0001193125-19-079544.txt : 20190319 0001193125-19-079544.hdr.sgml : 20190319 20190319155704 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001193125-19-079544 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 8-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 4 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20190313 ITEM INFORMATION: Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement ITEM INFORMATION: Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement ITEM INFORMATION: Other Events ITEM INFORMATION: Financial Statements and Exhibits FILED AS OF DATE: 20190319 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20190319 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: CNL Healthcare Properties II, Inc. CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001648383 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS [6798] IRS NUMBER: 474524619 STATE OF INCORPORATION: MD FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 8-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-55777 FILM NUMBER: 19691537 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 450 SOUTH ORANGE AVENUE CITY: ORLANDO STATE: FL ZIP: 32801 BUSINESS PHONE: 407.650.1000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 450 SOUTH ORANGE AVENUE CITY: ORLANDO STATE: FL ZIP: 32801 8-K 1 d676908d8k.htm 8-K 8-K

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 8-K

 

 

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): March 13, 2019

 

 

CNL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES II, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

 

 

Maryland   000-55777   47-4524619

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation)

 

(Commission

File No.)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

450 South Orange Avenue, Orlando, FL   32801
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (407) 650-1000

Not applicable

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)

 

 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

 

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).

Emerging growth company  ☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☒

 

 

 


Item 1.01

Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement

Sale of MOB Property

On March 15, 2019, CHP II Overland Park KS MOB Owner, LLC, an operating subsidiary of CNL Healthcare Properties II, Inc. (referred to herein as “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company”), (the “Seller”), entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Sale Agreement”) with HCP Medical Office Buildings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Purchaser”), for the sale of the Company’s medical office building located in Overland Park, Kansas (the “MOB Property”) for approximately $15.4 million in cash (the “Sale”), subject to certain pro-rations and other adjustments as described in the Sale Agreement (the “Purchase Price”). Purchaser will place into escrow a $0.3 million earnest money deposit (the “First Deposit”). If Purchaser does not terminate the Sale Agreement on or before the end of the inspection period on April 5, 2019, the Purchaser will place into escrow an additional $0.3 million earnest money deposit (together with the First Deposit, the “Deposit”) and the Deposit will be nonrefundable, except in the event of the Seller’s breach of the Sale Agreement or failure to satisfy conditions to the consummation of the Sale.

The MOB Property is subject to a right of first refusal, which provides an unaffiliated third party a right to acquire the MOB Property under the same material terms and conditions as Purchaser. Seller anticipates that the right of first refusal will be exercised or expire prior to the end of the inspection period in the Sale Agreement. The Sale Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities of the Seller and the Purchaser. The Company currently anticipates that the consummation of the Sale will occur in the first half of 2019; provided, however, that there can be no assurance that the Sale will ultimately be completed.

The Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) unanimously approved the Company entering into the Sale Agreement. Net proceeds from the Sale, after payment of closing costs, will be used to satisfy debt securing the MOB Property and the remaining proceeds may be used to make a special distribution to stockholders and/or for general corporate purposes.

The foregoing description of the Sale Agreement does not purport to be a complete description of the rights and obligations of the parties thereunder and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Sale Agreement that will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s next quarterly report.

 

Item 1.02

Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement

On March 13, 2019, the Board and the Company’s external advisor, CHP II Advisors, LLC (the “Advisor”) agreed to terminate the Amended and Restated Expense Support and Restricted Stock Agreement dated May 9, 2016 (as amended, the “Expense Support Agreement”) between the Company and the Advisor, which termination is effective April 1, 2019. Any restricted shares granted to the Advisor under the Expense Support Agreement shall continue to be held by the Advisor, subject to the vesting and forfeiture provisions of the Expense Support Agreement which survive termination. The Expense Support Agreement termination was unanimously approved by the Board and culminates certain Board action taken to modify the Advisor’s overall compensation. The Company and the Advisor previously agreed to eliminate future acquisition fees and disposition fees as well as to generally reduce the asset management fee (the “AUM Fee”) to 0.40 percent per annum of average invested assets as described in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 6, 2019. The AUM Fee is further subject and subordinate to an agreed upon hurdle relating to the total operating expenses of the Company (as described in the Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement), though to the extent any portion of the AUM Fee is not paid as a result of total operating expenses exceeding the prescribed limits, it may nevertheless be recovered by the Advisor if certain Company performance thresholds are subsequently met.

