10-K 1 tif612311910-k.htm 10-K Document
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K
þ
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2019
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 814-01136
Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
 
46-2865244
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
550 Fifth Avenue, 6th Floor
New York, New York 10036
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(212) 753-5100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common stock, $0.001 par value
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o
 
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer þ 
 
Smaller reporting company o
 
 
Emerging growth company þ
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of February 21, 2020, the registrant had 8,252,073 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding. No market value has been computed based upon the fact that no active trading market had been established as of the date of this document.
 


TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Page
PART I
  
PART II
 
PART III
 
PART IV
 


i


CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
Except as otherwise specified in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms:
•
“we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” refer to Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.;
•
“Terra Income Advisors” refers to Terra Income Advisors, LLC;
•
“Terra Capital Markets” refers to Terra Capital Markets, LLC:
•
“Terra Capital Partners” refers to Terra Capital Partners, LLC; and
•
“Terra Income Funds” refers collectively to Terra Secured Income Fund, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 2, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 3, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 4, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 5, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 5 International, Terra Income Fund International and Terra Secured Income Fund 7, LLC.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitute forward-looking statements because they relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may include, but are not limited to, statements as to:
•
our future operating results;
•
our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies;
•
the impact of the investments that we expect to make;
•
the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives;
•
our current and expected financings and investments;
•
the adequacy of our cash resources, financing sources and working capital;
•
the timing and amount of cash flows, distributions and dividends, if any, from our portfolio companies;
•
our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties;
•
actual and potential conflicts of interest with any of the following affiliated entities: Terra Income Advisors, LLC, our investment adviser; Terra Capital Partners, LLC, our sponsor; Terra REIT Advisors, LLC, a subsidiary of Terra Capital Partners, LLC; Terra Fund Advisors, LLC, an affiliate of Terra Capital Partners, LLC; Terra Secured Income Fund, LLC; Terra Secured Income Fund 2, LLC; Terra Secured Income Fund 3, LLC; Terra Secured Income Fund 4, LLC; Terra Secured Income Fund 5, LLC; Terra Secured Income Fund 5 International; Terra Income Fund International; Terra Secured Income Fund 7, LLC; Terra Property Trust, Inc., a subsidiary of Terra Secured Income Fund 5, LLC; Terra Property Trust 2, Inc., a subsidiary of Terra Secured Income Fund 7, LLC; Terra International Fund 3, L.P.; Terra International Fund 3 REIT, LLC, a subsidiary of Terra International Fund 3, L.P.; Terra Capital Advisors, LLC; Terra Capital Advisors 2, LLC; Terra Income Advisors 2, LLC; or any of their affiliates;
•
the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its effect on our investments;
•
our use of financial leverage;
•
the ability of Terra Income Advisors, LLC to locate suitable investments for us and to monitor and administer our investments;
•
the ability of Terra Income Advisors, LLC or its affiliates to attract and retain highly talented professionals;
•
our ability to elect to be taxed as, and maintain thereafter, our qualification as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940;
•
the effect of changes to tax legislation and our tax position; and
•
the tax status of the enterprises in which we invest.
In addition, words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect” and “intend” indicate a forward-looking statement, although not all forward-looking statements include these words. The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors set forth in “Part I — Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Annual Report. Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include:

ii


•
changes in the economy;
•
risks associated with possible disruption in our operations or the economy generally due to terrorism or natural disasters; and
•
future changes in laws or regulations and conditions in our operating areas.
We have based the forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K on information available to us on the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Stockholders are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to stockholders or through reports that we may file in the future with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. The forward-looking statements and projections contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are excluded from the safe harbor protection provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).


iii


PART I
Item 1. Business.
Formation of Our Company
We are a Maryland corporation, formed on May 15, 2013 and commenced operations on June 24, 2015. We have elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). We are an externally managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that initially elected to be taxed for federal income tax purposes beginning with our taxable year ended September 30, 2015, and qualified annually thereafter, as a regulated investment company (“RIC”). On December 31, 2018, we changed our tax election from taxation as a RIC to taxation as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”). The REIT tax election allows us to benefit from the preferential tax treatment afforded to both RICs and REITs, without us being subject to RIC-specific diversification restrictions. We elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) commencing with our short taxable year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018. Concurrent with the change in our tax election, we changed our fiscal year end from September 30 to December 31 to satisfy the REIT requirements under the Code.
We entered into a stock purchase agreement with Terra Capital Partners, LLC (“Terra Capital Partners”), our sponsor and an affiliate of our company. On September 19, 2014, pursuant to a private placement, Terra Capital Partners contributed cash consideration of $125,000 to purchase approximately 11,111 shares of our common stock at $11.25 per share. On October 20, 2014, pursuant to a private placement, Terra Capital Partners contributed an additional $50,000 in cash to purchase approximately 4,445 additional shares of our common stock at $11.25 per share.
On February 25, 2015, our board of directors (the “Board”) determined to change the initial offering price from $10.00 per share to $12.50 per share. As a result, on February 26, 2015, we effected a reverse stock split to account for the change in the offering price since the September and October 2014 contributions from Terra Capital Partners. As such, all share references and equity transaction pricing elsewhere reflect this reverse stock split.
On March 2, 2015, we filed a public registration statement on Form N-2 (the “Registration Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to offer a minimum of $2.0 million of common stock and a maximum of $1.0 billion of common stock in a continuous, public offering (the “Offering”). The SEC declared the Registration Statement effective on April 20, 2015, and we retained Terra Capital Markets, LLC (“Terra Capital Markets”), an affiliate of Terra Income Advisors, LLC (“Terra Income Advisors” or the “Adviser”), to serve as the dealer manager of the Offering. As dealer manager, Terra Capital Markets was responsible for marketing our shares being offered pursuant to the Offering, which ended on April 20, 2018.
On May 1, 2015, Terra Capital Partners contributed cash of $275,000 to purchase approximately 24,444 additional shares from the Offering at a per share price of $11.25, which price represents the then-current public offering price of $12.50 per share, net of selling commissions, broker-dealer fees and dealer manager fees. This contribution, in addition to the initial capital contributions described above, fulfilled Terra Capital Partners’ commitment to contribute total seed capitalization of $450,000.
On June 24, 2015, we successfully reached our minimum escrow requirement and officially commenced our operations by receiving gross proceeds of $2,000,000 (the “Minimum Offering Requirement”). Since commencing operations, and through the end of the Offering on April 20, 2018, we have sold a total of 8,878,606 shares of common stock for total gross proceeds of $103.6 million, excluding shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (“DRIP”). The proceeds from the issuance of common stock are presented in our statements of changes in net assets and statements of cash flows.
On January 13, 2017, we decreased the public offering price of our common stock from $12.50 per share to $10.90 per share. The decrease in the public offering price was effective as of our January 17, 2017 bi-monthly closing and first applied to subscriptions received from January 1, 2017 through January 16, 2017.
On February 8, 2018, a pooled investment vehicle advised by Axar Capital Management L.P. (“Axar”) entered into an investment agreement with Terra Capital Partners and its affiliates pursuant to which Axar acquired from the respective owners thereof a 65.7% economic and voting interest in Terra Capital Partners and an initial 49% economic interest, but no voting interest, in Terra Income Advisors. On November 30, 2018, Axar purchased the remaining 34.3% economic and voting interest in Terra Capital Partners. On April 25, 2019, we held our annual meeting of stockholders, at which time a new investment advisory agreement (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”) was approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Accordingly, on April 30, 2019, Axar acquired the remaining 51% economic interest and 100% of the voting interest in Terra Income Advisors, and we and Terra Income Advisors entered into a new Investment Advisory Agreement. Such new Investment Advisory Agreement has the same economic terms and is in all material respects otherwise on the same terms as the Investment Advisory Agreement in effect immediately prior to April 30, 2019, except for the date of the agreement. Pursuant to Section 15 of the 1940 Act, the new Investment Advisory Agreement has an initial two year term, but will be required to be renewed annually thereafter at an in-person meeting of our Board.

1


Overview of Our Business
We do not currently have any employees and do not expect to have any employees. Services necessary for our business are provided by individuals who are employees of our advisor, Terra Income Advisors, or by individuals who were contracted by us or by Terra Income Advisors to work on behalf of us pursuant to the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement between us and Terra Income Advisors. Terra Income Advisors is responsible for sourcing potential investments, conducting due diligence on prospective investments, analyzing investment opportunities, structuring investments and monitoring our portfolio on an ongoing basis according to asset allocation and other guidelines set by our Board. Terra Income Advisors is registered as an investment adviser with the SEC. Prior to October 1, 2018, we were a RIC and intended to qualify as a RIC until the tax return for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 was filed. Beginning with our short taxable year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018, we elected to operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code and during the taxable year ended December 31, 2019, have continued to operate, so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code. As a REIT, we are not subject to federal income taxes on income and gains distributed to the stockholders as long as certain requirements are satisfied, principally relating to the nature of income and the level of distributions, as well as other factors.
The level of our investment activity depends on many factors, including the amount of debt and equity capital available to prospective borrowers, the level of refinancing activity for such companies, the availability of credit to finance transactions, the general economic environment and the competitive environment for the types of investments we make. Our distributions may exceed our earnings. Therefore, portions of the distributions that we make may represent a return of capital to investors for tax purposes, which will lower investors’ tax basis in their shares.
Our Investment Adviser
Our investment activities are externally managed by Terra Income Advisors, a private investment firm affiliated with us, pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, under the oversight of the Board, a majority of whom are independent. Terra Income Advisors is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”).
Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, we have agreed to pay Terra Income Advisors a base management fee as well as an incentive fee based on our investment performance. Also, we have agreed to pay selling commissions, broker-dealer fees, a dealer manager fee and a servicing fee, and to reimburse Terra Income Advisors for our organization and offering expenses up to a maximum amount equal to 1.5% of the gross proceeds from the Offering. Terra Income Advisors bears all organization and offering expenses in excess of this amount.
The management of our investment portfolio is the responsibility of Terra Income Advisors and its executive officers. The investment committee of Terra Income Advisors will approve each new investment that we make. Our Board, including a majority of independent directors, oversees and monitors our investment performance and, beginning with the second anniversary of the date of the Investment Advisory Agreement, our Board will annually review the compensation we pay to our Adviser and its performance during the preceding 12 months to determine if the compensation paid to our Adviser is reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of the services performed, and that the provisions of the Investment Advisory Agreement are carried out.
About Terra Capital Partners
Terra Capital Partners, an affiliate of Terra Income Advisors, is a real estate finance and investment firm based in New York City that focuses primarily on the origination and management of commercial real estate-related loans, including mezzanine loans, as well as first mortgage loans, bridge loans and preferred equity investments, in all major property types. Since its formation in 2001 and its commencement of operations in 2002, Terra Capital Partners has been engaged in providing financing on commercial properties of all major property types throughout the United States. In the lead up to the global financial crisis in 2007, believing that the risks associated with commercial real estate markets had grown out of proportion to the potential returns from such markets, Terra Capital Partners sold 100% of its interest in its portfolio. It was not until mid-2009, after its assessment that commercial mortgage markets would begin a period of stabilization and growth, that Terra Capital Partners began to sponsor new investment vehicles, which included the Terra Income Funds, to again provide debt capital to commercial real estate markets. The financings provided by all vehicles managed by Terra Capital Partners from January 2004 through December 31, 2019 have been secured by approximately 12.0 million square feet of office properties, 3.5 million square feet of retail properties, 3.8 million square feet of industrial properties, 4,855 hotel rooms and 26,082 apartment units. The value of the properties underlying this capital was approximately $7.9 billion based on appraised values as of the closing dates of each financing. In addition to its extensive experience originating and managing debt financings, Terra Capital Partners and its affiliates have owned and operated over six million square feet of office and industrial space between 2005 and 2007, and this operational experience further informs its robust origination and underwriting standards and would be beneficial should our Adviser need to foreclose on a property underlying a financing. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Terra Capital Partners and its affiliates employed 28 persons.
Terra Capital Partners is wholly owned by Axar since November 30, 2018. Axar is an investment manager registered under the Advisers Act with over $850 million in assets under management, headquartered in New York City and founded by Andrew

2


M. Axelrod, Axar focuses on value-oriented and opportunistic investing across the capital structure and multiple sectors. The firm seeks attractive prices relative to intrinsic value and invests in event-driven situations with clear catalysts and asymmetric return potential. Axar’s senior real estate team has worked together for over five years, having previously built the $3 billion real estate business at Mount Kellett Capital Management, LP, or Mount Kellett Capital Management. Axar has a deep network of industry relationships including institutional investors (for both public and private investments), operators, advisers and senior lenders.     
Terra Capital Partners is led by Vikram S. Uppal (Chief Executive Officer), Gregory M. Pinkus (Chief Financial Officer) and Daniel Cooperman (Chief Originations Officer). Mr. Uppal was a Partner of Axar Capital Management and its Head of Real Estate. Prior to Axar, Mr. Uppal was a Managing Director on the Investment Team at Fortress Investment Group’s Credit and Real Estate Funds and Co-Head of North American Real Estate Investments at Mount Kellett Capital Management. Members of the Terra Capital Partners management team have broad based, long-term relationships with major financial institutions, property owners and commercial real estate service providers. The entire senior management team has held leadership roles at many top international real estate and investment banking firms, including Mount Kellett Capital Management and Fortress Investment Group.
Investment Objectives and Strategy
Our primary investment objectives are to pay attractive and stable cash distributions and to preserve, protect and return capital contributions to stockholders. Our investment strategy is to use substantially all of the proceeds of the Offering to originate and manage a diversified portfolio consisting of (i) commercial real estate loans to U.S. companies qualifying as “eligible portfolio companies” under the 1940 Act, including mezzanine loans, first and second lien mortgage loans, subordinated mortgage loans, bridge loans and other commercial real estate-related loans related to or secured by high quality commercial real estate in the United States and (ii) preferred equity real estate investments in U.S. companies qualifying as “eligible portfolio companies” under the 1940 Act; provided, however, that we are not a “diversified company” as defined in the 1940 Act. We may also purchase select commercial real estate-related debt securities, such as commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) or collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”).
We seek to structure, acquire and maintain a portfolio of investments that generate a stable income stream to enable us to pay attractive and consistent cash distributions to our stockholders. We directly structure, underwrite and originate most of our investments, as we believe that doing so will provide us with the best opportunity to invest in loans that satisfy our standards, establish a direct relationship with the borrower and optimize the terms of our investments; however, we may acquire existing loans from the originating lender should our adviser determine such an investment is in our best interest. We may hold our investments until their scheduled maturity dates or may sell them if we are able to command favorable terms for their disposition. We may also seek to realize growth in the value of our investments by timing their sale to maximize value. We believe that our investment strategy allows us to pay attractive and stable cash distributions to our stockholders and to preserve, protect and return our stockholders’ capital contributions, consistent with our investment objectives.
Terra Income Advisors’ management team has extensive experience in originating, acquiring, structuring, managing and disposing of real estate-related loans similar to the types of loans in which we intend to invest. In order to meet our investment objectives, we generally seek to follow the following investment criteria:
•
focus primarily on the origination of new loans;
•
focus on loans backed by properties in the United States;
•
invest primarily in floating rate rather than fixed rate loans, but we reserve the right to make debt investments that bear interest at a fixed rate;
•
invest in loans expected to be repaid within one to five years;
•
maximize current income;
•
lend to creditworthy borrowers;
•
construct a portfolio that is diversified by property type, geographic location, tenancy and borrower;
•
source off-market transactions; and
•
hold investments until maturity unless, in our adviser’s judgment, market conditions warrant earlier disposition.
While the size of each of our investments generally ranges between $3 million and $20 million, our investments ultimately are at the discretion Terra Income Advisors, subject to oversight by our Board. We focus on smaller, middle market loans which are financing properties in primary and secondary markets because we believe these loans are subject to less competition, offer higher risk adjusted returns than larger loans with similar risk metrics and facilitate portfolio diversification.

3


To enhance our returns, we intend to employ leverage as market conditions permit and at the discretion of our Terra Income Advisors, but in no event will leverage employed exceed 50% of the value of our assets, as required by the 1940 Act. See Item 1A “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Debt Financing” for a discussion of the risks inherent in employing leverage.
Business Strategy
In executing our business strategy, we believe that we benefit from Terra Income Advisors’ affiliation with Terra Capital Partners, given its strong track record and extensive experience and capabilities as real estate investment manager and sponsor of the Terra Income Funds. We believe the following core strengths will enable us to realize our investment objectives and provide us with significant competitive advantages in the marketplace, and attractive risk-adjusted returns to our stockholders:
Significant Experience of Terra Capital Partners
Terra Capital Partners provides Terra Income Advisors with all of its key investment personnel. Terra Capital Partners has developed a reputation within the commercial real estate finance industry as a leading sophisticated real estate investment and asset management company with a 17-year track record in originating, underwriting and managing commercial real estate and real estate-related loans, preferred equity investments and investments with similar characteristics to the assets that we acquire. We believe we benefit from the depth and the disciplined approach Terra Capital Partners brings to its underwriting and investment management processes to structure and manage investments prudently. In addition to its extensive experience originating and managing debt financings, Terra Capital Partners and its affiliates have owned and operated over six million square feet of office and industrial space between 2005 and 2007, and this operational experience has further informed its robust origination and underwriting standards.
Disciplined Investment Process
We follow a disciplined investment origination, underwriting and selection process. We follow an investment approach focused on long-term credit performance and capital protection. This investment approach involves a multi-phase evaluation, structuring and monitoring process for each potential investment opportunity. After investment, our management team focuses on a thorough review of our investments for potential credit quality deterioration and potential proactive steps, including making available significant managerial assistance as required by the 1940 Act, to mitigate any losses to our invested capital. We believe this approach maximizes current income and minimizes capital loss. To date, all of the loans originated by our Adviser and its affiliates have generated a positive return, which we believe is attributable to our Adviser’s rigorous origination, underwriting and selection process.
Portfolio Construction
We construct a portfolio that is diversified by property type, geographic location and borrower. We construct our portfolio based on our evaluation of the impact of each potential investment on the risk/reward mix in our existing portfolio. By selecting those assets that we believe will maximize stockholder returns while minimizing investment-specific risk, we believe we can build and manage an investment portfolio that provides superior value to stockholders over time, both in absolute terms and relative to other commercial real estate loan and real estate-related investment vehicles.
Superior Analytical Tools
We believe that our management team possesses the superior analytical tools to evaluate each potential investment through the balanced use of qualitative and quantitative analysis, which helps us manage risk on an individual investment and portfolio basis. We rely on a variety of analytical tools and models to assess our investments and risk management. We also conduct an extensive evaluation of the numerous factors that affect our potential investments. These factors include:
•
Top-down review of both the current macroeconomic environment generally and the real estate and commercial real estate loan market specifically;
•
Detailed evaluation of the real estate industry and its sectors;
•
Bottom-up review of each individual investment’s attributes and risk/reward profile relative to the macroeconomic environment;
•
Quantitative cash flow analysis and impact of the potential investment on our portfolio; and
•
Ongoing management and monitoring of all investments to assess changing conditions on our original investment assumptions.

4


Extensive Strategic Relationships
Our management team maintains extensive relationships within the real estate industry, including real estate developers, institutional real estate sponsors and investors, real estate funds, investment and commercial banks, private equity funds, asset originators and broker-dealers, as well as the capital and financing markets generally. We believe these relationships enhance our ability to source and finance our investments as well as mitigate their credit and interest rate risk. We leverage the many years of experience and well-established contacts of our management team, and to use these relationships for the benefit of our stockholders.
Targeted Investments
Real Estate-Related Loans
We originate, acquire, fund and structure real estate-related loans, including first and second mortgage loans, mezzanine loans, bridge loans, convertible mortgages and other loans related to high-quality commercial real estate in the United States. We may also acquire some equity participations in the underlying collateral of such loans. We structure, underwrite and originate most if not all of our investments. We use what we consider to be conservative underwriting criteria, and our underwriting process involves comprehensive financial, structural, operational and legal due diligence to assess the risks of investments so that we can optimize pricing and structuring. By originating loans directly, we are able to structure and underwrite loans that satisfy our standards, establish a direct relationship with the borrower and utilize our own documentation. Described below are some of the types of loans we own and may originate.
Mezzanine Loans. These are loans secured by ownership interests in an entity that owns commercial real estate and generally finance the acquisition, refinancing, rehabilitation or construction of commercial real estate. Mezzanine loans may be either short-term (one-to-five year) or long-term (up to 10-year) and may be fixed or floating rate. We may originate mezzanine loans backed by high-quality properties in the United States that fit our investment strategy. We may own such mezzanine loans directly or we may hold a participation in a mezzanine loan or a sub-participation in a mezzanine loan. These loans are predominantly current-pay loans (although there may be a portion of the interest that accrues) and may provide for participation in the value or cash flow appreciation of the underlying property as described below. We invest in mezzanine loans with loan-to-value ratios ranging from 60% to 80%.
Preferred Equity Investments. These are investments in preferred membership interests in an entity that owns commercial real estate and generally finance the acquisition, refinancing, rehabilitation or construction of commercial real estate. These investments are expected to have similar characteristics to and returns as mezzanine loans.
Subordinated Mortgage Loans (B-notes). B-notes include structurally subordinated first mortgage loans and junior participations in first mortgage loans or participations in these types of assets. Like first mortgage loans, these loans generally finance the acquisition, refinancing, rehabilitation or construction of commercial real estate. B-notes may be either short-term (one-to-five year) or long-term (up to 10-year), may be fixed or floating rate and are predominantly current-pay loans. We may originate current-pay B-notes backed by high-quality properties in the United States that fit our investment strategy. We may create B-notes by tranching our directly originated first mortgage loans generally through syndications of senior first mortgages or buy such assets directly from third-party originators.
Investors in B-notes are compensated for the increased risk of such assets from a pricing perspective but still benefit from a lien on the related property. Investors typically receive principal and interest payments at the same time as senior debt unless a default occurs, in which case these payments are made only after any senior debt is made whole. Rights of holders of B-notes are usually governed by participation and other agreements that, subject to certain limitations, typically provide the holders of subordinated positions of the mortgage loan with the ability to cure certain defaults and control certain decisions of holders of senior debt secured by the same properties (or otherwise exercise the right to purchase the senior debt), which provides for additional downside protection and higher recoveries.
Bridge Loans. We offer bridge financing products to borrowers who are typically seeking short-term capital to be used in an acquisition, development or refinancing of a given property. From the borrower’s perspective, shorter term bridge financing is advantageous because it allows time to improve the property value through repositioning without encumbering it with restrictive long-term debt. The terms of these loans generally do not exceed three years. Bridge loans may be structured as mezzanine loans, preferred equity or first mortgages.    
First Mortgage Loans. These loans generally finance the acquisition, refinancing, rehabilitation or construction of commercial real estate. First mortgage loans may be either short-term (one-to-five year) or long-term (up to 10-year), may be fixed or floating rate and are predominantly current-pay loans. We originate current-pay first mortgage loans backed by high-quality properties in the United States that fit our investment strategy. We selectively syndicate portions of these loans, including senior or junior participations that will effectively provide permanent financing or optimize returns which may include retained origination fees.
First mortgages provide for a higher recovery rate and lower defaults than other debt positions due to the lender’s senior position. However, such loans typically generate lower returns than subordinate debt such as mezzanine loans or B-notes.

5


Equity Participations. In connection with our loan origination activities, we may pursue equity participation opportunities, or interests in the projects being financed, in instances when we believe that the risk-reward characteristics of the loan merit additional upside participation because of the possibility of appreciation in value of the underlying assets securing the loan. Equity participations can be paid in the form of additional interest, exit fees or warrants in the borrower. Equity participation can also take the form of a conversion feature, permitting the lender to convert a loan or preferred equity investment into equity in the borrower at a negotiated premium to the current net asset value of the borrower. We expect to be able to obtain equity participations in certain instances where the loan collateral consists of an asset that is being repositioned, expanded or improved in some fashion which is anticipated to improve future cash flow. In such case, the borrower may wish to defer some portion of the debt service or obtain higher leverage than might be merited by the pricing and leverage level based on historical performance of the underlying asset. We generate additional revenues from these equity participations as a result of excess cash flows being distributed or as appreciated properties are sold or refinanced.
Other Real Estate-Related Investments. The Adviser has the right to invest in other real estate-related investments, which may include CMBS or other real estate debt or equity securities, so long as such investments do not constitute more than 15% of our assets. Certain of our real estate-related loans require the borrower to make payments of interest on the fully committed principal amount of the loan regardless of whether the full loan amount is outstanding portfolio.
Regulation
We have elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. As with other companies regulated by the 1940 Act, a BDC must adhere to certain substantive regulatory requirements. The 1940 Act contains prohibitions and restrictions relating to transactions between BDCs and their affiliates (including any investment advisers or sub-advisers), principal underwriters and affiliates of those affiliates or underwriters and requires that a majority of the directors be persons other than “interested persons,” as that term is defined in the 1940 Act. In addition, the 1940 Act provides that we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or to withdraw our election as, a BDC unless approved by a majority of our outstanding voting securities.
“A majority of the outstanding voting securities” of a company is defined under the 1940 Act as the lesser of: (i) 67% or more of the voting securities of such company present at a meeting if the holders of more than 50% of the company’s outstanding voting securities are present or represented by proxy; or (ii) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of such company.
Qualifying Assets
Under the 1940 Act, a BDC may not acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the company’s total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business are the following:
1.
Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer (subject to certain limited exceptions) is an eligible portfolio company, or from any person who is, or has been during the preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible portfolio company is defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer which:
a.
is organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business in, the United States;
b.
is not an investment company (other than a small business investment company wholly owned by the BDC) or a company that would be an investment company but for certain exclusions under the 1940 Act; and
c.
satisfies any of the following:
i.
does not have any class of securities that is traded on a national securities exchange;
ii.
has a class of securities listed on a national securities exchange, but has an aggregate market value of outstanding voting and non-voting common equity of less than $250 million;
iii.
is controlled by a BDC or a group of companies including a BDC and the BDC has an affiliated person who is a director of the eligible portfolio company;
iv.
is a small and solvent company having total assets of not more than $4 million and capital and surplus of not less than $2 million; or
v.
meets such other criteria as may be established by the SEC.
2.
Securities of any eligible portfolio company that we control.
3.
Securities purchased in a private transaction from a U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the purchase of its securities, was unable to meet its obligations as they came due without material assistance other than conventional lending or financing arrangements.

6


4.
Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready market for such securities and we already own 60% of the outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company.
5.
Securities received in exchange for or distributed on or with respect to securities described in (1) through (4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or rights relating to such securities.
6.
Cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment.
Control, as defined by the 1940 Act, is presumed to exist where a BDC beneficially owns more than 25% of the outstanding voting securities of the portfolio company.
In addition, a BDC must have been organized and have its principal place of business in the United States and must be operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of securities in eligible portfolio companies, or in other securities that are consistent with its purpose as a BDC.
Managerial Assistance to Portfolio Companies
In order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for the purpose of the 70% test, we must either control the issuer of the securities or must offer to make available to the issuer of the securities (other than small and solvent companies described above) significant managerial assistance; except that, where we purchase such securities in conjunction with one or more other persons acting together, one of the other persons in the group may make available such managerial assistance. Making available significant managerial assistance means, among other things, any arrangement whereby the BDC, through its directors, officers or employees, offers to provide, and, if accepted, does so provide, significant guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company.
Terra Income Advisors or its affiliates may provide such managerial assistance on our behalf to portfolio companies that request this assistance, recognizing that our involvement with each investment will vary based on factors including the size of the company, the nature of our investment, the company’s overall stage of development and our relative position in the capital structure. We may receive fees for these services.
Temporary Investments
Pending investment in other types of “qualifying assets,” as described above, our investments may consist of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment, which we refer to, collectively, as temporary investments, so that 70% of our assets are qualifying assets. Typically, we will invest in U.S. Treasury bills or in repurchase agreements, provided that such agreements are fully collateralized by cash or securities issued by the U.S. government or its agencies. A repurchase agreement involves the purchase by an investor, such as us, of a specified security and the simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase it at an agreed-upon future date and at a price that is greater than the purchase price by an amount that reflects an agreed-upon interest rate. There is no percentage restriction on the proportion of our assets that may be invested in such repurchase agreements.
Indebtedness and Senior Securities
As a BDC, we are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of indebtedness and one class of stock senior to our common stock if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 200% immediately after each such issuance. In addition, while any senior securities remain outstanding, we must generally make provisions to prohibit any distribution to our stockholders or the repurchase of such securities or stock unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the distribution or repurchase. We may also borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of our total assets for temporary or emergency purposes without regard to asset coverage. For a discussion of the risks associated with leverage, see Item 1A “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Debt Financing” and Item 1A “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Business Development Companies.”
Common Stock
We will generally not be able to issue and sell our common stock at a price per share, after deducting selling commissions, broker-dealer fees, and dealer manager fees, that is below our net asset value (“NAV”) per share. See Item 1A “Risk Factors — Risk Related to Business Development Companies — Regulations governing our operation as a BDC will affect our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise, additional capital or borrow for investment purposes, which may have a negative effect on our growth.” We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the then-current NAV of our common stock if our Board determines that such sale is in our best interests and that of our stockholders, and our stockholders approve such sale. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price which, in the determination of our Board, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any distributing commission or discount). We may generally issue new shares of our common stock at a price below NAV per share in rights offerings to existing stockholders, in payment of dividends and in certain other limited circumstances, subject to applicable requirements of the 1940 Act.

