10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017

or

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________________ to ______________________.

Commission File Number 001-37656

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	47-4452789
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
organization)

601 West 26th Street, 9th Floor
New York, New York 10001

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(646) 564-2577

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐      Accelerated filer ☒

Non-accelerated filer ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)   Smaller reporting company ☐Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of November 2, 2017, the registrant had63,151,870 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

		Page
	PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	4
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	32
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	37
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	38
	PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	39
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	40
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	40
Item 5.	Other Information	41
Item 6.	Exhibits	41

2

Forward-Looking Statements

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q (this “Quarterly Report”), including the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We use words such as “future,” “seek,” “could,” “can,” “predict,” “believe,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “estimate,” “potential,” “project” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements include, among others, those concerning our expected financial performance and strategic and operational plans, as well as all assumptions, expectations, predictions, intentions or beliefs about future events.  You are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that a number of risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.  Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to the following: (i) risks and uncertainties discussed in the reports that the Company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”); (ii) general economic, market or business conditions; (iii) the Company’s ability to identify suitable targets for acquisitions and to obtain financing for such acquisitions on commercially reasonable terms; (iv) the Company’s ability to timely achieve the anticipated results of recent acquisitions and any potential future acquisitions; (v) the Company’s ability to successfully integrate acquisitions into its ongoing business; (vi) the potential impact of the consummation of recent acquisitions or any potential future acquisitions on the Company’s relationships, including with employees, licensees, customers and competitors; (vii) the Company’s ability to achieve and/or manage growth and to meet target metrics associated with such growth; (viii) the Company’s ability to successfully attract new brands and to identify suitable licensees for its existing and newly acquired brands; (ix) the Company’s substantial level of indebtedness, including the possibility that such indebtedness and related restrictive covenants may adversely affect the Company’s future cash flows, results of operations and financial condition and decrease its operating flexibility; (x) the Company’s ability to achieve its guidance; (xi) continued market acceptance of the Company’s brands; (xii) changes in the Company’s competitive position or competitive actions by other companies; (xiii) licensees’ ability to fulfill their financial obligations to the Company; (xiv) concentrations of the Company’s licensing revenues with a limited number of licensees and retail partners; and (xv) other circumstances beyond the Company’s control.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and are based on current expectation and assumptions.  You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statement.  We are not under any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information, except to the extent required by applicable securities laws.  If we do update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect to such or other forward-looking statements.

Where You Can Find Other Information

Our corporate website address is www.sequentialbrandsgroup.com.  The information contained on our website is not part of this Quarterly Report.  We file our annual, quarterly and current reports and other information with the SEC.  These reports, and any amendments to these reports, are made available on our website and can be viewed and downloaded free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with or furnished to the SEC.  The public may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549.  The public may also obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.  In addition, the SEC maintains an internet site that contains annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, which is available at www.sec.gov.

Unless otherwise noted, references in this Quarterly Report to the “Sequential Brands Group,” “Company,” “our Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” or similar pronouns refer to Sequential Brands Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.  References to other companies may include their trademarks, which are the property of their respective owners.

3

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

		September 30,		December 31,
		2017		2016
		(Unaudited)		(Note 2)
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash	$	12,515	$	19,133
Restricted cash		1,527		1,521
Accounts receivable, net		50,632		53,195
Available-for-sale securities		-		7,673
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		6,367		4,366
Total current assets		71,041		85,888
Property and equipment, net		6,205		7,674
Intangible assets, net		995,348		1,030,212
Goodwill		304,123		307,744
Other assets		4,612		3,345
Total assets	$	1,381,329	$	1,434,863
Liabilities and Equity
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	14,627	$	18,915
Current portion of long-term debt		28,300		28,300
Current portion of deferred revenue		5,752		10,374
Total current liabilities		48,679		57,589
Long-term debt, net of current portion		598,428		616,735
Long-term deferred revenue, net of current portion		10,170		13,909
Deferred tax liability		199,910		200,357
Other long-term liabilities		7,913		8,705
Total liabilities		865,100		897,295
Commitments and Contingencies
Equity:
Preferred stock Series A, $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016		-		-
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 63,567,718 and 62,602,041    shares issued at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and 63,151,870    and 62,504,355 shares outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		634		624
Additional paid-in capital		507,876		502,564
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(506)		(144)
Accumulated deficit		(62,481)		(39,651)
Treasury stock, at cost; 415,848 and 97,686 shares at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		(1,784)		(638)
Total Sequential Brands Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries stockholders’ equity		443,739		462,755
Noncontrolling interests		72,490		74,813
Total equity		516,229		537,568

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Total liabilities and equity $ 1,381,329  $ 1,434,863 

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Net revenue	$	39,025	$	41,952	$	120,569	$	110,114
Operating expenses		16,071		20,180		57,379		63,077
Impairment charges		36,505		-		36,505		-
(Loss) income from operations		(13,551)		21,772		26,685		47,037
Other (income) expense		(214)		(150)		1,553		(243)
Interest expense, net		15,237		14,742		44,600		36,031
(Loss) income before income taxes		(28,574)		7,180		(19,468)		11,249
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes		(3,842)		3,858		(142)		5,276
Net (loss) income		(24,732)		3,322		(19,326)		5,973
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		552		(2,022)		(3,504)		(5,814)
Net (loss) income attributable to Sequential Brands Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries	$	(24,180)	$	1,300	$	(22,830)	$	159
(Loss) earnings per share attributable to Sequential Brands Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries:
Basic	$	(0.38)	$	0.02	$	(0.36)	$	0.00
Diluted	$	(0.38)	$	0.02	$	(0.36)	$	0.00
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic		62,998,944		62,176,700		62,796,716		61,817,742
Diluted		62,998,944		63,066,757		62,796,716		62,918,590

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(in thousands, except share data)

	Preferred Stock			Common Stock				Additional Paid-in		Accumulated Other Comprehensive		Accumulated	Treasury Stock				Total Sequential Brands Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries Stockholders'		Noncontrolling		Total
	Shares		Amount	Shares		Amount		Capital		Loss		Deficit	Shares		Amount		Equity		Interests		Equity
Balance at January 1, 2017	-	$	-	62,602,041	$	624	$	502,564	$	(144)	$	(39,651)	(97,686)	$	(638)	$	462,755	$	74,813	$	537,568
Stock-based compensation	-		-	965,677		10		5,332		-		-	-		-		5,342		-		5,342
Stock registration costs	-		-	-		-		(20)		-		-	-		-		(20)		-		(20)
Unrealized loss on interest rate cap	-		-	-		-		-		(362)		-	-		-		(362)		-		(362)
Repurchase of common stock	-		-	-		-		-		-		-	(318,162)		(1,146)		(1,146)		-		(1,146)
Noncontrolling interest distributions	-		-	-		-		-		-		-	-		-		-		(5,827)		(5,827)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	-		-	-		-		-		-		-	-		-		-		3,504		3,504
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	-		-	-		-		-		-		(22,830)	-		-		(22,830)		-		(22,830)
Balance at September 30, 2017	-	$	-	63,567,718	$	634	$	507,876	$	(506)	$	(62,481)	(415,848)	$	(1,784)	$	443,739	$	72,490	$	516,229

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net (loss) income	$	(19,326)	$	5,973
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for bad debts		381		475
Depreciation and amortization		3,544		3,379
Stock-based compensation		5,342		5,642
Amortization of deferred financing costs		2,918		2,117
Impairment of trademarks		36,505		-
Income from equity method investment		(22)		-
Loss on disposal of fixed assets		2		491
Realized loss on sale of available-for-sale securities		1,916		-
Deferred income taxes		(447)		5,003
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		2,182		(2,654)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(3,055)		776
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(4,552)		(7,607)
Deferred revenue		(7,361)		17,972
Other liabilities		1,233		(162)
Cash Provided By Operating Activities From Continuing Operations		19,260		31,405
Cash Used In Operating Activities From Discontinued Operations		-		(8)
Cash Provided By Operating Activities		19,260		31,397
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired		-		(147,587)
Investments in intangible assets, including registration and renewal costs		(280)		(390)
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities		5,757		-
Purchases of property and equipment		(1,183)		(1,617)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		2		45
Changes in restricted cash		(6)		(1,518)
Cash Provided By (Used In) Investing Activities		4,290		(151,067)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Proceeds from long-term debt		-		132,000
Stock registration costs		(20)		-
Payment of long-term debt		(21,225)		(14,000)
Guaranteed payments in connection with acquisitions		(1,950)		(1,475)
Deferred financing costs		-		(13,011)
Repurchases of common stock		(1,146)		(501)
Noncontrolling interest distributions		(5,827)		(4,992)
Cash (Used In) Provided by Financing Activities		(30,168)		98,021
Net Decrease In Cash		(6,618)		(21,649)
Cash — Beginning of period		19,133		41,560
Cash — End of period	$	12,515	$	19,911
Supplemental Disclosures Of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	41,697	$	31,792
Taxes	$	90	$	178
Non-cash Investing And Financing Activities
Accrued purchases of property and equipment at period end	$	189	$	1,602
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities during the period	$	-	$	1,060
Unrealized loss on interest rate cap during the period	$	(362)	$	-
Receivable for sale of trademark rights	$	500	$	-

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

7

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

1. Organization and Nature of Operations

Overview

Sequential Brands Group, Inc. (the “Company”) owns a portfolio of consumer brands in the fashion, active and home categories.  The Company aims to maximize the strategic value of its brands by promoting, marketing and licensing its global brands through various distribution channels, including to retailers, wholesalers and distributors in the United States and in certain international territories.  The Company’s core strategy is to enhance and monetize the global reach of its existing brands, and to pursue additional strategic acquisitions to grow the scope of and diversify its portfolio of brands.  The Company licenses brands to both wholesale and direct-to-retail licensees.  In a wholesale license, a wholesale supplier is granted rights (typically on an exclusive basis) to a single or small group of related product categories for a particular brand for sale to multiple accounts within an approved channel of distribution and territory.  In a direct-to-retail license, a single retailer is granted the right (typically on an exclusive basis) to sell branded products in a broad range of product categories through its brick and mortar stores and e-commerce sites.  As of September 30, 2017, the Company had more than one-hundred fifty licensees, with wholesale licensees comprising a significant majority.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).  Certain information or footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC for interim financial reporting.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  It is the Company’s opinion, however, that the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, operating results and cash flows for the periods presented.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC on March 14, 2017, which contains the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.  The financial information as of December 31, 2016 is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.  The interim results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017 or for any future interim periods.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries.  All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

Making estimates requires management to exercise significant judgment.  It is at least reasonably possible that the estimate of the effect of a condition, situation or set of circumstances that existed at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which management considered in formulating its estimate, could change in the near term due to one or more future confirming events.  Accordingly, the actual results could differ significantly from estimates.

8

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

Revenue Recognition

The Company has entered into various license agreements that provide revenues based on guaranteed minimum royalty payments and advertising/marketing fees with additional royalty revenues based on a percentage of defined sales.  Guaranteed minimum royalty payments and advertising/marketing revenue are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of each contract year, as defined in each license agreement.  Royalty payments exceeding the guaranteed minimum royalty payments are recognized as income during the period corresponding to the licensee’s sales.  Payments received as consideration for the grant of a license are recorded as deferred revenue at the time payment is received and recognized ratably as revenue over the term of the license agreement.  Advanced royalty payments are recorded as deferred revenue at the time payment is received and recognized as revenue when earned.  Revenue is not recognized unless collectability is reasonably assured.

If license agreements are terminated prior to the original licensing period, the Company recognizes revenue in the amount of any contractual termination fees, unless such amounts are deemed non-recoverable.

With respect to editorial content for books, the Company receives advance payments from the Company’s publishers and recognizes revenue when manuscripts are delivered to and accepted by the publishers.  Revenue is also earned from book publishing when sales on a unit basis exceed the advanced royalty.

Television sponsorship revenues are generally recorded ratably across the period when new episodes initially air.

The Company entered into a transaction with a media company for which it receives advertising credits as part of the consideration exchanged.  These transactions are recorded at the estimated fair value of the advertising credits received, as their fair value is deemed more readily determinable than the fair value of the trademark licensing right provided by the Company, in accordance with ASC 845, Nonmonetary Transactions. The fair value of the advertising credits are recorded as revenue and in other assets when earned, and expensed when the advertising credits are utilized.   The Company recorded revenue of $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 related to the advertising credits earned.  The Company did not record any expense related to the advertising credits as they have not yet been utilized.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of cash deposited with a financial institution required as collateral for the Company’s cash-collateralized letter of credit facilities.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are recorded net of allowances for doubtful accounts, based on the Company’s ongoing discussions with its licensees and other customers and its evaluation of their creditworthiness, payment history and account aging.  Accounts receivable balances deemed to be uncollectible are written off after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.  The allowance for doubtful accounts was $0.3 million and $0.2 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

The Company’s accounts receivable, net amounted to $50.6 million and $53.2 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.  Four licensees accounted for approximately 63% (25%, 14%, 13%, and 11%) of the Company’s total consolidated accounts receivable balance as of September 30, 2017 and four licensees accounted for approximately 49% (14%, 13%, 12% and 10%) of the Company’s total consolidated accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2016.  The Company does not believe the accounts receivable balance from these licensees represents a significant collection risk based on past collection experience.

9

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

Investments

The Company had marketable securities that were classified as available-for-sale securities under ASC 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities.  Such available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and, at the time of purchase, were reported in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows as an investing activity.  The Company reviews its available-for-sale securities at each reporting period to determine whether a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary.  Any decline in fair value that is determined to be other-than-temporary would result in an adjustment for an impairment charge in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.  The primary factors the Company considers in its determination are (i) the length of time that the fair value of the available-for-sale security is below the Company’s carrying value, (ii) the financial condition and operating performance of the available-for-sale security, (iii) the reason for decline in fair value and (iv) the Company’s intent and ability to hold the investment in available-for-sale security for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in fair value.  Realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities, if any, are determined on a specific-identification basis. 

The unrealized gains and losses on the available-for-sale securities held by the Company as of December 31, 2016 is set forth below.

						December 31, 2016
								Gross Unrealized
		Historical Cost		Cost Basis (1)		Estimated Fair Value		Gains		Losses
		(in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities	$	12,048	$	7,673	$	7,673	$	-	$	-

(1)  The cost basis is historical cost less other-than-temporary impairment.

During the second quarter of 2017, the Company sold its available-for-sale securities for $5.8 million.  The book cost basis of the available-for-sale securities was approximately $7.7 million, which was determined using the specific identification method.  The sale resulted in a net realized loss of $1.9 million, which is recorded in other (income) expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.  Included in the $1.9 million is $1.5 million that was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss.

Equity Method Investment

For investments in entities over which the Company exercises significant influence but which do not meet the requirements for consolidation, the Company uses the equity method of accounting.  On July 1, 2016, the Company acquired a 49.9% noncontrolling interest in Gaiam Pty. Ltd. in connection with its acquisition of Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC, which is included in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.  The Company’s share of earnings from its equity method investee, which was not material for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, is included in other (income) expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The Company evaluates its equity method investment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such investment may not be recoverable.  The difference between the carrying value of the equity method investment and its estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment charge when the loss in value is deemed other-than-temporary.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value.  In evaluating goodwill for impairment, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.  Qualitative factors considered include, for example, macroeconomic and industry conditions, overall financial performance, and other relevant entity-specific events.  If the Company bypasses the qualitative assessment, or concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, it then performs a quantitative goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment to be recognized, if any.

10

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, as a result of its qualitative assessment of the likelihood of goodwill impairment, the Company identified potential impairment indicators and determined that a quantitative assessment was necessary.  Fair value for the quantitative assessment was determined under an income approach using estimates of discounted future cash flows (the “DCF Method”).  The DCF Method relies on assumptions such as the Company’s projected future earnings and appropriate discount rates.   The Company corroborated the results of the DCF Method by reconciling to within a reasonable range of its market capitalization (calculated as total common shares outstanding multiplied by the common equity price per share, as adjusted for a control premium factor).  Reconciling items identified included the benefit of the Company’s fully reserved tax assets for which the market capitalization may not be giving full value.  Based on the results of the quantitative assessment, the Company determined goodwill was not impaired for the period ended September 30, 2017.

Intangible assets represent trademarks, customer agreements and patents related to the Company’s brands and a favorable lease.  Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but instead are subject to impairment evaluation.  The carrying value of intangible assets and other finite-lived assets is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset may not be recoverable.  When conducting its impairment assessment, the Company initially performs a qualitative evaluation of whether it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired.  If it is determined by a qualitative evaluation that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired, the Company then tests the asset for recoverability.  Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to its future undiscounted net cash flows.  If the carrying amount of such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the recoverability of the assets.  Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $36.5 million for indefinite-lived intangible assets related to the trademarks of five of the Company’s non-core brands: Caribbean Joe,  Revo,  Franklin Mint,  Nevados, and FUL.  Fair value for each trademark was determined based on estimates of future discounted cash flows.  The impairments arose due to reduced contractual minimums or reduced sales forecasts in key distribution channels for these brands.This charge is included in impairment charges in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.  See Note 3 and Note 6 for further information.

Treasury Stock

Treasury stock is recorded at cost as a reduction of equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Stock-Based Compensation

Compensation cost for restricted stock is measured using the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock at the date the common stock is granted.  For restricted stock and restricted stock units, for which restrictions lapse with the passage of time (“time-based restricted stock”), compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the period between the issue date and the date that restrictions lapse.  Time-based restricted stock is included in total shares of common stock outstanding upon the lapse of applicable restrictions.  For restricted stock, for which restrictions are based on performance measures (“performance stock units” or “PSUs”), restrictions lapse when those performance measures have been deemed achieved.  Compensation cost for PSUs is recognized on a straight-line basis during the period from the date on which the likelihood of the PSUs being earned is deemed probable and (x) the end of the fiscal year during which such PSUs are expected to vest or (y) the date on which awards of such PSUs may be approved by the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors (the “Compensation Committee”) on a discretionary basis, as applicable.  PSUs are included in total shares of common stock outstanding upon the lapse of applicable restrictions.  PSUs are included in total diluted shares of common stock outstanding when the performance measures have been deemed achieved but the PSUs have not yet been issued.

Fair value cost for stock options and warrants is calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation model and is expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the grant.  The Company elected to early adopt the provisions of ASU 2016-09 “Simplifying the Accounting for Share-Based Payments” (“ASU 2016-09”) and reduces compensation cost for actual forfeitures as they occur.  Prior to the adoption to ASU 2016-09, the Company’s estimated forfeiture rate utilized in calculating compensation cost was zero percent based on the Company’s limited historical forfeiture experience.  

At each subsequent reporting period prior to the lapse of restrictions on warrants, time-based restricted stock and PSUs granted to non-employees, the Company remeasures the aggregate compensation cost of such grants using the Company’s fair value at the end of such reporting period and revises the straight-line recognition of compensation cost in line with such remeasured amount.

11

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

Leases

The Company leases certain properties for office and showroom.  Certain of the Company's lease agreements contain rent escalation clauses, free rent periods and tenant inducement payments.  Rent expense for noncancelable operating leases with scheduled rent increases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term.  The difference between straight-line rent expense and the scheduled payment amounts is recorded as a deferred rent asset or liability.

Income Taxes

Current income taxes are based on the respective periods’ taxable income for federal, foreign and state income tax reporting purposes.  Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities, using statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  In accordance with ASU No. 2015-17 “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,” all deferred income taxes are reported and classified as non-current.  A valuation allowance is required if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Company applies the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes.  The guidance clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with other authoritative GAAP and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.  The guidance also addresses derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.  Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, are recorded in income tax expense.  Tax years that remain open for assessment for federal and state tax purposes include the years ended December 31, 2013 through December 31, 2016.

The benefit from income taxes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 represents a non-cash deferred tax expense created by the amortization of certain acquired trademarks for tax but not book purposes and taxes for state, local and foreign jurisdictions offset by a tax benefit, discrete to the third quarter, representing a reduction in deferred tax liabilities resulting from the impairment of related to acquired trademarks.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net (loss) income attributable to Sequential Brands Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period, excluding the effects of any potentially dilutive securities.  Diluted EPS gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the reporting period, including stock options, PSUs and warrants, using the treasury stock method, and convertible debt, using the if-converted method.  Diluted EPS excludes all potentially dilutive shares of common stock if their effect is anti-dilutive.  The shares used to calculate basic and diluted EPS consist of the following:

	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017	2016	2017	2016
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding	62,998,944	62,176,700	62,796,716	61,817,742
Acquisition hold back shares	-	-	-	230,840
Warrants	-	360,440	-	351,386
Stock options	-	18,252	-	15,406
Performance based restricted stock	-	407,355	-	408,152
Unvested restricted stock	-	104,010	-	95,064
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding	62,998,944	63,066,757	62,796,716	62,918,590

12

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

 The computation of diluted EPS for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 excludes the common stock equivalents of the following potentially dilutive securities because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive:

	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017	2016	2017	2016
Warrants	801,760	325,000	801,760	325,000
Stock options	84,000	51,000	84,000	51,000
Unvested restricted stock	972,355	-	972,355	130,000
Total	1,858,115	376,000	1,858,115	506,000

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which potentially expose the Company to credit risk consist primarily of cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable and available-for-sale securities.  Cash is held to meet working capital needs and future acquisitions.  Restricted cash is pledged as collateral for a comparable amount of irrevocable standby letters of credit for certain of the Company’s leased properties.  Substantially all of the Company’s cash, restricted cash and available-for-sale securities, prior to being sold, are deposited with high quality financial institutions.  At times, however, such cash, restricted cash and available-for-sale securities may be in deposit accounts that exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limit.  The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts as of September 30, 2017.

Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is minimal due to the collection history.  The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition.  The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the expected collectability of all accounts receivable.

Customer Concentrations

The Company recorded net revenues of $39.0 million and $42.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  During the three months ended September 30, 2017, three licensees represented at least 10% of net revenue, accounting for 12%, 11%, and 10% of the Company’s net revenue.  During the three months ended September 30, 2016, no licensees represented at least 10% of net revenue.

The Company recorded net revenues of $120.6 million and $110.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, three licensees represented at least 10% of net revenue, accounting for 11%, 11%, and 10% of the Company’s net revenue.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, two licensees represented at least 10% of net revenue, each accounting for 10% of the Company’s net revenue.

Loss Contingencies

The Company recognizes contingent losses that are both probable and estimable.  In this context, probable means circumstances under which events are likely to occur.  The Company records legal costs pertaining to contingencies as incurred.

Contingent Consideration

The Company recognizes the acquisition-date fair value of contingent consideration as part of the consideration transferred in exchange for the acquiree or assets of the acquiree in a business combination.  The contingent consideration is classified as either a liability or equity in accordance with ASC 480-10, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity.  If classified as a liability, the liability is remeasured to fair value at each subsequent reporting date until the contingency is settled.  Increases in fair value are recorded as losses, while decreases are recorded as gains.  If classified as equity, contingent consideration is not remeasured and subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity.

13

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

Noncontrolling Interest

Noncontrolling interest recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 represents income allocations to Elan Polo International, Inc., a member of DVS Footwear International, LLC, With You, Inc., a member of With You LLC (the partnership between the Company and Jessica Simpson), and JALP, LLC (“JALP”), a member of FUL IP Holdings, LLC (“FUL IP”).  Noncontrolling interest recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 represents income allocations to Elan Polo International, Inc., With You, Inc. and JALP.

Reportable Segment

An operating segment, in part, is a component of an enterprise whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (the “CODM”) to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance.  Operating segments may be aggregated only to a limited extent.  The Company’s CODM, the Chief Executive Officer, reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance.  Accordingly, the Company has determined that it has a single operating and reportable segment.  In addition, the Company has no foreign operations or any assets in foreign locations.  Nearly all of the Company’s operations consist of a single revenue stream, which is the licensing of its trademark portfolio, with an immaterial portion of revenues derived from television, book, café operations and certain commissions.

3. Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments

ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820-10”), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and provides for expanded disclosure about fair value measurements.  ASC 820-10 applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.

The Company determines or calculates the fair value of financial instruments using quoted market prices in active markets when such information is available or using appropriate present value or other valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating available market discount rate information for similar types of instruments while estimating for non-performance and liquidity risk.  These techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate, credit spreads and estimates of future cash flows.

Assets and liabilities typically recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis to which ASC 820-10 applies include:

• non-financial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in an acquisition or business combination, and

• long-lived assets measured at fair value due to an impairment assessment under ASC 360-10-15, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.

This topic defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and establishes a three-level hierarchy, which encourages an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.  ASC 820-10 requires that assets and liabilities recorded at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

• Level 1 - inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.

• Level 2 - inputs utilize other-than-quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly.  Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

• Level 3 - inputs are unobservable and are typically based on the Company’s own assumptions, including situations where there is little, if any, market activity.  Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair value of positions that are classified within the Level 3 classification.

14

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy.  In such cases, the Company classifies such financial assets or liabilities based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.  The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $36.5 million for indefinite-lived intangible assets related to the trademarks of five of the Company’s non-core brands: Caribbean Joe,  Revo,  Franklin Mint,  Nevados, and FUL.  Fair value for each trademark was determined based on estimates of future discounted cash flows, a Level 3 measure within the fair value hierarchy.  The impairments arose due to reduced contractual minimums or reduced sales forecastsin key distribution channels for these brands.The following table shows the change in indefinite-lived assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2017:

	September 30,
	2017
		(in thousands)
Balance at January 1	$	1,025,260
Additions		2,331
Impairment Charges		(36,505)
Ending balance	$	991,086

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no assets or liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis, except for available-for-sale securities, interest rate caps, contingent earn outs relating to theLinens ‘N Thingsbrand (the “LNT Contingent Earn Out”) and Legacy Payments (as defined below) to Ms. Martha Stewart.  The following table sets forth the carrying value and the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities required to be disclosed at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

			Carrying Value				Fair Value
Financial Instrument	Level		9/30/2017		12/31/2016		9/30/2017		12/31/2016
			(in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities		1	$	-	$	7,673	$	-	$	7,673
Interest rate caps		2	$	723	$	1,104	$	723	$	1,104
2016 Term Loans		3	$	558,988	$	582,500	$	549,664	$	551,324
2016 Revolving Loan		3	$	82,787	$	80,500	$	82,436	$	60,755
LNT Contingent Earn Out		3	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Legacy Payments		3	$	2,190	$	1,995	$	2,190	$	1,995

The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities.

The Company recorded its available-for-sale securities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value using Level 1 inputs at December 31, 2016.  The fair value of the Company’s available-for-sale securities was based upon quoted market prices for identical assets in active markets.

During 2016, the Company entered into interest rate cap agreements related to its 1-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) rates related to the Company’s loan agreements (the “2016 Cap Agreements”) with certain financial institutions.  The 2016 Cap Agreements have a $500 million notional value, strike rate of 1.50% and mature on November 23, 2018.  The Company recorded its interest rate caps on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value using Level 2 inputs.  The valuation technique used to determine the fair value of the 2016 Cap Agreements approximated the net present value of future cash flows, taking into account current interest rates.

