UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
	or
£	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _____________________ to __________________

Commission File Number: 001-36135

________________________

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	46-2616226
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
250 Vesey Street, 15th Floor New York, NY (Address of principal executive offices)	10281 (Zip Code)

(212) 417-7000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

None

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer £ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x Smaller reporting company £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes £ No x

As of May 9, 2014, 100% of the registrant’s common stock (all of which is privately owned and is not traded on any public market) was held by Brookfield DTLA Holdings LLC.

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements.
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) as of      March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013	1
		Condensed Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations      (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013	3
		Condensed Consolidated and Combined Statements of      Comprehensive (Loss) Income (unaudited)      for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013	4
		Condensed Consolidated and Combined Statements of      Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) (unaudited)      for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013	5
		Condensed Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows      (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013	6
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated and Combined Financial      Statements (unaudited)	8
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition      and Results of Operations.	24
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	38
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	38
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	39
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	41
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	43
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	43
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	43
	Item 5.	Other Information.	43
	Item 6.	Exhibits.	44
	Signatures		45
		Exhibit 31.1
		Exhibit 31.2
		Exhibit 32.1
		Exhibit 101 Instance Document
		Exhibit 101 Schema Document
		Exhibit 101 Calculation Linkbase Document
		Exhibit 101 Definition Linkbase Document
		Exhibit 101 Label Linkbase Document
		Exhibit 101 Presentation Linkbase Document

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited; in thousands)

	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
ASSETS
Investments in real estate:
Land	$	229,039		$	229,039
Buildings and improvements	2,142,443			2,141,821
Tenant improvements	197,286			187,005
	2,568,768			2,557,865
Less: accumulated depreciation	(136,272		)	(121,612		)
Investments in real estate, net	2,432,496			2,436,253
Cash and cash equivalents	119,798			196,071
Restricted cash	19,894			22,797
Rents, deferred rents and other receivables, net	70,316			53,306
Intangible assets, net	147,188			157,088
Deferred charges, net	61,299			61,371
Prepaid and other assets, net	19,736			19,310
Total assets	$	2,870,727		$	2,946,196
LIABILITIES AND (DEFICIT) EQUITY
Liabilities:
Mortgage loans, net	$	1,885,686		$	1,885,605
Accounts payable and other liabilities	67,587			60,637
Due to affiliates, net	40,907			35,615
Intangible liabilities, net	44,200			44,801
Total liabilities	$	2,038,380		$	2,026,658
Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 13)

1

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)

(Unaudited; in thousands)

	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
LIABILITIES AND (DEFICIT) EQUITY (continued)
Mezzanine Equity:
7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock,     $0.01 par value, 9,730,370 shares issued and     outstanding as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013	$	343,738		$	339,101
Noncontrolling Interests:
Series A-1 preferred interest	318,961			314,658
Senior participating preferred interest	192,111			257,780
Total mezzanine equity	854,810			911,539
Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000 shares     issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2014     and December 31, 2013	—			—
Additional paid-in capital	191,710			191,710
Accumulated deficit	(102,806		)	(89,177		)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	(409		)	480
Noncontrolling interest – Series B common interest	(110,958		)	(95,014		)
Total stockholders’ (deficit) equity	(22,463		)	7,999
Total liabilities and (deficit) equity	$	2,870,727		$	2,946,196

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated and combined financial statements.

2

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited; in thousands)

	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			March 31, 2013
Revenue:
Rental income	$	37,677		$	13,210
Tenant reimbursements	20,348			7,133
Parking	8,333			2,869
Interest and other	2,319			708
Total revenue	68,677			23,920
Expenses:
Rental property operating and maintenance	24,385			8,273
Real estate taxes	9,047			2,294
Parking	1,797			747
Other expense	243			546
Depreciation and amortization	26,010			7,177
Interest	22,520			4,337
Total expenses	84,002			23,374
Net (loss) income	(15,325		)	546
Net income attributable to TRZ Holdings IV LLC	—			(546		)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests:
Series A-1 preferred interest – current dividends	(4,303		)	—
Senior participating preferred interest – current dividends	(4,133		)	—
Senior participating preferred interest – redemption     measurement adjustment	(198		)	—
Series B common interest – allocation of net loss	14,967			—
Net loss attributable to Brookfield DTLA	(8,992		)	—
Series A preferred stock – current dividends	(4,637		)	—
Net loss available to common interest     holders of Brookfield DTLA	$	(13,629	)	$	—

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated and combined financial statements.

3

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(Unaudited; in thousands)

	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			March 31, 2013
Net (loss) income	$	(15,325	)	$	546
Other comprehensive loss:
Derivative transactions:
Derivative holding losses	(1,866		)	—
Comprehensive (loss) income	(17,191		)	546
Comprehensive (income) attributable to     TRZ Holdings IV LLC	—			(546		)
Comprehensive loss attributable to     noncontrolling interests	7,310			—
Comprehensive loss available to     common interest holders of Brookfield DTLA	$	(9,881	)	$	—

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated and combined financial statements.

4

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

(Unaudited; in thousands, except share amounts)

	Number of Shares	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Non- controlling Interest			Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
	Common Stock
Balance, December 31, 2013	1,000	$	—	$	191,710	$	(89,177	)	$	480		$	(95,014	)	$	7,999
Net loss						(8,992		)				(6,333		)	(15,325		)
Other comprehensive loss									(889		)	(977		)	(1,866		)
Dividends on Series A     preferred stock, Series A-1     preferred interest and     senior participating     preferred interest						(4,637		)				(8,634		)	(13,271		)
Balance, March 31, 2014	1,000	$	—	$	191,710	$	(102,806	)	$	(409	)	$	(110,958	)	$	(22,463	)

	Number of Shares	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		TRZ Holdings IV LLC’s Interest			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Common Stock
Balance, December 31, 2012	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	508,703		$	508,703
Net income										546			546
Distributions to     TRZ Holdings IV LLC, net										(2,277		)	(2,277		)
Balance, March 31, 2013	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	506,972		$	506,972

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated and combined financial statements.

5

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited; in thousands)

	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			March 31, 2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(15,325	)	$	546
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash      provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	26,010			7,177
Amortization of below-market leases/      above-market leases	(653		)	(501		)
Straight-line rent amortization	(6,013		)	(3,029		)
Amortization of tenant inducements	256			242
Amortization of debt discounts	1,274			153
Amortization of deferred financing costs	318			—
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Rents, deferred rents and other receivables	(9,748		)	(306		)
Due to (from) affiliates, net	3,786			(1,228		)
Deferred charges	(2,938		)	(1,512		)
Prepaid and other assets	(1,433		)	(64		)
Accounts payable and other liabilities	9,153			1,694
Net cash provided by operating activities	4,687			3,172
Cash flows from investing activities:
Expenditures for improvements to real estate	(12,670		)	(4,043		)
Decrease in restricted cash	2,903			—
Net cash used in investing activities	(9,767		)	(4,043		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Principal payments on mortgage loans	(1,193		)	(1,795		)
Distributions to Brookfield DTLA Holdings	(70,000		)	—
Distributions to TRZ Holdings IV LLC, net	—			(2,277		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(71,193		)	(4,072		)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	(76,273		)	(4,943		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	196,071			5,707
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	119,798		$	764

6

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)

(Unaudited; in thousands)

	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			March 31, 2013
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	20,674		$	4,188
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and      financing activities:
Accrual for real estate improvements	$	5,307		$	2,325
Accrual for deferred leasing costs	3,265			1,810
Decrease in fair value of interest rate swap	(1,866		)	—

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated and combined financial statements.

7

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1—Organization and Description of Business

General

Brookfield DTLA Fund Office Trust Investor Inc. (“Brookfield DTLA” or the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation and was incorporated on April 19, 2013. Brookfield DTLA was formed for the purpose of consummating the transactions contemplated in the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 24, 2013, as amended (the “Merger Agreement”), and the issuance of shares of 7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Series A preferred stock”) in connection with the acquisition of MPG Office Trust, Inc. and MPG Office, L.P. (together, “MPG”). Brookfield DTLA is a direct subsidiary of Brookfield DTLA Holdings LLC (“Brookfield DTLA Holdings”), a Delaware limited liability company, and an indirect subsidiary of Brookfield Office Properties Inc. (“BPO”).

Prior to October 15, 2013, 333 South Hope Co. LLC (“333 South Hope”) and EYP Realty LLC (“EYP Realty”) were controlled by BPO through its indirect ownership interest in TRZ Holdings IV LLC (“TRZ”). TRZ owned 100% of the member units of 333 South Hope and EYP Realty, and BPO indirectly owns approximately 84% of the member units of TRZ.

On October 15, 2013, through a series of formation transactions TRZ’s interests in 333 South Hope and EYP Realty were contributed to subsidiaries of Brookfield DTLA in exchange for preferred and common interests in Brookfield DTLA Fund Properties II LLC (“New OP”) and a preferred interest in Brookfield DTLA Fund Properties III LLC (“DTLA OP”). 333 South Hope owned Bank of America Plaza (“BOA Plaza”) and EYP Realty owned Ernst & Young Plaza (“EY Plaza”). Both of these Class A commercial properties are located in the Los Angeles Central Business District (the “LACBD”).

