XML 38 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.2.0.727
Note 1 - Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
3 Months Ended
May. 31, 2015
Notes to Financial Statements  
Business Description and Accounting Policies [Text Block]
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
 
Nature of Operations
 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc., a Delaware corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc., a Colorado corporation, and Aspen Leaf Yogurt, LLC (“ALY”), and its 39%-owned subsidiary, U-Swirl, Inc. (“U-Swirl”) of which, Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. has financial and operational control (collectively, the “Company”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
The Company is an international franchisor, confectionery manufacturer and retail operator in the United States, Canada, Japan, South Korea and the United Arab Emirates. Founded in 1981, the Company is headquartered in Durango, Colorado and manufactures an extensive line of premium chocolate candies and other confectionery products. U-Swirl franchises and operates soft-serve frozen yogurt stores. The Company also sells its candy in selected locations outside of its system of retail stores and licenses the use of its brand with certain consumer products.
 
Effective March 1, 2015, the Company was reorganized to create a holding company structure. The operating subsidiary with the same name, Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc., a Colorado corporation (“RMCF”), which was previously the public company, became a wholly-owned subsidiary of a newly formed entity, Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Newco”), and all of the outstanding shares of common stock of RMCF, par value $0.03 per share, were exchanged on a one-for-one basis for shares of common stock, par value $0.001, of Newco. The new holding company began trading on March 2, 2015 on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “RMCF”, which was the same symbol used by RMCF prior to the holding company reorganization.
 
In January 2013, through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, including ALY, the Company entered into two agreements to sell all of the assets of its ALY frozen yogurt stores, along with its interest in the self-serve frozen yogurt franchises and retail units branded as “Yogurtini” which the Company also acquired in January 2013, to U-Swirl, a publicly traded company (OTCQB: SWRL), in exchange for a 60% controlling equity interest in U-Swirl. Upon completion of these transactions, RMCF ceased to directly operate any Company-owned ALY locations or sell and support frozen yogurt franchise locations, which is now being supported by U-Swirl. As of May 31, 2015, the Company held approximately 39% of U-Swirl’s outstanding common stock. Additionally, RMCF has the right to acquire approximately 27,146,000 shares of U-Swirl’s common stock through the conversion of outstanding debt owed by U-Swirl to RMCF. If RMCF exercised this conversion right, RMCF would hold approximately 72% of U-Swirl’s common stock. The Company entered into the promissory note used to finance the acquisitions of U-Swirl and entered into a loan and security agreement with U-Swirl. The loan and security agreement between the Company and U-Swirl is subject to various financial and leverage covenants. U-Swirl was not compliant with the covenants at May 31, 2015. The loan covenants required U-Swirl to maintain consolidated adjusted EBITDA of $1,804,000 for the twelve months ended May 31, 2015. At May 31, 2015 U-Swirl had reported $1,532,000 of adjusted EBITDA. In the event of default, we may charge interest on all amounts due under the loan agreement with U-Swirl at the default rate of 15% per annum, accelerate payment of all amounts due under the Loan Agreement, and foreclose on our security interest. At May 31, 2015 we believe that the conversion of the loan into preferred stock as settlement of the obligation would result in 68% more preferred shares issued when compared to the amount issuable if U-Swirl was compliant with the loan covenants. The U-Swirl Board of Directors is composed solely of Board members also serving the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. Board of Directors.
 
Between fiscal year 2014 and 2016, U-Swirl acquired the franchise rights of frozen yogurt stores branded as “Cherryberry”, “Yogli Mogli” and “Fuzzy Peach”, and U-Swirl operates self-serve frozen yogurt cafes under the names “U-Swirl,” “Yogurtini,” “CherryBerry,” “Josie’s Frozen Yogurt,” “Yogli Mogli Frozen Yogurt,” “Fuzzy Peach Frozen Yogurt,” “Let’s Yo!,” and “Aspen Leaf Yogurt”.
 
The Company’s revenues are currently derived from three principal sources: sales to franchisees and others of chocolates and other confectionery products manufactured by the Company; the collection of initial franchise fees, royalty and marketing fees from franchisees’ sales; and sales at Company-owned stores of chocolates, frozen yogurt, and other confectionery products.
 
The following table summarizes the number of stores operating under the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory brand and its subsidiaries at May 31, 2015:
 
   
Sold, Not Yet
Open
   
Open
   
Total
 
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory
                       
Company-owned stores
    -       4       4  
Franchise stores – Domestic stores
    3       193       196  
Franchise stores – Domestic kiosks
    -       5       5  
International License Stores
    1       74       75  
Cold Stone Creamery – co-branded
    7       72       79  
U-Swirl Stores (Including all associated brands)
                       
Company-owned stores
    -       6       6  
Company-owned stores – co-branded
    -       3       3  
Franchise stores – Domestic stores
    *       225       225  
Franchise stores – Domestic – co-branded
    *       18       18  
International License Stores
    2       8       10  
Total
    13       608       621  
 
*U-Swirl cafés and the brands franchised by U-Swirl have historically utilized a development area sales model. The result is that many areas are under development and the rights to open cafés within the development areas have been established, but there is no assurance that any individual development area will result in a determinable number of café openings.
 
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, and reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial reporting and Securities and Exchange Commission regulations. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. Certain amounts previously presented for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on net income, working capital or equity previously reported.
In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (of a normal and recurring nature) which are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three months ended May 31, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year.
 
These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015.
 
 
New Accounting Pronouncements
 
In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs ("ASU 2015-03"). ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of debt liability, consistent with debt discounts or premiums. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs would not be affected by the amendments in ASU 2015-03. ASU 2015-03 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2015-03 may have on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
 
In May 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605),” and requires entities to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and is to be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted for years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the new standard.