 

Item 8.01

Other Events

Engagement of SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc.; Suspension of Cash Distribution

As previously disclosed in October 2018, the Company’s Board formed a special committee comprised solely of its independent directors (the “Special Committee”) to consider possible strategic alternatives for the Company. Such strategic alternatives may include, without limitation, an orderly disposition of the Company’s assets or one or


more of the Company’s asset classes and the distribution of the net sale proceeds thereof to the stockholders of the Company and a potential business combination or other transaction with an unrelated third party or affiliated party of the company’s sponsor. The sale of the MOB Property is the first transaction pursuant to this strategic shift by the Company. In furtherance of the Company’s consideration of strategic alternatives, in January 2019, the Special Committee engaged SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. (“STRH”), an independent investment banking firm to act as financial advisor to the Special Committee.

In light of the pending Sale and the formation of the Special Committee and the engagement of STRH, the Board voted to suspend the Company’s cash distribution on its common stock effective April 1, 2019. Accordingly, the Board does not currently intended to declare any regular distributions on the Company’s common stock after the effective date of the suspension, though special distributions may be made from time to time. The date of the suspension of the Company’s cash distribution corresponds with the termination date of the Expense Support Agreement.

Determination of Estimated Net Asset Value per Share

On March 13, 2019, the Board unanimously approved $9.92 as the estimated net asset value (“NAV”) per share of the Company’s common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2018 (the “Valuation Date”), based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, including estimated property transaction costs, divided by approximately 4.90 million shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018, excluding restricted shares issued to our Advisor. There have been no material changes between December 31, 2018 and the date of this filing that would impact the overall estimated NAV per share.

In establishing the estimated NAV, the Board engaged Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc., an independent third-party valuation firm (“Stanger”), to provide a net asset valuation analysis of the Company. Stanger developed a valuation analysis of the Company and provided the analysis to the valuation committee of the Board, comprised solely of the independent directors (the “Valuation Committee”) in a report dated March 13, 2019 that contained, among other information, a range of per share net asset values for the Company’s common stock as of the Valuation Date (the “Valuation Report”).

Background

In January 2019, the Company announced that it initiated a process to update the Company’s estimated NAV per share to provide existing investors and broker-dealers with increased transparency and an estimated value of the Company’s shares based on the value of the Company’s current portfolio as of December 31, 2018. The Company announced two previous NAVs per share of $10.06 and $10.00 as of December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017, respectively.

From Stanger’s engagement through the issuance of its Valuation Report, Stanger held discussions with our Advisor and conducted appraisals, investigations, research, review and analyses as it deemed necessary. The Valuation Committee, upon its receipt and review of the Valuation Report, concluded that the range of $9.40 and $10.49 for the Company’s estimated NAV per share of the Company’s common stock proposed in Stanger’s Valuation Report was reasonable, and recommended to the Board that it adopt $9.92 as the estimated NAV per share of the Company’s common stock, which is the midpoint of the range in Stanger’s Valuation Report. At a special meeting of the Board also held on March 13, 2019, the Board accepted the recommendation of the Valuation Committee and approved $9.92 as the estimated NAV per share of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2018.

Other than the adjustment for estimated transaction costs, which reduced the NAV by $0.26 per share, the Board’s determination of the December 31, 2018 NAV (the “2018 NAV”) was undertaken in accordance with the


Company’s valuation policy and the recommendations and methodologies of the Investment Program Association, a trade association for non-listed direct investment vehicles (“IPA”), as set forth in IPA Practice Guideline 2013-01 “Valuations of Publicly Registered Non-Listed REITs” (“IPA Practice Guideline”).

The estimated 2018 NAV represents a snapshot in time, will likely change, and does not necessarily represent the amount a stockholder would receive now or in the future for his or her shares of the Company’s common stock. The 2018 NAV is based on a number of assumptions, estimates and data that are inherently imprecise and susceptible to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Please see “Valuation Methodologies and Major Assumptions,” “Valuation Summary,” and “Additional Information Regarding the Valuation, Limitations of Estimated Share Value and the Engagement of Stanger” in this Current Report, below.

Valuation Methodologies

As of the Valuation Date, the Company’s real estate portfolio consisted of two seniors housing communities, one in Riverview, Florida and one in Pensacola, Florida and the MOB Property in Overland Park, Kansas (the “Appraised Properties”). The Appraised Properties were valued using valuation and appraisal methodologies with real estate industry standards and practices further described below.

