Renaissance 20-F Annual Report

20-F 1 renaissance201420f_annual.htm FORM 20-F ANNUAL REPORT Renaissance 20-F Annual Report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to __________

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report _______________________________

Renaissance Oil Corp.

(Formerly San Antonio Ventures Inc.)

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

British Columbia, Canada

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

15567 Marine Drive, White Rock, British Columbia, V4B 1C9

(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Shares, without par value

(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the Company’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report. 47,153,469 Common Shares

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨ No x

If this report is an annual or a transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 12 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨	Non-accelerated filer x

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP ¨

International Financial Reporting Standards as issued

by the International Accounting Standards Board x

Other ¨

Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:

Item 17 ¨ Item 18 x

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No x N/A ¨

Under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the "JOBS Act"), Renaissance is classified as an "Emerging Growth Company". Under the JOBS Act, Emerging Growth Companies are exempt from certain reporting requirements, including the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Under this exemption, the company’s auditor will not be required to attest to and report on management’s assessment of the company’s internal controls over financial reporting during a five-year transition period. The Company is also exempt from certain other requirements, including the requirement to adopt certain new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards would apply to private companies. The Company will remain an Emerging Growth Company for up to five years, although it will lose that status earlier if revenues exceed US$1 billion, or if the Company issues more than US$1 billion in non-convertible debt in a three year period, or if the market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds US$700 million.

Page 2 of 88

Index to Exhibits on Page 66


	- 2 -

Renaissance Oil Corp.

Form 20-F Annual Report

Table of Contents


	PART I	Page

Item 1.	Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors	5
Item 2.	Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable	5
Item 3.	Key Information	5
Item 4.	Information on the Company	13
Item 5.	Operating and Financial Review and Prospects	21
Item 6.	Directors, Senior Management and Employees	31
Item 7.	Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions	39
Item 8.	Financial Information	41
Item 9.	The Offer and Listing	41
Item 10.	Additional Information	44
Item 11.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	62
Item 12.	Description of Other Securities Other Than Equity Securities	62

	PART II

Item 13.	Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies	62
Item 14.	Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds	62
Item 15.	Controls and Procedures	62
Item 16.	Reserved	62
Item 16A.	Audit Committee Financial Expert	63
Item 16B.	Code of Ethics	64
Item 16C.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	64
Item 16D.	Exemptions from Listing Standards for Audit Committees	65
Item 16E.	Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers	65
Item 16F.	Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant	65
Item 16G.	Corporate Governance	66
Item 16H.	Mine Safety Disclosure	66

	PART III

Item 17.	Financial Statements	66
Item 18.	Financial Statements	66
Item 19.	Exhibits	66


	- 3 -

INTRODUCTION

Renaissance Oil Corp. (“Renaissance” or the “Company”), formerly San Antonio Ventures Inc., was incorporated in British Columbia under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) on June 9, 2010.

BUSINESS OF RENAISSANCE OIL CORP.

Renaissance is a natural resource exploration company engaged in the acquisition and exploration of energy and mineral properties.

There are no known proven reserves on Renaissance’s properties. All of the Company’s properties are currently at the exploration stage. The Company does not have any commercially producing mines or sites, nor is the Company in the process of developing any commercial mines or sites. The Company has not reported any revenue from operations since incorporation. As such, Renaissance is defined as an “exploration-stage company”.

FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

In this Annual Report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian Dollars (“CDN$” or “$”). The Government of Canada permits a floating exchange rate to determine the value of the Canadian Dollar against the U.S. Dollar (US$).

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this document constitute “forward-looking statements”. Some, but not all, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” and “intend,” statements that an action or event “may,” “might,” “could,” “should,” or “will” be taken or occur, or other similar expressions. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results, such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Registrant, or other future events, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following risks: the risks associated with outstanding litigation, if any, risks associated with project development; the need for additional financing; operational risks associated with resource and resource processing; fluctuations in oil and gas and mineral prices; title matters; uncertainties and risks related to carrying on business in foreign countries; environmental liability claims and insurance; reliance on key personnel; the potential for conflicts of interest among certain officers, directors or promoters of the Registrant with certain other projects; the absence of dividends; currency fluctuations; competition; dilution; the volatility of the Registrant’s common share price and volume; and tax consequences to U.S. Shareholders. We are not obligated to keep our information current and revise any forward-looking statements because of new information, future events or otherwise.


	- 4 -

PART I

Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors

Not Applicable

Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

Not Applicable

Item 3. Key Information

As used within this Annual Report, the terms “Renaissance”, “the Company”, “Issuer” and “Registrant” refer collectively to Renaissance Oil Corp., its predecessors and affiliates.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected financial data of the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were derived from the financial statements of the Company which have been audited by Deloitte LLP, Chartered Accountants, as indicated in its auditor’s report which is included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

The financial data for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 was derived from the financial statements of the Company as audited by Deloitte LLP, Chartered Accountants, although the financial statements and audit report are not included in this Annual Report. The financial statements are presented pursuant to a reverse takeover business combination (“RTO”) between Renaissance and R2 Energy Ltd. (“R2”) effective September 3, 2014. R2 was incorporated in Alberta on October 20, 2011 and began operations in 2012. For accounting purposes, R2 is the acquirer of San Antonio as a result of the RTO in September 2014 and all information presented in this annual report relates to the financial position, operations and results of R2 since its incorporation and the results of the consolidated entities after September 3, 2014.

The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and other financial information included elsewhere in the Annual Report.

The Company has not declared any dividends on its common shares since incorporation and does not anticipate that it will do so in the foreseeable future. The present policy of the Company is to retain future earnings, if any, for use in its operations and the expansion of its business.

Table No. 2 is derived from the financial statements of the Company, which have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).


	- 5 -

Table No. 1

Selected Financial Data

(CDN$ in 000, except per share data)


	Year Ended 12/31/14	Year Ended 12/31/13	Year Ended 12/31/12

Revenue	$Nil	$Nil	$Nil
Finance and Other Income	$164	$100	($13)
Net Loss	($1,984)	($1,288)	($1,921)
Total Comprehensive Loss	($1,984)	($1,288)	($1,921)
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share	($0.06)	($0.06)	($0.13)
Dividends Per Share	$0	$0	$0
Wtg. Avg. Shares (000)	32,071	21,950	15,070
Working Capital	$3,772	($203)	$745
Exploration and Evaluation Assets	$435	$Nil	$Nil
Long-Term Debt	$Nil	$Nil	$Nil
Shareholder’s Equity	$5,095	$529	$1,706
Total Assets	$5,581	$954	$1,837

Table No. 2 sets forth the rate of exchange for the Canadian Dollar at the end of the five most recent years ended December 31^st, the average rates for the period, and the range of high and low rates for the period. Table No. 2 also sets forth the rate of exchange for the Canadian Dollar at the end of the six most recent months, and the range of high and low rates for these periods.

For purposes of this table, the rate of exchange means the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The table sets forth the number of Canadian dollars required under that formula to buy one U.S. Dollar. The average rate means the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period.


	- 6 -

Table No. 2

Canadian Dollar/U.S. Dollar


Period	Average	High	Low	Close

Year Ended 12/31/14	$ 1.11	$ 1.16	$ 1.06	$ 1.16
Year Ended 12/31/13	1.04	1.07	0.98	0.16
Year Ended 12/31/12	1.00	1.04	0.97	1.00
Year Ended 12/31/11	0.99	1.06	0.94	1.02
Year Ended 12/31/10	1.04	1.08	1.00	1.00

Three Months Ended 3/31/15	$ 1.26	$ 1.28	$ 1.17	$ 1.27
Three Months Ended 12/31/14	1.14	1.16	1.11	1.13
Three Months Ended 9/30/14	1.11	1.12	1.06	1.12
Three Months Ended 6/30/14	1.08	1.10	1.07	1.07
Three Months Ended 3/31/14	1.11	1.13	1.06	1.11
Three Months Ended 12/31/13	1.05	1.07	1.03	1.06
Three Months Ended 9/30/13	1.04	1.06	1.02	1.03
Three Months Ended 6/30/13	1.04	1.05	1.00	1.03
Three Months Ended 3/31/13	1.02	1.03	0.98	1.02
Three Months Ended 12/31/12	1.00	1.00	0.98	1.00
Three Months Ended 9/30/12	0.99	1.02	0.97	0.98
Three Months Ended 6/30/12	1.01	1.04	0.98	1.02
Three Months Ended 3/31/12	1.00	1.03	0.98	1.00
Three Months Ended 12/31/11	1.01	1.06	0.99	1.02
Three Months Ended 9/30/11	0.99	1.04	0.94	1.04
Three Months Ended 6/30/11	0.96	0.99	0.95	0.96

March 2015		$ 1.28	$ 1.24	$ 1.27
February 2015		1.26	1.24	1.25
January 2015		1.27	1.17	1.27
December 2014		1.16	1.13	1.16
November 2014		1.14	1.12	1.14
October 2014		1.13	1.11	1.13

The exchange rate was $1.27 on March 31, 2015.

Statement of Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not Applicable


	- 7 -

Risk Factors

An investment in the Common Shares of the Company must be considered speculative due to the nature of the Company’s business and the present stage of exploration and development of its exploration stage properties. In particular, the following risk factors apply:

Risks Associated with Oil and Gas Exploration

Oil and gas exploration is highly speculative and may not result in the discovery of commercial quantities of recoverable reserves

The exploration for oil and natural gas reserves involve a number of uncertainties that even thorough evaluation, experience and knowledge of the industry cannot eliminate. The expenditures to be made by us in the exploration of our properties may not result in discoveries of oil and natural gas in commercial quantities. Oil and natural gas exploration may involve unprofitable efforts, not only from dry wells, but also from wells that are productive but do not produce sufficient net revenues to return a profit after drilling, operating and other costs. The commercial viability of a hydrocarbon pool is dependent upon a number of factors which are inherent to the industry, such as the content and the proximity of infrastructure, as well as oil and natural gas prices which are subject to considerable volatility, regulatory issues such as price regulation, taxes, royalties, land tax, import and export of oil and natural gas, and environmental protection issues. Many exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially recoverable oil and gas reserves. If the Company is unable to discover commercially recoverable reserves, it would have a negative effect on the Company’s financial condition, or require the Company to cease operations altogether.

Oil and gas exploration has certain inherent risks which could have a negative effect on the Company

Completion of a well does not assure a profit on the investment or recovery of drilling, completion and operating costs. In addition, drilling hazards or environmental damage could greatly increase the cost of operations, and various field operating conditions may adversely affect the production from successful wells. These conditions include delays in obtaining governmental approvals or consents, shut-ins of connected wells resulting from extreme weather conditions, insufficient storage or transportation capacity or other geological and mechanical conditions. These conditions would have a negative effect on the Company’s operations and financial condition.

The Company is at the exploration stage and has no reserves

The Company is currently at the exploration stage, and has not discovered any reserves, nor can it guarantee that it ever will in the future. Even if the Company succeeds in discovering oil or gas deposits, they may not be in commercially viable quantities or locations. Until it discovers such reserves, it will not be able to generate any revenues from their exploitation and development. If a property is determined to not contain any economic reserves, the entire amount spent on exploration will be lost. If the Company is unable to generate revenues from the development and exploitation of oil and gas reserves, it will have a negative effect on the Company’s operations and financial condition and may be forced to cease operations.


	- 8 -

All of the Company’s Oil and Gas Interests are in Foreign Countries

Currently, the Company’s oil and gas exploration activities are focused on Spain and Mexico. Any changes in government policies may result in changes to laws affecting ownership of assets, exploration policies, monetary policies, taxation, rates of exchange, environmental regulations, labor relations and return of capital. This may affect both the Company’s ability to undertake exploration and development activities in respect of present and future properties, as well as its ability to continue to explore, develop and operate those properties in which it has an interest or in respect of which it has obtained exploration and development rights to date. The possibility that future governments may adopt substantially different policies, which might extend to expropriation of assets, could result in having a negative effect on the Company’s operations and financial condition.

Risks Associated with Mineral Exploration

Mineral exploration is highly speculative and has certain inherent risks which could have a negative effect on the Company

Mineral exploration is a speculative business, characterized by a number of significant risks including, among other things, unprofitable efforts resulting not only from the failure to discover mineral deposits but from finding mineral deposits which, though present, are insufficient in quantity and quality to return a profit from production. The marketability of minerals acquired or discovered by the Company may be affected by numerous factors which are beyond the control of the Company and which cannot be accurately predicted, such as market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of milling facilities, mineral markets and processing equipment, and such other factors as government regulations, including regulations relating to royalties, allowable production, importing and exporting of minerals, and environment protection, the combination of which factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on investment capital.

All of the Company's mineral properties are at the exploration stage and all of the Company's exploration expenditures may be lost

The Company is at the exploration stage on all of its properties and substantial additional work and expenditures will be required in order to determine if any economic deposits occur on the Company’s properties. Mineral Exploration is highly risky, and most exploration properties do not contain any economic deposits of minerals. If a property is determined to not contain any economic reserves of minerals, the entire amount spent on exploration will be lost.

The mineral industry is highly competitive

The Company will be required to compete in the future directly with other corporations that may have greater resources. Such corporations could outbid the Company for potential projects or produce minerals at lower costs which would have a negative effect on the Company’s operations.

Commodity prices may not support corporate profit

The resource industry in general is intensely competitive and there is no assurance that, even if commercial quantities of minerals are discovered and developed, a profitable market will exist for the sale of same. Factors beyond the control of the Company may affect the marketability of any minerals discovered. The price of natural resources are volatile over short periods of time, and is affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the Company, including international economic and political trends, expectations of inflation, currency exchange fluctuations, interest rates and global or regional consumption patterns, speculative activities and increased production. If the Company is unable to economically produce minerals from its projects, it would have a negative effect on the Company’s financial condition, or require the Company to cease operations altogether.


	- 9 -

The Company's mineral exploration activities are subject to substantial government regulatory requirements

Exploration operations are affected by various government regulations relating to resource operations, including the acquisition of land, pollution control and environmental protection, waste disposal and toxic substances, and safety. Changes in these regulations or in their application are beyond the control of the Company and may adversely affect its operations, business and results of operations. The requirements to comply with these regulations may result in increased costs, as well as delays in obtaining the permits required to conduct operations. Failure to comply with the conditions set out in any permit or failure to comply with the applicable statutes and regulations may result in orders to cease or curtail operations or to install additional equipment. The Company may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of its operating or exploration activities.

On the Federal and Provincial level, the Company must comply with exploration permitting requirements which require sound operating and reclamation plans to be approved by the applicable government body prior to the start of exploration. Depending upon the type and extent of the exploration activities, the Company may be required to post reclamation bonds and/or assurances that the affected areas will be reclaimed. If the reclamation requires funds in addition to those already allocated, the Company could be forced to pay for the extra work and it could have a significant negative effect upon the Company’s financial position and operations.

The Company’s title to its properties may be disputed by third parties which may result in the loss of title to its properties:

The Company has only done a preliminary title survey of its exploration properties in accordance with industry standards. These procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title and therefore, in accordance with the laws of the jurisdictions in which these properties are situated, their existence and area could be in doubt. Unregistered agreements or transfers, or native land claims, may affect title. If title is disputed, the Company will have to defend its ownership through the courts, which would likely be an expensive and protracted process and have a negative effect on the Company’s operations and financial condition. In the event of an adverse judgment, the Company would lose its property rights.

Risks Relating to the Financing of the Company

The Company has a material uncertainty about their ability to continue as a “Going Concern”:

The Company’s auditor has drawn attention to matters and conditions which indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a “going concern” contained in the Company’s Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. The ability of the Company to continue and carry out its business objectives are dependent upon the Company’s ability to obtain substantial additional financing. If the Company is unable to meet its obligations, it will not be able to fulfill its business plan and be forced to reduce certain operations or cease operations altogether.


	- 10 -

The Company will require additional financing which could result in substantial dilution to existing shareholders

The Company is dependent on additional financing for exploration programs on its resource properties and general and administrative expenses. Management anticipates being able to raise the necessary funds by means of equity financing. The ongoing exploration of the Company’s properties is dependent upon the Company’s ability to obtain financing through the joint venturing of projects, debt financing, equity financing or other means. Such sources of financing may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. Failure to obtain such financing may result in delay or indefinite postponement of exploration work on the Company’s exploration properties, as well as the possible loss of its interest in such properties. Any transaction involving the issuance of previously authorized but unissued shares of common or preferred stock, or securities convertible into common stock, could result in dilution, possibly substantial, to present and prospective holders of common stock. These financings may be on terms less favorable to the Company than those obtained previously.

The Company has a history of net losses and no operational cash flow to sustain operations and does not expect to begin receiving operating revenue in the foreseeable future

None of the Company’s resource properties have advanced to the commercial production stage and the Company has no history of earnings or cash flow from operations. The Company has paid no dividends on its shares since incorporation and does not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future. Historically, the only source of funds available to the company has been through the sale of its common shares. Any future additional equity financing would cause dilution to current stockholders. If the Company does not have sufficient capital for its operations, management would be forced to reduce or discontinue its activities which would likely have a negative effect on the stock price.

Risks Relating to an Investment in the Securities of the Company

The market for the Company’s common shares has been subject to volume and price volatility which could negatively affect a shareholder’s ability to buy or sell the Company’s shares

The market for the common shares of the Company may be highly volatile for reasons both related to the performance of the Company or events pertaining to the industry (e.g. commodity price fluctuation/high production costs/accidents) as well as factors unrelated to the Company or its industry. In particular, market demand for products incorporating resource commodities fluctuate from one business cycle to the next. The Company’s common shares can be expected to be subject to volatility in both price and volume arising from market expectations, announcements and press releases regarding the Company’s business, and changes in estimates and evaluations by securities analysts or other events or factors.