15

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

The Company’s risk management objective and strategy with respect to the 2016 Cap Agreements is to reduce its exposure to variability in expected future cash outflows (forecasted interest payments) attributable to changes in 1-month LIBOR rates, the designated benchmark interest rate being hedged, relating to a portion of its outstanding floating-rate debt.  The 2016 Cap Agreements protect the Company from increases in hedged cash flows on its floating-rate debt attributable to changes in 1-month LIBOR rates above the strike rate.  Should 1-month LIBOR rates exceed 1.50% on a rate reset date during the terms of the 2016 Cap Agreements, the financial institutions will pay the Company for an amount equivalent to the excess interest over the strike rate.  To the extent the hedging relationship is perfectly effective, changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument each period will be deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the statement of changes in equity, and the upfront hedging instrument purchase price will be reclassified to interest expense, net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations according to its caplet values.  If hedge ineffectiveness exists, accumulated other comprehensive loss will be adjusted to a balance that reflects the lesser of either the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedging or the cumulative change in the fair value of the hypothetically “perfect” derivative.  The amount of ineffectiveness, if any, recorded in earnings would be equal to the excess of the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedging instrument over the cumulative change in the fair value of the hypothetical derivative.

The components of the 2016 Cap Agreements as of September 30, 2017 are as follows:

	Notional Value		Derivative Asset		Derivative Liability
		(in thousands)
LIBOR based loans	$	500,000	$	-	$	506

For purposes of this fair value disclosure, the Company based its fair value estimate for the 2016 Term Loans and 2016 Revolving Loan (each, as defined in Note 7) on its internal valuation whereby the Company applied the discounted cash flow method to its expected cash flow payments due under the loan agreements based on interest rates as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 for debt with similar risk characteristics and maturities.

On the date of the acquisition of Galaxy Brand Holdings, Inc., no value was assigned to the LNT Contingent Earn Out based on the remote probability that the Linens ‘N Things brand will achieve the performance measurements.  At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the LNT Contingent Earn Out had no value.  The Company continues to evaluate these performance measurements at each reporting period and determines their fair values if/when the achievement of the performance measurements becomes probable.

In connection with the acquisition of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (“MSLO”), beginning with calendar years commencing on or after January 1, 2026, the Company will pay Ms. Stewart three and one-half percent (3.5%) of Gross Licensing Revenues (as defined in Ms. Stewart’s employment agreement) for each such calendar year for the remainder of Ms. Stewart’s life (with a minimum of five (5) years of payments, to be made to Ms. Stewart’s estate if Ms. Stewart dies before December 31, 2030) (the “Legacy Payments”).  The Company recorded $0.1 million of accretion during each of the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and $0.2 million of accretion during each of the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 related to the Legacy Payments and recorded the expense within interest expense, net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

4. Acquisition

Acquisition of Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC

On July 1, 2016, the Company, together with its wholly-owned subsidiary, SBG-Gaiam Holdings LLC (formerly known as Stretch & Bend Holdings LLC), a Delaware limited liability company (“SBG-Gaiam” or the “Purchaser”) completed the acquisition pursuant to the terms of the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “MIPA”) with GAIAM, Inc., a Colorado corporation (“Seller”) pursuant to which Purchaser agreed to acquire the branded consumer business of Seller for a total purchase price of $145.7 million in cash.  As part of the transaction, SBG-Gaiam acquired Seller’s yoga, fitness and wellness product business, which include the GAIAM and SPRI brands.  In tandem with the transaction, the Company signed long-term licensing agreements for the brands’ core categories, which became effective upon closing.

As part of the MIPA, the Company paid $1.9 million to Seller for severance related charges to employees of GAIAM, Inc.  Also as part of the MIPA, the Company acquired a 49.9% noncontrolling interest in Gaiam Pty. Ltd, which is recorded under the equity method of accounting.  The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting.  Accordingly, the acquired assets were recorded at their estimated fair values, and operating results for theGAIAM and SPRI brands are included in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the acquisition, July 1, 2016.

16

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

The Company made the following updates to the purchase price during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 in connection with finalizing the valuation of the Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC acquisition (in thousands):

Allocated to:
Goodwill	$	(3,621)
Trademarks		3,568
Equity method investment		53
	$	--

The final allocation of the purchase price is summarized as follows (in thousands):

Purchase Price Allocation - Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC
Total consideration paid	$	147,587
Allocated to:
Trademarks	$	145,923
Goodwill		1,084
Equity method investment		757
Customer agreements		23
Accrued expenses		(200)
	$	147,587

The Company and Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC elected to treat the acquisition as an asset acquisition under section 338(h)(10) of the United States Internal Revenue Service tax code.  As such, the Company is not required to record a deferred tax liability in connection with the acquisition.

Goodwill arising from the acquisition mainly consists of the synergies of an ongoing licensing and brand management business.  Trademarks have been determined by management to have an indefinite useful life and, accordingly, no amortization is recorded in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.  Goodwill and trademarks are tested for impairment on an annual basis or sooner if an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the carrying amount of the goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable.

5. Goodwill

The changes in goodwill are summarized as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
		(in thousands)
Balance at January 1	$	307,744	$	314,288
Adjustment for acquisition of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.		-		(11,249)
(Adjustment for) and acquisition of Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC		(3,621)		4,705
Ending balance	$	304,123	$	307,744

17

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired under the acquisition method of accounting.  Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value.  In evaluating goodwill for impairment, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.  Qualitative factors considered include, for example, macroeconomic and industry conditions, overall financial performance and other relevant entity-specific events.  If the Company bypasses the qualitative assessment, or concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, it then performs a quantitative goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment to be recognized, if any.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, as a result of its qualitative assessment of the likelihood of goodwill impairment, the Company identified potential impairment indicators and determined that a quantitative assessment was necessary.  Fair value for the quantitative assessment was determined under an income approach using estimates of discounted future cash flows (the “DCF Method”).  The DCF Method relies on assumptions such as the Company’s projected future earnings and appropriate discount rates.   The Company corroborated the results of the DCF Method by reconciling to within a reasonable range of its market capitalization (calculated as total common shares outstanding multiplied by the common equity price per share, as adjusted for a control premium factor).  Reconciling items identified included the benefit of the Company’s fully reserved tax assets for which the market capitalization may not be giving full value.  Based on the results of the quantitative assessment, the Company determined goodwill was not impaired for the period ended September 30, 2017.

6. Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are summarized as follows:

September 30, 2017	Useful Lives (Years)		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount
			(in thousands)
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks	15	$	4,998	$	(1,808)	$	3,190
Customer agreements	4		2,832		(2,145)		687
Favorable lease	2		537		(537)		-
Patents	10		665		(280)		385
		$	9,032	$	(4,770)		4,262
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks							991,086
Intangible assets, net						$	995,348

18

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

December 31, 2016	Useful Lives (Years)		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount
			(in thousands)
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks	15	$	4,981	$	(1,558)	$	3,423
Customer agreements	4		2,832		(1,738)		1,094
Favorable lease	2		537		(537)		-
Patents	10		665		(230)		435
		$	9,015	$	(4,063)		4,952
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks							1,025,260
Intangible assets, net						$	1,030,212

Estimated future annual amortization expense for intangible assets in service as of September 30, 2017 is summarized as follows:

Years ending December 31,		(in thousands)
Remainder of 2017	$	208
2018		783
2019		593
2020		403
2021		400
Thereafter		1,875
	$	4,262

 Amortization expense amounted to $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.  Amortization expense amounted to $0.7 million and $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

Finite-lived intangible assets represent trademarks, customer agreements and patents related to the Company’s brands and a favorable lease.  Finite-lived assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but instead are subject to impairment evaluation.  The carrying value of finite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  Historically, indefinite-lived intangible assets have been tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset may not be recoverable.  When conducting its impairment assessment, the Company initially performs a qualitative evaluation of whether it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired.  If it is determined by a qualitative evaluation that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired, the Company then tests the asset for recoverability. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to its expected future undiscounted net cash flows.  If the carrying amount of such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the recoverability of the assets.  Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. 

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $36.5 million for indefinite-lived intangible assets related to the trademarks of five of the Company’s non-core brands: Caribbean Joe,  Revo,  Franklin Mint,  Nevados, and FUL.  Fair value for each trademark was determined based on estimates of future discounted cash flows.  The impairments arose due to reduced contractual minimums or reduced sales forecasts in key distribution channels for these brands.

19

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

7. Long-Term Debt

 The components of long-term debt are as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
		(in thousands)
2016 Term Loans	$	558,988	$	582,500
2016 Revolving Loan		82,787		80,500
Unamortized deferred financing costs		(15,047)		(17,965)
Total long-term debt, net of unamortized deferred financing costs		626,728		645,035
Less: current portion of long-term debt		28,300		28,300
Long-term debt	$	598,428	$	616,735

July 2016 Debt Facilities

On July 1, 2016 (the “Closing Date”), the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into (i) the Third Amended and Restated First Lien Credit Agreement (the “Amended BoA Credit Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent and the lenders party thereto and (ii) the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amended GSO Credit Agreement”) with Wilmington Trust, National Association, as administrative agent and collateral agent (the “GSO Agent”) and the lenders party thereto.  Such agreements amended, restated and replaced the Company’s previous debt facilities.  The Company used a portion of the proceeds of the $287.5 million loans made to the Company under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement and the $415.0 million loans made to the Company under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement to fund the payment of the purchase price with respect to the acquisition of the Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC and costs and expenses incurred in connection with such acquisition and related transactions.

The Amended BoA Credit Agreement provides for several five-year credit facilities, consisting of (i) Tranche A Term Loans in an aggregate principal amount of $133.0 million (the “Tranche A Loans”), (ii) Tranche A-1 Term Loans in an aggregate principal amount of $44.5 million (the “Tranche A-1 Loans” and, together with the Tranche A Loans, the “BoA Term Loans”) and (iii) revolving credit commitments in the aggregate principal amount of $110.0 million (the “Revolving Credit Facility” and, the loans under the Revolving Credit Facility, the “Revolving Loans”).  On the Closing Date, the total amount outstanding under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement was $258.0 million, including (i) $133.0 million of Tranche A Loans, (ii) $44.5 million of Tranche A-1 Loans and (iii) $80.5 million of borrowing under the Revolving Loans.

The loans under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement bear interest, at the Company’s option, at a rate equal to (i) with respect to the Revolving Loans and the Tranche A Loans (a) the LIBOR rate plus 3.50% per annum or (b) the base rate plus 2.50% per annum and (ii) with respect to the Tranche A-1 Loans (a) the LIBOR rate plus 7.00% per annum or (b) the base rate plus 6.00% per annum.  The undrawn portions of the commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility are subject to a commitment fee of 0.375% per annum. 

The Company may make voluntary prepayments of the loans outstanding under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement, subject to the payment of customary “breakage” costs with respect to LIBOR-based borrowings and, in certain cases, to the prepayment premium set forth in the Amended BoA Credit Agreement.  Additionally, the Company is mandated to make prepayments (without payment of a premium or penalty) under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement amounting to: (i) the loans outstanding under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement plus, (a) where intellectual property is disposed, 50.0% of the disposed intellectual property’s orderly liquidation value, and (b) where any other assets constituting collateral are disposed or upon the receipt of certain insurance proceeds, 100% of the net proceeds thereof, subject to certain reinvestment rights; and (ii) the Tranche A-1 Loans to the extent that the outstanding principal amount thereof exceeds 10.0% of the orderly liquidation value of the registered trademarks owned by the BoA Facility Loan Parties.Commencing on September 30, 2016, the BoA Term Loans will be amortized in quarterly installments of $5.0 million.

20

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

The Amended BoA Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and customary affirmative and negative covenants applicable to the BoA Facility Loan Parties and their subsidiaries.  Moreover, the Amended BoA Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that require the BoA Facility Loan Parties and their subsidiaries to (i) maintain a positive net income (as defined in the agreement), (ii) satisfy a maximum loan to value ratio set at 50.0% (applicable to the Revolving Loans and Tranche A Loans) and (iii) satisfy a maximum consolidated first lien leverage ratio, initially set at 2.80:1.00, decreasing over the term of the Amended BoA Credit Agreement until reaching the final maximum ratio of 2.50:1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2018 and thereafter.

The Amended BoA Credit Agreement contains certain customary events of default, including a change of control.  If an event of default occurs and is not cured within any applicable grace period or not waived, the Bank of America Agent, at the request of the lenders under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement, must take various actions, including, without limitation, the acceleration of amounts due under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement.

The Company may request an increase in (i) the Revolving Credit Facility and Tranche A Loans as would not cause the consolidated first lien leverage ratio, determined on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such increase, to exceed 2.33:1.00 and (ii) the Tranche A-1 Loans, as would not cause the consolidated first lien leverage ratio, determined on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such increase, to exceed (a) with respect to any increase, the proceeds of which will be used solely to finance an acquisition, 2.50:100 and (b) with respect to any other increase, 2.40:1.00, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions in the Amended BoA Credit Agreement.At September30, 2017, the Company is in compliance with the covenants included in the Amended BoA Credit Agreement.

The Amended GSO Credit Agreement provides for a six-year $415.0 million senior secured term loan facility.  The Company may request one or more additional term loan facilities or the increase of term loan commitments under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement as would not cause the consolidated total leverage ratio, determined on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such addition and increase, to exceed 6.00:1.00, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions in the Amended GSO Credit Agreement.

The loans under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement bear interest, at the Company’s option, at a rate equal to either (i) the LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin of 8.25% or 9.00% per annum or (ii) the base rate plus an applicable margin of 7.25% or 8.00% per annum, in each case based upon the consolidated total leverage ratio.

The Company may make voluntary prepayments of the loans outstanding under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement, subject to the payment of customary “breakage” costs with respect to LIBOR-based borrowings and, in certain cases, to the prepayment premium set forth in the Amended GSO Credit Agreement.  The Company is mandated to make prepayments (without payment of a premium or penalty) of loans outstanding under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement amounting to: (i) where intellectual property is disposed, 50.0% of the disposed intellectual property’s orderly liquidation value, (ii) where any other asset constituting collateral is disposed or upon the receipt of certain insurance proceeds, 100% of the net proceeds thereof, subject to certain reinvestment rights, and (iii) any consolidated excess cash flow, in an amount equal to (a) in the event the consolidated total leverage ratio is at least 4.00:1.00, 75% thereof, (b) in the event the consolidated total leverage ratio is less than 4.00:1.00 but at least 3.00:1.00, 50% thereof and (c) in the event the consolidated total leverage ratio is less than 3.00:1.00, 0% thereof.  Commencing on March 31, 2017, the loans under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement will amortize in quarterly installments, equal to 2.00% per annum of the original aggregate principal amount thereof.

The Amended GSO Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and customary affirmative and negative covenants applicable to the GSO Facility Loan Parties and their subsidiaries.  Moreover, the Amended GSO Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that require the GSO Facility Loan Parties and their subsidiaries to satisfy (i) a maximum consolidated total leverage ratio, initially set at 7.25:1.00, decreasing over the term of the Amended GSO Credit Agreement until reaching the final maximum ratio of 6.50:1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2018 and thereafter and (ii) a maximum consolidated first lien leverage ratio, initially set at 2.80:1.00, decreasing over the term of the Amended GSO Credit Agreement until reaching the final maximum ratio of 2.50:1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2018 and thereafter.  At September 30, 2017, the Company is in compliance with the covenants included in the Amended GSO Credit Agreement.

The Amended GSO Credit Agreement contains certain customary events of default, including a change of control.  If an event of default occurs and is not cured within any applicable grace period or is not waived, the GSO Agent, at the request of the lenders under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement, is required to take various actions, including, without limitation, the acceleration of amounts due thereunder.

The Company may request one or more additional term loan facilities or the increase of term loan commitments under the GSO Credit Agreement as would not cause the consolidated total leverage ratio, determined on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such addition and increase, to exceed 6.00:1.00, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions in the GSO Credit Agreement.

21

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

Interest Rate Caps

During 2016, the Company entered into interest rate cap agreements related to its 1-month LIBOR rates related to the 2016 Cap Agreements with certain financial institutions.  The 2016 Cap Agreements have a $500 million notional value, strike rate of 1.50% and mature on November 23, 2018.  The Company recorded its interest rate caps on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value using Level 2 inputs.  The valuation technique used to determine the fair value of the 2016 Cap Agreements approximated the net present value of future cash flows, taking into account current interest rates.

The Company’s risk management objective and strategy with respect to the 2016 Cap Agreements is to reduce its exposure to variability in expected future cash outflows (forecasted interest payments) attributable to change in 1-month LIBOR rates, the designated benchmark interest rate being hedged, relating to a portion of its outstanding floating-rate debt.  The 2016 Cap Agreements protect the Company from increases in hedged cash flows on its floating-rate debt attributable to changes in 1-month LIBOR rates above the strike rate.  Should 1-month LIBOR rates exceed 1.50% on a rate reset date during the terms of the 2016 Cap Agreements, the financial institutions will pay the Company for an amount equivalent to the excess interest over the strike rate.  To the extent the hedging relationship is perfectly effective, changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument each period will be deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of changes in equity, and the upfront hedging instrument purchase price will be reclassified to interest expense, net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations according to its caplet values.  If hedge ineffectiveness exists, accumulated other comprehensive loss will be adjusted to a balance that reflects the lesser of either the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedging or the cumulative change in the fair value of the hypothetically “perfect” derivative.  The amount of ineffectiveness, if any, recorded in earnings would be equal to the excess of the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedging instrument over the cumulative change in the fair value of the hypothetical derivative.

8. Commitments and Contingencies

MSLO Stockholder Complaint

In connection with the merger of MSLO in December 2015, the following 13 putative stockholder class action lawsuits have been filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware: (1) David Shaev Profit Sharing Plan f/b/o David Shaev v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on June 25, 2015; (2) Malka Raul v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on June 26, 2015; (3) Daniel Lisman v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on June 29, 2015; (4) Matthew Sciabacucchi v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 2, 2015; (5) Harold Litwin v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 5, 2015; (6) Richard Schiffrin v. Martha Stewart, filed on July 7, 2015; (7) Cedric Terrell v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 8, 2015; (8) Dorothy Moore v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 8, 2015; (9) Paul Dranove v. Pierre De Villemejane. et. al., filed on July 8, 2015; (10) Phuc Nguyen v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 10, 2015; (11) Kenneth Steiner v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 16, 2015; (12) Karen Gordon v. Martha Stewart et. al., filed on July 27, 2015 against the MSLO Board of Directors, Sequential, Madeline Merger Sub, Singer Merger; and (13) Anne Seader v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. et. al., filed on July 28, 2015.  All of the 13 class action lawsuits name the Old Sequential, MSLO, the MSLO board of directors, Madeline Merger Sub, Inc., Singer Merger Sub, Inc. and the Company as defendants and allege that (a) members of the MSLO board of directors breached their fiduciary duties and (b) Old Sequential, MSLO, Madeline Merger Sub, Inc., Singer Merger Sub Inc. and the Company aided and abetted such alleged breaches of fiduciary duties by the MSLO board of directors. On August 18, 2015, the Delaware Chancery Court issued an order consolidating these actions for all purposes under the caption In re Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc., et. al. to be the operative complaint in the consolidated action.  On January 12, 2016, after the consummation of the Mergers (as defined below), the plaintiffs filed a Verified Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, naming Ms. Martha Stewart, the Company, Old Sequential, Madeline Merger Sub, Inc. and Singer Merger Sub, Inc. and alleging that (a) Ms. Stewart breached her fiduciary duties to MSLO's stockholders and (b) the Company, Old Sequential, Madeline Merger Sub, Inc. and Singer Merger Sub, Inc. aided and abetted Ms. Stewart's breach of her fiduciary duties.  On April 4, 2016, Ms. Stewart and the Sequential defendants filed respective motions to dismiss the Verified Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint.  On June 15, 2016, Lead Plaintiffs sought leave to amend the complaint and file the Verified Second Amended Class Action Complaint, which Judge Slights granted on July 14, 2016.  On July 18, 2016, Lead Plaintiffs filed the Verified Second Amended Class Action Complaint against Defendants, asserting that Ms. Stewart breached her fiduciary duties and asserting that Sequential, Madeline Merger Sub, Singer Merger Sub, and Holdings aided and abetted the alleged breach of fiduciary duties.  On July 28, 2016, Ms. Stewart and the Sequential defendants filed respective motions to dismiss the Verified Second Amended Class Action Complaint.  On October 26, 2016, Lead Plaintiffs filed their opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss.  On November 29, 2016, Ms. Stewart and the Sequential Defendants filed reply briefs in further supports of their motions to dismiss the Verified Second Amended Class Action Complaint.  Oral argument on the motions to dismiss occurred on March 22, 2017.  In August 2017, the Court ruled in favor of Ms. Stewart and the Sequential defendants on the motions to dismiss.  The Lead Plaintiffs did not appeal the ruling.  This matter is resolved.

22

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

General Legal Matters

From time to time, the Company is involved in legal matters arising in the ordinary course of business. While the Company believes that such matters are currently not material, there can be no assurance that matters arising in the ordinary course of business for which the Company is, or could be, involved in litigation, will not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations. Contingent liabilities arising from potential litigation are assessed by management based on the individual analysis of these proceedings and on the opinion of the Company’s lawyers and legal consultants.

9. Stock-based Compensation

Stock Options

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017:

	Number of Options		Weighted-Average Exercise Price	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Outstanding - January 1, 2017	129,501	$	9.65	2.3	$	-
Granted	-		-
Exercised	-		-
Forfeited or canceled	(45,500)		(11.49)
Outstanding at September 30, 2017	84,001	$	8.65	2.4	$	-
Exercisable - September 30, 2017	84,001	$	8.65	2.4	$	-

A summary of the changes in the Company’s unvested stock options is as follows:

	Number of Options		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested - January 1, 2017	5,000	$	1.96
Granted	-		-
Vested	(5,000)		(1.96)
Forfeited or canceled	-		-
Unvested - September 30, 2017	-	$	-

The Company did not grant any stock options during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

Total compensation expense related to stock options for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was less than $0.1 million.  At September 30, 2017 there is no unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options.

23

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

Warrants

The following table summarizes the Company’s outstanding warrants for the nine months ended September 30, 2017:

	Number of Warrants		Weighted-Average Exercise Price	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Outstanding - January 1, 2017	801,760	$	7.87	3.1	$	51
Granted	-		-
Exercised	-		-
Forfeited or canceled	-		-
Outstanding at September 30, 2017	801,760	$	7.87	2.3	$	-
Exercisable - September 30, 2017	801,760	$	7.87	2.3	$	-

A summary of the changes in the Company’s unvested warrants is as follows:

	Number of Warrants		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested - January 1, 2017	50,000	$	6.32
Granted	-		-
Vested	(50,000)		(6.32)
Forfeited or canceled	-		-
Unvested - September 30, 2017	-	$	-

The Company did not issue any warrants during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

Total compensation expense related to warrants for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively.  Total compensation expense related to warrants for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was less than $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.  At September 30, 2017 there is no unrecognized compensation expense related to warrants.

Restricted Stock

A summary of the time-based restricted stock activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is as follows:

	Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
	(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Unvested - January 1, 2017	258,787	$	8.45	2.1
Granted	111,112		3.60
Vested	(147,632)		(5.75)
Unvested - September 30, 2017	222,267	$	7.82	2.2

24

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted 111,112 shares of time-based restricted stock to members of the Company’s board of directors.  These shares had a grant date fair value of $0.4 million and vest over a period of one year.  The Company recorded $0.1 million and $0.2 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, as compensation expense pertaining to these grants.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company granted 70,548 shares of time-based restricted stock to members of the Company’s board of directors.  These shares had a grant date fair value of $0.4 million and vest over a period of one year.  The Company recorded $0.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compensation expense pertaining to these grants.  The Company recorded $0.1 million and $0.2 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compensation expense pertaining to these grants. 

Total compensation expense related to time-based restricted stock grants for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively.  Total compensation expense related to time-based restricted stock grants for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively.  Total unrecognized compensation expense related to time-based restricted stock grants at September 30, 2017 amounted to $0.5 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.

Restricted Stock Units

A summary of the time-based restricted stock units activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is as follows:

	Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
	(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Unvested - January 1, 2017	326,667	$	8.52	2.5
Granted	636,753		3.24
Vested	(153,332)		(10.20)
Forfeited or canceled	(60,000)		(4.89)
Unvested - September 30, 2017	750,088	$	3.98	2.5

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted 200,000 time-based restricted stock units to certain employees for future services and 276,753 time-based restricted stock units to a consultant for future services.  These shares of time-based restricted stock units had a grant date fair value of $1.4 million and vest over a period of three years.  The Company recorded less than $0.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compensation expense pertaining to these grants.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted 100,000 time-based restricted stock units to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to an employment agreement, dated April 3, 2017.  These shares of time-based restricted stock units had a grant date fair value of $0.4 million and vest over a period of three years.  The Company recorded less than $0.1 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compensation expense pertaining to this grant.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company accelerated the vesting of 66,667 shares of time-based restricted stock units for the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer in connection with the CEO transition.  Total compensation expense related to these shares of $0.7 million was recorded as operating expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted 60,000 time-based restricted stock units to the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer pursuant to an amended employment agreement, dated January 3, 2017.  These shares of time-based restricted stock units had a grant date fair value of $0.3 million and a vesting period of two years.  Upon the former Chief Financial Officer’s departure, these shares were forfeited prior to vesting during the three months ended September 30, 2017.  Compensation expense previously recognized was reversed during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

25

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company issued 35,000 shares of time-based restricted stock units to an employee for future services.  These shares of time-based restricted stock units had a grant date fair value of $0.3 million and vest over a period of three years.  The Company recorded less than $0.1 million during the each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 as compensation expense pertaining to this grant.

Total compensation expense related to time-based restricted stock unit grants for each of the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.2 million.  Total compensation expense related to time-based restricted stock unit grants for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $1.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively.  Total unrecognized compensation expense related to time-based restricted stock unit grants at September 30, 2017 amounted to $2.7 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years.

Performance Stock Units

A summary of the PSUs activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is as follows:

	Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
	(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Unvested - January 1, 2017	2,803,367	$	8.18	2.4
Granted	716,600		3.17
Vested	(701,233)		(10.97)
Forfeited or canceled	(673,700)		(7.22)
Unvested - September 30, 2017	2,145,034	$	5.90	2.2

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted 200,000 PSUs to an employee upon their commencement of employment with the Company.  These PSUs had a grant date fair value of $0.7 million and vest over a period of three years and require achievement of certain of the Company’s performance metrics within each fiscal year for such PSUs to be earned.  The Company did not record any compensation expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as the likelihood of these PSUs being earned was not probable.

On July 25, 2017, the Compensation Committee voted to approve, on a discretionary basis, an award of 41,600 PSUs to employees and consultants.  The fair value and expense recorded for such PSUs was based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the modification of the performance metric was communicated to employees and consultants.  The Company did not record any compensation expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as the likelihood of these PSUs being earned was not probable.

