Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration Statement No. 333-184677

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
SUPPLEMENT NO. 1, DATED JUNE 16, 2014,
TO THE PROSPECTUS, DATED MAY 21, 2014

This prospectus supplement, or this Supplement No. 2, is part of the prospectus of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc., or the Company, dated May 21, 2014, or the Prospectus, and should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus. This Supplement No. 1 will be delivered with the Prospectus. Unless the context suggests otherwise, the terms “we,” “us” and “our” used herein refer to the Company, together with its consolidated subsidiaries.

The purposes of this Supplement No. 1 are to:

• update the status of the offering and the shares currently available for sale;

• add disclosure relating to our real estate investments;

• update disclosure relating to our investment policies;

• replace Appendix C-1 — Subscription Agreement and Appendix C-2 — Multi-Offering Subscription Agreement; and

• attach our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 as Annex A.

OPERATING INFORMATION

Status of the Offering

We commenced our reasonable best efforts initial public offering of up to 68.0 million shares of common stock on February 14, 2013 (excluding shares to be issued under the distribution reinvestment plan, or DRIP). On April 12, 2013, we satisfied the general escrow conditions of our initial public offering of common stock. On such date, we received and accepted aggregate subscriptions equal to the minimum of $2.0 million in shares of common stock, broke general escrow and issued shares to our initial investors. Additionally, on May 30, 2013, we received and accepted aggregate subscriptions in excess of $10.0 million in shares of common stock and broke escrow in Washington. Additionally, on September 18, 2013, we received and accepted aggregate subscriptions in excess of $85.0 million in shares of common stock and broke escrow in Pennsylvania. Accordingly, we began accepting subscriptions from all states, including Washington and Pennsylvania.

We will offer shares of our common stock until February 14, 2015, unless the offering is extended in accordance with the Prospectus, as supplemented from time to time, provided that the offering will be terminated if all 68.0 million shares of our common stock are sold before such date (subject to our right to reallocate shares offered pursuant to the DRIP for sale in our primary offering).

As of June 10, 2014, we had acquired 20 properties which were 93.2% leased on a weighted average basis. As of June 10, 2014, we had total real estate investments, at cost, of $160.3 million. As of March 31, 2014, we had incurred cumulatively to that date $66.2 million in selling commissions, dealer manager fees and offering costs in connection with the issuance and distribution of our registered securities.

Shares Currently Available for Sale

As of May 30, 2014, we had received aggregate gross proceeds of $975.9 million, consisting of the sale of 39.0 million shares of common stock in our public offering and $6.7 million from the DRIP. As of May 30, 2014, there are 39.3 million shares of our common stock outstanding, including shares issued under the DRIP and unvested restricted stock. As of May 30, 2014, there are 29.0 million shares of our common stock available for sale, excluding shares available under our DRIP.

1

PROSPECTUS UPDATES

Investor Suitability Standards

The following suitability paragraphs beginning on page i of the Prospectus are hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following disclosure.

“General Standards for all Investors

• Investors must have either (a) a net worth of at least $250,000 or (b) an annual gross income of $70,000 and a minimum net worth of $70,000.

Alabama

• In addition to the general suitability requirements described above, shares will only be sold to Alabama residents that represent that they have a liquid net worth of at least 10 times the amount of their investment in this real estate investment program and other similar programs. Note that Alabama investors cannot participate in the distribution reinvestment plan feature that reinvests distributions into subsequent affiliated programs or our Automatic Purchase Plan.

California

• In addition to the general suitability requirements described above, California investors’ maximum investment in us will be limited to 10% of their net worth (exclusive of home, home furnishings and automobile).

Iowa

• The maximum investment allowable in us and our affiliates is 10% of an Iowa investor’s liquid net worth. Liquid net worth is defined as that portion of net worth (total assets minus total liabilities) that is comprised of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable securities.

Kansas

• In addition to the general suitability requirements described above, it is recommended that investors should invest no more than 10% of their liquid net worth, in the aggregate, in us and securities of other real estate investment trusts. “Liquid net worth” is defined as that portion of net worth (total assets minus total liabilities) that is comprised of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable securities.

Kentucky

• Investors must have either (a) a net worth of $250,000 or (b) a gross annual income of at least $70,000 and a net worth of at least $70,000, with the amount invested in this offering not to exceed 10% of the Kentucky investor’s liquid net worth.

Maine

• The Maine Office of Securities recommends that an investor’s aggregate investment in this offering and similar direct participation investments not exceed 10% of the investor’s liquid net worth. For this purpose, “liquid net worth” is defined as that portion of net worth that consists of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable securities. Note that Maine investors cannot participate in the DRIP feature that reinvests distributions into subsequent affiliated programs.

Massachusetts

• An investor must have either (a) a minimum net worth of at least $250,000 or (b) an annual gross income of at least $70,000 and a net worth of at least $70,000. A Massachusetts investor’s aggregate investment in this Program and in other illiquid direct participation programs (including real estate investment trusts, business development programs, oil and gas programs, equipment leasing programs and commodity pools) may not exceed ten percent (10%) of his or her liquid net worth. “Liquid net worth” is defined as that portion of net worth (total assets exclusive of home, home furnishings and automobiles minus total liabilities) that is comprised of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable securities.

2

Michigan

• The maximum investment allowable in us for a Michigan investor is 10% of his or her net worth.

Missouri

• In addition to the general suitability requirements described above, no more than ten percent (10%) of any one Missouri investor’s liquid net worth shall be invested in the securities registered by us for this offering with the Missouri Securities Division.

Nebraska

• Investors must have either (a) a minimum net worth of $100,000 and an annual income of $70,000 or (b) a minimum net worth of $350,000. The investor’s maximum investment in us and our affiliates cannot exceed 10% of the investor’s net worth. Note that Nebraska investors cannot participate in the DRIP feature that reinvests distributions into subsequent affiliated programs.

New Jersey

• New Jersey investors must have either (a) a minimum liquid net worth of at least $100,000 and a minimum annual gross income of not less than $85,000, or (b) a minimum liquid net worth of $350,000. For these purposes, “liquid net worth” is defined as that portion of net worth (total assets exclusive of home, home furnishings, and automobiles, minus total liabilities) that consists of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable securities. In addition, a New Jersey investor's investment in us, our affiliates, and other non-publicly traded direct investment programs (including real estate investment trusts, business development programs, oil and gas programs, equipment leasing programs and commodity pools, but excluding unregistered, federally and state exempt private offerings) may not exceed ten percent (10%) of his or her liquid net worth.

New Mexico

• An investor must have either (a) a minimum net worth of at least $250,000 or (b) an annual gross income of at least $70,000 and a net worth of at least $70,000. A New Mexico investor’s aggregate investment in us, shares of our affiliates and in other non-traded real estate investment programs may not exceed ten percent (10%) of his or her liquid net worth. “Liquid net worth” is defined as that portion of net worth (total assets exclusive of home, home furnishings and automobiles minus total liabilities) that is comprised of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable securities.

North Dakota

• Shares will only be sold to residents of North Dakota representing that in addition to the general suitability standards listed above, they have a net worth of at least ten times their investment in us.

Ohio

• An investor must have either (a) a minimum net worth of at least $250,000 or (b) an annual gross income of at least $70,000 and a net worth of at least $70,000. An Ohio investor’s aggregate investment in us, shares of our affiliates and in other non-traded real estate investment programs may not exceed ten percent (10%) of his or her liquid net worth. “Liquid net worth” is defined as that portion of net worth (total assets exclusive of home, home furnishings and automobiles minus total liabilities) that is comprised of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable securities. Note that Ohio investors cannot participate in the DRIP feature that reinvests distributions into subsequent affiliated programs.

Oregon

• An investor must have either (a) a minimum net worth of at least $250,000 or (b) an annual gross income of at least $70,000 and a net worth of at least $70,000. The investor’s maximum investment in us and our affiliates also cannot exceed 10% of the Oregon resident’s net worth.

Pennsylvania

• A Pennsylvania investor’s investment in us cannot exceed 10% of his or her net worth.

3

Tennessee

• A Tennessee resident’s maximum investment in the offering must not exceed ten percent (10%) of his or her liquid net worth (exclusive of home, home furnishings and automobiles).

Texas

• An investor must have had, during the last tax year, or estimate that the investor will have during the current tax year, (a) a minimum net worth of $100,000 and a minimum annual gross income of $100,000, or (b) a minimum net worth of $500,000. The investor’s maximum investment in this offering shall not exceed 10% of the investor’s liquid net worth.”

Summary

The following disclosure replaces the last sentence in the first paragraph under the question “What is American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc.?” on page 1 of the Prospectus.

“We may also invest in assets located outside the United States.”

Management

Mr. Wilkins biography under the section “Other Key Employees” on page 100 of the Prospectus is hereby deleted in its entirety.

The second sentence of the second paragraph on page 106 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.

“Additionally, we estimate that each of Messrs. Leahy and Sanders, our vice president of asset management and our chief marketing officer, respectively, also will each spend approximately 30 hours per week on activities related to us.”

Investment Strategy, Objectives and Policies

The following disclosure hereby replaces in its entirety the section entitled “International Investments” on page 150 of the Prospectus.

“We may make investment in assets located outside of the United States.”

Estimated Use of Proceeds

The third sentence of the second paragraph under the section “Estimated Use of Proceeds” is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.

“If substantially less than the maximum amount of the offering is raised, we would expect that substantially all our assets will be invested in such healthcare-related assets located in the United States or internationally.”

Description of Real Estate Investments

The following disclosure is hereby added to the end of the section entitled “Description of Real Estate Investment” on page 177 of the Prospectus.

“Creekside Medical Office Building — Douglasville, GA

On April 30, 2014, we closed our acquisition of the fee simple interest in a medical office building, or the Creekside Medical Office Building (“Creekside”) located in Douglasville, GA. We acquired the property through a wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of the property was Creekside Medical Building, L.P., an entity which has no material relationship with us, and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.

Creekside contains 54,899 rentable square feet and was constructed in 1999.

Capitalization

The contract purchase price of Creekside was $10.0 million, exclusive of closing costs. We funded the acquisition of Creekside with $4.8 million in proceeds from this offering and the assumption of $5.2 million in existing mortgage debt as described under “Financing Obligations” below.

4

Major Tenant/Lease Expiration

Creekside was 87.6% leased to seven tenants as of the date of acquisition. The following table provides information relating to lease commencement and termination dates, rentable square feet, rental escalations, renewal options and annualized straight-line rental income for the tenants that represent over 10% of the total annualized rental income of Creekside:

Tenant

Lease Commencement Date

Lease Termination Date

Rentable Square Feet

Annualized Straight-Line Rental Income (in thousands)(1)

Rental Escalations

Renewal Options

The Medical Group of St. Joseph’s LLC

January 2001

December 2015

5,889

$

0.1 million

2% annually

2 – 5 year options

WellStar Health System, Inc.

December 1999

December 2024

28,348

$

0.6 million

3% annually

None

(1) Annualized rental income for the in-place leases in the property on a straight-line basis, which includes tenant concessions such as free rent, as applicable.

The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years:

	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009
Occupancy		87.6	%		82.1	%		82.1	%		79.6	%		79.6	%
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot	$	16.12		$	16.20		$	16.36		$	16.10		$	15.93

Other

We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.

We do not have any significant scheduled capital improvements for the property.

We believe that the property is adequately insured.

The U.S. federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2014 U.S. federal income tax return.

The annual real estate tax on the building for the calendar year 2014 is expected to be $0.1 million. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.

Creekside is located adjacent to WellStar Douglas Hospital. The hospital’s affiliated physicians occupy 59.4% of Creekside. The physician tenants at Creekside specialize in urology, cardiac care, nephrology, women’s health, orthopedics and pediatrics.

We believe that Creekside is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. Creekside will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire Creekside, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.

Bowie Gateway Medical Center — Bowie, MD

On May 7, 2014, we closed our acquisition of the fee simple interest in a medical office building, or the Bowie Gateway Medical Center (“Bowie Gateway”) located in Bowie, MD. We acquired the property through a wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of the property was LMOF II Bowie Gateway, L.L.C., an entity which has no material relationship with us, and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.

Bowie Gateway contains 36,260 rentable square feet and was constructed in 2000.

5

Capitalization

The contract purchase price of Bowie Gateway was $12.5 million, exclusive of closing costs. We funded the acquisition of Bowie Gateway with $6.4 million in proceeds from this offering and the assumption of $6.1 million in existing mortgage debt as described under “Financing Obligations” below.

Major Tenant/Lease Expiration

Bowie Gateway was 100.0% leased to two tenants as of the date of acquisition, one of which, Anne Arundel Health System, Inc., represents over 10% of the total annualized rental income of Bowie Gateway. The Anne Arundel Health System, Inc. lease is net whereby the tenant is required to pay substantially all operating expenses, including a majority of costs to maintain and repair the roof and structure of the building, in addition to base rent. The lease has an original 10-year term which commenced in December 2010 and expires in November 2020 and contains 3.0% annual rental and one five-year renewal options. The annualized rental income on a straight-line basis for the initial term is $0.9 million.

The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years:

	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009
Occupancy		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		92.8	%		92.8	%
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot	$	23.94		$	23.25		$	22.57		$	22.03		$	23.65

Other

We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.

We do not have any significant scheduled capital improvements for the property.

We believe that the property is adequately insured.

The U.S. federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2014 U.S. federal income tax return.

The annual real estate tax on the building for the calendar year 2014 is expected to be $0.1 million. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.

Bowie Gateway features a diagnostic radiology center, and services to support areas of women’s health, orthopedics and cardiology.

We believe that Bowie Gateway is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. Bowie Gateway will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire Bowie Gateway, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.

Campus at Crooks and Auburn Building D — Rochester Hills, MI

On May 19, 2014, we closed our acquisition of the fee simple interest in a medical office building, or the Campus at Crooks and Auburn Building D (“Crooks Building D”) located in Rochester Hills, MI. We acquired the property through a wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of the property was JBD Medical D Building, LLC, an entity which has no material relationship with us, and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.

Crooks Building D contains 24,529 rentable square feet and was constructed in 2007.

Capitalization

The contract purchase price of Crooks Building D was $5.0 million, exclusive of closing costs. We funded the acquisition, of Crooks Building D with net proceeds from this offering.