To estimate the value of the Appraised Properties, Stanger has performed a site visit and conducted an appraisal of each asset. In determining its value opinion of each Appraised Property, Stanger utilized all information that it deemed relevant, including information from the Advisor and its own data sources, which data sources included information on capitalization rates, leasing rates and other economic factors. In conducting its appraisals of the Appraised Properties, and pursuant to its engagement, Stanger utilized the income approach to valuation. Specifically, a direct capitalization analysis was used for seniors housing properties and both a direct capitalization and discounted cash flow analysis was used for the MOB Property.

For the seniors housing assets, a direct capitalization analysis was performed by applying a market capitalization rate for each applicable Appraised Property to the estimated stabilized forward-year annual net operating income at each such property. In selecting each capitalization rate, Stanger took into account, among other factors, prevailing capitalization rates in the applicable property sector, the property’s location, age and condition, and the property’s operating trends.

For the MOB Property, the above-described direct capitalization analysis was performed and a market discount rate and terminal capitalization rate was applied to multi-year property projections which factored in, among other things, the leases encumbering the property, market conditions with respect to lease-up or releasing and property historical and projected operating trends.

As applicable, Stanger adjusted the capitalized value of each Appraised Property for any deferred maintenance or capital needs and lease-up costs to estimate the “as-is” value of each Appraised Property. Stanger’s appraisal report was certified by an appraiser licensed in the state in which the Appraised Properties were located. As of the Valuation Date, the aggregate estimated value of the Appraised Properties was approximately $66.64 million.

Debt. The Company determined the fair market value of the Company’s debt by applying a discounted cash flow analysis over the projected remaining term of the debt and reflecting the debt’s contractual agreement and corresponding interest and principal payments. The expected debt payments were then discounted to present value at an interest rate the Company deemed appropriate and reflective of market interest rates as of the Valuation Date for debt instruments with similar collateral, anticipated duration and prepayment terms. As of the Valuation Date, the estimated market value of the Company’s debt was $24.5 million, which equaled its aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Valuation Date. While Stanger did not determine the value of the Company’s debt liabilities, Stanger did review the market interest rates used by the Company in determining the debt fair market value and, based upon a summary of the loan terms as provided by the Company, determined that in the aggregate, the market interest rates utilized by the Company were reasonable.

Valuation Summary; Material Assumptions

The following is a summary of the direct capitalization rates used to arrive at the value of the seniors housing properties: direct capitalization rate range of 6.25% to 7.00% with a weighted average of approximately 6.63%. The following is a summary of the rates used to arrive at the value of the medical office property: direct capitalization rate of 5.25%; discount rate of 6.50%, and a terminal capitalization rate of 6.00%.


In its Valuation Report, Stanger utilized the Company’s estimate of the December 31, 2018 value of the Company’s other assets, including cash and other tangible assets net of payables, accruals and other tangible liabilities, which approximated the net realizable values of such amounts on the Company’s adjusted balance sheet as of December 31, 2018. Furthermore, the Valuation Report includes Stanger’s estimate of the Advisor’s subordinated participation in net sales proceeds or incentive fee due upon liquidation of the Company’s portfolio.

The Valuation Report contained a range for the Company’s estimated 2018 NAV of $9.40 to $10.49 per share, including deductions for estimated property transaction costs in a hypothetical orderly sale of the assets of the Company. The per share range is based on a share count of approximately 4.90 million shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018, excluding restricted shares issued to the Company’s Advisor.

The valuation range was calculated by Stanger by varying the direct capitalization rates and discount rates and terminal capitalization rates by 25 basis points in either direction. The lower end of the range has a positive $0.57 impact on NAV per share. The high end of the range has a negative $0.52 impact on NAV per share.

Taking into consideration the reasonableness of the valuation methodologies, assumptions and estimated range of values contained in Stanger’s Valuation Report, the Valuation Committee recommended that the Board approve $9.92 as the estimated NAV per share and the Board ultimately approved $9.92 as the estimated NAV per share of the Company’s common stock. As with any valuation methodology, the methodologies considered by the Valuation Committee and the Board, in reaching an estimate of the value of the Company’s shares, are based upon all of the foregoing estimates, assumptions, judgments and opinions that may, or may not, prove to be correct. The use of different estimates, assumptions, judgments or opinions may have resulted in significantly different estimates of the value of the Company’s shares.

