UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________

FORM 10/A#2
________________________

General Form for Registration of Securities of Small Business Issuers Under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

KINDER HOLDING CORP.
(Exact Name of Registrant As Specified In Its Charter)

Delaware	26-2049376
(State of Incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
6230 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 46, Los Angeles, CA	90048
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(ZIP Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (323) 552-9867

Securities to be Registered Under Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)

Securities to be Registered Under Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.0001
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-Accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company x

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item ____	Description    _________	Page ____
ITEM 1.	DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS	3
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	9
ITEM 2.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	18
ITEM 3.	DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY	20
ITEM 4.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS	20
ITEM 5.	DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS	21
ITEM 6.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	21
ITEM 7.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	21
ITEM 8.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	21
ITEM 9.	MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	22
ITEM 10.	RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES	22
ITEM 11.	DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT'S SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED	23
ITEM 12.	INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS	24
ITEM 13.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	25
ITEM 14.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	42
ITEM 15.	FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND EXHIBITS	42

PART I

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS Back to Table of Contents

Some of the statements contained in this registration statement on Form 10 of Kinder Holding Corp. (hereinafter the "Company", "We" or the "Registrant") discuss future expectations, contain projections of our plan of operation or financial condition or state other forward-looking information. In this registration statement, forward-looking statements are generally identified by the words such as "anticipate", "plan", "believe", "expect", "estimate", and the like. Forward-looking statements involve future risks and uncertainties, there are factors that could cause actual results or plans to differ materially from those expressed or implied. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the statements. The forward-looking information is based on various factors and is derived using numerous assumptions. A reader, whether investing in the Company's securities or not, should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Registration Statement. Important factors that may cause actual results to differ from projections include, for example:

Ÿ   the success or failure of Management's efforts to implement the Registrant's plan of operation;
Ÿ   the ability of the Registrant to fund its operating expenses;
Ÿ   the ability of the Registrant to compete with other companies that have a similar plan of operation;
Ÿ   the effect of changing economic conditions impacting our plan of operation;
Ÿ   the ability of the Registrant to meet the other risks as may be described in future filings with the SEC.

General Background of the Registrant

The Company was incorporated on November 10, 1952 in Michigan as Gantos, Inc. On July 21, 2008, the Company completed its change in domicile to Delaware and subsequently changed its name to Kinder Holding Corp.

The Company was a specialty retailer of a full range of quality, fashionable women's apparel and accessories at moderate to higher prices. The Company operated up to 113 stores, averaging 8,000 square feet, in 23 states, located primarily in suburban malls in the West, Midwest and Northeast of the United States. The Company offered a selection of primarily name brand sportswear, career dresses and suits, social occasion dresses, accessories, outerwear, swimwear, and in selected stores, shoes. On December 28, 1999, the Company filed a Voluntary Petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code with the United States Bankruptcy Court (the "Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Petition").

On June 20, 2000, the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Petition was converted into a Chapter 7 petition. As a result of the conversion to Chapter 7, the Registrant's assets were transferred to a United States Trustee and the Registrant terminated its former business operations. During 2006, the Bankruptcy Trustee had disposed of substantially all of the assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries. In February 2007, the Trustee for the Company and Park Avenue Group, Inc. entered into a contract that was subject to Bankruptcy Court approval for the sale of certain asset free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances, the asset being comprised of the corporate shell of the debtor, Gantos, Inc. (the "Asset"). On February 27, 2007, the Bankruptcy Court granted an order approving the contract and finding that Park Avenue Group is a good faith purchaser within the meaning of 11 USC Section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code (the "Order").

In connection with the Order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, the Court authorized (i) that the existing officers and directors were deemed removed from office; (ii) the appointment of new members to the Registrant's board of directors; and (iii) the amendment of Registrant's Article of Incorporation.

On February 28, 2007 and as a result of the Bankruptcy Court Order, Park Avenue Group appointed Ivo Heiden to the board of directors of the Registrant and to serve as its sole executive officer (the "Management").

Page 3

Business Objectives of the Company

Since the Chapter 7 proceedings, the Registrant has had no present operations. Management has determined to direct its efforts and limited resources to pursue potential new business opportunities. The Registrant does not intend to limit itself to a particular industry and has not established any particular criteria upon which it shall consider and proceed with a business opportunity.

The Registrant's common stock has been subject to quotation on the pink sheets under the symbol KDRH. There is currently no active trading market in the Registrant's shares nor do we believe that any active trading market has existed for the last 3 years. There can be no assurance that there will be an active trading market for our securities following the effective date of this registration statement under the Exchange Act. In the event that an active trading market commences, there can be no assurance as to the market price of our shares of common stock, whether any trading market will provide liquidity to investors, or whether any trading market will be sustained.

Management would have substantial flexibility in identifying and selecting a prospective new business opportunity. The Registrant is dependent on the judgment of its Management in connection with this process. In evaluating a prospective business opportunity, we would consider, among other factors, the following:

Ÿ   costs associated with pursuing a new business opportunity;
Ÿ   growth potential of the new business opportunity;
Ÿ   experiences, skills and availability of additional personnel necessary to pursue a potential new business opportunity;
Ÿ   necessary capital requirements;
Ÿ   the competitive position of the new business opportunity;
Ÿ   stage of business development;
Ÿ   the market acceptance of the potential products and services;
Ÿ   proprietary features and degree of intellectual property; and
Ÿ   the regulatory environment that may be applicable to any prospective business opportunity.

The foregoing criteria are not intended to be exhaustive and there may be other criteria that Management may deem relevant. In connection with an evaluation of a prospective or potential business opportunity, Management may be expected to conduct a due diligence review.

The time and costs required to pursue new business opportunities, which includes negotiating and documenting relevant agreements and preparing requisite documents for filing pursuant to applicable securities laws, can not be ascertained with any degree of certainty.

Management intends to devote such time as it deems necessary to carry out the Registrant's affairs. The exact length of time required for the pursuit of any new potential business opportunities is uncertain. No assurance can be made that we will be successful in our efforts. We cannot project the amount of time that our Management will actually devote to the Registrant's plan of operation.

The Registrant intends to conduct its activities so as to avoid being classified as an "Investment Company" under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and therefore avoid application of the costly and restrictive registration and other provisions of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

Registrant is a Blank Check Company

At present, the Registrant is a development stage company with no revenues, no assets and no specific business plan or purpose. The Registrant's business plan is to seek new business opportunities or to engage in a merger or acquisition with an unidentified company. As a result, the Registrant is a "blank check company" and, as a result, any offerings of the Registrant's securities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") must comply with Rule 419 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") under the Act. The Registrant's Common Stock is a "penny stock," as defined in Rule 3a51-1 promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). The Penny Stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about Penny Stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market.

Page 4

The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its sales person in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each Penny Stock held in the customer's account. In addition, the Penny Stock rules require that the broker-dealer, not otherwise exempt from such rules, must make a special written determination that the Penny Stock is suitable for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure rules have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for a stock that becomes subject to the Penny Stock rules. So long as the common stock of the Registrant is subject to the Penny Stock rules, it may be more difficult to sell the Registrant's common stock.

We are a Shell Company as defined in Rule 405 promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act. A Shell Company is one that has no or nominal operations and either: (i) no or nominal assets; or (ii) assets consisting primarily of cash or cash equivalents. As a Shell Company, we are restricted in our use of Registrations on Form S-8 under the Securities Act; the lack of availability of the use of Rule 144 by security holders; and the lack of liquidity in our stock.

   Form S-8

Shell companies are is prohibited from using Form S-8 to register securities under the Securities Act. If a company ceases to be a Shell Company, it may use Form S-8 sixty calendar days, provided it has filed all reports and other materials required to be filed under the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that it has been required to file such reports and materials after the company files "Form 10 information," which is information that a company would be required to file in a registration statement on Form 10 if it were registering a class of securities under Section 12 of the Exchange Act. This information would normally be reported on a current report on Form 8-K reporting the completion of a transaction that caused the company to cease being a Shell Company.

   Unavailability of Rule 144 for Resale

Rule 144(i) "Unavailability to Securities of Issuers With No or Nominal Operations and No or Nominal Non-Cash Assets" provides that Rule 144 is not available for the resale of securities initially issued by an issuer that is a Shell Company. We have identified our company as a Shell Company and, therefore, the holders of our securities may not rely on Rule 144 to have the restriction removed from their securities without registration or until the company is no longer identified as a Shell Company.

As a result of our classification as a Shell Company, our investors are not allowed to rely on the "safe harbor" provisions of Rule 144, promulgated pursuant to the Securities Act, so as not to be considered underwriters in connection with the sale of our securities until one year from the date that we cease to be a Shell Company. This will likely make it more difficult for us to attract additional capital through subsequent unregistered offerings because purchasers of securities in such unregistered offerings will not be able to resell their securities in reliance on Rule 144, a safe harbor on which holders of restricted securities usually rely to resell securities.

   Very Limited Liquidity of our Common Stock

Our common stock trades from time to time on the OTC Grey Markets but there is no active market maker that maintains a quote in our common stock. As a result, there is very limited liquidity of our common stock. We plan to seek quotation of our common stock on the OTCQB Market. In order for our common stock to become subject to quotation on the OTCQB Market, we must obtain a market maker to file an application with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) on our behalf pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the Exchange Act. If we fail to continue to comply with the listing requirements of the OTCQB Market, the price of our common stock and the ability of our stockholders to to access the capital markets could be negatively impacted. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to continue to satisfy the requirements of the OTCQB Markets for continued quotation.

    We will be deemed a blank check company under Rule 419 of the Securities Act

The provisions of Rule 419 apply to registration statements filed under the Securities Act by a blank check company, such as the Company. Rule 419 requires that a blank check company filing a registration statement deposit the securities being offered and proceeds of the offering into an escrow or trust account pending the execution of an agreement for an acquisition or merger.

