PRE 14A 1 v411899_pre14a.htm PRE 14A

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



 

SCHEDULE 14A
 
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934



 
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

x Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as Permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

RCS CAPITAL CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

x No fee required.
o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5) Total fee paid:

o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:

(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3) Filing Party:

(4) Date Filed:


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

[GRAPHIC MISSING]

405 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10022
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on June 25, 2015

June   , 2015

To the Stockholders of RCS Capital Corporation:

I am pleased to invite our stockholders to the annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of RCS Capital Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). The Annual Meeting will be held on June 25, 2015 at The Core Club, located at 66 E. 55th Street, New York, NY 10022, commencing at 11:00 a.m. (local time). At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to:

1. Elect five members of the Board of Directors to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their respective successors have been elected and qualified.
2. Vote on an amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation to increase the number of shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Class A common stock”), the Company is authorized to issue to 300,000,000 shares.
3. Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2015.
4. Vote on a non-binding advisory proposal on the frequency of future say-on-pay votes (commonly referred to as “say-on-frequency”).
5. Vote on an amendment to the RCS Capital Corporation Equity Plan.
6. Consider and act upon any other business properly brought before the meeting.

The Board of Directors of the Company has fixed the close of business on April 27, 2015 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Record holders of shares of Class A common stock, and of shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company at the close of business on the record date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

For further information regarding the matter to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, I urge you to carefully read the accompanying proxy statement.

You may authorize a proxy to vote your shares by using a toll-free telephone number or via the Internet. Instructions for using these convenient services are provided on the enclosed proxy card and in the attached proxy statement. If you prefer, you may vote your shares by marking your votes on the proxy card, signing and dating it and mailing it in the postage-paid return envelope provided. If you sign and return your proxy card without specifying your choices, it will be understood that you wish to have your shares voted in accordance with the directors’ recommendation.

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Your vote is important.

 
By Order of the Board of Directors,         
       
/s/ Edward M. Weil, Jr.

Edward M. Weil, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer and Director
        


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  Page
Proxy Statement     1  
Information about the Meeting and Voting     2  
Management     6  
Report of the Audit Committee     17  
Executive Compensation     18  
Relationships and Related Party Transactions     24  
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services     45  
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance     46  
Stock Ownership by Directors, Officers and Certain Stockholders     47  
Proposal One: Election of Directors     50  
Proposal Two: Approval of an Amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to Increase the Number of Shares of Class A Common Stock the Company is Authorized to Issue to 300,000,000 Shares     51  
Proposal Three: Ratification of the Appointment of our Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
    53  
Proposal Four: Advisory Vote on Determining the Frequency of Say-On-Pay Votes (“Say-On-Frequency”)     54  
Proposal Five: Approval of Amendment to RCS Capital Corporation Equity Plan     55  
Dissenters’ Rights of Appraisal     61  
Interest of Certain Persons in the Matter Acted Upon     61  
Additional Information     62  
Stockholder Proposals for Our 2015 Annual Meeting     62  
Other Matters     63  
Annex A: Form of Amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation     A-1  
Annex B: Third Amendment to RCS Capital Corporation Equity Plan     B-1  

i


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT

The accompanying proxy, mailed together with this proxy statement (this “Proxy Statement”), is solicited by and on behalf of the board of directors (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) of RCS Capital Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for use at the annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. References in this Proxy Statement to “we,” “us,” “our,” “our company” or like terms also refer to the Company, and references in this Proxy Statement to “you” refer to the stockholders of the Company. The mailing address of our principal executive offices is 405 Park Avenue — 14th Floor, New York, New York 10022. This Proxy Statement, the accompanying proxy card, the Notice of Annual Meeting and our Annual Report were first mailed to our stockholders on or about June   , 2015.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials
for the Annual Meeting To Be Held on June 25, 2015

The Notice of Annual Meeting, the form of proxy card, this Proxy Statement and our
Annual Report are available at
www.proxyvote.com

1


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING

What is the date of the Annual Meeting and where will it be held?

The Annual Meeting will be held on June 25, 2015 at The Core Club, located at 66 E. 55th Street, New York, NY 10022, commencing at 11:00 a.m. (local time).

What will I be voting on at the Annual Meeting?

At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to:

Elect five members of the Board of Directors to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their respective successors have been elected and qualified;
Vote on an amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation to increase the number of shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Class A common stock”), the Company is authorized to issue to 300,000,000 shares;
Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2015;
Vote on a non-binding advisory proposal on the frequency of future say-on-pay votes (commonly referred to as “say-on-frequency”);
Vote on an amendment to the RCS Capital Corporation Equity Plan; and
Vote on such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

The Board of Directors does not know of any matters that may be considered at the Annual Meeting other than the matter set forth above.

Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?

The record date for the determination of holders of shares of our Class A common stock and the holders of shares of our Class B common stock, $0.001 par value per share (“Class B common stock” and, together with our Class A common stock, “Common Stock”), entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting, is the close of business on April 27, 2015 (the “Record Date”). As of the Record Date, 77,159,269 shares of our Class A common stock were issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and one share of our Class B common stock was issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The holders of the shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock are voting as a single class on each matter described in this Proxy Statement for which your vote is being solicited.

Our Class A common stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “RCAP.” As of the Record Date, the sole issued and outstanding share of our Class B common stock was held by RCAP Holdings, LLC (“RCAP Holdings”). The Class B common stock entitles RCAP Holdings to one vote more than the votes of the outstanding Class A common stock and, as a result, RCAP Holdings has the ability to control all matters submitted to stockholders for approval, including the matters set forth in this Proxy Statement.

RCAP Holdings has already indicated its intention to vote “FOR” each of the nominees to the Board of Directors, “FOR” approval of an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of shares of Class A common stock the Company is authorized to issue to 300,000,000 shares, “FOR” ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, “ONE YEAR” on the proposal to determine the frequency of “say-on-pay” votes and “FOR” approval of the amendment to the RCS Capital Corporation Equity Plan.

How many votes do I have?

Each share of Class A common stock has one vote and the sole outstanding share of Class B common stock has 77,159,270 votes on each matter to be considered at the Annual Meeting and any matter to be considered at any adjournment or postponement thereof. The enclosed proxy card shows the number of votes corresponding to the number and class of shares of Common Stock you are entitled to vote.

2


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

How may I vote?

You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy. Instructions for in-person voting, including directions to the Annual Meeting, may be obtained by calling our proxy solicitor, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) at 1-800-690-6903. Stockholders may submit their votes by proxy by mail by completing, signing, dating and returning their proxy in the enclosed envelope. Stockholders also have the following two options for authorizing a proxy to vote their shares:

via the Internet at www.proxyvote.com at any time prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 24, 2015, and follow the instructions provided on the proxy card; or
by telephone, by calling 1-800-690-6903 at any time prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 24, 2015, and follow the instructions provided on the proxy card.

For those stockholders with Internet access, we encourage you to authorize a proxy to vote your shares via the Internet, a convenient means of authorizing a proxy that also provides cost savings to us. In addition, when you authorize a proxy to vote your shares via the Internet or by telephone prior to the Annual Meeting date, your proxy authorization is recorded immediately and there is no risk that postal delays will cause your vote by proxy to arrive late and, therefore, not be counted. For further instructions on authorizing a proxy to vote your shares, see your proxy card enclosed with this Proxy Statement. You may also vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may submit your vote in person, and any previous votes that you submitted by mail or authorized by Internet or telephone will be superseded by the vote that you cast at the Annual Meeting.

How will proxies be voted?

Shares represented by valid proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the directions given. If the enclosed proxy card is signed and returned without any directions given, the shares will be voted “FOR” each of the nominees to the Board of Directors, “FOR” approval of an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of shares of Class A common stock the Company is authorized to issue to 300,000,000 shares, “FOR” ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, “ONE YEAR” on the proposal to determine the frequency of “say-on-pay” votes and “FOR” approval of the amendment to the RCS Capital Corporation Equity Plan.

The Board of Directors does not intend to present, and has no information indicating that others will present, any business at the Annual Meeting other than as set forth in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. However, if other matters requiring the vote of our stockholders come before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote the proxies held by them in their discretion.

How can I change my vote or revoke a proxy?

You have the unconditional right to revoke your proxy at any time prior to the voting thereof by (i) submitting a later-dated proxy either by telephone, via the Internet or in the mail to our proxy solicitor at the following address: Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, or (ii) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. No written revocation of your proxy shall be effective, however, unless and until it is received at or prior to the Annual Meeting.

What vote is required to approve the proposal?

The affirmative vote of the majority of the voting power of the shares of Common Stock of the Company present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter is required to approve each matter, except for the proposal to determine the frequency of “say-on-pay” votes. The advisory vote on the frequency of future “say-on-pay” proposals, commonly referred to as a “say-on-frequency” proposal, will be decided by the frequency option (one year, two years or three years) that receives the greatest number of votes.

Abstentions are considered voting power present at the meeting and thus will have the same effect as votes against each of the matters scheduled to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.

3


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee and you do not provide instructions on how to vote, your broker or other nominee may exercise their discretionary voting power with respect to proposals that are considered as “routine” matters. Of the matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting, only the proposal ratifying the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is commonly considered as a routine matter, and thus your broker, bank or other nominee may exercise their discretionary voting power with respect to such proposal.

A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker who holds shares for the beneficial owner does not vote on a proposal because the broker does not have discretionary voting authority for that proposal and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. The election of directors, the proposal to amend our certificate of incorporation, the “say-on-frequency” proposal and the proposal to amend the RCS Capital Corporation Equity Plan are non-routine matters for which the broker does not have discretionary authority. In tabulating the voting results for any particular proposal, shares that constitute broker non-votes are not considered present in person or represented by a proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on that proposal. Thus, broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of any matter being voted on at the meeting.

By reason of its ownership of the sole outstanding share of Class B common stock as of the Record Date, RCAP Holdings has the ability to control all matters submitted to stockholders for approval, including the matters set forth in this Proxy Statement.

RCAP Holdings has already indicated its intention to vote “FOR” each of the nominees to the Board of Directors, “FOR” approval of an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of shares of Class A common stock the Company is authorized to issue to 300,000,000 shares, “FOR” ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, “ONE YEAR” on the proposal to determine the frequency of “say-on-pay” votes and “FOR” approval of the amendment to the RCS Capital Corporation Equity Plan.

What constitutes a “quorum”?

The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business. Broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining a quorum; however, broker non-votes will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast.

RCAP Holdings has already indicated its intention to attend the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, which will constitute a quorum.

Will you incur expenses in soliciting proxies?

We are soliciting proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors, and we will pay all costs of preparing, assembling and mailing the proxy materials. We have retained Broadridge to aid in the solicitation of proxies. Broadridge will receive a fee of approximately $    , which includes the reimbursement for certain costs and out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their services, all of which will be paid by us. In addition, our directors and officers may solicit proxies by telephone or fax, without receiving any additional compensation for their services. We will request banks, brokers, custodians, nominees, fiduciaries and other record holders to forward copies of this Proxy Statement to beneficial owners on whose behalf they hold shares of Class A common stock and to request authority for the exercise of proxies by the record holders on behalf of those beneficial owners. In compliance with the regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we will reimburse such persons for reasonable expenses incurred by them in forwarding proxy materials to the beneficial owners.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?

Some of your shares may be registered differently or held in a different account. You should authorize a proxy to vote the shares in each of your accounts by mail, by telephone or via the Internet. If you mail proxy cards, please sign, date and return each proxy card to guarantee that all of your shares are voted. If you hold your shares in registered form and wish to combine your stockholder accounts in the future, you should call us at (212) 415-6500. Combining accounts reduces excess printing and mailing costs, resulting in cost savings to us that benefit you as a stockholder.

4


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

What if I receive only one set of proxy materials although there are multiple stockholders at my address?

The SEC has adopted a rule concerning the delivery of documents filed by us with the SEC, including proxy statements and annual reports. The rule allows us to, with the consent of the affected stockholders, send a single set of any annual report, proxy statement, proxy statement combined with a prospectus or information statement to any household at which two or more stockholders reside if they share the same last name or we reasonably believe they are members of the same family. This procedure is referred to as “Householding.” This rule benefits both you and us. It reduces the volume of duplicate information received at your household and helps us reduce expenses. Each stockholder subject to Householding will continue to receive a separate proxy card or voting instruction card.

We will promptly deliver, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of our Proxy Statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy was previously delivered. If you received a single set of disclosure documents for this year, but you would prefer to receive your own copy, you may direct a request for separate copies by calling us at (877) 373-2522 or by mailing a request to us at 405 Park Avenue — 14th Floor, New York, New York 10022, Attention: Investor Relations. Likewise, if your household currently receives multiple copies of disclosure documents and you would like to receive one set, please contact us.

Whom should I call with other questions?

If you have additional questions about this Proxy Statement or the Annual Meeting or would like additional copies of this Proxy Statement, or our 2014 Annual Report or any documents relating to any of our future stockholder meetings, please contact: RCS Capital Corporation, 405 Park Avenue — 14th Floor, New York, New York 10022, Attention: Investor Relations, Telephone: (877) 373-2522, E-mail: investorrelations@rcscapital.com, website: www.rcscapital.com.

UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE, THE PROXIES WILL BE VOTED “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, “FOR” APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK THE COMPANY IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE TO 300,000,000 SHARES, “FOR” RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM, “ONE YEAR” ON THE PROPOSAL TO DETERMINE THE FREQUENCY OF “SAY ON PAY” VOTES AND “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE RCS CAPITAL CORPORATION EQUITY PLAN. IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS, THE PROXIES WILL ALSO BE VOTED “FOR” OR “AGAINST” SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING. MANAGEMENT IS NOT AWARE OF ANY OTHER MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED FOR ACTION AT THE ANNUAL MEETING.

5


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MANAGEMENT

Executive Officers and Directors

The following table provides information regarding our current directors and our executive officers.

   
Name   Age   Position
Edward M. Weil, Jr.   48   Chief Executive Officer and Director
Peter M. Budko   55   Director
Brian D. Jones   46   Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Secretary and Director
R. Lawrence Roth   57   Director
Brian L. Nygaard   56   Chief Operating Officer
John H. Grady   53   Chief Strategy and Risk Officer
Mark Auerbach   76   Non-Executive Chairman of the Board and Independent Director
Jeffrey J. Brown   54   Independent Director
C. Thomas McMillen   62   Independent Director
Howell D. Wood   83   Independent Director

Edward M. Weil, Jr. has served as our Chief Executive Officer since September 2014 and has served as a director of our company since February 2013. Mr. Weil previously served as our president from February 2013 until his resignation in September 2014. Mr. Weil has also served as president, treasurer and secretary of RCS Capital Management, LLC (“RCS Capital Management”), the Company’s external services provider, since April 2013. Mr. Weil served as an executive officer of American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. (“ARCT”), the ARCT advisor and the ARCT property manager from their formation in August 2007 through March 2012. Mr. Weil previously served as an executive officer of New York REIT, Inc. (“NYRT”), the NYRT property manager and the NYRT advisor since their formation in October 2009 until his resignation from those positions in November 2014. He has served as the executive vice president and secretary of the Phillips Edison — ARC Shopping Center REIT, Inc. (“PE-ARC”) advisor since its formation in December 2009. Mr. Weil has served as an executive officer of American Realty Capital — Retail Centers of America, Inc. (“ARC RCA”) and the ARC RCA advisor since their formation in July 2010 and May 2010, respectively. Mr. Weil also served as an executive officer of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust, Inc. (“HTC”), the HTC advisor and the HTC property manager from their formation in August 2010 through February 2014. Mr. Weil served as a director of American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc. (“ARCT III”) beginning in February 2012 and as an executive officer of ARCT III, the ARCT III advisor and the ARCT III property manager from their formation in October 2010 until the close of ARCT III’s merger with American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. (“ARCP”) in February 2013. Mr. Weil has served as the executive president and secretary of the Business Development Corporation of America (“BDCA”) advisor since its formation in June 2010. Mr. Weil has served as treasurer and secretary of American Realty Capital New York City REIT, Inc. (“ARC NYCR”), the ARC NYCR advisor and the ARC NYCR property manager since April 2014 and previously served as chief operating officer of ARC NYCR, the ARC NYCR advisor and the ARC NYCR property manager since their respective formations in December 2013. Mr. Weil previously served as an executive officer of ARCP since its formation in December 2010 and as a director beginning in March 2012, and has served as an executive officer of the ARCP advisor since its formation in November 2010. Mr. Weil resigned from his position as an officer of ARCP and the ARCP advisor in February 2013 and as a director of ARCP in June 2014. Mr. Weil has been a director and an executive officer of American Realty Capital Global Trust, Inc. (“GNL”), the GNL advisor and the GNL property manager since their formation in July 2011, July 2011 and January 2012, respectively. Mr. Weil has served as the president, chief operating officer, treasurer and secretary of American Realty Capital Trust IV, Inc. (“ARCT IV”), the ARCT IV advisor and the ARCT IV property manager since their formation in February 2012. Mr. Weil was appointed as a director of ARCT IV in January 2013. Mr. Weil has served as the president, chief operating officer, treasurer and secretary of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. (“HTI”), the HTI advisor and the HTI property manager since their formation in October 2012. Mr. Weil served as the president, treasurer and secretary of ARC Realty Finance Trust, Inc. (“ARC RFT”) and the ARC RFT advisor from November 2012 until January 2013. Mr. Weil has served as president, chief operating officer, treasurer and secretary of Phillips Edison — ARC Grocery Center REIT II, Inc. (“PE-ARC II”) advisor since July 2013. Mr. Weil served as a member of the board of managers of the American Realty Capital Hospitality Trust, Inc. (“HOSP”)

6


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

sub-property manager from August 2013 to until his resignation in November 2014. Mr. Weil was formerly the senior vice president of sales and leasing for American Financial Realty Trust (“AFRT”) from April 2004 to October 2006, where he was responsible for the disposition and leasing activity for a 33 million square foot portfolio of properties. Under the direction of Mr. Weil, his department was the sole contributor in the increase of occupancy and portfolio revenue through the sales of over 200 properties and the leasing of over 2.2 million square feet, averaging 325,000 square feet of newly executed leases per quarter. After working at AFRT from October 2006 to May 2007, Mr. Weil was managing director of Milestone Partners Limited and prior to joining AFRT, from 1987 to April 2004, Mr. Weil was president of Plymouth Pump & Systems Co. Mr. Weil attended George Washington University. Mr. Weil holds FINRA Series 7, 24 and 63 licenses.

We believe that Mr. Weil’s current experience as an executive officer and/or director as applicable of NYRT, ARC RCA, HTC, ARCP, GNL, ARCT IV, HTI and ARC NYCR, his previous experience as senior vice president at AFRT and his real estate experience, make him well qualified to serve on our Board of Directors.

Peter M. Budko has served as a director of our company since February 2013. Mr. Budko has also served as chief investment officer of our company from April 2013 to December 29, 2014. Mr. Budko has also served as chief investment officer of the Company’s external services provider, RCS Capital Management, LLC (“RCS Capital Management”), from April 2013. Mr. Budko served as executive vice president and chief investment officer of ARCT, the ARCT advisor and the ARCT property manager from their formation in 2007 through March 2012. Mr. Budko has also served as executive vice president and chief operating officer of NYRT since its formation in October 2009, and the NYRT property manager and the NYRT advisor since their formation in November 2009. Mr. Budko has served as executive vice president and chief investment officer of the PE-ARC advisor since its formation in December 2009. Mr. Budko has served as executive vice president and chief investment officer of ARC RCA and the ARC RCA advisor since their formation in July 2010 and May 2010, respectively. Mr. Budko has served as executive vice president and, until February 2011, as chief investment officer, of HTC, the HTC advisor and the HTC property manager since their formation in August 2010. Mr. Budko served as an executive officer of ARCT III, the ARCT III advisor and the ARCT III property manager from their formation in October 2010 until the close of ARCT III’s merger with ARCP in February 2013. Mr. Budko has served as an executive officer of BDCA and the BDCA advisor since their formation in May 2010 and June 2010, respectively. Mr. Budko has served as executive vice president and chief investment officer of American Realty Capital Daily Net Asset Value Trust, Inc. (“ARC DNAV”), the ARC DNAV advisor and the ARC DNAV property manager since their formation in September 2010. Mr. Budko also has been executive vice president and chief investment officer of ARCP and the ARCP manager since their formation in December 2010 and November 2010, respectively, until his resignation from both positions in January 2014. Mr. Budko also has been an executive officer of GNL, the GNL advisor and the GNL property manager since their formation in July 2011, July 2011 and January 2012, respectively. Mr. Budko served as executive vice president and chief investment officer of ARCT IV, the ARCT IV advisor and the ARCT IV property manager from their formation in February 2012 until the closing of the merger of ARCT IV with ARCP in January 2014. Mr. Budko has served as the executive vice president of HTI, the HTI advisor and the HTI property manager since their formation in October 2012. Mr. Budko has served as the executive vice president of ARC RFT and the ARC RFT advisor since their formation in November 2012 and as president of ARC RFT and the ARC RFT advisor since January 2013. Mr. Budko was appointed as a director of ARC RFT in January 2013. Mr. Budko has served as chief investment officer and executive vice president of the PE-ARC II advisor since its formation in July 2013. From January 2007 to July 2007, Mr. Budko was chief operating officer of a real estate investment firm affiliated with AR Capital, LLC (“American Realty Capital”). Mr. Budko founded and formerly served as managing director and group head of the Structured Asset Finance Group, a division of Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, from 1997 to 2006. The Structured Asset Finance Group structures and invests in real estate that is net leased to corporate tenants. While at Wachovia, Mr. Budko acquired over $5 billion of net leased real estate assets. From 1987 to 1997, Mr. Budko worked in the Corporate Real Estate Finance Group at NationsBank Capital Markets (predecessor to Bank of America Securities), becoming head of the group in 1990. Mr. Budko received a B.A. in physics from the University of North Carolina.

7


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We believe that Mr. Budko’s current experience as an executive officer of NYRT, ARC RCA, ARC DNAV, GNL, and BDCA, as a director of ARC RFT, his prior experience as an executive officer of ARCT, ARCT III, ARCT IV, NYRT, HTC, HTI and at Wachovia Capital Markets and Nations Bank and his over 20 years of experience in debt and lending, make him well qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.

Brian D. Jones was appointed as a director in April 2015 and has been the chief financial officer and assistant secretary of the Company and RCS Capital Management since December 2013. Mr. Jones has served as head of the investment banking division of Realty Capital Securities, LLC (“Realty Capital Securities”), a subsidiary of our company, since February 2013. Mr. Jones served as chief operating officer of ARCP from February 2013 until November 2013. Mr. Jones served as chief financial officer and treasurer of ARCT from its internalization in March 2012 until the close of its merger with Realty Income Corporation in January 2013. Prior to ARCT’s internalization, Mr. Jones served as senior vice president, managing director and head of investment banking at Realty Capital Securities and ARC Advisory Services, LLC (“ARC”) from September 2010 through February 2012. Prior to joining Realty Capital Securities and ARC, Mr. Jones was a director in the real estate investment banking group at Robert W. Baird & Co. from February 2008 through August 2010. From January 2005 through November 2007, Mr. Jones was an executive director in the real estate investment banking group at Morgan Stanley & Co. Prior to that, Mr. Jones worked in the real estate investment banking group at RBC Capital Markets from February 2004 through February 2005. From October 1997 through February 2001, Mr. Jones worked in the real estate investment banking group at PaineWebber, Inc. He also founded in February 2001 and operated through February 2004 an independent financial consulting firm focused on strategic advisory and private capital raising for real estate investment firms. From September 1990 to October 1997, Mr. Jones worked in the real estate tax advisory group at Coopers & Lybrand, LLP, where he was a manager focused on REIT and partnership tax structuring. He has more than 17 years of experience advising public and private real estate companies and executing a broad range of complex strategic and capital markets transactions, including approximately $9.0 billion of capital markets transactions, $10.0 billion of real estate acquisitions and dispositions and $35.0 billion of corporate mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Jones is a member of CSCPA, ULI and NAREIT. Mr. Jones also has FINRA Series 7, 24 and 63 licenses. Mr. Jones received a B.S. with honors in Agricultural and Managerial Economics from the University of California at Davis and an M.S. in Taxation from Golden State University.

