10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly period Ended June 30, 2013

Redfield Ventures Inc

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	333-183502	45-4380591
(State or jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(Commission File Number)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

244 Fifth Ave Ste #1563

New York, NY 10001

(212) 726-2184

www.redfieldventures.com

(Company Address)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨   No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨   No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x   No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨   Accelerated filer ¨   Non-accelerated filer ¨   Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes x   No ¨

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. There are 29,500,000 common shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2013.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	Page
Item 1.	Financial Statements:
	Balance Sheets at June 30, 2013 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2012 (audited)	3
	StStatements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 (Unaudited), June 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and January 27 (inception) to June 30, 2013	4
	StStatements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the period from January 27 (inception) to June 30, 2013 (Unaudited)	5
	StStatements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 (Unaudited), June 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and January 27 (inception) to June 30, 2013	6
	Notes to Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	19
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	19

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	20
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	20
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	20
Item 5.	Other information	21
Item 6.	Exhibits	21
SIGNATURES		22

2

REDFIELD VENTURES, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

BALANCE SHEETS

	June 30,			December 31,
	2013			2012
	(Unaudited)			(audited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	148		$	389
Prepaid Expenses		24,850			0
Total Assets	$	24,998		$	389
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses	$	7,890		$	8,665
Accrued Interest payable		595			251
Deposits received		12795			100
Notes payable – current		7,135			6,600
Long-Term Liabilities
		-			-
Total Liabilities	$	28,415		$	15,616
Stockholders’ Deficit
Common stock, par value $0.001; 200,000,000 shares authorized;
29,500,000  at  6/30/13 and 24,500,000 at 12/31/12 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		29,500			24,500
Paid in Capital		45,000			0
Stock subscriptions receivable		0			0
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(77,918	)		(39,727	)
Total Stockholders’ Deficit		(3,418	)		(15,227	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit	$	24,998		$	389

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

3

REDFIELD VENTURES, INC.

 (A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

												For the period
												from January 27
	Three Months Ended			Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended			Six Months Ended		2012 (Inception) to
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			June 30,		June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012		2013
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)
Revenues	$			$			$	-		$	-	$	-
Operating Expenses
Website expenses		-			500			-			500		600
Consultancy fees		5,000			24,140			5,000			24,140		29,140
General and administrative expenses		22,845			86			28,216			86		31,937
Professional fees		2,000			1500			4,630			1500		15,645
Total Operating Expenses		29,845			26,226			37,846			26,226		77,322
Net Loss from Operations before other Income (Expense)		(29,845	)		(26,226	)		(37,846	)		(26,226)		(77,322	)
Other Income (Expense)
Interest expense		(176	)		(4	)		(344	)		(4)		(595	)
Net Income (Loss) Before Provision for Income Taxes		(30,022	)		(26,230	)	$	(38,191	)	$	(26,230)	$	(77,918	)
Provision for Income Taxes		-			0			-			0		-
Net Loss		(30,022	)		(26,230	)	$	(38,191	)	$	(26,230)	$	(77,918	)
Net Loss Per Share: Basic and Diluted	$	(0.00	)		(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00)
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding:
Basic and Diluted		29,500,000			24,500,000			29,294,167			24,500,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

4

REDFIELD VENTURES, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND

FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 27, 2012 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2013

		Common stock			Additional paid-in		Deficit accumulated during the development			Total
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Stage			(Unaudited)
Inception, January 27, 2012		-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-
Founders Shares issued January 27, 2012 as compensation for services		24,140,000		24,140		-		-			24,140
Net loss for the period January 27, 2012 through March 31, 2012		-		-		-		-			-
Balance, March 31, 2012		24,140,000		24,140		-		-			24,140
Shares issued for cash at $0.001 per share		360,000		360		-		-			360
Net loss for the period April 1,  2012 through December 31, 2012		-		-		-		(39,727	)		(39,727	)
Balance, December 31, 2012		24,500,000		24,500		-		(39,727	)		(15,227	)
Shares issued for cash at $0.01 per share		5,000,000		5,000		45,000		-			50,000
Net loss for the first and second quarter through June 30, 2013		-		-		-		(38,191	)		(38,191	)
Balance, June 30, 2013		29,500,000	$	29,500	$	45,000	$	(77,918	)	$	(3,418	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

5

REDFIELD VENTURES, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Six Months Ended June 30			Six Months Ended June 30			For the Period from January 27 2012 (Inception) to June 30
	2013			2012			2012
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net loss for the period	$	(38,191	)	$	(26,230)		$	(77,918	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) operating activities:
Stock issued as compensation for services		-			24,140			24,140
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease (Increase) in prepaid expenses		(24,850)			0			(24,850	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses		(775	)		1,504			7,958
Increase (decrease) in deposits		12,695			100			12,795
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable		344			-			527
Net Cash used in Operating Activities		(50,776	)		(486	)		(57,347	)
Cash flows from Investing Activities
		-			-			-
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		-			-			-
Cash flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from sale of common stock		50,000			360			50,360
Notes payable		535			1,000			7,135
Net Cash provided by Financing Activities		50,535			1,360			57,495
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash		(241	)		874			148
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		389			-			-
Cash, end of period		148			874			148
Supplemental Cash Flows Information:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

6

REDFIELD VENTURES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 – Organization and summary of significant accounting principles

Organization

Redfield Ventures, Inc (“REVE” or the “Company’) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on January 27, 2012.  REVE provides market research services throughout the United States and other countries through our website www.redfieldventures.com. The Company is in the development stage as defined under Statement on Financial Accounting Standards No. 7, Development Stage Enterprises (“SFAS No.7”) (ASC 915-10).

Accounting basis

The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP” accounting).  The Company has adopted a December 31 fiscal year end.

Basis of Preparation

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and are presented in US dollars.

Use of estimates and assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Election to be treated as an emerging growth company

In the second quarter of 2012, The Company has elected to use the extended transition period now available for complying with new or revised accounting standards under Section 102(b) (1). This election allows the Company to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. As a result of this election, the Company financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates.

Cash and cash equivalents

For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

Fair value of financial instruments

The fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities that qualify as financial instruments under FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” approximate their carrying amounts presented in the accompanying balance sheet at June 30, 2013.

7

REDFIELD VENTURES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 – Organization and summary of significant accounting principles (continued)

Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognized on an accrual basis after services have been performed under contract terms, the service price to the client is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

Basic Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net income available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive debt or equity. There are no such common stock equivalents outstanding as of June 30, 2013.

