XML 67 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Earnings Per Share
3 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]  
Earnings Per Share
EARNINGS PER SHARE
The reconciliations between basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to Catalent common shareholders for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows (in millions, except per share data):
 
 
Three Months Ended  
 September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
Earnings / (loss) from continuing operations less net income / (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
$
9.1

 
$
(19.9
)
Earnings / (loss) from discontinued operations

 
0.4

Net earnings / (loss) attributable to Catalent
$
9.1

 
$
(19.5
)
 
 
 
 
Weighted average shares outstanding
124,753,234

 
105,535,385

Dilutive securities issuable-stock plans
1,437,223

 

Total weighted average diluted shares outstanding
126,190,457

 
105,535,385

 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per share of common stock:
 
 
 

Earnings / (loss) from continuing operations
$
0.07

 
$
(0.19
)
Earnings / (loss) from discontinued operations

 
0.01

Net earnings / (loss) attributable to Catalent
$
0.07

 
$
(0.18
)
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per share of common stock-assuming dilution:
 
 
 
Earnings / (loss) from continuing operations
$
0.07

 
$
(0.19
)
Earnings / (loss) from discontinued operations

 
0.01

Net earnings / (loss) attributable to Catalent
$
0.07

 
$
(0.18
)

The computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2015 excludes the effect of 2.1 million shares potentially issuable pursuant to awards granted under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, because the vesting provisions of those awards specify performance or market-based conditions that had not been met as of the period end. The computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2014 excludes the maximum effect of the potential common shares issuable under the employee stock option plan of approximately 6.8 million shares, and excludes restricted share awards of 1.4 million shares, because the Company had a net loss for the period and the effect would therefore be anti-dilutive.