7


Co-Investments
As a BDC, we are subject to certain regulatory restrictions in making our investments. For example, we may be prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our Board who are not interested persons and, in some cases, prior approval by the SEC. The SEC has granted us exemptive relief permitting us, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, to co-invest in certain privately negotiated investment transactions with certain affiliates of Terra Income Advisors, including the Terra Income Funds, Terra Property Trust, Inc. (“TPT”), Terra Property Trust 2, Inc. (“TPT2”), and any future BDC or closed-end management investment company that is registered under the 1940 Act and is advised by Terra Income Advisors or its affiliated investment advisers (the “Co-Investment Affiliates”). However, we will be prohibited from engaging in certain transactions with our affiliates even under the terms of this exemptive order. We believe this relief will not only enhance our ability to further our investment objectives and strategy, but may also increase favorable investment opportunities for us, in part by allowing us to participate in larger investments, together with our Co-Investment Affiliates, than would be available to us if we had not obtained such relief.
Compliance Policies and Procedures
As a BDC, we and Terra Income Advisors have each adopted and implemented written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the federal securities laws and are required to review these compliance policies and procedures annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation. Our Chief Compliance Officer and the chief compliance officer of Terra Income Advisors are responsible for administering these policies and procedures.
Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures
We have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to Terra Income Advisors. The proxy voting policies and procedures of Terra Income Advisors are set forth below. The guidelines are reviewed periodically by Terra Income Advisors and our disinterested directors, and, accordingly, are subject to change. For purposes of these proxy voting policies and procedures described below, “we” “our” and “us” refers to Terra Income Advisors.
Proxy Policies
As an investment adviser registered under the Advisers Act, we have a fiduciary duty to act solely in the best interests of our clients. As part of this duty, we recognize that we must vote client securities in a timely manner free of conflicts of interest and in the best interests of our clients.
These policies and procedures for voting proxies for our investment advisory clients are intended to comply with Section 206 of, and Rule 206(4)-6 under, the Advisers Act.
We vote proxies relating to our portfolio securities in the best interests of our clients’ stockholders. We review on a case-by-case basis each proposal submitted to a stockholder vote to determine its impact on the portfolio securities held by our clients. Although we generally vote against proposals that may have a negative impact on our clients’ portfolio securities, we may vote for such a proposal if there exist compelling long-term reasons to do so.
Our proxy voting decisions are made by the senior officers who are responsible for monitoring each of our client’s investments. To ensure that our vote is not the product of a conflict of interest, we require that: (i) anyone involved in the decision making process disclose to our Chief Compliance Officer any potential conflict that he or she is aware of and any contact that he or she has had with any interested party regarding a proxy vote; and (ii) employees involved in the decision making process or vote administration are prohibited from revealing how we intend to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.
Proxy Voting Records
Investors may obtain information, without charge, regarding how Terra Income Advisors voted proxies with respect to our portfolio securities by making a written request for proxy voting information to: Chief Compliance Officer, Bernadette Murphy.
Other
As a BDC, we will be periodically examined by the SEC for compliance with applicable securities laws and related regulations.
We are required to provide and maintain a bond issued by a reputable fidelity insurance company to protect us against larceny and embezzlement. Furthermore, as a BDC, we are prohibited from protecting any director or officer against any liability to us or our stockholders arising from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such person’s office.
Available Information
We are required to file with or submit to the SEC annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information meeting the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. We maintain a website at http://www.terrafund6.com, on which we

8


make available, free of charge, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K and investors should not consider information contained on our website to be part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other report we file with the SEC. Investors may also inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements and other information, as well as our registration statement and related exhibits and schedules, at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Investors may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-732-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information filed electronically by us with the SEC, which are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Copies of these reports, proxy and information statements and other information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SEC’s Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Investing in our common stock involves a number of significant risks. If any of the following events occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In such case, the NAV of our common stock could decline, and investors may lose all or part of their investment.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our shares are not listed on an exchange or quoted through a quotation system, and will not be for the foreseeable future, if ever. Therefore, it is unlikely that investors will be able to sell them and, if they are able to do so, it is unlikely that they will receive a full return of their invested capital.
Our shares are illiquid, and as such there is no secondary market and it is not expected that any will develop in the foreseeable future. As a result, investors will have limited ability to sell their shares.
We are not obligated to provide liquidity to our stockholders by a finite date, either from the repayment to us of our debt investments within a reasonable period of time or from a liquidity event; therefore, it will be difficult for an investor to sell his or her shares.
We are not obligated to provide liquidity to our stockholders by a finite date, either from the repayment to us of our debt investments within a reasonable period of time or from a liquidity event. A liquidity event could include (i) a listing of our shares on a national securities exchange, (ii) the sale of all or substantially all of our assets either on a complete portfolio basis or individually followed by a liquidation or (iii) a merger or another transaction approved by our Board in which our stockholders receive cash or shares of a publicly traded company. However, there can be no assurance that we will return our stockholders’ capital contributions by a specified date following either the repayment to us of our debt investments or the completion of a liquidity event. In such event, the liquidity for an investor’s shares will be limited to our share repurchase program, which we have no obligation to maintain.
Only a limited number of shares may be repurchased, however, and, to the extent investors are able to sell their shares under our share repurchase program, they may not be able to recover the amount of their investment in those shares.
The share repurchase program includes numerous restrictions that limit investors’ ability to sell their shares. Further, we will have no obligation to repurchase shares if the repurchase would violate the restrictions on distributions under federal law or Maryland law, which prohibits distributions that would cause a corporation to fail to meet statutory tests of solvency. Any of the foregoing limitations may prevent us from accommodating all repurchase requests made in any year.
In addition, our Board may amend, suspend or terminate the share repurchase program upon 30 days’ notice. In addition, although we have adopted a share repurchase program, we have discretion to not repurchase any investor’s shares, to suspend the share repurchase program and to cease repurchases. Further, the share repurchase program has many limitations and should not be relied upon as a method to sell shares promptly or at a desired price.
The timing of our repurchase offers pursuant to our share repurchase program may be disadvantageous to our stockholders.
When we make quarterly repurchase offers pursuant to our share repurchase program, we may offer to repurchase shares at a price that is lower than the price that investors previous paid for shares. As a result, to the extent investors have the ability to sell their shares to us as part of our share repurchase program, the price at which an investor may sell shares, which will be the most recently disclosed NAV per share immediately prior to the date of repurchase, may be lower than what an investor paid in connection with the previous purchase of shares.
In addition, in the event an investor chooses to participate in our share repurchase program, the investor will be required to provide us with notice of intent to participate prior to knowing what the repurchase price will be on the repurchase date. Although an investor will have the ability to withdraw a repurchase request prior to the repurchase date, to the extent an investor seeks to

9


sell shares to us as part of our share repurchase program, the investor may be required to do so without knowledge of what the repurchase price of our shares will be on the repurchase date.
A stockholder’s interest in us will be diluted if we issue additional shares, which could reduce the overall value of an investment in us.
Our investors do not have preemptive rights to any shares we issue in the future. Pursuant to our charter, a majority of our entire Board may amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of authorized shares of stock or the number of authorized shares of stock of any class or series without stockholder approval. To the extent we issue additional equity interests after an investor purchases our shares, an investor’s percentage ownership interest in us will be diluted. In addition, depending upon the terms and pricing of any additional offerings and the value of our investments, an investor may also experience dilution in the book value and fair value of his or her shares.
Certain provisions of our charter and bylaws, as well as provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the value of our common stock.
The Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”), and our charter and bylaws contain certain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging, delaying or making difficult a change in control of our company or the removal of our incumbent directors. We will be covered by the Business Combination Act of the MGCL, pursuant to which certain business combinations between us and an “interested stockholder” (defined generally to include any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding voting stock) or an affiliate thereof are prohibited for five years and thereafter are subject to supermajority stockholder voting requirements, to the extent that such statute is not superseded by applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. However, our Board has adopted a resolution exempting from the Business Combination Act any business combination between us and any person to the extent that such business combination receives the prior approval of our Board, including a majority of our directors who are not interested persons as defined in the 1940 Act. Under the Control Share Acquisition Act of the MGCL, “control shares” acquired in a “control share acquisition” have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of stockholders entitled to cast two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding shares owned by the acquirer, by officers or by employees who are directors of the corporation. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share Acquisition Act any and all acquisitions by any person of shares of our common stock. The Business Combination Act (if our Board should repeal the resolution or fail to first approve a business combination) and the Control Share Acquisition Act (if we amend our bylaws to be subject to that Act) may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer. We will not amend our bylaws to remove the current exemption from the Control Share Acquisition Act without a formal determination by our Board that doing so would be in the best interests of our stockholders, and without first notifying the SEC in writing.
In addition, at any time that we have a class of equity securities registered under the Exchange Act and we have at least three independent directors, certain provisions of the MGCL permit our Board, without stockholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in our charter or bylaws, to implement certain takeover defenses, including increasing the vote required to remove a director.
Our Board is also divided into three classes of directors serving staggered three-year terms, with the term of office of only one of the three classes expiring each year. The classified board provision could have the effect of making the replacement of incumbent directors more time-consuming and difficult. At least two annual meetings of stockholders, instead of one, will generally be required to effect a change in a majority of the Board. Thus, the classified board provision could increase the likelihood that incumbent directors will retain their positions.
These provisions may inhibit a change of control in circumstances that could give the holders of our common stock the opportunity to realize a premium over the value of our common stock.
Risks Related to Our Business and Structure
Our Board may change our operating policies, objectives or strategies without prior notice or stockholder approval, and the effects of such a change may be adverse.
Our Board has the authority to modify or waive our current operating policies, objectives or investment criteria and strategies without prior notice and without stockholder approval. We cannot predict the effect any changes to our current operating policies, investment criteria and strategies would have on our business, NAV, operating results and the value of our stock. However, the effects might be adverse, which could negatively impact our ability to pay distributions and cause investors to lose all or part of their investment. Moreover, we will have significant flexibility in making investments and may invest in ways with which investors may not agree or for purposes other than those previously contemplated. Finally, since our shares are not expected to be listed on a national securities exchange, investors will be limited in their ability to sell their shares in response to any changes in our investment policy, operating policies, investment criteria or strategies.

10


Future recessions, downturns, disruptions or instability could have a materially adverse effect on our business.
From time to time, the global capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability, which could cause disruptions in liquidity in the debt capital markets, significant write-offs in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated credit market and the failure of major financial institutions. Despite actions of U.S. and foreign governments, these events could contribute to worsening general economic conditions that materially and adversely impact the broader financial and credit markets and reduce the availability of debt and equity capital for the market as a whole and financial services firms in particular.
Deterioration of economic and market conditions in the future could negatively impact credit spreads as well as our ability to obtain financing, particularly from the debt markets.
Concerns over U.S. fiscal policy could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In prior years, financial markets were affected by significant uncertainty relating to the stability of U.S. fiscal and budgetary policy. Any continuing uncertainty, together with the continuing U.S. debt and budget deficit concerns, could contribute to a U.S. economic slowdown. The impact of U.S. fiscal uncertainty is inherently unpredictable and could adversely affect U.S. and global financial markets and economic conditions. These developments could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms. Continued adverse economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives depends on Terra Income Advisors’ ability to manage and support our investment process. If Terra Income Advisors were to lose any members of its senior management team, our ability to achieve our investment objectives could be significantly harmed.
Since we have no employees, we depend on the investment expertise, skill and network of business contacts of Terra Income Advisors, which evaluates, negotiates, structures, executes, monitors and services our investments. Our future success depends to a significant extent on the continued service and coordination of Terra Income Advisors and its senior management team. The departure of any members of Terra Income Advisors’ senior management team could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objectives.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives depends on Terra Income Advisors’ ability to identify, analyze, invest in, finance and monitor companies that meet our investment criteria. Terra Income Advisors’ capabilities in structuring the investment process, providing competent, attentive and efficient services to us, and facilitating access to financing on acceptable terms depend on the employment of investment professionals in an adequate number and of adequate sophistication to match the corresponding flow of transactions. To achieve our investment objectives, Terra Income Advisors may need to hire, train, supervise and manage new investment professionals to participate in our investment selection and monitoring process. Terra Income Advisors may not be able to find investment professionals in a timely manner or at all. Failure to support our investment process could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, the Investment Advisory Agreement has termination provisions that allow the parties to terminate the agreements without penalty. The Investment Advisory Agreement may be terminated at any time, without penalty, by Terra Income Advisors, upon 120 days’ notice to us. The termination of this agreement may adversely impact the terms of any financing facility into which we may enter, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Because our business model depends to a significant extent upon relationships with real estate and real estate-related industry participants, investment banks and commercial banks, the inability of Terra Income Advisors to maintain or develop these relationships, or the failure of these relationships to generate investment opportunities, could adversely affect our business.
We expect that Terra Income Advisors will depend on its relationships with real estate and real estate-related industry participants, investment banks and commercial banks, and we will rely to a significant extent upon these relationships, to provide us with potential investment opportunities. If Terra Income Advisors fails to maintain its existing relationships or develop new relationships or sources of investment opportunities, we may not be able to grow our investment portfolio. In addition, individuals with whom Terra Income Advisors has relationships are not obligated to provide us with investment opportunities, and therefore there is no assurance that such relationships will generate investment opportunities for us.
We may face increasing competition for investment opportunities, which could delay deployment of our capital, reduce returns and result in losses.
We compete for investments with other alternative investment funds (including real estate and real estate-related investment funds, mezzanine funds and collateralized loan obligation funds), as well as traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and other sources of funding. Moreover, alternative investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, have begun to invest in areas in which they have not traditionally invested, including assets of the type we intend to acquire. As a result of these new entrants, competition for investment opportunities in private real estate and real estate-related U.S. companies may intensify.

11


Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. These characteristics could allow our competitors to consider a wider variety of investments, establish more relationships and demand more favorable investment terms and more flexible structuring than we are able to do. We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure. If we are forced to match our competitors’ terms and structure, we may not be able to achieve acceptable returns on our investments or may bear substantial risk of capital loss.
A significant portion of our investment portfolio is and will be recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board and, as a result, there is and will be uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio investments.
Under the 1940 Act, we are required to carry our portfolio investments at market value or, if there is no readily available market value, at fair value as determined by our Board. There is not a public market for the securities of the privately held real estate and real estate-related companies in which we invest. As a result, we value these securities quarterly at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board.
Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities and private companies, are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these non-traded securities existed. Due to this uncertainty, our fair value determinations may cause our NAV on a given date to materially understate or overstate the value that we may ultimately realize upon the sale of one or more of our investments.
There is a risk that investors in our common stock may not receive distributions or that our distributions will not grow over time.
We cannot assure investors that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to make a specified level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. All distributions will be paid at the discretion of our Board and will depend on our earnings, our net investment income, our financial condition, compliance with applicable BDC regulations and such other factors as our Board may deem relevant from time to time. In addition, due to the asset coverage test applicable to us as a BDC, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions.
Our distribution proceeds may exceed our earnings. Therefore, portions of the distributions that we make may represent a return of capital to investors for tax purposes, which will lower investors’ tax basis in their shares.
In the event that we encounter delays in locating suitable investment opportunities, we may pay all or a substantial portion of our distributions from borrowings in anticipation of future cash flow, which may constitute a return of stockholder capital and will lower investors’ tax basis in their shares. A return of capital generally is a return of each investor’s investment rather than a return of earnings or gains derived from our investment activities. As of December 31, 2019, a portion of the distributions paid to our stockholders constituted returns of capital.
Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations or the operations of our business partners may adversely affect our business or cause us to alter our business strategy.
We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation at the local, state and federal level. New legislation may be enacted or new interpretations, rulings or regulations could be adopted, including those governing the types of investments we are permitted to make, any of which could harm us and our stockholders, potentially with retroactive effect. Changes in laws or regulations governing the operations of those with whom we do business, including selected broker-dealers selling our shares, could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, any changes to the laws and regulations governing our operations relating to permitted investments may cause us to alter our investment strategy to avail ourselves of new or different opportunities. Such changes could result in material differences to our strategies and plans as set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and may result in our investment focus shifting from the areas of expertise of Terra Income Advisors to other types of investments in which Terra Income Advisors may have less expertise or little or no experience. Thus, any such changes, if they occur, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of each investor’s investment.
Uncertainty relating to the LIBOR calculation process may adversely affect the value of our portfolio of the LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities in our portfolio.
On July 27, 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), announced that it intends to phase out LIBOR by the end of 2021. It is unclear if at that time whether or not LIBOR will cease to exist or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it continues to exist after 2021. In addition, in April 2018, the Federal Reserve System, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, announced the replacement of LIBOR with a new index, calculated by short-term repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities, called the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (the “SOFR”). At this time, it is not possible to predict whether SOFR will attain market traction as a LIBOR replacement. Additionally, the future of LIBOR at this time is uncertain. Potential changes, or uncertainty

12


related to such potential changes, may adversely affect the market for LIBOR-based securities, including our portfolio of LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities. In addition, changes or reforms to the determination or supervision of LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR, which could have an adverse impact on the market for LIBOR-based securities, including the value of the LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities in our portfolio. The potential effect of the phase-out or replacement of LIBOR on our investment income cannot yet be determined.
We are an “emerging growth company” under the federal securities laws and will be subject to reduced public company reporting requirements.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”), which was enacted on April 5, 2012. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from, or reduced disclosure obligations relating to, various reporting requirements that are normally applicable to public companies.
We could remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years from the date of commencement of our initial public offering, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or more, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act (which would occur if the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million, measured as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, and we have been publicly reporting for at least 12 months) or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1.07 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period.
Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies are not required to (i) provide an auditor’s attestation report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (ii) comply with new requirements adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”), which require mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report in which the auditor must provide additional information about the audit and the issuer’s financial statements, (iii) comply with new audit rules adopted by the PCAOB after April 5, 2012 (unless the SEC determines otherwise), (iv) provide certain disclosures relating to executive compensation generally required for larger public companies or (v) hold stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation. We have not yet made a decision as to whether to take advantage of any or all of the JOBS Act exemptions that are applicable to us. If we do take advantage of any of these exemptions, we do not know if some investors will find our common stock less attractive as a result.
Additionally, the JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company” may take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies. This means that an emerging growth company can delay adopting certain accounting standards until such standards are otherwise applicable to private companies. However, we are electing to opt out of such extended transition period and will therefore comply with new or revised accounting standards on the applicable dates on which the adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that our decision to opt out of such extended transition period for compliance with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.
As a public company, we are subject to regulations not applicable to private companies, such as provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Efforts to comply with such regulations involves significant expenditures, and non-compliance with such regulations may adversely affect us.
As a public company, we are subject to regulations not applicable to private companies, including provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the related rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. Our management is required to report on our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder. We are required to review on an annual basis our internal control over financial reporting, and on a quarterly and annual basis, to evaluate and disclose changes in our internal control over financial reporting. This process diverts management’s time and attention. We cannot be certain as to the impact of our evaluation, testing and remediation actions on our operations, and we may not be able to ensure that the process is effective or that our internal control over financial reporting is or will be effective in a timely manner. In the event that we are unable to maintain an effective system of internal controls and maintain or achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related rules, we may be adversely affected.
We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors, including our ability or inability to make investments in companies that meet our investment criteria, the interest rate payable on the debt securities we originate and acquire, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any previous period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.

13


Our ability to maintain the security of customer, associate, third-party or company information could have an impact on our reputation and our results.
 
We have been, and likely will continue to be, subject to computer hacking, acts of vandalism or theft, malware, computer viruses or other malicious codes, phishing, employee error or malfeasance, catastrophes, unforeseen events or other cyber-attacks. To date, we have seen no material impact on our business or operations from these attacks or events. Any future significant compromise or breach of our data security, whether external or internal, or misuse of customer, associate, supplier or Company data, could result in significant costs, lost sales, fines, lawsuits, and damage to our reputation. However, the ever-evolving threats mean we and our third-party service providers and vendors must continually evaluate and adapt our respective systems and processes and overall security environment, as well as those of any companies we acquire. There is no guarantee that these measures will be adequate to safeguard against all data security breaches, system compromises or misuses of data. In addition, as the regulatory environment related to information security, data collection and use, and privacy becomes increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business, compliance with those requirements could also result in additional costs.
Risks Related to Terra Income Advisors and its Affiliates
We were the first publicly registered investment program sponsored by Terra Capital Partners and its affiliates, and therefore investors should not assume that the prior performance of any Terra Income Funds will be indicative of our future performance, or that our officers’ experience in managing those Terra Income Funds will be indicative of their ability to manage a publicly registered company. In addition, Terra Income Advisors has no prior experience managing a BDC. Therefore, investors should not assume that their experience in managing private investment programs will be indicative of their ability to comply with BDC election requirements.
We were the first publicly registered investment program sponsored by Terra Capital Partners and its affiliates. Because previous programs and investments sponsored by Terra Capital Partners or its affiliates were not publicly registered, those previous programs, including the Terra Income Funds, were not subject to the same limitations, restrictions and regulations to which we will be subject. Our officers have never operated a publicly registered investment program before. Operation as a publicly registered program under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act imposes a number of disclosure requirements and obligations, including among other things:
•
compliance with reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy disclosure and other rules and regulations that would significantly change our operations from those of the Terra Income Funds;
•
disclosure requirements with respect to investment activities, which are publicly available to our competitors;
•
requirements with respect to implementation of disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting;
•
preparation of annual, quarterly and current reports in compliance with SEC requirements and to be filed with the SEC and made publicly available; and
•
additional liabilities imposed on our directors and officers regarding certifications and disclosures made in periodic reports and filings made with the SEC.
In addition, the costs associated with registration as a public company and compliance with such restrictions could be substantial. These costs will reduce the amount available for distribution to our investors. In addition, these requirements would require a substantial amount of time on the part of Terra Income Advisors and its affiliates, thereby decreasing the time they spend actively managing our investments. As a result, investors should not assume that the prior performance of those programs will be indicative of our future performance, or that our officers’ experience in managing those Terra Income Funds will be indicative of their ability to manage a publicly registered company.
The private funds, including the Terra Income Funds, did not elect to be treated as BDCs, and were therefore not subject to the investment restrictions imposed by the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act and the Code impose numerous constraints on the operations of BDCs that do not apply to the other types of investment vehicles. For example, under the 1940 Act, BDCs are required to invest at least 70% of their total assets primarily in securities of qualifying U.S. private or thinly traded public companies. The failure to comply with these provisions in a timely manner could prevent us from qualifying as a BDC, which could result in adverse effects to us. Terra Income Advisors’ limited experience in managing a portfolio of assets under such constraints may hinder its ability to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities and, as a result, achieve our investment objectives. The Terra Income Funds also were not subject to the distribution requirements imposed by the Code; thus, Terra REIT Advisors, LLC and Terra Fund Advisors, LLC, the managers of the Terra Income Funds, had greater flexibility in making investment and asset allocation decisions on behalf of the Terra Income Funds.
Terra Income Advisors’ management team consists of the same personnel that form the operations team of the managers of the Terra Income Funds. Terra Income Advisors has no prior experience managing a BDC. Therefore, Terra Income Advisors may

14


not be able to successfully operate our business or achieve our investment objectives. As a result, an investment in our shares of common stock may entail more risk than the shares of common stock of a comparable company with a substantial operating history.
Terra Income Advisors and its affiliates, including our officers and some of our directors, face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us and our affiliates, which could result in actions that are not in the best interests of our stockholders.
Terra Income Advisors and its affiliates receive substantial fees from us in return for their services, and these fees could influence the advice provided to us. Among other matters, the compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to public offerings of equity by us, which allow the dealer manager to earn additional selling commissions, dealer manager fees and servicing fees, and Terra Income Advisors to earn increased asset management fees. In addition, the decision to utilize leverage will increase our assets and, as a result, will increase the amount of management fees payable to Terra Income Advisors.
We may be obligated to pay Terra Income Advisors incentive compensation even if we incur a net loss due to a decline in the value of our portfolio.
Our Investment Advisory Agreement entitles Terra Income Advisors to receive incentive compensation on income regardless of any capital losses. In such case, we may be required to pay Terra Income Advisors incentive compensation for a fiscal quarter even if there is a decline in the value of our portfolio or if we incur a net loss for that quarter.
Any incentive fee payable by us that relates to our net investment income may be computed and paid on income that may include interest that has been accrued but not yet received. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan that is structured to provide accrued interest, it is possible that accrued interest previously included in the calculation of the incentive fee will become uncollectible. Terra Income Advisors is not under any obligation to reimburse us for any part of the incentive fee it received that was based on accrued income that we never received as a result of a default by an entity on the obligation that resulted in the accrual of such income, and such circumstances would result in our paying an incentive fee on income we never received.
There may be conflicts of interest related to obligations Terra Income Advisors has to our affiliates and to other clients.

Terra Income Advisors, our investment adviser, and its affiliates who serve as investment advisers or managers to the Terra Income Funds, TPT, a subsidiary of Terra Secured Income Fund 5, LLC (“TSIF5”), and TPT2, a subsidiary of Terra Secured Income Fund 7, LLC (“TSIF7”), share the same senior management and investment teams. As a result, the members of the senior management and investment teams of Terra Income Advisors serve as officers, directors or principals of entities that operate in the same or a related line of business as we do, or of investment funds managed by the same personnel. In serving in these multiple and other capacities, they may have obligations to other clients or investors in those entities, including the Terra Income Funds, the fulfillment of which may not be in our best interests or in the best interest of our stockholders. Our investment objectives may overlap with the investment objectives of such investment funds, accounts or other investment vehicles, including the Terra Income Funds. As a result, Terra Income Advisors and its affiliates, their employees and certain of their affiliates will have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between us and other activities in which they are or may become involved, including the Terra Income Funds. Terra Income Advisors and its employees will devote only as much of its or their time to our business as Terra Income Advisors and its employees, in their judgment, determine is reasonably required, which may be substantially less than their full time.
The time and resources that individuals employed by Terra Income Advisors and its affiliates devote to us may be diverted, and we may face additional competition due to the fact that individuals employed by Terra Income Advisors are not prohibited from raising money for or managing another entity that makes the same types of investments that we target.
Neither Terra Income Advisors nor individuals employed by it are prohibited from raising money for and managing another
investment entity that makes the same types of investments as those we target. Affiliates of Terra Income Advisors who share the same senior management and investment teams also serve as investment advisers or managers for the Terra Income Funds, TPT and TPT2. As a result, the time and resources that these individuals may devote to us may be diverted. In addition, we may compete with any such investment entity for the same investors and investment opportunities. We also intend to co-invest with other affiliates of Terra Income Advisors manage or advise consistent with the conditions of the exemptive order granted to us.
Our incentive fee may induce Terra Income Advisors to make speculative investments.
The incentive fee payable by us to Terra Income Advisors may create an incentive for it to make investments on our behalf that are risky or more speculative than would be the case in the absence of such compensation arrangement. The way in which the incentive fee payable to Terra Income Advisors is determined may encourage it to use leverage to increase the return on our investments. In addition, the fact that our base management fee is payable based upon our gross assets, which would include any borrowings for investment purposes, may encourage Terra Income Advisors to use leverage to make additional investments. Under certain circumstances, the use of leverage may increase the likelihood of default, which would disfavor holders of our common stock. Such a practice could result in our investing in more speculative securities than would otherwise be in our best interests, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during cyclical economic downturns.

15


Risks Related to Business Development Companies
The requirement that we invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets could preclude us from investing in accordance with our current business strategy; conversely, the failure to invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets could result in our failure to maintain our status as a BDC.
As a BDC, we may not acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” unless, at the time of such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets. Therefore, we may be precluded from investing in what we believe are attractive investments if such investments are not qualifying assets. Conversely, if we fail to invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could lose our status as a BDC, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Similarly, these rules could prevent us from making additional investments in existing portfolio companies, which could result in the dilution of our position, or could require us to dispose of investments at an inopportune time to comply with the 1940 Act. If we were forced to sell non-qualifying investments in the portfolio for compliance purposes, the proceeds from such sale could be significantly less than the current value of such investments.
Failure to maintain our status as a BDC would reduce our operating flexibility.
If we do not remain a BDC, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would subject us to substantially more regulatory restrictions under the 1940 Act and correspondingly decrease our operating flexibility.
Regulations governing our operation as a BDC and a REIT will affect our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise, additional capital or borrow for investment purposes, which may have a negative effect on our growth.
Because we must distribute at least 90% of our REIT net taxable income and meet certain tests regarding the nature of its income and assets in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we will be unable to use those funds to make new investments. As a result, we will likely need to continually raise cash or borrow to fund new investments that we would otherwise acquire using the taxable income that we are required to distribute. At times, the sources and terms of funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all.
We may issue “senior securities,” as defined in the 1940 Act, including borrowing money from banks or other financial institutions only in amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after such incurrence or issuance. Our ability to issue different types of securities is also limited. Compliance with these requirements may unfavorably limit our investment opportunities and reduce our ability in comparison to other companies to profit from favorable spreads between the rates at which we can borrow and the rates at which we can lend. As a BDC, therefore, we intend to issue equity continuously at a rate more frequent than our privately-owned competitors, which may lead to greater stockholder dilution.
We expect to borrow for investment purposes. If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy the asset coverage test, which would prohibit us from paying distributions and could prevent us from maintaining our qualification as a REIT. If we cannot satisfy the asset coverage test, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our debt financing, repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous.
Under the 1940 Act, we generally are prohibited from issuing or selling our common stock at a price per share, after deducting selling commissions, broker-dealer fees, and dealer manager fees, that is below our NAV per share, which may be a disadvantage as compared with other public companies. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the current NAV of the common stock if our Board and independent directors determine that such sale is in the best interests of our stockholders and our company, and such sale is approved by a majority of our stockholders, including those stockholders that are not affiliated with us.
Our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is restricted.
We are prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with certain of our affiliates without the prior approval of a majority of the independent members of our Board and, in some cases, the SEC. Any person that owns, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of our outstanding voting securities will be our affiliate for purposes of the 1940 Act, and we will generally be prohibited from buying or selling any securities from or to such affiliate, absent the prior approval of our Board. The 1940 Act also prohibits certain “joint” transactions with certain of our affiliates, which could include investments in the same portfolio company (whether at the same or different times), without prior approval of our Board and, in some cases, the SEC. If a person acquires more than 25% of our voting securities, we will be prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to such person or certain of that person’s affiliates, or entering into prohibited joint transactions with such persons, absent the prior approval of the SEC. Similar restrictions limit our ability to transact business with our officers or directors or their affiliates. As a result of these restrictions, we may be prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to any portfolio company of a private equity fund managed by Terra Income Advisors without the prior approval of the SEC, which may limit the scope of investment opportunities that would otherwise be available to us.
The SEC has granted us exemptive relief from the provisions of Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the 1940 Act, thereby permitting us, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, to co-invest in certain privately negotiated investment transactions with our

16


Co-Investment Affiliates. However, we will be prohibited from engaging in certain transactions with our affiliates even under the terms of this exemptive order. We believe the relief granted to us under this exemptive order may not only enhance our ability to further our investment objectives and strategies, but may also increase favorable investment opportunities for us, in part by allowing us to participate in larger investments, together with our Co-Investment Affiliates, than would be available to us in the absence of such relief.
We are uncertain of our sources for funding our future capital needs; if we cannot obtain a sufficient amount of debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire investments and to expand our operations will be adversely affected.
The net proceeds from the sale of shares will be used for our investment opportunities, operating expenses and for payment of various fees and expenses such as base management fees, incentive fees and other fees. Any working capital reserves we maintain may not be sufficient for investment purposes, and we may require additional debt or equity financing to operate. In the event that we develop a need for additional capital in the future for investments or for any other reason, these sources of funding may not be available to us. Consequently, if we cannot obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire investments and to expand our operations will be adversely affected. As a result, we would be less able to allocate our portfolio among various issuers and achieve our investment objectives, which may negatively impact our results of operations and reduce our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Risks Related to Our Investments
A covenant breach by any of our portfolio companies may harm our operating results.
A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt or equity securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company.
We may not realize gains from our preferred equity investments.
The preferred equity investments we make may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our preferred equity investments, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any preferred equity investments may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience.
A lack of liquidity in certain of our investments may adversely affect our business.
We invest in certain real estate and real estate-related companies whose securities are not publicly traded or actively traded on the secondary market and are, instead, traded on a privately negotiated over-the-counter secondary market for institutional investors and whose securities are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or are otherwise less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of certain of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell these investments when desired. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we had previously recorded these investments. The reduced liquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to dispose of them at a favorable price, and, as a result, we may suffer losses.
We may not have the funds or ability to make additional investments in our portfolio companies.
We may not have the funds or ability to make additional investments in our portfolio companies. After our initial investment in a portfolio company, we may be called upon from time to time to provide additional funds to such company or have the opportunity to increase our investment. There is no assurance that we will make, or will have sufficient funds to make, follow-on investments. Any decisions not to make a follow-on investment or any inability on our part to make such an investment may have a negative impact on a portfolio company in need of such an investment, may result in a missed opportunity for us to increase our participation in a successful operation or may reduce the expected return on the investment.
Our real estate-related loans may be impacted by unfavorable real estate market conditions, which could decrease the value of our investments.
The real estate-related loans we make or invest in will be at risk of defaults caused by many conditions beyond our control, including local and other economic conditions affecting real estate values and interest rate levels. We do not know whether the values of the property securing the real estate-related loans will remain at the levels existing on the dates of origination of such loans. If the values of the underlying properties drop, our risk will increase and the value of our investments may decrease.
Our real estate-related loans will be subject to interest rate fluctuations that could reduce our returns as compared to market interest rates.
If we invest in fixed-rate, long-term real estate-related loans and interest rates rise, such loans could yield a return lower than then-current market rates. If interest rates decrease, we will be adversely affected to the extent that real estate-related loans are

17


prepaid, because we may not be able to make new loans at the previously higher interest rate. If we invest in floating-rate loans, the income from such loans will increase and decrease directly with the fluctuation in the floating rate.
Delays in liquidating defaulted mortgage loans could reduce our investment returns.
If there are defaults under our mortgage loans, we may not be able to repossess and sell the underlying properties quickly. The resulting time delay could reduce the value of our investment in the defaulted mortgage loans. An action to foreclose on a property securing a mortgage loan is regulated by state statutes and rules and is subject to many of the delays and expenses of other lawsuits if the mortgagor raises defenses or counterclaims. In the event of default by a mortgagor, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our ability to foreclose on or sell the mortgaged property or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the mortgage loan.
Returns on our real estate-related loans may be limited by regulations.
Our loan investments may be subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities and subject to various laws and judicial and administrative decisions. We may determine not to make or invest in real estate-related loans in any jurisdiction in which we believe we have not complied in all material respects with applicable requirements. If we decide not to make or invest in real estate-related loans in several jurisdictions, it could reduce the amount of income we would otherwise receive.
Foreclosures create additional ownership risks that could adversely impact our returns on mortgage investments.
If we acquire property by foreclosure following defaults under our mortgage loans, we will have the same economic and liability risks as the previous owner.
The mezzanine loans in which we may invest would involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by income-producing real properties.
We may invest in mezzanine loans that take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying real property or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of the entity owning the real property. These types of investments involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage lending secured by income-producing real property because the investment may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan-to-value ratios than conventional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the real property and increasing the risk of loss of principal.
Our commercial real estate-related loans, commercial real estate-related debt securities and select commercial real estate equity investments will be subject to the risks typically associated with real estate.
Our commercial real estate-related loans, commercial real estate-related debt securities and select commercial real estate equity will generally be directly or indirectly secured by a lien on real property (or the equity interests in an entity that owns real property) that, upon the occurrence of a default on the loan, could result in our acquiring ownership of the property. We will not know whether the values of the properties ultimately securing our loans will remain at the levels existing on the dates of origination of those loans. If the values of the mortgaged properties drop, our risk will increase because of the lower value of the security associated with such loans. In this manner, real estate values could impact the values of our loan investments. Our investments in commercial real estate-related loans, commercial real estate-related debt securities and select commercial real estate equity investments (including potential investments in real property) may be similarly affected by real estate property values. Therefore, our investments will be subject to the risks typically associated with real estate.
The value of real estate may be adversely affected by a number of risks, including:
•
natural disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes and floods;
•
acts of war or terrorism, including the consequences of terrorist attacks, such as those that occurred on September 11, 2001;
•
adverse changes in national and local economic and real estate conditions;
•
an oversupply of (or a reduction in demand for) space in the areas where particular properties are located and the attractiveness of particular properties to prospective tenants;
•
changes in governmental laws and regulations, fiscal policies and zoning ordinances and the related costs of compliance therewith and the potential for liability under applicable laws;
•
costs of remediation and liabilities associated with environmental conditions affecting properties; and
•
the potential for uninsured or underinsured property losses.