(A) Net Loss	$	(30,022	)
(B) Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding – Basic		29,294,167
Basic income (loss) per share: (A)÷(B)	$	(0.000	)
Equivalents
Stock Options		-
Warrants		-
Convertible notes		-
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding – Diluted		29,294,167

The Company incurred Net Loss of $30,022 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and based on the Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding of 29,294,167 the Basic income (loss) per shares is $(0.000) as per computation above.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, the Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the total of the future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of those assets, the Company recognizes an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.

Advertising Costs

The Company’s policy regarding advertising is to expense advertising when incurred. The Company incurred advertising expense of $0 during the period ended June 30, 2013 since inception.

8

REDFIELD VENTURES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 – Organization and summary of significant accounting principles (continued)

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes,” which requires accounting for deferred income taxes under the asset and liability method.  Deferred income tax asset and liabilities are computed for difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on the enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.  Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce the deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

In accordance with GAAP, the Company is required to determine whether a tax position of the Company is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company files an income tax return in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and may file income tax returns in various U.S. state and local jurisdictions.  The tax benefit to be recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.  De-recognition of a tax benefit previously recognized could result in the Company recording a tax liability that would reduce net assets. This policy also provides guidance on thresholds, measurement, de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition that is intended to provide better financial statement comparability among different entities.  It must be applied to all existing tax positions upon initial adoption and the cumulative effect, if any, is to be reported as an adjustment to stockholder’s equity as of July 1, 2009.

Based on its analysis, the Company has determined that the adoption of this policy did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption. However, management’s conclusions regarding this policy may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, on-going analyses of and changes to tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof.

Interest and Penalty Recognition on Unrecognized Tax Benefits

The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.

Comprehensive Income

The Company complies with FASB ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income,” which establishes rules for the reporting and display of comprehensive income (loss) and its components.  FASB ASC Topic 220 requires the Company’ to reflect as a separate component of stockholders’ equity items of comprehensive income.

9

REDFIELD VENTURES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 – Organization and summary of significant accounting principles (continued)

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company complies with FASB ASC Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” which establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services.  It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. FASB ASC Topic 718 focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions.  FASB ASC Topic 718 requires an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions).  That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award the requisite service period (usually the vesting period).  No compensation costs are recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service.  The grant-date fair value of employee share options and similar instruments will be estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for the unique characteristics of those instruments (unless observable market prices for the same or similar instruments are available).  If an equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-11, an amendment to the accounting guidance for disclosure of offsetting assets and liabilities and related arrangements. The amendment expands the disclosure requirements in that entities will be required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and shall be applied retrospectively. We do not expect the adoption of this accounting pronouncement to have a material effect on our financial statements when implemented.

In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update  (ASU) 2011-8an amendment to the accounting guidance for goodwill in order to simplify how companies test goodwill for impairment. The amendment permits an entity to first assess the qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. The amendment is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. We elected not to early adopt. We do not expect the adoption of this accounting pronouncement to have a material effect on our financial statements when implemented.

In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-05, an amendment to the accounting guidance for presentation of comprehensive income. Under the amended guidance, an entity may present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In either case, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. For public companies, the amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and shall be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We elected not to early adopt. Other than a change in presentation, the implementation of this accounting pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements when implemented.

10

REDFIELD VENTURES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 – Organization and summary of significant accounting principles (continued)

In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for fair value measurement and disclosure. Among other things, the guidance expands the disclosure requirements around fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and requires disclosure of the level in the fair value hierarchy of items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position but whose fair value must be disclosed. It also clarifies and expands upon existing requirements for measurement of the fair value of financial assets and liabilities as well as instruments classified in shareholders’ equity. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect the adoption of the guidance to have a material impact on our financial statements when implemented.

There are no other new accounting pronouncements adopted or enacted during the three months ended June 30, 2013 that had, or are expected to have, a material impact on our financial statements.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in bank deposit accounts, which, at times may exceed federally insured limits.  The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.  Management believes the Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk related to cash and cash equivalents.

Note 2 –Going Concern

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which assumes the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future.  As noted above, the Company is in the development stage and, accordingly, has not yet generated significant revenues from operations.  The Company has incurred losses since inception resulting in an accumulated deficit of $77,918 as of June 30, 2013 and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to raise additional capital from the sale of common stock and, ultimately, the achievement of significant operating revenues.  The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be required should the Company be unable to recover the value of its assets or satisfy its liabilities.

Note 3 –Income Taxes

As of June 30, 2013, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $77,918 that may be available to reduce future years’ taxable income in varying amounts through 2030. In accordance with FASB ASC740 “Income Taxes”. Future tax benefits which may arise as a result of these losses have not been recognized in these financial statements, as their realization is determined not likely to occur and accordingly, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset relating to these tax loss carry-forwards.

11

REDFIELD VENTURES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The provision for Federal income tax consists of the following:

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Refundable Federal income tax attributable to:
Current Operations	$	(26,492	)	$	(13,507	)
Change: valuation allowance		26,492			13,507
Net provision for Federal income taxes	$	0		$	0

The cumulative tax effect at the expected rate of 34% of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows:

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Deferred tax asset attributable to:
Net operating loss carryover	$	77,918		$	39,727
Less: valuation allowance		(77,918	)		(39,727	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	0		$	0

Due to the change in ownership provisions of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code and Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carry forwards of $77,918 for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occurs, the net operating loss carry forwards may be limited as to use in future years.

Note 4 – Common Stock

The authorized capital of the Company is 200,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share.

On January 27, 2012, the Company issued 24,140,000 shares of common stock at in exchange for fair market value of services rendered for total compensation of $24,140.  

Additionally, on June 29, 2012 the Company issued 360,000 shares of common stock under Regulation D offering for total cash proceeds of $360.

During the period ended March 31, 2013 the Company sold 5,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.01 per share pursuant to the Initial Offering under the Form S-1 Registration Statement effective on December 19, 2012. All the proceeds from the offering have been received during the period ended June 30, 2013.

The Company has 29,500,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2013.

12

REDFIELD VENTURES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 5 – Notes payable

On the following dates, a shareholder provided loans secured by 10% per annum interest bearing promissory notes. If this loan remains unpaid for a period of one year after the repayment dates, the promissory notes shall be convertible into common voting stocks at a price of 50% discount of the average bid on the day of the conversion.