We believe that Mr. Jones’ experience at Robert W. Baird & Co., Morgan Stanley & Co., RBC Capital Markets. PaineWebber, Inc., Coopers & Lybrand, LLP, and his experience as an independent financial consultant, as well as his experience working for various subsidiaries of our company and as chief financial officer of our company, make him well qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.

R. Lawrence Roth was appointed as a director in April 2015. Mr. Roth has served as chief executive officer of Cetera Financial Group, the Company’s independent retail advice division, and as a member of the board of directors of Cetera Financial Holdings. Inc., one of the Company’s subsidiaries, since May 2014. As of December 31, 2014 and after giving effect to the completion of our acquisitions of VSR Financial Services, Inc. and Girard Securities, Inc. which occurred in the first quarter of 2015, Cetera Financial Group serves clients with $236.4 billion in assets under administration through 9,520 financial advisors. Previously, Mr. Roth served as the chief executive officer of Realty Capital Securities, a subsidiary of our company, from September 2013 through May 2014. In January 2006, Mr. Roth became president and chief executive officer of Royal Alliance, a subsidiary of AIG Advisor Group, Inc., and then became president and chief executive officer of AIG Advisor Group in September 2007 until September 2013. Prior to joining AIG Advisor Group, Mr. Roth served as managing director for Berkshire Capital Securities, LLC, from 2001 until January 2006.

Mr. Roth has previously served as chairman of the board of directors, and is currently a board member, of The Insured Retirement Institute, a leading association for the retirement income industry. He also previously served as chairman of the board of directors for the Financial Services Institute, a not-for-profit organization that seeks to ensure that all individuals have access to competent and affordable financial advice. Mr. Roth has over 30 years of experience in the financial services industry with experience in securities, investment banking, brokerage and management.

8


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mr. Roth began his professional career at Deloitte & Touche as a certified public accountant (CPA). Mr. Roth received his bachelor’s degree from Michigan State University and his juris doctor from the University of Detroit School of Law. He has also graduated from the Owner/President Management Program at Harvard University’s Graduate School of Business Administration. Mr. Roth holds FINRA Series 7, 24 and 63 licenses.

We believe that Mr. Roth’s previous prior experience with AIG Advisor Group and other leading broker-dealers, as well as his extensive background in the accounting, investment management, and the independent broker-dealer industries, makes him well qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Brian L. Nygaard was appointed as our chief operating officer on April 29, 2014. Over the last 25 years, Mr. Nygaard has held leadership positions at several companies. From 2010 to 2014, he served as the Principle for Atticus Advisers, a retail financial services industry profitability-development firm. From 2006 through 2010, Mr. Nygaard served as the Managing Director for Pershing, LLC, a division of BNY Mellon Corporation, a leading provider of technology and platform solutions in the financial services industry. From 2002 through 2005, Mr. Nygaard held an executive leadership position at H&R Block Financial Advisors, the retail investment arm of the US tax-preparer. From 2000 through 2001, Mr. Nygaard held leadership positions at ING Advisors Network, the investment distribution unit of ING USA. From 1988 through 1998, Mr. Nygaard served in various leadership positions for Principal Financial Group, a leading insurance/qualified plan provider and global investment manager. Mr. Nygaard holds CPA and CFP designations and holds a FINRA Series 7 license. Mr. Nygaard received a Bachelor’s Degree in Accounting from Drake University, magna cum laude.

John H. Grady was appointed as our Chief Strategy and Risk Officer in October 2014. Over the past several decades, Mr. Grady has served in leadership roles in a variety of financial institutions and investment funds. Mr. Grady served as President of American National Stock Transfer, LLC (“ANST”), a subsidiary of our company, from October 2012 to September 2014 and Chief Operating Officer of Realty Capital Securities, a subsidiary of our company, from October 2012 to September 2014. In addition to his various roles within the company, Mr. Grady has also served as: Chairman and Interested Trustee of American Real Estate Income Fund from April 2015 through the present; President, Treasurer and Secretary of American Real Estate Income Fund from October 2012 to present; President of National Fund Advisors, LLC from October 2012 to present; Chief Compliance Officer of Business Development Corporation of America, from October 2012 to April 2015; Chief Compliance Officer of BDCA Adviser, LLC, from October 2012 to March 2015; General Counsel and Chief Operating Officer of Steben & Company (firm operated and distributed commodity pools using managed futures strategies), from December 2009 to September 2012. From April 2008 to December 2009, Mr. Grady was a senior advisor to Coil Investment Group. From October 2006 through February 2008, Mr. Grady served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Nationwide Funds Group. From March 2004 through June 2006, Mr. Grady served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Constellation Funds Group. Mr. Grady served as Chief Legal Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Turner Investment Partners from January 2001 through January 2004, and was previously a partner with the law firm of Morgan, Lewis and Bockius LLP from October 1995 through January 2001. Mr. Grady holds a Juris Doctorate from the University of Pennsylvania Law School and a Bachelor of Arts from Colgate University, where he was Phi Beta Kappa.

Mark Auerbach has served as an independent director since May 2013 and Lead Independent Director of the Company since February 2014 and served in such capacity until December 29, 2014, when he was elected as our Non-Executive Chairman of the Board. Mr. Auerbach has served as a director of Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Inc. since June 2005 and lead independent director of that company since February 2013 until its sale in October 2013. He has been Independent Director and Chair of the Audit Committee of Assembly Biosciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: ASMB) since November 2010. From September 2003 through October 2006, Mr. Auerbach served as Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors for Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., principally a manufacturer and marketer of generic pharmaceuticals and the parent of Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.

9


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In addition, Mr. Auerbach has previously served as director of a number of public companies, including Neuro-Hitch, Inc., an early-stage pharmaceutical company which specialized in brain degenerative diseases, Collexis, a company which develops knowledge management and discovery software, and RXElite Holdings, Inc., a company which develops, manufactures and markets generic prescription drug products in specialty generic markets. From 1993 to 2005, Mr. Auerbach served as Chief Financial Officer of Central Lewmar LLP, a national fine paper distributor. Mr. Auerbach received a B.S. degree from Rider University and is a Certified Public Accountant.

We believe that Mr. Auerbach’s previous experience as a member of the board of directors of Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Neuro-Hitch, Inc., Collexis, RxElite Holdings, Inc., and Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., his current experience as a member of the board of directors of Assembly Biosciences, Inc. and his previous experience as an officer of Central Lewmar LLP make him well qualified to serve on our Board of Directors.

Jeffrey J. Brown has served as an independent director since February 10, 2014. Mr. Brown is the Chief Executive Officer and founding member of Brown Equity Partners, LLC (“BEP”), which provides capital to management teams and companies needing equity of $3.0 million to $20.0 million. Prior to founding BEP in January 2007, Mr. Brown served as a founding partner and primary deal originator of the venture capital and private equity firm Forrest Binkley & Brown (“FBB”), from 1993 to January 2007. In March 2005, SBIC Partners II, L.P., an investment vehicle formed by FBB and licensed through the Small Business Administration (the “SBA”), voluntarily agreed to enter into receivership after failing to meet various SBA capital requirements. Prior to founding FBB, Mr. Brown served as a Senior Vice President of Bank America Venture Capital Group from 1990 to 1993 and as a Senior Vice President of Security Pacific Capital Corporation from 1987 to 1990. Mr. Brown also worked at the preferred stock desk of Morgan Stanley & Co. (NYSE: MS) in 1986 and as a software engineer at Hughes Aircraft Company from 1983 to 1985. In his 28 years of venture capital and private equity experience, Mr. Brown has served on the Board of Directors of over 40 public and private companies, including as the chairman of 10 such boards, and has served as the chair of audit, compensation, finance and other special board committees of such boards. From September 2012 until August 2014, Mr. Brown served on the Board of Directors of Nordion Inc. (NYSE: NDZ) where he was a member of each of the EHS/Governance and Finance/Audit Committees. From September 2009 until resigning in October 2011, Mr. Brown served as a director of Steadfast Income REIT, Inc. From December 2010 until resigning in April 2015, Mr. Brown served as a Director of Midatech Pharma (LONDON: MTPH). Beginning in June 2015, Mr. Brown will become a Director of Medifast, Inc. (NYSE:MED). Mr. Brown received a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics, Summa Cum Laude, from Willamette University and a Master of Business Administration from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business.

We believe that Mr. Brown’s extensive public and private company board experience and investment and transaction experience make him well qualified to serve on our Board of Directors.

Mr. Brown was originally appointed pursuant to an agreement we entered into with Luxor Capital Group LP and its affiliates (“Luxor”) in January 2014 as a condition to Luxor’s commitment to provide us with certain financing arrangements required to complete the acquisition of Cetera Financial Holdings, Inc. (“Cetera”) on April 29, 2014 (the “Cetera Acquisition”), which included the issuance of shares of our 7% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Series A Preferred Stock”), to Luxor. See “Relationships and Related Party Transactions — The Cetera Financings — The Luxor Transactions.” For so long as Luxor owned at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, the holders of a majority of the outstanding share of Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to elect one independent director. In December 2014, Luxor exchanged all of the then outstanding Series A Preferred Stock for shares of a new series of 11% Series B Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per share (“Series B Preferred Stock”), and 7% Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per share (“Series C Preferred Stock”). “Relationships and Related Party Transactions  — The Luxor Securities Exchange Agreement.” For so long as Luxor owns at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock, the holders of a majority of the outstanding share of Series C Preferred Stock are entitled to elect one independent director. Luxor, as the holder of the majority of the Series C Preferred Stock, has elected Mr. Brown to continue to serve as an independent director until our 2016 annual meeting.

10


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

C. Thomas McMillen has served as an independent director since May 2013. Mr. McMillen currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of Washington Capital Advisors, in which capacity he has served since 2002. Mr. McMillen has also served as a director of Nexstar Broadcasting since July 2014. Mr. McMillen served as Timios National Corporation’s (formerly Homeland Security Capital Corporation) Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board since August 2005 and served as its President since July 2011 until his resignation in February 2014. From May 2011 to July 2013, Mr. McMillen served as Chairman of the National Foundation on Fitness, Sports and Nutrition, a Congressionally authorized foundation that Mr. McMillen founded where he currently serves as Treasurer. From April 2007, he has served on the Board of Regents of the University of Maryland System. From December 2004 until January 2007, Mr. McMillen served as the Chairman of Fortress America Acquisition Corporation (now Fortress International Group, Inc., FIGI.PK), and, from January 2007 until August 2009, he served as Vice Chairman and director. From October 2007 until October 2009, Mr. McMillen served as Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Secure America Acquisition Corporation, (now Ultimate Escapes, Inc. OTCBB: ULEIQ.PK) and from October 2009 to December 2010 as a director and from November 2009 to December 2010 as Vice Chairman. Ultimate Escapes, Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Delaware in September 2010. From 1987 through 1993, Mr. McMillen served three consecutive terms in the U.S. House of Representatives representing the 4th Congressional District of Maryland. Mr. McMillen received a Bachelor of Science in Chemistry from the University of Maryland and a Bachelor and Master of Arts from Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar.

We believe that Mr. McMillen’s previous experience as a member of the Board of Directors of Nexstar Broadcasting, Timios National Corporation, the University of Maryland System, Dominion Funds, Inc., Ultimate Escapes, Inc., and other companies, his previous experience as an officer of Fortress International Group, Timios National Corporation and other entities and his expertise in United States public policy and politics make him well qualified to serve on our Board of Directors.

Howell D. Wood has served as an independent director since December 2013. Mr. Wood served as chairman of the Board of Directors and chief executive officer of Wood Logan Associates from its formation in August 1986 until June 1999, when Wood Logan Associates was acquired by The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company. From July 1999 to December 2011, Mr. Wood continued as chairman of the Wood Logan Associates division of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and held a variety of senior management and leadership positions with that company. From 1982 until June 1986, Mr. Wood served as chief executive officer of Integrated Capital Services, a subsidiary of Integrated Resources Inc. Prior to joining Integrated Resources Inc., Mr. Wood served as national sales manager at Massachusetts Financial Services Company and Drexel Burnham Lambert.

We believe that Mr. Wood’s previous experience as a founder, chairman of the Board of Directors and chief executive officer of Wood Logan Associates and his extensive background in the finance and investment management industry make him well qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Board Composition

Our Board of Directors is comprised of the following eight directors: Messrs. Weil, Budko, Jones, Roth, Auerbach, Brown, McMillen and Wood. We have determined that Messrs. Auerbach, McMillen, Brown, and Wood are independent directors within the meaning of the applicable rules of the SEC and NYSE, and that Mr. Auerbach is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of the applicable rules of the SEC and possesses financial sophistication as defined under the rules of NYSE. Our certificate of incorporation provides that our Board of Directors will consist of no fewer than three nor more than ten persons. The exact number of members on our Board of Directors is determined from time to time by resolution of a majority of our full Board of Directors.

11


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Controlled Company

Because RCAP Holdings controls a majority of our outstanding voting power, we are a “controlled company” under the corporate governance rules of NYSE. Therefore, we are not required to have a majority of our Board of Directors be independent, nor are we required to have a compensation committee or an independent nominating function. In light of our status as a controlled company, our Board of Directors has determined not to have an independent nominating function and to have the full Board of Directors be directly responsible for nominating members of the Board of Directors. We have established a compensation committee, although our compensation committee does not meet the independence requirements which would have been required under corporate governance rules for NYSE-listed companies if we were not a controlled company. At such time as the Company ceases to qualify as a “controlled company” under NYSE corporate governance rules, the Board will be required to include a majority of independent directors and the Company will be required to comply with all other then-applicable NYSE corporate governance rules.

As the holder of the sole outstanding share of our Class B common stock representing a majority of the combined voting power of our common stock, RCAP Holdings is able to effectively control all matters submitted to our stockholders for a vote, as well as the overall management and direction of our company. In addition, RCAP Holdings has the ability to take stockholder action without the vote of any other stockholder.

Executive Committee

On September 30, 2013, we established an Executive Committee of our Board of Directors. The Executive Committee has and may exercise all the powers and authority of our Board of Directors in the management of the business and affairs of our company, except to the extent limited by law, by the rules of the NYSE or by our certificate of incorporation or by-laws, in each case as in effect from time to time.

Messrs. Weil and Budko currently serve on the Executive Committee. During 2014, our Executive Committee held no meetings and acted by written consent 26 times.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee assists our Board of Directors in its oversight of our internal audit function, the integrity of our financial statements, our independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence and the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm.

Our Audit Committee’s responsibilities include, among others:

reviewing the audit plans and findings of our independent registered public accounting firm and our internal audit and risk review staff, as well as the results of regulatory examinations, and tracking management’s corrective action plans where necessary;
reviewing our financial statements, including any significant financial items and/or changes in accounting policies, with our senior management and independent registered public accounting firm;
reviewing our financial risk and control procedures, compliance programs and significant tax, legal and regulatory matters;
appointing annually our independent registered public accounting firm, evaluating its independence and performance, determining its compensation and setting clear hiring policies for employees or former employees of the independent registered public accounting firm; and
reviewing and approving or ratifying all related party transactions in accordance with the Company’s policies with respect to such matters and discussing with counsel, management and the independent registered accounting firm any related party transactions brought to the Committee’s attention which could reasonably be expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Messrs. Auerbach, McMillen and Wood currently serve on the Audit Committee and Mr. Auerbach serves as its chair. Messrs. Auerbach, McMillen and Wood are independent under Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and under Section 303A.02 of the Listed Company Manual of the NYSE.

12


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

During 2014, our Audit Committee held 12 meetings and acted by written consent five times. Our Audit Committee operates under a written charter. A copy of the charter is available under the Investors —  Corporate Information — Governance Documents section of our website, www.rcscapital.com.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee was constituted in October 2014 and its responsibilities include:

approving and evaluating all compensation plans, policies and programs as they affect the Company’s executive officers;
reviewing and overseeing the Company’s management’s annual process, if any, for evaluating the performance of the Company’s senior officers;
overseeing the Company’s equity incentive plans, including, without limitation, the issuance of stock options, restricted shares of Class A common stock, restricted stock units, dividend equivalent rights and other equity-based awards;
assisting the Board and the chairman of the Company in overseeing the development of executive succession plans; and
determining from time to time the remuneration for the Company’s non-executive directors.

Our Compensation Committee does not meet the independence requirements which would have been required under corporate governance rules for NYSE-listed companies if we were not a controlled company. Currently, the members of our Compensation Committee are Messrs. Weil, Budko and Wood, and the chairman is Mr. Wood. The charter of our Compensation Committee provides that its members consist of the members of our Executive Committee and one or more directors who meet the definition of “independent director” set forth in SEC rules and NYSE rules and are “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act and “outside directors” under the regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

Our chief executive officer, Edward M. Weil, Jr., is a member of our Compensation Committee and provides input and recommendations to the Compensation Committee for the compensation paid to the Company’s officers, directors and employees. Other executive officers also provide input and recommendations to the Compensation Committee for the compensation paid to each of the Company’s officers, directors and employees. Our Compensation Committee considers these recommendations when determining salary, if any, awarding annual incentive compensation and setting incentive opportunities for the coming year and under the RCAP Equity Plan.

Except for the retention of FTI Consulting (“FTI”) in connection with the performance-based awards described in “Executive Compensation — 2013 Manager Multi-Year Outperformance Agreement,” our Compensation Committee has not, in the past, retained a compensation consultant, and no compensation consultant currently plays a role in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive or director compensation. FTI was retained in July 2014 and its role was to advise on certain compensation arrangements, for which it received a fee of approximately $17,000, which was paid in August of 2014. No conflict of interest was raised in connection with the work performed by FTI. In addition, FTI was engaged by various subsidiaries of American Realty Capital, an entity under common control with our controlling stockholder, for various compensation consulting purposes (and which may have been performed by different FTI personnel than the FTI personnel who provided services to the Company), for total fees of approximately $325,800, all of which was paid in 2014. None of the Company, the Board of Directors, nor the Compensation Committee was involved in the decision to engage, or made any recommendations to engage, FTI by such subsidiaries and affiliates of American Realty Capital.

In carrying out its responsibilities, our Compensation Committee may delegate any or all of its responsibilities to a subcommittee to the extent consistent with our certificate of incorporation, by-laws, corporate governance guidelines and any other applicable laws, rules and regulations.

13


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

During 2014, our Compensation Committee held one meeting and did not act by written consent. Our Compensation Committee operates under a written charter. A copy of the charter is available under the Investors —  Corporate Information — Governance Documents section of our website, www.rcscapital.com.

Director Nominations

In light of our status as a controlled company, our Board of Directors has determined not to have an independent nominating function and to have the full Board of Directors, a majority of whom meet the “independent director” criteria under SEC and NYSE rules, be directly responsible for nominating members of the Board of Directors.

The Board will consider nominees recommended by stockholders, but it has not actively solicited recommendations from stockholders. Although the Board has not established specific minimum qualifications, or specific qualities or skills for prospective nominees, the Board will consider, among other things, a potential nominee’s financial and business experience, educational background, understanding of the Company’s business and industry, skills that would complement rather than duplicate skills of existing Board members, demonstrated ability in his or her professional field, integrity and reputation, willingness to work productively with other members of the Board and represent the interests of stockholders as a whole, and time availability to perform the duties of a director, as well as the then current size and composition of the Board. Although the Company does not have a formal diversity policy, when considering a prospective nominee, the Board will take into account diversity of skills, experience and other qualities that can contribute to the success of the Company. No weight is assigned to any of the factors and the Board may change its emphasis on certain of these factors from time to time in light of the needs of the Company at the time.

A stockholder seeking to recommend a prospective nominee for consideration by the Board should submit the recommendation to the Board in the manner described under our by-laws. See “Stockholder Proposals for our 2015 Annual Meeting — Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for Directors to Be Presented at Meetings.” The Board will evaluate nominees of stockholders using the same criteria as it uses in evaluating other nominees to the Board.

Board Meetings

During 2014, the Board held 27 meetings and acted by written consent 12 times. Each director attended at least 75% of all meetings of our Board of Directors and, as applicable, meetings of our Executive Committee, our Audit Committee and our Compensation Committee. We encourage our directors to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. All of our directors who were directors at the time attended the 2014 annual meeting.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board believes that its leadership structure, which separates the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles, is appropriate at this time in light of the Company’s business and operating environment. Mark Auerbach was elected as the lead independent director of the Company in February 2014 and served in such capacity until December 29, 2014, when he was elected as our non-executive Chairman of the Board.

The Board of Directors has elected a non-executive Chairman of the Board to ensure the Board’s independence and enhance the Board’s ability to fulfill its management oversight responsibilities. The Chairman of the Board chairs Board of Directors meetings and meetings or executive sessions of the independent directors, reviews and comments on Board of Directors’ meeting agendas, represents the views of the independent directors to management, facilitates communication among the independent directors and between management and the independent directors, acts as a liaison with service providers, officers, attorneys and other directors, serves as a representative and speaks on behalf of the Company at external seminars, conferences, in the media and otherwise, and otherwise assumes such responsibilities as may be assigned to him by the Board. Consistent with current practices, the Company compensates Mr. Auerbach for acting as non-executive Chairman of the Board.

The Board of Directors may modify this structure to best address the Company’s circumstances for the benefit of its stockholders when appropriate.

14


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors has an active role in overseeing the management of risks applicable to the Company. The entire Board is actively involved in overseeing risk management for the Company through its approval of all company acquisitions, incurrence and assumptions of debt, its oversight of the Company’s executive officers and RCS Capital Management, managing risks associated with independence of the members of the Board, reviewing and approving all transactions with affiliated parties and resolving other real or perceived conflicts of interest between the Company and its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and American Realty Capital, an entity under common control with our controlling stockholder, RCAP Holdings, any director, RCS Capital Management or their respective affiliates, on the other hand. Our Audit Committee oversees management of accounting, financial, legal and regulatory risks and also reviews and approves all transactions with affiliated parties and is involved in resolving other real or perceived conflicts of interest between the Company and its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and American Realty Capital, any director, RCS Capital Management or their respective affiliates, on the other hand.

Code of Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics for our executive officers, directors and employees and Corporate Governance Guidelines for our directors. Copies of the Code of Ethics and the Corporate Governance Guidelines are available under the Investors —  Corporate Information — Governance Documents section of our website, www.rcscapital.com.