6

Major Tenant/Lease Expiration

Crooks Building D was 88.9% leased to four tenants as of the date of acquisition. The following table provides information relating to lease commencement and termination dates, rentable square feet, rental escalations, renewal options and annualized straight-line rental income for the tenants that represent over 10% of the total annualized rental income of Crooks Building D:

Tenant

Lease Commencement Date

Lease Termination Date

Rentable Square Feet

Annualized Straight-Line Rental Income (in thousands)(1)

Rental Escalations

Renewal Options

Trinity Health Michigan

June 2009

June 2019

9,947

$

0.2 million

$

.50 per sq. ft. annually

3 – 5 year options

Metro Infectious Disease Consultants, PLLC

March 2007

March 2019

3,930

$

0.1 million

$

.50 per sq. ft. annually

2 – 5 year options

Catherine Waller, M.D., P.C.

June 2012

May 2022(2)

5,527

$

0.1 million

$

.50 per sq. ft. annually

2 – 5 year options

(1) Annualized rental income for the in-place leases in the property on a straight-line basis, which includes tenant concessions such as free rent, as applicable.

(2) Tenant has an early termination option in May 2019.

The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years:

	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009
Occupancy		88.9	%		88.9	%		66.4	%		66.4	%		66.4	%
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot	$	16.55		$	16.26		$	20.78		$	20.58		$	20.39

Other

We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.

We do not have any significant scheduled capital improvements for the property.

We believe that the property is adequately insured.

The U.S. federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2014 U.S. federal income tax return.

The annual real estate tax on the building for the calendar year 2014 is expected to be $0.1 million. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.

The tenants at Crooks Building D offer medical services and physician practices, specializing in internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatric, anti-aging and holistic, infectious disease and psychology.

We believe that Crooks Building D is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. Crooks Building D will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire Crooks Building D, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.

Medical Center of New Windsor — New Windsor, NY

On May 22, 2014, we closed our acquisition of the leasehold interest in a medical office building, or the Medical Center of New Windsor (“New Windsor”) located in New Windsor, NY. We acquired the property through a wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of the property was New Windsor LaSalle Medical Office, L.L.C., an entity which has no material relationship with us, and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.

New Windsor contains 48,377 rentable square feet and was constructed in 2002.

7

Capitalization

The contract purchase price of New Windsor was $11.6 million, exclusive of closing costs. We funded the acquisition of New Windsor with $2.7 million in proceeds from this offering and the assumption of $8.9 million in existing mortgage debt as described under “Financing Obligations” below.

Major Tenant/Lease Expiration

New Windsor was 84.1% leased to six tenants as of the date of acquisition. The following table provides information relating to lease commencement and termination dates, rentable square feet, rental escalations, renewal options and annualized straight-line rental income for the tenants that represent over 10% of the total annualized rental income of New Windsor:

Tenant

Lease Commencement Date

Lease Termination Date

Rentable Square Feet

Annualized Straight-Line Rental Income (in thousands)(1)

Rental Escalations

Renewal Options

St. Luke’s Cornwall Hospital, Inc.

August 2007

July 2014

7,464

$

0.1 million

3.0% annually

1 – 5 year option

Airport Imaging, LLC

January 2003

December 2019

12,488

$

0.3 million

3.0% annually

None

Westchester Medical Center Advanced Physician Services, PC

November 2002

November 2017

12,393

$

0.3 million

3.0% annually

None

New Windsor Family Medicine, PLLC

April 2008

March 2020

4,374

$

0.1 million

3.0% annually

2 – 3 year options

(1) Annualized rental income for the in-place leases in the property on a straight-line basis, which includes tenant concessions such as free rent, as applicable.

The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years:

	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009
Occupancy		86.3	%		86.3	%		86.3	%		86.3	%		86.3	%
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot	$	22.64		$	22.14		$	21.51		$	20.71		$	19.97

Other

We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.

We do not have any significant scheduled capital improvements for the property.

We believe that the property is adequately insured.

The U.S. federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2014 U.S. federal income tax return.

The annual real estate tax on the building for the calendar year 2014 is expected to be $0.2 million. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.

New Windsor includes tenants specializing in various medical practices and services, including imaging, family medicine, plastic surgery and cardiology.

We believe that New Windsor is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. New Windsor will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire New Windsor, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.

Plank Medical Center — Clifton Park, NY

On May 22, 2014, we closed our acquisition of the fee simple interest in a medical office building, or the Plank Medical Center (“Plank”) located in Clifton Park, NY. We acquired the property through a

8

wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of the property was Plank LaSalle Medical Office, L.L.C., an entity which has no material relationship with us, and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.

Plank contains 24,835 rentable square feet and was constructed in 1999.

Capitalization

The contract purchase price of Plank was $4.5 million, exclusive of closing costs. We funded the acquisition of Plank with $1.0 million in proceeds from this offering and the assumption of $3.5 million in existing mortgage debt as described under “Financing Obligations” below.

Major Tenant/Lease Expiration

Plank was 93.1% leased to five tenants as of the date of acquisition. The following table provides information relating to lease commencement and termination dates, rentable square feet, rental escalations, renewal options and annualized straight-line rental income for the tenants that represent over 10% of the total annualized rental income of Plank:

Tenant

Lease Commencement Date

Lease Termination Date

Rentable Square Feet

Annualized Straight-Line Rental Income (in thousands)(1)

Rental Escalations

Renewal Options

Seton Health Systems, Inc.

January 2000

January 2015

8,030

$

0.2 million

2.0% annually

1 – 5 year option

Clifton Park Advanced Imaging, PLLC

March 2003

February 2015

4,485

$

0.1 million

Lesser of CPI(2) or 4.0

%

1 – 7 year option

Gurinder S. Wadhwa, D.D.S.

May 2000

April 2014(3)

3,948

$

0.1 million

2.0% annually

None

PrimeLending

March 2012

February 2015

4,500

$

0.1 million

3.0% annually

None

(1) Annualized rental income for the in-place leases in the property on a straight-line basis, which includes tenant concessions such as free rent, as applicable.

(2) Consumer Price Index

(3) Tenant is currently occupying space on a month-to-month basis and in active negotiations to renew its lease.

The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years:

	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009
Occupancy		93.1	%		93.1	%		75.0	%		75.0	%		75.0	%
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot	$	19.76		$	19.33		$	18.89		$	18.59		$	17.47

Other

We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.

We do not have any significant scheduled capital improvements for the property.

We believe that the property is adequately insured.

The U.S. federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2014 U.S. federal income tax return.

The annual real estate tax on the building for the calendar year 2014 is expected to be $0.1 million. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.

The tenants of Plank provide a wide range of physician services, including imaging, orthopedics, oral and maxillofacial surgery and physical rehabilitation therapy.

We believe that Plank is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. Plank will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the

9

center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire Plank, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.

Cushing Center — Schenectady, NY

On May 23, 2014, we closed our acquisition of the leasehold interest in a medical office building, or the Cushing Center (“Cushing”) located in Schenectady, NY. We acquired the property through a wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of the property was Cushing LaSalle Medical Office, L.L.C., an entity which has no material relationship with us, and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.

Cushing contains 45,301 rentable square feet and was constructed in 1996.

Capitalization

The contract purchase price of Cushing was $13.2 million, exclusive of closing costs. We funded the acquisition of Cushing with $8.9 million in proceeds from this offering and the assumption of $4.3 million in existing mortgage debt as described under “Financing Obligations” below.

Major Tenant/Lease Expiration

Cushing was 95.3% leased to two tenants as of the date of acquisition under seven leases. The following table provides information relating to lease commencement and termination dates, rentable square feet, rental escalations, renewal options and annualized straight-line rental income for the tenants that represent over 10% of the total annualized rental income of Cushing:

Tenant

Lease Commencement Date

Lease Termination Date

Rentable Square Feet

Annualized Straight-Line Rental Income (in thousands)(1)

Rental Escalations

Renewal Options

Ellis Hospital

Various(2)

Various(3)

37,851

$

0.8 million

Various

Various

Fox & Schingo Plastic Surgery, PC

March 1996

March 2016

5,328

$

0.1 million

3% annually

2 – 5 year options

(1) Annualized rental income for the in-place leases in the property on a straight-line basis, which includes tenant concessions such as free rent, as applicable.

(2) Lease commencement dates for Ellis Hospital range from March 1996 to April 2012.

(3) Lease termination dates for Ellis Hospital range from December 2017 to July 2022.

The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years:

	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009
Occupancy		95.3	%		95.3	%		85.9	%		80.0	%		80.0	%
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot	$	21.29		$	21.16		$	20.73		$	19.26		$	18.72

Other

We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.

We do not have any significant scheduled capital improvements for the property.

We believe that the property is adequately insured.

The U.S. federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2014 U.S. federal income tax return.

The annual real estate tax on the building for the calendar year 2014 is expected to be approximately $39,000. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.

10

Cushing provides medical office space for physicians and houses specialties including a family health center, a medical library, pediatrics, child and adolescent care, capital care, rheumatology and ear-nose-throat care.

We believe that Cushing is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. Cushing will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire Cushing, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.

Berwyn Medical Center — Berwyn, IL

On May 29, 2014, we closed our acquisition of the leasehold interest in a medical office building, or the Berwyn Medical Center (“Berwyn”) located in Berwyn, IL. We acquired the property through a wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of the property was Patriot Berwyn Associates, L.P., an entity which has no material relationship with us, and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.

Berwyn contains 42,779 rentable square feet and was constructed in 2004.

Capitalization

The contract purchase price of Berwyn was $11.0 million, exclusive of closing costs. We funded the acquisition of Berwyn with proceeds from this offering.

Major Tenant/Lease Expiration

Berwyn was 100.0% leased to VHS of Illinois, Inc. as of the date of acquisition. The lease is net whereby the tenant is required to pay substantially all operating expenses, including all costs to maintain and repair the roof and structure of the building, in addition to base rent. The lease has an original 22-year term which commenced in February 2000 and expires in July 2021. The annualized straight-line rental income for the initial term is $0.9 million. The lease contains annual rental escalations equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index and has two renewal options of five years each.

The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years:

	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009
Occupancy		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot	$	21.89		$	21.08		$	20.18		$	19.54		$	18.99

Other

We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.

We do not have any significant scheduled capital improvements for the property.

We believe that the property is adequately insured.

The U.S. federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2014 U.S. federal income tax return.

The annual real estate tax on the building for the calendar year 2014 is expected to be $0.3 million. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.

VHS of Illinois, Inc. is owned by Tenet Healthcare Corporation. Tenet Healthcare Corporation operates regionally focused, integrated health care delivery networks with a significant presence in several large urban and suburban markets. As of December 31, 2013, Tenet Healthcare Corporation operated 77 hospitals, 183 outpatient centers, six health plans, and six accountable care networks.

11

We believe that Berwyn is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. Berwyn will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire Berwyn, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.

St. Andrews Medical Park — Venice, FL

On May 30, 2014, we closed our acquisition of the fee simple interest in a medical office building, or the St. Andrews Medical Park (“St. Andrews”), located in Venice, Florida. We acquired the property through a wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of St. Andrews, AW St. Andrews, LLC, has no material relationship with us and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.

St. Andrews contains 60,441 rentable square feet and was constructed in 1998.

Capitalization

The contract purchase price of St. Andrews was $13.3 million, exclusive of closing costs. We funded the acquisition of St. Andrews with $6.5 million in proceeds from this offering and the assumption of $6.8 million in existing mortgage debt allocated to St. Andrews as described under “Financing Obligations” below.

Major Tenant/Lease Expiration

St. Andrews is 95.3% leased to 11 tenants as of the date of acquisition. The following table provides information relating to lease commencement and termination dates, rentable square feet, rental escalations, renewal options and annualized straight-line rental income for the tenants that represent over 10% of the total annualized rental income of St. Andrews:

Tenant

Lease Commencement Date

Lease Termination Date

Rentable Square Feet

Annualized Straight-Line Rental Income (in thousands)

Rental Escalations

Renewal Options

Surgicare of St. Andrews, Ltd.

April 2005

March 2016

12,189

$

0.3 million

3.0% annually

None

Center for Sight, P.A.

January 2005

December 2020

17,292

$

0.4 million

Lesser of CPI(1) or 3.0

%

None

Heart Institute of Venice P.L.L.C.

August 2005

September 2017

7,383

$

0.2 million

3.0% annually

None

(1) Consumer Price Index.

The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years.

	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009
Occupancy		84.3	%		77.2	%		77.2	%		72.9	%		68.0	%
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot	$	23.04		$	22.93		$	22.27		$	21.93		$	21.34

Other

We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.

We do not have any significant scheduled capital improvements for the property.

We believe that the property is adequately insured.

The U.S. federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2014 U.S. federal income tax return.

The annual real estate tax on the building for the calendar year 2014 is expected to be approximately $0.1 million. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.

The tenants at St. Andrews include physicians offering procedures in foot surgery, outpatient surgery, imaging, cardiology, urgent care and ophthalmology.

12

We believe that St. Andrews is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. St. Andrews will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire St. Andrews, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.

Countryside Medical Arts Facility — Safety Harbor, FL

On May 30, 2014, we closed our acquisition of the fee simple interest in a medical office building, or the Countryside Medical Arts Facility (“Countryside”), located in Safety Harbor, Florida. We acquired the property through a wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of Countryside, AW Countryside, LLC, has no material relationship with us and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.

Countryside contains 50,972 rentable square feet and was constructed in 1988.

Capitalization

The contract purchase price of St. Andrews was $9.3 million, exclusive of closing costs. We funded the acquisition of Countryside with $3.2 million in proceeds from this offering and the assumption of $6.1 million in existing mortgage debt allocated to Countryside as described under “Financing Obligations” below.

Major Tenants/Lease Expiration

Countryside is 100.0% leased to Diagnostic Clinic Medical Group, P.A. as of the date of acquisition. The lease is net whereby the tenant is required to pay substantially all operating expenses, excluding a majority of costs to maintain and repair the roof and structure of the building, in addition to base rent. The lease has an original 20-year term which commenced in January 2005 and expires in December 2024 and contains annual rental escalations equal to the CPI, not to exceed 4.0% and two five-year renewal options. The annualized straight-line rental income for the initial term is $0.8 million.