MPG Acquisition

On October 15, 2013, Brookfield DTLA completed the acquisition of MPG (the “merger”) pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. As part of the transaction, MPG was contributed to New OP in exchange for a preferred interest in New OP. In addition to BOA Plaza and EY Plaza, Brookfield DTLA now owns Wells Fargo Center–North Tower (also known as “Wells Fargo Tower”), Wells Fargo Center–South Tower (also known as “KPMG Tower”), Gas Company Tower and 777 Tower, each of which are Class A office properties located in the LACBD that were formerly owned by MPG.

At the effective time of the merger, (i) each issued and outstanding share of MPG common stock was automatically converted into, and canceled in exchange for, the right to receive $3.15 in cash, without interest and less any required withholding tax and (ii) each issued and outstanding share of the 7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of MPG (the “MPG Preferred Stock”) automatically, and without a vote by the holders of MPG Preferred Stock, was converted into and canceled in exchange for, the right to receive one share of the Company’s Series A preferred stock.

8

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Unaudited)

In connection with the acquisition, DTLA Fund Holding Co., a subsidiary of Brookfield DTLA Holdings, made a tender offer to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares of MPG Preferred Stock for cash consideration of $25.00 per share (the “offer price”). A total of 372,901 shares of MPG Preferred Stock were validly tendered into the offer and the holders thereof received the offer price for such shares. At the effective time of the merger, each share of MPG Preferred Stock that was issued and outstanding immediately prior to the merger, including each share of MPG Preferred Stock acquired by DTLA Fund Holding Co. in the offer, was exchanged for one share of Series A preferred stock of the Company with rights, terms and conditions substantially identical to those of the MPG Preferred Stock.

Note 2—Basis of Presentation

Predecessor Entities

Prior to October 15, 2013, Brookfield DTLA had not conducted any business as a separate company and had no material assets or liabilities. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), the contribution of 333 South Hope and EYP Realty (together, the “Predecessor Entities”) constitute a transaction between entities under common control. A combination between entities that already share the same parent is not considered a business combination because there is no change in control at the parent level. Accordingly, the operations of the Predecessor Entities contributed to Brookfield DTLA by TRZ on October 15, 2013 are presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated and combined financial statements as if they were owned by Brookfield DTLA for all historical periods presented and the assets and liabilities of BOA Plaza and EY Plaza were recorded at the carrying values reflected in the books and records of 333 South Hope and EYP Realty. As such, no gain or loss was recorded in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 due to this transaction. As a result of the transaction, TRZ’s interest in the Predecessor Entities was exchanged for a preferred and common interest in New OP and a preferred interest in DTLA OP. As a result of certain redemption features in the preferred instruments, these instruments have been classified in the consolidated balance sheets as mezzanine equity. See Note 7 “Mezzanine Equity.”

As used in these condensed consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes, the terms “Brookfield DTLA,” the “Company,” “us,” “we” and “our” refer to the combination of Brookfield DTLA Fund Office Trust Investor Inc. and the Predecessor Entities.

Principles of Consolidation and Combination and Basis of Presentation

The unaudited condensed consolidated and combined financial statements and related disclosures have been prepared in accordance with GAAP applicable to interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10‑Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of only those of a normal and recurring nature, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and interim results of Brookfield DTLA and the Predecessor Entities as of and for the periods presented have been included. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of those that may be expected for a full fiscal year.

9

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Unaudited)

The condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2013 has been derived from Brookfield DTLA’s audited financial statements; however, the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated and combined financial statements do not include all disclosures required by GAAP.

The financial information included herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes included in Brookfield DTLA’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 8, 2014, as amended on April 29, 2014.

The Company consolidates entities in which it has a controlling financial interest. In determining whether Brookfield DTLA has a controlling financial interest in an entity and the requirement to consolidate the accounts of that entity, management considers factors such as ownership interest, board representation, management representation, authority to make decisions, and contractual and substantive participating rights of the partners/members as well as whether the entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and Brookfield DTLA is the primary beneficiary.

A VIE is broadly defined as an entity where either (i) the equity investors as a group, if any, lack the power through voting or similar rights to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance or (ii) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support.

A variable interest holder is considered to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE if it has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Brookfield DTLA qualitatively assesses whether it is (or is not) the primary beneficiary of a VIE.

Consideration of various factors includes, but is not limited to, Brookfield DTLA’s ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, its form of ownership interest, its representation on the VIE’s governing body, the size and seniority of its investment, its ability and the rights of other investors to participate in policy making decisions and its ability to replace the manager of and/or liquidate the entity.

The Company earns a return through an indirect investment in New OP. Brookfield DTLA Holdings, the parent of Brookfield DTLA, owns all of the common interest in New OP. Brookfield DTLA has an indirect preferred stock interest in New OP and its wholly owned subsidiary is the managing member of New OP.

The Company determined that New OP is a VIE and as a result of having the power to direct the significant activities of New OP and exposure to the economic performance of New OP, Brookfield DTLA meets the two conditions for being the primary beneficiary. Brookfield DTLA is required to continually evaluate its VIE relationships and consolidation conclusion.

10

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Unaudited)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of condensed consolidated and combined financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated and combined financial statements and accompanying notes. For example, estimates and assumptions have been made with respect to fair values of assets and liabilities for applying the acquisition method of accounting, the useful lives of assets, recoverable amounts of receivables, impairment of long-lived assets and fair value of debt. Actual results could ultimately differ from such estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014‑08, Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant, and Equipment: Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which requires entities to disclose only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations as discontinued operations. The new guidance requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide financial statement users with more information about the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of discontinued operations. The new standard is effective in the first quarter of 2015 for public organizations with calendar year ends. Early adoption is permitted but only for disposals (or classifications as held for sale) that have not been reported in the financial statements previously issued. We do not believe that this update will have a material effect on Brookfield DTLA’s consolidated financial statements in future periods.

Income Taxes

Brookfield DTLA intends to elect to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) pursuant to Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with its tax year ended December 31, 2013. Brookfield DTLA intends to conduct its operations so as to qualify as a REIT. Accordingly, Brookfield DTLA will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that it qualifies as a REIT and distributions to its stockholders generally equal or exceed its taxable income.

However, qualification and taxation as a REIT depends upon Brookfield DTLA’s ability to meet the various qualification tests imposed under the Code related to annual operating results, asset diversification, distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that Brookfield DTLA will be organized or be able to operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT. If Brookfield DTLA fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal and state income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates, and it may be ineligible to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent tax years. Brookfield DTLA may also be subject to certain state or local income taxes, or franchise taxes on its REIT activities.

Brookfield DTLA has made no provision for income taxes in its condensed consolidated and combined financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Brookfield DTLA’s taxable income or loss is different than its financial statement income or loss.

11

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Unaudited)

Brookfield DTLA recognizes tax benefits from uncertain tax positions when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. Income tax positions must meet a more likely than not recognition threshold. Brookfield DTLA had no unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and Brookfield DTLA does not expect its unrecognized tax benefits balance to change during the next 12 months. The Predecessor Entities’ 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 tax years remain open due to the statute of limitations and may be subject to examination by federal, state and local tax authorities.

Note 3—Rents, Deferred Rents and Other Receivables, Net

Brookfield DTLA’s rents, deferred rents and other receivables are presented net of the following amounts in the condensed consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	78	$	357
Accumulated amortization of tenant inducements	2,925		2,669

Brookfield DTLA and the Predecessor Entities recorded no provision for doubtful accounts during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Note 4—Intangible Assets and Liabilities

Brookfield DTLA’s intangible assets and liabilities are summarized as follows (in thousands):

	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Intangible Assets
In-place leases	$	110,380		$	110,380
Tenant relationships	46,248			46,248
Above-market leases	38,913			38,913
	195,541			195,541
Accumulated amortization	(48,353		)	(38,453		)
Intangible assets, net	$	147,188		$	157,088
Intangible Liabilities
Below-market leases	$	76,438		$	76,438
Accumulated amortization	(32,238		)	(31,637		)
Intangible liabilities, net	$	44,200		$	44,801

12

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Unaudited)

The impact of the amortization of acquired below-market leases, net of acquired above-market leases, on rental income and of acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships on depreciation and amortization expense is as follows (in thousands):

	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014		March 31, 2013
Rental income	$	653	$	501
Depreciation and amortization expense	8,324		1,358

As of March 31, 2014, the estimate of the amortization/accretion of intangible assets and liabilities during the remainder of 2014 and the next four years is as follows (in thousands):

	In-Place Leases		Other Intangible Assets		Intangible Liabilities
2014	$	17,945	$	8,430	$	6,048
2015	18,425		9,733		7,112
2016	15,351		8,597		6,433
2017	9,484		5,794		5,855
2018	6,829		4,901		4,081
Thereafter	24,259		17,440		14,671
	$	92,293	$	54,895	$	44,200

Note 5—Deferred Charges, Net

Brookfield DTLA’s deferred charges are presented net of the following amounts in the condensed consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Accumulated amortization of leasing costs	$	20,607	$	17,914
Accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs	470		152

13

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Unaudited)

Note 6—Mortgage Loans

Brookfield DTLA’s debt is as follows (in thousands, except percentage amounts):

	Contractual Maturity Date			Principal Amount as of
		Interest Rate		March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Floating-Rate Debt
Variable-Rate Loans:
Wells Fargo Center–South Tower (1)	12/1/2016	1.96	%	$	290,000		$	290,000
777 Tower (2)	11/1/2018	1.86	%	200,000			200,000
Total variable-rate loans				490,000			490,000
Variable-Rate Swapped to Fixed-Rate Loan:
EY Plaza (3)	11/27/2020	3.93	%	185,000			185,000
Total floating-rate debt				675,000			675,000
Fixed-Rate Debt:
Wells Fargo Center–North Tower	4/6/2017	5.70	%	550,000			550,000
Gas Company Tower	8/11/2016	5.10	%	458,000			458,000
BOA Plaza	9/7/2014	5.06	%	169,245			170,191
BOA Plaza	9/7/2014	6.26	%	44,074			44,321
Total fixed-rate debt				1,221,319			1,222,512
Total debt				1,896,319			1,897,512
Debt discounts				(10,633		)	(11,907		)
Total debt, net				$	1,885,686		$	1,885,605

__________

(1) This loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.80%. As required by the loan agreement, we have entered into an interest rate cap agreement that limits the LIBOR portion of the interest rate to 4.75%.

