September 2021
Company Presentation | September 2021 2 Forward Looking Statements and Non-GAAP Measures In keeping with the SEC's "Safe Harbor" guidelines, certain statements made during this presentation could be considered forward-looking and subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause results to differ materially from those projected. When we use the words "will likely result," "may," "anticipate," "estimate," "should," "expect," "believe," "intend," or similar expressions, we intend to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, our business and investment strategy, our understanding of our competition, current market trends and opportunities, projected operating results, and projected capital expenditures. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated including, without limitation: general volatility of the capital markets and the market price of our common stock; changes in our business or investment strategy; availability, terms and deployment of capital; availability of qualified personnel; changes in our industry and the market in which we operate, interest rates or the general economy, the degree and nature of our competition, legislative and regulatory changes, including changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and related rules, regulations and interpretations governing the taxation of REITs; and limitations imposed on our business and our ability to satisfy complex rules in order for us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. These and other risk factors are more fully discussed in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before interest expense and amortization of loan costs, depreciation and amortization, income taxes, equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entity and after the Company’s portion of EBITDA of OpenKey. In addition, we excluded impairment on real estate, (gain) loss on insurance settlement and disposition of assets and Company’s portion of EBITDA of OpenKey from EBITDA to calculate EBITDA for real estate, or EBITDAre, as defined by NAREIT. EBITDA yield is defined as trailing twelve month EBITDA divided by the purchase price or debt amount. A capitalization rate is determined by dividing the property's net operating income by the purchase price. Net operating income is the property's Hotel EBITDA minus a capital expense reserve of either 4% or 5% of gross revenues. Hotel EBITDA flow-through is the change in Hotel EBITDA divided by the change in total revenues. EBITDA, FFO, AFFO, CAD and other terms are non-GAAP measures, reconciliations of which have been provided in prior earnings releases and filings with the SEC or in the appendix to this presentation. The calculation of implied equity value is derived from an estimated blended capitalization rate (“Cap Rate”) for the entire portfolio using the capitalization rate method. The estimated Cap Rate is based on recent Cap Rates of publically traded peers involving a similar blend of asset types found in the portfolio, which is then applied to Net Operating Income (“NOI”) of the company’s assets to calculate a Total Enterprise Value (“TEV”) of the company. From the TEV, we deduct debt and preferred equ ity and then add back working capital to derive an equity value. The capitalization rate method is one of several valuation methods for estimating asset value and implied equity value. Among the limitations of using the capitalization rate method for determining an implied equity value are that it does not take into account the potential change or variability in future cash flows, potential significant future capital expenditures, the intended hold period of the asset, or a change in the future risk profile of an asset. This overview is for informational purposes only and is not an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, any securities of Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. or any of its respective affiliates, and may not be relied upon in connection with the purchase or sale of any such security. Our business has been and will continue to be materially adversely affected by the impact of, and the public perception of a risk of, a pandemic disease. In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) was identified in Wuhan, China, which has subsequently spread to other regions of the world, and has resulted in increased travel restrictions and extended shutdown of certain businesses in affected regions, including in nearly every state in the United States. Since late February, we have experienced a significant decline in occupancy and RevPAR and we expect the significant occupancy and RevPAR reduction associated with the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) to likely continue as we are recording significant reservation cancellations as well as a significant reduction in new reservations relative to prior expectations. The continued outbreak of the virus in the U.S. has and will likely continue to further reduce travel and demand at our hotels. The prolonged occurrence of the virus has resulted in health or other government authorities imposing widespread restrictions on travel or other market impacts. The hotel industry and our portfolio have and we expect will continue to experience the postponement or cancellation of a significant number of business conferences and similar events. At this time those restrictions are very fluid and evolving. We have been and will continue to be negatively impacted by those restrictions. Given that the type, degree and length of such restrictions are not known at this time, we cannot predict the overall impact of such restrictions on us or the overall economic environment. In addition, even after the restrictions are lifted, the propensity of people to travel and for businesses to hold conferences will likely remain below historical levels for an additional period of time that is difficult to predict. We may also face increased risk of litigation if we have guests or employees who become ill due to COVID-19. As such, the impact these restrictions may have on our financial position, operating results and liquidity cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, but the impact will likely be material. Additionally, the public perception of a risk of a pandemic or media coverage of these diseases, or public perception of health risks linked to perceived regional food and beverage safety has materially further adversely affected us by reducing demand for our hotels. These events have resulted in a sustained, significant drop in demand for our hotels and could have a material adverse effect on us. Prior to investing in Braemar, potential investors should carefully review Braemar’s periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, but not limited to, Braemar’s most current Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K’s, including the risk factors included therein.