Page 5

In addition, an issuer is required to file a post-effective amendment to the registration statement upon the execution of an agreement for such acquisition or merger. The rule provides procedures for the release of the offering funds in conjunction with the post effective acquisition or merger. The obligations to file post-effective amendments are in addition to the obligations to file Forms 8-K to report for both the entry into a material definitive (non-ordinary course of business) agreement and the completion of the transaction. Rule 419 applies to both primary and re-sale or secondary offerings.

Within five (5) days of filing a post-effective amendment setting forth the proposed terms of an acquisition, the Company must notify each investor whose shares are in escrow. Each investor then has no fewer than 20 and no greater than 45 business days to notify the Company in writing if they elect to remain an investor. A failure to reply indicates that the person has elected to not remain an investor. As all investors are allotted this second opportunity to determine to remain an investor, acquisition agreements should be conditioned upon enough funds remaining in escrow to close the transaction.

    Effecting a business combination

Prospective investors in the Company's common stock will not have an opportunity to evaluate the specific merits or risks of any of the one or more business combinations that we may undertake A business combination may involve the acquisition of, or merger with, a company which needs to raise substantial additional capital by means of being a publicly trading company, while avoiding what it may deem to be adverse consequences of undertaking a public offering itself. These include time delays, significant expense, loss of voting control and compliance with various Federal and state securities laws. A business combination may involve a company which may be financially unstable or in its early stages of development or growth.

    The Registrant has not identified a target business or target industry

The Company's effort in identifying a prospective target business will not be limited to a particular industry and the Company may ultimately acquire a business in any industry Management deems appropriate. To date, the Company has not selected any target business on which to concentrate our search for a business combination. While the Company intends to focus on target businesses in the United States, it is not limited to U.S. entities and may consummate a business combination with a target business outside of the United States. Accordingly, there is no basis for investors in the Company's common stock to evaluate the possible merits or risks of the target business or the particular industry in which we may ultimately operate. To the extent we effect a business combination with a financially unstable company or an entity in its early stage of development or growth, including entities without established records of sales or earnings, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of financially unstable and early stage or potential emerging growth companies. In addition, to the extent that we effect a business combination with an entity in an industry characterized by a high level of risk, we may be affected by the currently unascertainable risks of that industry. An extremely high level of risk frequently characterizes many industries which experience rapid growth. In addition, although the Company's Management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular industry or target business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant risk factors.

    Sources of target businesses

Our Management anticipates that target business candidates will be brought to our attention from various unaffiliated sources, including securities broker-dealers, investment bankers, venture capitalists, bankers and other members of the financial community, who may present solicited or unsolicited proposals. Our Management may also bring to our attention target business candidates. While we do not presently anticipate engaging the services of professional firms that specialize in business acquisitions on any formal basis, we may engage these firms in the future, in which event we may pay a finder's fee or other compensation in connection with a business combination. In no event, however, will we pay Management any finder's fee or other compensation for services rendered to us prior to or in connection with the consummation of a business combination.

Page 6

    Selection of a target business and structuring of a business combination

Management owns 44.03% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock and will have broad flexibility in identifying and selecting a prospective target business. In evaluating a prospective target business, our Management will consider, among other factors, the following:

Ÿ   financial condition and results of operation of the target company;
Ÿ   growth potential;
Ÿ   experience and skill of Management and availability of additional personnel;
Ÿ   capital requirements;
Ÿ   competitive position;
Ÿ   stage of development of the products, processes or services;
Ÿ   degree of current or potential market acceptance of the products, processes or services;
Ÿ   proprietary features and degree of intellectual property or other protection of the products, processes or services;
Ÿ   regulatory environment of the industry; and
Ÿ   costs associated with effecting the business combination.

These criteria are not intended to be exhaustive. Any evaluation relating to the merits of a particular business combination will be based, to the extent relevant, on the above factors as well as other considerations deemed relevant by our Management in effecting a business combination consistent with our business objective. In evaluating a prospective target business, we will conduct a due diligence review which will encompass, among other things, meetings with incumbent Management and inspection of facilities, as well as review of financial and other information which will be made available to us.

We will endeavor to structure a business combination so as to achieve the most favorable tax treatment to us, the target business and both companies' stockholders. However, there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service or applicable state tax authorities will necessarily agree with the tax treatment of any business combination we consummate.

The time and costs required to select and evaluate a target business and to structure and complete the business combination cannot presently be ascertained with any degree of certainty. Any costs incurred with respect to the identification and evaluation of a prospective target business with which a business combination is not ultimately completed will result in a loss to us.

    Probable lack of business diversification

While we may seek to effect business combinations with more than one target business, it is more probable that we will only have the ability to effect a single business combination, if at all. Accordingly, the prospects for our success may be entirely dependent upon the future performance of a single business. Unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several business combinations with entities operating in multiple industries or multiple areas of a single industry, it is probable that we will lack the resources to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses. By consummating a business combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may:

Ÿ   subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact upon the particular industry in which we may operate subsequent to a business combination, and
Ÿ   result in our dependency upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services.

   Limited ability to evaluate the target business' Management

Although we intend to closely scrutinize the Management of a prospective target business when evaluating the desirability of effecting a business combination, we cannot assure you that our assessment of the target business' Management will prove to be correct. In addition, we cannot assure you that the future Management will have the necessary skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company intending to embark on a program of business development. Furthermore, the future role of our director, if any, in the target business cannot presently be stated with any certainty.

Page 7

While it is possible that our director will remain associated in some capacity with us following a business combination, it is unlikely that he will devote his full efforts to our affairs subsequent to a business combination. Moreover, we cannot assure you that our director will have significant experience or knowledge relating to the operations of the particular target business.

Following a business combination, we may seek to recruit additional managers to supplement the incumbent Management of the target business. We cannot assure you that we will have the ability to recruit additional managers, or that additional managers will have the requisite skills, knowledge or experience necessary to enhance the incumbent Management.

   Our auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern

Our audited financial statements for the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, were prepared using the assumption that we will continue our operations as a going concern. Our independent accountants in their audit report have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our operations are dependent on our ability to raise sufficient capital or complete business combination as a result of which we become profitable. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty. There is not enough cash on hand to fund our administrative expenses and operating expenses for the next twelve months. Therefore, we may be unable to continue operations in the future as a going concern. If we cannot continue as a viable entity, our stockholders may lose some or all of their investment in the Company's shares of common stock.

Competition

In identifying, evaluating and selecting a target business, we expect to encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours. Many of these entities are well established and have extensive experience identifying and effecting business combinations, either directly or through affiliates. Many if not virtually most of these competitors possess far greater financial, human and other resources compared to our resources. While we believe that there are numerous potential target businesses that we may identify, our ability to compete in acquiring certain of the more desirable target businesses will be limited by our limited financial and human resources. Our inherent competitive limitations are expected by Management to give others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of a target business that we may identify and seek to pursue. Further, any of these limitations may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating a business combination. Our Management believes, however, that our status as a reporting public entity with potential access to the United States public equity markets may give us a competitive advantage over certain privately-held entities having a similar business objective in acquiring a desirable target business with growth potential on favorable terms.

If we succeed in effecting a business combination, there will be, in all likelihood, intense competition from existing competitors of the business we acquire. In particular, certain industries which experience rapid growth frequently attract an increasingly larger number of competitors, including those with far greater financial, marketing, technical and other resources than the initial competitors in the industry in which we seek to operate. The degree of competition characterizing the industry of any prospective target business cannot presently be ascertained. We cannot assure you that, subsequent to a business combination, we will have the resources to compete effectively, especially to the extent that the target business is in a high-growth industry.

Employees

Mr. Heiden, our CEO and CFO, is our sole executive officer. Mr. Heiden is not obligated to devote any specific number of hours per week and, in fact, intends to devote only as much time as he deem reasonably necessary to administer the Company's affairs until such time as a business combination is consummated. The amount of time he will devote in any time period will vary based on the availability of suitable target businesses to investigate. We do not intend to have any full-time employees prior to the consummation of a business combination.

Page 8

Conflicts of Interest

The Company's Management is not required to commit its full time to the Company's affairs. As a result, pursuing new business opportunities may require a longer period of time than if Management would devote full time to the Company's affairs. Management is not precluded from serving as an officer or director of any other entity that is engaged in business activities similar to those of the Registrant. Management has not identified and is not currently negotiating a new business opportunity for us. In the future, Management may become associated or affiliated with entities engaged in business activities similar to those we intend to conduct. In such event, Management may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. In the event that the Company's Management has multiple business affiliations, our Management may have legal obligations to present certain business opportunities to multiple entities. In the event that a conflict of interest shall arise, Management will consider factors such as reporting status, availability of audited financial statements, current capitalization and the laws of jurisdictions. If several business opportunities or operating entities approach Management with respect to a business combination, Management will consider the foregoing factors as well as the preferences of the Management of the operating company. However, Management will act in what it believes will be in the best interests of the shareholders of the Registrant. The Registrant shall not enter into a transaction with a target business that is affiliated with Management.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS Back to Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

This registration statement on Form 10 contains forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about us, our future performance, the market in which we operate, our beliefs and our Management's assumptions. In addition, other written or oral statements that constitute forward-looking statements may be made by us or on our behalf. Words such as "expects", "anticipates", "targets", "goals", "projects", "intends", "plans", "believes", "seeks", "estimates", variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict or assess. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecast in such forward-looking statements.

Any investment in our shares of common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following information about these risks, together with the other information contained in this annual report before you decide to invest in our common stock. Each of the following risks may materially and adversely affect our business objective, plan of operation and financial condition. These risks may cause the market price of our common stock to decline, which may cause you to lose all or a part of the money you invested in our common stock. We provide the following cautionary discussion of risks, uncertainties and possible inaccurate assumptions relevant to our business plan. In addition to other information included in this annual report, the following factors should be considered in evaluating the Company's business and future prospects.