In recent years the securities markets in the United States and Canada have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market price of securities of many companies, particularly small-capitalization companies such as the Company, have experienced wide fluctuations that have not necessarily been related to the operations, performances, underlying asset values, or prospects of such companies. For these reasons, the price of the Company’s common shares can also be expected to be subject to volatility resulting from purely market forces over which the Company will have no control. Further, despite the existence of a market for trading the Company’s common shares in Canada, shareholders of the Company may be unable to sell significant quantities of common shares in the public trading markets without a significant reduction in the price of the shares.


	- 11 -

The Company has a dependence upon key management employees, the loss or absence of which could have a negative effect on the Company’s operations

The Company strongly depends on the business and technical expertise of its management and key personnel, including Chief Executive Officer Craig Steinke and Chief Financial Officer Jeremy Crichton. There is little possibility that this dependence will decrease in the near term. As the Company’s operations expand, additional general management resources will be required. The Company may not be able to attract and retain additional qualified personnel and this would have a negative effect on the Company’s operations.

Certain officers and directors may have conflicts of interest

Certain of the directors and officers of the Company are also directors and/or officers and/or shareholders of other natural resource companies. While the Company is engaged in the business of acquiring and exploring resource properties, such associations may give rise to conflicts of interest from time to time. The Directors of the Company are required by law to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company and to disclose any interest that they may have in any project or opportunity of the Company. If a conflict of interest arises at a meeting of the board of directors, any director in a conflict must disclose his interest and abstain from voting on such matter. In determining whether or not the Company will participate in any project or opportunity, the directors will primarily consider the degree of risk to which the Company may be exposed and its financial position at the time.

The Company could be deemed a passive foreign investment company which could have negative consequences for U.S. investors

The Company could be classified as a Passive Foreign Investment Company (“PFIC”) under the United States tax code. If the Company is declared a PFIC, then owners of the Company’s Common Stock who are U.S. taxpayers generally will be required to treat any so-called "excess distribution" received on its common shares, or any gain realized upon a disposition of common shares, as ordinary income and to pay an interest charge on a portion of such distribution or gain, unless the taxpayer makes a qualified electing fund ("QEF") election or a mark-to-market election with respect to the Company’s shares. A U.S. taxpayer who makes a QEF election generally must report on a current basis its share of the Company’s net capital gain and ordinary earnings for any year in which the Company is classified as a PFIC, whether or not the Company distributes any amounts to its shareholders.

U.S. investors may not be able to enforce their civil liabilities against the company or its directors, controlling persons and officers

It may be difficult to bring and enforce suits against the Company. The Company is a corporation incorporated in Canada under the laws of British Columbia. A majority of the Company’s directors and officers are residents of Canada and all of the Company’s assets are located outside of the United States. Consequently, it may be difficult for United States investors to effect service of process in the United States upon those directors or officers who are not residents of the United States, or to realize in the United States upon judgments of United States courts predicated upon civil liabilities under United States securities laws. There is substantial doubt whether an original action could be brought successfully in Canada against any of such persons or the Company predicated solely upon such civil liabilities under the U.S. Securities Act.


	- 12 -

Broker-Dealers may be discouraged from effecting transactions in our common shares because they are considered "Penny Stocks" and are subject to the Penny Stock Rules

Rules 15g-1 through 15g-9 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, impose sales practice and disclosure requirements on FINRA broker-dealers who make a market in "a penny stock". A penny stock generally includes any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share that is not registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system. The additional sales practice and disclosure requirements imposed upon broker-dealers may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our shares, which could severely limit the market liquidity of the shares and impede the sale of our shares in the secondary market.

Under the penny stock regulations, a broker-dealer selling penny stock to anyone other than an established customer or "accredited investor" (generally, an individual with net worth in excess of US$1,000,000 or an annual income exceeding US$200,000 in each of the last two years, or US$300,000 together with his or her spouse) must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and must receive the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior to sale, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt.

In addition, the penny stock regulations require the broker-dealer to deliver, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the US Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the penny stock market, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt. A broker-dealer is also required to disclose commissions payable to the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, a broker-dealer is required to send monthly statements disclosing recent price information with respect to the penny stock held in a customer's account and information with respect to the limited market in penny stocks.

As a “Foreign Private Issuer”, the Company is exempt from the Section 14 Proxy Rules and Section 16 of the 1934 Securities Act

The submission of proxy and annual meeting of shareholder information (prepared to Canadian standards) on Form 6-K may result in shareholders having less complete and timely data. The exemption from Section 16 rules regarding sales of common shares by insiders may result in shareholders having less data.

Item 4. Information on the Company

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Introduction

Renaissance’s registered office is located at:

2200 – 885 West Georgia Street,

Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3E8

Renaissance’s head office is located at:

15567 Marine Drive,

White Rock, British Columbia, V4B 1C9

Telephone: (604) 609-6110

The Contact person is Gordon Keep, Director.


	- 13 -

The Company’s head office is rented from Craig Steinke, CEO and a Director of the Company. There is no written or contractual agreement between the Company and Mr. Steinke for office space.

The Company’s fiscal year ends December 31^st.

The Company's common shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol "ROE".

The authorized share capital of the Company consists of an unlimited number of common shares and an unlimited number of preferred shares. As of December 31, 2014, the end of the most recent fiscal year, there were 47,153,469 common shares issued and outstanding.

Corporate Background

The Company was incorporated on June 9, 2010 under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia). The Company is listed on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol “ROE”.

On September 3, 2014, R2 Energy Ltd. (“R2”) completed a reverse takeover (“RTO”) of San Antonio Ventures Inc. “San Antonio” whereby R2 shareholders were issued one post-consolidation common share of the continuing entity, Renaissance Oil Corp. (“Renaissance” or “the Company”) for every one R2 common share held immediately prior to the completion of the RTO and all convertible securities of R2 were exchanged for convertible securities of Renaissance on the same basis. A total of 4,741,250 common shares were issued to the former shareholders of San Antonio pursuant to the RTO on the acquisition of San Antonio.

R2 was originally incorporated as Realm II Resources Ltd. in the province of Alberta on October 20, 2011 and changed its name to R2 Energy Ltd. on November 21, 2011. R2 began its operations in 2012. Upon completion of the RTO, the Company changed its name to Renaissance Oil Corp. The Company is listed on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol “ROE”.

The Company has two legal subsidiaries: 100% owned R2, incorporated in British Columbia under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) on June 9, 2010 and 100% owned Renaissance Oil Corp. S.A. de C.V, which was incorporated in Mexico on December 17, 2014. In addition, the Company has a 40% interest in Montero Energy Corporation S.L, a private company incorporated in Spain on December 26, 2011.

For accounting purposes, R2 is the acquirer of San Antonio as a result of the RTO in September 2014 and all information presented in this annual report relates to the financial position, operations and results of R2 since its incorporation and the results of the RTO after September 3, 2014.

The registered office of the Company is 2200-885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia and the Company’s head office is located at 15567 Marine Drive, White Rock, British Columbia. The Company’s focus is the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas properties. The Company has not generated revenues from operations and is currently looking to develop a diversified shale gas and shale oil land portfolio in Mexico, Europe and other strategic countries, with its present principal focus being the investigation of gas and oil land prospects in Mexico and Spain.


	- 14 -

Effective September 16, 2014, the Company’s common shares were consolidated on the basis of 2 pre-consolidation common shares for 1 post-consolidation common share. All common share, share purchase warrant, share option, and per share amounts in this annual report have been retrospectively restated to present post-consolidation amounts.

Currently, the Company conducts unconventional petroleum and natural gas exploration in Spain and Mexico and mineral exploration in British Columbia, Canada.

History and Development of the Business

San Antonio was incorporated in British Columbia under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) on June 9, 2010. Prior to the initial public offering, the Company sold 987,500 common shares for cash proceeds of $177,500 and 1,675,000 flow-through common shares for proceeds of $154,750.

San Antonio completed its initial public offering of shares in November, 2011. A total of 1,978,750 common shares were sold at an offering price of $0.40 per share. Cash proceeds, net of share issuance costs, from the initial public offering was $591,318. The Company’s shares began trading on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol “SAN” on November 3, 2011.

Under an option agreement dated September 27, 2010 between San Antonio, Richard Billingsley and Dwayne Kress, the San Antonio agreed to acquire an undivided interest in 11 mineral claims from Billingsley and Kress known as the “Fame property”. Consideration for the claims was $40,000 cash and the issuance of 50,000 common shares of San Antonio. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, San Antonio fulfilled the terms of the agreement and has received 100% interest in the property.

During fiscal 2011, San Antonio commissioned an airborne geophysical survey over the Fame property which was used to identify specific targets for San Antonio’s exploration programs.

During fiscal 2012, San Antonio completed a comprehensive soil geochemical program on the Fame property. The program was successful in delineating anomalies over known gold occurrences as well as discovering several new significant anomalies over previously unexplored areas. A total of 12 kilometers of strike length of potential mineral bearing structures have been identified.

During fiscal 2013, San Antonio actively sought a joint-venture partner to fund the next phase of exploration on the Fame property.

On September 3, 2014, R2 Energy Ltd. (“R2”) completed a reverse takeover (“RTO”) of San Antonio Ventures Inc. (“San Antonio”) whereby R2 shareholders were issued one post-consolidation common share of the continuing entity, Renaissance Oil Corp. (“Renaissance” or “the Company”) for every one R2 common share held immediately prior to the completion of the RTO and all convertible securities of R2 were exchanged for convertible securities of Renaissance on the same basis. A total of 4,741,250 common shares were issued to the former shareholders of San Antonio pursuant to the RTO on the acquisition of San Antonio. Concurrent with the completion of the RTO, the Company changed its name from San Antonio Ventures Ltd. to Renaissance Oil Corp.


	- 15 -

Business Overview

The Company is in the business of identifying and acquiring prospective land to explore for unconventional oil and natural gas exploration in shale in Spain and Mexico.

In Spain, the Company conducts business through its 40% owned Spanish subsidiary, Montero Energy Corporation, S.L. (“Montero”). Montero has been the successful bidder on approximately 1.3 million acres of lands which are prospective for the exploration and development of shale gas and oil. The Company is now awaiting final awards.

In Mexico, the Company has an agreement with Haliburton Energy to complete a comprehensive evaluation for feasibility and profitability of mature fields, bypassed discoveries and shale prospects. Recent reforms will allow foreign exploration and production companies to acquire land in Mexico, with the first of property bids scheduled to occur in the first half of 2015.

The Company also has an interest in a mineral exploration property in British Columbia, Canada. It holds a 100% interest in the Fame property located in British Columbia, Canada. The property is at the exploration stage. There is no assurance that a commercially viable resource deposit is present the Company’s property, and additional exploration is required before it is determined if the property is economically and legally viable.

To date, the Company has received no revenue. All operating funds have been received from the sale of common shares. The Company is not currently dependent upon market prices for its operations, nor is it dependent upon any patents, licenses or manufacturing processes. The Company’s operations are dependent upon exploration rights and claims as well as the terms of option and/or joint venture agreements on the property Please see the individual property descriptions below for the details of the Company’s current explorations projects.

Oil and Gas Properties

Spain

The Company has a 40% interest in Montero Energy Corporation S.L. which has been the successful bidder on approximately 1.3 million acres of lands prospective for the exploration and development of shale gas and oil. The Company is now awaiting final awards of the permits.

How Acquired

The Company incorporated Montero in Spain on December 26, 2011. The Company originally had a 100% interest in Montero. In April 2014, Grupo SAMCA (“SAMCA”) subscribed for shares representing 60% of the shares of Montero for Eur 1,100,000 (approximately US $1.5 million) which reduced the Company’s interest in Montero to a 40% interest. SAMCA is a diverse industrial corporation with operations in energy, mining, industrial minerals, agriculture, environmental and various other business lines in Spain. Many of SAMCA’s industrial operations are strategic to R2’s permit areas. Within and proximal to the permit areas, SAMCA provides a substantial amount of employment and has strong relationships with many levels of government and community members.


	- 16 -

Spain has recently liberalized its hydrocarbon extraction regime to allow fracking, which is crucial for successful exploitation of shale oil and gas. The Company acquired an extensive proprietary data base which covers all Spanish sedimentary basins. The data base led to Montero making application for eight exploration permits covering a total of approximately 1.3 million acres. Montero was the successful applicant for all eight permit applications and is now awaiting final awards in order to commence exploration operations.

Permit Applications

The Company has successfully applied for eight exploration permits in Spain, pending final approval. The description of each permit follows:

Galileo Permit – Basque Cantabrian Basin

The permit is located within northeastern Spain and has consists of 77,737.5 hectares (192,094 acres).

The term of the permit will be six years with the possibility of two three-year extensions. No royalties or ad valorum taxes on hydrocarbon production will be assessed by national, regional or local governments.

The Galileo permit is located within the Basque-Cantabrian Basin which constitutes the western extension of the Pyreanean folded belt. It is a Mesozoic-Cenozoic basin with the Tertiary Duero and Ebro basins to the south and the Paleozoic Asturian massif to the west. The Galileo permit is located approximately halfway between the onshore Ayoluengo oil field and the offshore Gaviota gas field.

During the Jurassic Era, the Basque-Cantabrian Basin was an intracratonic basin located in a subtropical epicontinental seaway with a depositional section up to 600 m in thickness. A published cross-section of the Jurassic section over the Galileo permit shows the gas shale zone of interest consisting of two formations which depositionally thin from south to north. The organic rich Castillo Pedrosa and Camino formations are also shown in the composite log of Well Espinosa CB-1, which is located just to the south of the Galileo permit and shows a 105 metre organic rich marly zone between the depths of 2,795 metres and 2,900 metres with two reported mud gas shows.

Copernico and Kepler Permits – Central Ebro Basin

Land

These Copernico and Kepler permits are located within the autonomous community of Aragon in Northeastern Spain. Each permit has an area of 64,210 hectares (158,666 acres).

The term of the permits is six years with the possibility of two three-year extensions. No royalties or ad valorum taxes on hydrocarbon production will be assessed by national, regional or local governments.

The Ebro Basin is a Cenozoic basin in northeastern Spain, triangular in shape, and located between the Iberian Ranges to the south, the Pyrenees mountains to the north and the Catalonian coastal ranges to the east. The basin evolution is mainly linked to the development of the Pyrenean orogeny and represents the southern foreland basin of the Pyrenees Mountains.


	- 17 -

As well as Cenozoic intermontane deposits, the basin is underlain by a Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimentary section. Only one well in the basin has penetrated a significant Paleozoic sedimentary section, Ballobar 1. In this well, the Cenozoic section is 3,590 feet in thickness, the Mesozoic section is 6850 feet in thickness and the well penetrated 875 feet of Paleozoic section consisting of a Devonian-Silurian interval before reached total depth within a Silurian shale interval. The Company considers the Devonian-Silurian section to be the most prospective interval for potential shale gas production on these permits. The Devonian section is also prospective for shale gas on the permits, and Well Ballobar 1 fully penetrated the Devonian section at that location which included a 990 feet shale section at the top of the interval.

Platon, Aristoteles, Pitagoras and Arquimedes Permits - Maestrazgo Basin

Land

The Platon, Aristoteles, Pitagoras and Arquimedes permits are located in the Maestrazgo Basin of eastern Spain. The Platon permit is located within the Autonomous Community of Aragon while the other three permits are located within the autonomous community of Valencia. The Platon permit has an area of 55,412 hectares (136,925 acres), the Aristoteles permit an area of 42,374 hectares (104,707 acres), the Pitagoras permit an area of 58,671 hectares (144,979 acres), and the Arquimedes permit an area of 94,525 hectares (233,576 acres).

The term of the permits will be six years with the possibility of two three-year extensions. No royalties or ad valorum taxes on hydrocarbon production will be assessed by national, regional or local governments.

These four permits are located in the southern portion of the Iberian Ranges of central Spain. They cover much of the Maestrazgo Basin, which is a Mesozoic basin that commenced as a Triassic depocentre and referred to as the Maestrat Depocentre. A major marine transgression occurred took place during the Jurassic resulting in carbonate deposition. Tertiary convergence brought about the inversion of the Iberian Ranges into an uplifted area as presently seen.

To the north of the Maestrazgo Basin is the Castelotte Fold Zone, to the south is the Ateca-Castellon Fault Zone and to the east is the Coastal Fault Zone. Just 22 kilometres offshore of the Arquimedes permit is the now abandoned Amposta oil field which produced 56 million barrels of oil from 1973 to 1989 from a karsitic Lower Cretaceous limestone reservoir. Source rock for the field is considered to be a Jurassic marine marly unit. This field has recently been re-established as the Castor underground gas storage reservoir.

The gross thickness of the Triassic gas shale zone on the westernmost Platon permit averages approximately 600 feet, based on the two wells drilled on the permit. For the adjoining Aristotles permit to the east, the average thickness of the Triassic gas shale zone is slightly thinner at 585 feet. The gross thickness of the Jurassic gas shale zone on the easternmost Arquimedes permit averages approximately 360 feet based on the two wells drilled on the permit. For the adjoining Pitagoras permit to the west, the zone appears to becoming gradually more calcareous based on wells to the west.


	- 18 -

Edison Permit – North Almazon Basin

The Edison permit is located within the autonomous community of Castile and Leon in Northern Spain. The permit has an area of 77,052 hectares (190,400 acres).

The permit is located on the northern edge of the Almazon Basin, a Tertiary Basin located within the Iberian Ranges of Central Spain. The Company has identified two potential shale gas zones in the Carboniferous and Jurassic section within the permit.

There are Carboniferous outcrops throughout the Iberian Ranges. The target zone is the La Hoz Formation, a thick marine shale section interbedded with hemipelagic limestones and thin sandstones beds. This formation represents sediments prograding northwards into a deep marine basin. At the base of well EI Gredal 1, located to the south of the permit, a fissile organic rich shale unit was penetrated and is interpreted to be Carboniferous.

