Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 |
|
|
| x | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016
|
|
|
| o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
For the transition period from to
Commission File number 333-203841
ATEL 17, LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
| California | 90-1108275 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization) |
(I. R. S. Employer Identification No.) |
The Transamerica Pyramid, 600 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (415) 989-8800
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: Limited Liability Company Units
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x
The number of Limited Liability Company Units outstanding as of July 31, 2016 was 891,970.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.
ATEL 17, LLC
Index
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited).
ATEL 17, LLC
BALANCE SHEETS
JUNE 30, 2016 AND DECEMBER 31, 2015
|
|
|
||||||
| June 30, 2016 |
December 31, 2015 |
|||||||
| (Unaudited) | ||||||||
| ASSETS |
||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,589,588 | $ | 500 | ||||
| Accounts receivable | 54,579 | — | ||||||
| Investments in equipment and leases, net | 3,692,795 | — | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | 136,191 | — | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 6,473,153 | $ | 500 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' CAPITAL |
||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities: |
||||||||
| Managing Member | $ | 3,843 | $ | — | ||||
| Affiliates | 179,819 | — | ||||||
| Accrued distributions to Other Members | 61,844 | — | ||||||
| Other | 62,439 | — | ||||||
| Unearned operating lease income | 27,361 | — | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 335,306 | — | ||||||
| Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
| Members’ capital: |
||||||||
| Managing Member | 482 | 500 | ||||||
| Other Members | 6,137,365 | — | ||||||
| Total Members’ capital | 6,137,847 | 500 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and Members’ capital | $ | 6,473,153 | $ | 500 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
3
ATEL 17, LLC
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2016
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
||||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 |
|||||||
| Revenues: |
||||||||
| Leasing and lending activities: |
||||||||
| Operating lease revenue | $ | 94,077 | $ | 103,878 | ||||
| Interest income | 163 | 184 | ||||||
| Other | 266 | 266 | ||||||
| Total revenues | 94,506 | 104,328 | ||||||
| Expenses: |
||||||||
| Depreciation of operating lease assets | 72,955 | 78,364 | ||||||
| Asset management fees to Managing Member | 7,138 | 7,807 | ||||||
| Cost reimbursements to affiliates | 9,579 | 11,655 | ||||||
| Amortization of initial direct costs | 8,931 | 10,036 | ||||||
| Professional fees | 8,652 | 8,652 | ||||||
| Outside services | 11,945 | 13,082 | ||||||
| Taxes on income and franchise fees | 2,000 | 4,000 | ||||||
| Other | 2,632 | 2,740 | ||||||
| Total expenses | 123,832 | 136,336 | ||||||
| Net loss | $ | (29,326 | ) | $ | (32,008 | ) | ||
| Net loss: |
||||||||
| Managing Member | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | ||
| Other Members | (29,323 | ) | (32,005 | ) | ||||
| $ | (29,326 | ) | $ | (32,008 | ) | |||
| Net loss per Limited Liability Company Unit (Other Members) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||
| Weighted average number of Units outstanding | 597,816 | 453,259 | ||||||
See accompanying notes.
4
ATEL 17, LLC
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
FOR THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 16, 2015 (Date of Inception)
THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Units | Amount | Total | ||||||||||||||
| Other Members | Managing Member | |||||||||||||||
| Member's capital as of April 16, 2015 (Date of inception) | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
| Capital contributions | 50 | — | 500 | 500 | ||||||||||||
| Balance December 31, 2015 | 50 | — | 500 | 500 | ||||||||||||
| Capital contributions | 744,445 | 7,437,380 | — | 7,437,380 | ||||||||||||
| Less selling commissions to affiliates | — | (669,409 | ) | — | (669,409 | ) | ||||||||||
| Syndication costs | — | (446,273 | ) | — | (446,273 | ) | ||||||||||
| Distributions to Other Members ($0.34 per Unit) | — | (152,328 | ) | — | (152,328 | ) | ||||||||||
| Distributions to Managing Member | — | — | (15 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net loss | — | (32,005 | ) | (3 | ) | (32,008 | ) | |||||||||
| Balance June 30, 2016 (Unaudited) | 744,495 | $ | 6,137,365 | $ | 482 | $ | 6,137,847 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes.
5
ATEL 17, LLC
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2016 and 2015
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
| (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
| Operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (29,326 | ) | $ | — | $ | (32,008 | ) | $ | — | ||||||
| Adjustment to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation of operating lease assets | 72,955 | — | 78,364 | — | ||||||||||||
| Amortization of initial direct costs | 8,931 | — | 10,036 | — | ||||||||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
| Accounts receivable | (44,459 | ) | — | (54,579 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | 143,709 | — | (136,191 | ) | — | |||||||||||
| Accounts payable, Managing Member | 3,168 | — | 3,837 | — | ||||||||||||
| Accounts payable, other | (280,880 | ) | — | 62,439 | — | |||||||||||
| Accrued liabilities, affiliates | (120,343 | ) | — | 179,819 | — | |||||||||||
| Unearned operating lease income | 27,361 | — | 27,361 | — | ||||||||||||
| Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | (218,884 | ) | — | 139,078 | — | |||||||||||
| Investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||
| Purchases of equipment on operating leases | (3,041,792 | ) | — | (3,683,526 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Payments of initial direct costs | (80,653 | ) | — | (97,669 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | (3,122,445 | ) | — | (3,781,195 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||
| Selling commissions to affiliates | (334,627 | ) | — | (669,409 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Syndication costs paid to Managing Member and affiliates | (446,273 | ) | — | (446,273 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Distributions to Other Members | (90,484 | ) | — | (90,484 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Distributions to Managing Member | (9 | ) | — | (9 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Capital contributions | 3,718,080 | 500 | 7,437,380 | 500 | ||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 2,846,687 | 500 | 6,231,205 | 500 | ||||||||||||
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (494,642 | ) | 500 | 2,589,088 | 500 | |||||||||||
| Cash at beginning of period | 3,084,230 | — | 500 | — | ||||||||||||
| Cash at end of period | $ | 2,589,588 | $ | 500 | $ | 2,589,588 | $ | 500 | ||||||||
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||||||||||
| Cash paid during the period for taxes | $ | 1,600 | $ | 1,600 | ||||||||||||
| Schedule of non-cash investing and financing transactions: |
||||||||||||||||
| Distributions payable to Other Members at period-end |
$ | 61,844 | $ | 61,844 | ||||||||||||
| Distributions payable to Managing Member at period-end | $ | 6 | $ | 6 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
6
ATEL 17, LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization and Limited Liability Company matters:
ATEL 17, LLC (the “Company” or the “Fund”) was formed under the laws of the state of California on April 16, 2015 for the purpose of raising capital and originating equipment financing transactions and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities. The Managing Member of the Company is ATEL Managing Member, LLC (the “Managing Member” or the “Manager”), a Nevada limited liability corporation. The Managing Member is controlled by ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group (“ACG” or “ATEL”). The Fund may continue until terminated as provided in the ATEL 17, LLC limited liability company operating agreement dated April 24, 2015 (the “Operating Agreement”). Contributions in the amount of $500 were received as of April 28, 2015, which represented the initial member’s capital investment. As a limited liability company, the liability of any individual member for the obligations of the Fund is limited to the extent of capital contributions to the Fund by the individual member.
The offering of the Company was granted effectiveness by the Securities and Exchange Commission as of January 5, 2016. The offering will continue until the earlier of a period of two years from that date or until sales of the limited liability company units (Units) to the public reach $150,000,000. As of February 2, 2016, subscriptions for the minimum number of Units (120,000, representing $1,200,000), excluding subscriptions from Pennsylvania investors, had been received and the Fund requested subscription proceeds to be released from escrow. On that date, the Company commenced initial operations. Pennsylvania subscriptions are subject to a separate escrow and are released to the Fund only at such time as total subscription proceeds received by the Fund from all subscribers, including the escrowed Pennsylvania subscriptions, equal not less than $7,500,000 in gross proceeds. Such level of gross proceeds was eclipsed on July 6, 2016.
As of June 30, 2016, cumulative contributions totaling $7,437,880 have been received, inclusive of the $500 initial member’s capital investment. As of such date, a total of 744,495 Units were issued and outstanding. The Fund is actively raising capital and, as of July 31, 2016, has received cumulative contributions in the amount of $8,912,630, inclusive of the $500 initial member’s capital investment.