Communicating with Directors

Persons wishing to communicate with the Board of Directors as a group or one or more individual directors, including our chairman, may send communications in care of our general counsel who will forward the communication to the appropriate person or persons. These communications may be anonymous and may be addressed to the Board of Directors, our independent directors or our chairman or another director, in each case, addressed, 405 Park Avenue — 14th Floor, New York, New York 10022, Attention: James A. Tanaka: General Counsel, RCS Capital.

Director Compensation

Each independent director receives the following compensation for service on our Board of Directors and, if applicable, our Audit Committee and our Compensation Committee;

an annual cash retainer fee of $42,500;
annual equity grant of shares of restricted stock with a fixed dollar amount of $42,500 (which vests ratably over a three-year period);
meeting fees of $1,500 for each meeting attended in person and $500 for each electronic vote or telephonic meeting (if there is a meeting of the Board of Directors and one or more committee meetings in a single day, their fees are limited to $2,000 per day);
conference/seminar fees of $2,500 per half day (up to four hours) or $5,000 per full day (more than four hours); and
an additional cash retainer fee of $12,000 for the Chairman of the Board (who may elect to receive up to 100% in restricted stock, which would vest over a three-year period).

In addition, on February 3, 2014, the Board of Directors voted to grant each independent director serving at that date (Messrs. Auerbach, McMillen and Wood), 10,000 restricted shares of Class A common stock as a special one-time appreciation grant.

Retainers are paid following each regularly scheduled annual stockholder meeting. If a director joins our Board of Directors at any time other than the annual stockholder meeting, the retainers will be prorated and paid at the time of such director joining our Board of Directors. The directors have the right to elect to receive all or a portion of their annual cash retainer in restricted shares of Class A common stock at the beginning of each year of service in accordance with restrictions as may be required by law.

15


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

All directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board of Directors, committee and stockholder meetings, including those for travel, meals and lodging.

Nicholas S. Schorsch and William M. Kahane, who resigned from the Board of Directors on December 29, 2014, and Brian S. Block, who resigned from the Board of Directors on July 7, 2014, were non-independent directors who did not receive compensation for serving on the Board of Directors. Edward M. Weil, Jr., Peter M. Budko, Brian D. Jones and R. Lawrence Roth are non-independent directors who currently serve on the Board of Directors, and they do not receive and have not received compensation for serving on the Board of Directors. It is our policy not to compensate non-independent directors for serving on the Board of Directors. In December 2014, two of our current non-independent directors and three of our former non-independent directors who are also members of RCS Capital Management received shares of Class A common stock upon conversion and exchange of LTIP Units that had been earned and vested early. See “Relationships and Related Party Transactions  — LTIP Units — December Amendment.”

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation of our independent directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014:

             
Name   Fees Paid
in Cash
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  Option
Awards
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
  Changes in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(6)
  Total
Compensation
($)
Mark Auerbach     97,000       256,269 (2)                        3,930       357,199  
Jeffrey J. Brown     70,000       184,934 (3)                        1,165       256,099  
C. Thomas McMillen     74,000       244,727 (4)                        3,857       322,584  
Howell D. Wood     88,000       244,727 (5)                        3,857       336,584  

(1) Grants of restricted shares of Class A common stock which vests ratably over a three-year period from the date of grant.
(2) Represents a one-time special incentive grant of 10,000 restricted shares of Class A common stock granted on February 3, 2014, 404 restricted shares of Class A common stock granted on May 29, 2014 for serving as the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board and 1,429 restricted shares of Class A common stock granted on May 29, 2014, which represents the annual equity grant.
(3) Represents a one-time special incentive grant of 5,044 restricted shares of Class A common stock granted on May 29, 2014 and 1,429 restricted shares of Class A common stock granted on May 29, 2014, which represents the annual equity grant.
(4) Represents a one-time special incentive grant of 10,000 restricted shares of Class A common stock granted on February 3, 2014 and 1,429 restricted shares of Class A common stock granted on May 29, 2014, which represents the annual equity grant.
(5) Represents a one-time special incentive grant of 10,000 restricted shares of Class A common stock granted on February 3, 2014 and 1,429 restricted shares of Class A common stock granted on May 29, 2014, which represents the annual equity grant.
(6) Represents dividends paid on the restricted shares of Class A common stock granted during the period.

16


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

This report of the Audit Committee is required by the SEC and, in accordance with the SEC’s rules, will not be deemed to be part of or incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and will not otherwise be deemed “soliciting material” or “filed” under either the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

The principal purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in its general oversight of our accounting practices, system of internal controls, audit processes and financial reporting processes. The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing and retaining our independent auditor and approving the audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditor. The Audit Committee’s function is more fully described in its charter.

Our management is responsible for preparing our financial statements and ensuring they are complete and accurate and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2014, was responsible for performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 with management and with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. These audited financial statements are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Annual Report”).

The Audit Committee has also discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the independent auditors with the Audit Committee under the rules adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

The Audit Committee also has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its independence from us.

Based on the review and discussions described above, the audit committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report for filing with the SEC.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
 
Mark Auerbach (Chair)
C. Thomas McMillen
Howell D. Wood

17


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We are party to a services agreement with RCS Capital Management as described below under “— Services Agreement” pursuant to which RCS Capital Management provides us (but not our operating subsidiaries or RCS Holdings) with a management team, including a chief executive officer and president or similar positions.

As of December 31, 2014, Edward M. Weil, Jr., our chief executive officer, is a member of RCS Capital Management and does not receive compensation from us for serving as our chief executive officer. In addition, Mr. Weil received compensation from Realty Capital Securities during the period from our commencement of our operations following the issuance to us of Class A Units in the Original Operating Subsidiaries in connection with our initial public offering on June 10, 2013 to December 31, 2014. Specifically, in 2014, Mr. Weil earned cash compensation in the form of a stated commission rate calculated as a fixed percentage of sales of all products distributed by Realty Capital Securities through a compensation arrangement that was entered into prior to our initial public offering and that terminated in December 2014.

Brian D. Jones, in addition to serving as our chief financial officer, is employed by RCS Advisory Services, LLC (“RCS Advisory”), a subsidiary of our company, as the head of our investment banking division for which he receives a base salary. Mr. Jones receives no compensation from us for serving as chief financial officer.

Except as described above, none of our executive officers who are employed by RCS Capital Management receives any fees or compensation from us. Instead, we pay RCS Capital Management the quarterly and incentive fees described in “— Services Agreement” which RCS Capital Management uses in part to pay compensation to its officers and personnel and, during 2014, the performance-based awards described in “— 2013 Manager Multi-Year Outperformance Agreement.” We also compensate our directors, executive officers and employees with awards under our equity compensation plans. See “— Equity Compensation Plans.”

18


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation earned by our named executive officers for each of the last two completed fiscal years.

                 
                 
Name and principal position   Year   Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
awards
($)
  Option
awards
($)
  Nonequity
incentive plan
compensation
($)
  Nonqualified
deferred
compensation
earnings
($)
  All other
compensation
($)
  Total
($)
William M. Kahane;
Former Chief Executive Officer(1)
    2014                   514,570 (2)                        37,836 (3)      552,406  
    2013                                                  
Edward M. Weil, Jr.;
Chief Executive Officer(4)
    2014             140,400       133,587 (5)                        1,430,016 (6)      1,694,180  
    2013             104,200                               1,616,799 (6)      1,720,999  
Brian D. Jones;
Chief Financial Officer and
Assistant Secretary
    2014       325,000 (9)      2,400,000       3,577,993 (7)                        713,500 (8)      7,056,335  
    2013 (10)      297,917 (9)                                    296,000 (8)      593,917  
John H. Grady;
Chief Strategy and Risk Officer
    2014       500,000       500,000                               214,050 (11)      1,214,050  
    2013 (10)      279,452       171,875                               222,000 (11)      673,327  

(1) Mr. Kahane resigned as our chief executive officer on September 22, 2014.
(2) Represents 42,040 shares of Class A common stock issued in exchange for LTIP Units as the allocable portion of his share as a member of RCS Capital Management. See “Relationships and Related Party Transactions — LTIP Units.”
(3) Represents distributions on LTIP Units, which were equivalent to dividends on the Class A common stock.
(4) Mr. Weil was appointed as our chief executive officer on September 22, 2014. During the period from our commencement of our operations on June 10, 2013 to September 21, 2014, he served as our president, treasurer and secretary.
(5) Represents 10,914 shares of Class A common stock issued in exchange for LTIP Units as the allocable portion of his share as a member of RCS Capital Management. See “Relationships and Related Party Transactions — LTIP Units.”
(6) Reflects the amount of a commission calculated as a fixed percentage of sales of all products distributed by Realty Capital Securities for the period from our commencement of our operations on June 10, 2013 through December 2014, plus an additional $9,823 in 2014 representing distributions on LTIP Units, which were equivalent to dividends on the Class A common stock. The commission arrangement was entered into prior to our initial public offering and was terminated in December 2014.
(7) Represents 110,671 restricted shares of Class A common stock which vest in equal installments over four years as compensation in his role as the head of our investment banking division.
(8) Represents restricted stock awards granted by an entity that was previously a related party with vesting provisions related to continued employment with the Company for services performed on behalf of such entity, except for $39,842 in 2014 representing distributions on restricted shares of Class A common stock.
(9) Represents base salary paid to Mr. Jones by RCS Advisory in his capacity as head of our investment banking division. Mr. Jones was appointed as our chief financial officer in December 2013 but receives no compensation from us for serving as chief financial officer.
(10) For the period from our commencement of our operations on June 10, 2013 to December 31, 2013.
(11) Represents restricted stock awards granted by an entity that was previously a related party with vesting provisions related to continued employment with the Company for services performed on behalf of such entity.

19


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides certain information regarding Class A common stock authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2014:

     
Plan Category   Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
(a)(2)
  Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
(b)
  Number of
securities remaining
available for future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column (a))
(c)(3)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)     395,417     $ 18.46       6,581,286  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders                  
Total     395,417     $ 18.46       6,581,286  

(1) These plans consist of the RCAP Equity Plan and the 2014 Stock Purchase Program.
(2) Reflects warrants granted under the 2014 Stock Purchase Program. No options, warrants or rights have been granted under the RCAP Equity Plan.
(3) All of the securities remaining available for future issuance set forth in column (c) may be in the form of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, or other stock-based awards under the RCAP Equity Plan. These amounts give effect to 6,267,812 additional shares of Class A common stock that would have been available for future issuance subject to the filing of a Registration Statement on Form S-8.

Equity Plan

The RCAP Equity Plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares of Class A common stock, restricted stock units, dividend equivalent rights and other stock-based awards (which may include grants of shares of Class A common stock in payment of the amounts due under a plan or arrangement sponsored or maintained by our company or an affiliate) to individuals who are, as of the date of grant, non-executive directors, officers and other employees of our company or its affiliates, to certain advisors or consultants of our company or any of its affiliates who are providing services to our company or the affiliate, or, subject the services agreement (as defined below) remaining in effect on the date of grant, to RCS Capital Management and individuals who are, as of the date of grant, employees, officers or directors of RCS Capital Management or one of its affiliates. Our Board of Directors was initially responsible for all grants of awards under the RCAP Equity Plan, but, following an amendment to the RCAP Equity Plan in December 2014 permitting delegation of authority to a committee, the Board delegated the authority to make grants to our Compensation Committee. The maximum number of shares of Class A common stock that may be granted pursuant to awards under the RCAP Equity Plan was initially 250,000 shares of Class A common stock. Following any increase in the number of issued and outstanding shares of Class A common stock, the maximum number of shares of Class A common stock that may be granted pursuant to awards under the RCAP Equity Plan will be a number of shares of Class A common stock equal to the greater of (x) 250,000 shares and (y) 10% of the total number of issued and outstanding shares of Class A common stock (on a fully diluted basis) at any time following such increase (subject to the registration of the increased number of available shares). Pursuant to Registration Statements on Form S-8 filed on February 19, 2014 and January 9, 2015, a total of 6,980,124 shares of Class A common stock have been registered, of which 3,088,841 remained available to be granted pursuant to awards under the RCAP Equity Plan as of May 28, 2015. If we file additional Registration Statements on Form S-8 with respect to the current total number of issued and outstanding shares of Class A common stock (on a fully diluted basis) or subsequent increases, more shares of Class A common stock may be granted pursuant to awards under the RCAP Equity Plan.

Unless otherwise determined by our Board or a designated committee thereof and set forth in an individual award agreement, upon termination of an award recipient’s services to us, any then nonvested awards will be cancelled and forfeited without consideration. Upon a change in control of us (as defined under

20


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the RCAP Equity Plan), any award that was not previously vested will become fully vested and/or payable, and any performance conditions imposed with respect to the award will be deemed to be fully achieved; provided that with respect to an award that is subject to Section 409A of the Code, a change in control of us must constitute a “change of control” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code.

If a participant in the RCAP Equity Plan is subject to an excise tax on “parachute payments” under Section 280G of the Code as the result of any payments or benefits received by the participant in connection with a change in control of us (as defined under the RCAP Equity Plan), we will provide the participant with a gross-up payment, except that such gross-up payment will not be payable if the amount of the parachute payment exceeds the Section 280G threshold by 10% or less, in which case the amounts and benefits payable or to be provided to the participant will be subject to reduction to the extent necessary to avoid the excise tax if the participant would benefit from such reduction as opposed to paying the excise tax.

2014 Stock Purchase Program

Select employees, financial advisors and executive officers of the Company and its affiliates and of certain subsidiaries of the Company were eligible to participate in the 2014 Stock Purchase Program. Subject to the terms and conditions of the 2014 Stock Purchase Program, eligible individuals had the opportunity on September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014 to elect to purchase shares of Class A common stock and were automatically granted one warrant to purchase one share of Class A common stock for each three shares purchased. Each warrant granted gave the holder the right to purchase one additional share of Class A common stock at an exercise price equal to the purchase price per share purchased under the 2014 Stock Purchase Program, and will vest and become exercisable, subject to continuous service from the grant date to the three-year anniversary of the grant. Following such vesting on the three-year anniversary of the grant, such warrants may be exercised by the holder until the earliest of the 30th day following the date the holder’s service is terminated for any reason other than for cause and the 10-year anniversary of the issuance. Upon a termination of service for any reason, all outstanding nonvested warrants held by a warrant holder will expire and terminate immediately. Upon a termination of service for cause, all outstanding warrants, vested or nonvested, held by a warrant holder will expire and terminate immediately. The 2014 Stock Purchase Program was not intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the Code, and any warrants granted under the 2014 Stock Purchase Program were not intended to qualify as “incentive stock options” under Section 422 of the Code.

2014 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

During 2014, we issued restricted shares of our Class A common stock under the RCAP Equity Plan to Brian D. Jones, but not to William M. Kahane, Edward M. Weil, Jr. or John H. Grady. No options or warrants were granted to the named executive officers. The following tables set forth information with respect to all awards under the RCAP Equity Plan of restricted shares of our Class A common stock that have not vested for each of the named executive officers outstanding as of December 31, 2014.

   
Name   Number of
Restricted Shares of
Class A Common
Stock That Have
Not Vested

(#)
  Market Value of
Restricted Shares of
Class A Common
Stock That Have
Not Vested(2)
($)
William M. Kahane            
Edward M. Weil, Jr.            
Brian D. Jones(1)     110,671       1,354,613  
John H. Grady            

(1) The nonvested restricted shares of Class A common stock vest annually in four equal installments commencing on March 17, 2015, the first anniversary of the date of grant.
(2) Calculated based on $12.24 per share, the closing price of Class A common stock on December 31, 2014.

21


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Other Compensation Plans and Benefits

The Company also provides the named executive officers with a 401(k) plan, group health, and other insurance coverage. The Company also reimburses the named executive officers for all ordinary and necessary business expenses incurred in connection with performing their duties.

Services Agreement

Upon completion of our initial public offering in June 2013, we, together with the Original Operating Subsidiaries, entered into a management agreement with RCS Capital Management, which was amended and re-stated to change from a management agreement to a services agreement and to add RCS Holdings as a party in lieu of the Original Operating Subsidiaries on February 11, 2014 in connection with a series of concurrent and related corporate reorganization transactions undertaken by the Company (the “Restructuring Transactions”).

See “Relationships and Related Party Transactions — Services Agreement.”

2013 Manager Multi-Year Outperformance Agreement

We entered into the 2013 Manager Multi-Year Outperformance Agreement (the “OPP”) with RCS Capital Management in connection with our initial public offering in June 2013, and it was amended and restated in connection with the Restructuring Transactions in February 2014. It was amended again in April 2014, following which no additional LTIP Units may be earned under the OPP, and amended again in December 2014, following which no LTIP Units remained outstanding. See “Relationships and Related Party Transactions — LTIP Units.”

The OPP provided for a performance-based bonus award to RCS Capital Management intended to further align RCS Capital Management’s interests with those of our company and its stockholders.

Under the OPP, RCS Capital Management was issued LTIP Units in connection with our initial public offering in June 2013 with a maximum award value equal to approximately 5% of our initial market capitalization (the “OPP Cap”). LTIP Units originally represented units of equity ownership in each of Realty Capital Securities, ANST and RCS Advisory (the “Original Operating Subsidiaries”), and were structured as profits interests therein. In connection with the Restructuring Transactions, RCS Capital Management contributed to RCS Capital Holdings, LLC (“RCS Holdings”), an intermediate holding company we formed to own our operating subsidiaries, an aggregate of 3,975,000 LTIP Units in the Original Operating Subsidiaries (all of the 1,325,000 LTIP Units in each Original Operating Subsidiary) in exchange for 1,325,000 LTIP Units in RCS Holdings that are structured as profits interests therein.

Subject to the OPP Cap, RCS Capital Management was eligible to earn a number of LTIP Units under the OPP determined based on our achievement of total return to stockholders (“Total Return”), which included both share price appreciation and common stock dividends, as measured against a peer group of companies for the three-year performance period (the “Three-Year Period”) that commenced on June 4, 2013 (the “Commencement Date”), with valuation dates on which a portion of the LTIP Units up to a specified amount of the OPP Cap could be earned on the last day of each 12-month period during the Three-Year Period and the initial 24-month period of the Three-Year Period.

In April 2014, the OPP was amended in connection with the closing of the Cetera Acquisition and the acquisition by Luxor of an interest in RCS Capital Management, to provide that the first valuation date would be April 28, 2014 and that any LTIP Units in RCS Holdings not earned as of such date would be forfeited without payment of any compensation. Our Board of Directors determined that as of such valuation date, 310,947 LTIP Units in RCS Holdings were earned (the “Earned LTIP Units”) and 1,014,053 LTIP Units in RCS Holdings were forfeited. Following this amendment, no additional LTIP Units could be earned under the OPP.

In connection with this amendment of the OPP, we also entered into an agreement with RCS Capital Management and the Members (as defined under “Relationships and Related Party Transactions”) pursuant to which, immediately prior to the acquisition by Luxor of an interest in RCS Capital Management, RCS Capital Management distributed all of the 310,947 Earned LTIP Units to the Members pro rata in accordance with their respective percentage interests in RCS Capital Management as of immediately prior to the acquisition

22


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

by Luxor of an interest in RCS Capital Management. As holders of LTIP Units in RCS Holdings, each of the Members became a member of RCS Holdings as well as a party to the limited liability company agreement of RCS Holdings.

Subject to RCS Capital Management’s continued service through each vesting date, one-third of any Earned LTIP Units would have vested on each of the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the Commencement Date. Until such time as the LTIP Units were fully earned in accordance with the provisions of the OPP, the LTIP Units were entitled to distributions equal to 10% of the distributions on the Class A Units in RCS Holdings. The Earned LTIP Units were entitled to a catch-up distribution equal to approximately $0.3 million as a result of being earned and were entitled to their proportionate share of all distributions made on outstanding units of RCS Holdings from and after April 28, 2014. Under the OPP, at the time RCS Capital Management’s capital account with respect to the Earned LTIP Units became economically equivalent to the average capital account balance of the Class A Units and the Class C Units in RCS Holdings, and had been vested for 30 days, the Earned LTIP Units would automatically convert into Class C Units in RCS Holdings on a one-to-one basis. See “Relationships and Related Party Transactions — LTIP Units — Limited Liability Company Agreement of RCS Holdings.”

The OPP also provided for early calculation of the Earned LTIP Units and for their accelerated vesting in the event RCS Capital Management was terminated or in the event of a change in control, in either case prior to the end of the Three-Year Period. In the event RCS Capital Management was terminated or in the event of a change in our control on or following the end of the Three-Year Period, accelerated vesting of the Earned LTIP Units would still apply.

On December 31, 2014, we, RCS Capital Management, and RCS Holdings entered into another amendment to the OPP, which provided for the early vesting of all of the Earned LTIP Units such that all the Earned LTIP Units became fully vested on December 31, 2014.

Under the terms of the limited liability company agreement of RCS Holdings, LTIP Units in RCS Holdings automatically converted, upon vesting and after achieving economic equivalence with Class A Units in RCS Holdings (which had already been achieved), into Class C Units in RCS Holdings on a one-for-one basis. Accordingly, the Earned LTIP Units held by the Members automatically converted into Class C Units in RCS Holdings.

In connection with this amendment of the OPP, we also entered into a redemption and exchange agreement with RCS Holdings and the Members, pursuant to which the Members exchanged their Class C Units in RCS Holdings on a one-for-one basis for 310,947 shares of Class A common stock and all applicable notice and deliver waiting and notice periods were waived. Under the terms of the limited liability company agreement of RCS Holdings, a holder of Class C Units in RCS Holdings had the right to elect to convert Class C Units in RCS Holdings, on a one-for-one basis, into shares of Class A common stock, or, at our option, a cash equivalent.

As a result, as of December 31, 2014, no LTIP Units in RCS Holdings were outstanding and the Members were no longer members of RCS Holdings or parties to the limited liability company agreement of RCS Holdings.

As of December 31, 2014, RCS Capital Management is not entitled to receive any additional awards under the OPP.

23


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the period from January 1, 2014 to May 28, 2015, we were participants in several transactions, as described below, in which related parties had a direct or indirect material interest.

Services Agreement

Pursuant to the services agreement as amended and restated in connection with the Restructuring Transactions, RCS Capital Management provides strategic planning and consulting services to assist us, and our operating subsidiaries, in implementing our business strategy, as well as the business strategy of our operating subsidiaries, subject to oversight, directly or indirectly, by our Board of Directors. See “Management — Services Agreement.”

Such services may include advice concerning the performance of administrative functions, executive and administrative personnel, office space and office services, monitoring operating performance and assisting with tax filings and claims handling; provided, however, that RCS Capital Management may not provide any services for which registration as a broker-dealer, investment adviser or investment company would be required. RCS Capital Management has also agreed to provide us (but not our operating subsidiaries or RCS Holdings) with a management team, including a chief executive officer and president or similar positions, along with appropriate support personnel, who shall devote such of their time to us as necessary and appropriate, commensurate with the level of our activity from time to time. RCS Capital Management is at all times subject to the supervision and oversight of our Board of Directors.

RCS Capital Management is controlled and managed by Nicholas S. Schorsch, the former executive chairman of our Board of Directors, and William M. Kahane, our former chief executive officer. The other members of RCS Capital Management, which include two of our current directors, Messrs. Budko and Weil, along with a former director and Luxor, are passive, minority members, subject to certain minority consent rights held by Luxor. The members of RCS Capital Management (other than Luxor) are also the members of American Realty Capital and RCAP Holdings. RCS Capital Management, American Realty Capital and RCAP Holdings are controlled, directly or indirectly, by Messrs. Schorsch and Kahane.