The Company has a limited operating history and very limited resources.

Since emerging from bankruptcy, the Company's operations have been limited to seeking a potential business combination and has had no revenues from operations. Investors will have no basis upon which to evaluate the Company's ability to achieve the Company's business objective, which is to effect a merger, capital stock exchange and/or acquire an operating business. The Company will not generate any revenues until, at the earliest, after the consummation of a business combination or acquiring an operating business.

Our auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

As of June 30, 2014, we had no cash and cash equivalents and a deficit of $2,800. Our audited financial statements for the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, were prepared using the assumption that we will continue our operations as a going concern. Our independent accountants in their audit report have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our operations are dependent on our ability to raise sufficient capital or complete business combination as a result of which we become profitable. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Page 9

There is not enough cash on hand to fund our administrative expenses and operating expenses for the next twelve months. Therefore, we may be unable to continue operations in the future as a going concern. If we cannot continue as a viable entity, our stockholders may lose some or all of their investment in the Company's shares of common stock.

Since the Company has not yet selected a particular target industry or target business with which to complete a business combination, the Company is unable to ascertain the merits or risks associated with any particular business or industry.

Since the Company has not yet identified a particular industry or prospective target business, there is no basis for investors to evaluate the possible merits or risks of the particular industry in which the Company may ultimately operate or the target business which the Company may ultimately acquire. To the extent the Company completes a business combination with a financially unstable company or an entity in its development stage, the Company may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business operations of those entities. Although the Company's Management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular industry or target business, the Company cannot assure you that it will properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors. There can be no assurance that any prospective business combination will benefit shareholders or prove to be more favorable to shareholders than any other investment that may be made by shareholders and investors.

Unspecified and unascertainable risks

There is no basis for shareholders to evaluate the possible merits or risks of potential business combination or the particular industry in which the Company may ultimately operate. To the extent that the Company effects a business combination with a financially unstable operating company or an entity that is in its early stage of development or growth, the Company will become subject to numerous risks. If the Company effects a business combination with an entity in a high risk industry, the Company will become subject to the currently unascertainable risks of that industry. Although Management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular business or industry, there can be no assurance that Management will properly ascertain or assess all such risks that the Company perceived at the time of the consummation of a business combination.

It is likely that the Company's current sole officer and director will resign upon consummation of a business combination and the Company will have only limited ability to evaluate the Management of the target business.

The Company's ability to successfully effect a business combination will be dependent upon the efforts of the Company's Management. The future role of the Company's key personnel in the target business, however, cannot presently be ascertained. Although it is possible that Management will remain associated in various capacities with the target business following a business combination, it is likely that the Management of the target business at the time of the business combination will remain in place. Although the Company intends to closely scrutinize the Management of a prospective target business in connection with evaluating the desirability of effecting a business combination, the Company cannot assure you that the Company's assessment of Management will prove to be correct.

Dependence on key personnel

The Company is dependent upon the continued services of Management. To the extent that his services become unavailable, the Company will be required to obtain other qualified personnel and there can be no assurance that it will be able to recruit qualified persons upon acceptable terms.

The Company's sole officer and director may allocate his time to other businesses activities, thereby causing conflicts of interest as to how much time to devote to the Company's affairs. This could have a negative impact on the Company's ability to consummate a business combination in a timely manner, if at all.

The Company's officer and director is not required to commit his full time to the Company's affairs, which may result in a conflict of interest in allocating his time between the Company's business and other businesses. The Company does not intend to have any full time employees prior to the consummation of a business combination. Management of the Company is engaged in other business endeavors and is not obligated to contribute any specific number of his hours per week to the Company's affairs. Mr. Heiden owes fiduciary duty to Baltic Capital Corp. of which he is the sole officer and director. Baltic Capital Corp. is a private, non-reporting corporation engaged in the business of providing corporate securities compliance services.

Page 10

If Management's other business affairs require him to devote more substantial amounts of time to such affairs, it could limit his ability to devote time to the Company's affairs and could have a negative impact on the Company's ability to consummate a business combination. Furthermore, we do not have an employment agreement with Mr. Heiden. As a result, Mr. Heiden has no formal obligation or commitment to provide any particular amount of time to the Company's affairs. At present, Mr. Heiden, our sole officer and director, is not an officer or director of, nor does he owe any fiduciary duty to, any other company that is subject to Exchange Act reporting obligations.

The Company may be unable to obtain additional financing, if and when required, to complete a business combination or to fund the operations and growth of the business combination target, which could compel the Company to restructure a potential business combination transaction or to entirely abandon a particular business combination.

The Company has not yet identified any prospective target business. If we require funds for a particular business combination, because of the size of the business combination or otherwise, we will be required to seek additional financing, which may or may not be available a terms and conditions satisfactory to the Company, if at all. To the extent that additional financing proves to be unavailable when and if needed to consummate a particular business combination, we would be compelled to restructure the transaction or abandon that particular business combination and seek an alternative target business candidate. In addition, if we consummate a business combination, we may require additional financing to fund the operations or growth of the target business. The failure to secure additional financing could have a material adverse effect on the continued development or growth of the target business. The Company's officer, director or stockholders are not required to provide any financing to us in connection with or after a business combination.

It is probable that the Company will only be able to enter into one business combination, which will cause us to be solely dependent on such single business and a limited number of products or services.

It is probable that the Company will enter into a business combination with a single operating business. Accordingly, the prospects for the Company's success may be:

Ÿ   solely dependent upon the performance of a single operating business, or
Ÿ   dependent upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products or services.

In this case, the Company will not be able to diversify the Company's operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several business combinations in different industries or different areas of a single industry.

The Company has limited resources and there is significant competition for business combination opportunities. Therefore, the Company may not be able to enter into or consummate an attractive business combination.

The Company expects to encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to the Company's, including venture capital funds, leveraged buyout funds and operating businesses competing for acquisitions. Many of these entities are well established and have extensive experience in identifying and effecting business combinations directly or through affiliates. Many of these competitors possess greater technical, human and other resources than the Company does and the Company's financial resources are limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While the Company believes that there are numerous potential target businesses that it could acquire, the Company's ability to compete in acquiring certain sizable target businesses will be limited by the Company's limited financial resources and the fact that the Company will use its common stock to acquire an operating business. This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of certain target businesses.

The Company may be unable to obtain additional financing, if required, to complete a business combination or to fund the operations and growth of the target business, which could compel the Company to restructure a potential business transaction or abandon a particular business combination.

The Company has not yet identified any prospective target business. We may be required to seek additional financing. We cannot assure you that such financing would be available on acceptable terms, if at all. If additional financing proves to be unavailable, we would be compelled to restructure the transaction or abandon that particular business combination and seek an alternative target business. In addition, if we consummate a business combination, we may require additional financing to fund the operations or growth of the target business. The failure to secure additional financing could have a material adverse effect on the continued development or growth of the target business. The Company's officer, director or stockholders are not required to provide any financing to us in connection with or after a business combination.

Page 11

Financing requirements to fund operations associated with reporting obligations under the Exchange Act.

The Company has no revenues and is dependent upon the willingness of the Company's Management to fund the costs associated with the reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, other administrative costs associated with the Company's corporate existence and expenses related to the Company's business objective. The Company is not likely to generate any revenues until the consummation of a business combination, at the earliest. The Company believes that it will have available sufficient financial resources available from its Management to continue to pay accounting and other professional fees and other miscellaneous expenses that may be required until the Company commences business operations following a business combination.

We are dependent upon interim funding provided by Management or an affiliated party to pay professional fees and expenses. Our Management has provided funding, without formal agreement, as has been required to pay for accounting fees and other administrative expenses of the Company.

The Company does not currently engage in any business activities that provide cash flow. The costs of investigating and analyzing potential business combination candidates and preparing and filing Exchange Act reports for what may be an unlimited period of time will be paid by our sole officer and director, or an affiliated party notwithstanding the fact that there is no written agreement to pay such costs. Mr. Heiden and/or an affiliated party have informally agreed to pay the Company's expenses in the form of advances at an imputed interest of 8%. The Company intents to repay these advances when it has the cash resources to do so.

Based on Mr. Heiden's resource commitment to fund our operations , we believe that we will be able to continue as a going concern until such time as we conclude a business combination. During the next 12 months we anticipate incurring costs related to:

Ÿfiling of Exchange Act reports.
Ÿfranchise fees, registered agent fees and accounting fees, and
Ÿinvestigating, analyzing and consummating an acquisition or business combination.

We estimate that these costs will range from five to six thousand dollars per year, and that we will be able to meet these costs as necessary through loans/advances from Management or affiliated parties until we enter into a business combination.

The Company's sole officer and director has a 44.03% equity interest in the Company and thus is in a position to influence certain actions requiring stockholder vote.

Management has no present intention to call for an annual meeting of stockholders to elect new directors prior to the consummation of a business combination. As a result, our current director will continue in office at least until the consummation of the business combination. If there is an annual meeting of stockholders for any reason, the Company's Management has broad discretion regarding proposals submitted to a vote by shareholders as a consequence of Management's significant equity interest. Accordingly, the Company's Management will continue to exert substantial control at least until the consummation of a business combination.

Broad discretion of Management

Any person who invests in the Company's common stock will do so without an opportunity to evaluate the specific merits or risks of any prospective business combination. As a result, investors will be entirely dependent on the broad discretion and judgment of Management in connection with the selection of a prospective business combination. There can be no assurance that determinations made by the Company's Management will permit us to achieve the Company's business objectives.