The potential shale reservoir zone in this interval is the Turmiel Formation, a widespread marly shale that was deposited on an open relatively deep platform. In well Castelfrio 1 located on the Edison permit, a thick organic rich marly shale can be identified on the lithology log. Through this interval, samples are described as black, carbonaceous and pyritic.

Mexico

Mexico is currently the 10^th largest producer of oil in the world. In 1938, the government expropriated all foreign owned petroleum land and assets and nationalized all exploration and production under the national oil company, PEMEX. Mexican law barred foreign companies from participating in the Mexican industry. In response to a need for increased investment and modernizing the industry, Mexico instituted industry reforms in 2014 which will allow direct foreign investment in the Mexican oil and gas industry for the first time in 76 years. The first round of bidding for both exploration and production blocks is commencing in the first half of 2015. This round is expected to be the first of a total of five bidding rounds over a three-year period.

The Company conducts business in Mexico through its 100% owned subsidiary Renaissance Oil Corp. S.A. de C.V. The Company intends to participate in the bidding for these exploration and production blocks through technical and logistical support from Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (“Halliburton”). The Company has completed a consulting agreement with Halliburton where Halliburton will provide assistance to the Company to complete a comprehensive evaluation for feasibility and profitability of mature fields, bypassed discoveries, and shale prospects in Mexico. This arrangement adds significant depth to the Company’s technical team and includes petrophysical, geological, geophysical and geochemical analysis, as well as petroleum engineering and project management.

Mineral Property

Fame Property

The Fame Property is an exploration stage property located in British Columbia, Canada and covers approximately 3,200 hectares. The Company currently has a 100% interest in the property.


	- 19 -

The project is at the exploration stage and currently does not contain proven mineral reserves.

How Acquired

Under an option agreement dated September 27, 2010 between the Company, Richard Billingsley and Dwayne Kress, the Company agreed to acquire an undivided interest in 11 contiguous mineral claims from Billingsley and Kress known as the “Fame property”. Consideration to acquire a 100% interest was $40,000 cash and the issuance of 50,000 common shares (adjusted for the 1 new for 2 old common share consolidation). The Company fulfilled the terms of the agreement and has received 100% interest in the property.

The title to the mineral claims have been transferred to the Company from a Director of the Company, who had been holding the claims in-trust and on behalf of the Company. Currently, the Company’s exploration expenditures made on the Fame property have the Company’s claims in good standing with no additional work commitments or payments until June 2021.

Location and Access

The property is located in central British Columbia approximately 55 kilometers south-southwest of the community of Riske Creek and approximately 80 kilometers southwest of the community of Williams Lake. Access to the property is from Highway 20 at Riske Creek through a network of logging roads, or by a secondary road from Highway 97 through Clinton and Gang Ranch. Services and labor are available in Clinton and Williams Lake. Power and water are not available on the property, but the property does lie in a historic mining district with other historic and currently permitted projects.

Exploration History

After optioning the property in 2010, the Company contracted Aeroquest Airborne of Mississauga, Ontario to conduct a helicopter-borne magnetic and TEM survey over the property. In November 2010, 405 kilometers of lines were flown, covering an area of approximately 3200 hectares. The results of the survey were used to identify specific targets for the Company’s exploration programs.

During fiscal 2012, the Company’s completed a comprehensive soil geochemical program on the Fame property. A total of 4417 soil samples were collected on a grid at a spacing of 100 meters by 50 meters, covering an area of approximately 2180 hectares and including all known showings. The program was managed on site by the Company’s then President and CEO, Christopher Dyakowski. The program was successful in delineating anomalies over known gold occurrences as well as discovering several new significant anomalies over previously unexplored areas. A total of 12 kilometers of strike length of potential mineral bearing structures have been identified. Several new targets were identified for specific interest for additional exploration. In addition, an electromagnetic Beep Map survey was performed over the north part of the Discovery Zone and the Double Diamond showing. The electromagnetic survey and sampling program was performed by a third party contractor. All sample locations were mapped and location observations were recorded. Samples were collected and bagged before being sent to Acme Labs in Vancouver, B.C. for Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis. Acme inserted standards and blanks in the sample sequence, and prepared pulp duplicates in the lab.


	- 20 -

Exploration Recommendations

Based on the results of the 2011 and 2012 exploration programs, a program of additional exploration has been recommended. This work is expected to include geophysical surveys to penetrate the pervasive thick glacial cover and post mineral Miocene basalt which has made exploration on the property difficult. This work may include a 3D IP survey that could identify zones of silicification as well as pyrite in clay alteration zones related to epithermal gold mineralization. An IP survey of roughly 50km of 100 meter spaced lines to cover an area of 468 hectares is proposed at an estimated cost of $200,000. The Company is seeking farm-out arrangements on the property to fund additional exploration on the property.

Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

Overview

The Company's financial statements are stated in Canadian Dollars (CDN$) and are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the IASB.

On September 3, 2014, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of R2 Energy Ltd. in exchange for common shares of the Company. Accordingly, for accounting purposes, R2 is the parent company (legal subsidiary) and Renaissance is the subsidiary (legal parent) in the financial statements. R2 was deemed to be the acquirer for accounting purposes, its assets, liabilities and operations since incorporation are included in the financial statements at their historical carrying value. Renaissance’s results of operations have been included from September 3, 2014 onward.

The value of the U.S. Dollar in relationship to the Canadian Dollar was $1.27 on March 31, 2015.

The Company has since inception primarily financed its activities through the issuance of equity. The Company anticipates having to raise additional funds by equity issuance in the next several years, as the Company is at the exploration stage. The timing of such offerings is dependent upon the success of the Company’s exploration programs as well as the general economic climate.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2014 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2013

During the year, the Company completed the acquisition of R2 Energy Ltd. and changed its name to Renaissance Oil Corp. Through the acquisition of R2, the Company entered the energy industry with the pending final grant of permits in Spain and an agreement with Halliburton to evaluate and bid on concessions in Mexico.


	- 21 -

The net and comprehensive loss for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 was ($1,984,246), or ($0.06) per share, compared to a net and comprehensive loss of ($1,287,552), or ($0.06) per share, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. In the current year, expenses totaled $2,148.043, an increase of $760,371 from the expenses of $1,387,672 recorded in fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Advisory and Consulting Fees rose to $979,258 from $888,890 due to the higher level of operating activity in the current year. Professional Fees increased to $738,903 from $257,643 due to legal fees and auditing fees related to the RTO of R2 Energy. Share-based compensation rose to $251,313 from $110,549 as additional share purchase options were granted in the current year. Marketing and travel rose to $100,089 from $67,118 and general and administrative decreased to $54,614 from $61,496. Regulatory and filing totaled $22,119 compared to $Nil in the prior year, with the amounts related to the RTO. Depreciation fell slightly to $1,747 from $1,976.

Other items included a gain on loss of control of subsidiary of $214,599. This gain was a result of a reduction of the Company’s interest in Montero from 100% to 60% as Grupo SAMCA (“SAMCA”) subscribed for shares representing 60% of the shares of Montero for Eur 1,100,000 (approximately US $1.5 million). Equity loss on investment in associate was $94,414 which was the Company’s 40% share of Montero’s loss during the year. Finance income was $15,680 compared to $840 as the Company had higher cash balances during the year. Foreign exchange gain declined to $27,932 from $99,280 due to less favorable exchange rates during the current year.

Year Ended December 31, 2013 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2012

During the year, the Company evaluated oil and gas prospects in Spain.

The net and comprehensive loss for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 was ($1,287,552), or ($0.06) per share, compared to a net and comprehensive loss of ($1,921,231), or ($0.13) per share, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. In the current year, expenses totaled $1,387,672, a decrease of $520,225 from the expenses of $1,907,897 recorded in fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. Many expenses were higher in fiscal 2012 due to the commencement of operations by R2 Energy. Professional fees declined to $257,643 from $889,268 and advisory and consulting rose to $888,890 from $476,754. Share-based compensation was $110,549 compared to $Nil in fiscal 2012 as stock options were granted for the first time in fiscal 2013. Marketing and travel declined to $67,118 from $201,564, licenses and permits fell to $Nil from $250,443 as expenses were higher in 2012 due to the establishment of operations in Spain and Mexico. General and administrative declined to $61,496 from $70,889 and marketing fell to $Nil from $14,183. Equipment rental was $Nil in fiscal 2013 compared to $3,054 in fiscal 2012, and depreciation rose slightly to $1,976 from $1,742. Other items included finance income of $840 compared to $623 in prior year. Foreign exchange gain was $99,280 compared to a loss of $13,957 in fiscal 2012 due to more favorable exchange rates during fiscal 2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s working capital position at December 31, 2014 was $3,772,194, including cash of $4,168,687. The Company estimates it will spend approximately $3,700,000 on property exploration and general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2015. The current working capital is sufficient to meet its anticipated obligations for the remainder of Fiscal 2015. However, the Company will likely require additional funds to meet its anticipated obligations in future periods and if it is successful in obtaining land concessions in Mexico.


	- 22 -

The Company has financed its operations through the issuance of common shares. The following sales and issuances of common stock have been completed since inception, adjusted for the 1 new for 2 old common share consolidation effective September 16, 2014. The Company changed its fiscal year-end from March 31 to December 31 upon the completion of the RTO in September 2014.

Table No. 3

Common Share Issuances


Fiscal Period	Type of Share Issuance	Number of Common Shares Issued	Price	Gross Proceeds or Deemed Value

Period from inception	Private placement flow-through shares	612,500	$ 0.02	$ 12,250
on June 9, 2010 to	Private placement flow-through shares	700,000	0.10	70,000
March 31, 2011	Private placement flow-through shares	362,500	0.20	72,500
	Private placement common shares	200,000	0.10	20,000
	Private placement common shares	787,500	0.20	157,500

Fiscal Year 2012	Initial Public Offering	1,978,750	$ 0.40	$ 791,500
	Corporate finance fee	50,000	0.40	20,000
	Mineral property acquisition	50,000	0.40	20,000

Fiscal Year 2013	No issuances

Fiscal Year 2014	Private placement common shares	19,166,666	$ 0.30	5,750,000
	Finders fees	171,333	$ 0.30	51,400
	Shares issued in settlement of accounts payable	1,124,666	$ 0.30	337,400
	**Issued to R2 shareholders	21,949,554	-	-


**R2 Common Share Issuances	Private placement common shares	200	$1.00	200
	Private placement common shares	10,000,000	$ 0.10	1,000,041
	Private placement common shares	3,469,354	$ 0.25	867,339
	Private placement common shares	8,000,000	$ 0.23	1,865,600
	Share issue costs	480,000	-	-

Year Ended December 31, 2014

At the end of the fiscal year, the Company's working capital was $3,772,194 compared to negative working capital of ($202,817) as of December 31, 2013. The higher level of working capital was primarily due to the completion of a private placement for gross proceeds of $5,750,000 during the current year.

Operating activities used cash of ($1,560,189), which included the net loss for the year of ($1,984,246). Adjustments for items not involving cash included depreciation of $1,747, share-based compensation from the grant of incentive stock options of $251,313, loss on investment of associate related to the Company’s share of Montero’s annual loss of $94,414, and gain on control of subsidiary of ($214,599) from the Company’s sale of a 60% interest in Montero to SAMCA. Changes in non-cash working capital items include an increase in accounts receivable of ($48,674), an increase in prepaid expenses of ($18,025), and an increase in trade and other payables of $357,881.


	- 23 -

Investing activities provided cash of $3,793. Disposition of cash on loss of control of subsidiary was ($11,192), acquisition of cash from the reverse takeover transaction was $18,557, and purchase of equipment used cash of ($3,572).

Financing activities provided cash of $5,550,711. Issuance of common shares provided cash of $5,750,000, and share issue costs used cash of ($199,289). Effect of exchange rate changes on cash was ($17,188).

Cash and cash equivalents totaled $4,168,687 as of December 31, 2014, compared to cash and cash equivalents of $191,560 as of December 31, 2013, an increase of $3,977,127. During the year, the Company issued a total of 42,412,219 common shares. 21,949,554 common shares were issued to R2 shareholders pursuant to the RTO; 1,124,666 common shares were issued for the settlement of accounts payable; 19,166,666 common shares were issued pursuant to a private placement of common share units, with each unit consisting of one common share and common share purchase warrant at a price of $0.30 per unit. Each warrant is exercisable into one additional common share at a price of $0.50 until July 31, 2019. 171,333 common shares were issued as finders fees related to the private placement of common share units during the year.

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013

At the end of the fiscal year, the Company had negative working capital of ($202,817) compared to positive working capital of $745,044 as of December 31, 2012.

During the year, Operating Activities used cash of ($951,237), including the loss for the year of ($1,287,552). Items not affecting cash consisted of depreciation of $1,976, share-based compensation related to the grant of incentive stock options of $110,549, and unrealized foreign exchange loss of ($96,917). A decrease in accounts receivable provided cash of $26,412, and an increase in trade and other payables provided cash of $294,295.

Investing Activities provided cash of $303,741, with the entire amount due to changes in restricted cash balances. There were no Financing Activities during the year as no common shares were issued. Effect of exchange rate changes on cash was $19,385.

Cash and cash equivalents totaled $191,560 at December 31, 2013 compared to cash and cash equivalents of $819,671 as of December 31, 2012, a decrease of ($628,111).

Significant Accounting Policies

The Company prepares its annual consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”). These consolidated financial statements were approved by the board of directors of the Company on April 29, 2015.

Basis of measurement

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis except for certain financial instruments that have been measured at fair value. In addition, these consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting, except for cash flow information.


	- 24 -

Significant accounting judgments and estimates

Estimates and assumptions are continuously evaluated and are based on management’s experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual outcomes can differ from these estimates.

Critical Judgments

Going Concern

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments regarding the going concern assumption for the Company as discussed in Note 1.

Reverse Takeover

As disclosed in Note 4, San Antonio completed a RTO of R2 Energy in the year. The RTO requires management to make judgements regarding the accounting acquirer and accounting acquiree.

Investment in Associate

As disclosed in Note 6, the Company disposed of its controlling interest in Montero Energy Corporation S.L. (“Montero”). This disposition requires management to make judgement regarding whether the Company retains significant influence in Montero.

Impairment Indicators

The estimate of the recoverable amounts of the Company’s long lived assets, including its investment in Montero and its exploration and evaluation assets requires estimates of the amounts and timing of future cash flows as well as the discount rate applicable to these cash flows. Changes in the amounts or timing of these cash flows would impact the recoverable amounts of the Company’s investment in Montero and its exploration and evaluation assets. The estimate of the recoverable amount of the Company’s investment in long lived assets, including its investment in Montero and its exploration and evaluation assets requires estimates of the amount and timing of future cash flows as well as the discount rate applicable to these cash flows. Changes in the amount or timing of these cash flows would impact the recoverable amounts of the Company’s investment in Montero and its exploration and evaluation assets.

Key Sources of Estimation Uncertainty

Because a precise determination of many assets and liabilities is dependent upon future events, the preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences could be significant. Significant estimates made by management affecting our consolidated financial statements include:


	- 25 -

Deferred Tax Assets & Liabilities

The estimation of income taxes includes evaluating the recoverability of deferred tax assets based on an assessment of the Company’s ability to utilize the underlying future tax deductions against future taxable income prior to expiry of those deductions. Management assesses whether it is probable that some or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income, which in turn is dependent upon the successful discovery, extraction, development and commercialization of oil and gas reserves. To the extent that management’s assessment of the Company’s ability to utilize future tax deductions changes, the Company would be required to recognize more or fewer deferred tax assets, and future income tax provisions or recoveries could be affected. The measurement of deferred income tax provision is subject to uncertainty associated with the timing of future events and changes in legislation, tax rates and interpretations by tax authorities.

The principal accounting policies used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are described below:

Principles of consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, R2 and Renaissance Oil Corp. SA de CV. As R2 was deemed to be the acquirer for accounting purposes, its assets, liabilities and operations since incorporation are included in these consolidated financial statements at their historical carrying value. San Antonio’s results of operations have been included from September 3, 2014.

All intercompany balances, transactions, revenues and expenses have been eliminated on consolidation.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes deposits held with banks that are available on demand and highly liquid, short-term investments that are cashable on demand.

Equipment

Equipment is recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation begins when the asset is put into service and is calculated annually using the straight line method over 3 years. The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to expense as incurred. The cost of significant renewals and improvements is added to the carrying amount of the respective asset. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the statement of loss and comprehensive loss.


	- 26 -

Exploration and Evaluation Assets

At each reporting date the carrying amounts of the Company’s exploration and evaluation assets are reviewed to determine whether there is any indication that those assets are impaired. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment, if any. The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. If the recoverable amount of an asset is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its recoverable amount and the impairment loss is recognized in profit or loss for the period.

For the purposes of impairment testing, exploration and evaluation assets are allocated to cash generating units to which the exploration activity relates. Each of the Company’s properties is considered to be a separate cash generating unit. Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but only to the extent that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset (or cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognized immediately in profit or loss.

Financial Instruments

Financial instruments are classified into one of the following categories: fair-value-through-profit-and-loss, held-to-maturity investments, loans and receivables, available-for-sale financial assets, or other financial liabilities. Financial instruments are measured in the statement of financial position at fair value, except for loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, and other financial liabilities, which are measured at amortized cost. Subsequent measurement of financial instruments measured at fair value is dependent upon initial classification as follows: (1) fair-value-through-profit-and-loss financial assets are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income (loss); (2) available-for-sale financial instruments are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in other comprehensive income until the instrument is derecognized or impaired.

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and trade and other payables. Cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable are classified as loans and receivables. Trade and other payables are classified as other financial liabilities.