The Fund, or Managing Member on behalf of the Fund, has and will continue to incur costs in connection with the organization, registration and issuance of the Units. The amount of such costs to be borne by the Fund is limited by certain provisions of the Operating Agreement.
The Company’s principal objectives are to invest in a diversified portfolio of investments that will (i) preserve, protect and return the Company’s invested capital; (ii) generate regular cash distributions to Unit holders during the Offering Stage and Operating Stages of the Fund, any balance remaining after required minimum distributions, equal to not less than 8% nor more than 10% per annum on investors’ Original Invested Capital, to be used to purchase additional investments during the Operating Stage/Reinvestment Period (the first six years after the year the offering terminates); and (iii) provide additional cash distributions during the Liquidating Stage, commencing with the end of the Operating Stage/Reinvestment Period and continuing until all investment portfolio assets have been sold or otherwise disposed. The Company is governed by the Operating Agreement.
2. Summary of significant accounting policies:
Basis of presentation:
The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q as mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of the Managing Member, necessary for a fair statement of financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
7
ATEL 17, LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)
In preparing the accompanying financial statements, the Company has reviewed, as determined necessary by the Managing Member, events that have occurred after June 30, 2016, up until the issuance of the financial statements. No events were noted which would require disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements.
Cash:
Cash is maintained in non-interest bearing checking accounts and a savings account.
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term and expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes and determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts.
Credit risk:
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk include cash and cash equivalents, operating and direct financing lease receivables, notes receivable and accounts receivable. The Company places the majority of its cash deposits in non-interest bearing accounts with financial institutions that have no less than $10 billion in assets. Such deposits are insured up to $250,000. The remainder of the Funds’ cash is temporarily invested in U.S. Treasury denominated instruments. The concentration of such deposits and temporary cash investments is not deemed to create a significant risk to the Company. Accounts receivable represent amounts due from in various industries, related to equipment on operating leases.
Equipment on operating leases and related revenue recognition:
Equipment subject to operating leases is stated at cost. Depreciation is being recognized on a straight-line method over the terms of the related leases to the equipment’s estimated residual values. Off-lease equipment is generally not subject to depreciation. The Company depreciates all lease assets, in accordance with guidelines consistent with ASC 840-20-35-3, over the periods of the lease terms contained in each asset’s respective lease contract to the estimated residual value at the end of the lease contract. All lease assets are purchased only concurrent with the execution of a lease commitment by the lessee. Thus, the original depreciation period corresponds with the term of the original lease. Once the term of an original lease contract is completed, the subject property is typically sold to the existing user, re-leased to the existing user, or, when off-lease, is held for sale. Assets which are re-leased continue to be depreciated using the terms of the new lease agreements and the estimated residual values at the end of the new lease terms, adjusted downward as necessary. Assets classified as held-for-sale are carried at the lower of carrying amount, or the fair value less cost to sell (ASC 360-10-35-43).
The Company does not use the equipment held in its portfolio, but holds it solely for lease and ultimate sale. In the course of marketing equipment that has come off-lease, management may determine at some point that re-leasing the assets may provide a superior return for investors and would then execute another lease. Upon entering into a new lease contract, management will estimate the residual value once again and resume depreciation. If, and when, the Company, at any time, determines that depreciation in value may have occurred with respect to an asset held-for-sale, the Company would review the value to determine whether a material reduction in value had occurred and recognize any appropriate impairment. All lease assets, including off-lease assets, are subject to the Company’s quarterly impairment analysis, as described below. Maintenance costs associated with the Fund’s portfolio of leased assets are expensed as incurred. Major additions and betterments are capitalized.
8
ATEL 17, LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)
Operating lease revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the underlying leases. The initial lease terms will vary as to the type of equipment subject to the leases, the needs of the lessees and the terms to be negotiated, but initial leases are generally on terms from 36 to 120 months. The difference between rent received and rental revenue recognized is recorded as unearned operating lease income on the balance sheet.
Operating leases are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management considers the equipment underlying the lease contracts for impairment and periodically reviews the credit worthiness of all operating lessees with payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, the related operating leases may be placed on non-accrual status. Leases placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid lease payments is probable. Until such time, revenues are recognized on a cash basis.
Recorded values of the Company’s leased asset portfolio are reviewed each quarter to confirm the reasonableness of established residual values and to determine whether there is indication that an asset impairment might have taken place. The Company uses a variety of sources and considers many factors in evaluating whether the respective book values of its assets are appropriate. In addition, the Company may direct a residual value review at any time if it becomes aware of issues regarding the ability of a lessee to continue to make payments on its lease contract. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than their net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s lease contract and undiscounted future rents from the existing lease contract, if any. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the marketplace are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date. Upward adjustments for impairments recognized in prior periods are not made in any circumstances.
Initial direct costs:
The Company capitalizes initial direct costs (“IDC”) associated with the origination of lease assets. IDC includes both internal costs (e.g., the costs of employees’ activities in connection with successful lease originations) and external broker fees incurred with such originations. The costs are amortized on a lease by lease basis based on actual contract term using a straight-line method for operating leases. Upon disposal of the underlying lease assets, both the initial direct costs and the associated accumulated amortization are relieved. Costs related to leases that are not consummated are not eligible for capitalization as initial direct costs and are expensed as acquisition expense.
Acquisition expense:
Acquisition expense represents costs which include, but are not limited to, legal fees and expenses, travel and communication expenses, cost of appraisals, accounting fees and expenses and miscellaneous expenses related to the selection and acquisition of equipment which are reimbursable to the Managing Member under the terms of the Operating Agreement. As the costs are not eligible for capitalization as initial direct costs, such amounts are expensed as incurred.
Asset valuation:
Recorded values of the Company’s leased asset portfolio are periodically reviewed for impairment. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than their net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the
9
ATEL 17, LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)
estimated residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s expected holding period and estimates of undiscounted future rents. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the market place are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date.
Segment reporting:
The Company is organized into one operating segment for the purpose of making operating decisions or assessing performance. Accordingly, the Company operates in one reportable operating segment in the United States.
The Company’s principal decision makers are the Managing Member’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer. The Company believes that its financing business operates as one reportable segment because: a) the Company measures profit and loss at the portfolio assets level as a whole; b) the principal decision makers do not review information based on any operating segment other than the equipment financing transaction portfolio; c) the Company does not maintain discrete financial information on any specific segment other than its equipment financing operations; d) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around different products and services other than equipment financing; and e) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around geographic areas.
The primary geographic region in which the Company seeks financing opportunities is North America. Currently, 100% of the Company’s operating revenues are from customers domiciled in North America.
Per Unit data:
The Company issues only one class of Units, none of which are considered dilutive. Net loss per Unit is based upon the weighted average number of Other Members Units outstanding from February 2, 2016 (Release Date of Escrow) through June 30, 2016.
Recent accounting pronouncements:
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326) (“ASU 2016-13”). The main objective of this Update is to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. To achieve this objective, the amendments in this Update replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The amendments affect entities holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. The amendments affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off-balance-sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements.
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). The new standard will require lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases with lease terms greater than 12 months in the statement of financial position. Lessor accounting per ASU 2016-02 is mostly unchanged from the previous
10
ATEL 17, LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)
lease accounting GAAP. Certain changes were made to the lessor accounting guidance in order to align the lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Similar to the previous guidance, lessors will classify leases as operating, direct financing, or sales-type. Lessors in operating leases will continue to recognize the underlying asset and recognize income on a straight-line basis. Lessors determine whether a lease is a sale of the underlying asset based on whether the lessee effectively obtains control of the underlying assets. ASU-2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements.
In January 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-01, Financial Instruments — Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). The new standard provides guidance related to accounting for equity investments and financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, FASB clarified guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU-2014-15”). The new standard provides guidance relative to management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-15 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements or related disclosures.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved the deferral of the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year and in August 2015, issued Revenue from Contracts from Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”). ASU 2015-14 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. The Company evaluated the impact of the new standard on its financial statements and has determined that such impact is virtually non-existent as the new revenue guideline does not affect revenues from leases and loans, which comprise the majority of the Company’s revenues.
