N-CSR 1 primary-document.htm
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 30, 2023
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
FORM N-CSR
 
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
 
Investment Company Act file number 811-22842
 
FORUM FUNDS II
Three Canal Plaza, Suite 600
Portland, Maine 04101
 
 
Zachary Tackett, Principal Executive Officer
Three Canal Plaza, Suite 600
Portland, Maine 04101
207-347-2000
 
 
Date of fiscal year end: June 30
 
Date of reporting period: June 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023
 
 

ITEM 1. REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS.
 
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
ANNUAL
REPORT
June
30,
2023
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
A
Message
to
Our
Shareholders
(Unaudited)
2
Performance
Chart
and
Analysis
(Unaudited)
5
Schedule
of
Investments
6
Statement
of
Assets
and
Liabilities
9
Statement
of
Operations
10
Statements
of
Changes
in
Net
Assets
11
Financial
Highlights
12
Notes
to
Financial
Statements
13
Report
of
Independent
Registered
Public
Accounting
Firm
18
Additional
Information
(Unaudited)
19
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
A
MESSAGE
TO
OUR
SHAREHOLDERS
(Unaudited)
June
30,
2023
2
Dear
Shareholders:
As
of
June
30,
2023,
the
Acuitas
U.S.
Microcap
Fund’s
(the
“Fund”)
net
asset
value
was
$12.37
per
share
with
total
net
assets
at
$62.9
million.
Over
the
past
year,
the
Fund
returned
14.04%,
compared
to
6.63%
for
the
Russell
Microcap
Index
(the
“Benchmark”).
This
represents
7.41%
of
outperformance.
The
Fund
is
ahead
of
the
Benchmark
over
the
longer
term
3-
and
5-year
time
periods
as
well,
outperforming
by
an
annualized
8.64%
and
3.09%
rate,
respectively.
Since
the
July
18,
2014,
inception,
the
Fund
has
returned
an
annualized
7.93%,
outperforming
the
Benchmark
return
of
6.02%
by
1.91%
over
the
same
time
period.
Performance
data
quoted
represents
past
performance,
which
does
not
guarantee
future
results.
Investment
return
and
principal
value
will
fluctuate,
so
that
an
investor’s
shares,
when
redeemed,
may
be
worth
more
or
less
than
their
original
cost;
and
the
current
performance
may
be
lower
or
higher
than
the
performance
data
quoted.
For
the
most
recent
month-end
performance,
please
call
(844)
805-5628.
U.S.
equities
wrapped
up
one
of
the
best
first
halves
to
a
year
in
the
past
few
decades,
with
the
Russell
3000
returning
+16.17%,
the
fourth
best
start
in
nearly
three
decades.
Additionally,
the
Fund
had
a
strong
start
to
the
year,
returning
8.80%
compared
to
2.32%
for
the
Benchmark,
representing
648
basis
points
of
outperformance
to
start
2023.
This
time
last
year,
we
noted
how
every
market
cap
tier
within
U.S.
equities
was
in
bear
market
territory,
and
the
S&P
500
had
just
experienced
the
worst
start
to
a
year
in
50
years.
While
there
is
certainly
more
green
on
the
screen
for
investors’
portfolios
now
than
there
was
just
12
months
ago,
many
significant
items
driving
markets
today
are
eerily
similar
to
this
time
last
year.
Inflation
remains
elevated,
expectations
around
rate
hikes
from
the
Federal
Reserve
continue
to
drive
market
volatility,
and
the
war
in
Ukraine
continues
with
no
end
in
sight.
Uncertainty
remains
seemingly
everywhere,
with
good
news
often
becoming
bad
news
for
markets.
ADP
employment
figures
for
June
showed
a
stunning
497,000
private
sector
hires,
nearly
doubling
the
figures
for
May
and
well
ahead
of
the
220,000
that
was
expected.
Naturally,
markets
sold
off
on
the
news,
as
positive
data
points
imply
that
the
Fed’s
aggressive
rate
hikes
are
expected
to
continue.
This
strong
jobs
report
followed
stronger
than
expected
labor
market
data
earlier
in
the
quarter
as
well.
The
combination
of
low
unemployment,
strong
job
growth,
and
increased
wage
growth
(up
nearly
5%
year-over-year)
point
to
signs
that
the
U.S.
might
dodge
a
recession
after
all
(depending
on
your
definition
of
“recession”).
The
Fed
remains
in
an
unenviable
position
the
need
to
find
the
right
balance
of
taming
inflation
towards
their
long
term
2%
target
while
also
avoiding
crushing
employment.
While
they
did
pause
rate
hikes
in
June,
they
resumed
with
another
hike
in
the
third
quarter,
with
another
hike
remaining
a
possibility
before
year
end.
Where
the
economy
eventually
lands
and
the
trajectory
of
that
landing
remains
the
most
pressing
question
for
investors,
which
is
right
where
we
were
last
year.
The
collapse
of
Silicon
Valley
Bank,
First
Republic
Bank,
and
Signature
Bank
earlier
this
year
blindsided
investors
and
led
to
widespread
worries
that
we
were
seeing
early
signs
of
another
financial
crisis.
As
we
enter
the
third
quarter,
the
banking
system
is
largely
seen
as
out
of
trouble
for
now,
and
many
of
our
managers
are
digging
through
the
rubble
and
finding
attractive
new
stock
ideas.
Broadly
speaking
the
narrative
has
improved
dramatically
from
just
a
few
short
months
ago,
and
most
potential
tightening
in
business
conditions
as
a
direct
result
of
this
“bank
crisis”
appears
to
have
been
avoided.
At
the
center
of
this
are
signs
of
stabilization
across
deposits,
with
fears
of
continued
deposit
flight
issues
easing.
Concerns
do
remain
in
a
few
areas,
particularly
in
banks
with
greater
exposure
to
commercial
real
estate,
however
even
that
is
hit
or
miss.
The
devil
is
always
in
the
details,
and
while
downtown
hubs
in
major
cities
continue
to
struggle,
diversified
real
estate
portfolios
with
less
direct
exposure
to
business
district
office
space
have
a
greater
chance
of
weathering
the
storm.
As
one
manager
we
think
particularly
highly
of
put
it:
“some
central
business
districts
are
struggling
and
will
undoubtedly
see
an
uptick
in
non-performing
loans,
but
we
struggle
to
see
how
a
suburban
dentist
will
go
out
of
business
anytime
soon.”
Additionally,
there
are
signs
that
office
space
vacancy
issues
are
concentrated
across
a
few
properties,
while
other
individual
buildings
typically
newer,
“class
A”
type
properties
are
operating
near
pre-pandemic
vacancy
levels.
The
actual
commercial
real
estate
exposure
will
naturally
vary
bank
by
bank,
which
presents
unique
opportunities
for
active
managers
to
add
value
in
the
space
as
they
can
avoid
those
with
more
risk
in
their
loan
books
and
lean
into
banks
that
are
in
a
position
of
competitive
strength.
Along
these
lines,
it
is
important
to
highlight
that
the
Fund
had
no
exposure
to
the
banks
that
failed
earlier
this
year.
In
fact,
financials
added
the
most
value
of
any
sector
for
the
Fund
relative
to
the
Benchmark,
accounting
for
more
than
one
third
of
the
Fund’s
outperformance
over
the
last
twelve
months.
Industrials
was
the
other
sector
that
added
meaningful
excess
returns
for
the
Fund.
On
an
absolute
basis,
industrials
was
the
top
performing
sector
across
all
of
microcap
for
the
past
12
months,
advancing
nearly
24%.
Strong
stock
selection
across
our
portfolio
along
with
an
overweight
to
the
sector
drove
the
Fund’s
outperformance
in
the
space.
Health
care
has
also
performed
very
well
over
the
past
12
months,
and
especially
in
the
most
recent
quarter
leading
into
6/30/2023.
This
recent
surge
in
health
care
led
to
large
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
A
MESSAGE
TO
OUR
SHAREHOLDERS
(Unaudited)
June
30,
2023
3
and
expensive
stocks
within
the
Microcap
Index
performing
well
during
the
2nd
quarter
of
2023,
as
have
lower
quality
(low
ROE),
non-earners,
and
higher
momentum
names.
Given
the
nature
of
the
leadership
within
microcap,
we
would
generally
characterize
the
last
few
months
as
a
difficult
market
environment
for
our
strategy.
Despite
the
difficult
active
environment,
strong
stock
picking
across
our
managers
was
able
to
soften
the
blow
from
these
headwinds
and
help
the
Fund
stay
within
earshot
of
the
Benchmark
(4.92%
return
for
the
Fund
in
the
second
quarter
vs
5.29%
for
the
Benchmark)
and
remain
well
ahead
of
the
Benchmark
year-to-
date
in
2023.
As
of
June
30,
2023,
the
Fund’s
sector
allocations
were:
As
of
June
30,
2023,
the
10
largest
stock
positions
in
the
Fund
were:
Market
volatility
remains
and
we
do
not
expect
that
to
abate
in
the
near
term.
Volatility
naturally
leads
to
a
healthy
stock
picking
environment,
as
stock
prices
are
often
disconnected
from
their
fundamentals.
On
the
other
side
of
the
coin,
by
simply
avoiding
the
riskiest
stocks
during
these
markets,
active
managers
add
additional
value.
The
perfect
example
of
this
is
the
Fund’s
lack
of
exposure
to
the
banks
at
the
center
of
the
banking
crisis,
which
we
attribute
to
insightful
due
diligence
from
our
managers.
There
are
a
few
other
catalysts
in
place
that
we
are
excited
about.
There
is
still
a
pile
of
cash
sitting
on
the
sidelines
waiting
to
be
deployed
by
private
equity
funds
that
could
purchase
our
microcap
holdings
at
strong
premiums.
We
have
seen
a
healthy
level
of
mergers
and
acquisitions
(“M&A”)
activity
so
far
this
year,
and
we
expect
it
to
continue.
Health
care
has
been
a
hot
spot
for
“M&A”
to
start
the
year,
and
we
wouldn’t
be
surprised
to
see
an
uptick
in
activity
in
other
areas
of
the
market.
As
we
have
written
about
in
the
past,
microcap
stocks
are
taken
out
far
more
frequently
than
stocks
in
other
areas
of
the
market
and
at
meaningfully
higher
premiums.
The
Fed’s
tightening
cycle
was
put
on
“pause”
earlier
this
year,
and
we
share
the
consensus
view
that
we
are
in
the
later
innings
of
their
hiking
cycle.
This
seems
to
have
placed
a
floor
on
the
market,
reducing
some
near-term
downside
risk.
Conversely,
we
still
think
we
are
in
the
early
innings
for
an
improved
active
environment
due
to
higher
interest
rates
and
less
broad
support
for
non-earning
secular
growth
stories.
Finally,
microcap
has
far
more
leverage
to
the
U.S.
economy
than
large
cap
due
to
less
reliance
on
global
revenue
streams.
In
summary,
we
believe
the
cyclical
catalysts
in
place
alongside
the
attractive
relative
valuations
continue
to
provide
an
opportune
time
for
microcap
exposure.
AFMCX
Russell
Microcap
Index
Industrials
27.80%
16.39%
Health
Care
20.30%
24.79%
Technology
15.91%
10.36%
Consumer
Discretionary
12.39%
12.38%
Financials
10.81%
17.48%
Energy
4.83%
3.67%
Basic
Materials
2.61%
4.27%
Real
Estate
1.59%
5.24%
Consumer
Staples
1.36%
1.72%
Utilities
1.24%
1.69%
Telecommunications
1.16%
2.01%
UFP
Technologies,
Inc.
1.8
%
Photronics
,
Inc.
1.7
%
IES
Holdings,
Inc.
1.5
%
Columbus
McKinnon
Corp.
1.5
%
Harvard
Bioscience,
Inc.
1.5
%
BioLife
Solutions,
Inc.
1.4
%
Wabash
National
Corp.
1.3
%
Chase
Corp.
1.3
%
Winmark
Corp.
1.2
%
Enova
International,
Inc.
1.2
%
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
A
MESSAGE
TO
OUR
SHAREHOLDERS
(Unaudited)
June
30,
2023
4
We
thank
you
for
your
continued
support.
Best
Regards,
Chris
Tessin
Matt
Nieman
IMPORTANT
RISKS
AND
DISCLOSURE:
There
can
be
no
guarantee
that
any
strategy
(risk
management
or
otherwise)
will
be
successful.
All
investing
involves
risk,
including
potential
loss
of
principal.
The
Russell®
Microcap
Index
measures
the
performance
of
the
microcap
segment
of
the
U.S.
equity
market.
Microcap
stocks
make
up
less
than
3%
of
the
U.S.
equity
market
(by
market
cap)
and
consist
of
the
smallest
1,000
securities
in
the
small-cap
Russell
2000®
Index,
plus
the
next
smallest
eligible
securities
by
market
cap.
You
cannot
invest
directly
in
an
index.
The
S&P
500®
Index
is
a
market-value
weighted
index
representing
the
performance
of
500
widely
held,
publicly
traded
large
capitalization
stocks.
The
Russell
3000®
is
a
market
index
that
measures
the
performance
of
the
top
3,000
U.S.
publicly
traded
companies
as
ranked
by
market
capitalization.
Return
on
Equity
(ROE)
is
the
measure
of
a
company's
net
income
divided
by
its
shareholders'
equity.
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
PERFORMANCE
CHART
AND
ANALYSIS
(Unaudited)
June
30,
2023
5
The
following
chart
reflects
the
change
in
the
value
of
a
hypothetical
$10,000
investment
in
Institutional
Shares,
including
reinvested
dividends
and
distributions,
in
Acuitas
US
Microcap
Fund
(the”Fund”)
compared
with
the
performance
of
the
benchmark,
Russell
Microcap®
Index
(“Russell
Microcap”),
since
inception.
The
Russell
Microcap
is
an
unmanaged
index
that
measures
the
performance
of
the
microcap
segment
of
the
US
equity
market,
which
consists
of
the
smallest
1,000
securities
in
the
Russell
2000®
Index
and
the
next
1,000
smallest
eligible
securities
by
market
capitalization.
The
total
return
of
the
Russell
Microcap
includes
the
reinvestment
of
dividends
and
income.
The
total
return
of
the
Fund
includes
operating
expenses
that
reduce
returns,
while
the
total
return
of
the
Russell
Microcap
does
not
include
expenses.
The
Fund
is
professionally
managed,
while
the
Russell
Microcap
is
unmanaged
and
is
not
available
for
investment.
Comparison
of
Change
in
Value
of
a
$10,000
Investment
Acuitas
US
Microcap
Fund
vs.
Russell
Microcap®
Index
Performance
data
quoted
represents
past
performance
and
is
no
guarantee
of
future
results.
Current
performance
may
be
lower
or
higher
than
the
performance
data
quoted.
Investment
return
and
principal
value
will
fluctuate
so
that
shares,
when
redeemed,
may
be
worth
more
or
less
than
original
cost.
For
the
most
recent
month-end
performance,
please
call
(844)
805-5628.
As
stated
in
the
Fund’s
prospectus,
the
annual
operating
expense
ratios
(gross)
for
Institutional
and
Investor
Shares
are
2.00%
and
2.25%,
respectively.
However,
the
Fund’s
Adviser has
contractually
agreed
to
waive
its
fee
and/or
reimburse
Fund
expenses
to
limit
Total
Annual
Fund
Operating
Expenses
After
Fee
Waiver
and/or
Expense
Reimbursement
(excluding
all
taxes,
interest,
portfolio
transaction
expenses,
acquired
fund
fees
and
expenses,
proxy
expenses
and
extraordinary
expenses)
to
1.50%
and
1.75%
for
Institutional
and
Investor
Shares,
respectively,
through
November
1,
2023
(the
“Expense
Cap”).
The
Expense
Cap
may
be
raised
or
eliminated
only
with
the
consent
of
the
Board
of
Trustees.
The
Adviser
