XML 68 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.2.0.727
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

Note 5 – Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

Fair value measurement provisions establish a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. This guidance describes three levels of input that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.

Level 2: Inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, which are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.

The Company uses observable inputs when available. Fair value is based upon quoted market prices when available. If market prices are not available, the Company may employ internally-developed models that mostly use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest rates, volatilities, and credit curves, among others. The Company limits valuation adjustments to those deemed necessary to ensure that the financial instrument’s fair value adequately represents the price that would be received or paid in the marketplace. Valuation adjustments may include consideration of counterparty credit quality and liquidity as well as other criteria. The estimated fair value amounts are subjective in nature and may involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment for certain financial instruments. Changes in the underlying assumptions used in estimating fair value could affect the results. The fair value measurement levels are not indicative of risk of investment.

The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 

(Dollar amounts in thousands)    Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

June 30, 2015

           

Financial assets:

           

Indemnification assets:

           

Software cost reimbursement

   $ —         $ —         $ 141       $ 141   

December 31, 2014

           

Financial assets:

           

Indemnification assets:

           

Software cost reimbursement

   $ —         $ —         $ 1,428       $ 1,428   

 

The fair value of financial instruments is the amount at which an asset or obligation could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation sale. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on the type of financial instrument and relevant market information. Many of these estimates involve various assumptions and may vary significantly from amounts that could be realized in actual transactions.

For those financial instruments with no quoted market prices available, fair values have been estimated using present value calculations or other valuation techniques, as well as management’s best judgment with respect to current economic conditions, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows.

Indemnification assets include the present value of the expected future cash flows of certain expense reimbursement agreements with Popular. These contracts have termination dates up to September 2015 and were entered into in connection with the merger transaction completed on September 30, 2010 (“the Merger”). Management prepared estimates of the expected reimbursements to be received from Popular until the termination of the contracts, discounted the estimated future cash flows and recorded the indemnification assets as of the Merger closing date. Payments received during the quarters reduced the indemnification asset balance. The remaining balance was adjusted to reflect its fair value as of June 30, 2015, therefore resulting in a net unrealized gain of approximately $9,000 and $12,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, and a net unrealized gain of approximately $6,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and a net unrealized loss of approximately $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, which are reflected within the other expenses caption in the unaudited consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The indemnification assets is included within accounts receivable, net in the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets.

The unobservable inputs related to the Company’s indemnification assets as of June 30, 2015 using the discounted cash flow model include the discount rate of 5.01% and the projected cash flows of $0.1 million.

For indemnification assets a significant increase or decrease in market rates or cash flows could result in a change to the fair value. Also, the credit rating and/or the non-performance credit risk of Popular, which is subjective in nature, also could increase or decrease the sensitivity of the fair value of these assets.

The following table presents the carrying value, as applicable, and estimated fair values for financial instruments at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

 

     June 30, 2015      December 31, 2014  
(Dollar amounts in thousands)    Carrying
Amount
     Fair
Value
     Carrying
Amount
     Fair
Value
 

Financial assets:

           

Indemnification assets:

           

Software cost reimbursement

   $ 141       $ 141       $ 1,428       $ 1,428   

Financial liabilities:

           

Senior secured term loan A

   $ 269,781       $ 264,600       $ 277,239       $ 266,400   

Senior secured term loan B

     387,749         385,140         389,340         385,462   

The fair value of the senior secured term loans at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were obtained using prices supplied by third party service providers. Their pricing is based on various inputs such as: market quotes, recent trading activity in a non-active market or imputed prices. The pricing inputs also may include the use of an algorithm that could take into account movement in the general high-yield market, among other variants.

The senior secured term loans, which are not measured at fair value in the balance sheets, if measured, could be categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

 

The following table provides a summary of the change in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 assets:

 

     Three months ended June 30,      Six months ended June 30,  
(Dollar amounts in thousands)    2015      2014      2015      2014  

Indemnification assets:

           

Beginning balance

   $ 971       $ 2,947       $ 1,428       $ 3,586   

Payments received

     (839      (839      (1,299      (1,299

Unrealized gain (loss) recognized in other expenses

     9         6         12         (173
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 141       $ 2,114       $ 141       $ 2,114