The accompanying financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made that are necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, and the results of its operations and its cash flows.

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or other standard setting bodies and adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption. Under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, as amended, the Company meets the definition of an emerging growth company and has elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards, which delays the adoption of these accounting standards until they would apply to private companies.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates and assumptions are based on the Company’s historical experience, and on various other factors that management believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the recording of expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and actual results, the Company’s future results of operations will be affected. The more significant estimates and assumptions by management include, among others: the valuation allowance of deferred tax assets resulting from net operating losses, the valuation of stock options, the valuation of the warrant to purchase Common Stock and the valuation of embedded derivatives within the Company’s debt, long-term.

The Company’s marketable securities portfolio consists primarily of investments in money market funds, asset-backed securities, U.S. treasury and agency securities and short-term highly liquid, high credit quality corporate debt securities. The Company considers its marketable securities to be available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are classified as cash equivalents, or as short-term or long-term marketable securities based on the maturity date at the time of purchase and their availability to meet current operating requirements. Available-for-sale securities that mature in three months or less from the date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents. Available-for-sale securities, excluding cash equivalents, that mature in one year or less are classified as short-term marketable securities and those that mature in more than one year are classified as long-term.

Securities that are classified as available-for-sale are measured at fair value; see “Fair Value of Financial Instruments” below. Any premium arising at purchase is amortized to the earliest call date and any discount arising at purchase is accreted to maturity. Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recorded along with interest income on investments in interest income, net in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Unrealized gains and losses are excluded from earnings and are reported as a component of other comprehensive income. The cost of investments sold will be calculated using the specific-identification method.

For securities available-for-sale, Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments eliminates the concept of other-than-temporary impairment and instead requires entities to determine if impairment is related to credit loss or non-credit loss. In making the assessment of whether a loss is from credit or other factors, management considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency and adverse conditions related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an allowance is created, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Subsequent activity related to the credit loss component in the form of write-offs or recoveries is recognized as part of the allowance for credit losses on securities available-for-sale. The Company has made the accounting policy election to exclude accrued interest receivable on securities from the estimate of credit losses and will record a credit loss expense for accrued interest receivable in the period when a credit loss is recorded for the related securities. Management determined that the Company did not require an allowance for credit losses for available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2023 or 2022, as only a small number of investments had a present value of cash flows expected to be collected in excess of the amortized cost, and the aggregate amount of this credit loss was immaterial. The Company did not have any related write-offs or recoveries for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. The Company maintains deposits in financial institutions in excess of government insured limits. Management believes that the Company is not exposed to significant credit risk as the Company’s cash and cash equivalents are held at financial institutions that management believes to be of high credit quality. The Company has not experienced any losses due to credit risk on such accounts during any of the periods presented.

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are accounted for in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs when measuring fair value and classifies those inputs into three levels:

To the extent the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair values requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by management in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized as Level 3. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. There were no transfers made among the three levels in the fair value hierarchy for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

The carrying amount of the Company’s long-term debt approximates fair value due to its variable market interest rate and management’s opinion that current rates and terms that would be available to the Company with the same maturity and security structure would be essentially equivalent to that of the Company’s long-term debt. Certain features of the term loan were determined to be an embedded derivative requiring separate measurement from the loan host instrument.

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, including leasehold improvements and finance lease right-of-use assets that are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the terms of the respective leases. The Company generally uses the following useful lives for its property and equipment categories: three years for computer-related assets and five years for furniture. See Note 7. Leases for additional discussion regarding our finance lease for computer equipment .

The Company accounts for its leases under ASC 842, Leases. Under this guidance, arrangements meeting the definition of a lease are classified as operating or finance leases and are recorded in the balance sheet at the commencement date as both a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, calculated by discounting fixed lease payments over the lease term at the rate implicit in the lease or the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. Lease liabilities are increased by interest and reduced by payments each period, and right-of-use assets are amortized over the lease term, or, for finance leases, over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the assets. For operating leases, interest on the lease liability and the amortization of the right-of-use asset results in straight-line rent expense over the lease term. For finance leases, the right-of-use asset is amortized on a straight-line basis and the amortization is presented as an operating expense separately from interest expense on the lease liability. Variable lease expenses are recorded when incurred and not included in the measurement of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities.

The debt discount, which reduces the related debt balance in the balance sheets, is comprised of debt issuance costs, contractual fees due upon repayment of the debt, the issuance date fair value of warrants issued with the debt and the issuance date fair value of any derivatives that are bifurcated from the debt. Debt issuance costs include direct costs (e.g., legal costs and bank fees) incurred to issue non-revolving debt instruments. The debt discount is amortized to interest expense over the contractual term of the related debt using the effective interest method.