	- 27 -

Loss per Share

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution of common share equivalents, such as outstanding share options and warrants, in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, if dilutive. For this purpose, the “treasury stock method” is used which assumes proceeds upon the exercise of share options and warrants are used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense is comprised of current and deferred tax. Current tax and deferred tax are recognized in net income or loss except to the extent that it relates to a business combination or items recognized directly in equity or in other comprehensive income or loss. Current income taxes are recognized for the estimated income taxes payable or receivable on taxable income or loss for the current year and any adjustment to income taxes payable in respect of previous years.

Current income taxes are determined using tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the year-end date.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized where the carrying amount of an asset or liability differs from its tax base, except for taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill and temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction which is not a business combination and at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss. Recognition of deferred tax assets for unused tax losses, tax credits and deductible temporary differences is restricted to those instances where it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the deferred tax asset can be utilized. At the end of each reporting period the Company reassesses unrecognized deferred tax assets. The Company recognizes a previously unrecognized deferred tax asset to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.

Share Capital

Common shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of common shares are recognized as a deduction from equity.

Foreign Exchange

The Company’s functional and reporting currency is the Canadian dollar. Transactions denominated in other currencies are translated into their Canadian dollar equivalents at exchange rates prevailing at the transaction date. Carrying values of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are adjusted at each statement of financial position date to reflect exchange rates prevailing at that date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at historical exchange rates. Gains and losses on translation are included in determining net loss for the year.


	- 28 -

Investments in Associates

When the Company determines that it has significant influence over an investment, the investment is accounted for using the equity method. Under the equity method, the investment is initially recorded at cost and the carrying value is adjusted thereafter to include the Company’s pro rata share of post-acquisition earnings or loss of the investee. The amount of the adjustment is included in the determination of net earnings (loss) and the investment account is also increased or decreased to reflect the Company’s share of capital transactions. Profit distributions received or receivable from an investee reduce the carrying value of the investment.

The Company periodically assesses its investments to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. When there is an indication of impairment, the Company tests the carrying amount of the investment to ensure it does not exceed the higher of the present value of cash flows expected to be generated (value in use) and the amount that could be realized by selling the investment (fair value less cost to sell). When a reduction to the carrying amount of an investment is required after applying the impairment test, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the amount of the reduction.

Newly Adopted Accounting Policies

IFRIC 21

IFRIC 21 "Levies is applicable to all levies imposed by governments under legislation, other than outflows that are within the scope of other standards (e.g., International Accounting Standard (“IAS”) 12 "Income Taxes") and fines or other penalties for breaches of legislation. The interpretation clarifies that an entity recognizes a liability for a levy when the activity that triggers payment, as identified by the relevant legislation, occurs. It also clarifies that a levy liability is accrued progressively only if the activity that triggers payment occurs over a period of time, in accordance with the relevant legislation. Lastly, the interpretation clarifies that a liability should not be recognized before the specified minimum threshold to trigger that levy is reached. The adoption of this interpretation on January 1, 2014 did not have a material impact on these consolidated financial statements.

Future Accounting Standards and Amendments Effective After December 31, 2014

Financial instruments

The IASB intends to replace IAS 39 – Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement in its entirety with IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments (“IFRS 9”) which will be effective for annual periods commencing on or after January 1, 2018. IFRS 9 is intended to reduce the complexity for the classification and measurement of financial instruments. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the final standard is expected to have on its consolidated financial statements.

Revenue

The IASB issued IFRS 15 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers", which replaces IAS 18 "Revenue", IAS 11 "Construction Contracts", and related interpretations. The standard is required to be adopted either retrospectively or using a modified transition approach for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2017, with earlier adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.


	- 29 -

Amendments

In addition, the IASB issued amendments to the following standards in May 2014: IFRS 11 – Accounting for acquisitions of interests in joint operations, IAS 16 – Property, plant and equipment, and IAS 38 – Clarification of acceptable methods of depreciation and amortization amendments. These amendments are effective for financial periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016. The Company is evaluating the impact of these amendments on its consolidated financial statements and they are not expected to have any material impact.

Variation in Operating Results

Management periodically, through the exploration process, reviews results both internally and externally through mining related professionals. Decisions to abandon, reduce or expand exploration efforts is based upon many factors including general and specific assessments of exploration properties, the likelihood of the discovery of economic resources, land costs, estimates of future resource prices, potential extraction methods and costs, the likelihood of positive or negative changes to the environment, permitting, taxation, labor and capital costs. There cannot be a pre-determined hold period for any property as geological or economic circumstances render each property unique.

The Company's financial statements are stated in Canadian Dollars (CDN$) and are prepared in accordance with IFRS. The value of the Canadian Dollar in relationship to the US Dollar was $1.27 on March 31, 2015.

Research and Development

The Company conducts no research and development activities, nor is it dependent upon any patents or licenses.

Trend Information

The Company knows of no trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on the Company’s operations or financial condition.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

The Company currently has no contractual obligations. The Company currently rents office space from Craig Steinke, CEO, on a verbal agreement on a month-to-month basis at a cost of $1,000 per month.

Safe Harbor

Not Applicable


	- 30 -

Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees

Table No. 4 lists as of March 31, 2015 the names of the Directors of the Company. The Directors have served in their respective capacities since their election and/or appointment and will serve until the next Annual General Meeting or until a successor is duly elected, unless the office is vacated in accordance with the Articles/By-Laws of the Company. All Directors are citizens and residents of Canada except Craig Steinke, who is a resident of Washington State. Each director was re-elected to the Board at the meeting of shareholders held on September 12, 2014.

Table No. 4

Directors


Name	Age	Date First Elected/Appointed
Craig Steinke	57	September 3, 2014
Ian Telfer (1) (2)	69	September 3, 2014
Gordon Keep (1) (2)	58	September 3, 2014
Christopher Dyakowski (1) (2)	63	June 10, 2010

(1) Member of Audit Committee.
(2) Member of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Members of the Audit Committee meet periodically to approve and discuss the annual financial statements and each quarterly report before filing and mailing. The committee operates under a written charter as included in the Company's Management Information Circular dated August 12, 2014. Details of the charter are contained in Item 6, “Board Practices” below.

Table No. 5 lists, as of March 31, 2015, the names of the Executive Officers of the Company. The Executive Officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. All Executive Officers are citizens and residents of Canada except Craig Steinke, who is a resident of Washington State.

Table No. 5

Executive Officers


Name	Position	Age	Date of Appointment
Craig Steinke	Chief Executive Officer	57	September 3, 2014
Jeremy Crichton	Chief Financial Officer	33	September 3, 2014
Carmen Etchart	Corporate Secretary	48	September 3, 2014


	- 31 -

Craig Steinke was the co-founder, Chief Executive Officer and director of R2 Energy Ltd. and became CEO and a Director of the Company upon the completion of the RTO with R2 Energy. He has over 20 years of experience in the global oil and gas industry, specializing in property acquisitions and resource development. During his career, Mr. Steinke has contributed to the acquisition, development and financing of over 25 million acres of domestic and international petroleum and natural gas rights. Mr. Steinke has also initiated and developed several unconventional resource companies, with a focus on shale gas. Most recently, Mr. Steinke was Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Realm Energy International Corporation, a Canadian energy company focused on exploration and development of shale plays in Europe and emerging markets. Mr. Steinke is educated in Petroleum Land Management and received certification with the CWC School of Energy (London, England) in World Fiscal Systems for Oil and Gas. He is also a member of the Association of International Petroleum Negotiators, an organization that enhances the professionalism of cross-border energy negotiators worldwide. Mr. Steinke spends approximately 100% of his time on the Company’s business.

Jeremy Crichton has served as Chief Financial Officer of the Company since the completion of the RTO with R2 Energy. Mr. Crichton is a Chartered Accountant and holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Victoria. He is Vice President of Fiore Management & Advisory Corp., a private financial advisory firm and previously worked in the audit practice of Deloitte and Touche LLP. He has extensive experience in senior financial capacities with natural resource companies. He currently serves as Chief Financial Officer of several junior natural resource companies, including Klondike Gold Corp., Rusoro Mining Ltd. and Uracan Resources Ltd., which are all mineral exploration companies traded on the TSX Venture Exchange. He spends approximately 30% of his time on the Company’s business.

Carmen Etchart has served as Corporate Secretary of the Company since the completion of the RTO with R2 Energy. She has over 20 years of experience in senior administration and foreign relations, with a strong background in project and event coordination and execution. During this time, she has gained valuable skills from working in a variety of industries in Canada and internationally. In the last eight years, Ms. Etchart has served as Corporate Secretary for several publicly traded North American junior oil and gas exploration companies; the most recent being Realm Energy International Corporation, from its inception to its merger with San Leon Energy PLC in November 2011. Since March 2004, she has also been serving as Office Manager for Reconnaissance Energy Corporation. She spends approximately 90% of her time on the Company’s business.

Ian W. Telfer has over 25 years of experience in the mining industry, with a focus on the precious metals sector. Mr. Telfer currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Goldcorp Inc., a gold production company traded on multiple stock exchanges worldwide, including the Toronto and New York Stock Exchanges. Mr. Telfer has also served as director and/or officer of several Canadian and International mining companies, including Uranium One Inc., New Gold Inc. and Peak Gold Ltd. Mr. Telfer is the former Chairman of the World Gold Council, an organization comprised of representatives from the world’s leading gold mining companies. Mr. Telfer has received special achievement awards from various organizations, including the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada, Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year, and the BC & Yukon Chamber of Mines. Mr. Telfer is a Chartered Accountant and holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Toronto and a Masters in Business Administration from the University of Ottawa. He spends approximately 10% of his time on the Company’s business.


	- 32 -

Gordon Keep is a Professional Geologist in the Province of British Columbia and holds a Bachelor of Science in Geological Sciences from Queen’s University and a Masters Business Administration from the University of British Columbia. Mr. Keep has extensive business experience in investment banking and creating publically traded natural resource companies. Mr. Keep is the Chief Executive Officer of Fiore Management & Advisory Corp., a financial advisory firm. Mr. Keep also currently serves as director and/or officer for several junior mining and junior oil and gas companies, including Klondike Gold Corp. Oceanic Iron Ore Corp., Catalyst Copper Corp., Encanto Potash Corp. Rusoro Mining Ltd., and Uracan Resources Ltd., all of which are mineral exploration companies traded on the TSX Venture Exchange; Petromanas Energy Inc., an oil and gas exploration company traded on the TSX Venture Exchange; Peregrine Diamonds Ltd., a mineral exploration company traded on the TSX Exchange; and Eastern Platinum Limited, a mineral exploration company traded on the TSX and Johannesburg Stock Exchanges. He spends approximately 10% of his time on the Company’s business.

Christopher I. Dyakowski served as President, CEO and a Director of the Company from incorporation until the RTO with R2 Energy, whereupon he continues to serve as a Director. Mr. Dyakowski is a professional Geoscientist and holds a Bachelor of Science Degree (Geology) from the University of British Columbia which he obtained in 1975. He has been a member in good standing of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia since 1992. He is President of Max Investments, a private investment company. He is a past officer and director of several public reporting issuers in both Canada and the United States, and currently serves as a director of Noram Ventures, a mineral exploration company traded on the TSX Venture Exchange. He spends approximately 5% of his time on the Company’s business.

Gordon Keep was a director of Rusoro Mining Ltd. (“Rusoro”) on May 21, 2013 when the British Columbia Securities Commission (“BCSC”) issued a cease trade order against Rusoro for failure to file its audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 and related MD&A. On June 5, 2013 and June 7, 2013 respectively, similar cease trade orders were issued against Rusoro by the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) and the Authorite des Marches Financiers (“AMF”). On August 21, 2013, the BCSC, on August 28, 2013 the AMF and on September 4, 2013 the OSC, granted full revocations of the cease trade order issued by each of them. Rusoro was unable to file its December 31, 2012 financial statements and MD&A by the required filing deadline because it experienced significant delays in preparing them due to the nationalization by the Venezuelan government of Rusoro’s gold mining assets in Venezuela.

In September 2013, Ian Telfer entered into a settlement agreement with the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) with respect to allegations that he acted contrary to the public interest in connection with a share transaction in 2008. Mr. Telfer cooperated fully with the OSC staff and, pursuant to a settlement agreement, paid C$200,000 towards the costs of the investigation.

Other than the cease-trade orders and settlement agreement named above, no Director and/or Executive Officer has been the subject of any order, judgment, or decree of any governmental agency or administrator or of any court or competent jurisdiction, revoking or suspending for cause any license, permit or other authority of such person or of any corporation of which he or she is a Director and/or Executive Officer, to engage in the securities business or in the sale of a particular security or temporarily or permanently restraining or enjoining any such person or any corporation of which he or she is an officer or director from engaging in or continuing any conduct, practice, or employment in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, or convicting such person of any felony or misdemeanor involving a security or any aspect of the securities business or of theft or of any felony.


	- 33 -

There are no arrangements or understandings between any two or more Directors or Executive Officers, pursuant to which he or she was selected as a Director or Executive Officer.

COMPENSATION

The Company has no arrangements pursuant to which directors are compensated by the Company for their services in their capacity as directors, or for committee participation. There are no director’s service contracts providing for benefits upon termination of employment.

To assist the Company in compensating, attracting, retaining and motivating personnel, the Company grants incentive stock options under a formal Stock Option Plan which was approved by shareholders at the Annual General and Special General Meeting of shareholders held on September 12, 2014.

Table No. 6 sets forth the compensation paid to the Company’s executive officers and members of its administrative body during the last three fiscal years.

Table No. 6

Summary Compensation Table

All Figures in Canadian Dollars unless otherwise noted


Name	Fiscal Year	Salary	Options Granted	Other Compensation

Craig Steinke, CEO and Director (1)	2014	N/A	800,000	$ 182,155

Jeremy Crichton, Chief Financial Officer (2)	2014	N/A	250,000	$ 6,000

Carmen Etchart, Corporate Secretary (3)	2014	N/A	55,000	$ 91,000

Gordon Keep, Director (4)	2014	N/A	500,000	$ 40,000

Ian Telfer, Director	2014	N/A	500,000	Nil

Christopher Dyakowski, Director and former President and CEO (5)	2014 2013 2012	N/A N/A N/A	250,000 Nil Nil	$ 24,000 60,000 100,388

Kenneth Phillippe, Former Chief Financial Officer (6)	2014 2013 2012	N/A N/A N/A	Nil Nil 100,000	$ 18,000 18,000 4,000


	- 34 -



Sandra Morton, Former Corporate Secretary		2014 2013 2012	N/A N/A N/A	Nil Nil Nil	Nil Nil Nil

Stephen Kenwood, Former Director		2014 2013 2012	N/A N/A N/A	Nil Nil Nil	Nil Nil Nil

Thomas Dyakowski, Former Director		2014	N/A	Nil	Nil

Leslie Fowler Former Chief Financial Officer (7)		2012	N/A	Nil	$ 13,500

William Schmidt Former Director (8)		2013 2012	N/A N/A	Nil Nil	Nil $ 25,718

(1)	“Other Compensation” for Craig Steinke includes $12,505 in rent paid directly to Mr. Steinke and $169,650 in management fees paid to Reconnaissance Energy, a private company owned by Mr.Steinke.
(2)	“Other Compensation” for Jeremy Crichton is for management fees.
(3)	“Other Compensation” for Carmen Etchart includes $90,000 in management fees and $1,000 bonus.
(4)	“Other Compensation” for Gordon Keep is for consulting fees paid to Fiore Management & Advisory Corp., a private company which Gordon Keep is an officer.
(5)	“Other Compensation” for Christopher Dyakowski includes $24,000 (2013 - $60,000; 2012 - $60,000) for management fees paid to Max Investments, a private company owned by Mr. Dyakowski; $Nil (2013 - $Nil; 2012 - $36,788) to Max Investments for project management and overhead fees for mineral exploration services; $Nil (2013 - $Nil; 2012 - $3,600) for fieldwork and equipment rental. Mr. Dyakowski’s management contract terminated on August 31, 2014.
(6)	"Other Compensation" for Kenneth Phillippe is for accounting services.
(7)	“Other Compensation” for Leslie Fowler is for management and accounting services. Mr. Fowler passed away on January 3, 2012.
(8)	“Other Compensation” for William Schmidt is for payments for legal services paid to a law firm in which Mr. Schmidt was a partner. Mr. Schmidt passed away on August 14, 2013.

No funds were set aside or accrued by the Company during Fiscal 2014 to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for Directors or Executive Officers.

Board Practices

The Board of Directors’ mandate is to manage or supervise the management of the business and affairs of the Company and to act with a view to the best interests of the Company. The Company’s corporate governance practices are the responsibility of the Board.


	- 35 -

Management has been delegated the responsibility for meeting defined corporate objectives, implementing approved strategic and operating plans, carrying out the Company's business in the ordinary course, evaluating business opportunities, recruiting staff and complying with applicable regulatory requirements. The Board facilitates its independent supervision over management by reviewing and approving long-term strategic, business and capital plans, material contracts and business transactions, all debt and equity financing transactions. Through its Audit Committee, the Board examines the effectiveness of the Company's internal control processes. The Board reviews and sets executive compensation and recommends incentive stock options.

The Board facilitates its exercise of independent supervision over management by ensuring that a majority of its members are independent of the Company. Directors are considered to be independent if they have no direct or indirect material relationship with the Company. A "material relationship" is a relationship which could, in the view of the Company's Board, be reasonably expected to interfere with the exercise of a director's independent judgment. Upon the completion of the RTO with R2 Energy, Gordon Keep and Ian Telfer were named to the Company’s Board as Independent Directors.