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted 300,000 PSUs to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.  These PSUs had a grant date fair value of $0.8 million and vest over a period of three years and require achievement of certain of the Company’s performance metrics within each fiscal year for such PSUs to be earned.  The Company did not record any compensation expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as the likelihood of these PSUs being earned was not probable.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted 175,000 PSUs to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to an employment agreement, dated April 3, 2017.  These PSUs had a grant date fair value of $0.7 million and vest over a period of three years and require achievement of certain of the Company’s performance metrics within each fiscal year for such PSUs to be earned.  The Company did not record any compensation expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as the likelihood of these PSUs being earned was not probable.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company accelerated the vesting of 200,000 PSUs for the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer in connection with the CEO transition.  Total compensation expense related to these PSUs of $2.9 million was recorded as operating expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

26

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

On February 28, 2017, the Compensation Committee voted to approve, on a discretionary basis, an award of 164,978 PSUs to employees and consultants.  Included in the above award were 60,000 PSUs and 36,000 PSUs for the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively.  The fair value and expense recorded for such PSUs was based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the modification of the performance metric was communicated to employees and consultants.  Total compensation expense related to these PSUs of $0.6 million was recorded as operating expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company granted 30,000 PSUs to an employee upon the commencement of his employment with the Company.  These PSUs had a grant date fair value of $0.2 million and vest over a period of three years and require achievement of certain of the Company’s performance metrics within each fiscal year for such PSUs to be earned.  The Company did not record any compensation expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as the likelihood of the remaining PSUs being earned was not probable.  The Company recorded less than $0.1 million during each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compensation expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations pertaining to these PSUs as the likelihood of certain PSUs being earned became probable.

On February 23, 2016, the Compensation Committee voted to approve, on a discretionary basis, an award of 69,994 PSUs to employees and consultants.  Included in the above award were 20,000 PSUs and 12,000 PSUs for the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively.  The fair value and expense recorded for such PSUs was based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the modification of the performance metric was communicated to employees and consultants.  Total compensation expense related to these PSUs of $0.4 million was recorded as operating expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

The Company did not grant any PSUs during the three months ended September 30, 2016.  The Company did not record compensation expense related to the PSUs for the three months ended September 30, 2017.  Total compensation expense related to the PSUs for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was $1.3 million. Total compensation expense related to the PSUs for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $3.5 million and $3.6 million, respectively.

10. Related Party Transactions

Consulting Services Agreement with Tengram Capital Partners, L.P. (f/k/a Tengram Capital Management L.P.)

Pursuant to an agreement with Tengram Capital Partners, L.P., formerly known as Tengram Capital Management, L.P. (“TCP”), an affiliate of Tengram Capital Partners Gen2 Fund, L.P., which is one of the Company’s largest stockholders, the Company has engaged TCP, effective as of January 1, 2013, to provide services to the Company pertaining to (i) mergers and acquisitions, (ii) debt and equity financing and (iii) such other related areas as the Company may reasonably request from time to time (the “TCP Agreement”).  TCP was entitled to receive compensation of $1.0 million, including fees and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses in connection with performing its services under the TCP Agreement.  The TCP Agreement remains in effect for a period continuing through the earlier of five years or the date on which TCP and its affiliates cease to own in excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock in the Company.  On August 15, 2014, the Company consummated transactions pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger, dated as of June 24, 2014 (the “Galaxy Merger Agreement”) with SBG Universe Brands LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and the Company’s direct wholly-owned subsidiary (“LLC Sub”), Universe Galaxy Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and direct wholly-owned subsidiary of LLC Sub, Galaxy Brand Holdings, Inc. andCarlyle Galaxy Holdings, L.P. (such transactions, collectively, the “Galaxy Acquisition”).  In connection with the Galaxy Merger Agreement, the Company and TCP entered into an amendment to the TCP Agreement (the “Amended TCP Agreement”), pursuant to which, among other things, TCP is entitled to receive annual fees of $0.9 million beginning with fiscal 2014.

The Company paid TCP $0.5 million for services under the Amended TCP Agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.  The Company paid TCP $0.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.  At September 30, 2017, the Company had accrued $0.2 million payable to TCP.  At December 31, 2016, there were no amounts due to TCP for services.

27

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

Additionally, in July 2013, the Company entered into a consulting arrangement with an employee of TCP (the “TCP Employee”), pursuant to which the TCP Employee provides legal and other consulting services at the request of the Company from time to time.  The TCP Employee was also issued 125,000 shares of restricted stock, vesting over a four-year period and 180,000 PSUs, vesting over three years in increments of 20% for 2014, 20% for 2015 and 60% for 2016.  Additionally, the TCP employee was granted 200,000 PSUs, vesting over three years in increments of 33.3% for 2017, 33.3% for 2018 and 33.4% for 2019.  The Company paid the TCP Employee $0.1 million and $0.2 million for services under the consulting arrangement during each of the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The Company paid the TCP Employee $0.2 million and $0.3 million for services under the consulting arrangement during each of the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.  These amounts are included in operating expenses in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.  At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no amounts due to the TCP Employee.

Transactions with E.S. Originals, Inc.

A division president of the Company maintains a passive ownership interest in one of the Company’s licensees, E.S. Originals, Inc. (“ESO”).  The Company receives royalties from ESO under license agreements for certain of the Company’s brands in the footwear category.  The Company recorded $3.5 million and $3.0 million of revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for royalties and advertising revenue earned from ESO license agreements.  The Company recorded $11.3 million and $11.2 million of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for royalties and advertising revenue earned from ESO license agreements.  At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had $6.7 million and $7.1 million recorded as accounts receivable from ESO in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, respectively.

In addition, the Company entered into a license-back agreement with ESO under which the Company reacquired the rights to certain international territories in order to re-license these rights to an unrelated party.  The Company recorded less than $0.1 million in license-back expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Acquisition of FUL

On November 17, 2014, the Company made a strategic investment in FUL IP.  FUL IP is a collaborative investment between the Company and JALP.  FUL IP was formed for the purpose of licensing theFULtrademark to third parties in connection with the manufacturing, distribution, marketing and sale ofFULbranded bags, backpacks, duffels, luggage and apparel accessories.  JALP contributed theFULtrademark with a fair value of $8.9 million.  In exchange for a 50.5% economic interest in FUL IP the Company paid JALP $4.5 million.  JALP’s minority member interest in FUL IP has been reflected as noncontrolling interest on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.  One of the Company’s directors, Mr. Al Gossett, has a partial ownership interest in JALP.  There was $(2.4) million of noncontrolling interest recorded during each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.  There was $0.1 million and $0.4 million of noncontrolling interest recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.

Investment in Available-for-Sale Securities

As further discussed in Note 2, in September 2015, the Company purchased available-for-sale securities of an unaffiliated third-party publicly traded company from Tengram Capital Partners, L.P., which is an affiliate of Tengram Capital Partners Gen2 Fund, L.P., one of the Company’s largest stockholders, for an aggregate purchase price of $12.0 million (plus related transaction expenses), which was the purchase price paid by Tengram Capital Partners, L.P. upon the acquisition of such available-for-sale securities in open market transactions.  The Company did not pay a fee or any compensation to Tengram Capital Partners, L.P. in connection with the Company’s investment in the available-for-sale securities.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company sold its available-for-sale securities for $5.8 million. 

IP License Agreement and Intangible Asset Agreement

In connection with the transactions contemplated by the acquisition of MSLO (the “Mergers”), MSLO entered into an Amended and Restated Asset License Agreement (“Intangible Asset Agreement”) and Amended and Restated Intellectual Property License and Preservation Agreement (“IP License Agreement” and, together with the Intangible Asset Agreement, the “IP Agreements”) pursuant to which Ms. Martha Stewart licensed certain intellectual property to MSLO.  The IP Agreements grant the Company the right to use of certain properties owned by Ms. Stewart.

28

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

The Intangible Asset Agreement has an initial term commencing at December 4, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2020, provided that the term will automatically be renewed for five additional calendar years ending December 31, 2025 (subject to earlier termination as provided in Ms. Stewart’s employment agreement) if either the aggregate gross licensing revenues (as defined in Ms. Stewart’s employment agreement) for calendar years 2018 through 2020 exceed $195 million or the gross licensing revenues for calendar year 2020 equal or exceed $65 million.During the term of the Intangible Asset Agreement with the Company, Lifestyle Research Center LLC will be entitled to receive a guaranteed annual payment of $1.7 million, which amounts are being paid in connection with the Mergers regardless of Ms. Stewart’s continued employment with the Company plus reimbursable expenses.  The Company has paid Lifestyle Research Center LLC $0.8 million and less than $0.1 million in connection with other related services during the each of the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The Company has paid Lifestyle Research Center LLC $1.4 million and less than $0.1 million in connection with other related services during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

During the term of the IP Agreement with the Company, Ms. Stewart will be entitled to receive a guaranteed annual payment of $1.3 million, which amounts are being paid in connection with the Mergers regardless of Ms. Stewart’s continued employment with the Company.  During each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company made payments of $0.3 million and $1.0million, respectively, to Ms. Stewart in connection with the terms of the IP Agreement.  The IP License Agreement is perpetual.

During each of the three month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company expensed non-cash interest of $0.2 million related to the accretion of the present value of these guaranteed contractual payments.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company expensed non-cash interest of $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, related to the accretion of the present value of these guaranteed contractual payments.  At September 30, 2017, there was $8.3 million due under the IP Agreements of which $2.9 million is recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses and $5.4 million is recorded in other long-term liabilities.  At December 31, 2016, there was $8.8 million due under the IP Agreements of which $2.8 million is recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses and $6.0 million is recorded in other long-term liabilities.

11. Restructuring

The Company did not incur restructuring charges during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded $0.4 million of restructuring charges in connection with headcount reductions.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded $3.2 million of restructuring charges in connection with headcount reductions and lease termination costs.  The charges incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 consisted of $1.7 million of severance and related benefits associated with headcount reductions, $0.8 million of professional fees, $0.3 million in contract termination fees and $0.4 million of asset write-offs.  These charges are included in operating expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations.

On a cumulative basis, the Company has recorded $11.9 million of restructuring charges in connection with the Mergers, headcount reductions and contract termination costs.  The associated employee headcount reductions in connection with the reduction in workforce since inception were 65 employees.  The Company does not expect to incur any additional charges.

There is no restructuring accrual as of September 30, 2017.  A restructuring accrual of $1.5 million as of December 31, 2016 is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.  This accrual included amounts provided for contract termination fees.  The Company has paid $10.5 million in cash related to these initiatives as of September 30, 2017.

Changes in the restructuring accruals during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were as follows:

		Severance & Related Benefits		Contract Termination Costs		Professional Fees		Total Accrual
		(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2017	$	-	$	1,500	$	-	$	1,500
Charges to expense		-		-		-		-
Amounts paid		-		(1,500)		-		(1,500)
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

29

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

12. New Accounting Pronouncements

ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (‘ASU 2014-09’). ASU 2014-09 provides guidance for revenue recognition and affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets, and supersedes the current revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition,” and most industry-specific guidance. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is the recognition of revenue when a company transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, will require greater use of judgment and estimates than under the current guidance.  This ASU will be effective beginning in the first quarter of the Company’s fiscal year 2018. The ASU may be applied using a full retrospective method or a modified retrospective transition method, with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption.  The Company has made substantial progress in its review of the new standard and will complete its assessment by December 31, 2017. The Company will adopt the standard effective the first quarter of 2018 and apply the amendments using the modified retrospective method.  The Company currently expects the impact of adoption of this guidance to be immaterial to our financial statements and related disclosures.

ASU No. 2017-12, “Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities”

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, “Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities” (“ASU 2017-12”).  ASU 2017-12 amends the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging.  The amendments in ASU 2017-12 are intended to improve the transparency and understandability of information about an entity’s risk management activities and simplify the application of hedge accounting.

ASU 2017-12 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted.  The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-12 to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2017-09, “FASB Amends the Scope of Modification Accounting for Share-Based Payment Arrangements”

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, “FASB Amends the Scope of Modification Accounting for Share-Based Payment Arrangements” (“ASU 2017-09”).  ASU 2017-09 provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting under ASC 718,  Compensation – Stock Compensation.  Specifically, an entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions, and classification of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification.

ASU 2017-09 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-09 to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU 2017-04”).  ASU 2017-04 removes the requirement to compare the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount as part of step 2 of the goodwill impairment test.  As a result, under ASU 2017-04, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

ASU 2017-04 is effective prospectively for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted on testing dates after January 1, 2017.  The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-04 during the first quarter of 2017.  The adoption of ASU 2017-04 did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

30

SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

ASU No. 2017-01, “FASB Clarifies the Definition of a Business”

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “FASB Clarifies the Definition of a Business” (“ASU 2017-01”).  ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a business in ASC 805.  The amendments in ASU 2017-01 are intended to make application of the guidance more consistent and cost-efficient.

ASU 2017-01 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for transactions that occurred before the issuance date or effective date of the standard if the transactions were not reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance.  The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-01 to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

31

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” or MD&A, should be read in conjunction with our accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes and with the MD&A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.  The various sections of this MD&A contain a number of forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties.  See the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements on page 3 of this Quarterly Report for a description of important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expected results.

Licensing and Brand Management Business

We own a portfolio of consumer brands in the home, active and fashion categories, including Martha Stewart, Jessica Simpson, AND1, Avia, Joe’s Jeans,  GAIAM and Heelys.  We aim to maximize the value of our brands by promoting, marketing and licensing the brands through various distribution channels, including to retailers, wholesalers and distributors in the United States and in certain international territories.  Our core strategy is to enhance and monetize the global reach of our existing brands, and to pursue additional strategic acquisitions to grow the scope of and diversify our portfolio of brands. 

We aim to acquire well-known consumer brands with high potential for growth and strong brand awareness.  We additionally seek to diversify our portfolio by evaluating the strength of targeted brands and the expected viability and sustainability of future royalty streams.  Upon the acquisition of a brand, we partner with leading wholesalers and retailers to drive incremental value and maximize brand equity.  We focus on certain key initiatives in our licensing and brand management business.  These initiatives include:

· Maximizing the value of our existing brands by creating efficiencies, adding additional product categories, expanding distribution and retail presence and optimizing sales through innovative marketing that increases consumer brand awareness and loyalty;

· Developing international expansion through additional licenses, partnerships and other arrangements with leading retailers and wholesalers outside the United States; and

· Acquiring consumer brands (or the rights to such brands) with high consumer awareness, broad appeal and applicability to a wide range of product categories.

Our business is designed to maximize the value of our brands through license agreements with partners that are responsible for manufacturing and distributing our licensed products and, with the exception of our Martha Stewart brand, primarily responsible for the design of such licensed products.  Our brands are licensed for a broad range of product categories, including apparel, footwear, eyewear, fashion accessories and home goods, as well as, with respect to our Martha Stewart brand, food, wine, and a variety of media related assets, such as magazines, books and other print and digital content.  We seek to select licensees who have demonstrated the ability to produce and sell quality products in their respective licensed categories and have the capability to meet or exceed the minimum sales thresholds and guaranteed minimum royalty payments that we generally require.

We license our brands to both wholesale and direct-to-retail licensees.  In a wholesale license, a wholesale supplier is granted rights (typically on an exclusive basis) to a single or small group of related product categories for a particular brand for sale to multiple accounts within an approved channel of distribution and territory.  In a direct-to-retail license, a single retailer is granted the right (typically on an exclusive basis) to sell branded products in a broad range of product categories through its brick and mortar stores and e-commerce sites.  As of September 30, 2017, we had more than one-hundred fifty licensees, with wholesale licensees comprising a significant majority.

Our license agreements typically require a licensee to pay us royalties based upon net sales and, in most cases, contain guaranteed minimum royalties.  Our license agreements also require licensees to support the brands by either paying or spending contractually guaranteed minimum amounts for the marketing and advertising of the respective licensed brands.  As of September 30, 2017, we had contractual rights to receive an aggregate of $387.8 million in minimum royalty and marketing and advertising revenue from our licensees through the balance of the current terms of such licenses, excluding any renewals.

Fiscal Year

Our fiscal year ends on December 31.  Each quarter of each fiscal year ends on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31.

32

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to exercise its judgment.  We exercise considerable judgment with respect to establishing sound accounting policies and in making estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of our assets and liabilities, our recognition of revenues and expenses, and our disclosure of commitments and contingencies at the date of the financial statements.  On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments.  We base our estimates and judgments on a variety of factors, including our historical experience, knowledge of our business and industry and current and expected economic conditions, that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.  We periodically re-evaluate our estimates and assumptions with respect to these judgments and modify our approach when circumstances indicate that modifications are necessary.  While we believe that the factors we evaluate provide us with a meaningful basis for establishing and applying sound accounting policies, we cannot guarantee that the results will always be accurate.  Since the determination of these estimates requires the exercise of judgment, actual results could differ from such estimates.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $36.5 million for indefinite-lived intangible assets related to the trademarks of five of the Company’s non-core brands: Caribbean Joe,  Revo,  Franklin Mint,  Nevados, and FUL.  Fair value for each trademark was determined based on estimates of future discounted cash flows, a Level 3 measure within the fair value hierarchy.  The impairments arose due to reduced contractual minimums or reduced sales forecastsin key distribution channels for these brands.

Please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the SEC on March 14, 2017, for a discussion of our critical accounting policies.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, there were no material changes to these policies.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, results of operations information from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements:

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Change	Change
	2017		2016			(Dollars)	(Percentage)
		(in thousands, except percentages)
Net revenue	$	39,025	$	41,952	$	(2,927)	(7.0%)
Operating expenses		16,071		20,180		(4,109)	(20.4%)
Impairment charges		36,505		-		36,505	100.0%
(Loss) income from operations		(13,551)		21,772		(35,323)	(162.2%)
Other income		(214)		(150)		(64)	42.7%
Interest expense, net		15,237		14,742		495	3.4%
(Loss) income before income taxes		(28,574)		7,180		(35,754)	(498.0%)
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes		(3,842)		3,858		(7,700)	(199.6%)
Net (loss) income		(24,732)		3,322		(28,054)	(844.5%)
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		552		(2,022)		2,574	(127.3%)
Net (loss) income attributable to Sequential Brands Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries	$	(24,180)	$	1,300	$	(25,480)	1,960.0%

Net revenue.  The decrease in net revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016 is primarily attributable to decreased revenues in the Martha Stewart brandspartially offset by increased revenues in the AND1 brand.  Net revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2017 consists primarily of licensing revenue earned from our license agreements relating to the Martha Stewart,  Jessica Simpson, GAIAM, Avia, AND1,  Joe’s Jeans and Ellen Tracy brands.  Net revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2016 consists primarily of licensing revenue earned from our license agreements relating to the Martha Stewart,  Jessica Simpson,  GAIAM,  AND1, Avia,  Joe’s Jeans and Ellen Tracy brands.

Operating expenses. Operating expenses decreased $4.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 to $16.1 million compared to $20.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.  This decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in restructuring

33

costs of $1.2 million, stock-based compensation costs of $1.1 million, professional fees of $0.9 million, advertising costs of $0.7 million, rent costs of $0.5 million, deal advisory costs of $0.3 million, and partially offset by increased compensation costs of $0.6 million.

Impairment Charges.  During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $36.5 million for indefinite-lived intangible assets related to the trademarks of five of the Company’s non-core brands: Caribbean Joe,  Revo,  Franklin Mint,  Nevados, and FUL.  Fair value for each trademark was determined based on estimates of future discounted cash flows.  The impairments arose due to reduced contractual minimums or reduced sales forecasts in key distribution channels for these brands.

Other income.Other income during the three months ended September 30, 2017 consists of immaterial items.  Other income during the three months ended September 30, 2016 consists of the Company’s reversal of previously estimated accruals.

Interest expense, net.  The period-over-period increase in interest expense, net of $0.5 million is primarily due to an increase in interest incurred under our loan agreements.  Interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2017 includes interest incurred under our loan agreements of $14.0 million, non-cash interest related to the amortization of deferred financing costs of $1.0 million and non-cash interest of $0.2 million related to the accretion of the present value of guaranteed contractual payments assumed through certain of the Company’s acquisitions.  Interest expense, net during the three months ended September 30, 2016 includes interest incurred under our loan agreements and interest rate swaps of $13.2 million, non-cash interest related to the amortization of deferred financing costs of  $1.0 million and the write-off of approximately $0.3 million of deferred financing costs as a result of an extinguishment of a portion of the BoA Credit Agreement in accordance with ASC-470 – Debt in connection with the Company’s entry into the Amended BoA Credit Agreement.  Additionally, we expensed non-cash interest of $0.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016 related to the accretion of the present value of guaranteed contractual payments assumed through certain of the Company’s acquisitions.

Income taxes.  The benefit from income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2017 represents a non-cash deferred tax expense created by the amortization of certain acquired trademarks for tax but not book purposes and taxes for state, local and foreign jurisdictions offset by a tax benefit, discrete to the third quarter, representing a reduction in deferred tax liabilities resulting from the impairment of related to acquired trademarks..  The provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2016 represents the non-cash deferred tax expense created by the amortization of certain acquired trademarks for tax but not book purposes and taxes for state, local and foreign jurisdictions.  The effective tax rate differs from the statutory tax rate primarily due to benefits from taxes attributable to noncontrolling interest and changes in valuation allowance.

Noncontrolling interests.  Noncontrolling interests for the three months ended September 30, 2017 represents net income allocations of $1.8 million to With You, Inc., a member of With You LLC (the partnership between us and Jessica Simpson), $0.1 million to Elan Polo International, Inc., a member of DVS LLC, and $(2.4) million to JALP, LLC, a member of FUL IP Holdings, LLC.  Noncontrolling interests for the three months ended September 30, 2016 represents net income allocations of $1.8 million to With You, Inc., $0.1 million to Elan Polo International, Inc. and $0.1 million to JALP, LLC. 

Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, results of operations information from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,					Change	Change
	2017		2016			(Dollars)	(Percentage)
		(in thousands, except percentages)
Net revenue	$	120,569	$	110,114	$	10,455	9.5%
Operating expenses		57,379		63,077		(5,698)	(9.0%)
Impairment charges		36,505		-		36,505	100.0%
Income from operations		26,685		47,037		(20,352)	(43.3%)
Other expense (income)		1,553		(243)		1,796	(739.1%)
Interest expense, net		44,600		36,031		8,569	23.8%
(Loss) income before income taxes		(19,468)		11,249		(30,717)	(273.1%)
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes		(142)		5,276		(5,418)	(102.7%)
Net (loss) income		(19,326)		5,973		(25,299)	(423.6%)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(3,504)		(5,814)		2,310	(39.7%)
Net (loss) income attributable to Sequential Brands Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries	$	(22,830)	$	159	$	(22,989)	14,458.5%

34

Net revenue.  The increase in net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 is primarily attributable to the acquisition of GAIAM during the third quarter of 2016 and increased revenues in the Joe’s Jeans, AND1,  Avia, and Ellen Tracy brands offset by decreased revenues in the Martha Stewart brand.  Net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 consists primarily of licensing revenue earned from our license agreements relating to the Martha Stewart,  Jessica Simpson, GAIAM, Avia, AND1,  Joe’s Jeans and Ellen Tracy brands.  Net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 consists primarily of licensing revenue earned from our license agreements relating to the Martha Stewart,  Jessica Simpson, AND1, Avia,  GAIAM,  Joe’s Jeans and Ellen Tracy brands.

Operating expenses. Operating expenses decreased $5.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to $57.4 million compared to $63.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.  This decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in restructuring costs of $3.9 million, deal advisory costs of $3.4 million, stock-based compensation costs of $3.1 million, advertising costs of $2.0 million, professional fees of $1.3 million, and rent costs of $1.2 million partially offset by increased stock-based compensation and severance of $6.7 million in connection with the Company’s CEO transition, increased compensation costs of $1.5 million and $1.0 million of higher expenses related to the Martha & Snoop’s Potluck Dinner Party show.

Impairment Charges.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $36.5 million for indefinite-lived intangible assets related to the trademarks of five of the Company’s non-core brands: Caribbean Joe,  Revo,  Franklin Mint,  Nevados, and FUL.  Fair value for each trademark was determined based on estimates of future discounted cash flows.  The impairments arose due to reduced contractual minimums or reduced sales forecasts in key distribution channels for these brands.

Other expense (income).  Other expense (income) during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 consists of a $1.9 million loss recorded in connection with the sale of available-for-sale securities and other immaterial items partially offset by MSLO pre-acquisition sales tax refunds of $0.1 million.  Other expense (income) during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 consists of immaterial items.

Interest expense, net.  The period-over-period increase in interest expense, net of $8.6 million is primarily due to an increase in interest incurred under our loan agreements.  Interest expense, net during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 includes interest incurred under our loan agreements of $41.0 million, non-cash interest related to the amortization of deferred financing costs of $2.9 million and non-cash interest of $0.7 million related to the accretion of the present value of guaranteed contractual payments assumed through certain of the Company’s acquisitions.  Interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 includes interest incurred under our loan agreements and interest rate swaps of $33.0 million, non-cash interest related to the amortization of deferred financing costs of $1.8 million and the write off of approximately $0.3 million of deferred financing costs as a result of an extinguishment of a portion of the BoA Credit Agreement in accordance with ASC 470 – Debt in connection with the Company’s entry into the Amended BoA Credit Agreement.  Additionally, we expensed non-cash interest of $0.9 million related to the accretion of the present value of guaranteed contractual payments assumed through certain of the Company’s acquisitions.

Income taxes.  The benefit from income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 represents a non-cash deferred tax expense created by the amortization of certain acquired trademarks for tax but not book purposes and taxes for state, local and foreign jurisdictions offset by a tax benefit, discrete to the third quarter, representing a reduction in deferred tax liabilities resulting from the impairment of related to acquired trademarks.  The provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30,2016 represents the non-cash deferred tax expense created by the amortization of certain acquired trademarks for tax but not book purposes and taxes for state, local and foreign jurisdictions.  The effective tax rate differs from the statutory tax rate primarily due to benefits from taxes attributable to noncontrolling interest and changes in valuation allowance.

Noncontrolling interests.  Noncontrolling interests for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 represents net income allocations of $5.5 million to With You, Inc., a member of With You LLC (the partnership between us and Jessica Simpson), $0.4 million to Elan Polo International, Inc., a member of DVS LLCand $(2.4) million to JALP, LLC, a member of FUL IP Holdings, LLC.  Noncontrolling interests for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 represents net income allocations of $5.0 million to With You, Inc., $0.4 million to Elan Polo International, Inc. and $0.4 million to JALP, LLC. 

35

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2017, we had cash on hand, including restricted cash, of $14.0 million and a net working capital balance (defined below) of $20.8 million.  Additionally, we had outstanding debt obligations under our loan agreements of $641.8 million, which is presented net of $15.0 million of deferred financing fees in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.  As of December 31, 2016, we had cash on hand, including restricted cash, of $20.7 million and a net working capital balance (defined below) of $26.8 million.  Additionally, we had outstanding debt obligations under our loan agreements of $663.0 million, which is presented net of $18.0 million of deferred financing fees in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.  Net working capital is defined as current assets minus current liabilities, excluding restricted cash.  We believe that cash from operations and our currently available cash (including available borrowings under our existing financing arrangements) will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated working capital requirements for the foreseeable future.  Overall, we do not expect any negative effects to our funding sources that would have a material effect on our liquidity.  We intend to continue financing future brand acquisitions through a combination of cash from operations, bank financing and the issuance of additional equity and/or debt securities.  See Note 7 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for a description of certain financing transactions consummated by us.  There are no material capital expenditure commitments as of September 30, 2017.