(2) This loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.70%. As required by the loan agreement, we have entered into an interest rate cap agreement that limits the LIBOR portion of the interest rate to 5.75%.

(3) This loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.75%. As required by the loan agreement, we have entered into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge this loan, which effectively fixes the LIBOR portion of the interest rate at 2.178%. The effective interest rate of 3.93% includes interest on the swap.

14

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Unaudited)

As of March 31, 2014, our debt to be repaid during the remainder of 2014 and the next four years is as follows (in thousands):

2014	$	213,319
2015	311
2016	751,831
2017	554,026
2018	204,232
Thereafter	172,600
	$	1,896,319

As of March 31, 2014, $185.0 million of our debt may be prepaid without penalty, $671.3 million may be defeased (as defined in the underlying loan agreements), $550.0 million may be prepaid with prepayment penalties or defeased (as defined in the underlying loan agreement) at our option, $290.0 million may be prepaid with prepayment penalties, and $200.0 million is locked out from prepayment until November 1, 2015.

The BOA Plaza mortgage loans mature on September 7, 2014. Brookfield DTLA intends to refinance these loans prior to or upon maturity. Management expects the refinancing will generate proceeds in excess of the amounts necessary to refinance the existing mortgage loans, pay all fees and other expenses related to the refinancing, and create or maintain related reserves as the fair value of the collateral securing the loans exceeds the face value of those loans as of March 31, 2014.

Funding of Wells Fargo Center–North Tower Collateral Reserve

In connection with the MPG acquisition, Brookfield DTLA Holdings assumed the mortgage loan secured by the Wells Fargo Center–North Tower office property. In connection with loan assumption, Brookfield DTLA Holdings agreed to deposit a total of $10.0 million into a collateral reserve account held by the lender, of which $5.0 million was deposited when the loan was assumed during 2013 and $1.25 million was funded by Brookfield DTLA in April 2014. The remaining $3.75 million will be paid in installments of $1.25 million in October 2014, April 2015, and October 2015.

Non-Recourse Carve Out Guarantees

All of Brookfield DTLA’s $1.9 billion of mortgage debt is subject to “non-recourse carve out” guarantees that expire upon elimination of the underlying loan obligations. Under these guarantees, these otherwise non‑recourse loans can become partially or fully recourse against Brookfield DTLA Holdings if certain triggering events occur as defined in the loan agreements.

Debt Reporting

Pursuant to the terms of certain of our mortgage loan agreements, Brookfield DTLA is required to report a debt service coverage ratio (“DSCR”) calculated using the formulas specified in the underlying loan agreements. We have submitted the required reports to the lenders for the measurement periods ended March 31, 2014 and were in compliance with the amounts required by the loan agreements, with

15

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Unaudited)

the exception of Gas Company Tower.

Under the Gas Company Tower mortgage loan, we reported a DSCR of 0.92 to 1.00, calculated using actual debt service under the loan, and a DSCR of 0.73 to 1.00, calculated using actual debt service plus a hypothetical principal payment using a 30-year amortization schedule. Because the reported DSCR using the actual debt service plus a hypothetical principal payment was less than 1.00 to 1.00, the lender could seek to remove Brookfield Properties Management (CA) Inc. as property manager of Gas Company Tower, which is the only recourse available to the lender as a result of such breach.

Pursuant to the terms of the Gas Company Tower, Wells Fargo Center–South Tower, Wells Fargo Center–North Tower, and EY Plaza mortgage loan agreements, we are required to provide annual audited financial statements of Brookfield DTLA Holdings to the lenders or agents. The receipt of any opinion other than an “unqualified” audit opinion on our annual audited financial statements is an event of default under the loan agreements for the properties listed above. If an event of default occurs, the lenders have the right to pursue the remedies contained in the loan documents, including acceleration of all or a portion of the debt and foreclosure.

Note 7—Mezzanine Equity

Mezzanine equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is comprised of the Series A preferred stock, a Series A-1 preferred interest and a senior participating preferred interest (the “Preferred Interests”). The Series A-1 preferred interest and senior participating preferred interest are held by a noncontrolling interest holder. There is no commitment or obligation on the part of Brookfield DTLA or Brookfield DTLA Holdings to redeem the Preferred Interests. See “—Senior Participating Preferred Interest” below for a discussion of distributions paid related to the senior participating preferred interest during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

The Preferred Interests included within mezzanine equity were recorded at fair value on the date of issuance and have been adjusted to the greater of their carrying amount or redemption value as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Other than the distribution paid to the senior participating preferred interest in the first quarter of 2014 described below, Brookfield DTLA has not paid any cash dividends in the past. Any future dividends declared would be at the discretion of Brookfield DTLA’s board of directors and would depend on its financial condition, results of operations, contractual obligations and the terms of its financing agreements at the time a dividend is considered, and other relevant factors.

Series A Preferred Stock

As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, 9,730,370 shares of Series A preferred stock were outstanding, of which 9,357,469 shares were issued to third parties and 372,901 shares were issued to DTLA Fund Holding Co., a subsidiary of Brookfield DTLA Holdings.

The fair value of the 9,730,370 shares of Series A preferred stock issued by the Company in the merger with MPG was based on an estimate of fair value of $26.00 per share. The valuation was based on available trading information for the MPG Preferred Stock and the Company’s Series A preferred stock on the day prior to and subsequent to the transaction, respectively.

16

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Unaudited)

No dividends were declared on the Series A preferred stock during the three months ended March 31, 2014. Dividends on the Series A preferred stock are cumulative, and therefore, will continue to accrue at an annual rate of $1.90625 per share. As of March 31, 2014, the cumulative amount of unpaid dividends totals $100.5 million and has been reflected in the carrying amount of the Series A preferred stock.

As of March 31, 2014, the Series A preferred stock is reported at its redemption value of $343.7 million calculated using the redemption price of $25.00 per share plus all accumulated and unpaid dividends on such Series A preferred stock through March 31, 2014.

Series A-1 Preferred Interest

As of March 31, 2014, the Series A-1 preferred interest is reported at its redemption value of $319.0 million calculated using its liquidation value of $225.7 million plus $93.3 million of accumulated and unpaid dividends on such Series A-1 preferred interest through March 31, 2014.

Senior Participating Preferred Interest

On March 21, 2014, Brookfield DTLA made a cash distribution to Brookfield DTLA Holdings totaling $70.0 million, which was comprised of $7.3 million in settlement of preferred dividends on the senior participating preferred interest through March 21, 2014 and a return of investment of $62.7 million using proceeds generated by the refinancing of EY Plaza.

As of March 31, 2014, the senior participating preferred interest is reported at its redemption value of $192.1 million calculated using the value of the preferred and participating interests totaling $191.8 million plus $0.3 million of accumulated and unpaid dividends on the preferred interest through March 31, 2014.

Change in Mezzanine Equity

A summary of the change in mezzanine equity for the three months ended March 31, 2014 is as follows (in thousands, except share amounts):

	Number of Shares of Series A Preferred Stock	Series A Preferred Stock		Noncontrolling Interests					Total Mezzanine Equity
				Series A-1 Preferred Interest		Senior Participating Preferred Interest
Balance, December 31, 2013	9,730,370	$	339,101	$	314,658	$	257,780		$	911,539
Current dividends		4,637		4,303		4,133			13,073
Redemption measurement adjustment						198			198
Cash distribution						(70,000		)	(70,000		)
Balance, March 31, 2014	9,730,370	$	343,738	$	318,961	$	192,111		$	854,810

17

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Unaudited)

Note 8—Noncontrolling Interests

Mezzanine Equity Component

The Series A-1 preferred interest and senior participating preferred interest consist of equity interests of New OP and DTLA OP, respectively, which are owned directly by Brookfield DTLA Holdings. These noncontrolling interests are presented in mezzanine equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. See Note 7 “Mezzanine Equity.”

Stockholders’ Equity Component

The Series B common interest ranks junior to the Series A preferred stock as to dividends and upon liquidation and is presented in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 as noncontrolling interest.