may
be
reimbursed
by
the
Fund
for
fees
waived
and
expenses
reimbursed
by
the
Adviser
pursuant
to
the
Expense
Cap
if
such
payment
is
made
within
three
years
of
the
fee
waiver
or
expense
reimbursement,
and
does
not
cause
the
Total
Annual
Fund
Operating
Expenses
After
Fee
Waiver
and/or
Expense
Reimbursement
to
exceed
the
lesser
of
(i)
the
then-current
expense
cap,
or
(ii)
the
expense
cap
in
place
at
the
time
the
fees/expenses
were
waived/reimbursed.
Total
Annual
Fund
Operating
Expenses
After
Fee
Waiver
and/or
Expense
Reimbursement
will
increase
if
exclusions
from
the
Expense
Cap
apply.
Shares
redeemed
or
exchanged
within
60
days
of
purchase
will
be
charged
a
1.00%
redemption
fee.
The
performance
table
and
graph
do
not
reflect
the
deduction
of
taxes
that
a
shareholder
would
pay
on
Fund
distributions
or
the
redemption
of
Fund
shares.
Returns
greater
than
one
year
are
annualized.
Average
Annual
Total
Returns
Periods
Ended
June
30,
2023
One
Year
Three
Year
Five
Year
Since
Inception
07/18/14
Acuitas
US
Microcap
Fund
14.04%
17.73%
5.16%
7.93%
Russell
Microcap®
Index
6.63%
9.09%
2.07%
6.02%
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
SCHEDULE
OF
INVESTMENTS
June
30,
2023
6
See
Notes
to
Financial
Statements.
Shares
Security
Description
Value
Common
Stock
-
94.4%
Basic
Materials
-
2.4%
4,811‌
AdvanSix,
Inc.
$
168,289‌
13,429‌
Century
Aluminum
Co. 
(a)
117,101‌
95,843‌
LifeMD,
Inc. 
(a)
416,917‌
14,784‌
Northern
Technologies
International
Corp.
158,336‌
15,386‌
Orion
SA
326,491‌
3,150‌
Proto
Labs,
Inc. 
(a)
110,124‌
3,305‌
Ryerson
Holding
Corp.
143,371‌
8,686‌
US
Silica
Holdings,
Inc. 
(a)
105,361‌
1,545,990‌
Consumer
Discretionary
-
11.7%
27,179‌
Alta
Equipment
Group,
Inc.
471,012‌
17,258‌
Arhaus,
Inc. 
(a)
180,001‌
3,603‌
BJ's
Restaurants,
Inc. 
(a)
114,575‌
7,600‌
Blue
Bird
Corp. 
(a)
170,848‌
27,300‌
Carrols
Restaurant
Group,
Inc. 
(a)
137,592‌
22,183‌
Chico's
FAS,
Inc. 
(a)
118,679‌
10,396‌
Denny's
Corp. 
(a)
128,079‌
41,115‌
Duluth
Holdings,
Inc.,
Class B 
(a)
258,202‌
24,252‌
Entravision
Communications
Corp.,
Class A
106,466‌
295,139‌
Fluent,
Inc. 
(a)
184,875‌
1,845‌
Green
Brick
Partners,
Inc. 
(a)
104,796‌
16,330‌
Guess?,
Inc.
317,618‌
15,457‌
Hudson
Technologies,
Inc. 
(a)
148,696‌
58,081‌
Interface,
Inc.
510,532‌
10,235‌
Lindblad
Expeditions
Holdings,
Inc. 
(a)
111,357‌
67,220‌
Motorcar
Parts
of
America,
Inc. 
(a)
520,283‌
29,625‌
Purple
Innovation,
Inc.
82,357‌
10,200‌
Red
Robin
Gourmet
Burgers,
Inc. 
(a)
141,066‌
16,592‌
Shoe
Carnival,
Inc.
389,580‌
23,300‌
Stitch
Fix,
Inc.,
Class A 
(a)
89,705‌
21,483‌
Stoneridge,
Inc. 
(a)
404,955‌
34,916‌
The
Beauty
Health
Co. 
(a)
292,247‌
25,105‌
The
Children's
Place,
Inc. 
(a)
582,687‌
14,285‌
The
Lovesac
Co. 
(a)
384,981‌
40,565‌
The
ONE
Group
Hospitality,
Inc. 
(a)
296,936‌
14,600‌
Travelzoo 
(a)
115,194‌
2,442‌
Winmark
Corp.
811,892‌
10,775‌
Zumiez,
Inc. 
(a)
179,512‌
7,354,723‌
Consumer
Staples
-
1.3%
40,684‌
Cronos
Group,
Inc. 
(a)
80,147‌
203‌
MGP
Ingredients,
Inc.
21,575‌
8,772‌
The
Vita
Coco
Co.,
Inc. 
(a)
235,704‌
20,488‌
Village
Super
Market,
Inc.,
Class A
467,536‌
804,962‌
Energy
-
4.6%
71,848‌
Berry
Corp.
494,314‌
10,950‌
Civitas
Resources,
Inc.
759,602‌
49,650‌
Geospace
Technologies
Corp. 
(a)
385,781‌
1,071‌
Nabors
Industries,
Ltd. 
(a)
99,635‌
81,885‌
Newpark
Resources,
Inc. 
(a)
428,259‌
13,129‌
NOW,
Inc. 
(a)
136,016‌
17,277‌
Oil
States
International,
Inc. 
(a)
129,059‌
11,000‌
Stabilis
Solutions,
Inc. 
(a)
55,330‌
101,040‌
VAALCO
Energy,
Inc.
379,910‌
2,867,906‌
Financials
-
10.2%
7,501‌
Central
Valley
Community
Bancorp
115,890‌
20,965‌
Customers
Bancorp,
Inc. 
(a)
634,401‌
14,866‌
eHealth,
Inc. 
(a)
119,523‌
14,710‌
Enova
International,
Inc. 
(a)
781,395‌
Shares
Security
Description
Value
Financials
-
10.2%
(continued)
15,318‌
EZCORP,
Inc.,
Class A 
(a)
$
128,365‌
7,473‌
First
Internet
Bancorp
110,974‌
10,265‌
First
Western
Financial,
Inc. 
(a)
190,929‌
21,249‌
Heritage
Commerce
Corp.
175,942‌
5,840‌
Hippo
Holdings,
Inc. 
(a)
96,535‌
3,716‌
International
Money
Express,
Inc. 
(a)
91,153‌
11,637‌
James
River
Group
Holdings,
Ltd.
212,492‌
55,460‌
Medallion
Financial
Corp.
438,689‌
5,722‌
Mid
Penn
Bancorp,
Inc.
126,342‌
14,915‌
NMI
Holdings,
Inc.,
Class A 
(a)
385,105‌
9,397‌
Northrim
BanCorp,
Inc.
369,584‌
13,470‌
OP
Bancorp
113,552‌
3,533‌
Peapack-Gladstone
Financial
Corp.
95,674‌
2,165‌
Preferred
Bank/Los
Angeles
CA
119,053‌
12,140‌
QCR
Holdings,
Inc.
498,104‌
7,230‌
Regional
Management
Corp.
220,515‌
6,325‌
Texas
Capital
Bancshares,
Inc. 
(a)
325,738‌
4,879‌
The
Bancorp,
Inc. 
(a)
159,299‌
134,600‌
United
Insurance
Holdings
Corp. 
(a)
600,316‌
9,175‌
Veritex
Holdings,
Inc.
164,508‌
3,794‌
Westamerica
BanCorp
145,310‌
6,419,388‌
Health
Care
-
19.2%
22,931‌
908
Devices,
Inc. 
(a)
157,307‌
30,534‌
ADMA
Biologics,
Inc. 
(a)
112,670‌
48,442‌
Agenus,
Inc. 
(a)
77,507‌
20,444‌
Aldeyra
Therapeutics,
Inc. 
(a)
171,525‌
3,800‌
ANI
Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. 
(a)
204,554‌
33,801‌
Assertio
Holdings,
Inc. 
(a)
183,201‌
3,488‌
Avanos
Medical,
Inc. 
(a)
89,153‌
41,530‌
Avid
Bioservices,
Inc. 
(a)
580,174‌
41,878‌
BioLife
Solutions,
Inc. 
(a)
925,504‌
49,035‌
Bluebird
Bio,
Inc. 
(a)
161,325‌
21,605‌
Caribou
Biosciences,
Inc. 
(a)
91,821‌
19,101‌
Castle
Biosciences,
Inc. 
(a)
262,066‌
13,697‌
Catalyst
Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. 
(a)
184,088‌
167,240‌
ChromaDex
Corp. 
(a)
262,567‌
25,181‌
Cymabay
Therapeutics,
Inc. 
(a)
275,732‌
18,990‌
CytoSorbents
Corp. 
(a)
68,174‌
3,484‌
Eagle
Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. 
(a)
67,729‌
17,791‌
Edgewise
Therapeutics,
Inc. 
(a)
137,880‌
3,894‌
Harrow
Health,
Inc. 
(a)
74,142‌
173,442‌
Harvard
Bioscience,
Inc. 
(a)
952,197‌
47,196‌
Health
Catalyst,
Inc. 
(a)
589,950‌
10,462‌
Healthcare
Services
Group,
Inc.
156,198‌
13,280‌
ImmunoGen,
Inc. 
(a)
250,594‌
61,309‌
InfuSystem
Holdings,
Inc. 
(a)
590,406‌
35,461‌
Inogen,
Inc. 
(a)
409,574‌
6,128‌
Intercept
Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. 
(a)
67,776‌
2,643‌
iRadimed
Corp.
126,177‌
5,555‌
iTeos
Therapeutics,
Inc. 
(a)
73,548‌
39,640‌
Kezar
Life
Sciences,
Inc. 
(a)
97,118‌
8,285‌
Kiniksa
Pharmaceuticals,
Ltd.,
Class A 
(a)
116,653‌
32,309‌
KORU
Medical
Systems,
Inc. 
(a)
111,466‌
50,162‌
Lexicon
Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. 
(a)
114,871‌
15,400‌
MacroGenics,
Inc. 
(a)
82,390‌
30,251‌
MannKind
Corp. 
(a)
123,122‌
55,099‌
MaxCyte,
Inc. 
(a)
252,904‌
6,935‌
Nature's
Sunshine
Products,
Inc. 
(a)
94,663‌
6,179‌
NeoGenomics,
Inc. 
(a)
99,296‌
9,417‌
Nurix
Therapeutics,
Inc. 
(a)
94,076‌
8,400‌
Olema
Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. 
(a)
75,852‌
10,505‌
OrthoPediatrics
Corp. 
(a)
460,644‌
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
SCHEDULE
OF
INVESTMENTS
June
30,
2023
7
See
Notes
to
Financial
Statements.
Shares
Security
Description
Value
Health
Care
-
19.2%
(continued)
6,990‌
Pliant
Therapeutics,
Inc. 
(a)
$
126,659‌
73,279‌
Precigen,
Inc. 
(a)
84,271‌
3,353‌
Prothena
Corp.
PLC 
(a)
228,943‌
19,060‌
Quanterix
Corp. 
(a)
429,803‌
38,200‌
Savara,
Inc. 
(a)
122,049‌
17,810‌
Semler
Scientific,
Inc. 
(a)
467,334‌
20,522‌
SI-BONE,
Inc. 
(a)
553,684‌
64,360‌
SIGA
Technologies,
Inc.
325,018‌
10,689‌
Stoke
Therapeutics,
Inc. 
(a)
113,624‌
7,887‌
The
Pennant
Group,
Inc. 
(a)
96,852‌
10,568‌
Vanda
Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. 
(a)
69,643‌
7,800‌
Voyager
Therapeutics,
Inc. 
(a)
89,310‌
5,742‌
Xenon
Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. 
(a)
221,067‌
11,395‌
Zymeworks,
Inc. 
(a)
98,453‌
12,053,304‌
Industrials
-
26.2%
38,707‌
AerSale
Corp. 
(a)
568,993‌
10,151‌
Allied
Motion
Technologies,
Inc.
405,431‌
13,450‌
Argan,
Inc.
530,064‌
4,941‌
Barrett
Business
Services,
Inc.
430,855‌
15,845‌
BGSF,
Inc.
151,003‌
2,098‌
BlueLinx
Holdings,
Inc. 
(a)
196,750‌
38,000‌
CECO
Environmental
Corp. 
(a)
507,680‌
7,022‌
Chase
Corp.
851,207‌
23,797‌
Columbus
McKinnon
Corp.
967,348‌
17,100‌
Commercial
Vehicle
Group,
Inc. 
(a)
189,810‌
72,403‌
Computer
Task
Group,
Inc. 
(a)
550,987‌
84,450‌
Concrete
Pumping
Holdings,
Inc. 
(a)
678,134‌
29,138‌
Conduent,
Inc. 
(a)
99,069‌
4,014‌
Cross
Country
Healthcare,
Inc. 
(a)
112,713‌
11,530‌
Cryoport,
Inc. 
(a)
198,893‌
87,135‌
DHI
Group,
Inc. 
(a)
333,727‌
1,870‌
Distribution
Solutions,
Inc. 
(a)
97,352‌
11,675‌
Douglas
Dynamics,
Inc.
348,849‌
14,945‌
Ducommun,
Inc. 
(a)
651,154‌
2,987‌
Franklin
Covey
Co. 
(a)
130,472‌
2,784‌
Heidrick
&
Struggles
International,
Inc.
73,692‌
12,992‌
I3
Verticals,
Inc.,
Class A 
(a)
296,997‌
17,184‌
IES
Holdings,
Inc. 
(a)
977,426‌
23,936‌
Information
Services
Group,
Inc.
128,297‌
50,559‌
LSB
Industries,
Inc. 
(a)
498,006‌
35,370‌
Luxfer
Holdings
PLC
503,315‌
2,603‌
Mesa
Laboratories,
Inc.
334,486‌
5,515‌
Napco
Security
Technologies,
Inc.
191,095‌
36,678‌
Nordic
American
Tankers,
Ltd.
134,608‌
2,073‌
Olympic
Steel,
Inc.
101,577‌
144,260‌
Orion
Energy
Systems,
Inc. 
(a)
235,144‌
16,280‌
Primoris
Services
Corp.
496,052‌
78,295‌
Radiant
Logistics,
Inc. 
(a)
526,142‌
44,913‌
Ranpak
Holdings
Corp. 
(a)
203,007‌
21,775‌
Research
Solutions,
Inc./CA 
(a)
44,421‌
9,400‌
REV
Group,
Inc.
124,644‌
14,291‌
SoundThinking,
Inc. 
(a)
312,401‌
26,015‌
Stagwell,
Inc. 
(a)
187,568‌
5,444‌
Sterling
Infrastructure,
Inc. 
(a)
303,775‌
2,363‌
Teekay
Tankers,
Ltd.,
Class A
90,337‌
10,419‌
Titan
International,
Inc. 
(a)
119,610‌
6,221‌
Titan
Machinery,
Inc. 
(a)
183,520‌
6,086‌
UFP
Technologies,
Inc. 
(a)
1,179,771‌
3,669‌
V2X,
Inc. 
(a)
181,836‌
2,675‌
Vishay
Precision
Group,
Inc. 
(a)
99,376‌
2,188‌
VSE
Corp.
119,662‌
Shares
Security
Description
Value
Industrials
-
26.2%
(continued)
33,334‌
Wabash
National
Corp.
$
854,684‌
16,501,940‌
Real
Estate
-
1.5%
8,070‌
Alpine
Income
Property
Trust,
Inc.
REIT
131,137‌
32,507‌
Braemar
Hotels
&
Resorts,
Inc.
REIT
130,678‌
6,657‌
BRT
Apartments
Corp.
REIT
131,809‌
21,207‌
Plymouth
Industrial
REIT,
Inc.
488,185‌
8,918‌
The
GEO
Group,
Inc. 
(a)
63,853‌
945,662‌
Technology
-
15.0%
9,560‌
ADTRAN
Holdings,
Inc.
100,667‌
11,010‌
Agilysys,
Inc. 
(a)
755,726‌
13,359‌
Amtech
Systems,
Inc. 
(a)
127,712‌
45,005‌
AXT,
Inc. 
(a)
154,817‌
6,028‌
Bandwidth,
Inc.,
Class A 
(a)
82,463‌
5,699‌
Benchmark
Electronics,
Inc.
147,205‌
31,970‌
BM
Technologies,
Inc. 
(a)
95,271‌
16,759‌
Cantaloupe,
Inc. 
(a)
133,402‌
12,242‌
Celestica,
Inc. 
(a)
177,509‌
13,390‌
Cerence,
Inc. 
(a)
391,390‌
13,070‌
CEVA,
Inc. 
(a)
333,938‌
89,545‌
Edgio,
Inc. 
(a)
60,353‌
39,068‌
eGain
Corp. 
(a)
292,619‌
13,030‌
ePlus,
Inc. 
(a)
733,589‌
30,419‌
EverQuote,
Inc.,
Class A 
(a)
197,724‌
17,055‌
Grid
Dynamics
Holdings,
Inc. 
(a)
157,759‌
14,529‌
Hurco
Cos.,
Inc.
314,553‌
8,189‌
Ichor
Holdings,
Ltd. 
(a)
307,088‌
18,396‌
Immersion
Corp.
130,244‌
11,730‌
indie
Semiconductor,
Inc.,
Class A 
(a)
110,262‌
41,170‌
Key
Tronic
Corp. 
(a)
233,434‌
49,437‌
Magnite,
Inc. 
(a)
674,815‌
31,317‌
MiX
Telematics,
Ltd.,
ADR
197,923‌
54,758‌
Outbrain,
Inc. 
(a)
269,409‌
43,835‌
Photronics,
Inc. 
(a)
1,130,505‌
11,275‌
PROS
Holdings,
Inc. 
(a)
347,270‌
16,823‌
Radware,
Ltd. 
(a)
326,198‌
9,840‌
Red
Violet,
Inc. 
(a)
202,409‌
37,408‌
Solaris
Oilfield
Infrastructure,
Inc.,
Class A
311,609‌
13,581‌
Tactile
Systems
Technology,
Inc. 
(a)
338,574‌
37,776‌
TrueCar,
Inc. 
(a)
85,374‌
15,755‌
Veeco
Instruments,
Inc. 
(a)
404,588‌
10,669‌
Yext,
Inc. 
(a)
120,666‌
9,447,065‌
Telecommunications
-
1.1%
31,009‌
Airgain,
Inc. 
(a)
167,449‌
2,100‌
Bel
Fuse,
Inc.
120,561‌
2,964‌
Digi
International,
Inc. 
(a)
116,752‌
5,300‌
Harmonic,
Inc. 
(a)
85,701‌
4,490‌
IDT
Corp.,
Class A 
(a)
116,066‌
5,814‌
NETGEAR,
Inc. 
(a)
82,326‌
688,855‌
Utilities
-
1.2%
6,200‌
Consolidated
Water
Co.,
Ltd.
150,226‌
8,900‌
Enviri
Corp. 
(a)
87,843‌
4,969‌
Heritage-Crystal
Clean,
Inc. 
(a)
187,779‌
38,512‌
Select
Water
Solutions,
Inc.,
Class A
311,947‌
737,795‌
Total
Common
Stock
(Cost
$54,204,322)
59,367,590‌
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
SCHEDULE
OF
INVESTMENTS
June
30,
2023
8
See
Notes
to
Financial
Statements.
At
June
30,
2023,
The
Fund
held
the
following
exchange
traded
futures
contracts:
The
following
is
a
summary
of
the
inputs
used
to
value
the
Fund's investments
as
of
June
30,
2023. 
The
inputs
or
methodology
used
for
valuing
securities
are
not
necessarily
an
indication
of
the
risks
associated
with
investing
in
those
securities.
For
more
information
on
valuation
inputs,
and
their
aggregation
into
the
levels
used
in
the
table
below,
please
refer
to
the
Security
Valuation
section
in
Note
2
of
the
accompanying
Notes
to
Financial
Statements.
The
Level
1
value
displayed
in
this
table
consists
of
common
stock
and
a
Money
Market
Fund.
Refer
to
this
Schedule
of
Investments
for
a
further
breakout
of
each
security
by
industry.
* Other
Financial
Instruments
are
derivatives
not
reflected
in
the
Schedule
of
Investments,
such
as
futures,
which
are
valued
at
unrealized
appreciation
(depreciation)
at
year
end.
Shares
Security
Description
Value
Money
Market
Fund
-
5.1%
3,174,456‌
First
American
Government
Obligations
Fund,
Class X,
5.01% 
(b)
(Cost
$3,174,456)
$
3,174,456‌
Investments,
at
value
-
99.5%
(Cost
$57,378,778)
$
62,542,046‌
Other
Assets
&
Liabilities,
Net
-
0.5%
340,690‌
Net
Assets
-
100.0%
$
62,882,736‌
ADR
American
Depositary
Receipt
PLC
Public
Limited
Company
REIT
Real
Estate
Investment
Trust
(a)
Non-income
producing
security.
(b)
Dividend
yield
changes
daily
to
reflect
current
market
conditions.
Rate
was
the
quoted
yield
as
of
June
30,
2023.
Contracts
Description
Expiration
Date
Notional
Contract
Value
Value
Net
Unrealized
Depreciation
26
CME
E-Mini
Russell
2000
Index
Future
09/15/23
$
2,483,207‌
$
2,474,810‌
$
(8,397)‌
Valuation
Inputs
Investments
in
Securities
Other
Financial
Instruments*
Level
1
-
Quoted
Prices
$
62,542,046‌
$
(8,397‌)
Level
2
-
Other
Significant
Observable
Inputs
–‌
–‌
Level
3
-
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
–‌
–‌
Total
$
62,542,046‌
$
(8,397‌)
PORTFOLIO
HOLDINGS
