1.	Nature of Operations, Management’s Plans and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Company Description and Nature of Operations

Inspired Entertainment, Inc. (f/k/a Hydra Industries Acquisition Corp.) (the “Company,” the “Group,” “we,” “our,” and “us”) is a holding company that does not have any operations or material assets other than the direct ownership of DMWSL 633 Limited (“Inspired”). Inspired is a global gaming technology company, supplying Virtual Sports, Mobile and Server Based Gaming (“SBG”) systems to regulated lottery, betting and gaming operators worldwide. Our strategic focus is the development and sale of software systems and digital terminals.

The Company was originally incorporated in Delaware on May 24, 2014 as a special purpose acquisition company, formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization, recapitalization or other similar business combination with one or more businesses. On December 23, 2016 (the “Closing Date”), the Company consummated its business combination with Inspired pursuant to the Share Sale Agreement (the “Merger”), dated as of July 13, 2016, by and among the Company, the Selling Group, Inspired, DMWSL 632 Limited and Gaming Acquisitions Limited (the “Sale Agreement”). In connection with the closing of the Merger, the Company changed its name from Hydra Industries Acquisition Corp. to Inspired Entertainment, Inc. Unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company” refers to the combined company and its subsidiaries following the Merger, “Hydra” refers to the company prior to the closing of the Merger and “Inspired” refers to DMWSL 633 Limited prior to the Merger. See Note 2 for further discussion of the Merger.

Management Liquidity Plans

As of December 31, 2016, the Company’s cash on hand was $30,936 and the Company had working capital of $10,864. The Company recorded net losses of $22,383 and $16,874 for the periods ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The net losses arise primarily due to one-off costs and interest on shareholder loan notes which is no longer a liability of the Company post the Merger as detailed in Note 2. The Company historically has positive cash flows from operating activities and uses the cash flow to fund expenditures for capital additions. Management believes that the Company’s cash balances on hand, cash flows expected to be generated from operations, ability to control and defer capital projects and borrowings available under the Company’s credit facility will be sufficient to fund the Company’s net cash requirements through February 2018.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information or footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been condensed or omitted, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. It is management’s opinion, however, that the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of a normal recurring nature, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, operating results and cash flows for the periods presented.

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with Inspired’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the periods ended September 24, 2016 and September 26, 2015. The financial information as of September 24, 2016 is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements presented in the Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on December 30, 2016. The interim results for the three months ended December 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending September 30, 2017 or for any future interim periods.

The Merger has been accounted for as a reverse merger in accordance with US GAAP. This determination was primarily based on Inspired’s business comprising the ongoing operations of the Company following the Merger, Inspired’s senior management comprising the senior management of the Company and Inspired’s stockholders having a majority of the voting power of the Company. For accounting purposes, Hydra is considered the “acquired” company and Inspired is considered the “acquirer.” Accordingly, for accounting purposes, the Merger is treated as the equivalent of Inspired issuing stock for the net assets of Hydra, accompanied by a recapitalization. The net assets of Hydra are stated at historical cost, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded. The consolidated assets, liabilities and results of operations prior to the Closing Date of the Merger are those of Inspired, and Hydra’s assets, liabilities and results of operations are consolidated with Inspired beginning on the Closing Date. The shares and corresponding capital amounts and earnings per share available to common stockholders, pre-merger, have been retroactively restated as shares reflecting the exchange ratio in the Merger. The historical financial information and operating results of Hydra prior to the Merger have not been separately presented in these condensed consolidated financial statements as they were not significant or meaningful.

Effective September 25, 2016, the Company changed its reporting year end from a 52 week period to a calendar year end, commencing with the calendar year ended September 30, 2017. Accordingly, the period ended December 31, 2016 includes the results of operations for the Company for the period from September 25, 2016 through December 31, 2016. Additionally, the period ended December 31, 2015 includes the results of operations for the Company for the period from September 27, 2015 through December 31, 2015. Prior to September 25, 2016, the financial statement periods presented represented a 52 week period, which approximated a calendar year end period.

Principles of Consolidation

All monetary values set forth in these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements are in US Dollars (“USD”) unless otherwise stated herein. The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, as well as those subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates these estimates, including those related to the revenue recognition for contracts involving software and non-software elements, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserve for net realizable value, goodwill and intangible assets, useful lives of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation, valuation allowances on deferred taxes, earnout liability, derivative liabilities, commitments and contingencies and litigation, among others. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. We regularly evaluate these significant factors and make adjustments when facts and circumstances dictate. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Common Stock Purchase Warrants and Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company reviews any common stock purchase warrants and other freestanding derivative financial instruments at each balance sheet date and classifies them on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as:

Equity if they (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement, or (ii) gives the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement), or

Assets or liabilities if they (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the Company’s control), or (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).

The Company assesses classification of its common stock purchase warrants and other freestanding derivatives at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification between assets and liabilities is required. The Company determined that its outstanding common stock purchase warrants satisfied the criteria for classification as equity instruments at December 31, 2016. The Company also determined that its obligation to settle certain management bonuses in either cash or stock satisfied the criteria for classification as a derivative financial instrument at December 31, 2016 (see Note 14).

Share-Based Payment Arrangements

The Company accounts for stock based compensation in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”). ASC 718 requires generally that all equity awards be accounted for at their “fair value.” This fair value is measured on the grant date for stock-settled awards, and at subsequent exercise or settlement for cash-settled awards. Fair value is equal to the underlying value of the stock for “full-value” awards such as restricted stock and performance shares, and is estimated using an option-pricing model with traditional inputs for “appreciation” awards such as stock options and stock appreciation rights.

Costs equal to these fair values are recognized ratably over the requisite service period based on the number of awards that are expected to vest, or in the period of grant for awards that vest immediately and have no future service condition. For awards that vest over time, cumulative adjustments in later periods are recorded to the extent actual forfeitures differ from the Company’s initial estimates: previously recognized compensation cost is reversed if the service or performance conditions are not satisfied and the award is forfeited. The expense resulting from share-based payments is recorded in general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Subsequent modifications to outstanding awards result in incremental cost if the fair value is increased as a result of the modification. Thus, a value-for-value stock option repricing or exchange of awards in conjunction with an equity restructuring does not result in additional compensation cost.

Customer Concentration

During the period ended December 31, 2016, there were two customers that represented at least 10% of revenues, accounting for 30% and 11% of the Company’s revenues. During the period ended December 31, 2015, two customers represented at least 10% of revenues, accounting for 31% and 11% of the Company’s revenues.

At December 31, 2016 and September 24, 2016, there were no customers that represented at least 10% of accounts receivable.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows: Clarification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”), which eliminates the diversity in practice related to the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows, by adding or clarifying guidance on eight specific cash flow issues: debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies (including bank-owned life insurance policies); distributions received from equity method investees; beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. ASU 2016-15 provides for retrospective application for all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740)” (“ASU 2016-16”), which reduces the complexity in the accounting standards by allowing the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted using a modified retrospective transition approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU 2017-01”). The amendments in ASU 2017-01 is to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU 2017-04”). ASU 2017-04 eliminates Step 2 along with amending other parts of the goodwill impairment test. Under ASU 2017-04, an entity should perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, and should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value with the loss not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods therein with early adoption permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. At adoption, this update will require a prospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.