UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014
or
¨ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ______________ to ______________
Commission File Number: 333-189731
TYPE 1 MEDIA, INC. |
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
Delaware |
33-1223037 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
P.O. Box 11383
Washington, DC 20008
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
1-902-483-8511
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated Filer |
¨ |
Accelerated Filer |
¨ |
Non-accelerated Filer |
¨ |
Small Reporting Company |
x |
(Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of November 7, 2014, there were 5,700,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | |||||
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|||||
Item 1. |
Financial Statements. |
4 | |||
Item 2. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
5 | |||
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
10 | |||
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures. |
10 | |||
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION |
|||||
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings. |
12 | |||
Item 1A. |
Risk Factors. |
12 | |||
Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
12 | |||
Item 3. |
Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
12 | |||
Item 4. |
Mine Safety Disclosures. |
12 | |||
Item 5. |
Other Information. |
12 | |||
Item 6. |
Exhibits. |
13 |
2
|
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”) contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. Because they discuss future events or conditions, forward-looking statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “seek,” “plan,” “might,” “will,” “expect,” “predict,” “project,” “forecast,” “potential,” “continue” negatives thereof or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, are based on various underlying assumptions and current expectations about the future and are not guarantees. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievement to be materially different from the results of operations or plans expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
We cannot predict all of the risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, such information should not be regarded as representations that the results or conditions described in such statements or that our objectives and plans will be achieved and we do not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this Report and include information concerning possible or assumed future results of our operations, including statements about potential acquisition or merger targets; business strategies; future cash flows; financing plans; plans and objectives of management; any other statements regarding future acquisitions, future cash needs, future operations, business plans and future financial results, and any other statements that are not historical facts.
These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Many of those factors are outside of our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than we have described. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning other matters addressed in this Report and attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this Report.
Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, a change in events, conditions, circumstances or assumptions underlying such statements, or otherwise.
3
|
PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
Type 1 Media, Inc.
September 30, 2014 and 2013
Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Contents |
Page(s) | |||
|
||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2013 |
F-1 |
|||
|
|
|||
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months and Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited) |
F-2 |
|||
|
|
|||
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit for the Interim Period Ended September 30, 2014 (Unaudited) |
F-3 |
|||
|
|
|||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited) |
F-4 |
|||
|
|
|||
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) | F-5 |
4
|
Type 1 Media, Inc. |
|||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
September 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | ||||||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||||||
ASSETS |
|||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS |
|||||||||||
Cash |
$ |
29,335 |
$ |
114,429 |
|||||||
Total current assets |
29,335 |
114,429 |
|||||||||
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT |
|||||||||||
Computer equipment |
2,717 |
2,833 |
|||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(969 |
) |
(538 |
) |
|||||||
Computer equipment, net |
1,748 |
2,295 |
|||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ |
31,083 |
$ |
116,724 |
|||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT |
|||||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
$ |
54,098 |
$ |
89,753 |
|||||||
Advances from stockholder |
17,158 |
20,088 |
|||||||||
Deferred revenue |
4,894 |
45,402 |
|||||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
76,150 |
155,243 |
|||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
76,150 |
155,243 |
|||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT |
|||||||||||
Preferred stock par value $0.000001: 5,000,000 shares authorized; |
|||||||||||
none issued or outstanding |
- |
- |
|||||||||
Common stock par value $0.000001: 95,000,000 shares authorized; |
|||||||||||
5,700,000 shares issued and outstanding |
6 |
6 |
|||||||||
Additional paid-In capital |
(1,778 |
) |
(1,778 |
) |
|||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(50,758 |
) |
(43,645 |
) |
|||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|||||||||||
Foreign currency translation gain (loss) |
7,463 |
6,898 |
|||||||||
Total Stockholders' Deficit |
(45,067 |
) |
(38,519 |
) |
|||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT |
$ |
31,083 |
$ |
116,724 |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
F-1
|
Type 1 Media, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 | For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 | For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||
|
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) |
(Unaudited) |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Revenue |
$ |
46,962 |
$ |
12,014 |
$ |
25,144 |
$ |
16,054 |
||||||||
Cost of Revenue |
12,345 |
4,137 |
14,137 |
14,137 |
||||||||||||
Gross Margin |
34,617 |
7,877 |
11,007 |
1,917 |
||||||||||||
Operating Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Professional fees |
21,677 |
2,580 |
5,183 |
2,269 |
||||||||||||
Salary and compensation - officer |
12,345 |
4,137 |
13,189 |
4,327 |
||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
7,708 |
224 |
25,347 |
5,792 |
||||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses |
41,730 |
6,941 |
43,719 |
12,388 |
||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income tax provision |
(7,113 |
) |
936 |
(32,712 |
) |
(10,471 |
) |
|||||||||
Income tax provision |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
(7,113 |
) |
936 |
(32,712 |
) |
(10,471 |
) |
|||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation gain (loss) |
565 |