The Board considers its size each year when it considers the number of directors to recommend to the shareholders for elections at the annual meeting of shareholders, taking into account the number required to carry out the Board's duties effectively and to maintain a diversity of views and experience. At the Annual General and Special General Meeting of shareholders held on September 12, 2014, shareholders approved the resolution to determine the number of Board members at 4. When new directors are appointed, they receive orientation on the Company's business, current projects and the industry. Board meetings may also include presentations by the Company's management and employees to give the directors additional insight into the Company's business.

The Board has found that the fiduciary duties placed on individual directors by the Company's governing corporate legislation and the common law and the restrictions placed by applicable corporate legislation on an individual directors' participation in decisions of the Board in which the director has an interest have been sufficient to ensure that the Board operates independently of management and in the best interests of the Company.

Audit and Finance Committee

The Company's Audit and Finance Committee operates under a written charter which is reviewed by the Board of Directors on an annual basis. A copy of the current Audit Committee Charter was included in the Company’s Management Information Circular dated August 12, 2014 which has been included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 6-K which was filed on August 27, 2014.

The Audit and Finance Committee’s primary functions are to assist the Board of Directors (the "Board") in fulfilling its financial oversight responsibilities with respect to financial reporting and disclosure requirements; ensure that an effective risk management and financial control framework has been implemented by management of the Company; and be responsible for external and internal audit processes.


	- 36 -

Composition

The Audit and Finance Committee shall be composed of a minimum of three members of the Board of Directors, a majority of whom are independent. All members of the Audit and Finance Committee shall be generally knowledgeable in financial and auditing matters, especially possessing the ability to read and understand fundamental financial statements.

The Board shall appoint one member of the Committee as chair. The chair shall be responsible for leadership of the Committee, including reporting to the Board. The chair will also maintain regular liaison with the Company’s CEO, CFO and lead independent audit partner.

Role

The Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of the quality and integrity of the accounting, auditing, reporting practices, internal accounting and financial controls, the annual independent audit, and legal compliance and ethics programs as established by management, as well as any other related duties as directed by the Board.

Responsibilities

The Committee’s primary responsibilities include:

Overseeing the financial reporting process and reporting the results or findings of its oversight activities to the Board.

Having sole authority to appoint, retain and oversee the work of the independent auditor and establishing the compensation to be paid to the independent auditor. Renaissance’s independent auditor shall report directly to the Committee.

Establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls and/or auditing matters for the confidential, anonymous submission by the Company’s employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

Pre-approving all audit services and permissible non-audit services.

Overseeing the system to monitor and manage risk, and legal and ethical compliance programs, including the establishment and administration (including the grant of any waiver from) a written code of ethics applicable to each of the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions.

Authority

The Committee is granted the authority to investigate any matter brought to its attention, with full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of the Company. The Committee has the power to engage and determine funding for outside counsel or other experts or advisors as the Committee deems necessary for these purposes and as otherwise necessary or appropriate to carry out its duties. The Company shall provide appropriate funding, as determined by the Committee, for payment of compensation to any registered public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services and for any advisors employed by the Committee as well as for the payment of ordinary administrative expenses of the Committee that are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties.

The current Audit Committee members are Christopher Dyakowski, Ian Telfer (Independent), and Gordon Keep (Independent). The Committee met four times in Fiscal 2014.


	- 37 -

Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee

Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee considers the size of the Board of Directors each year when it considers the number of directors to recommend to the Board of Directors for director nominees. The criteria for selecting new directors shall reflect the requirements of the listing standards of the TSX Venture Exchange or such other exchange or self-regulatory organization on which the Company’s shares are listed for trading. The Committee considers various factors when evaluating potential candidates for the Board, including the appropriate size of the Board, the needs of the Company with respect to the talents and experience of candidates, and the ability and willingness of candidates to commit adequate time to the Board and any committees, among others.

Current members of the Nominating & Governance Committee are Christopher Dyakowski, Ian Telfer (Independent), and Gordon Keep (Independent). The Committee met four times in Fiscal 2014.

Staffing

The Company currently has no employees and 3 executive officers. Administrative functions are performed by the executive officers, and exploration and other field work is conducted by consultants as needed.

Share Ownership

Table No. 7 lists, as of March 31, 2015, Directors and Executive Officers who beneficially own the Registrant's voting securities and the amount of the Registrant's voting securities owned by the Directors and Executive Officers as a group.

Table No. 7

Shareholdings of Directors and Executive Officers


Title of Class	Name of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of Class

Common	Craig Steinke (1)	5,929,736	12.39%
Common	Jeremy Crichton (2)	216,667	0.46%
Common	Carmen Etchart (3)	351,666	0.74%
Common	Christopher Dyakowski (4)	295,667	0.62%
Common	Gordon Keep (5)	642,607	1.35%
Common	Ian Telfer (6)	9,973,945	20.35%

	Total Directors/Officers	17,410,288	34.52%


	- 38 -


(1)	Of these shares, 3,797,303 are common shares currently in escrow and will be released in stages over time pursuant to the terms of the Escrow Agreement. 166,666 are represented by currently exercisable share purchase warrants and 533,333 are currently exercisable share purchase options. An additional 266,667 options have been granted but not yet vested.
(2)	Of these shares, 166,667 are currently exercisable share purchase options. An additional 83,333 options have been granted but not yet vested.
(3)	Of these shares, 231,666 are currently exercisable share purchase options. An additional 18,334 options have been granted but not yet vested.
(4)	Of these shares, 166,667 are currently exercisable share purchase options. An additional 83,333 options have been granted but not yet vested.
(5)	Of these shares, 72,191 are common shares held by Fiore Management & Advisory Corp., a private company for which Mr. Keep serves as CEO and has control over the shares. 2,250 are common shares held by the Kinderdream Foundation, a charitable foundation over which Mr. Keep has control and direction. 333,333 are currently exercisable share purchase options held by Mr. Keep and 133,333 are currently exercisable share purchase options held by Fiore Management. An additional 166,667 options have been granted directly to Mr. Keep and 66,667 granted to Fiore Management but have not yet vested.
(6)	Of these shares, 4,950,075 are common shares currently in escrow and will be released in stages over time pursuant to the terms of the Escrow Agreement. 1,520,256 are represented by currently exercisable share purchase warrants and 333,333 are currently exercisable share purchase options. An additional 166,667 options have been granted but not yet vested.

Based upon 47,153,469 common shares outstanding as of March 31, 2015, share purchase warrants and Stock options held by each beneficial holder exercisable within sixty days as detailed in Table No. 11, “Stock Options Outstanding” below.

Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

The Registrant is a publicly owned Canadian corporation, the shares of which are owned by U.S. residents, Canadian residents and other foreign residents. The Registrant is not controlled by another corporation as described below. The Company's common shares are issued in registered form and the following information is taken from the records of Computershare Investor Services, 510 Burrard Street, 2nd Floor, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B9

On March 31, 2015 the shareholders' list for the Company's common shares showed 69 shareholders, including depositories, and 47,153,469 common shares issued and outstanding. Of the total shareholders, 35 are resident in Canada holding 36,116,088 common shares, or 77% of the total issued and outstanding common shares; 29 shareholders are resident in the United States holding 9,457,381 common shares, or 20% of the total issued and outstanding common shares; and 5 shareholders are resident in other nations holding 1,580,000 common shares, or 3% of the total issued and outstanding common shares.

The Company is aware of three persons/companies who beneficially own 5% or more of the Registrant's voting securities. Table No. 8 lists as of March 31, 2015, persons and/or companies holding 5% or more beneficial interest in the Company’s outstanding common stock.


	- 39 -

Table No. 8

5% or Greater Shareholders


Title of Class		Name of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of Class

Common		Casey Capital Strategies LLC (1)	10,000,000	19.55%
Common		Ian Telfer (2)	9,973,945	20.35%
Common		Craig Steinke (3)	5,929,736	12.39%

(1)	Of these shares. 4,000,000 are represented by currently exercisable share purchase warrants.
(2)	Of these shares, 4,950,075 are common shares currently in escrow and will be released in stages over time pursuant to the terms of the Escrow Agreement. 1,520,256 are represented by currently exercisable share purchase warrants and 333,333 are currently exercisable share purchase options. An additional 166,667 options have been granted but not yet vested.
(3)	Of these shares, 3,797,303 are common shares currently in escrow and will be released in stages over time pursuant to the terms of the Escrow Agreement. 166,666 are represented by currently exercisable share purchase warrants and 533,333 are currently exercisable share purchase options. An additional 266,667 options have been granted but not yet vested.

Based upon 47,153,469 common shares outstanding as of March 31, 2015, and any share purchase warrants and Stock options held by each beneficial holder exercisable within sixty days as detailed in Table No. 11, “Stock Options Outstanding” below.

No shareholders of the Company have different voting rights from any other shareholder.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In fiscal 2014 ended December 31, 2014, the Company paid $12,505 for rent to Craig Steinke, Chief Executive Officer, and paid $169,650 for management fees to Reconnaissance Energy, a private company owned by Craig Steinke.

In fiscal 2014, the Company paid $40,000 to Fiore Management & Advisory Corp. for consulting fees. Gordon Keep, Director, is an officer of Fiore.

In fiscal 2014, the Company paid $24,000 (fiscal 2013 - $60,000; fiscal 2012 - $60,000) to Max Investments, a private company owned by Christopher Dyakowski, former president and CEO, for management fees. In fiscal 2014, the Company paid Max Investments $Nil (fiscal 2013 - $Nil; fiscal 2012 - $36,788) for mineral exploration project management and overhead fees, and an additional $Nil (fiscal 2013 - $Nil; fiscal 2012 - $3,600) for fieldwork and equipment rental.

In fiscal 2014, the Company paid Kenneth Phillippe, former Chief Financial Officer, $18,000 (fiscal 2013 - $18,000; fiscal 2012 - $4,000) for accounting fees.

In fiscal 2014, the Company paid $Nil (fiscal 2013 - $Nil; fiscal 2012 - $13,500) to Leslie Fowler, former Chief Financial Officer, for accounting fees.

In fiscal 2014, the Company paid $Nil (fiscal 2013 - $Nil; fiscal 2012 - $39,589) to Hemsworth, Schmidt, a legal firm for which William Schmidt, former Director, was a partner.


	- 40 -

Item 8. Financial Information

The financial statements as required under ITEM #18 are attached hereto and found immediately following the text of this Annual Report. The Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Deloitte LLP, Chartered Accountants, is included herein immediately preceding the financial statements and schedules.

Current Legal Proceedings

The Company knows of no material, active or pending, legal proceedings against them; nor is the Company involved as a plaintiff in any other material proceeding or pending litigation. The Company knows of no other active or pending proceedings against anyone that might materially adversely affect an interest of the Company.

Dividends

The Company has not declared any dividends on its common shares since inceptions and does not anticipate that it will do so in the foreseeable future. The present policy of the Company is to retain future earnings, if any, for use in its operations and the expansion of its business.

Item 9. Offer and Listing of Securities

As of December 31, 2014, the end of the Company's most recent fiscal year, the authorized capital of the Company consisted of an unlimited number of common shares without par value and an unlimited number of preferred shares without par value. There were 47,153,469 common shares issued and outstanding and no preferred shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014.

NATURE OF TRADING MARKET

The Company's common shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. The Company began trading on the TSX Venture on November 3, 2011 under the symbol “SAN”. Upon completion of the RTO with R2 Energy, the Company changed its name to Renaissance and changed its trading symbol to “ROE” effective September 16, 2014. The CUSIP number is 75973C108. The Company's common shares are not registered to trade in the United States in the form of American Depository Receipts (ADR's) or similar certificates.

Table No. 9 lists the volume of trading and high, low and closing sale prices on the TSX Venture Exchange for the Company's common shares for:

each of the last six months ending March 31, 2015;

each of the last twelve fiscal quarters ending the three months ended March 31, 2015; and

each of the last three fiscal years ended December 31, 2014.

All share prices have been adjusted for a 1 new for 2 old share consolidation effective September 16, 2014.


	- 41 -

Table No. 9

TSX Venture Exchange

Common Shares Trading Activity


	- Sales-
	Canadian Dollars
Period	High	Low	Close

March 2015	$ 0.30	$ 0.24	$ 0.28
February 2015	0.34	0.21	0.28
January 2015	0.29	0.22	0.23
December 2014	0.32	0.22	0.28
November 2014	0.34	0.28	0.29
October 2014	0.48	0.29	0.29

Three Months Ended March 31, 2015	$ 0.34	$ 0.21	$ 0.28
Three Months Ended December 31, 2014	0.48	0.22	0.28
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014	0.74	0.32	0.47
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014	0.28	0.20	0.26

Three Months Ended March 31, 2014	$ 0.34	$ 0.20	$ 0.28
Three Months Ended December 31, 2013	0.40	0.12	0.20
Three Months Ended September 30, 2013	0.40	0.24	0.24
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013	0.50	0.22	0.30

Three Months Ended March 31, 2013	$ 0.60	$ 0.22	$ 0.33
Three Months Ended December 31, 2012	0.89	0.24	0.30
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012	0.32	0.20	0.20
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012	0.40	0.30	0.30

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2014	$ 0.74	$ 0.20	$ 0.28
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013	0.60	0.12	0.20
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012	0.89	0.20	0.30

Table No. 10a lists, as of March 31, 2015, share purchase warrants outstanding, the exercise price, and the expiration date of the share purchase warrants.

Table No. 10a

Share Purchase Warrants Outstanding


Number of Share Purchase Warrants Outstanding	Exercise Price/share	Expiration Date

19,166,666	$0.50	July 31, 2019

The Company's warrants trade on the TSX Venture Exchange in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, under the trading symbol to “ROE.WT”. The CUSIP number is 75973C116. The warrants began trading on September 16, 2014.


	- 42 -

Table No. 10b lists the volume of trading and high, low and closing sale prices on the TSX Venture Exchange for the Company's warrants for:

each of the last six months ending March 31, 2015;

each of the last two fiscal quarters ending the three months ended March 31, 2015; and

the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

Table No. 10b

TSX Venture Exchange

Common Share Purchase Warrant Trading Activity


	- Sales-
	Canadian Dollars
Period	High	Low	Close

March 2015	$ 0.09	$ 0.09	$ 0.09
February 2015	0.09	0.09	0.09
January 2015	0.09	0.09	0.09
December 2014	No Trades
November 2014	No Trades
October 2014	0.085	0.085	0.085

Three Months Ended March 31, 2015	$ 0.09	$ 0.09	$ 0.09
Three Months Ended December 31, 2014	0.085	0.085	0.085

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2014	$ 0.085	$ 0.085	$ 0.085

American Depository Receipts. Not applicable.

Other Securities to be Registered. Not applicable

The TSX Venture Exchange

The Company's common stock is currently listed and trading on the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX-V”).

The TSX-V is a self-regulating organization owned and operated by the TMX Group. It is governed by representatives of its member firms and the public.

Regulation of the TSX Venture Exchange, its member firms and its listed companies is the responsibility of Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ("IIROC"). IIROC is a not-for-profit, independent Canadian self-regulatory organization that, among other things, oversees trading in exchanges and marketplaces.


	- 43 -

IIROC administers, oversees and enforces the Universal Market Integrity Rules (“UMIR”). To ensure compliance with UMIR, IIROC monitors real-time trading operations and market-related activities of marketplaces and participants, and also enforces compliance with UMIR by investigating alleged rule violations and administering any settlements and hearings that may arise in respect of such violations.

Investors in Canada are protected by the Canadian Investor Protection Fund (“CIPF”). The CIPF is a private trust fund established to protect customers in the event of the insolvency of a member of any of the following Self-Regulatory Organizations: the TSX Venture Exchange, the Montreal Exchange, the TSX, the Toronto Futures Exchange and the IIROC.

Item 10. Additional Information

ESCROW SHARES

Under the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange, certain shareholders of R2 Energy are required to place the Company’s common shares received in the RTO into escrow to be released over time. A total of 12,686,922 common shares (adjusted for the 1 new for 2 old common share consolidation) were subject to this Value Escrow Agreement. These escrowed shares will be released from escrow under the following schedule:


Release Dates	Percentage of Total Escrowed Shares to be Released	Total Number of Originally Escrowed Shares to be Released
Date of Exchange Acceptance	10%	1,307,767
6 months following Acceptance	15%	1,961,650
12 months following Acceptance	15%	1,961,650
18 months following Acceptance	15%	1,961,650
24 months following Acceptance	15%	1,961,650
30 months following Acceptance	15%	1,961,650
36 months following Acceptance	15%	1,961,650

The TSX Venture Exchange accepted the documentation for the RTO on September 4, 2014, and the initial 10% of escrowed shares were released on that date.

The insiders with common shares subject to the value escrow agreement are as follows:


Name of Insider	Original Number of Shares Subject to Escrow	Current Number of Shares Remaining as of March 31, 2015

Ian Telfer	6,600,100	4,813,950
Craig Steinke	5,063,071	3,797,303
Total	11,663,171	8,611,253

A copy of this Value Escrow Agreement has been filed as an exhibit to this Form 20-F Annual Report.


	- 44 -

Certain of the common shares held by insiders at the time of the Company’s Initial Public Offering were subject to an escrow agreement between the Company and Computershare Investor Services as Escrow Agent dated January 12, 2011, 3,525,000 common shares were originally held in escrow. All those shares have been released from escrow under the original schedule.

FLOW THROUGH SHARES

Canadian tax legislation allows for investment tax credits, at a rate of 15%, applicable to certain mining exploration expenses in Canada pursuant to a Flow-through share issuance agreement. Common shares of exploration companies which are issued under the program are known as “Flow-Through” shares as the Company making the qualified expenditures flow-through such tax credits received to the purchasers of these specific common shares. A Flow-through share investor could apply this tax credit to reduce his or her Canadian Federal income tax payable. In order to apply for the credits, the flow-through shareholder must be resident in Canada and subject to Canada Federal Income Tax for the taxation year in which the credit is being claimed.