Note 9—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

A summary of the change in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to Brookfield DTLA’s cash flow hedges is as follows (in thousands):

	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			March 31, 2013
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,007		$	—
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications	(1,866		)	—
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other      comprehensive loss	—			—
Net current-period other comprehensive loss	(1,866		)	—
Balance at end of period	$	(859	)	$	—

Note 10—Fair Value Measurements

The valuation of Brookfield DTLA’s interest rate swap is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flow of the derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. We have incorporated credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own and the respective counterparty’s non-performance risk in the fair value measurements.

18

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Unaudited)

Brookfield DTLA’s assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall, are as follows (in thousands):

				Fair Value Measurements Using
	Total Fair Value			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical (Liabilities) Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Interest rate swap at:
March 31, 2014	$	(859	)	$	—	$	(859	)	$	—
December 31, 2013	1,007			—		1,007			—

Note 11—Financial Instruments

Derivative Financial Instruments

A summary of the fair value of Brookfield DTLA’s derivative financial instruments is as follows (in thousands):

	Fair Value
	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging     instruments:
Interest rate swap (liability) asset	$	(859	)	$	1,007

The interest rate swap liability as of March 31, 2014 is included in accounts payable and other liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet, while the interest rate swap asset as of December 31, 2013 is included in prepaid and other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

A summary of the effect of derivative financial instruments reported in the condensed consolidated and combined financial statements is as follows (in thousands):

	Amount of (Loss) Recognized in AOCL			Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from AOCL to Statement of Operations
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments:
Interest rate swap for the three months ended:
March 31, 2014	$	(1,866	)	$	—
March 31, 2013	—			—

19

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Unaudited)

Interest Rate Swap—

As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, Brookfield DTLA held an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $185.0 million, which was assigned to the EY Plaza mortgage loan. The swap requires net settlement each month and expires on November 2, 2020.

Interest Rate Caps—

Brookfield DTLA holds interest rate caps pursuant to the terms of certain of its mortgage loan agreements with the following notional amounts (in thousands):

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Wells Fargo Center–South Tower	$	290,000	$	290,000
777 Tower	200,000		200,000
	$	490,000	$	490,000

The fair value of our interest rate caps was $1.2 million and $1.6 million as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Other Financial Instruments

The estimated fair value and carrying amount of Brookfield DTLA’s mortgage loans are as follows (in thousands):

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Estimated fair value	$	1,888,712	$	1,890,436
Carrying amount	1,885,686		1,885,605

We calculated the estimated fair value of our mortgage loans by discounting the future contractual cash flows of the loans using current risk adjusted rates available to borrowers with similar credit ratings. The estimated fair value of mortgage loans is classified as Level 3.

Note 12—Related Party Transactions

Intercompany Loan

The Company is indebted to BOP Management Inc. under a $25.0 million promissory note dated October 11, 2013 that matures on October 15, 2015, which is included in due to affiliates, net in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2014and December 31, 2013. The note bears interest at 3.25%, which is payable semi-annually. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company accrued $0.2 million of interest expense related to this note. Given the short-term nature of this instrument, fair value was determined to approximate carrying value as of March 31, 2014and December 31, 2013.

20

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Unaudited)

Management Agreements

The Predecessor Entities entered into arrangements with Brookfield Properties Management LLC, which is affiliated through common ownership with BPO, under which the affiliate provides property management and various other services. On October 15, 2013, these agreements were transferred to BOP Management Inc., an affiliate of BPO. The MPG properties entered into similar arrangements with BOP Management Inc. after the closing of the acquisition on October 15, 2013. Property management fees under these agreements are calculated based on 3.0% of rents collected (as defined in the management agreements).

A summary of costs incurred by Brookfield DTLA and the Predecessor Entities under these arrangements is as follows (in thousands):

	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014		March 31, 2013
Management fees expense	$	3,386	$	643
General, administrative and reimbursable expenses	701		287
Leasing and construction management fees	672		436

Insurance Agreements

BOA Plaza and EY Plaza are covered under an insurance policy entered into by BPO that provides all risk property and business interruption for BPO’s commercial portfolio with an aggregate limit of $2.5 billion per occurrence as well as an aggregate limit of $300.0 million of earthquake insurance. The MPG properties are covered under an insurance policy that provides all risk property and business interruption with an aggregate limit of $1.25 billion and a $130.0 million aggregate limit of earthquake insurance.

In addition, BOA Plaza and EY Plaza are covered by a terrorism insurance policy that provides aggregate coverage of $4.0 billion for all of BPO’s U.S. properties. The MPG properties are covered by a terrorism insurance policy with a $1.25 billion aggregate limit. Brookfield DTLA is in compliance with the contractual obligations regarding terrorism insurance contained in such agreements.

Insurance premiums for BOA Plaza and EY Plaza are paid by an affiliate company under common control through BPO. Brookfield DTLA reimburses the affiliate company for the actual cost of such premiums.

A summary of costs incurred by the Predecessor Entities under this arrangement is as follows (in thousands):

	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014		March 31, 2013
Insurance expense	$	1,304	$	1,212

21

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Unaudited)

Effective April 19, 2014, the insurance policies covering the MPG properties expired and the MPG properties were added to the existing BPO insurance policies described above.

Note 13—Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

General—

Brookfield DTLA and its subsidiaries may be subject to pending legal proceedings and litigation incidental to its business. After consultation with legal counsel, management believes that any liability that may potentially result upon resolution of such matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or consolidated financial statements as a whole.

Merger-Related Litigation—

Following the announcement of the execution of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 24, 2013, as amended (the “Merger Agreement”), seven putative class actions were filed against Brookfield Office Properties Inc. (“BPO”), Brookfield DTLA, Brookfield DTLA Holdings LLC, Brookfield DTLA Fund Office Trust Inc., Brookfield DTLA Fund Properties (collectively, the “Brookfield Parties”), MPG Office Trust, Inc., MPG Office, L.P., and the members of MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s board of directors. Five of these lawsuits were filed on behalf of MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s common stockholders: (i) two lawsuits, captioned Coyne v. MPG Office Trust, Inc., et al., No. BC507342 (the “Coyne Action”), and Masih v. MPG Office Trust, Inc., et al., No. BC507962 (the “Masih Action”), were filed in the Superior Court of the State of California in Los Angeles County (the “California State Court”) on April 29, 2013 and May 3, 2013, respectively; and (ii) three lawsuits, captioned Kim v. MPG Office Trust, Inc. et al., No. 24‑C-13-002600 (the “Kim Action”), Perkins v. MPG Office Trust, Inc., et al., No. 24-C-13-002778 (the “Perkins Action”) and Dell’Osso v. MPG Office Trust, Inc., et al., No. 24‑C-13-003283 (the “Dell’Osso Action”) were filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland on May 1, 2013, May 8, 2013 and May 22, 2013, respectively (collectively, the “Common Stock Actions”). Two lawsuits, captioned Cohen v. MPG Office Trust, Inc. et al., No. 24-C-13-004097 (the “Cohen Action”) and Donlan v. Weinstein, et al., No. 24‑C-13-004293 (the “Donlan Action”), were filed on behalf of MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s preferred stockholders in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland on June 20, 2013 and July 2, 2013, respectively (collectively, the “Preferred Stock Actions,” together with the Common Stock Actions, the “Merger Litigations”).

In each of the Common Stock Actions, the plaintiffs allege, among other things, that MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s board of directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the merger by failing to maximize the value of MPG Office Trust, Inc. and ignoring or failing to protect against conflicts of interest, and that the relevant Brookfield Parties named as defendants aided and abetted those breaches of fiduciary duty. The Kim Action further alleges that MPG Office, L.P. also aided and abetted the breaches of fiduciary duty by MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s board of directors, and the Dell’Osso Action further alleges that MPG Office Trust, Inc. and MPG Office, L.P. aided and abetted the breaches of fiduciary duty by MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s board of directors. On June 4, 2013, the Kim and Perkins plaintiffs filed identical, amended complaints in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland. On June 5, 2013, the

22

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Unaudited)

Masih plaintiffs also filed an amended complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California in Los Angeles County. The three amended complaints, as well as the Dell’Osso Action complaint, allege that the preliminary proxy statement filed by MPG Office Trust, Inc. with the SEC on May 21, 2013 is false and/or misleading because it fails to include certain details of the process leading up to the merger and fails to provide adequate information concerning MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s financial advisors.

In each of the Preferred Stock Actions, which were brought on behalf of MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s preferred stockholders, the plaintiffs allege, among other things, that, by entering into the Merger Agreement and tender offer, MPG Office Trust, Inc. breached the Articles Supplementary, which governs the issuance of the MPG preferred shares, that MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s board of directors breached their fiduciary duties by agreeing to a merger agreement that violated the preferred stockholders’ contractual rights and that the relevant Brookfield Parties named as defendants aided and abetted those breaches of contract and fiduciary duty. On July 15, 2013, the plaintiffs in the Preferred Stock Actions filed a joint amended complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland that further alleged that MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s board of directors failed to disclose material information regarding BPO’s extension of the tender offer.

The plaintiffs in the seven lawsuits sought an injunction against the merger, rescission or rescissory damages in the event the merger has been consummated, an award of fees and costs, including attorneys’ and experts’ fees, and other relief.