RCAP Holdings beneficially owns the sole outstanding share of Class B common stock and thereby controls us, and is able to exercise control over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of our directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. Luxor also beneficially owns more than 5% of our Class A common stock.

The percentage beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock outstanding as of May 28, 2015 of each person who beneficially owns more than 5% of our Class A common stock and Luxor is set forth in “Stock Ownership by Directors, Officers and Certain Stockholders.”

Management Team

Pursuant to the terms of the services agreement, RCS Capital Management is required to provide us (but not our operating subsidiaries or RCS Holdings) our management team, including a chief executive officer and president or similar positions, along with appropriate support personnel, to provide the management services to be provided by RCS Capital Management to us.

RCS Capital Management is required to refrain from any action that, in its sole judgment made in good faith, would violate any law, rule or regulation of any governmental body or agency having jurisdiction over us or that would otherwise not be permitted by our certificate of incorporation or by-laws. If RCS Capital Management is ordered to take any action by our Board of Directors, RCS Capital Management will promptly notify the Board of Directors if it is RCS Capital Management’s judgment that such action violate any such law, rule or regulation or our certificate of incorporation or by-laws. RCS Capital Management, its directors, members, officers, stockholders, managers, personnel and employees and any person controlling or controlled by RCS Capital Management and any person providing sub-advisory services to RCS Capital Management will not be liable to us, our Board of Directors or our stockholders, partners or members, for any act or omission by RCS Capital Management, its directors, officers, stockholders or employees except as provided in the services agreement.

24


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Term and Termination

The services agreement may be amended or modified by agreement in writing by and among us, RCS Holdings and RCS Capital Management. The initial term of the services agreement expires on June 10, 2033. The services agreement will be deemed renewed automatically for successive five-year periods following the initial term. During the initial term, we, together with RCS Holdings, may terminate the services agreement only for cause. Cause is defined in the services agreement as:

RCS Capital Management’s continued breach of any material provision of the services agreement following a period of 30 days after written notice thereof (or 45 days after written notice of such breach if RCS Capital Management has taken steps to cure such breach within 30 days of the written notice);
the occurrence of certain events with respect to the bankruptcy or insolvency of RCS Capital Management, including an order for relief in an involuntary bankruptcy case or RCS Capital Management authorizing or filing a voluntary bankruptcy petition;
any change of control of RCS Capital Management which a majority of our independent directors determines is materially detrimental to us;
RCS Capital Management’s bad faith, willful misconduct or gross negligence; provided, however, that if such bad faith, willful misconduct or gross negligence is caused by an employee of RCS Capital Management or one of its affiliates and RCS Capital Management takes all necessary and appropriate action against such person and cures the damage caused by such actions within 30 days of RCS Capital Management’s knowledge of its commission, the services agreement shall not be terminable; and
the dissolution of RCS Capital Management.

Effective at the expiration of the initial 20-year term or any subsequent five-year renewal term, we, together with RCS Holdings, may terminate the services agreement “without cause” upon the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of our independent directors based upon: (1) RCS Capital Management’s unsatisfactory performance that is materially detrimental to us, or (2) our determination that the quarterly fees, incentive fees or performance-based awards payable to RCS Capital Management are not fair, subject to RCS Capital Management’s right to prevent termination based on unfair fees or awards by accepting a reduction of quarterly fees, incentive fees or awards agreed to by at least two-thirds of our independent directors. We will provide RCS Capital Management with 180 days’ prior notice of such a termination. RCS Capital Management may also decline to renew the services agreement at will by providing us with 180 days’ written notice.

Assignment

RCS Capital Management may assign the agreement in its entirety to any of its affiliates or delegate certain of its duties under the services agreement to any of its affiliates without the approval of our independent directors. Otherwise, an assignment by RCS Capital Management will require the approval of our independent directors.

We may not assign our rights or responsibilities under the services agreement without the prior written consent of RCS Capital Management, except in the case of assignment to another organization which is our successor, in which case such successor organization will be bound under the services agreement and by the terms of such assignment in the same manner as we are bound under the services agreement.

Quarterly and Incentive Fees

We and RCS Holdings pay RCS Capital Management a quarterly fee in an aggregate amount equal to 10% of our GAAP pre-tax income (if such amount is a positive number), calculated and payable quarterly in arrears, subject to our GAAP pre-tax income being positive for the current and preceding three calendar quarters.

25


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In addition, we and RCS Holdings pay RCS Capital Management an incentive fee, calculated and payable quarterly in arrears, that is based on our earnings and stock price. The incentive fee is an amount (if such amount is a positive number) equal to the difference between: (1) the product of (x) 20% and (y) the difference between (i) our Core Earnings, as defined below, for the previous 12-month period, and (ii) the product of (A) (X) the weighted average of the issue price per share (or deemed price per share) of our Class A common stock for all of our cash and non-cash issuances of Class A common stock from and after June 5, 2013 multiplied by (Y) the weighted average number of all shares of common stock outstanding (including any restricted shares of Class A common stock and any other shares of Class A common stock underlying awards granted under our RCAP Equity Plan) in the case of this clause (Y), in the previous 12-month period, and (B) 8.0%; and (2) the sum of any incentive fee paid to RCS Capital Management with respect to the first three calendar quarters of such previous 12-month period; provided, however, that no incentive fee is payable with respect to any calendar quarter unless our cash flows for the 12 most recently completed calendar quarters is greater than zero.

Core Earnings is a non-GAAP measure and is defined as the after-tax GAAP net income (loss) of RCS Capital Corporation, before the incentive fee, plus non-cash equity compensation expense, depreciation and amortization, any unrealized gains, losses or other non-cash items recorded in net income for the period, regardless of whether such items are included in other comprehensive income or loss, or in net income (loss). The amount may be adjusted to include one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and certain other non-cash charges after discussions between RCS Capital Management and our independent directors and after approval by a majority of our independent directors.

Quarterly fees were $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. No incentive fees were earned for the year ended December 31, 2014.

The quarterly fee and incentive fee of RCS Capital Management with respect to any quarter are calculated promptly after we file an Annual Report on Form 10-K (with respect to the fourth quarter) or Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q with the SEC with respect to such quarter, and such calculation must be promptly delivered to us. We and RCS Holdings pay the quarterly fee and incentive fee in cash within ten business days after delivery of the written statement of RCS Capital Management setting forth the computation of the quarterly fee and incentive fee for such month.

Services Provided to REITs Sponsored by American Realty Capital and Other Related Parties

We provide various non-traded REITs and other companies sponsored, co-sponsored or managed by American Realty Capital with wholesale distribution, investment banking, capital markets, transaction management, transfer agency and other services in connection with their operational activities and in connection with their pursuit, evaluation and execution of strategic alternatives.

Wholesale Distribution

Realty Capital Securities provides exclusive dealer manager services for affiliated and non-affiliated public, non-traded securities offerings, primarily for non-traded REITs, BDCs and registered investment company funds. These offerings are conducted on a “best efforts” or “reasonable best efforts” basis, such that a dealer manager is only required to use its good faith efforts and reasonable diligence to sell the shares and has no firm commitment or obligation to purchase any of the shares.

The majority of the offerings distributed by Realty Capital Securities relate to direct investment programs sponsored, co-sponsored or advised by our affiliate, American Realty Capital.

Realty Capital Securities also distributes American Realty Capital-sponsored open-end registered investment companies and closed-end registered investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act.

The commission and dealer manager fee rates are established jointly in a single contract negotiated with each individual issuer. We generally receive commissions of up to 7.0% of gross offering proceeds for funds raised by direct investment programs through the participating independent broker-dealer channel, all of which are reallowed as commissions, and up to 4.5% in connection with sales of open-end and up to 6.0% in

26


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

connection with sales of closed-end mutual funds sold by Realty Capital Securities in accordance with industry practices. We reallow all but 0.25% to 0.50% of the sales commission paid by investors to the selling broker.

We generally receive up to 3.0% of gross offering proceeds from the sale of common stock by direct investment programs as a dealer manager fee and also receive fees from the sale of common stock through registered investment advisers (“RIAs”). We have sole discretion as to reallowance of dealer manager fees to participating broker-dealers, based on such factors as the volume of shares sold and marketing support incurred by respective participating broker-dealers as compared to those of other participating broker-dealers.

We generally receive up to 50 basis points of the gross proceeds from the shares of the fund and also may receive fees from the shares of the funds from broker-dealers and RIAs.

During the period from January 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015, we earned $719.6 million in fees and commissions from these arrangements.

Transaction-Related Services

During the period from January 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015, we have provided the REITs, business development companies (“BDCs”) and other entities described below with investment banking, financial advisory and other services in connection with their mergers, acquisitions, listings and related activities and we acted as underwriter and placement agent and provided other capital market related services under agreements that provide for fees for services performed, fixed advisory fees and fixed fees due at the time of completion of a transaction.

At times during 2014, including when agreements were entered into or when transactions were pending or completed, certain of our directors and executive officers were also directors and executive officers of the REITs, BDCs and other entities involved in the transactions.

The entities and transactions for which agreements were entered into or which were pending or completed during the period from January 1, 2014 to April 29, 2015 are also described below.

BDCA.  BDCA is a business development company sponsored and advised by a subsidiary of American Realty Capital.
HCT.  HCT was a non-traded healthcare REIT sponsored and advised by a subsidiary of American Realty Capital until its acquisition by Ventas, Inc., a publicly traded healthcare REIT, which was completed on January 16, 2015. We provided services to HCT in connection with its listing on the NASDAQ, which was completed on April 7, 2014, and a related tender offer, as well as its subsequent sale to Ventas, Inc.
HTI.  HTI is a non-traded healthcare REIT sponsored and advised by a subsidiary of American Realty Capital. We are providing services to HTI in connection with its recently announced intention to list on the NASDAQ under the symbol, “HTI.”
AUMA.  AR Capital Acquisition Corporation (“AUMA”) is a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC, sponsored by a subsidiary of American Realty Capital.
NYRT.  NYRT is a publicly-traded REIT listed on the NYSE under the symbol “NYRT” sponsored and advised by a subsidiary of American Realty Capital. We provided services to NYRT in connection with its listing on the NYSE, which was completed on April 15, 2014, and a related tender offer. We also have been engaged by NYRT as a financial advisor in connection with its subsequent evaluation of strategic alternatives.
HOSP.  HOSP is a non-traded REIT sponsored and advised by a subsidiary of American Realty Capital focused on the North American hospitality sector. We provided services to HOSP in connection with its acquisition of a portfolio 116 hotel assets and related financing transactions, which were completed on February 27, 2015.

27


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ARC Energy.  AR Capital Energy Holdings, LLC (“ARC Energy”) is an entity under common ownership with American Realty Capital that is the external advisor to American Energy Capital Partners — Energy Recovery Program, LP, a direct investment program focused on the onshore oil and gas energy sector.
GNL.  GNL is a non-traded REIT sponsored and advised by a subsidiary of American Realty Capital. We are providing services to GNL in connection with its recently announced intention to list on the NYSE under the symbol, “GNL.”
AFIN.  American Realty Capital Trust V, Inc. (“AFIN”) is a non-traded REIT sponsored and advised by a subsidiary of American Realty Capital. We are providing services to AFIN in connection with its recently announced intention to list on the NYSE under the symbol, “AFIN.”
ARCP.  ARCP is a self-managed REIT listed on the NASDAQ, which was externally advised by an affiliate of American Realty Capital until it internalized its management January 8, 2014. In addition, during 2014, Nicholas Schorsch, who was our executive chairman until his resignation on December 29, 2014, was the chairman of the board of ARCP until his resignation on December 12, 2014. Following these resignations, ARCP is no longer a related party and there are no longer any related party transactions with ARCP. Pursuant to our binding term sheet with ARCP on December 4, 2014, we agreed with ARCP to work together in good faith to terminate any remaining transactions.

During the period from January 1, 2014 to December 2014, we provided services to ARCP in connection with four acquisition and sales transactions and we acted as underwriter and placement agent and provided structuring services in connection with various public and private offerings of debt securities, preferred stock and common stock for ARCP.

As of December 31, 2014, there were no on-going or pending transactions or relationships between ARCP and the Company.

ARCT IV.  Prior to its acquisition by ARCP in January 2014, ARCT IV was a non-traded REIT sponsored by American Realty Capital. We provided transaction management services to ARCT IV in connection with its acquisition by ARCP through a merger transaction, which was completed on January 3, 2014.

During the period from January 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015, we earned $77.8 million in fees, including reimbursement for out of pocket expenses, from agreements related to the services described above. These amounts do not include amounts paid on an hourly or flat rate basis under the transaction management services agreement described below under “— Transaction Management Services Agreement” or supervisory or service fees paid under the transfer agency services agreement described under “— Transfer Agency Services Agreement.”

Transaction Management Services Agreement

RCS Advisory is party to a transaction management services agreement with American Realty Capital, pursuant to which RCS Advisory provides American Realty Capital and its subsidiaries with transaction management services (including, without limitation, transaction management, compliance, due diligence, event coordination and marketing services among others), in connection with American Realty Capital’s performance of services for certain American Realty Capital-sponsored companies, including non-traded REITs, traded REITs and BDCs.

The agreement provides for an initial term of ten years, which commenced in connection with our initial public offering in June 2013, with automatic renewal for successive five-year periods, in each case unless either party provides written notice of non-renewal to the other party at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the term. In addition, the agreement will terminate upon the earlier to occur of: (i) American Realty Capital’s delivery to RCS Advisory of a notice of non-compliance with its obligations under the agreement and the failure of the parties to resolve the matters referred to in the non-compliance notice; and (ii) by a party impacted by a force majeure-related delay, if the force majeure results in performance being delayed by greater than 60 days.

28


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The service recipients pay RCS Advisory: (1) the hourly rates notified in writing by the chief financial officer of RCS Advisory to the chief financial officer of the service recipients on a quarterly basis, based on time incurred for the services billed at an hourly rate; and (2) at the flat rates notified in writing by the chief financial officer of RCS Advisory to the chief financial officer of the service recipients on a quarterly basis, based on services performed for the service recipients billed at a flat rate. RCS Advisory does not charge for personnel costs associated with any persons that they employ that are also employees of the service recipients. The compensation payable by the service recipients to RCS Advisory under the agreement for services rendered by RCS Advisory will not exceed then current market rates that could be obtained by the service recipients for the applicable services from unaffiliated third parties on an arm’s-length basis.

During the period from January 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015, we earned $26.4 million billed at an hourly or flat rate under the transaction management services agreement.

Transfer Agency Services Agreement

ANST is party to a transfer agency services agreement with certain American Realty Capital-sponsored companies, including non-traded REITs, traded REITs and BDCs, pursuant to which ANST provides such companies with transfer agency services (including broker and shareholder servicing, transaction processing, year-end IRS reporting and other services), and supervisory services overseeing the transfer agency services performed by a third-party transfer agent.

The agreement provides for an initial term of ten years, which commenced in connection with our initial public offering in June 2013, with the option to renew for unlimited successive one year terms upon the mutual consent of the parties. In addition, the agreement will terminate upon the delivery of 30 days’ written notice by (i) American Realty Capital to ANST of non-compliance with its obligations under the agreement; or (ii) by ANST upon a change of a control of American Realty Capital that would require disclosure under Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act.

A significant majority of the service recipients pay: (1) a monthly supervisory fee of $10,000 (subject to certain exceptions) in cash, for the first full month in which ANST is exclusively performing all the services under the agreement; and (2) from time to time, service fees in cash, based on the services provided per account serviced. ANST charges service recipients reasonable expenses incurred, on a monthly basis, in connection with the services provided under the agreement. The account service fees paid by the service recipients to ANST will increase annually in an amount no less than the annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index in New York, as reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Where a service recipient requests additional services to be provided which are not included under the agreement, these services will be compensated at customary rates as agreed upon by the service recipient and ANST.

During the period January 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015, ANST received $21.4 million under this agreement.

American Realty Capital Services Agreement

American Realty Capital is party to a services agreement with us, pursuant to which American Realty Capital and its subsidiaries provide our company and our subsidiaries with information technology, human resources and accounting services, among others, as well as office space. The agreement provides for an initial term of ten years, which commenced in June 2013, with automatic renewal for successive five-year periods, in each case unless either party provides written notice of non-renewal to the other party at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the term. In addition, the agreement will terminate upon the earlier to occur of: (i) delivery by us to American Realty Capital of a notice of non-compliance with its obligations under the agreement and the failure of the parties to resolve the matters referred to in the non-compliance notice; and (ii) by a party impacted by a force majeure-related delay, if the force majeure results in performance being delayed by greater than 60 days. We pay American Realty Capital: (1) the hourly rates notified in writing by the chief financial officer of American Realty Capital on a quarterly basis, based on time incurred for the services billed at an hourly rate; and (2) at the flat rates notified in writing by the chief financial officer of American Realty Capital on a quarterly basis, based on services performed billed at a flat rate. American Realty Capital does not charge for personnel costs associated with any persons that they employ that are also our employees. The compensation payable by us to American Realty Capital under the agreement for services rendered by

29


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Realty Capital will not exceed then current market rates that could be obtained by us or our operating subsidiaries for the applicable services from unaffiliated third parties on an arm’s-length basis.

During the period from January 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015, American Realty Capital received $6.5 million under this agreement.

Investment Research

Our investment research division, SK Research, LLC, provides due diligence services to various non-traded REITS and BDCs sponsored, co-sponsored or advised by American Realty Capital.

During the period from January 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015, SK Research, LLC received $3.7 million in fees for these services.

LTIP Units

During 2014, RCS Capital Management held LTIP Units in the Original Operating Subsidiaries and LTIP Units in RCS Holdings that were issued to it in 2013 pursuant to the OPP. See “Management — 2013 Manager Multi-Year Outperformance Agreement.”

February Amendment and Restatement

In February 2014, the OPP was amended and restated in connection with the Restructuring Transactions to, among other things, reflect that RCS Capital Management now held LTIP Units in RCS Holdings instead of LTIP Units in the Original Operating Subsidiaries.

Concurrently with this amendment and restatement, among other things:

we formed RCS Holdings;
we entered into an agreement with RCS Capital Management and RCS Holdings, pursuant to which we contributed to RCS Holdings all 26,499,999 Class A Units in each of the Original Operating Subsidiaries held by us in exchange for 26,499,999 Class A Units in RCS Holdings;
RCS Capital Management contributed to RCS Holdings an aggregate of 3,975,000 LTIP Units in the Original Operating Subsidiaries (all of the 1,325,000 LTIP Units in each Original Operating Subsidiary) in exchange for 1,325,000 LTIP Units in RCS Holdings;
the limited liability company agreements of each of the Original Operating Subsidiaries were amended and restated such that they only provided for classes of equity interests called “Class A Units” and “Class B Units” and no longer provided for classes of equity interests called “Class C Units” and “LTIP Units”; and
we effected certain other transactions described under “— The Exchanges.”

Limited Liability Company Agreement of RCS Holdings

Pursuant to the limited liability company agreement of RCS Holdings, we, as the managing member of RCS Holdings, control RCS Holdings’ affairs and decision making, and there are three classes of equity interests in RCS Holdings, called “Class A Units,” “Class C Units” and “LTIP Units.”

The Class A Units in RCS Holdings confer substantially all of the economic rights and all of the voting rights. The Class C Units have the same rights, privileges and obligations associated with Class A Units in RCS Holdings (other than voting) but are exchangeable for shares of Class A common stock on a one-to-one basis.

The LTIP Units in RCS Holdings had similar terms to the LTIP Units in the Original Operating Subsidiaries and were subject to vesting, forfeiture and restrictions on transfers as provided in the OPP, as amended in connection with the Restructuring Transactions. See “— February Amendment and Restatement.”

Until such time as the LTIP Units in RCS Holdings were fully earned in accordance with the provisions of the OPP, the LTIP Units in RCS Holdings were entitled to distributions equal to 10% of the distributions on Class A Units in RCS Holdings. After the LTIP Units in RCS Holdings were fully earned, they became

30


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

entitled to a catch-up distribution and then the same distributions as Class A Units in RCS Holdings. At the time RCS Capital Management’s capital account with respect to the LTIP Units in RCS Holdings became economically equivalent to the average capital account balance of the Class A Units and the Class C Units in RCS Holdings, and the LTIP Units had been earned and had been vested for 30 days, the LTIP Units in RCS Holdings automatically converted into Class C Units on a one-to-one basis.

April Amendment

In April 2014, the OPP was amended in connection with the closing of the Cetera acquisition and the acquisition by Luxor of an interest in RCS Capital Management, to provide that the first valuation date would be April 28, 2014 and that any LTIP Units in RCS Holdings not earned as of such date would be forfeited without payment of any compensation. Our Board of Directors determined that as of such valuation date, 310,947 Earned LTIP Units were earned and 1,014,053 LTIP Units in RCS Holdings were forfeited. Following this amendment, no additional LTIP Units may be earned under the OPP.

In connection with this amendment of the OPP, we also entered into an agreement with RCS Capital Management and the Members (as defined in “— December Amendment”) pursuant to which, immediately prior to the acquisition by Luxor of an interest in RCS Capital Management, RCS Capital Management distributed all of the 310,947 Earned LTIP Units to the Members pro rata in accordance with their respective percentage interests in RCS Capital Management as of immediately prior to the acquisition by Luxor of an interest in RCS Capital Management. As holders of LTIP Units in RCS Holdings, each of the Members became a member of RCS Holdings as well as a party to the limited liability company agreement of RCS Holdings.

December Amendment

On December 31, 2014, we, RCS Capital Management, and RCS Holdings entered into another amendment to the OPP, which provided for the early vesting of all of the Earned LTIP Units such that all the Earned LTIP Units became fully vested on December 31, 2014.

Under the terms of the limited liability company agreement of RCS Holdings, LTIP Units in RCS Holdings automatically converted, upon vesting and after achieving economic equivalence with Class A Units in RCS Holdings (which had already been achieved), into Class C Units in RCS Holdings on a one-for-one basis. Accordingly, the Earned LTIP Units held by the Members automatically converted into Class C Units in RCS Holdings. Under the terms of the limited liability company agreement of RCS Holdings, a holder of Class C Units in RCS Holdings had the right to elect to convert Class C Units in RCS Holdings, on a one-for-one basis, into shares of Class A common stock, or, at our option, a cash equivalent.

In connection with this amendment of the OPP, we also entered into a redemption and exchange agreement with RCS Holdings and the Members, pursuant to which the Members exchanged their Class C Units in RCS Holdings on a one-for-one basis for 310,947 shares of Class A common stock and all applicable notice and deliver waiting and notice periods were waived.

As a result, on December 31, 2014, the members of RCS Capital Management (other than Luxor) (the “Members”) received shares of Class A common stock as follows: (i) 174,193 shares to Mr. Schorsch; (ii) 42,040 shares to Mr. Kahane; (iii) 50,995 shares to Mr. Budko; (iv) 10,914 shares to Mr. Weil; (v) 23,445 shares to Mr. Schorsch’s spouse; and (vi) 9,360 shares to Mr. Block, a former director. On December 31, 2014, the closing price of Class A common stock on the NYSE was $12.24 per share. Moreover, no LTIP Units in RCS Holdings were outstanding and the Members were no longer members of RCS Holdings or parties to the limited liability company agreement of RCS Holdings.

