NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization

Twinlab Consolidated Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on October 24, 2013 under the laws of the State of Nevada as Mirror Me, Inc. On August 7, 2014, the Company amended its articles of incorporation and changed its name to Twinlab Consolidated Holdings, Inc.

Nature of Operations

The Company and its subsidiaries manufacture and market high-quality, science-based nutritional supplements, and also provide health and wellness information and dietary supplement contract manufacturing services. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Twinlab Consolidation Corporation (“TCC”), Twinlab Holdings, Inc. (“THI”), Twinlab Corporation (“Twinlab”), ISI Brands, Inc. (“ISI”), NutraScience Labs, Inc. (“NutraScience”) and NutraScience IP Corporation.

Products include vitamins, minerals, specialty supplements and sports nutrition products primarily under the Twinlab® brand name (including the Twinlab® Fuel family of sports nutrition products); diet and energy products under the Metabolife® brand name; a line of products that promote joint health under the Trigosamine® brand name; and a full line of herbal teas under the Alvita® brand name. These products are sold primarily through health and natural food stores and national and regional drug store chains, supermarkets, and mass market retailers.

Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Nutricap Purchase Agreement

As further discussed in Note 3, on February 6, 2015, NutraScience acquired the customer relationships of Nutricap Labs, LLC, a provider of dietary supplement contract manufacturing services.

Organic Holdings Purchase Agreement

As further discussed in Note 13, on October 5, 2015, TCC acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of Organic Holdings, LLC, a marketer and distributor of nutritional products.

Basis of Presentation and Unaudited Information

The condensed consolidated interim financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which in the opinion of management, are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained therein. Financial results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of financial results that may be expected for the fiscal year. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2015.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant management estimates include those with respect to returns and allowances, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the reserve for inventory obsolescence, the recoverability of long-lived assets and the estimated value of derivative liabilities.

Significant Concentration of Credit Risk

Sales to the Company’s top three major customers aggregated to approximately 37% and 33% of total sales for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and approximately 33% and 29% of total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Sales to one of those customers were approximately 18% and 16% of total sales for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and approximately 23% and 15% of total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Accounts receivable from these customers were approximately 30% and 26% of total accounts receivable as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company applies the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:

Level 1 – inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 – inputs are other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 – inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the underlying asset or liability.

The following table summarizes the financial instruments of the Company measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

September 30, 2015	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

Marketable securities	$	67	$	67	$	-	$	-
Derivative liabilities		13,599		-		-		13,599

December 31, 2014	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

Marketable securities	$	29	$	29	$	-	$	-

Net Loss per Common Share

Basic net income or loss per common share (Basic EPS) is computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income or loss per common share (Diluted EPS) is computed by dividing net income or loss by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and the dilutive potential common share equivalents then outstanding. Potential dilutive common share equivalents consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants to acquire common stock.

Due to the fact that for all periods presented the Company incurred net losses, potential dilutive common share equivalents as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, totaling 29,628,612 and 84,683,227 shares, respectively, are not included in the calculation of Diluted EPS because they are anti-dilutive. Therefore, basic loss per common share is the same as diluted loss per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330), Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory.” An entity is required to measure inventory within the scope of this Update at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Other than the change in the subsequent measurement guidance from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost and net realizable value for inventory within the scope of this Update, there are no other substantive changes to the guidance on measurement of inventory. For public companies, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments in this Update are to be applied prospectively with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. We are currently unable to determine the impact on our consolidated financial statements of the adoption of this new accounting pronouncement.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” To simplify presentation of debt issuance costs, the amendments in this Update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this Update. For public companies, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the amendments in this Update is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. We adopted the new guidance effective January 1, 2015. Our prior period financial statements were not impacted by the early adoption of this Update.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”. ASU 2014-09 amends the guidance for revenue recognition to replace numerous, industry-specific requirements and converges areas under this topic with those of the International Financial Reporting Standards. The ASU implements a five-step process for customer contract revenue recognition that focuses on transfer of control, as opposed to transfer of risk and rewards. The amendment also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows from contracts with customers. Other major provisions include the capitalization and amortization of certain contract costs, ensuring the time value of money is considered in the transaction price, and allowing estimates of variable consideration to be recognized before contingencies are resolved in certain circumstances. The amendments in this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016; however, in July 2015, the FASB agreed to delay the effective date by one year. The proposed deferral may permit early adoption, but would not allow adoption any earlier than the original effective date of the standard. Entities can transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. We are currently assessing the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09, including possible transition alternatives, will have on our financial statements