burl-10k_20170128.htm

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on July 29, 2016, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $5,367,694,090. The aggregate market value was computed by reference to the closing price of the Common Stock on such date.

As of February 25, 2017, 70,218,617 shares of common stock of the registrant were outstanding.

Certain provisions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed within 120 days of the close of the registrant’s 2016 fiscal year, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K to the extent described herein.

We are a nationally recognized retailer of high-quality, branded apparel at everyday low prices. We opened our first store in Burlington, New Jersey in 1972, selling primarily coats and outerwear. Since then, we have expanded our store base to 592 stores as of January 28, 2017, inclusive of an internet store, in 45 states and Puerto Rico, and diversified our product categories by offering an extensive selection of in-season, fashion-focused merchandise, including: women’s ready-to-wear apparel, menswear, youth apparel, baby, footwear, accessories, home and coats. We sell a broad selection of desirable, first-quality, current-brand, labeled merchandise acquired directly from nationally recognized manufacturers and other suppliers. For the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017, we generated net sales of $5,566.0 million, and earned net income, Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the section below entitled “Key Performance Measures”) of $215.9 million, $232.3 million and $584.6 million, respectively.

As used in this Annual Report, the terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to Burlington Stores, Inc. and all its subsidiaries. We were organized in 2013 under the name Burlington Holdings, Inc. and currently exist as a Delaware corporation. Our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (BCFWC), was initially organized in 1972 as a New Jersey corporation, was reincorporated in 1983 in Delaware when the company originally became a public company and currently exists as a Delaware corporation. BCFWC became a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Burlington Coat Factory Investments Holdings, Inc. in connection with the acquisition of BCFWC in April 2006 by affiliates of Bain Capital Partners, LLC (along with its associated investment funds, or any successor to its investment management business, Bain Capital) in a take private transaction (the Merger Transaction) and became an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of ours on February 14, 2013 in connection with our corporate reorganization. We completed an initial public offering of our common stock in October 2013.

We define our fiscal year as the 52 or 53 week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31. This is an annual report for the 52 week fiscal year ended January 28, 2017 (Fiscal 2016). The fiscal years ended January 30, 2016 (Fiscal 2015) and January 31, 2015 (Fiscal 2014) also consisted of 52 weeks.

As of January 28, 2017, we operated 592 stores, inclusive of an internet store. Over 98% of our net sales are derived from stores we operate as Burlington stores (Burlington Stores). We believe that our customers are attracted to our stores principally by the availability of a large assortment of first-quality current brand-name merchandise at everyday low prices.

Burlington Stores offer customers a complete line of value-priced apparel, including: ladies sportswear, menswear, coats, family footwear and youth apparel, as well as baby furniture, accessories, home décor and gifts. We continue to emphasize our rich heritage of coats and outerwear, and we believe that we are viewed as the destination for coat shoppers. Our broad selection provides a wide range of apparel, accessories and furnishing for all ages. We purchase both pre-season and in-season merchandise, allowing us to respond timely to changing market conditions and consumer fashion preferences. Furthermore, we believe Burlington Stores’ substantial selection of staple, destination products attracts customers from beyond our local trade areas. We believe these products drive incremental store-traffic and differentiate us from our competitors.

In some of our stores, we previously granted unaffiliated third parties the right to use designated store space solely for the purpose of selling such third parties’ goods, primarily fragrances. We did not own or have any rights to any trademarks, licenses or other intellectual property used in connection with the brands sold by such unaffiliated third parties. During Fiscal 2015, we began the conversion of our fragrance business, which was previously operated under a licensing arrangement, to an owned category, and such sales are recorded in the line item “Net sales” in our Consolidated Statements of Income. During Fiscal 2016, prior to the completion of our conversion, our rental income from all such arrangements aggregated less than $0.5 million of our total revenues.

We believe the breadth of our selection and our ability to successfully operate in stores of varying square footage represent a competitive advantage. Our average store size is approximately 76,000 square feet. We believe that as we continue to reduce our comparable store inventory, we will be able to reduce the square footage of our stores while continuing to maintain our broad assortment. As a result, we believe major landlords seek us as a tenant because the appeal of our apparel, home and accessory merchandise profile attracts a desired customer base.

Our store base is geographically diversified with stores located in 45 states and Puerto Rico as set forth below:

State	Number of Stores	State	Number of Stores	State	Number of Stores
AK	2	LA	9	NY	39
AL	7	MA	14	OH	21
AR	5	MD	16	OK	3
AZ	10	ME	2	OR	4
CA	65	MI	18	PA	30
CO	6	MN	7	PR	12
CT	10	MO	7	RI	5
DE	3	MS	3	SC	5
FL	42	NC	14	SD	1
GA	17	ND	1	TN	7
IA	3	NE	1	TX	62
ID	2	NH	3	UT	3
IL	31	NJ	29	VA	18
IN	12	NM	3	WA	12
KS	6	NV	6	WI	10
KY	5

Our store sales area is organized by merchandise category with flexibility to quickly expand or contract category offerings in response to changes in consumer preferences. Our typical store features open sight lines, bright overhead lighting and clear signage to promote easy navigation through the store. We highlight the best brands and freshest product in four way fixtures along the aisles with additional merchandise arranged by size in H-racks. We believe our clean, organized merchandise presentation highlights the brands, value, selection and sizing within assortments and promotes a self-service, treasure hunt experience for our customers.

Our store managers are accountable for the sales and profitability of their stores. The store leadership team is comprised of managers and assistant managers. The stores are led by their regional team, consisting of a regional vice president and regional managers in operations, human resources and loss prevention. The regional vice president sets the priorities for the team and ensures the stores are supported in their overall mission to grow sales and profitability.

We continue to explore expansion opportunities both within our current market areas and in other regions. We believe that our ability to find satisfactory locations for our stores is essential for the continued growth of our business. The opening of stores generally is contingent upon a number of factors including, but not limited to, the availability of desirable locations with suitable structures and the negotiation of acceptable lease terms. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to find suitable locations for new stores or that even if such locations are found and acceptable lease terms are obtained, we will be able to open the number of new stores presently planned.

We have a proven track record of new store expansion. Our store base has grown from 13 stores in 1980 to 592 stores, inclusive of an internet store, as of January 28, 2017. If we identify appropriate locations, we believe that we will be able to execute our growth strategy without significantly impacting our current stores. We have identified numerous market opportunities that we believe will allow us to reach 1,000 stores over the long-term. The table below shows our store openings and closings each fiscal year since the beginning of Fiscal 2014.

We have four distribution centers that ship approximately 94% of merchandise units to our stores. The remaining 6% of merchandise units are drop shipped by our vendors directly to our stores. Our two east coast distribution centers are located in Edgewater Park, New Jersey and Burlington, New Jersey. Our two west coast distribution centers are located in San Bernardino, California, and Redlands, California. These four distribution centers occupy an aggregate of 2,786,000 square feet, and each includes processing, shipping and storage capabilities.

We also operate four warehousing facilities to support our distribution centers. The east coast has three supporting warehouses; two in Burlington, New Jersey and one in Florence, New Jersey. The west coast has one supporting warehouse in Redlands, California. These four warehousing facilities occupy an aggregate of 1,567,000 square feet and primarily serve as storage facilities.

In addition, we occupy approximately 156,000 square feet of space at a third-party logistics center in Plainfield, Indiana to support our e-commerce business.

We are committed to providing our customers with an enjoyable shopping experience in stores that are clean, neat and easy to shop. In training our employees, our goal is to emphasize knowledgeable, friendly customer service and a sense of professional pride. We offer our customers special services to enhance the convenience of their shopping experience, such as layaway, baby gift registry and professional tailors (in selected stores).

We have empowered our store teams to provide an outstanding customer experience for every customer in every store, every day. We have streamlined processes and will continue to strive to create opportunities for fast and friendly customer interactions. Our stores must reflect clean, organized merchandise presentations that highlight the brands, value, and diversity of selection within our assortments.

Our “open to buy” off-price model enables us to provide our customers with products that are nationally branded, fashionable, high quality and priced right. We have an experienced team of General Merchandise Managers, Divisional Merchandise Managers and buyers focused on improving comparable store inventory turnover, inventory age and freshness of merchandise. We purchase merchandise from many suppliers, none of which accounted for more than 2% of our net purchases during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 or Fiscal 2014. We have no long-term purchase commitments or arrangements with any of our suppliers, and believe that we are not dependent on any one supplier. We continue to have good working relationships with our suppliers.

We have designed our merchant organization so that buyers focus primarily on buying, planners focus primarily on planning, and information systems help inform data-driven decisions for both groups. Buyers are in the market each week and focus on purchasing great products for great value. We seek to purchase a majority of our merchandise in-season. Buyers spend time interacting face-to-face with new and existing vendors and on continuously evaluating trends in the market to which we believe our customers

would respond positively. Our buyers use a merchant scorecard that rates products across four key attributes—fashion, quality, brand and price—to help formalize a framework for buying decisions.

Our merchandising model allows us to provide our customers with a wide breadth of product categories. Sales percentage by major product category is as follows:

We employ an e-commerce strategy currently focused on increasing awareness of the breadth of our merchandise selection, great brands and values, as well as driving traffic to our stores and selling merchandise directly from our website. We execute our strategy through our website and through social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest. In recent years, we have focused on expanding our online assortment, optimizing the user experience across devices, and improving our shipping and fulfillment capabilities in order to elevate the digital experience with our company for both new and existing customers.

Our core customer is the 25-49 year-old woman. The core customer is educated, resides in mid- to large-sized metropolitan areas and is a brand conscious fashion enthusiast. This customer shops for herself, her family, and her home. We appeal to value seeking and fashion conscious customers who are price-driven but enjoy the style and fit of high-quality, branded merchandise.

We use a variety of broad-based and targeted marketing strategies to efficiently deliver the right message to the targeted audience at the right time. These strategies include national television, direct mail, email, digital marketing, local radio and out-of-home communications. Our broad television broadcast communication and reach is balanced with relevant customer contacts to increase frequency of store visits.

We utilize a combination of industry-standard third party and internally developed information technology and system solutions to support our business functions. We continually evaluate and implement business system technologies and solutions that enhance the consistency of our execution and improve the scalability of business system functions. We utilize standard methodologies to evaluate new initiatives across our entire organization and make data-driven decisions that support our growth and cost management initiatives.

The U.S. retail apparel and home furnishings markets are highly fragmented and competitive. We compete for business with department stores, off-price retailers, specialty stores, discount stores, wholesale clubs, and outlet stores. At various times throughout the year, traditional full-price department store chains and specialty shops offer brand-name merchandise at substantial markdowns, which can result in prices approximating those offered by us at our Burlington Stores.

Our business, like that of most retailers, is subject to seasonal influences. In the second half of the year, which includes the back-to-school and holiday seasons, we generally realize a higher level of sales and net income. Weather is also a contributing factor to the sale of our clothing. Generally, our sales are higher if the weather is cold during the Fall and warm during the early Spring. Sales of cold weather clothing are increased by early cold weather during the Fall, while sales of warm weather clothing are improved by early warm weather conditions in the Spring. Although we have diversified our product offerings, we believe traffic to our stores is still driven, in part, by weather patterns.

We own the trademarks, service marks and tradenames that we use in connection with the operation of our business. Our trademarks include “Burlington Stores,” “BCF,” “Burlington,” “Burlington Coat Factory,” “Cohoes,” “Luxury Linens,” “MJM Designer Shoes,” and “Baby Depot.” We consider these trademarks and the accompanying name recognition to be valuable to our business. We believe that our rights to these properties are adequately protected. Our rights in these trademarks endure for as long as they are used.

As of January 28, 2017, we employed approximately 40,000 people, including part-time and seasonal employees. Our staffing requirements fluctuate during the year as a result of the seasonality of our business. We hire additional employees and increase the hours of part-time employees during seasonal peak selling periods. As of January 28, 2017, employees at one of our stores were subject to a collective bargaining agreement.

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Therefore, we file reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Copies of such reports, proxy statements, and other information may be obtained by visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

You can access financial and other information about us in the Investors Relations section of our website, which can be accessed at www.burlingtonstores.com. We make available through our website, free of charge, copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed with or furnished to the SEC under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing or furnishing such material to the SEC. The information contained on, or accessible through, our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is therefore not incorporate by reference. The reference to our website address is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.

This report contains forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about us, the industry in which we operate and other matters, as well as management’s beliefs and assumptions and other statements regarding matters that are not historical facts. For example, when we use words such as “projects,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “will,” “opportunity,” “potential” or “may,” variations of such words or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes, we are making forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Our forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Such statements may include, but are not limited to, proposed store openings and closings, proposed capital expenditures, projected financing requirements, proposed developmental projects, projected sales and earnings, our ability to maintain selling margins, and the effect of the adoption of recent accounting pronouncements on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Actual events or results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors. While it is impossible to identify all such factors, factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimated by us include: general economic conditions; our ability to successfully implement one or more of our strategic initiatives; the availability of desirable store locations on suitable terms; changing consumer preferences and demand; industry trends, including changes in buying, inventory and other business practices by customers; competitive factors, including pricing and promotional activities of major competitors; the availability, selection and purchasing of attractive merchandise on favorable terms; import risks; weather patterns, including, among other things, changes in year-over-year temperatures; our future profitability; our ability to control costs and expenses; unforeseen computer related problems; any unforeseen material loss or casualty; the effect of inflation; an increase in competition within the markets in which we compete; regulatory changes; our relationships with employees; the impact of current and future laws; terrorist attacks, particularly attacks on or within markets in which we operate; natural and man-made disasters, including, but not limited to, fire, snow and ice storms, flood, hail, hurricanes and earthquakes; our substantial level of indebtedness and related debt-service obligations; restrictions imposed by covenants in our debt agreements; availability of adequate financing; our dependence on vendors for our merchandise; domestic events affecting the delivery of merchandise to our stores; existence of adverse litigation and risks; and each of the factors discussed in

this Item 1A, Risk Factors as well as risks discussed elsewhere in this report. While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results. In addition, as a result of these and other factors, our past financial performance should not be relied on as an indication of future performance. The cautionary statements referred to in this section also should be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that may be issued by us or persons acting on our behalf. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this report might not occur. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee future results, events, levels of activity, performance or achievements.

Set forth below are certain important risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition and cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements made by us. Although we believe that we have identified and discussed below the key risk factors affecting our business, there may be additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known or that are not currently believed to be significant that may adversely affect our performance or financial condition. More detailed information regarding certain risk factors described below is contained in other sections of this report.

Consumer spending habits, including spending for the merchandise that we sell, are affected by, among other things, prevailing global economic conditions, inflation, levels of employment, salaries and wage rates, prevailing interest rates, housing costs, energy costs, commodities pricing, income tax rates and policies, consumer confidence and consumer perception of economic conditions. In addition, consumer purchasing patterns may be influenced by consumers’ disposable income, credit availability and debt levels. An incremental slowdown in the U.S. economy, an uncertain global economic outlook or a credit crisis could adversely affect consumer spending habits, resulting in lower net sales and profits than expected on a quarterly or annual basis. Consumer confidence is also affected by the domestic and international political situation. Our financial condition and operations could be impacted by changes in government regulations in areas including, but not limited to, taxes and healthcare. The outbreak or escalation of war, or the occurrence of terrorist acts or other hostilities in or affecting the U.S. could lead to a decrease in spending by consumers. In addition, natural disasters, industrial accidents and acts of war in various parts of the world could have the effect of disrupting supplies and raising prices globally which, in turn, may have adverse effects on the world and U.S. economies and lead to a downturn in consumer confidence and spending.

We face increased competition from other retailers that could adversely affect our business.

The retail sector is highly competitive, and retailers are constantly adjusting their business model, promotional activity and pricing strategies in response to changing conditions. We compete on the basis of a combination of factors, including among others, price, breadth, quality and style of merchandise offered, in-store experience, level of customer service, ability to identify and respond to new and emerging fashion trends, brand image and scalability. We compete with a wide variety of large and small retailers for customers, vendors, suitable store locations and personnel. In order to increase traffic and drive consumer spending in the economic environment of the past several years, competitors, including department stores, mass merchants and specialty apparel stores, have been offering brand-name merchandise at substantial markdowns. Continuation of this trend, or the possible effect on consumer buying patterns that improving economic conditions could have, may cause consumer demand to shift from off-price retailers to other retail categories, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Certain traditional, full-price retail chains have developed off-price concepts, which may directly compete with our business. Our competitors, including such retail chains, may seek to emulate facets of our business strategy, which could result in a reduction of any competitive advantage or special appeal that we might possess. In addition, most of our products are sold to us on a non-exclusive basis. As a result, our current and future competitors may be able to duplicate or improve on some or all of our product offerings that we believe are important in differentiating our stores. If our competitors were to duplicate or improve on some or all of our in-store experience or product offerings, obtaining the products we sell may become increasingly difficult, competition for customers may increase, and our competitive position and our business could suffer.

Our ability to compete with other retailers and to meet our customer expectations may also suffer if we are unable to deliver a superior omnichannel shopping experience for our customers through the integration of our store and online shopping channels. Omnichannel retailing is rapidly evolving, and we must anticipate and meet changing customer expectations. If we are unable to continue to meet changes in the competitive environment by successfully executing our e-commerce strategy consistent with customer expectations, or we do not realize a return on our omnichannel investments, our reputation and operating results may be adversely affected.

We may not be able to sustain our growth plans or successfully implement our long-range strategic and financial goals.

Our growth largely depends on our ability to successfully open and operate new stores, as well as to expand our distribution capabilities in order to support that growth. We intend to open 30 net new stores each year, while refreshing, remodeling or relocating a portion of our existing store base annually. The success of these strategies is dependent upon, among other things, the current retail environment, the identification of suitable markets and the availability of real estate that meets our criteria for traffic, square footage, co-tenancies, lease economics, demographics, and other factors, the negotiation of acceptable lease terms, construction costs, the availability of financing, the hiring, training and retention of competent sales personnel, and the effective management of inventory to meet the needs of new and existing stores on a timely basis.

Our proposed expansion will place increased demands on our operational, managerial and administrative resources. For example, our planned expansion will require us to increase the number of people we employ, as well as to monitor and upgrade our management information and other systems, and our distribution infrastructure. These increased demands could cause us to operate our business less effectively, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.

We may not be able to execute our growth strategies successfully, on a timely basis, or at all. If we fail to implement these strategies successfully, our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

Our net sales, operating income and inventory levels fluctuate on a seasonal basis, and decreases in sales or margins during our peak seasons could have a disproportionate effect on our overall financial condition and results of operations.

Our net sales and operating income fluctuate seasonally, with a significant portion of our operating income typically realized during the second half of the year. Any decrease in sales or margins during this period could have a disproportionate effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Seasonal fluctuations also affect our inventory levels. We must carry a significant amount of inventory, especially before the holiday season selling period. If we are not successful in selling our inventory, we may have to write down our inventory or sell it at significantly reduced prices or we may not be able to sell such inventory at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

A reduction in traffic to, or the closing of, the other destination retailers in the shopping areas where our stores are located could significantly reduce our sales and leave us with excess inventory, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, profitability and cash flows.

Many of our stores are strategically located in off-mall shopping areas known as “power centers.” Power centers typically contain three to five big-box anchor stores along with a variety of smaller specialty tenants. As a consequence of many of our stores being located in such shopping areas, our sales are derived, in part, from the volume of traffic generated by the other destination retailers and the anchor stores in power centers where our stores are located. Customer traffic to these shopping areas may be adversely affected by the closing of such destination retailers or anchor stores, or by a reduction in traffic to such stores resulting from a regional or global economic downturn, a general downturn in the local area where our store is located, or a decline in the desirability of the shopping environment of a particular power center. Such a reduction in customer traffic would reduce our sales and leave us with excess inventory, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, profitability and cash flows. We may respond by increasing markdowns, initiating marketing promotions or transferring product to other stores to reduce excess inventory, which would further decrease our gross profits and net income.

Failure to execute our opportunistic buying and inventory management process could adversely affect our business.

We purchase the majority of our inventory opportunistically, with our buyers purchasing close to need. Establishing the “treasure hunt” nature of the off-price buying experience to drive traffic to our stores requires us to offer changing assortments of merchandise in our stores. While opportunistic purchasing provides our buyers the ability to buy at desirable times and prices, in the quantities we need and into market trends, it places considerable discretion in our buyers, subjecting us to risks related to the pricing, quantity, nature and timing of inventory flowing to our stores. If we are unable to provide frequent replenishment of fresh, high quality, attractively priced merchandise in our stores, it could adversely affect traffic to our stores as well as our sales and margins. We base our purchases of inventory, in part, on our sales forecasts. If our sales forecasts do not match customer demand, we may experience higher inventory levels and need to markdown excess or slow-moving inventory, leading to decreased profit margins, or we may have insufficient inventory to meet customer demand, leading to lost sales, either of which could adversely affect our financial performance. We need to purchase inventory sufficiently below conventional retail to maintain our pricing differential to regular department and specialty store prices, and to attract customers and sustain our margins, which we may not achieve at various times and which could adversely affect our results.

In order to better serve our customers and maximize sales, we must properly execute our inventory management strategies by appropriately allocating merchandise among our stores and our e-commerce platform, timely and efficiently distributing inventory to such locations, maintaining an appropriate mix and level of inventory in such locations, appropriately changing the allocation of floor space of stores among product categories to respond to customer demand, and effectively managing pricing and markdowns, and there

is no assurance we will be able to do so. In addition, as we implement inventory localization initiatives, there could be disruptions in inventory flow and placement. Failure to effectively execute our opportunistic inventory buying and inventory management strategies could adversely affect our performance and our relationship with our customers.

In addition to our own execution, we may need to react to factors affecting inventory flow that are outside our control, such as adverse weather and natural disasters or other changes in conditions affecting our vendors and others in our supply chain, such as political instability, labor issues, including strikes or threats of strikes, or increasing cost of regulations. If we are not able to adjust appropriately to such factors, our inventory management may be affected, which could impact our performance and our relationship with our customers.