18


The value of each property is affected significantly by its ability to generate cash flow and net income, which in turn depends on the amount of rental or other income that can be generated net of expenses required to be incurred with respect to the property. Many expenditures associated with properties (such as operating expenses and capital expenditures) cannot be reduced when there is a reduction in income from the properties. These factors may have a material adverse effect on the ability of our borrowers to pay their loans, as well as on the value that we can realize from assets we originate, own or acquire.
The B-Notes in which we may invest may be subject to additional risks relating to the privately negotiated structure and terms of the transaction, which may result in losses to us.
We may invest in B-notes. A B-note is a mortgage loan typically (i) secured by a first mortgage on a single large commercial property or group of related properties and (ii) subordinated to an A-Note secured by the same first mortgage on the same collateral. As a result, if a borrower defaults, there may not be sufficient funds remaining for B-note holders after payment to the A-Note holders. Since each transaction is privately negotiated, B-notes can vary in their structural characteristics and risks. For example, the rights of holders of B-notes to control the process following a borrower default may be limited in certain investments. We cannot predict the terms of each B-note investment. Further, B-notes typically are secured by a single property, and so reflect the increased risks associated with a single property compared to a pool of properties.
Risks of cost overruns and non-completion of the construction or renovation of the properties underlying loans we make or acquire may materially adversely affect our investment.
The renovation, refurbishment or expansion by a borrower under a mortgaged or leveraged property involves risks of cost overruns and non-completion. Costs of construction or improvements to bring a property up to standards established for the market position intended for that property may exceed original estimates, possibly making a project uneconomical. Other risks may include environmental risks and construction, rehabilitation and subsequent leasing of the property not being completed on schedule. If such construction or renovation is not completed in a timely manner, or if it costs more than expected, the borrower may experience a prolonged impairment of net operating income and may not be able to make payments on our investment.
Our investments in commercial real estate-related loans are subject to changes in credit spreads.
Our investments in commercial real estate-related loans are subject to changes in credit spreads. When credit spreads widen, the economic value of such investments decrease. Even though a loan may be performing in accordance with its loan agreement and the underlying collateral has not changed, the economic value of the loan may be negatively impacted by the incremental interest foregone from the widened credit spread.
Investments in non-conforming or non-investment grade rated loans or securities involve greater risk of loss.
Some of our investments may not conform to conventional loan standards applied by traditional lenders and either will not be rated or will be rated as non-investment grade by the rating agencies. In addition, we may invest in securities that are rated below investment grade by rating agencies or that would be likely rated below investment grade if they were rated. Below investment grade securities, which are often referred to as “junk,” have predominantly speculative characteristics with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal. They may also be difficult to value and illiquid. The non-investment grade ratings for these assets typically result from the overall leverage of the loans, the lack of a strong operating history for the properties underlying the loans, the borrowers’ credit history, the properties’ underlying cash flow or other factors. As a result, these investments may have a higher risk of default and loss than investment grade-rated assets. Any loss we incur may be significant and may reduce distributions to our stockholders and adversely affect the value of our common stock.
Investments that are not U.S. government insured involve risk of loss.
We may originate and acquire uninsured loans and assets as part of our investment strategy. Such loans and assets may include mortgage loans, mezzanine loans and bridge loans. While holding such interests, we are subject to risks of borrower defaults, bankruptcies, fraud, losses and special hazard losses that are not covered by standard hazard insurance. In the event of any default under loans, we bear the risk of loss of principal and nonpayment of interest and fees to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral and the principal amount of the loan. To the extent we suffer such losses with respect to our investments in such loans, the value of our company and the value of our common stock may be adversely affected.
The mortgage-backed securities in which we may invest are subject to the risks of the mortgage securities market as a whole and risks of the securitization process.
The value of mortgage-backed securities may change due to shifts in the market’s perception of issuers and regulatory or tax changes adversely affecting the mortgage securities market as a whole. Mortgage-backed securities are also subject to several risks created through the securitization process. Subordinate mortgage-backed securities are paid interest only to the extent that there are funds available to make payments. To the extent the collateral pool includes delinquent loans, there is a risk that the interest payment on subordinate mortgage-backed securities will not be fully paid. Subordinate mortgage-backed securities are also subject to greater credit risk than those mortgage-backed securities that are more highly rated.

19


We may invest in CMBS, including subordinate securities, which entail certain risks.
CMBS are generally securities backed by obligations (including certificates of participation in obligations) that are principally secured by mortgages on real property or interests therein having a commercial or multi-family use, such as regional malls, other retail space, office buildings, industrial or warehouse properties, hotels, apartment buildings, nursing homes and senior living centers, and may include, without limitation, CMBS conduit securities, CMBS credit tenant lease securities and CMBS large loan securities. We may invest in a variety of CMBS, including CMBS which are subject to the first risk of loss if any losses are realized on the underlying mortgage loans. CMBS entitle the holders thereof to receive payments that depend primarily on the cash flow from a specified pool of commercial or multi-family mortgage loans. Consequently, CMBS will be affected by payments, defaults, delinquencies and losses on the underlying commercial real estate-related loans, which began to increase significantly toward the end of 2008 and are expected to continue to increase. Furthermore, a weakening rental market generally, including reduced occupancy rates and reduced market rental rates, could reduce cash flow from the loan pools underlying our CMBS investments.
We may invest in CDOs and such investments may involve significant risks.
We may invest in CDOs. CDOs are multiple class debt securities, or bonds, secured by pools of assets, such as mortgage-backed securities, B-notes, mezzanine loans and credit default swaps. Like typical securities structures, in a CDO, the assets are pledged to a trustee for the benefit of the holders of the bonds. Like CMBS, CDOs are affected by payments, defaults, delinquencies and losses on the underlying commercial real estate-related loans. CDOs often have reinvestment periods that typically last for five years during which proceeds from the sale of a collateral asset may be invested in substitute collateral. Upon termination of the reinvestment period, the static pool functions very similarly to a CMBS securitization where repayment of principal allows for redemption of bonds sequentially.
We have no established investment criteria limiting the geographic concentration of our investments in commercial real estate-related loans, commercial real estate-related debt securities and select commercial real estate equity investments. If our investments are concentrated in an area that experiences adverse economic conditions, our investments may lose value and we may experience losses.
Certain commercial real estate-related loans, commercial real estate-related debt securities and select commercial real estate equity investments in which we invest may be secured by a single property or properties in one geographic location. Further, we intend that our secured investments will be collateralized by properties located solely in the United States. These investments may carry the risks associated with significant geographical concentration. As a result, properties underlying our investments may be overly concentrated in certain geographic areas, and we may experience losses as a result. A worsening of economic conditions in the geographic area in which our investments may be concentrated could have an adverse effect on our business, including reducing the demand for new financings, limiting the ability of customers to pay financed amounts and impairing the value of our collateral.
We may invest in adjustable rate mortgage loans, which may entail greater risks of default to lenders than fixed rate mortgage loans.
Adjustable rate mortgage loans may contribute to higher delinquency rates. Borrowers with adjustable rate mortgage loans may be exposed to increased monthly payments if the related mortgage interest rate adjusts upward from the initial fixed rate or a low introductory rate, as applicable, in effect during the initial period of the mortgage loan to the rate computed in accordance with the applicable index and margin. This increase in borrowers’ monthly payments, together with any increase in prevailing market interest rates, after the initial fixed rate period, may result in significantly increased monthly payments for borrowers with adjustable rate mortgage loans, which may make it more difficult for the borrowers to repay the loan or could increase the risk of default of their obligations under the loan.
Prepayments can adversely affect the yields on our investments.
Prepayments on debt instruments, where permitted under the debt documents, are influenced by changes in current interest rates and a variety of economic, geographic and other factors beyond our control, and consequently, such prepayment rates cannot be predicted with certainty. If we are unable to invest the proceeds of such prepayments received or are forced to invest at yields lower than those on the debt instrument that was prepaid, the yield on our portfolio will decline. In addition, we may acquire assets at a discount or premium and if the asset does not repay when expected, our anticipated yield may be impacted. Under certain interest rate and prepayment scenarios we may fail to recoup fully our cost of acquisition of certain investments.
Hedging against interest rate exposure may adversely affect our earnings, limit our gains or result in losses, which could adversely affect cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
We may enter into interest rate swap agreements or pursue other interest rate hedging strategies. Our hedging activity will vary in scope based on the level of interest rates, the type of portfolio investments held, and other changing market conditions.

20


Any hedging activity we engage in may adversely affect our earnings, which could adversely affect cash available for distribution to our stockholders. Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to reduce interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in interest rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged or liabilities being hedged may vary materially. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss.
Hedging instruments often are not traded on regulated exchanges, guaranteed by an exchange or its clearing house, or regulated by any U.S. or foreign governmental authorities and involve risks and costs.
The cost of using hedging instruments increases as the period covered by the instrument increases and during periods of rising and volatile interest rates. We may increase our hedging activity and thus increase our hedging costs during periods when interest rates are volatile or rising and hedging costs have increased. In addition, hedging instruments involve risk since they often are not traded on regulated exchanges, guaranteed by an exchange or its clearing house, or regulated by any U.S. or foreign governmental authorities. Consequently, there are no requirements with respect to record keeping, financial responsibility or segregation of customer funds and positions. Furthermore, the enforceability of agreements underlying derivative transactions may depend on compliance with applicable statutory, commodity and other regulatory requirements and, depending on the identity of the counterparty, applicable international requirements. The business failure of a hedging counterparty with whom we enter into a hedging transaction will most likely result in a default. Default by a party with whom we enter into a hedging transaction may result in the loss of unrealized profits and force us to cover our resale commitments, if any, at the then current market price. It may not always be possible to dispose of or close out a hedging position without the consent of the hedging counterparty, and we may not be able to enter into an offsetting contract in order to cover our risk. We cannot assure investors that a liquid secondary market will exist for hedging instruments purchased or sold, and we may be required to maintain a position until exercise or expiration, which could result in losses.
Our investments in debt securities and preferred equity securities will be subject to the specific risks relating to the particular issuer of the securities and may involve greater risk of loss than secured debt financings.
Our investments in debt securities and preferred and common equity securities involve special risks relating to the particular issuer of the securities, including the financial condition and business outlook of the issuer. Real estate company issuers are subject to the inherent risks associated with real estate and real estate-related investments discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Issuers that are debt finance companies are subject to the inherent risks associated with structured financing investments also discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Furthermore, debt securities and preferred and common equity securities may involve greater risk of loss than secured debt financings due to a variety of factors, including that such investments are generally unsecured and may also be subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. As a result, investments in debt securities and preferred and common equity securities are subject to risks of (i) limited liquidity in the secondary trading market, (ii) substantial market price volatility resulting from changes in prevailing interest rates, (iii) subordination to the prior claims of banks and other senior lenders to the issuer, (iv) the operation of mandatory sinking fund or call or redemption provisions during periods of declining interest rates that could cause the issuer to reinvest redemption proceeds in lower yielding assets, (v) the possibility that earnings of the issuer may be insufficient to meet its debt service and distribution obligations and (vi) the declining creditworthiness and potential for insolvency of the issuer during periods of rising interest rates and economic downturn. These risks may adversely affect the value of outstanding debt securities and preferred and common equity securities and the ability of the issuers thereof to make principal, interest and distribution payments to us.
Declines in the market values of our investments may adversely affect periodic reported results of operations and credit availability, which may reduce earnings and, in turn, cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
A decline in the market value of our assets will reduce our earnings in the period recognized and may adversely affect us particularly in instances where we have borrowed money based on the market value of those assets. If the market value of those assets declines, the lender may require us to post additional collateral to support the loan. If we were unable to post the additional collateral, we may have to sell assets at a time when we might not otherwise choose to do so. A reduction in credit available may reduce our earnings and, in turn, cash available for distribution to stockholders.
Further, credit facility providers may require us to maintain a certain amount of cash reserves or to set aside unlevered assets sufficient to maintain a specified liquidity position, which would allow us to satisfy our collateral obligations. As a result, we may not be able to leverage our assets as fully as we would choose, which could reduce our return on equity. In the event that we are unable to meet these contractual obligations, our financial condition could deteriorate rapidly.
Market values of our investments may decline for a number of reasons, such as changes in prevailing market rates, increases in defaults, increases in voluntary prepayments for those investments that we have that are subject to prepayment risk, widening of credit spreads and downgrades of ratings of the securities by ratings agencies.

21


With respect to mortgaged properties, options and other purchase rights may affect value or hinder recovery.
A borrower under certain mortgage loans may give its tenants or another person a right of first refusal or an option to purchase all or a portion of the related mortgaged property. These rights may impede the lender’s ability to sell the related mortgaged property at foreclosure or may adversely affect the value or marketability of the property.
If we overestimate the value or income-producing ability or incorrectly price the risks of our investments, we may experience losses.
Analysis of the value or income-producing ability of a commercial property is highly subjective and may be subject to error. We value our potential investments based on yields and risks, taking into account estimated future losses on the commercial real estate-related loans and the mortgaged property included in the securitization’s pools or select commercial real estate equity investments, and the estimated impact of these losses on expected future cash flows and returns. In the event that we underestimate the risks relative to the price we pay for a particular investment, we may experience losses with respect to such investment.
The leases on the properties underlying our investments may not be renewed on favorable terms.
The properties underlying our investments could be negatively impacted by the deteriorating economic conditions and weaker rental markets. Upon expiration or earlier termination of leases on these properties, the space may not be relet or, if relet, the terms of the renewal or reletting (including the cost of required renovations or concessions to tenants) may be less favorable than current lease terms. In addition, the poor economic conditions may reduce a tenant’s ability to make rent payments under their leases. Any of these situations may result in extended periods where there is a significant decline in revenues or no revenues generated by these properties. Additionally, if market rental rates are reduced, property-level cash flows would likely be negatively affected as existing leases renew at lower rates. If the leases for these properties cannot be renewed for all or substantially all of the space at these properties, or if the rental rates upon such renewal or reletting are significantly lower than expected, the value of our investments may be adversely affected.
A borrower’s form of entity may cause special risks or hinder our recovery.
Since most of the borrowers for our commercial real estate loan investments are legal entities rather than individuals, our risk of loss may be greater than those of mortgage loans made to individuals. Unlike individuals involved in bankruptcies, most of the entities generally do not have personal assets and creditworthiness at stake. The terms of the mortgage loans generally require that the borrowers covenant to be single-purpose entities, although in some instances the borrowers are not required to observe all covenants and conditions that typically are required in order for them to be viewed under standard rating agency criteria as “single-purpose entities.”
The bankruptcy of a borrower, or a general partner or managing member of a borrower, may impair the ability of the lender to enforce its rights and remedies under the related mortgage. Borrowers that are not single-purpose entities structured to limit the possibility of becoming insolvent or bankrupt, may be more likely to become insolvent or the subject of a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy proceeding because the borrowers may be (i) operating entities with a business distinct from the operation of the mortgaged property with the associated liabilities and risks of operating an ongoing business or (ii) individuals that have personal liabilities unrelated to the property.
We may be exposed to environmental liabilities with respect to properties to which we take title.
In the course of our business, we may take title to real estate, and, if we do take title, we could be subject to environmental liabilities with respect to these properties. In such a circumstance, we may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury, and investigation and clean-up costs incurred by these parties in connection with environmental contamination, or may be required to investigate or clean up hazardous or toxic substances, or chemical releases, at a property. The costs associated with investigation or remediation activities could be substantial. If we ever become subject to significant environmental liabilities, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Risks Related to Debt Financing
If we borrow money, the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested in us will be magnified and may increase the risk of investing in us.
The use of borrowings, also known as leverage, increases the volatility of investments by magnifying the potential for gain or loss on invested equity capital. If we use leverage to partially finance our investments, through borrowing from banks and other lenders, investors will experience increased risks of investing in our common stock. If the value of our assets increases, leverage would cause the NAV attributable to our common stock to increase more sharply than it would have had we not leveraged. Conversely, if the value of our assets decreases, leverage would cause NAV to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged. Similarly, any increase in our income in excess of interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net income to increase more than it would without the leverage, while any decrease in our income would cause net income to

22


decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to make common stock distribution payments. Leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique. In addition, the decision to utilize leverage will increase our assets and, as a result, will increase the amount of management fees payable to Terra Income Advisors.
As a BDC, we generally are required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets to total borrowings and other senior securities, which include all of our borrowings and any preferred stock that we may issue in the future, of at least 200%. If this ratio declines below 200%, we cannot incur additional debt, declare any dividends, make any distributions or repurchase any stock, and could be required to sell a portion of our investments to repay some debt when it is disadvantageous to do so. This could have a material adverse effect on our operations and may cause us to be unable to make distributions. The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on Terra Income Advisors’ and our Board’s assessment of market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing.
On March 23, 2018, the U.S. Congress approved the Small Business Credit Availability Act which reduces the asset coverage ratio from 200% to 150% subject to the approval of stockholders or the board of directors. As of December 31, 2019, we have not obtained approval for the reduction in the asset coverage ratio from our stockholders or our Board. If we did obtain approval in the future, we would therefore be permitted to incur leverage beyond the current limitations of the 1940 Act, which would further increase the risks of loss in the event of a decline in the value of our assets. This legislation would also increase the risks of an investment in our common stock.
Changes in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net investment income.
Since we intend to use debt to finance investments, our net investment income will depend, in part, upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest those funds. As a result, we can offer no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income. In periods of rising interest rates when we have debt outstanding, our cost of funds will increase, which could reduce our net investment income. We expect that any long-term fixed rate investments we acquire will be financed primarily with equity and long-term debt. We may use interest rate risk management techniques in an effort to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. These techniques may include various interest rate hedging activities to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. These activities may limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the hedged portfolio. Adverse developments resulting from changes in interest rates or hedging transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, we have limited experience in entering into hedging transactions, and we will initially have to purchase or develop such expertise.
A rise in the general level of interest rates can be expected to lead to higher interest rates applicable to our debt investments. Accordingly, an increase in interest rates would make it easier for us to meet or exceed the incentive fee hurdle rate and may result in a substantial increase of the amount of incentive fees payable to Terra Income Advisors with respect to pre-incentive fee net investment income.
Risks Related to our REIT Status and Certain Other Tax Items
If we do not qualify as a REIT, we will be subject to tax as a regular corporation and could face a substantial tax liability.
We elected to operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code beginning with our short taxable year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018. However, qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which only a limited number of judicial or administrative interpretations exist. Notwithstanding the availability of cure provisions in the Code, various compliance requirements could be failed and could jeopardize our REIT status. Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any tax year, then:
•
we would be taxed as a regular domestic corporation, ineligible to deduct dividends paid to stockholders in computing taxable income and being subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates;
•
any resulting tax liability could be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on distributions to our shareholders and our value; and
•
we generally would not be eligible to requalify as a REIT for the subsequent four full taxable years.
We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could increase our tax liability, reduce our operating flexibility and reduce the price of our common stock.
In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in shares of our common stock. The 2017 tax reform legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act has resulted in fundamental changes to the Code, with many of the changes applicable to individuals applying only through December 31, 2025. Among the numerous changes included in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is a deduction of 20% of ordinary REIT dividends for individual taxpayers for taxable years through 2025.

23


Although REITs generally receive certain tax advantages compared to entities taxed as regular corporations, it is possible that future legislation would result in a REIT having fewer tax advantages, and it could become more advantageous for a company that invests in real estate to elect to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a corporation. As a result, our charter authorizes our board of directors to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if it determines that changes to U.S. federal income tax laws and regulations or other considerations mean it is no longer in our best interests to qualify as a REIT.
We cannot assure you that future changes will not adversely affect the taxation of our stockholders. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets.
The preferred equity investments we intend to make may make us unable to maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Code.
Part of our investment strategy involves investments in preferred limited liability company membership interests or partnership interests that own commercial real estate. There is no specific guidance addressing the treatment of preferred equity investments as debt or equity for federal income tax purposes. We hold preferred equity investments and treat them as loans secured by real property for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which are qualifying assets for purposes of the REIT asset tests and produce qualifying income for purposes of the REIT gross income tests. If our preferred equity investments are treated as partnership interests for U.S. federal income tax purposes, rather than as loans, we will be treated as owning our share of the assets held by the limited liability company or partnership that issued the preferred equity interest and we will be treated as receiving our proportionate share of the income of that entity. If that limited liability company or partnership owns nonqualifying assets or earns nonqualifying income, we may not be able to satisfy all of the REIT gross income and asset tests. Even if the IRS were to respect our preferred equity investments as loans, if the IRS did not treat such loans as secured by a mortgage on real property (which, in form, is not the case), such loans would not be qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test and would violate the 10% value test, and interest thereon would not be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. If we are unable to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will be subject to corporate-level income tax, and your investment in us would be adversely impacted.
To maintain our REIT status, we may have to borrow funds on a short-term basis during unfavorable market conditions.
To qualify as a REIT, we generally must distribute annually to our stockholders a minimum of 90% of our net taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends-paid deduction and excluding net capital gains. We will be subject to regular corporate income taxes on any undistributed REIT taxable income each year. Additionally, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions paid by us in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from previous years. Payments we make to our stockholders under our share repurchase plan will not be taken into account for purposes of these distribution requirements. If we do not have sufficient cash to make distributions necessary to preserve our REIT status for any year or to avoid taxation, we may be forced to borrow funds or sell assets even if the market conditions at that time are not favorable for these borrowings or sales. These options could increase our costs or reduce our equity.
Compliance with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities, which may hinder or delay our ability to meet our investment objectives and reduce your overall return.
To qualify as a REIT, we are required at all times to satisfy tests relating to, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the ownership of our stock and the amounts we distribute to our stockholders. Compliance with the REIT requirements may impair our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits. For example, we may be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution.
Compliance with REIT requirements may force us to liquidate or restructure otherwise attractive investments.
To qualify as a REIT, at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets must consist of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified real estate assets. The remainder of our investments in securities (other than qualified real estate assets and government securities) generally cannot include more than 10% of the voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the value of the outstanding securities of more than any one issuer (other than securities that qualify for the straight debt safe harbor) unless we and such issuer jointly elect for such issuer to be treated as a “taxable REIT subsidiary” under the Code. Debt will generally meet the “straight debt” safe harbor if the debt is a written unconditional promise to pay on demand or on a specified date a certain sum of money, the debt is not convertible, directly or indirectly, into stock, and the interest rate and the interest payment dates of the debt are not contingent on the profits, the borrower’s discretion, or similar factors. Additionally, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, no more than 20% of the value of our assets may be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries and no more than 25% of the value of our assets may consist of “nonqualified publicly offered REIT debt investments.” If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must dispose of a portion of our

24


assets within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions in order to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. In order to satisfy these requirements and maintain our qualification as a REIT, we may be forced to liquidate assets from our portfolio or not make otherwise attractive investments. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.
Our charter does not contain restrictions generally found in REIT charters regarding the ownership and transfer of our stock that are intended to assist with satisfying the share ownership requirements for REIT qualification, and we cannot ensure that transfers will not occur that would cause us to no longer satisfy the share ownership requirements.
In order to qualify as a REIT under the Code, not more than 50% of the value of our outstanding stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (including certain entities treated as individuals for this purpose) during the last half of a taxable year. The constructive ownership rules under the Code are complex and may cause shares of the outstanding common stock owned by a group of related persons to be deemed to be constructively owned by one person. Our charter does not contain restrictions generally found in REIT charters regarding the ownership and transfer of our stock that are intended to assist with satisfying the share ownership requirements. We currently satisfy the share ownership requirements; however, it is possible that transfers of our outstanding common stock could cause us to no longer satisfy the share ownership requirements.
We may incur tax liabilities that would reduce our cash available for distribution to you.
Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we may become subject to U.S. federal income taxes and related state and local taxes. For example, net income from the sale of properties that are “dealer” properties sold by a REIT (a “prohibited transaction” under the Code) will be subject to a 100% tax. We may not make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes applicable to REITs. Similarly, if we were to fail an income test (and did not lose our REIT status because such failure was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect) we would be subject to tax on the income that does not meet the income test requirements. We also may decide to retain net capital gain we earn from the sale or other disposition of our investments and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability unless they file U.S. federal income tax returns and thereon seek a refund of such tax. We also may be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, including franchise, payroll, mortgage recording and transfer taxes, either directly or at the level of the other companies through which we indirectly own our assets, such as our taxable REIT subsidiaries, which are subject to full U.S. federal, state, local and foreign corporate-level income taxes. Any taxes we pay directly or indirectly will reduce our cash available for distribution to you.
Our board of directors is authorized to revoke our REIT election without stockholder approval, which may cause adverse consequences to our stockholders.
Our charter authorizes our board of directors to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if it determines that changes to U.S. federal income tax laws and regulations or other considerations mean it is no longer in our best interests to qualify as a REIT. Our board of directors has fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders and could only cause such changes in our tax treatment if it determines in good faith that such changes are in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders. In this event, we would become subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income and we would no longer be required to distribute most of our net income to our stockholders, which may cause a reduction in the total return to our stockholders.
You may have current tax liability on distributions you elect to reinvest in our common stock.
If you participate in our distribution reinvestment plan, you will be deemed to have received, and for U.S. federal income tax purposes will be taxed on, the amount reinvested in shares of our common stock to the extent the amount reinvested was not a tax-free return of capital. Therefore, unless you are a tax-exempt entity, you may be forced to use funds from other sources to pay your tax liability on the reinvested dividends.
Modification of the terms of our commercial real estate debt investments in conjunction with reductions in the value of the real property securing such loans could cause us to fail to continue to qualify as a REIT.
Our commercial real estate (“CRE”) debt and securities investments may be materially affected by a weak real estate market and economy in general. As a result, many of the terms of our CRE debt may be modified to avoid taking title to a property. Under Treasury Regulations, if the terms of a loan are modified in a manner constituting a “significant modification,” such modification triggers a deemed exchange of the original loan for the modified loan. In general, if a loan is secured by real property and other property, the value of the personal property securing the loan exceeds 15% of the value of all property securing the loan and the highest principal amount of the loan outstanding during a taxable year exceeds the fair market value of the real property securing the loan determined as of the date we agreed to acquire the loan or the date we significantly modified the loan, a portion of the interest income from such loan will not be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test although it may nevertheless be qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test. A portion of the loan may also be a non-qualifying asset for purposes of the 75% asset test. The non-qualifying portion of such a loan would be subject to, among other requirements, the

25


requirement that a REIT not hold securities representing more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer, or the 10% value test.
IRS Revenue Procedure 2014-51 provides a safe harbor pursuant to which we will not be required to redetermine the fair market value of the real property securing a loan for purposes of the gross income and asset tests discussed above in connection with a loan modification that is: (i) occasioned by a borrower default; or (ii) made at a time when we reasonably believe that the modification to the loan will substantially reduce a significant risk of default on the original loan. No assurance can be provided that all of our loan modifications will qualify for the safe harbor in Revenue Procedure 2014-51. To the extent we significantly modify loans in a manner that does not qualify for that safe harbor, we will be required to redetermine the value of the real property securing the loan at the time it was significantly modified. In determining the value of the real property securing such a loan, we generally will not obtain third-party appraisals, but rather will rely on internal valuations. No assurance can be provided that the IRS will not successfully challenge our internal valuations. If the terms of our debt investments are “significantly modified” in a manner that does not qualify for the safe harbor in Revenue Procedure 2014-51 and the fair market value of the real property securing such loans has decreased significantly, we could fail the 75% gross income test, the 75% asset test, the 5% asset test and/or the 10% value test. Unless we qualified for relief under certain Internal Revenue Code cure provisions, such failures could cause us to fail to continue to qualify as a REIT.
Our acquisition of debt or securities investments may cause us to recognize income for federal income tax purposes even though no cash payments have been received on the investments.
We may acquire debt or securities investments in the secondary market for less than their face amount. The amount of such discount will generally be treated as a “market discount” for federal income tax purposes. If these debt or securities investments provide for “payment-in-kind” interest, we may recognize “original issue discount,” or OID, for federal income tax purposes. Moreover, we may acquire distressed debt investments that are subsequently modified by agreement with the borrower. If the amendments to the outstanding debt constitute “significant modifications” under the applicable Treasury Regulations, the modified debt may be considered to have been reissued to us in a debt-for-debt exchange with the borrower. In that event, if the debt is considered to be “publicly traded” for federal income tax purposes, the modified debt in our hands may be considered to have been issued with OID to the extent the fair market value of the modified debt is less than the principal amount of the outstanding debt. In the event the debt is not considered to be “publicly traded” for federal income tax purposes, we may be required to recognize taxable income to the extent that the principal amount of the modified debt exceeds our cost of purchasing it. Also, certain loans that we originate and later modify and certain previously modified debt we acquire in the secondary market may be considered to have been issued with the OID at the time it was modified.
In general, we will be required to accrue OID on a debt instrument as taxable income in accordance with applicable federal income tax rules even though no cash payments may be received on such debt instrument on a current basis.
In the event a borrower with respect to a particular debt instrument encounters financial difficulty rendering it unable to pay stated interest as due, we may nonetheless be required to continue to recognize the unpaid interest as taxable income. Similarly, we may be required to accrue interest income with respect to subordinate mortgage-backed securities at the stated rate regardless of when their corresponding cash payments are received.
In order to meet the REIT distribution requirements, it might be necessary for us to arrange for short-term or possibly long-term borrowings, or to pay distributions in the form of our shares or other taxable in-kind distributions of property. We may need to borrow funds at times when the market conditions are unfavorable. Such borrowings could increase our costs and reduce the value of a stockholders’ investment. In the event in-kind distributions are made, a stockholder’s tax liabilities associated with an investment in our common stock for a given year may exceed the amount of cash we distribute to stockholders during such year.
Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively.
The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code may limit our ability to hedge our operations effectively. Our aggregate gross income from non-qualifying hedges, fees and certain other non-qualifying sources cannot exceed 5% of our annual gross income. As a result, we might have to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”). Any hedging income earned by a TRS would be subject to federal, state and local income tax at regular corporate rates. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities or expose us to greater risks associated with interest rate or other changes than we would otherwise incur.
Liquidation of assets may jeopardize our REIT qualification.
To qualify as a REIT, we must comply with requirements regarding our assets and our sources of income. If we are compelled to liquidate our investments to satisfy our obligations to our lenders, we may be unable to comply with these requirements, ultimately jeopardizing our qualification as a REIT, or we may be subject to a 100% prohibited transaction tax on any resulting gain if we sell assets that are treated as dealer property or inventory.

26


Generally, ordinary dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for reduced U.S. federal income tax rates.
Currently, the maximum tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income payable to certain non-corporate U.S. stockholders is 20%. Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rate. The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause certain non-corporate investors to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends. Through 2025, individual taxpayers may be entitled to claim a deduction in determining their taxable income of 20% of ordinary REIT dividends (dividends other than capital gain dividends and dividends attributable to certain qualified dividend income received by us), which reduces the effective tax rate on such dividends. You are urged to consult with your tax advisor regarding the effect of this change on your effective tax rate with respect to REIT dividends.
The failure of a mezzanine loan to qualify as a real estate asset could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.
We own mezzanine loans, for which the IRS has provided a safe harbor but not rules of substantive law addressing whether such loans will be treated as real estate assets. Pursuant to the safe harbor, if a mezzanine loan meets certain requirements, it will be treated by the IRS as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, and interest derived from the mezzanine loan will be treated as qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the REIT 75% income test. Our mezzanine loans may not meet all of the requirements of this safe harbor. In the event we own a mezzanine loan that does not meet the safe harbor, the IRS could challenge such loan’s treatment as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset and gross income tests and, if such a challenge were sustained, we could fail to qualify as a REIT.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
Our administrative and principal executive offices are located at 550 Fifth Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, New York 10036. We believe that our office facilities are suitable and adequate for our business as it is presently conducted.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Neither we nor Terra Income Advisors is currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, are material legal proceedings threatened against us or Terra Income Advisors. From time to time, we and individuals employed by Terra Income Advisors may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.

27


PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market Information
There is currently no market for our common stock, and we do not expect that a market for our shares will develop in the foreseeable future. No stock has been authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plans. Under Maryland law, our stockholders generally will not be personally liable for our debts or obligations.
Set forth below is a chart describing the classes of our securities outstanding as of December 31, 2019:
       (1)
Title of Class
 
(2)
Amount
Authorized
 
(3)
Amount Held by
Us or for
Our Account
 
(4)
Amount Outstanding
Exclusive of Amount
Under Column (3)
Common Stock
 
450,000,000

 
—

 
8,232,636

Since commencing operations, and through the end of the Offering on April 20, 2018, we had issued 8,878,606 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $103.6 million, excluding shares pursuant to our DRIP. As of December 31, 2019, we had 2,088 record holders of our common stock.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We implemented a share repurchase program whereby every quarter we offer to repurchase up to 2.5% of the weighed-average number of shares outstanding in the prior calendar year at a price per share equal to the most recently disclosed NAV per share of our common stock immediately prior to the date of repurchase. The purpose of the share repurchase program is to provide stockholders with liquidity, because there is otherwise no public market for our common stocks. In addition, the Board may amend, suspend or terminate the share repurchase program upon 30 days’ notice.
The following table provides information with respect to our repurchases of shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase program for the year ended December 31, 2019:
Period
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased
 
Weighted Average Price Paid per Share
 
Maximum Number of Shares Allowed to be Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2019:
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 1 to March 31, 2019
 
116,955

 
$
9.47

 
223,679

June 1 to June 30, 2019 (1)
 
357,127

 
9.37

 
223,679

September 1 to September 30, 2019 (1)
 
315,872

 
9.25

 
223,679

December 1 to December 31, 2019
 
191,397

 
9.15

 
223,679

 
 
981,351

 
$
9.30

 
894,716

_______________
(1)
Shares were validly tendered, an amount that exceeded the maximum number of shares allowed to be repurchased, however, the Company elected to purchase all shares validly tendered.