The mining exploration expenses that qualify for the investment tax credit under the Flow-through program must be incurred in the scope of mining exploration activities conducted from or above the ground surface in order to determine the existence or location of mineral materials. These minerals include the deposit of common metals or the deposit of minerals for which the Minister of Natural Resources has stated that the principal mineral extract is an industrial mineral contained in a non-stratified deposit. The mining exploration activities that qualify include expenses incurred in order to determine the existence, location, extent, or quality of a mineral resource in Canada, including the prospector costs, the geological, geophysical or geochemical study costs, the costs of steelhead or diamond drilling, by hammering or other methods, and the costs of digging trenches. It is not intended for expenses related to existing mines.

During the period from incorporation to December 31, 2010, the Company issued a total of 3,350,000 flow-through common shares for cash proceeds of $154,750. As of the end fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, all of the qualifying exploration expenditures have been completed and all of the tax expenditures have been renounced to investors.

Stock Options

Stock Options to purchase securities from Registrant can be granted to Directors and Employees of the Company on terms and conditions acceptable to the regulatory authorities in Canada, notably the TSX Venture Exchange.

The Company has a “Rolling” Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") which is required to be approved by shareholders annually. The Plan was originally approved by shareholders at the Annual General and Special General Meeting of shareholders held on September 12, 2014 and replaced the Stock Option Plan first approved by shareholders on January 11, 2012 and reapproved by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held on September 25, 2013.

Under the Plan, stock options may be issued to qualified Officers, Directors, Employees and Consultants. The number of common shares reserved for issuance under the Plan is 10% of the currently issued common shares of the Company, less the aggregate number of common shares then reserved for issuance pursuant to any other Share Compensation Arrangement.


	- 45 -

The aggregate number of Options granted to any one Person, and companies wholly owned by that Person, pursuant to the Plan and any other Share Compensation Arrangement in a 12 month period must not exceed 5% of the issued shares of the Corporation. The aggregate number of Options granted to any one Consultant in a 12 month period pursuant to the Plan and any other Share Compensation Arrangement must not exceed 2% of the issued shares of the Corporation. The aggregate number of Options granted to all Persons retained to provide Investor Relations Activities pursuant to the Plan and any other Share Compensation Arrangement must not exceed 2% of the issued shares of the Corporation in any 12 month period. If the Corporation is listed on the NEX board of the TSX Venture Exchange, no Options are permitted to be granted to Persons who provide Investor Relations Activities. The aggregate number of Options granted and outstanding to Eligible Charitable Organizations pursuant to the Plan and any other Share Compensation Arrangement must not at any time exceed 1% of the issued shares of the Corporation. Options may not be assigned or transferred.

If an Optionee who is a Director, Officer, Employee or Consultant is terminated for cause, each Option held by such Optionee shall terminate and therefore cease to be exercisable upon such termination for cause. If an Optionee dies prior to otherwise ceasing to be an Eligible Person, each Option held by such Optionee shall be exercisable by the heirs or administrators of such Optionee and shall terminate and therefore cease to be exercisable no later than the earlier of the Expiry Date and the date which is twelve months from the date of the Optionee's death. Unless an option agreement specifies otherwise, if an Optionee ceases to be an Eligible Person for any reason other than death or termination for cause, each Option held by the Optionee other than an Optionee who is involved in investor relations activities will cease to be exercisable 90 days after the Termination Date or for a "reasonable period" after the Optionee ceases to serve in such capacity, as determined by the Board. For Optionees involved in investor relations activities, Options shall cease to be exercisable 30 days after the Termination Date or for a "reasonable period" after the Optionee ceases to serve in such capacity, as determined by the Board. If any portion of an Option is not vested at the time an Optionee ceases, for any reason whatsoever, to be an Eligible Person, such unvested portion of the Option may not be thereafter exercised by the Optionee or its legal representative, as the case may be, provided that the Board may, in its discretion, thereafter permit the Optionee or its legal representative, as the case may be, to exercise all or any part of such unvested portion of the Option that would have vested prior to the time such Option otherwise terminates. A Charitable Option must expire after the earlier of a date that is not more than 10 years from the grant date of the Charitable Option and the 90th day following the date that the holder of the Charitable Option ceases to be an Eligible Charitable Organization.

The exercise price of the option under the Plan may not be less than the closing price of the common shares on the TSX Venture Exchange at the day of the date of grant, subject to a minimum exercise price of $0.05 per common share. An option granted under the Plan will have an expiry date not exceeding 10 years. The Board shall determine the manner in which an option shall vest and become exercisable. Options granted to consultants performing Investor Relations Activities shall vest over a minimum of 12 months with no more than 1/3 of such Options vesting in any 3 month period. The Board may amend any Option with the consent of the affected Optionee and the Exchange, including any shareholder approval required by the Exchange. Disinterested Shareholder Approval is required for any reduction in the exercise price of an Option if the Optionee is an Insider at the time of the proposed amendment. If the amendment of an Option requires regulatory or shareholder approval, such amendment may be made prior to such approvals being given, but no such amended Options may be exercised unless and until such approvals are given.


	- 46 -

Upon the occurrence of an Accelerated Vesting Event as defined in the Plan, the Board will have the power, at its sole discretion and without being required to obtain the approval of shareholders or the holder of any Option, except pertaining to options granted to Consultants performing Investor Relations activities which will be subject to prior written Exchange approval, to make such changes to the terms of Options as it considers fair and appropriate in the circumstances, including but not limited to: (a) accelerating the vesting of Options, conditionally or unconditionally; (b) terminating every Option if under the transaction giving rise to the Accelerated Vesting Event, options in replacement of the Options are proposed to be granted to or exchanged with the holders of Options, which replacement options treat the holders of Options in a manner which the Board considers fair and appropriate in the circumstances having regard to the treatment of holders of Shares under such transaction; (c) otherwise modifying the terms of any Option to assist the holder to tender into any take-over bid or other transaction constituting an Accelerated Vesting Event; or (d) following the successful completion of such Accelerated Vesting Event, terminating any Option to the extent it has not been exercised prior to successful completion of the Accelerated Vesting Event. The determination of the Board in respect of any such Accelerated Vesting Event shall for the purposes of the Plan be final, conclusive and binding.

A complete copy of the Company’s Stock Option Plan as approved by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held on September 12, 2014 has been included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 6-K filed on November 4, 2014.

The names and titles of the Directors/Executive Officers of the Registrant to whom outstanding stock options have been granted and the numbers of common shares subject to such options are set forth in Table No. 11 as of March 31, 2015 and within 60 days, as well as the number of options granted to Directors and all employees as a group.


	- 47 -

Table No. 11

Stock Options Outstanding


Name	Number of Options	Number of Options Currently Vested	CDN$ Exercise Price	Expiration Date

Craig Steinke	800,000	533,333	$0.30	July 31, 2024

Jeremy Crichton	250,000	166,667	$0.30	July 31, 2024

Carmen Etchart	195,000 55,000	195,000 36,666	$0.25 $0.30	April 13, 2017 July 31, 2024

Christopher Dyakowski	250,000	166,667	$0.30	July 31, 2024

Gordon Keep	500,000	333,333	$0.30	July 31, 2024

Ian Telfer	500,000	333,333	$0.30	July 31, 2024

Consultants	751,000 200,000 400,000	751,000 133,332 266,666	$0.25 $0.25 $0.30	April 13, 2017 July 2, 2018 August 28, 2024

Total Officer and Directors	2,550,000	1,764,999

Total Consultants	1,351,000	1,150,998

Total of all holders	3,901,000	2,915,997

Resolutions/Authorization/Approvals

-No Disclosure Necessary-

Memorandum and Articles of Association

The Company was originally incorporated on June 9, 2010 under the provisions of the Business Corporations Act (B.C.) (the "Act"). Subsequent to the RTO with R2 Energy, the Company adopted new Articles of Incorporation as approved by shareholders at the Annual and Special General Meeting held on September 12, 2014.

There are no restrictions on the business the company may carry on in the Articles of Incorporation.


	- 48 -

Under the Company’s articles and bylaws any director or senior officer that has a disclosable interest in a contract or transaction shall be liable to account to the Company for any profits that accrue to the director or senior officer under or as a result of the contract or transaction in accordance with the provisions of the Act. A director is not allowed to vote on any transaction or contract with the Company in which he has a disclosable interest unless all directors have a disclosable interest in that transaction or contract, in which case all of those directors may vote on such resolution. A director or senior officer who holds any office or possesses any property, right or interest that could result, directly or indirectly, in the creation of a duty or interest that materially conflicts with that individual's duty or interest as a director or senior officer, must disclose the nature and extent of the conflict as required by the Act.

Article 15 of the Company’s bylaws address the powers and duties of the directors, while Part 8 discusses the Borrowing Powers. The Company may, if authorized by the directors:

borrow money in the manner and amount, on the security, from the sources and on the terms and conditions that the directors think appropriate;

issue bonds, debentures, and other debt obligations either outright or as security for any liability or obligation of the Company or any other person and at such discounts or premiums and on such other terms as they consider appropriate;

guarantee the repayment of money by any other person or the performance of any obligation of any other person;

mortgage, charge, whether by way of specific or floating charge, grant a security interest in, or give other security on, the whole or any part of the present and future assets and undertaking of the Company.

A Director need not to be a shareholder as qualification for his or her office, but must be qualified as required by the Act to become, act or continue to act as a director. There are no age limit requirements pertaining to the retirement or non-retirement of directors. At each annual general meeting of the Company, all the directors shall retire and the shareholders shall elect a Board of Directors consisting of the number of directors for the time being set pursuant the Company's Articles. A retiring director shall be eligible for re-election.

The remuneration of the directors may from time to time be determined by the directors or, if the directors shall so decide, by the shareholders. Such remuneration may be in addition to any salary or other remuneration paid to any officer or employee of the Company as such who is also a director. The Company must reimburse each director for the reasonable expenses that he or she may incur in and about the business of the Company. If any director shall perform any professional or other services for the Company that in the opinion of the directors are outside the ordinary duties of a director or shall otherwise be specially occupied in or about the Company's business, he may be paid a remuneration to be fixed by the Board or, at the option of that director, fixed by ordinary resolution, and such remuneration may be either in addition to or in substitution for any other remuneration that he may be entitled to receive.


	- 49 -

Article 20 deals with indemnification and payment of expenses of directors and officers. Subject to the provisions of the Act, the Company must indemnify a director or former director of the Company and his or her heirs and legal personal representatives against all eligible penalties to which such person is or may be liable, and the Company must, after the final disposition of an eligible proceeding, pay the expenses actually and reasonably incurred by such person in respect of that proceeding. Each director and alternate director is deemed to have contracted with the Company on the terms of the indemnity contained in Article 20.2. Subject to restrictions in the Business Corporations Act, the Company may indemnify any person. The failure of a director, former director, officer or former officer of the Company to comply with the provisions of the Act or these Articles shall not invalidate any indemnity to which he is entitled under this Part. The directors may cause the Company to purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of eligible parties.

The majority required for the passage of a special resolution or a special separate resolution shall be 2/3 of the votes cast on the resolution.

The rights, preferences and restrictions attaching to each class of the Company’s shares are as follows:

The authorized share structure of the Company consists of an unlimited number common shares without par value and an unlimited number of preferred shares, issuable in one or more series, without par value. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters to be acted upon by the shareholders. Subject to the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attached to the Preferred Shares of the Company, Directors may from time to time declare and authorize payment of such dividends, if any, as they deem advisable and need not give notice of such declaration to any shareholder. Subject to the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attached to the Preferred Shares of the Company, in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company or upon any distribution of the assets of the Company among shareholders being made (other than by way of dividend out of the monies properly applicable to the payment of dividends) the holders of Common Shares shall be entitled to share equally

Subject to the Act, the Company may by resolution of the Board

Create one or more classes or series of shares or, if none of the shares in a class or series of shares are allotted or issued, eliminate that class or series of shares;

increase, reduce or eliminate the maximum number of shares that the Company is authorized to issue out of any class or series of shares or establish a maximum number of shares that the Company is authorized to issue out of any class or series of shares for which no maximum is established;

subject to Article 2.1(2), alter the identifying name of any of its shares;

subdivide or consolidate all or any of its unissued, or fully paid issued, shares;


	- 50 -

if the Company is authorized to issue shares of a class of shares with par value:

decrease the par value of those shares; or

if none of the shares of that class of shares are allotted or issued, increase the par value of those shares;

change all or any of its unissued, or fully paid issued, shares with par value into shares without par value or any of its unissued shares without par value into shares with par value; or

subject to Article 2.1(2), otherwise alter its shares or authorized share structure when required or permitted to do so by the Business Corporations Act.

If the Business Corporations Act does not specify the type of resolution and the Articles do not specify another type of resolution, the Company may by ordinary resolution alter the Articles.

The Company may at any time, pay a reasonable commission or allow a reasonable discount to any person in consideration of that person purchasing or agreeing to purchase shares of the Company from the Company or any other person or procuring or agreeing to procure purchasers for shares of the Company. The Company may pay such brokerage fee or other consideration as may be lawful for or in connection with the sale or placement of its securities.

An annual general meeting shall be held once every calendar year at such time (not being more than 15 months after the annual reference date for the preceding calendar year) and place as may be determined by the Directors. The directors may, whenever they think fit, call a meeting of shareholders

There are no limitations upon the rights to own securities.

There are no provisions that would have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control of the Company.

There is no special ownership threshold above which an ownership position must be disclosed.

Advance Notice Policy

Article 26 contains Advance Notice Provisions for the nomination of Directors. Nominations of persons for election to the Board may be made at any Annual Meeting of shareholders or at any Special Meeting of shareholders if one of the purposes for which the Special Meeting was called was the election of directors. In order to be eligible for election to the Board at any Annual Meeting or Special Meeting of shareholders, persons must be nominated in accordance with one of the following procedures:

(a)

by or at the direction of the Board or an authorized officer, including pursuant to a notice of meeting;


	- 51 -

(b)

by or at the direction or request of one or more shareholders pursuant to a proposal made in accordance with the provisions of the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (the "BCA"), or a requisition of the shareholders made in accordance with the provisions of the BCA; or

(c)

by any person (a "Nominating Shareholder"): (A) who, at the close of business on the date of the giving by the Nominating Shareholder of the notice provided for below in Article 26.1 and at the close of business on the record date for notice of such meeting, is entered in the central securities register of the Company as a holder of one or more shares carrying the right to vote at such meeting or who beneficially owns shares that are entitled to be voted at such meeting; and (B) who complies with the notice procedures set forth in Article 26.1.

In addition to any other requirements under applicable laws, for a nomination to be made by a Nominating Shareholder, the Nominating Shareholder must give notice which is both timely and in proper written form in accordance with the Articles to the Secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company.

A Nominating Shareholder's notice to the Secretary of the Company will be deemed to be timely if:

(a)

in the case of an Annual Meeting of shareholders, such notice is made not less than 30 nor more than 65 days prior to the date of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders; provided, however, that in the event that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders is to be held on a date that is less than 50 days after the date (the "Notice Date") on which the first public announcement of the date of the Annual Meeting is made, notice by the Nominating Shareholder is made not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the Notice Date; and

(b)

in the case of a Special Meeting (which is not also an Annual Meeting) of Shareholders called for the purpose of electing directors (whether or not called for other purposes), such notice is made not later than the close of business on the fifteenth (15th) day following the day on which the first public announcement of the date of the Special Meeting of Shareholders was made. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board may, in its sole discretion, waive any requirement of this paragraph.

For greater certainty, the time periods for the giving of notice by a Nominating Shareholder as aforesaid shall, in all cases, be determined based on the original date of the applicable Annual Meeting or Special Meeting, and in no event shall any adjournment or postponement of an Annual Meeting or Special Meeting or the announcement thereof commence a new time period for the giving of such notice.


	- 52 -

A Nominating Shareholder's notice to the Secretary of the Company will be deemed to be in proper form if:

(a)

as to each person whom the Nominating Shareholder proposes to nominate for election as a director, such notice sets forth: (A) the name, age, business address and residential address of the person; (B) the principal occupation or employment of the person; (C) the class or series and number of shares in the capital of the Company which are controlled or which are owned beneficially or of record by the person as of the record date for the meeting of shareholders (if such date shall then have been made publicly available and shall have occurred) and as of the date of such notice; and (D) any other information relating to the person that would be required to be disclosed in a dissident's proxy circular in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to the BCA and Applicable Securities Laws; and

(b)

as to the Nominating Shareholder giving the notice, such notice sets forth any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding or relationship pursuant to which such Nominating Shareholder has a right to vote any shares of the Company and any other information relating to such Nominating Shareholder that would be required to be made in a dissident's proxy circular in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to the Business Corporations Act and Applicable Securities Laws.

The Company may require any proposed nominee for election as a Director to furnish such additional information as may reasonably be requested by the Company to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as an independent director of the Company or that could be material to a reasonable shareholder's understanding of the independence, or lack thereof, of such proposed nominee.

No person shall be eligible for election as a director of the Company unless nominated in accordance with the provisions of this Article 26.1; provided, however, that nothing in this Article 26.1 shall be deemed to restrict or preclude discussion by a shareholder (as distinct from the nomination of directors) at an Annual Meeting or Special Meeting of any matter that is properly brought before such meeting pursuant to the provisions of the BCA or at the discretion of the Chairman of the meeting. The Chairman of the meeting shall have the power and duty to determine whether any nomination for election of a director was made in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Article 26.1 and, if any proposed nomination is not in compliance with such procedures, to declare such nomination defective and that it be disregarded.

A copy of the Company’s current Articles has been filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 6-K filed on November 4, 2014.

Material Contracts

Property acquisition agreement between the Company and Richard Billingsley and Dwayne Kress dated September 27, 2010 for the acquisition of the Fame Property. To acquire a 100% interest in the property, the Company was required to pay $40,000 and issue 50,000 common shares (post-consolidation). A copy of this agreement has been filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 20-F Registration Statement.