Failure to identify customer trends and preferences to meet customer demand could negatively impact our performance.

Because our success depends on our ability to meet customer demand, we work to follow customer trends and preferences on an ongoing basis and to buy inventory in response to those trends and preferences. However, identifying consumer trends and preferences in the diverse product lines and many markets in which we do business and successfully meeting customer demand across those lines and for those markets on a timely basis is challenging. Although our flexible business model allows us to buy close to need and in response to consumer preferences and trends, and to expand and contract merchandise categories in response to consumers’ changing tastes, we may not do so successfully, which could adversely affect our sales and the markdowns required to move the resulting excess inventory will adversely affect our operating margins.

Customers may also have expectations about how they shop in stores or through e-commerce, or more generally engage with businesses across different channels or media (through internet-based and other digital or mobile channels or particular forms of social media), which may vary across demographics and may evolve rapidly. Customers are increasingly using technology and mobile devices to rapidly compare products and prices and to purchase products. Failure to effectively meet these changing expectations and demands may adversely impact our reputation and our financial results.

If we are unable to renew or replace our store leases or enter into leases for new stores on favorable terms, if one or more of our current leases are terminated prior to the expiration of their stated term and we cannot find suitable alternate locations, or if we cannot optimize the size of our stores, our growth strategy and profitability could be negatively impacted.

We lease substantially all of our store locations. Most of our current leases expire at various dates after ten-year terms, the majority of which are subject to our option to renew such leases for several additional five-year periods. While we have the right to terminate some of our leases under specified conditions, including by making specified payments, we may not be able to terminate a particular lease if or when we would like to close a particular store. If we decide to close stores, we are generally required to continue to perform obligations under the applicable leases, which generally include, among other things, paying rent and operating expenses for the balance of the lease term, or paying to exercise rights to terminate, and the performance of any of these obligations may be expensive. When we assign leases or sublease space to third parties, we can remain liable on the lease obligations, which could lead to significant expense if the assignee or sublessee does not perform. In addition, when the lease term for the stores in our ongoing operations expire, our ability to renew such expiring lease on commercially acceptable terms or, if such lease cannot be renewed, our ability to lease a suitable alternative location, and our ability to enter into leases for new stores on favorable terms will depend on many factors, some of which may not be within our control, such as conditions in the local real estate market, competition for desirable properties and our relationships with current and prospective landlords. As the Company renews and replaces its store leases, we also strive to optimize the size of our existing stores to ensure maximum space utilization, which frequently means adjusting operations to accommodate smaller space through increased store product density and inventory turn optimization.

In addition, to the extent that our new store openings are in existing markets, we may experience reduced net sales volumes in existing stores in those markets. We expect to fund some of our expansion through cash flow from operations, lease payment credits from our lessors, and, if necessary, by borrowings under our $600.0 million Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2014 (the ABL Line of Credit). If we experience a decline in performance or lease payment allowances from our lessors become unavailable, however, we may slow or discontinue store openings, relocations, refreshes or remodels.

If we are unable to effectively manage our existing portfolio of real estate leases, renew existing leases or lease suitable alternative locations, enter into leases for new stores on favorable terms, or optimize the size of our stores, our growth and profitability may be negatively impacted.

Extreme and/or unseasonable weather conditions, serious disruptions or catastrophic events could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Extreme weather conditions in the areas in which our stores or distribution centers are located – especially in areas with a high concentration of our stores – could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, heavy snowfall or other extreme weather conditions over a prolonged period might make it difficult for our customers or employees to travel to our stores. In addition, unforeseen public health issues such as pandemics or epidemics, natural disasters such

as hurricanes, tornados, floods, earthquakes, and other extreme weather or climate conditions, or a combination of these or other factors, could severely damage or destroy one or more of our stores or distribution facilities located in the affected areas, or disrupt our computer systems, thereby disrupting our business operations. Any of these events or circumstances could disrupt the operations of one or more of our vendors. Day-to-day operations, particularly our ability to receive products from our vendors or transport products to our stores, could be adversely affected, or we could be required to close stores. As a result, our business could be adversely affected.

Our business is also susceptible to unseasonable weather conditions. For example, extended periods of unseasonably warm temperatures during the fall or winter season or cool weather during the spring or summer season could render a portion of our inventory incompatible with those unseasonable conditions, particularly in light of our historical product mix. These prolonged unseasonable weather conditions could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, because a significant portion of our net sales historically have occurred during the second half of the year, unseasonably warm weather during these months could have a disproportionately large effect on our business and materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Since we do not have long-term contracts with our vendors, if we are unable to purchase attractive brand name merchandise in sufficient quantities at competitive prices, we may be unable to offer a merchandise mix that is appealing to our customers and our sales may be harmed.

Our ability to purchase merchandise opportunistically from third party vendors also depends upon the continuous, sufficient availability of high quality merchandise that we can acquire at prices sufficiently below those paid by conventional retailers in order to achieve the value proposition we strive to provide to our customers. Some of our key vendors may, however, limit the number of retail channels they use to sell their merchandise, which may, in limited cases, result in intense competition among retailers to obtain and sell these goods. In addition, most of the brands of our top vendors are sold by competing retailers and some of our top vendors also have their own dedicated retail stores. Moreover, we typically buy products from our vendors on a purchase order basis. We have no long-term purchase contracts with any of our vendors and, therefore, have no contractual assurances of continued supply, pricing or access to products, and any vendor could change the terms upon which they sell to us or discontinue selling to us at any time. Finally, if our vendors are better able to manage their inventory levels and reduce the amount of their excess inventory, the amount of high quality merchandise available to us could be materially reduced.

If our relationships with our vendors are disrupted, we may not be able to acquire the merchandise we require in sufficient quantities or on terms acceptable to us. Any inability to acquire high quality merchandise would have a negative effect on our business and operating results because we would be missing products from our merchandise mix unless and until alternative supply arrangements were made, resulting in deferred or lost sales. In addition, events that adversely affect our vendors could impair our ability to obtain desired merchandise in sufficient quantities. Such events include difficulties or problems associated with our vendors’ business, finances, labor, importation of products, costs, production, insurance and reputation.

The loss of key personnel may disrupt our business and adversely affect our financial results.

We depend on the contributions of key personnel in various functions for our continued success. These executives and other key personnel may be hired by our competitors, some of which have considerably more financial resources than we do. The loss of key personnel, or the inability to hire, train, motivate and retain qualified employees, or changes to our organizational structure, operating results, or business model that adversely affect morale or retention, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Effective succession planning is also a key factor for our success. Our failure to enable the effective transfer of knowledge and facilitate smooth transitions with regard to key personnel could adversely affect our strategic planning and execution and negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we fail to enable the effective transfer of knowledge and facilitate smooth transitions for key personnel, the operating results and future growth for our business could be adversely affected, and the morale and productivity of the workforce could be disrupted.

Our failure to attract, train and retain quality employees in appropriate numbers could adversely affect our business.

Our performance depends on recruiting, developing, training and retaining quality sales, systems, distribution center and other employees in large numbers as well as experienced buying and management personnel, and we invest significant resources in training and motivating them to maintain a high level of job satisfaction. Many of our store employees are in entry level or part-time positions with historically high rates of turnover, which can lead to increased training and retention costs, particularly if employment opportunities increase. Availability and skill of employees may differ across markets in which we do business and in new markets we enter, and we need to manage our labor needs effectively.

In addition, because of the distinctive nature of our off-price model, we must provide significant internal training and development for key employees across the company, including within our buying organization. Similar to other retailers, we face challenges in securing and retaining sufficient talent in management and other key areas for many reasons, including competition in the retail industry generally and for talent in various geographic markets. If we do not continue to attract qualified individuals, train them in our business model, support their development and retain them, our performance could be adversely affected or our growth could be limited.

We are also dependent upon temporary personnel to adequately staff our stores and distribution facilities, with heightened dependence during busy periods such as the holiday season and when multiple new stores are opening. There can be no assurance that we will receive adequate assistance from our temporary personnel, or that there will be sufficient sources of suitable temporary personnel to meet our demand. Any such failure to meet our staffing needs or any material increases in associate turnover rates could have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations.

Labor costs, including healthcare costs, and other challenges from our large workforce may adversely affect our results and profitability.

We have a large workforce, and our ability to meet our labor needs while controlling costs, including costs of providing health, retirement and other associate benefits, is subject to various factors such as unemployment levels; prevailing wage rates and minimum wage requirements; participant benefit levels; economic conditions; interest rate changes; health and other insurance costs; and the regulatory environment, including health care legislation, and governmental labor and employment and associate benefits programs and requirements. The results of the November 2016 U.S. elections have introduced greater uncertainty with respect to the costs and composition of healthcare coverage relating to the Affordable Care Act and possible replacements. In addition, when wage rates or benefit levels increase in a market, increasing our wages or benefits may cause our earnings to decrease, while failing to increase our wages or benefits competitively or reducing our wages or benefits could result in a decline in our ability to attract or retain employees or in the quality of our workforce, causing our customer service or performance to suffer, which could negatively impact our results.

Parties with whom we do business may be subject to insolvency risks or may otherwise become unable or unwilling to perform their obligations to us.

We are a party to contracts, transactions and business relationships with various third parties, including, without limitation, vendors, suppliers, service providers and lenders, pursuant to which such third parties have performance, payment and other obligations to us. In some cases, we depend upon such third parties to provide essential leaseholds, products, services or other benefits, including with respect to store and distribution center locations, merchandise, advertising, software development and support, logistics, other agreements for goods and services in order to operate our business in the ordinary course, extensions of credit and other vital matters. Economic, industry and market conditions could result in increased risks to us associated with the potential financial distress of such third parties.

If any of the third parties with which we do business become subject to bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings, our rights and benefits in relation to our contracts, transactions and business relationships with such third parties could be terminated, modified in a manner adverse to us, or otherwise impaired. We cannot make any assurances that we would be able to arrange for alternate or replacement contracts, transactions or business relationships on terms as favorable as our existing contracts, transactions or business relationships, if at all. Any inability on our part to do so could negatively affect our cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.

Although we purchase most of our inventory from vendors domestically, merchandise production is located primarily overseas.

We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities. As a result, we are dependent upon the timely receipt of quality merchandise from vendors. Factors which affect overseas production could affect our vendors and, in turn, our ability to obtain inventory and the price levels at which they may be obtained. Factors that cause an increase in merchandise costs or a decrease in supply could lead to generally lower sales and gross margins in the retail industry.

Any of the foregoing factors, or a combination thereof, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

In addition, the results of the November 2016 U.S. elections have introduced greater uncertainty with respect to tax and trade policies, tariffs and government regulations affecting trade between the U.S. and other countries. Although we source the majority of our merchandise from third party vendors located in the U.S., the production of that merchandise occurs primarily overseas. Major developments in tax policy or trade relations, such as the disallowance of tax deductions for imported merchandise or the imposition of unilateral tariffs on imported products could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and liquidity.

Our business would be disrupted severely if one of our primary distribution centers were to shut down.

Most of the merchandise we purchase is shipped directly to our distribution centers, where it is prepared for shipment to the appropriate stores. The success of our stores depends on their timely receipt of merchandise, and a strong, efficient and flexible distribution network is critical to our ability to grow and to maintain a low-cost operating structure. Accordingly, we must ensure that we continue to add capacity to our existing distribution centers and build out planned additional distribution centers timely and cost effectively.

A disruption within our distribution network, including the shutdown of or loss of significant capacity by one of our current primary distribution centers, could adversely affect our ability to deliver inventory in a timely manner.

Failure to operate information systems and implement new technologies effectively could disrupt our business or reduce our sales or profitability.

We rely extensively on various information systems, including data centers, hardware and software and applications to manage many aspects of our business, including to process and record transactions in our stores, to enable effective communication systems, to plan and track inventory flow, to manage logistics and to generate performance and financial reports. We are dependent on the integrity, security and consistent operations of these systems and related back-up systems. Our computer systems and the third-party systems we rely on are also subject to damage or interruption from a number of causes, including power outages; computer and telecommunications failures; computer viruses or malware; security breaches; cyber-attacks; acts of war or terrorism; and design or usage errors by our employees or contractors. Compromises, interruptions or shutdowns of our systems, including those managed by third parties, whether intentional or inadvertent, could lead to delays in our business operations and, if significant or extreme, negatively affect our results of operations.

We modify, update, and replace our systems, applications and infrastructure from time to time, including by maintaining, updating or replacing legacy programs; and integrating new service providers, including cloud computing technologies. Although we believe we are diligent in selecting systems and vendors and implementing procedures to enable us to maintain the integrity of our systems when we modify them, there are inherent risks associated with modifying or replacing systems, and with new or changed

relationships, including accurately capturing and maintaining data, realizing the expected benefit of the change and managing the potential disruption of the operation of the systems as the changes are implemented. Potential issues associated with implementing technology initiatives and the time and resources required to optimize the benefits of new elements of our systems and infrastructure could reduce the efficiency of our operations in the short term. In addition, any interruption in the operation of our websites, particularly our e-commerce site, could cause us to suffer reputational harm or to lose sales if customers are unable to access our site or purchase merchandise from us during such interruption.

Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential information, whether through a breach of our computer system or otherwise, could severely hurt our business.

Some aspects of our business, like that of most retailers, involves the receipt, storage and transmission of customers' personal information, consumer preferences and payment card information, as well as confidential information about our employees, our suppliers and our Company, some of which is entrusted to third-party service providers and vendors. We rely on commercially available systems, software, tools (including encryption technology) and monitoring to provide security and oversight for processing, transmission, storage and the protection of confidential information. Despite the security measures we have in place, our facilities and systems, and those of third parties with which we do business, may be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism and theft, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors, or other similar events.

Electronic security attacks designed to gain access to sensitive information by breaching mission critical systems of large organizations are constantly evolving, and high profile electronic security breaches leading to unauthorized release of confidential information have occurred at a number of major U.S. companies. Computer hackers or other unauthorized third parties may attempt to penetrate or otherwise gain access to our computer systems or the systems of third parties with which we do business through fraud or other means of deceit and, if successful, misappropriate personal information, payment card or check information or confidential business information. Hardware, software or applications we develop or obtain from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise information security. In addition, our employees, contractors or third parties with which we do business or to which we outsource business operations may attempt to circumvent our security measures in order to misappropriate such information, and may purposefully or inadvertently cause a breach involving such information. Despite advances in security hardware, software, and encryption technologies, the methods and tools used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems are constantly changing and evolving, and may be difficult to anticipate or detect for long periods of time. We have implemented and regularly review and update processes and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to or use of secured data and to prevent data loss. However, the ever-evolving threats mean we and our third-party service providers and vendors must continually evaluate and adapt our respective systems, procedures, controls and processes, and there is no guarantee that such measures will be adequate to safeguard against all data security breaches or misuses of data. An electronic security breach in our systems (or in the systems of third parties with which we do business) that results in the unauthorized release of individually identifiable customer or other sensitive data could nonetheless occur and have a material adverse effect on our reputation and lead to financial losses from remedial actions, loss of business or potential liability, including possible punitive damages. In addition, as the regulatory environment relating to retailers and other companies’ obligation to protect such sensitive data becomes increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business, compliance with those requirements could result in additional costs, and a material failure on our part to comply could subject us to fines or other regulatory sanctions and potentially to lawsuits.

We are subject to payment-related risks that could increase our operating costs, expose us to fraud or theft, subject us to potential liability and potentially disrupt our business.

We accept payments using a variety of methods, including cash, checks, credit and debit cards, and gift cards, and we may offer new payment options over time. Acceptance of these payment options subjects us to rules, regulations, contractual obligations and compliance requirements, including payment network rules and operating guidelines, data security standards and certification requirements, and rules governing electronic funds transfers. These requirements may change over time or be reinterpreted, making compliance more difficult or costly.

For certain payment methods, including credit and debit cards, we pay interchange and other fees, which may increase over time and raise our operating costs. We rely on third parties to provide payment processing services, including the processing of credit cards, debit cards, and other forms of electronic payment. If these companies become unable to provide these services to us, or if their systems are compromised, it could potentially disrupt our business. The payment methods that we offer also subject us to potential fraud and theft by criminals, who are becoming increasingly more sophisticated, seeking to obtain unauthorized access to or exploit weaknesses that may exist in the payment systems. If we fail to comply with applicable rules or requirements for the payment methods we accept, or if payment-related data is compromised due to a breach or misuse of data, we may be liable for costs incurred by payment card issuing banks and other third parties or subject to fines and higher transaction fees, or our ability to accept or facilitate certain types of payments may be impaired. In addition, our customers could lose confidence in certain payment types, which may result in a shift to other payment types or potential changes to our payment systems that may result in higher costs. As a result, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Issues with merchandise quality or safety could damage our reputation, sales and financial results.

Various governmental authorities in the jurisdictions where we do business regulate the quality and safety of the merchandise we sell to consumers. Regulations and standards in this area, including those related to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, state regulations like California’s Proposition 65, and similar legislation, impose restrictions and requirements on the merchandise we sell in our stores and through e-commerce. These regulations change from time to time as new federal, state or local regulations are enacted. If we or our merchandise vendors are unable to comply with regulatory requirements on a timely basis or at all, or to adequately monitor new regulations that may apply to existing or new merchandise categories, significant fines or penalties could be incurred or we could have to curtail some aspects of our sales or operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

We rely on our vendors to provide quality merchandise that complies with applicable product safety laws and other applicable laws, but they may not comply with their obligations to do so. Although our arrangements with our vendors frequently provide for indemnification for product liabilities, the vendors may fail to honor those obligations to an extent we consider sufficient or at all. Issues with the quality and safety of merchandise, and issues with the authenticity of merchandise, or customer concerns about such issues, regardless of our fault, could cause damage to our reputation and could result in lost sales, uninsured product liability claims or losses, merchandise recalls and increased costs, and regulatory, civil or criminal fines or penalties, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

Difficulty complying with existing laws, rules, regulations, and local codes, or changes in existing laws, rules and regulations could negatively affect our growth strategy, business operations and financial performance.

We are subject to federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations in the operation of our business. In addition to complying with current laws, rules and regulations, we must also comply with new and changing laws and regulations, new regulatory initiatives, evolving interpretation of existing laws by judicial and regulatory authorities, and reforms in jurisdictions where we do business. Complying with local zoning codes, real estate land use restrictions, employment-related laws, and other local laws across numerous jurisdictions is particularly challenging as we grow the number of our stores in new municipalities and need to stay abreast of changes in such local laws. The increasing proliferation of local laws generally further complicates our efforts to comply with all of the various laws, rules and regulations that apply to our business.

All of the above legal, regulatory and administrative requirements collectively affect multiple aspects of our business, including those involving labor and employment benefits; health, welfare and finance; real estate management; consumer protection and product safety; climate change, supply chain, energy and waste; use of the internet, including e-commerce, electronic communications, data protection and privacy; and protection of third party intellectual property rights. Changes to these laws and regulations could increase our costs of compliance or of doing business, and could adversely affect our operating results. In addition, if we fail to comply with these laws, rules, and regulations, we may be subject to judgments, fines or other costs or penalties, which could materially adversely affect our operations and our financial results and condition.

Changes in accounting standards and subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by management related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial results or financial condition.

Generally accepted accounting principles and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant to our business, such as inventories and self-insurance reserves are highly complex and involve many subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments. Changes in these rules or their interpretation, or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates or judgments could significantly change our reported or expected financial performance or financial condition.

Our future growth and profitability could be adversely affected if our advertising and marketing programs are not effective in generating sufficient levels of customer awareness and traffic.

We rely on advertising to increase consumer awareness of our product offerings and pricing to drive store traffic and traffic to our e-commerce site. In addition, we rely and will increasingly rely on other forms of media advertising, including, without limitation, social media and e-marketing. Our future growth and profitability will depend in part upon the effectiveness and efficiency of our advertising and marketing programs. In order for our advertising and marketing programs to be successful, we must:

Our planned advertising and marketing expenditures may not result in increased total or comparable store sales or generate sufficient levels of product awareness. Further, we may not be able to manage our advertising and marketing expenditures on a cost-effective basis. Additionally, some of our competitors may have substantially larger marketing budgets, which may provide them with a competitive advantage over us.

Damage to our corporate reputation or brand could adversely affect our sales and operating results.

Building brand reputation is important to our continuing success. Our reputation is partially based on perceptions of various subjective qualities and overall integrity. As such, in the many different markets in which we do business, we work hard to build relationships with our customers through our various marketing campaigns. However, any incident that erodes the trust or confidence of our customers or the general public could adversely affect our reputation and business, particularly if the incident results in significant adverse publicity or governmental inquiry. In addition, information concerning us, whether or not true, may be instantly and easily posted on social media platforms and similar devices at any time, which information may be adverse to our reputation or business. The harm may be immediate without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction. Damage to our reputation in any form could result in declines in customer loyalty and sales, affect our vendor relationships, development opportunities and associate retention, and otherwise adversely affect our business.

Use of social media by the Company or third parties at our direction may adversely impact our reputation or subject us to fines or other penalties.

There has been a substantial increase in the use of social media platforms and similar devices, including blogs, social media websites, and other forms of internet-based communications, which allow individuals access to a broad audience of consumers and other interested persons. We have increasingly utilized social media in our marketing and employment recruiting efforts in order to reach as many current and potential new customers and potential employment candidates as efficiently and cost effectively as possible, and have also retained third parties with expertise and distinction in the social media realm to bolster our social media efforts. As laws and regulations rapidly evolve to govern the use of these platforms and devices, the failure by us, our employees or third parties acting at our direction to abide by applicable laws and regulations in the use of theses platforms and devices could adversely impact our reputation or subject us to fines or other penalties.

Circumstances limiting our ability, or the ability of our vendors, to access capital markets could adversely affect our business or financial condition.

