		$	3,148		$	637		$	16,099
Charge-offs		(482	)		(28	)		(1,535	)		(2,283	)		(7,530	)		(3,688	)		(3,399	)		(18,945	)
Recoveries		39			9			103			247			490			157			211			1,256
Provision		271			167			3,561			2,257			4,571			4,021			3,612			18,460
Ending balance December 31, 2010	$	166		$	246		$	2,860		$	849		$	8,050		$	3,638		$	1,061		$	16,870
Ending balance
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	256		$	1,171		$	170		$	1,597
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	166		$	246		$	2,860		$	849		$	7,794		$	2,467		$	891		$	15,273
Portfolio balances:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	26,530		$	3,828		$	71,162		$	10,905		$	369,755		$	155,326		$	27,607		$	665,113
Individually evaluated for impairment
With no related allowance		—			—			3,180			1,549			3,122			4,122			706			12,679
With related allowance		—			—			—			—			2,706			4,503			630			7,839
Ending balance	$	26,530		$	3,828		$	74,342		$	12,454		$	375,583		$	163,951		$	28,943		$	685,631

Non-accrual and Past Due Loans. Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when, the loan is more than three payments past due as well as when required by regulatory provisions. Loans may be placed on non-accrual status regardless of whether or not such loans are considered past due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest income is recognized when the loan is returned to accrual status and all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current for a minimum of six months or future payments are reasonably assured.

The following table details non-accrual loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

		September 30,		September 30,
(in thousands)	Non-Accrual June 30, 2011		Non-Accrual December 31, 2010
Construction	$	22	$	1,791
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		381		—
Residential		18,810		21,498
Commercial		6,207		7,717
Consumer		86		39
Commercial and industrial		68		706
Multi Family		495		2,028
Total	$	26,069	$	33,779

An age analysis of past due loans, segregated by class of loans were as follows:

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
June 30, 2011 (in thousands)	Loans 30- 59 Days Past Due		Loans 60 - 89 or More Days Past Due		Loans 90+ Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Accruing Loans 90 Days Past Due
Construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	0	$	44,501	$	44,501	$	—
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		73		—		164		237		14,520		14,757		—
Residential / prime		1,425		319		4,778		6,522		249,900		256,422		—
Residential / subprime		5,783		846		9,360		15,989		66,203		82,192		—
Commercial		—		—		4,605		4,605		143,020		147,625		—
Consumer		2		39		34		75		3,431		3,506
Commercial and industrial		16		—		68		84		32,595		32,679		—
Multi Family		—		—		495		495		77,206		77,701		—
Total	$	7,299	$	1,204	$	19,504	$	28,007	$	631,376	$	659,383	$	—
December 31, 2010 (in thousands)	Loans 30- 59 Days Past Due		Loans 60 - 89 or More Days Past Due		Loans 90+ Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Accruing Loans 90 Days Past Due
Construction	$	75	$	—	$	1,057	$	1,132	$	25,398	$	26,530	$	—
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		—		—		—		—		12,454		12,454		—
Residential / prime		624		343		5,366		6,333		280,266		286,599		—
Residential / subprime		5,077		1,451		11,119		17,647		71,337		88,984		—
Commercial		—		2,766		3,301		6,067		157,884		163,951		—
Consumer		36		3		18		57		3,771		3,828
Commercial and industrial		85		—		706		791		28,152		28,943		—
Multi Family		85		—		1,685		1,770		72,572		74,342		—
Total	$	5,982	$	4,563	$	23,252	$	33,797	$	651,834	$	685,631	$	—

Although we believe that the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2011 is adequate to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio at that date based upon the available facts and circumstances, there can be no assurance that additions to the allowance for loan losses will not be necessary in future periods, which could adversely affect our results of operations. Unemployment rates in our markets and Ohio in general, are close to the National average, but we are still experiencing some decline in values of residential real estate. Ohio in general has not experienced significant increases in home values over the past five years like many regions in the U.S., which should comparatively mitigate losses on loans. Nonetheless, these factors, compounded by a very uncertain national economic outlook, may continue to increase the level of future losses beyond our current expectations.

Impaired loans. Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable Advantage will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled principal and interest payments. Impairment is evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of a similar nature and on an individual loan basis for other larger commercial credits. If a loan is impaired, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, of collateral if payment is expected solely from the collateral or at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the loan’s fair sale value. Interest payments on impaired loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount is reasonably assured in which case interest is recognized on an accrual basis. Impaired loans or portions of loans are charged off when deemed uncollectible.