On July 10, 2013, solely to avoid the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation, the Brookfield Parties and the other named defendants in the Common Stock Actions signed a memorandum of understanding (the “MOU”), regarding a proposed settlement of all claims asserted therein. The parties subsequently entered into a stipulation of settlement dated November 21, 2013 providing for the release of all asserted claims, additional disclosures by MPG concerning the merger made prior to the merger’s approval, and the payment, by defendants, of an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses in an amount not to exceed $475,000 (which will ultimately be determined by the California State Court), which has been recorded as a liability as of March 31, 2014 as part of accounts payable and other liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The asserted claims will not be released until such stipulation of settlement is approved by the court, following a hearing on notice to the proposed class. There can be no assurance that the court will approve the settlement. The hearing for final approval of the settlement is scheduled for June 4, 2014.

In the Preferred Stock Actions, at a hearing on July 24, 2013, the Maryland State Court denied plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin the tender offer. The plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint on November 22, 2013 that added additional arguments in support of their allegations that the new preferred shares do not have the same rights as the MPG preferred shares. The defendants moved to dismiss the second amended complaint on December 20, 2013, and briefing on the motion concluded on February 28, 2014. A hearing date on the motion has not been scheduled by the court.

While the final outcome with respect to the Merger Litigations cannot be predicted with certainty, in the opinion of management after consultation with external legal counsel, any liability that may arise from such contingencies would not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or liquidity of Brookfield DTLA.

23

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

and Results of Operations.

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated and combined financial statements and the related notes thereto that appear in Part I, Item 1. “Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Overview and Background

General

Brookfield DTLA Fund Office Trust Investor Inc. (“Brookfield DTLA” or the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation and was incorporated on April 19, 2013. Brookfield DTLA was formed for the purpose of consummating the transactions contemplated in the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 24, 2013, as amended (the “Merger Agreement”), and the issuance of shares of 7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Series A preferred stock”) in connection with the acquisition of MPG Office Trust, Inc. and MPG Office, L.P. (together, “MPG”). Brookfield DTLA is a direct subsidiary of Brookfield DTLA Holdings LLC (“Brookfield DTLA Holdings”), a Delaware limited liability company, and an indirect subsidiary of Brookfield Office Properties Inc. (“BPO”).

Prior to October 15, 2013, 333 South Hope Co. LLC (“333 South Hope”) and EYP Realty LLC (“EYP Realty”) were controlled by BPO through its indirect ownership interest in TRZ Holdings IV LLC (“TRZ”). TRZ owned 100% of the member units of 333 South Hope and EYP Realty, and BPO indirectly owns approximately 84% of the member units of TRZ.

On October 15, 2013, through a series of formation transactions TRZ’s interests in 333 South Hope and EYP Realty were contributed to subsidiaries of Brookfield DTLA in exchange for preferred and common interests in Brookfield DTLA Fund Properties II LLC (“New OP”) and a preferred interest in Brookfield DTLA Fund Properties III LLC (“DTLA OP”). 333 South Hope owned Bank of America Plaza (“BOA Plaza”) and EYP Realty owned Ernst & Young Plaza (“EY Plaza”). Both of these Class A commercial properties are located in the Los Angeles Central Business District (the “LACBD”).

Prior to October 15, 2013, Brookfield DTLA had not conducted any business as a separate company and had no material assets or liabilities. The operations of 333 South Hope and EYP Realty (together, the “Predecessor Entities”) contributed to Brookfield DTLA by TRZ on October 15, 2013 are presented in the condensed consolidated and combined financial statements as if they were owned by Brookfield DTLA for all historical periods presented. See Item 1. “Financial Statements.”

MPG Acquisition

On October 15, 2013, Brookfield DTLA completed the acquisition of MPG (the “merger”) pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. As part of the transaction, MPG was contributed to New OP in exchange for a preferred interest in New OP. In addition to BOA Plaza and EY Plaza, Brookfield DTLA now owns Wells Fargo Center–North Tower (also known as “Wells Fargo Tower”),

24

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Wells Fargo Center–South Tower (also known as “KPMG Tower”), Gas Company Tower and 777 Tower, each of which are Class A office properties located in the LACBD that were formerly owned by MPG.

Brookfield DTLA intends to elect to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) pursuant to Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with its tax year ended December 31, 2013. Brookfield DTLA intends to conduct its operations so as to qualify as a REIT. Accordingly, Brookfield DTLA will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that it qualifies as a REIT and distributions to its stockholders generally equal or exceed its taxable income.

Brookfield DTLA receives its income primarily from rental income (including tenant reimbursements) generated from the operations of its office and retail properties, and to a lesser extent, from its parking garages.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Brookfield DTLA’s business requires continued access to adequate cash to fund its liquidity needs. Over the last several years, the Predecessor Entities have maintained their liquidity position through cash generated from operations and contributions from TRZ.

Sources and Uses of Liquidity

Brookfield DTLA’s potential liquidity sources and uses are, among others, as follows:

	Sources		Uses
•	Cash on hand;	•	Property operations;
•	Cash generated from operations; and	•	Capital expenditures;
•	Contributions from Brookfield   DTLA Holdings.	•	Payments in connection with loans; and
		•	Distributions to Brookfield   DTLA Holdings.

Potential Sources of Liquidity—

Cash on Hand—

As of March 31, 2014, Brookfield DTLA had cash and cash equivalents totaling $119.8 million.

25

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Cash Generated from Operations—

Brookfield DTLA’s cash generated from operations is primarily dependent upon (1) the occupancy level of its portfolio, (2) the rental rates achieved on its leases, and (3) the collectability of rent and other amounts billed to its tenants. Net cash generated from operations is tied to the level of operating expenses, described below under “—Potential Uses of Liquidity.”

Occupancy levels. The following table presents leasing information for Brookfield DTLA for leases in place as of March 31, 2014:

	Square Feet			Leased % and In-Place Rents
Property	Net Building Rentable	% of Net Rentable		% Leased		Total Annualized Rents (1)		Annualized Rent $/RSF (2)
BOA Plaza	1,405,428	18.65	%	89.8	%	$	28,930,981	$	22.92
Wells Fargo Center–North Tower	1,400,639	18.59	%	83.2	%	27,717,505		23.78
Gas Company Tower	1,345,163	17.85	%	71.7	%	20,511,896		21.26
EY Plaza	1,234,372	16.38	%	86.7	%	22,735,481		21.24
Wells Fargo Center–South Tower	1,124,960	14.93	%	86.0	%	25,388,361		26.25
777 Tower	1,024,835	13.60	%	79.2	%	18,627,280		22.95
	7,535,397	100.00	%	82.8	%	$	143,911,504	$	23.05

__________

(1) Annualized rent represents the annualized monthly contractual rent under existing leases as of March 31, 2014. This amount reflects total base rent before any rent abatements as of March 31, 2014 and is shown on a net basis; thus, for any tenant under a partial gross lease, the expense stop, or under a fully gross lease, the current year operating expenses (which may be estimates as of such date), are subtracted from gross rent. Total abatements for leases in effect as of March 31, 2014 for the twelve months ending March 31, 2015 are approximately $11.6 million, or $1.86 per leased square foot.

(2) Annualized rent per rentable square foot represents annualized rent as computed above, divided by leased square feet as of the same date.

26

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

The following table presents a summary of lease expirations at Brookfield DTLA for leases in place at March 31, 2014, plus currently available space for the remainder of 2014 and for each of the nine calendar years beginning January 1, 2015. This table assumes that none of our tenants exercise renewal options or early termination rights, if any, at or prior to their scheduled expirations.

Year	Total Area in Square Feet Covered by  Expiring Leases	Percentage of Leased Square Feet		Annualized Rent (1)		Percentage of Annualized Rent		Current Rent per Leased Square Foot (2)		Rent per Leased Square Foot at Expiration (3)
2014	364,809	5.8	%	$	8,571,884	6.0	%	$	23.50	$	23.54
2015	298,872	4.8	%	6,938,093		4.7	%	23.21		23.62
2016	416,762	6.7	%	9,096,617		6.3	%	21.83		22.98
2017	598,161	9.6	%	14,727,924		10.2	%	24.62		26.93
2018	858,488	13.7	%	19,257,257		13.4	%	22.43		24.27
2019	436,162	7.0	%	11,354,633		7.9	%	26.03		31.20
2020	291,551	4.7	%	6,982,486		4.9	%	23.95		29.41
2021	135,238	2.1	%	2,742,485		1.9	%	20.28		23.86
2022	802,784	12.9	%	19,284,499		13.4	%	24.02		30.73
2023	642,195	10.3	%	14,467,742		10.1	%	22.53		30.71
Thereafter	1,397,211	22.4	%	30,487,884		21.2	%	21.82		29.42
Total expiring leases	6,242,233	100.0	%	$	143,911,504	100.0	%	$	23.05	$	27.73
Currently available	1,293,164
Total rentable square feet	7,535,397

__________

(1) Annualized rent represents the annualized monthly contractual rent under existing leases as of March 31, 2014. This amount reflects total base rent before any rent abatements as of March 31, 2014 and is shown on a net basis; thus, for any tenant under a partial gross lease, the expense stop, or under a fully gross lease, the current year operating expenses (which may be estimates as of such date), are subtracted from gross rent. Total abatements for leases in effect as of March 31, 2014 for the twelve months ending March 31, 2015 are approximately $11.6 million, or $1.86 per leased square foot.