Changes in the credit and capital markets, including market disruptions, limited liquidity and interest rate fluctuations, may increase the cost of financing or restrict our access to this potential source of future liquidity. A decrease in the ratings that rating agencies assign to our short and long-term debt may also negatively impact our access to the debt capital markets and increase our cost of borrowing. These circumstances may negatively impact our access to capital markets, which could have a materially adverse impact on our business or financial condition.

In many cases, our vendors depend upon commercial credit to finance their operations. If they are unable to secure commercial financing, our vendors could seek to change the terms on which they sell to us, which could negatively affect our liquidity. In addition, the inability of vendors to access liquidity, or the insolvency of vendors, could lead to their failure to deliver merchandise to us.

Legal and regulatory proceedings could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

We are subject to various legal and regulatory proceedings relating to our business, certain of which may involve jurisdictions with reputations for aggressive application of laws and procedures against corporate defendants. We are impacted by trends in litigation, including class action litigation brought under various consumer protection, employment, and privacy and information security laws. Accruals are established based on our best estimates of our potential liability. However, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation. Regardless of the outcome or whether the claims are meritorious, legal and regulatory proceedings may require that we devote substantial time and expense to defend our Company. Unfavorable rulings could result in a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our business could be impacted as a result of actions by activist shareholders or others.

From time to time, we may be subject to legal and business challenges in the operation of our Company due to shareholder proposals, media campaigns, proxy contests, and other such actions instituted by activist shareholders or others. Responding to such actions could be costly and time-consuming, disrupt our operations, may not align with our business strategies and could divert the attention of our Board of Directors and senior management from the pursuit of current business strategies. Perceived uncertainties as to our future direction as a result of shareholder activism or potential changes to the composition of the Board of Directors may lead to the perception of a change in the direction of the business or other instability, and may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners.

Our substantial indebtedness requires a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate sufficient cash depends on numerous factors beyond our control, and we may be unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt obligations.

As of January 28, 2017, our total indebtedness was $1,130.5 million, including $1,112.0 million, inclusive of original issue discount, under our $1,200.0 million Senior Secured Term Loan Facility, pursuant to our term loan credit agreement (the Term Loan Credit Agreement) dated as of February 24, 2011, as amended. We had no outstanding borrowings on our ABL Line of Credit as of January 28, 2017. Estimated cash required to make interest payments for these debt obligations amounts to approximately $43.4 million for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2018.

Our ability to make payments and to refinance our debt, and to fund planned capital expenditures, will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future, which is to some extent subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt and meet our other commitments, we will be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as refinancing all or a portion of our debt, selling material assets or operations or raising additional debt or equity capital. We may not be able to successfully carry out any of these actions on a timely basis, on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or be assured that these actions would be sufficient to meet our capital requirements. In addition, the terms of our existing or future debt agreements, including the ABL Line of Credit and the Term Loan Credit Agreement, may restrict us from affecting any of these alternatives.

Our failure to comply with the agreements relating to our outstanding indebtedness, including as a result of events beyond our control, could result in an event of default that could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and our financial condition.

If an event of default under any of the agreements relating to our outstanding indebtedness occurred, the holders of the defaulted debt could cause all amounts outstanding, with respect to that debt, to be due and payable immediately. Our assets or cash flow may not be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under our outstanding debt instruments if accelerated upon an event of default. Further, if we are unable to repay, refinance or restructure our secured indebtedness, the holders of such debt could proceed against the collateral securing that indebtedness through foreclosure proceedings and/or by forcing us into bankruptcy or liquidation. In addition, any event of default or declaration of acceleration under one debt instrument could also result in an event of default under one or more of our other debt instruments.

The market price of our common stock has fluctuated substantially in the past and may continue to fluctuate significantly. Future announcements or disclosures concerning us or any of our competitors, our strategic initiatives, our sales and profitability, our financial condition, any quarterly variations in actual or anticipated operating results or comparable sales, any failure to meet analysts’ expectations and sales of large blocks of our common stock, among other factors, could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. In addition, the stock market has experienced price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many retail and other stocks that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law might discourage or delay acquisition attempts for us that stockholders might consider favorable.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of the Company more difficult without the approval of our Board of Directors. These provisions:

These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions under Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of the Company, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors of their choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions they desire.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, subject to limited exceptions, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other employees to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation or our by-laws, or (iv) any other action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine.

Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the provisions of our certificate of incorporation described above. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find these provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Because we do not intend to pay cash dividends in the near term, stockholders may not receive any return on investment unless they are able to sell their common stock for a price greater than their purchase price.

The continued operation and expansion of our business will require substantial funding. Accordingly, we do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends on shares of our common stock in the near term. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon results of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions, including those under our ABL Line of Credit and Term Loan Credit Agreement, any potential indebtedness we may incur, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant. Accordingly, if stockholders purchase shares of our common stock, realization of a gain on investment will depend on the appreciation of the price of our common stock, which may never occur.

We are a holding company and rely on dividends, distributions and other payments, advances and transfers of funds from our subsidiaries to meet our obligations.

We are a holding company that does not conduct any business operations of our own. As a result, we are largely dependent upon cash dividends and distributions and other transfers from our subsidiaries to meet our obligations. The deterioration of income from, or other available assets of, our subsidiaries for any reason could limit or impair their ability to pay dividends or other distributions to us.

We own the land and/or buildings for 39 of our stores and have leases for 550 of our stores. Our new stores are generally leased for an initial term of ten to fifteen years, the majority of which are subject to our option to renew such leases for several additional

five-year periods. Store leases generally provide for fixed monthly rental payments, plus the payment, in most cases, of real estate taxes and other charges with escalation clauses. In many locations, our store leases contain formulas providing for the payment of additional rent based on sales. Most of our stores are located in malls, strip shopping centers, regional power centers or are freestanding.

We own approximately 97 acres of land in Burlington and Florence, New Jersey on which we have constructed our corporate campus, which includes our corporate headquarters and a warehouse facility. We own approximately 43 acres of land in Edgewater Park, New Jersey on which we have constructed a distribution center and an office facility of approximately 648,000 square feet. We lease a 660,000 square foot distribution facility in San Bernardino, California and two additional distribution facilities for storage/support purposes in New Jersey and California, with a combined square footage of 1,478,000 square feet. We also lease approximately 35,000 square feet of office space in New York City, as well as 10,000 square feet of office space in Los Angeles, California (West Coast buying office).

Like many retailers, the Company has been named in class or collective actions on behalf of various groups alleging violations of federal and state wage and hour and other labor statutes, and alleged violation of state consumer and/or privacy protection statutes. In the normal course of business, we are also party to various other lawsuits and regulatory proceedings including, among others, commercial, product, product safety, employee, customer, intellectual property and other claims. Actions against us are in various procedural stages. Many of these proceedings raise factual and legal issues and are subject to uncertainties. To determine the likelihood of a loss and/or the measurement of any loss can be complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss in excess of amounts accrued. Our assessments are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process relies heavily on estimates and assumptions that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change those estimates and assumptions. While no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of these matters, we believe that the final resolution of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position, liquidity or capital resources.

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “BURL.” The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated below, the quarterly high and low sales prices per share of our common stock during Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015.

During the past two fiscal years, we have not declared, and do not anticipate declaring in the near term, dividends on shares of our common stock. We currently do, and intend to continue to, retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund all of the Company's capital expenditures, business initiatives, and to support any potential opportunistic capital structure initiatives. Our ability to pay dividends on our common stock will be limited by restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make distributions under the terms of current and any future agreements governing our indebtedness as described in Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Long Term Debt.” Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors, subject to compliance with covenants in our current and future agreements governing our indebtedness, and will depend upon our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant.

In addition, since we are a holding company, substantially all of the assets shown on our consolidated balance sheets are held by our subsidiaries. Accordingly, our earnings, cash flow and ability to pay dividends are largely dependent upon the earnings and cash flows of our subsidiaries and the distribution or other payment of such earnings to us in the form of dividends.

The performance graph below and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.

The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from the closing prices of October 2, 2013 (the date our common stock commenced trading on the New York Stock Exchange) through January 28, 2017, with the return on the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index and the S&P Retailing Index over the same period. This graph assumes an initial investment of $100 and assumes the reinvestment of dividends, if any. Such returns are based on historical results and are not intended to suggest future performance.

The following table provides information regarding our purchases of common stock during the three fiscal months ended January 28, 2017:

The following table presents selected historical consolidated financial data and certain other financial data. The historical consolidated balance sheet data and consolidated statement of operations data for Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 and for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2014 (Fiscal 2013) and February 2, 2013 (Fiscal 2012) have been derived from our historical audited Consolidated Financial Statements.

The historical consolidated financial data and other financial data presented below should only be read in conjunction with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements (and the related notes thereto) and Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, each of which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our historical consolidated financial data may not be indicative of our future performance.

	Fiscal Year Ended(1)
	February 2, 2013			February 1, 2014			January 31, 2015			January 30, 2016			January 28, 2017
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
Net Sales	$	4,131,379		$	4,427,503		$	4,814,504		$	5,098,932		$	5,566,038
Net income	$	25,301		$	16,150		$	65,955		$	150,482		$	215,873
Net (loss) income per share—basic:
Class L stockholders	$	28.76		$	31.93		$	—		$	—		$	—
Common stockholders	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.26	)	$	0.89		$	2.03		$	3.06
Net (loss) income per share—diluted:
Class L stockholders	$	28.76		$	31.93		$	—		$	—		$	—
Common stockholders	$	(0.27	)	$	(0.39	)	$	0.87		$	1.99		$	3.01
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (end of the period):
Inventory		680,190			720,052			788,708			783,528			701,891
Total assets(2)		2,461,190			2,596,712			2,614,285			2,571,813			2,574,483
Long term debt(2)		1,318,640			1,344,779			1,238,992			1,295,163			1,128,843
Class L common stock(3)		1,029,189			—			—			—			—
Stockholders’ deficit(4)		(1,109,458	)		(150,468	)		(65,951	)		(99,022	)		(49,812	)
Other Financial Data:
Adjusted Net Income(5)		59,589			70,239			138,577			174,555			232,268
Adjusted EBITDA(6)		331,964			383,697			448,066			484,029			584,562
Comparable store sales growth(7)		1.2	%		4.7	%		4.9	%		2.1	%		4.5	%
Gross margin rate		38.8	%		39.1	%		39.7	%		40.0	%		40.8	%
Store payroll as a percentage of net sales		9.7	%		9.1	%		8.8	%		8.6	%		8.5	%
Cash flow increase (decrease)		7,672			89,648			(107,635	)		(4,434	)		60,682
Working capital (deficit)(8)		104,799			80,604			26,566			18,594			(96,310	)

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

For purposes of the following “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” unless the context requires otherwise, references to “the Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” refer to Burlington Stores, Inc., and its consolidated subsidiaries. “Parent” refers to Burlington Stores, Inc. alone, “Holdings” refers to Burlington Coat Factory Investments Holdings, Inc., Parent’s indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary, and “BCFWC” refers to Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Holdings’ direct, wholly-owned subsidiary.

The following discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting our consolidated operating results, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows as of and for the periods presented below. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the “Selected Financial Data” and our Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this report.

In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements based on current expectations that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, such as our plans, objectives, expectations, and intentions set forth under the caption entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” which can be found in Item 1A, Risk Factors. Our actual results and the timing of events may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth in Item 1A, Risk Factors and elsewhere in this report.

We are a nationally recognized retailer of high-quality, branded apparel at everyday low prices. We opened our first store in Burlington, New Jersey in 1972, selling primarily coats and outerwear. Since then, we have expanded our store base to 592 stores as of January 28, 2017, inclusive of an internet store, in 45 states and Puerto Rico, and diversified our product categories by offering an extensive selection of in-season, fashion-focused merchandise, including: women’s ready-to-wear apparel, menswear, youth apparel, baby, footwear, accessories, home and coats. We acquire a broad selection of desirable, first-quality, current-brand, labeled merchandise directly from nationally-recognized manufacturers and other suppliers.

On July 29, 2016, we completed the repricing of our senior secured term loan facility (the Term Loan Facility) which, among other things, reduced the interest rate margins applicable under the Term Loan Facility from 2.25% to 1.75% in the case of prime rate loans, and from 3.25% to 2.75% in the case of LIBOR loans, with the LIBOR floor being reduced from 1.00% to 0.75%. As a result of this transaction, we recognized a non-cash loss on the extinguishment of debt of $3.8 million, which was recorded in the line item “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Also in connection with the transaction, we incurred fees of $1.3 million, which were recorded in the line item “Costs related to debt amendments and secondary offering” in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Refer to the section below entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further explanation.

During Fiscal 2016, we opened 30 new stores under the name “Burlington Stores” and closed three Burlington Stores and two MJM Stores. We continue to pursue our growth plans and invest in capital projects that meet our financial requirements. During the fiscal year ended February 3, 2018 (Fiscal 2017), we plan to open 30 net new stores.

We continue to focus on a number of ongoing initiatives aimed at increasing our overall profitability by improving our comparable store sales trends, increasing total sales growth and reducing expenses. These initiatives include, but are not limited to:

We intend to continue to increase comparable store sales through the following initiatives:

We intend to expand and enhance our retail store base through the following initiatives:

As we strive to increase profitability through achieving positive comparable store sales and leveraging productivity initiatives focused on improving the in-store experience, more efficient movement of products from the vendors to the selling floors, and modifying our marketing plans to increase our core customer base and increase our share of our current customers’ spending, there are uncertainties and challenges that we face as an off-price retailer of apparel and accessories for men, women and children and home furnishings that could have a material impact on our revenues or income.

Seasonality of Sales and Weather Conditions. Our sales, like most other retailers, are subject to seasonal influences, with the majority of our sales and net income derived during the second half of the year, which includes the back-to-school and holiday seasons.

Weather continues to be a contributing factor to the sale of our clothing. Generally, our sales are higher if the weather is cold during the Fall and warm during the early Spring. Sales of cold weather clothing are increased by early cold weather during the Fall, while sales of warm weather clothing are improved by early warm weather conditions in the Spring. Although we have diversified our product offerings, we believe traffic to our stores is still driven, in part, by weather patterns.

General Economic Conditions. Consumer spending habits, including spending for the merchandise that we sell, are affected by, among other things, prevailing global economic conditions, inflation, levels of employment, salaries and wage rates, prevailing interest rates, housing costs, energy costs, commodities pricing, income tax rates and policies, consumer confidence and consumer perception of economic conditions. In addition, consumer purchasing patterns may be influenced by consumers’ disposable income, credit availability and debt levels.

A slowdown in the U.S. economy, an uncertain global economic outlook or a credit crisis could adversely affect consumer spending habits resulting in lower net sales and profits than expected on a quarterly or annual basis. Consumer confidence is also affected by the domestic and international political situation. Our financial condition and operations could be impacted by changes in government regulations in areas including, but not limited to, taxes and healthcare. The outbreak or escalation of war, or the occurrence of terrorist acts or other hostilities in or affecting the U.S., could lead to a decrease in spending by consumers. In addition, natural disasters, industrial accidents and acts of war in various parts of the world could have the effect of disrupting supplies and raising prices globally which, in turn, may have adverse effects on the world and U.S. economies and lead to a downturn in consumer confidence and spending.

We closely monitor our net sales, gross margin, expenses and working capital. We have performed scenario planning such that if our net sales decline, we have identified variable costs that could be reduced to partially mitigate the impact of these declines. If we were to experience adverse economic trends and/or if our efforts to counteract the impacts of these trends are not sufficiently effective, there could be a negative impact on our financial performance and position in future fiscal periods.

Competition and Margin Pressure. We believe that in order to remain competitive with off-price retailers and discount stores, we must continue to offer brand-name merchandise at a discount to prices offered by other retailers as well as an assortment of merchandise that is appealing to our customers.

The U.S. retail apparel and home furnishings markets are highly fragmented and competitive. We compete for business with department stores, off-price retailers, specialty stores, discount stores, wholesale clubs, and outlet stores as well as with certain traditional, full-price retail chains that have developed off-price concepts. At various times throughout the year, traditional full-price department store chains and specialty shops offer brand-name merchandise at substantial markdowns, which can result in prices approximating those offered by us at our Burlington Stores. We anticipate that competition will increase in the future. Therefore, we will continue to look for ways to differentiate our stores from those of our competitors.

The U.S. retail industry continues to face increased pressure on margins as overall challenging retail conditions have led consumers to be more value conscious. Our “open to buy” paradigm, in which we purchase both pre-season and in-season merchandise, allows us the flexibility to purchase less pre-season with the balance purchased in-season and opportunistically. It also provides us with the flexibility to shift purchases between suppliers and categories. This enables us to obtain better terms with our suppliers, which we expect to help offset any rising costs of goods.

Changes to import and export laws could have a direct impact on our income and an indirect impact on consumer prices. Unfortunately, we cannot predict any future changes in such laws.

We consider numerous factors in assessing our performance. Key performance measures used by management include net income, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted EBITDA, comparable store sales, gross margin, inventory, store payroll as a percentage of net sales and liquidity.

Net income. We earned net income of $215.9 million during Fiscal 2016 compared with net income of $150.5 million during Fiscal 2015. This improvement was primarily driven by our improved gross margin, partially offset by increases in our selling, general and administrative expenses and income tax expense. We earned net income of $150.5 million during Fiscal 2015 compared with net income of $66.0 million for Fiscal 2014. The improvement in our net income was primarily driven by our improved gross margin, a decrease in losses incurred on the extinguishment of our debt and a decrease in our interest expense, partially offset by increased selling, general and administrative expenses and income tax expense.

Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA: Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures of our performance. Adjusted Net Income is defined as net income for the period plus (i) net favorable lease amortization, (ii) costs related to debt amendments and secondary offering, (iii) stock option modification expense, (iv) loss on the extinguishment of debt, (v) impairment charges, (vi) amounts related to certain litigation, (vii) advisory fees and (viii) other unusual, non-recurring or extraordinary expenses, losses, charges or gains, all of which are tax effected (before discrete items) to arrive at Adjusted Net Income. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income for the period plus (i) net interest expense, (ii) loss on extinguishment of debt, (iii) costs related to debt amendments and secondary offering, (iv) stock option modification expense, (v) advisory fees, (vi) depreciation and amortization, (vii) impairment charges, (viii) amounts related to certain litigation (ix) other unusual, non-recurring or extraordinary expenses, losses, charges or gains and (x) taxes.

We present Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA because we believe they are useful supplemental measures in evaluating the performance of our business and provide greater transparency into our results of operations. In particular, we believe that excluding certain items that may vary substantially in frequency and magnitude from operating income are useful supplemental measures that assist in evaluating our ability to generate earnings and leverage sales, and to more readily compare these metrics between past and future periods.

Adjusted Net Income has limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be considered either in isolation or as a substitute for net income or other data prepared in accordance with GAAP. Some of these limitations include:

For Fiscal 2016, Adjusted Net Income improved $57.7 million to $232.3 million. For Fiscal 2015, Adjusted Net Income improved $36.0 million to $174.6 million. These improvements were the result of our improved gross margin and a reduction in our interest expense, partially offset by increased costs, primarily selling, general and administrative expenses and income tax expense, net of the tax effect of the adjustments cited above (refer to the sections below entitled “Results of Operations” for further explanation).

The following table shows our reconciliation of net income to Adjusted Net Income for Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014:

Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be considered either in isolation or as a substitute for net income or other data prepared in accordance with GAAP. Some of these limitations include:

For Fiscal 2016 Adjusted EBITDA improved $100.5 million to $584.6 million. For Fiscal 2015, Adjusted EBITDA increased $36.0 million to $484.0 million. These improvements in Adjusted EBITDA were the result of our improved gross margin, partially offset by increased selling, general and administrative expenses (refer to the sections below entitled “Results of Operations” for further explanation).

The following table shows our reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA for Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	January 28,			January 30,			January 31,
	2017			2016			2015
Reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA:
Net income	$	215,873		$	150,482		$	65,955
Interest expense		56,161			58,999			83,745
Interest income		(56	)		(25	)		(38	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt (a)		3,805			649			74,347
Costs related to debt amendments and secondary offerings (b)		1,346			247			2,412
Stock option modification expense (c)		601			1,368			2,940
Advisory fees (d)		—			105			185
Depreciation and amortization		183,586			172,099			167,580
Impairment charges (e)		2,450			6,111			2,579
Litigation accrual (f)		3,457			5,600			9,280
Tax expense		117,339			88,394			39,081
Adjusted EBITDA	$	584,562		$	484,029		$	448,066

Comparable Store Sales. Comparable store sales measure performance of a store during the current reporting period against the performance of the same store in the corresponding period of the previous year. The method of calculating comparable store sales varies across the retail industry. As a result, our definition of comparable store sales may differ from other retailers.

We define comparable store sales as sales of those stores, including our online store, commencing on the first day of the fiscal month one year after the end of their grand opening activities, which normally conclude within the first two months of operations. The table below depicts our comparable store sales during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014.

Various factors affect comparable store sales, including, but not limited to, weather conditions, current economic conditions, the timing of our releases of new merchandise and promotional events, the general retail sales environment, consumer preferences and buying trends, changes in sales mix among distribution channels, competition, and the success of marketing programs.

Gross Margin. Gross margin is the difference between net sales and the cost of sales. Our cost of sales and gross margin may not be comparable to those of other entities, since some entities include all of the costs related to their buying and distribution functions, and other costs, in cost of sales. We include certain of these costs in the line items “Selling, general and administrative expenses” and “Depreciation and amortization” in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We include in our “Cost of sales” line item all costs of merchandise (net of purchase discounts and certain vendor allowances), inbound freight, distribution center outbound freight and certain merchandise acquisition costs, primarily commissions and import fees. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales expanded approximately 80 basis points to 40.8% during Fiscal 2016, compared with 40.0% during Fiscal 2015. The improvement was driven by strong merchandise margins. This improvement more than offset the 20 basis point increase in product sourcing costs, which are included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales during Fiscal 2014 was 39.7%.