(Unaudited)
%
of
Total
Net
Assets
Basic
Materials
2.4‌%
Consumer
Discretionary
11.7‌%
Consumer
Staples
1.3‌%
Energy
4.6‌%
Financials
10.2‌%
Health
Care
19.2‌%
Industrials
26.2‌%
Real
Estate
1.5‌%
Technology
15.0‌%
Telecommunications
1.1‌%
Utilities
1.2‌%
Money
Market
Fund
5.1‌%
Other
Assets
&
Liabilities,
Net
0.5‌%
100.0‌%
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
STATEMENT
OF
ASSETS
AND
LIABILITIES
June
30,
2023
9
See
Notes
to
Financial
Statements.
*
Shares
redeemed
or
exchanged
within
60
days
of
purchase
are
charged
a
1.00%
redemption
fee.
ASSETS
Investments,
at
value
(Cost
$57,378,778)
$
62,542,046‌
Deposits
with
broker
449,565‌
Receivables:
Fund
shares
sold
8,781‌
Investment
securities
sold
361,269‌
Dividends
33,422‌
Prepaid
expenses
23,220‌
Total
Assets
63,418,303‌
LIABILITIES
Payables:
Investment
securities
purchased
420,250‌
Fund
shares
redeemed
7,018‌
Accrued
Liabilities:
Investment
adviser
fees
45,684‌
Fund
services
fees
14,757‌
Other
expenses
47,858‌
Total
Liabilities
535,567‌
NET
ASSETS
$
62,882,736‌
COMPONENTS
OF
NET
ASSETS
Paid-in
capital
$
60,911,695‌
Distributable
Earnings
1,971,041‌
NET
ASSETS
$
62,882,736‌
SHARES
OF
BENEFICIAL
INTEREST
AT
NO
PAR
VALUE
(UNLIMITED
SHARES
AUTHORIZED)
Institutional
Shares
5,081,536‌
NET
ASSET
VALUE,
OFFERING
AND
REDEMPTION
PRICE
PER
SHARE*
Institutional
Shares
(based
on
net
assets
of
$62,882,736)
$
12.37‌
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
STATEMENT
OF
OPERATIONS
FOR
THE
YEAR
ENDED
June
30,
2023
10
See
Notes
to
Financial
Statements.
INVESTMENT
INCOME
Dividend
income
(Net
of
foreign
withholding
taxes
of
$1,228)
$
661,619‌
Total
Investment
Income
661,619‌
EXPENSES
Investment
adviser
fees
648,939‌
Fund
services
fees
194,622‌
Custodian
fees
30,674‌
Registration
fees
22,733‌
Professional
fees
39,709‌
Trustees'
fees
and
expenses
8,706‌
Interest
expense
419‌
Other
expenses
117,323‌
Total
Expenses
1,063,125‌
Fees
waived
(283,980‌)
Net
Expenses
779,145‌
NET
INVESTMENT
LOSS
(117,526‌)
NET
REALIZED
AND
UNREALIZED
GAIN
(LOSS)
Net
realized
gain
(loss)
on:
Investments
(53,023‌)
Futures
64,641‌
Net
realized
gain
11,618‌
Net
change
in
unrealized
appreciation
(depreciation)
on:
Investments
7,346,177‌
Futures
28,851‌
Net
change
in
unrealized
appreciation
(depreciation)
7,375,028‌
NET
REALIZED
AND
UNREALIZED
GAIN
7,386,646‌
INCREASE
IN
NET
ASSETS
RESULTING
FROM
OPERATIONS
$
7,269,120‌
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
STATEMENTS
OF
CHANGES
IN
NET
ASSETS
11
See
Notes
to
Financial
Statements.
For
the
Years
Ended
June
30,
2023
2022
OPERATIONS
Net
investment
loss
$
(117,526‌)
$
(232,535‌)
Net
realized
gain
11,618‌
5,063,864‌
Net
change
in
unrealized
appreciation
(depreciation)
7,375,028‌
(20,765,059‌)
Increase
(Decrease)
in
Net
Assets
Resulting
from
Operations
7,269,120‌
(15,933,730‌)
DISTRIBUTIONS
TO
SHAREHOLDERS
Institutional
Shares
(2,851,832‌)
(4,606,485‌)
Total
Distributions
Paid
(2,851,832‌)
(4,606,485‌)
CAPITAL
SHARE
TRANSACTIONS
Sale
of
shares:
Institutional
Shares
18,042,023‌
11,116,557‌
Reinvestment
of
distributions:
Institutional
Shares
2,826,613‌
4,580,234‌
Redemption
of
shares:
Institutional
Shares
(9,485,043‌)
(14,495,313‌)
Redemption
fees:
Institutional
Shares
3,861‌
557‌
Increase
in
Net
Assets
from
Capital
Share
Transactions
11,387,454‌
1,202,035‌
Increase
(Decrease)
in
Net
Assets
15,804,742‌
(19,338,180‌)
NET
ASSETS
Beginning
of
Year
47,077,994‌
66,416,174‌
End
of
Year
$
62,882,736‌
$
47,077,994‌
SHARE
TRANSACTIONS
Sale
of
shares:
Institutional
Shares
1,537,505‌
779,405‌
Reinvestment
of
distributions:
Institutional
Shares
244,517‌
320,072‌
Redemption
of
shares:
Institutional
Shares
(784,235‌)
(980,826‌)
Increase
in
Shares
997,787‌
118,651‌
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
FINANCIAL
HIGHLIGHTS
12
See
Notes
to
Financial
Statements.
These
financial
highlights
reflect
selected
data
for
a
share
outstanding
throughout
each
year.
For
the
Years
Ended
June
30,
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
INSTITUTIONAL
SHARES
NET
ASSET
VALUE,
Beginning
of
Year
$
11.53‌
$
16.75‌
$
8.76‌
$
10.05‌
$
14.17‌
INVESTMENT
OPERATIONS
Net
investment
loss
(a)
(0.03‌)
(0.06‌)
(0.05‌)
(0.05‌)
(0.09‌)
Net
realized
and
unrealized
gain
(loss)
1.60‌
(3.91‌)
8.04‌
(1.23‌)
(1.46‌)
Total
from
Investment
Operations
1.57‌
(3.97‌)
7.99‌
(1.28‌)
(1.55‌)
DISTRIBUTIONS
TO
SHAREHOLDERS
FROM
Net
realized
gain
(0.73‌)
(1.25‌)
–‌
(0.01‌)
(2.57‌)
Total
Distributions
to
Shareholders
(0.73‌)
(1.25‌)
–‌
(0.01‌)
(2.57‌)
REDEMPTION
FEES(a)
0.00‌(b)
0.00‌(b)
0.00‌(b)
0.00‌(b)
0.00‌(b)
NET
ASSET
VALUE,
End
of
Year
$
12.37‌
$
11.53‌
$
16.75‌
$
8.76‌
$
10.05‌
TOTAL
RETURN
14.04‌%
(25.17‌)%
91.21‌%
(12.75‌)%
(9.68‌)%
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTARY
DATA
Net
Assets
at
End
of
Year
(000s
omitted)
$
62,883‌
$
47,078‌
$
66,416‌
$
40,483‌
$
77,663‌
Ratios
to
Average
Net
Assets:
Net
investment
loss
(0.23‌)%
(0.41‌)%
(0.36‌)%
(0.47‌)%
(0.78‌)%
Net
expenses
1.50‌%
1.50‌%
1.50‌%
1.70‌%
1.70‌%
Gross
expenses
(c)
2.05‌%
2.00‌%
2.08‌%
2.03‌%
1.87‌%
PORTFOLIO
TURNOVER
RATE
56‌%
61‌%
78‌%
74‌%
108‌%
(a)
Calculated
based
on
average
shares
outstanding
during
each
year.
(b)
Less
than
$0.01
per
share.
(c)
Reflects
the
expense
ratio
excluding
any
waivers
and/or
reimbursements.
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
NOTES
TO
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
June
30,
2023
13
Note
1.
Organization
The
Acuitas
US
Microcap
Fund
(the
“Fund”)
is
a
diversified
portfolio
of
Forum
Funds
II
(the
“Trust”).
The
Trust
is
a
Delaware
statutory
trust
that
is
registered
as
an
open-end,
management
investment
company
under
the
Investment
Company
Act
of
1940,
as
amended
(the
“Act”).
Under
its
Trust
Instrument,
the
Trust
is
authorized
to
issue
an
unlimited
number
of
the
Fund’s
shares
of
beneficial
interest
without
par
value.
The
Fund
currently
offers
two
classes
of
shares:
Institutional
Shares
and
Investor
Shares.
As
of
June
30,
2023,
Investor
Shares
had
not
commenced
operations.
The
Fund
seeks
capital
appreciation.
The
Fund
commenced
operations
on
July
18,
2014.
Note
2.
Summary
of
Significant
Accounting
Policies
The
Fund
is
an
investment
company
and
follows
accounting
and
reporting
guidance
under
Financial
Accounting
Standards
Board
Accounting
Standards
Codification
Topic
946,
“Financial
Services
Investment
Companies.”
These
financial
statements
are
prepared
in
accordance
with
accounting
principles
generally
accepted
in
the
United
States
of
America
(“GAAP”),
which
require
management
to
make
estimates
and
assumptions
that
affect
the
reported
amounts
of
assets
and
liabilities,
the
disclosure
of
contingent
liabilities
at
the
date
of
the
financial
statements,
and
the
reported
amounts
of
increases
and
decreases
in
net
assets
from
operations
during
the
fiscal
year.
Actual
amounts
could
differ
from
those
estimates.
The
following
summarizes
the
significant
accounting
policies
of
the
Fund:
Security
Valuation
Securities
are
valued
at
market
prices
using
the
last
quoted
trade
or
official
closing
price
from
the
principal
exchange
where
the
security
is
traded,
as
provided
by
independent
pricing
services
on
each
Fund
business
day.
In
the
absence
of
a
last
trade,
securities
are
valued
at
the
mean
of
the
last
bid
and
ask
price
provided
by
the
pricing
service.
Futures
contracts
are
valued
at
the
day’s
settlement
price
on
the
exchange
where
the
contract
is
traded.
Forward
currency
contracts
are
generally
valued
based
on
interpolation
of
forward
curve
data
points
obtained
from
major
banking
institutions
that
deal
in
foreign
currencies
and
currency
dealers.
Exchange-traded
options
for
which
the
last
quoted
sale
price
is
outside
the
closing
bid
and
ask
price
will
be
valued
at
the
mean
of
the
closing
bid
and
ask
price.
Shares
of
non-exchange
traded
open-end
mutual
funds
are
valued
at
net
asset
value
(“NAV”).
Short-term
investments
that
mature
in
sixty
days
or
less
may
be
valued
at
amortized
cost.
Pursuant
to
Rule
2a-5
under
the
Investment
Company
Act,
the
Trust’s
Board
of
Trustees
(the
“Board”)
has
designated
the
Adviser,
as
defined
in
Note
3,
as
the
Fund’s
valuation
designee
to
perform
any
fair
value
determinations
for
securities
and
other
assets
held
by
the
Fund.
The
Adviser
is
subject
to
the
oversight
of
the
Board
and
certain
reporting
and
other
requirements
intended
to
provide
the
Board
the
information
needed
to
oversee
the
Adviser’s
fair
value
determinations.
The
Adviser
is
responsible
for
determining
the
fair
value
of
investments
for
which
market
quotations
are
not
readily
available
in
accordance
with
policies
and
procedures
that
have
been
approved
by
the
Board.
Under
these
procedures,
the
Adviser
convenes
on
a
regular
and
ad
hoc
basis
to
review
such
investments
and
considers
a
number
of
factors,
including
valuation
methodologies
and
significant
unobservable
inputs,
when
arriving
at
fair
value.
The
Board
has
approved
the
Adviser’s
fair
valuation
procedures
as
a
part
of
the
Fund’s
compliance
program
and
will
review
any
changes
made
to
the
procedures.
The
Adviser
provides
fair
valuation
inputs.
In
determining
fair
valuations,
inputs
may
include
market-based
analytics
that
may
consider
related
or
comparable
assets
or
liabilities,
recent
transactions,
market
multiples,
book
values
and
other
relevant
investment
information.
Adviser
inputs
may
include
an
income-based
approach
in
which
the
anticipated
future
cash
flows
of
the
investment
are
discounted
in
determining
fair
value.
Discounts
may
also
be
applied
based
on
the
nature
or
duration
of
any
restrictions
on
the
disposition
of
the
investments.
The
Adviser
performs
regular
reviews
of
valuation
methodologies,
key
inputs
and
assumptions,
disposition
analysis
and
market
activity.
Fair
valuation
is
based
on
subjective
factors
and,
as
a
result,
the
fair
value
price
of
an
investment
may
differ
from
the
security’s
market
price
and
may
not
be
the
price
at
which
the
asset
may
be
sold.
Fair
valuation
could
result
in
a
different
NAV
than
a
NAV
determined
by
using
market
quotes.
GAAP
has
a
three-tier
fair
value
hierarchy.
The
basis
of
the
tiers
is
dependent
upon
the
various
“inputs”
used
to
determine
the
value
of
the
Fund’s
investments.
These
inputs
are
summarized
in
the
three
broad
levels
listed
below:
Level
1
-
Quoted
prices
in
active
markets
for
identical
assets
and
liabilities.
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
NOTES
TO
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
June
30,
2023
14
Level
2
-
Prices
determined
using
significant
other
observable
inputs
(including
quoted
prices
for
similar
securities,
interest
rates,
prepayment
speeds,
credit
risk,
etc.).
Short-term
securities
with
maturities
of
sixty
days
or
less
are
valued
at
amortized
cost,
which
approximates
market
value,
and
are
categorized
as
Level
2
in
the
hierarchy.
Municipal
securities,
long-term
U.S.
government
obligations
and
corporate
debt
securities
are
valued
in
accordance
with
the
evaluated
price
supplied
by
a
pricing
service
and
generally
categorized
as
Level
2
in
the
hierarchy.
Other
securities
that
are
categorized
as
Level
2
in
the
hierarchy
include,
but
are
not
limited
to,
warrants
that
do
not
trade
on
an
exchange,
securities
valued
at
the
mean
between
the
last
reported
bid
and
ask
quotation
and
international
equity
securities
valued
by
an
independent
third
party
with
adjustments
for
changes
in
value
between
the
time
of
the
securities’
respective
local
market
closes
and
the
close
of
the
U.S.
market.
Level
3
-
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(including
the
Fund’s
own
assumptions
in
determining
the
fair
value
of
investments).
The
aggregate
value
by
input
level,
as
of
June
30,
2023,
for
the
Fund’s
investments
is
included
at
the
end
of
the
Fund’s
Schedule
of
Investments.
Security
Transactions,
Investment
Income
and
Realized
Gain
and
Loss
Investment
transactions
are
accounted
for
on
the
trade
date.
Dividend
income
is
recorded
on
the
ex-dividend
date.
Interest
income
is
recorded
on
an
accrual
basis.
Premium
is
amortized
to
the
next
call
date
above
par,
and
discount
is
accreted
to
maturity
using
the
effective
interest
method.
Identified
cost
of
investments
sold
is
used
to
determine
the
gain
and
loss
for
both
financial
statement
and
federal
income
tax
purposes.
Futures
Contracts
A
futures
contract
is
an
agreement
between
parties
to
buy
or
sell
a
security
at
a
set
price
on
a
future
date.
Upon
entering
into
such
a
contract,
a
fund
is
required
to
pledge
to
the
broker
an
amount
of
cash,
U.S.
Government
obligations
or
other
high-quality
debt
securities
equal
to
the
minimum
“initial
margin”
requirements
of
the
exchange
on
which
the
futures
contract
is
traded.
Pursuant
to
the
contract,
the
Fund
agrees
to
receive
from
or
pay
to
the
broker
an
amount
of
cash
equal
to
the
daily
fluctuation
in
the
value
of
the
contract.
Such
receipts
or
payments
are
known
as
“variation
margin”
and
are
recorded
by
the
Fund
as
unrealized
gains
or
losses.
When
the
contract
is
closed,
the
Fund
records
a
realized
gain
or
loss
equal
to
the
difference
between
the
value
of
the
contract
at
the
time
it
was
opened
and
value
at
the
time
it
was
closed.
Risks
of
entering
into
futures
contracts
include
the
possibility
that
there
may
be
an
illiquid
market
and
that
a
change
in
the
value
of
the
contract
may
not
correlate
with
changes
in
the
value
of
the
underlying
securities.
Notional
amounts
of
each
individual
futures
contract
outstanding
as
of
June
30,
2023,
for
the
Fund,
are
disclosed
in
the
Schedule
of
Investments.
Distributions
to
Shareholders
The
Fund
declares
any
dividends
from
net
investment
income
and
pays
them
annually.
Any
net
capital
gains
realized
by
the
Fund
are
distributed
at
least
annually.
Distributions
to
shareholders
are
recorded
on
the
ex-dividend
date.
Distributions
are
based
on
amounts
calculated
in
accordance
with
applicable
federal
income
tax
regulations,
which
may
differ
from
GAAP.
These
differences
are
due
primarily
to