3,918 |
3,642 |
(392 |
) |
|||||||||||
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
$ |
(6,548 |
) |
$ |
4,854 |
$ |
(29,070 |
) |
$ |
(10,863 |
) |
|||||
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share |
||||||||||||||||
- basic and diluted |
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
$ |
0.00 |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|||||
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
- basic and diluted |
5,700,000 |
5,700,000 |
5,282,380 |
5,700,000 |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
F-2
|
Type 1 Media, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit |
||||||||||||||||
For the Interim Period Ended September 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) |
Common stock par value $0.000001 | Additional Paid-in | Accumulated |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Foreign Currency Translation | Total Stockholders' | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | gain (loss) | Deficit | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2012 | 5,000,000 | $ | 5 | $ | (36,777 | ) | (68,860 | ) | (1,635 | ) | (107,267 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for cash | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
at $0.05 per share on June 30, 2013 | 700,000 | 1 | 34,999 | 35,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | 25,215 | 25,215 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translational gain (loss) | 8,533 | 8,533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) | 33,748 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2013 | 5,700,000 | 6 | (1,778 | ) | (43,645 | ) | 6,898 | (38,519 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | (7,113 | ) | (7,113 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translational gain (loss) | 565 | 565 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) | (6,548 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2014 | 5,700,000 | $ | 6 | $ | (1,778 | ) | (50,758 | ) | 7,463 | $ | (45,067 | ) |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
F-3
|
Type 1 Media, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months | For the Nine Months | ||||||||||
Ended | Ended | ||||||||||
September 30, 2014 |
September 30, 2013 |
||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (7,113 | ) | $ | (32,712 | ) | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities | |||||||||||
Depreciation expense | 457 | 321 | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||
Accounts receivable | - | 16,704 | |||||||||
Accrued expenses | (32,560 | ) | 13,100 | ||||||||
Deferred revenue | (39,665 | ) | (10,419 | ) | |||||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (78,881 | ) | (13,006 | ) | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||
Purchase of computer equipment | - | (2,399 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | - | (2,399 | ) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||
Advances from (repayments to) stockholder | (1,672 | ) | 5,427 | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of common stock | - | 35,000 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (1,672 | ) | 40,427 | ||||||||
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH | (4,541 | ) | 60 | ||||||||
NET CHANGE IN CASH | (85,094 | ) | 25,082 | ||||||||
CASH BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF REPORTING PERIOD | 114,429 | 10,302 | |||||||||
CASH BALANCE AT END OF REPORTING PERIOD | $ | 29,335 | $ | 35,384 | |||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION: | |||||||||||
Interest paid | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||
Income tax paid | $ | - | $ | - |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
F-4
|
September 30, 2014 and 2013
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1 – Organization and Operations
Make Good Media
Make Good Media, a development stage company, (“Predecessor”), was organized as a Sole-Proprietorship on October 28, 2009 under the laws of Canada. The Company plans to make people, newly diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes, aware of the information in self-management with the disease.
The Company exists to increase the number of people living healthy, happy lives with Type 1 Diabetes by:
· |
Providing people with type 1 diabetes with a proactive perspective about self-care that will lead them to seek to understand and manage their condition |
· |
Providing people with type 1 diabetes with the information they need to self-manage and thrive with the condition. |
· |
Increasing the number of people who use existing informational, support, and research organizations concerned with improving the lives of people with type 1 diabetes. |
Type 1 Media, Inc.
Type 1 Media, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on January 12, 2012 under the laws of the State of Delaware for the sole purpose of acquiring all of the outstanding rights of Make Good Media. Upon formation, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of the newly formed corporation’s common stock to the President of the Predecessor for all of the outstanding rights. No value was given to the stock issued by the newly formed corporation. Therefore, the shares were recorded to reflect the $0.000001 par value and paid in capital was recorded as a negative amount ($5). The acquisition process utilizes the capital structure of the Company and the assets and liabilities of Make Good Media, which are recorded at historical cost.
The Company applied paragraph 505-10-S99-3 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (formerly Topic 4B of the Staff Accounting Bulletins (“SAB”) (“SAB Topic 4B”) issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), by reclassifying the Sole-Proprietorship’s deficit accumulated during the development stage of ($37,913) and other comprehensive income of $1,141 at January 12, 2012 to additional paid-in capital.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared as if the Company had its corporate capital structure as of the first date of the first period presented.
Note 2 – Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices
The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.
F-5
|
Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on May 15, 2014.
Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).
Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:
(i) |
Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. |
|
|
||
(ii) |
Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events. |
|
|
||
(iii) |
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors. |
These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
F-6
|
Principles of Consolidation
The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.
The Company's consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows:
Name of consolidated subsidiary or entity |
State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization |
Date of incorporation or formation (date of acquisition, if applicable) |
Attributable interest |
Make Good Media |
Canada |
October 28, 2009 |
100% |
The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company and Make Good Media as of reporting period dates and for the reporting periods then ended.