Date received loans	Amount		Repayment dates
June 15, 2012		1,000.00	June 30, 2012
July 20, 2012		1,600.00	July 30, 2012
August 20, 2012		3,000.00	August 30, 2012
October 25, 2012		1,000.00	October 30, 2012
January 4, 2013		70.00	January 31, 2013
April 15, 2012		465.00	April 30, 2013

Note 6 – Related party transactions

The following shares were issued for founder services rendered for the Company and all these shares were arbitrarily valued at $0.001 par value on January 27, 2012:-

● The Company issued 20,000,000 shares valued at $20,000.00 to Long Nguyen, CEO for services rendered at fair market value on January 27, 2012

The following shares were issued for services rendered in the development of the business and its business plan and all these shares were arbitrarily valued at $0.001 par value on January 27, 2012:-

● The Company issued 1,140,000 shares valued at $1,140.00 to Lee Chee Thing for services rendered at fair market value on January 27, 2012 in reviewing the company’s business plan. This shareholder purchased additional 275,000 shares on February 15, 2013 at $0.01 per share pursuant to the Initial Offering under the Form S-1 Registration Statement effective on December 19, 2012. This shareholder  is not an employee.

● The Company issued 1,000,000 shares valued at $1,000.00 to Mazlan Masrun for services rendered at fair market value on January 27, 2012 in developing the company’s business plan. This shareholder purchased additional 375,000 shares on February 15, 2013 at $0.01 per share pursuant to the Initial Offering under the Form S-1 Registration Statement effective on December 19, 2012. This shareholder is not an employee.

● The Company issued 1,000,000 shares valued at $1,000.00 to Tang Wai Mun for services rendered at fair market value on January 27, 2012 in developing the company’s business plan. This shareholder is not an employee.

● The Company issued 1,000,000 shares valued at $1,000.00 to Yap Peck Yoong for services rendered at fair market value on January 27, 2012 in developing the company’s business plan. This shareholder is not an employee.

Note 7 – Warrants and options

There are no warrants or options outstanding to acquire any additional shares of common stock.

Note 8 – Commitments and contingent liabilities

The Company is not a party to any ongoing or pending litigation. The Company neither owns nor leases any real or personal property. An officer has provided office services without charge.  There is no obligation for the officer to continue this arrangement.  Such costs are immaterial to the financial statements and accordingly are not reflected herein.  The officers and directors are involved in other business activities and most likely will become involved in other business activities in the future.

Note 9 – Subsequent events

In accordance with SFAS 165 (ASC 855-10) the Company has analyzed its operations subsequent to June 30, 2013 to the date these financial statements were submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission and has determined that it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose in these financial statements.

13

ITEM 2.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This document contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including, but not limited to, any projections of earnings, revenue or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objections of management for future operations; any statements concerning proposed new services or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.

Forward-looking statements may include the words “may,” “could,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue,” “believe,” “expect” or “anticipate” or other similar words. These forward-looking statements present our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. Except for our ongoing securities laws, we do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update any forward-looking statement.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in any of our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in any of our forward-looking statements. Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties. The factors impacting these risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

● increases in interest rates or our cost of borrowing or a default under any material debt agreements;

● the unavailability of funds for capital expenditures.

For a detailed description of these and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement, please see “Factors That May Affect Our Plan of Operation” in this document.

In this filing references to “Company,” “we,” “our,” and/or “us,” refers to Redfield Ventures, Inc.

14

Introduction

As a company in an early development stage, our ability to proceed with our plan of operation has been hindered by the present state of the United States and Global economies. At the end of our period ended June 30, 2013 we had limited cash available and we have secured no sources of loans from financial institutions and we had no revenues since inception until the period ended June 30, 2013. Our assets consist of checking account balances of $148.00 and prepaid expenses of $24,850.00 as of June 30, 2013.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013 we had a net loss of $30,022 and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company generating profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management intends to finance operating costs over the next nine months of the fiscal year with existing cash on hand and loans from directors and/or shareholders.

Our registration statement filing became effective on December 19, 2012 and our partially completed website has attracted several service enquiries as well as entering into a letter of intent with a new client during the period ended June 30, 2013.

Plan of Operation

We have no plans to change our planned business activities or to combine with another business, and we are not aware of any events or circumstances that might cause these plans to change. On a short-term basis, we have generated no revenues to cover operations and we may have insufficient revenue to satisfy current and recurring liabilities as we continue to build the business. For short term needs we will be dependent on receipt, if any, of public offering proceeds and loans from directors and/or shareholders.

Our audit reflects the fact that we have a limited current source of income.  Further, that without realization of additional capital, it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern. Our officer and director Mr. Long, has agreed that he will advance any additional funds without any interest nor collateral, which we require for operating capital and for costs in connection with either executing our business plan. There is no minimum or maximum amount the Officer and Director will advance to us. We will not borrow any funds for the purpose of repaying advances made by such Officer and Director, and we will not borrow any funds to make any payments to our promoters, management or their affiliates or associates.

We are currently offering Marketing Research services including product research, consumer research, packaging research, and pricing research to companies throughout the United States and other countries through our website www.redfieldventures.com and we have started offering the following additional services during the fiscal year 2013:-

● Independent market research for Initial Public Offering (IPO);

● Industry background analysis;

● Business and project feasibility;

● Competitor analysis

15

Our Business

Redfield Ventures, Inc is a marketing research services provider dedicated to serve in the areas of marketing research. Marketing research is a continuous process with a very wide scope and our services include product research, consumer research, packaging research, and pricing research. Marketing research services are widely used by manufacturers, exporters, distributors and service organizations and our services also include collection of information about competitors so that companies can use this information in decision making as well as to fight competition.  Our mission is to become an established marketing research service provider and the primary objective of our marketing research services is to assist companies in developing production and marketing policies such as introducing new products in the market or to identify new markets.

There are thousands of small to medium-size enterprises in the market and most of which had successfully developed beyond its critical start-up stages in its business life cycle but yet, they have not achieved the momentum needed to scale beyond their initial market base or their target niche market.   Often, these companies would have developed marketing strategies or advertising initiatives but lack the kind of market insight and/or the research knowledge and information necessary to execute an effective market growth and penetration strategy.  Market growth and penetration initiatives within these companies are usually drawn behind due to numerous factors such as mis-aligned market strategies or lacking marketing research and competitor intelligence. Hence, our goal has been to assist such innovative SMEs to overcome their impediments towards market growth and development and we plan to achieve this by providing them with quality marketing research services as well as business development opportunities.

Market Opportunity

The current economic environment has created an opportunity for experienced market research professionals to offer market research and advisory services to those companies that has limited access to market research information.  There are multiple factors that we may use as an entry to the market for our services:

● No access to information:   Many companies have adopted policies of making it increasingly more difficult for competitors to obtain information. Therefore, the management of companies in such a competitive environment is more willing to retain the services of marketing research firms who can assist with obtaining valuable information.

● Global expansion:  Many companies continue planning for global expansion which allows us to deliver marketing research services on the windows of global expansion into attractive markets.

● Increase in New Businesses: As a result of automation and computerization, technological reliance has reduced dependencies on skilled and semi-skilled workers and as a result, our marketing research services become useful due to the major shift from employment to own business initiatives.