Management agreement between the Company and Max Investments Inc., a private company owned by Christopher Dyakowski, dated January 1, 2011. Under the agreement, Max Investments will receive $5,000 per month. The agreement terminated on August 31, 2014. A copy of this agreement has been filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 20-F Registration Statement.


	- 53 -

Common Share Escrow Agreement dated January 12, 2011 between the Company, Computershare Investor Services and the Undersigned Securityholders of the Company for the escrow and release of common shares pursuant to the National Policy 46-201 for the Initial Public Offering of the Company. All shares have now been released from escrow and the agreement is no longer in force. A copy of this agreement has been filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 20-F Registration Statement.

Confirmation from Christopher Dyakowski regarding the claims of the Fame Property are held in trust for the benefit of the Company. The claims have subsequently been transferred to the Company. A copy of this confirmation has been filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 20-F Registration Statement.

Value Escrow Agreement dated September 3, 2014 between the Company, Computershare Investor Services and the Undersigned Securityholders of the Company for the escrow and release of common shares pursuant to Exchange Policy 5.4. A copy of this agreement has been filed as an exhibit to this Form 20-F Annual Report.

EXCHANGE CONTROLS AND OTHER LIMITATIONS AFFECTING SECURITY HOLDERS

Canada has no system of exchange controls. There are no Canadian restrictions on the repatriation of capital or earnings of a Canadian public company to non-resident investors. There are no laws in Canada or exchange restrictions affecting the remittance of dividends, profits, interest, royalties and other payments to non-resident holders of the Company's securities, except as discussed in ITEM 10, ”Taxation" below.

Restrictions on Share Ownership by Non-Canadians: There are no limitations under the laws of Canada or in the organizing documents of the Company on the right of foreigners to hold or vote securities of the Company, except that the Investment Canada Act may require review and approval by the Minister of Industry (Canada) of certain acquisitions of "control" of the Company by a "non-Canadian". The threshold for acquisitions of control is generally defined as being one-third or more of the voting shares of the Company. "Non-Canadian" generally means an individual who is not a Canadian citizen, or a corporation, partnership, trust or joint venture that is ultimately controlled by non-Canadians.

TAXATION

The following summary of the material Canadian federal income tax consequences are stated in general terms and are not intended to be advice to any particular shareholder. Each prospective investor is urged to consult his or her own tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of his or her purchase, ownership and disposition of shares of Common Stock. The tax consequences to any particular holder of common stock will vary according to the status of that holder as an individual, trust, corporation or member of a partnership, the jurisdiction in which that holder is subject to taxation, the place where that holder is resident and, generally, according to that holder’s particular circumstances.

This summary is applicable only to holders who are resident in the United States, have never been resident in Canada, deal at arm’s length with the Company, hold their common stock as capital property and who will not use or hold the common stock in carrying on business in Canada. Special rules, which are not discussed in this summary, may apply to a United States holder that is an issuer that carries on business in Canada and elsewhere.


	- 54 -

This summary is based upon the provisions of the Income Tax Act of Canada and the regulations thereunder (collectively, the "Tax Act" or “ITA”)and the Canada-United States Tax Convention (the “Tax Convention”) as at the date of the Annual Report and the current administrative practices of Canada Customs and Revenue Agency. This summary does not take into account provincial income tax consequences.

Management urges each holder to consult his own tax advisor with respect to the income tax consequences applicable to him in his own particular circumstances.

CANADIAN INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

Disposition of Common Stock

The summary below is restricted to the case of a holder (a “Holder”) of one or more common shares (“Common Shares”) who for the purposes of the Tax Act is a non-resident of Canada, holds his Common Shares as capital property and deals at arm’s length with the Company.

Dividends

A Holder will be subject to Canadian withholding tax (“Part XIII Tax”) equal to 25%, or such lower rates as may be available under an applicable tax treaty, of the gross amount of any dividend paid or deemed to be paid on his Common Shares. Under the Tax Convention, the rate of Part XIII Tax applicable to a dividend on Common Shares paid to a Holder who is a resident of the United States is, if the Holder is a company that beneficially owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the Company, 5% and, in any other case, 15% of the gross amount of the dividend. The Company will be required to withhold the applicable amount of Part XIII Tax from each dividend so paid and remit the withheld amount directly to the Receiver General for Canada for the account of the Holder.

Disposition of Common Shares

A Holder who disposes of Common Shares, including by deemed disposition on death, will not be subject to Canadian tax on any capital gain thereby realized unless the common Share constituted “taxable Canadian property” as defined by the Tax Act. Generally, a common share of a public corporation will not constitute taxable Canadian property of a Holder unless he held the common share as capital property used by him carrying on a business in Canada, or he or persons with whom he did not deal at arm’s length alone or together held or held options to acquire, at any time within the 60 months preceding the disposition, 25% or more of the issued shares of any class of the capital stock of the Company.

A Holder who is a resident of the United States and realizes a capital gain on disposition of Common Shares that was taxable Canadian property will nevertheless, by virtue of the Treaty, generally be exempt from Canadian tax thereon unless (a) more than 50% of the value of the Common Shares is derived from, or from an interest in, Canadian real estate, including Canadian mineral resources properties, (b) the Common Shares formed part of the business property of a permanent establishment that the Holder has or had in Canada within the 12 months preceding disposition, or (c) the Holder (i) was a resident of Canada at any time within the ten years immediately preceding the disposition, and for a total of 120 months during any period of 20 consecutive years, preceding the disposition, and (ii) owned the Common Shares when he ceased to be resident in Canada.


	- 55 -

A Holder who is subject to Canadian tax in respect of a capital gain realized on disposition of Common Shares must include one half of the capital gain (“taxable capital gain”) in computing his taxable income earned in Canada. The Holder may, subject to certain limitations, deduct one half of any capital loss (“allowable capital loss”) arising on disposition of taxable Canadian property from taxable capital gains realized in the year of disposition in respect to taxable Canadian property and, to the extent not so deductible, from such taxable capital gains of any of the three preceding years or any subsequent year.

UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

The following is a discussion of material United States Federal income tax consequences, under the law, generally applicable to a U.S. Holder (as defined below) of common shares of the Company. This discussion does not cover any state, local or foreign tax consequences.

The following discussion is based upon the sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“the Code”), Treasury Regulations, published Internal Revenue Service (“IRS) rulings, published administrative positions of the IRS and court decisions that are currently applicable, any or all of which could be materially and adversely changed, possible on a retroactive basis, at any time. In addition, the discussion does not consider the potential effects, both adverse and beneficial, or recently proposed legislation which, if enacted, could be applied, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time. The discussion is for general information only and it is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any holder or prospective holder of common shares of the Company. Each holder and prospective holder of common shares of the Company is advised to consult their own tax advisors about the federal, state, local, and foreign tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of common shares of the Company applicable to their own particular circumstances.

U.S. Holders

As used herein, a (“U.S. Holder”) includes a holder of common shares of the Company who is a citizen or resident of the United States, a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or of any political subdivision thereof, an estate whose income is taxable in the United States irrespective of source or a trust subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and control of a United States fiduciary as described in Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code. This summary does not address the tax consequences to, and U.S. Holder does not include, persons subject to special provisions of Federal income tax law, such as tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, broker-dealers, non-resident alien individuals, persons or entities that have a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar, shareholders who hold common shares as part of a straddle, hedging or conversion transaction, and shareholders who acquired their common shares through the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services.

This summary is limited to U.S. Holders who own common shares as capital assets. This summary does not address the consequences to a person or entity holding an interest in a shareholder or the consequences to a person of the ownership, exercise or disposition of any options, warrants or other rights to acquire common shares.


	- 56 -

Distribution on Common Shares of the Company

U.S. Holders receiving dividend distributions (including constructive dividends) with respect to common shares of the Company are required to include in gross income for United States Federal income tax purposes the gross amount of such distributions equal to the U.S. dollar value of such distributions on the date of receipt (based on the exchange rate on such date), to the extent that the Company has current or accumulated earnings and profits, without reduction for any Canadian income tax withheld from such distributions. Such Canadian tax withheld may be credited, subject to certain limitations, against the U.S. Holder’s United States Federal Income tax liability or, alternatively, individuals may be deducted in computing the U.S. Holder’s United States Federal taxable income by those individuals who itemize deductions. (See more detailed discussion at “Foreign Tax Credit” below). To the extent that distributions exceed current or accumulated earnings and profits of the Company, they will be treated first as a return of capital up to the U.S. Holder’s adjusted basis in the common shares and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of the common shares. Dividend income will be taxed at marginal tax rates applicable to ordinary income while preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains are applicable to a U.S. Holder which is an individual, estate or trust. There are currently no preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains for a U.S. Holder which is a corporation.

In the case of foreign currency received as a dividend that is not converted by the recipient into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder will have a tax basis in the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt. Generally any gain or loss recognized upon a subsequent sale of other disposition of the foreign currency, including the exchange for U.S. dollars, will be ordinary income or loss.

Dividends paid on the common shares of the Company will not generally be eligible for the dividends received deduction provided to corporations receiving dividends from certain United States corporations. A U.S. Holder which is a corporation may, under certain circumstances, be entitled to a 70% deduction of the United States source portion of dividends received from the Company (unless the Company qualifies as a “foreign personal holding company” or a “passive foreign investment company”, as defined below) if such U.S. Holder owns shares representing at least 10% of the voting power and value of the Company. The availability of this deduction is subject to several complex limitations which are beyond the scope of this discussion.

Under current Treasury Regulations, dividends paid on the Company’s common shares, if any, generally will not be subject to information reporting and generally will not be subject to U.S. backup withholding tax. However, dividends and the proceeds from a sale of the Company’s common shares paid in the U.S. through a U.S. or U.S. related paying agent (including a broker) will be subject to U.S. information reporting requirements and may also be subject to the 31% U.S. backup withholding tax, unless the paying agent is furnished with a duly completed and signed Form W-9. Any amounts withheld under the U.S. backup withholding tax rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required information is furnished to the IRS.

Foreign Tax Credit

For individuals whose entire income from sources outside the United States consists of qualified passive income, the total amount of creditable foreign taxes paid or accrued during the taxable year does not exceed $300 ($600 in the case of a joint return) and an election is made under section 904(j), the limitation on credit does not apply.


	- 57 -

A U.S. Holder who pays (or has withheld from distributions) Canadian income tax with respect to the ownership of common shares of the Company may be entitled, at the option of the U.S. Holder, to either a deduction or a tax credit for such foreign tax paid or withheld. Generally, it will be more advantageous to claim a credit because a credit reduces United States Federal income taxes on a dollar-for-dollar basis, while a deduction merely reduces the taxpayer’s income subject to tax. This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign income taxes (or taxes in lieu of income tax) paid by (or withheld from) the U.S. Holder during the year. There are significant and complex limitations which apply to the credit, among which is the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of the U.S. Holder’s United States income tax liability that the U.S. Holder’s foreign source income bears to his/her or its worldwide taxable income in the determination of the application of this limitation. The various items of income and deduction must be classified into foreign and domestic sources. Complex rules govern this classification process. In addition, this limitation is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income such as “passive income”, “high withholding tax interest”, “financial services income”, “shipping income”, and certain other classifications of income. Dividends distributed by the Company will generally constitute “passive income” or, in the case of certain U.S. Holders, “financial services income” for these purposes. The availability of the foreign tax credit and the application of the limitations on the credit are fact specific and management urges holders and prospective holders of common shares of the Company to consult their own tax advisors regarding their individual circumstances.

Disposition of Common Shares of the Company

A U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss upon the sale of common shares of the Company equal to the difference, if any, between (I) the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received, and (ii) the shareholder’s tax basis in the common shares of the Company. Preferential tax rates apply to long-term capital gains of U.S. Holders, which are individuals, estates or trusts. This gain or loss will be capital gain or loss if the common shares are capital assets in the hands of the U.S. Holder, which will be a short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending upon the holding period of the U.S. Holder. Gains and losses are netted and combined according to special rules in arriving at the overall capital gain or loss for a particular tax year. Deductions for net capital losses are subject to significant limitations. For U.S. Holders, which are not corporations, any unused portion of such net capital loss may be carried over to be used in later tax years until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted, but individuals may not carry back capital losses. For U.S. Holders, which are corporations (other than corporations subject to Subchapter S of the Code), an unused net capital loss may be carried back three years from the loss year and carried forward five years from the loss year to be offset against capital gains until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted.

Other Considerations

In the following circumstances, the above sections of the discussion may not describe the United States Federal income tax consequences resulting from the holding and disposition of common shares of the Company.


	- 58 -

Foreign Personal Holding Company

If at any time during a taxable year more than 50% of the total combined voting power or the total value of the Company’s outstanding shares is owned, actually or constructively, by five or fewer individuals who are citizens or residents of the United States and 60% (50% after the first tax year) or more of the Company’s gross income for such year was derived from certain passive sources (e.g. from interest income received from its subsidiaries), the Company would be treated as a “foreign personal holding company.” In that event, U.S. Holders that hold common shares of the Company would be required to include in gross income for such year their allocable portions of such passive income to the extent the Company does not actually distribute such income.

The Company does not believe that it currently has the status of a “foreign personal holding company”. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be considered a foreign personal holding company for the current or any future taxable year.

Foreign Investment Company

If 50% or more of the combined voting power or total value of the Company’s outstanding shares are held, actually or constructively, by citizens or residents of the United States, United States domestic partnerships or corporations, or estates or trusts other than foreign estates or trusts (as defined by the Code Section 7701(a)(31), and the Company is found to be engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities, commodities, or any interest therein, it is possible that the Company might be treated as a “foreign investment company” as defined in Section 1246 of the Code, causing all or part of any gain realized by a U.S. Holder selling or exchanging common shares of the Company to be treated as ordinary income rather than capital gains.

Passive Foreign Investment Company

As a foreign corporation with U.S. Holders, the Company could potentially be treated as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), as defined in Section 1297 of the Code, depending upon the percentage of the Company’s income which is passive, or the percentage of the Company’s assets which is held for the purpose of producing passive income.

The rule governing PFICs can have significant tax effects on U.S. shareholders of foreign corporations who are subject to U.S. Federal income taxation under alternative methods at the election of each such U.S. shareholder. As a PFIC, each U.S. shareholder’s income or gain, with respect to a disposition or deemed disposition of the PFIC’s shares or a distribution payable on such shares will generally be subject to tax at the highest marginal rates applicable to ordinary income and certain interest charges, unless the U.S. shareholder has timely made a “qualified electing fund” election or a “mark-to-market” election for those shares.


	- 59 -

A U.S. shareholder who elects to treat the PFIC as a Qualified Electing Fund ("QEF"), as defined in the Code, (an "Electing U.S. Holder") will be required to currently include in his income, for any taxable year in which the corporation qualifies as a PFIC, his pro-rata share of the corporation's (i) "net capital gain" (the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss), which will be taxed as long-term capital gain to the Electing U.S. Holder, and (ii) "ordinary earnings" (the excess of earnings and profits over net capital gain), which will be taxed as ordinary income to the Electing U.S. Holder, in each case, for the U.S. Holder's taxable year in which (or with which) the corporation’s taxable year ends, regardless of whether such amounts are actually distributed. A QEF election also allows the Electing U.S. Holder to generally treat any gain realized on the disposition of his common shares (or deemed to be realized on the pledge of his common shares) as capital gain; treat his share of the corporation's net capital gain, if any, as long-term capital gain instead of ordinary income, and either avoid interest charges resulting from PFIC status altogether, or make an annual election, subject to certain limitations, to defer payment of current taxes on his share of the corporation's annual realized net capital gain and ordinary earnings.

The procedure a U.S. Holder must comply with in making a timely QEF election will depend on whether the year of the election is the first year in the U.S. Holder's holding period in which the corporation is a PFIC. If the U.S. shareholder makes a QEF election in such first year, then the U.S. shareholder may make the QEF election by simply filing the appropriate documents at the time the U.S. Holder files a tax return for such first year. If, however, the corporation qualified as a PFIC in a prior year during the U.S. shareholder’s holding period, then the U.S. shareholder may make a retroactive QEF election, provided he has preserved his right to do so under the protective statement regime or he obtains IRS permission.

If a U.S. shareholder has not made a QEF Election at any time (a "Non-electing U.S. Holder"), then special taxation rules under Section 1291 of the Code will apply to gains realized on the disposition (or deemed to be realized by reason of a pledge) of his common shares, and certain "excess distributions" by the corporation. An excess distribution is a current year distribution received by the U.S. shareholder on PFIC stock to the extent that the distribution exceeds its ratable portion of 125% of the average amount received by the U.S. shareholder during the preceding three years.

A Non-electing U.S. shareholder generally would be required to pro-rate all gains realized on the disposition of his common shares and all excess distributions over the entire holding period for the common shares. All gains or excess distributions allocated to prior years of the U.S. shareholder (other than years prior to the first taxable year of the corporation during such U.S. Holder's holding period and beginning after January 1, 1987 for which it was a PFIC) would be taxed at the highest marginal tax rate for each such prior year applicable to ordinary income. The Non-electing U.S. shareholder also would be liable for interest on the foregoing tax liability for each such prior year calculated as if such liability had been due with respect to each such prior year. A Non-electing non-corporate U.S. shareholder must treat this interest charge as "personal interest" which is wholly non-deductible. The balance of the gain or the excess distribution will be treated as ordinary income in the year of the disposition or distribution, and no interest charge will be incurred with respect to such balance.