(2) Current rent per leased square foot represents current base rent, divided by total leased square feet as of the same date.

(3) Rent per leased square foot at expiration represents base rent, including any future rent steps, and thus represents the base rent that will be in place at lease expiration.

Rental Rates and Leasing Activity. Average asking rental rates in the LACBD were essentially flat during the three months ended March 31, 2014. Management believes that on average the current in‑place rents are generally close to market in the LACBD.

The following table summarizes leasing activity at Brookfield DTLA for the three months ended March 31, 2014:

	Leasing Activity		Percentage Leased
Leased square feet as of December 31, 2013	6,289,262		83.5	%
Expirations	(121,399	)	(1.9	)%
New leases	64,317		1.0	%
Renewals	10,053		0.2	%
Leased square feet as of March 31, 2014	6,242,233		82.8	%

27

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Collectability of rent from our tenants. Brookfield DTLA’s rental income depends on collecting rent from tenants, and in particular from its major tenants. In the event of tenant defaults, Brookfield DTLA may experience delays in enforcing its rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in pursuing legal possession of the tenant’s space and recovery of any amounts due from the tenant. This is particularly true in the case of the bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant or where the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is acting as receiver.

Contributions from Brookfield DTLA Holdings—

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, Brookfield DTLA received no contributions from Brookfield DTLA Holdings. To the extent that future contributions are needed, Brookfield DTLA Holdings has agreed to fund up to $260 million to the Company, for which it will be entitled to receive a preferred return.

Potential Uses of Liquidity—

The following are the projected uses, and some of the potential uses, of cash in the near term.

Property Operations—

The Predecessor Entities have generated sufficient cash from operations to fund their operating activities. In the future, should the cash generated by Brookfield DTLA’s properties, including the properties acquired from MPG, not be sufficient to fund their operations, such cash would be provided by Brookfield DTLA Holdings.

Capital Expenditures—

Capital expenditures fluctuate in any given period, subject to the nature, extent and timing of improvements required to maintain Brookfield DTLA’s properties. Leasing costs also fluctuate in any given period, depending upon such factors as the type of property, the length of the lease, the type of lease, the involvement of external leasing agents and overall market conditions.

Brookfield DTLA expects that leasing activities at its properties, including the properties acquired from MPG, will require material amounts of cash for at least several years. Excluding tenant improvements and leasing commissions, Brookfield DTLA projects spending between $70 million and $75 million over the next ten years, with the majority ($60 million to $65 million) over the next five years. The expected expenditures include, but are not limited to, renovations and physical capital upgrades to Brookfield DTLA’s properties, such as new fire alarm systems, elevator repairs and modernizations, facade work, roof replacement and new turbines.

28

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Payments in Connection with Loans—

As Brookfield DTLA’s debt matures, principal payment obligations present significant future cash requirements. BOA Plaza mortgage loans totaling $213.3 million mature on September 7, 2014. Brookfield DTLA intends to refinance these loans prior to or upon maturity. Management expects the refinancing to generate proceeds in excess of the amounts necessary to refinance the existing mortgage loans, pay all fees and other expenses related to the refinancing, and create or maintain related reserves as the fair value of the collateral securing the loans exceeds the face value of those loans as of March 31, 2014.

Brookfield DTLA currently intends to refinance the existing mortgage loans on Wells Fargo Center–North Tower and Gas Company Tower on or about their scheduled maturity with new debt with a target leverage ratio of approximately 60% to 65%. As the leverage ratio for these loans is significantly above such targeted leverage ratio, Brookfield DTLA anticipates the need for additional cash of approximately $273 million to complete these refinancings, all of which will occur prior to 2017. There can be no assurance that any of these refinancings can be accomplished, what terms will be available in the market for these type of financings at the time of any refinancing, or that these refinancings will generate net cash proceeds.

Distributions to Brookfield DTLA Holdings—

In 2014, Brookfield DLTA intends to refinance the mortgage loans secured by BOA Plaza. If the refinancings generate net cash proceeds to DTLA OP, a subsidiary of Brookfield DTLA, it is anticipated that the net cash proceeds will be distributed by DTLA OP to Brookfield DTLA Holdings.

On March 21, 2014, Brookfield DTLA made a cash distribution to Brookfield DTLA Holdings totaling $70.0 million, which was comprised of $7.3 million in settlement of preferred dividends on the senior participating preferred interest through March 21, 2014 and a return of investment of $62.7 million using proceeds generated by the refinancing of EY Plaza in 2013.

Indebtedness

As of March 31, 2014, Brookfield DTLA’s debt was comprised of mortgage loans secured by six properties. A summary of our debt as of March 31, 2014 is as follows (in millions, except percentage and year amounts):

	Principal Amount		Percent of Total Debt		Effective Interest Rate		Weighted Average Term to Maturity
Fixed-rate	$	1,221.3	64.40	%	5.41	%	2 years
Variable-rate swapped to fixed-rate	185.0		9.76	%	3.93	%	7 years
Variable-rate	490.0		25.84	%	1.92	%	3 years
	$	1,896.3	100.00	%	4.36	%	3 years

29

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Certain information with respect to our indebtedness as of March 31, 2014 is as follows (in thousands, except percentage amounts):

	Interest Rate		Contractual Maturity Date	Principal Amount (1)			Annual Debt Service
Floating-Rate Debt
Variable-Rate Loans:
Wells Fargo Center–South Tower (2)	1.96	%	12/1/2016	$	290,000		$	5,763
777 Tower (3)	1.86	%	11/1/2018	200,000			3,772
Total variable-rate loans				490,000			9,535
Variable-Rate Swapped to Fixed-Rate     Loan:
EY Plaza (4)	3.93	%	11/27/2020	185,000			7,368
Total floating-rate debt				675,000			16,903
Fixed-Rate Debt
Wells Fargo Center–North Tower	5.70	%	4/6/2017	550,000			31,769
Gas Company Tower	5.10	%	8/11/2016	458,000			23,692
BOA Plaza	5.06	%	9/7/2014	169,245			8,687
BOA Plaza	6.26	%	9/7/2014	44,074			2,797
Total fixed-rate rate debt				1,221,319			$	66,945
Total debt				1,896,319
Debt discounts				(10,633		)
Total debt, net				$	1,885,686

__________

(1) Assuming no payment has been made in advance of its due date.

(2) This loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.80%. As required by the loan agreement, we have entered into an interest rate cap agreement that limits the LIBOR portion of the interest rate to 4.75%.

(3) This loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.70%. As required by the loan agreement, we have entered into an interest rate cap agreement that limits the LIBOR portion of the interest rate to 5.75%.

(4) This loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.75%. As required by the loan agreement, we have entered into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge this loan, which effectively fixes the LIBOR portion of the interest rate at 2.178%. The effective interest rate of 3.93% includes interest on the swap.

Funding of Wells Fargo Center–North Tower Collateral Reserve

In connection with the MPG acquisition, Brookfield DTLA Holdings assumed the mortgage loan secured by the Wells Fargo Center–North Tower office property. In connection with loan assumption, Brookfield DTLA Holdings agreed to deposit a total of $10.0 million into a collateral reserve account held by the lender, of which $5.0 million was deposited when the loan was assumed during 2013 and $1.25 million was funded by Brookfield DTLA in April 2014. The remaining $3.75 million will be paid in installments of $1.25 million in October 2014, April 2015, and October 2015.

30

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Non-Recourse Carve Out Guarantees

All of Brookfield DTLA’s $1.9 billion of mortgage debt is subject to “non-recourse carve out” guarantees that expire upon elimination of the underlying loan obligations. Under these guarantees, these otherwise non‑recourse loans can become partially or fully recourse against Brookfield DTLA Holdings if certain triggering events occur as defined in the loan agreements.

Debt Reporting

Pursuant to the terms of certain of our mortgage loan agreements, Brookfield DTLA is required to report a debt service coverage ratio (“DSCR”) calculated using the formulas specified in the underlying loan agreements. We have submitted the required reports to the lenders for the measurement periods ended March 31, 2014 and were in compliance with the amounts required by the loan agreements, with the exception of Gas Company Tower.

Under the Gas Company Tower mortgage loan, we reported a DSCR of 0.92 to 1.00, calculated using actual debt service under the loan, and a DSCR of 0.73 to 1.00, calculated using actual debt service plus a hypothetical principal payment using a 30-year amortization schedule. Because the reported DSCR using the actual debt service plus a hypothetical principal payment was less than 1.00 to 1.00, the lender could seek to remove Brookfield Properties Management (CA) Inc. as property manager of Gas Company Tower, which is the only recourse available to the lender as a result of such breach.

Pursuant to the terms of the Gas Company Tower, Wells Fargo Center–South Tower, Wells Fargo Center–North Tower, and EY Plaza mortgage loan agreements, we are required to provide annual audited financial statements of Brookfield DTLA Holdings to the lenders or agents. The receipt of any opinion other than an “unqualified” audit opinion on our annual audited financial statements is an event of default under the loan agreements for the properties listed above. If an event of default occurs, the lenders have the right to pursue the remedies contained in the loan documents, including acceleration of all or a portion of the debt and foreclosure.