differing
treatments
of
income
and
gain
on
various
investment
securities
held
by
the
Fund,
timing
differences
and
differing
characterizations
of
distributions
made
by
the
Fund.
Federal
Taxes
The
Fund
intends
to
continue
to
qualify
each
year
as
a
regulated
investment
company
under
Subchapter
M
of
Chapter
1,
Subtitle
A,
of
the
Internal
Revenue
Code
of
1986,
as
amended
(“Code”),
and
to
distribute
all
of
its
taxable
income
to
shareholders.
In
addition,
by
distributing
in
each
calendar
year
substantially
all
of
its
net
investment
income
and
capital
gains,
if
any,
the
Fund
will
not
be
subject
to
a
federal
excise
tax.
Therefore,
no
federal
income
or
excise
tax
provision
is
required.
The
Fund
recognizes
interest
and
penalties,
if
any,
related
to
unrecognized
tax
benefits
as
income
tax
expense
in
the
Statement
of
Operations.
During
the
year,
the
Fund
did
not
incur
any
interest
penalties.
The
Fund
files
a
U.S.
federal
income
and
excise
tax
return
as
required.
The
Fund’s
federal
income
tax
returns
are
subject
to
examination
by
the
Internal
Revenue
Service
for
a
period
of
three
fiscal
years
after
they
are
filed.
As
of
June
30,
2023,
there
are
no
uncertain
tax
positions
that
would
require
financial
statement
recognition,
de-
recognition
or
disclosure.
Income
and
Expense
Allocation
The
Trust
accounts
separately
for
the
assets,
liabilities
and
operations
of
each
of
its
investment
portfolios.
Expenses
that
are
directly
attributable
to
more
than
one
investment
portfolio
are
allocated
among
the
respective
investment
portfolios
in
an
equitable
manner.
Redemption
Fees
A
shareholder
who
redeems
or
exchanges
shares
within
60
days
of
purchase
will
incur
a
redemption
fee
of
1.00%
of
the
current
NAV
of
shares
redeemed
or
exchanged,
subject
to
certain
limitations.
The
fee
is
charged
for
the
benefit
of
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
NOTES
TO
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
June
30,
2023
15
the
remaining
shareholders
and
will
be
paid
to
the
Fund
to
help
offset
transaction
costs.
The
fee
is
accounted
for
as
an
addition
to
paid-in
capital.
The
Fund
reserves
the
right
to
modify
the
terms
of
or
terminate
the
fee
at
any
time.
There
are
limited
exceptions
to
the
imposition
of
the
redemption
fee.
Redemption
fees
incurred
for
the
Fund,
if
any,
are
reflected
on
the
Statements
of
Changes
in
Net
Assets.
Commitments
and
Contingencies
In
the
normal
course
of
business,
the
Fund
enters
into
contracts
that
provide
general
indemnifications
by
the
Fund
to
the
counterparty
to
the
contract.
The
Fund’s
maximum
exposure
under
these
arrangements
is
dependent
on
future
claims
that
may
be
made
against
the
Fund
and,
therefore,
cannot
be
estimated;
however,
based
on
experience,
the
risk
of
loss
from
such
claims
is
considered
remote.
The
Fund
has
determined
that
none
of
these
arrangements
requires
disclosure
on
the
Fund’s
balance
sheet.
Note
3.
Fees
and
Expenses
Investment
Adviser
Acuitas
Investments,
LLC
(the
“Adviser”)
is
the
investment
Adviser
to
the
Fund.
Pursuant
to
an
investment
advisory
agreement,
the
Adviser
receives
an
advisory
fee,
payable
monthly,
from
the
Fund
at
an
annual
rate
of
1.25%
of
the
Fund’s
average
daily
net
assets.
The
sub-advisory
fees,
calculated
as
a
percentage
of
the
Fund’s
average
daily
net
assets
managed
by
the
subadvisers,
are
paid
by
the
Adviser.
Distribution
Foreside
Fund
Services,
LLC,
a
wholly-owned
subsidiary
of
Foreside
Financial
Group,
LLC
(dba
ACA
Group)
(the
“Distributor”)
acts
as
the
agent
of
the
Trust
in
connection
with
the
continuous
offering
of
shares
of
the
Fund.
The
Fund
has
adopted
a
Distribution
Plan
(the
“Plan”)
for
Investor
Shares
in
accordance
with
Rule
12b-1
of
the
Act.
Under
the
Plan,
the
Fund
pays
the
Distributor
and/or
any
other
entity
as
authorized
by
the
Board
a
fee
of
up
to
0.25%
of
the
average
daily
net
assets
of
Investor
Shares.
The
Distributor
is
not
affiliated
with
the
Adviser
or
Atlantic
Fund
Administration,
LLC,
a
wholly
owned
subsidiary
of
Apex
US
Holdings
LLC
(d/b/a
Apex
Fund
Services)
(“Apex”)
or
their
affiliates.
Currently,
Investor
Shares
are
not
offered
for
sale,
therefore
the
Fund
is
not
currently
paying
12b-1
fees.
Other
Service
Providers
Apex
provides
fund
accounting,
fund
administration,
compliance
and
transfer
agency
services
to
the
Fund.
The
fees
related
to
these
services
are
included
in
Fund
services
fees
within
the
Statement
of
Operations.
Apex
also
provides
certain
shareholder
report
production
and
EDGAR
conversion
and
filing
services.
Pursuant
to
an
Apex
Services
Agreement,
the
Fund
pays
Apex
customary
fees
for
its
services.
Apex
provides
a
Principal
Executive
Officer,
a
Principal
Financial
Officer,
a
Chief
Compliance
Officer
and
an
Anti-Money
Laundering
Officer
to
the
Fund,
as
well
as
certain
additional
compliance
support
functions.
Trustees
and
Officers
Each
Independent
Trustee
receives
an
annual
fee
of
$25,000
($32,500
for
the
Chairman)
for
service
to
the
Trust.
The
Independent
Trustees
and
Chairman
may
receive
additional
fees
for
special
Board
meetings.
The
Independent
Trustees
are
also
reimbursed
for
all
reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses
incurred
in
connection
with
their
duties
as
Trustees,
including
travel
and
related
expenses
incurred
in
attending
Board
meetings.
The
amount
of
Independent
Trustees’
fees
attributable
to
the
Fund
is
disclosed
in
the
Statement
of
Operations.
Certain
officers
of
the
Trust
are
also
officers
or
employees
of
the
above
named
service
providers,
and
during
their
terms
of
office
received
no
compensation
from
the
Fund.
Note
4.
Expense
Reimbursement
and
Fees
Waived
The
Adviser
has
contractually
agreed
to
waive
its
fees
and/or
reimburse
expenses
to
limit
total
annual
operating
expenses
(excluding
all
taxes,
interest,
portfolio
transaction
expenses,
acquired
fund
fees
and
expenses,
proxy
expenses
and
extraordinary
expenses)
of
Institutional
Shares
to
1.50%
and
Investor
Shares
to
1.75%
through
November
1,
2023.
Other
fund
service
providers
have
voluntarily
agreed
to
waive
a
portion
of
their
fees.
Voluntary
fee
waivers
may
be
reduced
or
eliminated
at
any
time.
For
the
year
ended
June
30,
2023,
the
fees
waived
and/or
reimbursed
expenses
were
as
follows:
Investment
Adviser
Fees
Waived
Other
Waivers
Total
Fees
Waived
and
Expenses
Reimbursed
$
261,288
$
22,692
$
283,980
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
NOTES
TO
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
June
30,
2023
16
The
Adviser
may
be
reimbursed
by
the
Fund
for
fees
waived
and
expenses
reimbursed
by
the
Adviser
pursuant
to
the
Expense
Cap
if
such
payment
is
approved
by
the
Board,
made
within
three
years
of
the
fee
waiver
or
expense
reimbursement,
and
does
not
cause
the
Total
Annual
Fund
Operating
Expenses
After
Fee
Waiver
and/or
Expense
Reimbursement
to
exceed
the
lesser
of
(
i
)
the
then-
current
expense
cap
and
(ii)
the
expense
cap
in
place
at
the
time
the
fees/expenses
were
waived/reimbursed.
As
of
June
30,
2023,
$801,822
is
subject
to
recapture
by
the
Adviser.
Other
waivers
are
not
eligible
for
recoupment.
Note
5.
Security
Transactions
The
cost
of
purchases
and
proceeds
from
sales
of
investment
securities
(including
maturities),
other
than
short-term
investments
during
the
year
ended
June
30,
2023,
totaled
$
35,268,700
and
$
28,243,412
,
respectively.
Note
6.
Summary
of
Derivative
Activity
The
volume
of
open
derivative
positions
may
vary
on
a
daily
basis
as
the
Fund
transacts
derivative
contracts
in
order
to
achieve
the
exposure
desired
by
the
Adviser.
The
notional
value
of
activity
for
the
year
ended
June
30,
2023
,
for
futures
contracts
was
$
11,702,220
.
The
Fund’s
use
of
derivatives
for
the
year
ended
June
30,
2023
,
was
limited
to
futures
contracts.
Following
is
a
summary
of
the
effect
of
derivatives
on
the
Statement
of
Assets
and
Liabilities
as
of
June
30,
2023.
Realized
and
unrealized
gains
and
losses
on
derivatives
contracts
for
the
year
ended
June
30,
2023,
are
recorded
by
the
Fund
in
the
following
locations
on
the
Statement
of
Operations:
Asset
(Liability)
amounts
shown
in
the
table
below
represent
amounts
for
derivative
related
investments
at
June
30,
2023.
These
amounts
may
be
collateralized
by
cash
or
financial
instruments.
Note
7.
Federal
Income
Tax
As
of
June
30,
2023,
the
cost
for
federal
income
tax
purposes
is
$59,338,131
and
the
components
of
net
unrealized
appreciation
consists
of:
Location:
Equity
Contracts
Liability
derivatives:
Unrealized
depreciation
on
futures*
$
(8,397‌)
*
Balance
is
included
in
the
deposits
with
broker
for
futures
on
the
Statement
of
Assets
and
Liabilities.
Location:
Equity
Contracts
Net
realized
gain
on:
Futures
$
64,641‌
Total
net
realized
gain
$
64,641‌
Net
change
in
unrealized
appreciation
(depreciation)
on:
Futures
$
28,851‌
Total
net
change
in
unrealized
appreciation
(depreciation)
$
28,851‌
Gross
Asset
(Liability)
as
Presented
in
the
Statement
of
Assets
and
Liabilities
Financial
Instruments
(Received)
Pledged*
Cash
Collateral
(Received)
Pledged*
Net
Amount
Unrealized
Depreciation
on
Futures**
$
(8,397)
$
-
$
8,397
$
-
*
The
actual
financial
instruments
and
cash
collateral
(received)
pledged
may
be
in
excess
of
the
amounts
shown
in
the
table.
The
table
only
reflects
collateral
amounts
up
to
the
amount
of
the
financial
instrument
disclosed
on
the
Statement
of
Assets
and
Liabilities.
**
Balance
is
included
in
the
deposits
with
broker
for
futures
on
the
Statement
of
Assets
and
Liabilities.
Gross
Unrealized
Appreciation
$
10,542,212‌
Gross
Unrealized
Depreciation
(7,338,297‌)
Net
Unrealized
Appreciation
$
3,203,915‌
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
NOTES
TO
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
June
30,
2023
17
Distributions
paid
during
the
fiscal
years
ended
as
noted
were
characterized
for
tax
purposes
as
follows:
As
of
June
30,
2023,
distributable
earnings
(accumulated
losses)
on
a
tax
basis
were
as
follows:
The
difference
between
components
of
distributable
earnings
on
a
tax
basis
and
the
amounts
reflected
in
the
Statement
of
Assets
and
Liabilities
are
primarily
due
to
investments
in
real
estate
investment
trusts,
futures,
equity
return
of
capital,
and
wash
sales.
As
of
June
30,
2023,
the
Fund
had
$1,232,455
of
available
short-term
capital
loss
carryforwards
that
have
no
expiration
date.
On
the
Statement
of
Assets
and
Liabilities,
as
a
result
of
permanent
book
to
tax
differences,
certain
amounts
have
been
reclassified
for
the
year
ended
June
30,
2023.
The
following
reclassification
was
the
result
of
net
operating
loss
and
has
no
impact
on
the
net
assets
of
the
Fund.
Note
8.
Recent
Accounting
Pronouncements
In
June
2022,
the
Financial
Accounting
Standards
Board
issued
Accounting
Standards
Update
2022-03,
which
amends
Fair
Value
Measurement
(Topic
820);
Fair
Value
Measurement
of
Equity
Securities
Subject
to
Contractual
Sale
Restrictions
(“ASU
2022-
03”).
ASU
2022-03
clarifies
guidance
for
fair
value
measurement
of
an
equity
security
subject
to
a
contractual
sale
restriction
and
establishes
new
disclosure
requirements
for
such
equity
securities.
ASU
2022-03
is
effective
for
fiscal
years
beginning
after
December
15,
2023,
and
for
interim
periods
within
those
fiscal
years,
with
early
adoption
permitted.
Management
is
currently
evaluating
the
impact
of
these
amendments
on
the
financial
statements.
Note
9.
Subsequent
Events
Subsequent
events
occurring
after
the
date
of
this
report
through
the
date
these
financial
statements
were
issued
have
been
evaluated
for
potential
impact,
and
the
Fund
has
had
no
such
events.
Management
has
evaluated
the
need
for
additional
disclosures
and/or
adjustments
resulting
from
subsequent
events.
Based
on
this
evaluation,
no
additional
disclosures
or
adjustments
were
required.
2023
2022
Ordinary
Income
$
–‌
$
1,022,882‌
Long-Term
Capital
Gain
2,851,832‌
3,583,603‌
$
2,851,832‌
$
4,606,485‌
Capital
and
Other
Losses
(1,232,455‌)
Unrealized
Appreciation
3,203,915‌
Other
Temporary
Differences
(419‌)
Total
$
1,971,041‌
Distributable
Earnings
$
43,134‌
Paid-in-Capital
(43,134‌)
REPORT
OF
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED
PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING
FIRM
18
To
the
Shareholders
of
Acuitas
US
Microcap
Fund
and
Board
of
Trustees
of
Forum
Funds
II
Opinion
on
the
Financial
Statements
We
have
audited
the
accompanying
statement
of
assets
and
liabilities,
including
the
schedule
of
investments,
of
Acuitas
US
Microcap
Fund
(the
“Fund”),
a
series
of
Forum
Funds
II,
as
of
June
30,
2023,
the
related
statements
of
operations
and
changes
in
net
assets,
the
related
notes,
and
the
financial
highlights
for
the
year
then
ended
(collectively
referred
to
as
the
“financial
statements”).
In
our
opinion,
the
financial
statements
present
fairly,
in
all
material
respects,
the
financial
position
of
the
Fund
as
of
June
30,
2023,
the
results
of
its
operations,
changes
in
net
assets,
and
the
financial
highlights
for
the
year
then
ended,
in
conformity
with
accounting
principles
generally
accepted
in
the
United
States
of
America.
The
Fund’s
financial
statements
and
financial
highlights
for
the
years
ended
June
30,
2022,
and
prior,
were
audited
by
other
auditors
whose
report
dated
August
24,
2022,
expressed
an
unqualified
opinion
on
those
financial
statements
and
financial
highlights.
Basis
for
Opinion
These
financial
statements
are
the
responsibility
of
the
Fund’s
management.
Our
responsibility
is
to
express
an
opinion
on
the
Fund’s
financial
statements
based
on
our
audit.
We
are
a
public
accounting
firm
registered
with
the
Public
Company
Accounting
Oversight
Board
(United
States)
(“PCAOB”)
and
are
required
to
be
independent
with
respect
to
the
Fund
in
accordance
with
the
U.S.
federal
securities
laws
and
the
applicable
rules
and
regulations
of
the
Securities
and
Exchange
Commission
and
the
PCAOB.
We
conducted
our
audit
in
accordance
with
the
standards
of
the
PCAOB.
Those
standards
require
that
