XML 118 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets [Abstract]  
Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets

Note 4 - Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following table sets forth information for MasTec's goodwill and intangible assets, including those associated with preliminary purchase price allocations, as of the dates indicated (in millions):

The following table provides a reconciliation of changes in goodwill and other intangible assets for the years indicated (in millions):

 

Information about estimated future amortization expense associated with amortizing intangible assets, including those associated with preliminary purchase price allocations, is summarized in the following table (in millions):

 

     Amortization
Expense
 

2012

   $ 11.4   

2013

     6.4   

2014

     4.6   

2015

     3.8   

2016

     3.2   

Thereafter

     15.3   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 44.7   
  

 

 

 

Management performs its annual impairment review of goodwill and certain intangible assets with indefinite lives during the fourth quarter each year at the reporting unit level. Assets of acquired businesses and related goodwill are allocated to the corresponding reporting units. Management identifies the Company's reporting units by assessing whether components holding purchased assets, including goodwill and related assumed liabilities, have discrete financial information available. To the extent that two or more components are deemed economically similar, those components are aggregated into one reporting unit for purposes of the Company's annual goodwill impairment review.

The Company's reporting units sell and provide contracting services, including building, installation, maintenance and upgrade services, primarily by digging and drilling trenches and installing poles, pipe, towers, antennae, wire, and equipment. Many of our reporting units perform these services across multiple industries, including telecommunications, utilities and government, and on behalf of a variety of customers, some of which contract services from multiple reporting units.

Management estimates the fair value of each reporting unit and compares the estimated fair value to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value, the value of the reporting units' goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangible assets may be impaired and could require a write down. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company adopted ASU 2011-08, which permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the traditional two-step goodwill impairment test. Based on this analysis, none of the Company's reporting units were considered more likely than not to be impaired as of December 31, 2011. During each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2010, management estimated the fair value of the Company's reporting units using a discounted cash flow methodology, which incorporates five-year projections of revenues, operating costs and cash flows considering historical and anticipated future results, general economic and market conditions, as well as the impact of planned business and operational strategies. Management applied a discounted cash flow technique utilizing a terminal value equal to 5.5 times year five EBITDA. The discount rate was estimated to be 8.5% per annum and represents the Company's estimated cost of capital at the time of the analysis. A 100 basis point change in the discount rate would not have had a material impact on the results of the impairment analysis. Based upon these analyses, the Company determined that the estimated fair values of the Company's reporting units substantially exceeded their carrying values for each of the three years ended in the period ended December 31, 2011.