We have included the following information with respect to impairment measurements relating to collateral-dependent loans for better understanding of our process and procedures relating to fair value of financial instruments:

• Based on policy, a loan is typically deemed impaired (non-performing) once it has gone over three payments or 90 days delinquent. Our management of the troubled credit will vary as will the timing of valuations, loan loss provision and charge offs based on a multitude of factors such as, cash flow of the business/borrower, responsiveness of the borrower, communication with the commercial banker, property inspections, property deterioration, and delinquency. Typically, a nonperforming, non-homogeneous collateral dependent loan will be valued and adjusted (if needed) within a time frame as short as 30 days or as many as 180 days after determination of impairment. If impaired, the collateral is then evaluated and an updated appraisal is most typically ordered. Upon receipt of an appraisal or other valuation, we complete an analysis to determine if the impaired loan requires a specific reserve or to be charged down to estimated net realizable value. The time frame may be as short as 30 days or as much as 180 days, when an appraisal is ordered.

• Camco’s credit risk management process consistently monitors key performance metrics across both the performing and non-performing assets to identify any further degradation of credit quality. Additionally, impaired credits are monitored in weekly loan committee asset quality discussions, monthly Asset Classification Committee meetings and quarterly loan loss reserve reviews. Strategy documents and exposure projections are completed on a monthly basis to ensure that the current status of the troubled asset is clearly understood and reported.

• The Asset Classification Committee oversees the management of all impaired loans and any subsequent loss provision or charge off that is considered. When a loan is deemed impaired, the valuation is obtained to determine any existing loss that may be present as of the valuation date. Policy dictates that any differences from fair market value, less costs to sell, are to be recognized as loss during the current period (loan loss provision or charge off). Any deviations from this policy will be identified by amount and contributing reasons for the policy departure during our quarterly reporting process.

• Camco’s policies dictate that an impaired loan subject to partial charge off will remain in a nonperforming status until it is brought current. Typically, this occurs when a loan is paid current and completes a period of on-time payments that demonstrate that the loan can perform and/or there is some certainty payments will continue. Camco monitors through various system reports any loan whose terms have been modified. These reports identify troubled debt restructures, modifications, and renewals.

• When circumstances do not allow for an updated appraisal or Camco determines that an appraisal is not needed, the underlying collateral’s fair market value is estimated in the following ways:

• Camco’s personnel property inspections combined with original appraisal review

• Broker price opinions

• Various on-line fair market value estimation programs (i.e. Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, etc).

Impaired loans are set forth in the following table:

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
June 30, 2011 (in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		1,037		1,037		—		1,095		23
Residential		397		1,181		—		398		—
Commercial		893		2,762		—		901		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—
Multi Family		24		253		—		66		—
Total	$	2,351	$	5,233	$	—	$	2,460	$	23
With a related specific allowance recorded:
Construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		183		183		16		165		22
Residential		5,343		6,100		1,018		5,624		63
Commercial		8,126		8,345		2,661		8,149		106
Consumer		—
Commercial and industrial		397		397		33		406		10
Multi Family		4,032		4,755		666		4,046		95
Total	$	18,081	$	19,780	$	4,394	$	18,390	$	296

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
December 31, 2010 (in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Construction	$	1,549	$	5,558	$	—	$	3,389	$	—
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		—		—		—		—		—
Residential		3,122		4,854		—		3,866		19
Commercial		4,122		8,239		—		5,765		6
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial		706		1,208		—		1,035		11
Multi Family		3,180		5,166		—		3,786		3
Total	$	12,679	$	25,025	$	—	$	17,841	$	39
With a related specific allowance recorded:
Construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		—		—		—		—		—
Residential		2,706		3,306		256		3,078		—
Commercial		4,503		4,521		1,171		4,589		131
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial		630		630		170		383		—
Multi Family		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	7,839	$	8,457	$	1,597	$	8,050	$	131

The Corporation categorizes loans and leases into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Corporation analyzes loans and leases individually by classifying the loans and leases as to credit risk. The loans monitored utilizing the risk categories listed below refer to commercial, commercial and industrial, construction, land, farmland and agriculture loans. All non-homogeneous loans are monitored through delinquency reporting. This analysis is performed on a quarterly basis. The Corporation uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

• Uncriticized Assets

Uncriticized assets exhibit no material problems, credit deficiencies or payment problems. These assets generally are well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the value of the asset or underlying collateral. Such credits are graded as follows: Excellent (1), Good (2) or Satisfactory (3).

• Watch (Grade 4)

Watch rated credits are of acceptable credit quality, but exhibit one or more characteristics which merit closer monitoring or enhanced structure. Such characteristics include higher leverage, lower debt service coverage, industry issues or a construction loan without preleasing commitments (generally multifamily projects).