Company Presentation | September 2021 3 Management Team 24 years of hospitality experience 5 years with the Company 15 years with Morgan Stanley Cornell School of Hotel Administration BS University of Pennsylvania MBA RICHARD J. STOCKTON Chief Executive Officer & President 21 years of hospitality experience 18 years with the Company 3 years with ClubCorp CFA charterholder Southern Methodist University BBA DERIC S. EUBANKS, CFA Chief Financial Officer 16 years of hospitality experience 11 years with the Company (5 years with the Company’s predecessor) 5 years with Stephens Investment Bank Oklahoma State University BS JEREMY J. WELTER Chief Operating Officer
Company Presentation | September 2021 4 BHR Market Position and Strategy Signal Sharp Recovery Market Outlook: Recovery Favors Luxury Resorts BHR Portfolio: Taking Advantage of Strategic Asset Class Recent Results & Developments Balance Sheet Strategy Ritz-Carlton Sarasota
Market Outlook Recovery Favors Luxury Resort Assets
Company Presentation | September 2021 6 Luxury Asset Class Recovering Rapidly $- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 RevPAR by STR Chain Scale: Trailing 28-Days Luxury Chains Upper Upscale Chains Upscale Chains Upper Midscale Chains Midscale Chains Independents Source: STR, a Costar Company
Company Presentation | September 2021 7 Resort Markets Outperforming Source: STR, a Costar Company $- $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180 $200 RevPAR by Location: Trailing 28-Days Urban Suburban Airport Interstate Resort Small Metro/Town
BHR Portfolio Taking Advantage of Strategic Asset Class
Company Presentation | September 2021 9 The Ritz-Carlton Lake Tahoe Truckee, CA Hotel Yountville Yountville, CA Marriott Seattle Waterfront Seattle, WA Sofitel Chicago Magnificent Mile Chicago, IL The Notary Hotel Philadelphia, PA Bardessono Hotel & Spa Yountville, CA The Clancy San Francisco, CA Hilton La Jolla Torrey Pines La Jolla, CA Park Hyatt Beaver Creek Beaver Creek, CO Pier House Resort & Spa Key West, FL The Ritz-Carlton St. Thomas St. Thomas, USVI The Ritz-Carlton Sarasota Sarasota, FL Capital Hilton Washington, D.C. High Quality Assets Situated in High Barrier to Entry Leisure and Urban Markets Mr. C Beverly Hills, Bevery Hills, CA Resort Resort Resort Resort Resort Urban UrbanUrbanUrban ResortResort Resort Urban Urban
Company Presentation | September 2021 10 (1) Source: TripAdvisor, Raymond James Research (2) Room count-weighted average TripAdvisor Ratings by Lodging REIT(1) AVG ROOMS TOTAL TRIPADVISOR REVIEWS PER AVG TRIPADVISOR COMPANY (SYMBOL) HOTELS ROOMS PER HOTEL REVIEWS ROOM HOTEL RATING(2) Braemar (BHR) 13 3,722 286 26,884 7.2 2,068 84% Apple (APLE) 235 30,023 128 155,654 5.2 662 83% Xenia (XHR) 35 10,012 286 66,029 6.6 1,887 82% Summit (INN) 72 11,288 157 56,313 5.0 782 81% Pebblebrook (PEB) 53 13,226 250 117,744 8.9 2,222 81% Sunstone (SHO) 17 9,017 530 43,875 4.9 2,581 80% DiamondRock (DRH) 30 9,600 320 53,169 5.5 1,772 80% Host (HST) 74 44,639 603 218,650 4.9 2,955 79% Hersha (HT) 48 7,582 158 59,820 7.9 1,246 79% Chatham (CLDT) 133 18,260 137 74,239 4.1 558 77% Ashford (AHT) 103 22,619 220 96,951 4.3 941 75% RLJ (RLJ) 104 22,742 219 133,560 5.9 1,284 73% Park (PK) 60 33,228 554 208,078 6.3 3,468 72% Ryman (RHP) 7 10,110 1,444 30,225 3.0 4,318 67% CorePoint (CPLG) 220 29,113 132 162,851 5.6 740 63% TOTAL/AVG 1,204 275,181 229 1,504,042 5.5 1,249 77% TripAdvisor Rating by Company Braemar Tops the List – February 2021
