XML 60 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

K. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 are as follows:

 

     June 30, 2012      September 30, 2011  
     Carrying
Amount
     Fair
Value
     Carrying
Amount
     Fair
Value
 
     (Dollars in millions)  

Assets:

           

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 407      $ 407      $ 286      $ 286  

GAM Promissory Notes and Inventory Note

     253        252         —           —     

Accounts and notes receivable

     710        710        659        659  

Derivative instruments

     —           —           1        1  

Liabilities:

           

Notes payable to banks

     102        102        86        86  

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

     440        440        461        461  

Long-term debt—fixed rate

     572        637        585        633  

Long-term debt—floating rate

     9        9         15        15  

Capital lease obligations

     16        16        15        15  

Derivative instruments

     19        19        39        39  

At June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and notes payable to banks approximated their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The estimated fair values of derivative instruments are valued as described in Note J. The fair value of Cabot’s fixed rate long-term debt and capital lease obligations are estimated based on comparable quoted market prices at the respective period ends. The carrying amount of Cabot’s floating rate long-term debt approximates its fair value. As discussed in Note J, other than the GAM Promissory Notes and Inventory Note, all such measurements are based on observable inputs and are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. The valuation technique used is the discounted cash flow model.

As described in Note J, the GAM Promissory Notes and Inventory Note are classified as Level 3 instruments within the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using a valuation model with significant unobservable inputs. The fair value of the GAM notes was $252 million at June 30, 2012. The valuation used is the discounted cash flow model and the significant inputs are the discount rate, Adjusted EBITDA forecast, and timing of expected cash flows from GAM.