28


Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The selected financial and other data below should be read in conjunction with our “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the financial statements and notes thereto. Financial information is presented for year ended December 31, 2019, the transition period ended December 31, 2018, and the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 and the period from June 24, 2015 through September 30, 2015 which have been derived from our audited financial statements.
 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
Transition Period Ended December 31, 2018
 
Years Ended September 30,
 
For the period from June 24, 2015 through September 30, 2015
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
2016
 
Statement of operations data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  

 
  

 
 
Total investment income
$
10,005,857

 
$
2,649,375

 
$
8,751,096

 
$
5,257,725

 
$
3,016,699

 
$
66,822

Base management fees
1,594,165

 
424,550

 
1,684,442

 
1,202,568

 
552,011

 
30,058

Servicing fees (1)
844,429

 
229,192

 
922,607

 
—

 
—

 
—

Incentive fees on capital gains (2)
(32,884
)
 
30,846

 
39,172

 
90,459

 
27,928

 
—

All other expenses
2,588,695

 
906,467

 
3,380,887

 
4,070,709

 
5,469,315

 
1,720,870

Total operating expenses
4,994,405

 
1,591,055

 
6,027,108

 
5,363,736

 
6,049,254

 
1,750,928

Less: Expense reimbursement
   from Adviser
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(576,755
)
 
(1,690,300
)
Less: Reduction of offering costs
—

 
—

 
—

 
(944,248
)
 
—

 
—

Net operating expenses
4,994,405

 
1,591,055

 
6,027,108

 
4,419,488

 
5,472,499

 
60,628

Net investment income (loss)
5,011,452

 
1,058,320

 
2,723,988

 
838,237

 
(2,455,800
)
 
6,194

Net change in unrealized
   appreciation on investments and
   obligations under participation
   agreements
(160,320
)
 
154,229

 
219,895

 
444,687

 
139,640

 
—

Net increase (decrease) in net
   assets resulting from operations
$
4,851,132

 
$
1,212,549

 
$
2,943,883

 
$
1,282,924

 
$
(2,316,160
)
 
$
6,194

Per share data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  

 
  

 
 
Net asset value
$
9.16

 
$
9.47

 
$
9.56

 
$
10.00

 
$
10.06

 
$
10.97

Net investment income (loss)
$
0.57

 
$
0.12

 
$
0.31

 
$
0.15

 
$
(0.99
)
 
$
0.01

Net increase (decrease) in net
   assets resulting from operations
$
0.56

 
$
0.13

 
$
0.34

 
$
0.23

 
$
(0.93
)
 
$
0.01

Distributions declared
$
0.87

 
$
0.22

 
$
0.87

 
$
0.90

 
$
1.00

 
$
0.27

Balance sheet data at period end:
 
 
 
 
 
  

 
  

 
 
Investments, at fair value
$
18,598,767

 
$
23,571,020

 
$
29,174,139

 
$
23,675,007

 
$
26,723,922

 
$
—

Investments through
   participation, at fair value
43,237,452

 
55,915,765

 
43,246,193

 
22,121,382

 
2,022,814

 
2,000,000

Cash and cash equivalents
17,057,558

 
6,072,043

 
15,753,725

 
32,176,500

 
31,634,296

 
8,248,797

Restricted cash
624,141

 
1,300,021

 
1,513,891

 
1,547,407

 
836,434

 
—

Other assets
588,631

 
738,537

 
713,927

 
546,977

 
914,757

 
1,090,355

Total assets
80,106,549

 
87,597,386

 
90,401,875

 
80,067,273

 
62,132,223

 
11,339,152

Obligations under participation
   agreements, at fair value
3,204,263

 
—

 
1,809,101

 
1,820,502

 
14,560,606

 
—

Transaction charge payable (1)
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
2,191,734

 
—

Interest reserve and other deposits
   held on investments
624,141

 
1,300,021

 
1,513,891

 
1,547,407

 
836,434

 
—

Due to Adviser, net
517,404

 
593,027

 
576,219

 
707,927

 
1,498,808

 
608,423

Accrued expenses and other
   liabilities
382,653

 
665,319

 
729,254

 
657,144

 
569,893

 
569,657

Total liabilities
4,728,461

 
2,558,367

 
4,628,465

 
4,732,980

 
19,657,475

 
1,178,080

Total net assets
$
75,378,088

 
$
85,039,019

 
$
85,773,410

 
$
75,334,293

 
$
42,474,748

 
$
10,161,072


29


 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
Transition Period Ended December 31, 2018
 
Years Ended September 30,
 
For the period from June 24, 2015 through September 30, 2015
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
2016
 
Other data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total return (3)
6.15
%
 
5.29
%
 
4.02
%
 
8.10
%
 
(0.26
)%
 
(10.36
)%
Weighted average annualized
   coupon rate at period end (4)
12.06
%
 
12.06
%
 
12.59
%
 
12.39
%
 
13.27
 %
 
12.00
 %
Number of investments at
   period end
10

 
15

 
16

 
10

 
5

 
1

Purchases of investments for
   the period
$
19,385,437

 
$
16,343,778

 
$
31,935,831

 
$
44,777,167

 
$
26,299,670

 
$
2,000,000

Proceeds from obligations
   under participation
   agreements for the period
$
3,120,888

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
14,300,000

 
$
—

Principal payments and sales
   of investments for the
   period
$
37,523,419

 
$
9,616,158

 
$
6,179,599

 
$
28,508,960

 
$
—

 
$
—

Repayments of obligations
   under participation
   agreements for the period
$
—

 
$
1,791,000

 
$
—

 
$
12,863,770

 
$
—

 
$
—

_______________
(1)
On September 30, 2017, we adopted the servicing plan (the “Servicing Plan”) and the second amended dealer manager agreement (the “Second Amended Dealer Manager Agreement”), which revised the terms of the servicing fee (which was previously referred to as a transaction charge). Pursuant to the Servicing Plan, Terra Capital Markets receives a servicing fee at an annual rate of 1.125% of the most recently published NAV per share of our common stock, excluding shares sold through the DRIP, in exchange for providing certain administrative support services. The servicing fee is recorded as expense on the statements of operations in the period in which it was incurred. In connection with the adoptions of the Servicing Plan and the Second Amended Dealer Manager Agreement, we reduced the previously recorded transaction charges by $3.2 million, as reflected on the statements of changes in net assets.
(2)
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company reversed $32,884 of incentive fees which were previously accrued. Incentive fees on capital gains are based on 20% of net unrealized capital gains. No incentive fees on capital gains are actually payable by the Company with respect to unrealized gains unless and until those gains are realized.
(3)
Total return is calculated assuming a purchase of shares of common stock at the current NAV per share on the first day and a sale at the current NAV per share on the last day of the periods reported. Distributions, if any, are assumed for purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under our DRIP. The total return does not consider the effect of any selling commissions or charges that may have been incurred in connection with the sale of shares of our common stock. Total return for the transition period ended December 31, 2018 was annualized. Total return for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 was 2.48% without the impact of reductions in offering costs and servicing fees.
(4)
The weighted average annualized coupon rate at period end is calculated based upon the par value of our debt investments and the related coupon rates. The weighted average annualized effective yield does not reflect operating expenses that may be incurred by us, nor does it consider the effect of any selling commissions or charges that may have been incurred in connection with the sale of shares of our common stock. The weighted average annualized effective yield does not represent actual investment returns to stockholders, is subject to change and, in the future, may be greater or less than the rates set forth above.


30


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and related notes thereto and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
For the discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the transition period ended December 31, 2018 and the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, please see “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of operations” of the Transition Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 22, 2019.
Please see Item 1A “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements.
Overview
We were incorporated under the general corporation laws of the State of Maryland on May 15, 2013 and commenced operations on June 24, 2015, upon the raising of gross proceeds in excess of the Minimum Offering Requirement. Prior to satisfying the Minimum Offering Requirement, we had no operations except for matters relating to our organization and registration. We are an externally managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act, and previously elected to be taxed for federal income tax purposes, beginning with our taxable year ended September 30, 2015, and qualified annually thereafter, as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. On December 31, 2018, we announced our intention to change our tax election from taxation as a RIC to taxation as a REIT. The REIT tax election allows us to benefit from the preferential tax treatment afforded to both RICs and REITs, without us being subject to RIC-specific diversification restrictions. We elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code commencing with our short taxable year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018. Concurrent with the change in tax election, we changed our fiscal year end from September 30 to December 31 to satisfy the REIT requirement. We have elected to be taxed and have continued to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for the taxable year ending December 31, 2019.
Our investment activities are externally managed by Terra Income Advisors and supervised by the Board, a majority of whom are independent. Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, we have agreed to pay Terra Income Advisors an annual base management fee based on our average quarterly gross assets, as well as incentive fees based on our performance. See “— Related Party Transactions — Compensation of Terra Income Advisors and Terra Capital Markets” below.
Also, we agreed to pay selling commissions, broker-dealer fees, a dealer manager fee and servicing fees, and to reimburse Terra Income Advisors for our organization and offering expenses up to a maximum amount equal to 1.5% of the gross proceeds from the Offering. Terra Income Advisors borne all organization and offering expenses in excess of this amount.
On February 8, 2018, a pooled investment vehicle advised by Axar entered into an investment agreement with Terra Capital Partners and its affiliates pursuant to which Axar acquired from the respective owners thereof a 65.7% economic and voting interest in Terra Capital Partners and an initial 49% economic interest, but no voting interest, in Terra Income Advisors. On November 30, 2018, Axar purchased the remaining 34.3% economic interest in Terra Capital Partners. On April 25, 2019, we held our annual meeting of stockholders, at which time a new Investment Advisory Agreement was approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Accordingly, on April 30, 2019, Axar acquired the remaining 51% economic interest and 100% of the voting interest in Terra Income Advisors and we and Terra Income Advisors entered into a new Investment Advisory Agreement. Such new Investment Advisory Agreement has the same economic terms and is in all material respects otherwise on the same terms as the Investment Advisory Agreement in effect immediately prior to April 30, 2019, except for the date of the agreement. Pursuant to Section 15 of the 1940 Act, the new Investment Advisory Agreement has an initial two year term, but will be required to be renewed annually thereafter at an in-period meeting of our Board.
Our primary investment objectives are to pay attractive and stable cash distributions and to preserve, protect and return capital contributions to stockholders. Our investment strategy is to use substantially all of the proceeds of the Offering to originate and manage a diversified portfolio consisting of (i) commercial real estate loans to U.S. companies qualifying as “eligible portfolio companies” under the 1940 Act, including mezzanine loans, first and second lien mortgage loans, subordinated mortgage loans, bridge loans and other commercial real estate-related loans related to or secured by high quality commercial real estate in the United States and (ii) preferred equity real estate investments in U.S. companies qualifying as “eligible portfolio companies” under the 1940 Act. We may also purchase select commercial real estate-related debt securities, such as CMBSs or CDOs.
The level of our investment activity depends on many factors, including the amount of debt and equity capital available to prospective borrowers, the level of refinancing activity for such companies, the availability of credit to finance transactions, the general economic environment and the competitive environment for the types of investments we make. Our distributions may exceed our earnings. Therefore, portions of the distributions that we make may represent a return of capital to investors for tax purposes, which will lower investors’ tax basis in their shares.


31


Revenues
We generate revenue primarily in the form of interest on the debt securities that we hold. We make debt investments that bear interest at fixed and floating rates. Interest on debt securities is generally payable monthly. The principal amount of the debt securities and any accrued but unpaid interest generally become due at the maturity date. In addition, we may generate revenue in the form of exit fees payable upon repayment of the loans we hold, origination fees for loans we originate, commitment and other fees in connection with transactions, all of which are recorded as interest income. As prepayment(s), partial or full, occurs on an investment, prepayment income is recognized. Preferred returns earned on any preferred equity investments, if any, is recognized on an accrual basis to the extent that we expect to collect such amounts.
Expenses
Our primary operating expenses include interest expense from obligations under participation agreements, professional fees, marketing expenses, payment of adviser fees and reimbursement of expenses to Terra Income Advisors and other expenses necessary for our operations. We bear other expenses, which include, among other things:
•
the cost of calculating our NAV, including the related fees and cost of any third-party valuation services;
•
the cost of effecting sales and repurchases of shares of our common stock and other securities;
•
fees payable to third parties relating to, or associated with, monitoring our financial and legal affairs;
•
making investments and valuing investments, including fees and expenses associated with performing due diligence reviews of prospective investments;
•
interest payable on debt, if any, incurred to finance our investments;
•
transfer agent and custodial fees;
•
fees and expenses associated with marketing efforts;
•
servicing fees;
•
federal and state registration fees;
•
federal, state and local taxes;
•
independent directors’ fees and expenses, including travel expenses;
•
costs of director and stockholder meetings, proxy statements, stockholders’ reports and notices;
•
costs of fidelity bonds, directors and officers/errors and omissions liability insurance and other insurance premiums;
•
direct costs, including those relating to printing of stockholder reports and advertising or sales materials, mailing and long-distance telephone expenses;
•
fees and expenses associated with independent audits and outside legal costs, including compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the 1940 Act and applicable federal and state securities laws;
•
costs associated with our chief compliance officer;
•
brokerage commissions for our investments; and
•
all other expenses incurred by us or Terra Income Advisors in connection with administering our investment portfolio, including expenses incurred by Terra Income Advisors in performing certain of its obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement.
We reimburse Terra Income Advisors for expenses necessary to perform services related to our administration and operation. The amount of this reimbursement is set at the lesser of (i) Terra Income Advisors’ actual costs incurred in providing such services and (ii) the amount that the Board, including a majority of our independent directors, estimates we would be required to pay alternative service providers for comparable services in the same geographic location. Terra Income Advisors is required to allocate the cost of such services to us based on objective factors, such as total assets, revenues, time allocations and/or other reasonable metrics. The Board then assesses the reasonableness of such reimbursements based on the breadth, depth and quality of such services as compared to the estimated cost to us of obtaining similar services from third-party providers known to be available. In addition, the Board considers whether any single third-party service provider would be capable of providing all such services at comparable cost and quality. Finally, the Board compares the total amount paid to Terra Income Advisors for such services as a percentage of our net assets to the same ratio as reported by other comparable BDCs. We do not reimburse Terra Income Advisors for any services for which it receives a separate fee, or for rent, depreciation, utilities, capital equipment or other administrative items allocated to a controlling person of Terra Income Advisors.

32


Net Investment Portfolio
The tables below present our investment portfolio on a net investment basis, which represents our proportionate share of the investments, based on our economic ownership of these investments. This measure is used in reports to our executive management and is used as a component to the asset base from which we calculate our base management fee. We believe that this measure provides useful information to investors because it represents our total assets under management and the financial exposure of each investment individually.
 
December 31, 2019
 
Gross Investments
 
Transfers Treated as Obligations Under Participation Agreements
 
Net Investments
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair value
370 Lex Part Deux, LLC
$
16,871,046

 
$
16,882,760

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
16,871,046

 
$
16,882,760

LD Milpitas Mezz, LP
12,480,889

 
12,817,047

 
3,130,788

 
3,204,263

 
9,350,101

 
9,612,784

Orange Grove Property Investors, LLC
8,484,231

 
8,556,332

 
—

 
—

 
8,484,231

 
8,556,332

Stonewall Station Mezz LLC
4,310,524

 
4,348,735

 
—

 
—

 
4,310,524

 
4,348,735

RS JZ Driggs, LLC
4,127,222

 
4,138,668

 
—

 
—

 
4,127,222

 
4,138,668

City Gardens 333 LLC
3,906,762

 
3,928,089

 
—

 
—

 
3,906,762

 
3,928,089

NB Private Capital, LLC
3,306,795

 
3,363,464

 
—

 
—

 
3,306,795

 
3,363,464

Dwight Mezz II LLC
3,000,000

 
3,075,315

 
—

 
—

 
3,000,000

 
3,075,315

Hertz Clinton One Mezzanine, LLC
2,457,144

 
2,706,405

 
—

 
—

 
2,457,144

 
2,706,405

TSG-Parcel 1, LLC
2,020,000

 
2,019,404

 
—

 
—

 
2,020,000

 
2,019,404

 
$
60,964,613

 
$
61,836,219

 
$
3,130,788

 
$
3,204,263

 
$
57,833,825

 
$
58,631,956

 
December 31, 2018
 
Gross Investments
 
Transfers Treated as Obligations Under Participation Agreements
 
Net Investments
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair value
370 Lex Part Deux, LLC
$
15,148,875

 
$
15,225,000

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
15,148,875

 
$
15,225,000

OHM Atlanta Owner, LLC
11,336,735

 
11,335,609

 
—

 
—

 
11,336,735

 
11,335,609

Residential X Mezz Concord LLC and Center
   Associates Mezz LLC
8,841,641

 
8,956,203

 
—

 
—

 
8,841,641

 
8,956,203

140 Schermerhorn Street Mezz LLC
7,530,018

 
7,574,247

 
—

 
—

 
7,530,018

 
7,574,247

Orange Grove Property Investors, LLC
6,625,110

 
6,733,003

 
—

 
—

 
6,625,110

 
6,733,003

YIP Santa Maria LLC
4,518,478

 
4,544,512

 
—

 
—

 
4,518,478

 
4,544,512

221 W. 17th Street Owner, LLC
4,223,149

 
4,241,552

 
—

 
—

 
4,223,149

 
4,241,552

NB Private Capital, LLC
4,212,203

 
4,284,030

 
—

 
—

 
4,212,203

 
4,284,030

Stonewall Station Mezz LLC
3,734,904

 
3,792,025

 
—

 
—

 
3,734,904

 
3,792,025

Dwight Mezz II LLC
3,000,000

 
3,106,630

 
—

 
—

 
3,000,000

 
3,106,630

City Gardens 333 LLC
2,888,629

 
2,914,245

 
—

 
—

 
2,888,629

 
2,914,245

Hertz Clinton One Mezzanine, LLC
2,448,572

 
2,722,123

 
—

 
—

 
2,448,572

 
2,722,123

TSG-Parcel 1, LLC
2,020,000

 
2,019,799

 
—

 
—

 
2,020,000

 
2,019,799

RS JZ Driggs, LLC
2,000,019

 
2,037,807

 
—

 
—

 
2,000,019

 
2,037,807

LD Milpitas Mezz, LP
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
$
78,528,333

 
$
79,486,785

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
78,528,333

 
$
79,486,785


33


 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018 (Unaudited)
 
Weighted Average Principal Amount
 
Weighted Average Coupon Rate
 
Weighted Average Principal Amount
 
Weighted Average Coupon Rate
Gross investments
$
66,268,212

 
12.1%
 
$
66,517,825

 
12.6%
Obligations under participation agreements
(1,138,067
)
 
9.5%
 
(1,706,301
)
 
13.0%
Net investments (1)
$
65,130,145

 
12.1%

$
64,811,524

 
12.6%
_______________
(1)
The weighted average coupon rate for net investments represents net interest income over the period calculated using the weighted average coupon rate and weighted average principal amount shown on the table (interest income on the investments less interest expense) divided by the weighted average principal amount of the net investments during the period.
Portfolio Investment Activity
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we invested $19.4 million and $39.6 million in add-on loans, respectively, and had $37.5 million and $15.8 million of repayments, respectively, resulting in net repayments of $18.1 million and net investments of $23.8 million, respectively.
Our portfolio composition, based on fair value at December 31, 2019 and 2018, was as follows:
 
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
  
 
Investments at Fair Value
 
Percentage of
Total Portfolio
 
Weighted Average
Coupon Rate (1)
 
Investments at Fair Value
 
Percentage of
Total Portfolio
 
Weighted Average
Coupon Rate (1)
Loans
 
$
18,598,767

 
30.1
%
 
12.5
%
 
$
23,571,020

 
29.7
%
 
12.2
%
Loans through participation
   interest
 
43,237,452

 
69.9
%
 
11.9
%
 
55,915,765

 
70.3
%
 
12.0
%
Total
 
$
61,836,219

 
100.0
%
 
12.1
%
 
$
79,486,785

 
100.0
%
 
12.1
%
_______________
(1)
Based upon the principal value of our debt investments.
The following table shows the portfolio composition by property type grouping based on fair value at December 31, 2019 and 2018:
 
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
  
 
Investments at Fair Value
 
Percentage of
Total Portfolio
 
Investments at Fair Value
 
Percentage of
Total Portfolio
Office
 
$
19,589,165

 
31.7
%
 
$
17,947,123

 
22.6
%
Hotel
 
17,165,782

 
27.8
%
 
15,910,784

 
20.0
%
Student housing
 
10,366,868

 
16.7
%
 
10,304,905

 
13.0
%
Condominium
 
8,556,332

 
13.8
%
 
10,974,555

 
13.8
%
Multifamily
 
4,138,668

 
6.7
%
 
10,994,010

 
13.8
%
Land
 
2,019,404

 
3.3
%
 
13,355,408

 
16.8
%
Total
 
$
61,836,219

 
100.0
%
 
$
79,486,785

 
100.0
%
Obligations under Participation Agreements
We may enter into participation agreements with related and unrelated parties, primarily other affiliated funds of our sponsor. The participation agreements provide us with the opportunity to invest along the same terms, conditions, price, and rights in the specified investment. The purpose of the participation agreements is to allow us and an affiliate to originate a specified investment when, individually, we do not have the liquidity to do so or to achieve a certain level of portfolio diversification. We may transfer portions of our investments to other participants or we may be a participant to an investment held by another entity.

34


Certain partial loan sales do not qualify for sale accounting because these sales do not meet the definition of a “participating interest,” as defined in the guidance, in order for sale treatment to be allowed. Participations or other partial loan sales which do not meet the definition of a participating interest remain as an investment on the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities and the portion transferred is recorded as obligations under participation agreements in the liabilities section of the statements of assets and liabilities.
As of December 31, 2019, obligations under participation agreements at fair value was $3.2 million and the weighted average interest rate on the obligations under participation agreements was 13.0%. As of December 31, 2018, we did not have any funded obligations under participation agreements. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we transferred $3.1 million of investments to affiliates through participation agreements and did not make any repayments on obligations under participation agreements. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we did not transfer any investments to affiliates through participation agreements and made $1.8 million of repayments on obligations under participation agreements.
Results of Operations
Comparison of Full Year December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (Unaudited)
Operating results for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
  
 
2019
 
2018
 
Change
 
 
 
 
(Unaudited)

 
 
Total investment income
 
$
10,005,857

 
$
9,576,584

 
$
429,273

Total operating expenses
 
4,994,405

 
6,127,666

 
(1,133,261
)
Net investment income
 
5,011,452

 
3,448,918

 
1,562,534

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments
 
(86,846
)
 
372,288

 
(459,134
)
Net change in unrealized appreciation on obligations under participation
   agreements
 
(73,474
)
 
11,171

 
(84,645
)
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
 
$
4,851,132

 
$
3,832,377

 
$
1,018,755

Investment Income
The composition of our investment income for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
  
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
Change
 
 
 
 
 
(Unaudited)

 
 
Interest income
 
 
$
9,242,765

 
$
9,497,050

 
$
(254,285
)
Prepayment fee income
 
 
675,779

 
—

 
675,779

Other fee income
 
 
87,313

 
79,534

 
7,779

Total investment income
 
 
$
10,005,857

 
$
9,576,584

 
$
429,273

Interest Income
For the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018, interest income decreased by $0.3 million, primarily due to a decrease in the weighted average coupon rate as well as a decrease in weighted average principal balance on our investments. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the weighted average principal balance of our investment portfolio decreased to an average of $66.3 million from an average of $66.5 million for the same period in 2018, and the weighted average coupon rate of our investment portfolio decreased to 12.1% from 12.6% for the same period in 2018. The decrease in weighted average principal balance was due to lower volume of new investments made than repayments of investments. The decrease in weighted average coupon rate was due to our investments having lower coupon rates than those of the investments that were repaid.
Prepayment Fee Income
Prepayment fee income represents prepayment fees charged to borrowers for the early repayment of loans.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we received prepayment fee income of $0.7 million, primarily related to the early repayment of a loan. For the year ended December 31, 2018, there was no prepayment fee income received.

35


Operating Expenses
The composition of our operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
  
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
Change
 
 
 
 
 
(Unaudited)

 
 
Base management fees
 
 
$
1,594,165

 
$
1,716,429

 
$
(122,264
)
Incentive fees on capital gains
 
 
(32,884
)
 
73,407

 
(106,291
)
Operating expense reimbursement to Adviser
 
 
897,816

 
907,405

 
(9,589
)
Servicing fees
 
 
844,429

 
944,744

 
(100,315
)
Professional fees
 
 
1,079,139

 
1,668,897

 
(589,758
)
Interest expense from obligations under participation agreements
 
 
159,904

 
237,569

 
(77,665
)
Marketing expenses
 
 
—

 
91,570

 
(91,570
)
Amortization of deferred offering costs
 
 
—

 
114,132

 
(114,132
)
Directors’ fees
 
 
122,000

 
117,875

 
4,125

Insurance expense
 
 
213,837

 
212,279

 
1,558

General and administrative expenses
 
 
115,999

 
43,359

 
72,640

Total operating expenses
 
 
$
4,994,405

 
$
6,127,666

 
$
(1,133,261
)
For the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018, total operating expenses decreased by $1.1 million. The reasons for the changes are stated below.
Base Management Fees
Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, we pay Terra Income Advisors a base management fee, which is calculated at an annual rate of 2.0% of our average gross assets.
For the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018, base management fees decreased by $0.1 million, due to a decrease in our gross assets.
Servicing Fees
On September 30, 2017, we adopted the Servicing Plan pursuant to which we pay Terra Capital Markets, an affiliate of Terra Income Advisors and the dealer manager of the Offering, a servicing fee at an annual rate of 1.125% of the most recently published NAV per share of our common stock, excluding shares sold through our DRIP, in exchange for providing stockholder-related administrative support services. With respect to each share sold, the servicing fee is payable annually on the anniversary of the applicable month of purchase.
For the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018, servicing fees decreased by $0.1 million, due to a decrease in our NAV.
Professional Fees
For the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018, professional fees decreased by $0.6 million, primarily due to additional legal fees incurred in connection with the filing of our preliminary proxy statement in 2018.
Interest Expense from Obligations under Participation Agreements
For the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018, interest expense from obligations under participation agreements decreased by $0.1 million, primarily due to a decrease in the weighted average principal balance on obligations under participation agreements as well as a decrease in the weighted average coupon rate on obligations under participation agreements. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the weighted average principal balance on obligations under participation agreements decreased to $1.1 million, from an average principal balance of $1.7 million for the same period in 2018 and the weighted average coupon rate on obligations under participation decreased to 9.5%, from 13.0% for the same period in 2018. The decrease in weighted average principal balance on obligations under participation agreements was due to higher repayment amounts than proceeds from obligations under participation agreements. The decrease in weighted average coupon rate on obligations under participation agreement was due to investments sold through participation agreements having lower coupon rates than those of the obligations under participation agreements that were repaid.

36


Marketing Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we did not recognize any marketing expenses, compared to the recognition of $0.1 million of marketing expense for the same period in 2018, respectively, primarily due to the ending of the Offering on April 20, 2018.
Amortization of Deferred Offering Costs
All deferred offering costs incurred during the offering period were recorded as deferred charge and amortized over twelve months from the date the cost was incurred, with the exception of those costs incurred prior to the commencement of operations on June 24, 2015, which were amortized over a 12-month period from that date forward. Any unamortized offering costs were written off at the end of the Offering.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, we did not record any amortization of deferred offering costs because the Offering ended on April 20, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2018, amortization of deferred offering costs was $0.1 million, primarily related to the write-off of the unamortized offering costs in connection with the ending of the Offering on April 20, 2018.
General and Administrative Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018, general and administrative expenses increased by $0.1 million, primarily due to fees incurred in connection with the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders. Due to the Axar Transaction, we did not have an annual meeting of stockholders last year.
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation on Investments and Obligations under Participation Agreements
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments and obligations under participation agreements reflects the change in our portfolio investment values during the reporting period, including any reversal of previously recorded unrealized gains or losses, when gains or losses are realized. Valuation of our portfolio investments and obligations under participation agreements fluctuates over time, reflecting changes in the market yields for loans and debt investments, and any associated premium or discount and origination or exit fee are amortized down or accreted up to par value as each investment approaches maturity.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized a decrease in unrealized appreciation on investments of $0.1 million, compared to an increase in unrealized appreciation on investments of $0.4 million for the same period in 2018. The decrease in unrealized appreciation on investments for the current period was due to several loans approaching maturity in the current period, of which three were settled at par. The increase in unrealized appreciation on investments for the year ended December 31, 2018 was due to new investments made in 2018 with higher fair values than the corresponding costs.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized an increase in unrealized appreciation on obligations under participation agreements of $0.1 million, compared to a decrease in unrealized appreciation on obligations under participation agreements of less than $0.1 million for the same period in 2018. The increase in unrealized appreciation on obligations under participation agreement in the current period was due to the transfer of an investment to an affiliate in 2019 through a participation agreement with higher fair value than the corresponding cost.
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we recorded a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of $4.9 million and $3.8 million, respectively. Based on the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding, our per share net increase in net assets resulting from operations was $0.56 and $0.43, respectively.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
We currently generate cash primarily from cash flows from interest, dividends and fees earned from our investments and principal repayments and proceeds from sales of our investments. Our primary use of cash is for our targeted investments, payments of our expenses and cash distributions to our stockholders.
Prior to investing in securities of portfolio companies, we invest the net proceeds from the Offering and from sales and paydowns of existing investments primarily in cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, repurchase agreements and high-quality debt instruments maturing in one year or less from the time of investment, consistent with our BDC election.
We may borrow funds to make investments to the extent we determine that leveraging our portfolio would be appropriate. We have not decided whether, and to what extent, we will finance portfolio investments using debt or the specific form that any such financing would take. Accordingly, we cannot predict with certainty what terms any such financing would have or the costs we would incur in connection with any such arrangement. We currently do not anticipate issuing any preferred stock; however, our charter authorizes us the ability to do so.
We do not have any material commitments for capital resources as of the end of the last fiscal year. We are not aware of any known trends in our capital recourses or any material changes in the mix and relative cost of such recourses.

37


Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2019
Operating Activities — For the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash provided by operating activities was $21.7 million. The level of cash flows used in or provided by operating activities is affected by the timing of purchases, repayments and sales of portfolio investments, among other factors. Cash flows provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 were primarily repayments of investments of $37.5 million, partially offset by purchases of investments of $19.4 million.
Financing Activities — For the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash used in financing activities was $11.4 million, primarily related to payments for repurchases of common stock under stock repurchase plan of $9.2 million and distributions paid to stockholders of $5.4 million, partially offset by proceeds from obligations under participation agreements of $3.1 million.
Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 (Unaudited)
Operating Activities — For the year ended December 31, 2018, net cash used in operating activities was $22.7 million. The level of cash flows used in or provided by operating activities is affected by the timing of purchases, repayments and sales of portfolio investments, among other factors. Cash flows used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 were primarily purchases of investments totaling $39.6 million, partially offset by repayments of investments of $15.8 million.
Financing Activities — For the year ended December 31, 2018, net cash used in financing activities was $2.2 million, primarily related to distributions paid to stockholders of $5.5 million, payments for repurchases of common stock under stock repurchase plan of $4.2 million, repayment of obligations under participation agreements of $1.8 million, and payments of selling commissions and dealer manager fees of $0.5 million, partially offset by proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $9.7 million
REIT Status and Distributions
We elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code commencing with our short taxable year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018. We have elected to be taxed and have continued to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for the taxable year ending December 31, 2019. In order to qualify as a REIT, we are required, among other things, to distribute at least 90% of our REIT net taxable income to the stockholders and meet certain tests regarding the nature of our income and assets. As long as the distributions are declared by the later of the fifteenth day of the ninth month following the close of the taxable year or the due date of the tax return, including extensions, distributions paid up to one year after the current tax year can be carried back to the prior tax year for determining the distributions paid in such tax year. We are also subject to nondeductible federal excise taxes if we do not distribute at least 85.0% of our ordinary income, 95.0% of our capital gain net income, if any, and any recognized and undistributed income from prior years on which we paid no federal income taxes. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we have made sufficient distributions to our stockholders to qualify to be taxed as a REIT and to preclude the imposition of either U.S. federal corporate income or excise taxation.
Distributions to our stockholders are recorded as of the record date. Subject to the discretion of the Board and applicable legal restrictions, we authorize and declare ordinary cash distributions on either a monthly or quarterly basis and pay such distributions on a monthly basis. We calculate each stockholder’s specific distribution amount for the period using daily record dates, and each stockholder’s distributions begin to accrue on the date we accept such stockholder’s subscription for shares of our common stock. From time to time at the discretion of the Board, we may also pay special interim distributions in the form of cash or shares of common stock.
During certain periods, our distributions may exceed our earnings. As a result, it is possible that some or all of the distributions we make will represent a return of capital for tax purposes. A return of capital generally is a return of an investor’s investment rather than a return of earnings or gains derived from our investment activities and will be made after deducting the fees and expenses payable in connection with the Offering, including any fees payable to Terra Income Advisors. Each year a statement on Form 1099-DIV identifying the sources of the distributions will be mailed to our stockholders.
We intend to continue to make our ordinary distributions in the form of cash out of assets legally available for distribution unless stockholders elect to receive their cash distributions in additional shares of our common stock under our DRIP. Any distributions reinvested under the plan will nevertheless remain taxable to a U.S. stockholder.
We have adopted an “opt in” DRIP for our stockholders. As a result, if we make a cash distribution, our stockholders will receive distributions in cash unless they specifically “opt in” to the DRIP so as to have their cash distributions reinvested in additional shares of our common stock. However, certain state authorities or regulators may impose restrictions from time to time that may prevent or limit a stockholder’s ability to participate in the DRIP.
We may fund our cash distributions to stockholders from any sources of funds available to us, including, borrowings, net investment income from operations, capital gain proceeds from the sale of assets, non-capital gain proceeds from the sale of assets, dividends or other distributions paid to us on account of preferred and common equity investments in portfolio companies. We have not established limits on the amount of funds we may use from available sources to make distributions.