Cash Flows from Operations

Cash flows from operations for operating, financing and investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 are summarized in the following table:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016
		(in thousands)
Operating activities	$	19,260	$	31,397
Investing activities		4,290		(151,067)
Financing activities		(30,168)		98,021
Net decrease in cash	$	(6,618)	$	(21,649)

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $12.1 million to $19.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to $31.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.  The $12.1 million decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in deferred revenue of $25.3 million, net income of $25.3 million, and prepaid expenses and other assets of $3.8 million, partially offset by increases in non-cash expenses of $33.0 million, in accounts receivable of $4.8 million, and in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities of $4.5 million period-over-period.

Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities increased $155.4 million to $4.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $151.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.  This increase is driven primarily by $147.6 million of cash used for acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to no cash used for acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we sold our available-for-sales securities for $5.8 million and we purchased $1.1 million of property and equipment.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we purchased $1.6 million of property and equipment and had a change in restricted cash of $1.5 million.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 decreased $128.2 million to $(30.2) million as compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $98.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we made principal payments of $21.2 million under our loan agreements in accordance with contractual terms and $5.8 million of distributions to certain noncontrolling interest partners.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2016,  we made principal payments of $14.0 million under our loan agreements in accordance with contractual terms and $5.0 million of distributions to certain noncontrolling interest partners.  In addition, we received $132.0 million of loan proceeds to finance the acquisition of GAIAM, Inc, and paid $13.0 million of related fees and expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we repurchased common stock from employees for tax withholding purposes related to the vesting of restricted stock of $1.1 million as compared to $0.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

36

Debt

As of September 30, 2017, we were party to a Third Amended and Restated First Lien Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A. as administrative and collateral agent (the “Amended BoA Credit Agreement”) and a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Wilmington Trust, National Association as administrative agent and collateral agent (the “GSO Credit Agreement”), referred to as our loan agreements.  Refer to Note 7 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our borrowings and the terms of these debt facilities.  As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, our long-term debt, including current portion, was $641.8 million and $663.0 million, which is presented net of $15.0 million and $18.0 million of deferred financing fees, respectively, in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.  As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016,  we had $7.4 million and $9.0 million, respectively, of availability under the current revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), subject to meeting certain leverage ratios.  We may request an increase in (i) the Revolving Credit Facility and Tranche A Loans as would not cause the consolidated first lien leverage ratio, determined on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such increase, to exceed 2.33:1.00 and (ii) the Tranche A-1 Loans, as would not cause the consolidated first lien leverage ratio, determined on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such increase, to exceed (a) with respect to any increase, the proceeds of which will be used solely to finance an acquisition, 2.50:100 and (b) with respect to any other increase, 2.40:1.00, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions in the Amended BoA Credit Agreement.  We may request one or more additional term loan facilities or the increase of term loan commitments under the GSO Credit Agreement as would not cause the consolidated total leverage ratio, determined on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such addition and increase, to exceed 6.00:1.00, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions in the GSO Credit Agreement.  We made $21.2 million of principal repayments under our loan agreements during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Contractual Obligations

On February 21, 2017, we amended the lease of its corporate headquarters which extends the lease through December 31, 2033 and effective in February 2018, lowers the rented square footage to approximately 63,000 square feet of corporate office space and 7,000 square feet of other rentable space.  Our contractual obligation as of September 30, 2017 for the amended lease is summarized as follows:

	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations		Total		Less than 1 Year		2-3 Years		4-5 Years		After 5 Years
		(in thousands)
Corporate Headquarters Lease	$	76,131	$	2,161	$	9,004	$	9,492	$	55,474

Future Capital Requirements

We believe cash on hand and cash from operations will be sufficient to meet our capital requirements for the twelve months following the filing of these financial statements.  We intend to continue financing future brand acquisitions through a combination of cash from operations, bank financing and the issuance of additional equity or debt securities.  The extent of our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our results of operations and growth through the acquisition of additional brands, and we cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain additional financing in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms in the near future, if at all.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.  As a result, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We limit exposure to foreign currency fluctuations by requiring payment under the majority of our licenses to be denominated in U.S. dollars.  One of our license agreements is denominated in Canadian dollars.  If there were an adverse change in the exchange rate from Canadian to U.S. dollars of 10%, the expected effect on net income would beimmaterial.

Our earnings may also be affected by changes in LIBOR interest rates as a result of our loan agreements.  As further discussed in Notes  3 and 7 to our accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, we have entered into interest rate caps to mitigate the effects of a change in LIBOR interest rates.  An increase in LIBOR interest rates of one percent affecting the loan agreements would not have had a material effect on our results of operations during the three and ninemonths ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

37

Item4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2017, the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on, and as of the date of such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2017 such that the information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted to the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

38

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

MSLO Stockholder Complaint

In connection with the merger of MSLO in December 2015, the following 13 putative stockholder class action lawsuits have been filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware: (1) David Shaev Profit Sharing Plan f/b/o David Shaev v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on June 25, 2015; (2) Malka Raul v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on June 26, 2015; (3) Daniel Lisman v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on June 29, 2015; (4) Matthew Sciabacucchi v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 2, 2015; (5) Harold Litwin v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 5, 2015; (6) Richard Schiffrin v. Martha Stewart, filed on July 7, 2015; (7) Cedric Terrell v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 8, 2015; (8) Dorothy Moore v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 8, 2015; (9) Paul Dranove v. Pierre De Villemejane. et. al., filed on July 8, 2015; (10) Phuc Nguyen v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 10, 2015; (11) Kenneth Steiner v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 16, 2015; (12) Karen Gordon v. Martha Stewart et. al., filed on July 27, 2015 against the MSLO Board of Directors, Sequential, Madeline Merger Sub, Singer Merger; and (13) Anne Seader v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. et. al., filed on July 28, 2015.  All of the 13 class action lawsuits name the Old Sequential, MSLO, the MSLO board of directors, Madeline Merger Sub, Inc., Singer Merger Sub, Inc. and the Company as defendants and allege that (a) members of the MSLO board of directors breached their fiduciary duties and (b) Old Sequential, MSLO, Madeline Merger Sub, Inc., Singer Merger Sub Inc. and the Company aided and abetted such alleged breaches of fiduciary duties by the MSLO board of directors. On August 18, 2015, the Delaware Chancery Court issued an order consolidating these actions for all purposes under the caption In re Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc., et. al. to be the operative complaint in the consolidated action.  On January 12, 2016, after the consummation of the Mergers, the plaintiffs filed a Verified Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, naming Ms. Martha Stewart, the Company, Old Sequential, Madeline Merger Sub, Inc. and Singer Merger Sub, Inc. and alleging that (a) Ms. Stewart breached her fiduciary duties to MSLO's stockholders and (b) the Company, Old Sequential, Madeline Merger Sub, Inc. and Singer Merger Sub, Inc. aided and abetted Ms. Stewart's breach of her fiduciary duties.  On April 4, 2016, Ms. Stewart and the Sequential defendants filed respective motions to dismiss the Verified Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint.  On June 15, 2016, Lead Plaintiffs sought leave to amend the complaint and file the Verified Second Amended Class Action Complaint, which Judge Slights granted on July 14, 2016.  On July 18, 2016, Lead Plaintiffs filed the Verified Second Amended Class Action Complaint against Defendants, asserting that Ms. Stewart breached her fiduciary duties and asserting that Sequential, Madeline Merger Sub, Singer Merger Sub, and Holdings aided and abetted the alleged breach of fiduciary duties.  On July 28, 2016, Ms. Stewart and the Sequential defendants filed respective motions to dismiss the Verified Second Amended Class Action Complaint.  On October 26, 2016, Lead Plaintiffs filed their opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss.  On November 29, 2016, Ms. Stewart and the Sequential Defendants filed reply briefs in further supports of their motions to dismiss the Verified Second Amended Class Action Complaint. Oral argument on the motions to dismiss occurred on March 22, 2017.  In August 2017, the Court ruled in favor of Ms. Stewart and the Sequential defendants on the motions to dismiss.  The Lead Plaintiffs did not appeal the ruling.  This matter is resolved.

Other Matters

From time to time, we are involved in legal matters arising in the ordinary course of business. We record a liability for litigation when we believe that it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If we determine that a loss is reasonably possible and the loss or range of loss can be estimated, we disclose the possible loss. Significant judgment is required to determine both likelihood of there being and the estimated amount of a loss related to such matters.

With respect to our outstanding legal matters, based on our current knowledge, we believe that the amount or range of reasonably possible loss will not, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.  However, the outcome of such legal matters is inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties. Further, regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors. See Note 8 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion of legal proceedings to which we are party.

39

Item1A. Risk Factors

Cautionary Statements and Risk Factors

This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in those forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the SEC onMarch 14, 2017.  There have been no material changes to such risk factors during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

There have been no unregistered sales of equity securities during the three months ended September 30, 2017.

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, we repurchased 30,521 shares of our common stock from employees for tax withholding purposes related to the vesting of restricted stock.  We do not currently have in place a repurchase program with respect to our common stock.

Period	(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased (1)	(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)	(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Jul 1 - 31	-	$                                     -	N/A	N/A
Aug 1 - 31	24,121	$                               2.63	N/A	N/A
Sep 1 - 30	6,400	$                               2.91	N/A	N/A
Total	30,521		-	-

(1) During the third quarter of 2017, 30,521 shares were purchased from employees for tax withholding purposes related to the vesting of restricted stock.  All shares were purchased other than through a repurchase plan or program.

40

Item 5.  Other Information

We and the required lenders under our Credit Agreements confirmed on November 7, 2017, that as of September 30, 2017, in calculating our Consolidated EBITDA thereunder for the quarter ended on September 30, 2017, we may exclude from Consolidated EBITDA, for the quarter ended on September 30, 2017, up to $500,000 of fees and expenses incurred in connection with the MSLO acquisition and up to $3.2 million of severance and other payments made to our former chief executive officer, in each case incurred or made during the 2017 fiscal year. 

Item 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:

Exhibit Number	Exhibit Title
31.1*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1**	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*Filed herewith.

**Furnished herewith.

41

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	SEQUENTIAL BRANDS GROUP, INC.
Date: November 10, 2017	/s/ Andrew Cooper
	By:     Andrew Cooper
	Title:  President and Interim Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)

42

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Karen Murray, certify that:

1.          I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sequential Brands Group, Inc.;

2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.          The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)          Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.          The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 10, 2017
	/s/ Karen Murray
	Karen Murray
	Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Andrew Cooper, certify that:

1.          I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sequential Brands Group, Inc.;

2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.          The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)          Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.          The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 10, 2017
	/s/ Andrew Cooper
	Andrew Cooper
	President and Interim Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 (the “Report”) by Sequential Brands Group, Inc. (“Registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of their knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

Date:  November 10, 2017	/s/ Karen Murray
	Karen Murray
	Chief Executive Officer
Date:  November 10, 2017	/s/ Andrew Cooper
	Andrew Cooper
	President and Interim Chief Financial Officer

XML

Document And Entity Information - shares	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017	Nov. 02, 2017
Document And Entity Information [Abstract]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2017
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2017
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Entity Registrant Name	Sequential Brands Group, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001648428
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Trading Symbol	sqbg
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		63,151,870

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Current Assets:
Cash	$ 12,515,000	$ 19,133,000
Restricted cash	1,527,000	1,521,000
Accounts receivable, net	50,632,000	53,195,000
Available-for-sale securities		7,673,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	6,367,000	4,366,000
Total current assets	71,041,000	85,888,000
Property and equipment, net	6,205,000	7,674,000
Intangible assets, net	995,348,000	1,030,212,000
Goodwill	304,123,000	307,744,000
Other assets	4,612,000	3,345,000
Total assets	1,381,329,000	1,434,863,000
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	14,627,000	18,915,000
Current portion of long-term debt	28,300,000	28,300,000
Current portion of deferred revenue	5,752,000	10,374,000
Total current liabilities	48,679,000	57,589,000
Long-term debt, net of current portion	598,428,000	616,735,000
Long-term deferred revenue, net of current portion	10,170,000	13,909,000
Deferred tax liability	199,910,000	200,357,000
Other long-term liabilities	7,913,000	8,705,000
Total liabilities	865,100,000	897,295,000
Commitments and Contingencies
Equity:
Preferred stock Series A, $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 63,567,718 and 62,602,041	634,000	624,000
Additional paid-in capital	507,876,000	502,564,000
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(506,000)	(144,000)
Accumulated deficit	(62,481,000)	(39,651,000)
Treasury stock, at cost; 415,848 and 97,686 shares at September 30, 2017 and December 31,	(1,784,000)	(638,000)
Total Sequential Brands Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries stockholders’ equity	443,739,000	462,755,000
Noncontrolling interest	72,490,000	74,813,000
Total equity	516,229,000	537,568,000
Total liabilities and equity	$ 1,381,329,000	$ 1,434,863,000

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Statement Of Financial Position [Abstract]
Preferred stock Series A, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock Series A, shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock Series A, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock Series A, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	150,000,000	150,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	63,567,718	62,602,041
Common stock, shares outstanding	63,151,870	62,504,355
Treasury stock, shares	415,848	97,686

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016
Income Statement [Abstract]
Net revenue	$ 39,025	$ 41,952	$ 120,569	$ 110,114
Operating expenses	16,071	20,180	57,379	63,077
Impairment charges	36,505		36,505
(Loss) income from operations	(13,551)	21,772	26,685	47,037
Other (income) expense	(214)	(150)	1,553	(243)
Interest expense, net	15,237	14,742	44,600	36,031
(Loss) income before income taxes	(28,574)	7,180	(19,468)	11,249
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes	(3,842)	3,858	(142)	5,276
Net (loss) income	(24,732)	3,322	(19,326)	5,973
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest	552	(2,022)	(3,504)	(5,814)
Net (loss) income attributable to Sequential Brands Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries	$ (24,180)	$ 1,300	$ (22,830)	$ 159
(Loss) earnings per share attributable to Sequential Brands Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries:
Basic	$ (0.38)	$ 0.02	$ (0.36)	$ 0.00
Diluted	$ (0.38)	$ 0.02	$ (0.36)	$ 0.00
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic (in shares)	62,998,944	62,176,700	62,796,716	61,817,742
Diluted (in shares)	62,998,944	63,066,757	62,796,716	62,918,590

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY - USD ($)	Total Sequential Brands Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries Stockholders' Equity	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-In Capital [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss [Member]	Accumulated Deficit [Member]	Treasury Stock [Member]	Noncontrolling Interest [Member]	Total
Treasury stock						$ (638,000)		$ (638,000)
Treasury stock, shares						(97,686)		(97,686)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2016	$ 462,755,000	$ 624,000	$ 502,564,000	$ (144,000)	$ (39,651,000)		$ 74,813,000	$ 537,568,000
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2016		62,602,041
Stock-based compensation	5,342,000	$ 10,000	5,332,000					5,342,000
Stock-based compensation (in shares)		965,677
Stock registration costs	(20,000)		(20,000)					(20,000)
Unrealized gain on interest rate cap	(362,000)			(362,000)				(362,000)
Repurchase of common stock	(1,146,000)					$ (1,146,000)		(1,146,000)
Repurchase of common stock (in shares)						(318,162)
Noncontrolling interest distribution							(5,827,000)	(5,827,000)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest							3,504,000	3,504,000
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	(22,830,000)				(22,830,000)			(22,830,000)
Balance at Sep. 30, 2017	$ 443,739,000	$ 634,000	$ 507,876,000	$ (506,000)	$ (62,481,000)		$ 72,490,000	516,229,000
Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2017		63,567,718
Treasury stock						$ (1,784,000)		$ (1,784,000)
Treasury stock, shares						(415,848)		(415,848)

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - USD ($)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net (loss) income	$ (19,326,000)	$ 5,973,000
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for bad debts	381,000	475,000
Depreciation and amortization	3,544,000	3,379,000
Stock-based compensation	5,342,000	5,642,000
Amortization of deferred financing costs	2,918,000	2,117,000
Impairment of trademark	36,505,000
Income from equity method investment	(22,000)
Loss on disposal of fixed assets	2,000	491,000
Realized loss on sale of available-for-sale securities	1,916,000
Deferred income taxes	(447,000)	5,003,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	2,182,000	(2,654,000)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(3,055,000)	776,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(4,552,000)	(7,607,000)
Deferred revenue	(7,361,000)	17,972,000
Other liabilities	1,233,000	(162,000)
Cash Provided By Operating Activities From Continuing Operations	19,260,000	31,405,000
Cash Used In Operating Activities From Discontinued Operations		(8,000)
Cash Provided By Operating Activities	19,260,000	31,397,000
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(147,587,000)
Investments in intangible assets, including registration and renewal costs	(280,000)	(390,000)
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities	5,757,000
Purchases of property and equipment	(1,183,000)	(1,617,000)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment	2,000	45,000
Changes in restricted cash	(6,000)	(1,518,000)
Cash Provided By (Used In) Investing Activities	4,290,000	(151,067,000)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Proceeds from long-term debt		132,000,000
Stock registration costs	(20,000)
Payment of long-term debt	(21,225,000)	(14,000,000)
Guaranteed payments in connection with acquisitions	(1,950,000)	(1,475,000)
Deferred financing costs		(13,011,000)
Repurchases of common stock	(1,146,000)	(501,000)
Noncontrolling interest distributions	(5,827,000)	(4,992,000)
Cash (Used In) Provided by Financing Activities	(30,168,000)	98,021,000
Net Decrease In Cash	(6,618,000)	(21,649,000)
Cash — Beginning of period	19,133,000	41,560,000
Cash — End of period	12,515,000	19,911,000
Supplemental Disclosures Of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for: Interest	41,697,000	31,792,000
Cash paid for: Taxes	90,000	178,000
Non-cash Investing And Financing Activities
Accrued purchases of property and equipment at period end	189,000	1,602,000
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities during the period		$ 1,060,000
Unrealized loss on interest rate cap during the period	(362,000)
Receivable for sale of trademark rights	$ 500,000

XML

Organization and Nature of Operations

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Organization and Nature of Operations [Abstract]

Organization and Nature of Operations

1. Organization and Nature of Operations

Overview

Sequential Brands Group, Inc. (the “Company”) owns a portfolio of consumer brands in the fashion, active and home categories.  The Company aims to maximize the strategic value of its brands by promoting, marketing and licensing its global brands through various distribution channels, including to retailers, wholesalers and distributors in the United States and in certain international territories.  The Company’s core strategy is to enhance and monetize the global reach of its existing brands, and to pursue additional strategic acquisitions to grow the scope of and diversify its portfolio of brands.  The Company licenses brands to both wholesale and direct-to-retail licensees.  In a wholesale license, a wholesale supplier is granted rights (typically on an exclusive basis) to a single or small group of related product categories for a particular brand for sale to multiple accounts within an approved channel of distribution and territory.  In a direct-to-retail license, a single retailer is granted the right (typically on an exclusive basis) to sell branded products in a broad range of product categories through its brick and mortar stores and e-commerce sites.  As of September 30, 2017, the Company had more than one-hundred fifty licensees, with wholesale licensees comprising a significant majority.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).  Certain information or footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC for interim financial reporting.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  It is the Company’s opinion, however, that the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, operating results and cash flows for the periods presented.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC on March 14, 2017, which contains the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.  The financial information as of December 31, 2016 is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.  The interim results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017 or for any future interim periods.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries.  All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

Making estimates requires management to exercise significant judgment.  It is at least reasonably possible that the estimate of the effect of a condition, situation or set of circumstances that existed at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which management considered in formulating its estimate, could change in the near term due to one or more future confirming events.  Accordingly, the actual results could differ significantly from estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company has entered into various license agreements that provide revenues based on guaranteed minimum royalty payments and advertising/marketing fees with additional royalty revenues based on a percentage of defined sales.  Guaranteed minimum royalty payments and advertising/marketing revenue are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of each contract year, as defined in each license agreement.  Royalty payments exceeding the guaranteed minimum royalty payments are recognized as income during the period corresponding to the licensee’s sales.  Payments received as consideration for the grant of a license are recorded as deferred revenue at the time payment is received and recognized ratably as revenue over the term of the license agreement.  Advanced royalty payments are recorded as deferred revenue at the time payment is received and recognized as revenue when earned.  Revenue is not recognized unless collectability is reasonably assured.

If license agreements are terminated prior to the original licensing period, the Company recognizes revenue in the amount of any contractual termination fees, unless such amounts are deemed non-recoverable.

With respect to editorial content for books, the Company receives advance payments from the Company’s publishers and recognizes revenue when manuscripts are delivered to and accepted by the publishers.  Revenue is also earned from book publishing when sales on a unit basis exceed the advanced royalty.

Television sponsorship revenues are generally recorded ratably across the period when new episodes initially air.

The Company entered into a transaction with a media company for which it receives advertising credits as part of the consideration exchanged.  These transactions are recorded at the estimated fair value of the advertising credits received, as their fair value is deemed more readily determinable than the fair value of the trademark licensing right provided by the Company, in accordance with ASC 845, Nonmonetary Transactions. The fair value of the advertising credits are recorded as revenue and in other assets when earned, and expensed when the advertising credits are utilized.   The Company recorded revenue of $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 related to the advertising credits earned.  The Company did not record any expense related to the advertising credits as they have not yet been utilized.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of cash deposited with a financial institution required as collateral for the Company’s cash-collateralized letter of credit facilities.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are recorded net of allowances for doubtful accounts, based on the Company’s ongoing discussions with its licensees and other customers and its evaluation of their creditworthiness, payment history and account aging.  Accounts receivable balances deemed to be uncollectible are written off after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.  The allowance for doubtful accounts was $0.3 million and $0.2 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

The Company’s accounts receivable, net amounted to $50.6 million and $53.2 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.  Four licensees accounted for approximately 63%  (25%,  14%,  13%, and 11%) of the Company’s total consolidated accounts receivable balance as of September 30, 2017 and four licensees accounted for approximately 49%  (14%,  13%,  12% and 10%) of the Company’s total consolidated accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2016.  The Company does not believe the accounts receivable balance from these licensees represents a significant collection risk based on past collection experience.

Investments

The Company had marketable securities that were classified as available-for-sale securities under ASC 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities.  Such available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and, at the time of purchase, were reported in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows as an investing activity.  The Company reviews its available-for-sale securities at each reporting period to determine whether a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary.  Any decline in fair value that is determined to be other-than-temporary would result in an adjustment for an impairment charge in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.  The primary factors the Company considers in its determination are (i) the length of time that the fair value of the available-for-sale security is below the Company’s carrying value, (ii) the financial condition and operating performance of the available-for-sale security, (iii) the reason for decline in fair value and (iv) the Company’s intent and ability to hold the investment in available-for-sale security for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in fair value.  Realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities, if any, are determined on a specific-identification basis. 

The unrealized gains and losses on the available-for-sale securities held by the Company as of December 31, 2016 is set forth below.

						December 31, 2016
								Gross Unrealized
		Historical Cost		Cost Basis (1)		Estimated Fair Value		Gains		Losses
		(in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities	$	12,048	$	7,673	$	7,673	$	-	$	-

(1)The cost basis is historical cost less other-than-temporary impairment.

During the second quarter of 2017, the Company sold its available-for-sale securities for $5.8 million.  The book cost basis of the available-for-sale securities was approximately $7.7 million, which was determined using the specific identification method.  The sale resulted in a net realized loss of $1.9 million, which is recorded in other (income) expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.  Included in the $1.9 million is $1.5 million that was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss.

Equity Method Investment

For investments in entities over which the Company exercises significant influence but which do not meet the requirements for consolidation, the Company uses the equity method of accounting.  On July 1, 2016, the Company acquired a 49.9% noncontrolling interest in Gaiam Pty. Ltd. in connection with its acquisition of Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC, which is included in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.  The Company’s share of earnings from its equity method investee, which was not material for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, is included in other (income) expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The Company evaluates its equity method investment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such investment may not be recoverable.  The difference between the carrying value of the equity method investment and its estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment charge when the loss in value is deemed other-than-temporary.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value.  In evaluating goodwill for impairment, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.  Qualitative factors considered include, for example, macroeconomic and industry conditions, overall financial performance, and other relevant entity-specific events.  If the Company bypasses the qualitative assessment, or concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, it then performs a quantitative goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment to be recognized, if any.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, as a result of its qualitative assessment of the likelihood of goodwill impairment, the Company identified potential impairment indicators and determined that a quantitative assessment was necessary.  Fair value for the quantitative assessment was determined under an income approach using estimates of discounted future cash flows (the “DCF Method”).  The DCF Method relies on assumptions such as the Company’s projected future earnings and appropriate discount rates.   The Company corroborated the results of the DCF Method by reconciling to within a reasonable range of its market capitalization (calculated as total common shares outstanding multiplied by the common equity price per share, as adjusted for a control premium factor).  Reconciling items identified included the benefit of the Company’s fully reserved tax assets for which the market capitalization may not be giving full value.  Based on the results of the quantitative assessment, the Company determined goodwill was not impaired for the period ended September 30, 2017.

Intangible assets represent trademarks, customer agreements and patents related to the Company’s brands and a favorable lease.  Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but instead are subject to impairment evaluation.  The carrying value of intangible assets and other finite-lived assets is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset may not be recoverable.  When conducting its impairment assessment, the Company initially performs a qualitative evaluation of whether it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired.  If it is determined by a qualitative evaluation that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired, the Company then tests the asset for recoverability.  Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to its future undiscounted net cash flows.  If the carrying amount of such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the recoverability of the assets.  Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.  During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $36.5 million for indefinite-lived intangible assets related to the trademarks of five of the Company’s non-core brands: Caribbean Joe,  Revo,  Franklin Mint,  Nevados, and FUL.  Fair value for each trademark was determined based on estimates of future discounted cash flows.  The impairments arose due to reduced contractual minimums or reduced sales forecasts in key distribution channels for these brands.This charge is included in impairment charges in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.  See Note 3 and Note 6 for further information.

Treasury Stock

Treasury stock is recorded at cost as a reduction of equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Stock-Based Compensation

Compensation cost for restricted stock is measured using the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock at the date the common stock is granted.  For restricted stock and restricted stock units, for which restrictions lapse with the passage of time (“time-based restricted stock”), compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the period between the issue date and the date that restrictions lapse.  Time-based restricted stock is included in total shares of common stock outstanding upon the lapse of applicable restrictions.  For restricted stock, for which restrictions are based on performance measures (“performance stock units” or “PSUs”), restrictions lapse when those performance measures have been deemed achieved.  Compensation cost for PSUs is recognized on a straight-line basis during the period from the date on which the likelihood of the PSUs being earned is deemed probable and (x) the end of the fiscal year during which such PSUs are expected to vest or (y) the date on which awards of such PSUs may be approved by the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors (the “Compensation Committee”) on a discretionary basis, as applicable.  PSUs are included in total shares of common stock outstanding upon the lapse of applicable restrictions.  PSUs are included in total diluted shares of common stock outstanding when the performance measures have been deemed achieved but the PSUs have not yet been issued.