The following table summarizes the material components of the Company’s estimated NAV as of December 31, 2018 compared to those as of December 31, 2017:

Table of Value Estimates for Components of Net Asset Value (1)

 

     Value as of
12/31/18
($ in 000’s)
     Value as of
12/31/18 (6)
Per Share
     Value as of
12/31/17 (7)
($ in 000’s)
     Value as of
12/31/17
Per Share
 

Present value of wholly owned assets(2)

     66,640      $ 13.60      $ 38,880      $ 12.65  

Cash and cash equivalents(3)

     8,238        1.68        12,422        4.04  

Other assets(4)

     357        0.07        189        0.06  

Debt outstanding(5)

     (24,500      (5.00      (19,813      (6.44

Accounts payable and other accrued expenses

     (705      (0.14      (478 )      (0.16

Other liabilities

     (144      (0.03      (287      (0.09
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net asset value

     49,886        10.18      $ 30,914      $ 10.06  

Estimated Transaction Costs

     (1,292      (0.26      0        0  
  

 

 

          

Net Asset Value (Net of Trans. Costs)

     48,594        9.92        
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1)

Balance sheet items reflect management’s unaudited balance sheet as of Dec. 31, 2018 and preliminary balance sheet as of Dec. 31, 2017. These are the composite mid-point figures as derived.

(2)

Includes three properties in 2018 and two properties in 2017.


(3)

Includes restricted cash.

(4)

Includes accounts receivable and prepaid expenses.

(5)

Debt outstanding in 2018 is equal to the fair market value of debt. In 2017, no fair market valuation of debt was conducted and the amount above represents debt outstanding. Increase represents debt incurred in connection with higher borrowings.

(6)

Based on approximately 4.90 million shares outstanding, excluding 0.06 million restricted shares issued to the Company’s Advisor.

(7)

Based on approximately 3.07 million shares outstanding, including approximately 0.06 million restricted shares expected to be issued to the Advisor during March 2018, as of the 2017 valuation date.

The main factors that impacted the Company’s estimated NAV per share as of December 31, 2018 as compared to the Company’s prior estimated NAV per share as of December 31, 2017 (the “2017 NAV”) are (i) an increase in real estate value due to the acquisition of our third property and improved values at our same store properties, (ii) a decrease in cash, reflective of the placement of capital in the aforementioned acquisition as well as the close of our offering, (iii) an increase in debt of approximately $4.7 million, (iv) the exclusion of restricted stock issued to our Advisor and the exclusion of liabilities otherwise expected to be settled by the issuance of restricted stock to our Advisor, further described below, and (v) the inclusion of estimated property transaction costs in the event of one or more transactions involving the Company’s portfolio of assets to provide liquidity to the Company’s stockholders.

The appraised value of the Company’s two real estate assets in the 2017 NAV was $38.9 million. On a same store basis, the two assets appraised in both the 2018 and 2017 NAV increased in collective value by approximately $2.5 million. The increase in same store real estate value is supported by the operating performance of Summer Vista Assisted Living and Mid-America Surgery Institute. As noted above, the 2018 NAV per share estimate excludes restricted shares currently outstanding of approximately 0.06 million as well as approximately $843,000 of liabilities otherwise expected to be settled by the issuance of restricted stock to our Advisor. If the restricted shares and to-be-settled restricted shares were factored into the 2018 NAV per share, they would result in a cumulative reduction to the NAV of approximately $0.28 per share. The determination was made to exclude these shares because they are subject to return thresholds that are not currently expected to be met and, due to the lack of scale of the Company, we anticipate the Advisor’s restricted shares would not participate in any special distributions as may be declared by the Board. The 2017 NAV per share estimate included restricted shares.

Sensitivity Analysis

Changes to the key assumptions used to arrive at the estimated NAV per share could have a significant impact on the underlying value of the Company’s real estate assets. The following table presents the impact on the estimated NAV per share of the Company’s common stock resulting from a 5.0% increase and decrease to parameters utilized in developing the appraised value of the Appraised Portfolio.

 

     Value Sensitivity  
     Low     Concluded     High  

Estimated Net Asset Value Per Share

   $ 9.25     $ 9.92     $ 10.61  

Weighted Average Capitalization Rate Appraised Properties

     6.69     6.29     6.02

Terminal Capitalization Rate Appraised Properties(a)(b)

     6.30     6.00     5.70

Discount Rate Appraised Properties(a)(b)

     6.83     6.50     6.18

 

(a)

Relates to the MOB Property.