38


Critical Accounting Policies
Our financial statements are prepared in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Critical accounting policies are those that require the application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often because of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and that may change in subsequent periods. In preparing the financial statements, management has made estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. In preparing the financial statements, management has utilized available information, including industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments, giving due consideration to materiality. Actual results may differ from these estimates. In addition, other companies may utilize different estimates, which may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. As we execute our expected operating plans, we will describe additional critical accounting policies in the notes to our future financial statements in addition to those discussed below.
Valuation of Investments
We measure the value of our investments in accordance with fair value accounting guidance promulgated under U.S. GAAP, which establishes a hierarchical disclosure framework that prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment. Investments with readily available actively quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices, generally, will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.
Investments measured and reported at fair value will be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:
•
Level 1 — observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets. Publicly listed equities and publicly listed derivatives will be included in Level 1.
•
Level 2 — observable inputs such as for similar securities in active markets and quoted prices for identical securities in markets that are not active. In certain cases, debt and equity securities are valued on the basis of prices from an orderly transaction between market participants provided by reputable dealers or pricing services. In determining the value of a particular investment, pricing services may use certain information with respect to transactions in such investments, quotations from dealers, pricing matrices, market transactions in comparable investments and various relationships between investments. Investments which are generally expected to be included in this category include corporate bonds and loans, convertible debt indexed to publicly listed securities and certain over-the-counter derivatives.
•
Level 3 — unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant judgment or estimation.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and we consider factors specific to the investment. We expect most of the investments that will be held in the investment portfolio to fall into Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Valuation of Obligations under Participation Agreements
We have elected the fair value option under Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic 825, Financial Instruments, relating to accounting for debt obligations at their fair value for obligations under participation agreements which arose due to partial loan sales which did not meet the criteria for sale treatment under ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. We employ the yield approach valuation methodology used for the real-estate related loan investments on our obligations under participation agreements.
Federal Income Taxes
We initially elected to be taxed for federal income tax purposes, and qualified annually thereafter, as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC, we did not have to pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any ordinary income or capital gains that we distributed to our stockholders from our earnings and profits as determined for federal income tax purposes.
On December 31, 2018, we announced our intention to change our tax election from taxation as a RIC to taxation as a REIT. We elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code commencing with our short taxable year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018. In order to qualify as a REIT, we are required, among other things, to distribute at least 90% of its REIT net taxable income to the stockholders and meet certain tests regarding the nature of its income and assets.

39


Recognition of a tax benefit or liability with respect to an uncertain tax position is required only when the position is “more likely than not” to be sustained assuming examination by taxing authorities. We recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax liabilities as income tax expense in the statements of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we did not incur any interest or penalties.
Contractual Obligations
We have entered into certain contracts under which we have material future commitments. On April 20, 2015, we entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with Terra Income Advisors in accordance with the 1940 Act. The Investment Advisory Agreement became effective on June 24, 2015, the date that we met the Minimum Offering Requirement. Terra Income Advisors serves as our investment adviser in accordance with the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement. Payments under the Investment Advisory Agreement in each reporting period consist of (i) a base management fee equal to a percentage of the value of our average gross assets and (ii) an incentive fee based on our performance. Terra Income Advisors is reimbursed for allocated administrative expenses incurred on our behalf. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we incurred $1.6 million and $1.7 million in base management fee under the Investment Advisory Agreement, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we reversed the previously accrued incentive fees on capital gains of $32,884, based on net unrealized capital losses of $160,320. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we accrued incentive fees on capital gains of $73,407, based on net unrealized capital gains of $383,459. No incentive fees on capital gains are actually payable by us with respect to unrealized gains unless and until those gains are realized. For both the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we incurred $0.9 million in allocated administrative expenses reimbursable to Terra Income Advisors.
We previously retained Terra Capital Markets, an affiliate of Terra Income Advisors, to serve as the dealer manager of the Offering. Under the terms of the dealer manager agreement (the “Dealer Manager Agreement”), Terra Capital Markets received selling commissions, dealer manager fees and broker-dealer fees of 3.0%, 1.5% and up to 1.0%, respectively, of gross proceeds from the Offering, all or a portion of which may be re-allowed to selected broker-dealers for marketing and expenses.
On September 30, 2017, we adopted the Servicing Plan. Pursuant to the Servicing Plan, Terra Capital Markets receives a servicing fee at an annual rate of 1.125% of the most recently published NAV per share of our common stock, excluding shares sold through the DRIP, in exchange for providing certain administrative support services. With respect to each share sold, the servicing fee will be payable annually on the anniversary of the applicable month of purchase. Terra Capital Markets, in its discretion, may re-allow a portion of such servicing fee to participating dealers for performing certain administrative support services. The Servicing Plan will remain in effect for so long as such continuance is approved quarterly by the Board, including a majority of our directors who are not “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act and who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the operation of the Servicing Plan or in any agreements entered into in connection therewith. In addition, the Board will review all payments made pursuant to the Servicing Plan at least quarterly. We will no longer incur the annual servicing fee upon the earlier of (i) the aggregate underwriting compensation from all sources, including selling commissions, dealer manager fees, broker-dealer fees, and servicing fees would exceed 10% of the gross proceeds in the Offering, (ii) with respect to a specific share, the date that such share is redeemed or is no longer outstanding, and (iii) the date, if any, upon which a liquidity event occurs.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we did not incur any broker-dealer commissions and fees because the Offering ended on April 20, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we incurred $0.5 million of broker-dealer commissions and fees, and of this amount, $0.4 million were re-allowed to selected broker-dealers. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we recorded servicing fees of $0.8 million and $0.9 million, respectively. As of both December 31, 2019 and 2018, unpaid servicing fees were $0.1 million and were included in accrued expenses on the statements of assets and liabilities.
Certain of our loans provide for commitments to fund the borrower at a future date. As of December 31, 2019, we had one loan with total funding commitments of $17.0 million, of which we funded $12.5 million. We expect to fund either directly or in combination with an affiliate the remaining $4.5 million in the next twelve months.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Other than contractual commitments and other legal contingencies incurred in the normal course of our business, we do not have any off-balance sheet financings or liabilities.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We may be subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. To the extent that we borrow money to make investments, our net investment income will be dependent upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest these funds. In periods of rising interest rates, our cost of funds would increase, which may reduce our net investment income. As a result, there can be no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income.

40


As of December 31, 2019, we had six investments with an aggregate principal balance of $47.1 million that provides for interest income indexed to LIBOR, all of which are subject to a LIBOR floor. A decrease of 1% in LIBOR would have no impact on our annual interest income because the interest rates are protected by a LIBOR floor in the respective loan agreements. An increase of 1% in LIBOR would increase our annual interest income by $0.1 million.
We may hedge against interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments, such as futures, options and forward contracts, subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act. While hedging activities may insulate us against adverse changes in interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in benefits of lower interest rates with respect to our portfolio of investments with fixed interest rates. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the transition period ended December 31, 2018 and the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, we did not engage in interest rate hedging activities.
In addition, we may have risks regarding portfolio valuation. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies — Valuation of Investments.” 
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that we would meet our disclosure obligations.
Evaluation of Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined
in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of Terra Income Advisors, and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements in our financial statements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

41


Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of Terra Income Advisors (performing functions equivalent to those a principal executive officer and principal financial officer of our company would perform if we had any officers), we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on its evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The rules of the SEC do not require, and this Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include, an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the most recent fiscal quarter, there was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting, as defined under Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate governance.
Set forth below is information concerning our directors and executive officers.
Board of Directors and Executive Officers
Our Board consists of four members, three of whom are not “interested persons” with respect to us or Terra Income Advisors as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. We refer to these individuals as our independent directors. Members of the Board will be elected annually at our annual meeting of stockholders. We are prohibited from making loans or extending credit, directly or indirectly, to our directors or executive officers under Section 402 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act.
Through its direct oversight role, and indirectly through its committees, the Board performs a risk oversight function for us consisting of, among other things, the following activities: (i) at regular and special Board meetings, and on an ad hoc basis, receiving and reviewing reports related to our performance and operations; (ii) reviewing and approving, as applicable, our compliance policies and procedures; (iii) meeting with the portfolio management team to review investment strategies, techniques and the processes used to manage related risks; (iv) meeting with, or reviewing reports prepared by, the representatives of key service providers, including our investment adviser, administrator, distributor, transfer agent, custodian and independent registered public accounting firm, to review and discuss our activities and to provide direction with respect thereto; (v) engaging the services of our chief compliance officer to test our compliance procedures and our service providers; and (vi) on a quarterly basis, approving the continuance of the Servicing Plan and the payments of service fees thereunder. Mr. Uppal, who is not an independent director, serves as Chairman of the Board. The Board feels that Mr. Uppal is the director with the most knowledge of our business strategy and is best situated to serve as Chairman of the Board. Our charter, as well as regulations governing BDCs generally, requires that a majority of the Board be independent directors. The Board does not currently have a lead independent director. The Board, after considering various factors, has concluded that this structure is appropriate given our current size and complexity.
Directors
Information regarding the Board is set forth below. We have divided the directors into two groups: interested director and independent directors. The address for each director is c/o Terra Income Fund 6, Inc., 550 Fifth Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10036.
NAME
 
AGE
 
DIRECTOR
SINCE
 
EXPIRATION
OF TERM
Interested Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vikram S. Uppal *
 
36
 
2019
 
2020
Independent Directors
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jeffrey M. Altman
 
46
 
2016
 
2019**
Spencer E. Goldenberg
 
37
 
2019
 
2021
Robert E. Marks
 
68
 
2015
 
2020

42


* On November 12, 2019, Bruce D. Batkin notified the Board of his resignation as a director and Chairmen of the Board, effective immediately. On November 12, 2019, the Board elected Vikram S. Uppal, our Chief Executive Officer, to fill the vacancy on the Board and appointed Mr. Uppal as Chairman of the Board, effective immediately. Mr. Uppal will serve as a Class II director of the Board and Chairman of the Board until the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is elected and dully qualified.
** Class III directorship expired in 2019. However, no Class III directors were elected at the designated time. Pursuant to Maryland General Corporation Law Section 2-405, Mr. Altman shall continue to manage our business and affairs as a Class III director until his successor is elected and qualifies.
Interested Director
Vikram S. Uppal has served as the Chairman of the Board since November 2019 and as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Adviser since April 2019, and the Chief Executive Officer of Terra Capital Partners since December 2018. Mr. Uppal has also served as a director of TPT and Terra REIT Advisors since February 8, 2018 and as Chief Executive Officer of TPT and Terra REIT Advisors since December 1, 2018. Prior to joining Terra Capital Partners, Mr. Uppal was a Partner and Head of Real Estate at Axar since 2016. Prior to Axar, Mr. Uppal was a Managing Director on the Investment Team at Fortress Investment Group’s Credit and Real Estate Funds from 2015 to 2016. From 2012 to 2015, Mr. Uppal worked at Mount Kellett Capital Management, a private investment organization, where he served as Co-Head of North American Real Estate Investments. Mr. Uppal holds a B.S. from the University of St. Thomas and a M.S. from Columbia University.
Independent Directors
Jeffrey M. Altman has served as one of our independent directors since April 2016 and as a member of the board of directors of TPT since October 2017. Since May 2019, Mr. Altman has been a Managing Director and Co-Head of U.S. Lodging & Leisure within the real estate, gaming and lodging investment banking group (REGAL) of Jefferies LLC, an investment bank. From July 2011 to May 2019, Mr. Altman was a Managing Director in Houlihan Lokey’s real estate and lodging investment banking group and from December 1998 to May 2011, he served as a Director of Lazard Fréres & Co. LLC REGAL, where he led the firm’s global hospitality and leisure effort. Mr. Altman has advised on over $100 billion of real estate transactions in his career and is a frequent speaker at real estate and lodging conferences. He is currently a member of the New York Hospitality Council, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, the International Council of Shopping Centers and the Samuel Zell and Robert Lurie Real Estate Center of the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Altman received a B.S., magna cum laude, with a concentration in accounting and finance, and an M.B.A., with a concentration in finance, from the John M. Olin School of Business at Washington University.
Spencer E. Goldenberg has served as our independent director since April 2019 and a member of the board of directors of TPT since February 2018. He has served since June 2015 as Vice President of Corporate Development at Menin Hospitality. Prior to his time at Menin, Mr. Goldenberg was employed as an accountant at the firm of Gerstle, Rosen & Goldenberg P.A. from February 2008 to June 2015. From October 2005 until February 2008, he served as a legislative aide to Florida State Senator Gwen Margolis. Mr. Goldenberg holds an active certified public accountant's license in the state of Florida. He holds a Bachelor of Arts in International Affairs from Florida State University.
Robert E. Marks has served as one of our independent directors since March 2015. Since 1994, Mr. Marks has been the President of Marks Ventures, LLC, a private equity investment firm. From 1982 to 1994, he served in the capacities of both Managing Director and Vice President for Carl Marks & Co. Inc., where he was co‑head of the firm’s leveraged buyout investing activity. From 1978 to 1982, he was a corporate finance associate with Dillon, Read & Co. Inc., an investment banking firm. From 1974 to 1976, he worked for the Export‑Import Bank of the United States, performing research and analysis on the economic fundamentals underpinning particular loan proposals. Mr. Marks was Chairman of the Board of Directors of Denny’s Corporation (NASDAQ: DENN) from 2004 through 2006 and is currently a director, the Chair of the Audit and Finance Committee and a member of the Corporate Governance Committee. He is currently the Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Corporate Governance Committee of Trans World Entertainment Corporation (NASDAQ: TWMC). Until July 2014, he served as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for Emeritus Corporation (formerly NYSE: ESC). Mr. Marks also serves on the board of directors of two private companies, Harris Environmental Systems LLC and Pacific Tool Inc., and on the board of trustees for one charitable organization, the Greenwich, Connecticut Public Library. He served on the board of trustees of The International Rescue Committee until February 2015 and is currently an overseer. From 2005 to 2013 Mr. Marks was a member of the Board of Trustees of the Fisher House Foundation. Until January 2015, he also served on the board of trustees of one private club, The Field Club of Greenwich. From 2010 through 2015, Mr. Marks served on the Stanford University Alumni Committee on Trustee Nominations, which is responsible for selecting members to the university’s board of trustees. Mr. Marks received a B.A. and an M.A. in Economics, Phi Beta Kappa and with distinction and departmental honors, from Stanford University in 1974 and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School in 1978 with a concentration in Finance and General Management.

43


Executive Officers
The following persons serve as our executive officers in the following capacities:
NAME
 
AGE
 
POSITION(S) HELD*
Vikram S. Uppal
 
36
 
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
Gregory M. Pinkus
 
55
 
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
Daniel J. Cooperman
 
45
 
Chief Originations Officer
*On November 12, 2019, Michael S. Cardello notified the Board of his resignations as Chief Compliance Officer, effective immediately. On the same day, the Board appointed Bernadette Murphy of Vigilant Compliance, LLC (“Vigilant”) to serve as our Chief Compliance Officer, effective immediately, pursuant to a services agreement between us and Vigilant.
The address for each executive officer is c/o Terra Income Fund 6, Inc., 550 Fifth Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10036.
Executive Officers Who are Directors
For information regarding the business experience of Mr. Uppal, see “- Interested Director” above.
Executive Officers Who are Not Directors
Gregory M. Pinkus has served as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary since May 2013 and our Chief Operating Officer since July 2014. He has also served as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Terra Income Advisors since February 2015 and July 2014, respectively. Mr. Pinkus has served as (i) the Chief Financial Officer of Terra Capital Advisors, LLC (“Terra Capital Advisors”), Terra Capital Advisors 2, LLC (“Terra Capital Advisors 2”) and Terra Income Advisors 2, LLC (“Terra Income Advisors 2”) since May 2012, September 2012 and October 2016, respectively; (ii) the Chief Operating Officer of each of Terra Capital Advisors, Terra Capital Advisors 2 and Terra Capital Partners since July 2014; (iii) the Chief Operating Officer of Terra Income Advisors 2 since October 2016; (iv) the Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary and Treasurer, of each of Terra Secured Income Fund (“TSIF”), Terra Secured Income Fund 2 (“TSIF 2”), Terra Secured Income Fund 3 (“TSIF 3”), Terra Secured Income Fund 4 (“TSIF 4”) and TSIF 5 since May 2012 and July 2014, respectively; and (v) the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Terra Secured Income Fund 5 International (“Terra International”), Terra Income Fund International (“TIFI”), TSIF 7, TPT and TPT 2 since June 2014, October 2016, October 2016, January 2016 and September 2016, respectively. Prior to joining Terra Capital Partners in May 2012, he served as Assistant Controller for W.P. Carey & Co. from 2006 to August 2010 and as Controller from August 2010 to May 2012. Mr. Pinkus also served as Controller and Vice President of Finance for several early‑stage technology companies during the period of 1999 to 2005. Additionally, he managed large‑scale information technology budgets at New York Life Insurance Company from 2003 to 2004 and oversaw an international reporting group at Bank of America from 1992 to 1996. Mr. Pinkus is a Certified Public Accountant and member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. He holds a B.S. in Accounting from the Leonard N. Stern School of Business at New York University.
Daniel J. Cooperman has served as our Chief Originations Officer since February 2015, having previously served as our Managing Director of Originations from May 2013 until February 2015. He has also served as Chief Originations Officer of Terra Income Advisors since February 2015. Mr. Cooperman has served as Chief Originations Officer of (i) each of Terra Capital Advisors and Terra Capital Advisors 2 since January 2015, having previously served as Managing Director of Originations until January 2015 of Terra Capital Advisors and Terra Capital Advisors 2 since April 2009 and September 2012, respectively; (ii) each of TSIF 2, TSIF 3, TSIF 4, TSIF 5 and Terra International since January 2015, having previously served as Managing Director of Originations until January 2015 of TSIF, TSIF 2, TSIF 3, TSIF 4, TSIF 5 and Terra International since July 2009, May 2011, January 2012, September 2012, August 2013 and June 2014, respectively; (iii) TPT since January 2016; (iv) TPT2 since September 2016; and (v) each of Terra Income Advisors 2, TIFI, TSIF 7 since October 2016. Mr. Cooperman has 18 years’ experience in the acquisition, financing, leasing and asset management of commercial real estate with an aggregate value of over $5 billion. Prior to the formation of Terra Capital Partners in 2001 and its commencement of operations in 2002, Mr. Cooperman handled mortgage and mezzanine placement activities for The Greenwich Group International, LLC. Prior to joining The Greenwich Group International, LLC, Mr. Cooperman worked in Chase Manhattan Bank’s Global Properties Group, where he was responsible for financial analysis and due diligence for the bank’s strategic real estate acquisitions and divestitures. Prior to that time, he was responsible for acquisitions and asset management for JGS, a Japanese conglomerate with global real estate holdings. Mr. Cooperman holds a B.S. in Finance from the University of Colorado at Boulder.
The officers of our company may also include one or more vice presidents and other officers in accordance with our bylaws. In addition, the Board may, from time to time, elect such other officers with such powers and duties as it shall deem necessary or desirable.

44


Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, our directors and executive officers, and any persons holding more than 10% of its common stock, are required to report their beneficial ownership and any changes therein to us and the SEC. Specific due dates for those reports have been established, and we are required to report herein any failure to file such reports by those due dates. Based solely on a review of the copies of such reports and written representations delivered to us by such persons, we believe that there were no violations of Section 16(a) by such persons during the year ended December 31, 2019, except that each of Jeffrey M. Altman, Spencer E. Goldenberg and Vikram S. Uppal did not timely file a Form 3 with the SEC to report a transaction.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) pursuant to Rule 17j‑1 of the 1940 Act, which applies to, among others, our senior officers, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as well as every officer, director, employee and “access person” (as defined within the Code of Ethics) of the Company.
Audit Committee
We have established an audit committee of the Board (the “Audit Committee”) that operates pursuant to a charter and consists of three members. The Audit Committee is responsible for selecting, engaging and supervising our independent accountants, reviewing the plans, scope and results of the audit engagement with our independent accountants, approving professional services provided by our independent accountants (including compensation therefor), reviewing the independence of our independent accountants and reviewing the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Altman, Goldenberg and Marks, each of whom is independent. Mr. Goldenberg serves as the chairman of the Audit Committee. The Board has determined that Mr. Goldenberg is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under Item 407 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act. Mr. Goldenberg meets the current independence and experience requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Compensation of Directors
Our directors who do not also serve in an executive officer capacity for us or Terra Income Advisors are entitled to receive annual cash retainer fees, fees for attending board and committee meetings and annual fees for serving as a committee chairperson. These director nominees are Messrs. Altman, Goldenberg and Marks. The above directors will receive an annual fee of $20,000, plus $2,500 for each board meeting attended in person, $1,000 for each board meeting attended via teleconference and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended. In addition, the chairman of the Audit Committee will receive an annual fee of $7,500 and the chairman of each of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Valuation Committee, and any other committee, will receive an annual fee of $2,500 for their additional services. We will also reimburse each of the above directors for all reasonable and authorized business expenses in accordance with our policies as in effect from time to time, including reimbursement of reasonable out‑of‑pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each board meeting and each committee meeting not held concurrently with a board meeting. We do not pay compensation to our directors who also serve in an executive officer capacity for us or Terra Income Advisors.
The following table sets forth compensation of our directors for the year ended December 31, 2019:
Name
 
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
 
All Other
Compensation
 
Total
Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interested Director
Vikram S. Uppal
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Independent Directors
Jeffrey M. Altman
 
$
39,000

 
$
—

 
$
39,000

Michael L. Evans *
 
$
14,264

 
$
—

 
$
14,264

Spencer Goldenberg *
 
$
29,736

 
$
—

 
$
29,736

Robert E. Marks
 
$
39,000

 
$
—

 
$
39,000

* On April 25, 2019, we held our annual meeting of stockholders, at which time the appointment of Mr. Goldenberg as an independent director to replace Mr. Evans was approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting.

45


Compensation of Executive Officers
Our executive officers do not receive any direct compensation from us. We do not currently have any employees and do not expect to have any employees. Services necessary for our business are provided by individuals who are employees of Terra Income Advisors or by individuals who were contracted by us or by Terra Income Advisors to work on behalf of us pursuant to the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement. Each of our executive officers is an employee of Terra Income Advisors, or one of its affiliates or an outside contractor, and the day-to-day investment operations and administration of our portfolio are managed by Terra Income Advisors. In addition, we reimburse Terra Income Advisors for our allocable portion of expenses incurred by Terra Income Advisors in performing its obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement, including the allocable portion of the cost of our officers and their respective staffs determined under the Investment Advisory Agreement.
The Investment Advisory Agreement provides that Terra Income Advisors and its officers, managers, controlling persons and any other person or entity affiliated with it acting as our agent will not be entitled to indemnification (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) for any liability or loss suffered by Terra Income Advisors or such other person, nor will Terra Income Advisors or such other person be held harmless for any loss or liability suffered by us, unless: (i) Terra Income Advisors or such other person has determined, in good faith, that the course of conduct which caused the loss or liability was in our best interests; (ii) Terra Income Advisors or such other person was acting on behalf of or performing services for us; (iii) the liability or loss suffered was not the result of negligence or misconduct by Terra Income Advisors or such other person acting as our agent; and (iv) the indemnification or agreement to hold Terra Income Advisors or such other person harmless for any loss or liability is only recoverable out of our net assets and not from our stockholders.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The following table sets forth, as of February 21, 2020, information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by:
•
any person known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock;
•
each member of the Board and each executive officer; and
•
all of the members of the Board and executive officers as a group.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities. There are no shares of our common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 21, 2020. Ownership information for those persons who beneficially own 5% or more of our shares of common stock is based upon reports filed by such persons with the SEC and other information obtained from such persons, if available. Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that each beneficial owner set forth in the table below has sole voting and investment power. Our directors are divided into two groups: interested directors and independent directors. Interested directors are “interested persons” of the Company as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.
 
 
Shares Beneficially Owned
as of February 21, 2020
Name (1)
 
Number of
Shares
 
Percentage (2)
Interested Director
 
 
 
 
Vikram S. Uppal
 
—
 
—
Independent Directors
Jeffrey M. Altman
 
—
 
—
Spencer Goldenberg
 
—
 
—
Robert E. Marks
 
—
 
—
Executive Officers
Gregory M. Pinkus
 
—
 
—
Daniel J. Cooperman
 
—
 
—
All officers and directors as a group (7 persons)
 
—
 
—
_______________
(1)
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner is c/o Terra Capital Partners, LLC, 550 Fifth Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, New York 10036.
(2)
Based on a total of 8,252,073 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of February 21, 2020.

46


Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
We have procedures in place for the review, approval and monitoring of transactions involving the Company and certain persons related to us. For example, our Code of Ethics generally prohibits any employee, officer or director from engaging in any transaction where there is a conflict between such individual’s personal interest and the interests of the Company and requires that those parties submit quarterly transactions reports and annual holdings reports to our Chief Compliance Officer. Our Chief Compliance Officer is required to review and approve all related-party transactions (as defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act). Any amendment or waiver of the Code of Ethics for any executive officer or director must be approved by the Board and publicly disclosed as required by applicable law and regulations.
Compensation of Terra Income Advisors and Terra Capital Markets
Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, we pay Terra Income Advisors a base management fee and an incentive fee. We commenced accruing fees under the Investment Advisory Agreement on June 24, 2015, upon commencement of our operations.
The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2% of our average gross assets. The base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears and is calculated based on the average value of our gross assets at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters. The base management fee may or may not be taken in whole or in part at the discretion of Terra Income Advisors. All or any part of the base management fee not taken as to any quarter will be deferred without interest and may be taken in such other quarter as Terra Income Advisors shall determine. The base management fee for any partial month or quarter will be prorated for such partial period.
The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part, which we refer to as the subordinated incentive fee on income, is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based upon our “pre-incentive fee net investment income” for the immediately preceding quarter. The subordinated incentive fee on income is subject to a quarterly hurdle rate, expressed as a rate of return on adjusted capital at the beginning of the most recently completed calendar quarter, of 2% (8% annualized), subject to a “catch-up” feature. For this purpose, “pre-incentive fee net investment income” means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees, other than fees for providing managerial assistance, such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that we receive from portfolio companies) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus our operating expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses reimbursed to Terra Income Advisors under the Investment Advisory Agreement and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with payment-in-kind interest and zero-coupon securities), accrued income that we have not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. The calculation of the subordinated incentive fee on income for each quarter is as follows:
•
No incentive fee is payable to Terra Income Advisors in any calendar quarter in which our pre-incentive fee net investment income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2% (8% annualized);
•
100% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5% in any calendar quarter (10% annualized) is payable to Terra Income Advisors, all or any portion of which may be waived or deferred in Terra Income Advisors’ discretion. We refer to this portion of our pre-incentive fee net investment income (which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5%) as the “catch-up.” The catch-up provision is intended to provide Terra Income Advisors with an incentive fee of 20% on all of our pre-incentive fee net investment income when our pre-incentive fee net investment income reaches 2.5% in any calendar quarter; and
•
20% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any calendar quarter (10% annualized) is payable to Terra Income Advisors once the hurdle rate is reached and the catch-up is achieved.
The second part of the incentive fee, which we refer to as the incentive fee on capital gains, is an incentive fee on capital gains earned on liquidated investments from the portfolio and is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement). This fee equals 20% of our incentive fee on capital gains, which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of the applicable period, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gains incentive fees. On a quarterly basis, we accrue (but do not pay) for the unrealized capital gains incentive fee by calculating such fee as if it were due and payable as of the end of such period.
We reimburse Terra Income Advisors for expenses necessary to perform services related to our administration and operation. The amount of this reimbursement is set at the lesser of (i) Terra Income Advisors’ actual costs incurred in providing such services and (ii) the amount that the Board, including a majority of our independent directors, estimates we would be required to pay alternative service providers for comparable services in the same geographic location. Terra Income Advisors is required to allocate the cost of such services to us based on objective factors such as total assets, revenues, time allocations or other reasonable metrics.

47


The Board then assesses the reasonableness of such reimbursements based on the breadth, depth and quality of such services as compared to the estimated cost to us of obtaining similar services from third-party providers known to be available. In addition, the Board considers whether any single third-party service provider would be capable of providing all such services at comparable cost and quality. Finally, the Board compares the total amount paid to Terra Income Advisors for such services as a percentage of our net assets to the same ratio as reported by other comparable BDCs. We do not reimburse Terra Income Advisors for any services for which it receives a separate fee, or for rent, depreciation, utilities, capital equipment or other administrative items allocated to a controlling person of Terra Income Advisors.
Terra Income Advisors has funded our offering costs and organization costs. Organization expenses are expensed on our statements of operations. All offering costs incurred during the offering period are recorded as deferred charge and amortized over twelve months from the date the cost is incurred, with the exception of those costs that were incurred prior to the commencement of operations on June 24, 2015, which are being amortized over a 12-month period from that date forward. Terra Income Advisors is responsible for the payment of our cumulative organization and offering expenses to the extent such expenses exceed 1.5% of
the gross proceeds from the Offering, without recourse against or reimbursement by us. As a result, Terra Income Advisors paid for all organization and offering expenses in excess of 1.5% of the gross proceeds from the Offering. As of the end of the Offering on April 20, 2018 and September 30, 2017, Terra Income Advisors funded offering costs and organization costs in the amount of $3.6 million and $3.2 million, respectively. As of the end of the Offering on April 20, 2018, we were obligated to reimburse Terra Income Advisors $1.6 million of the cumulative offering costs and organizations incurred, all of which were reimbursed. For the year ended December 31, 2019 and the transition period ended December 31, 2018, we did not make any reimbursement payments to Terra Income Advisors for offering costs incurred on our behalf because the offering costs have been fully reimbursed. For the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, we made reimbursement payments of $0.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively, to Terra Income Advisors for offering costs incurred on our behalf.
Under the Dealer Manager Agreement, Terra Capital Markets is entitled to receive selling commissions, broker-dealer fees and dealer manager fees in connection with the sale of shares of common stock in the Offering, all or a portion of which may be re-allowed to selected broker-dealers. On April 27, 2016, we adopted the amended dealer manager agreement (the “Amended Dealer Manager Agreement”) to change the terms of the underwriting compensation. On September 30, 2017, we adopted the Servicing Plan and the Second Amended Dealer Manager Agreement to revise the terms of the servicing fee (which was previously referred to as a transaction charge). For the year ended December 31, 2019 and the transition period ended December 31, 2018, we did not incur any broker-dealer commissions and fees because the Offering ended on April 20, 2018. For the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, we incurred $0.9 million and $3.3 million of broker-dealer commissions and fees, respectively, and, of this amount, $0.7 million and $2.3 million were re-allowed to selected broker-dealers, respectively.
On June 30, 2015, we entered into an expense support agreement (the “Expense Support Agreement”) with Terra Income Advisors. Pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement, Terra Income Advisors has agreed to reimburse us for certain operating expenses for any period since inception, until we and Terra Income Advisors mutually agree otherwise. This payment (the “Expense Support Payment”)for any month shall be paid by Terra Income Advisors to us in any combination of cash or other immediately available funds, and/or offsets against amounts due from us to Terra Income Advisors. Reimbursement shall be made as promptly as possible on a date mutually agreed to by us and Terra Income Advisors provided that (i) the operating expense ratio, defined as Net Operating Expenses expressed as a percentage of our net assets on the relevant measurement date, as of such reimbursement date is equal to or less than the operating expense ratio as of the Expense Support Payment date attributable to such specified Expense Support Payment, (ii) the annualized distribution rate (exclusive of any U.S. GAAP return of capital) as of such reimbursement date is equal to or greater than the annualized distribution rate as of the Expense Support Payment date attributable to such specified Expense Support Payment; (iii) such reimbursement date is not later than three years following such specified Expense Support Payment date; and (iv) the Expense Support Payment does not cause our Net Operating Expenses to exceed 1.5% of our net assets attributable to common shares, after taking such reimbursement into account. Terra Income Advisors is entitled to reimbursement of all previously unreimbursed Expense Support Payments in the event of termination of the Expense Support Agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the transition period ended December 31, 2018 and the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, we did not record any Expense Support Payment. As of December 31, 2019, we have not reimbursed Terra Income Advisors for any Expense Support Payments because the conditions for reimbursement have not been met. As of December 31, 2019, all of the Expense Support Payments are no longer eligible for reimbursement because the three-year period has elapsed.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Terra Income Advisors, our investment adviser, and its affiliates who currently serve as the investment manager to the Terra Income Funds, share the same senior management and investment team. While Terra Income Advisors intends to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner consistent with our investment objectives and strategies, if necessary, so that we will not be disadvantaged in relation to any other client of Terra Income Advisors, it is possible that some investment opportunities may be provided to the Terra Income Funds rather than to us.

