XML 20 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.1
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT - NET
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2022
Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]  
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT - NET PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT - NET
Property and equipment consisted of the following as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021:
(in thousands)March 31,
2022
December 31,
2021
Leasehold improvements$30,627 $27,137 
Furniture and fixtures17,912 15,276 
Internal-use software16,403 14,453 
Machinery and equipment879 780 
Computers and equipment1,313 1,236 
67,134 58,882 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization(24,198)(20,927)
$42,936 $37,955 
Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 was $3.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively, recognized in selling, general, and administrative expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. There were no assets disposed of in the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, unamortized capitalized internal-use software costs were $11.8 million and $10.6 million, respectively.
Geographic Information
The following table summarizes our long-lived assets by geographic area, which consist of property and equipment, net. No individual foreign country represented in excess of 10% of total long-lived assets balance as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021:
(in thousands)March 31,
2022
December 31,
2021
Long-lived assets:
United States$38,798 $33,384 
International4,138 4,571 
$42,936 $37,955 
As of March 31, 2022, a majority of our retail stores around the world remained open, while certain locations in China were temporarily closed based on local government and public health authority guidance in that market as a result of COVID-19. No retail stores have permanently closed to date. Temporary closures of stores as a result of COVID‐19 were considered to be a qualitative indicator of impairment and we performed an assessment of recoverability by asset group for long-lived assets. As a result of the analysis, no impairment charge was considered necessary.