XML 43 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

Fair value measurement provisions establish a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. These provisions describe three levels of input that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
Level 2: Inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, which are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.

The Company uses observable inputs when available. Fair value is based upon quoted market prices when available. If market prices are not available, the Company may employ models that mostly use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest rates, volatilities, and credit curves, among others. The Company limits valuation adjustments to those deemed necessary to ensure that the financial instrument’s fair value adequately represents the price that would be received or paid in the marketplace. Valuation adjustments may include consideration of counterparty credit quality and liquidity as well as other criteria. The estimated fair value amounts are subjective in nature and may involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment for certain financial instruments. Changes in the underlying assumptions used in estimating fair value could affect the results. The fair value measurement levels are not indicative of risk of investment.

The fair value of financial instruments is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on the type of financial instrument and relevant market information. Many of these estimates involve various assumptions and may vary significantly from amounts that could be realized in actual transactions.
 
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2017 and 2016, for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial asset:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap
$

 
$
214

 
$

 
$
214

December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liability:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap
$

 
$
1,964

 
$

 
$
1,964



Derivative Instruments

The fair value of the Company’s derivative instrument is determined using a standard valuation model. The significant inputs used in these models are readily available in public markets, or can be derived from observable market transactions, and therefore have been classified as Level 2. Inputs used in these standard valuation models for derivative instruments include the applicable forward rates and discount rates. The discount rates are based on the historical LIBOR Swap rates.

The following table presents the carrying value, as applicable, and estimated fair values for financial instruments at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

 
December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap
$
214

 
$
214

 
$

 
$

Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap

 

 
1,964

 
1,964

Senior Secured Term B Loan
376,395

 
370,540

 
378,074

 
383,491

2018 Term A Loan
26,690

 
26,027

 
28,721

 
29,268

2020 Term A Loan
200,653

 
196,584

 
212,661

 
213,872



The fair value of the senior secured term loans at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was obtained using the prices provided by third party service providers. Their pricing is based on various inputs such as: market quotes, recent trading activity in a non-active market or imputed prices. Also, the pricing may include the use of an algorithm that could take into account movement in the general high yield market, among other variants.
The senior secured term loans, which are not measured at fair value in the balance sheets, if measured, would be categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
There were no transfers in or out of Level 3 during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.