All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
Level 1 |
Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. |
|
Level 2 |
Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. |
|
Level 3 |
Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data. |
Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
F-7
|
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company has adopted Section 360-10-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-17 an impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). That assessment shall be based on the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) at the date it is tested for recoverability. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) exceeds its fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-20 if an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of a long-lived asset shall be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis shall be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited.
Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-21 the Company’s long-lived asset (asset group) is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers the following to be some examples of such events or changes in circumstances that may trigger an impairment review: (a) significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset (asset group); (b) A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition; (c) A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group); (e) A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); and (f) A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-45-4 and 360-10-45-5 an impairment loss recognized for a long-lived asset (asset group) to be held and used shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amount of that loss. A gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset (disposal group) that is not a component of an entity shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amounts of those gains or losses.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
F-8
|
Computer Equipment
Computer equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the asset’s estimated useful lives of five (5) years. Upon sale or retirement, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations.
Related Parties
The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include a. affiliates (“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act) of the Company; b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved ; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
Commitment and Contingencies
The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.
F-9
|
Foreign Currency Transactions
The Company applies the guidelines as set out in Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 830-20-35”) for foreign currency transactions. Pursuant to Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, foreign currency transactions are transactions denominated in currencies other than U.S. Dollar, the Company’s reporting currency or Canadian Dollar, the Company’s operating functional currency. Foreign currency transactions may produce receivables or payables that are fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that will be received or paid. A change in exchange rates between the functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated increases or decreases the expected amount of functional currency cash flows upon settlement of the transaction. That increase or decrease in expected functional currency cash flows is a foreign currency transaction gain or loss that generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the exchange rate changes. Likewise, a transaction gain or loss (measured from the transaction date or the most recent intervening balance sheet date, whichever is later) realized upon settlement of a foreign currency transaction generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the transaction is settled. The exceptions to this requirement for inclusion in net income of transaction gains and losses pertain to certain intercompany transactions and to transactions that are designated as, and effective as, economic hedges of net investments and foreign currency commitments. Pursuant to Section 830-20-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the following shall apply to all foreign currency transactions of an enterprise and its investees: (a) at the date the transaction is recognized, each asset, liability, revenue, expense, gain, or loss arising from the transaction shall be measured and recorded in the functional currency of the recording entity by use of the exchange rate in effect at that date as defined in section 830-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification; and (b) at each balance sheet date, recorded balances that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency or reporting currency of the recording entity shall be adjusted to reflect the current exchange rate.
Revenue Recognition
The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
The Company applies the aforementioned criteria of the revenue recognition policy in the accounting standards to the transactions that generated revenue in the Company’s financial statements as follows:
Whiteboard Video Creation
The Company creates whiteboard video for its customers. The Company bills 50% of the total estimated fees of the project as a retainer receivable before commencing the job. The Company recognizes whiteboard video creation revenue when the creation is completed and delivered to the customer.
Content Sponsorships
The Company sells sponsorship blocks in its website to pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers. The Company recognizes content sponsorship revenue ratably over the period in which the related sponsorship content is available on the Company’s website.
The Company assesses collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the creditworthiness of the customer. The Company does not request collateral from customers. If the Company determines that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, the Company defers the fee and recognizes revenue at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash.
F-10
|
Income Tax Provision
The Company was treated as a disregarded entity for income tax purposes until January 12, 2012. The operating results prior to January 12, 2012 were included in the income tax return of the Company’s founder.
Effective January 12, 2012, the Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.
The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
The Company discloses tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions pursuant to the ASC Paragraph 740-10-50-15.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Company follows Section 830-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 830-10-45”) for foreign currency translation to translate the financial statements from the functional currency, generally the local currency, into U.S. Dollars. Section 830-10-45 sets out the guidance relating to how a reporting entity determines the functional currency, re-measures the books of record (if necessary), and characterizes transaction gains and losses. Pursuant to Section 830-10-45, the assets, liabilities, and operations of a foreign entity shall be measured using the functional currency of that entity. An entity’s functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates; normally, that is the currency of the environment, or local currency, in which an entity primarily generates and expends cash.
The functional currency is determined based on management’s judgment and involves consideration of all relevant economic facts and circumstances affecting the subsidiary. Generally, the currency in which it transacts a majority of its transactions, including billings, financing, payroll and other expenditures, would be considered the functional currency. If a functional currency is deemed to be the local currency, then any gain or loss associated with the translation of the financial statements is included in accumulated other comprehensive income. However, if the functional currency is deemed to be the U.S. Dollar, then any gain or loss associated with the re-measurement of these financial statements from the local currency to the functional currency would be included in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss).
F-11
|
Based on an assessment of the factors discussed above, the management of the Company determined the relevant local currency to be the functional currency.
The financial records of the Company are maintained in its local currency, the Canadian Dollar (“CAD”), which is the functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated from the local currencies into the reporting currency, U.S. dollars, at the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at weighted average exchange rates for the period to approximate translation at the exchange rates prevailing at the dates those elements are recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Foreign currency translation gain (loss) resulting from the process of translating the local currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in determining accumulated other comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of stockholders’ deficit.