Inventory. Inventory at January 28, 2017 decreased to $701.9 million from $783.5 million at January 30, 2016. This decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in our comparable store inventory of approximately 9% as a result of our ongoing initiative to reduce inventory levels and increase inventory turnover, and a decrease in our pack-and-hold inventory of approximately $30 million. These decreases were partially offset by the inventory required for our 25 net new stores opened since January 30, 2016.

In order to better serve our customers and maximize sales, we continue to refine our merchandising mix and inventory levels within our stores. By appropriately managing our inventories, we believe we will be better able to deliver a continual flow of fresh merchandise to our customers. We continue to move toward more productive inventories by increasing the amount of current inventory as a percent of total inventory.

Inventory turnover and comparable store inventory turnover are performance metrics that indicate how efficiently inventory is bought and sold. They each measure the length of time that we own our inventory.

Inventory turnover is calculated by dividing cost of goods sold by the 13 month average cost value of our inventory for the period being measured. Our inventory turnover rate improved to 4.2 turns per year during Fiscal 2016 compared with 3.7 turns per year during Fiscal 2015.

Comparable store inventory turnover is calculated by dividing comparable store sales by the average comparable store retail value of inventory for the period being measured. The comparable store retail value of inventories is estimated based on the original sales price of items on hand reduced by retail reductions, which include sales, markdowns taken, an estimated shortage adjustment and employee discounts, for our comparable stores. The calculation is based on a rolling 13 month average of inventory (at estimated retail value) and the last 12 months’ comparable sales. Our comparable store inventory turnover rate improved to 5.9 turns per year during Fiscal 2016 compared with 5.3 turns per year during Fiscal 2015.

The difference between inventory turnover and comparable store inventory turnover is primarily the result of not including distribution center and warehouse inventory as well as inventory at new and non-comparable stores. Inventory held at our warehouses and distribution centers includes merchandise being readied for shipment to our stores and “Pack and Hold” inventory acquired opportunistically for future store release. The magnitude of Pack and Hold inventory, at any one point in time, is dependent on the buying opportunities identified in the marketplace.

We present inventory turnover because it demonstrates how effective we are at managing our inventory. We present comparable store inventory turnover as we believe this is a useful supplemental metric in evaluating the effectiveness of our merchandising efforts, as a faster comparable store inventory turnover generally leads to reduced markdowns and more fresh merchandise in our stores.

Store Payroll as a Percentage of Net Sales. Store payroll as a percentage of net sales measures our ability to manage our payroll in accordance with increases or decreases in net sales. The method of calculating store payroll varies across the retail industry. As a result, our store payroll as a percentage of net sales may differ from other retailers. We define store payroll as regular and overtime payroll for all store personnel as well as regional and territory personnel, exclusive of benefits and payroll charges related to corporate and warehouse employees. Store payroll as a percentage of net sales improved to 8.5% during Fiscal 2016 compared with 8.6% during Fiscal 2015. The improvement in store payroll as a percentage of net sales was primarily driven by the benefit from efficiencies realized in our stores as we continue to simplify operating procedures and improve the execution thereof. Store payroll as a percentage of net sales was 8.8% during Fiscal 2014.

Liquidity. Liquidity measures our ability to generate cash. Management measures liquidity through cash flow and working capital position. Cash flow is the measure of cash generated from or used in operating, financing, and investing activities. Cash and cash equivalents increased $60.7 million during Fiscal 2016, resulting in a cash and cash equivalent balance of $81.6 million as of January 28, 2017 compared with a decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $4.4 million during Fiscal 2015. The improvement in our cash flow was primarily driven by our improved operating results, as well as a decrease in income tax and incentive compensation payments during Fiscal 2016 compared to Fiscal 2015. Our improvement was also driven by changes in our inventories and accounts payable, as described further below. These improvements were partially offset by changes in the net borrowings on our ABL Facility ($167.4 million net repayments during Fiscal 2016 compared with $104.1 million net borrowings during Fiscal 2015) and changes in our deferred tax liabilities. Refer to the section below entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further explanation.

Changes in working capital also impact our cash flows. We had a working capital deficit at January 28, 2017 of $96.3 million compared with working capital of $18.6 million at January 30, 2016. The decrease in working capital was primarily related to the decrease in our inventories. In addition, our accounts payable increased from January 30, 2016 as a result of our 25 net new stores opened during Fiscal 2016 as well as the timing of our inventory receipts during the final two months of Fiscal 2016. We also experienced an increase in our income taxes payable and incentive compensation accruals, which was driven by our improved operating results during Fiscal 2016, and were partially offset by increases in our cash and prepaid and other current assets.

The following table sets forth certain items in the Consolidated Statements of Income as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated.

	Percentage of Net Sales
	Fiscal Year Ended
	January 28,			January 30,			January 31,
	2017			2016			2015
Net sales		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Other revenue		0.4			0.6			0.7
Total revenue		100.4			100.6			100.7
Cost of sales		59.2			60.0			60.3
Selling, general and administrative expenses		31.0			31.3			31.6
Costs related to debt amendments and secondary offerings		0.0			0.0			0.0
Stock option modification expense		0.0			0.1			0.1
Depreciation and amortization		3.3			3.4			3.4
Impairment charges-long-lived assets		0.0			0.1			0.1
Other income—net		(0.2	)		(0.1	)		(0.2	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		0.1			0.0			1.5
Interest expense		1.0			1.2			1.7
Total costs and expenses		94.4			96.0			98.5
Income before income tax expense		6.0			4.6			2.2
Income tax expense		2.1			1.7			0.8
Net income		3.9	%		2.9	%		1.4	%

Performance for Fiscal Year (52 weeks) Ended January 28, 2017 (Fiscal 2016) Compared with Fiscal Year (52 weeks) Ended January 30, 2016 (Fiscal 2015)

Net sales improved $467.1 million, or 9.2%, to $5,566.0 million, primarily attributable to the following:

We believe that the comparable store sales increase was primarily due to our improved execution of our off-price model. We also benefited from the transition of our fragrance sales from leased department rental income to an owned business, as discussed below.

Other revenue (consisting of layaway, shipping and handling, alteration, dormancy and other service charges, subleased rental income and rental income from leased departments) decreased $6.0 million to $24.9 million, primarily driven by a reduction in rental income from third party fragrance sales. During Fiscal 2015, we began the conversion of our fragrance business, which was previously operated under a licensing arrangement, to an owned category which is recorded in the line item “Net sales” in our Consolidated Statements of Income. As of January 28, 2017, fragrance is now exclusively an owned business.

Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales improved approximately 80 basis points to 59.2% during Fiscal 2016, primarily driven by strong merchandise margins. This improvement was partially offset by the approximate 20 basis point increase in product sourcing costs, which are included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in our Consolidated Statements of Income. On a dollar basis, cost of sales increased $237.7 million, or 7.8%, primarily driven by our overall increase in sales.

Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales improved approximately 30 basis points during Fiscal 2016. The following table details selling, general and administrative expenses for Fiscal 2016 compared with Fiscal 2015:

	(in millions)
	Fiscal Year Ended
	January 28,		Percentage of			January 30,		Percentage of
	2017		Net Sales			2016		Net Sales			$ Variance			% Change
Store related costs	$	1,133.8		20.4	%	$	1,057.7		20.7	%	$	76.1			7.2	%
Product sourcing costs		261.0		4.7			229.4		4.5			31.6			13.8
Corporate costs		168.5		3.0			155.7		3.1			12.8			8.2
Marketing and strategy costs		91.8		1.6			94.5		1.9			(2.7	)		(2.9	)
Other selling, general and administrative expenses		68.2		1.3			60.4		1.1			7.8			12.9
Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	1,723.3		31.0	%	$	1,597.7		31.3	%	$	125.6			7.9	%

Store related costs as a percentage of net sales improved approximately 30 basis points during Fiscal 2016, driven by 30 basis points of leverage in occupancy costs and a 10 basis point improvement in store payroll driven by the simplification of operating procedures and improved execution within our store operations. These improvements were partially offset by a 10 basis point increase in our incentive compensation costs driven by our improved operating results. On a dollar basis, the $76.1 million increase was primarily driven by our new and non-comparable stores, as well as the increase in incentive compensation.

Product sourcing costs as a percentage of net sales increased approximately 20 basis points during Fiscal 2016, which partially offset the 80 basis point improvement in cost of sales. The increase in product sourcing costs as a percentage of net sales was driven by an increase in our supply chain costs as we continue to improve the execution of our off-price model as well as an increase in incentive compensation costs related to our buying and merchandising departments.

Corporate costs increased $12.8 million during Fiscal 2016, primarily driven by increases in incentive compensation and stock based compensation.

Marketing and strategy costs improved 30 basis points during Fiscal 2016, primarily driven by our increased leverage from our national television advertising.

During Fiscal 2016, we recorded costs related to debt amendments of $1.3 million representing legal and placement fees incurred in connection with the repricing of our Term Loan Facility. Refer to Note 7, “Long Term Debt,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further details regarding this transaction. During Fiscal 2015, we recorded $0.2 million of secondary offering costs. Refer to Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” for further details on our secondary offerings.

In May 2013, our Board of Directors approved a modification to the outstanding options, through a combination of exercise price reductions and cash payments to the option holders. Based on the terms of the modification, we will be required to make cash payments over the option holders’ vesting periods, which vary through Fiscal 2017. During Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, we recorded $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of expense related to these payments. We expect to recognize the remaining expense of less than $0.1 million during Fiscal 2017.

Additionally, upon application of modification accounting for the reduction in strike prices, which contemplates fair value of awards both before and after the modification, incremental non-cash stock option expense is expected to be recognized over the option holders’ vesting periods, which vary through Fiscal 2017. During Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, we recognized $0.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of incremental non-cash stock option expense. We expect to recognize the remaining non-cash stock option modification expense of $0.1 million during Fiscal 2017.

Depreciation and amortization expense related to the depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and the amortization of favorable and unfavorable leases amounted to $183.6 million during Fiscal 2016 compared with $172.1 million during Fiscal 2015. The increase was primarily driven by our new and non-comparable stores, as well as increased depreciation expense related to our ongoing supply chain initiatives and the renovation of our new corporate campus.

Impairment charges related to long-lived assets were $2.5 million and $6.1 million during Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively. We recorded impairment charges related to store-level assets for five stores during each of Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015. During Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, we also recorded impairment charges for capital expenditures for previously impaired stores. Refer to Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Impairment Charges,” for further discussion.

The recoverability assessment related to these store-level assets requires various judgments and estimates, including estimates related to future revenues, gross margin rates, store expenses and other assumptions. We base these estimates upon our past and expected future performance. We believe our estimates are appropriate in light of current market conditions. However, future impairment charges could be required if we do not achieve our current revenue or cash flow projections for each store.

Other income, net (consisting of breakage income, gains and losses on disposition of assets, investment income and other miscellaneous items) improved $5.0 million to $10.8 million during Fiscal 2016. The improvement in other income was primarily driven by the sale of certain state tax credits as well as a gain on the sale of one of our owned stores.

During Fiscal 2016, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $3.8 million as a result of the repricing of our Term Loan Facility. During Fiscal 2015, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.6 million, primarily driven by the $50.0 million prepayment on our Term Loan Facility on May 1, 2015. Refer to Note 7, “Long Term Debt,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further details regarding our debt transactions.

Interest expense improved $2.8 million to $56.2 million, primarily driven by the repricing of our Term Loan Facility during the second quarter of Fiscal 2016, which reduced our interest rate margins, partially offset by an increase in the amortization of the financings costs associated with our interest rate cap contracts from accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense.

Our average interest rates and average balances related to our Term Loan and our ABL Line of Credit for Fiscal 2016 compared with Fiscal 2015 are summarized in the table below:

Income tax expense was $117.3 million for Fiscal 2016 compared with $88.4 million for Fiscal 2015. The effective tax rate was 35.2% related to pretax income of $333.2 million for Fiscal 2016, and the effective tax rate was 37.0% related to pretax income of $238.9 million for Fiscal 2015. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily the result of realizing a tax benefit due to the release of our Puerto Rico valuation allowance resulting from a change in Puerto Rico regulations.

We earned net income of $215.9 million during Fiscal 2016 compared with net income of $150.5 million for Fiscal 2015. The improvement in our net income was primarily driven by our improved gross margin, partially offset by an increase in our selling, general and administrative expenses, income tax expense and depreciation expense.

Performance for Fiscal Year (52 weeks) Ended January 30, 2016 (Fiscal 2015) Compared with Fiscal Year (52 weeks) Ended January 31, 2015 (Fiscal 2014)

Net sales improved $284.4 million, or 5.9%, to $5,098.9 million, primarily attributable to the following:

We believe that the comparable store sales increase was primarily due to our improved execution of our off-price model. Our ability to achieve a positive comparable store sales despite the weather demonstrated the progress we have made toward de-weathering our business, which continues to be a goal for us. We also benefited from the transition of our fragrance sales from rental income from leased department to an owned business, as discussed below.

Other revenue decreased $4.2 million to $30.9 million, primarily driven by a reduction in rental income from third party fragrance sales due to the conversion of our fragrance business from a licensing arrangement to an owned category.

Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales increased approximately 30 basis points to 60.0% during Fiscal 2015, primarily driven by a reduction in markdown rate. This improvement was offset by the approximate 30 basis point increase in product sourcing costs, which are included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in our Consolidated Statements of Income. On a dollar basis, cost of sales increased $158.8 million, or 5.5%, primarily driven by our overall increase in sales, partially offset by the reduction in markdown rate.

Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales improved approximately 30 basis points during Fiscal 2015 as referenced to the table below:

	(in millions)
	Fiscal Year Ended
	January 30,		Percentage of			January 31,		Percentage of
	2016		Net Sales			2015		Net Sales			$ Variance			% Change
Store related costs	$	1,057.7		20.7	%	$	1,008.1		20.9	%	$	49.6			4.9	%
Product sourcing costs		229.4		4.5			204.1		4.2			25.3			12.4
Corporate costs		155.7		3.1			158.3		3.3			(2.6	)		(1.6	)
Marketing and strategy costs		94.5		1.9			94.7		2.0			(0.2	)		(0.2	)
Other selling, general and administrative expenses		60.4		1.1			55.7		1.2			4.7			8.4
Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	1,597.7		31.3	%	$	1,520.9		31.6	%	$	76.8			5.0	%

Store related costs as a percentage of net sales improved approximately 20 basis points during Fiscal 2015, driven by a 10 basis point expense leverage achieved in store payroll and a 10 basis point improvement driven by a reduction of incentive compensation. On a dollar basis, the $49.6 million increase was primarily driven by our new and non-comparable stores.

Product sourcing costs as a percentage of net sales increased approximately 30 basis points during Fiscal 2015, which offset the improvement in cost of sales as noted above. The increase in product sourcing costs as a percentage of net sales was driven by an increase in our supply chain and merchandising costs, which were partially offset by a reduction in incentive compensation.

Corporate costs as a percentage of net sales improved approximately 20 basis points during Fiscal 2015 driven by a reduction of incentive compensation of approximately 20 basis points and a reduction in legal expenses related to certain litigation matters of approximately 10 basis points, and were partially offset by an increase in stock based compensation of approximately 10 basis points.

During Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, costs related to debt amendments and secondary offerings totaled $0.2 million and $2.4 million, respectively, and were primarily related to our secondary offerings.

During Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, we recorded $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of expense related to cash payments, and recognized $1.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively, of incremental non-cash stock option expense.

Depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $172.1 million during Fiscal 2015 compared with $167.6 million during Fiscal 2014. The increase was primarily driven by our new and non-comparable stores, as well as our new corporate headquarters, which opened during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2014.

Impairment charges related to long-lived assets were $6.1 million and $2.6 million during Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, respectively. We recorded impairment charges related to store-level assets for five stores during Fiscal 2015 and three stores during Fiscal 2014. During Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, we also recorded impairment charges for capital expenditures for previously impaired stores.

Other income, net decreased $4.9 million to $5.9 million during Fiscal 2015. The decrease in other income was primarily driven by a favorable $3.2 million one-time legal settlement during Fiscal 2014.

During Fiscal 2015, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.6 million as a result of the May 1, 2015 prepayment on our Term Loan Facility. During Fiscal 2014, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $74.3 million, primarily driven by a $70.3 million loss as a result of our August 2014 refinancing transactions and a $3.6 million loss as a result of the April 4, 2014 partial redemption of our Holdco Notes.

Interest expense improved $24.7 million to $59.0 million, primarily driven by our August 2014 debt refinancing, our $58.0 million prepayment on our Holdco Notes in April 2014 and our $30.0 million and $50.0 million principal payments on our Term Loan Facility in January 2015 and May 2015, respectively. These improvements were partially offset by an increase in the outstanding borrowings on our ABL Line of Credit during the respective periods.

Our average interest rates and average balances related to our Term Loan and our ABL Line of Credit for Fiscal 2015 compared with Fiscal 2014 are summarized in the table below:

Income tax expense was $88.4 million for Fiscal 2015 compared with $39.1 million for Fiscal 2014. The effective tax rate was 37.0% related to pre-tax income of $238.9 million for Fiscal 2015, and the effective tax rate was 37.2% related to pre-tax income of $105.0 million for Fiscal 2014. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily driven by a decrease in state tax rate.

We earned net income of $150.5 million during Fiscal 2015 compared with net income of $66.0 million for Fiscal 2014. The improvement in our net income was primarily driven by our improved gross margin, a decrease in losses incurred on the extinguishment of our debt and a decrease in our interest expense, partially offset by increased selling, general and administrative expenses and income tax expense.

Our ability to satisfy interest payment obligations on our outstanding debt will depend largely on our future performance which, in turn, is subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors beyond our control. If we do not have sufficient cash flow to service interest payment obligations on our outstanding indebtedness, and if we cannot borrow or obtain equity financing to satisfy those obligations, our business and results of operations will be materially adversely affected. We cannot be assured that any replacement borrowing or equity financing could be successfully completed on terms similar to our current financing agreements, or at all.

We believe that cash generated from operations, along with our existing cash and our ABL Line of Credit, will be sufficient to fund our expected cash flow requirements and planned capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months as well as the foreseeable future. However, there can be no assurance that we would be able to offset declines in our comparable store sales with savings initiatives in the event that the economy declines.

We generated $60.7 million of cash flows during Fiscal 2016 compared with a use of $4.4 million during Fiscal 2015.

Net cash provided by operating activities amounted to $602.4 million and $327.5 million during Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively. The improvement was primarily driven by our improved operating results, as well as a decrease in income tax and incentive compensation payments during Fiscal 2016 compared to Fiscal 2015. The improvement was also driven by changes in our inventories and accounts payable. These improvements were partially offset by changes in our deferred rent incentives and deferred income taxes.

Net cash used in investing activities was $180.4 million and $194.7 million during Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively. This change was primarily the result of a reduction in capital expenditures related to our overall supply chain initiatives, partially offset by an increase in store expenditures (new stores, store refreshes and remodels and other store expenditures).

Net cash used in financing activities was $361.4 million during Fiscal 2016 compared to $137.2 million during Fiscal 2015. This change was primarily related to the net change in our ABL Facility ($167.4 million net repayments during Fiscal 2016 compared to $104.1 million of net borrowings during Fiscal 2015) and the $50.0 million repayment on our Term Loan Facility during Fiscal 2015 that did not repeat in Fiscal 2016.

Cash flow and working capital levels assist management in measuring our ability to meet our cash requirements. Changes in working capital also impact our cash flows. We had a working capital deficit at January 28, 2017 of $96.3 million compared with

working capital of $18.6 million at January 30, 2016. Refer to the previous section entitled “Key Performance Measures” for explanation of the changes in our working capital.

We used $4.4 million of cash flows during Fiscal 2015 compared with $107.6 million during Fiscal 2014.

Net cash provided by operating activities amounted to $327.5 million and $302.3 million during Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, respectively. The increase was primarily driven by our improved operating results, inclusive of the impact of our August 2014 debt refinancing and changes in our incentive compensation. Partially offsetting these increases were changes in our accounts payable resulting from the timing of our inventory purchases and changes in our prepaid rent due to the timing of our rental payments in relation to our fiscal calendar.

Net cash used in investing activities was $194.7 million and $216.5 million during Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, respectively. This change was primarily the result of reductions in capital expenditures related to our new corporate headquarters which was completed during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2014 and store expenditures (new stores, store refreshes and remodels and other store expenditures), partially offset by an increase in expenditures to support our supply chain initiatives.

Net cash used in financing activities was $137.2 million during Fiscal 2015 compared to $193.5 million during Fiscal 2014. This change in cash was primarily related to the net change in our debt obligations resulting from our August 2014 debt refinancing and our Term Loan Facility prepayment in May 2015, as well as a reduction in our deferred financing costs, partially offset by repurchases of our common stock.

Cash flow and working capital levels assist management in measuring our ability to meet our cash requirements. Changes in working capital also impact our cash flows. Working capital at January 30, 2016 was $18.6 million compared with $26.6 million at January 31, 2015.

For Fiscal 2016, cash spend for capital expenditures, net of $32.2 million of landlord allowances, amounted to $155.3 million. These capital expenditures include approximately $85 million, net of the previously mentioned landlord allowances, for store expenditures (new stores, store refreshes and remodels and other store expenditures). In addition, we made capital expenditures of approximately $22 million to support our supply chain initiatives, approximately $16 million to improve our localization efforts, with the rest to support information technology and other business initiatives. We incurred cash spend on capital expenditures of $160.0 million, net of approximately $41.8 million of landlord allowances, during Fiscal 2015.

We estimate that we will spend approximately $200 million, net of approximately $35 million of landlord allowances, in capital expenditures during Fiscal 2017, including approximately $105 million, net of the previously mentioned landlord allowances, for store expenditures (new stores, store refreshes and remodels and other store expenditures). In addition, we estimate that we will spend approximately $45 million to support our supply chain initiatives, with the remaining capital used to support our information technology and other business initiatives.

On November 24, 2015, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of our common stock, which we completed during Fiscal 2016. On November 15, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $200 million of our common stock. This share repurchase program will be funded using the Company’s available cash and is authorized to be executed through November 2018. As of January 28, 2017, we had $199.6 million available for purchase under this share repurchase program.