Page 12

Reporting requirements may delay or preclude a business combination

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Exchange Act, the Company is required to provide certain information about significant acquisitions and other material events. The Company will continue to be required to file quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual reports on Form 10-K, which annual report must contain the Company's audited financial statements. As a reporting company under the Exchange Act, following any business combination, we will be required to file a report on Form 8-K, which report contains audited financial statements of the acquired entity. These audited financial statements must be filed with the SEC within 5 days following the closing of a business combination. While obtaining audited financial statements is typically the responsibility of the acquired company, it is possible that a potential target company may be a non-reporting company with unaudited financial statements. The time and costs that may be incurred by some potential target companies to prepare such audited financial statements may significantly delay or may even preclude consummation of an otherwise desirable business combination. Acquisition prospects that do not have or are unable to obtain the required audited statements may not be appropriate for acquisition because we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act.

If the Company is deemed to be an investment company, the Company may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and the Company's activities may be restricted, which may make it difficult for the Company to enter into a business combination.

Ÿ restrictions on the nature of the Company's investments; and
Ÿ restrictions on the issuance of securities, which may make it difficult for us to complete a business combination.

In addition, we may have imposed upon us burdensome requirements, including:
Ÿ registration as an investment company;
Ÿ adoption of a specific form of corporate structure; and
Ÿ reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy and disclosure requirements and other rules and regulations.

The Company does not believe that its anticipated principal activities will subject it to the Investment Company Act of 1940.

The Company may be deemed to have no "Independent Director", actions taken and expenses incurred by our officer and director on behalf of the Company will generally not be subject to "Independent Review".

Our director owns shares of our common stock and, although no compensation will be paid to him for services rendered prior to or in connection with a business combination, he may receive reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses incurred by him in connection with activities on the Company's behalf such as identifying potential target businesses and performing due diligence on suitable business combinations. There is no limit on the amount of these out-of-pocket expenses and there will be no review of the reasonableness of the expenses by anyone other than our board of director, which consist of one directors who may seek reimbursement. If our director will not be deemed "independent," he will generally not have the benefit of independent director examining the propriety of expenses incurred on our behalf and subject to reimbursement. Although the Company believes that all actions taken by our director on the Company's behalf will be in the Company's best interests, the Company cannot assure the investor that this will actually be the case. If actions are taken, or expenses are incurred that are actually not in the Company's best interests, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and plan of operation and the price of our stock held by the public stockholders.

General Economic Risks.

The Company's current and future business objectives and plan of operation are likely dependent, in large part, on the state of the general economy. Adverse changes in economic conditions may adversely affect the Company's business objective and plan of operation. These conditions and other factors beyond the Company's control include also, but are not limited to regulatory changes.

Page 13

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

The Company's shares of common stock are traded from time to time on the OTC Grey Market.

Our common stock trades from time to time on the OTC Grey Markets but there is no active market maker that maintains a quote in our common stock. As a result, there is very limited liquidity of our common stock. We plan to seek quotation of our common stock on the OTCQB Market. Quotation of the Company's securities on the OTCQB market limits the liquidity and price of the Company's common stock more than if the Company's shares of common stock were listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market or a national exchange. In order for our common stock to become subject to quotation on the OTCQB Market, we must obtain a market maker to file an application with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) on our behalf pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the Exchange Act. If we fail to continue to comply with the listing requirements of the OTCQB Market, the price of our common stock and the ability of our stockholders to to access the capital markets could be negatively impacted. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to continue to satisfy the requirements of the OTCQB Markets for continued quotation. There can be no assurance that there will be a liquid trading market for the Company's common stock following a business combination. In the event that a liquid trading market commences, there can be no assurance as to the market price of the Company's shares of common stock, whether any trading market will provide liquidity to investors, or whether any trading market will be sustained.

Our common stock is subject to the Penny Stock Rules of the SEC and the trading market in our common stock is limited, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our common stock.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 3a51-1 which establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, Rule 15g-9 require:

Ÿ   that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks; and
Ÿ   the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:

Ÿ  obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and
Ÿ  make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:

Ÿsets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and
Ÿthat the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.

Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the "penny stock" rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

Page 14

State blue sky registration; potential limitations on resale of the Company's common stock

The holders of the Company's shares of common stock registered under the Exchange Act and those persons who desire to purchase them in any trading market that may develop in the future, should be aware that there may be state blue-sky law restrictions upon the ability of investors to resell the Company's securities. Accordingly, investors should consider the secondary market for the Registrant's securities to be a limited one.

It is the intention of the Registrant's Management following the consummation of a business combination to seek coverage and publication of information regarding the Registrant in an accepted publication manual which permits a manual exemption. The manual exemption permits a security to be distributed in a particular state without being registered if the Registrant issuing the security has a listing for that security in a securities manual recognized by the state. However, it is not enough for the security to be listed in a recognized manual. The listing entry must contain (1) the names of issuers, officers, and directors, (2) an issuer's balance sheet, and (3) a profit and loss statement for either the fiscal year preceding the balance sheet or for the most recent fiscal year of operations. Furthermore, the manual exemption is a nonissuer exemption restricted to secondary trading transactions, making it unavailable for issuers selling newly issued securities.

Most of the accepted manuals are those published by Standard and Poor's, Moody's Investor Service, Fitch's Investment Service, and Best's Insurance Reports, and many states expressly recognize these manuals. A smaller number of states declare that they "recognize securities manuals" but do not specify the recognized manuals. The following states do not have any provisions and therefore do not expressly recognize the manual exemption: Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Montana, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont and Wisconsin.

Rule 144 Related Risks

The SEC adopted amendments to Rule 144 which became effective on February 15, 2008. These Rule 144 amendments apply to securities acquired both before and after that date. Generally, under the Rule 144 amendments, a person who has beneficially owned restricted shares for at least six months would be entitled to sell their securities provided that: (i) such person is not deemed to have been an affiliate at the time of, or at any time during the three months preceding, a sale; (ii) we are subject to and are current in the Exchange Act periodic reporting requirements for at least 90 days before the sale; and (iii) if the sale occurs prior to satisfaction of a one-year holding period, provided current information is available at the time of sale.

Persons who have beneficially owned restricted shares for at least six months but who are affiliates at the time of, or at any time during the three months preceding a sale, would be subject to additional restrictions, by which such person would be entitled to sell within any three-month period only a number of securities that does not exceed the greater of either of the following: (i) 1% of the total number of securities of the same class then outstanding; or (ii) the average weekly trading volume of such securities during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to the sale; provided, in each case, that we are subject to the Exchange Act periodic reporting requirements for at least three months before the sale. Such sales by affiliates must also comply with the manner of sale, current public information and notice provisions of Rule 144.

These Rule 144 related risks are subject to further restrictions in the event that the Exchange Act reporting company is deemed to be a Shell Company, such as the Registrant.

Restrictions on the Reliance of Rule 144 by Shell Companies or Former Shell Companies

Historically, the SEC staff has taken the position that Rule 144 is not available for the resale of securities initially issued by companies that are, or previously were, blank check companies, like us. The SEC has codified and expanded this position in the amendments discussed above by prohibiting the use of Rule 144 for resale of securities issued by any shell companies (other than business combination related shell companies) or any issuer that has been at any time previously a shell company. The SEC has provided an important exception to this prohibition, however, if the following conditions are met:

Page 15

- The issuer of the securities that was formerly a shell company has ceased to be a shell company;
- The issuer of the securities is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
- The issuer of the securities has filed all Exchange Act reports and material required to be filed, as applicable, during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports and materials), other than Current Reports on Form 8-K; and
-At least one year has elapsed from the time that the issuer filed current comprehensive disclosure with the SEC reflecting its status as an entity that is not a shell company.

As a result, it is likely that pursuant to Rule 144, stockholders who receive our restricted securities in a business combination will not be able to sell our shares without registration until one year after we have completed our initial business combination.

Rule 145 Related Risk

Under the new amendments, affiliates of a target company who receive registered shares in a Rule 145 business combination transaction, and who do not become affiliates of the acquirer, will be able to immediately resell the securities received by them into the public markets without registration (except for affiliates of a shell company as discussed in the following section). However, those persons who are affiliates of the acquirer, and those who become affiliates of the acquirer after the acquisition, will still be subject to the Rule 144 resale conditions generally applicable to affiliates, including the adequate current public information requirement, volume limitations, manner-of-sale requirements for equity securities, and, if applicable, a Form 144 filing.

Application of Rule 145 to Shell Companies

Public resale of securities acquired by affiliates of acquirers and target companies in business combination transactions involving shell companies will continue to be subject to restrictions imposed by Rule 145. If the business combination transaction is not registered under the Securities Act, then the affiliates must look to Rule 144 to resell their securities (with the additional Rule 144 conditions applicable to shell company securities). If the business combination transaction is registered under the Securities Act, then affiliates of the acquirer and target company may resell the securities acquired in the transaction, subject to the following conditions:

-The issuer must meet all of the conditions applicable to shell companies under Rule 144;
- After 90 days from the date of the acquisition, the affiliates may resell their securities subject to Rule 144's volume limitations, adequate current public information requirement, and manner-of-sale requirements;
- After six months from the date of the acquisition, selling security-holders who are not affiliates of the acquirer may resell their securities subject only to the adequate current public information requirement of Rule 144; and
- After one year from the date of the acquisition, selling security-holders who are not affiliates or the acquirer may resell their securities without restriction.

Application of Rule 419 to Shell Companies

The provisions of Rule 419 apply to registration statements filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by a blank check company. Rule 419 requires that a blank check company filing such registration statement deposit the securities being offered and proceeds of the offering into an escrow or trust account pending the execution of an agreement for an acquisition or merger.

Page 16

In addition, the registrant is required to file a post-effective amendment to the registration statement upon the execution of an agreement for such acquisition or merger. The rule provides procedures for the release of the offering funds in conjunction with the post effective acquisition or merger. The obligations to file post-effective amendments are in addition to the obligations to file Forms 8-K to report for both the entry into a material non-ordinary course agreement and the completion of the transaction. Rule 419 applies to both primary and re-sale or secondary offerings.