11
ATEL 17, LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3. Investment in equipment and leases, net:
The Company’s investment in leases consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Balance December 31, 2015 |
Additions | Depreciation/ Amortization Expense |
Balance June 30, 2016 |
|||||||||||||
| Net investment in operating leases | $ | — | $ | 3,683,526 | $ | (78,364 | ) | $ | 3,605,162 | |||||||
| Initial direct costs, net of accumulated amortization of $10,036 at June 30, 2016 | — | 97,669 | (10,036 | ) | 87,633 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | — | $ | 3,781,195 | $ | (88,400 | ) | $ | 3,692,795 | |||||||
Additions to net investment in operating lease assets are stated at cost. All of the Company’s leased property was acquired beginning in March 2016 through June 2016.
Impairment of investments in leases:
Recorded values of the Company’s leased asset portfolio are reviewed each quarter to confirm the reasonableness of established residual values and to determine whether there is indication that an asset impairment might have taken place. The Company uses a variety of sources and considers many factors in evaluating whether the respective book values of its assets are appropriate. In addition, the Company may direct a residual value review at any time if it becomes aware of issues regarding the ability of a lessee to continue to make payments on its lease contract. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than their net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s lease contract and undiscounted future rents from the existing lease contract, if any. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the marketplace are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date. Upward adjustments for impairments recognized in prior periods are not made in any circumstances. As a result of these reviews, management determined that no impairment losses existed during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.
The Company utilizes a straight-line depreciation method for equipment in all of the categories currently in its portfolio of operating lease transactions. Depreciation expense on the Company’s equipment totaled $72,955 and $78,364 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. IDC amortization expense related to the Company’s operating leases totaled $8,931 and $10,036 for the same three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.
12
ATEL 17, LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3. Investment in equipment and leases, net: - (continued)
Operating leases:
Property on operating leases consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Balance December 31, 2015 |
Additions | Reclassifications or Dispositions |
Balance June 30, 2016 |
|||||||||||||
| Agriculture | $ | — | $ | 741,827 | $ | — | $ | 741,827 | ||||||||
| Aviation | — | 461,950 | — | 461,950 | ||||||||||||
| Containers | — | 859,560 | — | 859,560 | ||||||||||||
| Marine Vessels | — | 1,041,158 | — | 1,041,158 | ||||||||||||
| Materials Handling | — | 270,822 | — | 270,822 | ||||||||||||
| Trucks/Trailers | — | 96,699 | — | 96,699 | ||||||||||||
| Paper Processing | — | 211,510 | — | 211,510 | ||||||||||||
| — | 3,683,526 | — | 3,683,526 | |||||||||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation | — | (78,364 | ) | — | (78,364 | ) | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | — | $ | 3,605,162 | $ | — | $ | 3,605,162 | ||||||||
The average estimated residual value for assets on operating leases was 49% of the assets’ original cost at June 30, 2016.
At June 30, 2016, the aggregate amounts of future minimum lease payments receivable are as follows:
|
|
|||
| Operating Leases |
||||
| Six months ending December 31, 2016 | $ | 291,659 | ||
| Year ending December 31, 2017 | 583,317 | |||
| 2018 | 583,317 | |||
| 2019 | 563,006 | |||
| 2020 | 381,750 | |||
| 2021 | 104,771 | |||
| 2022 and thereafter | 145,514 | |||
| $ | 2,653,334 | |||
The useful lives for each category of leases is reviewed at a minimum of once per quarter. As of June 30, 2016, the respective useful lives of each category of lease assets in the Company’s portfolio are as follows (in years):
|
|
|||
| Equipment category | Useful Life | |||
| Containers | 15 – 20 | |||
| Aviation | 15 – 20 | |||
| Agriculture | 7 – 10 | |||
| Marine vessel | 20 – 30 | |||
| Materials handling | 7 – 10 | |||
| Trucks/trailers | 7 – 10 | |||
| Paper processing | 10 – 15 | |||
13
ATEL 17, LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
4. Related Party Transactions:
The terms of the Operating Agreement provide that the Managing Member and/or affiliates are entitled to receive certain fees, for equipment acquisition and asset management services and to receive reimbursements for payments made on behalf of the Fund for certain operating expenses, which are more fully described in Section 8 of the Operating Agreement.
The Operating Agreement allows for the reimbursement of costs incurred by the Managing Member and/or affiliates for providing administrative services to the Company. Administrative services provided include Company accounting, investor relations, legal counsel and equipment financing documentation. The Managing Member is not reimbursed for services whereby it is entitled to receive a separate fee as compensation for such services, such as management of investments.
Cost reimbursements to the Managing Member or its affiliates are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Company. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as managed assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred. The Managing Member believes that the costs reimbursed are the lower of (i) actual costs incurred on behalf of the Company or (ii) the amount the Company would be required to pay independent parties for comparable administrative services in the same geographic location.
Each of ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) and AFS is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group and perform services for the Company. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; and investor relations, communications services and general administrative services are performed by AFS.
During its offering period, the Fund will pay selling commissions of up to 9% of the selling price of the Units to ATEL Securities Corporation (“ASC”), an affiliate of the Managing Member acting as Dealer Manager for the group of selling broker-dealers. ASC will in turn pay to participating broker-dealers selling commissions of up to 7% of the price of the Units sold by them, retaining the balance of 2%.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Managing Member and/or affiliates earned commissions and fees, and billed for reimbursements pursuant to the Operating Agreement as follows:
|
|
|
||||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 |
|||||||
| Selling commissions, equal to 9% of the selling price of the Limited Liability Company Units, deducted from Other Members capital | $ | 334,627 | $ | 669,409 | ||||
| Reimbursement of other syndication costs to Managing Member and/or affiliates, deducted from Other Members capital | 446,273 | 446,273 | ||||||
| Administrative costs reimbursed to Managing Member and/or affiliates | 9,579 | 11,655 | ||||||
| Asset management fees to Managing Member | 7,138 | 7,807 | ||||||
| Acquisition and initial direct costs paid to Managing Member | 80,653 | 97,669 | ||||||
| $ | 878,270 | $ | 1,232,813 | |||||
14
ATEL 17, LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
5. Syndication Costs:
Syndication costs are reflected as a reduction to Members’ capital as such costs are netted against the capital raised. The amount shown is primarily comprised of selling commissions as well as fees pertaining to the organization of the Fund, document preparation, regulatory filing fees, and accounting and legal costs. Syndication costs totaled $780,900 and $1,115,682 for the respective three and six months ended June 30, 2016.
The Operating Agreement places a limit for cost reimbursements to the Managing Member and/or affiliates. When added to selling commissions, such cost reimbursements may not exceed a total equal to 15% of all offering proceeds. As of June 30, 2016, the Company had not recorded any syndication costs in excess of the limitation. The limitation on the amount of syndication costs pursuant to the Operating Agreement is determined on the date of termination of the offering. At such time, the Manager guarantees repayment of any excess syndication costs (above the limitation) which it may have collected from the Company, which guarantee is without recourse or reimbursement by the Fund.
6. Commitments:
At June 30, 2016, there were commitments to purchase lease assets totaling $5,296,036. The amount represents contract awards which may be canceled by the prospective borrower/investee or may not be accepted by the Company.
7. Members’ Capital:
Totals of 744,495 and 50 units were issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, including the 50 Units issued to the initial Member (Managing Member). The Fund is authorized to issue up to 15,000,000 Units in addition to the Units issued to the initial Member.
Distributions to the Other Members for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and for the period from February 2, 2016 (Date of Escrow) through June 30, 2016 were as follows:
|
|
|
||||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 |
For the period from February 2, 2016 (Date of Escrow) through June 30, 2016 |
|||||||
| Distributions | $ | 119,463 | $ | 152,328 | ||||
| Weighted average number of Units outstanding | 597,816 | 453,259 | ||||||
| Weighted average distributions per Unit | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.34 | ||||
15
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Statements contained in this Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (“MD&A”) and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, which are not historical facts, may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. In particular, economic recession and changes in general economic conditions, including fluctuations in demand for equipment, lease rates, and interest rates, may result in delays in investment and reinvestment, delays in leasing, re-leasing, and disposition of equipment, and reduced returns on invested capital. The Company’s performance is subject to risks relating to lessee and borrower defaults and the creditworthiness of its lessees and borrowers. The Company’s performance is also subject to risks relating to the value of its equipment at the end of its leases, which may be affected by the condition of the equipment, technological obsolescence and the markets for new and used equipment at the end of lease terms. Investors are cautioned not to attribute undue certainty to these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than as required by law.