Company Presentation | September 2021 11 Portfolio Resort Exposure Lifts Performance Occupancy Ramping Up – 03/1/20 to 08/31/21 Resort: Bardessono, Hotel Yountville, Ritz-Carlton St. Thomas, Pier House, Hilton Torrey Pines, Park Hyatt Beaver Creek, Ritz-Carlton Lake Tahoe and Ritz-Carlton Sarasota Urban: The Clancy, The Notary Hotel, Marriott Seattle Waterfront, Capital Hilton and Sofitel Chicago 67.4% 54.3% 59.5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 3/1 3/31 4/30 5/30 6/29 7/29 8/28 9/27 10/27 11/26 12/26 1/25 2/24 3/26 4/25 5/25 6/24 7/24 8/23 30-Day Avg. Occ (Resort) 30-Day Avg. Occ (Urban) 30-Day Avg. Occ (Total)
Company Presentation | September 2021 12 Portfolio Resort Exposure Lifts Performance ADR Ramping Up – 03/1/20 to 08/31/21 Resort: Bardessono, Hotel Yountville, Ritz-Carlton St. Thomas, Pier House, Hilton Torrey Pines, Park Hyatt Beaver Creek, Ritz-Carlton Lake Tahoe and Ritz-Carlton Sarasota Urban: The Clancy, The Notary Hotel, Marriott Seattle Waterfront, Capital Hilton and Sofitel Chicago $533.58 $201.39 $351.93 $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 3/1 3/31 4/30 5/30 6/29 7/29 8/28 9/27 10/27 11/26 12/26 1/25 2/24 3/26 4/25 5/25 6/24 7/24 8/23 30-Day Avg. ADR % (Resort) 30-Day Avg. ADR (Urban) 30-Day Avg. ADR (Total)
Company Presentation | September 2021 13 RevPAR Ramping Up – 03/1/20 to 08/31/21 Resort: Bardessono, Hotel Yountville, Ritz-Carlton St. Thomas, Pier House, Hilton Torrey Pines, Park Hyatt Beaver Creek, Ritz-Carlton Lake Tahoe and Ritz-Carlton Sarasota Urban: The Clancy, The Notary Hotel, Marriott Seattle Waterfront, Capital Hilton and Sofitel Chicago Portfolio Resort Exposure Lifts Performance $360 $109 $210 $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500 3/1 3/31 4/30 5/30 6/29 7/29 8/28 9/27 10/27 11/26 12/26 1/25 2/24 3/26 4/25 5/25 6/24 7/24 8/23 Rolling 30-Day Resort RevPAR Rolling 30-Day Rolling Urban RevPAR Rolling 30-Day Total RevPAR
Company Presentation | September 2021 14 Q2 2021 Core Assets Location Market Type Number of Rooms Occ% ADR RevPAR Hotel EBITDA Ritz-Carlton St. Thomas St. Thomas, USVI Resort 180 88% $1,063 $934 $8,136 Ritz-Carlton Sarasota Sarasota, FL Resort 266 87% $530 $462 $7,723 Pier House Key West, FL Resort 142 91% $568 $518 $4,913 Bardessono Napa Valley, CA Resort 65 77% $1,050 $812 $2,657 Hilton Torrey Pines La Jolla, CA Resort 394 62% $194 $120 $1,815 Hotel Yountville Napa Valley, CA Resort 80 70% $672 $471 $1,759 Marriott Seatt le Waterfront Seatt le, WA Urban 361 47% $204 $97 $1,163 The Notary Hotel Philadelphia, PA Urban 499 33% $163 $53 $154 Sofitel Chicago Magnificent Mile Chicago, IL Urban 415 40% $194 $78 ($156) Ritz-Carlton Lake Tahoe Truckee, CA Resort 170 52% $449 $233 ($306) Park Hyatt Beaver Creek Beaver Creek, CO Resort 190 32% $283 $90 ($401) The Clancy San Francisco, CA Urban 410 52% $147 $76 ($1,024) Capital Hilton Washington, D.C. Urban 550 18% $134 $24 ($1,706) Total Portfolio 3,722 49% $381 $187 $24,728 Portfolio Q2 2021 Performance Hilton Torrey Pines (1) In thousands (1)
Company Presentation | September 2021 15 EBITDA By Brand, Class, and Market 2021 Q2 TTM Hotel EBITDA by Brand(1) 2021 Q2 TTM Hotel EBITDA by Class(1) (1) Comparable TTM as of 6/30/2021, see appendix for a reconciliation of TTM hotel net income (loss) to hotel TTM EBITDA; In thousands. 2021 Q2 TTM Room Revenue(1) 2021 Q2 TTM Room Revenue by Location(1) Ritz-Carlton $40,863 Independent $19,032 Park Hyatt $5,168 Sofitel -$3,104 Hilton -$5,727 Marriott/ Autograph -$9,074 (20,000) (10,000) - 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 Luxury $61,958 Upper Upscale -$14,801 (20,000) (10,000) - 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 High Exposure to Luxury Asset Class and Resort Markets 16% 84% Urban Resort 90.8% 8.1% 1.1% Transient Group Contract