31

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 to March 31, 2013

Condensed Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations Information

(In millions, except percentage amounts)

	For the Three Months Ended					Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change
	3/31/2014			3/31/2013
Revenue:
Rental income	$	37.7		$	13.2	$	24.5		185	%
Tenant reimbursements	20.4			7.1		13.3			186	%
Parking	8.3			2.9		5.4			188	%
Interest and other	2.3			0.7		1.6			229	%
Total revenue	68.7			23.9		44.8			187	%
Expenses:
Rental property operating and maintenance	24.4			8.3		16.1			195	%
Real estate taxes	9.0			2.3		6.7			292	%
Parking	1.8			0.7		1.1			147	%
Other expense	0.3			0.5		(0.2		)	(60	)%
Depreciation and amortization	26.0			7.2		18.8			262	%
Interest	22.5			4.3		18.2			420	%
Total expenses	84.0			23.3		60.7			261	%
Net (loss) income	$	(15.3	)	$	0.6	$	(15.9	)

Rental Income

Rental income increased $24.5 million, or 185%, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013 due to the acquisition of MPG which contributed $24.5 million to rental income in the first quarter of 2014.

Tenant Reimbursements Revenue

Tenant reimbursements revenue increased $13.3 million, or 186%, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013, mainly due to the acquisition of MPG which contributed $11.8 million to tenant reimbursements revenue in the first quarter of 2014.

Parking Revenue

Parking revenue increased $5.4 million, or 188%, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013, mainly due to the acquisition of MPG which contributed $5.3 million to parking revenue in the first quarter of 2014.

32

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Interest and Other Revenue

Interest and other revenue increased $1.6 million, or 229%, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013 due to the acquisition of MPG which contributed $1.6 million to interest and other revenue in the first quarter of 2014.

Rental Property Operating and Maintenance Expense

Rental property operating and maintenance expense increased $16.1 million, or 195%, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013, mainly due to the acquisition of MPG which contributed $16.0 million to rental property operating and maintenance expense in the first quarter of 2014.

Real Estate Taxes Expense

Real estate taxes expense increased $6.7 million, or 292%, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013, largely as a result of the acquisition of MPG which contributed $6.0 million to real estate taxes expense in the first quarter of 2014.

Parking Expense

Parking expense increased $1.1 million, or 147%, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013, primarily as a result of the acquisition of MPG which contributed $0.9 million to parking expense in the first quarter of 2014.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $18.8 million, or 262%, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013 due to the acquisition of MPG which contributed $18.7 million to depreciation and amortization expense in the first quarter of 2014.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $18.2 million, or 420%, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013, largely as a result of the acquisition of MPG which contributed $17.4 million to interest expense in the first quarter of 2014 combined with payments on the interest rate swap agreement related to the EY Plaza mortgage loan that was entered into in November 2013.

33

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Cash Flow

The following summary discussion of Brookfield DTLA’s cash flow is based on the condensed consolidated and combined statements of cash flows in Item 1. “Financial Statements” and is not meant to be an all‑inclusive discussion of the changes in its cash flow for the periods presented below.

	For the Three Months Ended						Increase/ (Decrease)
	March 31, 2014			March 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	4,687		$	3,172		$	1,515
Net cash used in investing activities	(9,767		)	(4,043		)	5,724
Net cash used in financing activities	(71,193		)	(4,072		)	67,121

Operating Activities

Brookfield DTLA’s cash flow from operating activities is primarily dependent upon (1) the occupancy level of its portfolio, (2) the rental rates achieved on its leases, and (3) the collectability of rent and other amounts billed to tenants and is also tied to the level of operating expenses. Net cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2014 totaled $4.7 million, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $3.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

Investing Activities

Brookfield DTLA’s cash flow from investing activities is generally impacted by the amount of capital expenditures for its properties. Net cash used in investing activities totaled $9.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to net cash used in investing activities of $4.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013, as a result of increased expenditures for improvements to its properties during 2014.

Financing Activities

Brookfield DTLA’s cash flow from financing activities is generally impacted by our loan activity, less any dividends and distributions paid to stockholders and distributions to affiliated companies, if any. Net cash used in financing activities totaled $71.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to net cash used in financing activities of $4.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013. A$70.0 milliondistribution to Brookfield DTLA Holdings related to the senior participating preferred interestduring the three months ended March 31, 2014was the primary driver of the change.

34

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Brookfield DTLA did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Contractual Obligations

The following table provides information with respect to Brookfield DTLA’s commitments as of March 31, 2014, including any guaranteed or minimum commitments under contractual obligations (in thousands):

	2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		Thereafter		Total
Principal payments on      mortgage loans	$	213,319	$	311	$	751,831	$	554,026	$	204,232	$	172,600	$	1,896,319
Interest payments –
Fixed-rate debt (1)	49,620		55,461		46,331		8,269		—		—		159,681
Variable-rate swapped to     fixed-rate debt	5,511		7,368		7,306		7,130		6,985		13,111		47,411
Variable-rate debt (2)	7,184		9,535		9,087		3,772		3,152		—		32,730
Tenant-related      commitments (3)	46,044		2,032		568		8,108		—		9,466		66,218
	$	321,678	$	74,707	$	815,123	$	581,305	$	214,369	$	195,177	$	2,202,359

__________

(1) Interest payments on fixed-rate debt are calculated based on contractual interest rates and scheduled maturity dates.

(2) Interest payments on variable-rate debt are calculated based on scheduled maturity dates and the one-month LIBOR rate in place on the debt as of March 31, 2014 plus the contractual spread per the loan agreements.

(3) Tenant-related commitments include tenant improvements and leasing commissions and are based on executed leases as of March 31, 2014.

Related Party Transactions

Management Agreements

The Predecessor Entities entered into arrangements with Brookfield Properties Management LLC, which is affiliated through common ownership with BPO, under which the affiliate provides property management and various other services. On October 15, 2013, these agreements were transferred to BOP Management Inc., an affiliate of BPO. The MPG properties entered into similar arrangements with BOP Management Inc. after the closing of the acquisition on October 15, 2013. Property management fees under these agreements are calculated based on 3.0% of rents collected (as defined in the management agreements).

35

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

A summary of costs incurred by Brookfield DTLA and the Predecessor Entities under these arrangements is as follows (in thousands):

	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014		March 31, 2013
Management fees expense	$	3,386	$	643
General, administrative and reimbursable expenses	701		287
Leasing and construction management fees	672		436

Insurance Agreements

BOA Plaza and EY Plaza are covered under an insurance policy entered into by BPO that provides all risk property and business interruption for BPO’s commercial portfolio with an aggregate limit of $2.5 billion per occurrence as well as an aggregate limit of $300.0 million of earthquake insurance. The MPG properties are covered under an insurance policy that provides all risk property and business interruption with an aggregate limit of $1.25 billion and a $130.0 million aggregate limit of earthquake insurance.

In addition, BOA Plaza and EY Plaza are covered by a terrorism insurance policy that provides aggregate coverage of $4.0 billion for all of BPO’s U.S. properties. The MPG properties are covered by a terrorism insurance policy with a $1.25 billion aggregate limit. Brookfield DTLA is in compliance with the contractual obligations regarding terrorism insurance contained in such agreements.

Insurance premiums for BOA Plaza and EY Plaza are paid by an affiliate company under common control through BPO. Brookfield DTLA reimburses the affiliate company for the actual cost of such premiums.

A summary of costs incurred by the Predecessor Entities under this arrangement is as follows (in thousands):

	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014		March 31, 2013
Insurance expense	$	1,304	$	1,212

Effective April 19, 2014, the insurance policies covering the MPG properties expired and the MPG properties were added to the existing BPO insurance policies described above.

Litigation

See Part II, Item 1. “Legal Proceedings.”

36

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE TRUST INVESTOR INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Critical Accounting Policies

Please refer to Brookfield DTLA’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 8, 2014, as amended on April 29, 2014, for a discussion of our critical accounting policies for “Business Combinations,” “Consolidation,” “Impairment Evaluation,” “Revenue Recognition,” and “Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.” There have been no changes to these policies during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014‑08, Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant, and Equipment: Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which requires entities to disclose only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations as discontinued operations. The new guidance requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide financial statement users with more information about the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of discontinued operations. The new standard is effective in the first quarter of 2015 for public organizations with calendar year ends. Early adoption is permitted but only for disposals (or classifications as held for sale) that have not been reported in the financial statements previously issued. We do not believe that this update will have a material effect on Brookfield DTLA’s consolidated financial statements in future periods.

37

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

See Part II, Item 7A. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in Brookfield DTLA’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 8, 2014, as amended on April 29, 2014, for a discussion regarding our exposure to market risk. Our exposure to market risk has not changed materially since year end 2013.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Brookfield DTLA maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), Brookfield DTLA carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its principal executive officer and its principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Brookfield DTLA’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, Mitchell E. Rudin, our principal executive officer, and Bryan K. Davis, our principal financial officer, concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of March 31, 2014.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in Brookfield DTLA’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014 that have materially affected, or that are reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

38

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

General

Brookfield DTLA and its subsidiaries may be subject to pending legal proceedings and litigation incidental to its business. After consultation with legal counsel, management believes that any liability that may potentially result upon resolution of such matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or consolidated financial statements as a whole.