Overview
ATEL 17, LLC (the “Company” or the “Fund”) was formed under the laws of the state of California on April 16, 2015 for the purpose of raising capital and originating equipment financing transactions and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities. The offering of the Company was granted effectiveness by the Securities and Exchange Commission as of January 5, 2016.
The Company conducted a public offering of 15,000,000 Limited Liability Company Units (“Units”), at a price of $10 per Unit. The offering will continue until the earlier of a period of two years from that date or until sales of the limited liability company Units to the public reach $150,000,000. As of February 2, 2016, subscriptions for the minimum number of Units (120,000, representing $1,200,000), excluding subscriptions from Pennsylvania investors, had been received and the Fund requested subscription proceeds to be released from escrow. On that date, the Company commenced initial operations. Pennsylvania subscriptions are subject to a separate escrow and will be released to the Fund only at such time as total subscription proceeds received by the Fund from all subscribers, including the escrowed Pennsylvania subscriptions, equal not less than $7,500,000 in gross proceeds. Such used of gross proceeds was eclipsed on July 6, 2016. The Fund is actively raising capital and, as of July 31, 2016, has received cumulative contributions in the amount of $8,912,630, inclusive of the $500 initial member’s capital investment.
Results of Operations
The Company had a net loss of $29,326 and $32,008 for the respective three and six months ended June 30, 2016.
The net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was a result of total revenues of $94,506 that was lower than total expenses of $123,832. Total revenues mostly consisted of $94,077 of operating lease revenues. The net loss is mainly a result of depreciation and amortization expense recognized on assets placed in service during the quarter. Such expense represents a charge of approximately 90% of gross revenue. Additional expenses of $10,000 were related to regulatory filings of post-effective amendment and Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2016.
The net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was a result of total revenues of $104,328 that were lower than total expenses of $136,336. The net loss is mainly a result of depreciation and amortization expense recognized on assets placed in service during the period. Such expense represents a charge of 84% of gross revenue. Additional expenses of $10,000 were related to regulatory filings of post-effective amendment and Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2016.
16
Capital Resources and Liquidity
The Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $2,589,588 and $500 at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The liquidity of the Company will vary in the future, increasing to the extent cash flows from cash flows from subscriptions, leases and proceeds of asset sales exceed expenses and decreasing as lease assets are acquired, as distributions are made to the Members and to the extent expenses exceed cash flows from leases and proceeds from asset sales.
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth the summary cash flow data (in thousands):
|
|
|
||||||
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 |
|||||||
| Net cash (used in) provided by: |
||||||||
| Operating activities | $ | (218,884 | ) | $ | 139,078 | |||
| Investing activities | (3,122,445 | ) | (3,781,195 | ) | ||||
| Financing activities | 2,846,687 | 6,231,205 | ||||||
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (494,642 | ) | $ | 2,589,088 | |||
The three months and six months ended June 30, 2016
During th three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company’s primary source of liquidity was subscription proceeds from the public offering of Units. Capital contributions totaled $3.7 million and $7.4 million for the respective three and six months ended June 30, 2016. In addition, during the current year period, the Company began to realize cash flow from its portfolio of operating lease contracts.
During the respective three and six months ended June 30, 2016, cash was primarily used for equipment purchases totaling $3.0 million and $3.7 million, payment of commissions associated with the offering totaling $334,627 and $669,409, payment of syndication costs associated with the offering totaling $446,273 each for both periods, and payment of distributions to Members totaling $90,493.
Distributions
The Unitholders of record are entitled to certain distributions as provided under the Operating Agreement. The Company commenced periodic distributions beginning with the month of February 2016. Additional distributions have been made through June 30, 2016.
Cash distributions were paid by the Fund to Unitholders of record as of May 31, 2016, and paid through June 30, 2016. The distributions may be characterized for tax, accounting and economic purposes as a return of capital, a return on capital (including escrow interest) or a portion of each. Generally, the portion of each cash distribution by a company which exceeds its net income for the fiscal period would constitute a return of capital. The Fund is required by the terms of its Operating Agreement to distribute the net cash flow generated by its investments in certain minimum amounts during the Reinvestment Period before it can reinvest its operating cash flow in additional portfolio assets. See the discussion in the Prospectus under “Income, Losses and Distributions.” Accordingly, the amount of cash flow from Fund investments distributed to Unitholders will not be available for reinvestment in additional portfolio assets.
The cash distributions were based on current and anticipated gross revenues from the loans funded and equity investments acquired. During the Fund’s acquisition and operating stages, the Fund may incur short term borrowing to fund regular distributions of such gross revenues to be generated by newly acquired transactions during their respective initial fixed terms. As such, all Fund periodic cash distributions made during these stages have been, and are expected in the future to be, based on the Fund’s actual and anticipated gross revenues to be generated from the binding initial terms of the loans and investments funded.
17
The following table summarizes distribution activity for the Fund from inception through June 30, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distribution Period(1) | Paid | Return of Capital |
Distribution of Income |
Total Distribution |
Total Distribution per Unit(2) |
Weighted Average Units Outstanding(3) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Monthly and quarterly distributions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jan 2016 – Feb 2016 (Distribution of all escrow interest) |
Apr 2016 | $ | — | $ | 21 | $ | 21 | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Feb 2016 – May 2016 |
Apr 2016 – Jun 2016 |
90,463 | — | 90,463 | 232.14 | 389,691 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 90,463 | $ | 21 | $ | 90,484 | $ | 232.14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Source of distributions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lease and loan payments and sales proceeds received | $ | 90,463 | 100.00 | % | $ | — | 0.00 | % | $ | 90,463 | 99.98 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Income | — | 0.00 | % | 21 | 100.00 | % | 21 | 0.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt against non-cancellable firm term payments on leases and loans |
— | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 90,463 | 100.00 | % | $ | 21 | 100.00 | % | $ | 90,484 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Investors may elect to receive their distributions either monthly or quarterly. See “Timing and Method of Distributions” on Page 67 of the Prospectus. |
| (2) | Total distributions per Unit represents the per Unit distributions rate for those units which were outstanding for all of the applicable period. |
| (3) | Balances shown represent weighted average units for the period from February 2 – May 31, 2016. |
Commitments and Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
Commitments and Contingencies
At June 30, 2016, there were commitments to purchase lease assets totaling an approximate $5,296,036. The amounts represent contract awards which may be canceled by the prospective borrower/investee or may not be accepted by the Company.
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
None.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For information on recent accounting pronouncements, see note 2 summary of significant accounting policies.
Item 4. Controls and procedures.
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
The Company’s Managing Member’s Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer (“Management”), evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
18
The Company does not control the financial reporting process, and is solely dependent on the Management of the Managing Member, who is responsible for providing the Company with financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The Managing Member’s disclosure controls and procedures, as they are applicable to the Company, means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in internal control
There were no changes in the Managing Member’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company, during the quarter ended June 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Managing Member’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company.
19
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
In the ordinary course of conducting business, there may be certain claims, suits, and complaints filed against the Managing Member. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such matters, if any, will not have a material impact on the Managing Member’s financial position or results of operations.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Information provided pursuant to §229.701 (Item 701(f)) (formerly included in Form SR):
| (1) | Effective date of the offering: January 5, 2016; File Number: 333-203841 |
| (2) | Offering commenced: January 5, 2016 |
| (3) | The offering did not terminate before any securities were sold. |
| (4) | The managing underwriter is ATEL Securities Corporation. |
| (5) | The title of the registered class of securities is “Units of Limited Liability Company Interest.” |
| (6) | Aggregate amount and offering price of securities registered and sold as of June 30, 2016: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Title of Security | Amount Registered |
Aggregate price of offering amount registered |
Units sold | Aggregate price of offering amount sold |
||||||||||||
| Units of Limited Company Interest | 15,000,000 | $ | 150,000,000 | 744,495 | $ | 7,437,880 | ||||||||||
| (7) | Costs incurred for the issuers’ account in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities registered for each category listed below: |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Direct or indirect payments to directors, officers, Managing Members of the issuer or their associates, to persons owning ten percent or more of any class of equity securities of the issuer; and to affiliates of the issuer |
Direct or indirect payments to others |
Total | ||||||||||
| Underwriting discounts and commissions | $ | 148,758 | $ | 520,652 | $ | 669,409 | ||||||
| Total expenses | $ | 148,758 | $ | 520,652 | $ | 669,409 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||
(8) Net offering proceeds to the issuer after total expenses in item 7: | $ 6,768,471 | |||||
(9) The amount of net offering proceeds to the issuer used for each of the purposes listed below: | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Direct or indirect payments to directors, officers, Managing Members of the issuer or their associates, to persons owning ten percent or more of any class of equity securities of the issuer; and to affiliates of the issuer |
Direct or indirect payments to others |
Total | ||||||||||
| Purchase and installation of machinery and equipment | $ | 97,669 | $ | 3,683,526 | $ | 3,781,195 | ||||||
| Distributions paid and accrued | 15 | 152,328 | 152,344 | |||||||||
| Other expenses | 145,605 | — | 145,605 | |||||||||
| $ | 243,289 | $ | 3,835,854 | $ | 4,079,144 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||
(10) Net offering proceeds to the issuer after total expenses in item 9: | $ 2,689,327 | |||||
20
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not Applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
(a) Documents filed as a part of this report
| 1. | Financial Statement Schedules |
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore have been omitted.