48


Distributions
Distributions to our stockholders are recorded as of the applicable record date. Subject to the discretion of the Board and applicable legal restrictions, we intend to authorize and declare ordinary cash distributions on either a monthly or quarterly basis and pay such distributions on a monthly basis. Net realized capital gains, if any, will be distributed or deemed distributed at least annually.
Capital Gains Incentive Fee
Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the incentive fee on capital gains earned on liquidated investments of our portfolio is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement). Such fee equals 20% of our incentive fee on capital gains (i.e., its realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of the applicable period, net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis), less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gains incentive fees. Once any amount of this fee has been earned, on a quarterly basis, we accrue (but do not pay) for the unrealized capital gains incentive fee by calculating such fee as if it were due and payable as of the end of such period.
Exemptive Relief
The SEC has granted us exemptive relief from the provisions of Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the 1940 Act, thereby permitting us, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, to co-invest in certain privately negotiated investment transactions with our Co-Investment Affiliates. However, we will be prohibited from engaging in certain transactions with our affiliates even under the terms of this exemptive order. We believe the relief granted to us under this exemptive order may not only enhance our ability to further our investment objectives and strategies, but may also increase favorable investment opportunities for us, in part by allowing us to participate in larger investments, together with our Co-Investment Affiliates, than would be available to us in the absence of such relief.
On April 19, 2016, the Board approved the Amended Dealer Manager Agreement. Under the terms of the Amended Dealer Manager Agreement, Terra Capital Markets receives selling commissions, dealer manager fees and broker-dealer fees of 3.0%, 1.5% and 1.0%, respectively, of gross proceeds from the Offering, all or a portion of which may be re-allowed to selected broker-dealers for marketing and expenses. In addition, Terra Capital Markets received a transaction charge at an annual rate of 1.125% of gross offering proceeds, excluding shares sold through the DRIP. The transaction charge was payable annually with respect to each share sold in the primary offering on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the month of purchase.
On September 30, 2017, the Board approved the Servicing Plan and the Second Amended Dealer Manager Agreement, which revised the terms of the servicing fee (which was previously referred to as a transaction charge). Pursuant to the Servicing Plan, Terra Capital Markets receives a servicing fee at an annual rate of 1.125% of the most recently published NAV per share of our common stock, excluding shares sold through the DRIP, in exchange for providing certain administrative support services. With respect to each share sold, the servicing fee will be payable annually on the anniversary of the applicable month of purchase. Terra Capital Markets, in its discretion, may re-allow a portion of such servicing fee to participating dealers for performing certain administrative support services. In connection with the adoptions of the Second Amended Dealer Manager Agreement and the Servicing Plan, we reduced the previously recorded transaction charges and as of September 30, 2017, there was no transaction charge payable outstanding.
In connection with the approval of the Amended Dealer Manager Agreement, Terra Capital Markets reimbursed us an amount equal to the transaction charges expected to be paid on all outstanding shares of common stock as of April 27, 2016. Both Terra Capital Markets and Terra Income Advisors are subsidiaries of Terra Capital Partners, our sponsor. Therefore, the transaction charge reimbursement, the Amended Dealer Manager Agreement and the Second Amended Dealer Manager Agreement may be deemed a “joint enterprise or other joint arrangement” within the meaning of the 1940 Act and the rules promulgated thereunder. Accordingly, to eliminate any uncertainty, we applied for and were granted exemptive relief from the provisions of Section 57(a)(4) of the 1940 Act and Rule 17d-1 under the 1940 Act by the SEC, pursuant to an exemptive order permitting Terra Capital Markets, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, to effect the transaction charge reimbursement.
Director Independence
In accordance with our charter, the Board consists of a majority of independent directors. We do not consider a director independent unless the Board has determined that he or she has no material relationship with us and is therefore not an “interested person,” as defined by Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. We monitor the relationships of our directors and officers through the activities of the nominating and corporate governance committee of the Board (the “Nominating Committee”) and through a questionnaire each director completes no less frequently than annually and updates periodically as information provided in the most recent questionnaire changes. The Board limits membership on the Audit Committee and the Nominating Committee to independent directors and requires that the valuation committee of the Board have at least two independent directors as members.

49


The Board has determined that each of the directors and the director nominees are independent and has no material relationship with the Company, except as a director and stockholder of the Company, with the exception of Vikram S. Uppal. Mr. Uppal is an interested person of the Company due to their positions as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, respectively, of the Company and of Terra Income Advisors.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the transition period ended December 31, 2018 and the year ended September 30, 2018, KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) served as our independent auditor and provided certain tax and other services. The Audit Committee currently anticipates that it will engage KPMG as our independent auditor to audit our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2020, subject to agreeing on fee estimates for the audit work. The Audit Committee reserves the right, however, to select a new auditor at any time in the future in its discretion if it deems such decision to be in the best interests of us and our stockholders. Any such decision would be disclosed to the stockholders in accordance with applicable securities laws.
Audit Fees
The following table displays fees for professional services by KPMG for the year ended December 31, 2019, the transition period ended December 31, 2018 and the year ended September 30, 2018:
 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
Transition Period Ended
December 31, 2018
 
Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2018
Audit Fees
$
216,500

 
$
120,000

 
$
241,500

Audit-Related Fees
—

 
—

 
—

Tax Fees
34,000

 
16,240

 
20,450

All Other Fees
—

 
—

 
—

Total
$
250,500

 
$
136,240

 
$
261,950

Audit Fees.  Audit fees include fees for services that normally would be provided by KPMG in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and that generally only an independent accountant can provide. In addition to fees for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our quarterly financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), this category contains fees for comfort letters, statutory audits, consents, and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
Audit-Related Fees.  Audit-related services consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include attest services that are not required by statute or regulation and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
Tax Services Fees.  Tax services fees consist of fees billed for professional tax services. These services also include assistance regarding federal, state, and local tax compliance.
All Other Fees.  Other fees would include fees for products and services other than the services reported above.
Pre-Approval Policies
We have established a pre-approval policy that describes the permitted audit, audit-related, tax and other services to be provided by our independent auditor. Pursuant to this policy, the Audit Committee will pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by our independent auditor in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. Any requests for audit, audit-related, tax and other services that have not received general pre-approval must be submitted to the Audit Committee for specific pre-approval in accordance with the pre-approval policy, irrespective of the amount of fees associated with such services, and cannot commence until such approval has been granted. Normally, pre-approval is provided at the regularly scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee. However, the Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated must report any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee does not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by our independent auditor to management. All services rendered by KPMG for the year ended December 31, 2019, the transition period ended December 31, 2018 and the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 were pre-approved in accordance with the policies set forth above.

50


PART IV
Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
(1) Financial Statements
The following financial statements are set forth on Item 8:
(2) Financial Statement Schedule
None
(3) Exhibits
Exhibit No.
 
Description and Method of Filing
3.1
 
3.2
 
3.3
 
4.1
 
4.2
 
4.3*
 
10.1
 
10.2
 
10.3
 
10.4
 

51


* Filed herewith.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
None.

52



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of Terra Income Fund 6, Inc. (the Company), including the schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2019, the three-month transition period ended December 31, 2018, and the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2019, the three-month transition period ended December 31, 2018, and the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of investments owned as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, by correspondence with custodian and portfolio companies. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.
New York, New York
February 21, 2020





F-1


Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
 
December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
Assets
 
 
 
Investments, at fair value - non-controlled (amortized cost of $17,938,033 and
   $23,031,840, respectively)
$
18,598,767

 
$
23,571,020

Investment through participation interest, at fair value — non-controlled (amortized cost
   of $43,026,580 and $55,496,493, respectively) (Note 4)
43,237,452

 
55,915,765

Total investments
61,836,219

 
79,486,785

Cash and cash equivalents
17,057,558

 
6,072,043

Restricted cash
624,141

 
1,300,021

Interest receivable
529,819

 
669,404

Prepaid expenses and other assets
58,812

 
69,133

Total assets
80,106,549

 
87,597,386

Liabilities
 
 
 
Obligations under participation agreements, at fair value (proceeds of $3,120,888 and $0,
   respectively) (Note 4)
3,204,263

 
—

Interest reserve and other deposits held on investments
624,141

 
1,300,021

Due to Adviser, net
517,404

 
593,027

Accrued expenses
266,950

 
375,075

Interest payable from obligations under participation agreements
34,937

 
—

Distributions payable
—

 
—

Other liabilities
80,766

 
290,244

Total liabilities
4,728,461

 
2,558,367

Net assets
$
75,378,088

 
$
85,039,019

Commitments and contingencies (See Note 5)
 
 
 
Components of net assets:
 
 
 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 450,000,000 shares authorized, and 8,232,636 and
   8,975,103 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
$
8,233

 
$
8,975

Capital in excess of par
74,872,851

 
84,566,421

Accumulated distributable net income
497,004

 
463,623

Net assets
$
75,378,088

 
$
85,039,019

Net asset value per share
$
9.16

 
$
9.47


See notes to financial statements.


F-2


Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.
Statements of Operations

 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
Transition Period Ended December 31, 2018
 
Years Ended September 30,
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
Investment income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest income
$
9,242,765

 
$
2,635,214

 
$
8,649,725

 
$
4,916,169

Prepayment fee income
675,779

 
—

 
—

 
63,960

Other fee income
87,313

 
14,161

 
101,371

 
277,596

Total investment income
10,005,857

 
2,649,375

 
8,751,096

 
5,257,725

Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Base management fees
1,594,165

 
424,550

 
1,684,442

 
1,202,568

Incentive fees on capital gains (1)
(32,884
)
 
30,846

 
39,172

 
90,459

Operating expense reimbursement to Adviser (Note 4)
897,816

 
234,191

 
879,892

 
530,619

Servicing fees (Note 2, Note 4)
844,429

 
229,192

 
922,607

 
—

Professional fees
1,079,139

 
516,625

 
1,451,933

 
1,071,089

Interest expense from obligations under participation
   agreements (Note 4)
159,904

 
58,221

 
239,783

 
838,860

Marketing expenses
—

 
—

 
327,168

 
777,058

Amortization of deferred offering costs
—

 
—

 
114,132

 
375,748

Directors’ fees
122,000

 
34,625

 
117,875

 
113,000

Insurance expense
213,837

 
52,977

 
212,771

 
213,870

Interest expense on mortgage loan payable
—

 
—

 
—

 
35,974

General and administrative expenses
115,999

 
9,828

 
37,333

 
114,491

Total operating expenses
4,994,405

 
1,591,055

 
6,027,108

 
5,363,736

Less: Reduction of offering costs
—

 
—

 
—

 
(944,248
)
Net operating expenses
4,994,405

 
1,591,055

 
6,027,108

 
4,419,488

Net investment income
5,011,452

 
1,058,320

 
2,723,988

 
838,237

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments
(86,846
)
 
143,358

 
205,961

 
416,920

Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on
   obligations under participation agreements
(73,474
)
 
10,871

 
13,934

 
27,767

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
$
4,851,132

 
$
1,212,549

 
$
2,943,883

 
$
1,282,924

Per common share data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment income per share
$
0.57

 
$
0.12

 
$
0.31

 
$
0.15

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
   per share
$
0.56

 
$
0.13

 
$
0.34

 
$
0.23

Weighted average common shares outstanding
8,738,650

 
8,993,646

 
8,663,812

 
5,691,428

_______________
(1)
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company reversed $32,884 of incentive fees which were previously accrued. Incentive fees on capital gains are based on 20% of net unrealized capital gains. No incentive fees on capital gains are actually payable by the Company with respect to unrealized gains unless and until those gains are realized.
 
See notes to financial statements.

F-3


Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
Transition Period Ended December 31, 2018
 
Years Ended September 30,
 
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
Operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment income
 
$
5,011,452

 
$
1,058,320

 
$
2,723,988

 
$
838,237

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments
 
(86,846
)
 
143,358

 
205,961

 
416,920

Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on
   obligations under participation agreements
 
(73,474
)
 
10,871

 
13,934

 
27,767

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
 
4,851,132

 
1,212,549

 
2,943,883

 
1,282,924

Stockholder distributions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Distributions from return of capital
 
(2,801,281
)
 
(876,881
)
 
(4,665,786
)
 
(4,631,433
)
Distributions from net investment income
 
(4,817,753
)
 
(1,098,653
)
 
(2,887,713
)
 
(467,761
)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from stockholder
   distributions
 
(7,619,034
)
 
(1,975,534
)
 
(7,553,499
)
 
(5,099,194
)
Capital share transactions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of common stock
 
60,000

 
—

 
17,262,662

 
35,108,677

Reinvestment of stockholder distributions
 
2,213,069

 
613,297

 
2,283,295

 
1,696,283

Selling commissions and dealer manager fees
 
—

 
—

 
(914,494
)
 
(3,324,658
)
Reduction of transaction charge payable (Note 4)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
3,195,513

Offering costs
 
(900
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

Repurchases of common stock under stock repurchase
   plan
 
(9,165,198
)
 
(584,703
)
 
(3,582,730
)
 
—

Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from
   capital share transactions
 
(6,893,029
)
 
28,594

 
15,048,733

 
36,675,815

Net (decrease) increase in net assets
 
(9,660,931
)
 
(734,391
)
 
10,439,117

 
32,859,545

Net assets, at beginning of period
 
85,039,019

 
85,773,410

 
75,334,293

 
42,474,748

Net assets, at end of period
 
$
75,378,088

 
$
85,039,019

 
$
85,773,410

 
$
75,334,293

Accumulated (over-distributed) net investment income
 
$
(301,129
)
 
$
(494,829
)
 
$
(454,496
)
 
$
(404,902
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital share activity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shares outstanding, at beginning of period
 
8,975,103

 
8,972,358

 
7,530,130

 
4,222,358

Shares issued from subscriptions
 
6,276

 
—

 
1,587,124

 
3,148,661

Shares issued from reinvestment of stockholder
   distributions
 
236,743

 
63,906

 
221,864

 
159,111

Shares repurchased under stock repurchase plan
   and other
 
(985,486
)
 
(61,161
)
 
(366,760
)
 
—

Shares outstanding, at end of period
 
8,232,636

 
8,975,103

 
8,972,358

 
7,530,130

 
See notes to financial statements.


F-4


Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.
Statements of Cash Flows
 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
Transition Period Ended December 31, 2018
 
Years Ended September 30,
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
$
4,851,132

 
$
1,212,549

 
$
2,943,883

 
$
1,282,924

Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net
  cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments
86,846

 
(143,358
)
 
(205,961
)
 
(416,920
)
Net change in unrealized appreciation on obligations under participation
agreements
73,474

 
(10,871
)
 
(13,934
)
 
(27,767
)
Amortization of deferred offering costs
—

 
—

 
114,132

 
375,748

Amortization and accretion of investment-related fees, net
(463,910
)
 
(181,033
)
 
(489,380
)
 
(277,558
)
Amortization of discount on investments
(8,573
)
 
(2,143
)
 
(8,571
)
 
96,846

Paid-in-kind interest, net
(91,878
)
 
(19,529
)
 
(161,266
)
 
(32,381
)
Purchases of investments
(19,385,437
)
 
(16,343,778
)
 
(31,935,831
)
 
(44,777,167
)
Repayments of investments
37,523,419

 
9,616,158

 
6,179,599

 
28,508,960

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Decrease in deferred offering costs
—

 
—

 
—

 
361,482

Decrease (increase) in interest receivable
139,585

 
(3,120
)
 
(228,283
)
 
(159,577
)
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets
10,321

 
(21,490
)
 
61,333

 
165,875

(Decrease) increase in interest reserve and other
   deposits held on investments
(675,880
)
 
(213,870
)
 
(33,516
)
 
710,973

(Decrease) increase in due to Adviser, net
(75,623
)
 
16,808

 
(245,840
)
 
(1,166,629
)
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses
(108,125
)
 
(65,034
)
 
194,161

 
27,588

Decrease in directors’ fees payable
—

 
—

 
(5,625
)
 
—

Increase (decrease) in interest payable from obligations
   under participation agreements
34,937

 
(16,250
)
 
—

 
(128,325
)
(Decrease) increase in payable for unsettled stock
   subscriptions
—

 
—

 
(226,642
)
 
226,642

(Decrease) increase in other liabilities
(209,478
)
 
17,349

 
191,396

 
(119,834
)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
21,700,810

 
(6,157,612
)
 
(23,870,345
)
 
(15,349,120
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from obligations under participation agreements
3,120,888

 
—

 
—

 
—

Issuance of common stock
60,000

 
—

 
17,262,662

 
35,108,677

Payments of selling commissions and dealer manager fees
—

 
—

 
(995,674
)
 
(2,239,699
)
Payments of offering costs
(900
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

Payments of stockholder distributions
(5,405,965
)
 
(1,362,237
)
 
(5,270,204
)
 
(3,402,911
)
Payments for repurchases of common stock under stock repurchase plan
(9,165,198
)
 
(584,703
)
 
(3,582,730
)
 
—

Repayments of obligations under participation
   agreements
—

 
(1,791,000
)
 
—

 
(12,863,770
)
Proceeds from mortgage financing
—

 
—

 
—

 
3,333,333

Repayments of mortgage financing
—

 
—

 
—

 
(3,333,333
)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(11,391,175
)
 
(3,737,940
)
 
7,414,054

 
16,602,297



F-5


Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.
Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
Transition Period Ended December 31, 2018
 
Years Ended September 30,
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents
   and restricted cash
10,309,635

 
(9,895,552
)
 
(16,456,291
)
 
1,253,177

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, at
   beginning of period
7,372,064

 
17,267,616

 
33,723,907

 
32,470,730

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, at end
   of period (Note 2)
$
17,681,699

 
$
7,372,064

 
$
17,267,616

 
$
33,723,907

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest paid on obligations under participation
   agreements
$
115,067

 
$
47,450

 
$
237,250

 
$
748,907

Supplemental non-cash information:
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Reinvestment of stockholder distributions
$
2,213,069

 
$
613,297

 
$
2,283,295

 
$
1,696,283

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

See notes to financial statements.

F-6


Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.
Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2019
Portfolio Company (1)
 
Collateral Location
 
Property 
Type
 
Coupon
Rate (2)
 
Current Interest Rate
 
Exit Fee
 
Acquisition Date
 
Maturity Date
 
Principal
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value (3)
 
% of Net Assets (4)
Investments — non-controlled
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Mezzanine loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hertz Clinton One Mezzanine, LLC
 
US - MS
 
Office
 
12.00%
 
12.00%
 
0.00%
 
3/18/2016
 
1/1/2025
 
$
2,500,000

 
$
2,457,144

 
$
2,706,405

 
3.6
%
Dwight Mezz II, LLC
 
US - CA
 
Student
housing
 
11.00%
 
11.00%
 
0.00%
 
5/11/2017
 
5/6/2027
 
3,000,000

 
3,000,000

 
3,075,315

 
4.1
%
Stonewall Station Mezz LLC (5)(7)
 
US - NC
 
Hotel
 
Current 12.00% PIK 2.00%
 
14.00%
 
1.00%
 
5/31/2018
 
5/20/2021
 
4,308,818

 
4,310,524

 
4,348,735

 
5.7
%
LD Milpitas Mezz, LP (5)(6)(8)
 
US - CA
 
Hotel
 
LIBOR + 10.25% (2.75% Floor)
 
13.00%
 
1.00%
 
6/27/2018
 
6/27/2021
 
12,483,552

 
12,480,889

 
12,817,047

 
17.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
22,248,557

 
22,947,502

 
30.4
%
Preferred equity investments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
City Gardens 333 LLC (5)(7)
 
US - CA
 
Student
housing
 
LIBOR + 9.95% (2.00% Floor)
 
11.95%
 
0.00%
 
4/11/2018
 
4/1/2021
 
3,926,961

 
3,906,762

 
3,928,089

 
5.2
%
RS JZ Driggs, LLC (5)(7)
 
US - NY
 
Multifamily
 
12.25%
 
12.25%
 
1.00%
 
5/1/2018
 
5/1/2020
 
4,100,000

 
4,127,222

 
4,138,668

 
5.5
%
Orange Grove Property Investors,
LLC (5)(7)
 
US - CA
 
Condominium
 
LIBOR + 8.00% (4.00% Floor)
 
12.00%
 
1.00%
 
5/24/2018
 
6/1/2021
 
8,480,000

 
8,484,231

 
8,556,332

 
11.3
%
NB Private Capital, LLC (5)(7)
 
Various
 
Student
housing
 
LIBOR + 10.50% (3.50% Floor)
 
14.00%
 
1.00%
 
7/27/2018
 
4/16/2021
 
3,333,333

 
3,306,795

 
3,363,464

 
4.5
%
370 Lex Part Deux, LLC (5)(7)
 
US - NY
 
Office
 
LIBOR + 8.25% (2.44% Floor)
 
10.69%
 
0.00%
 
12/17/2018
 
1/9/2022
 
16,922,482

 
16,871,046

 
16,882,760

 
22.4
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
36,696,056

 
36,869,313

 
48.9
%
First mortgages:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TSG-Parcel 1, LLC (5)(7)
 
US - CA
 
Land
 
LIBOR + 10.00% (2.00% Floor)
 
12.00%
 
1.00%
 
7/10/2015
 
3/31/2020
 
2,000,000

 
2,020,000

 
2,019,404

 
2.7
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,020,000

 
2,019,404

 
2.7
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Investments — non-controlled
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
$
60,964,613

 
$
61,836,219

 
82.0
%
_______________
(1)
All of the Company’s investments are issued by eligible portfolio companies, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the rules promulgated thereunder. All of the Company’s borrowers are in the diversified real estate industry.
(2)
Some of the Company’s investments provide for coupon rate indexed to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and are subject to a LIBOR floor.

F-7


(3)
Because there is no readily available market for these investments, these investments are valued using significant unobservable inputs under Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and are approved in good faith by the Company’s board of directors.
(4)
Percentages are based on net assets of $75.4 million as of December 31, 2019.
(5)
Participation interest is with Terra Property Trust, Inc., a related-party real estate investment trust managed by an affiliate of the Company’s sponsor.
(6)
The loan participations from the Company do not qualify for sale accounting and therefore, these loans remain in the Schedule of Investments. See “Obligations under Participation Agreements” in Note 3 in the accompanying notes to the financial statements.  
(7)
The Company acquired these investments through participation agreements. See “Participation Agreements” in Note 4 in the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
(8)
On June 27, 2018, the Company entered into agreement with the borrower to provide funding commitment of up to $17.0 million. As of December 31, 2019, this investment had an unfunded commitment of $4.5 million.


See notes to financial statements.




F-8


Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.
Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2018
Portfolio Company (1)
 
Collateral Location
 
Property 
Type
 
Coupon
Rate (2)
 
Current Interest Rate
 
Exit Fee
 
Acquisition Date
 
Maturity Date
 
Principal
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value (3)
 
% of Net Assets (4)
Investments — non-controlled
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Mezzanine loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hertz Clinton One Mezzanine, LLC
 
US - MS
 
Office
 
12.00%
 
12.00%
 
0.00%
 
3/18/2016
 
1/1/2025
 
$
2,500,000

 
$
2,448,572

 
$
2,722,123

 
3.2
%
YIP Santa Maria, LLC
 
US - CA
 
Hotel
 
13.00%
 
13.00%
 
1.00%
 
11/15/2016
 
12/9/2019
 
4,500,000

 
4,518,478

 
4,544,512

 
5.3
%
140 Schermerhorn Street Mezz,
LLC (5)(7)
 
US - NY
 
Hotel
 
12.00%
 
12.00%
 
1.00%
 
11/16/2016
 
12/1/2019
 
7,500,000

 
7,530,018

 
7,574,247

 
8.9
%
Dwight Mezz II, LLC
 
US - CA
 
Student
housing
 
11.00%
 
11.00%
 
0.00%
 
5/11/2017
 
5/6/2027
 
3,000,000

 
3,000,000

 
3,106,630

 
3.7
%
Residential X Mezz Concord, LLC and
Center Associates Mezz, LLC (8)
 
US - DE
 
Multifamily
 
12.00%
 
12.00%
 
2.00%
 
8/8/2017
 
9/5/2020
 
8,810,000

 
8,841,641

 
8,956,203

 
10.5
%
221 W. 17th Street Owner, LLC (9)
 
US - NY
 
Condominium
 
12.75%
 
12.75%
 
1.00%
 
1/19/2018
 
3/31/2019
 
4,200,000

 
4,223,149

 
4,241,552

 
5.0
%
Stonewall Station Mezz LLC (5)(7)
 
US - NC
 
Hotel
 
Current 12.00% PIK 2.00%
 
14.00%
 
1.00%
 
5/31/18
 
5/20/2021
 
3,761,540

 
3,734,904

 
3,792,025

 
4.5
%
LD Milpitas Mezz, LP (5)(6)(10)
 
US - CA
 
Hotel
 
LIBOR + 10.25% (2.75% Floor)
 
13.00%
 
1.00%
 
6/27/2018
 
6/27/2021
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
34,296,762

 
34,937,292

 
41.1
%
Preferred equity investments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
City Gardens 333 LLC (5)(7)
 
US - CA
 
Student
housing
 
LIBOR + 9.95% (2.00% Floor)
 
12.45%
 
0.00%
 
4/11/2018
 
4/1/2021
 
2,914,245

 
2,888,629

 
2,914,245

 
3.4
%
RS JZ Driggs, LLC (5)(7)
 
US - NY
 
Multifamily
 
12.25%
 
12.25%
 
1.00%
 
5/1/2018
 
5/1/2020
 
2,020,675

 
2,000,019

 
2,037,807

 
2.4
%
Orange Grove Property Investors,
LLC (5)(7)
 
US - CA
 
Condominium
 
LIBOR + 8.00% (4.00% Floor)
 
12.00%
 
1.00%
 
5/24/2018
 
6/1/2021
 
6,680,000

 
6,625,110

 
6,733,003

 
7.9
%
NB Private Capital, LLC (5)(7)
 
Various
 
Student
housing
 
LIBOR + 10.50% (3.50% Floor)
 
14.00%
 
1.00%
 
7/27/2018
 
7/27/2020
 
4,250,000

 
4,212,203

 
4,284,030

 
5.1
%
370 Lex Part Deux, LLC (5)(7)
 
US - NY
 
Office
 
LIBOR + 8.25% (2.44% Floor)
 
10.75%
 
0.00%
 
12/17/2018
 
1/9/2022
 
15,225,000

 
15,148,875

 
15,225,000

 
17.9
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
30,874,836

 
31,194,085

 
36.7
%
First mortgages:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TSG-Parcel 1, LLC (5)(7)
 
US - CA
 
Land
 
LIBOR + 10.00% (2.00% Floor)
 
12.50%
 
1.00%
 
7/10/2015
 
12/31/2019
 
2,000,000

 
2,020,000

 
2,019,799

 
2.4
%
OHM Atlanta Owner, LLC (5)(7) (11)
 
US - GA
 
Land
 
LIBOR + 9.00% (3.00% Floor)
 
12.00%
 
1.00%
 
6/20/2017
 
1/24/2019
 
11,224,490

 
11,336,735

 
11,335,609

 
13.3
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13,356,735

 
13,355,408

 
15.7
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Investments — non-controlled
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
$
78,528,333

 
$
79,486,785

 
93.5
%

F-9


_______________
(1)
All of the Company’s investments are issued by eligible portfolio companies, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the rules promulgated thereunder. All of the Company’s borrowers are in the diversified real estate industry.
(2)
Some of the Company’s investments provide for coupon rate indexed to LIBOR and are subject to a LIBOR floor.
(3)
Because there is no readily available market for these investments, these investments are valued using significant unobservable inputs under Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and are approved in good faith by the Company’s board of directors.
(4)
Percentages are based on net assets of $85.0 million as of December 31, 2018.
(5)
Participation interest is with Terra Property Trust, Inc., a related-party real estate investment trust managed by an affiliate of the Company’s sponsor.
(6)
The loan participations from the Company do not qualify for sale accounting and therefore, these loans remain in the Schedule of Investments. See “Obligations under Participation Agreements” in Note 3 in the accompanying notes to the financial statements.  
(7)
The Company acquired these investments through participation agreements. See “Participation Agreements” in Note 4 in the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
(8)
As of December 31, 2018, this investment had an unfunded commitment of $1.2 million.
(9)
This investment was co-invested with Terra Property Trust, Inc.
(10)
On June 27, 2018, the Company entered into agreement with the borrower to provide funding commitment of up to $17.0 million. As of December 31, 2018, none of the commitment has been funded.
(11)
On January 11, 2019, the borrower made a partial repayment of $7.6 million on this investment. In connection with the repayment, the maturity date of the investment was extended to March 5, 2019.

See notes to financial statements.


