The Exchanges

In connection with our initial public offering, we entered into an exchange agreement with RCAP Holdings under which RCAP Holdings had the right, from time to time, to exchange units consisting of one Class B Unit in each of the Original Operating Subsidiaries (each, an “Original Operating Subsidiaries Unit”) for shares of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis.

31


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

On February 11, 2014 in connection with the Restructuring Transactions, the exchange agreement was amended so as to permit an exchange by RCAP Holdings of its Original Operating Subsidiaries Units for shares of our Class A common stock thereunder to be treated as a contribution by RCAP Holdings of its equity interests in each of the Original Operating Subsidiaries to us in a transaction intended to qualify as tax-free under Section 351 of the Code.

Immediately following this amendment, RCAP Holdings exchanged all of its Original Operating Subsidiaries Units except for one Original Operating Subsidiaries Unit for a total of 23,999,999 shares of Class A common stock.

Pursuant to our certificate of incorporation then in effect, a share of Class B common stock could not be transferred, except in connection with an exchange of an Original Operating Subsidiaries Unit for a share of our Class A common stock pursuant to the exchange agreement. Further, an Original Operating Subsidiaries Unit could not be exchanged for a share of our Class A common stock under the exchange agreement without the corresponding share of our Class B common stock being delivered together at the time of exchange, at which time, such Class B common stock would be automatically cancelled.

Accordingly, concurrently with the exchange of Original Operating Subsidiary Units described above all but one of the outstanding shares of Class B common stock, all of which were held by RCAP Holdings, were cancelled.

In July 2014, following receipt of stockholder approval, we amended our certificate of incorporation, and, in August 2014, we amended the exchange agreement. Following these amendments, corresponding shares of Class B common stock were no longer required to be cancelled in connection with any exchange of Original Operating Subsidiaries Units for shares of Class A common stock.

Subsequently, the remaining Original Operating Subsidiaries Unit owned by RCAP Holdings was exchanged for one share of Class A common stock, which was not issued as RCAP Holdings waived the right to receive it.

Following this exchange, no more Original Operating Subsidiaries Units are outstanding.

Registration Rights Agreement

In connection with our initial public offering, we entered into a registration rights agreement with RCAP Holdings and RCS Capital Management pursuant to which we granted (i) RCAP Holdings, its affiliates and certain of its transferees the right, under certain circumstances and subject to certain restrictions, to require us to register under the Securities Act shares of our Class A common stock issuable upon exchange of the Original Operating Subsidiaries Units held or acquired by them; and (ii) RCS Capital Management, its affiliates and certain of its transferees the right, under certain circumstances and subject to certain restrictions, to require us to register under the Securities Act any equity-based awards granted to RCS Capital Management under the RCAP Equity Plan.

Under the registration rights agreement, the shareholders party thereto have the right to request us to register the sale of their shares and also may require us to make available shelf registration statements, at such time as we may be eligible to file shelf registration statements, permitting sales of shares into the market from time to time over an extended period. In addition, the agreement gives the shareholders party thereto the ability to exercise certain piggyback registration rights in connection with registered offerings requested by the shareholders party thereto or initiated by us.

Tax Receivable Agreement

We are party to a tax receivable agreement with RCAP Holdings requiring us to pay to RCAP Holdings 85% of the amount of the reduction, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax liabilities that we realize (or are deemed to realize upon an early termination of the tax receivable agreement or a change of control, both discussed below) as a result of the increases in tax basis, if any, created by RCAP Holdings’ exchanges described below. For purposes of the tax receivable agreement, reductions in tax liabilities will be computed by comparing our actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that we would otherwise have been required to pay had there been no increase to the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of each of the Original Operating Subsidiaries. The term of the tax receivable agreement will continue until all

32


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

such tax benefits have been utilized or expired, unless we exercise our right to terminate the tax receivable agreement early. If we exercise our right to terminate the tax receivable agreement early, we will be obligated to make an early termination payment to RCAP Holdings, or its transferees, based upon the net present value (based upon certain assumptions and deemed events set forth in the tax receivable agreement, including the assumption that we would have enough taxable income in the future to fully utilize the tax benefit resulting from any increased tax basis that results from each exchange and that any Original Operating Subsidiaries Units that RCAP Holdings, or its transferees, own on the termination date are deemed to be exchanged on the termination date) of all payments that would be required to be paid by us under the tax receivable agreement. If certain change of control events were to occur, we would be obligated to make payments to RCAP Holdings using certain assumptions and deemed events similar to those used to calculate an early termination payment.

The actual increase in tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the tax receivable agreement, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of exchanges, the price of our Class A common stock at the time of an exchange, the extent to which such exchanges are taxable, the amount and timing of our income and the tax rates then applicable.

Payments under the tax receivable agreement would be expected to give rise to certain additional tax benefits attributable to further increases in basis or, in certain circumstances, in the form of deductions for imputed interest. Any such benefits are covered by the tax receivable agreement and will increase the amounts due thereunder. In addition, the tax receivable agreement provides for interest accrued from the due date (without extensions) of the corresponding tax return to the date of payment specified by the agreement.

Although we are not aware of any issue that would cause the IRS to challenge a tax basis increase, we will not be reimbursed for any payments previously made under the tax receivable agreement in excess of our cash tax savings.

It is the intention of the parties to the exchanges of Original Operating Subsidiaries Units for Class A common stock described under “— The Exchanges” that these exchanges, as part of an overall plan to restructure our ownership that includes them, the Underwritten Public Offering (as defined in “— Sale of Class A Common Stock by RCAP Holdings in the Underwritten Public Offering.”), the Cetera Financings (as defined in “— The Cetera Financings”) and the completion of certain acquisitions we entered into in 2014 that have subsequently been completed, qualify as a tax-free contribution to us under Section 351 of the Code. If the exchange by RCAP Holdings qualifies as a tax-free contribution to us, under Section 351 of the Code we would obtain carryover tax basis in the tangible and intangible assets of the Original Operating Subsidiaries connected with such Original Operating Subsidiaries Units. As there will be no increase in tax basis created if the exchange qualifies as a tax-free Section 351 contribution, there will be no reductions in our tax liability, and as such we would not be required to make any payments under the tax receivable agreement. However, if the exchange were treated as a taxable transaction, each of the Original Operating Subsidiaries intends to have an election under Section 754 of the Code which would result in us receiving a step up in the tax basis of tangible and intangible assets of the Original Operating Subsidiaries with respect to such Original Operating Subsidiaries Units acquired by us in such exchanges. This increase in tax basis is likely to increase (for tax purposes) depreciation and amortization allocable to us from each of the Original Operating Subsidiaries and therefore reduce the amount of income tax we would otherwise be required to pay in the future. This increase in tax basis may also decrease gain (or increase loss) on future dispositions of certain capital assets to the extent increased tax basis is allocated to those capital assets.

The Cetera Financings

In order to complete the Cetera Acquisition, we concurrently entered into a series of financing arrangements (the “Cetera Financings”) pursuant to certain commitments received on January 16, 2014 from Luxor and certain banks, including Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”) and Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”) and other lenders, in connection with the signing of the merger agreement pursuant to which we acquired Cetera.

33


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RCAP Holdings, Luxor, the Members and certain of our other related parties had direct or indirect interests in the Cetera Financings, and certain of the other transactions, arrangements and relationships related thereto, as described in more detail below.

The Bank Facilities

Concurrently with the closing of the Cetera Acquisition on April 29, 2014, we entered into the following facilities with Barclays and Bank of America: (i) a $575.0 million in original principal amount senior secured first lien term loan facility (the “First Lien Term Facility”), having a term of five years; (ii) a $150.0 million in original principal amount senior secured second lien term loan facility, having a term of seven years, (the “Second Lien Term Facility”); and (iii) a $25.0 million senior secured first lien revolving credit facility having a term of three years (the “Revolving Facility” and, together with the First Lien Term Facility and the Second Lien Term Facility, the “Bank Facilities”).

Our obligations under the Bank Facilities are guaranteed, subject to certain exceptions, by RCS Capital Management, RCAP Holdings and each of our direct or indirect domestic subsidiaries that are not SEC-registered broker-dealers. We, together with the guarantors, have pledged substantially all of our assets to secure the Bank Facilities, subject to certain exceptions. The assets of RCAP Holdings subject to this pledge include the sole outstanding share of our Class B common stock. Accordingly, an event of default under the Bank Facilities and operation of the pledge with respect to the sole outstanding share of our Class B common stock could give rise to a change in control of our company. See “Stock Ownership by Directors, Officers and Certain Stockholders.”

In addition, the Bank Facilities provided for an event of default if an amount sufficient to repay the First Allied Notes (as defined under “— The First Allied Contribution”) was not deposited in a special escrow by August 27, 2014, and, on June 9, 2014, we deposited $26.0 million into the special escrow in satisfaction of this obligation. The Bank Facilities also provided for an event of default if First Allied did not repay the outstanding First Allied Indebtedness (as defined under “— The First Allied Contribution”) by July 28, 2014, on which date the Company repaid the outstanding First Allied Indebtedness including principal, unpaid interest and fees totaling $32.0 million.

As of April 29, 2015, $553.4 million was outstanding under the First Lien Term Facility and the interest rate was 6.5% per annum, $150.0 million was outstanding under the Second Lien Term Facility and the interest rate was 10.50% per annum, and $23.0 million was outstanding under the Revolving Facility and the interest rate was 7.75% per annum.

During the period from April 29, 2014 to April 29, 2015, we paid $21.6 million in principal and $49.3 million in interest under the Bank Facilities.

Assignment of Debt of RCAP Holdings to American Realty Capital

On September 25, 2013, to finance part of the cash merger consideration paid by RCAP Holdings to acquire First Allied Holdings Inc. (“First Allied”), $40.0 million was borrowed by RCAP Holdings from Bank of America (the “Original FA Acquisition Indebtedness”), which was secured by a pledge of substantially all the assets and equity interests then owned by RCAP Holdings (including shares of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock held by RCAP Holdings), American Realty Capital and certain subsidiaries of American Realty Capital.

On April 28, 2014, in connection with our and RCAP Holdings’ entry into the Bank Facilities and the completion of the Cetera Acquisition, the Original FA Acquisition Indebtedness was refinanced to remove RCAP Holdings as an obligor and to add American Realty Capital, which had been a guarantor under the Original FA Acquisition Indebtedness, as the borrower. The refinanced indebtedness is otherwise on substantially similar terms as the Original FA Acquisition Indebtedness, including the same principal amount and the same maturity.

As a condition of this refinancing, RCAP Holdings transferred to a special purpose entity 11,200,000 shares of Class A common stock which were then used to secure American Realty Capital’s obligation under the indebtedness.

34


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Following closing on April 28, 2014, $40.0 million in indebtedness was outstanding, all of which had been repaid as of the closing date. This indebtedness matured on September 25, 2015 and bore interest at 6.5% per annum. American Realty Capital paid $0.1 million in interest.

The First Allied Reimbursement Agreement

In connection with the Bank Facilities, we entered into a reimbursement agreement with RCAP Holdings dated as of April 28, 2014.

The Bank Facilities provided for an event of default if an amount sufficient to repay the First Allied Notes was not deposited in a special escrow by August 27, 2014.

On June 9, 2014, we deposited $26.0 million into the special escrow in satisfaction of this obligation.

On November 25, 2014, RCAP Holdings deposited $24.0 million into the special escrow account, which was an amount sufficient to satisfy the then outstanding obligations under the First Allied Notes. Simultaneously, the Company’s obligations with respect to the special escrow account were terminated.

The reimbursement agreement provided that the amount deposited in the special escrow by us in June 2014 could have been released by RCAP Holdings to repay its obligations under the First Allied Notes. In addition, RCAP Holdings would have been required to reimburse us for any amounts released by RCAP Holdings from the special escrow in connection with repaying RCAP Holdings’ obligations under the First Allied Notes. The reimbursement agreement also provided that if RCAP Holdings failed to reimburse us within five business days, interest would have accrued at LIBOR plus the Applicable Margin for Term Loans (each, as defined in the Bank Facilities) until the reimbursed amounts were repaid in full.

The Luxor Transactions

On January 16, 2014, Luxor committed to purchase certain securities to be issued by us as part of the Cetera Financings pursuant to a commitment letter by and among Luxor, us, RCAP Holdings and RCS Capital Management (the “Luxor Commitment”).

On April 29, 2014, as part of the Cetera Financings and as contemplated in the Luxor Commitment, we, RCAP Holdings and Luxor entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “SPA”), pursuant to which we issued and sold to Luxor in private placements: (i) $120.0 million (face amount) of 5.00% Senior Convertible Notes due 2021 (“Convertible Notes”) at a price of $666.67 per $1,000 of par value (for gross proceeds to us upon issuance of $80.0 million); and (ii) 14,657,980 shares of Series A Preferred Stock having an aggregate initial liquidation preference $270.0 million, at a price of 88.89% of the liquidation preference per share (for gross proceeds to us upon issuance of $240.0 million).

Concurrently with the entry into the SPA on April 29, 2014 and also as contemplated by the Luxor Commitment, Luxor purchased a percentage of the membership interests in RCS Capital Management (the “Luxor Percentage Interest”), and entered into a related put & call agreement (the “Put/Call Agreement”) with us and the Members.

Concurrently with the closing of the Underwritten Public Offering on June 10, 2014, Luxor completed the financing transactions contemplated by the Luxor Commitment when it purchased 2,469,136 shares of Class A common stock (the “Luxor Common Stock”) at $20.25 per share, the same price as shares sold in the Underwritten Public Offering, for an aggregate amount of $50.0 million in a private placement pursuant to the SPA.

See “— Sale of Class A Common Stock by RCAP Holdings in the Underwritten Public Offering.”

We paid certain premiums, fees and expenses to Luxor consisting of approximately $17.7 million in connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes and Series A Preferred Stock and approximately $2.3 million in connection with the issuance of the Luxor Common Stock.

The Convertible Notes

The Convertible Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated April 29, 2014 (as amended by supplemental indentures on May 5, 2014, July 23, 2014 and January 30, 2015, the “Indenture”) by and between us and Wilmington Trust, N.A. The Convertible Notes are our senior unsecured obligations, but they

35


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

are subordinate to the Bank Facilities and any refinancing thereof. The Convertible Notes are convertible at the option of the holder, and to the extent permitted by the Bank Facilities, into shares of our Class A common stock, at a conversion price equal to $21.18 per share of Class A common stock, which conversion price is subject to anti-dilution adjustments upon the occurrence of certain events and transactions. The Convertible Notes mature on November 1, 2021 and bear interest at a rate of 5.00% per annum.

The Convertible Notes contain customary events of default and negative covenants, including limitations on incurrence of indebtedness, liens, investments, restricted payments (with similar, but less restrictive, exceptions as the Bank Facilities), asset dispositions, acquisitions and transactions with affiliates. The Convertible Notes are not redeemable by us prior to their maturity date.

The ownership limitations contained in the Indenture are the same as those contained in the Series C Preferred Stock and the Put/Call Agreement. See “— The Luxor Securities Exchange Agreement —  Ownership Limitations.”

As of May 28, 2015, without giving effect to these ownership limitations, 5,665,722 shares of our Class A common stock would be issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes.

During the period from April 29, 2014 to April 29, 2015, we paid no principal and $5.5 million in interest on the Convertible Notes.

Series A Preferred Stock

While they were outstanding, the shares of Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to a quarterly dividend of 7% of the liquidation preference in cash and a dividend of 8% of the liquidation preference if a quarterly dividend was not paid in cash on the dividend payment date. The shares of Series A Preferred Stock were convertible, at the option of the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, into shares of Class A common stock, at the lower of (i) a 2% discount to the volume-weighted average price (“VWAP”) of Class A common stock for the ten trading days prior to the date of the holder’s election to convert; (ii) a 2% discount to the closing price of Class A common stock on the date of the holder’s election to convert; and (iii) $20.26, the fixed conversion price. The fixed conversion price was subject to anti-dilution adjustments upon the occurrence of certain events and transactions. If both the one-day VWAP and the daily closing price of Class A common stock for the prior 30 consecutive trading days exceeded 2.5 times the fixed conversion price, or $50.65, and at least $10.0 million of Class A common stock was traded each day for 30 consecutive days at any time after April 29, 2016, or two years from the issuance date of the Series A Preferred Stock, then we may have required the holders to convert the Series A Preferred Stock into shares of Class A common stock at the same price as set forth above. Accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock were also entitled to the same liquidation preference and were convertible into additional shares of Class A common stock on the same terms as actual shares of Series A Preferred Stock.

The terms of the Series A Preferred Stock set forth in the related certificate of designation include voting rights relating to the issuance of additional preferred securities, amending the provisions of the related certificate of designation, affiliate transactions and the incurrence of indebtedness.

For so long as Luxor owned at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to elect one independent director and designate one observer to our Board of Directors. In connection with the Luxor Commitment, Jeffrey Brown was appointed to our Board of Directors in February 2014. Luxor has declined to exercise its right to appoint a board observer.

In addition, for so long as Luxor owned at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock were also entitled to appoint an additional director if and whenever at any time or times there was a bankruptcy event or an acceleration of our outstanding obligations under our senior credit facilities and if, after April 29, 2016, we were more than 18 months in arrears on the payment of dividends.

36


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

On November 18, 2014 and December 12, 2014, 3,073,553 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock, together with accrued dividends thereon, were submitted for conversion, and on December 10, 2014, December 19, 2014 and February 23, 2015, 5,405,601 shares of Class A common stock were issued on account of such conversions.

On December 19, 2014, Luxor exchanged the remaining 11,584,427 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for 5,800,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock and 4,400,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock. $3.0 million of accrued and unpaid dividends on Series A Preferred Stock through December 12, 2014, the date of submission for conversion, were proportionately added to the amount of dividends due on the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock on January 12, 2015, the first dividend payment date. See “— The Luxor Securities Exchange Agreement.”

The Luxor Percentage Interest in RCS Capital Management

Concurrently with entering into the SPA in April 2014, Luxor purchased the Luxor Percentage Interest, which was 23.5% of the membership interests in RCS Capital Management, for $15.3 million. The Luxor Percentage Interest was reduced to 19.46% following the completion of the Underwritten Public Offering based on the gross proceeds we received from the Underwritten Public Offering.

We also entered into the Put/Call Agreement with Luxor and the Members, which was amended in December 2014 in connection with the exchange of the Series A Preferred Stock for Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock. See “— The Luxor Securities Exchange Agreement.”

Pursuant to the Put/Call Agreement, (i) we will have the right, commencing on the earlier of December 29, 2016 or the occurrence of a change of control of Luxor, to repurchase the Luxor Percentage Interest from Luxor in exchange for its fair market value (as determined by us and Luxor pursuant to the Put/Call Agreement) in shares of our Class A common stock (or, at our election, a cash equivalent); and (ii) Luxor currently has the right (the “Luxor Put”) to require us to purchase the Luxor Percentage Interest in exchange for a number of shares of our Class A common stock (or, at our election, a cash equivalent) that is equal to 15% multiplied by the then existing Luxor Percentage Interest multiplied by the then outstanding number of shares of our Class A common stock (assuming the conversion immediately prior thereto of the then outstanding Convertible Notes and Series C Preferred Stock).

The Put/Call Agreement also provides that the Members may elect to purchase all of the Luxor Percentage Interest offered to us upon exercise of the Luxor Put or our call right for an amount equal to the value of the Class A common stock required to be delivered by us for cash, shares of our Class A common stock or a combination thereof. If we are prohibited by the Bank Facilities from purchasing the Luxor Percentage Interest, the Members will be required to purchase the Luxor Percentage Interest under the same terms.

The ownership limitations contained in the Put/Call Agreement are the same as those contained in the Series C Preferred Stock and the Indenture. See “— The Luxor Securities Exchange Agreement — Ownership Limitations”.

As of May 28, 2015, without giving effect to these ownership limitations, 2,673,334 shares of our Class A common stock would be issuable upon exercise of the Luxor Put.

Registration Rights

Pursuant to the SPA, we agreed to file with the SEC a continuously effective resale registration statement with respect to the Luxor Common Stock, the Convertible Notes, the Series A Preferred Stock and shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes and the Series A Preferred Stock and upon the exercise of the Luxor Put or other rights under the Put/Call Agreement. A Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-197148) in fulfillment of this obligation was filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014 and became effective on July 16, 2014.

37


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Other Agreements with Luxor

We, and certain of our affiliates, have also entered into certain other agreements with Luxor in connection with the Luxor Commitment, some of which are described below.

Restrictive covenants.  RCAP Holdings, RCS Capital Management and the Members entered into a restrictive covenants agreement with Luxor pursuant to which the Members agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to compete with or solicit employees from us for a period of two years from the date of the Luxor Commitment, or until January 16, 2016, subject to certain termination events.
Corporate reorganization.  RCAP Holdings and the Members agreed with Luxor to use their reasonable best efforts to cause us to undertake a corporate reorganization whereby RCAP Holdings will: (i) contribute its equity interest in First Allied to us (which occurred in June 2014 through the completion of the First Allied Contribution described below under “— First Allied Contribution”); (ii) exchange substantially all of its membership interests in all our subsidiaries for our Class A common stock (which occurred in February 2014 as described under “— The Exchanges”); and (iii) agree to the cancellation of all of our Class B common stock owned by it, except that it will be permitted to retain a nominal amount of our Class B common stock (which occurred in February 2014 as described under “— The Exchanges”).
Class B Common Stock Repurchase.  RCAP Holdings and the Members agreed with Luxor to use their reasonable best efforts to cause the rights of our Class B common stock to be amended to allow us, at any time after July 1, 2016, to redeem any outstanding Class B common stock owned by RCAP Holdings for $50.0 million in cash, subject to proportionate increase if the market price of our Class A common stock is above $30.00 per share, although we would be prohibited from doing so by the restricted payments covenant contained in the Bank Facilities currently in effect. Any such redemption would also be subject to our obtaining the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding Class A common stock.

The Member Commitment

On January 16, 2014, we entered into a commitment letter (the “Member Commitment”) with Messrs. Schorsch, Kahane, Budko, Weil and Block (the “Committed Members”). Under the Member Commitment, the Committed Members committed to purchase, in a private offering, and at the same price as the shares sold in any well-marketed, underwritten public offering, $10.0 million of our Class A common stock from us.

The Member Commitment also provided for an additional equity commitment related to the Luxor Common Stock. The Committed Members agreed that that if, prior to the closing of the Cetera Acquisition, (i) we did not complete a well-marketed, underwritten public offering, or (ii) Luxor purchased less than $50.0 million of Luxor Common Stock, the Committed Members would purchase additional shares of our Class A common stock such that the combined net proceeds to us from the Luxor Common Stock and the additional equity commitment would be at least $50.0 million.

The proceeds from these financings would have been used by us to pay a portion of the consideration to be paid in the Cetera Acquisition. The Member Commitment was not required to complete the Cetera Financings at the closing of the Cetera Acquisition, however, and we did not call on the Member Commitment.