| 2. | Other Exhibits |
| 31.1 | Certification of Dean L. Cash |
| 31.2 | Certification of Paritosh K. Choksi |
| 32.1 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of Dean L. Cash |
| 32.2 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of Paritosh K. Choksi |
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
| 101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| 101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
| 101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
| 101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
| 101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
21
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 12, 2016
ATEL 17, LLC
(Registrant)
| By: | ATEL Managing Member, LLC Managing Member of Registrant |
|
|
|
By: /s/ Dean L. Cash | ||
By: /s/ Paritosh K. Choksi | ||
By: /s/ Samuel Schussler |
22
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Dean L. Cash, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ATEL 17, LLC; |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| 4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
| 5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
| b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 12, 2016
/s/ Dean L. Cash
Dean L. Cash
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Managing Member, LLC
(Managing Member)
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Paritosh K. Choksi, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ATEL 17, LLC; |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| 4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
| 5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
| b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 12, 2016
/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi
Paritosh K. Choksi
Director, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of
ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL 17, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dean L. Cash, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Managing Member, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
Date: August 12, 2016
/s/ Dean L. Cash
Dean L. Cash
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Managing Member, LLC
(Managing Member)
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL 17, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Managing Member, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
Date: August 12, 2016
/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi
Paritosh K. Choksi
Director, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of
ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document and Entity Information - shares |
6 Months Ended | |
|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 |
Jul. 31, 2016 |
|
| Document And Entity Information [Abstract] | ||
| Document Type | 10-Q | |
| Amendment Flag | false | |
| Document Period End Date | Jun. 30, 2016 | |
| Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2016 | |
| Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q2 | |
| Entity Registrant Name | ATEL 17, LLC | |
| Entity Central Index Key | 0001640982 | |
| Current Fiscal Year End Date | --12-31 | |
| Entity Filer Category | Smaller Reporting Company | |
| Entity Units Outstanding | 891,970 |
Balance Sheets - USD ($) |
Jun. 30, 2016 |
Dec. 31, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| ASSETS | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ 2,589,588 | $ 500 |
| Accounts receivable | 54,579 | |
| Investments in equipment and leases, net | 3,692,795 | |
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | 136,191 | |
| Total assets | 6,473,153 | 500 |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities: | ||
| Managing Member | 3,843 | |
| Affiliates | 179,819 | |
| Accrued distributions to Other Members | 61,844 | |
| Other | 62,439 | |
| Unearned operating lease income | 27,361 | |
| Total liabilities | 335,306 | |
| Commitments and contingencies | ||
| Members' capital: | ||
| Managing Member | 482 | 500 |
| Other Members | 6,137,365 | |
| Total Members' capital | 6,137,847 | 500 |
| Total liabilities and Members' capital | $ 6,473,153 | $ 500 |
Statements of Operations - USD ($) |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended |
|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 |
Jun. 30, 2016 |
|
| Leasing and lending activities: | ||
| Operating lease revenue | $ 94,077 | $ 103,878 |
| Interest income | 163 | 184 |
| Other | 266 | 266 |
| Total revenues | 94,506 | 104,328 |
| Expenses: | ||
| Depreciation of operating lease assets | 72,955 | 78,364 |
| Asset management fees to Managing Member | 7,138 | 7,807 |
| Cost reimbursements to affiliates | 9,579 | 11,655 |
| Amortization of initial direct costs | 8,931 | 10,036 |
| Professional fees | 8,652 | 8,652 |
| Outside services | 11,945 | 13,082 |
| Taxes on income and franchise fees | 2,000 | 4,000 |
| Other | 2,632 | 2,740 |
| Total expenses | 123,832 | 136,336 |
| Net loss | (29,326) | (32,008) |
| Net loss: | ||
| Managing Member | (3) | (3) |
| Other Members | (29,323) | (32,005) |
| Net loss | $ (29,326) | $ (32,008) |
| Net loss per Limited Liability Company Unit (Other Members) | $ (0.05) | $ (0.07) |
| Weighted average number of Units outstanding | 597,816 | 453,259 |
Statements of Changes in Members' Capital (Parenthetical) - $ / shares |
3 Months Ended | 5 Months Ended |
|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 |
Jun. 30, 2016 |
|
| Statements of Changes in Members' Capital [Abstract] | ||
| Distributions to Other Members, per unit | $ 0.20 | $ 0.34 |
Organization and Limited Liability Company Matters |
6 Months Ended |
|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 | |
| Organization and Limited Liability Company Matters [Abstract] | |
| Organization and Limited Liability Company Matters | 1. Organization and Limited Liability Company matters: ATEL 17, LLC (the “Company” or the “Fund”) was formed under the laws of the state of California on April 16, 2015 for the purpose of raising capital and originating equipment financing transactions and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities. The Managing Member of the Company is ATEL Managing Member, LLC (the “Managing Member” or the “Manager”), a Nevada limited liability corporation. The Managing Member is controlled by ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group (“ACG” or “ATEL”). The Fund may continue until terminated as provided in the ATEL 17, LLC limited liability company operating agreement dated April 24, 2015 (the “Operating Agreement”). Contributions in the amount of $500 were received as of April 28, 2015, which represented the initial member’s capital investment. As a limited liability company, the liability of any individual member for the obligations of the Fund is limited to the extent of capital contributions to the Fund by the individual member. The offering of the Company was granted effectiveness by the Securities and Exchange Commission as of January 5, 2016. The offering will continue until the earlier of a period of two years from that date or until sales of the limited liability company units (Units) to the public reach $150,000,000. As of February 2, 2016, subscriptions for the minimum number of Units (120,000, representing $1,200,000), excluding subscriptions from Pennsylvania investors, had been received and the Fund requested subscription proceeds to be released from escrow. On that date, the Company commenced initial operations. Pennsylvania subscriptions are subject to a separate escrow and are released to the Fund only at such time as total subscription proceeds received by the Fund from all subscribers, including the escrowed Pennsylvania subscriptions, equal not less than $7,500,000 in gross proceeds. Such level of gross proceeds was eclipsed on July 6, 2016. As of June 30, 2016, cumulative contributions totaling $7,437,880 have been received, inclusive of the $500 initial member’s capital investment. As of such date, a total of 744,495 Units were issued and outstanding. The Fund is actively raising capital and, as of July 31, 2016, has received cumulative contributions in the amount of $8,912,630, inclusive of the $500 initial member’s capital investment. The Fund, or Managing Member on behalf of the Fund, has and will continue to incur costs in connection with the organization, registration and issuance of the Units. The amount of such costs to be borne by the Fund is limited by certain provisions of the Operating Agreement. The Company’s principal objectives are to invest in a diversified portfolio of investments that will (i) preserve, protect and return the Company’s invested capital; (ii) generate regular cash distributions to Unit holders during the Offering Stage and Operating Stages of the Fund, any balance remaining after required minimum distributions, equal to not less than 8% nor more than 10% per annum on investors’ Original Invested Capital, to be used to purchase additional investments during the Operating Stage/Reinvestment Period (the first six years after the year the offering terminates); and (iii) provide additional cash distributions during the Liquidating Stage, commencing with the end of the Operating Stage/Reinvestment Period and continuing until all investment portfolio assets have been sold or otherwise disposed. The Company is governed by the Operating Agreement.