we
plan
and
perform
the
audit
to
obtain
reasonable
assurance
about
whether
the
financial
statements
are
free
of
material
misstatement
whether
due
to
error
or
fraud.
Our
audit
included
performing
procedures
to
assess
the
risks
of
material
misstatement
of
the
financial
statements,
whether
due
to
error
or
fraud,
and
performing
procedures
that
respond
to
those
risks.
Such
procedures
included
examining,
on
a
test
basis,
evidence
regarding
the
amounts
and
disclosures
in
the
financial
statements.
Our
procedures
included
confirmation
of
securities
owned
as
of
June
30,
2023,
by
correspondence
with
the
custodian
and
brokers;
when
replies
were
not
received
from
brokers,
we
performed
other
auditing
procedures.
Our
audit
also
included
evaluating
the
accounting
principles
used
and
significant
estimates
made
by
management,
as
well
as
evaluating
the
overall
presentation
of
the
financial
statements.
We
believe
that
our
audit
provides
a
reasonable
basis
for
our
opinion.
We
have
served
as
the
Fund’s
auditor
since
2023.
COHEN
&
COMPANY,
LTD.
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
August
28,
2023
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
(Unaudited)
June
30,
2023
19
Investment
Advisory
Agreement
Approval
Acuitas
US
Microcap
Fund
(“Microcap
Fund”)
(the
“Fund”)
At
the
June
9,
2023
Board
meeting
(the
“June
meeting”),
the
Board,
including
the
Independent
Trustees,
considered
the
approval
of
the
continuance
of
the
investment
advisory
agreement
between
the
Adviser
and
the
Trust
pertaining
to
the
Fund
(the
“Advisory
Agreement”)
and
the
subadvisory
agreements
between
the
Adviser
and
each
of
AltraVue
Capital,
LLC;
ClariVest
Asset
Management,
LLC;
Granahan
Investment
Management,
Inc.;
and
Tieton
Capital
Management,
LLC
(each
a
“Subadviser”)
(the
“Subadvisory
Agreements”).
In
preparation
for
the
June
meeting,
the
Board
was
presented
with
a
range
of
information
to
assist
in
its
deliberations.
The
Board
requested
and
reviewed
written
responses
from
the
Adviser
and
each
Subadviser
to
a
letter
circulated
on
the
Board’s
behalf
concerning
the
personnel,
operations,
financial
condition,
performance,
and
services
provided
to
the
Fund
by
the
Adviser
and
each
of
the
Subadvisers.
During
its
deliberations,
the
Board
received
an
oral
presentation
from
the
Adviser
and
discussed
the
materials
with
the
Adviser,
independent
legal
counsel
to
the
Independent
Trustees
(“Independent
Legal
Counsel”),
and,
as
necessary,
with
the
Trust’s
administrator.
The
Independent
Trustees
also
met
in
executive
session
with
Independent
Legal
Counsel
while
deliberating.
At
the
June
meeting,
the
Board
reviewed,
among
other
matters,
the
topics
discussed
below.
Nature,
Extent
and
Quality
of
Services
Based
on
written
materials
received
and
the
presentation
from
senior
representatives
of
the
Adviser
regarding
the
personnel,
operations,
and
financial
condition
of
the
Adviser
and
each
Subadviser,
the
Board
considered
the
quality
of
services
provided
by
the
Adviser
under
the
Advisory
Agreement
and
by
each
Subadviser
under
the
respective
Subadvisory
Agreement.
In
this
regard,
the
Board
considered
information
regarding
the
experience,
qualifications
and
professional
background
of
the
portfolio
managers
and
other
personnel
at
the
Adviser
and
each
Subadviser
with
principal
responsibility
for
the
Fund’s
investments;
the
investment
philosophy
and
decision-making
process
of
the
Adviser’s
and
Subadvisers’
investment
professionals;
the
quality
of
the
Adviser’s
and
Subadvisers’
services
with
respect
to
regulatory
compliance;
and
the
Adviser’s
and
each
Subadviser’s
representations
that
each
firm
is
in
stable
financial
condition
to
allow
each
firm
to
provide
quality
advisory
services
to
the
Fund.
The
Board
also
considered
the
Adviser’s
analysis
of
and
recommendation
to
approve
the
continuance
of
the
Subadvisory
Agreements
with
the
Subadvisers.
The
Board
concluded
that,
overall,
it
was
satisfied
with
the
nature,
extent
and
quality
of
services
provided
to
the
Fund
by
the
Adviser
under
the
Advisory
Agreement
and
by
each
Subadviser
under
the
respective
Subadvisory
Agreements.
Performance
In
connection
with
a
presentation
by
the
Adviser
regarding
its
approach
to
managing
the
Fund,
including
the
investment
objective
and
strategy
of
the
Fund
and
the
Adviser’s
discussion
of
the
performance
of
each
of
the
Subadvisers,
the
Board
reviewed
the
performance
of
the
Fund
compared
to
its
primary
benchmark.
The
Board
observed
that
the
Fund
outperformed
its
primary
benchmark
index,
the
Russell
Microcap
Index,
for
the
one-,
three-,
and
five-year
periods
ended
March
31,
2023,
and
for
the
period
since
the
Fund’s
inception
on
July
18,
2014.
The
Board
also
considered
the
Fund’s
performance
relative
to
an
independent
peer
group
of
funds
identified
by
Strategic
Insight,
Inc.
(“Strategic
Insight”)
believed
to
have
characteristics
similar
to
those
of
the
Fund.
Based
on
information
presented
by
Strategic
Insight,
the
Board
observed
that
the
Fund
underperformed
the
average
of
the
Strategic
Insight
peers
for
the
one-year
period
ended
March
31,
2023
and
outperformed
the
average
of
the
Strategic
Insight
peers
for
the
three-,
and
five-year
periods
ended
March
31,
2023.
The
Board
noted
the
Adviser’s
representation
that
the
Fund’s
relative
performance
could
be
attributed,
in
part,
to
the
Fund’s
stock
selection
and
bias
toward
high
quality
companies.
The
Board
also
noted
the
Adviser’s
representation
that
the
Strategic
Insight
peer
group
was
not
an
optimal
representation
of
the
Fund’s
investment
strategy
from
a
performance
comparison
standpoint
because
many
of
the
funds
within
the
Strategic
Insight
peer
group
operate
within
the
small
cap
universe,
whereas
the
Fund
places
a
larger
emphasis
on
microcap
investments,
which
tend
to
have
higher
beta
than
small
cap
companies
and,
as
a
result,
tend
to
lag
the
performance
of
small
cap
companies
during
bear
markets
such
as
the
market
environment
experienced
during
2022.
At
the
request
of
the
Adviser,
the
Board
reviewed
performance
of
the
Fund
compared
to
the
performance
of
a
peer
group
of
funds
identified
by
the
Adviser
as
being
a
more
optimal
comparison
to
the
Fund
(the
“Comparable
Funds”).
The
Board
observed
that
the
Fund
outperformed
the
average
of
the
Comparable
Funds
for
the
one-,
three-,
and
five-year
periods
ended
March
31,
2023.
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
(Unaudited)
June
30,
2023
20
The
Board
also
evaluated
the
Adviser's
assessment
of
each
Subadviser’s
performance.
The
Board
acknowledged
the
Adviser’s
representation
that
the
different
Subadvisers
could
be
expected
to
achieve
different
performance
results
in
light
of
the
differences
in
their
strategies,
allocated
assets,
and
market
environment.
In
this
regard,
the
Board
noted
that
the
Adviser
emphasized
its
responsibility
for
allocating
the
Fund’s
assets
among
Subadvisers
on
an
ongoing
basis
in
order
to
achieve
the
Fund’s
investment
objective.
In
view
of
the
respective
roles
of
the
Adviser
and
Subadvisers,
the
Board
determined
that
it
was
appropriate
to
evaluate
the
individual
performance
achieved
by
each
Subadviser
as
it
contributed
to
the
performance
of
the
Fund
as
a
whole.
Based
on
the
foregoing,
among
other
applicable
considerations,
the
Board
concluded
that
the
Fund
and
its
shareholders
could
benefit
from
the
Adviser’s
continued
management
under
the
Advisory
Agreement
and
from
each
Subadviser’s
continued
management
under
the
respective
Subadvisory
Agreements.
Compensation
The
Board
evaluated
the
Adviser’s
compensation
for
providing
advisory
services
to
the
Fund
and
analyzed
comparative
information
on
actual
advisory
fee
rates
and
actual
total
expense
ratios
of
the
Fund’s
Strategic
Insight
peers.
The
Board
noted
that,
based
on
the
information
provided
by
Strategic
Insight,
the
net
advisory
fee
rate
and
net
total
expense
ratio
for
the
Fund
were
each
higher
than
the
median
of
its
Strategic
Insight
peers.
The
Board
noted
the
Adviser’s
representation
that
the
Fund’s
Strategic
Insight
peers
are
heavily
weighted
toward
small
cap
managers,
which
offer
lower
fees
than
microcap
managers,
which
could
account
for
some
of
the
variance
in
the
fee
and
expense
comparison.
The
Board
also
noted
the
Adviser’s
representation
that
many
of
the
funds
listed
in
the
respective
Strategic
Insight
peer
groups
did
not
operate
pursuant
to
a
multi-manager
structure
and
that,
unlike
the
peers
in
the
Strategic
Insight
peer
group,
the
Adviser
paid
each
of
the
Subadvisers
directly
from
the
advisory
fee
paid
to
the
Adviser
such
that
the
fees
and
expenses
of
the
Strategic
Insight
peers
were
not
directly
comparable.
The
Board
noted
further
the
Adviser’s
representation
that,
although
the
total
expense
ratio
for
the
Fund
was
higher
than
the
average
of
the
expense
ratios
of
the
Comparable
Funds,
the
Fund’s
total
expense
ratio
was
believed
to
be
within
a
reasonable
range.
Finally,
the
Board
observed
that
the
contractual
advisory
fee
and
expense
cap
were
each
most
recently
lowered
in
2020.
With
regard
to
Subadviser
compensation,
the
Board
noted
the
arms-length
nature
of
the
relationship
between
the
Adviser
and
each
Subadvisers
with
respect
to
the
negotiation
of
the
subadvisory
fee
rate
on
behalf
of
the
Fund
and
that
the
Adviser,
and
not
the
Fund,
was
responsible
for
paying
the
subadvisory
fees
due
under
each
Subadvisory
Agreement.
Based
on
the
foregoing
and
other
relevant
considerations,
the
Board
concluded
that
the
Adviser’s
advisory
fee
rate
charged
to
the
Fund
appeared
to
be
reasonable
in
light
of
the
nature,
extent
and
quality
of
services
provided
by
the
Adviser.
Cost
of
Services
and
Profitability
The
Board
considered
information
provided
by
the
Adviser
regarding
the
costs
of
services
and
its
profitability
with
respect
to
the
Fund.
In
this
regard,
the
Board
considered
the
Adviser’s
resources
devoted
to
the
Fund,
as
well
as
the
Adviser’s
discussion
of
the
aggregate
costs
and
profitability
of
its
mutual
fund
activity,
including
the
percentage
and
amount
of
the
Adviser’s
fee
that
the
Adviser
retained
and
the
percentage
and
amount
of
the
Adviser’s
fee
that
was
paid
to
the
Subadvisers.
The
Board
noted
that
the
Adviser
does
not
maintain
separate
profit
and
loss
data
by
account,
making
it
difficult
to
assess
costs
incurred
specific
to
providing
services
to
the
Fund.
The
Board
noted
further
the
Adviser’s
representation
that
the
Adviser
continues
to
pay
its
Subadvisers
directly
from
the
Adviser’s
advisory
fees
and
that
the
Adviser
continued
to
subsidize
the
operation
of
the
Fund
by
waiving
its
advisory
fee
and
reimbursing
expenses
to
the
extent
necessary
to
keep
the
Fund’s
total
expense
ratios
at
competitive
levels.
Based
on
these
and
other
applicable
considerations,
the
Board
concluded
that
the
Adviser’s
profits
attributable
to
management
of
the
Fund
were
reasonable
in
light
of
the
nature,
extent
and
quality
of
the
services
provided
by
the
Adviser.
The
Board
did
not
consider
information
regarding
the
costs
of
services
provided
or
profits
realized
by
the
Subadvisers
from
their
relationships
with
the
Fund,
noting
instead
the
arms-length
nature
of
the
relationship
between
the
Adviser
and
each
Subadviser
with
respect
to
the
negotiation
of
the
subadvisory
fee
rate
on
behalf
of
the
Fund
and
that
the
Adviser,
and
not
the
Fund,
was
responsible
for
paying
the
subadvisory
fee
due
under
each
Subadvisory
Agreement.
Economies
of
Scale
The
Board
considered
whether
the
Fund
was
benefitting,
or
may
benefit
in
the
future,
from
any
economies
of
scale.
In
this
regard,
the
Board
considered
the
Fund’s
fee
structure,
asset
size,
net
expense
ratio,
and
the
fees
of
comparable
advisers,
recognizing
that
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
(Unaudited)
June
30,
2023
21
an
analysis
of
economies
of
scale
is
generally
most
relevant
when
a
fund
has
achieved
a
substantial
size
and
has
growing
assets
and
that,
if
a
fund’s
assets
are
stable
or
decreasing,
the
significance
of
economies
of
scale
may
be
reduced.
The
Board
noted
the
assets
of
the
Fund
were
stable
but
relatively
low.
The
Board
also
noted
the
Adviser’s
representation
that
the
Fund
was
benefitting
from
expenses
subsidized
by
the
Adviser
under
the
contractual
expense
limitation
agreement.
The
Board
noted
further
the
Adviser’s
representation
that,
although
the
Fund
could
benefit
from
economies
of
scale
as
assets
grow,
the
Adviser
believed
that
economies
of
scale
had
not
been
achieved
at
current
asset
levels.
The
Board
also
considered
whether
the
Fund
would
benefit
from
any
economies
of
scale
with
respect
to
the
Subadvisory
Agreements.
In
this
respect,
the
Board
noted
that
there
were
no
breakpoints
in
the
Subadvisory
Agreements
and
that
such
breakpoints
were
likely
to
benefit
the
Adviser,
rather
than
the
Fund,
because
the
Adviser
pays
the
subadvisory
fees
directly
from
the
Adviser’s
advisory
fee.
The
Board
considered
that
the
subadvisory
fee
rates
were
negotiated
at
arm’s
length
between
the
Adviser
and
each
Subadviser
and
that,
for
the
reasons
cited
above,
among
other
relevant
considerations,
breakpoints
in
the
subadvisory
fee
rates
were
unlikely
to
result
in
the
Fund’s
realization
of
economies
of
scale.
Based
on
the
foregoing
information
and
other
applicable
factors,
and
in
light
of
the
size
of
the
Fund,
the
Board
concluded
that
the
asset
level
of
the
Fund
was
not
consistent
with
the
existence
of
economies
of
scale
and
that
economies
of
scale
were
not
a
material
factor
in
approving
the
continuation
of
the
Advisory
Agreement
or
Subadvisory
Agreements.
Other
Benefits
The
Board
noted
the
Adviser’s
representation
that,
aside
from
its
contractual
advisory
fees,
it
does
not
benefit
in
a
material
way
from
its
relationship
with
the
Fund.
Based
on
the
foregoing
representation
and
other
relevant
considerations,
the
Board
concluded
that
other
benefits
received
by
the
Adviser
from
its
relationship
with
the
Fund
were
not
a
material
factor
in
approving
the
continuation
of
the
Advisory
Agreement.