Fair value cost for stock options and warrants is calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation model and is expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the grant.  The Company elected to early adopt the provisions of ASU 2016-09 “Simplifying the Accounting for Share-Based Payments” (“ASU 2016-09”) and reduces compensation cost for actual forfeitures as they occur.  Prior to the adoption to ASU 2016-09, the Company’s estimated forfeiture rate utilized in calculating compensation cost was zero percent based on the Company’s limited historical forfeiture experience.  

At each subsequent reporting period prior to the lapse of restrictions on warrants, time-based restricted stock and PSUs granted to non-employees, the Company remeasures the aggregate compensation cost of such grants using the Company’s fair value at the end of such reporting period and revises the straight-line recognition of compensation cost in line with such remeasured amount.

Leases

The Company leases certain properties for office and showroom.  Certain of the Company's lease agreements contain rent escalation clauses, free rent periods and tenant inducement payments.  Rent expense for noncancelable operating leases with scheduled rent increases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term.  The difference between straight-line rent expense and the scheduled payment amounts is recorded as a deferred rent asset or liability.

Income Taxes

Current income taxes are based on the respective periods’ taxable income for federal, foreign and state income tax reporting purposes.  Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities, using statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  In accordance with ASU No. 2015-17 “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,” all deferred income taxes are reported and classified as non-current.  A valuation allowance is required if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Company applies the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes.  The guidance clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with other authoritative GAAP and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.  The guidance also addresses derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.  Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, are recorded in income tax expense.  Tax years that remain open for assessment for federal and state tax purposes include the years ended December 31, 2013 through December 31, 2016.

The benefit from income taxes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 represents a non-cash deferred tax expense created by the amortization of certain acquired trademarks for tax but not book purposes and taxes for state, local and foreign jurisdictions offset by a tax benefit, discrete to the third quarter, representing a reduction in deferred tax liabilities resulting from the impairment of related to acquired trademarks.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net (loss) income attributable to Sequential Brands Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period, excluding the effects of any potentially dilutive securities.  Diluted EPS gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the reporting period, including stock options, PSUs and warrants, using the treasury stock method, and convertible debt, using the if-converted method.  Diluted EPS excludes all potentially dilutive shares of common stock if their effect is anti-dilutive.  The shares used to calculate basic and diluted EPS consist of the following:

	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017	2016	2017	2016
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding	62,998,944	62,176,700	62,796,716	61,817,742
Acquisition hold back shares	-	-	-	230,840
Warrants	-	360,440	-	351,386
Stock options	-	18,252	-	15,406
Performance based restricted stock	-	407,355	-	408,152
Unvested restricted stock	-	104,010	-	95,064
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding	62,998,944	63,066,757	62,796,716	62,918,590

The computation of diluted EPS for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 excludes the common stock equivalents of the following potentially dilutive securities because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive:

	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017	2016	2017	2016
Warrants	801,760	325,000	801,760	325,000
Stock options	84,000	51,000	84,000	51,000
Unvested restricted stock	972,355	-	972,355	130,000
Total	1,858,115	376,000	1,858,115	506,000

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which potentially expose the Company to credit risk consist primarily of cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable and available-for-sale securities.  Cash is held to meet working capital needs and future acquisitions.  Restricted cash is pledged as collateral for a comparable amount of irrevocable standby letters of credit for certain of the Company’s leased properties.  Substantially all of the Company’s cash, restricted cash and available-for-sale securities, prior to being sold, are deposited with high quality financial institutions.  At times, however, such cash, restricted cash and available-for-sale securities may be in deposit accounts that exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limit.  The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts as of September 30, 2017.

Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is minimal due to the collection history.  The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition.  The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the expected collectability of all accounts receivable.

Customer Concentrations

The Company recorded net revenues of $39.0 million and $42.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  During the three months ended September 30, 2017, three licensees represented at least 10% of net revenue, accounting for 12%,11%, and 10% of the Company’s net revenue.  During the three months ended September 30, 2016,  no licensees represented at least 10% of net revenue.

The Company recorded net revenues of $120.6 million and $110.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, three licensees represented at least 10% of net revenue, accounting for 11%,  11%, and 10% of the Company’s net revenue.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, two licensees represented at least 10% of net revenue, each accounting for 10% of the Company’s net revenue.

Loss Contingencies

The Company recognizes contingent losses that are both probable and estimable.  In this context, probable means circumstances under which events are likely to occur.  The Company records legal costs pertaining to contingencies as incurred.

Contingent Consideration

The Company recognizes the acquisition-date fair value of contingent consideration as part of the consideration transferred in exchange for the acquiree or assets of the acquiree in a business combination.  The contingent consideration is classified as either a liability or equity in accordance with ASC 480-10, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity.  If classified as a liability, the liability is remeasured to fair value at each subsequent reporting date until the contingency is settled.  Increases in fair value are recorded as losses, while decreases are recorded as gains.  If classified as equity, contingent consideration is not remeasured and subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity.

Noncontrolling Interest

Noncontrolling interest recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 represents income allocations to Elan Polo International, Inc., a member of DVS Footwear International, LLC, With You, Inc., a member of With You LLC (the partnership between the Company and Jessica Simpson), and JALP, LLC (“JALP”), a member of FUL IP Holdings, LLC (“FUL IP”).  Noncontrolling interest recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 represents income allocations to Elan Polo International, Inc., With You, Inc. and JALP.

Reportable Segment

An operating segment, in part, is a component of an enterprise whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (the “CODM”) to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance.  Operating segments may be aggregated only to a limited extent.  The Company’s CODM, the Chief Executive Officer, reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance.  Accordingly, the Company has determined that it has a single operating and reportable segment.  In addition, the Company has no foreign operations or any assets in foreign locations.  Nearly all of the Company’s operations consist of a single revenue stream, which is the licensing of its trademark portfolio, with an immaterial portion of revenues derived from television, book, café operations and certain commissions.

XML

Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments

3. Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments

ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820-10”), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and provides for expanded disclosure about fair value measurements.  ASC 820-10 applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.

The Company determines or calculates the fair value of financial instruments using quoted market prices in active markets when such information is available or using appropriate present value or other valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating available market discount rate information for similar types of instruments while estimating for non-performance and liquidity risk.  These techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate, credit spreads and estimates of future cash flows.

Assets and liabilities typically recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis to which ASC 820-10 applies include:

• non-financial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in an acquisition or business combination, and

• long-lived assets measured at fair value due to an impairment assessment under ASC 360-10-15, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.

This topic defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and establishes a three-level hierarchy, which encourages an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.  ASC 820-10 requires that assets and liabilities recorded at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

• Level 1 - inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.

• Level 2 - inputs utilize other-than-quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly.  Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

• Level 3 - inputs are unobservable and are typically based on the Company’s own assumptions, including situations where there is little, if any, market activity.  Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair value of positions that are classified within the Level 3 classification.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy.  In such cases, the Company classifies such financial assets or liabilities based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.  The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $36.5 million for indefinite-lived intangible assets related to the trademarks of five of the Company’s non-core brands: Caribbean Joe,  Revo,  Franklin Mint,  Nevados, and FUL.  Fair value for each trademark was determined based on estimates of future discounted cash flows, a Level 3 measure within the fair value hierarchy.  The impairments arose due to reduced contractual minimums or reduced sales forecastsin key distribution channels for these brands.The following table shows the change in indefinite-lived assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2017:

	September 30,
	2017
		(in thousands)
Balance at January 1	$	1,025,260
Additions		2,331
Impairment Charges		(36,505)
Ending balance	$	991,086

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no assets or liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis, except for available-for-sale securities, interest rate caps, contingent earn outs relating to theLinens ‘N Thingsbrand (the “LNT Contingent Earn Out”) and Legacy Payments (as defined below) to Ms. Martha Stewart.  The following table sets forth the carrying value and the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities required to be disclosed at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

			Carrying Value				Fair Value
Financial Instrument	Level		9/30/2017		12/31/2016		9/30/2017		12/31/2016
			(in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities		1	$	-	$	7,673	$	-	$	7,673
Interest rate caps		2	$	723	$	1,104	$	723	$	1,104
2016 Term Loans		3	$	558,988	$	582,500	$	549,664	$	551,324
2016 Revolving Loan		3	$	82,787	$	80,500	$	82,436	$	60,755
LNT Contingent Earn Out		3	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Legacy Payments		3	$	2,190	$	1,995	$	2,190	$	1,995

The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities.

The Company recorded its available-for-sale securities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value using Level 1 inputs at December 31, 2016.  The fair value of the Company’s available-for-sale securities was based upon quoted market prices for identical assets in active markets.

During 2016, the Company entered into interest rate cap agreements related to its 1-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) rates related to the Company’s loan agreements (the “2016 Cap Agreements”) with certain financial institutions.  The 2016 Cap Agreements have a $500 million notional value, strike rate of 1.50% and mature on November 23, 2018.  The Company recorded its interest rate caps on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value using Level 2 inputs.  The valuation technique used to determine the fair value of the 2016 Cap Agreements approximated the net present value of future cash flows, taking into account current interest rates.

The Company’s risk management objective and strategy with respect to the 2016 Cap Agreements is to reduce its exposure to variability in expected future cash outflows (forecasted interest payments) attributable to changes in 1-month LIBOR rates, the designated benchmark interest rate being hedged, relating to a portion of its outstanding floating-rate debt.  The 2016 Cap Agreements protect the Company from increases in hedged cash flows on its floating-rate debt attributable to changes in 1-month LIBOR rates above the strike rate.  Should 1-month LIBOR rates exceed 1.50% on a rate reset date during the terms of the 2016 Cap Agreements, the financial institutions will pay the Company for an amount equivalent to the excess interest over the strike rate.  To the extent the hedging relationship is perfectly effective, changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument each period will be deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the statement of changes in equity, and the upfront hedging instrument purchase price will be reclassified to interest expense, net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations according to its caplet values.  If hedge ineffectiveness exists, accumulated other comprehensive loss will be adjusted to a balance that reflects the lesser of either the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedging or the cumulative change in the fair value of the hypothetically “perfect” derivative.  The amount of ineffectiveness, if any, recorded in earnings would be equal to the excess of the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedging instrument over the cumulative change in the fair value of the hypothetical derivative.

The components of the 2016 Cap Agreements as of September 30, 2017 are as follows:

	Notional Value		Derivative Asset		Derivative Liability
		(in thousands)
LIBOR based loans	$	500,000	$	-	$	506

For purposes of this fair value disclosure, the Company based its fair value estimate for the 2016 Term Loans and 2016 Revolving Loan (each, as defined in Note 7) on its internal valuation whereby the Company applied the discounted cash flow method to its expected cash flow payments due under the loan agreements based on interest rates as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 for debt with similar risk characteristics and maturities.

On the date of the acquisition of Galaxy Brand Holdings, Inc., no value was assigned to the LNT Contingent Earn Out based on the remote probability that the Linens ‘N Things brand will achieve the performance measurements.  At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the LNT Contingent Earn Out had no value.  The Company continues to evaluate these performance measurements at each reporting period and determines their fair values if/when the achievement of the performance measurements becomes probable.

In connection with the acquisition of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (“MSLO”), beginning with calendar years commencing on or after January 1, 2026, the Company will pay Ms. Stewart three and one-half percent (3.5%) of Gross Licensing Revenues (as defined in Ms. Stewart’s employment agreement) for each such calendar year for the remainder of Ms. Stewart’s life (with a minimum of five (5) years of payments, to be made to Ms. Stewart’s estate if Ms. Stewart dies before December 31, 2030) (the “Legacy Payments”).  The Company recorded $0.1 million of accretion during each of the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and $0.2 million of accretion during each of the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 related to the Legacy Payments and recorded the expense within interest expense, net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

XML

Acquisition

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Acquisition [Abstract]

Acquisition

4. Acquisition

Acquisition of Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC

On July 1, 2016, the Company, together with its wholly-owned subsidiary, SBG-Gaiam Holdings LLC (formerly known as Stretch & Bend Holdings LLC), a Delaware limited liability company (“SBG-Gaiam” or the “Purchaser”) completed the acquisition pursuant to the terms of the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “MIPA”) with GAIAM, Inc., a Colorado corporation (“Seller”) pursuant to which Purchaser agreed to acquire the branded consumer business of Seller for a total purchase price of $145.7 million in cash.  As part of the transaction, SBG-Gaiam acquired Seller’s yoga, fitness and wellness product business, which include the GAIAM and SPRI brands.  In tandem with the transaction, the Company signed long-term licensing agreements for the brands’ core categories, which became effective upon closing.

As part of the MIPA, the Company paid $1.9 million to Seller for severance related charges to employees of GAIAM, Inc.  Also as part of the MIPA, the Company acquired a 49.9% noncontrolling interest in Gaiam Pty. Ltd, which is recorded under the equity method of accounting.  The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting.  Accordingly, the acquired assets were recorded at their estimated fair values, and operating results for theGAIAM and SPRI brands are included in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the acquisition, July 1, 2016.

The Company made the following updates to the purchase price during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 in connection with finalizing the valuation of the Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC acquisition (in thousands):

Allocated to:
Goodwill	$	(3,621)
Trademarks		3,568
Equity method investment		53
	$	--

The final allocation of the purchase price is summarized as follows (in thousands):

Purchase Price Allocation - Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC
Total consideration paid	$	147,587
Allocated to:
Trademarks	$	145,923
Goodwill		1,084
Equity method investment		757
Customer agreements		23
Accrued expenses		(200)
	$	147,587

The Company and Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC elected to treat the acquisition as an asset acquisition under section 338(h)(10) of the United States Internal Revenue Service tax code.  As such, the Company is not required to record a deferred tax liability in connection with the acquisition.

Goodwill arising from the acquisition mainly consists of the synergies of an ongoing licensing and brand management business.  Trademarks have been determined by management to have an indefinite useful life and, accordingly, no amortization is recorded in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.  Goodwill and trademarks are tested for impairment on an annual basis or sooner if an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the carrying amount of the goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable.

XML

Goodwill

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Goodwill [Abstract]

Goodwill

5. Goodwill

The changes in goodwill are summarized as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
		(in thousands)
Balance at January 1	$	307,744	$	314,288
Adjustment for acquisition of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.		-		(11,249)
(Adjustment for) and acquisition of Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC		(3,621)		4,705
Ending balance	$	304,123	$	307,744

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired under the acquisition method of accounting.  Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value.  In evaluating goodwill for impairment, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.  Qualitative factors considered include, for example, macroeconomic and industry conditions, overall financial performance and other relevant entity-specific events.  If the Company bypasses the qualitative assessment, or concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, it then performs a quantitative goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment to be recognized, if any.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, as a result of its qualitative assessment of the likelihood of goodwill impairment, the Company identified potential impairment indicators and determined that a quantitative assessment was necessary.  Fair value for the quantitative assessment was determined under an income approach using estimates of discounted future cash flows (the “DCF Method”).  The DCF Method relies on assumptions such as the Company’s projected future earnings and appropriate discount rates.   The Company corroborated the results of the DCF Method by reconciling to within a reasonable range of its market capitalization (calculated as total common shares outstanding multiplied by the common equity price per share, as adjusted for a control premium factor).  Reconciling items identified included the benefit of the Company’s fully reserved tax assets for which the market capitalization may not be giving full value.  Based on the results of the quantitative assessment, the Company determined goodwill was not impaired for the period ended September 30, 2017.

XML

Intangible Assets

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Intangible Assets [Abstract]

Intangible Assets

6. Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are summarized as follows:

September 30, 2017	Useful Lives (Years)		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount
			(in thousands)
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks	15	$	4,998	$	(1,808)	$	3,190
Customer agreements	4		2,832		(2,145)		687
Favorable lease	2		537		(537)		-
Patents	10		665		(280)		385
		$	9,032	$	(4,770)		4,262
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks							991,086
Intangible assets, net						$	995,348

December 31, 2016	Useful Lives (Years)		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount
			(in thousands)
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks	15	$	4,981	$	(1,558)	$	3,423
Customer agreements	4		2,832		(1,738)		1,094
Favorable lease	2		537		(537)		-
Patents	10		665		(230)		435
		$	9,015	$	(4,063)		4,952
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks							1,025,260
Intangible assets, net						$	1,030,212

Estimated future annual amortization expense for intangible assets in service as of September 30, 2017 is summarized as follows:

Years ending December 31,		(in thousands)
Remainder of 2017	$	208
2018		783
2019		593
2020		403
2021		400
Thereafter		1,875
	$	4,262

 Amortization expense amounted to $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.  Amortization expense amounted to $0.7 million and $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.  

Finite-lived intangible assets represent trademarks, customer agreements and patents related to the Company’s brands and a favorable lease.  Finite-lived assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but instead are subject to impairment evaluation.  The carrying value of finite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  Historically, indefinite-lived intangible assets have been tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset may not be recoverable.  When conducting its impairment assessment, the Company initially performs a qualitative evaluation of whether it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired.  If it is determined by a qualitative evaluation that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired, the Company then tests the asset for recoverability. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to its expected future undiscounted net cash flows.  If the carrying amount of such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the recoverability of the assets.  Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

XML

Long-Term Debt

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Long-Term Debt [Abstract]

Long-Term Debt

7. Long-Term Debt

The components of long-term debt are as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
		(in thousands)
2016 Term Loans	$	558,988	$	582,500
2016 Revolving Loan		82,787		80,500
Unamortized deferred financing costs		(15,047)		(17,965)
Total long-term debt, net of unamortized deferred financing costs		626,728		645,035
Less: current portion of long-term debt		28,300		28,300
Long-term debt	$	598,428	$	616,735

July 2016 Debt Facilities

On July 1, 2016 (the “Closing Date”), the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into (i) the Third Amended and Restated First Lien Credit Agreement (the “Amended BoA Credit Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent and the lenders party thereto and (ii) the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amended GSO Credit Agreement”) with Wilmington Trust, National Association, as administrative agent and collateral agent (the “GSO Agent”) and the lenders party thereto.  Such agreements amended, restated and replaced the Company’s previous debt facilities.  The Company used a portion of the proceeds of the $287.5 million loans made to the Company under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement and the $415.0 million loans made to the Company under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement to fund the payment of the purchase price with respect to the acquisition of the Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC and costs and expenses incurred in connection with such acquisition and related transactions.

The Amended BoA Credit Agreement provides for several five-year credit facilities, consisting of (i) Tranche A Term Loans in an aggregate principal amount of $133.0 million (the “Tranche A Loans”), (ii) Tranche A-1 Term Loans in an aggregate principal amount of $44.5 million (the “Tranche A-1 Loans” and, together with the Tranche A Loans, the “BoA Term Loans”) and (iii) revolving credit commitments in the aggregate principal amount of $110.0 million (the “Revolving Credit Facility” and, the loans under the Revolving Credit Facility, the “Revolving Loans”).  On the Closing Date, the total amount outstanding under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement was $258.0 million, including (i) $133.0 million of Tranche A Loans, (ii) $44.5 million of Tranche A-1 Loans and (iii) $80.5 million of borrowing under the Revolving Loans.

The loans under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement bear interest, at the Company’s option, at a rate equal to (i) with respect to the Revolving Loans and the Tranche A Loans (a) the LIBOR rate plus 3.50% per annum or (b) the base rate plus 2.50% per annum and (ii) with respect to the Tranche A-1 Loans (a) the LIBOR rate plus 7.00% per annum or (b) the base rate plus 6.00% per annum.  The undrawn portions of the commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility are subject to a commitment fee of 0.375% per annum. 

The Company may make voluntary prepayments of the loans outstanding under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement, subject to the payment of customary “breakage” costs with respect to LIBOR-based borrowings and, in certain cases, to the prepayment premium set forth in the Amended BoA Credit Agreement.  Additionally, the Company is mandated to make prepayments (without payment of a premium or penalty) under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement amounting to: (i) the loans outstanding under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement plus, (a) where intellectual property is disposed, 50.0% of the disposed intellectual property’s orderly liquidation value, and (b) where any other assets constituting collateral are disposed or upon the receipt of certain insurance proceeds, 100% of the net proceeds thereof, subject to certain reinvestment rights; and (ii) the Tranche A-1 Loans to the extent that the outstanding principal amount thereof exceeds 10.0% of the orderly liquidation value of the registered trademarks owned by the BoA Facility Loan Parties.Commencing on September 30, 2016, the BoA Term Loans will be amortized in quarterly installments of $5.0 million.

The Amended BoA Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and customary affirmative and negative covenants applicable to the BoA Facility Loan Parties and their subsidiaries.  Moreover, the Amended BoA Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that require the BoA Facility Loan Parties and their subsidiaries to (i) maintain a positive net income (as defined in the agreement), (ii) satisfy a maximum loan to value ratio set at 50.0% (applicable to the Revolving Loans and Tranche A Loans) and (iii) satisfy a maximum consolidated first lien leverage ratio, initially set at 2.80:1.00, decreasing over the term of the Amended BoA Credit Agreement until reaching the final maximum ratio of 2.50:1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2018 and thereafter.

The Amended BoA Credit Agreement contains certain customary events of default, including a change of control.  If an event of default occurs and is not cured within any applicable grace period or not waived, the Bank of America Agent, at the request of the lenders under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement, must take various actions, including, without limitation, the acceleration of amounts due under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement.

The Company may request an increase in (i) the Revolving Credit Facility and Tranche A Loans as would not cause the consolidated first lien leverage ratio, determined on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such increase, to exceed 2.33:1.00 and (ii) the Tranche A-1 Loans, as would not cause the consolidated first lien leverage ratio, determined on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such increase, to exceed (a) with respect to any increase, the proceeds of which will be used solely to finance an acquisition, 2.50:100 and (b) with respect to any other increase, 2.40:1.00, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions in the Amended BoA Credit Agreement.At September 30, 2017, the Company is in compliance with the covenants included in the Amended BoA Credit Agreement.

The Amended GSO Credit Agreement provides for a six-year $415.0 million senior secured term loan facility.  The Company may request one or more additional term loan facilities or the increase of term loan commitments under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement as would not cause the consolidated total leverage ratio, determined on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such addition and increase, to exceed 6.00:1.00, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions in the Amended GSO Credit Agreement.

The loans under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement bear interest, at the Company’s option, at a rate equal to either (i) the LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin of 8.25% or 9.00% per annum or (ii) the base rate plus an applicable margin of 7.25% or 8.00% per annum, in each case based upon the consolidated total leverage ratio.

The Company may make voluntary prepayments of the loans outstanding under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement, subject to the payment of customary “breakage” costs with respect to LIBOR-based borrowings and, in certain cases, to the prepayment premium set forth in the Amended GSO Credit Agreement.  The Company is mandated to make prepayments (without payment of a premium or penalty) of loans outstanding under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement amounting to: (i) where intellectual property is disposed, 50.0% of the disposed intellectual property’s orderly liquidation value, (ii) where any other asset constituting collateral is disposed or upon the receipt of certain insurance proceeds, 100% of the net proceeds thereof, subject to certain reinvestment rights, and (iii) any consolidated excess cash flow, in an amount equal to (a) in the event the consolidated total leverage ratio is at least 4.00:1.00, 75% thereof, (b) in the event the consolidated total leverage ratio is less than 4.00:1.00 but at least 3.00:1.00, 50% thereof and (c) in the event the consolidated total leverage ratio is less than 3.00:1.00, 0% thereof.  Commencing on March 31, 2017, the loans under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement will amortize in quarterly installments, equal to 2.00% per annum of the original aggregate principal amount thereof.

The Amended GSO Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and customary affirmative and negative covenants applicable to the GSO Facility Loan Parties and their subsidiaries.  Moreover, the Amended GSO Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that require the GSO Facility Loan Parties and their subsidiaries to satisfy (i) a maximum consolidated total leverage ratio, initially set at 7.25:1.00, decreasing over the term of the Amended GSO Credit Agreement until reaching the final maximum ratio of 6.50:1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2018 and thereafter and (ii) a maximum consolidated first lien leverage ratio, initially set at 2.80:1.00, decreasing over the term of the Amended GSO Credit Agreement until reaching the final maximum ratio of 2.50:1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2018 and thereafter.  At September 30, 2017, the Company is in compliance with the covenants included in the Amended GSO Credit Agreement.

The Amended GSO Credit Agreement contains certain customary events of default, including a change of control.  If an event of default occurs and is not cured within any applicable grace period or is not waived, the GSO Agent, at the request of the lenders under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement, is required to take various actions, including, without limitation, the acceleration of amounts due thereunder.

The Company may request one or more additional term loan facilities or the increase of term loan commitments under the GSO Credit Agreement as would not cause the consolidated total leverage ratio, determined on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such addition and increase, to exceed 6.00:1.00, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions in the GSO Credit Agreement.

Interest Rate Caps

During 2016, the Company entered into interest rate cap agreements related to its 1-month LIBOR rates related to the 2016 Cap Agreements with certain financial institutions.  The 2016 Cap Agreements have a $500 million notional value, strike rate of 1.50% and mature on November 23, 2018.  The Company recorded its interest rate caps on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value using Level 2 inputs.  The valuation technique used to determine the fair value of the 2016 Cap Agreements approximated the net present value of future cash flows, taking into account current interest rates.

The Company’s risk management objective and strategy with respect to the 2016 Cap Agreements is to reduce its exposure to variability in expected future cash outflows (forecasted interest payments) attributable to change in 1-month LIBOR rates, the designated benchmark interest rate being hedged, relating to a portion of its outstanding floating-rate debt.  The 2016 Cap Agreements protect the Company from increases in hedged cash flows on its floating-rate debt attributable to changes in 1-month LIBOR rates above the strike rate.  Should 1-month LIBOR rates exceed 1.50% on a rate reset date during the terms of the 2016 Cap Agreements, the financial institutions will pay the Company for an amount equivalent to the excess interest over the strike rate.  To the extent the hedging relationship is perfectly effective, changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument each period will be deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of changes in equity, and the upfront hedging instrument purchase price will be reclassified to interest expense, net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations according to its caplet values.  If hedge ineffectiveness exists, accumulated other comprehensive loss will be adjusted to a balance that reflects the lesser of either the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedging or the cumulative change in the fair value of the hypothetically “perfect” derivative.  The amount of ineffectiveness, if any, recorded in earnings would be equal to the excess of the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedging instrument over the cumulative change in the fair value of the hypothetical derivative.