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
6 Months Ended |
|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 | |
| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of significant accounting policies: Basis of presentation: The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q as mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of the Managing Member, necessary for a fair statement of financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. In preparing the accompanying financial statements, the Company has reviewed, as determined necessary by the Managing Member, events that have occurred after June 30, 2016, up until the issuance of the financial statements. No events were noted which would require disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements. Cash: Cash is maintained in non-interest bearing checking accounts and a savings account. Use of Estimates: The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term and expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes and determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Credit risk: Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk include cash and cash equivalents, operating and direct financing lease receivables, notes receivable and accounts receivable. The Company places the majority of its cash deposits in non-interest bearing accounts with financial institutions that have no less than $10 billion in assets. Such deposits are insured up to $250,000. The remainder of the Funds’ cash is temporarily invested in U.S. Treasury denominated instruments. The concentration of such deposits and temporary cash investments is not deemed to create a significant risk to the Company. Accounts receivable represent amounts due from in various industries, related to equipment on operating leases. Equipment on operating leases and related revenue recognition: Equipment subject to operating leases is stated at cost. Depreciation is being recognized on a straight-line method over the terms of the related leases to the equipment’s estimated residual values. Off-lease equipment is generally not subject to depreciation. The Company depreciates all lease assets, in accordance with guidelines consistent with ASC 840-20-35-3, over the periods of the lease terms contained in each asset’s respective lease contract to the estimated residual value at the end of the lease contract. All lease assets are purchased only concurrent with the execution of a lease commitment by the lessee. Thus, the original depreciation period corresponds with the term of the original lease. Once the term of an original lease contract is completed, the subject property is typically sold to the existing user, re-leased to the existing user, or, when off-lease, is held for sale. Assets which are re-leased continue to be depreciated using the terms of the new lease agreements and the estimated residual values at the end of the new lease terms, adjusted downward as necessary. Assets classified as held-for-sale are carried at the lower of carrying amount, or the fair value less cost to sell (ASC 360-10-35-43). The Company does not use the equipment held in its portfolio, but holds it solely for lease and ultimate sale. In the course of marketing equipment that has come off-lease, management may determine at some point that re-leasing the assets may provide a superior return for investors and would then execute another lease. Upon entering into a new lease contract, management will estimate the residual value once again and resume depreciation. If, and when, the Company, at any time, determines that depreciation in value may have occurred with respect to an asset held-for-sale, the Company would review the value to determine whether a material reduction in value had occurred and recognize any appropriate impairment. All lease assets, including off-lease assets, are subject to the Company’s quarterly impairment analysis, as described below. Maintenance costs associated with the Fund’s portfolio of leased assets are expensed as incurred. Major additions and betterments are capitalized. Operating lease revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the underlying leases. The initial lease terms will vary as to the type of equipment subject to the leases, the needs of the lessees and the terms to be negotiated, but initial leases are generally on terms from 36 to 120 months. The difference between rent received and rental revenue recognized is recorded as unearned operating lease income on the balance sheet. Operating leases are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management considers the equipment underlying the lease contracts for impairment and periodically reviews the credit worthiness of all operating lessees with payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, the related operating leases may be placed on non-accrual status. Leases placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid lease payments is probable. Until such time, revenues are recognized on a cash basis. Recorded values of the Company’s leased asset portfolio are reviewed each quarter to confirm the reasonableness of established residual values and to determine whether there is indication that an asset impairment might have taken place. The Company uses a variety of sources and considers many factors in evaluating whether the respective book values of its assets are appropriate. In addition, the Company may direct a residual value review at any time if it becomes aware of issues regarding the ability of a lessee to continue to make payments on its lease contract. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than their net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s lease contract and undiscounted future rents from the existing lease contract, if any. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the marketplace are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date. Upward adjustments for impairments recognized in prior periods are not made in any circumstances. Initial direct costs: The Company capitalizes initial direct costs (“IDC”) associated with the origination of lease assets. IDC includes both internal costs (e.g., the costs of employees’ activities in connection with successful lease originations) and external broker fees incurred with such originations. The costs are amortized on a lease by lease basis based on actual contract term using a straight-line method for operating leases. Upon disposal of the underlying lease assets, both the initial direct costs and the associated accumulated amortization are relieved. Costs related to leases that are not consummated are not eligible for capitalization as initial direct costs and are expensed as acquisition expense. Acquisition expense: Acquisition expense represents costs which include, but are not limited to, legal fees and expenses, travel and communication expenses, cost of appraisals, accounting fees and expenses and miscellaneous expenses related to the selection and acquisition of equipment which are reimbursable to the Managing Member under the terms of the Operating Agreement. As the costs are not eligible for capitalization as initial direct costs, such amounts are expensed as incurred. Asset valuation: Recorded values of the Company’s leased asset portfolio are periodically reviewed for impairment. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than their net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the estimated residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s expected holding period and estimates of undiscounted future rents. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the market place are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date. Segment reporting: The Company is organized into one operating segment for the purpose of making operating decisions or assessing performance. Accordingly, the Company operates in one reportable operating segment in the United States. The Company’s principal decision makers are the Managing Member’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer. The Company believes that its financing business operates as one reportable segment because: a) the Company measures profit and loss at the portfolio assets level as a whole; b) the principal decision makers do not review information based on any operating segment other than the equipment financing transaction portfolio; c) the Company does not maintain discrete financial information on any specific segment other than its equipment financing operations; d) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around different products and services other than equipment financing; and e) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around geographic areas. The primary geographic region in which the Company seeks financing opportunities is North America. Currently, 100% of the Company’s operating revenues are from customers domiciled in North America. Per Unit data: The Company issues only one class of Units, none of which are considered dilutive. Net loss per Unit is based upon the weighted average number of Other Members Units outstanding from February 2, 2016 (Release Date of Escrow) through June 30, 2016. Recent accounting pronouncements: In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) (“ASU 2016-13”). The main objective of this Update is to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. To achieve this objective, the amendments in this Update replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The amendments affect entities holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. The amendments affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off-balance-sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements. In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). The new standard will require lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases with lease terms greater than 12 months in the statement of financial position. Lessor accounting per ASU 2016-02 is mostly unchanged from the previous lease accounting GAAP. Certain changes were made to the lessor accounting guidance in order to align the lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Similar to the previous guidance, lessors will classify leases as operating, direct financing, or sales-type. Lessors in operating leases will continue to recognize the underlying asset and recognize income on a straight-line basis. Lessors determine whether a lease is a sale of the underlying asset based on whether the lessee effectively obtains control of the underlying assets. ASU-2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements. In January 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). The new standard provides guidance related to accounting for equity investments and financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, FASB clarified guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements. In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU-2014-15”). The new standard provides guidance relative to management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-15 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements or related disclosures. In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved the deferral of the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year and in August 2015, issued Revenue from Contracts from Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”). ASU 2015-14 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. The Company evaluated the impact of the new standard on its financial statements and has determined that such impact is virtually non-existent as the new revenue guideline does not affect revenues from leases and loans, which comprise the majority of the Company’s revenues.