Unless otherwise noted, the rate presented below per U.S. $1.00 was the midpoint of the interbank rate as quoted by OANDA Corporation (www.oanda.com) contained in its consolidated financial statements. Translation of amounts from CAD into U.S. dollars has been made at the following exchange rates for the respective periods:
September 30, 2014 |
December 31, 2013 |
September 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||||||||
Balance sheets |
0.8963 |
0.9350 |
0.9704 |
0.9968 |
||||||||||||
Statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) |
0.9145 |
0.9712 |
0.9773 |
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The Company has applied section 220-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This statement establishes rules for the reporting of comprehensive income and its components. Comprehensive income (loss), for the Company, consists of net loss and foreign currency translation adjustments and is presented in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) and stockholders’ equity.
Earnings per Share
Earnings per share ("EPS") is the amount of earnings attributable to each share of common stock. For convenience, the term is used to refer to either earnings or loss per share. EPS is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-10 through 260-10-45-16 Basic EPS shall be computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to common stockholders shall be computed by deducting both the dividends declared in the period on preferred stock (whether or not paid) and the dividends accumulated for the period on cumulative preferred stock (whether or not earned) from income from continuing operations (if that amount appears in the income statement) and also from net income. The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.
F-12
|
Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-45-21 through 260-10-45-45-23 Diluted EPS shall be based on the most advantageous conversion rate or exercise price from the standpoint of the security holder. The dilutive effect of outstanding call options and warrants (and their equivalents) issued by the reporting entity shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method unless the provisions of paragraphs 260-10-45-35 through 45-36 and 260-10-55-8 through 55-11 require that another method be applied. Equivalents of options and warrants include non-vested stock granted to employees, stock purchase contracts, and partially paid stock subscriptions (see paragraph 260–10–55–23). Anti-dilutive contracts, such as purchased put options and purchased call options, shall be excluded from diluted EPS. Under the treasury stock method: a. Exercise of options and warrants shall be assumed at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and common shares shall be assumed to be issued. b. The proceeds from exercise shall be assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. (See paragraphs 260-10-45-29 and 260-10-55-4 through 55-5.) c. The incremental shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall be included in the denominator of the diluted EPS computation.
There were no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding for the reporting period ended September 30, 2014 or 2013.
Cash Flows Reporting
The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent Events
The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The amendments in this Update change the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in Subtopic 205-20.
Under the new guidance, a discontinued operation is defined as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and “represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results.” The ASU states that a strategic shift could include a disposal of (i) a major geographical area of operations, (ii) a major line of business, (iii) a major equity method investment, or (iv) other major parts of an entity. Although “major” is not defined, the standard provides examples of when a disposal qualifies as a discontinued operation.
F-13
|
The ASU also requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide more information about the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of discontinued operations. In addition, the ASU requires disclosure of the pre-tax profit or loss attributable to a disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation in the financial statements.
The ASU is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years.
In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”).
This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:
1. |
Identify the contract(s) with the customer |
2. |
Identify the performance obligations in the contract |
3. |
Determine the transaction price |
4. |
Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract |
5. |
Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations |
The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following:
1. |
Contracts with customers – including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations) |
2. |
Significant judgments and changes in judgments – determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations |
3. |
Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. |
F-14
|
ASU 2014-09 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period for all public entities. Early application is not permitted.
In August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).
In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The term probable is used consistently with its use in Topic 450, Contingencies.
When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of management’s plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes):
a. |
Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management’s plans) |
b. |
Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations |
c. |
Management’s plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. |
F-15
|
If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of management’s plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). Additionally, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following:
a. |
Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern |
b. |
Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations |
c. |
Management’s plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. |
The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.
Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 – Going Concern
The Company has elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).
The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
As reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at September 30, 2014, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The Company is attempting to generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate sufficient revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds.
The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
F-16
|
Note 4 – Computer Equipment
(i) |
Impairment Testing |
The Company completed the annual impairment testing of computer equipment and determined that there was no impairment as the fair value of property and equipment, exceeded their carrying values at December 31, 2013.
(ii) |
Depreciation Expense |
Depreciation expense was $457 and $321 for the reporting period ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Note 5 – Stockholder’s Deficit
Shares Authorized
Upon formation the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of which Five Million (5,000,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value $0.000001 per share, and Ninety Five Million (95,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, par value $0.000001 per share.
Common Stock
Upon formation, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of the newly formed corporation’s common stock to the President of the Predecessor for all of the outstanding shares. No value was given to the stock issued by the newly formed corporation. Therefore, the shares were recorded to reflect the $0.000001 par value and paid in capital was recorded as a negative amount ($5). In other words, no net value was assigned to these shares.
For the period from May 21, 2013 through June 30, 2013, the Company sold 700,000 shares of its common stock at $0.05 per share to thirty two (32) individuals for a total consideration of $35,000.