Within five (5) days of filing a post effective amendment setting forth the proposed terms of an acquisition, the Company must notify each investor whose shares are in escrow. Each investor then has no fewer than 20 and no greater than 45 business days to notify the Company in writing if they elect to remain an investor. A failure to reply indicates that the person has elected to not remain an investor. As all investors are allotted this second opportunity to determine to remain an investor, acquisition agreements should be conditioned upon enough funds remaining in escrow to close the transaction.

You May Not Be Entitled to Protections Normally Afforded to Investors of Bank Check Companies.

If the net proceeds of an offering under the Securities Act of 1933 is used to complete a initial business combination with a target business that has not been identified, and we will have net tangible assets in excess of $5,000,001 upon the successful consummation of this offering and will file a Current Report on Form 8-K, including an audited balance sheet demonstrating this fact, we are exempt from rules promulgated by the SEC to protect investors of blank check companies such as Rule 419. Accordingly, investors will not be afforded the benefits or protections of those rules which would, for example, completely restrict the transferability of our securities, require us to complete our initial business combination within 18 months of the effective date of the initial registration statement and restrict the use of interest earned on the funds held in the trust account.

Investors will then not be entitled to protections normally offered to investors in Rule 419 blank check offerings.

Possible Issuance of Additional Securities.

Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001. As of September 30, 2014, we had 22,710,192 shares issued and outstanding. We may be expected to issue additional shares in connection with our pursuit of new business opportunities and new business operations. To the extent that additional shares of common stock are issued, our shareholders would experience dilution of their respective ownership interests. If we issue shares of common stock in connection with our intent to pursue new business opportunities, a change in control of the Registrant may be expected to occur. The issuance of additional shares of common stock may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, in the event that an active trading market commences. 

Dividends unlikely

The Company does not expect to pay dividends for the foreseeable future because it has no revenues or cash resources. The payment of dividends will be contingent upon the Company's future revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and overall financial conditions. The payment of any future dividends will be within the discretion of the Company's board of directors as then constituted. It is the Company's expectation that future Management following a business combination will determine to retain any earnings for use in its business operations and accordingly, the Company does not anticipate declaring any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Page 17

ITEM 2. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Back to Table of Contents

Management's Plan of Operation

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use of words such as "anticipate", "estimate", "expect", "project", "intend", "plan", "believe", and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. From time to time, we also may provide forward-looking statements in other materials we release to the public.

Overview

The Company's current business objective is to seek a business combination with an operating company. We intend to use the Company's limited personnel and financial resources in connection with such activities. The Company will utilize its capital stock, debt or a combination of capital stock and debt, in effecting a business combination. It may be expected that entering into a business combination will involve the issuance of restricted shares of capital stock. The issuance of additional shares of our capital stock:

Ÿ   may significantly reduce the equity interest of our stockholders;
Ÿ   will likely cause a change in control if a substantial number of our shares of capital stock are issued, and most likely will also result in the resignation or removal of our present officer and director; and
Ÿ   may adversely affect the prevailing market price for our common stock.

Similarly, if we issued debt securities, it could result in:
Ÿ   default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenues after a business combination were insufficient to pay our debt obligations;
Ÿ   acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness even if we have made all principal and interest payments when due if the debt security contained covenants that required the maintenance of certain financial ratios or reserves and any such covenants were breached without a waiver or renegotiations of such covenants;
Ÿ   our immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt security was payable on demand; and
Ÿ   our inability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, if the debt security contained covenants restricting our ability to obtain additional financing while such security was outstanding.

Results of Operations during the year ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the year ended June 30, 2013

We have not generated any revenues during the years 2014 and 2013. We had total operating expenses of $505 related to general and administrative expenses during the year ended June 30, 2014 compared to total operating expenses of $450 during the year ended June 30, 2013. We incurred interest expense of $31 during the year ended June 30, 2014 compared to interest expense of $14 during the year ended June 30, 2013. During the year ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we had a net loss of $536 and $464, respectively mainly due to our general and administrative expenses.

Results of Operations during the three months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013.

We have not generated any revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. We incurred interest expense of $9 during the three-month period ended September 30, 2014 compared to interest expense of $10 during the same period in the prior year. We had a net loss of $9 and $10 during the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At present, the Company has no business operations and no cash resources other than that provided by Management. We are dependent upon interim funding provided by Management or an affiliated party to pay professional fees and expenses. Our Management and an affiliated party have agreed to provide funding as may be required to pay for accounting fees and other administrative expenses of the Company until the Company enters into a business combination. The Company would be unable to continue as a going concern without interim financing provided by Management.

Page 18

If we require additional financing, we cannot predict whether equity or debt financing will become available at terms acceptable to us, if at all. The Company depends upon services provided by Management and an affiliated party to fulfill its filing obligations under the Exchange Act. At present, the Company has no financial resources to pay for such services and may be required to issue restricted shares in lieu of cash or, in the alternative, issue debt instruments evidencing financial obligations if and when they arise.

The Company does not currently engage in any business activities that provide cash flow. The costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations, maintaining the filing of Exchange Act reports, the investigation, analyzing, and consummation of an acquisition for an unlimited period of time will be paid from additional money contributed by Ivo Heiden, our sole officer and director, or an affiliated party. Mr. Heiden or an affiliated party have verbally agreed to pay the Company's expenses through advances until we enter into a business combination. The imputed interest for these advances is 8%. The Company intents to repay these advances and when it has the cash resources to do so.

During the next 12 months we anticipate incurring costs related to:

Ÿfiling of Exchange Act reports.
Ÿfranchise fees, registered agent fees and accounting fees, and
Ÿinvestigating, analyzing and consummating an acquisition or business combination.

We estimate that these costs will be in the range of five to six thousand dollars per year, and that we will be able to meet these costs as necessary, to be advanced/loaned to us by Management and/or an affiliated party.

On September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014, we have had no current assets. As of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014, we had $484 in liabilities consisting of short-term borrowings of $429 due to our CEO and accounts payable of $55.

We had a negative cash flow from operations of $450 during the year ended June 30, 2014 mainly due to a net loss of $536 offset by imputed interest of $31 and an increase in accounts payable of $55. We financed our negative cash flow from operations during the year ended June 30, 2014 through the issuance of shares of common stock of $500, advances made by our CEO of $450 offset by $500 used to repurchase and cancel shares of common stock.

We had a negative cash flow from operations of $450 during the year ended June 30, 2013 mainly due to a net loss of $464 offset by imputed interest of $14.

We had no cash flow activities during the three-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

The Company's limited resources and lack of having cash-generating business operations may make it difficult to borrow funds or raise capital. The Company's limitations to borrow funds or raise funds through the issuance of restricted capital stock required to effect or facilitate a business combination may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and future prospects, including the ability to complete a business combination. To the extent that debt financing ultimately proves to be available, any borrowing will subject us to various risks traditionally associated with indebtedness, including the risks of interest rate fluctuations and insufficiency of cash flow to pay principal and interest, including debt of an acquired business.

The Company currently plans to satisfy its cash requirements for the next 12 months through borrowings from its CEO or companies affiliated with its CEO and believes it can satisfy its cash requirements so long as it is able to obtain financing from these affiliated parties. The Company expects that money borrowed will be used during the next 12 months to satisfy the Company's operating costs, professional fees and for general corporate purposes.

The Company has only limited capital. Additional financing is necessary for the Company to continue as a going concern. Our independent auditors have unqualified audit opinion for the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 with an explanatory paragraph on going concern.

Page 19

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2014 and 2013, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1934.

As of September 30, 2014 and 2013, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1934.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

As of June 30, 2014 and 2013, we did not have any contractual obligations.

As of September 30, 2014 and 2013, we did not have any contractual obligations.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to our financial statements for the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, and are included elsewhere in this registration statement.

ITEM 3. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Back to Table of Contents

The Registrant's corporate office is located at 6230 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 46, Los Angeles, CA 90048, which space is  provided to us on a rent-free basis. The Registrant believes that the office facilities are sufficient for the foreseeable future and this arrangement will remain until we find a new business opportunity.

ITEM 4. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT Back to Table of Contents

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of December 12, 2014. The information in this table provides the ownership information for: each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock; each of our directors; each of our executive officers; and our executive officers and directors as a group.

Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the shares. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to the number of shares indicated as beneficially owned by them.

Name of Beneficial Owner	Common Stock Beneficially Owned (1)	Percentage of Common Stock  Owned (1)
Ivo Heiden	10,000,000	44.03%
6230 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 46
Los Angeles, CA 90048
Securities Compliance Corp. (2)	10,000,000	44.03%
2852 A Myrtle Street, Oakland, CA 94608
Oakland, CA 94608
Director and Officer (1 person)	10,000,000	44.03%

(1) Applicable percentage ownership is based on 22,710,192 shares of common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2014. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2014 are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such securities for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
(2) Mr. Richard Rubin exercises the sole voting and dispositive powers with respect to these shares. On March 25, 2014, Mr. Rubin bought 5,000,000 restricted shares for cash consideration of $500 and subsequently assigned those shares to Securities Compliance Corp., the entity he controls.

Page 20

ITEM 5. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS Back to Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the names and ages of the member of our Board of Director and our executive officers and the positions held by each.

Name	Age	Title
Ivo Heiden	48	CEO, CFO and Chairman

Ivo Heiden, 48, has been CEO, CFO and Chairman of the Registrant since February 2007. During the last five years, Mr. Heiden has been engaged in the business of providing corporate securities compliance service to publically traded companies. From December 2009 until October 2014, Mr. Heiden served on the board of directors of Peregrine Industries, Inc., a public reporting company. From October 2004 until November 2014, Mr. Heiden served as the CEO, CFO and Chairman of Zaxis International Inc. Since 2008, Mr. Heiden is the president, sole officer and director of Baltic Capital Corp. a private non-reporting corporation engaged in the business of providing corporate securities compliance services.