Company Presentation | September 2021 16 Strong Asset Class and Strategic Market Exposure Position Portfolio for Potential Rapid Recovery Ritz-Carlton Lake Tahoe $(20,000) $(10,000) $- $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2020 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Q3 2020 Q4 2021 Q1 2021 Q2 Quarterly Hotel EBITDA (In Thousands) $- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2020 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Q3 2020 Q4 2021 Q1 2021 Q2 Quarterly RevPAR
Company Presentation | September 2021 17 Highest EBITDA Per Room & RevPAR $38 $37 $30 $30 $28 $27 $27 $23 $20 $19 $17 $15 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 BHR PEB SHO XHR DRH HST PK HT RLJ INN CLDT APLE 2019 EBITDA Per Room (In thousands) $233 $211 $196 $189 $188 $184 $183 $171 $145 $134 $128 $106 $70 $100 $130 $160 $190 $220 $250 BHR PEB SHO DRH HT HST PK XHR RLJ CLDT INN APLE 2019 RevPAR $12 $4 $4 $4 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $2 $1 $0 $0 $- $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 2021 Q2 YTD EBITDA Per Room (In thousands) $174 $97 $88 $85 $82 $71 $71 $70 $69 $67 $65 $60 $49 $- $40 $80 $120 $160 $200 2021 Q2 YTD RevPAR
Recent Results & Developments Solid Q2 Results Signals Sharp Recovery
Company Presentation | September 2021 19 2021 Q2 Hotel Operating Results Comparable Hotel Operating Results(1)(4)(5) 2021 Q2 2020 Q2 2019 Q2 % Variance 2020 % Variance 2019 ADR $ 380.98 $ 282.11 $290.53 35.1% 31.1% Occupancy 49.2% 6.8% 80.2% 621.6% (38.7)% RevPAR $ 187.31 $ 19.22 $232.94 874.6% (19.6)% Total Hotel Revenue(2) $ 97,110 $ 12,895 $118,412 653.1% (18.0)% Hotel EBITDA(2) $ 24,728 $(15,804) $38,368 256.5% (35.6)% Hotel EBITDA Margin 25.5% (122.6)% 32.3% 148.0% (21.1)% (1) Includes: Bardessono, Hotel Yountville, Ritz-Carlton St. Thomas, Pier House, Marriott Seattle Waterfront, Capital Hilton, Sofitel Chicago, Hilton Torrey Pines, The Clancy, The Notary Hotel, Park Hyatt Beaver Creek, Ritz-Carlton Lake Tahoe and Ritz-Carlton Sarasota (2) In thousands (3) As reported in Earnings Releases: 2017 as reported on 2/28/2018; 2018 as reported on 2/27/2019; 2019 as reported on 2/26/2020; as reported on 02/25/2021 (4) Due to the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company, the lodging industry and the broader economy, the information provided should not be relied upon as an accurate representation of the current or future financial condition or performance of the Company (5) Total Hotel Revenue, RevPAR, Occupancy and ADR do not include the operations of ten condominium units not owned by the Lake Tahoe Ritz-Carlton COMPARABLE HOTEL EBITDA(3)(4)COMPARABLE REVPAR(3)(4) $219 $226 $233 $99 $129 $- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 TTM $126.9 $136.7 $143.0 $13.4 $47.2 $- $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 TTM (I n m ill io n s)
Company Presentation | September 2021 20 2021 Q2 Highlights and Results AFFO PER SHAREADJUSTED EBITDARE Quarter Highlights Full Year Highlights $111.1 $119.3 $121.5 $(4.5) $36.2 $(20) $- $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 YTD (I n m ill io n s) $0.46 $0.46 $0.44 $0.12 $0.20 $0.50 $0.56 $0.42 $(0.68) $0.20 $0.37 $0.34 $0.29 $(0.21) $0.31 $0.15 $0.27 $(0.17) ($1.20) ($0.80) ($0.40) $0.00 $0.40 $0.80 $1.20 $1.60 $2.00 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 • Comparable RevPAR for all hotels increased 875% to $187.31 during the quarter on a 35.1% increase in ADR and a 621.6% increase in occupancy. Comparable RevPAR for all hotels decreased 19.6% compared to the comparable period in 2019. • Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) was $0.20 per diluted share for the quarter compared to $(0.68) in the prior year quarter. • Adjusted EBITDAre was $19.6 million for the quarter and Comparable Hotel EBITDA was $24.7 million for the quarter. • During the quarter, the Company closed on a private placement of $86.25 million aggregate principal amount of its 4.