Note 6 – Related Party Transactions
Advances from Stockholder
From time to time, the stockholder of the Company advances funds to the Company for working capital purpose. Those advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.
F-17
|
Free Office Space
The Company has been provided office space by its Chief Executive Officer at no cost. The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize the rent expense in its financial statement.
Note 7 – Concentrations and Credit Risk
Customers and Credit Concentrations
Customer concentrations and credit concentrations are as follows:
Net Revenue for the reporting period ended |
Accounts Receivable at |
|||||||||||||
September 30, 2014 |
September 30, 2013 |
September 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||
Customer A |
32.0 |
% |
63.6 |
% |
- |
% |
|
- |
% |
|||||
Customer B |
15.0 |
% |
36.4 |
% |
- |
% |
- |
% | ||||||
Customer C |
53.0 |
% |
- |
% |
- |
% |
- |
% | ||||||
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
- |
% |
- |
% |
A reduction in sales from or loss of such customers would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
Note 8 – Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated all events that occur after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent event(s) to be disclosed.
F-18
|
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Type 1 Media, Inc. (“Type 1 Media”, the “Company”, “we”, and “our”) for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2014. This discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as its plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Its actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. The following information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated interim financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2014 and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”).
Overview
Type 1 Media was incorporated in the State of Delaware on January 12, 2012. Type 1 was formed primarily to inform people new to type 1 diabetes about living well with the condition as well as products and services that will help them thrive.
Type 1 Media began its business by creating short custom videos for pharmaceutical companies and medical devices companies who sell medications and products that people with type 1 diabetes need, as well as videos for charities concerned with type 1 diabetes. These projects, completed in 2012, helped build the Company’s reputation so that the Company could seek sponsorship for a larger project, titled Welcome to Type 1, which is detailed in the “Business Strategy" section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
The Company intends to expand its business through the acquisition and development of new and existing companies. At this time, the Company has not identified or actively sought out a potential acquisition target.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.
We are still in our development stage and our revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were $12,014 and $16,054, respectively.
Our operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2014 were $6,941 compared to operating expenses of $12,388 for the three months ended September 30, 2013.
The Company’s net profit for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was $936 compared to a net loss of $10,471 for the three months ended September 30, 2013.
Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.
Our revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were $46,962 and $25,144, respectively. The increase in revenues were primarily due to a grant obtained from one of the sponsor clients we had been courting.
Our operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 were $41,730 compared to operating expenses of $43,719 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
The Company’s net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $7,113 compared to a net loss of $32,712 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2014, cash flows used in operating activities was $78,881, cash flows from investing activities was $0, and net cash flows used in financing activities was $1,672 resulting in a total cash balance of $29,335 as of September 30, 2014.
5
|
The accrued expenses in the amount of $54,098 consist of salaries unpaid to Jonathan White and Oliver Brown, the Company’s two most involved employees. Both Jonathan White and Oliver Brown are aware that the repayment of these salaries from the Company is contingent upon the success of the Company and have deferred the salaries owed to them. Neither Dr. White nor Mr. Brown expect to demand their salary if it cause liquidity problems for the Company.
The current budget for the next 12 months is divided into three main departments and estimates website production costs for the next 12 months at $42,500 (Design: $14,000, Development: $21,000, Promotion: $7,500), video production costs at $55,500 (Post-Production: $25,500, Distribution: $30,000), and operating costs at $139,701 (Salaries: $110,000, Travel: $8,500, Office: $21,201)
This plan of operations assumes that a significant portion of the original sponsorship target of $540,000 is met, minus the $90,000 that has already been obtained and spent. Should we obtain fewer sponsorships than expected, we will adjust our budget, starting with video post-production effects and titles, which can easily be easily substituted with more generic titles and effects. Further cuts will come from marketing and travel.
Based on our financial history since inception, our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. Our independent registered public accounting firm raised the issue that the Company had a deficit accumulated during the development stage at September 30, 2014 and a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the quarter then ended.
Limited Operating History
We have generated no independent financial history and have not previously demonstrated that we will be able to expand our business. Our business is subject to risks inherent in growing an enterprise, including limited capital resources and possible rejection of our business model and/or sales methods.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 to our financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 204. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe that the following critical accounting policies are subject to estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Basis of Presentation – Unaudited Interim Financial Information
The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for the interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-K and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim period presented. Unaudited interim consolidated results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on May 15, 2014.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).
6
|
Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:
(i) |
Assumption as a going concern : Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business ; |
(ii) |
Allowance for doubtful accounts : Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical sales, historical loss levels, and an analysis of the collectability of individual accounts and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay . The Company evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the allowance in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole; |
(iii) |
Fair value of long-lived assets : Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events; |
(iv) |
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets : Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering , among other factors. |
These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
7
|
The Company applies the aforementioned criteria of the revenue recognition policy in the accounting standards to the transactions that generated revenue in the Company’s financial statements as follows:
Whiteboard Video Creation
The Company creates whiteboard video for its customers. The Company charges 50% of the total estimated fees of the project as a retainer receivable before commencing the job. The Company recognizes whiteboard video creation revenue when the creation is completed and delivered to the customer.
