Fair Value Measurement

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2019

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurement

6. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

When applying fair value principles in the valuation of assets and liabilities, the Company is required to maximize the use of quoted market prices and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company has not changed its valuation techniques used in measuring the fair value of any financial assets or liabilities during the fiscal periods presented. The fair value estimates take into consideration the credit risk of both the Company and its counterparties.

When active market quotes are not available for financial assets and liabilities, the Company uses industry standard valuation models. Where applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to a present value using market-based observable inputs including credit risk, interest rate curves, foreign currency rates and forward and spot prices for currencies. In circumstances where market-based observable inputs are not available, management judgment is used to develop assumptions to estimate fair value. Generally, the fair value of Level 3 instruments is estimated as the net present value of expected future cash flows based on internal and external inputs.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements - The assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of the periods presented were as follows:

	June 30, 2019
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Derivative assets – diesel fuel contracts	$	151	$	—	$	151	$	—
Total assets at fair value on a recurring basis	$	151	$	—	$	151	$	—
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities – diesel fuel contracts	$	314	$	—	$	314	$	—
Interest rate swaps		638		—		638		—
Contingent consideration for acquisitions		57		—		—		57
Foreign exchange forward contracts		53		—		53		—
Total liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis	$	1,062	$	—	$	1,005	$	57

	March 31, 2019
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Derivative assets – diesel fuel contracts	$	189	$	—	$	189	$	—
Interest rate swaps		1,088		—		1,088		—
Total assets at fair value on a recurring basis	$	1,277	$	—	$	1,277	$	—
Liabilities:
Derivative liability - diesel fuel contracts	$	283	$	—	$	283	$	—
Foreign exchange contracts		60		—		60		—
Contingent consideration for acquisitions		203		—		—		203
Total liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis	$	546	$	—	$	343	$	203

For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, there were no transfers in or out of Levels 1, 2 or 3.

Valuation of Contingent Consideration for Acquisitions - The method used to price these liabilities is considered Level 3. Changes in the fair value of recurring fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the periods presented were as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018
	(In thousands)
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	203		$	578
Change in fair value		—			2
Payments of contingent consideration liability		(146	)		(120	)
Balance at the end of the period	$	57		$	460

Valuation of Debt - The carrying amounts of current financial assets and liabilities approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these items, or in the case of derivative instruments, because they are recorded at fair value. The carrying and fair value of the Company’s Senior Notes (as defined below and further discussed in “Note 13. Debt” to the Company’s audited financial statements included in the Fiscal 2019 Form 10-K) were $100.0 million and $100.5 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2019 and $100.0 million and $98.9 million, respectively, at March 31, 2019. The fair value of the Senior Notes was determined

based on a comparison of the interest rate and terms of such borrowings to the rates and terms of similar debt available for the period. The Company believes the carrying amount on the remaining long-term debt, including debt under the PNC Credit Agreement (as defined below), is not materially different from its fair value as the interest rates and terms of the borrowings are similar to currently available borrowings. The categorization of the framework used to evaluate this debt is considered Level 2.