Assuming the consensus surrounding these factors is accurate, the convergence of such factors above may result in substantial increase in the number of clients and deal flow in the 2013 fiscal year for REVE.

Core Competencies

Our core competencies refers to our ability to provide a full service market research services in market research and market development that allow us to quickly convert leads into viable clientele that will yield profits to the Company in the short- to medium-term. We are uniquely positioned to deliver effective market research solutions as well as value added services of marketing development by leveraging on our associates.  This can be summarized in the following five core competencies:

16

REVE is focused on providing clients the core set of market research information they need in order to become successful or simply to overcome challenges. A client may benefit from our value added services by leveraging on our associates in their market development initiatives so as to achieve a cost effective growth and marketing strategy.

The overriding rationale for REVE in maintaining the core competencies in market research and market development is to continue offering the services and advice until it translates into success for our clients. This success will serve to strengthen our relationship with them and enable us to provide additional services. We intend to use our significant marketing, managerial, and operating experience as well as industry knowledge to assist senior management teams of our client companies in terms of market research and market development.  

Employees

As of June 30, 2013, we had two employees, Long Nguyen, President and CEO and Khoo Hsiang Hua, Secretary. As the Company’s officer and director, Mr. Nguyen devotes such time as he believes is required to the Company. None of the company’s employees were, nor are they now represented by a collective bargaining arrangement.

The Company does not carry key person life insurance on its directors nor employees. The loss of the services of any of its executive officers or other directors could have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition of the Company. The Company's future success also depends on its ability to retain and attract highly qualified technical and managerial personnel.

There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to retain its key managerial and technical personnel or that it will be able to attract and retain additional highly qualified technical and managerial personnel in the future. The inability to attract and retain the technical and managerial personnel necessary to support the growth of the Company's business, due to, among other things, a large increase in the wages demanded by such personnel, could have a material adverse effect upon the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition.

Results of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 and from January 27, 2012 (Inception) to June 30, 2013.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $29,845 compared to $26,226 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. Operating expenses increased due to increased costs for general and administrative expenses as well as professional fees.

Net Loss

Net loss during the three months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $30,022 compared to $26,230 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

17

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company had $148 and $874 of cash as of June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively.

Net cash used in operating activities was $25,926 for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $486 for the same period in 2012. The cash used in operating activities is primarily attributable the net loss.

Net cash used in investing activities was $24,850 for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $0 for the same period in 2012. The cash used in investing activities is for website development.

Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2013, was $50,535 compared to $1,360 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

On February 15, 2013 the company closed the initial offering of 5,000,000 shares of common stock offered at a fixed price of $0.01 per share pursuant to the initial offering under the Registration Statement on Form S-1 with the SEC effective in December 19, 2012. The proceeds received during the period ended March 31, 2013 was $11,950.

We had not yet recognized revenues from our operations. As a result, our current cash position may not be sufficient to fund our cash requirements during the next nine months including operations and capital expenditures.

We had current assets at March 31, 2013 of $24,998 including cash of $148. We will be reliant upon shareholder loans, private placements or public offerings of equity to fund any kind of operations. We have secured no sources of loans. We had negative cash flow from operations and no revenues during the period ended June 30, 2013.

SHORT TERM

On a short-term basis, we have generated no revenues to cover operations. We will have insufficient revenue to satisfy current and recurring liabilities as we continue to build the business. For short term needs we will be dependent on receipt, if any, of insider loans, public offering or private placement proceeds.

As noted above, we believe that we do not have sufficient liquidity to satisfy our cash requirements for the next nine months, which will require us to raise additional external funds through the sale of additional equity or debt securities. Currently, we have no plans in place for additional capital. In any event, we expect that unless we begin generating revenue, we will need to raise additional funds over the next nine months to finance the costs of establishing the corporate infrastructure and related expenses, as well as sales and marketing expenses to support our business plan. The sale of additional equity securities will result in additional dilution to our shareholders. Sale of debt securities could involve substantial operational and financial covenants that might inhibit our ability to follow our business plan. Additional financing may not be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us or at all. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we may be required to reduce the scope of, delay or eliminate some or all of our business plan, which could harm our financial conditions and operating results.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results or operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Inflation

We do not believe that our business and operations have been materially affected by inflation.

18

ITEM 3.    QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a smaller reporting company, as defined by Rule 229.10(f)(1), we are not required to provide quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk.

ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) that are designed to be effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “ SEC”), and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute assurance of achieving the desired objectives. Also, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. The design of any system of controls is based, in part, upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our chief executive officer and secretary, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of March 31, 2013 to cause the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Evaluation of and Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting of the Company. Management, with the participation of the chief executive officer and secretary, has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013 based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that, as of June 30, 2013, our internal control over financial reporting were effective in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

This quarterly report does not include an attestation report of the company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management's report was not subject to attestation by the company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the company to provide only management's report in this quarterly report.

19

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the requisite evaluation that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations

Our management, including our chief executive officer and secretary, does not expect that our disclosure controls or internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all errors or all instances of fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and any design may not succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitation of a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.       Legal Proceedings.

The Company is not a party to any pending material legal proceedings.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from risk factors disclosed in our Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2013.

Item 2.       Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

In connection with our private placement completed in June 27, 2012, we issued 360,000 shares of our common stock to 36 investors at $0.001 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $360 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

We issued these 360,000 shares in reliance on the safe harbor provided by Regulation D Rule 504 promulgated under Section 3(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  These stockholders who received the securities representations that (a) the stockholder is acquiring the securities for his, her or its own account for investment and not for the account of any other person and not with a view to or for distribution, assignment or resale in connection with any distribution within the meaning of the Securities Act, (b) the stockholder agrees not to sell or otherwise transfer the purchased shares unless they are registered under the Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws, or an exemption or exemptions from such registration are available, (c) the stockholder has knowledge and experience in financial and business matters such that he, she or it is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in us, (d) the stockholder had access to all of our documents, records, and books pertaining to the investment and was provided the opportunity to ask questions and receive answers regarding the terms and conditions of the offering and to obtain any additional information which we possessed or were able to acquire without unreasonable effort and expense, and (e) the stockholder has no need for the liquidity in its investment in us and could afford the complete loss of such investment. Our management made the determination that the investors in instances where we relied on Regulation D are accredited investors (as defined in Regulation D) based upon our management’s inquiry into their sophistication and net worth. In addition, there was no general solicitation or advertising for securities issued in reliance upon Regulation D. During the first quarter of 2013 the company issued the following shares:

20

Item 5.       Other Information.   

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners.

