Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Policies)	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2019
Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	Accounting Guidance Issued and Not Yet Adopted Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The amendments in this update affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, and any other financial assets that have the contractual right to receive cash. The ASU requires an entity to recognize expected credit losses rather than incurred losses for financial assets. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impacts of adopting this guidance on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. Changes to Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-14, Compensation –Retirement Benefits – Defined Benefit Plans – General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans (“ASU No. 2018-14”). This update removes disclosures that are no longer considered cost beneficial, clarifies the specific requirements of certain disclosures, and adds new disclosure requirements that are considered relevant for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. ASU No. 2018-14 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020 with retrospective application to all periods presented, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impacts of adopting this guidance, which it does not expect to be material. Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance Leases In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU No. 2016-02”), which supersedes the leases requirements in Topic 840. The core principle of ASU No. 2016-02 is that a lessee should recognize on the balance sheet the lease assets and lease liabilities that arise from all lease arrangements with terms greater than 12 months. Recognition of these lease assets and lease liabilities represents a change from previous GAAP, which did not require lease assets and lease liabilities to be recognized for operating leases. The Company adopted ASU No. 2016-02 on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective transition method, which did not require the Company to adjust comparative periods. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use assets, other accrued liabilities, and operating lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases are included in property, plant, and equipment, net, short-term and current maturities of long-term debt, and long-term debt, net, on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s lease assets and lease liabilities are recognized on the lease commencement date in an amount that represents the present value of future lease payments. The Company’s incremental borrowing rate, which is based on information available at the adoption date for existing leases and the commencement date for leases commencing after the adoption date, is used to determine the present value of lease payments. The most significant impact of the Company’s adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 was the recognition of $333 of operating lease right-of-use assets and $349 of operating lease liabilities on its consolidated balance sheets at January 1, 2019. Operating lease right-of-use assets were reduced by $16 due to a tenant improvement allowance on a lease of office space. The Company’s adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 did not have any impact to the Company’s consolidated statements of operations, or its consolidated statements of cash flows. Further, there was no impact on the Company’s covenant compliance under its current debt agreements as a result of the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02. The Company elected the package of practical expedients included in this guidance, which allowed it to not reassess: (i) whether any expired or existing contracts contain leases; (ii) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases; and, (iii) the initial direct costs for existing leases. The Company combines lease components with non-lease components for all classes of assets, except for certain manufacturing facilities. The Company also elected the practical expedient to not assess whether existing or expired land easements contain a lease. The Company does not recognize short-term leases on its consolidated balance sheets, and will recognize those lease payments in the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Leases with the options to extend their term or terminate early are reflected in the lease term when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise such options. Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (“ASU No. 2018-15”), which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. Pursuant to the amendments, the Company, when acting as a customer to a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract, is required to follow the guidance in Subtopic 350-40 to determine the implementation costs to capitalize as an asset related to the service contract and the costs to expense. ASU No. 2018-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted in any interim period. Upon adoption, the Company had the option to elect whether it applies the amendments under ASU No. 2018-15 retrospectively, or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. The Company adopted ASU No. 2018-15 on January 1, 2019 using the prospective adoption method, the effect of which, was not material to its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2019

Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Accounting Guidance Issued and Not Yet Adopted

Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The amendments in this update affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, and any other financial assets that have the contractual right to receive cash. The ASU requires an entity to recognize expected credit losses rather than incurred losses for financial assets. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impacts of adopting this guidance on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

Changes to Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-14, Compensation –Retirement Benefits – Defined Benefit Plans – General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans (“ASU No. 2018-14”). This update removes disclosures that are no longer considered cost beneficial, clarifies the specific requirements of certain disclosures, and adds new disclosure requirements that are considered relevant for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. ASU No. 2018-14 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020 with retrospective application to all periods presented, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impacts of adopting this guidance, which it does not expect to be material.

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

Leases

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU No. 2016-02”), which supersedes the leases requirements in Topic 840. The core principle of ASU No. 2016-02 is that a lessee should recognize on the balance sheet the lease assets and lease liabilities that arise from all lease arrangements with terms greater than 12 months. Recognition of these lease assets and lease liabilities represents a change from previous GAAP, which did not require lease assets and lease liabilities to be recognized for operating leases.

The Company adopted ASU No. 2016-02 on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective transition method, which did not require the Company to adjust comparative periods. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use assets, other accrued liabilities, and operating lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases are included in property, plant, and equipment, net, short-term and current maturities of long-term debt, and long-term debt, net, on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s lease assets and lease liabilities are recognized on the lease commencement date in an amount that represents the present value of future lease payments. The Company’s incremental borrowing rate, which is based on information available at the adoption date for existing leases and the commencement date for leases commencing after the adoption date, is used to determine the present value of lease payments.

The most significant impact of the Company’s adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 was the recognition of $333 of operating lease right-of-use assets and $349 of operating lease liabilities on its consolidated balance sheets at January 1, 2019. Operating lease right-of-use assets were reduced by $16 due to a tenant improvement allowance on a lease of office space. The Company’s adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 did not have any impact to the Company’s consolidated statements of operations, or its consolidated statements of cash flows. Further, there was no impact on the Company’s covenant compliance under its current debt agreements as a result of the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02.

The Company elected the package of practical expedients included in this guidance, which allowed it to not reassess: (i) whether any expired or existing contracts contain leases; (ii) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases; and, (iii) the initial direct costs for existing leases. The Company combines lease components with non-lease components for all classes of assets, except for certain manufacturing facilities. The Company also elected the practical expedient to not assess whether existing or expired land easements contain a lease.

The Company does not recognize short-term leases on its consolidated balance sheets, and will recognize those lease payments in the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Leases with the options to extend their term or terminate early are reflected in the lease term when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise such options.

Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (“ASU No. 2018-15”), which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. Pursuant to the amendments, the Company, when acting as a customer to a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract, is required to follow the guidance in Subtopic 350-40 to determine the implementation costs to capitalize as an asset related to the service contract and the costs to expense. ASU No. 2018-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted in any interim period. Upon adoption, the Company had the option to elect whether it applies the amendments under ASU No. 2018-15 retrospectively, or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. The Company adopted ASU No. 2018-15 on January 1, 2019 using the prospective adoption method, the effect of which, was not material to its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2019.