During Fiscal 2016, we repurchased 2,797,088 shares of common stock for $200.0 million under our share repurchase programs.

We are authorized to repurchase shares of our outstanding common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions under our repurchase programs. The timing and amount of stock repurchases will depend on a variety of factors, including the market conditions as well as corporate and regulatory considerations. Our share repurchase programs may be suspended, modified or discontinued at any time, and we have no obligation to repurchase any amount of our common stock under the programs.

We currently do, and intend to continue to, retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund all of the Company's capital expenditures, business initiatives, and to support any potential opportunistic capital structure initiatives. Therefore, at this time, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the near term. Our ability to pay dividends on our common stock will be limited by restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make distributions under the terms of current and any future agreements governing our indebtedness. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors, subject to compliance with covenants in our current and future agreements governing our indebtedness, and will depend upon our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant.

As of January 28, 2017, our obligations include $1,112.0 million, inclusive of original issue discount, under our Term Loan Facility. We had no outstanding balance on our ABL Facility as of January 28, 2017. Our debt obligations also include $23.6 million of capital lease obligations as of January 28, 2017.

On July 29, 2016, we entered into Amendment No. 5 (the Fifth Amendment) to the Term Loan Credit Agreement (as amended, the Amended Term Loan Credit Agreement) governing our Term Loan Facility. The Fifth Amendment, among other things, reduced the interest rate margins applicable under the Term Loan Facility from 2.25% to 1.75% in the case of prime rate loans, and from 3.25% to 2.75% in the case of LIBOR loans, with the LIBOR floor being reduced from 1.00% to 0.75%. The Fifth Amendment was accomplished by replacing the outstanding $1,117.0 million principal amount of Term B-3 Loans with a like aggregate principal amount of Term B-4 Loans. The Term B-4 Loans have the same maturity date that was applicable to the Term B-3 Loans. As a result of the Fifth Amendment, we recognized a non-cash loss on the extinguishment of debt of $3.8 million, representing the write-off of $2.5 million and $1.3 million in deferred financing costs and unamortized original issue discount, respectively, which was recorded in the line item “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Also in connection with the Fifth Amendment, we incurred fees of $1.3 million, primarily related to legal and placement fees, which were recorded in the line item “Costs related to debt amendments and secondary offering” in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

At January 28, 2017, our borrowing rate related to the Term Loan Facility was 3.53%.

At January 28, 2017, we had $427.8 million available under the Amended ABL Line of Credit and no outstanding borrowings. The maximum borrowings under the facility during Fiscal 2016 amounted to $350.0 million. Average borrowings during Fiscal 2016 amounted to $173.9 million at an average interest rate of 1.8%.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our obligations to make future payments under current contracts as of January 28, 2017:

	Payments Due By Period
	Total		Less Than 1 Year		2-3 Years		4-5 Years		Thereafter
	(in thousands)
Debt obligations	$	1,117,000	$	—	$	—	$	1,117,000	$	—
Interest on debt obligations(1)		187,920		43,385		83,830		60,705		—
Financing of interest rate cap contracts(2)		11,356		4,867		6,489		—		—
Capital lease obligations(3)		35,615		4,111		8,018		7,706		15,780
Operating lease obligations(4)		2,576,190		320,027		633,276		519,708		1,103,179
Purchase obligations(5)		651,539		651,539		—		—		—
Other(6)		926		926		—		—		—
Total	$	4,580,546	$	1,024,855	$	731,613	$	1,705,119	$	1,118,959

Our agreements with each of three former employees (including our former President and Chief Executive Officer) to pay their beneficiaries $1.0 million upon their deaths for a total of $3.0 million is not reflected in the table above because the timing of the payments is unpredictable.

The table above excludes ASC Topic No. 740 “Income Taxes” (Topic No. 740) liabilities which represent uncertain tax positions related to temporary differences. The total Topic No. 740 liability was $23.0 million, inclusive of $13.8 million of interest and penalties included in our total Topic No. 740 liability neither of which is presented in the table above as we are not certain if and when these payments would be required.

The table above excludes our irrevocable letters of credit guaranteeing payment and performance under certain leases, insurance contracts, debt agreements, merchandising agreements and utility agreements in the amount of $53.1 million as of January 28, 2017.

As of January 28, 2017, insurance reserves amounted to $70.0 million. These amounts are excluded from the table above as we are not certain if and when these payments would be required.

The table above excludes the payment of the cash portion of our stock option modification in the amount of less than $0.1 million as of January 28, 2017 as we are not certain if payments would be required based on the vesting requirements.

Our Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. We believe there are several accounting policies that are critical to understanding our historical and future performance as these policies affect the reported amounts of revenues and other significant areas that involve management’s judgments and estimates. The preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities; (ii) the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements; and (iii) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, inventories and insurance reserves. Historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances form the basis for making estimates and judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates

under different assumptions or conditions. A critical accounting estimate meets two criteria: (1) it requires assumptions about highly uncertain matters and (2) there would be a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements from either using a different, although reasonable, amount within the range of the estimate in the current period or from reasonably likely period-to-period changes in the estimate.

While there are a number of accounting policies, methods and estimates affecting our Consolidated Financial Statements as addressed in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” areas that are particularly critical and significant include:

Revenue Recognition. While revenue recognition for the Company does not involve significant judgment, it represents an important accounting policy. We record revenue at the time of sale and delivery of merchandise, net of allowances for estimated future returns. We present sales, net of sales taxes, in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We account for layaway sales and leased department revenue in accordance with ASC Topic No. 605 “Revenue Recognition.” Layaway sales are recognized upon delivery of merchandise to the customer. The amount of cash received upon initiation of the layaway is recorded as a deposit liability within the line item “Other current liabilities” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Store value cards (gift cards and store credits issued for merchandise returns) are recorded as a liability at the time of issuance, and the related sale is recorded upon redemption.

We estimate and recognize store value card breakage income in proportion to actual store value card redemptions and record such income in the line item “Other income, net” in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We determine an estimated store value card breakage rate by continuously evaluating historical redemption data. Breakage income is recognized on a monthly basis in proportion to the historical redemption patterns for those store value cards for which the likelihood of redemption is remote.

Inventory. Our inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market using the retail inventory method. Under the retail inventory method, the valuation of inventory and the resulting gross margin are determined by applying a calculated cost to retail ratio to the retail value of inventory. The retail inventory method is an averaging method that results in valuing inventory at the lower of cost or market provided markdowns are taken timely to reduce the retail value of inventory. Inherent in the retail inventory method calculation are certain significant management judgments and estimates including merchandise markon, markups, markdowns and shortage, which significantly impact the ending inventory valuation as well as the resulting gross margin. Management believes that our retail inventory method provides an inventory valuation which approximates cost using a first-in, first-out assumption and results in carrying value at the lower of cost or market. We reserve for aged inventory based on historical trends and specific identification. Our aged inventory reserve contains uncertainties as the calculations require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment regarding a number of factors, including market conditions, the selling environment, historical results and current inventory trends. A 1% change in the dollar amount of markdowns would have resulted in an increase in markdown expense of approximately $2.8 million for Fiscal 2016.

Typically, estimates are used to record inventory shortage at retail stores for the first three quarters of a fiscal year. Actual physical inventories are typically conducted annually during the second or fourth quarter to calculate actual shortage. While we make estimates on the basis of the best information available to us at the time the estimates are made, over accruals or under accruals of shortage may be identified as a result of the physical inventory counts, requiring adjustments. During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2014, we recorded shortage adjustment gains of $5.1 million and $10.0 million, respectively, as a result of actual shortage being less than what we had estimated. During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2015, we recorded a shortage adjustment loss of $3.5 million, as a result of actual shortage being more than what we had estimated.

Insurance Reserves. We have risk participation agreements with insurance carriers with respect to workers’ compensation, general liability insurance and health insurance. Pursuant to these arrangements, we are responsible for paying individual claims up to designated dollar limits. The amounts included in our costs related to these claims are estimated and can vary based on changes in assumptions or claims experience included in the associated insurance programs. For example, changes in legal trends and interpretations, as well as changes in the nature and method of how claims are settled, can impact ultimate costs. An increase in workers’ compensation claims by employees, health insurance claims by employees or general liability claims may result in a corresponding increase in our costs related to these claims. Insurance reserves amounted to $70.0 million and $63.0 million at January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, respectively.

Refer to Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and their impact in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

We expect that our revenues and operating results may fluctuate from fiscal quarter to fiscal quarter or over the longer term. Certain of the general factors that may cause such fluctuations are discussed in Item 1A, Risk Factors and elsewhere in the Annual Report.

We do not believe that our operating results have been materially affected by inflation during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 or Fiscal 2014. Historically, as the costs of merchandising and related operating expenses have increased, we have been able to mitigate the effect of such impact on our operations.

The U.S. retail industry continues to face increased pressure on margins as commodity prices increase and the overall challenging retail conditions have led consumers to be more value conscious. Our “open to buy” paradigm, in which we purchase both pre-season and in-season merchandise, allows us the flexibility to purchase less pre-season with the balance purchased in-season and opportunistically. It also provides us the flexibility to shift purchases between suppliers and categories. This enables us to obtain better terms with our suppliers, which we expect to help offset the expected rising costs of goods.

We are exposed to market risks relating to fluctuations in interest rates. Our borrowings contain floating rate obligations and are subject to interest rate fluctuations. The objective of our financial risk management is to minimize the negative impact of interest rate fluctuations on our earnings and cash flows. We manage interest rate risk through the use of our interest rate cap contracts.

As more fully described in Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” we enter into interest rate cap contracts to manage interest rate risks associated with our long term debt obligations. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in the line item “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. We continue to have exposure to interest rate risks to the extent they are not hedged.

Other than operating leases consummated in the normal course of business and letters of credit, as more fully described above under the caption “Certain Information Concerning Contractual Obligations,” we are not involved in any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future impact on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing business operations. Primary exposures include (i) changes in interest rates, as borrowings under our ABL Line of Credit and Term Loan Facility bear interest at floating rates based on LIBOR or the base rate, in each case plus an applicable borrowing margin, and (ii) investing activities. The interest rate of our Term Loan Facility is also dependent on the LIBOR, prime rate, and the federal funds rate as further discussed in Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Long Term Debt.”

We manage our interest rate risk through the use of interest rate cap contracts. For our floating-rate debt, interest rate changes generally impact our earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant.

On April 24, 2015 we entered into two interest rate cap contracts which were designated as cash flow hedges. These interest rate cap contracts have an aggregate notional principal amount of $800.0 million, cap rates of 1.0%, and mature on May 31, 2019.

On July 29, 2016, we completed the repricing of our Term Loan Facility, which, among other things, reduced the interest rate margins applicable under the Amended Term Loan Credit Agreement from 2.25% to 1.75% in the case of prime rate loans, and from 3.25% to 2.75% in the case of LIBOR loans, with the LIBOR floor being reduced from 1.00% to 0.75%.

We had exposure to changes in interest rates from the 0.78% LIBOR as of January 28, 2017 from our Term Loan Facility to the 1.00% rate under our interest rate cap contracts. In addition, we have unlimited interest rate risk related to borrowings on our variable rate debt in excess of the notional principal amount of our interest rate cap contracts.

At January 28, 2017, we had $1,117.0 million of floating-rate debt, exclusive of original issue discount. Based on $1,117.0 million outstanding as floating-rate debt, a one percentage point increase as of January 28, 2017 (after considering our 1.0% interest rate cap contracts), would cause an increase to cash interest expense of $4.8 million per year, resulting in $4.8 million less in our pre-tax earnings. This sensitivity analysis assumes our mix of financial instruments and all other variables will remain constant in future periods. These assumptions are made in order to facilitate the analysis and are not necessarily indicative of our future intentions.

If a one percentage point increase in interest rates were to occur as of January 28, 2017, such an increase would result in the following additional interest expenses (assuming current borrowing level remains constant):

Our ability to satisfy our interest payment obligations on our outstanding debt will depend largely on our future performance, which, in turn, is in part subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors beyond our control. If we do not have sufficient cash flow to service our interest payment obligations on our outstanding indebtedness and if we cannot borrow or obtain equity financing to satisfy those obligations, our business and results of operations will be materially adversely affected. We cannot be assured that any replacement borrowing or equity financing could be successfully completed.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Burlington Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended January 28, 2017. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (a)(2). These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended January 28, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of January 28, 2017, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 16, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

	Fiscal Year Ended
	January 28,			January 30,			January 31,
	2017			2016			2015
REVENUES:
Net sales	$	5,566,038		$	5,098,932		$	4,814,504
Other revenue		24,912			30,911			35,130
Total revenue		5,590,950			5,129,843			4,849,634
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of sales		3,297,373			3,059,641			2,900,819
Selling, general and administrative expenses		1,723,251			1,597,718			1,520,929
Costs related to debt amendments and secondary offerings		1,346			247			2,412
Stock option modification expense		601			1,368			2,940
Depreciation and amortization		183,586			172,099			167,580
Impairment charges - long-lived assets		2,450			6,111			2,579
Other income - net		(10,835	)		(5,865	)		(10,753	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		3,805			649			74,347
Interest expense		56,161			58,999			83,745
Total costs and expenses		5,257,738			4,890,967			4,744,598
Income before income tax expense		333,212			238,876			105,036
Income tax expense		117,339			88,394			39,081
Net income	$	215,873		$	150,482		$	65,955

Net income per common share:
Common stock - basic	$	3.06		$	2.03		$	0.89
Common stock - diluted	$	3.01		$	1.99		$	0.87
Weighted average number of common shares:
Common stock - basic		70,480			74,111			74,101
Common stock - diluted		71,721			75,443			75,865

	January 28,			January 30,
	2017			2016
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	81,597		$	20,915
Restricted cash and cash equivalents		27,800			27,800
Accounts receivable—net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $262 and $272		43,252			38,571
at January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, respectively
Merchandise inventories		701,891			783,528
Prepaid and other current assets		73,784			62,168
Total current assets		928,324			932,982
Property and equipment—net		1,049,447			1,018,570
Tradenames		238,000			238,000
Favorable leases—net		213,180			238,753
Goodwill		47,064			47,064
Deferred tax assets		7,973			—
Other assets		90,495			96,444
Total assets	$	2,574,483		$	2,571,813

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	640,326		$	598,199
Other current liabilities		354,870			286,986
Current maturities of long term debt		1,638			1,403
Total current liabilities		996,834			886,588
Long term debt		1,128,843			1,295,163
Other liabilities		290,683			287,389
Deferred tax liabilities		207,935			201,695
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 1, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 17)
Stockholders’ deficit:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value: authorized: 50,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $0.0001 par value:
Authorized: 500,000,000 shares;
Issued: 77,653,924 shares and 76,711,663 shares, respectively;
Outstanding: 70,180,713 shares and 72,071,177 shares, respectively		7			7
Additional paid-in-capital		1,420,581			1,395,863
Accumulated deficit		(1,060,099	)		(1,275,972	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(7,191	)		(8,992	)
Treasury stock, at cost		(403,110	)		(209,928	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(49,812	)		(99,022	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	2,574,483		$	2,571,813

	Fiscal Year Ended
	January 28,			January 30,			January 31,
	2017			2016			2015
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	215,873		$	150,482		$	65,955
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		183,586			172,099			167,580
Impairment charges—long-lived assets		2,450			6,111			2,579
Amortization of deferred financing costs		2,679			2,868			6,057
Accretion of long term debt instruments		942			809			1,579
Deferred income taxes		(2,919	)		5,909			(30,940	)
Non-cash loss on extinguishment of debt—write-off of deferred financing costs and original issue discount		3,805			649			28,051
Non-cash stock compensation expense		15,953			11,161			6,264
Non-cash rent		(27,910	)		(24,143	)		(19,463	)
Deferred rent incentives		32,212			41,786			38,418
Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation		(13,470	)		(11,941	)		(15,461	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(3,489	)		1,263			(8,616	)
Merchandise inventories		81,048			5,180			(68,658	)
Prepaid and other current assets		(13,267	)		(6,454	)		27,546
Accounts payable		41,543			(23,483	)		78,695
Other current liabilities		74,819			(10,642	)		18,958
Other long term assets and long term liabilities		5,715			3,850			2,552
Other operating activities		2,876			1,957			1,239
Net cash provided by operating activities		602,446			327,461			302,335
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Cash paid for property and equipment		(187,507	)		(201,787	)		(220,980	)
Change in restricted cash and cash equivalents		—			—			4,300
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment and assets held for sale		7,288			4,250			174
Other investing activities		(132	)		2,805			—
Net cash (used in) investing activities		(180,351	)		(194,732	)		(216,506	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from long term debt—ABL Line of Credit		1,392,700			1,607,400			962,500
Principal payments on long term debt—ABL Line of Credit		(1,560,100	)		(1,503,300	)		(899,200	)
Proceeds from long term debt—Term B-4 Loans		1,114,208			—			—
Proceeds from long term debt—Term B-3 Loans		—			—			1,194,000
Principal payments on long term debt—Term B-3 Loans		(1,117,000	)		(50,000	)		(33,000	)
Principal payments on long term debt—Term B-2 Loans		—			—			(834,507	)
Principal payments on long term debt—Holdco Notes		—			—			(128,223	)
Principal payments on long term debt—Senior Notes		—			—			(450,000	)
Purchase of treasury shares		(202,371	)		(201,670	)		(3,933	)
Proceeds from stock option exercises		4,484			2,100			2,514
Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation		13,470			11,941			15,461
Deferred financing costs		(655	)		(168	)		(13,658	)
Other financing activities		(6,149	)		(3,466	)		(5,418	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(361,413	)		(137,163	)		(193,464	)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		60,682			(4,434	)		(107,635	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		20,915			25,349			132,984
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	81,597		$	20,915		$	25,349
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	51,590		$	57,376		$	100,047
Income tax payments - net	$	68,962		$	84,676		$	74,363
Non-cash investing activities:
Accrued purchases of property and equipment	$	24,120		$	18,017		$	21,878
Acquisition of capital lease	$	—		$	409		$	3,342

	Common Stock				Additional Paid-in			Accumulated			Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Treasury Stock
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Deficit			Loss			Shares			Amount			Total
Balance at February 1, 2014		74,218,275		7		1,346,259			(1,492,409	)		—			(531,751	)		(4,325	)		(150,468	)
Net income		—		—		—			65,955			—			—			—			65,955
Stock options exercised and related taxes of $15.5 million		1,362,066		—		17,975			—			—			—			—			17,975
Shares used for tax withholding		—		—		—			—			—			(139,074	)		(3,933	)		(3,933	)
Issuance of restricted shares, net of forfeitures of 1,707 restricted shares		345,166		—		—			—			—			—			—			—
Stock based compensation		—		—		6,264			—			—			—			—			6,264
Unrealized losses on interest rate cap contracts, net of related taxes of $1.2 million		—		—		—			—			(1,744	)		—			—			(1,744	)
Balance at January 31, 2015		75,925,507	$	7	$	1,370,498		$	(1,426,454	)	$	(1,744	)		(670,825	)	$	(8,258	)	$	(65,951	)
Net income		—		—		—			150,482			—			—			—			150,482
Stock options exercised and related taxes of $11.9 million		600,099		—		14,204			—			—			—			—			14,204
Shares used for tax withholding		—		—		—			—			—			(25,559	)		(1,313	)		(1,313	)
Shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs		—		—		—			—			—			(3,944,102	)		(200,357	)		(200,357	)
Issuance of restricted shares, net of forfeitures of 40,588 restricted shares		186,057		—		—			—			—			—			—			—
Stock based compensation		—		—		11,161			—			—			—			—			11,161
Unrealized losses on interest rate cap contracts, net of related taxes of $4.9 million		—		—		—			—			(7,420	)		—			—			(7,420	)
Amount reclassified into earnings, net of related taxes of $0.1 million		—		—		—			—			172			—			—			172
Balance at January 30, 2016		76,711,663	$	7	$	1,395,863		$	(1,275,972	)	$	(8,992	)		(4,640,486	)	$	(209,928	)	$	(99,022	)
Net income		—		—		—			215,873			—			—			—			215,873
Stock options exercised and related taxes of $13.5 million		604,675		—		17,954			—			—			—			—			17,954
Shares used for tax withholding		—		—		—			—			—			(35,637	)		(2,371	)		(2,371	)
Shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs		—		—		—			—			—			(2,797,088	)		(200,000	)		(200,000	)
Issuance of restricted shares, net of forfeitures of 17,815 restricted shares		337,586		—		—			—			—			—			—			—
Stock based compensation		—		—		15,953			—			—			—			—			15,953
Unrealized losses on interest rate cap contracts, net of related taxes of $0.1 million		—		—		—			—			220			—			—			220
Re-issuance of shares previously held within treasury		—		—		(9,189	)		—			—			—			9,189			—
Amount reclassified into earnings, net of related taxes of $1.0 million		—		—		—			—			1,581			—			—			1,581
Balance at January 28, 2017		77,653,924	$	7	$	1,420,581		$	(1,060,099	)	$	(7,191	)		(7,473,211	)	$	(403,110	)	$	(49,812	)

As of January 28, 2017, Burlington Stores, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company), a Delaware Corporation, through its wholly owned indirect subsidiary Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (BCFWC), operated 592 retail stores, inclusive of an internet store, in 45 states and Puerto Rico, selling apparel, footwear and accessories for men, women and children. A majority of those stores offer a home furnishing and linens department and a juvenile furniture department. As of January 28, 2017, the Company operated stores under the names “Burlington Stores” (576 stores), “Cohoes Fashions” (2 stores), “Super Baby Depot” (2 stores), “MJM Designer Shoes” (10 stores), “Burlington Shoes” (1 store) and one online store. Cohoes Fashions offers products similar to those offered by Burlington Stores. MJM Designer Shoes and Burlington Shoes offer moderately priced designer and fashion shoes. The Super Baby Depot stores offer baby clothing, accessories, furniture and other merchandise in the middle to higher price range. During the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017 (Fiscal 2016), the Company opened 30 new stores under the name “Burlington Stores” and closed three Burlington Stores and two MJM Designer Shoes stores.