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

8. Commitments and Contingencies

MSLO Stockholder Complaint

In connection with the merger of MSLO in December 2015, the following 13 putative stockholder class action lawsuits have been filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware: (1) David Shaev Profit Sharing Plan f/b/o David Shaev v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on June 25, 2015; (2) Malka Raul v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on June 26, 2015; (3) Daniel Lisman v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on June 29, 2015; (4) Matthew Sciabacucchi v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 2, 2015; (5) Harold Litwin v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 5, 2015; (6) Richard Schiffrin v. Martha Stewart, filed on July 7, 2015; (7) Cedric Terrell v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 8, 2015; (8) Dorothy Moore v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 8, 2015; (9) Paul Dranove v. Pierre De Villemejane. et. al., filed on July 8, 2015; (10) Phuc Nguyen v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 10, 2015; (11) Kenneth Steiner v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al., filed on July 16, 2015; (12) Karen Gordon v. Martha Stewart et. al., filed on July 27, 2015 against the MSLO Board of Directors, Sequential, Madeline Merger Sub, Singer Merger; and (13) Anne Seader v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. et. al., filed on July 28, 2015.  All of the 13 class action lawsuits name the Old Sequential, MSLO, the MSLO board of directors, Madeline Merger Sub, Inc., Singer Merger Sub, Inc. and the Company as defendants and allege that (a) members of the MSLO board of directors breached their fiduciary duties and (b) Old Sequential, MSLO, Madeline Merger Sub, Inc., Singer Merger Sub Inc. and the Company aided and abetted such alleged breaches of fiduciary duties by the MSLO board of directors. On August 18, 2015, the Delaware Chancery Court issued an order consolidating these actions for all purposes under the caption In re Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc., et. al. to be the operative complaint in the consolidated action.  On January 12, 2016, after the consummation of the Mergers (as defined below), the plaintiffs filed a Verified Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, naming Ms. Martha Stewart, the Company, Old Sequential, Madeline Merger Sub, Inc. and Singer Merger Sub, Inc. and alleging that (a) Ms. Stewart breached her fiduciary duties to MSLO's stockholders and (b) the Company, Old Sequential, Madeline Merger Sub, Inc. and Singer Merger Sub, Inc. aided and abetted Ms. Stewart's breach of her fiduciary duties.  On April 4, 2016, Ms. Stewart and the Sequential defendants filed respective motions to dismiss the Verified Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint.  On June 15, 2016, Lead Plaintiffs sought leave to amend the complaint and file the Verified Second Amended Class Action Complaint, which Judge Slights granted on July 14, 2016.  On July 18, 2016, Lead Plaintiffs filed the Verified Second Amended Class Action Complaint against Defendants, asserting that Ms. Stewart breached her fiduciary duties and asserting that Sequential, Madeline Merger Sub, Singer Merger Sub, and Holdings aided and abetted the alleged breach of fiduciary duties.  On July 28, 2016, Ms. Stewart and the Sequential defendants filed respective motions to dismiss the Verified Second Amended Class Action Complaint.  On October 26, 2016, Lead Plaintiffs filed their opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss.  On November 29, 2016, Ms. Stewart and the Sequential Defendants filed reply briefs in further supports of their motions to dismiss the Verified Second Amended Class Action Complaint.  Oral argument on the motions to dismiss occurred on March 22, 2017.  In August 2017, the Court ruled in favor of Ms. Stewart and the Sequential defendants on the motions to dismiss.  The Lead Plaintiffs did not appeal the ruling.  This matter is resolved.

General Legal Matters

From time to time, the Company is involved in legal matters arising in the ordinary course of business. While the Company believes that such matters are currently not material, there can be no assurance that matters arising in the ordinary course of business for which the Company is, or could be, involved in litigation, will not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations. Contingent liabilities arising from potential litigation are assessed by management based on the individual analysis of these proceedings and on the opinion of the Company’s lawyers and legal consultants.

XML

Stock-based Compensation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Stock-based Compensation [Abstract]

Stock-based Compensation

9. Stock-based Compensation

Stock Options

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017:

	Number of Options		Weighted-Average Exercise Price	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Outstanding - January 1, 2017	129,501	$	9.65	2.3	$	-
Granted	-		-
Exercised	-		-
Forfeited or canceled	(45,500)		(11.49)
Outstanding at September 30, 2017	84,001	$	8.65	2.4	$	-
Exercisable - September 30, 2017	84,001	$	8.65	2.4	$	-

A summary of the changes in the Company’s unvested stock options is as follows:

	Number of Options		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested - January 1, 2017	5,000	$	1.96
Granted	-		-
Vested	(5,000)		(1.96)
Forfeited or canceled	-		-
Unvested - September 30, 2017	-	$	-

The Company did not grant any stock options during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

Total compensation expense related to stock options for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was less than $0.1 million.  At September 30, 2017 there is no unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options.

Warrants

The following table summarizes the Company’s outstanding warrants for the nine months ended September 30, 2017:

	Number of Warrants		Weighted-Average Exercise Price	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Outstanding - January 1, 2017	801,760	$	7.87	3.1	$	51
Granted	-		-
Exercised	-		-
Forfeited or canceled	-		-
Outstanding at September 30, 2017	801,760	$	7.87	2.3	$	-
Exercisable - September 30, 2017	801,760	$	7.87	2.3	$	-

A summary of the changes in the Company’s unvested warrants is as follows:

	Number of Warrants		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested - January 1, 2017	50,000	$	6.32
Granted	-		-
Vested	(50,000)		(6.32)
Forfeited or canceled	-		-
Unvested - September 30, 2017	-	$	-

The Company did not issue any warrants during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

Total compensation expense related to warrants for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively.  Total compensation expense related to warrants for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was less than $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.  At September 30, 2017 there is no unrecognized compensation expense related to warrants.

Restricted Stock

A summary of the time-based restricted stock activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is as follows:

	Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
	(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Unvested - January 1, 2017	258,787	$	8.45	2.1
Granted	111,112		3.60
Vested	(147,632)		(5.75)
Unvested - September 30, 2017	222,267	$	7.82	2.2

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted 111,112 shares of time-based restricted stock to members of the Company’s board of directors.  These shares had a grant date fair value of $0.4 million and vest over a period of one year.  The Company recorded $0.1 million and $0.2 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, as compensation expense pertaining to these grants.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company granted 70,548 shares of time-based restricted stock to members of the Company’s board of directors.  These shares had a grant date fair value of $0.4 million and vest over a period of one year.  The Company recorded $0.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compensation expense pertaining to these grants.  The Company recorded $0.1 million and $0.2 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compensation expense pertaining to these grants. 

Total compensation expense related to time-based restricted stock grants for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively.  Total compensation expense related to time-based restricted stock grants for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively.  Total unrecognized compensation expense related to time-based restricted stock grants at September 30, 2017 amounted to $0.5 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.

Restricted Stock Units

A summary of the time-based restricted stock units activity for thenine months ended September 30, 2017 is as follows:

	Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
	(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Unvested - January 1, 2017	326,667	$	8.52	2.5
Granted	636,753		3.24
Vested	(153,332)		(10.20)
Forfeited or canceled	(60,000)		(4.89)
Unvested - September 30, 2017	750,088	$	3.98	2.5

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted 200,000 time-based restricted stock units to certain employees for future services and 276,753 time-based restricted stock units to a consultant for future services.  These shares of time-based restricted stock units had a grant date fair value of $1.4 million and vest over a period of three years.  The Company recorded less than $0.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compensation expense pertaining to these grants.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted 100,000 time-based restricted stock units to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to an employment agreement, dated April 3, 2017.  These shares of time-based restricted stock units had a grant date fair value of $0.4 million and vest over a period of three years.  The Company recorded less than $0.1 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compensation expense pertaining to this grant.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company accelerated the vesting of 66,667 shares of time-based restricted stock units for the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer in connection with the CEO transition.  Total compensation expense related to these shares of $0.7 million was recorded as operating expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted 60,000 time-based restricted stock units to the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer pursuant to an amended employment agreement, dated January 3, 2017.  These shares of time-based restricted stock units had a grant date fair value of $0.3 million and a vesting period of two years.  Upon the former Chief Financial Officer’s departure, these shares were forfeited prior to vesting during the three months ended September 30, 2017.  Compensation expense previously recognized was reversed during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company issued 35,000 shares of time-based restricted stock units to an employee for future services.  These shares of time-based restricted stock units had a grant date fair value of $0.3 million and vest over a period of three years.  The Company recorded less than $0.1 million during the each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 as compensation expense pertaining to this grant.

Total compensation expense related to time-based restricted stock unit grants for each of the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.2 million.  Total compensation expense related to time-based restricted stock unit grants for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $1.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively.  Total unrecognized compensation expense related to time-based restricted stock unit grants at September 30, 2017 amounted to $2.7 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years.

Performance Stock Units

A summary of the PSUs activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is as follows:

	Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
	(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Unvested - January 1, 2017	2,803,367	$	8.18	2.4
Granted	716,600		3.17
Vested	(701,233)		(10.97)
Forfeited or canceled	(673,700)		(7.22)
Unvested - September 30, 2017	2,145,034	$	5.90	2.2

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted 200,000 PSUs to an employee upon their commencement of employment with the Company.  These PSUs had a grant date fair value of $0.7 million and vest over a period of three years and require achievement of certain of the Company’s performance metrics within each fiscal year for such PSUs to be earned.  The Company did not record any compensation expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as the likelihood of these PSUs being earned was not probable.

On July 25, 2017, the Compensation Committee voted to approve, on a discretionary basis, an award of 41,600 PSUs to employees and consultants.  The fair value and expense recorded for such PSUs was based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the modification of the performance metric was communicated to employees and consultants.  The Company did not record any compensation expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as the likelihood of these PSUs being earned was not probable.

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted 300,000 PSUs to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.  These PSUs had a grant date fair value of $0.8 million and vest over a period of three years and require achievement of certain of the Company’s performance metrics within each fiscal year for such PSUs to be earned.  The Company did not record any compensation expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as the likelihood of these PSUs being earned was not probable.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted 175,000 PSUs to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to an employment agreement, dated April 3, 2017.  These PSUs had a grant date fair value of $0.7 million and vest over a period of three years and require achievement of certain of the Company’s performance metrics within each fiscal year for such PSUs to be earned.  The Company did not record any compensation expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as the likelihood of these PSUs being earned was not probable.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company accelerated the vesting of 200,000 PSUs for the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer in connection with the CEO transition.  Total compensation expense related to these PSUs of $2.9 million was recorded as operating expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

On February 28, 2017, the Compensation Committee voted to approve, on a discretionary basis, an award of 164,978 PSUs to employees and consultants.  Included in the above award were 60,000 PSUs and 36,000 PSUs for the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively.  The fair value and expense recorded for such PSUs was based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the modification of the performance metric was communicated to employees and consultants.  Total compensation expense related to these PSUs of $0.6 million was recorded as operating expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company granted 30,000 PSUs to an employee upon the commencement of his employment with the Company.  These PSUs had a grant date fair value of $0.2 million and vest over a period of three years and require achievement of certain of the Company’s performance metrics within each fiscal year for such PSUs to be earned.  The Company did not record any compensation expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as the likelihood of the remaining PSUs being earned was not probable.  The Company recorded less than $0.1 million during each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compensation expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations pertaining to these PSUs as the likelihood of certain PSUs being earned became probable.

On February 23, 2016, the Compensation Committee voted to approve, on a discretionary basis, an award of 69,994 PSUs to employees and consultants.  Included in the above award were 20,000 PSUs and 12,000 PSUs for the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively.  The fair value and expense recorded for such PSUs was based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the modification of the performance metric was communicated to employees and consultants.  Total compensation expense related to these PSUs of $0.4 million was recorded as operating expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

The Company did not grant any PSUs during the three months ended September 30, 2016.  The Company did not record compensation expense related to the PSUs for the three months ended September 30, 2017.  Total compensation expense related to the PSUs for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was $1.3 million. Total compensation expense related to the PSUs for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $3.5 million and $3.6 million, respectively.

XML

Related Party Transactions

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related Party Transactions

10. Related Party Transactions

Consulting Services Agreement with Tengram Capital Partners, L.P. (f/k/a Tengram Capital Management L.P.)

Pursuant to an agreement with Tengram Capital Partners, L.P., formerly known as Tengram Capital Management, L.P. (“TCP”), an affiliate of Tengram Capital Partners Gen2 Fund, L.P., which is one of the Company’s largest stockholders, the Company has engaged TCP, effective as of January 1, 2013, to provide services to the Company pertaining to (i) mergers and acquisitions, (ii) debt and equity financing and (iii) such other related areas as the Company may reasonably request from time to time (the “TCP Agreement”).  TCP was entitled to receive compensation of $1.0 million, including fees and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses in connection with performing its services under the TCP Agreement.  The TCP Agreement remains in effect for a period continuing through the earlier of five years or the date on which TCP and its affiliates cease to own in excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock in the Company.  On August 15, 2014, the Company consummated transactions pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger, dated as of June 24, 2014 (the “Galaxy Merger Agreement”) with SBG Universe Brands LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and the Company’s direct wholly-owned subsidiary (“LLC Sub”), Universe Galaxy Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and direct wholly-owned subsidiary of LLC Sub, Galaxy Brand Holdings, Inc. andCarlyle Galaxy Holdings, L.P. (such transactions, collectively, the “Galaxy Acquisition”).  In connection with the Galaxy Merger Agreement, the Company and TCP entered into an amendment to the TCP Agreement (the “Amended TCP Agreement”), pursuant to which, among other things, TCP is entitled to receive annual fees of $0.9 million beginning with fiscal 2014.

The Company paid TCP $0.5 million for services under the Amended TCP Agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.  The Company paid TCP $0.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.  At September 30, 2017, the Company had accrued $0.2 million payable to TCP.  At December 31, 2016, there were no amounts due to TCP for services.

Additionally, in July 2013, the Company entered into a consulting arrangement with an employee of TCP (the “TCP Employee”), pursuant to which the TCP Employee provides legal and other consulting services at the request of the Company from time to time.  The TCP Employee was also issued 125,000 shares of restricted stock, vesting over a four-year period and 180,000 PSUs, vesting over three years in increments of 20% for 2014,  20% for 2015 and 60% for 2016.  Additionally, the TCP employee was granted 200,000 PSUs, vesting over three years in increments of 33.3% for 2017,  33.3% for 2018 and 33.4% for 2019.  The Company paid the TCP Employee $0.1 million and $0.2 million for services under the consulting arrangement during each of the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The Company paid the TCP Employee $0.2 million and $0.3 million for services under the consulting arrangement during each of the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.  These amounts are included in operating expenses in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.  At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no amounts due to the TCP Employee.

Transactions with E.S. Originals, Inc.

A division president of the Company maintains a passive ownership interest in one of the Company’s licensees, E.S. Originals, Inc. (“ESO”).  The Company receives royalties from ESO under license agreements for certain of the Company’s brands in the footwear category.  The Company recorded $3.5 million and $3.0 million of revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for royalties and advertising revenue earned from ESO license agreements.  The Company recorded $11.3 million and $11.2 million of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for royalties and advertising revenue earned from ESO license agreements.  At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had $6.7 million and $7.1 million recorded as accounts receivable from ESO in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, respectively.

In addition, the Company entered into a license-back agreement with ESO under which the Company reacquired the rights to certain international territories in order to re-license these rights to an unrelated party.  The Company recorded less than $0.1 million in license-back expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Acquisition of FUL

On November 17, 2014, the Company made a strategic investment in FUL IP.  FUL IP is a collaborative investment between the Company and JALP.  FUL IP was formed for the purpose of licensing theFULtrademark to third parties in connection with the manufacturing, distribution, marketing and sale ofFULbranded bags, backpacks, duffels, luggage and apparel accessories.  JALP contributed theFULtrademark with a fair value of $8.9 million.  In exchange for a 50.5% economic interest in FUL IP the Company paid JALP $4.5 million.  JALP’s minority member interest in FUL IP has been reflected as noncontrolling interest on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.  One of the Company’s directors, Mr. Al Gossett, has a partial ownership interest in JALP.  There was $(2.4) million of noncontrolling interest recorded during each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.  There was $0.1 million and $0.4 million of noncontrolling interest recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.

Investment in Available-for-Sale Securities

As further discussed in Note 2, in September 2015, the Company purchased available-for-sale securities of an unaffiliated third-party publicly traded company from Tengram Capital Partners, L.P., which is an affiliate of Tengram Capital Partners Gen2 Fund, L.P., one of the Company’s largest stockholders, for an aggregate purchase price of $12.0 million (plus related transaction expenses), which was the purchase price paid by Tengram Capital Partners, L.P. upon the acquisition of such available-for-sale securities in open market transactions.  The Company did not pay a fee or any compensation to Tengram Capital Partners, L.P. in connection with the Company’s investment in the available-for-sale securities.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company sold its available-for-sale securities for $5.8 million. 

IP License Agreement and Intangible Asset Agreement

In connection with the transactions contemplated by the acquisition of MSLO (the “Mergers”), MSLO entered into an Amended and Restated Asset License Agreement (“Intangible Asset Agreement”) and Amended and Restated Intellectual Property License and Preservation Agreement (“IP License Agreement” and, together with the Intangible Asset Agreement, the “IP Agreements”) pursuant to which Ms. Martha Stewart licensed certain intellectual property to MSLO.  The IP Agreements grant the Company the right to use of certain properties owned by Ms. Stewart.

The Intangible Asset Agreement has an initial term commencing at December 4, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2020, provided that the term will automatically be renewed for five additional calendar years ending December 31, 2025 (subject to earlier termination as provided in Ms. Stewart’s employment agreement) if either the aggregate gross licensing revenues (as defined in Ms. Stewart’s employment agreement) for calendar years 2018 through 2020 exceed $195 million or the gross licensing revenues for calendar year 2020 equal or exceed $65 million.During the term of the Intangible Asset Agreement with the Company, Lifestyle Research Center LLC will be entitled to receive a guaranteed annual payment of $1.7 million, which amounts are being paid in connection with the Mergers regardless of Ms. Stewart’s continued employment with the Company plus reimbursable expenses.  The Company has paid Lifestyle Research Center LLC $0.8 million and less than $0.1 million in connection with other related services during the each of the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The Company has paid Lifestyle Research Center LLC $1.4 million and less than $0.1 million in connection with other related services during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

During the term of the IP Agreement with the Company, Ms. Stewart will be entitled to receive a guaranteed annual payment of $1.3 million, which amounts are being paid in connection with the Mergers regardless of Ms. Stewart’s continued employment with the Company.  During each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company made payments of $0.3 million and $1.0million, respectively, to Ms. Stewart in connection with the terms of the IP Agreement.  The IP License Agreement is perpetual.

During each of the three month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company expensed non-cash interest of $0.2 million related to the accretion of the present value of these guaranteed contractual payments.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company expensed non-cash interest of $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, related to the accretion of the present value of these guaranteed contractual payments.  At September 30, 2017, there was $8.3 million due under the IP Agreements of which $2.9 million is recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses and $5.4 million is recorded in other long-term liabilities.  At December 31, 2016, there was $8.8 million due under the IP Agreements of which $2.8 million is recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses and $6.0 million is recorded in other long-term liabilities.

XML

Restructuring

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Restructuring [Abstract]

Restructuring

11. Restructuring

The Company did not incur restructuring charges during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded $0.4 million of restructuring charges in connection with headcount reductions.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded $3.2 million of restructuring charges in connection with headcount reductions and lease termination costs.  The charges incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 consisted of $1.7 million of severance and related benefits associated with headcount reductions, $0.8 million of professional fees, $0.3 million in contract termination fees and $0.4 million of asset write-offs.  These charges are included in operating expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations.

On a cumulative basis, the Company has recorded $11.9 million of restructuring charges in connection with the Mergers, headcount reductions and contract termination costs.  The associated employee headcount reductions in connection with the reduction in workforce since inception were 65 employees.  The Company does not expect to incur any additional charges.

There is no restructuring accrual as of September 30, 2017.  A restructuring accrual of $1.5 million as of December 31, 2016 is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.  This accrual included amounts provided for contract termination fees.  The Company has paid $10.5 million in cash related to these initiatives as of September 30, 2017.

Changes in the restructuring accruals during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were as follows:

		Severance & Related Benefits		Contract Termination Costs		Professional Fees		Total Accrual
		(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2017	$	-	$	1,500	$	-	$	1,500
Charges to expense		-		-		-		-
Amounts paid		-		(1,500)		-		(1,500)
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

XML

New Accounting Pronouncements

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

New Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]

New Accounting Pronouncements

12. New Accounting Pronouncements

ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (‘ASU 2014-09’). ASU 2014-09 provides guidance for revenue recognition and affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets, and supersedes the current revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition,” and most industry-specific guidance. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is the recognition of revenue when a company transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, will require greater use of judgment and estimates than under the current guidance.  This ASU will be effective beginning in the first quarter of the Company’s fiscal year 2018. The ASU may be applied using a full retrospective method or a modified retrospective transition method, with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption.  The Company has made substantial progress in its review of the new standard and will complete its assessment by December 31, 2017. The Company will adopt the standard effective the first quarter of 2018 and apply the amendments using the modified retrospective method.  The Company currently expects the impact of adoption of this guidance to be immaterial to our financial statements and related disclosures.

ASU No. 2017-12, “Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities”

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, “Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities” (“ASU 2017-12”).  ASU 2017-12 amends the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging.  The amendments in ASU 2017-12 are intended to improve the transparency and understandability of information about an entity’s risk management activities and simplify the application of hedge accounting.

ASU 2017-12 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted.  The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-12 to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2017-09, “FASB Amends the Scope of Modification Accounting for Share-Based Payment Arrangements”

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, “FASB Amends the Scope of Modification Accounting for Share-Based Payment Arrangements” (“ASU 2017-09”).  ASU 2017-09 provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting under ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation.  Specifically, an entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions, and classification of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification.

ASU 2017-09 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-09 to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU 2017-04”).  ASU 2017-04 removes the requirement to compare the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount as part of step 2 of the goodwill impairment test.  As a result, under ASU 2017-04, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

ASU 2017-04 is effective prospectively for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted on testing dates after January 1, 2017.  The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-04 during the first quarter of 2017.  The adoption of ASU 2017-04 did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2017-01, “FASB Clarifies the Definition of a Business”

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “FASB Clarifies the Definition of a Business” (“ASU 2017-01”).  ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a business in ASC 805.  The amendments in ASU 2017-01 are intended to make application of the guidance more consistent and cost-efficient.

ASU 2017-01 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for transactions that occurred before the issuance date or effective date of the standard if the transactions were not reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance.  The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-01 to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).  Certain information or footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC for interim financial reporting.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  It is the Company’s opinion, however, that the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, operating results and cash flows for the periods presented.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC on March 14, 2017, which contains the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.  The financial information as of December 31, 2016 is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.  The interim results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017 or for any future interim periods.

Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries.  All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

Making estimates requires management to exercise significant judgment.  It is at least reasonably possible that the estimate of the effect of a condition, situation or set of circumstances that existed at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which management considered in formulating its estimate, could change in the near term due to one or more future confirming events.  Accordingly, the actual results could differ significantly from estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

The Company has entered into various license agreements that provide revenues based on guaranteed minimum royalty payments and advertising/marketing fees with additional royalty revenues based on a percentage of defined sales.  Guaranteed minimum royalty payments and advertising/marketing revenue are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of each contract year, as defined in each license agreement.  Royalty payments exceeding the guaranteed minimum royalty payments are recognized as income during the period corresponding to the licensee’s sales.  Payments received as consideration for the grant of a license are recorded as deferred revenue at the time payment is received and recognized ratably as revenue over the term of the license agreement.  Advanced royalty payments are recorded as deferred revenue at the time payment is received and recognized as revenue when earned.  Revenue is not recognized unless collectability is reasonably assured.

If license agreements are terminated prior to the original licensing period, the Company recognizes revenue in the amount of any contractual termination fees, unless such amounts are deemed non-recoverable.

With respect to editorial content for books, the Company receives advance payments from the Company’s publishers and recognizes revenue when manuscripts are delivered to and accepted by the publishers.  Revenue is also earned from book publishing when sales on a unit basis exceed the advanced royalty.

Television sponsorship revenues are generally recorded ratably across the period when new episodes initially air.

The Company entered into a transaction with a media company for which it receives advertising credits as part of the consideration exchanged.  These transactions are recorded at the estimated fair value of the advertising credits received, as their fair value is deemed more readily determinable than the fair value of the trademark licensing right provided by the Company, in accordance with ASC 845, Nonmonetary Transactions. The fair value of the advertising credits are recorded as revenue and in other assets when earned, and expensed when the advertising credits are utilized.   The Company recorded revenue of $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 related to the advertising credits earned.  The Company did not record any expense related to the advertising credits as they have not yet been utilized.

Restricted Cash

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of cash deposited with a financial institution required as collateral for the Company’s cash-collateralized letter of credit facilities.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are recorded net of allowances for doubtful accounts, based on the Company’s ongoing discussions with its licensees and other customers and its evaluation of their creditworthiness, payment history and account aging.  Accounts receivable balances deemed to be uncollectible are written off after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.  The allowance for doubtful accounts was $0.3 million and $0.2 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

The Company’s accounts receivable, net amounted to $50.6 million and $53.2 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.  Four licensees accounted for approximately 63%  (25%,  14%,  13%, and 11%) of the Company’s total consolidated accounts receivable balance as of September 30, 2017 and four licensees accounted for approximately 49%  (14%,  13%,  12% and 10%) of the Company’s total consolidated accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2016.  The Company does not believe the accounts receivable balance from these licensees represents a significant collection risk based on past collection experience.

Investments

Investments

The Company had marketable securities that were classified as available-for-sale securities under ASC 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities.  Such available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and, at the time of purchase, were reported in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows as an investing activity.  The Company reviews its available-for-sale securities at each reporting period to determine whether a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary.  Any decline in fair value that is determined to be other-than-temporary would result in an adjustment for an impairment charge in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.  The primary factors the Company considers in its determination are (i) the length of time that the fair value of the available-for-sale security is below the Company’s carrying value, (ii) the financial condition and operating performance of the available-for-sale security, (iii) the reason for decline in fair value and (iv) the Company’s intent and ability to hold the investment in available-for-sale security for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in fair value.  Realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities, if any, are determined on a specific-identification basis. 

The unrealized gains and losses on the available-for-sale securities held by the Company as of December 31, 2016 is set forth below.

						December 31, 2016
								Gross Unrealized
		Historical Cost		Cost Basis (1)		Estimated Fair Value		Gains		Losses
		(in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities	$	12,048	$	7,673	$	7,673	$	-	$	-

(1)The cost basis is historical cost less other-than-temporary impairment.

During the second quarter of 2017, the Company sold its available-for-sale securities for $5.8 million.  The book cost basis of the available-for-sale securities was approximately $7.7 million, which was determined using the specific identification method.  The sale resulted in a net realized loss of $1.9 million, which is recorded in other (income) expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.  Included in the $1.9 million is $1.5 million that was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss.

Equity Method Investment

Equity Method Investment

For investments in entities over which the Company exercises significant influence but which do not meet the requirements for consolidation, the Company uses the equity method of accounting.  On July 1, 2016, the Company acquired a 49.9% noncontrolling interest in Gaiam Pty. Ltd. in connection with its acquisition of Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC, which is included in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.  The Company’s share of earnings from its equity method investee, which was not material for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, is included in other (income) expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The Company evaluates its equity method investment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such investment may not be recoverable.  The difference between the carrying value of the equity method investment and its estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment charge when the loss in value is deemed other-than-temporary.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value.  In evaluating goodwill for impairment, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.  Qualitative factors considered include, for example, macroeconomic and industry conditions, overall financial performance, and other relevant entity-specific events.  If the Company bypasses the qualitative assessment, or concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, it then performs a quantitative goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment to be recognized, if any.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, as a result of its qualitative assessment of the likelihood of goodwill impairment, the Company identified potential impairment indicators and determined that a quantitative assessment was necessary.  Fair value for the quantitative assessment was determined under an income approach using estimates of discounted future cash flows (the “DCF Method”).  The DCF Method relies on assumptions such as the Company’s projected future earnings and appropriate discount rates.   The Company corroborated the results of the DCF Method by reconciling to within a reasonable range of its market capitalization (calculated as total common shares outstanding multiplied by the common equity price per share, as adjusted for a control premium factor).  Reconciling items identified included the benefit of the Company’s fully reserved tax assets for which the market capitalization may not be giving full value.  Based on the results of the quantitative assessment, the Company determined goodwill was not impaired for the period ended September 30, 2017.