F-10


Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
Note 1. Principal Business and Organization
Terra Income Fund 6, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the general corporation laws of the State of Maryland on May 15, 2013. On March 2, 2015, the Company filed a public registration statement on Form N-2 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to offer a minimum of $2.0 million of common stock and a maximum of $1.0 billion of common stock in a continuous public offering (the “Offering”). The Company formally commenced operations on June 24, 2015, upon raising gross proceeds in excess of $2.0 million (the “Minimum Offering Requirement”) from sales of shares of its common stock in the Offering, including sales to persons who are affiliated with the Company or its adviser, Terra Income Advisors, LLC (“Terra Income Advisors” or the “Adviser”). Since commencing the Offering and through the end of the Offering on April 20, 2018, the Company has sold 8,878,606 shares of common stock, including shares purchased by Terra Capital Partners, LLC (“Terra Capital Partners”), the Company’s sponsor, and excluding shares sold through the distribution reinvestment plan (“DRIP”), in both an initial private placement and from the Offering, for gross proceeds of $103.6 million. The Company has elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). The Company is an externally managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that initially elected to be taxed for federal income tax purposes, and qualified annually thereafter, as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
On December 11, 2018, the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) voted to approve a change in its fiscal year from September 30 to December 31 in connection with its plan to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Subchapter M of the Code. The Board delegated to its management the authority to determine when such change in fiscal year would take effect. On December 31, 2018, the Company’s management determined to change its tax election from taxation as a RIC to taxation as a REIT under Subchapter M of the Code. The REIT tax election allows the Company to benefit from the preferential tax treatment afforded to both RICs and REITs, without the Company being subject to RIC-specific diversification restrictions. The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code commencing with its short taxable year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018. Concurrent with the change in its tax election, the Company changed its fiscal year from September 30 to December 31 to satisfy the REIT requirement under the Code.
The Company’s investment activities are externally managed by Terra Income Advisors, a private investment firm affiliated with the Company, pursuant to an investment advisory and administrative services agreement (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”), under the oversight of the Company’s Board, a majority of whom are independent directors. Terra Income Advisors is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (see Note 4).
The Company previously retained Terra Capital Markets, LLC (“Terra Capital Markets”), an affiliate of Terra Income Advisors, to serve as the dealer manager of the Offering. As the dealer manager, Terra Capital Markets was responsible for marketing the Company’s shares being offered pursuant to the Offering, which ended on April 20, 2018.
On February 8, 2018, a pooled investment vehicle advised by Axar Capital Management L.P. (“Axar”) entered into an investment agreement with Terra Capital Partners and its affiliates pursuant to which Axar acquired from the respective owners thereof a 65.7% economic and voting interest in Terra Capital Partners and an initial 49% economic interest, but no voting interest, in Terra Income Advisors. On November 30, 2018, Axar purchased the remaining 34.3% economic interest in Terra Capital Partners. On April 25, 2019, the Company held its annual meeting of stockholders, at which time a new Investment Advisory Agreement was approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Accordingly, on April 30, 2019, Axar acquired the remaining 51% economic interest and 100% of the voting interest in Terra Income Advisors, and the Company and Terra Income Advisors entered into a new Investment Advisory Agreement. Such new Investment Advisory Agreement has the same economic terms and is in all material respects otherwise on the same terms as the Investment Advisory Agreement in effect immediately prior to April 30, 2019, except for the date of the agreement. Pursuant to Section 15 of the 1940 Act, the new Investment Advisory Agreement has an initial two year term, but will be required to be renewed annually thereafter at an in-person meeting of the Board.
The Company’s primary investment objectives are to pay attractive and stable cash distributions and to preserve, protect and return capital contributions to stockholders. The Company’s investment strategy is to use substantially all of the proceeds of the Offering to originate and manage a diversified portfolio consisting of (i) commercial real estate loans to U.S. companies qualifying as “eligible portfolio companies” under the 1940 Act, including mezzanine loans, first and second lien mortgage loans, subordinated mortgage loans, bridge loans and other commercial real estate-related loans related to or secured by high quality commercial real estate in the United States and (ii) preferred equity real estate investments in U.S. companies qualifying as “eligible portfolio companies” under the 1940 Act. The Company may also purchase select commercial real estate-related debt securities, such as commercial mortgage-backed securities or collateralized debt obligations. The Company intends to either directly or through an

F-11


affiliate, structure, underwrite and originate most of its investments, as it believes that doing so will provide it with the best opportunity to invest in loans that satisfy its standards, establish a direct relationship with the borrower and optimize the terms of its investments. The Company may hold its investments until their scheduled maturity dates or may sell them if the Company is able to command favorable terms for their disposition.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation:  The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The accompanying financial statements of the Company and related financial information have been prepared pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-K and Articles 6 or 10 of Regulation S-X. The Company is an investment company, as defined under U.S. GAAP, and applies accounting and reporting guidance in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946, Financial Services — Investment Companies. Certain prior period information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents:  The Company considers all highly liquid investments, with original maturities of ninety days or less when purchased, as cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents held at financial institutions, at times, may exceed the amount insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Restricted Cash: Restricted cash represents cash held as additional collateral by the Company on behalf of the borrowers related to the investments for the purpose of such borrowers making interest and property-related operating payments. There is a corresponding liability of the same amount on the statements of assets and liabilities called “Interest reserve and other deposits held on investments.”
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in the Company’s statements of assets and liabilities to the total amount shown in its statements of cash flows:
 
December 31,
 
September 30,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2018
 
2017
Cash and cash equivalents
$
17,057,558

 
$
6,072,043

 
$
15,753,725

 
$
32,176,500

Restricted cash
624,141

 
1,300,021

 
1,513,891

 
1,547,407

Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown
   in the statements of cash flows
$
17,681,699

 
$
7,372,064

 
$
17,267,616

 
$
33,723,907

Investment Transactions and Investment Income (Expense):  The Company records investment transactions on the trade date. Realized gains or losses on dispositions of investments represent the difference between the amortized cost of the investment, based on the specific identification method, and the proceeds received from the sale or maturity (exclusive of any prepayment penalties). Realized gains and losses and changes in unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the statements of operations. Interest income is accrued based upon the outstanding principal amount and contractual terms of the debt instruments and preferred equity investments. Interest is accrued on a daily basis. Discounts and premiums on investments purchased are accreted or amortized over the expected life of the respective investment using the effective yield method and are included in interest income in the statements of operations. Loan origination fees and exit fees are capitalized and the Company then amortizes such amounts using the effective interest method as interest income over the life of the investment. Income accrual is generally suspended for investments at the earlier of the date at which payments become 90 days past due or when, in the opinion of the Adviser, recovery of income and principal becomes doubtful. Interest is then recorded on the basis of cash received until accrual is resumed when the investment becomes contractually current and performance is demonstrated to be resumed. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost adjusted for the accretion of discounts on investments and exit fees, and the amortizations of premiums on investments and origination fees. As prepayment(s), partial or full, occurs on an investment, prepayment income is recognized. All other income is recognized when earned.
The Company may hold debt investments in its portfolio that contain paid-in-kind (“PIK”) interest provisions. The PIK interest, which represents contractually deferred interest that is added to the principal balance that is due at maturity, is recorded on the accrual basis.
Participation Interests: Loan participations from the Company which do not qualify for sale treatment remain on the Company’s statements of assets and liabilities and the proceeds are recorded as obligations under participation agreements. For the investments which participation has been granted, the interest earned on the entire loan balance is recorded within “interest income” and the interest related to the participation interest is recorded within “interest expense from obligations under participation agreements” in the accompanying statements of operations. Interest expense from obligations under participation agreement is reversed when

F-12


recovery of interest income on the related loan becomes doubtful. See “Obligations under Participation Agreements” in Note 3 for additional information.
Valuation of Investments:  The Company determines the value of its investments on a quarterly basis in accordance with fair value accounting guidance promulgated under U.S. GAAP, which establishes a three-tier hierarchical disclosure framework that prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring investments at fair value. These tiers include:
•
Level 1 — observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets. Publicly listed equities and publicly listed derivatives will be included in Level 1.
•
Level 2 — observable inputs such as for similar securities in active markets and quoted prices for identical securities in markets that are not active. In certain cases, debt and equity securities are valued on the basis of prices from an orderly transaction between market participants provided by reputable dealers or pricing services. In determining the value of a particular investment, pricing services may use certain information with respect to transactions in such investments, quotations from dealers, pricing matrices, market transactions in comparable investments and various relationships between investments. Investments which are generally expected to be included in this category include corporate bonds and loans, convertible debt indexed to publicly listed securities and certain over-the-counter derivatives.
•
Level 3 — unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant judgment or estimation.
Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment. Investments with readily available actively quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices, generally, will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires subjective judgment and consideration of factors specific to the investment. The fair values of the Company’s investments are determined in good faith by the Board pursuant to the Company’s valuation policy and consistently applied valuation process. It is expected that the Company’s investments will primarily be classified as Level 3 investments.
Valuation of Obligations under Participation Agreements: The Company has elected the fair value option under ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, relating to accounting for debt obligations at their fair value for obligations under participation agreements which arose due to partial loan sales which did not meet the criteria for sale treatment under ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. The Company employs the yield approach valuation methodology used for the real-estate related loan investments on its obligations under participation agreements.
Stockholder Dividends and Distributions:  Dividends and distributions to stockholders, which are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, are recorded on the record date. The amount to be paid out as a dividend or distribution is approved by the Board. Net realized capital gains, if any, are generally distributed or deemed distributed at least annually. The Company adopted an “opt in” DRIP pursuant to which stockholders may elect to have the full amount of stockholders cash distributions reinvested in additional shares of common stock. Participants in the DRIP are free to elect to participate or terminate participation in the plan within a reasonable time as specified in the plan. For stockholders who have opted in to the DRIP, they have their cash distributions reinvested in additional shares of common stock, rather than receiving the cash distributions. The Company coordinated distribution payment dates so that the same price that was used for the semi-monthly closing date immediately following such distribution payment date used to calculate the purchase price for purchasers under the DRIP. In such case, a stockholder’s reinvested distributions was used to purchase shares at a price equaled to 95% of the price that shares were sold in the offering at the semi-monthly closing immediately following the distribution payment date and such price may represent a premium to net asset value (“NAV”) per share.
On August 7, 2018, the Board, including all of the directors who are not “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act, voted to adopt an amended and restated DRIP, which amended the Company’s previous DRIP to provide that the Company now sells shares thereunder at a price equal to its most recently disclosed NAV per share of its common stock immediately prior to the applicable distribution payment date. The terms of the previous DRIP otherwise remain unchanged. In accordance with the terms of the DRIP, the amended and restated DRIP went into effect on September 8, 2018.
Incentive Fee on Capital Gains: Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the incentive fee on capital gains is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement). This fee equals 20.0% of the Company’s incentive fee on capital gains, which equals the realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of the applicable period, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gains incentive fees. On a quarterly basis, the Company accrues (but does not pay) for the capital gains incentive fee by calculating such fee as if

F-13


it were due and payable as of the end of such period. While the Investment Advisory Agreement neither includes nor contemplates the inclusion of unrealized gains in the calculation of the capital gains incentive fee, pursuant to an interpretation of an American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Technical Practice Aid for investment companies, the Company accrues for this incentive fee to include unrealized gains in the calculation of the capital gains incentive fee expense and related accrued capital gains incentive fee. This accrual reflects the incentive fees that would be payable to Terra Income Advisors if the Company’s entire portfolio were liquidated at its fair value as of the balance sheet date even though Terra Income Advisors is not entitled to an incentive fee with respect to unrealized gains unless and until such gains are actually realized.
Servicing Fee: The Company pays Terra Capital Markets a servicing fee at an annual rate of 1.125% of the most recently published NAV per share, excluding shares sold through the DRIP, in exchange for providing certain administrative support services (Note 4) to stockholders such as establishing and maintaining stockholder accounts, customer service support and assisting stockholders in changing account options, account designations and account addresses. The servicing fee is recorded as expense on the statements of operations in the period in which it was incurred.
Income Taxes:  The Company initially elected to operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a RIC as defined under Subchapter M of the Code. Generally, a RIC is not required to pay corporate-level federal income tax on income and gains distributed to stockholders, provided that it distributes at least 90.0% of “investment company taxable income,” as defined in the Code, each year and meets specified source-of-income and asset diversification requirements. Dividends paid up to one year after the current tax year can be carried back to the prior tax year for determining the dividends paid in such tax year. For the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company distributed sufficient dividends to maintain its qualification to be taxed as a RIC.
On December 31, 2018, the Company announced its intention to change its tax election from taxation as a RIC to taxation as a REIT. The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code commencing with its short taxable year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018. In order to qualify as a REIT, the Company is required, among other things, to distribute at least 90% of its REIT net taxable income to the stockholders and meet certain tests regarding the nature of its income and assets. As a REIT, the Company is not subject to U.S. federal income taxes on income and gains distributed to the stockholders as long as certain requirements are satisfied, principally relating to the nature of income and the level of distributions, as well as other factors. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year and does not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes at regular corporate rates beginning with the year in which it fails to qualify and may be precluded from being able to elect to be treated as a REIT for the Company’s four subsequent taxable years. For the year ended December 31, 2019 and the transition period ended December 31, 2018, the Company satisfied all the requirements for a REIT and accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes has been included in the financial statements.
The Company did not have any uncertain tax positions that met the recognition or measurement criteria under accounting for income taxes, nor did the Company have any unrecognized tax benefits as of the periods presented herein. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax liabilities as income tax expense in its statements of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the transition period ended December 31, 2018 and the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company did not incur any interest or penalties. Although the Company files federal and state tax returns, its major tax jurisdiction is federal. The Company’s 2015-2018 federal tax years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and the state department of revenue.
Use of Estimates:  The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of income, expenses and gains and losses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and those differences could be material.
The financial statements include investments at fair value of $61.8 million and $79.5 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and obligations under participation agreements at fair value of $3.2 million and zero at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These fair values have been determined in good faith by the Board. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, the determined values may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for the investments and obligations under participation agreements, and the differences could be material.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 outlines a new model for accounting by lessees, whereby their rights and obligations under substantially all leases, existing and new, would be capitalized and recorded on the balance sheet. For lessors, however, the accounting remains largely unchanged from the model under ASC Topic 840 — Leases (“ASC Topic 840”), with the distinction between operating and financing leases retained, but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model and the new revenue recognition standard. The new standard also replaces the sale-leaseback guidance under ASC Topic 840 with a new model applicable to both lessees and lessors. Additionally, the new standard requires extensive quantitative and qualitative disclosures. ASU 2016-02 was effective for U.S. GAAP public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted for all entities. The new standard must be adopted

F-14


using a modified retrospective transition of the new guidance and provides for certain practical expedients. Transition requires application of the new model at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements as the Company does not have any lease arrangements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure framework — Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2018-13”). The objective of ASU 2018-13 is to improve the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to financial statements by facilitating clear communication of information required by U.S. GAAP. The amendments in ASU 2018-13 added, removed and modified certain fair value measurement disclosure requirements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The amendments on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements, and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty should be applied prospectively for only the most recent interim or annual period presented in the initial fiscal year of adoption. All other amendments should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented upon their effective date. Early adoption is permitted upon issuance of ASU 2018-13. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2018-13 to have a material impact on its financial statements and disclosures.
In August 2018, the SEC adopted a final rule that eliminates or amends disclosure requirements that have become duplicative,
overlapping, or outdated in light of other SEC disclosure requirements, U.S. GAAP, or changes in the information environment (the “Final Rule”). The Final Rule is intended to simplify and update the disclosure of information to investors and reduce compliance burdens for companies, without significantly altering the total mix of information available to investors. Among other items, the Final Rule requires registrants to include in their interim financial statements a reconciliation of changes in net assets or stockholders’ equity in the notes or as a separate statement. The Final Rule was effective for all filings made on or after November 5, 2018; however, the SEC would not object if a filer’s first presentation of the changes in net assets or stockholders’ equity and the balance sheet presentation of distributable earnings were included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter that begins after the effective date of the Final Rule. The Company adopted the Final Rule in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. The adoption of the Final Rule did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.
Note 3. Investments
The following tables show the composition of the investment portfolio, at amortized cost and fair value at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (with corresponding percentage of total portfolio investments):
 
 
December 31, 2019
 
 
Investments at
Amortized Cost
 
Percentage of
Amortized Cost
 
Investments at
Fair Value
 
Percentage of
Fair Value
Loans
 
$
17,938,033

 
29.4
%
 
$
18,598,767

 
30.1
%
Loans through participation interest (Note 4)
 
43,026,580

 
70.6
%
 
43,237,452

 
69.9
%
Total
 
$
60,964,613

 
100.0
%
 
$
61,836,219

 
100.0
%
 
 
December 31, 2018
 
 
Investments at
Amortized Cost
 
Percentage of
Amortized Cost
 
Investments at
Fair Value
 
Percentage of
Fair Value
Loans
 
$
23,031,840

 
29.3
%
 
$
23,571,020

 
29.7
%
Loans through participation interest (Note 4)
 
55,496,493

 
70.7
%
 
55,915,765

 
70.3
%
Total
 
$
78,528,333

 
100.0
%
 
$
79,486,785

 
100.0
%
Obligations under Participation Agreements
The Company has elected the fair value option relating to accounting for debt obligations at their fair value for its obligations under participation agreements which arose due to partial loan sales which did not meet the criteria for sale treatment. The Company employs the same yield approach valuation methodology used for the real estate-related loan investments on the Company’s obligations under participation agreements. As of December 31, 2019, obligations under participation agreements at fair value was $3.2 million and the weighted average contractual interest rate on the obligations under participation agreements was 13.0%. As of December 31, 2018, the Company did not have any funded obligations under participation agreements. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company transferred $3.1 million of investments to affiliates through participation agreements and did not make any repayments on obligations under participation agreements. For the transition period ended December 31, 2018, the Company did not transfer any investments to affiliates through participation agreements and made $1.8 million of repayments on

F-15


obligations under participation agreements. For the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company did not transfer any investments to affiliates through participation agreements and did not make any repayments on obligations under participation agreements. For the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company did not transfer any investments to affiliates through participation agreements and made $12.9 million of repayments on obligations under participation agreements, including PIK interest of $0.4 million.
Mortgage Loan Payable
In May 2017, the Company obtained $3.3 million of mortgage financing for a senior loan. The mortgage financing carried interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 4.75% and had a maturity date of August 4, 2017. In June 2017, the mortgage financing was repaid in full.
Valuation Methodology
Market quotations are not readily available for the Company’s real estate-related loan investments, all of which are included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, and therefore these investments are valued utilizing a yield approach, i.e. a discounted cash flow methodology to arrive at an estimate of the fair value of each respective investment in the portfolio using an estimated market yield. In following this methodology, investments are evaluated individually, and management takes into account, in determining the risk-adjusted discount rate for each of the Company’s investments, relevant factors, including available current market data on applicable yields of comparable debt/preferred equity instruments; market credit spreads and yield curves; the investment’s yield; covenants of the investment, including prepayment provisions; the portfolio company’s ability to make payments, net operating income and debt service coverage ratio; construction progress reports and construction budget analysis; the nature, quality and realizable value of any collateral (and loan-to-value ratio); the forces that influence the local markets in which the asset (the collateral) is purchased and sold, such as capitalization rates, occupancy rates, rental rates and replacement costs; and the anticipated duration of each real estate-related loan investment.
These valuation techniques are applied in a consistent and verifiable manner to all investments that are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and Terra Income Advisors provides the valuation committee of the Board (which is made up exclusively of independent directors) with portfolio security valuations that are based on this discounted cash flow methodology. Valuations are prepared quarterly, or more frequently as needed, with each asset in the portfolio subject to a valuation prepared by a third-party valuation service at a minimum of once during every 12-month period. The valuation committee reviews the preliminary valuation with Terra Income Advisors and, together with an independent valuation firm, if applicable, responds and supplements the preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the valuation committee. The Board discusses valuations and determines the fair value of each investment in the portfolio in good faith based on various statistical and other factors, including the input and recommendation provided by Terra Income Advisors, the valuation committee and any third-party valuation firm, if applicable.
The following tables present fair value measurements of investments, by major class, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, according to the fair value hierarchy:
 
 
December 31, 2019
 
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Investments:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Loans
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
18,598,767

 
$
18,598,767

Loans through participation interest
 
—

 
—

 
43,237,452

 
43,237,452

Total Investments
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
61,836,219

 
$
61,836,219

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Obligations under participation agreements
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
3,204,263

 
$
3,204,263


F-16


 
 
December 31, 2018
 
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Investments:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Loans
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
23,571,020

 
$
23,571,020

Loans through participation interest
 
—

 
—

 
55,915,765

 
55,915,765

Total Investments
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
79,486,785

 
$
79,486,785

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Obligations under participation agreements
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Changes in Level 3 investments for the year ended December 31, 2019, the transition period ended December 31, 2018 and the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
 
 Loans
 
Loans
Through
Participation
 
Total
Investments
 
Obligations under
Participation Agreements
Balance as of January 1, 2019
 
$
23,571,020

 
$
55,915,765

 
$
79,486,785

 
$
—

Purchases of investments
 
12,376,727

 
7,008,710

 
19,385,437

 
—

Repayments of investments
 
(17,717,701
)
 
(19,805,718
)
 
(37,523,419
)
 
—

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments
 
121,556

 
(208,402
)
 
(86,846
)
 
—

PIK interest income, net
 
—

 
91,878

 
91,878

 
—

Amortization and accretion of investment-related fees, net
 
238,592

 
235,219

 
473,811

 
9,901

Amortization of discount and premium on investments, net
 
8,573

 
—

 
8,573

 
—

Proceeds from obligations under participation agreements
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
3,120,888

Net change in unrealized appreciation on obligations under
   participation agreements
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
73,474

Balance as of December 31, 2019
 
$
18,598,767

 
$
43,237,452

 
$
61,836,219

 
$
3,204,263

Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation for
   the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still
   held by the Company at the end of the period:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments and
   obligations under participation agreements
 
$
280,553

 
$
(165,298
)
 
$
115,255

 
$
73,474


F-17


 
 
Transition Period Ended December 31, 2018
 
 
 Loans
 
Loans
Through
Participation
 
Total
Investments
 
Obligations under
Participation Agreements
Balance as of October 1, 2018
 
$
29,174,139

 
$
43,246,193

 
$
72,420,332

 
$
1,809,101

Purchases of investments
 
—

 
16,343,778

 
16,343,778

 
—

Repayments of investments
 
(5,829,000
)
 
(3,787,158
)
 
(9,616,158
)
 
—

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments
 
142,796

 
562

 
143,358

 
—

PIK interest income, net
 
—

 
19,529

 
19,529

 
—

Amortization and accretion of investment-related fees, net
 
80,942

 
92,861

 
173,803

 
(7,230
)
Amortization of discount and premium on investments, net
 
2,143

 
—

 
2,143

 
—

Net change in unrealized depreciation on obligations under
   participation agreements
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(10,871
)
Repayments of obligations under participation agreements
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(1,791,000
)
Balance as of December 31, 2018
 
$
23,571,020

 
$
55,915,765

 
$
79,486,785

 
$
—

Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation for
   the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still
   held by the Company at the end of the period:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments and
   obligations under participation agreements
 
$
177,828

 
$
31,640

 
$
209,468

 
$
—

 
 
Year Ended September 30, 2018
 
 
 Loans
 
Loans
Through
Participation
 
Total
Investments
 
Obligations under
Participation Agreements
Balance as of October 1, 2017
 
$
23,675,007

 
$
22,121,382

 
$
45,796,389

 
$
1,820,502

Purchases of investments
 
8,734,586

 
23,201,245

 
31,935,831

 
—

Repayments of investments
 
(3,438,847
)
 
(2,740,752
)
 
(6,179,599
)
 
—

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments
 
19,166

 
186,795

 
205,961

 
—

PIK interest income, net
 
—

 
161,266

 
161,266

 
—

Amortization and accretion of investment-related fees, net
 
175,656

 
316,257

 
491,913

 
2,533

Amortization of discount and premium on investments, net
 
8,571

 
—

 
8,571

 
—

Net change in unrealized depreciation on obligations under
   participation agreements
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(13,934
)
Balance as of September 30, 2018
 
$
29,174,139

 
$
43,246,193

 
$
72,420,332

 
$
1,809,101

Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation for
   the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still
   held by the Company at the end of the period:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
   investments and obligations under participation
   agreements
 
$
29,997

 
$
186,795

 
$
216,792

 
$
(13,934
)


F-18


 
 
Year Ended September 30, 2017
 
 
 Loans
 
Loan
Through
Participation
 
Total
Investments
 
Obligations under
Participation Agreements
Balance as of October 1, 2016
 
$
26,723,922

 
$
2,022,814

 
$
28,746,736

 
$
14,560,606

Purchases of investments
 
15,513,417

 
29,263,750

 
44,777,167

 
—

Repayments of investments
 
(19,120,683
)
 
(9,388,277
)
 
(28,508,960
)
 
—

Net increase in unrealized appreciation on investments
 
207,821

 
209,099

 
416,920

 
—

PIK interest income, net
 
188,117

 
—

 
188,117

 
155,736

Amortization and accretion of investment-related fees, net
 
153,842

 
119,413

 
273,255

 
(4,303
)
Amortization of discount on investments
 
8,571

 
(105,417
)
 
(96,846
)
 
—

Net change in unrealized depreciation on obligations under
   participation agreements
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(27,767
)
Repayments of obligations under participation agreements
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(12,863,770
)
Balance as of September 30, 2017
 
$
23,675,007

 
$
22,121,382

 
$
45,796,389

 
$
1,820,502

Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation for
the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still
held by the Company at the end of the period:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments and obligations under participation
agreements
 
$
207,821

 
$
209,099

 
$
416,920

 
$
(27,767
)

Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the period in which transfers occur. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the transition period ended December 31, 2018 and the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, there were no transfers.
Significant Unobservable Inputs
The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs used by the Company to value the Level 3 investments as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. The table is not intended to be all-inclusive, but instead identifies the significant unobservable inputs relevant to the determination of fair values.
December 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
Primary
Valuation
Technique
 
Unobservable Input
 
Range
 
Weighted
Asset Category
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
Minimum
 
Maximum
 
Average
Assets:
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Loans
 
$
18,598,767

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
10.15
%
 
11.90
%
 
11.45
%
Loans through participation interest
 
43,237,452

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
11.00
%
 
14.95
%
 
12.15
%
Total Level 3 Assets
 
$
61,836,219

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Obligations under participation agreements
 
$
3,204,263

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
11.90
%
 
11.90
%
 
11.90
%
December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
Primary
Valuation
Technique
 
Unobservable Input
 
Range
 
Weighted
Asset Category
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
Minimum
 
Maximum
 
Average
Assets:
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Loans
 
$
23,571,020

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
10.15
%
 
13.00
%
 
11.94
%
Loans through participation interest
 
55,915,765

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
10.77
%
 
14.00
%
 
12.00
%
Total Level 3 Assets
 
$
79,486,785

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Obligations under participation agreements
 
$
—

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
—

 
—

 
—


F-19


If the weighted average discount rate used to value the Company’s investments were to increase, the fair value of the Company’s investments would decrease. Conversely, if the weighted average discount rate used to value the Company’s investments were to decrease, the fair value of Company’s investments would increase.
Note 4. Related Party Transactions
The Company entered into various agreements with Terra Income Advisors whereby the Company pays and reimburses Terra Income Advisors for certain fees and expenses. Additionally, the Company paid Terra Capital Markets certain fees in connection with its Offering.
The following table presents a summary of such fees and reimbursements in accordance with the terms of the related agreements:
 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
Transition Period Ended December 31, 2018
 
Years Ended September 30,
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
Amounts Included in the Statements of
   Operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Base management fees
$
1,594,165

 
$
424,550

 
$
1,684,442

 
$
1,202,568

Incentive fees on capital gains (1)
(32,884
)
 
30,846

 
39,172

 
90,459

Operating expense reimbursement to Adviser (2)
897,816

 
234,191

 
879,892

 
530,619

Servicing fees (3)
844,429

 
229,192

 
922,607

 
—

Commissions and dealer manager fees incurred
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commissions and dealer manager fees (4)
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
914,494

 
$
3,324,658

Reduction of transaction charge payable (5)
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
(3,195,513
)
_______________
(1)
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company reversed $32,884 of incentive fees which were previously accrued. Incentive fees on capital gains are based on 20% of net unrealized capital gains. Incentive fees on capital gains are based on 20% of net unrealized capital gains. No incentive fees on capital gains are actually payable by the Company with respect to unrealized gains unless and until those gains are realized.
(2)
Amounts were primarily compensation for time spent supporting the Company’s day-to-day operations.
(3)
As discussed in “Dealer Manager Agreement” below, on September 30, 2017, the Company adopted the servicing plan. The servicing fee is recorded as expense on the statements of operations in the period in which it was incurred. As of both December 31, 2019 and 2018, unpaid servicing fees were $0.1 million and were included in accrued expenses on the statements of assets and liabilities. There were no commissions and dealer manager fees incurred for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the transition period ended December 31, 2018 because the Offering ended on April 20, 2018.
(4)
Of the amounts, $0.7 million and $2.3 million for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, were re-allowed to selected broker-dealers. Amounts were recorded as reductions to capital in excess of par on the statements of assets and liabilities. There were no commissions and dealer manager fees incurred for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the transition period ended December 31, 2018 because the Offering ended on April 20, 2018.
(5)
As discussed in “Dealer Manager Agreement” below, on September 30, 2017, the Company adopted the servicing plan (the “Servicing Plan”) and the second amended dealer manager agreement (the “Second Amended Dealer Manager Agreement”) to revise the terms of the servicing fee (which was previously referred to as a transaction charge). The servicing fee is recorded as expense on the statements of operations in the period in which it was incurred. In connection with the adoptions of the Servicing Plan and the Second Amended Dealer Manager Agreement, the Company reduced the previously recorded transaction charges by $3.2 million, as reflected on the statements of changes in net assets.

F-20


Due to / Due from Adviser
The Company determined that it has the right of offset on the amounts due to and due from Terra Income Advisors under the guidance in ASC Topic 210, Balance Sheet. As such, the net amount is presented as Due to Adviser, net on the statements of assets and liabilities. The following table presents a summary of Due to Adviser, net as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2019
 
2018
Due to Adviser:
 
 

 
 

Base management fee and expense reimbursement payable
 
$
365,895

 
$
404,622

Incentive fees on capital gains (1)
 
155,521

 
188,405

 
 
521,416

 
593,027

Due from Adviser:
 
 
 
 
Reimbursable costs - other operating expense
 
4,012

 
—

Due to Adviser, net
 
$
517,404

 
$
593,027

_______________
(1)
Incentive fees on capital gains are based on 20% of accumulated net unrealized capital gains of $0.8 million and $1.0 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. No incentive fees on capital gains are actually payable by the Company with respect to unrealized gains unless and until those gains are realized.
Management and Incentive Fee Compensation to Adviser
Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, Terra Income Advisors is responsible for the Company’s day-to-day operations. Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, Terra Income Advisors is paid for its services in two components — a base management fee and an incentive fee. The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2.0% of the Company’s average gross assets. The base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears and calculated based on the average value of the Company’s gross assets at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters.
The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part, which is referred to as the subordinated incentive fee on income, is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based upon the Company’s “pre-incentive fee net investment income” for the immediately preceding quarter. The subordinated incentive fee on income is subject to a quarterly hurdle rate, expressed as a rate of return on adjusted capital at the beginning of the most recently completed calendar quarter, of 2.0% (8.0% annualized), subject to a “catch-up” feature. For this purpose, “pre-incentive fee net investment income” means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees, other than fees for providing managerial assistance, such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that the Company receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus the Company’s operating expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses reimbursed to Terra Income Advisors under the Investment Advisory Agreement and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with PIK interest and zero-coupon securities), accrued income that the Company has not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. The calculation of the subordinated incentive fee on income for each quarter is as follows:
•
No incentive fee is payable to Terra Income Advisors in any calendar quarter in which the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2.0% (8.0% annualized);
•
100% of the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5% in any calendar quarter (10.0% annualized) is payable to Terra Income Advisors, all or any portion of which may be waived or deferred in Terra Income Advisors’ discretion. This portion of the pre-incentive fee net investment income (which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5%) is referred to as the “catch-up.” The catch-up provision is intended to provide Terra Income Advisors with an incentive fee of 20.0% on all of the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income when the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income reaches 2.5% in any calendar quarter; and
•
20.0% of the amount of the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any calendar quarter (10.0% annualized) is payable to Terra Income Advisors once the hurdle rate is reached and the catch-up is achieved.

F-21


The second part of the incentive fee, which is referred to as the incentive fee on capital gains, is an incentive fee on capital gains earned on liquidated investments from the portfolio and is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement). This fee equals 20.0% of the Company’s incentive fee on capital gains, which equals the realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of the applicable period, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gains incentive fees. On a quarterly basis, the Company accrues (but does not pay) for the unrealized capital gains incentive fee by calculating such fee as if it were due and payable as of the end of such period.
Operating Expenses
The Company reimburses Terra Income Advisors for operating expenses incurred in connection with administrative services provided to the Company, including compensation to administrative personnel. The Company does not reimburse Terra Income Advisors for personnel costs in connection with services for which Terra Income Advisors receives a separate fee. In addition, the Company does not reimburse Terra Income Advisors for (i) rent or depreciation, capital equipment or other costs of Terra Income Advisors’ own administrative items, or (ii) salaries, fringe benefits, travel expenses and other administrative items incurred or allocated to any controlling person of Terra Income Advisors.
Organization and Offering Expenses
As of the end of the Offering on April 20, 2018, Terra Income Advisors incurred cumulative organization costs of $0.2 million and cumulative offering costs of $3.4 million on behalf of the Company. Offering expenses consist of costs paid by Terra Income Advisors that are directly related to the registration and offering of the Company’s shares, including registration fees, legal fees and printing costs. Organization costs include those expenses paid by Terra Income Advisors for the legal organization, drafting and filing of the Company’s charter and other governance documents and include, but are not limited to, legal, accounting and filing fees.
Upon meeting the Minimum Offering Requirement, Terra Income Advisors is responsible for the payment of the Company’s cumulative organization and offering expenses to the extent such expenses exceed 1.5% of the gross proceeds from the Offering without recourse against or reimbursement by the Company. As a result, Terra Income Advisors paid for all organization and offering expenses in excess of 1.5% of the gross proceeds from the Offering. Based on the gross proceeds from the Offering, the Company was responsible for $1.6 million of the cumulative offering and organization costs incurred by Terra Income Advisors, all of which were reimbursed to Terra Income Advisors. For the year ended December 31, 2019 and the transition period ended December 31, 2018, the Company did not make any reimbursement payments to Terra Income Advisors for offering costs incurred on behalf of the Company because all of the offering costs have been reimbursed. For the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company made reimbursement payments of $0.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively, to Terra Income Advisors for offering costs incurred on behalf of the Company.
Dealer Manager Agreement
The Company entered into a dealer manager agreement with Terra Capital Markets, an affiliate of Terra Income Advisors, to serve as the dealer manager of the Offering. Under the terms of the dealer manager agreement, Terra Capital Markets received selling commissions of 3.0% of gross proceeds from the Offering, dealer manager fees of up to 1.5% of the gross proceeds from the Offering, and broker-dealer fees of up to 1.0% of gross proceeds from the Offering for reimbursement of marketing and expenses, in connection with the sale of shares of the Company’s common stock in the Offering, all or a portion of which may be re-allowed to selected broker-dealers.
On September 30, 2017, the Board adopted the Servicing Plan and the Second Amended Dealer Manager Agreement. Pursuant to the Servicing Plan, Terra Capital Markets receives a servicing fee at an annual rate of 1.125% of the most recently published NAV per share of the Company’s common stock, excluding shares sold through the DRIP, in exchange for providing certain administrative support services. With respect to each share sold, the servicing fee will be payable annually on the anniversary of the applicable month of purchase. Terra Capital Markets, in its discretion, may re-allow a portion of such servicing fee to participating dealers for performing certain administrative support services. The Servicing Plan will remain in effect for so long as such continuance is approved quarterly by the Board, including a majority of the directors who are not “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act and who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the operation of the Servicing Plan or in any agreements entered into in connection therewith. In addition, the Board will review all payments made pursuant to the Servicing Plan at least quarterly. The Company will no longer incur the annual servicing fee upon the earlier of (i) the aggregate underwriting compensation from all sources, including selling commissions, dealer manager fees, broker-dealer fees, and servicing fees would exceed 10% of the gross proceeds in the Offering, (ii) with respect to a specific share, the date that such share is redeemed or is no longer outstanding, and (iii) the date, if any, upon which a liquidity event occurs. In connection with the adoptions of the Servicing Plan and the Second Amended Dealer Manager Agreement, the Company reduced the previously recorded transaction charges by $3.2 million, as reflected on the statements of changes in net assets.