Conclusion
The
Board
did
not
identify
any
single
factor
as
being
of
paramount
importance,
and
different
Trustees
may
have
given
different
weight
to
different
factors.
In
addition,
various
materials
provided
to
and
discussed
with
the
Board
throughout
the
year,
including
with
respect
to
performance
and
compliance,
also
informed
the
Board’s
decision.
In
light
of
the
fact
that
the
Fund
is
a
multi-manager
Fund,
however,
for
which
the
Adviser
identifies
Subadvisers
whose
strategies
it
seeks
to
combine
to
achieve
the
Fund’s
investment
objective,
when
considering
the
renewal
of
the
Subadvisory
Agreements,
the
Board
gave
significant
weight
to
the
Adviser’s
recommendation
that
the
Subadvisory
Agreements
be
renewed
and
to
the
Adviser’s
representation
that
the
reappointment
of
the
Subadvisers
would
positively
contribute
to
the
Adviser’s
successful
execution
of
the
Fund’s
overall
strategy.
The
Board
reviewed
a
memorandum
from
Independent
Legal
Counsel
discussing
the
legal
standards
applicable
to
its
consideration
of
the
Advisory
Agreement
and
each
Subadvisory
Agreement.
Based
on
its
review,
including
consideration
of
each
of
the
factors
referenced
above,
the
Board,
in
the
exercise
of
its
reasonable
business
judgment,
approved
the
continuation
of
the
Advisory
Agreement
and
each
Subadvisory
Agreement.
Acuitas
US
Microcap
Fund
(the
“Fund”)
Meros
Investment
Management,
LP
At
the
June
9,
2023
Board
meeting
(the
“June
meeting”),
the
Board,
including
the
Independent
Trustees,
considered
the
approval
of
a
new
investment
subadvisory
agreement
between
Acuitas
Investments,
LLC
(the
“Adviser”)
and
Meros
Investment
Management,
LP
(“Meros”
or
the
“Subadviser”)
pertaining
to
the
Fund
(the
“Subadvisory
Agreement”).
The
Subadvisory
Agreement
was
being
considered
in
connection
with
the
anticipated
termination
of
the
original
subadvisory
agreement
between
Meros
and
the
Adviser
(“Original
Agreement”)
due
to
an
internal
restructuring
of
the
ownership
of
Meros’
parent
company
(the
“Transaction”).
The
Transaction
is
expected
to
result
in
a
change
in
control
of
Meros,
and
thus,
a
termination
of
the
Original
Agreement.
The
Subadvisory
Agreement
is
identical
to
the
Original
Agreement,
except
for
the
effective
date,
and
would
take
effect
immediately
upon
the
change
in
control
of
Meros
and
termination
of
the
Original
Agreement.
In
preparation
for
its
deliberations,
the
Board
requested
and
reviewed
written
responses
from
Meros
to
a
due
diligence
questionnaire
circulated
on
the
Board’s
behalf
concerning
Meros’
personnel,
operations,
financial
condition,
performance,
compensation,
and
services
to
be
provided
to
a
portion
of
the
Fund
by
the
Subadviser
(the
“Sleeve”).
The
Board
also
discussed
the
materials
with
independent
legal
counsel
to
the
Independent
Trustees
(“Independent
Legal
Counsel”)
and,
as
necessary,
with
the
Trust's
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
(Unaudited)
June
30,
2023
22
administrator.
During
its
deliberations,
the
Board
received
an
oral
presentation
from
the
Adviser
and
was
assisted
by
the
advice
of
Independent
Legal
Counsel.
At
the
June
meeting,
the
Board
reviewed,
among
other
matters,
the
topics
discussed
below:
Nature,
Extent
and
Quality
of
Services
The
Board
received
a
presentation
from
senior
representatives
of
the
Adviser
and
discussed
Meros’
personnel,
operations
and
financial
condition.
In
this
context,
the
Board
considered
the
adequacy
of
Meros’
resources
and
the
quality
of
services
to
be
provided
by
Meros
under
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
The
Board
reviewed
information
regarding
the
experience,
qualifications
and
professional
background
of
the
portfolio
managers
and
other
personnel
at
Meros
who,
as
Meros
employees
had,
and
under
the
Subadvisory
Agreement
would
continue
to
have,
responsibility
for
the
Sleeve.
The
Board
considered
the
Adviser’s
representation
that
the
portfolio
managers
of
Meros
who
were
responsible
for
the
Sleeve
would
continue
in
that
role
as
portfolio
managers
at
Meros
and
noted
that,
since
2019,
the
same
portfolio
managers
had
provided
such
services
to
the
Fund.
The
Board
considered
the
investment
philosophy
and
decision-making
process
of
those
professionals
and
the
capability
and
integrity
of
Meros’
senior
management
and
staff.
The
Board
also
evaluated
the
anticipated
quality
of
Meros’
services
with
respect
to
regulatory
compliance
and
compliance
with
client
investment
policies
and
restrictions.
In
addition,
the
Board
took
into
consideration
the
Adviser’s
recommendation
to
approve
the
Subadvisory
Agreement
with
Meros.
The
Board
also
noted
Meros’
representation
that
it
is
financially
stable
and
able
to
provide
investment
advisory
services
to
the
Fund.
The
Board
concluded
that,
overall,
it
was
satisfied
with
the
nature,
extent,
and
quality
of
services
to
be
provided
to
the
Fund
by
Meros
under
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
Costs
of
Services
and
Profitability
The
Board
noted
that
the
Adviser,
and
not
the
Fund,
was
responsible
for
paying
the
subadvisory
fees
due
under
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
The
Board
considered
information
regarding
the
fees
paid
and
revenue
received
by
the
Subadviser
from
its
relationship
with
the
Fund,
noting
the
arm’s-length
nature
of
the
relationship
between
the
Adviser
and
the
Subadviser
with
respect
to
the
negotiation
of
the
subadvisory
fee
rate
that
would
apply.
The
Board
concluded
that
the
Subadviser’s
profitability
was
not
a
material
factor
in
determining
whether
to
approve
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
Performance
Recognizing
that
the
Subadviser’s
portfolio
management
personnel
were
the
same
as
those
currently
employed
to
manage
the
Sleeve
as
employees
of
Meros,
the
Board
considered
the
historical
performance
of
the
proposed
portfolio
managers
of
the
Subadviser
in
managing
the
Sleeve,
including
in
particular
the
Adviser’s
evaluation
of
the
performance
Meros
achieved
for
the
Sleeve.
The
Board
noted
the
Adviser
had
expressed
satisfaction
with
the
performance
of
Meros
and
that
the
Adviser
had
recommended
the
approval
of
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
Based
on
the
Adviser’s
evaluation
of
Meros’
performance
and
other
relevant
facts
and
circumstances,
the
Board
concluded
that
the
Subadviser’s
management
of
the
Sleeve
could
benefit
the
Fund
and
its
shareholders.
Compensation
The
Board
reviewed
the
Subadviser’s
proposed
compensation
for
providing
subadvisory
services
to
the
Fund
and
noted
that
the
total
advisory
fee
paid
by
the
Fund
would
not
change
because
the
subadvisory
fees
are
paid
by
the
Adviser
and
not
the
Funds.
The
Board
thus
did
not
focus
on
information
regarding
the
proposed
compensation
to
be
paid
to
the
Subadviser
as
a
result
of
its
relationship
with
the
Fund,
noting
instead
the
arm’s-length
nature
of
the
relationship
between
the
Adviser
and
the
Subadviser
with
respect
to
the
negotiation
of
the
subadvisory
fee
rate
that
would
apply
to
the
Subadviser.
The
Board
did
note,
however,
that
the
compensation
to
be
received
by
the
Subadviser
under
the
Subadvisory
Agreement
would
be
no
greater
than
the
compensation
that
Meros
received
under
the
prior
subadvisory
agreement.
As
a
result,
the
Board
concluded
that
the
proposed
compensation
for
providing
subadvisory
services
to
the
Fund
was
not
a
material
factor
in
considering
the
approval
of
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
Economies
of
Scale
The
Board
considered
whether
the
Fund
would
benefit
from
any
economies
of
scale
with
respect
to
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
The
Board
noted
that
because
the
Adviser,
and
not
the
Fund,
pays
the
subadvisory
fee,
the
Fund
would
not
benefit
from
any
economies
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
(Unaudited)
June
30,
2023
23
of
scale
in
the
form
of
breakpoints
in
the
subadvisory
fee
rate.
Based
on
the
foregoing
information
and
other
materials
presented,
the
Board
concluded
that
economies
of
scale
were
not
a
material
factor
in
approving
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
Other
Benefits
The
Board
noted
the
Subadviser’s
representation
that,
aside
from
its
contractual
subadvisory
fees,
it
does
not
benefit
in
a
material
way
from
its
relationship
with
the
Fund.
As
a
result,
other
benefits
accrued
by
the
Subadviser
were
not
a
material
factor
in
approving
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
Conclusion
The
Board
did
not
identify
any
single
factor
as
being
of
paramount
importance,
and
different
Trustees
may
have
given
different
weight
to
different
factors;
however,
in
light
of
the
fact
that
the
Fund
is
a
multi-manager
Fund
for
which
the
Adviser
identifies
subadvisers
whose
strategies
it
seeks
to
combine
to
achieve
the
Fund’s
investment
objective,
the
Board
gave
significant
weight
to
the
Adviser’s
recommendation
that
the
Subadviser
be
appointed
as
a
subadviser
to
the
Fund
and
to
the
Adviser’s
representation
that
the
appointment
of
the
Subadviser
would
positively
contribute
to
the
Adviser
successfully
executing
the
overall
strategy
of
the
Fund.
Based
on
its
review,
including
consideration
of
each
of
the
factors
referenced
above,
the
Board
(including
a
majority
of
the
Independent
Trustees)
determined,
in
the
exercise
of
its
reasonable
business
judgment,
that
the
subadvisory
arrangement,
as
outlined
in
the
Subadvisory
Agreement,
was
fair
and
reasonable
in
light
of
the
services
to
be
performed,
expenses
to
be
incurred
by
the
Fund
and
such
other
matters
as
the
Board
considered
relevant.
Acuitas
US
Microcap
Fund
(the
“Fund”)
Bridge
City
Capital,
LLC
At
the
June
9,
2023
Board
meeting
(the
“June
meeting”),
the
Board,
including
the
Independent
Trustees,
considered
the
approval
of
a
new
investment
subadvisory
agreement
between
Acuitas
Investments,
LLC
(“Adviser”)
and
Bridge
City
Capital,
LLC
(“Subadviser”)
pertaining
to
the
Fund
(the
“Subadvisory
Agreement”).
In
preparation
for
the
June
meeting,
the
Board
was
presented
with
a
range
of
information
to
assist
in
its
deliberations.
The
Board
requested
and
reviewed
written
responses
from
the
Subadviser
to
a
letter
circulated
on
the
Board’s
behalf
concerning
the
personnel,
operations,
financial
condition,
performance,
compensation,
and
services
to
be
provided
to
the
Fund
by
the
Subadviser,
and
also
a
memorandum
from
the
Adviser
summarizing
the
due
diligence
process
the
Adviser
employed
in
making
its
recommendation
to
the
Board
to
approve
the
Subadviser
to
manage
a
portion
of
the
Fund
(the
“Sleeve”).
The
Board
also
received
an
oral
presentation
from
each
of
the
Adviser
and
the
Subadviser
and
discussed
the
materials
with
the
Adviser,
Subadviser,
independent
legal
counsel
to
the
Independent
Trustees
(“Independent
Legal
Counsel”),
and,
as
necessary,
with
the
Trust’s
administrator.
The
Independent
Trustees
also
met
in
executive
session
with
Independent
Legal
Counsel
while
deliberating.
At
the
June
meeting,
the
Board
reviewed,
among
other
matters,
the
topics
discussed
below.
Nature,
Extent
and
Quality
of
Services
The
Board
received
a
presentation
from
senior
representatives
of
the
Subadviser
and
the
Adviser
and
discussed
the
Subadviser’s
personnel,
operations
and
financial
condition.
In
this
context,
the
Board
considered
the
adequacy
of
the
Subadviser’s
resources
and
the
quality
of
services
to
be
provided
by
the
Subadviser
under
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
The
Board
reviewed
information
regarding
the
experience,
qualifications
and
professional
background
of
the
portfolio
managers
and
other
personnel
at
the
Subadviser
who
would
have
responsibility
for
the
Sleeve.
The
Board
considered
the
investment
philosophy
and
decision-making
processes
of
those
professionals
and
the
capability
and
integrity
of
the
Subadviser’s
senior
management
and
staff.
The
Board
also
evaluated
the
anticipated
quality
of
the
Subadviser’s
services
with
respect
to
regulatory
compliance
and
compliance
with
client
investment
policies
and
restrictions.
In
addition,
the
Board
took
into
consideration
the
Adviser’s
recommendation
with
respect
to
the
Subadviser.
The
Board
noted
the
Subadviser’s
representation
that
it
is
financially
stable
and
able
to
provide
investment
advisory
services
to
the
Fund.
The
Board
concluded
that,
overall,
it
was
satisfied
with
the
nature,
extent,
and
quality
of
services
to
be
provided
to
the
Fund
by
the
Subadviser
under
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
(Unaudited)
June
30,
2023
24
Costs
of
Services
and
Profitability
The
Board
noted
that
the
Adviser,
and
not
the
Fund,
was
responsible
for
paying
the
subadvisory
fees
due
under
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
The
Board
considered
information
regarding
the
costs
of
services
provided
or
profits
to
be
realized
by
the
Subadviser
from
its
relationship
with
the
Fund,
but
emphasized
the
arm’s-length
nature
of
the
relationship
between
the
Adviser
and
the
Subadviser
with
respect
to
the
negotiation
of
the
subadvisory
fee
rate
that
would
apply.
The
Board
concluded
that
the
Subadviser’s
profitability
was
not
a
material
factor
in
determining
whether
to
approve
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
Performance
Recognizing
that
the
Subadviser
had
not
yet
managed
any
portion
of
the
Fund,
the
Board
evaluated
the
Adviser’s
assessment
of
the
Subadviser’s
historical
performance
in
managing
other
investment
accounts
with
similar
investment
strategies
to
the
one
to
be
employed
for
the
Sleeve,
noting
the
Adviser
had
expressed
satisfaction
with
the
performance
of
the
Subadviser
and
that
the
Adviser
had
recommended
the
approval
of
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
Based
on
the
Adviser’s
evaluation
of
the
Subadviser’s
performance
and
other
relevant
facts
and
circumstances,
the
Board
concluded
that
the
Subadviser’s
management
of
the
Sleeve
could
benefit
the
Fund
and
its
shareholders.
Compensation
The
Board
reviewed
the
Subadviser’s
proposed
