XML 56 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in an orderly transaction. The market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset or liability is known as the principal market. When no principal market exists, the most advantageous market is used. This is the market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the price that maximizes the amount that would be received or minimizes the amount that would be paid. Fair value is based on assumptions market participants would make in pricing the asset or liability. Generally, fair value is based on observable quoted market prices or derived from observable market data when such market prices or data are available. When such prices or inputs are not available, the reporting entity should use valuation models.

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized based on the priority of the inputs used to measure fair value. The inputs used in measuring fair value are categorized into three levels, as follows:

 

    Level 1 Inputs – unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

    Level 2 Inputs – unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data.

 

    Level 3 Inputs – amounts derived from valuation models in which unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions of market participants that would be used in pricing the asset or liability.

  

The following table summarizes the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013, and the level they fall within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):

 

Description of Financial Instrument

 

Financial Statement
Classification

 

Fair Value
Hierarchy

   March 31,
2014
     June 30,
2013
 
       Fair Value  

Non-COLI assets held in connection with the Supplemental Savings Plan

  Long-term asset   Level 1    $ —         $ 830   

Contingent Consideration

  Current liability   Level 3    $ —         $ 2,977   

Interest rate swap agreements

  Other long-term liabilities   Level 2    $ 4,025       $ 1,765   

Changes in the fair value of the assets held in connection with the Supplemental Savings Plan are recorded in indirect costs and selling expenses.

Contingent consideration at June 30, 2013 related to the requirement that the Company pay contingent consideration in the event Tomorrow Communications, Ltd (TCL), acquired by the Company’s U.K. operations on February 1, 2012, achieved certain specified earnings results during the one year period subsequent to acquisition. The Company determined the fair value of contingent consideration as of the acquisition date using a valuation model which included the evaluation of all possible outcomes and the application of an appropriate discount rate. At the end of each reporting period, the fair value of the contingent consideration was remeasured and any changes were recorded in indirect costs and selling expenses. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, this remeasurement did not result in a significant change to the liability recorded. The maximum contingent consideration associated with the TCL acquisition was approximately $6.0 million. During the year ended June 30, 2013, the Company determined that the maximum contingent consideration possible had been earned. One-half of this amount was paid to the former shareholders of TCL in February 2013 and the other one-half was paid in February 2014.

Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.