If a corporation is a PFIC for any taxable year during which a Non-electing U.S. shareholder holds common shares, then the corporation will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such common shares, even if it is no longer by definition a PFIC. A Non-electing U.S. shareholder may terminate this deemed PFIC status by electing to recognize a gain, which will be taxed under the rules for Non-Electing U.S. Holders, as if such common shares had been sold on the last day of the last taxable year for which it was a PFIC. If the corporation no longer qualifies as a PFIC in a subsequent year, then normal Code rules and not the PFIC rules will apply with respect to a U.S. shareholder who has made a QEF election.


	- 60 -

In certain circumstances, a U.S. Holder of stock in a PFIC can make a “qualified electing fund election” to mitigate some of the adverse tax consequences of holding stock in a PFIC by including in income its share of the corporation’s income on a current basis. However, we do not currently intend to prepare or provide the information that would enable you to make a qualified electing fund election. Management urges US persons to consult with their own tax advisors with regards to the impact of these rules.

Controlled Foreign Corporation

A Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) is a foreign corporation more than 50% of whose stock by vote or value is, on any day in the corporation’s tax year, owned (directly or indirectly) by U.S. Shareholders. If more than 50% of the voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote is owned, actually or constructively, by citizens or residents of the United States, United States domestic partnerships and corporations or estates or trusts other than foreign estates or trusts, each of whom own actually or constructively 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company could be treated as a “controlled foreign corporation” under Subpart F of the Code. This classification would affect many complex results, one of which is the inclusion of certain income of a CFC, which is subject to current U.S. tax. The United States generally taxes United States Shareholders of a CFC currently on their pro rata shares of the Subpart F income of the CFC. Such United States Shareholders are generally treated as having received a current distribution out of the CFC’s Subpart F income and are also subject to current U.S. tax on their pro rata shares of the CFC’s earnings invested in U.S. property. The foreign tax credit described above may reduce the U.S. tax on these amounts.

In addition, under Section 1248 of the Code, gain from the sale or exchange of shares by a U.S. Holder of common shares of the Corporation which is or was a United States Shareholder at any time during the five-year period ending with the sale or exchange is treated as ordinary income to the extent of earnings and profits of the Company (accumulated in corporate tax years beginning after 1962, but only while the shares were held and while the Company was “controlled”) attributable to the shares sold or exchanged. If a foreign corporation is both a PFIC and a CFC, the foreign corporation generally will not be treated as a PFIC with respect to the United States Shareholders of the CFC. This rule generally will be effective for taxable years of United States Shareholders beginning after 1997 and for taxable years of foreign corporations ending with or within such taxable years of United States Shareholders. The PFIC provisions continue to apply in the case of PFIC that is also a CFC with respect to the U.S. Holders that are less than 10% shareholders. Because of the complexity of Subpart F, a more detailed review of these rules is outside of the scope of this discussion.

The amount of any backup withholding will not constitute additional tax and will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder’s federal income tax liability.

Filing of Information Returns. Under a number of circumstances, United States Investor acquiring shares of the Company may be required to file an information return with the Internal Revenue Service Center where they are required to file their tax returns with a duplicate copy to the Internal Revenue Service Center, Philadelphia, PA 19255. In particular, any United States Investor who becomes the owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the shares of the Company will be required to file such a return. Other filing requirements may apply, and management urges United States Investors to consult their own tax advisors concerning these requirements.

Documents on Display

All documents incorporated in this 20-F Annual Report may be viewed at the Company’s head office located at 15567 Marine Drive, White Rock, British Columbia, V4B 1C9.


	- 61 -

Item 11. Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company competes with other resource companies for exploration properties and possible joint venture agreements. There is a risk that this competition could increase the difficulty of concluding a negotiation on terms that the Company considers acceptable.

Item 12. Description of Other Securities

Not Applicable

Part II

Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

Not Applicable

Item 14. Modifications of Rights of Securities Holders and Use of Proceeds

Not Applicable

Item 15. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance that material information related to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to senior management, including Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), by others within those entities on a timely basis so that appropriate decisions can be made regarding public disclosure.

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of December 31, 2014. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2014, were effective to give reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Office and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for designing, establishing and maintaining a system of internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) to provide reasonable assurance that the financial information prepared by the Company for external purposes is reliable and has been recorded, processed and reported in an accurate and timely manner in accordance with IFRS as issued by IASB. The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its responsibilities. The Audit Committee fulfills its role of ensuring the integrity of the reported information through its review of the interim and annual financial statements. Management reviewed the results of their assessment with the Company’s Audit Committee.


	- 62 -

Because of its inherent limitations, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all possible misstatements or frauds. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate.

To evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, Management has used the Internal Control - Integrated Framework, which is a suitable, recognized control framework established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and concluded that such internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2014.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

The Company's management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls or our Internal Controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Attestation Report of the Registered Accounting Firm.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Form 20-F Annual Report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 16. Reserved


	- 63 -

Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Company does not have an “audit committee financial expert” serving on its audit committee. The Company’s Audit Committee consists of three directors (one independent), all of whom are both financially literate and very knowledgeable about the Company’s affairs. Because the Company’s structure and operations are straightforward, the Company does not find it necessary at the current time to augment its Board with a financial expert.

Item 16B. Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics which sets forth legal and ethical standards of conduct for employees, officers, directors and consultants. The Code is intended to deter wrongdoing and to promote the conduct of all Company business in accordance with high standards of integrity and in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.

A copy of the Code of Conduct and Ethics has been filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 20-F Registration Statement.

Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of auditors; the audit committee has in place procedures for receiving complaints and concerns about accounting and auditing matters; and has the authority and the funding to engage independent counsel and other outside advisors.

In accordance with the requirements of the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company’s Audit Committee Charter includes a procedure for the review and pre-approval of any services performed by the Company's auditor, including audit services, audit related services, tax services and other services. The procedure requires that all proposed engagements of the auditor for audit and permitted non-audit services are submitted to the finance and audit committee for approval prior to the beginning of any such services.

Fees, including reimbursements for expenses, for professional services rendered by Deloitte LLP are included in Table No. 12a:


Table No. 12a Principal Accountant Fees and Services Deloitte LLP

Type of Service	Fiscal Year 2014	Fiscal Year 2013

Audit Fees	$ 45,000	$ 21,400
Audit Related Fees	39,750	Nil
Tax Fees	Nil	7,236
All Other Fees	Nil	Nil
Total	$ 84,750	$ 28,636


	- 64 -

Prior to the RTO with R2 Energy, San Antonio had a fiscal year-end of March 31 and its auditor was MNP LLP. Fees, including reimbursements for expenses, for professional services rendered by MNP LLP are included in Table No. 12b:


Table No. 12b Principal Accountant Fees and Services MNP LLP

Type of Service	Fiscal Year 2014	Fiscal Year 2013

Audit Fees	$ 12,852	$ 13,770
Audit Related Fees	Nil	Nil
Tax Fees	Nil	Nil
All Other Fees	Nil	Nil
Total	$ 12,852	$ 13,770

Item 16D. Exemptions from Listing Standards for Audit Committees

Not Applicable

Item 16E. Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

Not Applicable

Item 16F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

San Antonio’s certifying accountant from inception through March 31, 2014 was MNP LLP. Upon completion of the Company’s RTO with R2 Energy, MNP LLP resigned as auditors at the request of the Company and Deloitte LLP was appointed. Under the RTO, R2 is considered to be the acquirer for accounting purposes and is the parent company and Renaissance the subsidiary in the financial statements. Deloitte LLP was R2 Energy’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and therefore continues as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm post-RTO.

There were no disagreements between the Company and the former auditors, and the accountant’s report on the financial statements for each of the two prior fiscal periods contained no adverse opinions or disclaimer of opinions. The Company did not consult with Deloitte LLP during the two fiscal years prior to the completion of the RTO and their engagement by Renaissance regarding the application of accounting principles to any specified transaction or any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue, or any matter that was subject to a disagreement or reportable event.

MNP LLP provided a letter which agree with the statements in the Notice of Change of Auditor. This letter was filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 6-K filed on December 2, 2014.


	- 65 -

Item 16G. Corporate Governance

Not Applicable

Item 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure

Not Applicable

Part III

Item 17. Financial Statements

Not applicable

Item 18. Financial Statements

The Company's financial statements are stated in Canadian Dollars (CDN$) and are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by IASB.

The financial statements as required are attached hereto and found immediately following the text of this Annual Report. The Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of Deloitte LLP, Chartered Accountant, is also included herein immediately preceding the financial statements.

Item 19. Exhibits

(A1) The financial statements thereto as required under ITEM #18 are attached hereto and found immediately following the text of this Annual Report. The audit report of Deloitte LLP, Chartered Accountants, for the audited financial statements is included herein immediately preceding the audited financial statements.

Audited Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of Deloitte LLP, dated April 29, 2015.

Statements of Financial Position at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Notes to Financial Statements


	- 66 -

(B) Index to Exhibits:

Certificate of Incorporation, Certificates of Name Change, Articles of Incorporation, Articles of Amalgamation and By-Laws:

Certificate of Incorporation Amendment dated June 9, 2010 (1)

Articles and Bylaws dated June 9, 2010 (1)

Notice of Articles dated November 14, 2012 (1)

Certificate of Change of Name (2)

Notice of Alteration (2)

Notice of Change in Articles (2)

Articles and Bylaws dated September 12, 2014 (2)

Instruments defining the rights of holders of the securities being registered

***See Exhibit Number 1***

Voting Trust Agreements - N/A

Material Contracts

Property Acquisition Agreement between the Company and Richard Billingsley and Dwayne Kress dated September 27, 2010 for the acquisition of the Fame Property. (1)

Management Agreement between the Company and Max Investments Inc., a private company owned by Christopher Dyakowski, dated January 1, 2011. (1)

Confirmation from Christopher Dyakowski regarding the claims of the Fame Property are held in trust for the benefit of the Company. (1)

List of Foreign Patents - N/A

Calculation of earnings per share - N/A

Explanation of calculation of ratios - N/A

List of Subsidiaries - N/A

Statement pursuant to the instructions to Item 8.A.4, regarding the financial statements filed in registration statements for initial public offerings of securities – N/A


	- 67 -

10.




	Note		2014		2013

Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$	4,168,687	$	191,560
Accounts receivable			68,948		30,215
Prepaid expenses			20,625		-
			4,258,260		221,775

Restricted cash	5		-		730,130
Investment in associate	6		883,977		-
Equipment			4,200		2,033
Exploration and evaluation assets	7		434,619		-
Total assets		$	5,581,056	$	953,938

Liabilities
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables		$	486,066	$	424,592

Equity
Share capital	8		8,793,371		3,627,580
Reserves	8		1,494,648		110,549
Deficit			(5,193,029)		(3,208,783)
Total equity			5,094,990		529,346
Total liabilities and equity		$	5,581,056	$	953,938




	Note		2014		2013

Expenses
Advisory and consulting	9	$	979,258	$	888,890
Professional fees			738,903		257,643
Share-based compensation	8(c)		251,313		110,549
Marketing and travel			100,089		67,118
General and administrative			54,614		61,496
Regulatory and filing			22,119		-
Depreciation			1,747		1,976
			(2,148,043)		(1,387,672)

Other Items
Gain on loss of control of subsidiary	6		214,599		-
Equity loss on investment in associate	6		(94,414)		-
Finance income			15,680		840
Foreign exchange gain			27,932		99,280
			163,797		100,120

Loss and comprehensive loss for the year		$	(1,984,246)	$	(1,287,552)

Basic and diluted loss per common share for the year		$	(0.06)	$	(0.06)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic and diluted			32,071,144		21,949,554



		Common Shares							Total
	Note	Shares issued	Amount		Reserves		Deficit		equity

At December 31, 2012		21,949,554	$	3,627,580	$	-	$	(1,921,231)	$	1,706,349
Share-based compensation	8(c)	-		-		110,549		-		110,549
Net loss		-		-		-		(1,287,552)		(1,287,552)
At December 31, 2013		21,949,554	$	3,627,580	$	110,549	$	(3,208,783)	$	529,346
Share-based compensation	8(c)	-		-		251,313		-		251,313
Exchange of R2 shares for Renaissance shares	4	4,741,250		-		-		-		-
Value assigned upon amalgamation	4	-		410,466		-		-		410,466
Shares issued for cash pursuant to private placement	8(b)	19,166,666		4,565,575		1,184,425		-		5,750,000
Shares issued in settlement of accounts payable	8(b)	1,124,666		337,400		-		-		337,400
Shares issued as finders fees	8(b)	171,333		51,400						51,400
Share issue costs	8(b)	-		(199,050)		(51,639)		-		(250,689)
Net loss		-		-		-		(1,984,246)		(1,984,246)
At December 31, 2014		47,153,469	$	8,793,371	$	1,494,648	$	(5,193,029)	$	5,094,990




	2014	2013

Operating activities
Net loss	(1,984,246)	(1,287,552)
Adjusted for:
Depreciation	1,747	1,976
Share-based compensation (Note 8(c))	251,313	110,549
Loss on investment in associate (Note 6)	94,414	-
Unrealized foreign exchange gain	-	(96,917)
Gain on loss of control of subsidiary (Note 6)	(214,599)	-
Changes in non-cash working capital items:
Accounts receivable	(48,674)	26,412
Prepaid expenses	(18,025)	-
Trade and other payables	357,881	294,295
Cash used in operating activities	(1,560,189)	(951,237)

Investing activities
Disposition of cash on loss of control of subsidiary (Note 6)	(11,192)	-
Acquisition of cash on reverse takeover transaction (Note 4)	18,557	-
Purchase of equipment	(3,572)	-
Changes in restricted cash balances	-	303,741
Cash provided by investing activities	3,793	303,741

Financing activities
Issuance of common shares	5,750,000	-
Share issue costs	(199,289)	-
Cash provided by financing activities	5,550,711	-

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	(17,188)	19,385
Net increase (decrease) in cash	3,977,127	(628,111)
Cash, beginning of year	191,560	819,671
Cash, end of year	4,168,687	191,560


Cash	$	18,557
Amounts receivable		7,390
Prepaid expenses		2,600
Equipment		342
Exploration and evaluation assets		434,619
Trade and other payables		(53,042)
Net assets acquired	$	410,466



	Deloitte LLP 700, 850 - 2 Street SW Calgary AB T2P 0R8 Canada

	Tel: 403-267-1700 Fax: 403-213-5791 www.deloitte.ca


		April 4, 2014
	ASSETS	$
	Cash	11,192
	Accounts receivable	17,331
	Restricted cash	747,318
	Total assets	775,841

	Accounts payable	12,049
	Total liabilities	(12,049)

	Net assets derecognized	763,792

	Net assets derecognized	(763,792)
	Investment in Montero (a)	978,391
	Gain on loss of control of subsidiary	214,599


Balance, April 4, 2014	$	978,391
Equity loss in associate		(94,414)
Balance, December 31, 2014	$	883,977


	Balance December 31, 2013		Acquired on RTO		Balance December 31, 2014
Acquisition costs
Property option payments – cash	$	-	$	40,000	$	40,000
Property option payments – shares		-		20,000		20,000
		-		60,000		60,000
Exploration costs
Surveying		-		162,290		162,290
Equipment & field costs		-		35,057		35,057
Filing and assessments		-		12,811		12,811
Geological consulting		-		16,760		16,760
Grid work and soil sampling		-		56,287		56,287
Project management		-		36,788		36,788
Sample preparation and analysis		-		83,500		83,500
Technical report		-		25,547		25,547
Mineral exploration tax credits		-		(54,420)		(54,420)
		-		374,620		374,620
	$	-	$	434,620	$	434,620


	Gross proceeds	Transaction costs	Book value
	$	$	$

Share capital	4,565,575	199,050	4,366,525
Reserves – warrants	1,184,425	51,639	1,132,786
	5,750,000	250,689	5,499,311


	Outstanding and exercisable		Weighted average exercise price
Balance, December 31, 2012	1,346,000	$	0.25
Cancelled	(400,000)		(0.25)
Granted	200,000		0.25
Balance, December 31, 2013	1,146,000		0.25
Granted	2,755,000		0.30
Balance, December 31, 2014	3,901,000	$	0.28


	2014	2013

Risk-free interest rate	1.75% - 1.90%	1.13%
Expected life	6 years	3 years
Annualized volatility	65.00%	65.00%
Forfeiture rate	1.00%	0.00%
Dividend rate	0.00%	0.00%


Outstanding	Exercisable	Weighted average exercise price		Expiry date	Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)

946,000	630,666	$	0.25	April 13, 2017	2.3
200,000	66,666		0.25	July 2, 2018	3.5
2,355,000	784,997		0.30	July 31, 2024	9.6
400,000	133,333		0.30	August 28, 2024	9.7
3.901,000	1,615,662	$	0.28		6.5


*December 31, 2014*	Canada	Spain	Total
Investment	-	883,977	883,977
Equipment	4,200	-	4,200
Exploration & evaluation assets	434,619	-	434,619
	438,819	883,977	1,322,795


*December 31, 2013*	Canada	Spain	Total
Restricted cash	-	730,130	730,130
Equipment	2,033	-	2,033
	2,033	730,130	732,163


		2014		2013
Loss before income taxes	$	1,984,000	$	1,288,000
Federal and provincial statutory tax rates		26.00%		25.75%
Expected income tax recovery		(516,000)		(335,000)
Non-deductible expenses and other permanent differences		139,000		26,000
Non-taxable portion of gain		(28,000)		-
Losses for which no tax benefit has been recorded		405,000		359,000
Foreign exchange translation differences		-		(29,000)
Difference in foreign tax rates		-		(21,000)
Income tax recovery	$	-	$	-


	2014	2013
	$	$
Non-capital losses	940,000	965,000
Share issue costs	59,000	16,000
Investment in associate	202,000	-
Exploration Assets	(58,000)	-
Other	2,000	2,000


2029	$	29,000
2030		935,000
2031		872,000
2032		187,000
2033		600,000
2034		991,000
	$	3,614,000