compensation
for
providing
subadvisory
services
to
the
Fund
and
noted
that
the
total
advisory
fee
paid
by
the
Fund
would
not
change
because
the
subadvisory
fees
are
paid
by
the
Adviser
and
not
the
Fund.
The
Board
thus
did
not
focus
on
information
regarding
the
proposed
compensation
to
be
paid
to
the
Subadviser
as
a
result
of
its
relationship
with
the
Fund,
noting
instead
the
arm’s-length
nature
of
the
relationship
between
the
Adviser
and
the
Subadviser
with
respect
to
the
negotiation
of
the
subadvisory
fee
rate
that
would
apply
to
the
Subadviser.
The
Board
did
note,
however,
that
the
compensation
to
be
received
by
the
Subadviser
under
the
Subadvisory
Agreement
would
be
the
same
as
the
subadvisory
fee
received
by
the
Fund’s
other
subadvisers.
As
a
result,
the
Board
concluded
that
the
proposed
compensation
for
providing
subadvisory
services
to
the
Fund
was
not
a
material
factor
in
considering
the
approval
of
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
Economies
of
Scale
The
Board
considered
whether
the
Fund
would
benefit
from
any
economies
of
scale
with
respect
to
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
The
Board
noted
that
because
the
Adviser,
and
not
the
Fund,
pays
the
subadvisory
fee,
the
Fund
would
not
benefit
from
any
economies
of
scale
in
the
form
of
breakpoints
in
the
subadvisory
fee
rate.
Based
on
the
foregoing
information
and
other
materials
presented,
the
Board
concluded
that
economies
of
scale
were
not
a
material
factor
in
approving
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
Other
Benefits
The
Board
noted
the
Subadviser’s
representation
that,
aside
from
its
contractual
subadvisory
fees,
it
does
not
benefit
in
a
material
way
from
its
relationship
with
the
Fund.
As
a
result,
other
benefits
accrued
by
the
Subadviser
were
not
a
material
factor
in
approving
the
Subadvisory
Agreement.
Conclusion
The
Board
did
not
identify
any
single
factor
as
being
of
paramount
importance,
and
different
Trustees
may
have
given
different
weight
to
different
factors;
however,
in
light
of
the
fact
that
the
Fund
is
a
multi-manager
Fund
for
which
the
Adviser
identifies
subadvisers
whose
strategies
it
seeks
to
combine
to
achieve
the
Fund’s
investment
objective,
the
Board
gave
significant
weight
to
the
Adviser’s
recommendation
that
the
Subadviser
be
appointed
as
a
subadviser
to
the
Fund
and
to
the
Adviser’s
representation
that
the
appointment
of
the
Subadviser
would
positively
contribute
to
the
Adviser
successfully
executing
the
overall
strategy
of
the
Fund.
Based
on
its
review,
including
consideration
of
each
of
the
factors
referenced
above,
the
Board
(including
a
majority
of
the
Independent
Trustees)
determined,
in
the
exercise
of
its
reasonable
business
judgment,
that
the
subadvisory
arrangement,
as
outlined
in
the
Subadvisory
Agreement,
was
fair
and
reasonable
in
light
of
the
services
to
be
performed,
expenses
to
be
incurred
by
the
Fund
and
such
other
matters
as
the
Board
considered
relevant.
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
(Unaudited)
June
30,
2023
25
Change
in
Independent
Registered
Public
Accounting
Firm
On
March
9,
2023,
BBD
LLP
(“BBD”)
ceased
to
serve
as
the
independent
registered
public
accounting
firm
of
the
Fund,
a
series
of
Forum
Funds
II.
The
Audit
Committee
of
the
Board
of
Directors
approved
the
replacement
of
BBD
as
a
result
of
Cohen
&
Company,
Ltd.’s
(“Cohen”)
acquisition
of
BBD’s
investment
management
group.
The
reports
of
BBD
on
the
financial
statements
of
the
Fund
as
of
and
for
the
fiscal
years
ended
June
30,
2021
and
June
30,
2022
did
not
contain
an
adverse
opinion
or
a
disclaimer
of
opinion,
and
were
not
qualified
or
modified
as
to
uncertainties,
audit
scope
or
accounting
principles.
During
the
years
ended
June
30,
2021
and
June
30,
2022,
and
during
the
subsequent
interim
period
through
March
9,
2023,
(i)
there
were
no
disagreements
between
the
Trust
and
BBD
on
any
matter
of
accounting
principles
or
practices,
financial
statement
disclosure,
or
auditing
scope
or
procedure,
which
disagreements,
if
not
resolved
to
the
satisfaction
of
BBD,
would
have
caused
it
to
make
reference
to
the
subject
matter
of
the
disagreements
in
its
report
on
the
financial
statements
of
the
Fund
for
such
years
or
interim
period,
and
(ii)
there
were
no
“reportable
events,”
as
defined
in
Item
304(a)(1)(v)
of
Regulation
S-K
under
the
Securities
Exchange
Act
of
1934,
as
amended.
The
Trust
requested
that
BBD
furnish
it
with
a
letter
addressed
to
the
U.S.
Securities
and
Exchange
Commission
stating
that
it
agrees
with
the
above
statements.
A
copy
of
this
letter
is
filed
as
an
exhibit
to
Form
N-CSR.
On
March
17,
2023,
the
Audit
Committee
of
the
Board
also
recommended
and
approved
the
appointment
of
Cohen
as
the
Fund’s
independent
registered
public
accounting
firm
for
the
fiscal
year
ending
June
30,
2023.
During
the
fiscal
years
ended
June
30,
2021
and
June
30,
2022,
and
during
the
subsequent
interim
period
through
March
17,
2023,
neither
the
Trust,
nor
anyone
acting
on
its
behalf,
consulted
with
Cohen
on
behalf
of
the
of
Fund
regarding
the
application
of
accounting
principles
to
a
specified
transaction
(either
completed
or
proposed),
the
type
of
audit
opinion
that
might
be
rendered
on
the
Fund’s
financial
statements,
or
any
matter
that
was
either,
(i)
the
subject
of
a
“disagreement,”
as
defined
in
Item
304(a)(1)(iv)
of
Regulation
S-K
and
the
instructions
thereto;
or
(ii)
"reportable
events,"
as
defined
in
Item
304(a)(1)(v)
of
Regulation
S-K.
Proxy
Voting
Information
A
description
of
the
policies
and
procedures
that
the
Fund
uses
to
determine
how
to
vote
proxies
relating
to
securities
held
in
the
Fund’s
portfolio
is
available,
without
charge
and
upon
request,
by
calling
(844)
805-5628
and
on
the
U.S.
Securities
and
Exchange
Commission's
(the
"SEC")
website
at
www.sec.gov.
The
Fund’s
proxy
voting
record
for
the
most
recent
twelve-month
period
ended
June
30
is
available,
without
charge
and
upon
request,
by
calling
(844)
805-5628
and
on
the
SEC’s
website
at
www.sec.gov.
Availability
of
Quarterly
Portfolio
Schedules
The
Fund
files
its
complete
schedule
of
portfolio
holdings
with
the
SEC
for
the
first
and
third
quarters
of
each
fiscal
year
on
Form
N-PORT.
Forms
N-PORT
are
available
free
of
charge
on
the
SEC’s
website
at
www.sec.gov.
Shareholder
Expense
Example
As
a
shareholder
of
the
Fund,
you
incur
two
types
of
costs:
(1)
transaction
costs,
including
redemption
fees,
and
(2)
ongoing
costs,
including
management
fees,
distribution
and/or
service
(12b-1)
fees
(for
Investor
Shares
only)
and
other
Fund
expenses.
This
example
is
intended
to
help
you
understand
your
ongoing
costs
(in
dollars)
of
investing
in
the
Fund,
and
to
compare
these
costs
with
the
ongoing
costs
of
investing
in
other
mutual
funds.
The
example
is
based
on
an
investment
of
$1,000
invested
at
the
beginning
of
the
period
and
held
for
the
entire
period
from
January
1,
2023
through
June
30,
2023.
Actual
Expenses
The
first
line
of
the
table
below
provides
information
about
actual
account
values
and
actual
expenses.
You
may
use
the
information
in
this
line,
together
with
the
amount
you
invested,
to
estimate
the
expenses
that
you
paid
over
the
period.
Simply
divide
your
account
value
by
$1,000
(for
example,
an
$8,600
account
value
divided
by
$1,000
=
8.6),
then
multiply
the
result
by
the
number
in
the
first
line
under
the
heading
entitled
“Expenses
Paid
During
Period”
to
estimate
the
expenses
you
paid
on
your
account
during
the
period.
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
(Unaudited)
June
30,
2023
26
Hypothetical
Example
for
Comparison
Purposes
The
second
line
of
the
table
below
provides
information
about
hypothetical
account
values
and
hypothetical
expenses
based
on
the
Fund’s
actual
expense
ratio
and
an
assumed
rate
of
return
of
5%
per
year
before
expenses,
which
is
not
the
Fund’s
actual
return.
The
hypothetical
account
values
and
expenses
may
not
be
used
to
estimate
the
actual
ending
account
balance
or
expenses
you
paid
for
the
period.
You
may
use
this
information
to
compare
the
ongoing
costs
of
investing
in
the
Fund
and
other
funds.
To
do
so,
compare
this
5%
hypothetical
example
with
the
5%
hypothetical
examples
that
appear
in
the
shareholder
reports
of
other
funds.
Please
note
that
the
expenses
shown
in
the
table
are
meant
to
highlight
your
ongoing
costs
only
and
do
not
reflect
any
transactional
costs,
such
as
redemption
fees.
Therefore,
the
second
line
of
the
table
is
useful
in
comparing
ongoing
costs
only
and
will
not
help
you
determine
the
relative
total
costs
of
owning
different
funds.
In
addition,
if
these
transactional
costs
were
included,
your
costs
would
have
been
higher.
Federal
Tax
Status
of
Dividends
Declared
during
the
Fiscal
Year
Pursuant
to
Section
852
(b)(3)
of
the
Internal
Revenue
Code,
the
Fund
designates
$2,851,832
as
long-term
capital
gain
dividends
for
the
year
ended
June
30,
2023.
Trustees
and
Officers
of
the
Trust
The
Board
is
responsible
for
oversight
of
the
management
of
the
Trust’s
business
affairs
and
of
the
exercise
of
all
the
Trust’s
powers
except
those
reserved
for
the
shareholders.
The
following
table
provides
information
about
each
Trustee
and
certain
officers
of
the
Trust.
Each
Trustee
and
officer
holds
office
until
the
person
resigns,
is
removed,
or
is
replaced.
Unless
otherwise
noted,
the
persons
have
held
their
principal
occupations
for
more
than
five
years.
The
address
for
all
Trustees
and
officers
is
Three
Canal
Plaza,
Suite
600,
Portland,
Maine
04101.
The
Fund’s
Statement
of
Additional
Information
includes
additional
information
about
the
Trustees
and
is
available,
without
charge
and
upon
request,
by
calling
(844)
805-5628.
Beginning
Account
Value
January
1,
2023
Ending
Account
Value
June
30,
2023
Expenses
Paid
During
Period*
Annualized
Expense
Ratio*
Institutional
Shares
Actual
$
1,000.00‌
$
1,087.95‌
$
7.77‌
1.50%‌
Hypothetical
(5%
return
before
expenses)
$
1,000.00‌
$
1,017.36‌
$
7.50‌
1.50%‌
*
Expenses
are
equal
to
the
Fund’s
annualized
expense
ratio
multiplied
by
the
average
account
value
over
the
period,
multiplied
by
the
number
of
days
in
the
most
recent
fiscal
half-year
(181)
divided
by
365
to
reflect
the
half-year
period.
Name
and
Year
of
Birth
Position
with
the
Trust
Length
of
Time
Served
Principal
Occupation(s)
During
Past
Five
Years
Number
of
Series
in
Fund
Complex
Overseen
By
Trustee
Other
Directorships
Held
By
Trustee
During
Past
Five
Years
Independent
Trustees
David
Tucker
Born:
1958
Chairman
of
the
Board;
Trustee;
Chairman,
Nominating
Committee
and
Qualified
Legal
Compliance
Committee
Since
2013
Director,
Blue
Sky
Experience
(a
charitable
endeavor),
since
2008;
Senior
Vice
President
&
General
Counsel,
American
Century
Companies
(an
investment
management
firm),
1998-
2008.
1
Trustee,
Forum
Funds;
Trustee,
U.S.
Global
Investors
Funds.
Mark
D.
Moyer
Born:
1959
Trustee;
Chairman
Audit
Committee
Since
2013
Chief
Financial
Officer,
Freedom
House
(a
NGO
advocating
political
freedom
and
democracy),
2017-2021;
independent
consultant
providing
interim
CFO
services,
principally
to
non-profit
organizations,
2011-2017.
1
Trustee,
Forum
Funds;
Trustee,
U.S.
Global
Investors
Funds.
ACUITAS
US
MICROCAP
FUND
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
(Unaudited)
June
30,
2023
27
(1)
Karen
Shaw
is
currently
an
interested
person
of
the
Trust,
as
defined
in
the
1940
Act,
due
to
her
affiliation
with
Apex
Fund
Services
and
her
role
as
Treasurer
of
the
Trust.
Apex
Fund
Services
is
a
wholly
owned
subsidiary
of
Apex
US
Holdings
LLC.
Name
and
Year
of
Birth
Position
with
the
Trust
Length
of
Time
Served
Principal
Occupation(s)
During
Past
Five
Years
Number
of
Series
in
Fund
Complex
Overseen
By
Trustee
Other
Directorships
Held
By
Trustee
During
Past
Five
Years
Jennifer
Brown-Strabley
Born:
1964
Trustee
Since
2013
Principal,
Portland
Global
Advisors
(a
registered
investment
adviser),
1996-
2010.
1
Trustee,
Forum
Funds;
Trustee,
U.S.
Global
Investors
Funds.
Interested
Trustees
(1)
Karen
Shaw
Born:
1972
Trustee
Since
2023
Senior
Vice
President,
Apex
Fund
Services
since
2019;
Senior
Vice
President,
Atlantic
Fund
Services
2008-
2019.
1
Trustee,
Forum
Funds,
Trustee,
U.S.
Global
Investors
Funds.
Name
and
Year
of
Birth
Position
with
the
Trust
Length
of
Time
Served
Principal
Occupation(s)
During
Past
5
Years
Officers
Zachary
Tackett
Born:
1988
President;
Principal
Executive
Officer;
Anti-Money
Laundering
Compliance
Officer;
Identity
Theft
Prevention
Officer
President
and
Principal
Executive
Officer
since
2023;
Anti-Money
Laundering
Compliance
Officer
and
Identity
Theft
Prevention
Officer
since
2015
Senior
Counsel,
Apex
Fund
Services
since
2019;
Counsel,
Atlantic
Fund
Services
2014-
2019.
Karen
Shaw
Born:
1972
Treasurer;
Principal
Financial
Officer
Since
2013
Senior
Vice
President,
Apex
Fund
Services
since
2019;
Senior
Vice
President,
Atlantic
Fund
Services
2008-2019.
Carlyn
Edgar
Born:
1963
Chief
Compliance
Officer
Since
2013
Senior
Vice
President,
Apex
Fund
Services
since
2019;
Senior
Vice
President,
Atlantic
Fund
Services
2008-2019.
Lindsey
Dorval
Born:
1981
Vice
President;
Secretary
Since
2023
Counsel,
Apex
Fund
Services
since
2020.
220-ANR-0623
FOR
MORE
INFORMATION
Investment
Adviser
Acuitas
Investments,
LLC
520
Pike
Street,
Suite
1221
Seattle,
WA
98101
https://acuitasinvestments.com
Transfer
Agent
Apex
Fund
Services
P.O.
Box
588
Portland,
ME
04112
www.apexgroup.com
Distributor
Foreside
Fund
Services,
LLC
Three
Canal
Plaza,
Suite
100
Portland,
ME
04101
www.foreside.com
Acuitas
US
Microcap
Fund
P.O.
Box
588
Portland,
ME
04112
(844)
805-5628
This
report
is
submitted
for
the
general
information
of
the
shareholders
of
the
Fund.
It
is
not
authorized
for
distribution
to
prospective
investors
unless
preceded
or
accompanied
by
an
effective
prospectus,
which
includes
information
regarding
the
Fund’s
risks,
objectives,
fees
and
expenses,
experience
of
its
management,
and
other
information.
 