F-22


Expense Support Agreement
On June 30, 2015, the Company entered into an expense support agreement (the “Expense Support Agreement”) with Terra Income Advisors, whereby Terra Income Advisors may pay up to 100% of the Company’s costs and expenses, including all fees payable to Terra Income Advisors pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement from inception until the Company and Terra Income Advisors mutually agree otherwise. This payment (the “Expense Support Payment”) for any month shall be paid by Terra Income Advisors to the Company in any combination of cash or other immediately available funds, and/or offsets against amounts due from the Company to Terra Income Advisors. The purpose of the Expense Support Payment is to reduce offering and operating expenses until the Company has achieved economies of scale sufficient to ensure that the Company is able to bear a reasonable level of expense in relation to investment income. Operating expenses subject to the Expense Support Agreement include expenses as defined by U.S. GAAP, including, without limitation, fees payable to Terra Income Advisors and interest on indebtedness for such period, if any.
Pursuant to the terms of the Expense Support Agreement, the Company has agreed to reimburse Terra Income Advisors for each Expense Support Payment within three years after such Expense Support Payment is made by Terra Income Advisors. Reimbursement shall be made as promptly as possible on a date mutually agreed to by the Company and Terra Income Advisors provided that (i) the operating expense ratio, defined as operating expenses excluding organization and offering expenses, base management fee, incentive fee and any interest expense attributable to indebtedness by the Company (“Net Operating Expenses”) expressed as a percentage of the Company’s net assets on the relevant measurement date, as of such Reimbursement Date is equal to or less than the operating expense ratio as of the Expense Support Payment date attributable to such specified Expense Support Payment, (ii) the annualized distribution rate (exclusive of any U.S. GAAP return of capital) as of such Reimbursement Date is equal to or greater than the annualized distribution rate as of the Expense Support Payment date attributable to such specified Expense Support Payment; (iii) such Reimbursement Date is not later than three years following such specified Expense Support Payment date; and (iv) the Expense Support Payment does not cause the Company’s Net Operating Expenses to exceed 1.5% of the Company’s net assets attributable to common shares, after taking such reimbursement into account. Terra Income Advisors is entitled to reimbursement of all previously unreimbursed Expense Support Payments in the event of termination of the Expense Support Agreement.
The following table provides information regarding the expenses that the parties to the agreement determined would be incurred by Terra Income Advisors pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement:
Three months ended
 
Amount of
Expense
Reimbursement
Payment
 
Annualized Operating
Expense Ratio as of
the Date of Expense
Reimbursement Payment
 
Annualized
Rate of
Distributions
Per Share (1)
 
Reimbursement
Eligibility
Expiration (2)
June 30, 2015
 
$
515,813

 
24.53
%
 
8.00
%
 
June 30, 2018
September 30, 2015
 
1,174,487

 
66.63
%
 
8.00
%
 
September 30, 2018
December 31, 2015
 
576,755

 
15.60
%
 
8.00
%
 
November 30, 2018
_______________
(1)
The annualized rate of distributions per share is expressed as a percentage equal to the projected annualized distribution amount as of the date each payment was made (which is calculated by annualizing the regular daily cash distribution per share as of the date each payment was made without compounding), divided by the Company’s public offering price per share as of the date each payment was made.
(2)
As of December 31, 2019, the Company has not reimbursed Terra Income Advisors for any Expense Support Payments because the conditions for reimbursement have not been met. Additionally, as of December 31, 2019, all of the expense reimbursement payments are no longer eligible for reimbursement because the three-year period has elapsed.
Participation Agreements
The Company may enter into participation agreements with related and unrelated parties, primarily other affiliated funds of Terra Income Advisors. The participation agreements provide the Company with the opportunity to invest along the same terms, conditions, price and rights in the specified investment. The purpose of the participation agreements is to allow the Company and an affiliate to originate a specified investment when, individually, the Company does not have the liquidity to do so or to achieve a certain level of portfolio diversification. The Company may transfer portions of its investments to other participants or it may be a participant to an investment held by another entity.
ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing (“ASC 860”), establishes accounting and reporting standards for transfers of financial assets. ASC 860-10 provides consistent standards for distinguishing transfers of financial assets that are sales from transfers that are secured borrowings. The Company has determined that the participation agreements it enters into are accounted for as secured

F-23


borrowings under ASC Topic 860 (see “Participation Interests” in Note 2 and “Obligations under Participation Agreements” in Note 3).
Participation interest purchased by the Company: The below tables list the investment interests participated by the Company via participation agreement (each, a “PA”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. In accordance with the terms of each PA, each Participant’s rights and obligations, including interest income and other income (e.g., exit fee and prepayment income) and related fees/expenses are based upon its respective pro-rata participation interest in such investments, as specified in the respective PA. The Company’s share of the investment is repayable only from the proceeds received from the related borrower/issuer of the investment, and therefore the Company is also subject to the credit risk (i.e., risk of default by the underlying borrower/issuer).
Pursuant to each PA, the affiliated fund receives and allocates the interest income and other related investment incomes in respect of the investment to the Company. The Company pays related expenses (i.e., the base management fee) directly to Terra Income Advisors.
 
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
 
Participating Interests
 
Principal Balance
 
Fair
Value
 
Participating Interests
 
Principal Balance
 
Fair
Value
370 Lex Part Deux, LLC (1)
 
35.0
%
 
$
16,922,482

 
$
16,882,760

 
35.0
%
 
$
15,225,000

 
$
15,225,000

Orange Grove Property Investors,
   LLC (1)
 
80.0
%
 
8,480,000

 
8,556,332

 
80.0
%
 
6,680,000

 
6,733,003

Stonewall Station Mezz LLC (1)(3)
 
44.0
%
 
4,308,818

 
4,348,735

 
44.0
%
 
3,761,540

 
3,792,025

RS JZ Driggs, LLC (1)
 
50.0
%
 
4,100,000

 
4,138,668

 
50.0
%
 
2,020,675

 
2,037,807

City Gardens 333 LLC (1)
 
14.0
%
 
3,926,961

 
3,928,089

 
14.0
%
 
2,914,245

 
2,914,245

NB Private Capital, LLC (1)
 
16.7
%
 
3,333,333

 
3,363,464

 
16.7
%
 
4,250,000

 
4,284,030

TSG-Parcel 1, LLC (1)
 
11.1
%
 
2,000,000

 
2,019,404

 
11.1
%
 
2,000,000

 
2,019,799

OHM Atlanta Owner, LLC (1)(2)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
40.8
%
 
11,224,490

 
11,335,609

140 Schermerhorn Street Mezz
   LLC (1)(2)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
50.0
%
 
7,500,000

 
7,574,247

Total
 
 
 
$
43,071,594

 
$
43,237,452

 
 
 
$
55,575,950

 
$
55,915,765

_______________
(1)
Participation held in the name of Terra Property Trust, Inc., an affiliated fund managed by a subsidiary of Terra Capital Partners.
(2)
These participations were repaid during the year ended December 31, 2019.
(3)
The principal amount includes PIK interest of $128,818 and $36,940 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Transfers of participation interests by the Company: The following table summarizes the investments that were subject to PAs with investment partnerships affiliated with Terra Income Advisors as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
Transfers treated as
obligations under participation agreements
 
 
Principal
 
Fair Value
 
% Transferred
 
Principal
 
Fair Value
LD Milpitas Mezz, LP (1)
 
$
12,483,552

 
$
12,817,047

 
25.0
%
 
$
3,120,888

 
$
3,204,263

 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
Transfers treated as
obligations under participation agreements
 
 
Principal
 
Fair Value
 
% Transferred
 
Principal
 
Fair Value
LD Milpitas Mezz, LP (1)
 
—

 
—

 
25.0
%
 
—

 
—

_______________
(1)
On June 27, 2018, the Company entered into a participation agreement with Terra Property Trust, Inc. to sell a 25% participation interest, or $4.3 million, in a $17.0 million mezzanine loan. As of December 31, 2019, this loan had an unfunded commitment of $4.5 million.

F-24


Co-investment
As a BDC, the Company is subject to certain regulatory restrictions in making its investments. For example, the Company may be prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly participating in certain transactions with its affiliates without the prior approval of its Board who are not interested persons and, in some cases, prior approval by the SEC. The SEC has granted the Company exemptive relief permitting it, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, to co-invest in certain privately negotiated investment transactions with certain affiliates of Terra Income Advisors, including Terra Secured Income Fund, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 2, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 3, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 4, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 5, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 5 International, Terra Income Fund International and Terra Secured Income Fund 7, LLC, Terra Property Trust, Inc., Terra Property Trust 2, Inc. and any future BDC or closed-end management investment company that is registered under the 1940 Act and is advised by Terra Income Advisors or its affiliated investment advisers (the “Co-Investment Affiliates”). However, the Company will be prohibited from engaging in certain transactions with its affiliates even under the terms of this exemptive order. The Company believes this relief will not only enhance its ability to further its investment objectives and strategy, but may also increase favorable investment opportunities for the Company, in part by allowing the Company to participate in larger investments, together with its Co-Investment Affiliates, than would be available to the Company if it had not obtained such relief.
In January 2018, the Company and Terra Property Trust, Inc. co-invested in an $8.9 million mezzanine loan that bears interest at an annual fixed rate of 12.75% and matured on March 31, 2019. In March 2019, the maturity date of the loan was extended to July 1, 2019. In June 2019, the maturity of the loan was extended to September 30, 2019. In August 2019, the loan was repaid in full. The Company’s portion of the investment was 47.19%, or $4.2 million and was reflected as investments at fair value on the statements of assets and liabilities. The Company’s rights and obligations under the loan pertained to its portion of the investment only.
Note 5. Commitments and Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may enter into future funding commitments, which are subject to the borrower meeting certain performance-related metrics that are monitored by the Company. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had $4.5 million and $18.2 million, respectively, of unfunded commitments. The Company expects to maintain sufficient cash on hand to fund such unfunded commitments, including matching these commitments with principal repayments on outstanding loans.
The Company enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnification provisions. The Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown; however, the Company has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts. Management of Terra Income Advisors has reviewed the Company’s existing contracts and expects the risk of loss to the Company to be remote.
The Company is not currently subject to any material legal proceedings and, to the Company’s knowledge, no material legal proceedings are threatened against the Company. From time to time, the Company may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of the Company’s rights under contracts with its portfolio companies. While the outcome of any legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not expect that any such proceedings will have a material adverse effect upon its financial condition or results of operations.
See Note 4. “Related Party Transactions”, for a discussion of the Company’s commitments to Terra Income Advisors.
Note 6. Income Taxes
On December 11, 2018, the Company’s Board voted to approve a change its tax election from taxation as a RIC to taxation as a REIT under Subchapter M of the Code. The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code commencing with its short taxable year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018. Prior to October 1, 2018, the Company elected to operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and, as such, was not subject to federal income tax on the portion of taxable income distributed to stockholders.
In order to qualify as a REIT, the Company is required, among other things, to distribute at least 90% of its REIT net taxable income to the stockholders and meet certain tests regarding the nature of its income and assets. Because federal income tax regulations differ from U.S. GAAP, distributions in accordance with tax regulations may differ from net investment for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary in nature. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial statements to reflect their tax character. Differences in classification may also result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes.
Taxable income generally differs from net increase in net assets resulting from operations for financial reporting purposes due to temporary and permanent differences in the recognition of income and expenses and generally excludes unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments as investment gains and losses are not included in taxable income until they are realized.

F-25


The following table reconciles net increase in net assets resulting from operations to taxable income:
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
Transition Period Ended December 31, 2018
 
Years Ended September 30,
 
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
 
$
4,851,132

 
$
1,212,549

 
$
2,943,883

 
$
1,282,924

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments
 
86,846

 
(143,358
)
 
(205,961
)
 
(416,920
)
Net change in unrealized appreciation on obligations
   under participation agreements
 
73,474

 
(10,871
)
 
(13,934
)
 
(27,767
)
Amortization of deferred offering costs
 
—

 
—

 
114,132

 
375,748

Reduction of offering costs
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(944,248
)
Expense reimbursement from Adviser
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Incentive fees on capital gains
 
(32,884
)
 
30,846

 
39,172

 
90,459

Other temporary differences (1)
 
(160,815
)
 
9,487

 
10,421

 
107,565

Total taxable income
 
$
4,817,753

 
$
1,098,653

 
$
2,887,713

 
$
467,761

_______________
(1)
Other temporary differences primarily related to capitalization and amortization of transaction-related fees.
The following table reflects, for tax purposes, the estimated sources of the cash distributions that the Company has paid on its common stock:
 
Year Ended
December 31, 2019
 
Transition Period Ended
December 31, 2018
 
Years Ended September 30,
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
Source of Distribution
Distribution
Amount (1)
 
%
 
Distribution
Amount (1)
 
%
 
Distribution
Amount (1)
 
%
 
Distribution
Amount (1)
 
%
Return of capital
$
2,801,281

 
36.8
%
 
$
876,881

 
44.4
%
 
$
4,665,786

 
61.8
%
 
$
4,631,433

 
90.8
%
Net investment income
4,817,753

 
63.2
%
 
1,098,653

 
55.6
%
 
2,887,713

 
38.2
%
 
467,761

 
9.2
%
Distributions on a
   tax basis:
$
7,619,034

 
100.0
%
 
$
1,975,534

 
100.0
%
 
$
7,553,499

 
100.0
%
 
$
5,099,194

 
100.0
%
_______________
(1)
The Distribution Amount and Percentage reflected are estimated figures. The actual source of distributions are calculated in connection with the filing of the Company’s tax return.
The Company makes certain adjustments to the classification of stockholders’ equity as a result of permanent book-to-tax
differences, which include disallowed net operating loss carryforwards, amortization of deferred offering expenses and expense
reimbursement from Adviser. To the extent these differences are permanent, they are charged or credited to capital in excess of
par or accumulated net investment loss, as appropriate.
For the year ended December 31, 2019 and the transition period ended December 31, 2018, there were no permanent differences. For the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, permanent difference was related to $0.1 million and $0.6 million of amortization of deferred offering expenses, respectively.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company did not have differences between amortized cost basis and tax basis cost of investments.

F-26


Note 7. Directors’ Fees
The Company’s directors who do not serve in an executive officer capacity for the Company or Terra Income Advisors are entitled to receive annual cash retainer fees, fees for attending board and committee meetings and annual fees for serving as a committee chairperson. These directors receive an annual fee of $20,000, plus $2,500 for each board meeting attended in person, $1,000 for each board meeting attended via teleconference and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended. In addition, the chairman of the audit committee receives an annual fee of $7,500 and the chairman of each of the nominating and corporate governance and the valuation committees, and any other committee, receives an annual fee of $2,500 for their additional services. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the transition period ended December 31, 2018 and the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded $0.1 million, $0.03 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million of directors’ fees expense, respectively.
The Company will also reimburse each of the above directors for all reasonable and authorized business expenses in accordance with the Company policies as in effect from time to time, including reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each board meeting and each committee meeting not held concurrently with a board meeting.
The Company does not pay compensation to the directors who also serve in an executive officer capacity for the Company or Terra Income Advisors.
Note 8. Capital
The Company’s Offering ended on April 20, 2018. Since the commencement of the Offering on June 24, 2015 and through the end of the Offering on April 20, 2018, the Company has sold 8,878,606 shares of common stock, including shares purchased by Terra Capital Partners and excluding shares sold through the DRIP, in both an initial private placement and from the Offering, for gross proceeds of $103.6 million. On January 17, 2019, the Company sold 6,276 shares of common stock at a price of $9.56 per share to an officer in a private placement. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had 8,232,636 shares of common stock outstanding.
On August 7, 2018, the Board voted to adopt an amended and restated DRIP, which amended the Company’s previous DRIP to provide that the Company now sells shares thereunder at a price equal to its most recently disclosed NAV per share of its common stock immediately prior to the applicable distribution payment date. The terms of the previous DRIP otherwise remain unchanged. In accordance with the terms of the DRIP, the amended and restated DRIP went into effect on September 8, 2018.
Share Repurchase Program    
The Company implemented a share repurchase program whereby every quarter the Company offers to repurchase up to 2.5% of the weighed-average number of shares outstanding in the prior calendar year at a price per share equal to the most recently disclosed NAV per share of its common stock immediately prior to the date of repurchase. The purpose of the share repurchase program is to provide stockholders with liquidity, because there is otherwise no public market for the Company’s common stock. In addition, the Board may amend, suspend or terminate the share repurchase program upon 30 days’ notice.
The following table provides information with respect to repurchases of the Company’s common stock since the program's inception:
Period
 
 Total Number of Shares Repurchased
 
Average Price Paid per Share
 
Maximum Number of Shares Allowed to be Repurchased
 
Year Ended December 31, 2019:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
 
116,955

 
$
9.47

 
223,679

 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 (1)
 
357,127

 
$
9.37

 
223,679

 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2019 (1)
 
315,872

 
$
9.25

 
223,679

 
Three Months Ended December 31, 2019
 
191,397

 
$
9.15

 
223,679

 
Period
 
 Total Number of Shares Repurchased
 
Average Price Paid per Share
 
Maximum Number of Shares Allowed to be Repurchased
 
Transition Period Ended December 31, 2018:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended December 31, 2018
 
61,161

 
$
9.56

 
163,674

 

F-27


Period
 
 Total Number of Shares Repurchased
 
Average Price Paid per Share
 
Maximum Number of Shares Allowed to be Repurchased
 
Year Ended September 30, 2018:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended December 31, 2017
 
65,456

 
$
10.00

 
111,881

 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
 
34,980

 
$
9.86

 
163,674

 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
 
98,903

 
$
9.75

 
163,674

 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 (1)
 
167,421

 
$
9.67

 
163,674

 
_______________
(1)
Shares validly tendered exceeded the maximum number of shares allowed to be repurchased, however, the Company elected to purchase all shares validly tendered.
Note 9. Net Increase in Net Assets
Income per share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Other potentially dilutive shares, and the related impact to earnings, are considered when calculating earnings per share on a diluted basis. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were no dilutive shares.
The following information sets forth the computation of the weighted average net increase in net assets per share from operations for the year ended December 31, 2019, transition period ended December 31, 2018 and years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
Transition Period Ended December 31, 2018
 
Years Ended September 30,
Basic
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
Net increase in net assets resulting from
   operations
 
$
4,851,132

 
$
1,212,549

 
$
2,943,883

 
$
1,282,924

Weighted average common shares outstanding
 
8,738,650

 
8,993,646

 
8,663,812

 
5,691,428

Net increase in net assets per share resulting from
   operations
 
$
0.56

 
$
0.13

 
$
0.34

 
$
0.23

Note 10. Distributions
Distributions from net investment income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations, which differ from U.S. GAAP.

F-28


The following table reflects the Company’s distributions for the year ended December 31, 2019, the transition period ended December 31, 2018 and the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:
Record Date
 
Payment Date
 
Per Share
Per Day
 
Distributions
Paid in Cash
 
Distributions
Paid through
the DRIP
 
Total
Distributions
Paid/Accrued
Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
January 20, 2019
 
January 31, 2019
 
$
0.002389

 
$
463,408

 
$
201,500

 
$
664,908

February 20, 2019
 
February 28, 2019
 
0.002389

 
423,071

 
179,129

 
602,200

March 20, 2019
 
March 29, 2019
 
0.002389

 
472,614

 
195,507

 
668,121

April 20, 2019
 
April 30, 2019
 
0.002389

 
449,880

 
189,779

 
639,659

May 20, 2019
 
May 31, 2019
 
0.002389

 
467,067

 
196,200

 
663,267

June 20, 2019
 
June 28, 2019
 
0.002389

 
462,358

 
180,237

 
642,595

July 26, 2019
 
July 29, 2019
 
0.002389

 
454,782

 
184,214

 
638,996

August 26, 2019
 
August 27, 2019
 
0.002389

 
456,261

 
184,190

 
640,451

September 25, 2019
 
September 26, 2019
 
0.002389

 
449,128

 
171,949

 
621,077

October 28, 2019
 
October 29, 2019
 
0.002389

 
440,990

 
178,613

 
619,603

November 25, 2019
 
November 29, 2019
 
0.002389

 
427,924

 
173,070

 
600,994

December 26, 2019
 
December 27, 2019
 
0.002389

 
438,482

 
178,681

 
617,163

 
 
 
 
 

 
$
5,405,965

 
$
2,213,069

 
$
7,619,034

Record Date
 
Payment Date
 
Per Share
Per Day
 
Distributions
Paid in Cash
 
Distributions
Paid through
the DRIP
 
Total
Distributions
Paid/Accrued
Transition Period Ended December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
October 20, 2018
 
October 31, 2018
 
$
0.002389

 
$
457,760

 
$
206,734

 
$
664,494

November 20, 2018
 
November 30, 2018
 
0.002389

 
443,634

 
200,955

 
644,589

December 20, 2018
 
December 29, 2018
 
0.002389

 
460,843

 
205,608

 
666,451

 
 
 
 
 

 
$
1,362,237

 
$
613,297

 
$
1,975,534

Record Date
 
Payment Date
 
Per Share
Per Day
 
Distributions
Paid in Cash
 
Distributions
Paid through
the DRIP
 
Total
Distributions
Paid/Accrued
Year Ended September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
October 20, 2017
 
October 31, 2017
 
$
0.002389

 
$
379,643

 
$
182,495

 
$
562,138

November 20, 2017
 
November 30, 2017
 
0.002389

 
383,269

 
182,003

 
565,272

December 20, 2017
 
December 29, 2017
 
0.002389

 
406,236

 
195,247

 
601,483

January 20, 2018
 
January 31, 2018
 
0.002389

 
409,747

 
204,116

 
613,863

February 20, 2018
 
February 27, 2018
 
0.002389

 
377,936

 
189,792

 
567,728

March 20, 2018
 
March 30, 2018
 
0.002389

 
450,154

 
210,657

 
660,811

April 20, 2018
 
April 27, 2018
 
0.002389

 
443,998

 
203,856

 
647,854

May 20, 2018
 
May 31, 2018
 
0.002389

 
464,061

 
213,512

 
677,573

June 20, 2018
 
June 29, 2018
 
0.002389

 
514,611

 
142,098

 
656,709

July 20, 2018
 
July 30, 2018
 
0.002389

 
525,722

 
147,067

 
672,789

August 20, 2018
 
August 31, 2018
 
0.002389

 
460,580

 
213,263

 
673,843

September 20, 2018
 
September 28, 2018
 
0.002389

 
454,247

 
199,189

 
653,436

 
 
 
 
 

 
$
5,270,204

 
$
2,283,295

 
$
7,553,499


F-29


Record Date
 
Payment Date
 
Per Share
Per Day
 
Distributions
Paid in Cash
 
Distributions
Paid through
the DRIP
 
Total
Distributions
Paid/Accrued
Year Ended September 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
October 20, 2016
 
October 31, 2016
 
$
0.002733

 
$
237,090

 
$
123,938

 
$
361,028

November 20, 2016
 
November 30, 2016
 
0.002733

 
242,959

 
123,376

 
366,335

December 20, 2016
 
December 31, 2016
 
0.002733

 
264,315

 
132,250

 
396,565

January 20, 2017
 
January 31, 2017
 
0.002389

 
245,151

 
120,219

 
365,370

February 20, 2017
 
February 28, 2017
 
0.002389

 
229,907

 
113,350

 
343,257

March 20, 2017
 
March 31, 2017
 
0.002389

 
269,633

 
130,692

 
400,325

April 20, 2017
 
April 30, 2017
 
0.002389

 
274,065

 
136,743

 
410,808

May 20, 2017
 
May 31, 2017
 
0.002389

 
296,817

 
151,121

 
447,938

June 20, 2017
 
June 30, 2017
 
0.002389

 
311,708

 
153,637

 
465,345

July 20, 2017
 
July 31, 2017
 
0.002389

 
335,112

 
164,935

 
500,047

August 20, 2017
 
August 31, 2017
 
0.002389

 
346,753

 
172,852

 
519,605

September 20, 2017
 
September 30, 2017
 
0.002389

 
349,401

 
173,170

 
522,571

 
 
 
 
 

 
$
3,402,911

 
$
1,696,283

 
$
5,099,194

Note 11. Financial Highlights
The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the year ended December 31, 2019, the transition period ended December 31, 2018, the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 and for the period from June 24, 2015, the date on which the minimum offering requirement of $2,000,000 was met, through September 30, 2015:
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
Transition Period Ended December 31, 2018
 
Years Ended September 30,
 
For the period from June 24, 2015 through September 30, 2015
 
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
2016
 
Per share data:
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net asset value at beginning of period
 
$
9.47

 
$
9.56

 
$
10.00

 
$
10.06

 
$
10.97

 
$
10.97

Results of operations (1):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
Net investment income (loss)
 
0.57

 
0.12

 
0.31

 
0.15

 
(0.99
)
 
0.05

Net change in unrealized
   appreciation on investments
 
(0.01
)
 
0.01

 
0.03

 
0.08

 
0.08

 
—

Net change in unrealized
   (appreciation) depreciation on
   obligations under participation
   agreements (2)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(0.02
)
 
—

Net increase (decrease) in net assets
resulting from operations
 
0.56

 
0.13

 
0.34

 
0.23

 
(0.93
)
 
0.05

Stockholder distributions (3):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
Distributions from return of capital
 
(0.32
)
 
(0.10
)
 
(0.54
)
 
(0.81
)
 
(1.00
)
 
(0.27
)
Distributions from net investment
income
 
(0.55
)
 
(0.12
)
 
(0.33
)
 
(0.08
)
 
—

 
—

Net decrease in net assets resulting
   from stockholder distributions
 
(0.87
)
 
(0.22
)
 
(0.87
)
 
(0.89
)
 
(1.00
)
 
(0.27
)
Capital share transactions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
Reduction of transaction
charges (Note 4) (4)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.42

 
—

 
—

    Other (5)
 
—

 
—

 
0.09

 
0.18

 
1.02

 
0.22

Net increase in net assets resulting
   from capital share transactions
 
—

 
—

 
0.09

 
0.60

 
1.02

 
0.22

Net asset value, end of period
 
$
9.16

 
$
9.47

 
$
9.56

 
$
10.00

 
$
10.06

 
$
10.97

Shares outstanding at end of period
 
8,232,636

 
8,975,103

 
8,972,358

 
7,530,130

 
4,222,358

 
926,357

    Total return (6)
 
6.15
%
 
5.29
%
 
4.02
%
 
8.10
%
 
(0.26
)%
 
(10.36
)%

F-30


 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
Transition Period Ended December 31, 2018
 
Years Ended September 30,
 
For the period from June 24, 2015 through September 30, 2015
 
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
2016
 
Ratio/Supplemental data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
Net assets, end of period
 
$
75,378,088

 
$
85,039,019

 
$
85,773,410

 
$
75,334,293

 
$
42,474,748

 
$
10,161,072

Ratio of net investment income (loss) to
average net assets (7)
 
6.26
%
 
4.92
%
 
3.26
%
 
1.47
%
 
(9.30
)%
 
1.33
%
Ratio of operating expenses to average
net assets (7)
 
6.24
%
 
7.28
%
 
7.21
%
 
7.73
%
 
20.73
 %
 
2.81
%
Portfolio turnover
 
28.37
%
 
10.30
%
 
10.22
%
 
33.06
%
 
—
 %
 
—
%
_______________
(1)
The per share data was derived by using the weighted average shares outstanding during the applicable period.
(2)
The impact on net asset value was approximately $0.008 for the year ended December 31, 2019, $0.001 for the transition period ended December 31, 2018, and $0.002 and $0.005 for the year ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(3)
The per share data for distributions reflects the actual amount of distributions declared per share during the period.
(4)
Amount is calculated based on total shares outstanding as of September 30, 2017.
(5)
The continuous issuance of shares of common stock in the Offering as well as pursuant to the DRIP may cause an incremental increase in net asset value per share due to the sale of shares at the then prevailing public offering price and the receipt of net proceeds per share by the Company in excess of the net asset value per share on each subscription closing date. In addition, the timing of the Company’s sales of shares during the year and the repurchases of shares also impacted the net asset value per share.
(6)
Total return is calculated assuming a purchase of shares of common stock at the current net asset value on the first day and a sale at the current net asset value on the last day of the periods reported. Distributions, if any, are assumed for purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the DRIP. The total return does not consider the effect of any selling commissions or charges that may have been incurred in connection with the sale of shares of our common stock. For the transition period ended December 31, 2018, the total return was annualized.
(7)
For the year ended September 30, 2017, excluding the reduction of offering costs, the ratios of net investment loss and operating expenses to average net assets are (0.19)% and 9.38%, respectively. For the year ended September 30, 2016 and the period ended September 30, 2015, excluding the expense support and conditional reimbursement, the ratio of net investment loss to average net assets was (11.49)% and (13.82)%, respectively, and the ratio of operating expenses to average net assets were 22.91% and 77.96%, respectively.

F-31


Note 12. Condensed Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 (Unaudited)
The condensed statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 are as follows:
 
 
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
 
 
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
Total investment income
 
$
9,576,584

Base management fees
 
1,716,429

Operating expense reimbursement to Adviser
 
907,405

Servicing fees
 
944,744

Incentive fees on capital gains
 
73,407

All other expenses
 
2,485,681

Total operating expenses
 
6,127,666

Net investment income
 
3,448,918

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments and obligations under participation agreements
 
383,459

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
 
$
3,832,377

Per common share data:
 
 
Net investment income
 
$
0.39

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
 
$
0.43

Distributions declared
 
$
0.87

 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding
 
8,947,175

Note 13. Selected Quarterly Financial Data
 
 
Three Months Ended
  
 
December 31, 2019
 
September 30, 2019
 
June 30, 2019
 
March 31, 2019
 
 
(Unaudited)
 
(Unaudited)
 
(Unaudited)
 
(Unaudited)
Total investment income
 
$
3,028,982

 
$
2,322,049

 
$
2,237,536

 
$
2,417,290

Total operating expenses
 
1,235,949

 
1,167,685

 
1,262,791

 
1,327,980

Net investment income
 
1,793,033

 
1,154,364

 
974,745

 
1,089,310

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments
 
127,814

 
(88,082
)
 
(8,666
)
 
(117,912
)
Net change unrealized depreciation (appreciation) on
obligations under participation agreements
 
(66,090
)
 
(4,149
)
 
(3,235
)
 
—

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
 
$
1,854,757

 
$
1,062,133

 
$
962,844

 
$
971,398

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment income per share
 
$
0.21

 
$
0.13

 
$
0.11

 
$
0.12

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
   per share
 
$
0.22

 
$
0.12

 
$
0.11

 
$
0.11

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net asset value per share at period end
 
$
9.16

 
$
9.15

 
$
9.25

 
$
9.37


F-32


 
Transition Period Ended December 31, 2018
 
Three Months Ended
  
 
September 30,
2018
 
June 30,
2018
 
March 31,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
 
 
 
(Unaudited)
 
(Unaudited)
 
(Unaudited)
 
(Unaudited)
Total investment income
$
2,649,375

 
$
2,592,764

 
$
2,304,383

 
$
2,030,062

 
$
1,823,887

Total operating expenses
1,591,055

 
1,564,173

 
1,501,494

 
1,470,944

 
1,490,497

Net investment income
1,058,320

 
1,028,591

 
802,889

 
559,118

 
333,390

Net change in unrealized appreciation
   (depreciation) on investments
143,358

 
(37,536
)
 
314,310

 
(47,844
)
 
(22,969
)
Net change unrealized depreciation
   (appreciation) on obligations under
   participation agreements
10,871

 
740

 
91

 
(531
)
 
13,634

Net increase in net assets resulting
   from operations
$
1,212,549

 
$
991,795

 
$
1,117,290

 
$
510,743

 
$
324,055

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment income per share
$
0.12

 
$
0.11

 
$
0.09

 
$
0.07

 
$
0.04

Net increase in net assets resulting
   from operations per share
$
0.13

 
$
0.11

 
$
0.12

 
$
0.06

 
$
0.04

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net asset value per share at period end
$
9.47

 
$
9.56

 
$
9.67

 
$
9.75

 
$
9.86


Note 14. Subsequent Events
The management of the Company has evaluated events and transactions through the date the financial statements were issued and has determined that there are no other events that would require adjustment to or disclosure in the Company’s financial statements.

F-33


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 21, 2020
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TERRA INCOME FUND 6, INC.
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Vikram S. Uppal
 
 
 
Vikram S. Uppal
 
 
 
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
   and President
 
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Gregory M. Pinkus
 
 
 
Gregory M. Pinkus
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer,
 
 
 
Treasurer and Secretary
 
 
 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
 
 
 
 
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Vikram S. Uppal
 
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
   and President
 
February 21, 2020
Vikram S. Uppal
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Gregory M. Pinkus
 
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
February 21, 2020
Gregory M. Pinkus
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Jeffrey M. Altman
 
Director
 
February 21, 2020
Jeffrey M. Altman
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Spencer E. Goldenberg
 
Director
 
February 21, 2020
Spencer E. Goldenberg
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Robert E. Marks
 
Director
 
February 21, 2020
Robert E. Marks
 
 
 
 


53