The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years.

	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009
Occupancy		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot	$	15.26		$	15.07		$	14.81		$	16.43		$	16.25

Other

We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.

We do not have any significant scheduled capital improvements for the property.

We believe that the property is adequately insured.

The U.S. federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2014 U.S. federal income tax return.

The annual real estate tax on the building for the calendar year 2014 is expected to be $0.1 million. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.

Diagnostic Clinic Medical Group, P.A. is one of Tampa, Florida’s largest physician practices and a wholly owned subsidiary of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida.

We believe that Countryside is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. Countryside will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire Countryside, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.

13

Campus at Crooks and Auburn Building C — Rochester Hills, MI

On June 3, 2014, we closed our acquisition of the fee simple interest in a medical office building, or the Campus at Crooks and Auburn Building C (“Crooks Building C”) located in Rochester Hills, MI. We acquired the property through a wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of the property was JBD Medical C Building, LLC, an entity which has no material relationship with us, and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.

Crooks Building C contains 24,224 rentable square feet and was constructed in 2005.

Capitalization

The contract purchase price of Crooks Building C was $5.3 million, exclusive of closing costs. We funded the acquisition of Crooks Building C with $1.6 million in proceeds from this offering and the assumption of $3.7 million in existing mortgage debt as described under ``Financing Obligations” below.

Major Tenant/Lease Expiration

Crooks Building C was 100.0% leased to four tenants as of the date of acquisition. The following table provides information relating to lease commencement and termination dates, rentable square feet, rental escalations, renewal options and annualized cash rental income for the tenants that represent over 10% of the total annualized straight-line rental income of Crooks Building C:

Tenant

Lease Commencement Date

Lease Termination Date

Rentable Square Feet

Annualized Straight-Line Rental Income (in thousands)(1)

Rental Escalations

Renewal Options

Renal Treatment Centers-Illinois, Inc.

September 2005

August 2025

9,707

$

0.2 million

$

0.33 per sq. ft. annually; 2.0% annually beginning Aug. 2015

2 – 5 year option

Joseph E. Mark, M.D., PC

October 2005

September 2020

6,176

$

0.1 million

$

0.50 per sq. ft. annually

2 – 5 year option

RMS Lifeline, Inc.

March 2006

February 2016

5,531

$

0.1 million

$

0.33 per sq. ft. annually

2 – 5 year option

Michigan Kidney Consultants, P.C.

July 2009

June 2015

2,810

$

0.1 million

$

0.50 per sq. ft. annually

2 – 5 year option

(1) Annualized rental income for the in-place leases in the property on a straight-line basis, which includes tenant concessions such as free rent, as applicable.

The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years:

	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009
Occupancy		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot	$	19.86		$	19.48		$	19.10		$	18.72		$	18.34

Other

We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.

We do not have any significant scheduled capital improvements for the property.

We believe that the property is adequately insured.

The U.S. federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2014 U.S. federal income tax return.

The annual real estate tax on the building for the calendar year 2014 is expected to be $0.1 million. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.

Crooks Building C is anchored by Renal Treatment Centers-Illinois, Inc., a subsidiary of DaVita, Inc., which provides acute inpatient dialysis services in approximately 750 hospitals and related laboratory services.

14

We believe that Crooks Building C is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. Crooks Building C will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire Crooks Building C, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.

Financing Obligations

Creekside Medical Office Building — Douglasville, GA

On April 30, 2014, in connection with the acquisition of Creekside, pursuant to a note and mortgage assumption agreement entered into among U.S. Bank National Association, the sellers of the property and a subsidiary of our operating partnership, we assumed a $5.2 million mortgage note payable, secured by Creekside.

The loan bears interest at a per annum fixed rate of 5.25%. The loan matures in September 2015 and provides for monthly principal and interest payments, with all principal outstanding being repaid on the maturity date. The loan may be prepaid through defeasance. The loan may be prepaid not more than three payment dates in advance of the maturity date, in whole, with 30 days’ notice, with no prepayment premium or penalty.

Bowie Gateway Medical Center — Bowie, MD

On May 7, 2014, in connection with the acquisition of Bowie Gateway, pursuant to a note and mortgage assumption agreement entered into among U.S. Bank National Association, the sellers of the property and a subsidiary of our operating partnership, we assumed a $6.1 million mortgage note payable, secured by Bowie Gateway.

The loan bears interest at a per annum fixed rate of 6.10%. The loan matures in September 2016 and provides for monthly principal and interest payments, with all principal outstanding being repaid on the maturity date. The loan may not be prepaid, in whole or in part.

Medical Center of New Windsor — New Windsor, NY

On May 22, 2014, in connection with the acquisition of New Windsor, pursuant to a note and mortgage assumption agreement entered into among Royal Bank of Canada, the sellers of the property and a subsidiary of our operating partnership, we assumed an $8.9 million mortgage note payable, secured by New Windsor.

The loan bears interest at a per annum fixed rate of 6.30%. The loan matures in September 2017 and provides for monthly principal and interest payments, with all principal outstanding being repaid on the maturity date. The loan may be prepaid not more than two years in advance of the maturity date, in whole, with 30 days’ notice, with no prepayment premium or penalty.

Plank Medical Center — Clifton Park, NY

On May 22, 2014, in connection with the acquisition of Plank, pursuant to a note and mortgage assumption agreement entered into among Royal Bank of Canada, the sellers of the property and a subsidiary of our operating partnership, we assumed a $3.5 million mortgage note payable, secured by Plank.

The loan bears interest at a per annum fixed rate of 6.30%. The loan matures in September 2017 and provides for monthly principal and interest payments, with all principal outstanding being repaid on the maturity date. The loan may be prepaid not more than two years in advance of the maturity date, in whole, with 30 days’ notice, with no prepayment premium or penalty.

Cushing Center — Schenectady, NY

On May 23, 2014, in connection with the acquisition of Cushing, pursuant to a note and mortgage assumption agreement entered into among UBS Real Estate Investments Inc., the sellers of the property and a subsidiary of our operating partnership, we assumed a $4.3 million mortgage note payable, secured by Cushing.

15

The loan bears interest at a per annum fixed rate of 5.63%. The loan matures in February 2016 and provides for monthly principal and interest payments, with all principal outstanding being repaid on the maturity date. The loan may be prepaid through defeasance. The loan may be prepaid not more than three payment dates in advance of the maturity date, in whole, with 30 days’ notice, with no prepayment premium or penalty.

St. Andrews Medical Park — Venice, FL and Countryside Medical Arts Facility — Safety Harbor, FL

On May 30, 2014, in connection with the acquisition of St. Andrews and Countryside, pursuant to a note and mortgage assumption agreement entered into among General Electric Capital Corporation, the sellers of the properties and a subsidiary of our operating partnership, we assumed a $12.9 million mortgage note payable, secured by St. Andrews and Countryside.

The loan bears interest at a per annum fixed rate of 5.985% per annum through May 2017 and thereafter bears interest at LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum. The loan matures in April 2019 and provides for monthly principal and interest payments, with all principal outstanding being repaid on the maturity date. The loan may be prepaid at any time, in whole or in part, with defeasance costs.

Campus at Crooks and Auburn Building C — Rochester Hills, MI

On June 3, 2014, in connection with the acquisition of Crooks Building C, pursuant to a note and mortgage assumption agreement entered into among JP Morgan Chase, N.A., the sellers of the property and a subsidiary of our operating partnership, we assumed a $3.7 million mortgage note payable, secured by Crooks Building C.

The loan bears interest at a per annum fixed rate of 5.83%. The loan matures in April 2016 and provides for monthly principal and interest payments, with all principal outstanding being repaid on the maturity date. The loan may not be prepaid, in whole or in part.”

Subscription Agreements

The form of subscription agreement contained in Appendix C-1 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the revised form of subscription agreement attached to this Supplement No. 1 as Appendix C-1. The revised form of subscription agreement supersedes and replaces the form of subscription agreement contained in the Prospectus.

The form of multi-offering subscription agreement contained in Appendix C-2 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the revised form of multi-offering subscription agreement attached to this Supplement No. 1 as Appendix C-2. The revised form of multi-offering subscription agreement supersedes and replaces the form of multi-offering subscription agreement contained in the Prospectus.

Annex A

On May 15, 2014, we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, which is attached as Annex A to this Supplement No. 1.

16

C-1-1

C-1-2

C-1-3

C-1-4

C-1-5

C-1-6

C-1-7

C-1-8

C-1-9

C-2-1

C-2-2

C-2-3

C-2-4

C-2-5

C-2-6

C-2-7

C-2-8

C-2-9

C-2-10

C-2-11

C-2-12

C-2-13

C-2-14

C-2-15

C-2-16

C-2-17

C-2-18

C-2-19

C-2-20

C-2-21

C-2-22

Annex A

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)
x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014

OR

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from             to            

Commission file number: 333-184677

 

American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Maryland	38-3888962
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

405 Park Ave., 15th Floor, New York, NY	10022
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(212) 415-6500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web Site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer x  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of April 30, 2014, the registrant had 29,313,846 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements		1
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2014 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2013		1
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited)		2
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)		3
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited)		4
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		5
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		17
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		32
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		32
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		33
Item 1A. Risk Factors		33
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		35
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		36
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures		36
Item 5. Other Information		36
Item 6. Exhibits		36
Signatures		37

i

Part I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
  
Item 1. Financial Statements.

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)

	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Real estate investments, at cost:
Land	$	4,351		$	3,220
Buildings, fixtures and improvements		52,592			37,114
Acquired intangible lease assets		7,733			5,952
Total real estate investments, at cost		64,676			46,286
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(1,969	)		(1,094	)
Total real estate investments, net		62,707			45,192
Cash and cash equivalents		406,340			111,833
Receivable for sale of common stock		7,560			1,286
Prepaid expenses and other assets		3,875			1,888
Deferred costs		1,292			7
Total assets	$	481,774		$	160,206
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	2,012		$	962
Below-market lease liability, net		54			57
Deferred rent and other liabilities		77			46
Distributions payable		2,831			992
Total liabilities		4,974			2,057
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 authorized, none issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 22,277,430 and 7,529,789 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		223			75
Additional paid-in capital		486,848			161,952
Accumulated deficit		(10,271	)		(3,878	)
Total stockholders’ equity		476,800			158,149
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	481,774		$	160,206

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

1

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
Revenues:
Rental income	$	1,127		$	—
Operating expense reimbursements		260			—
Total revenues		1,387			—
Expenses:
Property operating		294			—
Acquisition and transaction related		404			—
General and administrative		412			47
Depreciation and amortization		857			—
Total expenses		1,967			47
Operating loss		(580	)		(47	)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(3	)		—
Other income		1			—
Total other expense		(2	)		—
Net loss	$	(582	)	$	(47	)
Comprehensive loss	$	(582	)	$	(47	)
Basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding		13,623,545			8,888
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.04	)		NM

NM — Not Meaningful

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

2

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands, except for share data)
(Unaudited)

	Common Stock				Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Number of Shares		Par Value
Balance, December 31, 2013		7,529,789	$	75	$	161,952		$	(3,878	)	$	158,149
Issuance of common stock		14,661,262		147		364,209			—			364,356
Common stock offering costs, commissions and dealer manager fees		—		—		(41,368	)		—			(41,368	)
Common stock issued through distribution reinvestment plan		86,179		1		2,046			—			2,047
Share-based compensation		200		—		9			—			9
Distributions declared		—		—		—			(5,811	)		(5,811	)
Net loss		—		—		—			(582	)		(582	)
Balance, March 31, 2014		22,277,430	$	223	$	486,848		$	(10,271	)	$	476,800

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statements.

3

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(582	)	$	(47	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		623			—
Amortization of intangibles		234			—
Accretion of below-market lease liability and amortization of above-market lease assets, net		15			—
Share-based compensation		9			3
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses and other assets		743			—
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		228			44
Deferred rent and other liabilities		31			—
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,301			—
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment in real estate and other assets		(18,340	)		—
Deposits for real estate acquisitions		(2,246	)		—
Net cash used in investing activities		(20,586	)		—
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments of deferred financing costs		(1,285	)		—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		358,082			—
Common stock repurchases		(40	)		—
Payments of offering costs and fees related to common stock issuances		(40,556	)		(37	)
Distributions paid		(1,925	)		—
Advances from (payments to) affiliate		(484	)		37
Net cash provided by financing activities		313,792			—
Net change in cash		294,507			—
Cash, beginning of period		111,833			3
Cash, end of period	$	406,340		$	3
Non-Cash Financing Activities:
Common stock issued through distribution reinvestment plan	$	2,047		$	—
Reclassification of deferred offering costs to equity		—			807

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statements.

4

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2014
(Unaudited)

Note 1 — Organization

American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on October 15, 2012 as a Maryland corporation that intends to elect and qualify to be taxed as a real estate investment trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2013. On February 14, 2013, the Company commenced its ongoing initial public offering (the “IPO”) on a “reasonable best efforts” basis of up to $1.7 billion of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, at a price of $25.00 per share, subject to certain volume and other discounts, pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-11, as amended (File No. 333-184677) (the “Registration Statement”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Registration Statement also covers up to 14.7 million shares of common stock available pursuant to a distribution reinvestment plan (the “DRIP”) under which common stockholders may elect to have their distributions reinvested in additional shares of common stock.

As of March 31, 2014, the Company had 22.3 million shares of common stock outstanding, including unvested restricted shares and shares issued pursuant to the DRIP, and had received total gross proceeds from the IPO and the DRIP of $553.2 million. As of March 31, 2014, the aggregate value of all share issuances and subscriptions of common stock outstanding was $556.7 million based on a per share value of $25.00 (or $23.75 for shares issued under the DRIP). Until the filing of the Company's second quarterly financial filing with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, following February 14, 2015, which is two years from the effective date of the IPO, the per share purchase price in the IPO will be up to $25.00 per share (including the maximum allowed to be charged for commissions and fees) and shares issued under the DRIP will be based on the greater of $23.75 per share or 95% of the estimated value of a share of common stock. Thereafter, the per share purchase price will vary quarterly and will be equal to the net asset value (“NAV”) per share, as determined by American Realty Capital Healthcare II Advisors, LLC (the “Advisor”), plus applicable commissions and fees and the per share purchase price in the DRIP will be equal to the NAV per share. The Company reserves the right to reallocate shares covered in the Registration Statement between the IPO and the DRIP.