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026. • During the quarter, the Company announced the planned acquisition of the 138-room Mr. C Beverly Hills Hotel in Los Angeles, California for total consideration of $77.9 million. • Net debt to gross assets was 49% at the end of the second quarter. • Capex invested during the quarter was $4.4 million.
Company Presentation | September 2021 21 59%OCCUPANCY $346ADR $205REVPAR August 2021 Update on Recent Operating Performance August 2021 RevPAR Exceeded August 2019 RevPAR -12%VS. 2019 149%VS. 2020 RevPAR Growth “It is especially encouraging that all of our resorts and all but one of our urban properties had positive Hotel EBITDA for the month. Some of our resorts continue to set records, with our Bardessono property achieving an ADR of over $1,350 for the month.”
Company Presentation | September 2021 22 Recent Developments: Mr. C Beverly Hills TRANSACTION OVERVIEW • 2.5M OP units in BHR, warrants for 500k shares of common stock at a $6.00 strike price, $30M of mortgage debt, and $30.0M cash (the majority of which is used to pay down existing debt) • Hotel acquisition price of $65.4M(1) • Plan to sell 5 residences valued at $12.5M+ • Remington to take over management • Estimated ~$10M renovation in the first 2 years Property Overview Number of Rooms 138 Residences 5 Meeting Space (S.F) 5,800 Location Beverly Hills Last Renovation 2011 (1) Net of 5 residences, which were valued at $12.5M+ (2) TTM December 31, 2019 Mr. C, Beverly Hills 2019 Cap Rate RevPAR Price Per Key Unlevered IRR $251(2) 5% $474K(1) ~10%
Balance Sheet Strategy Maintain Liquidity, Monitor Leverage, Navigate Recovery
Company Presentation | September 2021 24 Current Liquidity(1) $157.7M CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS $57.4MRESTRICTED CASH 73% CAD PAYOUT RATIO(3) 44% AFFO PAYOUT RATIO(1)(3) TOTAL CASH $236.6M CASH POSITION (1) As of 6/30/21 (2) Q2 2021 YTD $36.2MADJ. EBITDARE ($12.7M)INTEREST EXPENSE POSITIVE OPERATING CASH FLOW(2) CASH FLOW ~$10.1M $21.5MDUE FROM 3RD PARTY MANAGERS ($13.4M) Sofitel Chicago PREFERRED DIVIDENDS + CAPEX
Company Presentation | September 2021 25 Floating-rate debt provides a natural hedge to hotel cash flows and maximizes flexibility in all economic environments Long-standing lender relationships Proactive strategy to opportunistically refinance loans and extend maturities Overview Leverage Strategy Well Designed to Handle Pandemic Impact (1) Pro Forma for Mr. C Note: the use of debt potentially increases BHR’s returns, as well as the risk of losses associated with the investment Hold 10% of Gross Debt Balance as cash on the balance sheet Delever to 35% Net Debt to Gross Assets 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 2018 2019 2020 2Q21 Weighted Avg. Interest rate (1)
Company Presentation | September 2021 26 Laddered debt maturities(1)(2)(3) Debt Maturities 2022 NEXT HARD DEBT MATURITY OVERVIEW (1) As of 6/30/2021 (2) Pro Forma for Mr. C (3) Assumes extension options are exercised. There can be no guaranty that extension options are exercisable on or before maturity. In the event one or more extensions are not exercisable we will be subject to the prevailing conditions of the debt markets at that time, which could result in increased or decreased borrowing cost or the inability to borrow at all. In such case, our ability to repay the amounts owed under the debt arrangements may not be feasible or could have a negative impact on our financial performance 2.7% WEIGHTED AVG. INTEREST RATE(1)(2) The Notary Hotel $158.5 $98.0 $401.5 $435.0 $86.3 $0.0 $50.0 $100.0 $150.0 $200.0 $250.0 $300.0 $350.0 $400.0 $450.0 $500.0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 (i n m ill io n s) Maturities