Our director holds office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his successors have been duly elected and qualified. There are no agreements with respect to the election of directors. We do not compensate our directors. Officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors and each executive officer serves at the discretion of the Board of Directors. We do not have any standing committees at this time.

Our director, officer or affiliates have not, within the past five years, filed any bankruptcy petition, been convicted in or been the subject of any pending criminal proceedings, or is any such person the subject or any order, judgment or decree involving the violation of any state or federal securities laws.

Section 16(a) Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Registrant's directors and executive officers, and persons who own beneficially more than ten percent (10%) of the Registrant's Common Stock, to file reports of ownership and changes of ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of all filed reports are required to be furnished to the Registrant pursuant to Section 16(a). Once the Registrant becomes subject to the Exchange Act of 1934, our office and director has informed us that he intends to file reports required to be filed under Section 16(a).

ITEM 6. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Back to Table of Contents

No executive compensation was paid during the fiscal periods ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012. The Registrant has no employment agreement with any of its officers and directors.

ITEM 7. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE Back to Table of Contents

During each of the last two years, Mr. Heiden made advances of $450 to the Company for franchise taxes and registered agent fees.

In March 2014, the Company repurchased 5,000,000 restricted shares for $500 from the father of Mr. Heiden, our CEO.

ITEM 8. LEGAL PROCEEDING Back to Table of Contents

None.

Page 21

ITEM 9. MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE COMPANY'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS Back to Table of Contents

Market Information

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC market "Pink Sheets" under the symbol KDRH. For the periods indicated, the following table sets forth the high and low bid prices per share of common stock. The below prices represent inter-dealer quotations without retail markup, markdown, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

	Fiscal 2014				Fiscal 2013				Fiscal 2012
	High		Low		High		Low		High		Low
First Quarter ended September 30	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001
Second Quarter ended December 31	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001
Third Quarter ended March 31	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001
Fourth Quarter ended June 30	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001	$	0.001

As of September 30, 2014, our shares of common stock were held by approximately 476 stockholders of record. The transfer agent of our common stock is Standard Registrar and Transfer Company, Inc. Phone (801) 571-8844.

Dividends

Holders of common stock are entitled to dividends when, as, and if declared by the Board of Directors, out of funds legally available therefore. We have never declared cash dividends on its common stock and our Board of Directors does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future as it intends to retain future earnings to finance the growth of our businesses. There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that restrict us from declaring dividends.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

No equity compensation plan or agreements under which our common stock is authorized for issuance has been adopted during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014.

ITEM 10. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES Back to Table of Contents

On March 25, 2014, Ivo Heiden and Richard Rubin each subscribed to purchase 5,000,000 restricted shares of common stock for $500. Richard Rubin subsequently assigned his shares to Securities Compliance Corp. Mr. Richard Rubin exercises the sole voting and dispositive powers with respect to these shares. The Registrant believes that the issuance and sale of the restricted shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act as privately negotiated, isolated, non-recurring transactions not involving any public solicitation. The recipients in each case represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to the distribution thereof. Appropriate restrictive legends are affixed to the stock certificates issued in such transactions.

It is the position of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in a No Action Letter to OTC Compliance at the NASD, dated January 21, 2000, that Rule 144 is not available for resale transactions involving securities sold by promoters and affiliates of a blank check company, and their transferees, and anyone else who has been issued securities from a blank check company, and that securities issued by a blank check company to promoters and affiliates, and their transferees, can only be resold through registration under the Act. Promoters and affiliates of a blank check company will be considered underwriters under the Securities Act when reselling the securities of a blank check company. At present, the Registrant is a development stage company with no revenues and has no specific business plan or purpose. The Registrant's business plan is to seek new business opportunities or to engage in a merger or acquisition with an unidentified company. As a result, the Registrant is a blank check company.

Page 22

ITEM 11. DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT'S SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED Back to Table of Contents

The following statements relating to the capital stock set forth the material terms of the Company's securities; however, reference is made to the more detailed provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and by-laws, copies of which are filed herewith.

Common Stock

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorize the issuance of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001. Our holders of shares of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters to be voted on by the shareholders. Holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights. Holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the board of directors in its discretion from legally available funds. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the holders of common stock are entitled to share pro rata all assets remaining after payment in full of all liabilities. Holders of common stock have no preemptive rights to purchase the Company's common stock. There are no conversion or redemption rights or sinking fund provisions with respect to the common stock.

Dividends

Dividends, if any, will be contingent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and financial conditions. The payment of dividends, if any, will be within the discretion of our board of directors. We intend to retain earnings, if any, for use in our business operations and accordingly, the board of directors does not anticipate declaring any dividends prior to a business combination transaction, nor can there be any assurance that any dividends will be paid following any business combination.

Preferred Stock

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorize the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001, and vest in the Company's board of directors the authority to establish series of unissued preferred shares by the designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights, including voting rights, of the preferred shares of any series so established to the same extent that such designations, preferences, limitations, and relative rights could have been fully stated in the Articles of Incorporation, and in order to establish a series, the board of directors shall adopt a resolution setting forth the designation of the series and fixing and determining the designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights, including voting rights, thereof or so much thereof as shall not be fixed and determined by the Certificate of Incorporation.

The board of directors may authorize the issuance of preferred shares without further action by our shareholders and any preferred shares would have priority over the common stock with respect to dividend or liquidation rights. Any issuance of preferred shares may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company and may contain voting and other rights superior to common stock. As a result, the issuance of preferred shares may adversely affect the relative rights of the holders of common stock. We have currently two series of preferred stock authorized, but none has been issued as of September 30, 2014.

The Board of Directors of the corporation shall be authorized to issue one million (1,000,000) shares of series A preferred stock, $0.0001 par value ("Series A Preferred Stock"). The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall have the following voting rights: Each share of Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled to ten (10) votes on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the corporation.

Page 23

The Board of Directors of the corporation shall be authorized to issue one million (1,000,000) shares of series B convertible preferred stock, $0.0001 par value ("Series B Convertible Preferred Stock"). The holders of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock shall have the following rights: Each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock shall be entitled to ten (10) votes on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the corporation. In the event the corporation shall at any time (i) declare a dividend on the Common Stock payable in shares of Common Stock, (ii) subdivide the outstanding shares of Common Stock, (iii) combine the outstanding shares of Common Stock into a smaller number of shares or (iv) issue any of its shares of capital stock in a reclassification of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (including any such reclasssification in connection with a consolidation or merger in which the corporation is the continuing or surviving entity), then in each such case the number of votes per share to which holders of shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock were entitled immediately prior to such event shall be adjusted by multiplying such number by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately after such event and the denominator of which is the number of shares of Common Stock that were outstanding immediately prior to such event. The holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock shall have the right to convert each share into ten (10) shares of Common Stock upon their written request at any time.

ITEM 12. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS Back to Table of Contents

The Company is a Delaware corporation. Section 252 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) provides that the certificates of incorporation of a Delaware corporation may contain a provision eliminating or limiting the personal liability of a director to the corporation or its shareholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except that any such provision may not eliminate or limit the liability of a director (i) for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the corporation or its  shareholders, (ii) acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing  violation of law, (iii) acts specified in Section 7-108-403 (concerning unlawful distributions), or (iv) any transaction from which a director directly or indirectly derived an improper personal benefit. The Company's certificate of incorporation contain a provision eliminating the personal liability of directors to Standard Commerce or Standard Commerce shareholders for monetary damages to the fullest extent provided by the DGCL.

Section 242 of the DGCL provides that a Delaware corporation must indemnify a person who was wholly successful, on the merits or otherwise, in defense of any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal,  administrative, or investigative and whether formal or informal (a "Proceeding"), in which he or she was a party because the person is or  was a  director, against reasonable expenses incurred by him or her in connection with the Proceeding, unless such indemnity is limited by the corporation's articles of incorporation. The Company's articles of incorporation do not contain any such limitation.

Section 242 of the DGCL provides that a Delaware corporation may indemnify a person made a party to a Proceeding because the person is or was a director against any obligation incurred with respect to a Proceeding to pay a judgment, settlement, penalty, fine (including an excise tax assessed with respect to an employee benefit plan) or reasonable expenses incurred in the Proceeding if the person conducted himself or herself in good faith and the person reasonably believed, in the case of conduct in an official capacity with the corporation, that the person's conduct was in the corporation's  best interests and, in all other cases, his or her conduct was at least not opposed to the corporation's best interests and, with respect to any criminal proceedings, the person had no reasonable cause to believe  that his or her conduct was unlawful. The Company's articles of incorporation and bylaws allow for such indemnification. A corporation may not indemnify a director in connection with any Proceeding by or in the right of the corporation in which the director was adjudged liable to the corporation or, in connection with any other Proceeding charging that the director derived an improper personal benefit, whether or not involving actions in an official capacity, in which Proceeding the director was judged liable on the basis that he or she derived an improper personal benefit.  Any indemnification permitted in connection with a Proceeding by or in the right of the corporation is limited to reasonable expenses incurred in connection with such Proceeding.

Under 242 of the DGCL, unless otherwise provided in the certificates of incorporation, a Delaware corporation may indemnify an officer, employee, fiduciary, or agent of the corporation to the same extent as a director and may indemnify such a person who is not a director to a greater extent, if not inconsistent with public policy and if provided for by its bylaws, general or specific action of its board of directors or shareholders, or contract.  The Company's articles of incorporation provide for indemnification of directors, officers, employees, fiduciaries and agents of the Company to the full extent permitted by Delaware law.