• Special Mention Assets (Grade 5)

Special Mention Assets have potential weaknesses or pose financial risk that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Bank’s credit position at some future date. Special Mention Assets are not adversely classified and do not expose the Bank to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

• Substandard Assets (Grade 6)

An asset classified Substandard is protected inadequately by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor, or by the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. The possibility that liquidation would not be timely requires a substandard classification even if there is little likelihood of total loss.

Assets classified as Substandard may exhibit one or more of the following weaknesses:

• The primary source of repayment is gone or severely impaired and the Bank may have to rely upon a secondary source.

• Loss does not seem likely but sufficient problems have arisen to cause the Bank to go to abnormal lengths to protect its position in order to maintain a high probability of repayment.

• Obligors are unable to generate enough cash flow for debt reduction.

• Collateral has deteriorated.

• The collateral is not subject to adequate inspection and verification of value (if the collateral is expected to be the source of repayment).

• Flaws in documentation leave the Bank in a subordinated or unsecured position if the collateral is needed for the repayment of the loan.

• For assets secured by real estate, the appraisal does not conform to FDIC appraisal standards or the assumptions underlying the appraisal are demonstrably incorrect.

• Doubtful Assets (Grade 7)

An asset classified Doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified as Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

• Loss Assets (Grade 8)

An asset, or portion thereof, classified loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that its continuance on the books is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value; rather, it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off an essentially worthless asset (or portion thereof), even through partial recovery may occur in the future.

Loans and leases not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans and leases.

Based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of non-homogenous loans and leases is as follows:

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	(Dollars in Thousands)
June 30, 2011	Pass		Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Total
Construction	$	27,632	$	16,847	$	—	$	22	$	44,501
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		12,781		182		—		1,794		14,757
Commercial		104,595		20,285		1,686		21,059		147,625
Commercial and industrial		26,327		5,649		129		584		32,679
Multi Family*		57,171		13,822		1,989		4,719		77,701
Total	$	228,506	$	56,775	$	3,803	$	28,179	$	317,263
December 31, 2010	Pass		Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Total
Construction	$	12,743	$	10,514	$	329	$	2,944	$	26,530
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans		11,822		632		—		—		12,454
Commercial		124,478		11,982		6,158		21,333		163,951
Commercial and industrial		22,488		4,416		165		1,874		28,943
Multi Family*		66,074		1,861		3,227		3,180		74,342
Total	$	237,605	$	29,405	$	9,879	$	29,331	$	306,220

Homogeneous loans are monitored at 60+ days delinquent. See the above schedule related to change in allowance for loans which includes all class of loans including the loans related to residential and consumer.

* The increase in Multi Family is principally due to multi-family construction loans that have not yet stabilized.

XML

Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statement

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statement [Abstract]

Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statement

9. Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statement

Subsequent to the Corporation’s filing of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Corporation and Advantage received notice from Advantage’s regulators, the FDIC and Ohio Department of Financial Institutions (“ODFI”), that Advantage must restate its Call Report previously filed with the FDIC for the quarters ended June 30 and September 30, 2011. As a result, Camco also had to amend its Y9C and Y9LP as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2011. None of the amounts as of December 31, 2010 in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been restated.

		September 30,			September 30,		September 30,
As a result of the restatement, the following line items were adjusted:	Restated			Previously Reported		Effect of Change
Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2011 (unaudited):
Loans receivable – net	$	639,683		$	641,283	$	(1,600	)
Total assets		765,926			767,526		(1,600	)
Retained earnings		(675	)		925		(1,600	)
Total stockholders’ equity		44,495			46,095		(1,600	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		765,926			767,526		(1,600	)
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) Three Months ended June 30, 2011
Provision for losses on loans	$	1,797		$	197	$	1,600
Net interest income after provision for losses on loans		4,639			6,239		1,600
Earnings (Loss) before federal income tax expenses (benefit)		(1,474	)		126		(1,600	)
Net earnings (loss)		(1,463	)		137		(1,600	)
Comprehensive income (loss)		(1,442	)		158		(1,600	)
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic		(.20	)		.02		(.22	)
Diluted		(.20	)		.02		(.22	)
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) Six Months ended June 30, 2011
Provision for losses on loans	$	2,810		$	1,210	$	1,600
Net interest income after provision for losses on loans		10,236			11,836		1,600
Earnings (loss) before federal income tax expenses (benefit)		(274	)		1,326		(1,600	)
Net earnings (loss)		(811	)		789		(1,600	)
Comprehensive income (loss)		(1,044	)		556		(1,600	)
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic		(.11	)		11		(.22	)
Diluted		(.11	)		.11		(.22	)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Net earnings (loss) for the period	$	(811	)	$	789	$	(1,600	)
Provision for losses on loans		2,810			1,210		1,600

8. Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statement (continued)

		September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
As a result of the restatement, the following line items were adjusted:	Restated			Previously Reported			Effect of Change
Nonaccrual and delinquent loans
Allowance for loan losses	$	18,351		$	16,751		$	1,600
Non-performing assets to total assets		3.95	%		3.94	%		.01	%
ALLL as a percent of nonperforming loans		5.26	%		5.25	%		0.01	%
ALLL as a percent of nonperforming loans		70.4	%		64.3	%		6.10	%
Allowance for loan losses by loan category
Construction	$	25		$	23		$	2
Consumer		114			100			14
Multi-Family		2,933			2,632			301
Land, Farm & Ag Loans		628			744			(116	)
Residential		8,974			7,967			1,007
Commercial & Non-Residential		5,102			4,782			320
Commercial and Industrial		575			503			72
Total		18,351			16,751			1,600
Collectively evaluated for impairment
Construction	$	25		$	23		$	2
Consumer		114			100			14
Multi-Family		2,267			1,966			301
Land, Farm & Ag Loans		628			744			(116	)
Residential		7,940			6,933			1,007
Commercial & Non-Residential		2,441			2,121			320
Commercial and Industrial		542			470			72
Total		13,957			12,357			1,600
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Carrying amount	$	639,683		$	641,283		$	(1,600	)
Fair value		641,459			643,059			(1,600	)
Regulatory Capital – Camco Financial Corporation
Total capital to risk-weighted assets		9.33	%		9.57	%		(.24	)%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		8.06	%		8.30	%		(.24	)%
Tier 1 leverage to average assets		6.28	%		6.49	%		(.21	)%
Regulatory Capital – Advantage Bank
Total capital to risk-weighted assets		8.88	%		9.12	%		(.24	)%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		7.61	%		7.85	%		(.24	)%
Tier 1 leverage to average assets		5.94	%		6.14	%		(.20	)%
Average Balances, Yield, Rate and Volume Data
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
Noninterest-earning assets	$	67,405		$	67,805		$	(400	)
Total average assets		780,342			780,742			(400	)
Total average shareholders’ equity		45,613			46,013			(400	)
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		780,342			780,742			(400	)

		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
As a result of the restatement, the following line items were adjusted:	Restated		Previously Reported		Effect of Change
Average Balances, Yield, Rate and Volume Data
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Noninterest-earning assets	$	75,067	$	75,257	$	(190	)
Total average assets		795,613		795,803		(190	)
Total average shareholders’ equity		45,875		46,065		(190	)
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		795,613		795,803		(190	)
See Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further discussion on the “Provisions for Losses on Loans”.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Abstract]
Net loss	$ (1,463)	$ (4,099)	$ (811)	$ (3,970)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized holding gains on securities during the period, net of tax effects of $(103) and $99, $(143) and $64 for the respective periods	21	125	1,043	193
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in net earnings, net of taxes of $(441) and $0 in 2011 and 2010, respectively			(1,276)
Comprehensive loss	$ (1,442)	$ (3,974)	$ (1,044)	$ (3,777)

XML

Critical Accounting Policies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Basis of Presentation and Critical Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Critical Accounting Policies

3. Critical Accounting Policies

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” as well as disclosures found elsewhere in this quarterly report, are based upon Camco’s consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with US GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires Camco to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is critical in the preparation of financial statements. These factors include, among other things, whether the estimates are significant to the financial statements, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other information including third parties or available prices, and sensitivity of the estimates to changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be utilized under US GAAP.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of mortgage servicing rights and the valuation of deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

We believe the accounting estimates related to the allowance for loan losses, the capitalization, amortization, and valuation of mortgage servicing rights, deferred income taxes and other real estate are “critical accounting estimates” because: (1) the estimates are highly susceptible to change from period to period because they require us to make assumptions concerning the changes in the types and volumes of the portfolios, rates of future prepayments, and anticipated economic conditions, and (2) the impact of recognizing an impairment or loan loss could have a material effect on Camco’s assets reported on the balance sheet as well as its net earnings.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses reflect management’s evaluation of credit risk after careful consideration of all information available to management. In developing this assessment, management must rely on estimates and exercise judgment regarding matters where the ultimate outcome is unknown such as economic factors, developments affecting companies in specific industries and issues with respect to single borrowers. Depending on changes in circumstances, future assessments of credit risk may yield materially different results, which may require an increase or a decrease in the allowance for loan losses.