On April 29, 2014, the Luxor Commitment was amended to remove the condition to Luxor’s commitment to purchase the Luxor Common Stock that RCAP Holdings was required to concurrently purchase, in a private offering, and at the same price as the shares sold in any well-marketed, underwritten public offering, $10.0 million of our Class A common stock, and RCAP Holdings did not purchase any additional shares of our Class A common stock in connection with the Underwritten Public Offering (defined under “— Sale of Class A Common Stock by RCAP Holdings in the Underwritten Public Offering”).

Sale of Class A Common Stock by RCAP Holdings in the Underwritten Public Offering

On June 10, 2014, RCAP Holdings sold 5,000,000 shares of Class A common stock at a public offering price of $20.25 per share, less underwriting discounts and commissions of $1.215 per share (the “Underwritten Public Offering”) pursuant to an underwriting agreement dated June 4, 2014, between

38


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RCAP Holdings and our company, on the one hand, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Barclays Capital Inc., for themselves and as representatives of the other underwriters named in the agreement, on the other hand.

We also sold 19,000,000 shares of Class A common stock in the Underwritten Public Offering at the same price pursuant to the same underwriting agreement using the same underwriters.

The Luxor Securities Exchange Agreement

On December 12, 2014, we entered into a Securities Exchange Agreement (the “SEA”) with Luxor contemplating the exchange of all outstanding Series A Preferred Stock for shares of Series B Preferred Stock and shares of Series C Preferred Stock.

Concurrently with and as contemplated by the SEA, 2,171,553 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock were submitted for conversion in accordance with the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock.

On December 19, 2014, we issued 5,800,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock and 4,400,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock to Luxor in exchange for 11,584,427 outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, having an aggregate liquidation preference of $213.4 million, then held by Luxor.

The Series B Preferred Stock had an aggregate initial liquidation preference of $145.0 million and the Series C Preferred Stock had an aggregate initial liquidation preference of $110.0 million. Because dividends have not been paid in cash through the March 31, 2015 dividend payment date, the Series B Preferred Stock had an aggregate liquidation preference of $151.9 million and the Series C Preferred Stock had an aggregate liquidation preference of $113.9 million.

The Series B Preferred Stock ranks pari passu with the Series C Preferred Stock.

Under the SEA, we agreed to file with the SEC a continuously effective resale registration statement by February 2, 2015 with respect to the Series B Preferred Stock, the Series C Preferred Stock and the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock. A Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333- 201763) in fulfillment of this obligation was filed with the SEC on January 30, 2015 and became effective on February 12, 2015.

Series B Preferred Stock

On December 19, 2014, we issued 5,800,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock to Luxor. If paid in cash, dividends on shares of Series B Preferred Stock accrue quarterly at 11.00% per annum of the liquidation preference. To the extent a quarterly dividend is not paid in cash on the applicable dividend payment date, then such dividend not paid in cash for such period will accrue at 12.50% per annum of the liquidation preference.

The initial liquidation preference of shares of Series B Preferred Stock was $25.00 per share. Any dividends that are not paid in cash on an applicable dividend payment date are automatically added to the aggregate liquidation preference on such applicable dividend payment date.

The holders of Series B Preferred Stock have no conversion rights.

At any time prior to June 12, 2016, we have the right to redeem all (and not less than all) of the outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock for cash at a redemption price equal to the aggregate liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends from the date immediately following the immediately preceding dividend payment date to the date of redemption.

Starting on December 12, 2022, we will have a right to redeem, and holders of shares of Series B Preferred Stock will have a right to cause us to redeem, all or a part of the outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock for cash at a redemption price equal to the aggregate liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends from the date immediately following the immediately preceding dividend payment date to the date of redemption. If any redemption by us would result in less than $35.0 million in aggregate liquidation preference of Series B Preferred Stock remaining outstanding, then we will be required to redeem all (and not less than all) of the outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock.

39


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The shares of Series B Preferred Stock are also redeemable in connection with a consolidation or merger of our company with one or more entities that are not its affiliates which results in a change of control and as a result of which our company is not the surviving entity.

The terms of the Series B Preferred Stock set forth in the related certificate of designation include voting rights relating to the issuance of additional preferred securities, amending the provisions of the related certificate of designation, affiliate transactions and the incurrence of indebtedness.

Series C Preferred Stock

On December 19, 2014, we issued 4,400,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock to Luxor. If paid in cash, dividends on shares of Series C Preferred Stock accrue quarterly at 7.00% per annum of the liquidation preference. To the extent a quarterly dividend is not paid in cash on the applicable dividend payment date, then such dividend not paid in cash for such period will accrue at 8.00% per annum of the liquidation preference.

The initial liquidation preference of shares of Series C Preferred Stock was $25.00 per share. Any dividends that are not paid in cash on an applicable dividend payment date are automatically added to the aggregate liquidation preference on such applicable dividend payment date.

The shares of Series C Preferred Stock are convertible, at the option of the holders of the Series C Preferred Stock, into shares of Class A common stock at $13.00, which conversion price is subject to anti-dilution adjustments upon the occurrence of certain events and transactions. If both the one-day VWAP and the daily closing price of Class A common stock for the prior 30 consecutive trading days exceeds $50.66 and at least $10.0 million of Class A common stock is traded each day for 30 consecutive days at any time after December 19, 2016, two years from the issuance date of the Series C Preferred Stock, then we may require the holders to convert the Series C Preferred Stock into shares of Class A common stock at the same price as set forth above.

Through March 31, 2015, 8,758,912 shares of Class A common stock would be issuable upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock held by Luxor.

Starting on December 12, 2022, we will have a right to redeem, and holders of shares of Series C Preferred Stock will have a right to cause us to redeem, all or a part of the outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock for cash at a redemption price equal to the aggregate liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends from the date immediately following the immediately preceding dividend payment date to the date of redemption. If any redemption by us would result in less than $35.0 million in aggregate liquidation preference of Series C Preferred Stock remaining outstanding, then we will be required to redeem all (and not less than all) of the outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock.

The shares of Series C Preferred Stock are also redeemable in connection with a consolidation or merger of our company with one or more entities that are not its affiliates which results in a change of control and as a result of which our company is not the surviving entity.

The terms of the Series C Preferred Stock set forth in the related certificate of designation include voting rights relating to the issuance of additional preferred securities, amending the provisions of the related certificate of designation, affiliate transactions and the incurrence of indebtedness.

For so long as Luxor owns at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock, the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock will be entitled to elect one independent director and designate one observer to our Board of Directors. In connection with the issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock, Luxor, as the holder of the majority of the Series C Preferred Stock, elected Mr. Brown to continue to serve as an independent director until our 2016 annual meeting. No board observer has been appointed by the holders of Series C Preferred Stock as of the date of this proxy statement.

For so long as Luxor owns at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock, the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock will also be entitled to appoint an additional director if and whenever at any time or times there is a bankruptcy event or an acceleration of our outstanding obligations under our senior credit facilities.

40


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ownership Limitations

The following limitations on the ownership of Class A common stock are contained in the certificate of designation related to the Series C Preferred Stock. The same limitations are also contained in the Indenture and Put/Call Agreement so they similarly apply to any conversion of Convertible Notes or exercise of the Luxor Put. See “— The Cetera Financings — The Luxor Transactions.”

At any time when a holder of Series C Preferred Stock then beneficially owns 9.9% or less, but greater than 4.9%, of the shares of Class A common stock outstanding, in no event will such holder be allowed to accept shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of Series C Preferred Stock that, when taken together with the shares of Class A common stock otherwise beneficially owned, collectively exceeds 9.9% of the shares of Class A common stock outstanding on the trading day immediately preceding the election to convert such Series C Preferred Stock. This ownership limitation can be waived by any holder of Series C Preferred Stock on 65 days prior written notice to us.

At any time when a holder of Series C Preferred Stock then beneficially owns 4.9% or less of the shares of Class A common stock outstanding, in no event will such holder be allowed to accept shares of Class A common stock obtained upon conversion of Series C Preferred Stock that, when taken together with the shares of Class A common stock otherwise held, collectively exceeds 4.9% of the shares of Class A common stock outstanding on the trading day immediately preceding the election to convert such Series C Preferred Stock. This ownership limitation can be waived by any holder of Series C Preferred Stock on 65 days prior written notice to us.

In no event will a holder of Series C Preferred Stock be allowed to accept shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of Series C Preferred Stock that that would result in that holder owning an aggregate number of shares of Class A common stock, when taken together with any other shares of Class A common stock then held by such holder and persons aggregated with such holder under the rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), in excess of 24.9% of the shares of Class A common stock outstanding on the trading day immediately preceding the election to convert such Series C Preferred Stock, unless such ownership of shares of Class A common stock in excess of 24.9% is duly approved in advance by FINRA.

The First Allied Contribution

On September 25, 2013, following the completion of the merger pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of June 5, 2013, with First Allied and other parties thereto (the “Original First Allied Acquisition Agreement”), RCAP Holdings became the owner of all the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of First Allied (the “First Allied Shares”). Under the Original First Allied Acquisition Agreement, the effective cost to RCAP Holdings of $177.0 million, consisting of $145.0 million in merger consideration (including the $26.0 million in principal amount of exchangeable notes issued by RCAP Holdings (the “First Allied Notes”) paid to the former owners of First Allied plus the assumption of $32.0 million of bank indebtedness of First Allied (“First Allied Indebtedness”).

To finance part of the cash merger consideration paid pursuant to the Original First Allied Acquisition Agreement, $40.0 million was borrowed by RCAP Holdings from Bank of America (the “Original FA Acquisition Indebtedness”) which was secured by a pledge of substantially all the assets and equity interests owned by RCAP Holdings (including shares of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock held by RCAP Holdings), American Realty Capital and certain subsidiaries of American Realty Capital. The Original FA Acquisition Indebtedness was scheduled to mature on September 25, 2015, and the effective interest rate of the Original FA Acquisition Indebtedness from September 25, 2013 through April 28, 2014, when the Original FA Acquisition Indebtedness was refinanced, was 4.54% per annum, resulting in a total interest expense of $1.1 million for such period. See “— The Cetera Financings  — Assignment of Debt of RCAP Holdings to American Realty Capital.”

On February 11, 2014, we entered into a non-binding letter of intent with RCAP Holdings under which the First Allied Shares would be contributed us in return for the issuance to RCAP Holdings of 11,264,929 shares of Class A common stock (the “First Allied Contribution”).

41


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

On April 3, 2014, we entered into an agreement with RCAP Holdings to effect the First Allied Contribution (the “First Allied Contribution Agreement”).

On June 30, 2014, pursuant to the First Allied Contribution Agreement, RCAP Holdings contributed the First Allied Shares to us and we issued 11,264,929 shares of our Class A common stock to RCAP Holdings. The number of shares issued as consideration was determined based on a value of $207.5 million for the equity of First Allied and the VWAP of our Class A common stock on January 15, 2014, the day prior to the announcement of the merger agreement pursuant to which we acquired Cetera. In addition, immediately following consummation of the contribution, $32.0 million of First Allied Indebtedness was outstanding. The First Allied Indebtedness was on the same terms then as it was immediately following the closing of the acquisition of First Allied by RCAP Holdings under the Original First Allied Acquisition Agreement. The value of the shares of Class A common stock issued by us as consideration in the First Allied Contribution was $239.2 million, based on $21.23 per share of Class A common stock, the closing price of Class A common stock on June 30, 2014. Accordingly, the effective cost to us for the First Allied Contribution was $271.2 million (including $32.0 million of First Allied Indebtedness and based on the closing price for our Class A common stock on June 30, 2014 of $21.23 per share), which is $94.2 million more than the effective cost to RCAP Holdings for First Allied in September 2013 under the terms of the Original First Allied Acquisition Agreement.

Under the Bank Facilities, it was an event of default if the outstanding First Allied Indebtedness was not repaid by July 28, 2014. Following repayment of the outstanding First Allied Indebtedness on July 28, 2014, our obligations under the Bank Facilities also were guaranteed, subject to certain exceptions, by First Allied and each of First Allied’s direct or indirect domestic subsidiaries that are not SEC-registered broker-dealers.

Pursuant to the First Allied Contribution Agreement with RCAP Holdings, we also were assigned substantially all rights and assumed substantially all obligations of RCAP Holdings under the Original First Allied Acquisition Agreement. Any outstanding First Allied Notes, as well as any remaining acquisition debt incurred by RCAP Holdings to finance a portion of the merger consideration, in connection with the Original First Allied Acquisition Agreement, remained the obligations of RCAP Holdings. The Bank Facilities provided for an event of default if an amount sufficient to repay the First Allied Notes was not deposited in the special escrow by August 27, 2014. On June 9, 2014, we deposited $26.0 million into the special escrow in satisfaction of this obligation. On November 25, 2014, RCAP Holdings deposited $24.0 million into the special escrow account, which was an amount sufficient to satisfy the then outstanding obligations under the First Allied Notes. Simultaneously, the Company’s obligations with respect to the special escrow account were terminated.

The value of $207.5 million for the equity of First Allied established by our Board of Directors in January 2014 was determined as the effective cost to RCAP Holdings for First Allied of $177.0 million (consisting of $145.0 million in merger consideration (including the First Allied Notes)) paid by RCAP Holdings to the former owners of First Allied and $32.0 million in First Allied Indebtedness outstanding immediately following consummation of the merger), minus indebtedness (net of cash) of First Allied of $7.0 million plus a carrying cost of $37.5 million. The carrying cost used to compensate RCAP Holdings for the use of its capital was determined based on an estimate of what we believe a third-party investor would have earned for a similar investment, or a range between 18% to 25% of the original cost of the investment. We used a midpoint of this range, or 21.5%, to determine the carrying cost. The rate used to determine the carrying cost was 21.2%, which was based on the period from June 5, 2013 (the date the Original First Allied Acquisition Agreement was executed and RCAP Holdings committed to make the investment) through May 31, 2014 (the expected closing date of the First Allied Contribution at the time the carrying cost was determined). The annualized rate from September 25, 2013 (the date the investment was actually made) until May 31, 2014 was 34.4%. The effective weighted blended interest rate on the First Allied Notes and the $40.0 million borrowed to finance part of the cash merger consideration paid pursuant to the Original First Allied Acquisition Agreement from September 25, 2013 through May 31, 2014 was 3.55% per annum, resulting in a total interest expense of $1.1 million for such period, not including the value of the conversion option on the First Allied Notes.

42


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Board of Directors, when it established the purchase price for the First Allied Contribution in January 2014, applied the carrying cost to the effective cost of RCAP Holdings’ acquisition of First Allied, which was $177.0 million (consisting of $145.0 million in merger consideration paid to the former owners of First Allied and $32.0 million of First Allied Indebtedness outstanding immediately following the merger). First Allied had approximately $25.0 million of cash at the time of the determination of the purchase price for the First Allied Contribution by our Board of Directors. The cash of First Allied could have increased or decreased prior to the date of closing of the First Allied Contribution, which would have had the effect of decreasing or increasing the effective cost of the acquisition to us. RCAP Holdings and First Allied had previously agreed that First Allied would not make any dividends or other distributions prior to the closing of the First Allied Contribution.

The representations and warranties contained in the First Allied Contribution Agreement will generally survive the closing of the First Allied Contribution for a period of one year, or until June 30, 2015. Subject to certain limitations, including, among other things, a cap of $15.5 million and a deductible of $1.0 million that applies to breaches of most of RCAP Holdings’ representations and warranties before we would be entitled to recover any losses, RCAP Holdings has agreed to indemnify us for breaches of RCAP Holdings’ representations, warranties, covenants and agreements. In addition, subject to certain limitations, including, among other things, a cap of $15.5 million and a deductible of $1.0 million that applies to breaches of most of our representations and warranties before RCAP Holdings would be entitled to recover any losses, we have agreed to indemnify RCAP Holdings for breaches of our representations, warranties, covenants and agreements and for the Company’s assumption of substantially all obligations of RCAP Holdings under the Original First Allied Acquisition Agreement. As of April 29, 2015, no claims for indemnification have been made under the First Allied Contribution Agreement.

Agreements with ARCP relating to Cole Capital Partners LLC and Cole Capital Advisors, Inc. (“Cole Capital”)

On September 30, 2014, we entered into an agreement to acquire Cole Capital from ARC Properties Operating Partnership, L.P. (“ARCP OP”), a subsidiary and the operating partnership of ARCP for $700.0 million plus contingent consideration. Cole Capital is the private capital management business of ARCP, which includes a broker-dealer, wholesale distribution, and a non-traded REIT sponsor and advisory businesses.

The definitive agreement provided that the acquisition of Cole Capital was to be consummated in two closings.

At the first closing (the “First Closing”) on October 22, 2014, subsidiaries of ours entered into interim sub-advisory arrangements with the current advisors (which are subsidiaries of ARCP) of the five non-traded REITs sponsored and advised by Cole Capital. In addition, Realty Capital Securities entered into wholesaling agreements whereby a subsidiary of Cole Capital engaged Realty Capital Securities as its distribution agent for the three non-traded REITs for which it then served as “dealer-manager.” Realty Capital Securities was entitled to receive a sourcing fee on sales through dealers it sourced.

We paid a portion of the purchase price equal to $10.0 million at the First Closing. The balance of the consideration would have been paid and Cole Capital would have been acquired by us at a second closing, which did not occur.

On November 3, 2014, we announced that we had terminated the previously disclosed definitive agreement to acquire Cole Capital from ARCP OP. Also on November 3, 2014, ARCP issued a press release asserting that, in its view, we had no basis to terminate the agreement and that our termination of the agreement was itself breach of the agreement. On November 11, 2014, ARCP filed suit for specific performance, injunctive relief and other relief against us in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, (the “ARCP Action”) and, on November 12, 2014, ARCP issued a press release asserting that our termination of the agreement constituted a breach of contract.

On December 4, 2014, we entered into a binding term sheet with ARCP to settle the ARCP Action. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, we paid ARCP a negotiated break-up fee consisting of a cash payment of $32.7 million and a $15.3 million, two-year promissory note bearing interest at a rate of 8% per annum,

43


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and ARCP dismissed with prejudice its lawsuit against us and, accordingly, the acquisition of Cole Capital did not proceed. The principal amount of the promissory note is due in three payments of $7.7 million, $3.8 million and $3.8 million on March 31, 2016, September 30, 2016 and March 31, 2017, respectively. During the period from December 4, 2014 to April 29, 2015, we paid $0.4 million in interest on this promissory note.

We and ARCP also agreed, among other things, that ARCP would keep the $10.0 million payment delivered by us in connection with the First Closing and we would release ARCP from its obligation to pay $2.0 million in respect of structuring services provided by Realty Capital Securities in connection with ARCP’s May 2014 equity offering. See “— Services Provided to REITs Sponsored by American Realty Capital and Other Related Parties — Capital Markets.”

Pursuant to our binding term sheet entered into with ARCP on December 4, 2014, we and ARCP agreed with to work in good faith to terminate any remaining transactions and relationships. A formal definitive settlement agreement is expected to be entered into during 2015. As of December 31, 2014, there were no on-going or pending transactions or relationships between ARCP and the Company.

AR Capital Real Estate Income Fund

As of March 31, 2015, RCS Advisory, Realty Capital Securities and the Company had investments in the AR Capital Real Estate Income Fund of $0.02 million, $7.8 million and $2.8 million, respectively. American Realty Capital is the advisor of AR Capital Real Estate Income Fund.

Lease of Lodging Facility

In March 2014, Realty Capital Securities leased a lodging facility in Newport, Rhode Island from an affiliate, ARC HTNEWRI001, LLC. Realty Capital Securities also entered into an agreement with another affiliate, Crestline Hotels and Resorts, LLC (“Crestline”) to manage and operate the lodging facility. Crestline remits the lodging facility’s revenue to us, net of the fees from Crestline. During the period from January 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015, we incurred $0.1 million in rent expense under these arrangements.

Indemnification Agreements with Executive Officers and Directors

We are party to separate indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and directors, which require us to indemnify them against liabilities to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.

Other Related Party Transactions

Nicholas S. Schorsch, Jr., the son of Mr. Schorsch, the former executive chairman of our Board of Directors, was employed during 2013 as a Senior Product Manager at Realty Capital Securities. Nicholas S. Schorsch, Jr. was not employed as an employee of Realty Capital Securities, the Company or any other Company subsidiary in 2014. In 2014, Nicholas S. Schorsch, Jr. received a grant in respect of his 2013 performance consisting of 15,000 restricted shares of our Class A common stock having a value of $406,611, based on the ten-day VWAP of our Class A common stock as of March 14, 2014 (the date of the award agreement) of $27.1074.

In 2013, the Company extended a non-interest bearing loan to Mr. Roth in the amount of $187,046 in respect of federal income taxes payable by Mr. Roth on the vested portion of certain restricted stock grants he received upon the commencement of his employment with a subsidiary of the Company. Mr. Roth repaid such loan in full in 2014.

44


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES AND SERVICES

On June 13, 2014, the Company and WeiserMazars LLP (“Weiser”) agreed to terminate the client-auditor relationship. The Company engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as its new independent registered public accounting firm as of June 13, 2014 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. The Audit Committee participated in and approved the decision to change the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The reports of Weiser on the financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinions and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the subsequent interim period through June 13, 2014, there were no disagreements with Weiser on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of Weiser would have caused them to make reference thereto in their reports on the financial statements for such years.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the subsequent interim period through June 13, 2014, there were no reportable events of the type described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the subsequent interim period through June 13, 2014, the Company had not consulted with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to the Company nor oral advice was provided that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement, as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K, or a reportable event, as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for audit and other services for the year ended December 31, 2013 by Weiser and for the year ended December 31, 2014 by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firms for fiscal years (in thousands).

   
  2014(1)   2013
Audit fees   $ 5,818.5     $ 643.5  
Audit-related fees     851.0 (2)      51.6 (3) 
Tax fees     676.8 (4)       
All other fees     407.1 (5)       
Total fees   $ 7,753.4     $ 695.1  

(1) In addition. $654.1 thousand was paid to Weiser for the year ended December 31, 2014, of which $583.7 thousand related to audit fees, $69.6 thousand related to audit-related fees and $0.8 thousand related to all other fees.
(2) These fees primarily relate to the services rendered in connection with the relevant broker dealer reports on internal control as required by Regulation 1.16 of the Commodity Futures Trading Commissions, custody rule reports, surprise examinations, SOC 1 report and ANST under Rule 17a-13 control reports.
(3) These fees related to the annual study and evaluation of internal accounting control for ANST under Rule 17ad-13 and accounting consultations in connection with acquisitions.
(4) These fees primarily relate to the services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning including state apportionment rates, various structuring matters and limited scope tax due diligence.
(5) These fees primarily relate to (a) performance of a quality of earnings report related to a potential business acquisition and (b) assistance provided to management in their assessment of which new human resource application to implement at a subsidiary.

45


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accountants. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. The Audit Committee generally pre-approves particular services or categories of services on a case-by-case basis. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with these pre-approvals, and the fees for the services performed to date.

All the services described above were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers, and holders of more than ten percent of our Class A common stock to file with the SEC reports regarding their ownership and changes in ownership of our securities. We believe that, during 2014, our directors, executive officers, and ten percent stockholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.

In making these statements, we have relied upon examination of the copies of Forms 3, 4, and 5, and amendments to these forms, provided to us and the written representations of our directors, executive officers, and ten percent stockholders.