Page 24

ITEM 13. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Back to Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	26
Financial Statements:
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2014 and 2013	27
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013	28
Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013	29
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013	30
Notes to Financial Statements	31
Unaudited Interim Financial Statements:
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and June 30, 2014	38
Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited)	39
Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited)	40
Notes to Unaudited Interim Financial Statements	41

Page 25

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Back to Table of Contents

To the Board of Directors
Kinder Holding Corp.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Kinder Holding Corp. (the "Company") as of June 30, 2014 and 2013 and the related statement of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kinder Holding Corp. as of June 30, 2014 and 2013 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

ThThe accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company suffered a loss from operations which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

M&K CPAS, PLLC

www.mkacpas.com
Houston, Texasr>
November 14, 2014

Page 26

Kinder Holding Corp.
(As Successor Company)
Balance Sheets
Back to Table of Contents
		June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	-	$	-
Total current assets		-		-
Total Assets	$	-	$	-
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	55	$	-
Advances from related party		429		479
Total current liabilities		484		479
Stockholders' deficit:
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 10,000,000 authorized;
Series A Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value, 1,000,000 authorized: none issued;		-		-
Series B Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value, 1,000,000 authorized: none issued;		-		-
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;
22,710,192 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and 17,710,192 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013.		2,271		1,771
Additional paid in capital		45		14
Accumulated deficit		(2,800)		(2,264)
Total stockholders' deficit		(484)		(479)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	-	$	-
See Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Financial Statements.

Page 27

Kinder Holding Corp.
(As Successor Company)
Statements of Operations
Back to Table of Contents
		Fiscal Year		Fiscal Year
		Ended		Ended
		June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013
Revenue	$	-	$	-
Costs and Expenses:
General and administrative		505		450
Total operating expenses		505		450
Other income and expenses
Interest expense		31		14
Net loss	$	(536)	$	(464)
Per shares amounts:				0
Basic and diluted net loss	$	(0.00)	$	0.00
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic and diluted)		19,011,562		17,710,192
See Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Financial Statements.

Page 28

Kinder Holding Corp.
(As Successor Company)
Statement of Stockholders' Deficit
Back to Table of Contents
	Common Stock				Additional				Total
	Number of		Stated Or		Paid-In		Accumulated		Shareholders'
	Shares		Par Value		Capital		Deficit		Deficit
Balance at June 30, 2012	17,710,192	$	1,771	$	-	$	(1,800)	$	(29)
Imputed interest	-		-		14		-		14
Net loss	-		-		-		(464)		(464)
Balance at June 30, 2013	17,710,192	$	1,771	$	14	$	(2,264)	$	(479)
Imputed interest	-		-		31		-		31
Shares issued for cash	10,000,000		1,000		-		-		1,000
Shares cancelled	5,000,000		(500)		-		-		(500)
Net loss	-		-		-		(536)		(536)
Balance at June 30, 2014	22,710,192	$	2,271	$	45	$	(2,800)	$	(484)
See Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Financial Statements.

Page 29

Kinder Holding Corp.
(As Successor Company)
Statements of Cash Flows
Back to Table of Contents
		Fiscal Year		Fiscal Year
		Ended		Ended
		June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(536)	$	(464)
Adjustments required to reconcile net loss
to cash used in operating activities:
Imputed interest		31		14
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		55		-
Cash flows used by operating activities		(450)		(450)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of equipment		-		-
Cash used in investing activities		-		-
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		500		-
Repurchase of common stock for cancellation		(500)		-
Advances from related party		450		450
Cash generated by financing activities		450		450
Change in cash		-		-
Cash - Beginning of period		-		-
Cash - End of period	$	-	$	-
Non cash transactions:
Advances from related party converted into common stock	$	500	$	-
See Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Financial Statements.

Page 30

Kinder Holding Corp.
Background and Significant Accounting Policies
June 30, 2014
Back to Table of Contents

Note 1. The Company and Significant Accounting Policies

Kinder Holding Corp. (the "Company") was formed on November 10, 1952 in Michigan as Gantos, Inc. On July 21, 2008, the Company completed its change in domicile to Delaware and subsequently changed its name to Kinder Holding Corp. The Company was a specialty retailer of a full range of quality, fashionable women's apparel and accessories at moderate to higher prices operating primarily in suburban malls in the West, Midwest and Northeast of the United States. On December 28, 1999, the Company filed a Voluntary Petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code with the United States Bankruptcy Court (the "Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Petition").

Bankruptcy Proceedings

On December 28, 1999, the Company filed a petition for Relief and Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut. On June 6, 2000. the bankruptcy proceedings were converted to Chapter 7 for liquidation of the Company’s business. As a result of the conversion to a case under Chapter 7, all of our properties were transferred to a United States Trustee and the Company terminated all of its business operations. The Bankruptcy Trustee has disposed of all of the assets.

In February 2007, the Trustee for the Company and Park Avenue Group, Inc. entered into a contract that was subject to Bankruptcy Court approval for the sale of certain asset free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances, the asset being comprised of the corporate shell of the debtor, Gantos, Inc. (the "Asset"). On February 27, 2007, the Bankruptcy Court granted an order approving the contract and finding that Park Avenue Group is a good faith purchaser within the meaning of 11 USC Section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Basis of Presentation:

We adopted "fresh-start" accounting as of June 21, 2000 in accordance with procedures specified by AICPA Statement of Position ("SOP") No. 90-7, "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code.

Significant Accounting Policies:

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statement and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: For financial statement presentation purposes, the Company considers those short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash or cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents at June 30, 2014 or 2013.

Property and Equipment: New property and equipment are recorded at cost. Property and equipment included in the bankruptcy proceedings and transferred to the Trustee had been valued at liquidation value. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally 5 years. Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized. Expenditures for minor items, repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred. Gain or loss upon sale or retirement due to obsolescence is reflected in the operating results in the period the event takes place.

Page 31

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets: We review the recoverability of our long-lived assets including equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets, when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based on our ability to recover the carrying value of the asset from the expected future pre-tax cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) of the related operations. If these cash flows are less than the carrying value of such asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair value and carrying value. Our primary measure of fair value is based on discounted cash flows. The measurement of impairment requires Management to make estimates of these cash flows related to long-lived assets, as well as other fair value determinations.

Stock Based Compensation: Stock-based awards are accounted for using the fair value method in accordance with ASC 718, Share-Based Payments. Our primary type of share-based compensation consists of stock options. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model in valuing options. The inputs for the valuation analysis of the options include the market value of the Company's common stock, the estimated volatility of the Company's common stock, the exercise price of the warrants and the risk free interest rate.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments: FASB ASC 825, "Financial Instruments," requires entities to disclose the fair value of financial instruments, both assets and liabilities recognized and not recognized on the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. FASB ASC 825 defines fair value of a financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. At June 30, 2014 and 2013, the carrying value of certain financial instruments (cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses.) approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of the instruments or interest rates, which are comparable with current rates.

Earnings per Common Share: We compute net income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earning per Share. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.

Income Taxes: We have adopted ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. Pursuant to ASC 740, we are required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

We must make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using the tax rates and laws in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. ASC 740 provides for the recognition of deferred tax assets if realization of such assets is more likely than not to occur. Realization of our net deferred tax assets is dependent upon our generating sufficient taxable income in future years in appropriate tax jurisdictions to realize benefit from the reversal of temporary differences and from net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards. We have determined it more likely than not that these timing differences will not materialize and have provided a valuation allowance against substantially all of our net deferred tax asset.

Management will continue to evaluate the realizability of the deferred tax asset and its related valuation allowance. If our assessment of the deferred tax assets or the corresponding valuation allowance were to change, we would record the related adjustment to income during the period in which we make the determination. Our tax rate may also vary based on our results and the mix of income or loss in domestic and foreign tax jurisdictions in which we operate.

Page 32

The calculation of our tax liabilities may involve uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. based on our estimate of whether, and to the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If we ultimately determine that payment of these amounts is unnecessary, we will reverse the liability and recognize a tax benefit during the period in which we determine that the liability is no longer necessary. We will record an additional charge in our provision for taxes in the period in which we determine that the recorded tax liability is less than we expect the ultimate assessment to be.

ASC 740 which requires recognition of estimated income taxes payable or refundable on income tax returns for the current year and for the estimated future tax effect attributable to temporary differences and carry-forwards. Measurement of deferred income tax is based on enacted tax laws including tax rates, with the measurement of deferred income tax assets being reduced by available tax benefits not expected to be realized.

Uncertain Tax Positions: The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes" ("FIN No. 48") became effective for the Company on January 1, 2007. FIN No. 48 relates to the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under FIN No. 48, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN No. 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure requirements.

Our federal and state income tax returns are open for fiscal years ending on or after June 30, 2008. We are not under examination by any jurisdiction for any tax year. At June 30, 2014, we had no material unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were required under FIN 48.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-10, "Development Stage Entities". The amendments in this update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the ASC thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. The amendments in this update are applied retrospectively. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 removed the development stage entity financial reporting requirements from the Company.

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014 - 12, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation based on a specific performance targets in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved.

Page 33

This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." The provisions of ASU No. 2013-11 require an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion thereof, in the statement of financial position as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions related to availability. ASU No. 2013-11 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:

   Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and

   Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Page 34

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Management does not anticipate that the adoption of these standards will have a material impact on the financial statements.

Note 2. Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern The Company has incurred losses, has negative operational cash flows and has no revenues. The future of the Company is dependent upon Management success in its efforts and limited resources to pursue and effect a business combination.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise from this uncertainty.

Kinder Holding Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2014

Note 3. "Fresh Start" Accounting

On June 20, 2000, all assets were transferred to the Chapter 7 trustee in settlement of all outstanding corporate obligations. We adopted "fresh-start" accounting as of June 21, 2000 in accordance with procedures specified by AICPA Statement of Position ("SOP") No. 90-7, "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code."

In February 2007, the Trustee for the Company and Park Avenue Group, Inc. entered into a contract that was subject to Bankruptcy Court approval for the sale of certain asset free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances, the asset being comprised of the corporate shell of the debtor, Gantos, Inc. (the "Asset"). On February 27, 2007, the Bankruptcy Court granted an order approving the contract and finding that Park Avenue Group is a good faith purchaser within the meaning of 11 USC Section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code. All results for periods including and subsequent to June 21, 2000 are referred to as those of the "Successor Company".