The Company was formed to acquire a diversified portfolio of real estate properties, focusing primarily on building a portfolio of healthcare-related assets, including medical office buildings, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities. All such properties may be acquired and operated by the Company alone or jointly with another party. The Company may also originate or acquire first mortgage loans secured by real estate. The Company purchased its first property and commenced real estate operations in May 2013. As of March 31, 2014, the Company owned ten properties consisting of 224,437 rentable square feet, which were 91.3% leased, with a weighted-average remaining lease term of 7.6 years.

Substantially all of the Company's business is conducted through American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “OP”), a Delaware limited partnership. The Company is the sole general partner and holds substantially all of the units of limited partner interests in the OP (“OP units”). American Realty Capital Healthcare II Special Limited Partnership, LLC (the “Special Limited Partner”), an entity controlled by the Company's sponsor, American Realty Capital VII, LLC (the “Sponsor”), contributed $2,020 to the OP in exchange for 90 OP units, which represents a nominal percentage of the aggregate OP ownership. A holder of OP units has the right to convert OP units for the cash value of a corresponding number of shares of the Company's common stock or, at the option of the OP, a corresponding number of shares of the Company's common stock, in accordance with the limited partnership agreement of the OP, provided, however, that such OP units must have been outstanding for at least one year. The remaining rights of the limited partners in the OP are limited, however, and do not include the ability to replace the general partner or to approve the sale, purchase or refinancing of the OP's assets.

5

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2014
(Unaudited)

Note 1 — Organization  – (continued)

The Company has no direct employees. The Advisor has been retained by the Company to manage the Company's affairs on a day-to-day basis. The Company has retained American Realty Capital Healthcare II Properties, LLC (the “Property Manager”) to serve as the Company's property manager. Realty Capital Securities, LLC (the “Dealer Manager”) serves as the dealer manager of the IPO. The Advisor, the Property Manager and the Dealer Manager are under common ownership with the Sponsor, as a result of which, they are related parties, and each of which will receive compensation, fees and expense reimbursements for services related to the IPO and the investment and management of the Company's assets. The Advisor, Property Manager and Dealer Manager will receive compensation, fees and expense reimbursements during the Company's offering, acquisition, operational and liquidation stages.

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company included herein were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The information furnished includes all adjustments and accruals of a normal recurring nature, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim periods. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year or any subsequent interim period.

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as of, and for the year ended December 31, 2013, which are included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 7, 2014. There have been no significant changes to Company's significant accounting policies during the three months ended March 31, 2014 other than the updates described below.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new accounting guidance clarifying the accounting and disclosure requirements for obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount under the arrangement is fixed at the reporting date. The new guidance was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In April 2014, the FASB amended the requirements for reporting discontinued operations. Under the revised guidance, in addition to other disclosure requirements, a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results when the component or group of components meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, disposed of by sale or other than by sale. The Company has adopted the provisions of this guidance effective January 1, 2014, and have applied the provisions prospectively. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

6

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2014
(Unaudited)

Note 3 — Real Estate Investments

The following table presents the allocation of the assets acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2014. There were no assets acquired or liabilities assumed during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
Real estate investments, at cost:
Land	$	1,131
Buildings, fixtures and improvements		15,478
Total tangible assets		16,609
Acquired intangibles:
In-place leases		1,574
Above-market lease assets		207
Total assets acquired, net		18,390
Other liabilities assumed		(50	)
Cash paid for acquired real estate investments	$	18,340
Number of properties purchased		3

The following table presents unaudited pro forma information as if the acquisitions during the three months ended March 31, 2014, had been consummated on January 1, 2013. Additionally, the unaudited pro forma net loss was adjusted to exclude acquisition and transaction related expense of $0.4 million from the three months ended March 31, 2014.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2014			2013
Pro forma revenues	$	1,644		$	453
Pro forma net loss	$	(247	)	$	(136	)

The following table presents future minimum base rental cash payments due to the Company over the next five years and thereafter. These amounts exclude contingent rent payments, as applicable, that may be collected from certain tenants based on provisions related to sales thresholds and increases in annual rent based on exceeding certain economic indexes among other items.

(In thousands)	Future Minimum Base Rent Payments
April 1, 2014 – December 31, 2014	$	3,769
2015		4,857
2016		4,672
2017		4,392
2018		3,614
Thereafter		20,363
	$	41,667

7

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2014
(Unaudited)

Note 3 — Real Estate Investments  – (continued)

The following table lists the tenants (including for this purpose, all affiliates of such tenants) whose annualized rental income on a straight-line basis represented 10% or more of total annualized rental income for all properties on a straight-line basis as of March 31, 2014. The Company did not own any properties and had no tenants whose annualized rental income on a straight-line basis represented 10% or more of total annualized rental income for all properties on a straight-line basis as of March 31, 2013.

Tenant	March 31, 2014
IASIS Healthcare, LLC		11.2	%
National Mentor Holdings, Inc.		18.1	%

The termination, delinquency or non-renewal of leases by one or more of the above tenants may have a material adverse effect on revenues.

The following table lists the states where the Company has concentrations of properties where annualized rental income on a straight-line basis represented greater than 10% of consolidated annualized rental income for all properties on a straight-line basis as of March 31, 2014. The Company did not own any properties and had no state concentrations as of March 31, 2013.

State	March 31, 2014
Arizona		15.7	%
Colorado		18.1	%
Georgia		11.2	%
Illinois		16.8	%
Louisiana		11.2	%

Note 4 — Revolving Credit Facility

On March 21, 2014, the Company entered into a senior secured credit facility in the amount of $50.0 million (the “Credit Facility”). On April 15, 2014, the Company entered into an increase letter, increasing the amount available under the Credit Facility to $200.0 million. The Credit Facility contains an “accordion” feature to allow the Company, under certain circumstances, to increase the aggregate commitments under the Credit Facility to a maximum of $450.0 million.

The Company has the option, based upon its leverage, to have the Credit Facility priced at either: (a) LIBOR, plus an applicable margin that ranges from 1.60% to 2.20%; or (b) the Base Rate, plus an applicable margin that ranges from 0.35% to 0.95%. Base Rate is defined in the Credit Facility as the greatest of (i) the fluctuating annual rate of interest announced from time to time by the lender as its “prime rate,” (ii) 0.5% above the federal funds effective rate or (iii) one-month LIBOR plus 1.0%.

The Credit Facility provides for monthly interest payments for each Base Rate loan and periodic payments for each LIBOR loan, based upon the applicable LIBOR loan period, with all principal outstanding being due on the maturity date on March 21, 2017, subject to two one-year extension options. The Credit Facility may be prepaid at any time, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty (subject to standard breakage costs). In the event of a default, the lender have the right to terminate its obligations under the Credit Facility and to accelerate the payment on any unpaid principal amount of all outstanding loans.

Availability of borrowings is based on a pool of eligible unencumbered real estate assets. The Company did not have any borrowing capacity as of March 31, 2014, as there were no assets assigned to the borrowing base of the Credit Facility as of March 31, 2014. There were no advances outstanding as of March 31, 2014.

8

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2014
(Unaudited)

Note 4 — Revolving Credit Facility  – (continued)

The Credit Facility requires the Company to meet certain financial covenants, including the maintenance of certain financial ratios (such as specified debt to equity and debt service coverage ratios) as well as the maintenance of a minimum net worth. As of March 31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants under the Credit Facility agreement.

Note 5 — Common Stock

The Company had 22.3 million and 7.5 million shares of common stock outstanding, including unvested restricted shares and shares issued pursuant to the DRIP, and had received total proceeds of $553.2 million and $186.8 million, including proceeds from shares issued pursuant to the DRIP, as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

On April 9, 2013, the Company's board of directors authorized, and the Company declared, a distribution rate, which is calculated based on stockholders of record each day during the applicable period at a rate of $0.0046575343 per day based on a price of $25.00 per share of common stock. Distributions began to accrue on May 24, 2013, 15 days following the Company's initial property acquisition. Distributions are payable by the 5^th day following each month end to stockholders of record at the close of business each day during the prior month. Distribution payments are dependent on the availability of funds. The board of directors may reduce the amount of distributions paid or suspend distribution payments at any time and therefore distributions payments are not assured.

The Company has a Share Repurchase Program (“SRP”) that enables stockholders, subject to certain conditions and limitations, to sell their shares to the Company. Under the SRP, stockholders may request that the Company repurchase all or any portion of their shares of common stock, if such repurchase does not impair the Company's capital or operations. The Company will fund repurchases from proceeds from the sale of common stock pursuant to the DRIP. The following table summarizes the number of shares repurchased under the SRP cumulatively through March 31, 2014:

	Number of Requests		Number of Shares Repurchased		Average Price per Share
Cumulative repurchases as of December 31, 2013		2		1,600	$	25.00
Three months ended March 31, 2014		—		—		—
Cumulative repurchases as of March 31, 2014		2		1,600	$	25.00

Note 6 — Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may become subject to litigation or claims. There are no material legal proceedings pending or known to be contemplated against the Company.

Environmental Matters

In connection with the ownership and operation of real estate, the Company may potentially be liable for costs and damages related to environmental matters. As of March 31, 2014, the Company has not been notified by any governmental authority of any non-compliance, liability or other claim, and is not aware of any other environmental condition that it believes will have a material adverse effect on the results of operations.

9

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2014
(Unaudited)

Note 7 — Related Party Transactions and Arrangements

As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Special Limited Partner owned 8,888 shares of the Company's outstanding common stock. The Advisor and its affiliates may incur and pay costs and fees on behalf of the Company. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had $0.5 million payable to affiliated entities, primarily related to funding the payment of third party professional fees and offering costs. There were no such amounts payable as of March 31, 2014.

Fees Paid in Connection with the IPO

The Dealer Manager receives fees and compensation in connection with the sale of the Company's common stock in the IPO. The Dealer Manager receives a selling commission of up to 7.0% of the per share purchase price of offering proceeds before reallowance of commissions earned by participating broker-dealers. In addition, the Dealer Manager receives up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares, before reallowance to participating broker-dealers, as a dealer-manager fee. The Dealer Manager may reallow its dealer-manager fee to such participating broker-dealers. A participating broker dealer may elect to receive a fee equal to 7.5% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares (not including selling commissions and dealer manager fees) by such participating broker dealer, with 2.5% thereof paid at the time of such sale and 1.0% thereof paid on each anniversary of the closing of such sale up to and including the fifth anniversary of the closing of such sale. If this option is elected, the dealer manager fee will be reduced to 2.5% of gross proceeds (not including selling commissions and dealer manager fees). The following table details total selling commissions and dealer manager fees incurred from and due to the Dealer Manager as of and for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Payable as of
(In thousands)	2014		2013		March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Total commissions and fees incurred from the Dealer Manager	$	34,475	$	—	$	708	$	127

The Advisor and its affiliates receive compensation and reimbursement for services relating to the IPO, including transfer agent services provided by an affiliate of the Dealer Manager. All offering costs incurred by the Company or its affiliated entities on behalf of the Company are charged to additional paid-in capital on the accompanying balance during the IPO. The following table details offering costs and reimbursements incurred from and due to the Advisor and Dealer Manager as of and for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Payable as of
(In thousands)	2014		2013		March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Fees and expense reimbursements from the Advisor and Dealer Manager	$	6,250	$	298	$	274	$	192

The Company is responsible for offering and related costs from the IPO, excluding commissions and dealer manager fees, up to a maximum of 2.0% of gross proceeds received from the IPO, measured at the end of the IPO. Offering costs in excess of the 2.0% cap as of the end of the IPO are the Advisor's responsibility. As of March 31, 2014, offering and related costs, excluding commissions and dealer manager fees, exceeded 2.0% of gross proceeds received from the IPO by $3.1 million.

After the general escrow break, the Advisor and the Dealer Manager elected to cap cumulative offering costs for the IPO, including selling commissions and dealer manager fees, incurred by the Company, net of unpaid amounts, to 15% of gross common stock proceeds during the offering period of the IPO. As of March 31, 2014, cumulative offering costs were $66.2 million. Cumulative offering costs net of unpaid amounts, were less than the 15% threshold as of March 31, 2014.

10

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2014
(Unaudited)

Note 7 — Related Party Transactions and Arrangements  – (continued)

Fees Paid in Connection With the Operations of the Company

The Advisor receives an acquisition fee of 1.0% of the contract purchase price of each acquired property and 1.0% of the amount advanced for a loan or other investment. The Advisor is also paid for services provided for which they incur investment-related expenses, or insourced expenses. Such insourced expenses will be fixed initially at, and may not exceed, 0.5% of the contract purchase price of each acquired property and 0.5% of the amount advanced for a loan or other investment. Additionally, the Company pays third party acquisition expenses. Once the proceeds from the IPO have been fully invested, the aggregate amount of acquisition fees and financing coordination fees (as described below) shall not exceed 1.5% of the contract purchase price and the amount advanced for a loan or other investment for all the assets acquired. In no event will the total of all acquisition fees, acquisition expenses and any financing coordination fees payable with respect to the Company's portfolio of investments or reinvestments exceed 4.5% of the contract purchase price of the Company's portfolio to be measured at the close of the acquisition phase or 4.5% of the amount advanced for all loans or other investments.

If the Advisor provides services in connection with the origination or refinancing of any debt that the Company obtains and uses to acquire properties or to make other permitted investments, or that is assumed, directly or indirectly, in connection with the acquisition of properties, the Company will pay the Advisor a financing coordination fee equal to 0.75% of the amount available and/or outstanding under such financing, subject to certain limitations.