Content Sponsorships
The Company sells sponsorship block in its website to pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers. The Company recognizes content sponsorship revenue ratably over the period in which the related sponsorship content is available on the Company’s website.
The Company assesses collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the creditworthiness of the customer. The Company does not request collateral from customers. If the Company determines that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, the Company defers the fee and recognizes revenue at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The amendments in this Update change the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in Subtopic 205-20.
Under the new guidance, a discontinued operation is defined as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and “represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results.” The ASU states that a strategic shift could include a disposal of (i) a major geographical area of operations, (ii) a major line of business, (iii) a major equity method investment, or (iv) other major parts of an entity. Although “major” is not defined, the standard provides examples of when a disposal qualifies as a discontinued operation.
The ASU also requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide more information about the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of discontinued operations. In addition, the ASU requires disclosure of the pre-tax profit or loss attributable to a disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation in the financial statements.
The ASU is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years.
In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”)
This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:
1. |
Identify the contract(s) with the customer |
2. |
Identify the performance obligations in the contract |
3. |
Determine the transaction price |
4. |
Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract |
5. |
Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations |
8
|
The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following:
1. |
Contracts with customers – including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations) |
|
|
2. |
Significant judgments and changes in judgments – determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations |
|
|
3. |
Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. |
ASU 2014-09 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period for all public entities. Early application is not permitted.
In June 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12 “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) : Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period” (“ASU 2014-12”).
The amendments clarify the proper method of accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The Update requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered.
The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted.
Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Our business plan within 6 months is outlined below:
For the next 6 months the Company is engaged in completing production of 10-20 short videos providing useful information and empowerment to people and families new to type 1. The following 6 months will primarily be spent driving traffic to the website via search engine optimization; visits to endorcrinologists, diabetes educators, nurses, dieticians, and health care teams; and presenting at conferences. These activities will overlap somewhat. The process of soliciting and creating sponsorship agreements with clients in the pharmaceutical and medical devices industries relevant to type 1 diabetes is ongoing.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual Obligations
The Company sold two of the nine available sponsorship blocks to date, one for CAD60,000 and one modified block for CAD15,000.
On April 15, 2012 the Company sold one of the nine available sponsorship blocks at CAD60,000 expiring December 31, 2014 to Animas Canada, a Canadian company owned by Johnson & Johnson. The Company accounted for the sale of the content sponsorship block ratably over the period in which the related sponsorship content is available on the Company’s website. For the year ended December 31, 2012 the Company recognized content sponsorship revenue of CAD16,362 under this sponsorship agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 the Company recognized content sponsorship revenue of CAD21,816 and CAD16,362 under this sponsorship agreement, respectively.
9
|
On May 9, 2013 the Company reached an agreement with, and sold one modified sponsorship blocks at CAD15,000 expiring December 31, 2013, Medtronic Canada, a Canadian company owned by Johnson & Johnson. The Company accounted for the sale of the content sponsorship block ratably over the period in which the related sponsorship content is available on the Company’s website. For the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company recognized content sponsorship revenue of CAD15,000 under this sponsorship agreement.
The Company entered into an agreement with Dads Against Diabetes (“D.A.D.”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to create a promotional video for D.A.D for a fee of $8,000.
The Company entered into an agreement with Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet (“TrialNet”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to create a promotional video for TrialNet for a fee of $14,000.
As of the date of this Report, the Company has been awarded a grant by Lilly USA, LLC in the amount of $75,000. The funds may be used only for the stated purpose of the grant and may not be used for the purpose of promoting any of the Company or its affiliates’ products, including entertainment, capital and operating expenses, gifts, compensation, or personal travel. As of the date of this Report, the full amount has been collected pursuant to the Lilly Grant.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
We carried out an evaluation required by Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” and “internal control over financial reporting” as of the end of the period covered by this Report.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted to the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, and that information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and financial officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report (the “Evaluation Date”), pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, due to material weaknesses in our control environment and financial reporting process.
10
|
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management or board override of the control.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended September 30, 2014 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
11
|
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are currently not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
12
|
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits |
||
31.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1* |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Schema |
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase |
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase |
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase |
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase |
_______________
*In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibit 32.1 is being furnished and not filed.