(b)

As changes in these specific valuation parameters are not material by themselves, we have shown the aggregate value change from moving all parameters up or down by 5%.


Additional Information Regarding the Valuation, Limitations of Estimated Share Value and the Engagement of Stanger

Throughout the valuation process, the Valuation Committee, the Company’s Advisor and senior members of management reviewed, confirmed and approved the processes and methodologies and their consistency with real estate industry standards and best practices.

Stanger’s Valuation Report was based upon market, economic, financial and other information, circumstances and conditions existing at or prior to December 31, 2018, and any material change in such information, circumstances and/or conditions may have a material effect on the Company’s estimated NAV. Stanger’s valuation materials were solely to assist the Company in establishing an estimated value of the Company’s common stock. Stanger’s valuation materials were not addressed to the public and should not be relied upon by any other person to establish an estimated value of the Company’s common stock. Stanger’s Valuation Report does not constitute a recommendation by Stanger to purchase or sell any shares of the Company’s common stock. Although Stanger considered comments received from the Company or the Advisor during the valuation process, the final appraised values of the Company’s appraised properties and debt liabilities in the Valuation Report were determined by Stanger.

In connection with its review, while Stanger reviewed for reasonableness the information supplied or otherwise made available to it by the Company or its Advisor, Stanger assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all such information and of all information supplied or otherwise made available to it by any other party, and did not undertake any duty or responsibility to verify independently any of such information.

In performing its analyses, Stanger made numerous assumptions as of various points in time with respect to industry performance, general business, economic and regulatory conditions, current and future rental market for the Company’s operating properties and other matters, many of which are necessarily subject to change and beyond the control of Stanger and the Company. The analyses performed by Stanger are not necessarily indicative of actual values, trading values or actual future results of the Company’s common stock that might be achieved, all of which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by the Valuation Report. The actual value of the Company’s common stock may vary significantly depending on numerous factors that generally impact the price of securities, the financial condition of the Company and the state of the real estate industry more generally. Accordingly, with respect to the estimated NAV of the Company’s common stock, neither we nor Stanger can give any assurance that:

 

   

a stockholder would be able to resell his or her shares at this estimated value for the respective class of shares;

 

   

a stockholder would ultimately realize distributions per share equal to our estimated NAV for the respective class of shares of common stock upon liquidation of our assets and settlement of our liabilities or a sale of the Company;

 

   

our shares would trade at a price equal to or greater than the estimated NAV for the respective class of shares if we listed them on a national securities exchange; or

 

   

the methodology used to estimate our NAV would be acceptable to FINRA or under ERISA for compliance with its reporting requirements.

The December 31, 2018, estimated NAV was determined by our Board at a special meeting held on March 13, 2019. The value of the Company’s shares will fluctuate over time as a result of, among other things, developments related to individual assets and responses to the real estate and capital markets. We currently expect to continue to determine our estimated NAV at least annually.

Stanger possesses substantial experience in the valuation of assets similar to those owned by the Company and regularly undertake the valuation of securities in connection with business combinations and similar transactions. For the preparation of the Valuation Report, we paid Stanger a customary fee for services of this nature, no part of which was contingent relating to the provision of services or specific findings. The Company has not engaged Stanger for any other services.

Certain of the Company’s affiliates engaged Stanger for various real estate-related services and/or to serve as a third-party valuation advisor. The Company anticipates that Stanger will continue to provide similar services to the


Company and its affiliates in the future. In addition, the Company may in its discretion engage Stanger to assist the Board in future determinations of the Company’s estimated NAV. The Company is not affiliated with Stanger or any of its affiliates. While the Company and affiliates of the Company have engaged and/or may engage in the future Stanger for commercial real estate services of various kinds, the Company believes that there are no material conflicts of interest with respect to the Company’s engagement of Stanger.

The Company is furnishing (i) as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K a copy of the letter to the Company’s stockholders regarding the NAV determination as of December 31, 2018, Text of correspondence from the Company to Stockholders regarding the 2018 NAV, and (ii) as Exhibit 99.2 to this Current Report on Form 8-K a copy of the notice mailed to our stockholders’ registered representatives or investment advisers regarding, among other things, the recent determination of the estimated NAV of the Company’s common stock. Such shareholder letter and notice shall not be deemed to be “filed” with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or incorporated by reference into any other filing with the SEC.

 

Item 9.01

Financial Statements and Exhibits.