The following table sets forth, as the period ended June 30, 2013, the total number of shares owned beneficially by our directors, officers and key employees, individually and as a group, and the present owners of 5% or more of our total outstanding shares.  The officers and directors currently own 20,000,000 common shares.   The table also reflects the percentage of ownership pursuant to the 5,000,000 shares offering closed on February 15, 2013. The stockholders listed below have direct ownership of their shares and possess sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares.

	Percent of			Number of
	Voting			Common
Beneficial Owner Officer/Directors (1)	Shares Owned (2)			Shares Owned (3)
Long Nguyen – Chief Executive Officer		67.8	%		20,000,000
Total Shares Outstanding					29,500,000
Total Shares Authorized					200,000,000
Total Shares owned by Officers and Directors					20,000,000
The address of each executive officer and director is c/o the Company.

(1) As used in this table, “beneficial ownership” means the sole or shared power to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or the sole or share investment power with respect to a security (i.e., the power to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of, a security).

(2) Percentage owned pursuant to initial offering of 5,000,000 shares of common stock

(3) The aggregate amount of shares issued and outstanding after the initial offering of 5,000,000 shares is 29,500,000.

Item 6.       Exhibits

31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Principal Executive Officer Certification and Principal Financial Officer Certification
32.1	Certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

21

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on August 6, 2013.

REDFIELD VENTURES, INC.

REGISTRANT

By: /s/ Long Nguyen

Long Nguyen

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer

22

EX-31.1

EX-31.1

31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Redfield Ventures, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Long Nguyen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Redfield Ventures, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 6, 2013

/s/ Long Nguyen

Long Nguyen

Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.1

EX-32.1

32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Redfield Ventures, Inc pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Redfield Ventures, Inc (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Long Nguyen, Chief Executive Officer of Redfield Ventures, Inc, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 6, 2013

/s/Long Nguyen

Long Nguyen

Chief Executive Officer

XML

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Principles (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Principles [Abstract]

Accounting basis

Accounting basis

The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP” accounting).  The Company has adopted a December 31 fiscal year end.

Basis of Preparation

Basis of Preparation

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and are presented in US dollars.

Use of estimates and assumptions

Use of estimates and assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Election to be treated as an emerging growth company

Election to be treated as an emerging growth company

In the second quarter of 2012, The Company has elected to use the extended transition period now available for complying with new or revised accounting standards under Section 102(b) (1). This election allows the Company to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. As a result of this election, the Company financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents

For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

Fair value of financial instruments

Fair value of financial instruments

The fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities that qualify as financial instruments under FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” approximate their carrying amounts presented in the accompanying balance sheet at June 30, 2013.

Revenue recognition

Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognized on an accrual basis after services have been performed under contract terms, the service price to the client is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

Basic Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net income available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive debt or equity. There are no such common stock equivalents outstanding as of June 30, 2013.

(A) Net Loss	$	(30,022	)
(B) Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding – Basic		29,294,167
Basic income (loss) per share: (A)÷(B)	$	(0.000	)
Equivalents
Stock Options		-
Warrants		-
Convertible notes		-
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding – Diluted		29,294,167

The Company incurred Net Loss of $30,022 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and based on the Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding of 29,294,167 the Basic income (loss) per shares is $(0.000) as per computation above.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, the Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the total of the future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of those assets, the Company recognizes an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.

Advertising Costs

Advertising Costs

The Company’s policy regarding advertising is to expense advertising when incurred. The Company incurred advertising expense of $0 during the period ended June 30, 2013 since inception.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes,” which requires accounting for deferred income taxes under the asset and liability method.  Deferred income tax asset and liabilities are computed for difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on the enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.  Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce the deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

In accordance with GAAP, the Company is required to determine whether a tax position of the Company is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company files an income tax return in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and may file income tax returns in various U.S. state and local jurisdictions.  The tax benefit to be recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.  De-recognition of a tax benefit previously recognized could result in the Company recording a tax liability that would reduce net assets. This policy also provides guidance on thresholds, measurement, de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition that is intended to provide better financial statement comparability among different entities.  It must be applied to all existing tax positions upon initial adoption and the cumulative effect, if any, is to be reported as an adjustment to stockholder’s equity as of July 1, 2009.

Based on its analysis, the Company has determined that the adoption of this policy did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption. However, management’s conclusions regarding this policy may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, on-going analyses of and changes to tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof.

Interest and Penalty Recognition on Unrecognized Tax Benefits

The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive Income

The Company complies with FASB ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income,” which establishes rules for the reporting and display of comprehensive income (loss) and its components.  FASB ASC Topic 220 requires the Company’ to reflect as a separate component of stockholders’ equity items of comprehensive income.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company complies with FASB ASC Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” which establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services.  It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. FASB ASC Topic 718 focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions.  FASB ASC Topic 718 requires an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions).  That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award the requisite service period (usually the vesting period).  No compensation costs are recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service.  The grant-date fair value of employee share options and similar instruments will be estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for the unique characteristics of those instruments (unless observable market prices for the same or similar instruments are available).  If an equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-11, an amendment to the accounting guidance for disclosure of offsetting assets and liabilities and related arrangements. The amendment expands the disclosure requirements in that entities will be required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and shall be applied retrospectively. We do not expect the adoption of this accounting pronouncement to have a material effect on our financial statements when implemented.

In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update  (ASU) 2011-8an amendment to the accounting guidance for goodwill in order to simplify how companies test goodwill for impairment. The amendment permits an entity to first assess the qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. The amendment is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. We elected not to early adopt. We do not expect the adoption of this accounting pronouncement to have a material effect on our financial statements when implemented.

In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-05, an amendment to the accounting guidance for presentation of comprehensive income. Under the amended guidance, an entity may present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In either case, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. For public companies, the amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and shall be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We elected not to early adopt. Other than a change in presentation, the implementation of this accounting pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements when implemented.

In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for fair value measurement and disclosure. Among other things, the guidance expands the disclosure requirements around fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and requires disclosure of the level in the fair value hierarchy of items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position but whose fair value must be disclosed. It also clarifies and expands upon existing requirements for measurement of the fair value of financial assets and liabilities as well as instruments classified in shareholders’ equity. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect the adoption of the guidance to have a material impact on our financial statements when implemented.

There are no other new accounting pronouncements adopted or enacted during the three months ended June 30, 2013 that had, or are expected to have, a material impact on our financial statements.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in bank deposit accounts, which, at times may exceed federally insured limits.  The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.  Management believes the Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk related to cash and cash equivalents.

