Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for the Company have been prepared in accordance with instructions to the SEC Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X; therefore, they do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income, and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All adjustments consisting of normally recurring accruals that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position and results of operations for the periods covered by this report have been included. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. Operating results for the period ended March 31, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2019.

The Company and its subsidiaries follow accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, including, where applicable, general practices within the banking industry. The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The assessment of whether or not the Company has a controlling interest (i.e., the primary beneficiary) in a variable-interest entity (“VIE”) is performed on an on-going basis. All equity investments in non-consolidated VIEs are included in “other assets” in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets (Note 22).

Certain amounts reported in prior years have been reclassified to conform to the 2019 presentation. These reclassifications did not materially impact the Company’s consolidated balance sheets or consolidated statements of income.

In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 855, “Subsequent Events,’ the Company’s Management has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements through the date of the issuance of the consolidated financial statements. No subsequent events were identified that would have required a change to the consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are susceptible to significant change in the near term are the allowance for credit losses, valuation of and accounting for acquired credit impaired loans, valuation of goodwill, intangible assets and deferred income taxes.

Recently Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases”. This ASU requires lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities generated by contracts longer than a year on their balance sheets. Accordingly, a lessee will recognize a lease asset for its right-to-use (“ROU”) the underlying asset and a lease liability for the corresponding lease obligation. Both the asset and liability will initially be measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. The ASU also requires lessees to provide additional qualitative and quantitative information about the amount, timing, and uncertainty for the payments they make for the lease agreements.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases and ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements. ASU No. 2018-10 provides improvements related to ASU No. 2016-02 to increase stakeholders’ awareness of the amendments and to expedite the improvements. The amendments affect narrow aspects of the guidance issued in ASU No. 2016-02. ASU No. 2018-11 allows entities adopting ASU No. 2016-02 to choose an additional (and optional) transition method, under which an entity initially applies the new leases standard at the adoption date and recognizes a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. ASU No. 2018-11 also allows lessors to not separate non-lease components from the associated lease component if certain conditions are met. The amendments in these updates became effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018.

In December 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-20, Leases (Topic 842) Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors. The amendments in this guidance allow lessors as accounting policy election to not evaluate whether certain sales taxes and other similar taxes are lessor costs or lessee costs. The amendments in ASU 2018-20 affect the amendments in ASU 2016-02 and have the same effective date and transition requirements. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2019 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019 using the optional modified retrospective transition approach which resulted in a right-of-use asset of approximately $80.0 million and lease liability of $92.3 million (Note 7). The Company has elected to adopt the package of practical expedients permitted under ASC 842 which, among other things, does not require reassessment of lease classification. The Company determines if an arrangement is or contains a lease at the inception of the contract. In determining the present value of lease payments, the Bank used our incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate for the leases.

The Bank has defined a separate accounting policy for real estate and non-real estate leases to account for non-lease components from a lessee perspective. For non-real estate leases, we elected the practical expedient to not separate non-lease components from lease components and instead to account for both as a single lease component as it relates to this class type. The election was made to separate the non-lease components from the lease components in real estate leases due to the volume of real estate leases that are structured as triple net leases, where many of these expenses are already excluded from the lease. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any residual value guarantees.

The Bank has elected to apply the short-term lease exception to existing leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease, considering the lease term from the commencement date, not the remaining term at the date of adoption. The Bank elected to include all renewal options in the lease term in determination of the capitalization period and lease liability and ROU asset.

In March 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-01, “Leases (Topic 842)”. ASU 2019-01 updates codification improvements related to ASU 2016-02 to increase stakeholders’ awareness of the amendments and to expedite the improvements. The amendments in ASU 2019-01 address three topics which include 1) determining the fair value of the underlying asset by lessors that are not manufacturers or dealers (Issue 1); 2) presentation on the statement of cash flows-sales-type and direct financing leases (Issue 2); and 3) transition disclosures related to Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Issue 3). ASU No. 2019-01 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years for public business entities. An entity is permitted to early adopt. However, an entity should apply the amendments as of the date that it first applied Topic 842. The transition and effective date provisions apply to Issue 1 and Issue 2. The Company adopted ASU No. 2019-01 at January 1, 2019 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, “Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities”, which will shorten the amortization period for callable debt securities held at a premium to the earliest call date instead of the maturity date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount, which will continue to be amortized to the maturity date. ASU No. 2017-08 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim reporting periods within those periods. The amendments should be applied using a modified-retrospective transition method as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The adoption of ASU 2017-08 at January 1, 2019 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The amendments in this ASU allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2019 and reclassified approximately $35.4 million from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-09, “Codification Improvements”. The amendments in the ASU are related to changes which seek to clarify, correct errors or make improvements to the Codification. This ASU covers nine amendments, which affect a variety of Topics. Some amendments do not require transition guidance and are effective upon issuance, while others are applicable for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The adoption of ASU 2018-09 at January 1, 2019 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-16, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes”. The amendments in ASU 2018-16 permit the use of the OIS rate based on SOFR as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under Topic 815. The amendments should be adopted on a prospective basis for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after the date of the adoption. For public business entities that have already adopted ASU 2017-12, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of ASU 2018-16 at January 1, 2019 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows as the Company does not have any instruments tied to the OIS rate.

Pending Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASB has issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (referred to as “CECL”). CECL is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments. CECL will replace the current incurred loss accounting model with an expected loss approach and requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. CECL requires enhanced disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization’s portfolio. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019.

Adoption of the standard may result in a material increase in the allowance for credit losses given the change from accounting for losses inherent in the loan portfolio to accounting for losses over the remaining contractual life of the portfolio. However, the impact at adoption will be influenced by the portfolios’ composition and quality at the adoption date as well as economic conditions and forecasts at that time.

The Company expects no material allowance impact to available-for-sale securities.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”, which simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Therefore, any carrying amount which exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value (up to the amount of goodwill recorded) will be recognized as an impairment loss. ASU No. 2017-04 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim reporting periods within those periods. The amendments will be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. Based on recent goodwill impairments tests, which did not require the application of Step 2, the Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have an immediate impact.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)”. ASU 2018-13 amends the disclosure requirements of Topic 820. Fair Value Measurement, to remove disclosure of transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the valuation process for Level 3 fair value measurements, among other amendments, and to include disclosure of the range and weighted average used in Level 3 fair value measurements, among other amendments. Amendments should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented, except for certain amendments, which should be applied prospectively. ASU No. 2018-13 will be effective for annual reporting periods after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those periods. An entity is permitted to early adopt any removed or modified disclosures upon issuance and delay adoption of the additional disclosures until the effective date.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-14, Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. This ASU makes minor changes to the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension and/or other postretirement benefit plans. ASU 2018-14 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020; early adoption is permitted. As ASU 2018-14 only revises disclosure requirements, it will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-17, Targeted Improvements to Related Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities. This ASU amends Topic 810, Consolidation, guidance on how all reporting entities evaluate indirect interests held through related parties in common control arrangements when determining whether fees paid to decision makers and service providers are variable interests. ASU 2018-17 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020; early adoption is permitted. The Company believes the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact.