Commitment and Contingencies	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2022
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitment and Contingencies	Note 12 — Commitment and Contingencies Legal Proceedings Delaware Court of Chancery Complaint On November 2, 2020, a stockholder of the Company, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated stockholders, filed a complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery alleging broker non-votes were not properly counted in accordance with the Company’s bylaws at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders on July 24, 2020, and, as a result, asserted certain matters deemed to have been approved were not so approved (including matters relating to the increase in the size of the PAVmed Inc. 2014 Long-Term Incentive Equity Plan and the PAVmed Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan). The relief sought under the complaint included certain corrective actions by the Company, but did not seek any specific monetary damages. The Company did not believe it was clear the prior approval of these matters was invalid or otherwise ineffective. However, to avoid any uncertainty and the expense of further litigation, on January 5, 2021, the Company’s board of directors determined it would be advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to re-submit these proposals to the Company’s stockholders for ratification and/or approval. In this regard, the Company held a special meeting of stockholders on March 4, 2021, at which such matters were ratified and approved. The parties reached agreement on a Settlement Term Sheet Agreement, dated January 28, 2021, to settle the complaint, the terms of which did not contemplate payment of monetary damages to the putative class in the proceeding. In connection with the foregoing, on August 3, 2022, the parties agreed that plaintiff’s counsel would not seek an award from the Court in excess of $450, to be paid by the Company, upon Court approval, as compensation for the benefits conferred by the settlement, and the Company would not object to an award of up to such maximum amount. The settlement and a plaintiff’s fee award of $450 were approved by the Court on November 3, 2022, with such award having been subsequently paid by the Company in December 2022. Benchmark Investments, Inc. / Benchmark Investments LLC On December 23, 2020, Benchmark Investments, Inc. filed a complaint against the Company in the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of New York alleging the registered direct offerings of shares of common stock of the Company completed in December 2020 were in violation of provisions set forth in an engagement letter between the Company and Kingswood Capital Markets, a “division” of Benchmark Investments, Inc. On December 16, 2021, the court granted PAVmed’s motion to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On February 7, 2022, Benchmark Investments LLC, which claimed to be a successor to Benchmark Investments, Inc., filed a new complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, asserting claims similar to those in the federal action, and adding to its allegations that financings conducted by the Company in January 2021 and February 2021 also violated the Company’s engagement letter with Kingswood Capital Markets. On February 13, 2023, the Company entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with EF Hutton, a division of Benchmark Investments, LLC (f/k/a Kingswood Capital Markets, a division of Benchmark Investments, Inc.) (“EF Hutton”) and Benchmark Investments, LLC (f/k/a Benchmark Investments, Inc.). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company has paid EF Hutton $450 in full and final satisfaction of all claims and disputes the parties made or could have made against one another arising out of or relating in any way to the above described actions. The Settlement Agreement also included a mutual release and certain other covenants that are customary for agreements of this nature. As of December 31, 2022, the Company has fully accrued for this settlement, which is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Other Matters In the ordinary course of our business, particularly as it begins commercialization of its products, the Company may be subject to certain other legal actions and claims, including product liability, consumer, commercial, tax and governmental matters, which may arise from time to time. Except as otherwise noted herein, the Company does not believe it is currently a party to any other pending legal proceedings. Notwithstanding, legal proceedings are subject-to inherent uncertainties, and an unfavorable outcome could include monetary damages, and excessive verdicts can result from litigation, and as such, could result in a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations, and /or cash flows. Additionally, although the Company has specific insurance for certain potential risks, the Company may in the future incur judgments or enter into settlements of claims which may have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations, and /or cash flows.

Commitment and Contingencies

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2022

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Note 12 — Commitment and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

Delaware Court of Chancery Complaint

On November 2, 2020, a stockholder of the Company, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated stockholders, filed a complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery alleging broker non-votes were not properly counted in accordance with the Company’s bylaws at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders on July 24, 2020, and, as a result, asserted certain matters deemed to have been approved were not so approved (including matters relating to the increase in the size of the PAVmed Inc. 2014 Long-Term Incentive Equity Plan and the PAVmed Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan). The relief sought under the complaint included certain corrective actions by the Company, but did not seek any specific monetary damages. The Company did not believe it was clear the prior approval of these matters was invalid or otherwise ineffective. However, to avoid any uncertainty and the expense of further litigation, on January 5, 2021, the Company’s board of directors determined it would be advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to re-submit these proposals to the Company’s stockholders for ratification and/or approval. In this regard, the Company held a special meeting of stockholders on March 4, 2021, at which such matters were ratified and approved. The parties reached agreement on a Settlement Term Sheet Agreement, dated January 28, 2021, to settle the complaint, the terms of which did not contemplate payment of monetary damages to the putative class in the proceeding. In connection with the foregoing, on August 3, 2022, the parties agreed that plaintiff’s counsel would not seek an award from the Court in excess of $450, to be paid by the Company, upon Court approval, as compensation for the benefits conferred by the settlement, and the Company would not object to an award of up to such maximum amount. The settlement and a plaintiff’s fee award of $450 were approved by the Court on November 3, 2022, with such award having been subsequently paid by the Company in December 2022.

Benchmark Investments, Inc. / Benchmark Investments LLC

On December 23, 2020, Benchmark Investments, Inc. filed a complaint against the Company in the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of New York alleging the registered direct offerings of shares of common stock of the Company completed in December 2020 were in violation of provisions set forth in an engagement letter between the Company and Kingswood Capital Markets, a “division” of Benchmark Investments, Inc. On December 16, 2021, the court granted PAVmed’s motion to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On February 7, 2022, Benchmark Investments LLC, which claimed to be a successor to Benchmark Investments, Inc., filed a new complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, asserting claims similar to those in the federal action, and adding to its allegations that financings conducted by the Company in January 2021 and February 2021 also violated the Company’s engagement letter with Kingswood Capital Markets. On February 13, 2023, the Company entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with EF Hutton, a division of Benchmark Investments, LLC (f/k/a Kingswood Capital Markets, a division of Benchmark Investments, Inc.) (“EF Hutton”) and Benchmark Investments, LLC (f/k/a Benchmark Investments, Inc.). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company has paid EF Hutton $450 in full and final satisfaction of all claims and disputes the parties made or could have made against one another arising out of or relating in any way to the above described actions. The Settlement Agreement also included a mutual release and certain other covenants that are customary for agreements of this nature. As of December 31, 2022, the Company has fully accrued for this settlement, which is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

Other Matters

In the ordinary course of our business, particularly as it begins commercialization of its products, the Company may be subject to certain other legal actions and claims, including product liability, consumer, commercial, tax and governmental matters, which may arise from time to time. Except as otherwise noted herein, the Company does not believe it is currently a party to any other pending legal proceedings. Notwithstanding, legal proceedings are subject-to inherent uncertainties, and an unfavorable outcome could include monetary damages, and excessive verdicts can result from litigation, and as such, could result in a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations, and /or cash flows. Additionally, although the Company has specific insurance for certain potential risks, the Company may in the future incur judgments or enter into settlements of claims which may have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations, and /or cash flows.