In accordance with SOP No. 90-7, the reorganized value of the Company was allocated to the Company's assets based on procedures specified by SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations". Each liability existing at the plan sale date, other than deferred taxes, was stated at the present value of the amounts to be paid at appropriate market rates. It was determined that the Company's reorganization value computed immediately before June 21, 2000 was $0. We adopted "fresh-start" accounting because holders of existing voting shares immediately before filing and confirmation of the sale received less than 50% of the voting shares of the emerging entity and its reorganization value is less than its post-petition liabilities and allowed claims.

Note 4. Income Taxes

The Company had approximately $44 million in net operating loss carryovers available to reduce future income taxes. These carryovers were reduced to zero or eliminated through our bankruptcy proceedings. We have adopted ASC 740 which provides for the recognition of a deferred tax asset based upon the value the loss carry-forwards will have to reduce future income taxes and Management's estimate of the probability of the realization of these tax benefits.

Page 35

We have a current operating loss carry-forward of $2,755. We have determined it more likely than not that these timing differences will not materialize and have provided a valuation allowance against substantially all our net deferred tax asset.

Future utilization of currently generated federal and state NOL and tax credit carry forwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and similar state provisions. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of NOL and tax credit carry forwards before full utilization.

	June 30, 2014	June 30, 2013
Individual components giving rise to the deferred tax assets are as follows::
Future tax benefit arising from net operating loss carryovers	$964	$788
Less valuation allowance	(964)	(788)
Total deferred tax asset	$ -	$ -

The Company is not under examination by any jurisdiction for any tax year. Our federal and state income tax returns are open for fiscal years ending on or after June 30, 2008.

Note 5. Commitments

The Company, prior to its bankruptcy, was a party to numerous lawsuits and claims. As a result of the bankruptcy and the subsequent transfer by the Bankruptcy Trustee of the Company’s corporate shell entity free of all liens, claims and encumbrances pursuant to Section 363(f) of the US Bankruptcy Code, the Company is no longer party to any litigation.

The Company is not a party to any leases and does not have any commitments

Note 6. Stockholders' Equity

Common Stock

The certificate of incorporation authorize the issuance of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001. All issued shares of common stock are entitled to one vote per share of common stock. As of June 30, 2014, the Company has 22,710,192 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

On March 26, 2014, the Company issued 5,000,0000 shares of common stock for $500 to an investor who is a 5% shareholder and an affiliated party.

On March 26, 2014, the Company agreed to convert $500 in advances made to the Company by its CEO into 5,000,000 shares of common stock.

On March 25, 2014, the Company repurchased and cancelled 5,000,000 shares of common stock from an investor who is the father of our CEO.

During the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company incurred imputed interest on advances made to the Company by its CEO of $31 and $14, respectively.

Preferred Stock

The certificate of incorporation authorize the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share. None are issued

Stock Based Compensation

There were no grants of employee or non-employee stock or options in either fiscal period ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Page 36

Note 7. Change of Control

In February 2007, the Trustee for the Company and Park Avenue Group, Inc. entered into a contract resulting in a change in control of the Company. On February 27, 2007. the Bankruptcy Court granted an order approving the contract and finding that Park Avenue Group is a good faith purchaser within the meaning of 11 USC Section 363(m).

In connection with the order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court dated February 27, 2007, the Court order authorized (i) that the existing officers and directors were deemed removed from office; (ii) the appointment of new members to the Registrant's board of directors; and (iii) the amendment of Registrant's Article of Incorporation.

On February 28, 2007, Park Avenue Group appointed Ivo Heiden to be the Company's sole officer and director. On September 29, 2009, the board authorized the issuance of 5,000,000 restricted shares based on a subscription agreement to the Company's newly appointed CEO and Chairman. On March 25, 2014, the Company's CEO subscripted to an additional 5,000,000 restricted shares. Our CEO and Chairman controls 44.04% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

Note 8. Related Party Transactions

Due to Related Parties: Amounts due to related parties consist of corporate regulatory compliance expenses paid for by our CEO.

Such items due totaled $429 at June 30, 2014 and $479 at June 30, 2013.

Share Issuance to Related Parties:

On March 26, 2014, the Company issued 5,000,0000 shares of common stock for $500 to an investor who is a 5% shareholder and an affiliated party.

On March 26, 2014, the Company agreed to convert $500 in advances made to the Company by its CEO into 5,000,000 shares of common stock.

On March 25, 2014, the Company repurchased and cancelled 5,000,000 shares of common stock from an investor who is the father of our CEO..

During the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company incurred imputed interest on advances made to the Company by its CEO of $31 and $14, respectively.

Note 9. Subsequent Events

The Company had no subsequent events after June 30, 2014 to the date the financial statements were issued.

Page 37

Kinder Holding Corp.

Unaudited Interim Financial Statements

Kinder Holding Corp.
(As Successor Company)
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and June 30, 2014
Back to Table of Contents
		September 30, 2014
		(Unaudited)		June 30, 2014
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	-	$	-
Total current assets		-		-
Total Assets	$	-	$	-
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	55	$	55
Advances from related party		429		429
Total current liabilities		484		484
Stockholders' deficit:
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 10,000,000 authorized;
Series A Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value, 1,000,000 authorized: none issued;		-		-
Series B Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value, 1,000,000 authorized: none issued;		-		-
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;
22,710,192 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014.		2,271		2,271
Additional paid in capital		54		45
Accumulated deficit		(2,809)		(2,800)
Total stockholders' deficit		(484)		(484)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	-	$	-
See Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Financial Statements.

Page 38

Kinder Holding Corp.
(As Successor Company)
Statements of Operations
For the Three Months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Unaudited)
Back to Table of Contents
		For the Three		For the Three
		Months Ended		Months Ended
		September 30, 2014		September 30, 2013
Revenue	$	-	$	-
Costs and Expenses:
General and administrative		-		-
Total operating expenses		-		-
Other income and expenses:
Interest expense		9		10
Total other expenses		9		10
Net loss	$	(9)	$	(10)
Per shares amounts:
Basic and diluted net loss	$	(0.00)	$	(0.00)
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic and diluted)		22,710,192		17,710,192
See Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Financial Statements.

Page 39

Kinder Holding Corp.
(As Successor Company)
Statements of Cash Flows
For the Three Months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Unaudited)
Back to Table of Contents
		For the Three		For the Three
		Months Ended		Months Ended
		September 30, 2014		September 30, 2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(9)	$	(10)
Adjustments required to reconcile net loss
to cash used in operating activities:
Imputed interest		9		10
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses		-		-
Cash flows used by operating activities		-		-
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		-		-
Advances from related party		-		-
Cash generated by financing activities		-		-
Change in cash		-		-
Cash - Beginning of period		-		-
Cash - End of period	$	-	$	-
See Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Financial Statements.

Page 40

Kinder Holding Corp.
Notes to Unaudited Interim Financial Statements
September 30, 2014 (Unaudited)
Back to Table of Contents

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

The Financial Statements presented herein have been prepared by us in accordance with the accounting policies described in our June 30, 2014 audited financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the notes to financial statements which appear as part of those financial statements.

The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to intangible assets, income taxes, insurance obligations and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other resources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

In the opinion of Management, the information furnished in these interim financial statements reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the financial position and results of operations and cash flows as of and for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-B and therefore do not include some information and notes necessary to conform with annual reporting requirements.

Note 2. Related Party Transactions

Due to Related Parties: Amounts due to related parties consist of corporate regulatory compliance expenses paid for by our CEO. Such items due totaled $429 at September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014.

Share Issuance to Related Parties:

On March 26, 2014, the Company issued 5,000,0000 shares of common stock for $500 to an investor who is a 5% shareholder and an affiliated party.

On March 26, 2014, the Company agreed to convert $500 in advances made to the Company by its CEO into 5,000,000 shares of common stock.

On March 25, 2014, the Company repurchased and cancelled 5,000,000 shares of common stock from an investor who is the father of our CEO.

During the three-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company incurred imputed interest on advances made to the Company by its CEO of $9 and $10, respectively.

Note 3. Earnings/Loss Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) for the period. Diluted earnings per share assumes that any dilutive convertible securities outstanding were converted, with related preferred stock dividend requirements and outstanding common shares adjusted accordingly. It also assumes that outstanding common shares were increased by shares issuable upon exercise of those stock options for which market price exceeds the exercise price, less shares which could have been purchased by us with the related proceeds. In periods of losses, diluted loss per share is computed on the same basis as basic loss per share as the inclusion of any other potential shares outstanding would be anti-dilutive.

There were no common equivalent shares required to be added back to the basic weighted average shares outstanding in order to compute the diluted weighted average shares outstanding.

Page 41

ITEM 14. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE Back to Table of Contents

In its two most recent fiscal years or any later interim period, the Company has had no disagreements with its independent accountants.

ITEM 15. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS Back to Table of Contents

Exhibit No.	Description
2	Bankruptcy Court Order Confirming Sale of Public Shell Entity to Park Avenue Group, Inc., attached as exhibit to the Company's Form 10 as filed with the SEC on November 14, 2014.
3.1	Certificate of Incorporation, attached as exhibit to the Company's Form 10 as filed with the SEC on November 14, 2014.
3.1 (i)	Certificate of Merger, attached as exhibit to the Company's Form 10 as filed with the SEC on November 14, 2014..
3.1 (ii)	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, attached as exhibit to the Company's Form 10 as filed with the SEC on November 14, 2014.
3.2	Bylaws, attached as exhibit to the Company's Form 10 as filed with the SEC on November 14, 2014.
23	Consent of Independent Auditor, filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this amended registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: December 19, 2014

Kinder Holding Corp.
By: Ivo Heiden, CEO
/s/ Ivo Heiden

Kinder Holding Corp.
By: Ivo Heiden, CFO
/s/ Ivo Heiden