Intangible assets represent trademarks, customer agreements and patents related to the Company’s brands and a favorable lease.  Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but instead are subject to impairment evaluation.  The carrying value of intangible assets and other finite-lived assets is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset may not be recoverable.  When conducting its impairment assessment, the Company initially performs a qualitative evaluation of whether it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired.  If it is determined by a qualitative evaluation that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired, the Company then tests the asset for recoverability.  Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to its future undiscounted net cash flows.  If the carrying amount of such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the recoverability of the assets.  Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.  During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $36.5 million for indefinite-lived intangible assets related to the trademarks of five of the Company’s non-core brands: Caribbean Joe,  Revo,  Franklin Mint,  Nevados, and FUL.  Fair value for each trademark was determined based on estimates of future discounted cash flows.  The impairments arose due to reduced contractual minimums or reduced sales forecasts in key distribution channels for these brands.This charge is included in impairment charges in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.  See Note 3 and Note 6 for furth

Treasury Stock

Treasury Stock

Treasury stock is recorded at cost as a reduction of equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation

Compensation cost for restricted stock is measured using the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock at the date the common stock is granted.  For restricted stock and restricted stock units, for which restrictions lapse with the passage of time (“time-based restricted stock”), compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the period between the issue date and the date that restrictions lapse.  Time-based restricted stock is included in total shares of common stock outstanding upon the lapse of applicable restrictions.  For restricted stock, for which restrictions are based on performance measures (“performance stock units” or “PSUs”), restrictions lapse when those performance measures have been deemed achieved.  Compensation cost for PSUs is recognized on a straight-line basis during the period from the date on which the likelihood of the PSUs being earned is deemed probable and (x) the end of the fiscal year during which such PSUs are expected to vest or (y) the date on which awards of such PSUs may be approved by the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors (the “Compensation Committee”) on a discretionary basis, as applicable.  PSUs are included in total shares of common stock outstanding upon the lapse of applicable restrictions.  PSUs are included in total diluted shares of common stock outstanding when the performance measures have been deemed achieved but the PSUs have not yet been issued.

Fair value cost for stock options and warrants is calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation model and is expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the grant.  The Company elected to early adopt the provisions of ASU 2016-09 “Simplifying the Accounting for Share-Based Payments” (“ASU 2016-09”) and reduces compensation cost for actual forfeitures as they occur.  Prior to the adoption to ASU 2016-09, the Company’s estimated forfeiture rate utilized in calculating compensation cost was zero percent based on the Company’s limited historical forfeiture experience.  

At each subsequent reporting period prior to the lapse of restrictions on warrants, time-based restricted stock and PSUs granted to non-employees, the Company remeasures the aggregate compensation cost of such grants using the Company’s fair value at the end of such reporting period and revises the straight-line recognition of compensation cost in line with such remeasured amount.

Leases

Leases

The Company leases certain properties for office and showroom.  Certain of the Company's lease agreements contain rent escalation clauses, free rent periods and tenant inducement payments.  Rent expense for noncancelable operating leases with scheduled rent increases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term.  The difference between straight-line rent expense and the scheduled payment amounts is recorded as a deferred rent asset or liability.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

Current income taxes are based on the respective periods’ taxable income for federal, foreign and state income tax reporting purposes.  Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities, using statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  In accordance with ASU No. 2015-17 “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,” all deferred income taxes are reported and classified as non-current.  A valuation allowance is required if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Company applies the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes.  The guidance clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with other authoritative GAAP and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.  The guidance also addresses derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.  Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, are recorded in income tax expense.  Tax years that remain open for assessment for federal and state tax purposes include the years ended December 31, 2013 through December 31, 2016.

The benefit from income taxes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 represents a non-cash deferred tax expense created by the amortization of certain acquired trademarks for tax but not book purposes and taxes for state, local and foreign jurisdictions offset by a tax benefit, discrete to the third quarter, representing a reduction in deferred tax liabilities resulting from the impairment of related to acquired trademarks.

Earnings Per Share

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net (loss) income attributable to Sequential Brands Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period, excluding the effects of any potentially dilutive securities.  Diluted EPS gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the reporting period, including stock options, PSUs and warrants, using the treasury stock method, and convertible debt, using the if-converted method.  Diluted EPS excludes all potentially dilutive shares of common stock if their effect is anti-dilutive.  The shares used to calculate basic and diluted EPS consist of the following:

	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017	2016	2017	2016
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding	62,998,944	62,176,700	62,796,716	61,817,742
Acquisition hold back shares	-	-	-	230,840
Warrants	-	360,440	-	351,386
Stock options	-	18,252	-	15,406
Performance based restricted stock	-	407,355	-	408,152
Unvested restricted stock	-	104,010	-	95,064
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding	62,998,944	63,066,757	62,796,716	62,918,590

The computation of diluted EPS for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 excludes the common stock equivalents of the following potentially dilutive securities because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive:

	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017	2016	2017	2016
Warrants	801,760	325,000	801,760	325,000
Stock options	84,000	51,000	84,000	51,000
Unvested restricted stock	972,355	-	972,355	130,000
Total	1,858,115	376,000	1,858,115	506,000

Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which potentially expose the Company to credit risk consist primarily of cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable and available-for-sale securities.  Cash is held to meet working capital needs and future acquisitions.  Restricted cash is pledged as collateral for a comparable amount of irrevocable standby letters of credit for certain of the Company’s leased properties.  Substantially all of the Company’s cash, restricted cash and available-for-sale securities, prior to being sold, are deposited with high quality financial institutions.  At times, however, such cash, restricted cash and available-for-sale securities may be in deposit accounts that exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limit.  The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts as of September 30, 2017.

Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is minimal due to the collection history.  The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition.  The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the expected collectability of all accounts receivable.

Customer Concentrations

Customer Concentrations

The Company recorded net revenues of $39.0 million and $42.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  During the three months ended September 30, 2017, three licensees represented at least 10% of net revenue, accounting for 12%,11%, and 10% of the Company’s net revenue.  During the three months ended September 30, 2016,  no licensees represented at least 10% of net revenue.

The Company recorded net revenues of $120.6 million and $110.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, three licensees represented at least 10% of net revenue, accounting for 11%,  11%, and 10% of the Company’s net revenue.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, two licensees represented at least 10% of net revenue, each accounting for 10% of the Company’s net revenue.

Loss Contingencies

Loss Contingencies

The Company recognizes contingent losses that are both probable and estimable.  In this context, probable means circumstances under which events are likely to occur.  The Company records legal costs pertaining to contingencies as incurred.

Contingent Consideration

Contingent Consideration

The Company recognizes the acquisition-date fair value of contingent consideration as part of the consideration transferred in exchange for the acquiree or assets of the acquiree in a business combination.  The contingent consideration is classified as either a liability or equity in accordance with ASC 480-10, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity.  If classified as a liability, the liability is remeasured to fair value at each subsequent reporting date until the contingency is settled.  Increases in fair value are recorded as losses, while decreases are recorded as gains.  If classified as equity, contingent consideration is not remeasured and subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity.

Noncontrolling Interest

Noncontrolling Interest

Noncontrolling interest recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 represents income allocations to Elan Polo International, Inc., a member of DVS Footwear International, LLC, With You, Inc., a member of With You LLC (the partnership between the Company and Jessica Simpson), and JALP, LLC (“JALP”), a member of FUL IP Holdings, LLC (“FUL IP”).  Noncontrolling interest recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 represents income allocations to Elan Polo International, Inc., With You, Inc. and JALP.

Reportable Segment

Reportable Segment

An operating segment, in part, is a component of an enterprise whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (the “CODM”) to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance.  Operating segments may be aggregated only to a limited extent.  The Company’s CODM, the Chief Executive Officer, reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance.  Accordingly, the Company has determined that it has a single operating and reportable segment.  In addition, the Company has no foreign operations or any assets in foreign locations.  Nearly all of the Company’s operations consist of a single revenue stream, which is the licensing of its trademark portfolio, with an immaterial portion of revenues derived from television, book, café operations and certain commissions.

XML

Goodwill (Policy)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Goodwill [Abstract]

Goodwill

	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
		(in thousands)
Balance at January 1	$	307,744	$	314,288
Adjustment for acquisition of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.		-		(11,249)
(Adjustment for) and acquisition of Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC		(3,621)		4,705
Ending balance	$	304,123	$	307,744

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired under the acquisition method of accounting.  Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value.  In evaluating goodwill for impairment, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.  Qualitative factors considered include, for example, macroeconomic and industry conditions, overall financial performance and other relevant entity-specific events.  If the Company bypasses the qualitative assessment, or concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, it then performs a quantitative goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment to be recognized, if any.

XML

Intangible Assets (Policy)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Intangible Assets [Abstract]

Finite-lived Intangible Assets

Finite-lived intangible assets represent trademarks, customer agreements and patents related to the Company’s brands and a favorable lease.  Finite-lived assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but instead are subject to impairment evaluation.  The carrying value of finite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  Historically, indefinite-lived intangible assets have been tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset may not be recoverable.  When conducting its impairment assessment, the Company initially performs a qualitative evaluation of whether it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired.  If it is determined by a qualitative evaluation that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired, the Company then tests the asset for recoverability. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to its expected future undiscounted net cash flows.  If the carrying amount of such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the recoverability of the assets.  Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.   

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available-For-Sale Securities

The unrealized gains and losses on the available-for-sale securities held by the Company as of December 31, 2016 is set forth below.

						December 31, 2016
								Gross Unrealized
		Historical Cost		Cost Basis (1)		Estimated Fair Value		Gains		Losses
		(in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities	$	12,048	$	7,673	$	7,673	$	-	$	-

(1)The cost basis is historical cost less other-than-temporary impairment.

Shares Used to Calculate Basic And Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share

The shares used to calculate basic and diluted EPS consist of the following:

	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017	2016	2017	2016
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding	62,998,944	62,176,700	62,796,716	61,817,742
Acquisition hold back shares	-	-	-	230,840
Warrants	-	360,440	-	351,386
Stock options	-	18,252	-	15,406
Performance based restricted stock	-	407,355	-	408,152
Unvested restricted stock	-	104,010	-	95,064
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding	62,998,944	63,066,757	62,796,716	62,918,590

Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted

The computation of diluted EPS for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 excludes the common stock equivalents of the following potentially dilutive securities because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive:

XML

Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Schedule of Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis

The following table sets forth the carrying value and the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities required to be disclosed at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

			Carrying Value				Fair Value
Financial Instrument	Level		9/30/2017		12/31/2016		9/30/2017		12/31/2016
			(in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities		1	$	-	$	7,673	$	-	$	7,673
Interest rate caps		2	$	723	$	1,104	$	723	$	1,104
2016 Term Loans		3	$	558,988	$	582,500	$	549,664	$	551,324
2016 Revolving Loan		3	$	82,787	$	80,500	$	82,436	$	60,755
LNT Contingent Earn Out		3	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Legacy Payments		3	$	2,190	$	1,995	$	2,190	$	1,995

Schedule of Notional Amounts of Outstanding Derivative Positions

The components of the 2016 Cap Agreements as of September 30, 2017 are as follows:

	Notional Value		Derivative Asset		Derivative Liability
		(in thousands)
LIBOR based loans	$	500,000	$	-	$	506

Trademarks [Member]

Schedule of Indefinite-lived Assets

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $36.5 million for indefinite-lived intangible assets related to the trademarks of five of the Company’s non-core brands: Caribbean Joe,  Revo,  Franklin Mint,  Nevados, and FUL.  Fair value for each trademark was determined based on estimates of future discounted cash flows, a Level 3 measure within the fair value hierarchy.  The impairments arose due to reduced contractual minimums or reduced sales forecastsin key distribution channels for these brands.The following table shows the change in indefinite-lived assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2017:

	September 30,
	2017
		(in thousands)
Balance at January 1	$	1,025,260
Additions		2,331
Impairment Charges		(36,505)
Ending balance	$	991,086

XML

Acquisition (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC [Member]

Schedule of Business Combination Purchase Price Allocation

The Company made the following updates to the purchase price during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 in connection with finalizing the valuation of the Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC acquisition (in thousands):

Allocated to:
Goodwill	$	(3,621)
Trademarks		3,568
Equity method investment		53
	$	--

The final allocation of the purchase price is summarized as follows (in thousands):

Purchase Price Allocation - Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC
Total consideration paid	$	147,587
Allocated to:
Trademarks	$	145,923
Goodwill		1,084
Equity method investment		757
Customer agreements		23
Accrued expenses		(200)
	$	147,587

XML

Goodwill (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Goodwill [Abstract]

Schedule of Goodwill

The changes in goodwill are summarized as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
		(in thousands)
Balance at January 1	$	307,744	$	314,288
Adjustment for acquisition of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.		-		(11,249)
(Adjustment for) and acquisition of Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC		(3,621)		4,705
Ending balance	$	304,123	$	307,744

XML

Intangible Assets (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Intangible Assets [Abstract]

Summary of Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are summarized as follows:

September 30, 2017	Useful Lives (Years)		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount
			(in thousands)
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks	15	$	4,998	$	(1,808)	$	3,190
Customer agreements	4		2,832		(2,145)		687
Favorable lease	2		537		(537)		-
Patents	10		665		(280)		385
		$	9,032	$	(4,770)		4,262
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks							991,086
Intangible assets, net						$	995,348

December 31, 2016	Useful Lives (Years)		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount
			(in thousands)
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks	15	$	4,981	$	(1,558)	$	3,423
Customer agreements	4		2,832		(1,738)		1,094
Favorable lease	2		537		(537)		-
Patents	10		665		(230)		435
		$	9,015	$	(4,063)		4,952
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks							1,025,260
Intangible assets, net						$	1,030,212

Summary of Future Annual Estimated Amortization Expense

Estimated future annual amortization expense for intangible assets in service as of September 30, 2017 is summarized as follows:

Years ending December 31,		(in thousands)
Remainder of 2017	$	208
2018		783
2019		593
2020		403
2021		400
Thereafter		1,875
	$	4,262

XML

Long-Term Debt (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Long-Term Debt [Abstract]

Schedule of long term debt

The components of long-term debt are as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
		(in thousands)
2016 Term Loans	$	558,988	$	582,500
2016 Revolving Loan		82,787		80,500
Unamortized deferred financing costs		(15,047)		(17,965)
Total long-term debt, net of unamortized deferred financing costs		626,728		645,035
Less: current portion of long-term debt		28,300		28,300
Long-term debt	$	598,428	$	616,735

XML

Stock-based Compensation (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Stock-based Compensation [Abstract]

Summary of Stock Option Activity

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017:

	Number of Options		Weighted-Average Exercise Price	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Outstanding - January 1, 2017	129,501	$	9.65	2.3	$	-
Granted	-		-
Exercised	-		-
Forfeited or canceled	(45,500)		(11.49)
Outstanding at September 30, 2017	84,001	$	8.65	2.4	$	-
Exercisable - September 30, 2017	84,001	$	8.65	2.4	$	-

Schedule of Nonvested Stock Options

A summary of the changes in the Company’s unvested stock options is as follows:

	Number of Options		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested - January 1, 2017	5,000	$	1.96
Granted	-		-
Vested	(5,000)		(1.96)
Forfeited or canceled	-		-
Unvested - September 30, 2017	-	$	-

Schedule of Warrants Activity and Nonvested Warrants

Warrants

The following table summarizes the Company’s outstanding warrants for the nine months ended September 30, 2017:

	Number of Warrants		Weighted-Average Exercise Price	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Outstanding - January 1, 2017	801,760	$	7.87	3.1	$	51
Granted	-		-
Exercised	-		-
Forfeited or canceled	-		-
Outstanding at September 30, 2017	801,760	$	7.87	2.3	$	-
Exercisable - September 30, 2017	801,760	$	7.87	2.3	$	-

A summary of the changes in the Company’s unvested warrants is as follows:

	Number of Warrants		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested - January 1, 2017	50,000	$	6.32
Granted	-		-
Vested	(50,000)		(6.32)
Forfeited or canceled	-		-
Unvested - September 30, 2017	-	$	-

Schedule of Restricted Stock Activity

Restricted Stock

A summary of the time-based restricted stock activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is as follows:

	Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
	(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Unvested - January 1, 2017	258,787	$	8.45	2.1
Granted	111,112		3.60
Vested	(147,632)		(5.75)
Unvested - September 30, 2017	222,267	$	7.82	2.2

Schedule of Restricted Stock Units Activity

Restricted Stock Units

A summary of the time-based restricted stock units activity for thenine months ended September 30, 2017 is as follows:

	Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
	(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Unvested - January 1, 2017	326,667	$	8.52	2.5
Granted	636,753		3.24
Vested	(153,332)		(10.20)
Forfeited or canceled	(60,000)		(4.89)
Unvested - September 30, 2017	750,088	$	3.98	2.5

Schedule of Performance Stock Units Activity

A summary of the PSUs activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is as follows:

	Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
	(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Unvested - January 1, 2017	2,803,367	$	8.18	2.4
Granted	716,600		3.17
Vested	(701,233)		(10.97)
Forfeited or canceled	(673,700)		(7.22)
Unvested - September 30, 2017	2,145,034	$	5.90	2.2

XML

Restructuring (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Restructuring [Abstract]

Restructuring and Related Costs

Changes in the restructuring accruals during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were as follows:

		Severance & Related Benefits		Contract Termination Costs		Professional Fees		Total Accrual
		(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2017	$	-	$	1,500	$	-	$	1,500
Charges to expense		-		-		-		-
Amounts paid		-		(1,500)		-		(1,500)
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Narrative) (Details)		3 Months Ended			9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
		Sep. 30, 2017 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2017 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2017 USD ($) segment	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)	Jul. 01, 2016
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Advertising revenue		$ 800,000			$ 800,000
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable		300,000			300,000		$ 200,000
Accounts receivable, net		50,632,000			50,632,000		53,195,000
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities			$ 5,754,000		5,757,000
Cost Basis	[1]						$ 7,673,000
Realized loss on sale of available-for-sale securities					1,916,000
Reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss					1,500,000
Net revenue		39,025,000		$ 41,952,000	120,569,000	$ 110,114,000
Goodwill, impairment loss		0			0
Impairment of trademark		$ 36,505,000			$ 36,505,000
Fair value assumption method used					Black-Scholes valuation model
Number of operating segments | segment					1
Number of reportable segments | segment					1
Gaiam Pty Limited [Member]
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Equity method investment, noncontrolling interest								49.90%
Accounts Receivable [Member]
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Concentration risk, percentage					63.00%		49.00%
Accounts Receivable [Member] | License One [Member]
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Concentration risk, percentage					25.00%		14.00%
Accounts Receivable [Member] | License Two [Member]
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Concentration risk, percentage					14.00%		13.00%
Accounts Receivable [Member] | License Three [Member]
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Concentration risk, percentage					13.00%		12.00%
Accounts Receivable [Member] | License Four [Member]
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Concentration risk, percentage					11.00%		10.00%
Sales Revenue, Net [Member] | License One [Member]
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Concentration risk, percentage		12.00%			11.00%	10.00%
Sales Revenue, Net [Member] | License Two [Member]
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Concentration risk, percentage		11.00%			11.00%	10.00%
Sales Revenue, Net [Member] | License Three [Member]
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Concentration risk, percentage		10.00%			10.00%

[1] The cost basis is historical cost less other-than-temporary impairment.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Unrealized Gains And Losses On Available-For-Sale Securities) (Details) $ in Thousands	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments [Abstract]
Historical Cost	$ 12,048
Cost Basis	7,673	[1]
Estimated Fair Value	$ 7,673

[1] The cost basis is historical cost less other-than-temporary impairment.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding) (Details) - shares	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding	62,998,944	62,176,700	62,796,716	61,817,742
Acquisition hold back shares				230,840
Warrants		360,440		351,386
Stock options		18,252		15,406
Performance based restricted stock		407,355		408,152
Unvested restricted stock		104,010		95,064
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding	62,998,944	63,066,757	62,796,716	62,918,590

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Computation of Diluted EPS) (Details) - shares	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016
Antidilutive Securities Excluded From Computation Of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Antidilutive securities excluded from computation of earnings per share	1,858,115	376,000	1,858,115	506,000
Warrants
Antidilutive Securities Excluded From Computation Of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Antidilutive securities excluded from computation of earnings per share	801,760	325,000	801,760	325,000
Restricted Stock
Antidilutive Securities Excluded From Computation Of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Antidilutive securities excluded from computation of earnings per share	972,355		972,355	130,000
Equity Option [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded From Computation Of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Antidilutive securities excluded from computation of earnings per share	84,000	51,000	84,000	51,000

XML

Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2016
Gross licensing revenue payable, percentage			3.50%
Licensing revenue payment period			5 years
Impairment of trademark	$ 36,505		$ 36,505
Interest Rate Cap [Member]
Derivative, notional amount	500,000		$ 500,000		$ 500,000
Derivative, cap interest rate					1.50%
Derivative, maturity date			Nov. 23, 2018		Nov. 23, 2018
Interest Expense [Member]
Accretion expense	$ 100	$ 100	$ 200	$ 200

XML

Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments (Schedule of Indefinite-lived Assets) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2017
Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Impairment charges	$ (36,505)	$ (36,505)
Trademarks [Member]
Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Balance January 1		1,025,260
Additions		2,331
Impairment charges		(36,505)
Ending Balance	$ 991,086	$ 991,086

XML

Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments (Schedule of Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member] | Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale securities		$ 7,673
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member] | Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
LNT Contingent Earn Out
Legacy Payments	2,190	1,995
Reported Value Measurement [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member] | Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale securities		7,673
Reported Value Measurement [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member] | Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
LNT Contingent Earn Out
Legacy Payments	2,190	1,995
Interest Rate Cap [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member] | Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Derivative liability	723	1,104
Interest Rate Cap [Member] | Reported Value Measurement [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member] | Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Derivative liability	723	1,104
BoA Term Loans [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member] | Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Debt instrument, fair value disclosure	549,664	551,324
BoA Term Loans [Member] | Reported Value Measurement [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member] | Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Debt instrument, fair value disclosure	558,988	582,500
Revolving Loans [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member] | Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Debt instrument, fair value disclosure	82,436	60,755
Revolving Loans [Member] | Reported Value Measurement [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member] | Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Debt instrument, fair value disclosure	$ 82,787	$ 80,500

XML

Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments (Schedule of Notional Amounts of Outstanding Derivative Positions) (Details) - Interest Rate Cap [Member] - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Notional Value	$ 500,000	$ 500,000
Derivative Liability	$ 506

XML

Acquisition (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($)		9 Months Ended
	Jul. 02, 2016	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016	Jul. 01, 2016
Payments to acquire businesses, net of cash acquired			$ 147,587,000
Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC [Member]
Business acquisition, effective date of acquisition		Jul. 01, 2016
Payments to acquire businesses, net of cash acquired	$ 145,700,000
Other payments to acquire businesses	$ 1,900,000
Gaiam Pty Limited [Member]
Equity method investment, noncontrolling interest				49.90%

XML

Acquistion (Schedule of Business Combination Purchase Price Allocation) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Goodwill	$ 304,123	$ 307,744	$ 314,288
Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC [Member]
Business combination, consideration transferred	147,587
Goodwill	1,084
Trademarks	145,923
Equity method investment	757
Customer agreements	23
Accrued expenses	(200)
Total allocated business combination	147,587
Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC [Member] | Scenario, Adjustment [Member]
Goodwill	(3,621)
Trademarks	3,568
Equity method investment	$ 53

XML

Goodwill (Summary of Goodwill) (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Schedule Of Goodwill [Line Items]
Beginning Balance		$ 307,744,000	$ 314,288,000
Ending Balance	$ 304,123,000	304,123,000	307,744,000
Goodwill, impairment loss	$ 0	0
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. [Member]
Schedule Of Goodwill [Line Items]
Adjustment			(11,249,000)
Acquisition of Gaiam, Inc. Branded Consumer Business [Member]
Schedule Of Goodwill [Line Items]
(Adjustment for) and acquisition of Gaiam Brand Holdco, LLC		$ (3,621,000)	$ 4,705,000

XML

Intangible Assets (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016
Intangible Assets [Abstract]
Amortization expense	$ 200	$ 300	$ 700	$ 1,000
Impairment charges	$ 36,505		$ 36,505

XML

Intangible Assets (Summary of Intangible Assets) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Schedule Of Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross Carrying Amount	$ 9,032	$ 9,015
Accumulated Amortization	(4,770)	(4,063)
Intangible assets amortization, total	4,262	4,952
Net Carrying Amount, Intangible Assets	995,348	1,030,212
Trademarks [Member]
Schedule Of Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Indefinite lived intangible assets	$ 991,086	$ 1,025,260
Trademarks [Member]
Schedule Of Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Useful Lives	15 years	15 years
Gross Carrying Amount	$ 4,998	$ 4,981
Accumulated Amortization	(1,808)	(1,558)
Intangible assets amortization, total	$ 3,190	$ 3,423
Customer Contracts [Member]
Schedule Of Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Useful Lives	4 years	4 years
Gross Carrying Amount	$ 2,832	$ 2,832
Accumulated Amortization	(2,145)	(1,738)
Intangible assets amortization, total	$ 687	$ 1,094
Favorable Lease [Member]
Schedule Of Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Useful Lives	2 years	2 years
Gross Carrying Amount	$ 537	$ 537
Accumulated Amortization	$ (537)	$ (537)
Patents [Member]
Schedule Of Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Useful Lives	10 years	10 years
Gross Carrying Amount	$ 665	$ 665
Accumulated Amortization	(280)	(230)
Intangible assets amortization, total	$ 385	$ 435

XML

Intangible Assets (Future Annual Estimated Amortization Expense) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Intangible Assets [Abstract]
Remainder of 2017	$ 208
2018	783
2019	593
2020	403
2021	400
Thereafter	1,875
Intangible assets amortization, total	4,262	$ 4,952
Net Carrying Amount, Intangible Assets	$ 995,348	$ 1,030,212