46


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

STOCK OWNERSHIP BY DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND CERTAIN STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock as of May 28, 2015 for:

each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of any class of our outstanding shares;
each of our named executive officers;
each of our directors; and
all our directors and executive officers as a group.

For purposes of the table below, “beneficial ownership” is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, pursuant to which a person or group of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares that the person has the right to acquire by July 27, 2015, or within 60 days after May 28, 2015. For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding common stock held by each person or group of persons named below, any shares that the person or persons has the right to acquire within 60 days after May 28, 2015 are deemed to be outstanding but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. As of May 28, 2015, there were 77,159,269 shares of Class A common stock outstanding. SEC rules also generally attribute beneficial ownership of securities to persons who possess sole or shared voting power or investment power with respect to such securities. Except as otherwise indicated, all persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws.

       
Beneficial Owner(1)   No. of Shares
of Class A
common stock
Beneficially
Owned
  % of Class A
common stock
  No. of Shares
of Class B
common stock
Beneficially Owned
  % of
Combined
Voting Power(2)
Nicholas S. Schorsch     19,432,103       25.18 %      1 (3)      62.59 % 
William M. Kahane     4,128,078       5.35 %      1 (3)      52.68 % 
RCAP Holdings, LLC                 1       50.00 % 
Steven A. Cohen(4)     4,486,326 (5)      5.81 %            2.91 % 
Luxor Capital Group, LP(6)     25,593,370 (7)(8)      27.15 %(7)            13.58 %(7) 
LCG Holdings, LLC(8)     24,966,141 (7)(9)      26.64 %(7)            13.32 %(7) 
Luxor Capital Partners, LP(8)     10,039,043 (7)(1)      12.03 %(7)            6.01 %(7) 
Luxor Capital Partners Offshore Master Fund, LP(8)     10,555,754 (7)(11)      12.59 %(7)            6.30 %(7) 
Edward M. Weil, Jr.     1,098,329 (12)      1.42 %           
Peter M. Budko     5,007,278 (13)      6.49 %            3.24 % 
Brian D. Jones     496,703 (14)               
R. Lawrence Roth     152,088 (15)               
Mark Auerbach     33,179 (16)               
Jeffrey J. Brown     11,264 (17)               
C. Thomas McMillen     16,220 (18)               
Howell D. Wood     17,220 (19)               
John H. Grady     49,267 (20)                            
Directors and executive officers as a group (ten persons)     6,891,786 (21)      8.93 %            4.47 % 

* Less than 1%.
(1) Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of each individual or entity listed in the table is c/o RCS Capital Corporation, 405 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10022.
(2) Holders of our Class A common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Our certificate of incorporation provides that so long as any of our Class B common stock remains outstanding, the holders of our Class B common stock will have a majority of the voting power of our outstanding common stock, and thereby control our company.

47


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RCAP Holdings holds the sole outstanding share of our Class B common stock and controls one vote more than the majority of the combined voting power of our company.
(3) Held by RCAP Holdings, LLC, which holds the sole outstanding share of Class B common stock. On April 29, 2014, RCAP Holdings, LLC pledged substantially all of its assets, including the sole outstanding share of our Class B common stock, to secure the Bank Facilities. See “Relationships and Related Party Transactions — The Cetera Financings — The Bank Facilities.” An event of default under the Bank Facilities and operation of the pledge with respect to the sole outstanding share of Class B common stock could give rise to a change in control of our company. The reporting person directly or indirectly controls RCAP Holdings, LLC and may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by RCAP Holdings, LLC. The reporting person disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities reported herein except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
(4) The business address of Point72 Asset Management, Point72 Capital Advisors Inc., Rubric Capital Management and Mr. Cohen is 72 Cummings Point Road, Stamford, CT 06902. The information contained herein with respect to Point72 Asset Management, Point72 Capital Advisors Inc., Cubist Systematic Strategies, Rubric Capital Management and Mr. Cohen is based solely on Amendment No. 2 to the Schedule 13G filed by such entities with the SEC on January 8, 2015.
(5) Mr. Cohen directly owns no shares of Class A common stock. Pursuant to an investment management agreement, Point72 Asset Management maintains investment and voting power with respect to the securities held by certain investment funds it manages. Point72 Capital Advisors Inc. is the general partner of Point72 Asset Management. Pursuant to an investment management agreement, Cubist Systematic Strategies maintains investment and voting power with respect to the securities held by certain investment funds it manages. Pursuant to an investment management agreement, Rubric Capital Management maintains investment and voting power with respect to the securities held by certain investment funds it manages. Mr. Cohen controls each of Point72 Capital Advisors Inc., Cubist Systematic Strategies and Rubric Capital Management. By reason of the provisions of Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act, each of (i) Point72 Asset Management, Point72 Capital Advisors Inc. and Mr. Cohen may be deemed to beneficially own 1,125,548 shares of Class A common stock (constituting approximately 1.46% of the Shares outstanding); (ii) Cubist Systematic Strategies and Mr. Cohen may be deemed to beneficially own 10,778 Shares (constituting less than 0.1% of the shares of Class A common stock outstanding); and (iii) Rubric Capital Management and Mr. Cohen may be deemed to beneficially own 3,350,000 Shares (constituting approximately 4.34% of the shares of Class A common stock outstanding). Each of Point72 Asset Management, Point72 Capital Advisors Inc., Cubist Systematic Strategies, Rubric Capital Management and Mr. Cohen disclaims beneficial ownership of any of these shares.
(6) The business of this reporting person is c/o Luxor Capital Group, LP, 1114 Avenue of the Americas, 29th Floor, New York NY 10036. The information contained herein with respect to this reporting person is based on Amendment No. 6 to the Schedule 13D filed by such reporting person and its affiliates with the SEC on December 24, 2014.
(7) The number of shares of Class A common stock and percentage of Class A common stock beneficially owned by this reporting person is presented without giving effect to ownership limitations which are applicable to securities and other rights held by this reporting person as described in more detail under “Relationships and Related Party Transactions — The Luxor Securities Exchange Agreement —  Ownership Limitations.”
(8) Luxor Capital Group, LP, as the investment manager of each of Luxor Capital Partners, LP, Luxor Wavefront, LP, Luxor Capital Partners Offshore Master Fund, LP, Luxor Capital Partners Offshore, Ltd., Luxor Spectrum Offshore Master Fund, LP, Luxor Spectrum Offshore, Ltd. (collectively, the “Luxor Funds”) and OC 19 Master Fund, L.P. — LCG, may be deemed to have beneficially owned the 25,593,370 shares of Class A common stock beneficially owned by the Luxor Funds (4,236,626 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, which are convertible into 8,433,690 shares of our Class A common stock based on the $109,637,982 aggregate liquidation preference of such shares of Series C Preferred Stock through March 31, 2015, $120,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes, which are convertible into 5,455,382 shares of our Class A common stock and 2,673,334 shares of our Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the Luxor Put), and 627,229 shares of Class A common stock beneficially owned by OC 19 Master Fund, L.P. — LCG (163,374 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, which are convertible into 325,222 shares of our Class A common stock based on the $4,227,885 aggregate liquidation preference of such shares of Series C Preferred Stock through March 31, 2015 and $4,455,000 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes, which are convertible into 210,340 shares of our Class A common stock). Christian Leone, in his capacity as the CEO of Luxor Capital Group, LP

48


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and OC 19 Master Fund, L.P. — LCG, makes voting and investment decisions on behalf of the Luxor Funds and OC 19 Master Fund, L.P. — LCG in its capacity as investment manager to the Luxor Funds and OC 19 Master Fund, L.P. — LCG. Luxor Management, LLC, as the general partner of Luxor Capital Group, LP, also may be deemed to have beneficially owned the shares of Class A common stock beneficially owned by Luxor Capital Group, LP. Christian Leone, as the managing member of each of Luxor Management, LLC and LCG Holdings, LLC, may be deemed to have beneficially owned the shares of Class A common stock owned by Luxor Management, LLC. Luxor Management, LLC, as the general partner of Luxor Capital Group, LP, also may be deemed to have beneficially owned the shares of Class A common stock beneficially owned by Luxor Capital Group, LP. Christian Leone, in his capacity as the CEO of Luxor Capital Group, LP, makes voting and investment decisions on behalf of Luxor Capital Group, LP.
(9) LCG Holdings, LLC, as the general partner of Luxor Capital Partners, LP, Luxor Wavefront, LP, Luxor Capital Partners Offshore Master Fund, LP and Luxor Spectrum Offshore Master Fund, LP, may be deemed to have beneficially owned the 24,966,141 shares of Class A common stock beneficially owned by Luxor Capital Partners, LP, Luxor Wavefront, LP, Luxor Capital Partners Offshore Master Fund, LP and Luxor Spectrum Offshore Master Fund, LP in the aggregate (4,236,626 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, which are convertible into 8,433,690 shares of our Class A common stock based on the $109,637,982 aggregate liquidation preference of such shares of Series C Preferred Stock through March 31, 2015, $120,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes, which are convertible into 5,455,382 shares of our Class A common stock and 2,673,334 shares of our Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the Luxor Put).
(10) Luxor Capital Partners, LP directly holds: (i) 3,737,944 shares of our Class A common stock; (ii) 1,621,436 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, which are convertible into 3,227,730 shares of our Class A common stock based on the $41,960,502 aggregate liquidation preference of such shares of Series C Preferred Stock through March 31, 2015; (iii) $44,232,000 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes, which are convertible into 2,088,385 shares of our Class A common stock; and (iv) 984,984 shares of our Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the Luxor Put Luxor Capital Group, LP, as the investment manager of Luxor Capital Partners, LP, has voting and investment discretion over securities held by Luxor Capital Partners, LP. Christian Leone, in his capacity as the CEO of Luxor Capital Group, LP, makes voting and investment decisions on behalf of Luxor Capital Group, LP in its capacity as investment manager to Luxor Capital Partners, LP.
(11) Luxor Capital Partners Offshore Master Fund, LP directly holds: (i) 3,884,436 shares of our Class A common stock; (ii) 2,035,094 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, which are convertible into 4,051,185 shares of our Class A common stock based on the $52,665,407 aggregate liquidation preference of such shares of Series C Preferred Stock through March 31, 2014; and (iii) $55,494,000 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes, which are convertible into 2,620,113 shares of our Class A common stock. Luxor Capital Partners Offshore, Ltd., as the owner of a controlling interest in Luxor Capital Partners Offshore Master Fund, LP, may be deemed to beneficially own the 10,555,734 Shares beneficially owned by Luxor Capital Partners Offshore Master Fund, LP. Luxor Capital Group, LP as the investment manager of Luxor Capital Partners Offshore Master Fund, LP has voting and investment discretion over securities held by Luxor Capital Partners Offshore Master Fund, LP. Christian Leone, in his capacity as the CEO of Luxor Capital Group, LP, makes voting and investment decisions on behalf of Luxor Capital Group, LP in its capacity as investment manager to Luxor Capital Partners Offshore Master Fund, LP.
(12) Includes 10,914 shares awarded under the 2014 RCAP Equity Plan.
(13) Includes 50,995 shares awarded under the 2014 RCAP Equity Plan.
(14) Includes 485,703 restricted shares awarded under the 2014 RCAP Equity Plan.
(15) Includes 152,088 restricted shares awarded under the 2014 RCAP Equity Plan.
(16) Includes 32,179 restricted shares awarded under the 2014 RCAP Equity Plan.
(17) Includes 10,264 restricted shares awarded under the 2014 RCAP Equity Plan.
(18) Includes 15,220 restricted shares awarded under the 2014 RCAP Equity Plan.
(19) Includes 15,220 restricted shares awarded under the 2014 RCAP Equity Plan.
(20) Includes 42,921 shares awarded under the 2014 RCAP Equity Plan.
(21) Includes 821,942 shares awarded under the 2014 RCAP Equity Plan.

49


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The following individuals, all of whom are currently serving on our Board of Directors, are nominated for election this year:

Edward M. Weil, Jr.
Peter M. Budko
Brian D. Jones
R. Lawrence Roth
Mark Auerbach
C. Thomas McMillen
Howell D. Wood

Directors will be elected by a majority of the votes of the shares of capital stock of the Company present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. If elected, each of these individuals will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. In the event that any nominee for any reason is unable to serve, or for good cause will not serve, the proxies will be voted for such substitute nominee as our Board of Directors may determine. We are not aware of any nominee who will be unable to serve, or for good cause will not serve, as a director.

For so long as Luxor owns at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock, the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock are entitled to elect one independent director. In connection with the issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock in December 2014, Luxor, as the holder of the majority of the Series C Preferred Stock, elected Jeffrey J. Brown to continue to serve as an independent director until our 2016 annual meeting. See “Relationships and Related Party Transactions — The Luxor Securities Exchange Agreement.”

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each of the nominated directors.

50


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL TWO: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SHARES OF CLASS A
COMMON STOCK THE COMPANY IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE TO 300,000,000 SHARES

Stockholders are being asked to approve an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of shares of stock the Company is authorized to issue from 300,000,000 to 500,000,000 shares of capital stock; and (ii) increase the number of authorized shares of Class A common stock from 100,000,000 shares to 300,000,000 shares. No change will be made in the number of shares of Class B common stock or the number of shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “preferred stock”), authorized to be issued.

The form of the proposed amendment is set forth in Annex A to this Proxy Statement.

The Board of Directors approved the proposed amendment by unanimous written consent on May 29, 2015, subject to stockholder approval, and directed that the proposed amendment be submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders at this Annual Meeting.

Our certificate of incorporation currently authorizes the issuance of: (i) 100,000,000 shares of Class A common stock; (ii) 100,000,000 shares of Class B common stock; and (iii) 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock.

If the proposed amendment is approved by the stockholders and becomes effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, our certificate of incorporation will authorize the issuance of: (i) 300,000,000 shares of Class A common stock; (ii) 100,000,000 shares of Class B common stock; and (iii) 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock.

Purpose of Amendment

The Board believes it is in the best interest of the Company to increase the number of authorized shares of Class A common stock in order to give the Company greater flexibility in considering and planning for future potential business needs, including providing shares of Class A common stock for various corporate purposes, including potential future acquisitions and future financings.

The Company plans to continue to grow its core businesses through both organic and strategic acquisition opportunities and may selectively pursue acquisitions of businesses or infrastructure complementary to its businesses. However, the Company has no current plan, commitment, arrangement, understanding or agreement regarding the issuance of the additional shares of Class A common stock resulting from the proposed increase in authorized shares. The additional shares of Class A common stock will be available for issuance by the Board for various corporate purposes including, but not limited to, stock dividends, grants under equity compensation plans, stock splits, financings, potential strategic transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, and business combinations, as well as other general corporate transactions. The Board of Directors believes that additional authorized shares of Class A common stock will enable the Company to take timely advantage of market conditions and favorable financing and acquisition opportunities that become available to the Company without the delay and expense associated with convening a special meeting of the Company’s stockholders.

As of May 28, 2015, 91,583,903 shares of Class A common stock were either outstanding or reserved for issuance upon conversion of the Convertible Notes and the Series C Preferred Stock or for other purposes, leaving 9,416,097 shares available for issuance or reservation in connection with future potential business needs.

Possible Effects of the Amendment and Additional Anti-takeover Consideration

If the proposed amendment is approved by the stockholders and becomes effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, the additional authorized shares of Class A common stock will be available for issuance at the discretion of the Board of Directors without further action by the stockholders, except as otherwise required by law or by rules of the NYSE.

The additional authorized shares of Class A common stock would have the same rights and privileges as the shares of Class A common stock currently issued and outstanding. While adoption of the proposed amendment would not have any immediate dilutive effect on the proportionate voting power or other rights of

51


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the Company’s existing stockholders, any future issuance of additional authorized shares of the Class A common stock may, among other things, dilute the earnings per share of the Class A common stock and the equity and voting rights of those holding Class A common stock at the time the additional shares of Class A common stock are issued.

In addition to the corporate purposes mentioned above and notwithstanding the fact that, for so long as any shares of Class B common stock are outstanding, the holders of Class B common stock will control the Company regardless of how many shares of Class A common stock are issued or authorized, an increase in the number of authorized shares of Class A common stock may make it more difficult to, or discourage an attempt to, obtain control of the Company by means of a takeover bid that the Board of Directors determines is not in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. However, the Board of Directors does not intend or view the proposed increase in the number of authorized shares of Class A common stock as an anti-takeover measure and is not aware of any attempt or plan to obtain control of the Company.

The proposed amendment will not affect the rights of current holders of the Class A common stock, none of whom have preemptive or similar rights to acquire the newly authorized shares.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” approval of an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of shares of Class A common stock the Company is authorized to issue to 300,000,000 shares.

52


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL THREE: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF OUR
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to be our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2015 and recommends that the stockholders vote for ratification of such appointment. The ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2015 will be determined by the affirmative vote of the majority of the voting power of the shares of capital stock of the Company present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter.

We expect representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to be present at the Annual Meeting, and such representatives will have the opportunity to make a statement at the Annual Meeting if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee and the Board will reconsider whether or not to continue to retain PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee and the Board may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if they determine that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

53


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL FOUR: ADVISORY VOTE ON DETERMINING THE FREQUENCY OF
SAY-ON-PAY VOTES (“SAY-ON-FREQUENCY”)

As of December 31, 2014, we no longer qualified as an “emerging growth company” under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. As a result, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires that we provide stockholders with the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, for their preference as to how frequently to hold future advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. Stockholders have the option of recommending a say-on-pay vote every year, every two years, or every three years or abstaining from making a recommendation. Our first say-on-pay vote will occur at our annual meeting for 2016 with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers during 2015.

Our Board of Directors has considered the advantages and disadvantages of the frequency of the say-on-pay vote. Based on its analysis, our Board of Directors believes that asking our stockholders to vote on executive compensation each year would be the most meaningful for our Board of Directors and our compensation committee and best serve the interests of our company and its stockholders. Our Board of Directors believes an annual say-on-pay advisory vote will provide the most timely feedback on executive compensation arrangements, plans, programs, and policies as executive compensation disclosures are made annually. The Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote; however, when considering the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, the Board of Directors may decide that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and the Company to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the frequency receiving the most votes cast by our stockholders.

Stockholders should recognize, however, that it may not be appropriate or feasible to change compensation programs already in place for the year in which the vote occurs since the advisory vote on executive compensation will take place after the beginning of the compensation year. Stockholders also should recognize that their recommendation may be modified in the future if an annual frequency vote becomes burdensome or otherwise proves to be less helpful than originally expected.

The say-on-frequency proposal requires a plurality of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal. Therefore, the frequency option (one year, two years or three years) that receives the greatest number of votes shall be passed.

The say-on-frequency vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on our company, our compensation committee or our Board of Directors. We will consider stockholders to have expressed a preference for the frequency that receives the largest number of favorable votes. Our Board of Directors also may from time to time decide that it is in the best interests of our company and its stockholders to hold the frequency vote more or less frequently than the non-binding option preferred by our stockholders.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote of “ONE YEAR” on the proposal to determine the frequency of “say-on-pay” votes.

54


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL FIVE: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO
RCS CAPITAL CORPORATION EQUITY PLAN

Stockholders are being asked to approve an amendment (the “Amended Plan”) to the RCS Capital Corporation Equity Plan, as amended June 5, 2013 and December 29, 2014 (the “Equity Plan”). The Amended Plan was approved by the Board by unanimous written consent on May 29, 2015.

The form of the Amended Plan is set forth in Annex B to this Proxy Statement.

The purpose of the amendment is to expand the class of participants eligible to receive awards under the Equity Plan to include financial advisors who are engaged in providing broker-dealer or investment advisor services through the Company’s subsidiaries in its retail advice business. The proposed amendment does not however expand the number of the Company’s shares that could be issued under the Equity Plan.

Background of the Proposal to Amend the Equity Plan

The Board believes that equity and equity-linked awards are important incentives to help attract and retain highly-qualified non-executive directors, officers, employees, advisors and other consultants to provide services to the Company and its subsidiaries (including non-employee financial advisors). By providing such equity and equity-linked awards, the Board believes that the Company helps promote the success of the Company’s business, thereby benefitting both the Company and the Company’s stockholders.

The Board and management of the Company believe that, in light of the Company’s evolving business, including the expansion of its retail advice segment under the name “Cetera Financial Group,” it is essential for the Company’s equity compensation programs to cover financial advisors who are licensed as registered principals or registered representatives with the Company’s broker-dealer subsidiaries or persons associated or registered with the Company’s investment adviser subsidiaries. Although these persons provide similar services as those which could have been provided by financial advisors who are direct employees of the Company, they are independent contractors and would not have met the definition of employee or consultant under the Equity Plan. Consistent with applicable NYSE rules, the Company seeks stockholder approval of the Amended Plan to expand the class of participants eligible receive awards and to therefore expand the number of individuals who will be incentivized to grow the Company’s business.

Notably, the Company is currently not asking its stockholders to approve an increase in the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Equity Plan. Therefore, regardless of whether or not the requisite stockholder approval of the Amended Plan is obtained, the maximum number of shares available to grant awards under the Equity Plan will continue to be as provided in accordance with the current terms of the Equity Plan.

If the requisite stockholder approval of the Amended Plan is not obtained, the provision relating to the expansion of the class of participants eligible to receive awards under the Amended Plan will not take effect. If such approval is not obtained, we may continue to grant awards under the Equity Plan in accordance with the current terms of the Equity Plan. However, if the Amended Plan is not approved, the Company would be prohibited from granting awards under the Equity Plan to certain financial advisors and other individuals whom the Company desires to retain, incentivize and motivate.

If the requisite stockholder approval of the Amended Plan is obtained, the Company may make grants to financial advisors similar to the grants of the right to elect to purchase Class A common stock and warrants made under the 2014 Stock Purchase Program (the “2014 Plan”) and other grants to participants in the 2014 Plan.

RCAP Holdings, which has the ability to control all matters submitted to stockholders for approval, has already indicated its intention to vote for the Amended Plan.

Summary of the Amended Plan

Purpose; Eligibility.  The purposes of the Amended Plan are to afford an incentive to the non-executive directors, officers and other employees, advisors and consultants of the Company that are providing services to the Company to continue to provide services for or on behalf of the Company or as directors, officers, advisors and consultants, to increase their efforts on behalf of the Company and to promote the success of the Company’s business. Awards (other than incentive stock options) under the Amended Plan may be granted to

55


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(i) individuals who are (a) non-executive directors, officers and employees of the Company and its affiliates, (b) current or prospective registered principals or registered representatives of a broker-dealer or persons associated or registered with an investment adviser, who provide services through the Company, an Affiliate of the Company or an entity engaged in the broker-dealer business or rendering investment advice as part of the Company’s retail advice business, or (c) other advisors or consultants to the Company or an affiliate that provide services to the Company or an affiliate pursuant to a written agreement that are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction, and do not, directly or indirectly, promote or maintain a market for the securities of the Company or its affiliates; and (ii) subject to the management agreement between the Company and RCS Capital Management, RCS Capital Management and individuals who are employees, officers or directors of RCS Capital Management or its affiliates. Incentive stock options may be granted only to participants who are, as of the date of grant, employees of the Company and its subsidiaries.