Company Presentation | September 2021 27 Highly Aligned Management Team Management has significant personal wealth invested in the Company10.7% Insider ownership 2.8x higher than public lodging REIT industry average2.8x Total dollar value of insider ownership (as of 08/10/2021)$36.1M REIT Avg includes: AHT, HT, APLE, CLDT, CHSP, RLJ, PEB, INN, HST, DRH, SHO, XHR, PK Source: Latest Proxy and Company filings Highly-aligned management team is among highest insider equity ownership of publicly- traded Hotel REITs 18.2% 10.7% 7.0% 4.7% 3.8% 3.1% 2.4% 2.0% 1.9% 1.6% 1.5% 1.4% 1.2% 1.0% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% HT BHR APLE CLDT Peer Avg. INN XHR AHT PEB RLJ SHO DRH HST PK
Company Presentation | September 2021 28 Key Takeaways Market Outlook: Recovery Favors Luxury Resorts BHR Portfolio: Taking Advantage of Strategic Asset Class Recent Results & Developments Balance Sheet Strategy Ritz-Carlton Sarasota
Appendix
Company Presentation | September 2021 30 Indebtedness
Company Presentation | September 2021 31 Indebtedness (1) This mortgage loan has five one-year extension options subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, of which the first was exercised in June 2020. This mortgage loan is secured by the Chicago Sofitel Magnificent Mile, The Clancy, Seattle Marriott Waterfront and The Notary Hotel. (2) This mortgage loan has three one-year extension options subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. This mortgage loan has a LIBOR floor of 1.00%. (3) This mortgage loan has three one-year extension options subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, of which the third was exercised in April 2021. (4) Base Rate, as defined in the term loan agreement, is the greater of (i) the prime rate set by Bank of America, or (ii) federal funds rate + 0.5%, or (iii) LIBOR + 1.0%. (5) This mortgage loan has a LIBOR floor of 0.25%. (6) This mortgage loan has a LIBOR floor of 0.50%. (7) See pg. 32 for reconciliation of net income (loss) to hotel EBITDA.
Company Presentation | September 2021 32 Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Comparable Hotel EBITDA In thousands 2019 2019 2019 2019 December 31, 2019 4th Q uarter 3rd Q uarter 2nd Q uarter 1st Q uarter TTM Net income (loss) 31,806$ 9,410$ 12,828$ 16,800$ 70,844$ Non-property adjustments (26,320) 1,441 (9) — (24,888) Interest income (69) (79) (77) (62) (287) Interest expense 5,210 4,829 4,965 4,856 19,860 Amortizaton of loan costs 309 229 209 345 1,092 Depreciation and amortization 18,310 16,831 18,474 16,686 70,301 Income tax expense (benefit) (173) (78) 422 115 286 Non-hotel EBITDA ownership expense 1,277 1,048 1,395 1,279 4,999Hotel EBITDA including amounts attributable to noncontrolling interest 30,350 33,631 38,207 40,019 142,207 Non-comparable adjustments (44) 10 161 705 832 Net income (loss) 30,306$ 33,641$ 38,368$ 40,724$ 143,039$
Company Presentation | September 2021 33 Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre In thousands
Company Presentation | September 2021 34 Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted FFO Q4
Company Presentation | September 2021 35 Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted FFO Q3
Company Presentation | September 2021 36 Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted FFO Q2
Company Presentation | September 2021 37 Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted FFO Q1