XML 24 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

Fair value measurement provisions establish a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. These provisions describe three levels of input that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market at the measurement date.
Level 2: Inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, which are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.

The Company uses observable inputs when available. Fair value is based upon quoted market prices when available. If market prices are not available, the Company may employ models that mostly use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest rates, volatilities, and credit curves, among others. The Company limits valuation adjustments to those deemed necessary to ensure that the financial instrument’s fair value adequately represents the price that would be received or paid in the marketplace. Valuation adjustments may include consideration of counterparty credit quality and liquidity as well as other criteria. The estimated fair value amounts are subjective in nature and may involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment for certain financial instruments. Changes in the underlying assumptions used in estimating fair value could affect the results. The fair value measurement levels are not indicative of risk of investment.

The fair value of financial instruments is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on the type of financial instrument and relevant market information. Many of these estimates involve various assumptions and may vary significantly from amounts that could be realized in actual transactions. The following table summarizes the fair value measurement by level at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 for the liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
 
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
June 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap
 
$

 
$
1,588

 
$

 
$
1,588

December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap
 
$

 
$
1,964

 
$

 
$
1,964


The following table presents the carrying value, as applicable, and estimated fair values for financial instruments at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
 
 
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap
 
$
1,588

 
$
1,588

 
$
1,964

 
$
1,964

Senior Secured Term B Loan
 
377,218

 
382,080

 
378,074

 
383,491

2018 Term A Loan
 
27,894

 
28,168

 
28,721

 
29,268

2020 Term A Loan
 
206,657

 
208,232

 
212,661

 
213,872



The fair value of the term loans at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were obtained using the prices provided by third party service providers. Their pricing is based on various inputs such as: market quotes, recent trading activity in a non-active market or imputed prices. Also, the pricing may include the use of an algorithm that could take into account movement in the general high yield market, among other variants. The unpaid principal balance of the 2018 Term A Loan as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $28.4 million and $29.5 million, respectively, and the unpaid principal balance of the 2020 Term A Loan was $209.5 million and $216.0 million for the same periods, respectively. The unpaid principal balance of the Term B Loan was $384.0 million and $386.0 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
The Senior Secured term loans, which are not measured at fair value in the balance sheets, would be categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.