XML

Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended		17 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013
Statements of Operations [Abstract]
Revenues
Operating Expenses
Website expenses		500		500	600
Consultancy fees	5,000	24,140	5,000	24,140	29,140
General and administrative expenses	22,845	86	28,216	86	31,937
Professional fees	2,000	1,500	4,630	1,500	15,645
Total Operating Expenses	29,845	26,226	37,846	26,226	77,322
Net Loss from Operations before other Income (Expense)	(29,845)	(26,226)	(37,846)	(26,226)	(77,322)
Other Income (Expense)
Interest expense	(176)	(4)	(344)	(4)	(595)
Net Income (Loss) Before Provision for Income Taxes	(30,022)	(26,230)	(38,191)	(26,230)	(77,918)
Provision for Income Taxes		0		0
Net Loss	$ (30,022)	$ (26,230)	$ (38,191)	$ (26,230)	$ (77,918)
Net Loss Per Share: Basic and Diluted	$ 0.00	$ 0.00	$ 0.00	$ 0.00
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding: Basic and Diluted	29,500,000	24,500,000	29,294,167	24,500,000

XML

Income Taxes

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Income Taxes [Abstract]

Income Taxes

Note 3 –Income Taxes

As of June 30, 2013, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $77,918 that may be available to reduce future years’ taxable income in varying amounts through 2030. In accordance with FASB ASC740 “Income Taxes”. Future tax benefits which may arise as a result of these losses have not been recognized in these financial statements, as their realization is determined not likely to occur and accordingly, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset relating to these tax loss carry-forwards.

The provision for Federal income tax consists of the following:

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Refundable Federal income tax attributable to:
Current Operations	$	(26,492	)	$	(13,507	)
Change: valuation allowance		26,492			13,507
Net provision for Federal income taxes	$	0		$	0

The cumulative tax effect at the expected rate of 34% of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows:

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Deferred tax asset attributable to:
Net operating loss carryover	$	77,918		$	39,727
Less: valuation allowance		(77,918	)		(39,727	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	0		$	0

Due to the change in ownership provisions of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code and Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carry forwards of $77,918 for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occurs, the net operating loss carry forwards may be limited as to use in future years.

XML

Income Taxes (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Refundable Federal income tax attributable to:
Current Operations	$ (26,492)	$ (13,507)
Change: valuation allowance	26,492	13,507
Net provision for Federal income taxes	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Principles (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Principles [Abstract]

Summary of income (loss) per share

(A) Net Loss	$	(30,022	)
(B) Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding – Basic		29,294,167
Basic income (loss) per share: (A)÷(B)	$	(0.000	)
Equivalents
Stock Options		-
Warrants		-
Convertible notes		-
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding – Diluted		29,294,167

XML

Common Stock (Details) (USD $)	0 Months Ended			2 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2013	Jun. 29, 2012	Jan. 27, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Common Stock (Textual)
Common stock, shares authorized					200,000,000	200,000,000
Common stock, par value					$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock issued for services rendered at fair market value			24,140,000
Common stock issued for services rendered at fair market value, value			$ 24,140	$ 24,140
Common stock issued for cash		360,000
Common stock issued for cash, value		$ 360			$ 50,000	$ 360
Common stock, shares issued					29,500,000	24,500,000
Common stock, shares outstanding					29,500,000	24,500,000
Stock issued pursuant to initial offering	5,000,000
Share price	$ 0.01

XML

Income Taxes (Details Textual) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Income Taxes (Textual)
Net operating loss carry forwards	$ 77,918
Operating loss carryforwards, Expiration date	Through 2030.
Expected income tax rate	34.00%

XML

Income Taxes (Details 1) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Deferred tax asset attributable to:
Net operating loss carryover	$ 77,918	$ 39,727
Less: valuation allowance	(77,918)	(39,727)
Net deferred tax asset	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $)	6 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]
Shares issued for cash, price per share	$ 0.01	$ 0.001

XML

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Principles

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Principles [Abstract]

Organization and summary of significant accounting principles

Note 1 – Organization and summary of significant accounting principles

Organization

Redfield Ventures, Inc (“REVE” or the “Company’) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on January 27, 2012.  REVE provides market research services throughout the United States and other countries through our website www.redfieldventures.com. The Company is in the development stage as defined under Statement on Financial Accounting Standards No. 7, Development Stage Enterprises (“SFAS No.7”) (ASC 915-10).

Accounting basis

The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP” accounting).  The Company has adopted a December 31 fiscal year end.

Basis of Preparation

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and are presented in US dollars.

Use of estimates and assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Election to be treated as an emerging growth company

In the second quarter of 2012, The Company has elected to use the extended transition period now available for complying with new or revised accounting standards under Section 102(b) (1). This election allows the Company to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. As a result of this election, the Company financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates.

Cash and cash equivalents

For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

Fair value of financial instruments

The fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities that qualify as financial instruments under FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” approximate their carrying amounts presented in the accompanying balance sheet at June 30, 2013.

Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognized on an accrual basis after services have been performed under contract terms, the service price to the client is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

Basic Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net income available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive debt or equity. There are no such common stock equivalents outstanding as of June 30, 2013.

(A) Net Loss	$	(30,022	)
(B) Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding – Basic		29,294,167
Basic income (loss) per share: (A)÷(B)	$	(0.000	)
Equivalents
Stock Options		-
Warrants		-
Convertible notes		-
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding – Diluted		29,294,167

The Company incurred Net Loss of $30,022 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and based on the Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding of 29,294,167 the Basic income (loss) per shares is $(0.000) as per computation above.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, the Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the total of the future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of those assets, the Company recognizes an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.

Advertising Costs

The Company’s policy regarding advertising is to expense advertising when incurred. The Company incurred advertising expense of $0 during the period ended June 30, 2013 since inception.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes,” which requires accounting for deferred income taxes under the asset and liability method.  Deferred income tax asset and liabilities are computed for difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on the enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.  Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce the deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

In accordance with GAAP, the Company is required to determine whether a tax position of the Company is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company files an income tax return in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and may file income tax returns in various U.S. state and local jurisdictions.  The tax benefit to be recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.  De-recognition of a tax benefit previously recognized could result in the Company recording a tax liability that would reduce net assets. This policy also provides guidance on thresholds, measurement, de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition that is intended to provide better financial statement comparability among different entities.  It must be applied to all existing tax positions upon initial adoption and the cumulative effect, if any, is to be reported as an adjustment to stockholder’s equity as of July 1, 2009.

Based on its analysis, the Company has determined that the adoption of this policy did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption. However, management’s conclusions regarding this policy may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, on-going analyses of and changes to tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof.

Interest and Penalty Recognition on Unrecognized Tax Benefits

The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.