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.
(a)
          
As of the end of the period covered by this report, Forum Funds II (the “Registrant”) has adopted a code of ethics, which applies to its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer (the “Code of Ethics”). 
 
(c)
          
There have been no amendments to the Registrant’s Code of Ethics during the period covered by this report.
 
(d)
          
There have been no waivers to the Registrant’s Code of Ethics during the period covered by this report.
 
(e)
          
Not applicable.
 
(f) (1)  A copy of the Code of Ethics is being filed under Item 13(a) hereto.
 
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
The Board of Trustees has determined that Mr. Mark Moyer is an "audit committee financial expert" as that term is defined under applicable regulatory guidelines. Mr. Moyer is a non- “interested” Trustee (as defined in Section 2(a)(19) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”)), and serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee.
 
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
(a) Audit Fees - The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years (the “Reporting Periods”) for professional services rendered by the Registrant’s principal accountant for the audit of the Registrant’s annual financial statements, or services that are normally provided by the principal accountant in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the Reporting Periods, were $13,400 in 2022 and $13,400 in 2023.
 
(b) Audit-Related Fees – The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for assurance and related services rendered by the principal accountant that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item 4 were $0 in 2022 and $0 in 2023. 
 
(c) Tax Fees - The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for professional services rendered by the principal accountant to the Registrant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were $3,000 in 2022 and $3,000 in 2023.  These services consisted of review or preparation of U.S. federal, state, local and excise tax returns. 
 
(d) All Other Fees - The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for products and services provided by the principal accountant to the Registrant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item, were $0 in 2022 and $0 in 2023. 
 
(e) (1) The Audit Committee reviews and approves in advance all audit and “permissible non-audit services” (as that term is defined by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission) to be rendered to a series of the Registrant (each, a “Series”).  In addition, the Audit Committee reviews and approves in advance all “permissible non-audit services” to be provided to an investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser) of a Series, or an affiliate of such investment adviser, that is controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser and provides on-going services to the Registrant (“Affiliate”), by the Series’ principal accountant if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Series.  The Audit Committee considers whether fees paid by a Series’ investment adviser or an Affiliate to the Series’ principal accountant for audit and permissible non-audit services are consistent with the principal accountant’s independence.
 
(e) (2) No services included in (b) - (d) above were approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
                     
(f) Not applicable
 
(g) The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the principal accountant for services rendered to the Registrant for the Reporting Periods were $0 in 2022 and $0 in 2023.  There were no fees billed in either of the Reporting Periods for non-audit services rendered by the principal accountant to the Registrant’s investment adviser or any Affiliate.
 
(h) During the Reporting Period, the Registrant's principal accountant provided no non-audit services to the investment advisers or any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment advisers to the series of the Registrant to which this report relates.
 
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
Not applicable
 
ITEM 6. INVESTMENTS.
 
(a)
    
Included as part of report to shareholders under Item 1.
 
(b)
   
Not applicable.
 
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable.
 
ITEM 8.  PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable.
 
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
Not applicable.
 
TEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The Registrant does not accept nominees to the board of trustees from shareholders.
 
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) The Registrant’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Act are effective, based on their evaluation of the controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the Act and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
 (b) There were no changes in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
ITEM 12. DISCLOSURE OF SECURITIES LENDING ACTIVITIES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Not applicable.
 
ITEM 13. EXHIBITS.
 
 
 
(a)(3)  Not applicable.
 
 
 

 
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
Registrant Forum Funds II
 
By
/s/ Zachary Tackett
 
 
Zachary Tackett, Principal Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
Date
August 29, 2023
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
 
By
/s/ Zachary Tackett
 
 
Zachary Tackett, Principal Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
Date
August 29, 2023
 
 
 
By
/s/ Karen Shaw
 
 
Karen Shaw, Principal Financial Officer
 
 
 
 
Date
August 29, 2023