The Company evaluates embedded derivatives within debt to determine whether the embedded derivatives should be bifurcated from the host instrument and accounted for as a derivative at fair value that will be remeasured at each reporting period for the term of the loan, with changes in fair value recorded in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Management initially assesses the probability of the occurrence of trigger events for bifurcated embedded derivatives in determining fair value. The probability is reassessed at each reporting period during the term of a loan.

The Company assesses whether warrants issued require accounting as derivatives. The Company determined that its warrant to purchase Common Stock is not a liability within the scope of ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, but met the requirements to be classified within stockholders’ equity, as the warrant is indexed to the Company’s own stock and met all of the conditions for equity classification in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging.

Research and development (“R&D”) expenses primarily consist of consultants and materials, biologic storage, salaries and other personnel-related expenses related to R&D activities and are expensed as incurred. Payments for these activities are based on the terms of the individual agreements, which may differ from the pattern of costs incurred, and are reflected on the balance sheets as prepaid or accrued expenses. The Company records accruals for estimated ongoing research costs. When evaluating the adequacy of the accrued liabilities, the Company analyzes progress of the studies, including the phase or completion of events, invoices received and contracted costs.

Clinical trial costs are a significant component of R&D expenses and include costs associated with third-party contractors. The Company accrues and expenses costs for clinical trial activities performed by third parties based upon the work completed to date for each clinical trial in accordance with established agreements. The Company determines its costs through discussions with internal clinical stakeholders and outside service providers as to the progress or stage of completion of clinical trials or services and the contracted fee to be paid for such services. In the event advance payments are made to an outside service provider, the payments are recorded within prepaid expenses and other current assets in the balance sheets and subsequently recognized as R&D expense in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss when the associated services have been performed. As actual costs become known, the Company adjusts its estimates, liabilities and assets. Inputs used in the determination of estimates discussed above may vary from actual, which will result in adjustments to R&D expense in future periods.

The Company expenses stock-based compensation to employees, non-employees and board members over the requisite service period based on the estimated grant date fair value of the awards and actual forfeitures. The Company estimates the fair value of stock option grants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires the use of a number of complex assumptions including the fair value of the Common Stock, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected dividends, and the expected term of the option. The fair value of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) is the closing market price of the Common Stock on the date of the grant. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based awards represent management’s best estimates and involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. Stock-based awards with graded-vesting schedules are recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

Income taxes are recorded in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which provides for deferred taxes using an asset and liability approach. The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse, and net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and R&D tax credit carryforwards. Valuation allowances are provided if, based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company has recorded a full valuation allowance to reduce its net deferred income tax assets to zero. In the event the Company were to determine that it would be able to realize some or all of its deferred income tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred income tax asset valuation allowance would increase income in the period such determination was made.

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740. When uncertain tax positions exist, the Company recognizes the tax benefit of tax positions to the extent that the benefit would more likely than not be realized assuming examination by the taxing authority. The determination as to whether the tax benefit will more likely than not be realized is based upon the technical merits of the tax position as well as consideration of the available facts and circumstances. The Company has not recorded any liabilities related to uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. The Company’s policy is to record interest and penalties, if any, as part of income tax benefit. No interest or penalties were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

Basic net loss per share of common stock is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share of common stock includes the effect, if any, from the potential exercise or conversion of securities, such as convertible debt, stock options, restricted stock units and warrants, which would result in the issuance of incremental shares of common stock. However, potential shares of common stock are excluded if their effect is anti-dilutive. For diluted net loss per share, the weighted-average number of shares of common stock is the same for basic net loss per share due to the fact that when a net loss exists, dilutive securities are not included in the calculation as the impact is anti-dilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2023, potential common shares consisted of stock options, restricted stock units, convertible debt and a warrant to purchase Common Stock. For the year ended December 31, 2022, potential shares of common stock consisted of stock options.

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which was codified with its subsequent amendments as ASC 326. ASC 326 seeks to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments, including trade receivables, and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The amendments require an entity to replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current U.S. GAAP with a methodology that reflects current expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2023. The Company’s marketable securities portfolio consists entirely of available-for-sale debt securities and, as such, the adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on its financial statements and disclosures upon adoption, but it did require the Company to provide additional disclosures related to its available-for-sale debt securities in a continuous unrealized loss position.

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470- 20) and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity (“ASU 2020-06”), to address the complexity associated with applying U.S. GAAP to certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity. ASU 2020-06 includes amendments to the guidance on convertible instruments and the derivative scope exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity and simplifies the accounting for convertible instruments, which include beneficial conversion features or cash conversion features by removing certain separation models in Subtopic 470-20. Additionally, ASU 2020-06 requires entities to use the “if-converted” method when calculating diluted earnings per share for convertible instruments. The Company early adopted this guidance on January 1, 2023, with no impact to the financial statements or results of operations of the Company.