 

  (d)

Exhibits

 

99.1    Correspondence from the Company to stockholders regarding the NAV as of December 31, 2018
99.2    Correspondence with financial advisors of stockholders of CNL Healthcare Properties II, Inc.

Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this document may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Company intends that all such forward-looking statements be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, as applicable.

All statements, other than statements that relate solely to historical facts, including, among others, statements regarding the Company’s future financial position, business strategy, projected levels of growth, projected costs and projected financing needs, are forward-looking statements. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of the management team, as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based, and generally are identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “should,” “continues,” “pro forma” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including but not limited to, the factors detailed in our annual report for the year ended December 31, 2018, and other documents filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Many of these factors are beyond the Company’s ability to control or predict. Such factors include, but are not limited to: changes in general economic conditions in the U.S. or globally (including financial market fluctuations); risks associated with our investment strategy; risks associated with the real estate markets in which the Company invests; risks associated with the use of debt to finance the Company’s business activities, including refinancing and interest rate risk and the Company’s failure to comply with its debt covenants; the Company’s failure to obtain, renew or extend necessary financing or to access the debt or equity markets; competition for properties and/or tenants in the markets in which the Company engages in business; the impact of current and future environmental, zoning and other governmental regulations affecting the Company’s properties; the Company’s ability to make necessary improvements to properties on a timely or cost-efficient basis; risks related to development projects or acquired property value-add conversions, if applicable (including construction delays, cost overruns, the Company’s inability to obtain necessary permits and/or public opposition to these activities); defaults on or non-renewal of leases by tenants; failure to lease properties at all or on favorable rents and terms; unknown liabilities in connection with acquired properties or liabilities caused by property managers or operators; the Company’s failure to successfully manage growth or integrate acquired properties and operations; increases in operating costs and other expense items and costs, uninsured losses or losses in excess of the Company’s insurance coverage; the impact of outstanding or potential litigation; risks associated with the Company’s tax structuring; the Company’s failure to qualify and maintain its status as a real estate investment trust; and the Company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and the value of its brands.


Management believes these forward-looking statements are reasonable; however, such statements are necessarily dependent on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and the Company may not be able to realize them. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements which are based on current expectations. All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time unless otherwise required by law.

For further information regarding risks and uncertainties associated with our business, please refer to the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Risk Factors” sections of our documents filed from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including, but not limited to, our annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, copies of which may be obtained from our website at http://www.cnlhealthcarepropertiesII.com.

We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward looking-statements that may be made to reflect future events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

    CNL Healthcare Properties II, Inc.

 

March 19, 2019

 

     
    By:  

/s/ Stephen H. Mauldin

      Stephen H. Mauldin
      Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman
EX-99.1 2 d676908dex991.htm EX-99.1 EX-99.1

Exhibit 99.1

March 19, 2019

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

I am writing to update you on the company’s progress as we have launched our evaluation of strategic alternatives, plus to share the results of our annual estimated net asset valuation (NAV) per share process.

The last time I wrote, I mentioned that the company had formed a special committee, comprised solely of our independent directors, to begin exploring strategic opportunities for shareholders. Since then, the special committee engaged SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. (STRH), an independent investment banking firm, to serve as its financial advisor. STRH has begun to assist the committee and management team with insight and advice as we work to identify and execute the best methods to drive value, now that we have closed our capital raising activities.

Strategic Alternatives: Purchase & Sale Agreement/Distributions

I am pleased to announce that our first step along our strategic alternatives path is a definitive purchase and sale agreement for our medical office building. We have successfully contracted with HCP Medical Office Buildings, LLC to buy our Mid-America Surgery Institute medical office building for a gross value of approximately $15.4 million, before closing costs and other transactional expenses. The sales price represents a meaningful premium compared to our acquisition cost in December 2017. The property is a high-quality, fully leased, on-campus facility in a highly desirable submarket of Kansas City. We expect that the sale will be completed by mid-2019.

We anticipate that net sales proceeds, after payment of closing costs, from the presumed sale will be used to satisfy debt secured by the property. The remaining proceeds, upon board approval, may be used to make a special distribution to shareholders, and/or for general corporate purposes.

Given that we are actively selling, or evaluating the sale of, our assets as a function of the strategic alternatives process, the board of directors has unanimously voted to suspend quarterly distributions effective April 1, 2019. This action is typical for a company in our current life stage. However, it is important to note, special distributions from net proceeds derived from our anticipated sale of assets could be made from time-to-time. Such distributions are also typical, yet subject to board approval.