For its asset management services, the Company issues (subject to periodic approval by the board of directors) to the Advisor performance-based restricted partnership units of the OP (“Class B Units”) in an amount equal to the excess of the cost of the Company's assets multiplied by 0.1875% less any amounts payable as an oversight fee (as described below) divided by the value of one share of common stock as of the last day of such calendar quarter, which is equal initially to $22.50 (the IPO price minus selling commissions and dealer manager fees) and, at such time as the Company calculates NAV, to per share NAV. However, if the amounts payable as an oversight fee for such quarter exceed the amount of the cost of the Company's assets multiplied by 0.1875% for such quarter (an excess oversight fee), no Class B Units shall be issued for such quarter and the excess oversight fee shall be carried forward to the next succeeding calendar quarter and included with and treated as amounts payable as an oversight fee for such quarter for purposes of determining the amount of restricted Class B Units issuable for that quarter. In addition, the sum of the cost of the Company's assets multiplied by 0.1875% for a calendar year plus the amounts payable as an oversight fee for such calendar year, shall not be less than 0.75% of the cost of assets for such calendar year. The Advisor will be entitled to receive distributions on the vested and unvested Class B units it receives in connection with its asset management subordinated participation at the same rate as distributions received on the Company's common stock; such distributions will be in addition to the incentive fees the Advisor and its affiliates may receive from the Company, including, without limitation, the annual subordinated performance fee and the subordinated participation in net sales proceeds, the subordinated incentive listing distribution or the subordinated distribution upon termination of the advisory agreement, as applicable. The restricted Class B Units shall not be convertible into unrestricted Class B Units until such time as the adjusted market value of the OP's assets plus applicable distributions equals the sum of the aggregate capital contributed by investors plus an amount equal to an annual 6.0% cumulative, pre-tax, non-compounded return to investors and only at such time as the capital account associated with a restricted Class B Unit equals the capital account of an unrestricted Class B Unit. As of March 31, 2014, the Company's board of directors approved the issuance of 7,785 Class B Units to the Advisor in connection with this arrangement.

11

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2014
(Unaudited)

Note 7 — Related Party Transactions and Arrangements  – (continued)

Unless the Company contracts with a third party, the Company will pay the Property Manager a property management fee of 1.5% of gross revenues from the Company's stand-alone single-tenant net leased properties and 2.5% of gross revenues from all other types of properties, respectively. The Company will also reimburse the affiliate for property level expenses. If the Company contracts directly with third parties for such services, the Company will pay them customary market fees and will pay the Property Manager an oversight fee of up to 1.0% of the gross revenues of the property managed. In no event will the Company pay the Property Manager or any affiliate both a property management fee and an oversight fee with respect to any particular property.

Effective June 1, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with the Dealer Manager to provide strategic advisory services and investment banking services required in the ordinary course of the Company's business, such as performing financial analysis, evaluating publicly traded comparable companies and assisting in developing a portfolio composition strategy, a capitalization structure to optimize future liquidity options and structuring operations. Strategic advisory fees are amortized over approximately 20.5 months, the estimated remaining term of the IPO and are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

The following table details amounts incurred, forgiven and payable in connection with the Company's operations-related services described above as of and for the periods presented. The Company did not incur any such fees as of or for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014				Payable as of
(In thousands)	Incurred		Forgiven		March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
One-time fees and reimbursements:
Acquisition fees and related cost reimbursements	$	276	$	—	$	—	$	—
Financing coordination fees		375		—		—		—
Other expense reimbursements		—		—		—		—
Ongoing fees:
Property management and leasing fees		—		18		—		—
Strategic advisory fees		135		—		—		—
Distributions on Class B Units		2		—		—		1
Total related party operation fees and reimbursements	$	788	$	18	$	—	$	1

The Company reimburses the Advisor's costs of providing administrative services, subject to the limitation that the Company will not reimburse the Advisor for any amount by which the Company's operating expenses at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters exceeds the greater of (a) 2.0% of average invested assets and (b) 25.0% of net income other than any additions to reserves for depreciation, bad debt or other similar non-cash reserves and excluding any gain from the sale of assets for that period. Additionally, the Company reimburses the Advisor for personnel costs in connection with other services during the operational stage; however, the Company may not reimburse the Advisor for personnel costs in connection with services for which the Advisor receives acquisition fees, acquisition expenses or real estate commissions. No reimbursement was incurred from the Advisor for providing services during the three months ended March 31, 2014 or 2013.

In order to improve operating cash flows and the ability to pay distributions from operating cash flows, the Advisor may elect to waive certain fees. Because the Advisor may waive certain fees, cash flow from operations that would have been paid to the Advisor may be available to pay distributions to stockholders.

12

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2014
(Unaudited)

Note 7 — Related Party Transactions and Arrangements  – (continued)

The fees that are forgiven are not deferrals and accordingly, will not be paid to the Advisor. In certain instances, to improve the Company's working capital, the Advisor may elect to absorb a portion of the Company's property operating and general and administrative costs, which the Company will not repay. No such fees were absorbed during the three months ended March 31, 2014 or 2013. The Company did not have any receivable due from the Advisor related to absorbed general and administrative costs as of March 31, 2014. The Company had a $1.0 million receivable due from the Advisor related to absorbed general and administrative costs as of December 31, 2013 which was paid by the Advisor during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Fees Paid in Connection with the Liquidation or Listing of the Company's Real Estate Assets

The Company will pay the Advisor an annual subordinated performance fee calculated on the basis of the Company's total return to stockholders, payable annually in arrears, such that for any year in which the Company's total return on stockholders' capital exceeds 6.0% per annum, the Advisor will be entitled to 15.0% of the excess total return but not to exceed 10.0% of the aggregate total return for such year. This fee will be payable only upon the sale of assets, distributions or other event which results in the return on stockholders' capital exceeding 6.0% per annum. No subordinated performance fees were incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014 or 2013.

The Company will pay a brokerage commission on the sale of property, not to exceed the lesser of 2.0% of the contract sale price of the property and 50.0% of the total brokerage commission paid if a third party broker is also involved; provided, however, that in no event may the real estate commissions paid to the Advisor, its affiliates and unaffiliated third parties exceed the lesser of 4.5% of the contract sales price and a reasonable, customary and competitive real estate commission, in each case, payable to the Advisor if the Advisor or its affiliates, as determined by a majority of the independent directors, provided a substantial amount of services are provided in connection with the sale. No such fees were incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014 or 2013.

If the Company is not simultaneously listed on an exchange, the Company intends to pay the Special Limited Partner a subordinated participation in the net sales proceeds of the sale of real estate assets of 15.0% of remaining net sale proceeds after return of capital contributions to investors plus payment to investors of a 6.0% cumulative, pre-tax non-compounded return on the capital contributed by investors. The Company cannot assure that it will provide this 6.0% return but the Special Limited Partner will not be entitled to the subordinated participation in net sale proceeds unless the Company's investors have received a 6.0% cumulative non-compounded return on their capital contributions. No such fees were incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014 or 2013.

If the common stock of the Company is listed on a national exchange, the Company expects to pay the Special Limited Partner a subordinated incentive listing distribution of 15.0% of the amount by which the adjusted market value of real estate assets plus distributions exceeds the aggregate capital contributed by investors plus an amount equal to a 6.0% cumulative, pre-tax non-compounded annual return to investors. The Company cannot assure that it will provide this 6.0% return but the Special Limited Partner will not be entitled to the subordinated incentive listing fee unless investors have received a 6.0% cumulative, pre-tax non-compounded return on their capital contributions. No such fees were incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014 or 2013. Neither the Special Limited Partner nor any of its affiliates can earn both the subordinated participation in the net proceeds and the subordinated listing distribution.

Upon termination or non-renewal of the advisory agreement with the Advisor, with or without cause, the Special Limited Partner, through its controlling interest in the Advisor, will be entitled to receive distributions from the OP equal to 15% of the amount by which the sum of the Company's market value plus distributions exceeds the sum of the aggregate capital contributed by investors plus an amount equal to an annual 6%

13

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2014
(Unaudited)

Note 7 — Related Party Transactions and Arrangements  – (continued)

cumulative, pre-tax, non-compounded return to investors. The Special Limited Partner may elect to defer its right to receive a subordinated distribution upon termination until either a listing on a national securities exchange or other liquidity event occurs.

Note 8 — Economic Dependency

Under various agreements, the Company has engaged or will engage the Advisor, its affiliates and entities under common ownership with the Advisor to provide certain services that are essential to the Company, including asset management services, supervision of the management and leasing of properties owned by the Company, asset acquisition and disposition decisions, the sale of shares of the Company's common stock available for issue, transfer agency services, as well as other administrative responsibilities for the Company including accounting services, transaction management services and investor relations.

As a result of these relationships, the Company is dependent upon the Advisor and its affiliates. In the event that the Advisor and its affiliates are unable to provide the Company with the respective services, the Company will be required to find alternative providers of these services.

Note 9 — Share-Based Compensation

Restricted Share Plan

The Company has an employee and director incentive restricted share plan (the “RSP”), which provides for the automatic grant of 1,333 restricted shares of common stock to each of the independent directors, without any further action by the Company's board of directors or the stockholders, on the date of initial election to the board of directors and on the date of each annual stockholder's meeting. Restricted stock issued to independent directors will vest over a five-year period following the first anniversary of the date of grant in increments of 20.0% per annum. The RSP provides the Company with the ability to grant awards of restricted shares to the Company's directors, officers and employees (if the Company ever has employees), employees of the Advisor and its affiliates, employees of entities that provide services to the Company, directors of the Advisor or of entities that provide services to the Company, certain consultants to the Company and the Advisor and its affiliates or to entities that provide services to the Company. The total number of common shares granted under the RSP may not exceed 5.0% of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock on a fully diluted basis at any time and in any event will not exceed 3.4 million shares (as such number may be adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, combinations and similar events).

Restricted share awards entitle the recipient to receive shares of common stock from the Company under terms that provide for vesting over a specified period of time. Such awards would typically be forfeited with respect to the unvested shares upon the termination of the recipient's employment or other relationship with the Company. Restricted shares may not, in general, be sold or otherwise transferred until restrictions are removed and the shares have vested. Holders of restricted shares may receive cash distributions prior to the time that the restrictions on the restricted shares have lapsed. Any distributions payable in shares of common stock shall be subject to the same restrictions as the underlying restricted shares. The following table reflects restricted share award activity for the three months ended March 31, 2014:

	Number of Common Shares			Weighted-Average Issue Price
Unvested, December 31, 2013		3,999		$	22.50
Vested		(800	)		22.50
Unvested, March 31, 2014		3,199		$	22.50

14

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2014
(Unaudited)

Note 9 — Share-Based Compensation  – (continued)

As of March 31, 2014, the Company had $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted share awards granted under the Company's RSP. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.9 years. The fair value of the restricted shares is being expensed over the vesting period of five years. Compensation expense related to restricted stock was approximately $4,000 and $3,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and is recorded as general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Other Share-Based Compensation

The Company may issue common stock in lieu of cash to pay fees earned by the Company's directors at the respective director's election. There are no restrictions on the shares issued since these payments in lieu of cash relate to fees earned for services performed. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company issued 200 shares in lieu of approximately $5,000 in cash. There were no shares issued in lieu of cash during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

Note 10 — Net Loss Per Share

The following is a summary of the basic and diluted net loss per share computation for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
Net loss (in thousands)	$	(582	)	$	(47	)
Basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding		13,623,545			8,888
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.04	)		NM

NM — not meaningful

The Company had the following common share equivalents as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, which were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share attributable to stockholders as the effect would have been antidilutive:

	March 31,
	2014		2013
Unvested restricted stock		3,199		3,999
OP Units		90		90
Class B units		7,785		—
Total common share equivalents		11,074		4,089

Note 11 — Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and determined that there have not been any events that have occurred that would require adjustments to disclosures in the consolidated financial statements except for the following transactions:

Sales of Common Stock

As of April 30, 2014, the Company had 29.3 million shares of common stock outstanding, including unvested restricted shares and shares issued pursuant to the DRIP from total gross proceeds from the IPO and the DRIP of $728.2 million.

15

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2014
(Unaudited)

Note 11 — Subsequent Events  – (continued)

Total capital raised to date, including shares issued under the DRIP, is as follows:

Source of Capital (in thousands)	Inception to March 31, 2014		April 1, 2014 to April 30, 2014		Total
Common stock	$	553,200	$	174,975	$	728,175

Acquisitions

The following table presents certain information about the properties that the Company acquired from April 1, 2014 to May 12, 2014:

	Number of Properties		Rentable Square Feet		Base Purchase Price(1)
					(In thousands)
Portfolio, March 31, 2014		10		224,437	$	64,615
Acquisitions		2		91,159		22,480
Portfolio, May 12, 2014		12		315,596	$	87,095

(1) Contract purchase price, excluding acquisition related costs.

16

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. and the notes thereto. As used herein, the terms the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc., a Maryland corporation, including, as required by context, American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, which we refer to as the “OP,” and its subsidiaries. The Company is externally managed by American Realty Capital Healthcare II Advisors, LLC (our “Advisor”), a Delaware limited liability company.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of the Company and members of our management team, as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based, and generally are identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “should” or similar expressions. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time, unless required by law.

The following are some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all risks and uncertainties, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements:

• We have a limited operating history which makes our future performance difficult to predict.

• All of our executive officers are also officers, managers and/or holders of a direct or indirect controlling interest in the Advisor, our dealer manager, Realty Capital Securities, LLC (the “Dealer Manager”) and other AR Capital, LLC affiliated entities (“American Realty Capital”). As a result, our executive officers, our Advisor and its affiliates face conflicts of interest, including significant conflicts created by our Advisor's compensation arrangements with us and other investment programs advised by American Realty Capital affiliates and conflicts in allocating time among these investment programs and us. These conflicts could result in unanticipated actions.

• Because investment opportunities that are suitable for us may also be suitable for other American Realty Capital advised investment programs, our Advisor and its affiliates face conflicts of interest relating to the purchase of properties and other investments and such conflicts may not be resolved in our favor, meaning that we could invest in less attractive assets, which could reduce the investment return to our stockholders.

• No public market currently exists, or may ever exist, for shares of our common stock which are, and may continue to be, illiquid.

• We focus on acquiring a diversified portfolio of healthcare-related assets located in the United States and are subject to risks inherent in concentrating investments in the healthcare industry.

• The healthcare industry is heavily regulated, and new laws or regulations, changes to existing laws or regulations, loss of licensure or failure to obtain licensure could result in the inability of tenants to make lease payments to us.

• If we and our Advisor are unable to find suitable investments, then we may not be able to achieve our investment objectives or pay distributions.

• If we raise substantially less than the maximum offering in our initial public offering (the “IPO” or “our offering”), we may not be able to invest in a diversified portfolio of real estate assets, which may cause the value of an investment in us to vary more widely with the performance of specific assets.