Each quarter, management analyzes the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses based on review of the loans in the portfolio along with an analysis of external factors (including current economy, unemployment rates, housing price depreciation, etc.) and historical delinquency and loss trends. The allowance is developed through specific components: 1) the specific allowance for loans subject to individual analysis, 2) the allowance for classified loans not otherwise subject to individual analysis and 3) the allowance for non-classified loans (primarily homogenous).

Classified loans with indication or acknowledgment of deterioration are subject to individual analysis. Loan classifications are those used by regulators consisting of Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful and Loss. In evaluating these loans for impairment, the measure of expected loss is based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, a loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. All other classified assets and non-classified assets are combined with the homogenous loan pools and segregated into collateral codes. Loss rate factors are developed for each collateral code which is used to estimate losses and determine an allowance. The loss factors for each code are derived from historical delinquency, classification, and charge-off rates and adjusted for economic factors and an estimated loss scenario. While the Corporation strives to reflect all known risk factors in its evaluations, these evaluations are by their nature imprecise and based in part on factors beyond the Bank’s control.

The allowance is reviewed by management to determine whether the amount is considered adequate to absorb probable, incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is an estimate based on management’s current judgment about the credit quality of the loan portfolio. This evaluation includes specific loss estimates on certain individually reviewed loans, statistical loss estimates for collateral codes that are based on historical loss experience, and general loss estimates that are based upon the size, quality, and concentration characteristics of the various loan portfolios, adverse situations that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay, and current economic and industry conditions. Also considered as part of that judgment is a review of the Bank’s trends in delinquencies and loan losses, as well as trends in delinquencies and losses for the region and nationally, and economic factors. While the Corporation strives to reflect all known risk factors in its evaluations, these evaluations are by their nature imprecise and based in part on factors beyond the Bank’s control.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

To determine the fair value of its mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) each reporting quarter, the Corporation provides information to a third party valuation firm, representing loan information in each pooling period accompanied by escrow amounts. The third party then evaluates the possible impairment of MSRs as described below.

MSRs are recognized as separate assets or liabilities when loans are sold with servicing retained. A pooling methodology, in which loans with similar characteristics are “pooled” together, is applied for valuation purposes. Once pooled, each grouping of loans is evaluated on a discounted earnings basis to determine the present value of future earnings that the Bank could expect to realize from the portfolio. Earnings are projected from a variety of sources including loan service fees, net interest earned on escrow balances, miscellaneous income and costs to service the loans. The present value of future earnings is the estimated fair value for the pool, calculated using consensus assumptions that a third party purchaser would utilize in evaluating a potential acquisition of the MSRs.

Events that may significantly affect the estimates used are changes in interest rates and the related impact on mortgage loan prepayment speeds and the payment performance of the underlying loans. The interest rate for net interest earned on escrow balances, which is supplied by management, takes into consideration the investment portfolio average yield as well as current short duration investment yields. Management believes this methodology provides a reasonable estimate. Mortgage loan prepayment speeds are calculated by the third party provider utilizing the Economic Outlook as published by the Office of Chief Economist of Freddie Mac in estimating prepayment speeds and provides a specific scenario with each evaluation. Based on the assumptions discussed, pre-tax projections are prepared for each pool of loans serviced. These earnings figures approximate the cash flow that could be received from the servicing portfolio. Valuation results are presented quarterly to management. At that time, management reviews the information and MSRs are marked to lower of amortized cost or fair value for the current quarter.

Federal Income Taxes

Camco recognizes expense for federal income taxes currently payable as well as for deferred federal taxes for estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets. Realization of a deferred tax asset is dependent upon generating sufficient taxable income in the carry forward periods to cover net operating losses generated by the reversal of temporary differences. A valuation allowance is provided by way of a charge to income tax expense if it is determined that it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. If different assumptions and conditions were to prevail, the valuation allowance may not be adequate to absorb unrealized deferred taxes and the amount of income taxes payable may need to be adjusted by way of a charge or credit to expense.

Income tax returns are subject to audit by the IRS. Income tax expense for current and prior periods is subject to adjustment based upon the outcome of such audits. During 2011, the IRS began an examination of the Company’s tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2009. Accrual of income taxes payable and valuation allowances against deferred tax assets are estimates subject to change based upon the outcome of future events.

Other Real Estate

Assets acquired through or instead of foreclosure, primarily other real estate owned, are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. New real estate appraisals are generally obtained at the time of foreclosure and are used to establish fair value. If fair value declines, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Estimating the initial and ongoing fair value of these properties involves a number of factors and judgments including holding time, costs to complete, holding costs, discount rate, absorption and other factors.