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Burlington Stores, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company defines its fiscal year as the 52 or 53 week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal 2016, and the Fiscal years ended January 30, 2016 (Fiscal 2015) and January 31, 2015 (Fiscal 2014) each consisted of 52 weeks.

Certain amounts included in the Consolidated Financial Statements are estimated based on historical experience, currently available information and management’s judgment as to the expected outcome of future conditions and circumstances. While every effort is made to ensure the integrity of such estimates, actual results could differ from these estimates, and such differences could have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

During Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, the Company closed secondary public offerings in which 12,490,154 shares and 42,300,000 shares of its common stock, respectively, were sold by certain of the Company’s stockholders. All of the shares sold in the secondary offerings were offered by selling stockholders. The Company did not receive any of the proceeds from the secondary offerings. The Company incurred $0.2 million and $1.8 million in offering costs related to the secondary offerings during Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, respectively, which are included in the line item “Costs related to debt amendments and secondary offerings” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

Cash and cash equivalents represent cash and short-term, highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase. Book cash overdrafts are included in the line item “Accounts payable” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Accounts receivable consist of credit card receivables, lease incentive receivables and other receivables. Accounts receivable are recorded at net realizable value, which approximates fair value. The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts for amounts deemed uncollectible.

Merchandise inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, as determined by the retail inventory method. Under the retail inventory method, the valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross margins are calculated by applying a calculated cost to retail ratio to the retail value of inventories. The Company regularly records a provision for estimated shortage, thereby reducing the carrying value of merchandise inventory. Complete physical inventories of all of the Company’s stores and warehouses are performed no less frequently than annually, with the recorded amount of merchandise inventory being adjusted to coincide with these physical counts.

The Company records its cost of merchandise (net of purchase discounts and certain vendor allowances), certain merchandise acquisition costs (primarily commissions and import fees), inbound freight, outbound freight from distribution centers, and freight on internally transferred merchandise in the line item “Cost of sales” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

Costs associated with the Company’s distribution, buying, and store receiving functions are included in the line items “Selling, general and administrative expenses” and “Depreciation and amortization” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Product sourcing costs included within the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” amounted to $261.0 million, $229.4 million and $204.1 million during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, respectively. Depreciation and amortization related to the distribution and purchasing functions for the same periods amounted to $22.6 million, $18.3 million and $15.3 million, respectively.

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 20 and 40 years for buildings, depending upon the expected useful life of the facility, and three to ten years for store fixtures and equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lease term, including any reasonably assured renewal options or the expected economic life of the improvement, whichever is less. Repairs and maintenance expenditures are expensed as incurred. Renewals and betterments, which significantly extend the useful lives of existing property and equipment, are capitalized. Assets recorded under capital leases are recorded at the present value of minimum lease payments and are amortized over the lease term. Amortization of assets recorded as capital leases is included in the line item “Depreciation and amortization” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The carrying value of all long-lived assets is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable, in accordance with ASC Topic No. 360 “Property, Plant, and Equipment” (Topic No. 360). The Company recorded impairment charges related to property and equipment of $0.8 million, $2.4 million and $2.4 million during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, respectively. These charges are recorded in the line item “Impairment charges—long-lived assets” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Refer to Note 6, “Impairment Charges,” for further discussion of the Company’s measurement of impairment of long-lived assets.

The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted pre-tax future net cash flows expected to be generated by that asset. If the undiscounted future cash flows are not adequate to recover the carrying value of the asset, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of such assets. Refer to Note 6, “Impairment Charges,” for further discussion of the Company’s measurement of impairment of long-lived assets.

The Company accounts for capitalized software in accordance with ASC Topic No. 350 “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other” (Topic No. 350) which requires the capitalization of certain costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining software for internal use. The Company capitalized $28.2 million and $17.1 million relating to these costs during Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively.

The Company accounts for intangible assets in accordance with Topic No. 350. The Company’s intangible assets primarily represent tradenames and favorable lease positions. The tradename asset “Burlington” is expected to generate cash flows indefinitely and, therefore, is accounted for as an indefinite-lived asset not subject to amortization. The values of favorable and unfavorable lease positions are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease terms. Amortization of net favorable lease positions is included

in the line item “Depreciation and amortization” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company evaluates its intangible assets for possible impairment as follows:

Indefinite-lived intangible assets: The Company tests identifiable intangible assets with an indefinite life for impairment on an annual basis, or when a triggering event occurs, relying on a number of factors that include operating results, business plans and projected future cash flows. The impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset with its carrying amount. The Company determines fair value through the relief of royalty method which is a widely accepted valuation technique. In May 2016, the Company’s annual assessment date, the Company performed a quantitative analysis and determined that the fair values of each of the Company’s identifiable intangible assets are greater than their respective carrying values. There were no impairment charges recorded during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 or Fiscal 2014 related to indefinite-lived intangible assets.

Finite-lived intangible assets: Identifiable intangible assets that are subject to amortization are evaluated for impairment in accordance with Topic No. 360 using a process similar to that used to evaluate other long-lived assets as described in Note 6, “Impairment Charges.” An impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. For the favorable lease positions, if the carrying amount exceeds the estimated expected undiscounted future cash flows, the Company measures the amount of the impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to its fair value. The fair value is estimated by discounting expected future cash flows using the Company’s risk adjusted rate of interest. The Company recorded impairment charges of $1.6 million and $3.3 million related to finite-lived intangible assets during Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively. These charges are recorded in the line item “Impairment charges–long-lived assets” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Refer to Note 6, “Impairment Charges,” for further discussion of the Company’s measurement of impairment of long-lived assets. The Company did not record an impairment charge related to finite-lived intangible assets during Fiscal 2014.

Goodwill represents the excess of the acquisition cost over the estimated fair value of tangible assets and other identifiable intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed. Topic No. 350 requires a comparison, at least annually, of the carrying value of the assets and liabilities associated with a reporting unit, including goodwill, with the fair value of the reporting unit. The Company determines fair value through multiple widely accepted valuation techniques. These techniques use a variety of assumptions including projected market conditions, discount rates and future cash flows. If the carrying value of the assets and liabilities exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, the Company would calculate the implied fair value of its reporting unit goodwill as compared with the carrying value of its reporting unit goodwill to determine the appropriate impairment charge. In May 2016, the Company’s annual assessment date, the Company performed a quantitative analysis and determined that the fair value of the Company’s reporting unit was greater than its respective carrying value. There were no impairment charges related to goodwill during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 or Fiscal 2014.

Other assets consist primarily of landlord owned store assets that the Company has paid for as part of its lease, deferred financing costs associated with the Company’s senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the ABL Line of Credit) and purchased lease rights. Landlord owned assets represent leasehold improvements at certain stores for which the Company has paid, but the landlord has retained title. These assets are amortized over the lease term inclusive of reasonably assured renewal options, and the amortization is included in the line item “Depreciation and amortization” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Deferred financing costs are amortized over the life of the ABL Line of Credit using the interest method of amortization. Amortization of deferred financing costs is recorded in the line item “Interest expense” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Purchased lease rights are amortized over the lease term inclusive of reasonably assured renewal options and the amortization is recorded in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Both landlord owned assets and purchased lease rights are assessed for impairment in accordance with Topic No. 360. During Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, the Company recorded impairment charges of $0.1 million, $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to purchased lease rights and landlord owned assets. These charges are recorded in the line item “Impairment charges–long-lived assets” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Refer to Note 6, “Impairment Charges,” for further discussion of the Company’s measurement of impairment of long-lived assets.

Other current liabilities primarily consist of sales tax payable, customer liabilities, accrued payroll costs, self-insurance reserves, accrued operating expenses, payroll taxes payable, current portion of straight line rent liability and other miscellaneous items. Customer liabilities totaled $33.2 million and $32.3 million as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, respectively.

The Company has risk participation agreements with insurance carriers with respect to workers’ compensation, general liability insurance and health insurance. Pursuant to these arrangements, the Company is responsible for paying individual claims up to designated dollar limits. The amounts related to these claims are estimated and can vary based on changes in assumptions or claims experience included in the associated insurance programs. An increase in workers’ compensation claims, health insurance claims or general liability claims may result in a corresponding increase in costs related to these claims. Self-insurance reserves as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016 were:

Other liabilities primarily consist of deferred lease incentives, the long term portion of self-insurance reserves, the excess of straight-line rent expense over actual rental payments and tax liabilities associated with the uncertain tax positions recognized by the Company in accordance with ASC Topic No. 740 “Income Taxes” (Topic No. 740).

Deferred lease incentives are funds received or receivable from landlords used primarily to offset the costs incurred for remodeling of stores. These deferred lease incentives are amortized over the expected lease term, including rent holiday periods and option periods where the exercise of the option can be reasonably assured. Amortization of deferred lease incentives is included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. At January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, deferred lease incentives were $180.9 million and $179.3 million, respectively.

The Company records revenue at the time of sale and delivery of merchandise, net of allowances for estimated future returns. The Company presents sales, net of sales taxes, in its Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company accounts for layaway sales and leased department revenue in compliance with ASC Topic No. 605 “Revenue Recognition” (Topic No. 605). Layaway sales are recognized upon delivery of merchandise to the customer. The amount of cash received upon initiation of the layaway is recorded as a deposit liability in the line item “Other current liabilities” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Store value cards (gift cards and store credits issued for merchandise returns) are recorded as a liability at the time of issuance, and the related sale is recorded upon redemption.

The Company determines an estimated store value card breakage rate by continuously evaluating historical redemption data. Breakage income is recognized monthly in proportion to the historical redemption patterns for those store value cards for which the likelihood of redemption is remote.

Other revenue consists of service fees (layaway, shipping and handling, alteration, dormancy and other service charges), subleased rental income and rental income from leased departments as shown in the table below:

Rental income from leased departments results from arrangements at some of the Company’s stores where the Company had granted unaffiliated third parties the right to use designated store space solely for the purpose of selling such third parties’ goods, including such items as fragrances. Rental income is based on an agreed upon percentage of the lease departments’ total revenues. The Company does not own or have any rights to any tradenames, licenses or other intellectual property in connection with the brands sold by such unaffiliated third parties. During Fiscal 2015, the Company began the conversion of its fragrance business, which was previously operated under a licensing arrangement, to an owned category, and such sales are recorded in the line item “Net sales” in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Company’s advertising costs consist primarily of national television, direct mail and digital costs. Advertising costs are expensed the first time the advertising takes place, and are included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. During Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, net advertising costs were $81.8 million, $84.7 million and $84.9 million, respectively.

The Company accounts for barter transactions under ASC Topic No. 845 “Nonmonetary Transactions.” Barter transactions with commercial substance are recorded at the estimated fair value of the products exchanged, unless the products received have a more readily determinable estimated fair value. Revenue associated with barter transactions is recorded at the time of the exchange of the related assets.

During Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, the Company exchanged $0.6 and $0.1 million, respectively, of inventory for certain advertising credits. To account for the exchange, the Company recorded “Net sales” and “Cost of sales” of $0.6 million and $0.1 million in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income during Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively. The Company did not enter into any new barter agreements during Fiscal 2014. The Company has $3.7 million of unused advertising credits remaining as of January 28, 2017 that are expected to be used over the four consecutive fiscal years following Fiscal 2016.

The following table summarizes the prepaid advertising expense which was included in the line items “Prepaid and other current assets” and “Other assets” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016:

The following table details barter credit usage for Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, which are included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income:

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Topic No. 740. Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and such amounts as measured by tax laws. A valuation allowance against the Company’s deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, management is required to make assumptions and to apply judgment, including forecasting future earnings, taxable income, and the mix of earnings in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Management periodically assesses the need for a valuation allowance based on the Company’s current and anticipated results of operations. The need for and the amount of a valuation allowance can change in the near term if operating results and projections change significantly.

Topic No. 740 requires the recognition in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements of the impact of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, if that position is “more likely than not” of being sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authority, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as part of income taxes.

Other income, net, consists of breakage income, net gains and losses from disposition of fixed assets, investment income gains and losses, and other miscellaneous income items. During Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, the Company recognized $3.3 million, $2.9 million and $2.5 million, respectively, of breakage income. During Fiscal 2016, the Company also recognized $2.5 million related to the sale of certain state tax credits. During Fiscal 2014, the Company also recognized $3.2 million related to a favorable, one-time legal settlement.

Comprehensive income is comprised of net income, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges, less amounts reclassified into earnings.

The Company leases store locations, distribution centers and office space used in its operations. The Company accounts for these types of leases in accordance with ASC Topic No. 840, “Leases” (Topic No. 840), and subsequent amendments, which require that leases be evaluated and classified as operating or capital leases for financial reporting purposes. Assets held under capital leases are included in the line item “Property and equipment—net of accumulated depreciation and amortization” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. For leases classified as operating, the Company calculates rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the lease term including renewal options, if reasonably assured, or the economic life of the leased premises, taking into consideration rent escalation clauses, rent holidays and other lease concessions. The Company commences recording rent expense during the store fixturing and merchandising phase of the leased property.

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic No. 718, “Stock Compensation” (Topic No. 718), which requires companies to record stock compensation expense for all non-vested and new awards beginning as of the grant date. As of January 28, 2017, there were 5,789,898 shares available for issuance under the Company’s 2013 Management Incentive Plan as defined in Note 12, “Stock-Based Compensation.” As of January 28, 2017, there were 2,646,123 options outstanding and 744,634 shares of non-vested restricted stock outstanding under the Company’s Management Incentive Plans. During Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, the Company recognized non-cash stock compensation expense in the amount of $16.0 million, $11.2 million and $6.3 million, respectively. Refer to Note 12 for further details.

Net income per share is calculated using the treasury stock method. Refer to Note 11, “Net Income Per Share,” for further details.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents and investments. The Company manages the credit risk associated with cash equivalents and investments by investing with high-quality institutions and, by policy, limiting investments only to those which meet prescribed investment guidelines. The Company maintains cash accounts that, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses from maintaining cash accounts in excess of such limits. Management believes that it is not exposed to any significant risks on its cash and cash equivalent accounts.

The Company reports segment information in accordance with ASC Topic No. 280 “Segment Reporting.” The Company has one reportable segment. The Company is an off-price retailer that offers customers a complete line of value-priced apparel, including: ladies sportswear, menswear, coats, family footwear and youth apparel as well as baby furniture, accessories, home décor and gifts. Sales percentage by major product category is as follows:

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-03 (ASU 2015-03), “Interest—Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” This standard requires the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability. Further, on August 16, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, “Interest—Imputation of Interest” to clarify the SEC staff’s position on presenting and measuring debt issuance costs incurred in connection with line-of-credit arrangements given the lack of guidance on this topic in ASU 2015-03. The SEC staff has stated that it would “not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement.” These standards become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company adopted these standards during Fiscal 2016 on a retrospective basis. As a result, $8.3 million deferred financing costs associated with the Term Loan Facility (as defined in Note 7, “Long Term Debt”) as of January 30, 2016, have been reclassified and shown as a deduction from the line item “Long term debt” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. These amounts were previously recorded in the line item “Other assets” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remaining deferred financing costs associated with the Company’s ABL Line of Credit and interest rate cap contracts continue to be shown in the line item “Other assets” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with ASU 2015-15.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which converges revenue recognition under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The new guidance supersedes most preexisting revenue recognition guidance, and provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The FASB issued ASU 2015-14 in August 2015 which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for public companies to periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The standard shall be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. This ASU will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of the fiscal year ended February 2, 2019 (Fiscal 2018). The Company is in the process of determining the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. The Company does not, however, anticipate that the new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases.” The standard’s core principle is to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. This ASU will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of the fiscal year ended February 1, 2020 (Fiscal 2019). Early adoption is permitted. While the Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements or notes thereto, it does expect that this new guidance will result in a significant increase to the assets and liabilities presented on its consolidated balance sheets, refer to Note 12 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, “Lease Commitments,” for further detail of the Company’s future minimum lease payments. This guidance is not expected, however, to have a material impact on the Company's liquidity.

On March 30, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The Company will adopt this guidance during the first quarter of Fiscal 2017. The Company will elect to account for forfeitures as they occur, rather than estimate expected forfeitures. The net cumulative effect of this change will be recognized as an adjustment to retained earnings as of January 29, 2017. Once adopted, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies from stock based compensation will be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the statement of income as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur, regardless of whether the benefit reduces taxes payable in the current period. The Company notes the potential for volatility in its effective tax rate as any windfall or shortfall tax benefits related to its stock-based compensation plans will be recorded directly into results of operations. From Fiscal 2014 through Fiscal 2016, the Company recorded an average of $13.6 million of excess tax benefit from stock based compensation in additional paid-in capital. These amounts would have been recorded as a reduction to income tax expense under the new guidance. However, due to potential fluctuations in the stock price of the Company’s common stock, variability in the timing of stock option exercises and the spread of exercise prices on outstanding options, historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results. Refer to Note 12, “Stock-Based Compensation,” for discussion regarding the number of and weighted average exercise prices of the Company’s outstanding options as of January 28, 2017.

On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” The primary purpose of this ASU is to reduce the diversity in practice that has resulted from the lack of consistent principles on this topic. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. This ASU will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of Fiscal 2018. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. The Company does not anticipate that the new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

On November 17, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash.” The primary purpose of this ASU is to reduce the diversity in practice that exists in the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. This ASU will require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. This ASU will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of Fiscal 2018. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. While the Company is still in the process of determining the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements or notes thereto, it does not anticipate that the new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

There were no other new accounting standards that had a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements during the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017, and there were no other new accounting standards or pronouncements that were issued but not yet effective as of January 28, 2017 that the Company expects to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations upon becoming effective.

At January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, restricted cash and cash equivalents consisted of $27.8 million related to collateral for certain insurance contracts. The Company has the ability to convert the restricted cash to a letter of credit at any time, which would reduce available borrowings on the ABL Line of Credit by a like amount.

As of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, assets, net of accumulated amortization of $18.8 million and $16.6 million, respectively, held under capital leases amounted to approximately $22.0 million and $24.2 million, respectively, and are included in the line item “Buildings” in the foregoing table. Amortization expense related to capital leases is included in the line item “Depreciation and amortization” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The total amount of depreciation expense during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 was $146.3 million, $135.7 million and $130.8 million, respectively.

During Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, the Company recorded impairment charges related to property and equipment of $0.8 million, $2.4 million and $2.4 million, respectively. Refer to Note 6, “Impairment Charges,” for further discussion.

Internally developed software is amortized on a straight line basis over three to five years and is recorded in the line item “Depreciation and amortization” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Depreciation and amortization of internally developed software amounted to $15.4 million, $14.6 million and $17.4 million during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, respectively.

Intangible assets at January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016 consist primarily of tradenames and favorable lease positions as follows:

The decrease in the gross carrying amount of the Company’s favorable leases from January 30, 2016 to January 28, 2017 reflects a reduction of $12.2 million during Fiscal 2016 from the write-off of certain favorable leases becoming fully amortized during the period, as well as $1.6 million related to the impairment of three stores. Refer to Note 6, “Impairment Charges,” for further discussion related to impairment charges of favorable leases.

Accumulated amortization of favorable leases as of January 28, 2017 reflects Fiscal 2016 amortization expense of $24.0 million, partially offset by a decrease of $12.2 million related to the write-off of fully amortized leases, as discussed above.

The weighted average amortization period remaining for the Company’s favorable leases is 13.2 years. Amortization expense of favorable leases for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter is estimated to be as follows:

Impairment charges recorded during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 amounted to $2.5 million, $6.1 million and $2.6 million, respectively, and are primarily related to declines in revenues and operating results of the respective stores. Impairment charges during these periods related to the following:

The Company recorded impairment charges related to store-level assets for five stores during Fiscal 2016, five stores during Fiscal 2015 and three stores during Fiscal 2014. During Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, the Company also recorded impairment charges for capital expenditures for previously impaired stores.

Long-lived assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for purposes of calculating impairment using the fair value hierarchy of ASC Topic No. 820 “Fair Value Measurements” (Topic No. 820). Refer to Note 16, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” for further discussion of the Company’s fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the Company’s long-lived assets is generally calculated using discounted cash flows. All of the stores impaired during Fiscal 2016 were partially impaired. The table below sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the fair value of the partially-impaired stores, subsequent to impairment charges as of January 28, 2017:

On February 24, 2011, the Company entered into a $1.0 billion senior secured term loan facility (the Term Loan Facility). The Term Loan Facility was issued pursuant to a credit agreement (Term Loan Credit Agreement), dated February 24, 2011, among BCFWC, the guarantors signatory thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (in such capacity, the Term Loan Administrative Agent) and as collateral agent, the lenders party thereto, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC, as joint bookrunners, and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint arrangers, governing the terms of the Term Loan Facility.