As a general reminder, the company’s strategic alternatives options include, but are not limited to: an orderly disposition of the company’s assets or one or more asset classes and the distribution of net sales proceeds to shareholders; or a potential business combination or other transaction with an unrelated third party or affiliated party of the company’s sponsor.


Estimated Net Asset Value

Recently, we also concluded our annual net asset valuation process, with the assistance of Robert A. Stanger, Inc. (Stanger), an independent third-party valuation firm. The valuation resulted in an estimated net asset value (NAV) per share. The per share value of $9.921 represents the midpoint of the Stanger-provided NAV per share range of $9.40 to $10.49. The updated appraised value of the company’s real estate assets rose from prior valuations, yet the most recent NAV per share now reflects the inclusion of hypothetical property transaction costs related to the potential future sale of company assets. We believe that the inclusion of these hypothetical costs in this year’s NAV are entirely appropriate now that we have shifted into the strategic alternatives phase of the company’s life cycle. The estimated transaction costs reduced our estimated 2018 NAV by $0.26 per share. For additional context, our previous estimated NAVs per share were $10.06 as of Dec. 31, 2017 and $10.00 as of July 31, 2017. Please keep in mind that NAV values are as of a specific date and may not be indicative of the value that could be realized as we pursue strategies to maximize shareholder value.

For additional details and information on the events outlined in this letter, I encourage you to visit our website at cnlhealthcarepropertiesii.com to access our Form 8-K that was filed with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission.

Next Steps

I will provide further information as we close on the expected sale of our medical office building and make continued progress in studying and executing on strategic alternatives. We are focused and engaged as a management team and board of directors and I look forward to future updates as material events unfold. If you have any questions, please contact your financial advisor or CNL Client Services at 866-650-0650, option 3.

Thank you for your confidence and allowing us to be stewards of your investment.

Sincerely,

 

LOGO

Stephen H. Mauldin

President & Chief Executive Officer

cc: Financial advisors

Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and may be identified by words such as believes, anticipates, expects, may, will, continues, could and terms of similar substance, and speak only as of the date made. Actual results could differ materially due to risks and uncertainties that are beyond the company’s ability to control or accurately predict. Shareholders and financial advisors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

1 The estimated NAV per share is only an estimate and is based on several assumptions and estimates that may not be correct. The NAV is based on numerous assumptions and estimates with respect to industry, business, economic and regulatory conditions, all of which are subject to changes. Throughout the valuation process, the valuation committee, the company’s advisor and senior members of management reviewed, confirmed and approved the processes and methodologies and their consistency with real estate industry standards and best practices. The company will have the potential for greater volatility due to the substantial portion of assets invested in a limited number of properties.

There is no assurance that CNL Healthcare Properties II. adherence to any of the methodologies set forth in IPA Practice Guideline 2013-01 satisfies applicable compliance or other requirements of the SEC, FINRA or under ERISA with respect to the preparation and disclosure of its estimated NAV per share. The Institute of Portfolio Alternatives is a trade organization of which CNL is a member.

EX-99.2 3 d676908dex992.htm EX-99.2 EX-99.2

Exhibit 99.2

FA Email

Subject: CNL Healthcare Properties II News: NAV Results, Purchase & Sale Agreement and Distribution Changes

March 19, 2019

FOR BROKER-DEALER AND RIA USE ONLY. Not for general use with the public

We are writing to inform you that CNL Healthcare Properties II1 has filed a Form 8-K to announce that:

 

   

The board of directors has approved an estimated net asset value (NAV)2 per share of $9.92 for the company’s common stock as of Dec. 31, 2018. The estimated NAV per share represents the midpoint within the range of values, $9.40 to $10.49, provided by Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc., (Stanger), an independent third-party valuation firm.

 

  o

The 2018 resulting estimated NAV per share was reduced by $0.26 per share to $9.92, after adjusting for estimated property transaction costs. The property transaction costs are outside the scope of The Institute of Portfolio Alternatives (IPA) suggested valuation methodology and were not included in prior years when the offering was open.

 

  o

Along with the same store value increase, inclusion of estimated property transaction costs, the estimated NAV was impacted by the exclusion of the advisor’s restricted shares, a decrease in cash and an increase in company borrowings for the purchase of the company’s third asset.

 

   

SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., an independent investment banking firm, has been engaged as a financial advisor to assist the special committee with exploring strategic alternatives for the portfolio.