13
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
TYPE 1 MEDIA, INC. |
|||
Date: November 13, 2014 |
By: |
/s/ Jonathan White |
|
Jonathan White |
|||
President (Duly Authorized, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer) |
14
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Jonathan White, certify that:
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Type 1 Media, Inc.; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. |
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; |
|
d) |
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; |
5. |
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
a) |
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. |
|
Date: November 13, 2014 |
By: |
/s/ Jonathan White |
|
Jonathan White President, (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Type 1 Media, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jonathan White, President of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) |
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
(2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
Date: November 13, 2014 |
By: |
/s/ Jonathan White |
|
Jonathan White President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_$EW(>$*2%M>0&&4'C4"%N)-9$E(\DD]-=WI1!G$T,&GA+9V2]GSYZUS\X7
ME8Q>N+%"JSY)]Q(2<97K0JAIG_R]__7CF$36,54PJ17ODU=NR?G@^[>SN3:S
M)ZUG$0"4[9/2N?HTCFU>\HK9/5US!7 N[$CSJL#7
M9'&3XWBU'.KS4_"M&3TCTZCM1RW*SZ+C4&S8)K'/2^=*\@.'X1?3=L
MP%>-2E[136N_J>TG+NK&PFY/P9#SM2B?;[EA4%"@B=*I8V*J!0%P15*XSH""
MT*?AOA6E;0J VY*%_Z=7K@S`'47@[4\'-=:PN3BJR-PO@C5X'OQ'($I-;,8+W
MD."DW"<'^^YU60AJ32'SY/PZ&IL!OVNR/_8*,.S-VB=L&6Q4W^/#IHTOGGZ]
M^>W.TT<&TRT%;)[]8F=SY]F.TN:><4%JRW95?0O7&\1HD*D`Z8Y?X&%;F]96
M"&"1"!Q1+'9>EGB"LPK56RBV5A,%*9^XQX\" F=6
M7:D92W9U08[D467Y/#L:C/573%2$,C2=3,O+71?319TBS"P`,-,F:L")5P
MN.%Y&DI"G0$F:=#6U9U46+(;$RX)I.8,])`IEKZT4,X4+[A'(9O'R<9482A=
MCN$>+0(^(M(P<^1R5Q-"`]YM5'XVL$S3LJD$%LW5PD1:7E*46%;J$Q
M9M`W//.&J!!Q=R(?4[Y'C0+I114C_6;T>7*GV@MJ@&F'LEF4T^$_F$>&9JI!
M*97F`=5!Y9\!)_@,CXB-QQ6S+-B^1>K3B'7JCS3PB[!>S=235KD&F>EUCXI[
M='BQW.X(U#Q3&4]M#FF\3C1U5NXM<(RE\&J_-'@?(/V8&N"Z:XQZ@G]<_7@*
M5Z))M'X0VB).72B="D[;6K*?/GZS\S@>&LI2G`E9X7]0DFES%1GX^+L!`/Z#
M-H=VHL-]^]]D[V'SSZ]-$$&$E1#H;"5JRAH'U<7-*UX4M<2.RM\K$KE,*M
MU373`(Q3UNO0.F,]'<\)K75HK];ZCAKLGSZJ-'Y5_DKNL[K>XL0F(D7UA61C
M@N6JZK_]]7_I"5M6%AE%""5Q->NES7)^I6!9+4E+I%6-I;+Z-H++*O6EUL'*
M95#KX)V*,L7&CBKM6+*P#*T%]G+C02R1:K:^I1NS"'0AH)?$PD]PH$[H`)F\
M=W&VG+^KEEMC\GVHIY5"HD"VRA%C6.-3`M\^>^S*[8BH1A6#$LNQ5%1@!F=Y
MS4[TU!LL9*(56)!,V0BJ)5.*US7Z=MM^7VGS$BQG=-0UO*HWM^*;_E%5W9.5
MWR`NB-@:GFO>(I:D%,#=Q1RA:C3T,3_!E&C[?FX!9.2C>5DC?YQV\4),.`&C
M5E6V%%31*<*FS.C"N8D)(DB2U04Z90/^EYJJ'@U:&+C[6&7)D40LZ$\^DA0`
M0ZJP;D;(E@(()\,[E.86%+:\:D;`OU0^%54']GE&LYA3.`MJ)5&&"'!U6BN?
MI544"M'D*V2<5ML7:)JN!+I$ODT+F4,J3G&"K$GRA.O8M$R'@@5:*!L/6B;6
MP0\V1TOQ`Y#%WES3PB"AX_EVTM5`7]%SD%X)JBV1C7G(&W79'(S-@28MELRX
MME@JT:.!3TD&OX"ESM*K4UX-UIY#V!E(XT\? @,CLX)FT\*PFFHJA.\*
MI)HY.>&8%D3VK1H'^25AFKK1B2["?K(#96DPU`T9%3G/49IO[P/@8?BEI'T_
MVAU^B<(;3;>ZCNX1,R)![N"00FHX0E,^@):RV*=R*UM/=R/)[^E8["[0D!1_
M$]>PZ6=Y%_X[\"M/`?;VG,C?"8B%:S?O91QLQ3SCRL,_I7#0P4J)YHWSH-Z&
MHE]8\-2RE::6A-'JL&/5P\M62=DGPZ;H,BMN>JW)23FN;",XA*!Q!9L!N`4-
MV7-4;KP>61LZ_"8!QID3-]S[B&)F/N-\\ILCY[$*ZM,V7'WN*&F(O2OJO&[_
M;>T)90!Z@BF>HROI__;6'-7=#S*3VF``K60U(YZ-5I1Y*"ICTV:,CY,;@K&?