On August 13, 2014, BCFWC entered into Amendment No. 4 (the Fourth Amendment) to the Term Loan Credit Agreement. As a result of the Fourth Amendment the $830.6 million principal amount of term B-2 loans (Term B-2 Loans) outstanding was replaced with $1,200.0 million principal amount of term B-3 loans. In accordance with ASC Topic No. 405-20, “Extinguishments of Liabilities” (Topic No. 405), the Company recognized a loss on the extinguishment of debt of $16.4 million, representing the write off of $11.7 million and $4.7 million in deferred financing costs and unamortized original issue discount, respectively, which were recorded in the line item “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

During Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, the Company prepaid $50.0 million and $4.0 million on the Term Loan Facility. In accordance with ASC Topic No. 470-50, “Debt Modifications and Extinguishments” (Topic No. 470), the Company recognized losses on the extinguishment of debt of $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, which were recorded in the line item “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

On July 29, 2016, BCFWC entered into Amendment No. 5 (the Fifth Amendment) to the Term Loan Credit Agreement (as amended, the Amended Term Loan Credit Agreement) governing its Term Loan Facility. The Fifth Amendment, among other things, reduced the interest rate margins applicable to the Term Loan Facility from 2.25% to 1.75% in the case of prime rate loans, and from 3.25% to 2.75% in the case of LIBOR loans, with the LIBOR floor being reduced from 1.00% to 0.75%. The Fifth Amendment was accomplished by replacing the outstanding $1,117.0 million principal amount of Term B-3 Loans with a like aggregate principal amount of Term B-4 Loans. The Term B-4 Loans outstanding under the Term Loan Facility mature on August 13, 2021. In accordance with Topic No. 470, the Company recognized a non-cash loss on the extinguishment of debt of $3.8 million, representing the write-off of $2.5 million and $1.3 million in deferred financing costs and unamortized original issue discount, respectively, which was recorded in the line item “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Also in connection with the Fifth Amendment, the Company incurred fees of $1.3 million, primarily related to legal and placement fees, which were recorded in the line item “Costs related to debt amendments and secondary offering” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Term Loan Facility is collateralized by a first lien on our favorable leases, real estate and property & equipment and a second lien on our inventory and receivables. Interest rates for the Term Loan Facility are based on: (i) for LIBOR rate loans for any interest period, at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (x) the LIBOR rate, as determined by the Term Loan Facility Administrative Agent, for such interest period multiplied by the Statutory Reserve Rate (as defined in the Term Loan Credit Agreement), and (y) 0.75% (the Term Loan Adjusted LIBOR Rate), plus an applicable margin; and (ii) for prime rate loans, a rate per annum equal to the highest of (a) the variable annual rate of interest then announced by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. at its head office as its “prime

rate,” (b) the federal reserve bank of New York rate in effect on such date plus 0.50% per annum, and (c) the Term Loan Adjusted LIBOR Rate for the applicable class of term loans for one-month plus 1.00%, plus, in each case, an applicable margin. As of January 28, 2017, the Company’s borrowing rate related to the Term Loan Facility was 3.53%.

On August 13, 2014, BCFWC entered into Amendment No. 1 (the ABL Amendment) to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 2, 2011 (as amended, supplemented and otherwise modified, the Amended ABL Credit Agreement) governing BCFWC’s existing ABL Line of Credit. The ABL Amendment, among other things, gives BCFWC and certain of its subsidiaries additional flexibility to make investments, restricted payments (including dividends), incur additional debt, grant liens and otherwise comply with their covenants under the Amended ABL Credit Agreement. In accordance with Topic No. 470, the Company recognized a loss on the extinguishment of debt of $0.2 million representing the write off of deferred financing costs which was recorded in the line item “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

The ABL Line of Credit matures on August 13, 2019. The aggregate amount of commitments under the Amended ABL Credit Agreement is $600.0 million and, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, the Company can increase the aggregate amount of commitments up to $900.0 million. As a result of the ABL Amendment, the interest rate margin applicable under the Amended ABL Credit Agreement in the case of loans drawn at LIBOR was reduced from 1.75% - 2.25% (based on total commitments or borrowing base availability) to 1.25% - 1.50% (based on total commitments or borrowing base availability), and the fee on the average daily balance of unused loan commitments was reduced from 0.375% to 0.25%. The ABL Line of Credit is collateralized by a first lien on the Company’s inventory and receivables and a second lien on the Company’s real estate and property and equipment.

The Company believes that the Amended ABL Credit Agreement provides the liquidity and flexibility to meet its operating and capital requirements over the remaining term of the ABL Line of Credit. Further, the calculation of the borrowing base under the Amended Credit Agreement has been amended to allow for increased availability, particularly during the September 1st through December 15th period of each year.

At January 28, 2017, the Company had $427.8 million available under the Amended ABL Line of Credit and no outstanding borrowings. The maximum borrowings under the facility during Fiscal 2016 amounted to $350.0 million. Average borrowings during Fiscal 2016 amounted to $173.9 million at an average interest rate of 1.8%.

At January 30, 2016, the Company had $335.4 million available under the Amended ABL Line of Credit and $167.4 million of outstanding borrowings. The maximum borrowings under the facility during Fiscal 2015 amounted to $350.0 million. Average borrowings during Fiscal 2015 amounted to $199.3 million at an average interest rate of 1.6%

On February 24, 2011, BCFWC issued $450.0 million aggregate principal amount of 10% Senior Notes due 2019 at an issue price of 100% (the Senior Notes). The Senior Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated February 24, 2011, among BCFWC, the guarantors signatory thereto, and Wilmington Trust FSB.

On August 13, 2014, BCFWC redeemed the Senior Notes in full. In accordance with Topic No. 405, the Company recognized a loss on the extinguishment of debt of $49.6 million, representing $43.7 million in redemption premiums and the write off of $5.9 million in deferred financing costs, which was recorded in the line item “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

On February 20, 2013, Burlington Holdings, LLC (Holdings LLC) and Burlington Holdings Finance, Inc. (collectively the Issuers), completed the offering of $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due 2018 (Holdco Notes) at an issue price of 98.00%. The Holdco Notes were senior unsecured obligations of the Issuers, which were not obligors or guarantors under the Term Loan Facility or the indenture governing the Senior Notes.

On April 4, 2014, the Issuers redeemed $58.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Holdco Notes. In accordance with Topic No. 405, the Company recognized a loss on the extinguishment of long-term debt of $3.6 million representing $1.2 million in redemption premiums and the write off of $1.5 million and $0.9 million in deferred financing costs and unamortized original issue discount, respectively, which was recorded in the line item “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

On August 13, 2014, the Company redeemed the Holdco Notes in full. In accordance with Topic No. 405, the Company recognized a loss on the extinguishment of debt of $4.1 million, representing $1.4 million in redemption premiums and the write off of $1.7 million and $1.0 million in deferred financing costs and unamortized original issue discount, respectively, which was recorded in the line item “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Company had $3.6 million and $5.0 million in deferred financing costs associated with its ABL Line of Credit and interest rate cap contracts recorded in the line item “Other assets” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, respectively. In addition, The Company had $5.2 million and $8.3 million of deferred financing costs associated with its Term Loan Facility recorded in the line item “Long term debt” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, respectively.

Amortization of deferred financing costs amounted to $2.7 million, $2.9 million and $6.1 million during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, respectively, which was included in the line item “Interest expense” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. During Fiscal 2016, the Company incurred new deferred financing costs of $0.7 million and wrote-off $2.5 million of deferred financing costs as a result of the Fifth Amendment.

Amortization expense related to the deferred financing costs as of January 28, 2017 for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter is estimated to be as follows:

Deferred financing costs have a weighted average amortization period of approximately 3.7 years.

Scheduled maturities of the Company’s long term debt and capital lease obligations, as they exist as of January 28, 2017, in each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows:

The capital lease obligations noted above are exclusive of interest charges of $2.4 million, $2.0 million, $1.9 million, $1.5 million, $1.4 million and $2.8 million for the fiscal years ended February 3, 2018, February 2, 2019, February 1, 2020, January 30, 2021, January 29, 2022 and thereafter, respectively.

The Company accounts for derivatives and hedging activities in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (Topic No. 815). Topic No. 815 provides the disclosure requirements for derivatives and hedging activities with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how the entity accounts for derivative instruments and related hedged items, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. Further, qualitative disclosures are required that explain the Company’s objectives and strategies for using derivatives, as well as quantitative disclosures about the fair value of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative instruments.

As required by Topic No. 815, the Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value and adjusts them to market on a quarterly basis. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting, and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risk, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting.

The Company uses interest rate cap contracts to manage interest rate risk. The fair value of the Company’s interest rate cap contracts is determined using the market standard methodology of discounted future variable cash flows. The variable cash flows are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates rise above the strike rate of the caps in conjunction with the cash payments related to financing the premium of the interest rate caps. The variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts on the cap are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves and volatilities. In addition, to comply with the provisions of Topic No. 820, credit valuation adjustments, which consider the impact of any credit enhancements to the contracts, are incorporated in the fair values to account for potential nonperformance risk. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered any applicable credit enhancements such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.

In accordance with Topic No. 820, the Company made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of its derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting agreements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio. There is no impact of netting because the Company’s only derivatives are interest rate cap contracts that are with separate counterparties and are under separate master netting agreements.

Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. However, as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustment is not significant to the overall valuation of its derivative portfolios. As a result, the Company classifies its derivative valuations in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Company’s known or expected cash payments principally related to the Company’s borrowings.

The Company uses interest rate derivatives to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate caps as part of its interest rate risk management

strategy. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract.

On August 19, 2014, the Company entered into four interest rate cap contracts, which were designated as cash flow hedges. On April 24, 2015, the Company terminated and sold these interest rate cap contracts for $1.2 million in cash, which was included in the line item “Other” in the financing section of the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As a result of the termination and sale of these interest rate cap contracts, the amount of loss previously deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to these caps was $2.0 million, net of taxes of $1.3 million. The Company will amortize this loss from accumulated other comprehensive loss into interest expense over the original life of each respective cap through April 2019.

Also on April 24, 2015, the Company entered into two new interest rate cap contracts, which were designated as cash flow hedges. The Company financed the cost of these interest rate cap contracts, which will be amortized through the life of the caps. During Fiscal 2016, the Company paid $4.9 million related to the financing of these interest rate cap contracts, which was included in the line item “Other” in the financing section of the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

During Fiscal 2016, the Company’s derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing (or anticipated) variable-rate debt. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges are recorded in the line item “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and are subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the Company’s interest rate cap contracts will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt. As of January 28, 2017, the Company estimates that approximately $7.3 million will be reclassified into interest expense during the next twelve months.

The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. The Company did not record any hedge ineffectiveness in its earnings during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 or Fiscal 2014.

As of January 28, 2017, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:

The tables below present the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on a gross basis, as well as their classification on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets:

The following table presents the unrealized gains (losses) deferred to accumulated other comprehensive loss resulting from the Company’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedging instruments for each of the reporting periods.

The following table presents information about the reclassification of losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings related to the Company’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedging instruments for each of the reporting periods.

Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss are recorded net of the related income tax effects. The table below details the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss for Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015.

As of January 28, 2017, the total amount of the Company’s authorized capital stock consisted of 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 50,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock, par value of $0.0001 per share.

The Company’s common stock is not entitled to preemptive or other similar subscription rights to purchase any of the Company’s securities. The Company’s common stock is neither convertible nor redeemable. Unless the Company’s Board of Directors determines otherwise, the Company will issue all of the Company’s capital stock in uncertificated form.

The Company does not have any shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding. The Company’s Board of Directors has the authority to issue shares of preferred stock from time to time on terms it may determine, to divide shares of preferred stock into one or more series and to fix the designations, preferences, privileges, and restrictions of preferred stock, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, liquidation preference, sinking fund terms, and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of any series to the fullest extent permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. The issuance of the Company’s preferred stock could have the effect of decreasing the trading price of the Company’s common stock, restricting dividends on the Company’s capital stock, diluting the voting power of the Company’s common stock, impairing the liquidation rights of the Company’s capital stock, or delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company.

Each holder of the Company’s common stock is entitled to one vote per share on each matter submitted to a vote of stockholders. The Company’s amended and restated bylaws provide that the presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of shares representing a majority of the outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote at a stockholders’ meeting shall constitute a quorum. When a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is required to take action, unless otherwise specified by law or the Company’s certificate of incorporation, and except for the election of directors, which is determined by a plurality vote;

provided, however, that the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that, in any non-contested election of directors, any director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election shall, promptly following the receipt of the final report from the independent inspectors of election, tender his or her resignation, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall consider the resignation offer and recommend to the Board whether to accept it. There are no cumulative voting rights.

Each holder of shares of the Company’s capital stock will be entitled to receive such dividends and other distributions in cash, stock or property as may be declared by the Company’s Board of Directors from time to time out of the Company’s assets or funds legally available for dividends or other distributions. These rights are subject to the preferential rights of any other class or series of the Company’s preferred stock.

During the past two fiscal years, the Company has not declared, and does not anticipate declaring in the near term, dividends on shares of its common stock. The Company currently does, and intends to continue to, retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund all of the Company's capital expenditures, business initiatives, and to support any potential opportunistic capital structure initiatives. The Company’s ability to pay dividends on its common stock will be limited by restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make distributions under the terms of current and any future agreements governing our indebtedness as described in Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Long Term Debt.” Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors, subject to compliance with covenants in our current and future agreements governing our indebtedness, and will depend upon our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant.

Each holder of common stock is subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock that the Company may designate and issue in the future.

If the Company is involved in a consolidation, merger, recapitalization, reorganization, or similar event, each holder of common stock will participate pro rata in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities, subject to prior distribution rights of preferred stock, if any, then outstanding.

During Fiscal 2016, the Company acquired 35,637 shares of common stock from employees for approximately $2.4 million to satisfy their minimum statutory tax withholdings related to the vesting of restricted stock awards. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2016, the Company re-issued 688,880 shares held in its treasury stock pool for re-issuance under the 2006 Management Incentive Plan. As a result of this transaction, the Company reclassified approximately $9.2 million from treasury stock to additional paid-in-capital.

On November 24, 2015, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of the Company’s common stock, which the Company completed during Fiscal 2016. On November 15, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $200 million of the Company’s common stock. This share repurchase program will be funded using the Company’s available cash, and is authorized to be executed through November 2018. As of January 28, 2017, the Company had $199.6 million available for purchase under its share repurchase program.

During Fiscal 2016, the Company repurchased 2,797,088 shares of common stock for $200.0 million under its share repurchase programs.

The Company is authorized to repurchase shares of its outstanding common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions under our repurchase programs. The timing and amount of stock repurchases will depend on a variety of factors, including the market conditions as well as corporate and regulatory considerations. The Company’s share repurchase

programs may be suspended, modified or discontinued at any time, and the Company has no obligation to repurchase any amount of its common stock under the programs.

Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Dilutive net income per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method.

Less than 100,000 options to purchase shares of common stock and unvested restricted stock awards were excluded from diluted net income per share for Fiscal 2016 since their effect was anti-dilutive.

Approximately 115,000 options to purchase shares of common stock and shares of unvested restricted stock awards were excluded from diluted net income per share for Fiscal 2015 since their effect was anti-dilutive.

Less than 100,000 options to purchase shares of common stock and unvested restricted stock awards were excluded from diluted net income per share for Fiscal 2014 since their effect was anti-dilutive.

On May 1, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Company’s assumption and adoption of the 2006 Management Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan) that was previously sponsored by Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, LLC. The 2006 Plan terminated on April 12, 2016. The Company’s 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the 2013 Plan and, together with the 2006 Plan, the Plans) was adopted effective prior to and in connection with the Company’s initial public offering. The 2006 Plan, prior to its termination, and the 2013 Plan provide for the granting of stock options, restricted stock and other forms of awards to key employees and directors of the Company or its affiliates.

The Company accounts for awards issued under the Plans in accordance with Topic No. 718. As of January 28, 2017, there were 5,789,898 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2013 Plan.

Options granted during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 were all service-based awards granted under the Plans at the following exercise prices:

All awards granted during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 vest 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. The final exercise date for any option granted is the tenth anniversary of the grant date. With the exception of the special one-time grant of options to purchase shares of common stock to certain members of management made during Fiscal 2013, all options awarded prior to Fiscal 2016 become immediately exercisable upon a change of control; options awarded after Fiscal 2015 become exercisable if the grantee’s employment is terminated without cause or, in some instances, the recipient resigns with good reason, within a certain period of time following a change in control. The vesting of the special one-time grants will not be accelerated in the event of a change of control, provided, however, that in the event that within two years after a change of control, the grantee’s employment is terminated without cause or, in some instances, the grantee resigns with good reason, then an incremental 20% of the special one-time grants shall be deemed vested as of the date of termination of grantee’s employment, but in no event more than the total number of the special one-time grants granted to such grantee. Unless determined otherwise by the plan administrator, upon cessation of employment, the majority of options that have not vested will terminate immediately (subject to the potential acceleration of special one-time grants in the event of a change of control, as described above) and unexercised vested options will be exercisable for a period of 60 days. The final exercise date for any option granted is the tenth anniversary of the grant date.

In May 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a modification to all then outstanding options. The modification, through a combination of either reduced exercise prices or cash payments, did not affect the existing vesting schedules. The modification resulted in a total of $0.6 million, $1.4 million and $2.9 million of incremental compensation expense during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, respectively, of which $0.1 million, $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, are payable in cash. These costs were recorded in the line item “Stock option modification expense” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. As of January 28, 2017, the Company expects to recognize $0.1 million of incremental compensation expense to be recorded over the remaining vesting periods through the fiscal year ended February 3, 2018, of which less than $0.1 million will be payable in cash.

As of January 28, 2017, the Company had 2,646,123 options outstanding to purchase shares of common stock, and there was $20.0 million of unearned non-cash stock-based option compensation, exclusive of the $0.1 million of incremental compensation associated with the modification, that the Company expects to recognize as expense over a weighted average period of 3.0 years. The awards are expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

The following table summarizes information about the options outstanding and exercisable as of January 28, 2017:

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding as of January 28, 2017 was $154.8 million.

The following table summarizes information about the stock options vested and expected to vest during the contractual term:

The fair value of each stock option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Monte Carlo Simulation option pricing model prior to the date of the Company’s initial public offering and the Black Scholes option pricing model subsequent to the date of the initial public offering. The fair value of each stock option granted during Fiscal 2016 was estimated using the following assumptions:

The expected dividend yield was based on the Company’s expectation of not paying dividends in the foreseeable future. Since the Company completed its initial public offering in October 2013, it does not have sufficient history as a publicly traded company to

evaluate its volatility factor. As such, the expected stock price volatility is based upon the historical volatility of the stock price over the expected life of the options of peer companies that are publicly traded. The risk free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury rates for U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with maturities similar to those of the expected term of the awards being valued. For grants issued during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, the expected life of the options was calculated using the simplified method, which defines the life as the average of the contractual term of the options and the weighted average vesting period for all option tranches. This methodology was utilized due to the short length of time our common stock has been publicly traded.

Restricted stock awards granted during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 were all service-based awards. The fair value of each share of restricted stock granted during Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 was based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant (for awards made under the 2006 Plan) or the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date prior to the grant date (for awards made under the 2013 Plan). The Company has 206,086 awards outstanding that cliff vest at the end of the service periods ranging from three years to five years from the grant date. The remaining awards outstanding as of January 28, 2017 have graded vesting provisions that generally vest in quarters over a four-year-period, or in thirds over a three-year period (for members of the Company’s Board of Directors) starting one year after the grant date. Following a change of control, all unvested shares of restricted stock shall remain unvested, provided, however, that 100% of such shares shall vest if, following such change of control, the employment of the recipient is terminated without cause or, in some instances, the recipient resigns with good reason.

As of January 28, 2017, there was approximately $32.0 million of unearned non-cash stock-based compensation that the Company expects to recognize as an expense over the next 2.9 years. The awards are expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods.

Award grant, vesting and forfeiture transactions during Fiscal 2016 are summarized as follows:

The Company leases stores, distribution facilities and office space under operating and capital leases that will expire principally during the next thirty years. The leases typically include renewal options and escalation clauses and provide for contingent rentals based on a percentage of gross sales.

The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments having an initial or remaining term in excess of one year:

The above schedule of future minimum lease payments has not been reduced by future minimum sublease rental income of $38.6 million relating to operating leases under non-cancelable subleases and other contingent rental agreements.

The following is a schedule of net rent expense for Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014:

The Company maintains separate defined contribution 401(k) retirement savings and profit-sharing plans covering employees in the United States and Puerto Rico who meet specified age and service requirements. The discretionary profit sharing component (which the Company has not utilized for nine years and has no current plans to utilize) is entirely funded by the Company, and the Company also makes additional matching contributions to the 401(k) component of the plans. Participating employees can voluntarily elect to contribute a percentage of their earnings to the 401(k) component of the plans (up to certain prescribed limits) through a cash or deferred (salary deferral) feature qualifying under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (401(k) Plan).

The Company recorded $7.4 million, $7.1 million and $5.9 million of 401(k) Plan match expense for the plan years ending December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, and are included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

Income (loss) before income taxes was as follows for Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014:

The tax rate reconciliations were as follows for Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014:

The tax effects of temporary differences are included in deferred tax accounts as follows:

	(in thousands)
	January 28, 2017					January 30, 2016
	Tax Assets			Tax Liabilities		Tax Assets			Tax Liabilities
Non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities:
Property and equipment basis adjustments	$	—		$	178,017	$	—		$	161,380
Deferred rent		36,529			—		35,299			—
Intangibles—long-lived		—			83,499		—			92,559
Intangibles—indefinite-lived		—			94,624		—			94,315
Incidental supplies		—			13,744		—			12,519
Insurance reserves		26,015			—		23,365			—
Employee benefit compensation		26,665			—		17,649			—
State net operating losses (net of federal benefit)		9,096			—		9,270			—
Inventory costs and reserves capitalized for tax purposes		11,869			—		15,245			—
Landlord allowances		40,699			—		39,463			—
Other		13,705			—		17,763			2,897
Reserves		8,252			—		12,019			—
Tax credits		4,480			—		4,760			—
Valuation allowance		(7,388	)		—		(12,858	)		—
Total non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities	$	169,922		$	369,884	$	161,975		$	363,670
Net deferred tax liability				$	199,962				$	201,695

As of January 28, 2017, the Company has a deferred tax asset related to net operating losses of $9.1 million inclusive of $7.0 million of state net operating losses which will expire at various dates between 2017 and 2036 and $2.1 million of deferred tax assets

recorded for Puerto Rico net operating loss carry-forwards that will begin to expire in 2025. As of January 28, 2017, the Company had tax credit carry-forwards of $4.5 million inclusive of state tax credit carry-forwards of $3.2 million that will begin to expire in 2022 and $1.3 million of Puerto Rico alternative minimum tax (AMT) credits that have an indefinite life.