• We may be unable to pay or maintain cash distributions or increase distributions over time.

17

• We are obligated to pay fees which may be substantial to our Advisor and its affiliates.

• We depend on tenants for our revenue and, accordingly, our revenue is dependent upon the success and economic viability of our tenants.

• Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and limit our ability to pay distributions.

• We are permitted to pay distributions from unlimited amounts of any source. Until substantially all of the proceeds from our IPO are invested, we may use proceeds from our IPO and financings to fund distributions until we have sufficient cash flows from operations. There are no established limits on the amount of net proceeds and borrowings that we may use to fund distribution payments, except in accordance with our organizational documents and Maryland law.

• Any distributions may reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in properties and other permitted investments and negatively impact the value of your investment.

• We may not generate cash flows sufficient to pay our distributions to stockholders, as such, we may be forced to borrow at higher rates or depend on our Advisor to waive reimbursement of certain expenses and fees to fund our operations.

• We are subject to risks associated with any dislocations or liquidity disruptions that may exist or occur in the credit markets of the United States from time to time.

• We may fail to qualify, or continue to qualify, to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for United States federal income tax purposes, which would result in higher taxes, may adversely affect our operations and would reduce our NAV and cash available for distributions.

• We may be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), and thus subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act.

• As of March 31, 2014, we only own 10 properties and therefore, have limited diversification.

Overview

We were incorporated on October 15, 2012 as a Maryland corporation that intends to elect and qualify to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning with the taxable year ending December 31, 2013. On February 14, 2013, we commenced our IPO on a “reasonable best efforts” basis of up to $1.7 billion of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, at a price of $25.00 per share, subject to certain volume and other discounts, pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-11, as amended (File No. 333-184677) (the “Registration Statement”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The Registration Statement also covers up to 14.7 million shares of common stock available pursuant to a distribution reinvestment plan (the “DRIP”) under which common stockholders may elect to have their distributions reinvested in additional shares of common stock.

As of March 31, 2014, we had 22.3 million shares of common stock outstanding, including unvested restricted shares and shares issued pursuant to the DRIP, and had received total gross proceeds from the IPO and the DRIP of $553.2 million. As of March 31, 2014, the aggregate value of all share issuances and subscriptions of common stock outstanding was $556.7 million based on a per share value of $25.00 (or $23.75 for shares issued under the DRIP). Until the filing of our second quarterly financial filing with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, following February 14, 2015 (the “NAV pricing date”), which is two years from the effective date of the IPO, the per share purchase price in the IPO will be up to $25.00 per share (including the maximum allowed to be charged for commissions and fees) and shares issued under the DRIP will be based on the greater of $23.75 per share or 95% of the estimated value of a share of common stock. Thereafter, the per share purchase price will vary quarterly and will be equal to the NAV per share, as determined by the Advisor, plus applicable commissions and fees and the per share purchase price in the DRIP will be equal to the NAV per share.

18

We were formed to acquire a diversified portfolio of real estate properties, focusing primarily on building a portfolio of healthcare-related assets, including medical office buildings, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities. All such properties may be acquired and operated by us alone or jointly with another party. We may also originate or acquire first mortgage loans secured by real estate. We purchased our first property and commenced real estate operations in May 2013. As of March 31, 2014, we owned 10 properties consisting of 224,437 rentable square feet, which were 91.3% leased, with a remaining lease term of 7.6 years.

Substantially all of our business is conducted through the OP. We are the sole general partner and hold substantially all of the units of limited partner interests in the OP (“OP units”). American Realty Capital Healthcare II Special Limited Partnership, LLC (the “Special Limited Partner”), an entity controlled by American Realty Capital VII, LLC (the “Sponsor”), contributed $2,020 to the OP in exchange for 90 OP units, which represents a nominal percentage of the aggregate OP ownership. A holder of OP units has the right to convert OP units for the cash value of a corresponding number of shares of the Company's common stock or, at the option of the OP, a corresponding number of shares of the Company's common stock, in accordance with the limited partnership agreement of the OP. The remaining rights of the limited partner interests are limited, however, and do not include the ability to replace the general partner or to approve the sale, purchase or refinancing of the OP's assets.

We have no direct employees. The Advisor is our affiliated external advisor, which we have retained to manage our affairs on a day-to-day basis. We have retained American Realty Capital Healthcare II Properties, LLC (the “Property Manager”) to serve as our property manager. The Dealer Manager serves as the dealer manager of the IPO. The Advisor and the Property Manager are wholly owned entities of, and the Dealer Manager is under common ownership with, the Sponsor, as a result of which, they are related parties, and each of which will receive compensation, fees and expense reimbursements for services related to the IPO and the investment and management of our assets. The Advisor, Property Manager and Dealer Manager will receive fees during our offering, acquisition, operational and liquidation stages.

Significant Accounting Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies

Set forth below is a summary of the significant accounting estimates and critical accounting policies that management believes are important to the preparation of our financial statements. Certain of our accounting estimates are particularly important for an understanding of our financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by our management. As a result, these estimates are subject to a degree of uncertainty. These significant accounting estimates and critical accounting policies include:

Offering and Related Costs

Offering and related costs include all expenses incurred in connection with our IPO. Offering costs (other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fees) include costs that may be paid by the Advisor, the Dealer Manager or their affiliates on our behalf. These costs include but are not limited to (i) legal, accounting, printing, mailing, and filing fees; (ii) escrow service related fees; (iii) reimbursement of the Dealer Manager for amounts it may pay to reimburse the bona fide diligence expenses of broker-dealers; and (iv) reimbursement to the Advisor for a portion of the costs of its employees and other costs in connection with preparing supplemental sales materials and related offering activities. We are obligated to reimburse the Advisor or its affiliates, as applicable, for organization and offering costs paid by them on our behalf, provided that the Advisor is obligated to reimburse us to the extent organization and offering costs (excluding selling commissions and the dealer manager fee) incurred by us in our IPO exceed 2.0% of gross offering proceeds in the IPO. As a result, these costs are only our liability to the extent aggregate selling commissions, the dealer manager fee and other organization and offering costs do not exceed 12.0% of the gross proceeds determined at the end of our IPO.

Revenue Recognition

Our rental income is primarily related to rent received from tenants, which are recorded in accordance with the terms of each lease on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the lease. Because many of the leases provide for rental increases at specified intervals, straight-line basis accounting requires us to record a receivable, and include in revenues, unbilled rent receivables that we will only receive if the tenant makes all

19

rent payments required through the expiration of the initial term of the lease. When we acquire a property, the terms of existing leases are considered to commence as of the acquisition date for the purposes of this calculation. We defer the revenue related to lease payments received from tenants in advance of their due dates. Cost recoveries from tenants are included in operating expense reimbursement in the period the related costs are incurred, as applicable.

Cost recoveries from tenants are included in operating expense reimbursement in the period the related costs are incurred, as applicable.

We continually review receivables related to rent and unbilled rent receivables and determine collectability by taking into consideration the tenant's payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. In the event that the collectability of a receivable is in doubt, we will record an increase in the allowance for uncollectible accounts or record a direct write-off of the receivable in the consolidated statements of operations.

Investments in Real Estate

Investments in real estate are recorded at cost. Improvements and replacements are capitalized when they extend the useful life of the asset. Costs of repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of up to 40 years for buildings, 15 years for land improvements, five years for fixtures and improvements and the shorter of the useful life or the remaining lease term for tenant improvements and leasehold interests.

We are required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of our properties for purposes of determining the amount of depreciation to record on an annual basis with respect to our investments in real estate. These assessments have a direct impact on our net income because if we were to shorten the expected useful lives of our investments in real estate, we would depreciate these investments over fewer years, resulting in more depreciation expense and lower net income on an annual basis. We are required to present the operations related to properties that have been sold or properties that are intended to be sold as discontinued operations in the statement of operations at fair value for all periods presented to the extent the disposal of a component represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on our operations and financial results. Properties that are intended to be sold are to be designated as “held for sale” on the balance sheet.

Long-lived assets are carried at cost and evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate such an evaluation is warranted or when they are designated as held for sale. Valuation of real estate is considered a “critical accounting estimate” because the evaluation of impairment and the determination of fair values involve a number of management assumptions relating to future economic events that could materially affect the determination of the ultimate value, and therefore, the carrying amounts of our real estate. Additionally, decisions regarding when a property should be classified as held for sale are also highly subjective and require significant management judgment.

Events or changes in circumstances that could cause an evaluation for impairment include the following:

• a significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset;

• a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset is being used or in its physical condition;

• a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset, including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator;

• an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset; and

• a current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset.

20

We review our portfolio on an ongoing basis to evaluate the existence of any of the aforementioned events or changes in circumstances that would require us to test for recoverability. In general, our review of recoverability is based on an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest charges, expected to result from the property's use and eventual disposition. These estimates consider factors such as expected future operating income, market and other applicable trends and residual value expected, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If impairment exists due to the inability to recover the carrying value of a property, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property. We are required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the values of our investments in real estate. These assessments have a direct impact on our net income because recording an impairment loss results in an immediate negative adjustment to net income.

Purchase Price Allocation

We allocate the purchase price of acquired properties to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their respective fair values. Tangible assets include land, land improvements, buildings, fixtures and tenant improvements on an as-if vacant basis. We utilize various estimates, processes and information to determine the as-if vacant property value. Estimates of value are made using customary methods, including data from appraisals, comparable sales, discounted cash flow analysis and other methods. Amounts allocated to land, land improvements, buildings and fixtures are based on cost segregation studies performed by independent third-parties or on our analysis of comparable properties in our portfolio. Identifiable intangible assets include amounts allocated to acquire leases for above- and below-market lease rates, the value of in-place leases, and the value of customer relationships, as applicable.

The aggregate value of intangible assets related to in-place leases is primarily the difference between the property valued with existing in-place leases adjusted to market rental rates and the property valued as if vacant. Factors considered by us in our analysis of the in-place lease intangibles include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up period for each property, taking into account current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, we include real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at contract rates during the expected lease-up period, which typically ranges from six to 12 months. We also estimate costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.

Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for owned properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and management's estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The capitalized above-market lease intangibles are amortized as a decrease to rental income over the remaining term of the lease. The capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining term and any fixed rate renewal periods provided within the respective leases. In determining the amortization period for below-market lease intangibles, we initially will consider, and periodically evaluate on a quarterly basis, the likelihood that a lessee will execute the renewal option. The likelihood that a lessee will execute the renewal option is determined by taking into consideration the tenant's payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located.

The aggregate value of intangible assets related to customer relationship is measured based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease and our overall relationship with the tenant. Characteristics considered by us in determining these values include the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant's credit quality and expectations of lease renewals, among other factors.

The value of in-place leases is amortized to expense over the initial term of the respective leases, which range primarily from one to 14 years. The value of customer relationship intangibles is amortized to expense over the initial term and any renewal periods in the respective leases, but in no event does the amortization

21

period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. If a tenant terminates its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value and customer relationship intangibles is charged to expense.

In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, we utilize a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective property and other market data. We also consider information obtained about each property as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, as well as subsequent marketing and leasing activities, in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and intangible liabilities assumed.

Derivative Instruments

We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge all or a portion of the interest rate risk associated with our borrowings. The principal objective of such agreements is to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with our operating and financial structure as well as to hedge specific anticipated transactions.

We record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that is attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. We may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain risks, even though hedge accounting does not apply or we elect not to apply hedge accounting.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new accounting guidance clarifying the accounting and disclosure requirements for obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount under the arrangement is fixed at the reporting date. The new guidance was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In April 2014, the FASB amended the requirements for reporting discontinued operations. Under the revised guidance, in addition to other disclosure requirements, a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results when the component or group of components meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, disposed of by sale or other than by sale. We have adopted the provisions of this guidance effective January 1, 2014, and have applied the provisions prospectively. This adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

22

Properties

The following table presents certain additional information about the properties we own as of March 31, 2014:

Portfolio	Acquisition Date		Number of Properties		Rentable Square Feet		Occupancy			Remaining Lease Term(1)		Base Purchase Price(2)
												(In thousands)
Fresenius Medical Care - Winfield, AL		May 2013		1		5,564		100.0	%		8.9	$	1,920
Adena Health Center - Jackson, OH		Jun. 2013		1		24,924		100.0	%		9.9		5,446
Ouachita Community Hospital - West Monroe, LA		Jul. 2013		1		17,830		100.0	%		9.9		6,834
CareMeridian – Littleton, CO		Aug. 2013		1		27,630		100.0	%		13.3		11,275
Oak Lawn Medical Center - Oak Lawn, IL		Aug. 2013		1		26,324		100.0	%		3.9		10,300
Surgery Center of Temple - Temple, TX		Aug. 2013		1		10,400		100.0	%		12.9		6,150
Greenville Health System - Greenville, SC		Oct. 2013		1		21,603		100.0	%		6.0		4,300
Arrowhead Medical Plaza II - Glendale, AZ		Feb. 2014		1		45,289		87.1	%		3.2		11,170
Village Center Parkway - Stockbridge, GA		Feb. 2014		1		25,051		72.1	%		3.6		4,100
Stockbridge Family Medical - Stockbridge, GA		Feb. 2014		1		19,822		65.7	%		1.3		3,120
Portfolio, March 31, 2014				10		224,437		91.3	%		7.6	$	64,615

(1) Remaining lease term in years as of March 31, 2014, calculated on a weighted-average basis, as applicable.

(2) Contract purchase price, excluding acquisition related costs.

Results of Operations

We purchased our first property and commenced our real estate operations in May 2013. Accordingly, our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013 reflect significant increases in most categories.

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013

Rental Income

Rental income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $1.1 million. As of March 31, 2014, we owned 10 properties, which were 91.3% leased with annualized rental income on a straight line basis of $5.4 million. We did not own any properties and therefore had no rental income for the three months ended March 31, 2013.

Operating Expense Reimbursements and Property Operating Expense

Operating expense reimbursements and property operating expense were $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Pursuant to many of our lease agreements, tenants are required to pay their pro rata share of property operating expenses, in addition to base rent, whereas under certain other lease agreements, the tenants are directly responsible for all operating costs of the respective properties. We did not own any properties and therefore had no property operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2013.