|
Investment in Equipment and Leases, Net |
6 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investments in Equipment and Leases, Net [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investments in Equipment and Leases, Net | 3. Investment in equipment and leases, net: The Company’s investment in leases consists of the following:
Additions to net investment in operating lease assets are stated at cost. All of the Company’s leased property was acquired beginning in March 2016 through June 2016. Impairment of investments in leases: Recorded values of the Company’s leased asset portfolio are reviewed each quarter to confirm the reasonableness of established residual values and to determine whether there is indication that an asset impairment might have taken place. The Company uses a variety of sources and considers many factors in evaluating whether the respective book values of its assets are appropriate. In addition, the Company may direct a residual value review at any time if it becomes aware of issues regarding the ability of a lessee to continue to make payments on its lease contract. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than their net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s lease contract and undiscounted future rents from the existing lease contract, if any. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the marketplace are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date. Upward adjustments for impairments recognized in prior periods are not made in any circumstances. As a result of these reviews, management determined that no impairment losses existed during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. The Company utilizes a straight-line depreciation method for equipment in all of the categories currently in its portfolio of operating lease transactions. Depreciation expense on the Company’s equipment totaled $72,955 and $78,364 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. IDC amortization expense related to the Company’s operating leases totaled $8,931 and $10,036 for the same three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. Operating leases: Property on operating leases consists of the following:
The average estimated residual value for assets on operating leases was 49% of the assets’ original cost at June 30, 2016. At June 30, 2016, the aggregate amounts of future minimum lease payments receivable are as follows:
The useful lives for each category of leases is reviewed at a minimum of once per quarter. As of June 30, 2016, the respective useful lives of each category of lease assets in the Company’s portfolio are as follows (in years):
|
Related Party Transactions |
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Party Transactions [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Party Transactions |
4. Related Party Transactions: The terms of the Operating Agreement provide that the Managing Member and/or affiliates are entitled to receive certain fees, for equipment acquisition and asset management services and to receive reimbursements for payments made on behalf of the Fund for certain operating expenses, which are more fully described in Section 8 of the Operating Agreement. The Operating Agreement allows for the reimbursement of costs incurred by the Managing Member and/or affiliates for providing administrative services to the Company. Administrative services provided include Company accounting, investor relations, legal counsel and equipment financing documentation. The Managing Member is not reimbursed for services whereby it is entitled to receive a separate fee as compensation for such services, such as management of investments. Cost reimbursements to the Managing Member or its affiliates are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Company. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as managed assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred. The Managing Member believes that the costs reimbursed are the lower of (i) actual costs incurred on behalf of the Company or (ii) the amount the Company would be required to pay independent parties for comparable administrative services in the same geographic location. Each of ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) and AFS is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group and perform services for the Company. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; and investor relations, communications services and general administrative services are performed by AFS. During its offering period, the Fund will pay selling commissions of up to 9% of the selling price of the Units to ATEL Securities Corporation (‘‘ASC’’), an affiliate of the Managing Member acting as Dealer Manager for the group of selling broker-dealers. ASC will in turn pay to participating broker-dealers selling commissions of up to 7% of the price of the Units sold by them, retaining the balance of 2%. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Managing Member and/or affiliates earned commissions and fees, and billed for reimbursements pursuant to the Operating Agreement as follows:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Syndication Costs |
6 Months Ended |
|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 | |
| Syndication Costs [Abstract] | |
| Syndication Costs | 5. Syndication Costs: Syndication costs are reflected as a reduction to Members’ capital as such costs are netted against the capital raised. The amount shown is primarily comprised of selling commissions as well as fees pertaining to the organization of the Fund, document preparation, regulatory filing fees, and accounting and legal costs. Syndication costs totaled $780,900 and $1,115,682 from the respective three and six months ended June 30, 2016. The Operating Agreement places a limit for cost reimbursements to the Managing Member and/or affiliates. When added to selling commissions, such cost reimbursements may not exceed a total equal to 15% of all offering proceeds. As of June 30, 2016, the Company had not recorded any syndication costs in excess of the limitation. The limitation on the amount of syndication costs pursuant to the Operating Agreement is determined on the date of termination of the offering. At such time, the Manager guarantees repayment of any excess syndication costs (above the limitation) which it may have collected from the Company, which guarantee is without recourse or reimbursement by the Fund.
|
Commitments |
6 Months Ended |
|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 | |
| Commitments [Abstract] | |
| Commitments | 6. Commitments: At June 30, 2016, there were commitments to purchase lease assets totaling $5,296,036. The amount represents contract awards which may be canceled by the prospective borrower/investee or may not be accepted by the Company.
|
Members' Capital |
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Members' Capital [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Members' Capital | 7. Members’ Capital: Totals of 744,495 and 50 units were issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, including the 50 Units issued to the initial Member (Managing Member). The Fund is authorized to issue up to 15,000,000 Units in addition to the Units issued to the initial Member. Distributions to the Other Members for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and for the period from February 2, 2016 (Date of Escrow) through June 30, 2016 were as follows:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policy) |
6 Months Ended |
|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 | |
| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
| Basis of Presentation | Basis of presentation: The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q as mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of the Managing Member, necessary for a fair statement of financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. In preparing the accompanying financial statements, the Company has reviewed, as determined necessary by the Managing Member, events that have occurred after June 30, 2016, up until the issuance of the financial statements. No events were noted which would require disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements.
|
| Cash | Cash: Cash is maintained in non-interest bearing checking accounts and a savings account.
|
| Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates: The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term and expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes and determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts.
|
| Credit Risk | Credit risk: Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk include cash and cash equivalents, operating and direct financing lease receivables, notes receivable and accounts receivable. The Company places the majority of its cash deposits in non-interest bearing accounts with financial institutions that have no less than $10 billion in assets. Such deposits are insured up to $250,000. The remainder of the Funds’ cash is temporarily invested in U.S. Treasury denominated instruments. The concentration of such deposits and temporary cash investments is not deemed to create a significant risk to the Company. Accounts receivable represent amounts due from in various industries, related to equipment on operating leases.
|
| Equipment on operating leases and related revenue recognition | Equipment on operating leases and related revenue recognition: Equipment subject to operating leases is stated at cost. Depreciation is being recognized on a straight-line method over the terms of the related leases to the equipment’s estimated residual values. Off-lease equipment is generally not subject to depreciation. The Company depreciates all lease assets, in accordance with guidelines consistent with ASC 840-20-35-3, over the periods of the lease terms contained in each asset’s respective lease contract to the estimated residual value at the end of the lease contract. All lease assets are purchased only concurrent with the execution of a lease commitment by the lessee. Thus, the original depreciation period corresponds with the term of the original lease. Once the term of an original lease contract is completed, the subject property is typically sold to the existing user, re-leased to the existing user, or, when off-lease, is held for sale. Assets which are re-leased continue to be depreciated using the terms of the new lease agreements and the estimated residual values at the end of the new lease terms, adjusted downward as necessary. Assets classified as held-for-sale are carried at the lower of carrying amount, or the fair value less cost to sell (ASC 360-10-35-43). The Company does not use the equipment held in its portfolio, but holds it solely for lease and ultimate sale. In the course of marketing equipment that has come off-lease, management may determine at some point that re-leasing the assets may provide a superior return for investors and would then execute another lease. Upon entering into a new lease contract, management will estimate the residual value once again and resume depreciation. If, and when, the Company, at any time, determines that depreciation in value may have occurred with respect to an asset held-for-sale, the Company would review the value to determine whether a material reduction in value had occurred and recognize any appropriate impairment. All lease assets, including off-lease assets, are subject to the Company’s quarterly impairment analysis, as described below. Maintenance costs associated with the Fund’s portfolio of leased assets are expensed as incurred. Major additions and betterments are capitalized. Operating lease revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the underlying leases. The initial lease terms will vary as to the type of equipment subject to the leases, the needs of the lessees and the terms to be negotiated, but initial leases are generally on terms from 36 to 120 months. The difference between rent received and rental revenue recognized is recorded as unearned operating lease income on the balance sheet. Operating leases are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management considers the equipment underlying the lease contracts for impairment and periodically reviews the credit worthiness of all operating lessees with payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, the related operating leases may be placed on non-accrual status. Leases placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid lease payments is probable. Until such time, revenues are recognized on a cash basis. Recorded values of the Company’s leased asset portfolio are reviewed each quarter to confirm the reasonableness of established residual values and to determine whether there is indication that an asset impairment might have taken place. The Company uses a variety of sources and considers many factors in evaluating whether the respective book values of its assets are appropriate. In addition, the Company may direct a residual value review at any time if it becomes aware of issues regarding the ability of a lessee to continue to make payments on its lease contract. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than their net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s lease contract and undiscounted future rents from the existing lease contract, if any. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the marketplace are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date. Upward adjustments for impairments recognized in prior periods are not made in any circumstances.
|
| Initial Direct Costs | Initial direct costs: The Company capitalizes initial direct costs (“IDC”) associated with the origination of lease assets. IDC includes both internal costs (e.g., the costs of employees’ activities in connection with successful lease originations) and external broker fees incurred with such originations. The costs are amortized on a lease by lease basis based on actual contract term using a straight-line method for operating leases. Upon disposal of the underlying lease assets, both the initial direct costs and the associated accumulated amortization are relieved. Costs related to leases that are not consummated are not eligible for capitalization as initial direct costs and are expensed as acquisition expense.