We believe that it is more likely than not that the benefit from certain state net operating loss carry forwards and credits will not be realized. In recognition of this risk, we have provided a total valuation allowance of $7.4 million inclusive of $5.3 million of valuation allowance related to state net operating losses and $2.1 million related to tax credit carry-forwards, for the year ended January 28, 2017. If our assumptions change and we determine we will be able to realize these net operating losses or the credits, the tax benefits relating to any reversal of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets as of January 28, 2017, will be recorded to the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. The total valuation allowance decreased by $5.5 million from the prior year which was primarily due to the release of the valuation allowance on Puerto Rico deferred tax assets resulting from a change in Puerto Rico regulations. As of January 30 2016, we provided a total valuation allowance of $12.9 million inclusive of $5.7 of valuation allowance related to state net operating losses, $2.1 million related to tax credit carry-forwards, and $5.1 million related to Puerto Rico tax attributes.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits (exclusive of interest and penalties) is as follows:

As of January 28, 2017, the Company reported total unrecognized benefits of $9.2 million, of which $6.0 million would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. As a result of previous positions taken, the Company recorded an increase of $0.4 million of interest and penalties during Fiscal 2016 in the line item “Income tax expense” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Cumulative interest and penalties of $13.8 million are recorded in the line item “Other liabilities” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 28, 2017. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as part of income taxes. Within the next twelve months, the Company does not expect any significant changes in its unrecognized tax benefits.

As of January 30, 2016, the Company reported total unrecognized benefits of $10.6 million, of which $6.1 million would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. As a result of previous positions taken, the Company recorded an increase of $1.3 million of interest and penalties during Fiscal 2015 in the line item “Income tax expense” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Cumulative interest and penalties of $13.4 million are recorded in the line item “Other liabilities” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 30, 2016.

The Company files tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, Puerto Rico and various state jurisdictions. The Company is open to examination by the IRS under the applicable statutes of limitations for Fiscal Years 2013 through 2016. The Company or its subsidiaries’ state and Puerto Rico income tax returns are open to audit for Fiscal Years 2011 through 2016, with a few exceptions, under the applicable statutes of limitations. There are ongoing federal and state audits in several jurisdictions, and the Company has accrued for possible exposures as required under Topic No. 740. The Company does not expect the settlement of these audits to have a material impact to its financial results.

The Company accounts for fair value measurements in accordance with Topic No. 820 which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measurement and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Topic No. 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price), and classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:

The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Refer to Note 8, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” for further discussion regarding the fair value of the Company’s interest rate cap contracts.

The fair values of the Company’s financial assets and the hierarchy of the level of inputs as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016 are summarized below:

The fair values presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of the respective year end dates. The estimated fair values of the Company’s debt are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Although management is not aware of any factors that could significantly affect the estimated fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since that date, and current estimates of fair value may differ from amounts presented herein.

The Company establishes accruals relating to legal claims in connection with litigation to which the Company is party from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Like many retailers, the Company has been named in class or collective actions on behalf of various groups alleging violations of federal and state wage and hour and other labor statutes, and alleged violation of state consumer and/or privacy protection statutes. In the normal course of business, we are also party to various other lawsuits and regulatory proceedings including, among others, commercial, product, product safety, employee, customer, intellectual property and other claims. Actions against us are in various procedural stages. Many of these proceedings raise factual and legal issues and are subject to uncertainties. To determine the likelihood of a loss and/or the measurement of any loss can be complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss in excess of amounts accrued. The Company’s assessments are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process relies heavily on estimates and assumptions that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change those estimates and assumptions. While no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of these matters, the Company believes that the final resolution of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, liquidity or capital resources.

The Company had irrevocable letters of credit in the amounts of $53.1 million and $41.3 million as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, respectively.

Letters of credit outstanding as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016 amounted to $44.2 million and $32.2 million, respectively, guaranteeing performance under various lease agreements, insurance contracts, and utility agreements. The Company also had outstanding letters of credit arrangements in the aggregate amount of $8.9 million and $9.1 million at January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, respectively, related to certain merchandising agreements. Based on the terms of the Amended ABL Credit Agreement relating to the ABL Line of Credit, the Company had available letters of credit of $427.8 million and $335.4 million as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, respectively.

The Company had $651.5 million of purchase commitments related to goods that were not received as of January 28, 2017.

In November of 2005, the Company entered into agreements with three of the Company’s former executives whereby, upon each of their deaths, the Company will pay $1.0 million to each respective designated beneficiary.

The brother-in-law of one of the Company’s Executive Vice Presidents is an independent sales representative of one of the Company’s suppliers of merchandise inventory. This relationship predated the commencement of the Executive Vice President’s employment with the Company. The Company has determined that the dollar amount of purchases through such supplier represents an insignificant amount of its inventory purchases.

In the opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments which are necessary for the fair presentation of the quarters presented. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results of any future quarter.

	Fiscal Years Ended
	January 28, 2017			January 30, 2016			January 31, 2015
	(in thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net cash provided by operations	$	—		$	—		$	—
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Receipt of dividends		—			—			—
Net cash used in investing activities		—			—			—
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from initial public offering		—			—			—
Offering costs		—			—			—
Receipt of dividends		—			—			—
Payment of dividends		—			—			—
Purchase of treasury shares		(202,371	)		(201,670	)		(3,933	)
Intercompany financing transactions		197,910			198,090			(600	)
Proceeds from stock option exercises		4,484			2,100			2,514
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		23			(1,480	)		(2,019	)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		23			(1,480	)		(2,019	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		24			1,504			3,523
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	47		$	24		$	1,504

Burlington Stores, Inc. (the Parent Company) is a holding company that conducts substantially all of its business operations through its subsidiaries. The Parent Company’s ability to pay dividends on Parent Company’s common stock will be limited by restrictions on the ability of Parent Company’s subsidiaries to pay dividends or make distributions under the terms of current and future agreements governing the indebtedness of Parent Company’s subsidiaries, so long as the pro forma consolidated secured leverage ratio of Parent Company’s subsidiaries does not exceed 3.50 to 1.00.

The accompanying Condensed Financial Statements include the accounts of the Parent Company and, on an equity basis, its subsidiaries and affiliates. Accordingly, these Condensed Financial Statements have been presented on a “parent-only” basis. Under a parent-only presentation, the Parent Company’s investments in its consolidated subsidiaries are presented under the equity method of accounting. These parent-only financial statements should be read in conjunction with Burlington Stores, Inc.’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.

As discussed above, payment of dividends is prohibited under the credit agreements of Parent Company’s subsidiaries, except in limited circumstances.

Non-cash stock compensation expense of $16.0 million, $11.2 million and $6.3 million has been pushed down to Parent Company’s subsidiaries for Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, respectively. The excess tax benefit from stock based compensation of $13.5 million, $11.9 million and $15.5 million has been pushed down to Parent Company’s subsidiaries for Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, respectively.

Description	Balance at Beginning of Period		Charged to Costs & Expenses			Charged to Other Accounts(1)			Accounts Written Off or Deductions(2)		Balance at End of Period
Year ended January 28, 2017
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	272	$	508		$	—		$	518	$	262
Sales reserves	$	3,264	$	(230	)	$	318,214		$	317,829	$	3,419
Valuation allowances on deferred tax assets	$	12,858	$	—		$	(5,470	)	$	—	$	7,388
Year ended January 30, 2016
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	111	$	740		$	—		$	579	$	272
Sales reserves	$	3,052	$	(317	)	$	313,737		$	313,208	$	3,264
Valuation allowances on deferred tax assets	$	10,653	$	—		$	2,205		$	—	$	12,858
Year ended January 31, 2015
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	109	$	344		$	—		$	342	$	111
Sales reserves	$	2,604	$	(672	)	$	304,577		$	303,457	$	3,052
Valuation allowances on deferred tax assets	$	9,108	$	—		$	1,545		$	—	$	10,653

Our management team, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), as of the last day of the fiscal period covered by this report, January 28, 2017. The term disclosure controls and procedures means our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of January 28, 2017.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the issuer’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the issuer’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that:

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In accordance with the internal control reporting requirement of the SEC, management completed an assessment of the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 28, 2017. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013).

Based on this assessment and the criteria in the COSO framework, management has concluded that, as of January 28, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited and reported on our consolidated financial statements contained herein, has audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 28, 2017, and has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting included herein.

During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Burlington Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of January 28, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 28, 2017, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017 of the Company and our report dated March 16, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedules.

For the information required by this Item 10, see “Election of Directors,” “Executive Officers of the Company,” “Corporate Governance,” “Board Committees,” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), which information is incorporated herein by reference. The Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting (the “Proxy Statement”) will be filed within 120 days of the close of our 2016 fiscal year.

For the information required by this Item 11, see “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

For the information required by this Item 12, see “Ownership of Securities” and “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

For the information required by this Item 13, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” and “Corporate Governance” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

For the information required by this Item 14, see “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” and “Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

(1) Financial Statements. The Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of this Report are listed on the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 43 of this Report.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules. Schedule I—Condensed Financial Information of Registrant is set forth on pages 77-80. Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts filed as part of this Report is set forth on page 81 of this Report. All other financial statement schedules have been omitted here because they are not applicable, not required, or the information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.

The following is a list of exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K and filed as part of this Report. Exhibits that previously have been filed are incorporated herein by reference.

Exhibit No.		Description
10.3(12)		Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 2, 2011, among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, as Lead Borrower, the Borrowers and the Facility Guarantors party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and as Collateral Agent, the Lenders party thereto, Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as co-syndication agents, and Suntrust Bank and U.S. Bank, National Association, as co-documentation agents.

10.3.1(20)		First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2014, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, as lead borrower, the other borrowers signatory thereto, the facility guarantors signatory thereto, each lender party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent.

10.4(1)		Revolving Credit Note, dated as of April 13, 2006, by the Borrowers party thereto in favor of PNC Bank, National Association.

10.5(1)		Revolving Credit Note, dated as of April 13, 2006, by the Borrowers party thereto in favor of Siemens Financial Services, Inc.

10.6(8)		Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Note, dated January 15, 2010, by the Borrowers party thereto in favor of Wells Fargo Retail Finance, LLC.

10.7(1)		Revolving Credit Note, dated as of April 13, 2006, by the Borrowers party thereto in favor of National City Business Credit, Inc.

10.8(1)		Revolving Credit Note, dated as of April 13, 2006, by the Borrowers party thereto in favor of Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania.

10.9(1)		Revolving Credit Note, dated as of April 13, 2006, by the Borrowers party thereto in favor of HSBC Business Credit (USA), Inc.

10.10(1)		Revolving Credit Note, dated as of April 13, 2006, by the Borrowers party thereto in favor of Sovereign Bank.

10.11(8)		Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Note, dated January 15, 2010, by the Borrowers party thereto in favor of Capital One Leverage Finance Corp.

10.12(1)		Form of Swingline Note.

10.13(1)		Guaranty, dated as of April 13, 2006, by the Facility Guarantors party thereto in favor of Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Bank of America, N.A., as Collateral Agent.

10.14(1)		Security Agreement, dated as of April 13, 2006, by and among each of the Borrowers party thereto, each of the Facility Guarantors party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Collateral Agent.

10.15(1)		Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated as of April 13, 2006, by and among each of the Borrowers party thereto, each of the Facility Guarantors party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Collateral Agent.

10.16(1)		Pledge Agreement, dated as of April 13, 2006, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, Inc., Burlington Coat Factory Investments Holdings, Inc., Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Realty Corp., Burlington Coat Factory Purchasing, Inc., K&T Acquisition Corp., Burlington Coat Factory of New York, LLC, Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of Baytown, Inc., Burlington Coat Factory of Texas, Inc., as the Pledgors, and Bank of America, N.A., as Collateral Agent.

10.17+(8)		Employment Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2009, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Joyce Manning Magrini.

10.17.1+(8)		Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated February 26, 2010, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Joyce Manning Magrini.

10.17.2+(16)		Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2012, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Joyce Manning Magrini.

10.18+(4)		Employment Agreement, dated as of December 2, 2008, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, Inc., and Thomas Kingsbury.

10.18.1+(16)		Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated as of October 23, 2012, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, Inc., and Thomas Kingsbury.

Exhibit No.		Description

10.18.2+(21)		Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2014, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, LLC, Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas Kingsbury.

10.18.3+(11)		Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2015, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, LLC, Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas Kingsbury.

10.18.4+(2)		Amendment No. 4 to Employment Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2015, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, LLC, Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas Kingsbury.

10.18.5+(7)		Amendment No. 5 to Employment Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2015, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, LLC, Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas Kingsbury.
10.18.6+(23)		Amendment No. 6 to Employment Agreement, dated as of January 20, 2017, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, LLC, Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas Kingsbury.

10.19+(9)		Employment Agreement, dated as of January 28, 2008, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Fred Hand.

10.19.1+(17)		Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2012, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Fred Hand.

10.20+(3)		Employment Agreement, dated as of June 26, 2008, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Marc Katz.

10.20.1+(17)		Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2012, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Marc Katz.

10.21+(5)		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, Inc. and Employees with Employment Agreements (for grants made after March 2009 and prior to 2014 (other than 2013 special one-time grants)) pursuant to 2006 Management Incentive Plan.

10.22+(5)		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, Inc. and Employees without Employment Agreements (for grants made after March 2009 and prior to 2014 (other than 2013 special one-time grants)) pursuant to 2006 Management Incentive Plan.

10.23+(5)		Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement between Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, Inc. and Employees with Employment Agreements (for grants made after March 2009 and prior to 2014) pursuant to 2006 Management Incentive Plan.

10.24+(5)		Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement between Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, Inc. and Employees without Employment Agreements (for grants made after March 2009 and prior to 2014) pursuant to 2006 Management Incentive Plan.

10.25+(17)		Burlington Holdings, Inc. 2006 Management Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated June 15, 2013).

10.26(18)		Form of Directors and Officers Indemnification Agreement.

10.27+(19)		Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

10.28+(17)		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, pursuant to 2006 Management Incentive Plan, between Burlington Holdings, Inc. and Employees with Employment Agreements (for 2013 special one-time grants).

10.29+(17)		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, pursuant to 2006 Management Incentive Plan, between Burlington Holdings, Inc. and Employees without Employment Agreements (for 2013 special one-time grants).

10.30+(17)		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, pursuant to 2006 Management Incentive Plan, dated as of June 17, 2013, between Burlington Holdings, Inc. and Thomas A. Kingsbury (for 2013 special one-time grant).

10.31+(6)		Employment Agreement, dated as of November 7, 2014, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Eric Seeger.

10.32+(6)		Restricted Stock Grant Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas Kingsbury dated December 15, 2014.

10.33+(6)		Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Independent Directors pursuant to 2006 Management Incentive Plan

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 16^th day of March 2017.

Delaware		80-0895227
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2006 Route 130 North Burlington, New Jersey		08016
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share		New York Stock Exchange

Large accelerated filer	☒	Accelerated filer	☐

Non-Accelerated filer	☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	☐

		PAGE
PART I.

Item 1.	Business	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	5
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	16
Item 2.	Properties	16
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	17
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	17

PART II.

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	18
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	21
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	41
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	43
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	82
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	82
Item 9B.	Other Information	84

PART III.

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	84
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	84
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	84
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	84
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	84

PART IV.

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	85

Item 16.	Form 10-K Summary	90

SIGNATURES		91
EXHIBIT INDEX		92

	Calendar Year Operational		Size (sq. feet)		Leased or Owned
Primary Distribution Centers:
Edgewater Park, New Jersey(a)		2004		648,000	Owned
Burlington, New Jersey (Daniels Way)		2014		678,000	Leased
San Bernardino, California		2006		660,000	Leased
Redlands, California (Pioneer Ave)		2014		800,000	Leased
Warehousing Facilities:
Burlington, New Jersey (Route 130 North)(a)		1987		402,000	Owned
Florence, New Jersey		2013		208,000	Leased
Redlands, California (Palmetto Ave)		2015		446,000	Leased
Burlington, New Jersey (Richards Run)(b)		2017		511,000	Leased

	Fiscal 2016			Fiscal 2015			Fiscal 2014
Stores (beginning of period)		567			542			521
Stores opened		30			28			24
Stores closed		(5	)		(3	)		(3	)
Stores (end of period)		592			567			542

Category	Fiscal 2016			Fiscal 2015			Fiscal 2014
Women’s ready-to-wear apparel		24	%		24	%		24	%
Accessories and footwear		22	%		22	%		22	%
Menswear		20	%		21	%		20	%
Youth apparel/baby		16	%		16	%		18	%
Home		12	%		11	%		9	%
Coats		6	%		6	%		7	%


	•		political or labor instability in countries where vendors are located or at foreign ports which could result in lengthy shipment delays, which, if timed ahead of the Fall and Winter peak selling periods, could materially and adversely affect our ability to stock inventory on a timely basis;


	•		political or military conflict, which could cause a delay in the transportation of our products to us and an increase in transportation costs;


	•		heightened terrorism security concerns, which could subject imported goods to additional, more frequent or more thorough inspections, leading to delays in deliveries or impoundment of goods for extended periods;


	•		disease epidemics, outbreaks and other health related concerns, which could result in closed factories, reduced workforces, scarcity of raw materials and scrutiny or embargoing of goods produced in infected areas;


	•		natural disasters and industrial accidents, which could have the effect of curtailing production and disrupting supplies;


	•		increases in labor and production costs in goods-producing countries, which would result in an increase in our inventory costs;


	•		the migration and development of manufacturers, which can affect where our products are or will be produced;


	•		fluctuation in our vendors’ local currency against the dollar, which may increase our cost of goods sold; and


	•		changes in import duties, taxes, charges, quotas, loss of “most favored nation” trading status with the United States for a particular foreign country and trade restrictions (including the United States imposing antidumping or countervailing duty orders, safeguards, remedies or compensation and retaliation due to illegal foreign trade practices).


	•		manage advertising and marketing costs effectively in order to maintain acceptable operating margins and return on our marketing investment; and


	•		convert customer awareness into actual store visits and product purchases.


	•		authorize the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and the shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or preferences superior to the rights of the holders of common stock;


	•		prohibit stockholder action by written consent, requiring all stockholder actions be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;


	•		provide that the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal our amended and restated bylaws;


	•		establish advance notice requirements for nominations for elections to our Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings;


	•		prohibit stockholders from calling special meetings of stockholders; and


	•		require the approval of holders of at least 75% of the outstanding shares of our voting common stock to amend the amended and restated bylaws and certain provisions of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

	Fiscal 2016				Fiscal 2015
	High		Low		High		Low
First quarter	$	58.94	$	48.55	$	61.02	$	49.80
Second quarter	$	76.91	$	51.19	$	56.75	$	48.58
Third quarter	$	87.23	$	72.45	$	55.57	$	45.66
Fourth quarter	$	91.67	$	68.94	$	53.73	$	40.70

	Base Period		Indexed Returns for Fiscal Years Ended
Company / Index	October 2, 2013		February 1, 2014		January 31, 2015		January 30, 2016		January 28, 2017
Burlington Stores, Inc.	$	100.00	$	102.28	$	199.48	$	214.83	$	323.51
S&P 500 Index	$	100.00	$	105.24	$	117.78	$	114.54	$	135.47
S&P Retailing Index	$	100.00	$	100.62	$	119.48	$	138.07	$	161.95

Month	Total Number of Shares Purchased(1)		Average Price Paid Per Share(2)		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(3)		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
October 30, 2016 through November 26, 2016		5,706	$	72.85		—	$	249,642,662
November 27, 2016 through December 31, 2016		562,384	$	88.94		562,199		199,642,696
January 1, 2017 through January 28, 2017		1,887	$	83.59		—		199,642,696
Total		569,977				562,199

	Comparable Store Sales
Fiscal 2016		4.5	%
Fiscal 2015		2.1	%
Fiscal 2014		4.9	%

	(in millions)
Floating Rate Debt	Principal Outstanding at January 28, 2017		Additional Interest Expense Q1 2017		Additional Interest Expense Q2 2017		Additional Interest Expense Q3 2017		Additional Interest Expense Q4 2017
Term Loan Facility (a)	$	1,117.0	$	1.2	$	1.2	$	1.2	$	1.2
ABL Line of Credit		—		—		—		—		—
	$	1,117.0	$	1.2	$	1.2	$	1.2	$	1.2

		Page
Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		44
Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015		45
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015		46
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016		47
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015		48
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for the fiscal years ended January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015		49
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal years ended January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015		50

		(in thousands)
	Useful Lives	January 28, 2017			January 30, 2016
Land	N/A	$	157,272		$	159,044
Buildings	20 to 40 Years		452,497			438,609
Store fixtures and equipment	3 to 10 Years		762,826			732,851
Software	3 to 5 Years		205,673			188,399
Leasehold improvements	Shorter of lease term or useful life		561,371			511,036
Construction in progress	N/A		37,145			15,815
			2,176,784			2,045,754
Less: accumulated depreciation			(1,127,337	)		(1,027,184	)
Total property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization		$	1,049,447		$	1,018,570

	(in thousands)
	January 28, 2017							January 30, 2016
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Amount
Tradenames	$	238,000	$	—		$	238,000	$	238,000	$	—		$	238,000
Favorable leases	$	456,389		(243,209	)	$	213,180	$	470,133	$	(231,380	)	$	238,753

Fiscal Years:	(in thousands)
2017	$	23,870
2018		20,890
2019		20,224
2020		18,918
2021		18,419
Thereafter		110,859
Total	$	213,180

	(in thousands)
	Fiscal Years Ended
Asset Categories	January 28, 2017		January 30, 2016		January 31, 2015
Favorable leases	$	1,550	$	3,318	$	—
Store fixtures and equipment		440		1,146		500
Leasehold improvements		387		1,005		696
Other assets		73		429		216
Software		—		213		15
Buildings		—		—		1,152
Land		—		—		—
Total	$	2,450	$	6,111	$	2,579

	(in thousands)
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Un- Observable Inputs (Level 3)		Total		Total Impairment Losses
Favorable leases	$	—	$	—	$	1,709	$	—	$	1,550
Store fixtures and equipment		—		—		517		—		440
Leasehold improvements		—		—		458		—		387
Other assets		—		—		64		—		73
Total	$	—	$	—	$	2,748	$	—	$	2,450