XML

Long-Term Debt (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($)		3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Jul. 02, 2016	Sep. 30, 2018	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2016	Jul. 01, 2016
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt				$ 132,000,000
Long-term debt			$ 626,728,000		$ 645,035,000
Debt instrument orderly liquidation value of registered trademarks percentage benchmark			10.00%
Interest Rate Cap [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Derivative, notional amount			$ 500,000,000		$ 500,000,000
Derivative, cap interest rate					1.50%
Derivative, maturity date			Nov. 23, 2018		Nov. 23, 2018
Revolving Credit Facility [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Line of credit facility, maximum borrowing capacity						$ 110,000,000
Line of credit facility, unused capacity, commitment fee percentage			0.375%
BoA Credit Agreement [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument period of credit agreement			5 years
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt	$ 287,500,000
Debt instrument, face amount						415,000,000
Long-term debt						258,000,000
Debt instrument covenant payment percentage of intellectual property disposed liquidation value			50.00%
Debt instrument covenant payment percentage of net proceeds related to other assets constituting collateral			100.00%
Debt instrument, covenant description			(i) maintain a positive net income (as defined in the agreement), (ii) satisfy a maximum loan to value ratio set at 50.0% (applicable to the Revolving Loans and Tranche A Loans) and (iii) satisfy a maximum consolidated first lien leverage ratio, initially set at 2.80:1.00, decreasing over the term of the Amended BoA Credit Agreement until reaching the final maximum ratio of 2.50:1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2018 and thereafter.
Debt instrument, description			amounting to: (i) the loans outstanding under the Amended BoA Credit Agreement plus, (a) where intellectual property is disposed, 50.0% of the disposed intellectual property's orderly liquidation value, and (b) where any other assets constituting collateral are disposed or upon the receipt of certain insurance proceeds, 100% of the net proceeds thereof, subject to certain reinvestment rights; and (ii) the Tranche A-1 Loans to the extent that the outstanding principal amount thereof exceeds 10.0% of the orderly liquidation value of the registered trademarks owned by the BoA Facility Loan Parties.
Debt instrument, covenant compliance			At September 30, 2017, the Company is in compliance with the covenants included in the Amended BoA Credit Agreement.
BoA Term Loans [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Long-term debt			$ 558,988,000		$ 582,500,000
Debt instrument, periodic payment			$ 5,000,000
Debt instrument, date of first required payment			Sep. 30, 2016
Tranche A [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Maximum loan to value ratio			50.00%
Tranche A [Member] | Notes Payable to Banks [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument, face amount						133,000,000
Long-term debt						133,000,000
Tranche A [Member] | Notes Payable to Banks [Member] | London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument, basis spread on variable rate			3.50%
Tranche A [Member] | Notes Payable to Banks [Member] | Base Rate [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument, basis spread on variable rate			2.50%
Tranche A [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Line of credit facility, covenant terms			(i) the Revolving Credit Facility and Tranche A Loans as would not cause the consolidated first lien leverage ratio, determined on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such increase, to exceed 2.33:1.00 and (ii) the Tranche A-1 Loans, as would not cause the consolidated first lien leverage ratio, determined on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such increase, to exceed (a) with respect to any increase, the proceeds of which will be used solely to finance an acquisition, 2.50:100 and (b) with respect to any other increase, 2.40:1.00, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions in the Amended BoA Credit Agreement.
Tranche A -1 Term Loans [Member] | Scenario Plan Two [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Consolidated first lien leverage ratio			2.50%
Tranche A -1 Term Loans [Member] | Scenario Plan Three [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Consolidated first lien leverage ratio			2.40%
Tranche A -1 Term Loans [Member] | London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument, basis spread on variable rate			7.00%
Tranche A -1 Term Loans [Member] | Base Rate [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument, basis spread on variable rate			6.00%
Tranche A -1 Term Loans [Member] | Notes Payable to Banks [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument, face amount						44,500,000
Long-term debt						44,500,000
Revolving Loans [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Long-term debt			$ 82,787,000		$ 80,500,000	$ 80,500,000
Maximum loan to value ratio			50.00%
Revolving Loans [Member] | Notes Payable to Banks [Member] | London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument, basis spread on variable rate			3.50%
Revolving Loans [Member] | Notes Payable to Banks [Member] | Base Rate [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument, basis spread on variable rate			2.50%
GSO Credit Agreement [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument covenant payment percentage of intellectual property disposed liquidation value	50.00%
Debt instrument covenant payment percentage of net proceeds related to other assets constituting collateral	100.00%
Debt instrument, date of first required payment			Mar. 31, 2017
Consolidated first lien leverage ratio			2.80%
Debt instrument, covenant description			(a) in the event the consolidated total leverage ratio is at least 4.00:1.00, 75% thereof, (b) in the event the consolidated total leverage ratio is less than 4.00:1.00 but at least 3.00:1.00, 50% thereof and (c) in the event the consolidated total leverage ratio is less than 3.00:1.00, 0% thereof. Commencing on March 31, 2017, the loans under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement will amortize in quarterly installments, equal to 2.00% per annum
Debt instrument consolidated total leverage ratio			7.25%
Amortization percentage for quarterly installments of the original aggregate principal amount			2.00%
Line of credit facility, interest rate description			(i) the LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin of 8.25% or 9.00% per annum or (ii) the base rate plus an applicable margin of 7.25% or 8.00% per annum, in each case based upon the consolidated total leverage ratio.
Debt instrument, covenant compliance			At September 30, 2017, the Company is in compliance with the covenants included in the Amended GSO Credit Agreement.
Debt instrument, debt default, description of violation or event of default			The Amended GSO Credit Agreement contains certain customary events of default, including a change of control. If an event of default occurs and is not cured within any applicable grace period or is not waived, the GSO Agent, at the request of the lenders under the Amended GSO Credit Agreement, is required to take various actions, including, without limitation, the acceleration of amounts due thereunder.
GSO Credit Agreement [Member] | Scenario, Plan [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Consolidated first lien leverage ratio		2.50%
Debt instrument consolidated total leverage ratio		6.50%	6.00%
GSO Credit Agreement [Member] | Scenario Plan One [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument consolidated total leverage ratio			6.00%
GSO Credit Agreement [Member] | London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument, basis spread on variable rate			8.25%
GSO Credit Agreement [Member] | Base Rate [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument, basis spread on variable rate			7.25%
GSO Credit Agreement Reinvestment Rights Scenario One [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument covenant payment percentage of net proceeds related to other assets constituting collateral			75.00%
GSO Credit Agreement Reinvestment Rights Scenario Two [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument covenant payment percentage of net proceeds related to other assets constituting collateral			50.00%
GSO Credit Agreement Reinvestment Rights Scenario Three [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument covenant payment percentage of net proceeds related to other assets constituting collateral			0.00%
Maximum [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | Scenario Plan One [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Consolidated first lien leverage ratio			2.33%
Maximum [Member] | BoA Credit Agreement [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Consolidated first lien leverage ratio			2.80%
Maximum [Member] | Tranche A [Member] | Scenario Plan One [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Consolidated first lien leverage ratio			2.33%
Maximum [Member] | GSO Credit Agreement [Member] | London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument, interest rate, stated percentage			9.00%
Maximum [Member] | GSO Credit Agreement [Member] | Base Rate [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument, interest rate, stated percentage			8.00%
Maximum [Member] | GSO Credit Agreement Reinvestment Rights Scenario Two [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument consolidated total leverage ratio			4.00%
Maximum [Member] | GSO Credit Agreement Reinvestment Rights Scenario Three [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument consolidated total leverage ratio			3.00%
Minimum [Member] | BoA Credit Agreement [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Consolidated first lien leverage ratio			2.50%
Minimum [Member] | GSO Credit Agreement Reinvestment Rights Scenario One [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument consolidated total leverage ratio			4.00%
Minimum [Member] | GSO Credit Agreement Reinvestment Rights Scenario Two [Member]
Disclosure Long Term Debt Additional Information [Line Items]
Debt instrument consolidated total leverage ratio			3.00%

XML

Long-Term Debt (Schedule of Long Term Debt) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Jul. 01, 2016
Unamortized deferred financing costs	$ (15,047)	$ (17,965)
Total long-term debt, net of unamortized deferred financing costs	626,728	645,035
Less: current portion of long-term debt	28,300	28,300
Long term debt, noncurrent	598,428	616,735
BoA Credit Agreement [Member]
Total long-term debt, net of unamortized deferred financing costs			$ 258,000
BoA Term Loans [Member]
Total long-term debt, net of unamortized deferred financing costs	558,988	582,500
Revolving Loans [Member]
Total long-term debt, net of unamortized deferred financing costs	$ 82,787	$ 80,500	$ 80,500

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017
Stockholder Class Action Lawsuits [Member]
Loss contingency, domicile of litigation	Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware
Loss contingency, parties jointly and severally liable in litigation	the Old Sequential, MSLO, the MSLO board of directors, Madeline Merger Sub, Inc., Singer Merger Sub, Inc. and the Company as defendants
Loss contingency, allegations	allege that (a) members of the MSLO board of directors breached their fiduciary duties and (b) Old Sequential, MSLO, Madeline Merger Sub, Inc., Singer Merger Sub Inc. and the Company aided and abetted such alleged breaches of fiduciary duties by the MSLO board of directors.
Litigation Case One [Member]
Loss contingency, name of plaintiff	David Shaev Profit Sharing Plan f/b/o David Shaev
Loss contingency, name of defendant	Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al.
Loss contingency, lawsuit filing date	June 25, 2015
Litigation Case Two [Member]
Loss contingency, name of plaintiff	Malka Raul
Loss contingency, name of defendant	Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al
Loss contingency, lawsuit filing date	June 26, 2015
Litigation Case Three [Member]
Loss contingency, name of plaintiff	Daniel Lisman
Loss contingency, name of defendant	Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al.
Loss contingency, lawsuit filing date	June 29, 2015
Litigation Case Four [Member]
Loss contingency, name of plaintiff	Matthew Sciabacucchi
Loss contingency, name of defendant	Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al.
Loss contingency, lawsuit filing date	July 2, 2015
Litigation Case Five [Member]
Loss contingency, name of plaintiff	Harold Litwin
Loss contingency, name of defendant	Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al.
Loss contingency, lawsuit filing date	July 5, 2015
Litigation Case Six [Member]
Loss contingency, name of plaintiff	Richard Schiffrin
Loss contingency, name of defendant	Martha Stewart
Loss contingency, lawsuit filing date	July 7, 2015
Litigation Case Seven [Member]
Loss contingency, name of plaintiff	Cedric Terrell
Loss contingency, name of defendant	Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al.
Loss contingency, lawsuit filing date	July 8, 2015
Litigation Case Eight [Member]
Loss contingency, name of plaintiff	Dorothy Moore
Loss contingency, name of defendant	Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al.
Loss contingency, lawsuit filing date	July 8, 2015
Litigation Case Nine [Member]
Loss contingency, name of plaintiff	Paul Dranove
Loss contingency, name of defendant	Pierre De Villemejane. et. al.
Loss contingency, lawsuit filing date	July 8, 2015
Litigation Case Ten [Member]
Loss contingency, name of plaintiff	Phuc Nguyen
Loss contingency, name of defendant	Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al.
Loss contingency, lawsuit filing date	July 10, 2015
Litigation Case Eleven [Member]
Loss contingency, name of plaintiff	Kenneth Steiner
Loss contingency, name of defendant	Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. et. al.
Loss contingency, lawsuit filing date	July 16, 2015
Litigation Case Twelve [Member]
Loss contingency, name of plaintiff	Karen Gordon
Loss contingency, name of defendant	Martha Stewart et. al.
Loss contingency, parties jointly and severally liable in litigation	MSLO Board of Directors, Sequential, Madeline Merger Sub, Singer Merger
Loss contingency, lawsuit filing date	July 27, 2015
Litigation Case Thirteen [Member]
Loss contingency, name of plaintiff	Anne Seader
Loss contingency, name of defendant	Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. et. al.
Loss contingency, lawsuit filing date	July 28, 2015

XML

Stock-based Compensation (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($)				3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jul. 25, 2017	Feb. 28, 2017	Feb. 23, 2016	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unrecognized compensation expense, options				$ 0		$ 0
Granted, Options
Former Chief Executive Officer [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock awards, granted in period			20,000
Chief Financial Officer [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock awards, granted in period			12,000
Employees and Consultants [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense							$ 400,000
Restricted stock awards, granted in period			69,994
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense				200,000	$ 200,000	$ 1,400,000	400,000
Unrecognized compensation expense, other than options				2,700,000		$ 2,700,000
Unrecognized compensation expense, period for recognition						2 years 6 months
Granted, Options						111,112
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche One [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense					100,000	$ 100,000	$ 200,000
Restricted stock awards, granted in period							70,548
Stock granted, value, share-based compensation, gross							$ 400,000
Share-based compensation arrangement by share-based payment award, award vesting period							1 year
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member] | Chief Executive Officer [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche One [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock awards, granted in period						100,000
Stock granted, value, share-based compensation, gross						$ 400,000
Share-based compensation arrangement by share-based payment award, award vesting period						3 years
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member] | Former Chief Executive Officer [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche Two [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Accelerated shares, vesting						66,667
Accelerated shares, compensation expense						$ 700,000
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member] | Chief Financial Officer [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock awards, granted in period						60,000
Stock granted, value, share-based compensation, gross						$ 300,000
Share-based compensation arrangement by share-based payment award, award vesting period						2 years
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member] | Director [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense				100,000	600,000	$ 500,000	$ 1,400,000
Unrecognized compensation expense, other than options				500,000		$ 500,000
Unrecognized compensation expense, period for recognition						2 years 2 months 12 days
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member] | Director [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche One [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense				$ 100,000		$ 200,000
Restricted stock awards, granted in period						111,112
Stock granted, value, share-based compensation, gross						$ 400,000
Share-based compensation arrangement by share-based payment award, award vesting period						1 year
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member] | Employees and Consultants [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche One [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Share-based compensation arrangement by share-based payment award, award vesting period				3 years
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member] | Employees [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche One [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock awards, granted in period				200,000			35,000
Stock granted, value, share-based compensation, gross				$ 1,400,000			$ 300,000
Share-based compensation arrangement by share-based payment award, award vesting period							3 years
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member] | Consultant [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche One [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock awards, granted in period				276,753
Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense				$ 0	1,300,000	$ 3,500,000	$ 3,600,000
Granted, Options						716,600
Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member] | Chief Executive Officer [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense				0		$ 0
Unrecognized compensation expense, other than options				$ 0		$ 0
Restricted stock awards, granted in period				300,000		175,000
Stock granted, value, share-based compensation, gross				$ 800,000		$ 700,000
Share-based compensation arrangement by share-based payment award, award vesting period				3 years		3 years
Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member] | Former Chief Executive Officer [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock awards, granted in period		60,000
Accelerated shares, vesting						200,000
Accelerated shares, compensation expense						$ 2,900,000
Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member] | Chief Financial Officer [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock awards, granted in period		36,000
Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member] | Employees and Consultants [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense				$ 0		0
Restricted stock awards, granted in period	41,600	164,978
Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member] | Employees and Consultants [Member] | February 28, 2017 [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense						600,000
Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member] | Employees [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense				$ 0		$ 0
Restricted stock awards, granted in period				200,000			30,000
Stock granted, value, share-based compensation, gross				$ 700,000			$ 200,000
Share-based compensation arrangement by share-based payment award, award vesting period				3 years			3 years
Employee Stock Option [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Granted, Options
Warrants [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unrecognized compensation expense, other than options				$ 0		$ 0
Granted, Options
Maximum [Member] | Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member] | Chief Executive Officer [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche One [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense				100,000		$ 100,000
Maximum [Member] | Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member] | Employees and Consultants [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche One [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense				100,000
Maximum [Member] | Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member] | Employees [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche One [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense				100,000	100,000	100,000	$ 100,000
Maximum [Member] | Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member] | Employees [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense							100,000
Maximum [Member] | Employee Stock Option [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense				100,000	100,000	100,000	100,000
Maximum [Member] | Warrants [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated share-based compensation expense				$ 100,000	$ 100,000	$ 100,000	$ 200,000

XML

Stock-based Compensation (Summary of Stock Option Activity) (Details) - USD ($)	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding [Roll Forward]
Granted, Number of Options
Vested, Number of Options	(5,000)
Vested, options Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ (1.96)
Employee Stock Option [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding [Roll Forward]
Outstanding beginning, Number of Options	129,501
Granted, Number of Options
Exercised, Number of Options
Forfeited or Canceled, Number of Options	(45,500)
Outstanding ending, Number of Options	84,001	129,501
Exercisable, Number of Options	84,001
Outstanding beginning, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 9.65
Granted, Weighted Average Exercise Price
Exercised, Weighted Average Exercise Price
Forfeited or Canceled, Weighted Average Exercise Price	(11.49)
Outstanding ending, Weighted Average Exercise Price	8.65	$ 9.65
Exercisable, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 8.65
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	2 years 4 months 24 days	2 years 3 months 19 days
Exercisable, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	2 years 4 months 24 days
Outstanding, Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Exercisable, Aggregate Intrinsic Value

XML

Stock-based Compensation (Schedule of Nonvested Stock Options) (Details)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017 $ / shares shares
Stock-based Compensation [Abstract]
Unvested - Outstanding, beginning | shares	5,000
Granted, Options | shares
Vested, Number of Options | shares	(5,000)
Forfeited or Cancelled, Options | shares
Unvested - Outstanding endingng | shares
Unvested, options - Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value | $ / shares	$ 1.96
Granted, options - Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value | $ / shares
Vested, options Weighted Average Exercise Price | $ / shares	(1.96)
Forfeited or Cancelled, options Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | $ / shares
Unvested, options - Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value | $ / shares

XML

Stock-based Compensation (Schedule of Warrants Activity and Nonvested Warrants) (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding [Roll Forward]
Granted, Number of Options
Vested, Number of Options	(5,000)
Vested, options Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ (1.96)
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Nonvested, Number of Shares [Roll Forward]
Unvested - Outstanding, beginning	5,000
Granted, Options
Vested, Number of Options	(5,000)
Forfeited or Cancelled, Options
Unvested - Outstanding endingng		5,000
Unvested, options - Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value	$ 1.96
Granted, options - Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Vested, options Weighted Average Exercise Price	(1.96)
Forfeited or Cancelled, options Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested, options - Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value		$ 1.96
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding [Roll Forward]
Outstanding beginning, Number of Options	258,787
Granted, Number of Options	111,112
Outstanding ending, Number of Options	222,267	258,787
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	2 years 2 months 12 days	2 years 1 month 6 days
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Nonvested, Number of Shares [Roll Forward]
Granted, Options	111,112
Granted, options - Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value	$ 3.60
Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding [Roll Forward]
Outstanding beginning, Number of Options	2,803,367
Granted, Number of Options	716,600
Outstanding ending, Number of Options	2,145,034	2,803,367
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	2 years 2 months 12 days	2 years 4 months 24 days
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Nonvested, Number of Shares [Roll Forward]
Granted, Options	716,600
Forfeited or Cancelled, Options	(673,700)
Granted, options - Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value	$ 3.17
Forfeited or Cancelled, options Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value	$ (7.22)
Employee Stock Option [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding [Roll Forward]
Outstanding beginning, Number of Options	129,501
Granted, Number of Options
Exercised, Number of Options
Forfeited or Canceled, Number of Options	(45,500)
Outstanding ending, Number of Options	84,001	129,501
Exercisable, Number of Options	84,001
Outstanding beginning, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 9.65
Granted, Weighted Average Exercise Price
Exercised, Weighted Average Exercise Price
Forfeited or Canceled, Weighted Average Exercise Price	(11.49)
Outstanding ending, Weighted Average Exercise Price	8.65	$ 9.65
Exercisable, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 8.65
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	2 years 4 months 24 days	2 years 3 months 19 days
Exercisable, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	2 years 4 months 24 days
Outstanding, Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Exercisable, Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Nonvested, Number of Shares [Roll Forward]
Granted, Options
Warrants [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding [Roll Forward]
Outstanding beginning, Number of Options	801,760
Granted, Number of Options
Exercised, Number of Options
Vested, Number of Options	(50,000)
Forfeited or Canceled, Number of Options
Outstanding ending, Number of Options	801,760	801,760
Exercisable, Number of Options	801,760
Outstanding beginning, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 7.87
Granted, Weighted Average Exercise Price
Vested, options Weighted Average Exercise Price	(6.32)
Exercised, Weighted Average Exercise Price
Forfeited or Canceled, Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding ending, Weighted Average Exercise Price	7.87	$ 7.87
Exercisable, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 7.87
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	2 years 3 months 19 days	3 years 1 month 6 days
Exercisable, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	2 years 3 months 19 days
Outstanding, Aggregate Intrinsic Value		$ 51
Exercisable, Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Nonvested, Number of Shares [Roll Forward]
Unvested - Outstanding, beginning	50,000
Granted, Options
Vested, Number of Options	(50,000)
Unvested - Outstanding endingng		50,000
Unvested, options - Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value	$ 6.32
Vested, options Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ (6.32)
Unvested, options - Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value		$ 6.32

XML

Stock-based Compensation (Summary of Restricted Stock Activity and Performance Stock Units) (Details) - $ / shares	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Granted, Number of Options
Forfeited or Cancelled, Options
Granted, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Forfeited or Cancelled, options Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Outstanding beginning, Number of Options	258,787
Granted, Number of Options	111,112
Vested, Number of Shares	(147,632)
Outstanding ending, Number of Options	222,267	258,787
Outstanding, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 8.45
Granted, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value	3.60
Vested, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value	(5.75)
Outstanding, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 7.82	$ 8.45
Unvested, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	2 years 2 months 12 days	2 years 1 month 6 days
Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Outstanding beginning, Number of Options	2,803,367
Granted, Number of Options	716,600
Vested, Number of Shares	(701,233)
Forfeited or Cancelled, Options	(673,700)
Outstanding ending, Number of Options	2,145,034	2,803,367
Outstanding, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 8.18
Granted, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value	3.17
Vested, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value	(10.97)
Forfeited or Cancelled, options Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value	(7.22)
Outstanding, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 5.90	$ 8.18
Unvested, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	2 years 2 months 12 days	2 years 4 months 24 days
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Outstanding beginning, Number of Options	326,667
Granted, Number of Options	636,753
Vested, Number of Shares	(153,332)
Forfeited or Cancelled, Options	(60,000)
Outstanding ending, Number of Options	750,088	326,667
Outstanding, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 8.52
Granted, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value	3.24
Vested, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value	(10.20)
Forfeited or Cancelled, options Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value	(4.89)
Outstanding, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 3.98	$ 8.52
Unvested, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	2 years 6 months	2 years 6 months

XML

Related Party Transactions (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($)						1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended				9 Months Ended
	Jul. 30, 2016	Dec. 04, 2015	Nov. 17, 2014	Jul. 30, 2013	Jan. 01, 2013	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2016	Aug. 15, 2014
Related Party [Line Items]
Operating expenses							$ 16,071,000		$ 20,180,000		$ 57,379,000	$ 63,077,000
Payments to acquire businesses, net of cash acquired												147,587,000
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities								$ 5,754,000			5,757,000
Intangible asset agreement annual payment							1,700,000				$ 1,700,000
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement By Share-Based Payment Award, Options, Grants In Period, Gross
FUL [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Business acquisition, percentage of voting interests acquired			50.50%
Payments to acquire businesses, net of cash acquired			$ 4,500,000
Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest							(2,400,000)			$ 100,000	$ (2,400,000)	400,000
Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement By Share-Based Payment Award, Options, Grants In Period, Gross											716,600
Tengram Capital Partners Gen2 Fund LP [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Percentage of beneficially owned outstanding common stock					5.00%
Tengram Capital Partners Limited Partnership [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Payments to acquire available-for-sale securities						$ 12,000,000
JALP [Member] | FUL [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Business combination, recognized identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, intangible assets, other than goodwill			$ 8,900,000
ES Originals Inc [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Royalty revenue							3,500,000		3,000,000		$ 11,300,000	11,200,000
Due from related parties, current							6,700,000				6,700,000		$ 7,100,000
TCP Employee [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Operating expenses							100,000		200,000		200,000	300,000
Accounts payable, related parties, current							0				$ 0		0
TCP Employee [Member] | Restricted Stock
Related Party [Line Items]
Other than options, granted				125,000
Share-based compensation arrangement by share-based payment award, award vesting period											4 years
TCP Employee [Member] | Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Other than options, granted	200,000			180,000
Share-based compensation arrangement by share-based payment award, award vesting period											3 years
IP License Agreement and Intangible Asset Agreement [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Terms of agreement, description											for calendar years 2018 through 2020 exceed $195 million or the gross licensing revenues for calendar year 2020 equal or exceed $65 million.
Aggregate gross revenues per agreement, benchmark		$ 195,000,000
Gross revenues per agreement, benchmark		$ 65,000,000
License agreement payments during period							800,000				$ 1,400,000
Accretion expense							200,000		200,000		500,000	600,000
IP License Agreement [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
License agreement annual payment							1,300,000				1,300,000
License agreement payments during period							300,000		1,000,000		300,000	1,000,000
Due to related parties, current							8,300,000				8,300,000		8,800,000
IP License Agreement [Member] | Other Noncurrent Liabilities [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Due to related parties, current							5,400,000				5,400,000		6,000,000
IP License Agreement [Member] | Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Due to related parties, current							2,900,000				2,900,000		2,800,000
TCP Agreement [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Receivables from series rendered for merger and acquisition					$ 1,000,000
License agreement annual payment														$ 900,000
TCP Agreement [Member] | Tengram Capital Partners Limited Partnership [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Operating expenses									900,000		500,000	900,000
Accounts payable, related parties, current							200,000				$ 200,000		$ 0
Award Date One [Member] | TCP Employee [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche One [Member] | Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Share based compensation, vesting percentage											20.00%
Award Date One [Member] | TCP Employee [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche Two [Member] | Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Share based compensation, vesting percentage											20.00%
Award Date One [Member] | TCP Employee [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche Three [Member] | Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Share based compensation, vesting percentage											60.00%
Award Date Two [Member] | TCP Employee [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche One [Member] | Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Share based compensation, vesting percentage											33.30%
Award Date Two [Member] | TCP Employee [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche Two [Member] | Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Share based compensation, vesting percentage											33.30%
Award Date Two [Member] | TCP Employee [Member] | Share-based Compensation Award, Tranche Three [Member] | Performance Based Restricted Stock [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Share based compensation, vesting percentage											33.40%
Maximum [Member] | ES Originals Inc [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
Expenses, related party							$ 100,000				$ 100,000
Maximum [Member] | IP License Agreement and Intangible Asset Agreement [Member]
Related Party [Line Items]
License agreement payments during period									$ 100,000			$ 100,000

XML

Restructuring (Narrative) (Details)	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($) employee	Sep. 30, 2017 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring charges, total	$ 400,000	$ 3,200,000
Restructuring Reserve			$ 0	$ 1,500,000
Accumualted restructuring charges to date			$ 10,500,000
Restructuring and related cost, number of positions eliminated | employee		65
Other Restructuring Costs		$ 11,900,000
Professional Fees [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring charges, total		800,000
Asset Write-Offs [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring charges, total		400,000
Employee Severance [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring charges, total		1,700,000
Contract Termination [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring charges, total		$ 300,000
Restructuring Reserve				$ 1,500,000

XML

Restructuring (Changes in Restructuring Accruals) (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016
Reserves and allowance deducted from asset accounts:
Beginning Balance		$ 1,500,000
Charges to expense	$ 400,000		$ 3,200,000
Amounts paid		(1,500,000)
Ending Balance		0
Employee Severance [Member]
Reserves and allowance deducted from asset accounts:
Charges to expense			1,700,000
Contract Termination [Member]
Reserves and allowance deducted from asset accounts:
Beginning Balance		1,500,000
Charges to expense			300,000
Amounts paid		$ (1,500,000)
Professional Fees [Member]
Reserves and allowance deducted from asset accounts:
Charges to expense			$ 800,000