|
| Acquisition Expense | Acquisition expense: Acquisition expense represents costs which include, but are not limited to, legal fees and expenses, travel and communication expenses, cost of appraisals, accounting fees and expenses and miscellaneous expenses related to the selection and acquisition of equipment which are reimbursable to the Managing Member under the terms of the Operating Agreement. As the costs are not eligible for capitalization as initial direct costs, such amounts are expensed as incurred.
|
| Asset Valuation | Asset valuation: Recorded values of the Company’s leased asset portfolio are periodically reviewed for impairment. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than their net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the estimated residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s expected holding period and estimates of undiscounted future rents. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the market place are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date.
|
| Segment Reporting | Segment reporting: The Company is organized into one operating segment for the purpose of making operating decisions or assessing performance. Accordingly, the Company operates in one reportable operating segment in the United States. The Company’s principal decision makers are the Managing Member’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer. The Company believes that its financing business operates as one reportable segment because: a) the Company measures profit and loss at the portfolio assets level as a whole; b) the principal decision makers do not review information based on any operating segment other than the equipment financing transaction portfolio; c) the Company does not maintain discrete financial information on any specific segment other than its equipment financing operations; d) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around different products and services other than equipment financing; and e) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around geographic areas. The primary geographic region in which the Company seeks financing opportunities is North America. Currently, 100% of the Company’s operating revenues are from customers domiciled in North America.
|
| Per Unit Data | Per Unit data: The Company issues only one class of Units, none of which are considered dilutive. Net loss per Unit is based upon the weighted average number of Other Members Units outstanding from February 2, 2016 (Release Date of Escrow) through June 30, 2016.
|
| Recent Accounting Pronouncements | Recent accounting pronouncements: In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) (“ASU 2016-13”). The main objective of this Update is to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. To achieve this objective, the amendments in this Update replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The amendments affect entities holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. The amendments affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off-balance-sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements. In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). The new standard will require lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases with lease terms greater than 12 months in the statement of financial position. Lessor accounting per ASU 2016-02 is mostly unchanged from the previous lease accounting GAAP. Certain changes were made to the lessor accounting guidance in order to align the lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Similar to the previous guidance, lessors will classify leases as operating, direct financing, or sales-type. Lessors in operating leases will continue to recognize the underlying asset and recognize income on a straight-line basis. Lessors determine whether a lease is a sale of the underlying asset based on whether the lessee effectively obtains control of the underlying assets. ASU-2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements. In January 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). The new standard provides guidance related to accounting for equity investments and financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, FASB clarified guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements. In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU-2014-15”). The new standard provides guidance relative to management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-15 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements or related disclosures. In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved the deferral of the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year and in August 2015, issued Revenue from Contracts from Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”). ASU 2015-14 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. The Company evaluated the impact of the new standard on its financial statements and has determined that such impact is virtually non-existent as the new revenue guideline does not affect revenues from leases and loans, which comprise the majority of the Company’s revenues.
|
Investment in Equipment and Leases, Net (Tables) |
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investments in Equipment and Leases, Net [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment in Leases | The Company’s investment in leases consists of the following:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Property on Operating Leases | Property on operating leases consists of the following:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Future Minimum Lease Payments Receivable | At June 30, 2016, the aggregate amounts of future minimum lease payments receivable are as follows:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of Useful Lives of Assets | As of June 30, 2016, the respective useful lives of each category of lease assets in the Company’s portfolio are as follows (in years):
|
Related Party Transactions (Tables) |
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Party Transactions [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Managing Members and/or Affiliates Earned Commissions and Billed for Reimbursements Pursuant to Operating Agreement | During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Managing Member and/or affiliates earned commissions and fees, and billed for reimbursements pursuant to the Operating Agreement as follows:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Members' Capital (Tables) |
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Members' Capital [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions to Other Members | Distributions to the Other Members for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and for the period from February 2, 2016 (Date of Escrow) through June 30, 2016 were as follows:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Narrative) (Details) |
6 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Jun. 30, 2016
USD ($)
segment
| |
| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items] | |
| Number of operating segments | segment | 1 |
| Number of reportable segments | segment | 1 |
| Revenues [Member] | |
| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items] | |
| Percentage of concentration risk from customers domiciled in North America | 100.00% |
| Minimum [Member] | |
| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items] | |
| Required assets value of financial institutions for cash deposits | $ | $ 10,000,000,000 |
| Operating leases, initial terms | 36 months |
| Operating leases, Period for non-accrual status | 90 days |
| Maximum [Member] | |
| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items] | |
| Cash deposits, insured amount | $ | $ 250,000 |
| Operating leases, initial terms | 120 months |
| Equipment and lessee period of review for impairment | 90 days |
Investment in Equipment and Leases, Net (Narrative) (Details) |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended |
|---|---|---|
|
Jun. 30, 2016
USD ($)
|
Jun. 30, 2016
USD ($)
|
|
| Investments in Equipment and Leases, Net [Abstract] | ||
| Amortization of initial direct costs | $ 8,931 | $ 10,036 |
| Depreciation of operating lease assets | $ 72,955 | $ 78,364 |
| Average estimated residual value of assets on operating leases | 49.00% | 49.00% |
| Asset impairment losses | $ 0 | $ 0 |
Investment in Equipment and Leases, Net (Investment in Leases) (Details) |
6 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Jun. 30, 2016
USD ($)
| |
| Leases Disclosure [Line Items] | |
| Balance December 31, 2015 | |
| Additions | 3,781,195 |
| Depreciation/ Amortization Expense | (88,400) |
| Balance June 30, 2016 | 3,692,795 |
| Initial direct costs, accumulated amortization | 10,036 |
| Initial Direct Cost [Member] | |
| Leases Disclosure [Line Items] | |
| Balance December 31, 2015 | |
| Additions | 97,669 |
| Depreciation/ Amortization Expense | (10,036) |
| Balance June 30, 2016 | 87,633 |
| Operating Leases [Member] | |
| Leases Disclosure [Line Items] | |
| Balance December 31, 2015 | |
| Additions | 3,683,526 |
| Depreciation/ Amortization Expense | (78,364) |
| Balance June 30, 2016 | $ 3,605,162 |
Investment in Equipment and Leases, Net (Future Minimum Lease Payments Receivable) (Details) |
Jun. 30, 2016
USD ($)
|
|---|---|
| Operating Leases | |
| Six months ending December 31, 2016 | $ 291,659 |
| Year ending December 31, 2017 | 583,317 |
| 2018 | 583,317 |
| 2019 | 563,006 |
| 2020 | 381,750 |
| 2021 | 104,771 |
| 2022 and thereafter | 145,514 |
| Operating leases, total | $ 2,653,334 |
Syndication Costs (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended |
|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 |
Jun. 30, 2016 |
|
| Syndication Costs [Abstract] | ||
| Syndication costs | $ 780,900 | $ 1,115,682 |
| Percentage of offering proceeds, limit on reimbursements to Managing Members and/or affiliates | 15.00% |
Commitments (Narrative) (Details) |
6 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Jun. 30, 2016
USD ($)
| |
| Commitments [Abstract] | |
| Commitments to purchase lease assets | $ 5,296,036 |
Members' Capital (Narrative) (Details) - shares |
Jun. 30, 2016 |
Dec. 31, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Members Capital Account [Line Items] | ||
| Members capital account, Units issued | 744,495 | |
| Members capital account, Units outstanding | 744,495 | |
| Members capital account, units authorized | 15,000,000 | 15,000,000 |
| Other Members [Member] | ||
| Members Capital Account [Line Items] | ||
| Members capital account, Units issued | 744,495 | 50 |
| Members capital account, Units outstanding | 744,495 | |
| Managing Member [Member] | ||
| Members Capital Account [Line Items] | ||
| Members capital account, Units issued | 50 | |
| Members capital account, Units outstanding | 50 |
Members' Capital (Distributions to Other Members) (Details) - USD ($) |
3 Months Ended | 5 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended |
|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2016 |
Jun. 30, 2016 |
Jun. 30, 2016 |
|
| Members' Capital [Abstract] | |||
| Distributions declared | $ 119,463 | $ 152,328 | $ 152,328 |
| Weighted average number of Units outstanding | 597,816 | 453,259 | 453,259 |
| Weighted average distributions per Unit | $ 0.20 | $ 0.34 |