Comprehensive Income

The Company complies with FASB ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income,” which establishes rules for the reporting and display of comprehensive income (loss) and its components.  FASB ASC Topic 220 requires the Company’ to reflect as a separate component of stockholders’ equity items of comprehensive income.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company complies with FASB ASC Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” which establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services.  It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. FASB ASC Topic 718 focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions.  FASB ASC Topic 718 requires an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions).  That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award the requisite service period (usually the vesting period).  No compensation costs are recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service.  The grant-date fair value of employee share options and similar instruments will be estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for the unique characteristics of those instruments (unless observable market prices for the same or similar instruments are available).  If an equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-11, an amendment to the accounting guidance for disclosure of offsetting assets and liabilities and related arrangements. The amendment expands the disclosure requirements in that entities will be required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and shall be applied retrospectively. We do not expect the adoption of this accounting pronouncement to have a material effect on our financial statements when implemented.

In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update  (ASU) 2011-8an amendment to the accounting guidance for goodwill in order to simplify how companies test goodwill for impairment. The amendment permits an entity to first assess the qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. The amendment is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. We elected not to early adopt. We do not expect the adoption of this accounting pronouncement to have a material effect on our financial statements when implemented.

In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-05, an amendment to the accounting guidance for presentation of comprehensive income. Under the amended guidance, an entity may present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In either case, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. For public companies, the amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and shall be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We elected not to early adopt. Other than a change in presentation, the implementation of this accounting pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements when implemented.

In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for fair value measurement and disclosure. Among other things, the guidance expands the disclosure requirements around fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and requires disclosure of the level in the fair value hierarchy of items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position but whose fair value must be disclosed. It also clarifies and expands upon existing requirements for measurement of the fair value of financial assets and liabilities as well as instruments classified in shareholders’ equity. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect the adoption of the guidance to have a material impact on our financial statements when implemented.

There are no other new accounting pronouncements adopted or enacted during the three months ended June 30, 2013 that had, or are expected to have, a material impact on our financial statements.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in bank deposit accounts, which, at times may exceed federally insured limits.  The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.  Management believes the Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk related to cash and cash equivalents.

XML

Common Stock

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Common Stock [Abstract]

Common Stock

Note 4 – Common Stock

The authorized capital of the Company is 200,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share.

On January 27, 2012, the Company issued 24,140,000 shares of common stock at in exchange for fair market value of services rendered for total compensation of $24,140.  

Additionally, on June 29, 2012 the Company issued 360,000 shares of common stock under Regulation D offering for total cash proceeds of $360.

During the period ended March 31, 2013 the Company sold 5,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.01 per share pursuant to the Initial Offering under the Form S-1 Registration Statement effective on December 19, 2012. All the proceeds from the offering have been received during the period ended June 30, 2013.

The Company has 29,500,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2013.

XML

Going Concern

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Going Concern [Abstract]

Going Concern

Note 2 –Going Concern

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which assumes the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future.  As noted above, the Company is in the development stage and, accordingly, has not yet generated significant revenues from operations.  The Company has incurred losses since inception resulting in an accumulated deficit of $77,918 as of June 30, 2013 and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to raise additional capital from the sale of common stock and, ultimately, the achievement of significant operating revenues.  The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be required should the Company be unable to recover the value of its assets or satisfy its liabilities.

XML

Notes Payable (Details) (USD $)			6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013 Loan one [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Loan two [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Loan three [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Loan four [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Loan five [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Loan six [Member]
Debt Instruments [Abstract]
Date received loans			Jun. 15, 2012	Jul. 20, 2012	Aug. 20, 2012	Oct. 25, 2012	Jan. 04, 2013	Apr. 15, 2012
Amount	$ 7,135	$ 6,600	$ 1,000.00	$ 1,600.00	$ 3,000.00	$ 1,000.00	$ 70.00	$ 465.00
Repayment dates			Jun. 30, 2012	Jul. 30, 2012	Aug. 30, 2012	Oct. 30, 2012	Jan. 31, 2013	Apr. 30, 2013

XML

Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Balance Sheets [Abstract]
Common stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, shares authorized	200,000,000	200,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	29,500,000	24,500,000
Common stock, shares outstanding	29,500,000	24,500,000

XML

Warrants and Options

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Warrants and Options [Abstract]

Warrants and options

Note 7 – Warrants and options

There are no warrants or options outstanding to acquire any additional shares of common stock.

XML

Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) (USD $)	Total	Common stock	Additional paid-in Capital	Deficit accumulated during the development Stage
Beginning balance at Jan. 27, 2012
Beginning balance, Shares at Jan. 27, 2012
Founders Shares issued January 27, 2012 as compensation for services	24,140	24,140
Founders Shares issued January 27, 2012 as compensation for services, Shares		24,140,000
Net loss for the period
Balance at Mar. 31, 2012	24,140	24,140
Balance, Shares at Mar. 31, 2012		24,140,000
Shares issued for cash at $0.01 per share	360	360
Shares issued for cash at $0.01 per share, Shares		360,000
Net loss for the period	(39,727)			(39,727)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2012	(15,227)	24,500		(39,727)
Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2012		24,500,000
Shares issued for cash at $0.01 per share	50,000	5,000	45,000
Shares issued for cash at $0.01 per share, Shares		5,000,000
Net loss for the period	(38,191)
Balance at Jun. 30, 2013	$ (3,418)	$ 29,500	$ 45,000	$ (77,918)
Balance, Shares at Jun. 30, 2013		29,500,000

XML

Balance Sheets (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 148	$ 389
Prepaid Expenses	24,850	0
Total Assets	24,998	389
Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses	7,890	8,665
Accrued Interest payable	595	251
Deposits received	12,795	100
Notes payable - current	7,135	6,600
Long-Term Liabilities
Total Liabilities	28,415	15,616
Stockholders' Deficit
Common stock, par value $0.001; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 29,500,000 at 6/30/13 and 24,500,000 at 12/31/12 shares issued and outstanding, respectively	29,500	24,500
Paid in Capital	45,000	0
Stock subscriptions receivable	0	0
Deficit accumulated during the development stage	(77,918)	(39,727)
Total Stockholders' Deficit	(3,418)	(15,227)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$ 24,998	$ 389

XML

Notes Payable (Details Textual)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Notes Payable (Textual)
Interest on promissory notes	10.00%
Description of conversion of promissory notes	If this loan remains unpaid for a period of one year after the repayment dates, the promissory notes shall be convertible into common voting stocks at a price of 50% discount of the average bid on the day of the conversion.

XML

Going Concern (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Going Concern (Textual)
Deficit accumulated during the development stage	$ 77,918	$ 39,727

XML

Related Party Transactions

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related party transactions

Note 6 – Related party transactions

The following shares were issued for founder services rendered for the Company and all these shares were arbitrarily valued at $0.001 par value on January 27, 2012:-

● The Company issued 20,000,000 shares valued at $20,000.00 to Long Nguyen, CEO for services rendered at fair market value on January 27, 2012

The following shares were issued for services rendered in the development of the business and its business plan and all these shares were arbitrarily valued at $0.001 par value on January 27, 2012:-

● The Company issued 1,140,000 shares valued at $1,140.00 to Lee Chee Thing for services rendered at fair market value on January 27, 2012 in reviewing the company’s business plan. This shareholder purchased additional 275,000 shares on February 15, 2013 at $0.01 per share pursuant to the Initial Offering under the Form S-1 Registration Statement effective on December 19, 2012. This shareholder  is not an employee.

● The Company issued 1,000,000 shares valued at $1,000.00 to Mazlan Masrun for services rendered at fair market value on January 27, 2012 in developing the company’s business plan. This shareholder purchased additional 375,000 shares on February 15, 2013 at $0.01 per share pursuant to the Initial Offering under the Form S-1 Registration Statement effective on December 19, 2012. This shareholder is not an employee.

● The Company issued 1,000,000 shares valued at $1,000.00 to Tang Wai Mun for services rendered at fair market value on January 27, 2012 in developing the company’s business plan. This shareholder is not an employee.

● The Company issued 1,000,000 shares valued at $1,000.00 to Yap Peck Yoong for services rendered at fair market value on January 27, 2012 in developing the company’s business plan. This shareholder is not an employee.

XML

Related Party Transactions (Details) (USD $)	0 Months Ended	2 Months Ended	0 Months Ended
	Jan. 27, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Jan. 27, 2012 Long Nguyen [Member]	Feb. 15, 2013 Lee Chee Thing [Member]	Jan. 27, 2012 Lee Chee Thing [Member]	Feb. 15, 2013 Mazlan Masrun [Member]	Jan. 27, 2012 Mazlan Masrun [Member]	Jan. 27, 2012 Tang Wai Mun [Member]	Jan. 27, 2012 Yap Peck Yoong [Member]
Related Party Transactions (Textual)
Common stock issued for services rendered at fair market value	24,140,000		20,000,000		1,140,000		1,000,000	1,000,000	1,000,000
Common stock issued for services rendered at fair market value, value	$ 24,140	$ 24,140	$ 20,000.00		$ 1,140.00		$ 1,000.00	$ 1,000.00	$ 1,000.00
Additional Shares Purchased By Stockholder				275,000		375,000
Common stock issued, price per share	$ 0.001			$ 0.01		$ 0.01	$ 0.001

XML

Subsequent Events

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent events

Note 9 – Subsequent events

In accordance with SFAS 165 (ASC 855-10) the Company has analyzed its operations subsequent to June 30, 2013 to the date these financial statements were submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission and has determined that it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose in these financial statements.

XML

Notes Payable

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Notes Payable [Abstract]

Notes payable

Note 5 – Notes payable

On the following dates, a shareholder provided loans secured by 10% per annum interest bearing promissory notes. If this loan remains unpaid for a period of one year after the repayment dates, the promissory notes shall be convertible into common voting stocks at a price of 50% discount of the average bid on the day of the conversion.

Date received loans	Amount		Repayment dates
June 15, 2012		1,000.00	June 30, 2012
July 20, 2012		1,600.00	July 30, 2012
August 20, 2012		3,000.00	August 30, 2012
October 25, 2012		1,000.00	October 30, 2012
January 4, 2013		70.00	January 31, 2013
April 15, 2012		465.00	April 30, 2013

XML

Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $)	6 Months Ended		17 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net loss for the period	$ (38,191)	$ (26,230)	$ (77,918)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) operating activities:
Stock issued as compensation for services		24,140	24,140
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease (Increase) in prepaid expenses	(24,850)	0	(24,850)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses	(775)	1,504	7,958
Increase (decrease) in deposits	12,695	100	12,795
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable	344		527
Net Cash used in Operating Activities	(50,776)	(486)	(57,347)
Cash flows from Investing Activities
Payments for website development
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
Cash flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from sale of common stock	50,000	360	50,360
Notes payable	535	1,000	7,135
Net Cash provided by Financing Activities	50,535	1,360	57,495
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash	(241)	874	148
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	389
Cash, end of period	148	874	148
Supplemental Cash Flows Information:
Interest paid
Income taxes paid

XML

Income Taxes (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Income Taxes [Abstract]

Components of provision for Federal income tax

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Refundable Federal income tax attributable to:
Current Operations	$	(26,492	)	$	(13,507	)
Change: valuation allowance		26,492			13,507
Net provision for Federal income taxes	$	0		$	0

Schedule of net deferred tax asset

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Deferred tax asset attributable to:
Net operating loss carryover	$	77,918		$	39,727
Less: valuation allowance		(77,918	)		(39,727	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	0		$	0

XML

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities [Abstract]

Commitments and contingent liabilities

Note 8 – Commitments and contingent liabilities

The Company is not a party to any ongoing or pending litigation. The Company neither owns nor leases any real or personal property. An officer has provided office services without charge.  There is no obligation for the officer to continue this arrangement.  Such costs are immaterial to the financial statements and accordingly are not reflected herein.  The officers and directors are involved in other business activities and most likely will become involved in other business activities in the future.

XML

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Principles (Details Textual) (USD $)	2 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended		9 Months Ended	17 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Principles (Textual)
Net Loss		$ (30,022)	$ (26,230)	$ (38,191)	$ (26,230)	$ (39,727)	$ (77,918)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding		29,294,167
Basic income (loss) per shares		$ 0.000
Advertising expense							$ 0

XML

Notes Payable (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Notes Payable [Abstract]

Summary of notes payable

Date received loans	Amount		Repayment dates
June 15, 2012		1,000.00	June 30, 2012
July 20, 2012		1,600.00	July 30, 2012
August 20, 2012		3,000.00	August 30, 2012
October 25, 2012		1,000.00	October 30, 2012
January 4, 2013		70.00	January 31, 2013
April 15, 2012		465.00	April 30, 2013

XML

Document and Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	Redfield Ventures, Inc
Entity Central Index Key	0001554300
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2013
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	29,500,000

XML

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Principles (Details) (USD $)	2 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended		9 Months Ended	17 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013
Summary of income (loss) per share
Net Loss		$ (30,022)	$ (26,230)	$ (38,191)	$ (26,230)	$ (39,727)	$ (77,918)
(B) Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding - Basic		29,294,167
Basic income (loss) per share: (A)÷(B)		$ 0.000
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding - Diluted		29,294,167
Stock Options [Member]
Summary of income (loss) per share
Equivalents
Warrant [Member]
Summary of income (loss) per share
Equivalents
Convertible notes [Member]
Summary of income (loss) per share
Equivalents