 

   

As part of its strategic alternatives process, a purchase and sale agreement has been signed for the company’s only medical office building. The property is being sold to HCP Medical Office Buildings, LLC for approximately $15.4 million cash (purchased for approximately $14 million). This transaction is anticipated to close in the second quarter of 2019, subject to customary closing conditions.

 

   

Given this information, the board of directors has approved to suspend quarterly distributions3 effective April 1, 2019. However, special distributions could be made from time-to-time from net sales proceeds received from sales of real estate. Suspending regular distributions at this phase of a company’s life cycle is a common practice within the alternative investment industry.

 

   

Additionally, the advisor has agreed to eliminate all future acquisition and disposition fees and reduce its monthly asset management fee to 0.0333 percent (0.40 percent annually) and subordinated this lower fee to agreed-upon stipulations for total operating expenses. These changes are directly and financially beneficial to shareholders and are effective March 2, 2019, with the Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement.

 

   

The board of directors approved the termination of the expense support agreement between the company and its advisor, effective April 1, 2019.


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

   

The prior estimated NAVs per share were $10.06 as of Dec. 31, 2017 and $10.00 as of June 30, 2017. The estimated NAV is a snapshot in time and not indicative of the value the company or shareholders may receive now or in the future. Please review the company’s latest financial filings for more details on performance metrics.

 

   

Stanger assisted the valuation committee with the preparation of the estimated NAV per share of its common stock as of Dec. 31, 2018. Other than the adjustment for estimated property transaction costs, the estimated NAV per share was determined in accordance with the company’s valuation policy and certain methodologies of the IPA, a trade association for non-listed direct investment vehicles, as set forth in IPA Practice Guideline 2013-01 “Valuations of Publicly Registered Non-Listed REITs.”4

 

   

Net sales proceeds, after payment of closing costs, will be used to satisfy debt securing the property. The remaining proceeds, upon board approval, may be used to make a special distribution to shareholders, and/or for general corporate purposes.

For additional information, please review the Form 8-K filed on March 19, 2019, contact your sales representative directly or call CNL Client Services at 866-650-0650, option 2.

1 CNL Healthcare Properties II elected REIT tax status commencing with the taxable year ending Dec. 31, 2017. If the company fails to meet the REIT qualification standards now or in the future, the company will be subject to increased taxes, which will decrease investors’ returns.

2 The estimated NAV per share is only an estimate and is based on several assumptions and estimates that may not be correct. The NAV is based on numerous assumptions and estimates with respect to industry, business, economic and regulatory conditions, all of which are subject to changes. Throughout the valuation process, the valuation committee, the company’s advisor and senior members of management reviewed, confirmed and approved the processes and methodologies and their consistency with real estate industry standards and best practices. The company will have the potential for greater volatility due to the substantial portion of assets invested in a limited number of properties.

3 Due to the high levels of investment costs and fees incurred during the company’s initial phase, distributions will not be fully covered by cash flows from operating activities and will be paid from expense waivers, borrowings and offering proceeds, which is not sustainable over the long term and may reduce investors’ return. For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2018, approximately 36 percent of cash distributions were covered by operating cash flow and 64 percent were funded by offering proceeds. For the years ended Dec. 31, 2017 and 2016, approximately 30 and 0 percent of distributions were covered by operating cash flow and 70 and 100 percent were funded by offering proceeds, respectively. Distributions paid from sources other than operating cash flow, now and in the future, are not sustainable, can reduce investors’ overall return and may be dilutive.

4 There is no assurance that CNL Healthcare Properties II adherence to any of the methodologies set forth in IPA Practice Guideline 2013-01 satisfies applicable compliance or other requirements of the SEC, FINRA or under ERISA with respect to the preparation and disclosure of its estimated NAV per share. The IPA is a trade organization of which CNL is a member.

There is no assurance the stated objectives will be met.

Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and may be identified by words such as believes, anticipates, expects, may, could and terms of similar substance, and speak only as of the date made. Actual results could differ materially due to risks and uncertainties that are beyond the company’s ability to control or accurately predict, including the amount and timing of anticipated future distributions, estimated per share net asset value of the

company’s stock and/or other matters. The company’s forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Stockholders and financial advisors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

FOR BROKER-DEALER AND RIA USE ONLY. Not for general use with the public

CHPII-0319-752541-BD

GRAPHIC 4 g676908g23q45.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 g676908g23q45.jpg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end