23

Acquisition and Transaction Related Expenses

Acquisition and transaction related expenses of $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 related to our acquisition of three properties with an aggregate purchase price of $18.4 million. We did not own any properties and therefore had no acquisition and transaction related expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million to $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 from approximately $47,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, as a result of maintaining our larger real estate portfolio. General and administrative expenses primarily included board member compensation, insurance expense, professional fees and state income and franchise tax expense.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses of $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 related to our acquisition of 10 properties with an aggregate purchase price of $64.6 million. The purchase price of acquired properties is allocated to tangible and identifiable intangible assets and depreciated or amortized over the estimated useful lives. We did not own any properties and therefore had no depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013.

Interest Expense

Interest expenses of approximately $3,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 related to non-usage fees on or senior secured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) As of March 31, 2013, we had not entered into the Credit Facility and therefore had not incurred any interest expense or non-usage fees.

Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, net cash provided by operating activities was $1.3 million. The level of cash flows used in or provided by operating activities is affected by the volume of acquisition activity and the receipt of scheduled rent payments. Cash flows provided by operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2014 includes $0.4 million of acquisition and transaction costs. Cash inflows included a net loss adjusted for non-cash items of $0.3 million (net loss of $0.6 million adjusted for non-cash items including depreciation and amortization of tangible and intangible real estate assets and share based compensation of $0.9 million). Additionally cash inflows included an increase in prepaid expenses and other assets of $0.7 million primarily due to the Advisor's payment for prior period absorbed costs, an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $0.2 million related to accrued real estate taxes and approximately $31,000 in deferred rent.

The net cash used in investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2014 of $20.6 million related to the acquisition of three properties with an aggregate purchase price of $18.4 million. Net cash used in investing activities also includes a deposit on pending acquisitions of $2.2 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities of $313.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 related to proceeds, net of receivables, from the issuance of common stock of $358.1 million, partially offset by payments of deferred financing costs of $1.3 million, payments related to offering costs of $40.6 million, $1.9 million in distributions paid to stockholders and payments to affiliates for advances to fund offering costs of $0.5 million.

Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we had a net loss adjusted for non cash items of approximately $44,000 (net loss of approximately $47,000 offset by share based compensation expense of approximately $3,000). This cash outflow was offset by an increase of approximately $44,000 in accounts payable and accrued expenses related to professional fees.

Cash flow from financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2013, consisted of advances from affiliates of approximately $37,000 to fund the payment of third party offering costs completely offset by approximately $37,000 in payments related to offering costs.

24

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Pursuant to the IPO, we are offering and selling up to $1.7 billion in shares of our common stock to the public until the NAV pricing date at $25.00 per share (including the maximum allowed to be charged for commissions and fees). We are also offering up to 14.7 million shares of our common stock to be issued pursuant to our DRIP under which our stockholders may elect to have distributions reinvested in additional shares. Commencing with the NAV pricing date, the per share purchase price in the IPO will vary quarterly and will be equal to the NAV per share, as determined by the Advisor, plus applicable commissions and fees and the per share purchase price in the DRIP will be equal to the NAV per share. As of March 31, 2014, we had 22.3 million shares of common stock outstanding, including unvested restricted shares and shares issued pursuant to the DRIP, and had received total gross proceeds from the IPO and the DRIP of $553.2 million.

On March 21, 2014, we entered into a senior secured credit facility in the amount of $50.0 million. On April 15, 2014, the Credit Facility was amended to increase the commitment up to a maximum of $200.0 million. The Credit Facility contains an “accordion” feature to allow us, under certain circumstances, to increase the aggregate commitments under the Credit Facility to a maximum of $450.0 million. The Credit Facility matures in March 21, 2017, subject to two one-year extension options. There were no advances outstanding as of March 31, 2014. As of March 31, 2014, the company had no assets assigned to the Credit Facility and therefore no borrowing capacity. Availability of borrowings is based on a pool of eligible unencumbered real estate assets. The Company plans to add its unencumbered acquisitions to the borrowing base of the Credit Facility during the second quarter of 2014.

As of March 31, 2014, we had cash of $406.3 million. We expect cash flows from operations and the sale of common stock to be used primarily to invest in additional real estate, pay debt service, pay operating expenses and pay stockholder distributions. We expect to continue to raise capital through the sale of our common stock and to utilize the net proceeds from the sale of our common stock and proceeds from our Credit Facility and secured financings to fund future property acquisitions. We acquired our first property and commenced real estate operations in May 2013. As of March 31, 2014, we owned ten properties with an aggregate purchase price of $64.6 million.

Our principal demands for cash will continue to be for acquisition costs, including the purchase price of any properties, loans and securities we acquire, improvement costs, the payment of our operating and administrative expenses, debt service obligations and distributions to our stockholders. Generally, we will fund our acquisitions from the net proceeds of our IPO. We intend to acquire our assets with cash advances under our Credit Facility and mortgage or other debt proceeds, but we also may acquire assets free and clear of permanent mortgage or other indebtedness by paying the entire purchase price for the asset in cash or in OP Units.

We expect to fund our future short-term operating liquidity requirements through a combination of net cash provided by our current property operations and the operations of properties to be acquired in the future, proceeds from the sale of common stock, proceeds from our Credit Facility and secured mortgage financings. Management expects that in the future, as our portfolio matures, cash flow from our properties will be sufficient to fund operating expenses and the payment of our monthly distributions. Other potential future sources of capital include proceeds from secured and unsecured financings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from public and private offerings, proceeds from the sale of properties and undistributed funds from operations.

We expect to use debt financing as a source of capital. Under our charter, the maximum amount of our total indebtedness may not exceed 300% of our total “net assets” (as defined in our charter) as of the date of any borrowing, which is generally expected to be approximately 75% of the cost of our investments. We may exceed that limit if approved by a majority of our independent directors and disclosed to stockholders in our next quarterly report following such borrowing along with justification for exceeding such limit. This charter limitation, however, does not apply to individual real estate assets or investments. In addition, it is currently our intention to limit our aggregate borrowings to 45% of the aggregate fair market value of our assets (calculated after the close of our IPO and once we have invested substantially all the proceeds of our IPO), unless borrowing a greater amount is approved by a majority of our independent directors and disclosed to stockholders in our next quarterly report following such borrowing along with justification for borrowing such

25

a greater amount. This limitation, however, will not apply to individual real estate assets or investments. At the date of acquisition of each asset, we anticipate that the cost of investment for such asset will be substantially similar to its fair market value, which will enable us to satisfy our requirements under our charter. However, subsequent events, including changes in the fair market value of our assets, could result in our exceeding these limits. As of March 31, 2014, we had not obtained any debt financing.

Once our NAV exceeds $1.0 billion, we intend to maintain 5% of the overall value of our portfolio in liquid assets. However, our stockholders should not expect that we will maintain liquid assets at or above this level. To the extent that we maintain borrowing capacity under a line of credit, such available amount will be included in calculating our liquid assets. Our Advisor will consider various factors in determining the amount of liquid assets we should maintain, including, but not limited to, our receipt of proceeds from sales of additional shares, our cash flow from operations, available borrowing capacity under a line of credit, if any, our receipt of proceeds from any asset sale, and the use of cash to fund repurchases. The board of directors will review the amount and sources of liquid assets on a quarterly basis.

Our board of directors has adopted a Share Repurchase Program (“SRP”) that enables our stockholders to sell their shares to us under limited circumstances. At the time a stockholder requests a repurchase, we may, subject to certain conditions, repurchase the shares presented for repurchase for cash to the extent we have sufficient funds available to fund such purchase. There are limits on the number of shares we may repurchase under this program during any 12-month period. Further, we are only authorized to repurchase shares using the proceeds secured from the DRIP in any given quarter. The following table reflects the number of shares repurchased under the Company's Share Repurchase Program cumulatively through March 31, 2014:

	Number of Requests		Number of Shares Repurchased		Average Price per Share
Cumulative repurchases as of December 31, 2013		2		1,600	$	25.00
Three months ended March 31, 2014		—		—		—
Cumulative repurchases as of March 31, 2014		2		1,600	$	25.00

Acquisitions

As of May 12, 2014, we owned 12 properties with an aggregate purchase price of $87.1 million. Our Advisor evaluates potential acquisitions of real estate and real estate related assets and engages in negotiations with sellers and borrowers on our behalf. Investors should be aware that after a purchase contract is executed that contains specific terms, the property will not be purchased until the successful completion of due diligence and fully negotiated binding agreements. We currently have $1.0 billion of assets under contract and submitted letters of intent. Pursuant to the terms of the purchase and sale agreements and letters of intent, our obligation to close upon these acquisitions is subject to certain conditions customary to closing. We may decide to temporarily invest any unused proceeds from common stock offerings in certain investments that could yield lower returns than the properties. These lower returns may affect our ability to make distributions.

Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations

Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, as discussed below, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), an industry trade group, has promulgated a measure known as funds from operations (“FFO”), which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. FFO is not equivalent to net income or loss as determined under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”).

We define FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the standards established by the White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, as revised in February 2004 (the “White Paper”). The White Paper defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property and asset impairment writedowns, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO. Our FFO calculation complies with NAREIT's policy described above.

26

The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, especially if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances and/or is requested or required by lessees for operational purposes in order to maintain the value disclosed. We believe that, since real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation may be less informative. Additionally, we believe it is appropriate to disregard impairment charges, as this is a fair value adjustment that is largely based on market fluctuations and assessments regarding general market conditions which can change over time. An asset will only be evaluated for impairment if certain impairment indicators exist and if the carrying, or book value, exceeds the total estimated undiscounted future cash flows (including net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and any other ancillary cash flows at a property or group level under GAAP) from such asset. Determinations of whether impairment charges have been incurred are based partly on anticipated operating performance, because estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property, including estimated future net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of FFO as described above, because impairments are based on estimated undiscounted future cash flows and the relatively limited term of our operations, it could be difficult to recover any impairment charges.

Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, we believe that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate related depreciation and amortization and impairments, provides a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income. However, FFO and modified funds from operations (“MFFO”), as described below, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or in its applicability in evaluating our operating performance. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.

Changes in the accounting and reporting promulgations under GAAP (for acquisition fees and expenses from a capitalization/depreciation model to an expensed-as-incurred model) that were put into effect in 2009 and other changes to GAAP accounting for real estate subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT's definition of FFO have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, specifically acquisition fees and expenses for all industries as items that are expensed under GAAP, that are typically accounted for as operating expenses. Management believes these fees and expenses do not affect our overall long-term operating performance. Publicly registered, non-listed REITs typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operation. We are using the proceeds raised in our offering to, among other things, acquire properties. We intend to begin the process of achieving a liquidity event (i.e., listing of our common stock on a national stock exchange, a merger or sale or another similar transaction) within three to five years of the completion of the offering. Thus, unless we raise, or recycle, a significant amount of capital after we complete our offering, we will not be continuing to purchase assets at the same rate as during our offering. Due to the above factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, the Investment Program Association (“IPA”), an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as MFFO, which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental measure for publicly registered non-listed REITs and which we believe to be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a non-listed REIT having the characteristics described above. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under GAAP, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to purchase a significant amount of new assets after we complete our offering. We believe that, because MFFO excludes costs that we consider more reflective of investing activities and other non-operating items included in FFO and also

27

excludes acquisition fees and expenses that affect our operations only in periods in which properties are acquired, MFFO can provide, on a going forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of our operating performance after the period in which we are acquiring our properties and once our portfolio is stabilized. By providing MFFO, we believe we are presenting useful information that assists investors and analysts to better assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our IPO has been completed and our portfolios have been stabilized. We also believe that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the non-listed REIT industry. Further, we believe MFFO is useful in comparing the sustainability of our operating performance after our IPO and acquisitions are completed with the sustainability of the operating performance of other real estate companies that are not as involved in acquisition activities. MFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our IPO has been completed and our portfolio has been stabilized because it excludes acquisition costs that have a negative effect on our operating performance during the periods in which properties are acquired.

We define MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the IPA's Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds from Operations (“Practice Guideline”) issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for the following items, as applicable, included in the determination of GAAP net income: acquisition fees and expenses; amounts relating to deferred rent receivables and amortization of above and below market leases and liabilities (which are adjusted in order to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments); accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. The accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, gains and losses on hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings, unrealized gains and losses resulting from consolidations, as well as other listed cash flow adjustments are adjustments made to net income in calculating the cash flows provided by operating activities and, in some cases, reflect gains or losses which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized.

Our MFFO calculation complies with the IPA's Practice Guideline described above. In calculating MFFO, we exclude acquisition related expenses, amortization of above and below market leases, fair value adjustments of derivative financial instruments, deferred rent receivables and the adjustments of such items related to non-controlling interests. Under GAAP, acquisition fees and expenses are characterized as operating expenses in determining operating net income. These expenses are paid in cash by us, and therefore such funds will not be available to distribute to investors. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses negatively impact our operating performance during the period in which properties are acquired and negatively impact the returns earned on an investment in our shares, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property. Therefore, MFFO may not be an accurate indicator of our operating performance, especially during periods in which properties are being acquired. MFFO that excludes such costs and expenses would only be comparable to that of non-listed REITs that have completed their acquisition activities and have similar operating characteristics as us. Further, under GAAP, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income in determining cash flow from operating activities. In addition, we view fair value adjustments of derivatives as items which are unrealized. We view both gains and losses from dispositions of assets and fair value adjustments of derivatives as items which are not reflective of ongoing operations and are therefore typically adjusted for when assessing operating performance. The purchase of properties, and the corresponding expenses associated with that process, is a key operational feature of our business plan to generate operational income and cash flows in order to make distributions to our investors. Acquisition fees and expenses will not be reimbursed by our Advisor if there are no further proceeds from the sale of shares in our offering, and therefore such fees and expenses will need to be paid from either additional debt, operational earnings or cash flows, net proceeds from the sale of properties or from ancillary cash flows.

28

Our management uses MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other non-listed REITs with similar acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate in this manner. We believe that our use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it allow us to present our performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to non-listed REITs, such as a limited and defined acquisition period. By excluding expensed acquisition costs, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with management's analysis of the operating performance of the properties. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as rental and occupancy rates, may not be directly related or attributable to our current operating performance. By excluding such changes that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gains or losses, we believe MFFO provides useful supplemental information.

Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way. Accordingly, comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or income (loss) from continuing operations as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations as an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with GAAP measurements as an indication of our performance. MFFO has limitations as a performance measure while an offering is ongoing such as our offering where the price of a share of common stock is a stated value and there is no NAV determination during the offering stage and for a period thereafter. MFFO is useful in assisting management and investors in assessing the sustainability of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete and NAV is disclosed. FFO and MFFO are not useful measures in evaluating NAV because impairments are taken into account in determining NAV but not in determining FFO or MFFO.

Neither the SEC, NAREIT nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that we use to calculate FFO or MFFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the non-listed REIT industry and we would have to adjust our calculation and characterization of FFO or MFFO.

The table below reflects the items deducted or added to net loss in our calculation of FFO and MFFO for the period indicated:

(In thousands)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
Net loss (in accordance with GAAP)	$	(582	)
Depreciation and amortization		857
FFO		275
Acquisition fees and expenses(1)		404
Amortization of above or accretion of below market leases and liabilities, net(2)		15
Straight-line rent(3)		(80	)
MFFO	$	614

(1) In evaluating investments in real estate, management differentiates the costs to acquire the investment from the operations derived from the investment. Such information would be comparable only for non-listed REITs that have completed their acquisition activity and have other similar operating characteristics. By excluding expensed acquisition costs, management believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for each type of real estate investment and is consistent with management's analysis of the investing and operating performance of our properties. Acquisition fees and expenses include payments to our Advisor or third parties. Acquisition fees and expenses under GAAP

29

are considered operating expenses and as expenses included in the determination of net income and income from continuing operations, both of which are performance measures under GAAP. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to the property.

(2) Under GAAP, certain intangibles are accounted for at cost and reviewed at least annually for impairment, and certain intangibles are assumed to diminish predictably in value over time and amortized, similar to depreciation and amortization of other real estate related assets that are excluded from FFO. However, because real estate values and market lease rates historically rise or fall with market conditions, management believes that by excluding charges relating to amortization of these intangibles, MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the performance of the real estate.

(3) Under GAAP, rental receipts are allocated to periods using various methodologies. This may result in income recognition that is significantly different than underlying contract terms. By adjusting for these items (to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments), MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the realized economic impact of lease terms and debt investments, providing insight on the contractual cash flows of such lease terms and debt investments, and aligns results with management's analysis of operating performance.

Distributions

On April 9, 2013, our board of directors authorized, and we declared, a distribution rate, which is calculated based on stockholders of record each day during the applicable period at a rate of $0.0046575343 per day based on a price of $25.00 per share of common stock. Distributions began to accrue on May 24, 2013, 15 days following our initial property acquisition. Distributions are payable by the 5^th day following each month end to stockholders of record at the close of business each day during the prior month.

The amount of distributions payable to our stockholders is determined by our board of directors and is dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for distribution, our financial condition, capital expenditure requirements, as applicable, requirements of Maryland law and annual distribution requirements needed to qualify and maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Distribution payments are dependent on the availability of funds. Our board of directors may reduce the amount of distributions paid or suspend distribution payments at any time and therefore distribution payments are not assured.

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, distributions paid to common stockholders totaled $4.0 million, inclusive of $2.0 million under the DRIP. During the three months ended March 2014, cash used to pay distributions was generated from proceeds from cash flows from operations, the issuance of common stock and common stock issued under the DRIP.

The following table shows the sources for the payment of distributions to common stockholders, excluding distributions on unvested restricted stock, for the period indicated:

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)				Percentage of Distributions
Distributions:
Distributions paid in cash	$	1,923
Distributions reinvested		2,047
Total distributions	$	3,970
Source of distribution coverage:
Cash flows provided by operations(1)	$	1,301			32.8	%
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		622			15.7	%
Common stock issued under the DRIP/offering proceeds		2,047			51.5	%
Proceeds from financings		—			—	%
Total source of distribution coverage	$	3,970			100.0	%
Cash flows provided by operations (GAAP basis)(1)	$	1,301
Net loss (in accordance with GAAP)	$	(582	)

30

(1) Cash flows used in operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 reflect acquisition and transaction related expenses of $0.4 million.

The following table compares cumulative distributions paid to cumulative net loss (in accordance with GAAP) for the period from October 15, 2012 (date of inception) through March 31, 2014:

(In thousands)	For the Period from October 15, 2012 (date of inception) to March 31, 2014
Distributions paid:
Common stockholders in cash	$	3,226
Common stockholders pursuant to DRIP/offering proceeds		3,392
Total distributions paid	$	6,618
Reconciliation of net loss:
Revenues	$	3,204
Acquisition and transaction related		(1,134	)
Depreciation and amortization		(1,934	)
Other operating expenses		(952	)
Other non-operating expenses		(2	)
Net loss (in accordance with GAAP)(1)	$	(818	)

(1) Net loss as defined by GAAP includes the non-cash impact of depreciation and amortization expense as well as costs incurred relating to acquisitions and related transactions.

Election as a REIT

We intended to elect and qualify to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, effective for our taxable year ended December 31, 2013. We believe that, commencing with such taxable year, we are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code. We intend to continue to operate in such a manner to qualify for taxation as a REIT, but no assurance can be given that we will operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT. In order to qualify and continue to qualify, for taxation as a REIT, we must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income. REITs are also subject to a number of other organizational and operational requirements. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income and properties as well as federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income.

Inflation

We may be adversely impacted by inflation on any leases that do not contain indexed escalation provisions. In addition, we may be required to pay costs for maintenance and operation of properties which may adversely impact our results of operations due to potential increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

31

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

The market risk associated with financial instruments and derivative financial instruments is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices or rates. As of March 31, 2014, we do not have any long-term debt, but anticipate incurring long-term debt in the future. Our interest rate risk management objectives with respect to our long-term debt will be to limit the impact of interest rate changes in earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, from time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as swaps and collars in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. We would not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes. We do not anticipate having any foreign operations and we do not expect to be exposed to foreign currency fluctuations.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and determined that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

No change occurred in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended March 31, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

32

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We are not a party to, and none of our properties are subject to, any material pending legal proceedings.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Our potential risks and uncertainties are presented in the section entitled “Risk Factors,” contained in the prospectus as supplemented and included in our Registration Statement (File No. 333-184677), as amended from time to time. The following additional risk factors should be considered regarding our potential risks and uncertainties:

Distributions paid from sources other than our cash flows from operations, particularly from proceeds of our IPO, will result in us having fewer funds available for the acquisition of properties and other real estate-related investments and may dilute our stockholders' interests in us, which may adversely affect our ability to fund future distributions with cash flows from operations and may adversely affect our stockholders' overall return.

Our cash flows provided by operations were $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we paid distributions of $4.0 million, of which $1.3 million, or 32.8%, was funded from cash flows from operation, $0.6 million, or 15.7%, was funded from proceeds from the issuance of common stock and $2.0 million, or 51.5%, was funded from proceeds from common stock issued under the DRIP/offering proceeds. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 cash flow from operations included an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $0.2 million, as reflected on the statement of cash flows. Accordingly, if these accounts payable and accrued expenses had been paid during the three months ended March 31, 2014, there would have been $0.2 million less in cash flow from operations available to pay distributions. Additionally, we may in the future pay distributions from sources other than from our cash flows from operations.

Until we acquire additional properties or other real estate-related investments, we may not generate sufficient cash flows from operations to pay distributions. If we are unable to acquire additional properties or other real estate-related investments, it may result in a lower return on an investment in our shares. If we have not generated sufficient cash flows from our operations and other sources, such as from borrowings, the sale of additional securities, advances from our Advisor, and our Advisor's deferral, suspension or waiver of its fees and expense reimbursements, to fund distributions, we may use the proceeds from our IPO. Moreover, our board of directors may change our distribution policy, in its sole discretion, at any time. Distributions made from offering proceeds are a return of capital to stockholders, from which we will have already paid offering expenses in connection with our IPO. We have not established any limit on the amount of proceeds from our IPO that may be used to fund distributions, except that, in accordance with our organizational documents and Maryland law, we may not make distributions that would: (1) cause us to be unable to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; (2) cause our total assets to be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus senior liquidation preferences, if any; or (3) jeopardize our ability to qualify as a REIT.

If we fund distributions from the proceeds of our IPO, we will have less funds available for acquiring properties or other real estate-related investments. As a result, the return realized on an investment in our shares may be reduced. Funding distributions from borrowings could restrict the amount we can borrow for investments, which may affect our profitability. Funding distributions with the sale of assets or the proceeds of our IPO may affect our ability to generate cash flows. Funding distributions from the sale of additional securities could dilute each stockholder's interest in us if we sell shares of our common stock or securities that are convertible or exercisable into shares of our common stock to third-party investors. Payment of distributions from the mentioned sources could restrict our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations, affect our profitability or affect the distributions payable to stockholders upon a liquidity event, any or all of which may have an adverse effect on an investment in our shares.

33

We rely significantly on six major tenants (including, for this purpose, all affiliates of such tenants) and therefore, are subject to tenant credit concentrations that make us more susceptible to adverse events with respect to those tenants.

As of March 31, 2014, the following six major tenants represented annualized rental income on a straight-line basis, which represented 5% or more of our total annualized rental income on a straight-line basis including for this purpose, all affiliates of such tenants:

Tenant	Percentage of Straight-Line Rental Income
Adena Health System		7.9	%
Advocate Health and Hospitals Corporation		7.9	%
Greenville Health System		6.8	%
HH/Killeen Health System, LLC		9.3	%
IASIS Healthcare, LLC		11.2	%
National Mentor Holdings, Inc.		18.1	%

Therefore, the financial failure of any of these tenants could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our financial condition. In addition, the value of our investment is driven by the credit quality of the underlying tenant, and an adverse change in either tenant's financial condition or a decline in the credit rating of such tenant may result in a decline in the value of our investments.

Our property portfolio has a high concentration of properties located in eight states. Our properties may be adversely affected by economic cycles and risks inherent to those states.

As of March 31, 2014, annualized rental income on a straight-line basis in excess of 5% included properties located in the following states:

State	Percentage of Straight-Line Rental Income
Arizona		15.7	%
Colorado		18.1	%
Georgia		11.2	%
Illinois		16.8	%
Louisiana		11.2	%
Ohio		7.9	%
South Carolina		6.8	%
Texas		9.3	%

Any adverse situation that disproportionately affects the states listed above may have a magnified adverse effect on our portfolio. Real estate markets are subject to economic downturns, as they have been in the past, and we cannot predict how economic conditions will impact this market in both the short and long term. Declines in the economy or a decline in the real estate market in these states could hurt our financial performance and the value of our properties. Factors that may negatively affect economic conditions in these states include:

• business layoffs or downsizing;

• industry slowdowns;

• relocations of businesses;

• changing demographics;

• increased telecommuting and use of alternative work places;

• infrastructure quality;

• any oversupply of, or reduced demand for, real estate;

34

• concessions or reduced rental rates under new leases for properties where tenants defaulted; and

• increased insurance premiums.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds of Registered Securities.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

We did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Use of Proceeds of Registered Securities

On February 14, 2013 we commenced our IPO on a “reasonable best efforts” basis of up to a maximum of $1.7 billion of common stock, consisting of up to 68.0 million shares, pursuant to the Registration Statement initially filed on October 31, 2012 with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Registration Statement, which was declared effective by the SEC on February 14, 2013, also covers 14.7 million shares of common stock pursuant the DRIP under which common stockholders may elect to have their distributions reinvested in additional shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2014, we have issued 22.3 million shares of our common stock, including unvested restricted shares and shares issued pursuant to the DRIP, and received $553.2 million of offering proceeds, including proceeds from shares issued pursuant to the DRIP.

The following table reflects the offering costs associated with the issuance of common stock:

(In thousands)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
Selling commissions and dealer manager fees	$	34,475
Other offering costs		6,893
Total offering costs	$	41,368

The Dealer Manager may reallow the selling commissions and a portion of the dealer manager fees to participating broker-dealers. The following table details the selling commissions incurred and reallowed related to the sale of shares of common stock:

(In thousands)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
Total commissions paid to the Dealer Manager	$	34,475
Less:
Commissions to participating brokers		(23,512	)
Reallowance to participating broker dealers		(3,652	)
Net to the Dealer Manager	$	7,311

As of March 31, 2014, we have incurred $66.2 million of cumulative offering costs in connection with the issuance and distribution of our shares in connection with our IPO. As of March 31, 2014, cumulative offering costs included $11.2 million of offering costs reimbursements incurred from the Advisor and Dealer Manager, excluding commission and dealer manager fees. The Advisor elected to cap cumulative offering costs incurred by us, net of unpaid amounts, to 15% of gross common stock proceeds during the offering period. Cumulative offering costs, net of unpaid amounts, were less that the 15% threshold as of March 31, 2014. Cumulative offering proceeds from the sale of common stock exceeded cumulative offering costs by $487.0 million at March 31, 2014.

We have used and expect to continue to use substantially all of the net proceeds from our IPO to primarily acquire a diversified portfolio of income producing real estate properties, focusing predominantly on medical office buildings and healthcare-related facilities. We may also originate or acquire first mortgage loans secured by real estate. As of March 31, 2014, we have used the net proceeds from our IPO to purchase ten properties with an aggregate purchase price of $64.6 million.

35

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table reflects the number of shares repurchased under the Company's SRP cumulatively through March 31, 2014:

	Number of Requests		Number of Shares Repurchased		Average Price per Share
Cumulative repurchases as of December 31, 2013		2		1,600	$	25.00
Three months ended March 31, 2014		—		—		—
Cumulative repurchases as of March 31, 2014		2		1,600	$	25.00

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index (following the signatures section of this report) are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

36

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.

By: /s/ Thomas P. D'Arcy

Thomas P. D'Arcy
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

By: /s/ Edward F. Lange

Edward F. Lange
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer (and Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Dated: May 14, 2014

37

EXHIBITS INDEX

The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):

Exhibit No.	Description
10.23*	Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of March 21, 2014 by and among American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II Operating Partnership, L.P., KeyBank National Association, the other lenders which are parties to this agreement and other lenders that may become parties to the agreement.
31.1*	Certification of the Principal Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*	Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32*	Written statements of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101*	XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language). The following materials from American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2014, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information in furnished and not filed for purpose of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

* Filed herewith

38