Merger-Related Litigation

Following the announcement of the execution of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 24, 2013, as amended (the “Merger Agreement”), seven putative class actions were filed against Brookfield Office Properties Inc. (“BPO”), Brookfield DTLA, Brookfield DTLA Holdings LLC, Brookfield DTLA Fund Office Trust Inc., Brookfield DTLA Fund Properties (collectively, the “Brookfield Parties”), MPG Office Trust, Inc., MPG Office, L.P., and the members of MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s board of directors. Five of these lawsuits were filed on behalf of MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s common stockholders: (i) two lawsuits, captioned Coyne v. MPG Office Trust, Inc., et al., No. BC507342 (the “Coyne Action”), and Masih v. MPG Office Trust, Inc., et al., No. BC507962 (the “Masih Action”), were filed in the Superior Court of the State of California in Los Angeles County (the “California State Court”) on April 29, 2013 and May 3, 2013, respectively; and (ii) three lawsuits, captioned Kim v. MPG Office Trust, Inc. et al., No. 24‑C-13-002600 (the “Kim Action”), Perkins v. MPG Office Trust, Inc., et al., No. 24-C-13-002778 (the “Perkins Action”) and Dell’Osso v. MPG Office Trust, Inc., et al., No. 24‑C-13-003283 (the “Dell’Osso Action”) were filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland on May 1, 2013, May 8, 2013 and May 22, 2013, respectively (collectively, the “Common Stock Actions”). Two lawsuits, captioned Cohen v. MPG Office Trust, Inc. et al., No. 24-C-13-004097 (the “Cohen Action”) and Donlan v. Weinstein, et al., No. 24‑C-13-004293 (the “Donlan Action”), were filed on behalf of MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s preferred stockholders in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland on June 20, 2013 and July 2, 2013, respectively (collectively, the “Preferred Stock Actions,” together with the Common Stock Actions, the “Merger Litigations”).

In each of the Common Stock Actions, the plaintiffs allege, among other things, that MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s board of directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the merger by failing to maximize the value of MPG Office Trust, Inc. and ignoring or failing to protect against conflicts of interest, and that the relevant Brookfield Parties named as defendants aided and abetted those breaches of fiduciary duty. The Kim Action further alleges that MPG Office, L.P. also aided and abetted the breaches of fiduciary duty by MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s board of directors, and the Dell’Osso Action further alleges that MPG Office Trust, Inc. and MPG Office, L.P. aided and abetted the breaches of fiduciary duty by MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s board of directors. On June 4, 2013, the Kim and Perkins plaintiffs filed identical, amended complaints in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland. On June 5, 2013, the Masih plaintiffs also filed an amended complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California in Los Angeles County. The three amended complaints, as well as the Dell’Osso Action complaint, allege that the preliminary proxy statement filed by MPG Office Trust, Inc. with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on May 21, 2013 is false and/or misleading because it fails to include certain details of the process leading up to the merger and fails to provide adequate information concerning MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s financial advisors.

39

In each of the Preferred Stock Actions, which were brought on behalf of MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s preferred stockholders, the plaintiffs allege, among other things, that, by entering into the Merger Agreement and tender offer, MPG Office Trust, Inc. breached the Articles Supplementary, which governs the issuance of the MPG preferred shares, that MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s board of directors breached their fiduciary duties by agreeing to a merger agreement that violated the preferred stockholders’ contractual rights and that the relevant Brookfield Parties named as defendants aided and abetted those breaches of contract and fiduciary duty. On July 15, 2013, the plaintiffs in the Preferred Stock Actions filed a joint amended complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland that further alleged that MPG Office Trust, Inc.’s board of directors failed to disclose material information regarding BPO’s extension of the tender offer.

The plaintiffs in the seven lawsuits sought an injunction against the merger, rescission or rescissory damages in the event the merger has been consummated, an award of fees and costs, including attorneys’ and experts’ fees, and other relief.

On July 10, 2013, solely to avoid the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation, the Brookfield Parties and the other named defendants in the Common Stock Actions signed a memorandum of understanding (the “MOU”), regarding a proposed settlement of all claims asserted therein. The parties subsequently entered into a stipulation of settlement dated November 21, 2013 providing for the release of all asserted claims, additional disclosures by MPG concerning the merger made prior to the merger’s approval, and the payment, by defendants, of an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses in an amount not to exceed $475,000 (which will ultimately be determined by the California State Court). The asserted claims will not be released until such stipulation of settlement is approved by the court, following a hearing on notice to the proposed class. There can be no assurance that the court will approve the settlement. The hearing for final approval of the settlement is scheduled for June 4, 2014.

In the Preferred Stock Actions, at a hearing on July 24, 2013, the Maryland State Court denied plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin the tender offer. The plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint on November 22, 2013 that added additional arguments in support of their allegations that the new preferred shares do not have the same rights as the MPG preferred shares. The defendants moved to dismiss the second amended complaint on December 20, 2013, and briefing on the motion concluded on February 28, 2014. A hearing date on the motion has not been scheduled by the court.

While the final outcome with respect to the Merger Litigations cannot be predicted with certainty, in the opinion of management after consultation with external legal counsel, any liability that may arise from such contingencies would not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or liquidity of Brookfield DTLA.

40

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Factors That May Affect Future Results

(Cautionary Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995)

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of “safe harbor” provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (as set forth in Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Forward-looking statements include statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, include statements regarding our operations, business, financial condition, expected financial results, performance, prospects, opportunities, priorities, targets, goals, ongoing objectives, strategies and outlook, as well as the outlook for North American and international economies for the current fiscal year and subsequent periods, and include words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “seeks,” “intends,” “targets,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “likely,” or negative versions thereof and other similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” and “could.”

Although Brookfield DTLA believes that its anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements and information are based upon reasonable assumptions and expectations, the reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and information because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond its control, which may cause Brookfield DTLA’s actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievement expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and information.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated or implied by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

• Risks generally incident to the ownership of real property, including the ability to retain tenants and rent space upon lease expirations, the financial condition and solvency of our tenants, the relative illiquidity of real estate and changes in real estate taxes, regulatory compliance costs and other operating expenses;

• Risks associated with the Downtown Los Angeles market, which is characterized by challenging leasing conditions, including limited numbers of new tenants coming into the market and the downsizing of large tenants in the market such as accounting firms, banks and law firms;

• Risks related to increased competition for tenants in the Downtown Los Angeles market, including aggressive attempts by competing landlords to fill large vacancies by providing tenants with lower rental rates, increasing amounts of free rent and providing larger allowances for tenant improvements;

• The impact or unanticipated impact of general economic, political and market factors in the regions in which Brookfield DTLA or any of its subsidiaries does business;

• The use of debt to finance Brookfield DTLA’s business or that of its subsidiaries;

41

• The behavior of financial markets, including fluctuations in interest rates;

• Uncertainties of real estate development or redevelopment;

• Global equity and capital markets and the availability of equity and debt financing and refinancing within these markets;

• Risks relating to Brookfield DTLA’s insurance coverage;

• The possible impact of international conflicts and other developments, including terrorist acts;

• Potential environmental liabilities;

• Dependence on management personnel;

• The ability to complete and effectively integrate acquisitions into existing operations and the ability to attain expected benefits therefrom;

• Operational and reputational risks;

• Catastrophic events, such as earthquakes and hurricanes; and

• Other risks and factors relating to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement including, but not limited to:

• Increases in operating costs resulting from expenses related to the MPG acquisition;

• Failure to realize the anticipated benefits and synergies of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including as a result of an increase in costs associated with integration or difficulty in integrating the businesses of Brookfield DTLA, the Predecessor Entities and their respective subsidiaries and MPG;

• Risks resulting from any lawsuits that may arise out of or have arisen as a result of the MPG acquisition or other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; and

• The impact of legislative, regulatory and competitive changes and other risk factors relating to the real estate industry, as detailed from time to time in the reports of Brookfield DTLA and BPO filed with the SEC.

Brookfield DTLA cautions that the foregoing list of important factors that may affect future results is not exhaustive. When relying on Brookfield DTLA’s forward-looking statements or information, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties and potential events. Except as required by law, Brookfield DTLA undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward‑looking statements or information, whether written or oral, that may be as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

42

Additional material risk factors are discussed in other sections of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 8, 2014, as amended on April 29, 2014. Those risks are also relevant to our performance and financial condition. Moreover, we operate in a highly competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Dividends on the Series A preferred stock are cumulative, and therefore, will continue to accrue at an annual rate of $1.90625 per share. As of April 30, 2014, the cumulative amount of unpaid dividends totals $102.0 million.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

43

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit No.	Exhibit Description
31.1*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer dated May 15, 2014 pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2*	Certification of Principal Financial Officer dated May 15, 2014 pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1**	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer dated May 15, 2014 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (1)
101.INS**	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

__________

*	Filed herewith.
**	Furnished herewith.

(1) This exhibit should not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.

44

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: As of May 15, 2014

BROOKFIELD DTLA FUND OFFICE     TRUST INVESTOR INC.
Registrant
By:	/s/ MITCHELL E. RUDIN
	Mitchell E. Rudin
	President and Chief Executive Officer,
	U.S. Commercial Operations
	(Principal executive officer)
By:	/s/ BRYAN K. DAVIS
	Bryan K. Davis
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal financial officer)

45