M+0PQL-$[-!YD:&,K@_M5*W9-0A.B14'/I$+Q`13`UOL0.YC'305PVO*.C4""
M^?Q;1+]5B%4 -G]5V*7!T%^NMX2-)4-
M%QB]X)1TOLF.4C5G&ZG=@`N/P'GG.'..)+>V*E ]T.J!$[DUU
MKSS157S\J4Y'/Z@/IGI4'J$I^N!>I],;U,=3G'N@,H>.0HPWB752SFL0@'?4,#TUH"/DU7SN6:&J#$>)%\^"*`0<;:A4
MCTQ'8I3OI.+-'PN%AR@;,CF$1&!_.#_Q)K=Q&"?_3_&MD2GP@2BR7`B^1S!K
MX)JR(WH.AG-(UI5%T)_ARJ`D/>9>#S)#@99P.UZ6410M_!=H87Y@5N?,Q"76
MYT04'!$?_(Z24/JIY&4Y#4,1&)W(38^YIH"59:8G3.P2ZTN$XP87&N^FX0Q#
M]M$M^5>R5;-(:KJ:>JG[BC_=S'JBXWE'&VH?KZUA5SON::PLDACM.#"OGN@E
MPE)3%>3<,]M5OWPBN+3(U:K]OKX7..3G*-CH9[.FE/QR+#.L/G')W9-3H:
M[NDD/1V+C)]OXWE'6V^%)\^9RTM8PZYV$O:T+6+G6SH\X2XBCEQZC9R&>W*]
M)]O*(H?%,!M:#)<(1PVVM2L:9^B>W-F#62=F^)+=(688L7IVK[1;24>V]!L1
M6]9*5-,2GFV!-X.5)>Q.:0\4[\R6L>$*=CCSM8)_-!3VD\`#N.12!=(.SB"QLD.
MVF#2I*QIT]9)6RW;K"^XT\WYGC"VENPL_CZGL?/FS&7GY.)%&CNUL&-K.[;2
MU.#9DRD*0Y/L(&,<8[Z4%3]F\=%]0.?#:8,25-,,&G*H&AAQZ8/(#DMQS-
MTJV_````__\#`%!+`P04``8`"````"$`ISQ/V7D$``#'$0``&````'AL+W=O
M
U
M*#Y5;#J[LDAB>IIX2?<5?1K-NOQZ.-_1AMJ':VO8T78T5A:)[50(S,L1[2,Z
M:K`@AJMIV%&[ZUYX99&I4?LWOTRWU]?/=73B6W0T[.@DCHY%KNM]?1F=VB
MH^&N3NQT8&61X?-M.-_1UAOAV5.F?P5KV-$.G2Y:Q,ZW)+HZX7J1CEQRBYR&
M'3GGP;:RR'$QS*XMACZBHP:;V@V-,[0C-W$Z=V3Z['H1JV=W2KN1M&1+OQ&Q
M98U$%2W@V19X,UA9PNZ3]D#QUFP8&ZY@?S-?2_@_0V$W"3R`"\[5^X'>B4__
MD)9_`0``__\#`%!+`P04``8`"````"$`[+$`V,I.```0^```%````'AL+W-H
M87)E9%-T7$[5BH0P1%,]F;<^Z'LF<;*#0^Z_&^6G&`K9*#A95RJG]>4PK4Z)V&Y3C3
MPBD!'9K2H66()45%1;U3X'FHC?72=I^&4IS,;)YBBNB2.EQ(=Z_U;'XFMQ%L
MH6<[8XVN!O>./]X=H,G8C5;CIL3SY96&A3W<_YAA((A(98?R*A=
MY1.&Z?Q9)JOW\,$W4D7]LKX'=B?7HU6B?IK70]7B]:?:PCV336LVCJV79;QQ
M"2C>^'BJV@+WR=XI'(2S2U\U][;O1,[=C]K2@BB!)C:,QVK_=E(KQ&UN5K;)
MI-5394]VDJFUI>R&-TT9FI$H]0L/[<64>"@0;M:ZNV(0]
ML-!A"X=)MX#'FJ=;3>OBC/%,0Y6&TV&I$%A)=F(:BX?KF-0X_F7N(
;S!H3^&U,:#"6Q#>CJA/VQ#3;K"MY\F"Y
M`K ?X%3EA$U&BM_E^!U!<57-!>)71\WO2>P
M2W/YG-*,&HW%Y]10?$4SQ.>\+;!7G$%-_T]7U']M!$Z-1M`6XUBZG!>&)HU&
MLJBW;V@P\=.^]4P:3<-K^K><5WL>\RQ37B*/V,!2>+*]VG;D3:OFNSEL)'8>'*Z&%O"L[TH&4D7)202I)%:DF-:26U)%ZTD`:21-I#BALD5JT
MV7W0IZ\BKKA0LV2VB]R;XDVT]-POH]R?\#HL%-[Q3Q8&5^