Administration.  Under the terms of the Amended Plan, the Board was initially responsible for the administration of the Equity Plan. However, the Board approved an amendment to the Equity Plan in December 2014 to clarify its authority to delegate to a committee or subcommittee of the Board all or a portion of its power and authority in respect of the Equity Plan or to exercise its powers and authorities under the Equity Plan or that are necessary or advisable in the administration of the Amended Plan in connection with its administration of the Equity Plan to a committee or subcommittee of the Board. In accordance with such authority, the Board delegated the authority to administer the Equity Plan to the Compensation Committee of the Board, except with respect to the amendment, modification, suspension or early termination of the Amended Plan.

Share and Other Limitations.  The maximum number of shares of Class A common stock that may be granted pursuant to awards under the Equity Plan is a number of shares of Class A common stock equal to the greater of (x) 250,000 shares and (y) 10% of the total number of issued and outstanding shares of Class A common stock (on a fully diluted basis) at any time following such increase (subject to the registration of the increased number of available shares). Pursuant to Registration Statements on Form S-8 filed on February 19, 2014 and January 9, 2015, a total of 6,980,124 shares of Class A common stock have been registered, of which 3,088,841 remained available to be granted pursuant to awards under the RCAP Equity Plan as of May 28, 2015. The maximum number of shares of Class A common stock that may be granted through incentive stock options will at all times be 250,000 shares of Class A common stock.

If any vested award granted under the Amended Plan is paid or otherwise settled without the issuance of shares of Class A common stock, or if shares of Class A common stock are surrendered to or withheld as payment of either the exercise price of an award or withholding taxes in respect of an award, the shares of Class A common stock that were subject to such award will not again be available for awards under the Amended Plan. If any shares subject to an award are forfeited, cancelled, exchanged or surrendered or if an award terminates or expires without a distribution of shares to the participant (other than as provided in the immediately preceding sentence), the shares of Class A common stock with respect to such award will, to the extent of any such forfeiture, cancellation, exchange, surrender, termination or expiration, again be available for awards under the Amended Plan. Upon the exercise of any award granted in tandem with any other award, such related award will be cancelled to the extent of the number of shares of Class A common stock as to which the award is exercised and, notwithstanding the foregoing, such number of shares of Class A common stock will no longer be available for awards under the Amended Plan.

Certain Adjustments.  In the event that the Board determines that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, shares of Class A common stock, or other property), recapitalization, stock split, reverse split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination, repurchase, or share exchange, or other similar corporate transaction or event, affects the Class A common stock such that an adjustment is appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of participants under the Amended Plan, then the Compensation Committee will make equitable changes or adjustments to any or all of: (i) the number and kind of shares of Class A common stock or other property (including cash) that may thereafter be issued in connection with awards; (ii) the number and kind of shares of Class A common stock or other property (including cash) issued or issuable in respect of outstanding awards; (iii) the exercise price, base price or purchase price relating to any award and (iv) the performance goals, if any, applicable to outstanding awards.

56


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In addition, the Board may determine that any such equitable adjustment may be accomplished by making a payment to the award holder, in the form of cash or other property (including but not limited to shares of Class A common stock).

Types of Awards.  The Amended Plan permits the grant of any or all of the following types of awards to eligible participants: (i) options to buy shares of the Class A common stock, which may be either incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options; (ii) stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), in tandem with a stock option or freestanding; (ii) restricted stock; (iv) restricted stock units (“RSUs”); and (v) other stock-based awards. Incentive stock options may only be granted to participants who are, as of the date of grant, employees of the Company and its subsidiaries.

Stock Options.  Stock options may be in the form of incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options. With respect to each grant of stock options, the Compensation Committee will determine the number of shares of Class A common stock subject to the option, the exercise price per share of Class A common stock subject to the option, which may not be less than 100% (or, in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a 10% stockholder, 110%) of the fair market value of a share of Class A common stock on the date of grant, the term of the option (which will not exceed 10 years from the date of grant, or five years for a 10% stockholder), the vesting schedule and other material terms of the option. In general, unless otherwise specified in a participant’s award agreement, upon a participant’s termination of service for any reason, outstanding stock options will be forfeited. In general, the Amended Plan provides that, in the event of a “change in control” (as defined in the Amended Plan), outstanding stock options will become fully vested.

The exercise price for each share of Class A common stock subject to an option may be paid in cash or by an exchange of shares of Class A common stock previously owned by the participant, through a “broker cashless exercise” procedure approved by the Compensation Committee (and to the extent permitted by law), or a combination of the foregoing, in any case in an amount having a combined value equal to the exercise price. A participant’s award agreement may permit a participant to pay all or a portion of the aggregate exercise price by having shares of Class A common stock with a fair market value on the date of exercise equal to the aggregate exercise price withheld by the Company.

Stock Appreciation Rights.  The Compensation Committee may grant SARs either with a stock option (a “tandem SAR”) or independent of a stock option (a “non-tandem SAR”). A SAR is a right to receive an amount (in cash, shares of Class A common stock or other property) with respect to each share of Class A common stock subject to the SAR, upon exercise of the SAR, equal to the excess of the fair market value of one share of Class A common stock on the exercise date over the base price of the SAR. In the case of a tandem SAR, the base price will be equal to the exercise price of the underlying option, and in the case of a non-tandem SAR, the base price will be the price determined by the Compensation Committee, provided it may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of one share of Class A common stock on the date of grant of the SAR. SARs will be exercisable for the applicable exercise period, which may not exceed the lesser of 10 years from the date of grant, or in the case of a tandem SAR, the expiration of the related option. With respect to a tandem SAR, the SAR may be granted at the time of the grant of the related option or at any time thereafter. In general, unless otherwise specified in a participant’s award agreement, upon a participant’s termination of service for any reason, outstanding SARs will be forfeited. In general, the Amended Plan provides that, in the event of a “change in control,” outstanding SARs will become fully vested.

Restricted Stock.  The Compensation Committee may grant shares of restricted Class A common stock. A recipient of shares of restricted Class A common stock will have all of the rights of a stockholder, including the right to vote the shares of restricted Class A common stock and the right to receive dividends. Unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, dividends on shares of restricted Class A common stock will be paid on the same date and in the same manner as the dividend distribution date and amount with respect to shares of the Class A common stock. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, shares of Class A common stock delivered in respect of a stock split or stock dividend, and other property distributed as a dividend or other distribution, will be subject to restrictions to the same extent as the share of restricted Class A common stock with respect to which such Class A common stock or other property has been distributed.

57


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Shares of restricted Class A common stock will be subject to transfer and other restrictions that the Compensation Committee may impose on the date of grant or thereafter. The restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances, in such installments, or otherwise, as the Compensation Committee may determine. The Compensation Committee may place restrictions on shares of restricted Class A common stock that lapse, in whole or in part, solely on the attainment of one or more performance goals. In general, unless otherwise specified in a participant’s award agreement, upon a participant’s termination of service for any reason, outstanding restricted Class A common stock will be forfeited, although the Compensation Committee may determine that restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to a participant’s shares of restricted Class A common stock will be waived in whole or in part in the event of a participant’s termination of service resulting from specified causes. In general, the Amended Plan provides that, in the event of a “change in control,” outstanding shares of restricted Class A common stock will become fully vested and all restrictions thereon will lapse (and to the extent such restrictions are based on the achievement of performance goals, such performance goals will be deemed to be fully achieved).

Restricted Stock Units.  The Compensation Committee may grant RSUs to participants. An RSU is a unit of measurement equal to one share of Class A common stock, although the recipient of an RSU does not have any of the rights of a stockholder. The Compensation Committee has discretion to determine the terms and conditions of RSUs, including the time at which such awards will be made, the number of RSUs to be awarded and the other terms of the award, including the vesting schedule. The Compensation Committee may place restrictions on RSUs that will lapse, in whole or in part, solely on the attainment of one or more performance goals. In general, unless otherwise specified in a participant’s award agreement, upon a participant’s termination of service for any reason, outstanding RSUs will be forfeited, although the Compensation Committee may determine that restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to a participant’s RSUs will be waived in whole or in part in the event of a participant’s termination of service resulting from specified causes. In general, the Amended Plan provides that, in the event of a “change in control,” outstanding RSUs will become fully vested and payable, and any performance conditions imposed with respect to outstanding RSUs will be deemed to be fully achieved.

Other Stock-Based Awards.  The Compensation Committee may grant other stock-based awards under the Amended Plan. Grants of other stock-based awards may include grants of shares of Class A common stock not subject to restrictions or a substantial risk of forfeiture and shares of Class A common stock in payment of amounts due under a plan or arrangement sponsored or maintained by the Company or an affiliate. The other stock-based awards may be granted with vesting, value or payment thereof contingent on the attainment of one or more performance goals. The Compensation Committee will determine the terms and conditions of other stock-based awards at the time of grant or thereafter.

Term.  Unless earlier terminated by the Board, the Amended Plan will expire on June 5, 2023. No awards may be granted under the Amended Plan after such expiration date. The expiration of the Amended Plan will not adversely affect the rights of any participant, without such participant’s consent, under any award granted prior to the expiration date.

Amendment and Termination.  The Board may at any time and from time to time terminate, amend, modify or suspend the Amended Plan in whole or in part, except that, unless otherwise determined by the Board, any amendment that requires stockholder approval for the Amended Plan to comply with any law, regulation or stock exchange requirement will not be effective unless approved by the required vote of stockholders. At any time and from time to time the Board may amend any outstanding award in whole or in part. No modification to or suspension or termination of the Amended Plan or amendment of any award will adversely affect the rights of any participant, without such participant’s consent, under any award granted prior to such modification, suspension or amendment.

Change in Control.  In the event of a “change in control,” any award that was not previously vested will become fully vested and payable, and any performance conditions imposed with respect to the award will be deemed to be fully achieved; provided, however, that for any award subject to Section 409A of the Code, no payment may be made to the holder of such award unless the transaction constituting a “change in

58


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

control” also constitutes, within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, a “change in the ownership or effective control” of the Company or a “change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets” of the Company.

In the event that a participant becomes entitled to payments or benefits provided by the Amended Plan or any other amounts in the “nature of compensation” (whether pursuant to the terms of the Amended Plan or any other plan, arrangement or agreement with the Company, any person whose actions result in a change of ownership or effective control covered by Section 280G(b)(2) of the Code or any person affiliated with the Company or such person) as a result of a “change in control” (the “Company Payments”), and if such Company Payments will be subject to the tax (the “Excise Tax”) imposed by Section 4999 of the Code (and any similar tax that may hereafter be imposed by any taxing authority), the Company will pay to such participant an additional amount such that the net amount retained by the participant, after deduction of any Excise Tax on the Company Payments and any U.S. federal, state, and local income or payroll tax upon the additional amount paid to such participant, but before deduction for any U.S. federal, state, and local income or payroll tax on the Company Payments, will be equal to the Company Payments. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if it is determined that a participant is entitled to an additional payment, but the Company Payments do not exceed 110% of the greatest amount (the “Reduced Amount”) that could be paid to the participant such that the receipt of the Company Payments would not give rise to the Excise Tax, then no additional payment will be made to the participant and the Company Payments, in the aggregate, will be reduced to an amount that is one dollar ($1) less than the Reduced Amount. Such reduction will only occur if the reduced Company Payments received by the participant (after taking into account further reduction for applicable federal, state and local income, social security and other taxes) would be greater than the unreduced Company Payments to be received by the participant minus (i) the Excise Tax payable with respect to such Company Payments and (ii) all applicable federal, state and local income, social security and other taxes on such Company Payments.

Transferability.  Unless otherwise provided in a participant’s award agreement, awards will not be transferable by a participant except by will or the laws of descent and distribution and will be exercisable during the participant’s lifetime only by the participant or the participant’s guardian or legal representative.

Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

The rules concerning the federal income tax consequences with respect to stock options granted pursuant to the Amended Plan are highly technical. In addition, the applicable statutory provisions are subject to change and their application may vary in individual circumstances. Therefore, the following is designed to provide a general understanding of the federal income tax consequences as of the date of this Proxy Statement; it does not set forth any non-U.S., state or local income tax, estate tax or other tax consequences that may be applicable.

The following summary is included for general information only and does not purport to address all of the tax considerations that may be relevant. Each recipient of a grant is urged to consult his or her own tax advisor as to the specific tax consequences to such grantee and the disposition of common stock.

Incentive Stock Options.  Options granted under the Amended Plan may be incentive stock options as defined in the Code, provided that such options satisfy the requirements under the Code. In general, neither the grant nor the exercise of an incentive stock option will result in taxable income to the participant or a deduction to the Company. The sale of shares of Class A common stock received pursuant to the exercise of an option which satisfied all the requirements of an incentive stock option, as well as the holding period requirement described below, will result in a long-term capital gain or loss to the participant equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale and the exercise price, and will not result in a tax deduction to the Company. To receive incentive stock option treatment, the participant must not dispose of the shares of Class A common stock purchased pursuant to the exercise of an option either (i) within two years after the option is granted or (ii) within one year after the date of exercise.

If all requirements for incentive stock option treatment other than the holding period rules are satisfied, the recognition of income by the participant is deferred until disposition of the shares of Class A common stock, but, in general, any gain (in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the fair market value of the share of

59


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Class A common stock on the date of exercise (or, with respect to officers, the date that sale of such Class A common stock would not create liability, referred to as Section 16(b) liability, under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act) minus the exercise price or (ii) the amount realized on the disposition minus the exercise price) is treated as ordinary income. Any remaining gain is treated as long-term or short-term capital gain depending on the participant’s holding period prior to disposal of the shares of Class A common stock. The Company generally will be entitled to a deduction at that time equal to the amount of ordinary income realized by the participant.

The Amended Plan provides that a participant may pay for shares of Class A common stock received upon the exercise of an option (including an incentive stock option) with other shares of Class A common stock for which the participant has good title free and clear of any lien or encumbrance. In general, a participant’s transfer of shares of Class A common stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option, to acquire other shares of Class A common stock in connection with the exercise of an incentive stock option, may result in ordinary income if the transferred shares of Class A common stock have not met the minimum statutory holding period necessary for favorable tax treatment as an incentive stock option. For example, if a participant exercises an incentive stock option and uses the stock so acquired to exercise another incentive stock option within the two-year or one-year holding periods discussed above, the participant may realize ordinary income under the rules summarized above.

Nonqualified Stock Options.  Participants will recognize no taxable income at the time of grant of nonqualified stock options. Such conclusion is predicated on the assumption that, under existing U.S. Treasury Department regulations, a nonqualified stock option, at the time of its grant, has no readily ascertainable fair market value. Ordinary income will be realized when a nonqualified stock option is exercised. The amount of such income will be equal to the excess of the fair market value on the exercise date of the shares of Class A common stock issued to a participant over the exercise price. The participant’s holding period with respect to the shares acquired will begin on the date of exercise.

Certain Other Tax Issues.  In addition, (i) any of the Company’s officers subject to Section 16(b) liability may be subject to special rules regarding the income tax consequences concerning their awards; (ii) any entitlement to a tax deduction on the Company’s part is subject to the applicable federal tax rules (including, without limitation, Section 162(m) of the Code regarding the $1,000,000 limitation on deductible compensation); (iii) in the event that the exercisability or vesting of any award is accelerated because of a change in control, payments relating to the awards (or a portion thereof), either alone or together with certain other payments, may constitute parachute payments under Section 280G of the Code, which excess amounts may be subject to excise taxes and may be nondeductible by the Company; and (iv) the exercise of an incentive stock option may have implications in the computation of alternative minimum taxable income. Without limitation on the foregoing, as described above, the Equity Plan includes a modified gross-up provision that would require the Company to make an additional payment to make participants whole for any golden parachute excise tax under 4999 of the Code (and any taxes on such payment) in the event that there are any excess parachute payments in excess of 110% of the applicable safe harbor amount. As a result, in the event that payments relating to Equity Plan awards (or a portion thereof) constitute parachute payments under Section 280G of the Code, the total cost to the Company will exceed that of the applicable excise tax and loss of deduction.

Section 409A of the Code provides that all amounts deferred under a nonqualified deferred compensation plan are includible in a participant’s gross income to the extent such amounts are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, unless certain requirements are satisfied. If the requirements are not satisfied, in addition to current income inclusion, interest at the underpayment rate plus 1% will be imposed on the participant’s underpayments that would have occurred had the deferred compensation been includible in gross income for the taxable year in which first deferred or, if later, the first taxable year in which such deferred compensation is not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. The amount required to be included in income is also subject to an additional 20% tax. While most awards under the Amended Plan are anticipated to be exempt from the requirements of Code Section 409A, awards not exempt from Code Section 409A are intended to comply with Code Section 409A.

The Amended Plan is not, nor is it intended to be, qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code.

60


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

New Plan Benefits

Under the Amended Plan, the terms and number of options or other awards to be granted in the future are to be determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Since no such determination regarding awards or grants has yet been made, the benefits or amounts that will be received by or allocated to our executive officers and other eligible employees cannot be determined at this time.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote of “FOR” approval of the amendment to the RCS Capital Corporation Equity Plan.

DISSENTERS’ RIGHTS OF APPRAISAL

Delaware law does not provide for dissenters’ rights in connection with the matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting.

INTEREST OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MATTER ACTED UPON

Other than the director nominees’ elections to office, there are no substantial interests, direct or indirect, by security holdings or otherwise, of each of the following persons in connection with any of the matters to be acted upon:

Each director or executive officer of the Company at any time since the beginning of the last fiscal year.
Each nominee for election as a director of the Company.
Each associate of any of the foregoing persons.

61


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and registration statements with the SEC. These filings are available to the public via the Internet at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any document we file with the SEC without charge at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also obtain copies of the documents at prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference facilities.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR OUR 2015 ANNUAL MEETING

Stockholder Proposals in the Proxy Statement

Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, a stockholder intending to present a proposal to be included in our 2016 annual meeting must deliver a proposal in writing to be received at our principal executive offices, 405 Park Avenue — 14th Floor, New York, New York 10022, Attention: James A. Tanaka: General Counsel, RCS Capital, not later than 120 days before the date our proxy statement was released to stockholders in connection with this year’s annual meeting. Accordingly, for our annual meeting to be held in 2016, any stockholder proposal to be included in the proxy statement under Rule 14a-8 must be received by us no later than February   , 2016.

Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for Directors to Be Presented at Meetings

For any proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in our proxy material for our 2015 annual meeting but is instead sought to be presented directly at that meeting and for any director nominations, Rule 14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act permits our management to exercise discretionary voting authority under proxies it solicits unless we receive timely notice of the proposal in accordance with the procedures set forth under our by-laws. To be timely submitted for presentation at our 2016 annual meeting, our secretary must receive written notice of the proposal at our principal executive offices, 405 Park Avenue — 14th Floor, New York, New York 10022, Attention: Secretary, c/o James A. Tanaka: General Counsel, RCS Capital between March 1, 2016 and March 31, 2016. Any proposal not received within the applicable time in the previous sentence will be considered untimely. All proposals must contain the information specified in, and otherwise comply with, our by-laws.

62


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OTHER MATTERS

The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

This Proxy Statement is dated June   , 2015. You should not assume that the information contained in this Proxy Statement is accurate as of any date other than the date above, unless expressly provided.

 
By Order of the Board of Directors,
        
       
/s/ Edward M. Weil, Jr.

Edward M. Weil, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer and Director
          

63


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEX A:
FORM OF AMENDMENT TO OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF THE
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
RCS CAPITAL CORPORATION
 
(Pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware)

RCS CAPITAL CORPORATION, (hereinafter called the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “General Corporation Law”) does hereby certify:

FIRST:  That by written consent of the Board of Directors of the Corporation in accordance with Section 141(f) of the General Corporation Law, the following resolution was duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to the Corrected Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”), declaring said amendment to be advisable. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is:

RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation be amended to change “Section 4.01” of the Certificate of Incorporation so that, as amended, said Section shall be and read as follows:

“Section 4.01. Capitalization.  The total number of shares of stock that the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 500,000,000, consisting of (a) 300,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Class A common stock”), (b) 100,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Class B Common Stock,” and together with the Class A common stock, the “Common Stock”), and (c) 100,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Preferred Stock”). Holders of capital stock of the Corporation do not have preemptive rights.”

SECOND:  That thereafter, the necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

THIRD:  That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this certificate of amendment to be signed as of June   , 2015.

 

By:


Name, Title: Edward M. Weil, Jr., Chief Executive Officer

    

A-1


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEX B:
THIRD AMENDMENT TO
RCS CAPITAL CORPORATION
EQUITY PLAN

WHEREAS, RCS Capital Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the RCS Capital Corporation Equity Plan, as amended June 5, 2013 and December 29, 2014 (the “Plan”);

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9(d)(ii) of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may at any time and from time to time, amend or modify the Plan in whole or in part, subject to stockholder approval to the extent required to comply with any law, regulation or stock exchange requirement; and

WHEREAS, the Board considers it in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and its employees and other service providers to adopt an amendment to the Plan to expand the class of eligible persons to whom Awards (with the meaning of the Plan) may be granted under the Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 9(d)(ii) of the Plan, and subject to, approval of the Company’s stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting to be held on June 25, 2015, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

Section 1. Amendment.

(a) Section 2 (Definitions) is hereby amended by adding the following new definitions in the appropriate alphabetical order or sub-section number, and, as applicable, reordering and renumbering the existing defined terms:

Financial Advisor” means an individual who (i) is a registered principal or registered representative of a broker-dealer or a person associated or registered with an investment adviser, and (ii) provides services to the Company or its Affiliates through, the Company, an Affiliate of the Company or a Retail Advice Entity (including prospective Financial Advisors).

Retail Advice Entity” means an entity engaged in the broker-dealer business or rendering investment advice as part of the Company’s retail advice business.”

(b) The first and second sentences of Section 4 (Eligibility) are hereby amended and restated in their entirety as follows:

“Awards (other than Incentive Stock Options) may be granted, in the discretion of the Board, to (i) individuals who are, as of the date of grant, (a) non-executive directors, officers and other employees of the Company or its Affiliates, (b) Financial Advisors and (c) other advisors or consultants of the Company or any of its Affiliates that are providing services to the Company or the Affiliate pursuant to a written agreement, which are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction, and do not, directly or indirectly, promote or maintain a market for the Company’s or its Affiliates’ securities and (ii) subject to the Management Agreement remaining in effect on the date of grant, the Manager and individuals who are, as of the date of grant, employees, officers or directors of the Manager or one of its Affiliates (it being understood that references in the Plan to employment or service with “the Company” shall be deemed to refer to employment or service with the Company or an Affiliate, the Manager or its Affiliates or, with respect to a Financial Advisor or other eligible person that is an independent contractor, such Financial Advisor’s or independent contractor’s continuing to provide services in such capacity to the Company or its Affiliates, as the case may be). Incentive Stock Options may be granted, in the discretion of the Board, to individuals who are, as of the date of grant, employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries.”

Section 2. Headings.  The headings of the sections of this Amendment are inserted as a matter of convenience and for reference purposes only and in no respect define, limit or describe the scope of this Amendment or the Plan or any Award thereunder or the intent of any section of any of the foregoing.

Section 3. Entire Agreement.  Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.

B-1


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section 4. Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has approved the amendment to the Plan as set forth herein and authorized the undersigned officer of the Company to execute this amendment and the undersigned has caused this amendment to be executed this [•  ] day of June, 2015.

RCS CAPITAL CORPORATION

By:  

Name: Edward M. Weil, Jr.
Title:  Chief Executive Officer

B-2